This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
693-699 Published by: American Sociological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2655234 Accessed: 15/11/2010 18:20
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=asa. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Contemporary Sociology.
we maylosethe basedinformation will networks.Except a few stubborn consensus that we bleforanyone without access a French-Greek mists.of thisarticle on sociology. society. factoraffecting we transformation oursocial of which kind of social processes emerging. withouta structure.dimensions socialchangethat. potential creativity of based upongenerembedded thatthe industrial of into the values and technologies of the ationanddistribution energy.always as of of jumping the latesttrendy on word. betterthananyoneelse to produce have knowledge But it did. than taking liberty refer the to observation. Then we can argue and the reader mytrilogy the matter we will! aboutthe best wayto proceed with 2000a).there is widespread to haveentered neweconomy. will throughout world. The sociology study processes constitution. the of organization. thusof its theories methods. the during sociology rootedin its scientific endeavor.andbecause we peo. thatpeopleneedis not a normative meta-disci. unequivo.andchangeof a new society. we musttakeseriYet needto knowwhichkindof society arein. as an exogenous not the whirlwind are goingthrough. ety. it must for And have studied the newanalytical Sincethefocus a clearpurpose producing of objective knowl. and to on (Castells cal communication. ouslythe material are technologies allow what is structural. of about whatis to be done.We areneeded the information because. blockchange. we areneeded.in accordance thenewphenomena be the and issues be tackto futilesearch respectability. they socially we So society. But First a new technological is paradigm. Of society unfold. that of grasp upontheprocess change.in myview. depending subjectmatter in their interaction. probably starting pline instructing them.understandtechnology. what can be changed fabric.as new information and of of through purposive social action.alsolivingin a new society.the main of and observation.least morecredible social than the futurologists and out trulyunderstanding let alonefeelinga ideologues litterthe interpretation curit." and methodological traditions. . We are neededbecauseas Thetwenty-first century theCommon did would-be of Era scientists society arepositioned of we not necessarily to usherin a new society. people. Berkeley The Call to Sociology Information Age. theory building. rigorous theorizing. have in and tive terms). peo. individually collectively.rent historicalchanges.led.always rela.asmaterial culture thatis.together constitutea new social sion of findings. to do what? but Well.Butwhatis thisnewsociety? is not I edge(yes!thereis sucha thing. tion andsocialinteraction rightly. gyasa meaningful and and with to withoutmimicking naturalsciencesin a al.let alone politicians lengeto sociology.Symposia 693 Toward a Sociology of the Network Society MANUEL CASTELLS University of California. following Claude and most (1992). brought about by empirical no optionbut to be schematic declarative. to be credible orat the the and windsof multidimensional changewith. based consensus sociology science indeed. formal and expres.More thaneversociety needssociology. survival sociolothe of course.rather analytical. contend are a I we dlctlonary. but So. of Thusthechal.to not just any kind of sociology. . Peoplearound worldfeel the about newsociety. couldnot be . thescience study soci. asa ple in the worldarelost aboutthe meaning of Fischer embedded process. whichthe new Since this ple need to know.And we are the formation new forms socialorganizaalongelectronically needed because without understanding. century. a on as as of techspecific socialscience we sociologists fail on the deployment new information will geneticengineering as in our professional intellectual and duty at a nologiesand including technology livingmatter.morethan everwe need a economyis only one component. A New Society for academic econoexpressed termsdeliberately in incomprehensi.It callthe network society. the sameway and In extraordinary revolution. on underlying "new the society. musthavethe specificity its object the twenty-first it of activity depends itsrenewon of study. is evenlessa pseudo-sociology upof empmade ty word games and intellectualnarcissism.fromthe authoritative with its socialstructurewhat I provisionally towers academia. of Because needto know.Hereare. of I timewhenwe areneeded most. .
more decisions is people about care theirlocal a powerfulcomponentof multidimensional ence.sume. thusof calconsciousnesspermeating human and is the mind ourexperience communicating as beings. benefitfrominformation communication archy extend.Thisis his. the of ( 1999). organizational. egalitarian struggle setbacks. dominated markets networks.to break societies in up based negotiated on instilion projected the end of 2001. or NAFTA). nent of oursymbolic environment. beginning a mostextraordinary of of cultural transthat the of communication.700 mil.with its own specific and around world.atwhichspeed.revolution in informationtechnology.increasingly be) collectiveaffirmations the will of identity around keythemes relithe of monframe reference symbolic of for processing primary ethnicity. realissue how. a result. by nological. The acterized lasttwocenturies. supranational institutions. more politicalrepresentation becomesdevoid of giesarenot causal factors thissocialchange. arejustat the We quenceof the global networks the economy. socialcomplexity.and ultimately by Because crisis the stateandof the family. 2000. produce.the UnitedStatesandWestern Europe.andstatism (withdifferent fortheseantagfates ments. localgovernments. couldnot andwithwhichhuman which cost. a theyareindispensable fortheactual means man.knowledge. culture realvirtuality. of of Therewillbe otherforms precisely. understood the tech. progress scientific in and its themselves to the shared and multimedia hyper. perceive a and ourselves. the persistence patriarchal of families as The is torically new. Internet gion. speed. movements.co. Whilenewinformation technolo. has been documented DavidHeld et alter ization.the interaction among three independent or in that to in the works shared of sovereignty formed national processes happened coincide time: by governments.theeconomy) work a unitin real cult to imagine. of theglobalization economy of patriarchy. advanced internationalization.onisticmodesof production).eties.NATO.experience. whichwilltend fromall sources all messages..notwithout of of at socitem(e.2 billionby tutions. information wasconstituted the national the the key havea global frame referof technology revolution.structural and of brought aboutby women's insurcationmedia. but not least. it patriarchy. another of In axis change.the crisisof patriwill forms. as as values diffuse theday.sentation redefined well. NGOs. globalization. the conThe fourthaxisof change.694 Symposia is as separated the industrial from societythatchar. 2007) will link individuals groups and among Last. it is diffiand But capacity the corecomponents a givensys. While .is thedemise the sovereign of nation-state. thathasprevailed among world's the dominant Not thatcurrent nation-states disappear groups will in sincethe Enlightenment. and affecting way we live. throughthe nation-state of other than as a defensive device.meaning ifestation manycurrent of processes social resource lastresort of of against would-be tyrants or corrupt politicians. redefining are the text. issueof political As the repre.in a world is of an void.Thishypertext constitutes backbone ownone-sided the of betweencultureand naturethat a new culture.nation. favor value-founded by in of communes. inantcultural manifestations an interactive. leastin industrialized to as orchosentimeon a planetary scale. and institutional offamily. the useof scienceto correct development. locality. sincedemocracy in enclosure.largely conse. last quarter the twentieth astheyareeither bypassed rearranged net. as personality formation. suchas the emergence newforms of of blatantly change. thereis a fundamental crisis production management.formation is reversing course thought and and tion.andthe more the social change. relationship the of in whichvirtuality becomes fundamental a compo. theirexistence but of century.g.foundation family. the cultural and and that in acting in a negotiatedprocessof decision socialmovements emerged the 1960sin making. course.characterized industrial A deepecologithe era. theglobal and of system. This new societywas produced during the theirinstitutional existence.regional govern. whichbecomes com. through aspower apparatusesprofoundly is transformed. knowledge informa. newcommuni.the restructuring both capitalism of national institutions(such as the European socioeconomic Union. in its early still stages. is creating institutional thereare(and in electronic hypertext. challenging heterosexuality a as The seconddimension socialchangeis.all inter. by and Thethird dimension theenclosing dom. in contrast with past formsof the norm. intootherareas of redefines sexuality. and The (248 millionusers currently. or of gencyand amplified gay and lesbiansocial by andculture. crisis the The of technologies able to handlethe current size.
and of whilecoordinating purpose decisionmakand ing. resources. electronic The hypertext. . of of up.dominant are networks.thenear mass Yet Under conditions thisnew.is themselves.nodesdo not represent obstacle fulfilling in For duction studios. as project. mobiletransmission and all regions the world units. by markets. Their advantagesare flexibility and the information lie in theredefinition culage of adaptability. incorporatrealtime. among different levelsof institutional decision networks based alternative on values exist. the rootsof the newsociety. in theorganization tronics-based and of future biologically information by based standardized. productionsites.Networks werehistorically usefulfor societies. region not valuable sucha network. perform can Global financial markets builton electronic powered information are in networks process that financial transactions anytaskthathasbeenprogrammed the netin work. The new societyis madeup of networks. reciprocal tionalarrangementshumans relationships for for of production/consumption. in the are socialstructure. Theycanexpand indefinitely.in the exercise power. production.adaptive are structures that. Naturally. computerized infor. a new for social organization. sociology address rnust was overcome with the development new emerging of information/communication technologies. notin theprocess. social structure. gram opposite networks the outside.and support. thelevelwhere if at newsocialforms constituted thatis. solidarity. by Electronic communication systemsgive networksthe capacityto decentralize adaptthe execution tasks. thissubstan. I proposethe notionthat thereis somecommonality the in outcome. throughout But history.ponentsof production distribution. markets. a and If prise.the shapeof network-based the struggles reproto try. by technology. theywerebadperformers mobiBut in in interaction lizingresources focusing and theseresources on power. linking on different mediain global/local connection. And andtheirsocialmorphologysimilar thatof is to the mostdynamic socialmovements con. At in all its diversity. materials. the conditionthat these new an to madeup of networks communication of pro. network The enter. a newformof business as organization. in maybe linkedinto the mation systems. experience. by their contributionin human laborpools.as expressed meaningful by In Age.Symposia 695 omized the Internet. theInformation these arrangements based are apparatuses usuallyoutperformed networks in specificorganizational networks powered microelecby the conduct war. through competition.network. veryold formof Byscripting codes(newvalues. of The Netsvork Society: The Social A network a set of interconnected is nodes. instance) are. net.key instructions theirprogram. epit. the of tiallimitation networks' of competitive capacity technologies). Governance relieson the articulation wholesuffering major inconvenience. instance.powered money.several conceptual methodological in and issues this multidimensional changeinduces social a variety socialandcultural of expressions each in specificinstitutional context.andthe world. onlyto thepointwhere but they increasingly interactive senders receivers.Therefore. Structure of the Information Age Networks flexible. is whythe mainsocial This struggles of lem. global and function this of The globaleconomyis a network financial addvalueto the value-making of transactions.information.Large. also making linkedby information networks. gradually are eliminating centered. newsrooms. of of in on information information technologies (andin symbolic domination.thecoun.The Internet a network computis of ing any new node by simply reconfiguring er networks. networks. ing tasksin a worldas volatileandmutable as tural The prevalence networks organizing of in ours. economy.in the goalsorganizing performance the the of works major had advantages a major and prob. of centralized framed culture. the execution a giventask. a newsocialstructure.and economy. problem theembedded The was inability of socialpractice redefines socialstructure our in networks manage to complexity beyond critia By cal size. Becauseof their superior performing capacity. thatsocialconflicts so take nected theInternet via across city. from How? Networks however. characteristics essential managfor codesin thehuman mind. will is is to it madeof networks firmsor subunits firms not be linked or if it ceases be valuable. is the network society. flexibility be achieved can without sacrificing performance. social structure I meanthe organizaof in personal interaction. othercomraw or andbusiness organization. to it organized around performance a business will be switched withoutthe network a the of off. hierarchical forms organization theirspeof in cificrealm activity.
" the of basedin emerging advanced in societiesand diffusing meaningful physical proximity. accor. of in The threedimensions analytically are independancewith current trendsof socialevolution. production for process. ments autonomous of systems goals. conflict. networked.whosefunctional symbolic roleof producers information theirdiffer. dissolve.1985). workers. recent debateaboutthe emeralization of the relationship between has been considerable order be equipped analyze processes to to core of socialorganization socialpractice.g. researchers. 1999). whichI define. dent.ceptualizethe new occupationalstructure is lishedin sociological research. usetwo of I will tialstructure. 1992). designers. second.localities. reform and under dif.Forvaluemaking. on or meaning is largely based. advance notion switched-off. this of is dimension The prevailing of business form organization distance" not theendof the spatial of society..businesscenters. illustrations make case. The space flowsis made bitsandpieces of of try of new industrial organizations. distant. symbolized de-localized and For in years there tiondo not disappear. an information-based in al association the studyof socialnetworks.Thus. moving away fromconceptual frame. interactive communication does meansis constituted the intersection segby of noteliminate space. empirical the observation thevarof This impliesmorethan analyzing socialnetamong different positions in works. of in as ential positionalong an interactive network? ratherthan on its specificcharacteristics Howcan we conceptualize variable the geome.andmarked symbols spaces intermedia international hotels. thesource newsocial at of structure." is of of of circuits information and sysproduction management. focusing on Theorizing Social Structure as networked relationships rather thanon vertical Interactive Information Netsvorks hierarchies. the ensuing but individu. by exploitation. Howcan we conceptualize the places..ceases be a precondition the simultaneity of interactive socialpractices. "space places. work. Fischer(e. thus of the made electronic and and physical occupational structure whichsocialstructure tems. continues bea to throughout globaleconomyis thenetwork the and functionfor enterprise. vetter(e. industrial organizations require newconceptual a apparatus.connectedby telecommunications.gists). instance. the humanterminals.classic a themeof urban sociology..manceof a givenproject yieldsomeclues of of worksorganized around notion of centers on the emergence newsocialrelationships the production. In I propose conto The studyof socialnetworks well estab. "thedeathof But tionsfrom change perspective. knowledge specific and in pro. bringing together of places. value rela(e. integraand that the the the ter understanding socialnetworks specific tors. transforms A newform it it. decision and making. and systems. and . maydifferentiate we various whichconstitutes fruitful a milieu research. workers. ation (such as airports.g. the executors. majorsourceof experience And asthespecific ofenterprise form whose system of manypeopleand in manycircumstances. structural of It positions: commanders stratethe (or canprovide concepts methods willfos. territorial contiguity fields: industrial sociology urban and sociology.taking to my themfrom of based comtwo different verytraditional and sociological Withthe diffusion electronically munication technologies. capital. follows of It It a completetransformation relationships of spaceemerges "the spaceof flows. negotia.but it is alsomadeof territories. and Grano. First.tionmaking.Thereis alsoan internation. participants.the operators. spearheaded around interaction in the among threedimensions contemporary American sociology Wellman of production by relationships: making. thisperspective.696 Symposia management labor the ephemeral and and characterof project-based.fast transportation.deciders. the and building thistradition. on I the And the relativepositioning in thattwenty-first-century sociology haveto decision making differentiatesamong the will expandthe network-based perspective the to the and analysis the entiresocialstructure.It will require reconceptualizing many iousarrangements the threedimensions built around perforthe social processes institutions expressions and as of may networks. andhierarchies. cooperation. of as and forms organization relationship. information by and of jectsthatform. I to for willthendraw somegeneral theoretical implica. basedon firms' permeable boundaries. the Yet. while tions:the networkers. of and including Relationmakingdefinesanotherset of posielectronic communication networks.in sociological terms.dependson their connectionto a network.architecture).g. ferent configuration? Yes. A second example: transformation the of spaForthesake communication.
Paris. sociology the network of as mensional.and then Socialactorsconstituted networks and components. the of which lead to conflictsand al economy of global and information networks.integrated the same perspective on interactive based networks the as terlands. and not The issuearises. the organicist with with one of the oldestsociological traditions. social change.not global. are of as with the samedigitallanguage.by settingup thesegoalson in interaction a diverse with range localities of networks' of of codes.constantlyon the move.as through theirinteracInformation Indeed. is city. and enactandchangestructures following alization. London. history sociology The of by of of Manhattan. suchcities (New tistandInternet For entrepreneur Metcalfe. city. fact.between structure upofnetworks an made is theoretical perspective can developmodels tice. city. factmost nation social in of change. for and organizations.in V= n(n whereV is the valueof the network of Thus.and works the components socialstructure. environments." global is not each network's The city as In justa major metropolitan center ranks that high valueexponentially theyaddnodes. becomes appropriate that the perspec.integrated organs specific bodilyfunctions.ture and the analysis of social change.societywouldbe built on the self-generating works helpexplain may socialevolution the processes in discovered molecular by biology.A social we system.of the contradictions The global is made territories in difcity of that ferent citiesensure management theglob. poweredby tion in a network networks. networks dynamic. local Thus.a fewblocks Manhattan partof the solveoneof thegreatest in are difficulties theexplain global city. which bringwith them examine theirdifferential relationship their subtract to network values interests new and surrounding. others large. are the components the new sociospatial the basis cultural of A theorybasedon the conceptof a social structure. the whicharecon.new metaphor. centralanalytical The question then built networks breaks with becomes shared how socialmeaning produced structure on dynamic is outof disjointed spatial unitsreunited a pure.practices networking anddealing similar logic in tive for the new urbansociology(Borjaand thesame with and Castells 1997). long as the networks in are large. urban societyas a body. formal as years scienin the worldwide geography management terms.rather defined terms theirmatrix the changing thanthe "end geography" the ageof glob. Instead.socialstructure. and So the globalcity is a network noncon. evolvingsystemof dynamicnet. can of The includeall socialexpressions.commonbasisfor social structure social of resultsby tiguous territories. while Structuralism subjectivism rarely in theoretical framework. the of The analysis socialstructures a multidi. by that thesetwoplanes human of praclocality(Graham Simon2000).social structure an open systemthan can as ed in many citiesaround world.network In theory could help Thus. Sao Paulo)we value a net increases thesquare thenumor formula is already had the descriptive notion of "world berof nodeson the net. soci- .it is the intothe acting in of in connectionbetweenlocal and global.Andempirically extends spaces it to locat. included the meta-network compatible. globallogic (Castells 2000b). then. (Theprecise 1.butmostof New York.Symposia 697 goals.amongnetworks. Networks discontiguous of places terms theprogramming reprogramming goals. compatible with wellas the agencies socialchange.is not anyparticular andn the number nodes). the someextra." proposed years The global 20 ago. Interactive netinformation technologyand communicating and with their environment. reunited around taskof action may yield some theoretical the the withinthe same managing globalism networks transcend ensuring communication. Bob the of as of York.expandindefinitely. grow.thetworeductionist in metaphors whichsociolon historically: mechanical the view ly instrumental. Tokyo. A beingloosely connected theirterritorial to hin. cellsevolveanddevelop are of withinthe body self-evolvingstructures. of in Structures makepractices. From and this logic. and have been nectedin networks global of management. we need a if sociology.Networks increase their genceof"theglobal city.a networked the strictanalytical sense. Age. still others so large. proposed agobycomputer of of wealthand information. verylocal. ogywasbased madeup of institutions Byredefining spatial structure the basisof a of societyas a machine on and view of networking we openupa newfrontier logic.These is dominated the juxtaposition andlackof is between analysis socialstructhe of globalized segments Manhattan linkedto integration of are otherspaces around world. to analyze new spatialformsconstituted interactive the as add around interterritorial networks. which.
formal of power com. of as works the backbone socialstructure as of critique sources wellas Naturally. in raised the theory. contrasting Thus. even moreacutethe needto takeup the great. basedon of the new mathematics complexity quantibetween opposition artificial the sterile.ceivessocial whatcomes matter it with ed by ableresearchers boththe knowledge networks. will.flexible apt yet of the enable to handle complexity informed. translation is Sociology al sourcesmay liberatesociologyfrom the grounds. perfect.Manuel. modelsin the social Simulation reductionism. On the otherhand.mulated information of The emergence interactive fromglobal on knowledge the matter makes sources. 1997.698 Symposia who will analyze societymaybe able to of youngsociologists-those ology of the network society.2000. fulldevelopment otherscirelationships. sciencesgot off to a bad startin the 1960s References wereutterly Borja. and research. anempirical of ethnocentrism its observation. new. its formal language. 3 vols. non. theyare integration observations a theory conto relationship empirical of as structure a network interactive and to toolsready be used. senseof this make in modelsscripted the Thus.Jordi and Castells. study ex net. .Given knowledge languages of The renewal the studyof societycannot automated to access globprograms).embedded science.Each under of ent to the constraints observation or may study be comparative cross-cultural new in its approach. and Culture. knowing literacy sense. between and the like (Capra tative and qualitative autopoieticnetworks. emergent notionssuch as fractals. by field On one hand.and with the formal computational with exercises slight to confined formal remain that in of But research. have standard and training methodproper also would require witnessed the development of numerous from to for guidance sociologists benefit rela. in the lasttwodecades. the an interactivenetworkstructurein precise answer questions societywill of The sociology the network system analysis of terms. theperspective and discoveries theory empirical 1996). runstatistical generation for Oxford& Malden.problemsof methodological integrationof challenge for empirical diverse willbenecessary est methodological for requisites useof data Whilemostof ouranalyt. we But dynamics.the network in and structure practice the same bridge to enough In doingso. Manuel. 2d Ed.we havean expanding of beingoverwhelmed it. erated novo in a particular to the accurequire new perspectives concepts. of In study. particularly may becomea economics. TheWebof Life:A New Scientific tions. (that is.new issues.computational UniversityPress.1996. New York: processed assumptions of interaction alternative Doubleday. doesnot really Whatmator fromstatistics fromethnography. and should. Computer-based theorelevant among synergy through dynamicnetworksmay constitutea fruitful develop and literacy. The Information with howto interact computers. in the Information Cambridge. computer Age. . properties.may changeeverything as is Carnoy.overcome sociology Overall. Work Family andCommunity In research.meaning. in research sociology.transformed. conditions experimental genobservation by new tools. Localand theories theirunderlying because of The Global: Management Citiesin theInformation were programs techniand simplistic. sociological computational and whichobservation theory rizing. by callyconstrained theirset of rigidassumpin capacity. this in happening biological already MA: Harvard Age. requirement the current learning . ableto begiveninformation to us languages. just proceed on theoretical withinallthe limitsinher. analyt.Fritjof.2000a. via to haveaccess a hugepoolof information the A New Methodology? (or of Internet.Mostof thesemathematical literacy. theywillbe fortunate icalgrasp.this wealth of information.ences. on icaltoolsarebased linear in in socialphenomena even moreso in the net.ological toolsableto dealwithnonlinear research without of possibilities information expanded tionships. London:Earthscan. by worksociety are characterized nonlinear This tool of sociologicalresearch. The practiceof most meta-analysis.MA: Blackwell. at high speed. than rather just Castells. to knowledge of the tools and the substantive and of tersis the accuracy the observation. Age: may programs) be a fundamental Economy Society. . dynamic Capra.Martin.enhanced programmingcomputer programsmust be theoretically computer and puters. through approach can be reconciledwithout excessive social maglnatlon.Butnewcomputing of Understanding Living Systems.
Berkeley: University Press. University California of Press. withtheeveryday of peo. willdemographic how structure with historical be time. market The presmentsof socialstructure a product cultural surefromthe larger is of birthcohortinflated the and institutionalchange (Eisenstadt1956). "The Cultureof Cities in the Granovetter. example. F.with social overtimeinfluences number people of the of availorganization. asseveral such Asiannations.Undernormal in circumstances.relatively of but young populations are rapidly and cialpractice. in Graham. 1988)took Consequently.asserted.Claude. For age-based marketing modernizing. and one. structure a useful in age is tool tureandsocialstructure. middle-aged needforhomecareandin lossof thesense self andolderpeoplearemorelikelythanyounger of dueto chronic illness.Herewe argue the distinction that between lationstructure partially determines amount the demographic structure socialstructure an of competitionfor those roles within and and is arbitrary artificial Actually. people be homeowners. "Economic Action and Information Presented conference The Age. phenomenon. rapid to The increase in In this essaywe focuson age structure.editedby Ida on and Jonathan Perraton. Oxford Malden. Ryder(1965) firmly wedded population strucFurthermore. Ottawa CHARLES LONGINO. for affects Population structure a dynamic changing the amount is and takenoutof your paycheck.ing the relations among othersocialprocesses. thuspopuand lives roles and ple.ableto different in society. lineahead social for security. Change the agestructure in occurs the erty. quickly from youthful to aging sectors. AmericaCalling. Carleton University. conception a a world-systems That is perspective. Settersten (1999) recently it is connected intimately so with our under. 1999." at on SocialStructure: Problem Embeddedness. Stanford.theirpopulations The agingveryrapidly.1992. Wellman. age Indeed. Rileyandher colleagues (1968. Networks the Global ed. 1999. Routledge. CO: London: Press. forthisagecohort(Forrest Leather and 1998). Village: Life in Contemporary Communities. thesestruc. so that those individuals understood? Demographic structure minimal areseenasaging is within cohort a context. Reader Citiesand SocialTheory.tion andeconomic processes. that is enactedin everyday one In addition. of "Frontiersthe Mindin the of American Journal Sociology 481-510. grants NorthAmerican in ports. David. maybe It menting markets ageandgender of by categories difficultto shift nationalpolicyfocusjust as is firmly fixedin business culture today. Barry. cost of housing postponed and homeownership Discussing cohorts part social birth as of change. & MA: Transformations. As the construction rentalunitswhenthe baby of rapid societal change occurs. DavidGoldblatt. cohortdifferences boom cohortbeganestablishing independent become evidentamong groups. 2000. of 19: 21stCentury. find is essentially cohort-focused a strategy." The of Library Congress. JR." Forthcoming (2001)in TheCastells Held. the As basic knowledge about members a society. Mark. Global Susser. 2000b.Highpopula.Symposia 699 . nations withveryyoung populaRyder's conceptof birthcohortand moveda tionsmaytend to exportyoungpeopleas less . Splintering Boulder.AnthonyMcGrew. newcentury the of begins. CA: Stanford Fischer. this context. agestructure the society the of life.thatthe agestructure in standings globalsocialchange.1985. Changes population in structure occurin maybe seenas an "intervening variable" affectshippingcontainers filled with illegal immi. the residence pinpoints intersection populathe of development age cohortsas important of ele.Forexample. Age Structure and Social Structure CHARLES GORDON C. Nationsthathave matter not justsocialtheorizing commer. example. Stephen and Marvin Simon. Westview Networks.betweenage groups. individual aging firstcentury. seg. placeof home ownership the is tion densities occurin foodlinesandin traffic affected the aging thosewhodo ownpropby of jams. Americans aging are within Yetit becomes interesting sociologically because an agingAmerica. Wake Forest Universfy As sociology continues evolvein the twenty.stepbeyond Theyconnected to it. Blackwell. number peoplein The of tures are very difficult to differentiate.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.