You are on page 1of 9

ETCHING CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLID STATE NUCLEAR TRACK DETECTOR Submitted to: Dr. Asloob Ahmed Mudassar Submitted by: Yasir Ali M.

Phil. Physics DPAM PIEAS

Radioactive elements emit different kinds of radiations. These radiations may be alpha particles, beta particles or electromagnetic gamma rays. These radiations require different kinds of detection systems. Gamma rays detection require a special kind of detector, beta particles need another kind of detector. Similarly alpha particles require it own detector with specific properties. Solid state nuclear track detector is also used to detect nuclear radiations.

Solid state nuclear track detector (SSNTD):-. Fast moving charged particles are known to
produce trails of atomic disorder in an immense variety of dielectric solids and some other materials. These dielectric solids include crystals, glasses, and high polymers, and other materials used, include intermetallics, certain metals and amorphous metals, oxide conductors and superconductors. Tracks produced by radiations from nucleus are known as nuclear tracks. Nuclear tracks have found many applications in different branches of science. A solid-state nuclear track detector or SSNTD is also known as an etched track detector or a dielectric track detector, DTD. When it is uncovered to nuclear radiation i.e. neutrons or charged particles, intermittently as well gamma rays, is etched, and inspected microscopically which give information about the radiation.

History :-.D.A. Young of Atomic Energy Research Establishment (AERE) at England
discovered in 1958, the method of detecting charged particles through particle track produced in LiF crystals. When a LiF crystal was irradiated with radiation from uranium, they penetrate into crystal and produced a track in it. These tracks are helpful in detection of these charged particles. In 1959 other two researchers, Silk and Barnes of AERE England, observed hair like tracks of fission fragments. After these two events, researchers from other parts of the world started work on this new detector and they developed this method further. Other elements were also discovered which could have similar tracking characteristics. Very soon after its discovery, the use of SSNTDS started in almost every field of science and technology which includes radiation dosimetry, nuclear physics, space physics, geology, medicine, etc. Having observed tracks in SSNTD.

How it works:-. When a heavily ionized particle falls on SSNTD, it penetrates inside it.
During the process particle strikes with the atoms of lattice of SSNTD and may knock out them from their lattice sites. Depending on particle’s energy, it may penetrate deep inside SSNTD and having some decrease in energy. Therefore track continuous inside the detector also in form of cone. These tracks are used to extract valuable information about the radiation incident o detector.

SSNTDs fall in two distinct categories:
1) Polymeric or plastic detectors: These are widely used not only for radiation monitoring and measurement, but also in many other fields involving nuclear physics and radioactivity. 2) Natural minerals crystals (and glasses): This kind of SSNTD has greatest application in fields such as geology, planetary sciences [especially lunar and meteoritic samples], oil exploration etc.

The most widely used SSNTDs today are plastic, which unlike mineral crystal do not require special preparation such as grinding and polishing. They are also much more sensitive than crystals and glasses. At present, the most sensitive and also the most widely used plastic is the CR-39 polymer [a poly allyldiglycol carbonate: C12H18O7]. It can record all charged nucleons, starting with protons.

Tracks visualization:-. Due to irradiation of radiation tracks are formed on SSNTD. These
tracks are of very small size and of order of 10nm. To make these tracks visible, they are passed through a process called etching. In etching 6 Molar solution of NaOH is used and SSNTD is placed in it for irradiation. This process make the tracks formed by radiation larger in size and after some time their size become of the order of micrometer. Size of tracks depends on duration of etching. In this experiment we study etching characteristics of SSNTD detector. Tracks evaluations:-. Many methods are used to evaluate tracks so that valuable information about the radiation is obtained. 1. Manual (Ocular) Counting:-. Manual or more accurately, ocular (with eye) counting denotes non-automatic counting of etched tracks generally using an optical microscope, with a moving stage, and two eye pieces. But there is a problem with this method that some of tacks may be repeated in counting and some may be left. 2. There are also spark counting and automatic track evaluation. By these methods we can also count tracks of pits. From data taken track density is found. Track densities are expressed either in relative terms or in absolute terms [tracks cm-2] which is converted after calibrating into a dose (e.g. Bq m-3 h) or radon concentration (e.g. Bq m-3 ) by dividing by the time of exposure.

Advantages and Disadvantages of SSNTDs:-.
1. Relative inexpensiveness: They consist of cheap, simple materials. 2. They are sensitive to radiations of high linear energy transfer but are insensitive to a background of lightly-ionizing radiations such as beta particles and gamma rays. 3. Ease of development (there is no need for darkroom processing as in the case of TLD or nuclear emulsions). Simple chemicals (e.g. NaOH) can be used in ordinary daylight to etch tracks in polymers, mineral crystals, glasses, etc. 4. They can be, used over a long time-period, without maintenance, significant background or noise problems, or fading at normal temperatures. 5. Track records in geological and extraterrestrial samples (meteorites) remain intact for millions, indeed billions, of years. 6. They are small, durable and unobtrusive and thus can be used in homes as well as in application where small geometry is important. 7. Heavily charge particles (such as protons, alpha particles and fission fragments) can be distinguished from one another. 8. They are passive detectors and do not require power supplies.
The disadvantages of SSNTDs are that all the observations require

extensive use of microscope. This process is time consuming and human error is always present in the observation, which may affect the results. Automatic scanning systems are available commercially which can reduce the observations time but they are very costly.

Objective of experiment:-. In this experiment we need to study etching characteristics of SSNTD.
We observe effect of duration of etching on tracks formed on detector.

Apparatus:-. In this experiment we used SSNTD strips which were already passed through
the process of etching and irradiation from two different radiation sources and microscope.

Procedure:-. To see the effect of etching duration of tracks we need to measure size of tracks.
For this we need calibrated microscope. So first of all we calibrated microscope. Calibration of microscope:-. Measurement of microscopic objects requires the use of an eyepiece micrometer and a stage micrometer. The eyepiece micrometer is a round glass disk on which a scale has been etched. The eyepiece micrometer is inserted into one eyepiece and held in place in the correct focal plane of the eyepiece with a small retaining ring. The eyepiece and eyepiece micrometer can be rotated 360 degrees in the eye tube so the measuring scale can be aligned with or superimposed over the image of your specimen. With eyepiece micrometer there is another scale of micrometer called stage micrometer placed on stage. A stage micrometer is simply a microscope slide with a known dimension etched upon its surface. The stage micrometer is placed directly on the stage of the microscope and brought into focus. By rotating the eyepiece both scales can be positioned parallel to each other. To calibrate the eyepiece micrometer you must first find out how many intervals of the eyepiece micrometer correspond to a certain distance on the stage micrometer. You can then calculate the value of one interval of the eyepiece micrometer. Our microscope had s stage micrometer with one micrometer each division. And also that had three objectives with 40x, 100x, and 10x resolutions. Each objective needed separate calibration. 1. Objective 10x :-. In this case eyepiece 1 division were equal to 10 divisions (i.e. 10µm), therefore each division of eyepiece had 10/1 = 10 µm length. 2. Objective 40x :-. In this case 4 divisions of eyepiece were equal to 10 divisions of stage micrometer. Therefore each eyepiece had 10/4 = 2.5 µm length. 3. Objective 100x :-. In this case one division of eyepiece was equal to single division of stage micrometer. Therefore each eyepiece had 1/1 =1 µm length. We used 100x objectives therefore each eyepiece division was 1 µm in length.

Figure. 1. Calibration of microscope. Measuring size of tracks:-. Now to get data about size of tracks, we placed different strips of SSNTD which were irradiated from different sources and were etched for different time durations. First of all we used strips irradiated with Americium 242 source which is an alpha emitter. We used strips etched for different time duration. Using slide attached with stage, strip of SSNTD could be moved in back and forth direction and also in right and left direction. Using this facility, different pits i.e. tracks of radiation were brought on scale of eyepiece as shown in figure, from where it size were found. Many readings were taken for each strip. Similar procedure was repeated for Californium 252 which is an alpha emitter and also fission fragments come out from this source due to spontaneous fission so we took different readings for alpha particles and for fission fragments.

Figure 2. Measuring size or diameter of tracks of radiation on SSNTD.

Observations:-. First we took reading for Americium 242 element. Ten different tracks/pits
were selected and diameter of those pits was measured for five different strips. Data is given below. For each case we can see that etching or diameter of tracks of alpha particles and fission fragments are increasing with time.

Table of data taken for alpha particles emitted from Americium 242 , scale is in micrometer Etching Time
12 Hours 10 Hours 9 9 9 5 7 5 7 8 8 10 7 10 9 9 Average Diameter(µm) 8.6 µm 7.5 µm 5.9 µm 4.4 µm 3.1 µm 8 6 6 7 7 5 8 6 8 7 8 6 7 6 7 4 2 5 3 4 3 4 4 6 3 4 3 3 3 5 4 5 3 8 Hours 6 6 Hours 4 4 Hours 3

Diameter measured ten different times All readings are taken in µm

Table of data taken for Fission fragments particles emitted from Californium 252 , scale is in micrometer
Etching time
10.5hrs 25 20 24 23 22 23 24 22 22 24 8.5hrs 23 21 18 16 17 17 17 18 17 19 18.3 µm 14.3 µm 6.5hrs 15 14 14 16 13 14 15 13 13 16 7.9 µm 4.5hrs 9 8 6 7 8 9 8 7 9 8 3.7 µm 2.5hrs 4 3 3 4 4 5 3 4 3 4

Diameter of tracks measured different randomly micrometer for ten

tracks in

Average diameter

22.9 µm

Table of data taken for alpha particles emitted from Californium 252 , scale is in micrometer
Etching time
10.5hrs 8.5hrs 11 8 9 7 7 10 10 8 9 8 6 6 7 8 6 6 5 6 5 7 6.2 µm 6.5hrs 4 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 5 7 4.6 µm 4.5hrs 3 2 3 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 2.9 µm 2.5hrs 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 1.8 µm

Diameter micrometer

measured

in

For ten different tracks for each track

Average Diameter

8.7 µm