Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Today's supply chain technology has a notable lack of risk management tools. Developers need to change this to compete in a global market.
By NohaTohamy
In a recently conduclfd AMR survey, 100 user companies listed commodity volatility and prices as their number one supplychain risk. This comes as no surprise when the price of copper has tripled in five years, the price of Zine has douhled, and that of wheat and soybeans rose by 70 percent in 2007. Futures prices of crude oil, gold, silver, lead, uranium, cattle, cocoa and corn are all at or near records. Close followers in the ranldngs were supplier failure risk, logistics services costs and shortages, and environmental risks. All indicate that companies find themselves facing significant risks across their entire supply chains. For a global company managing an extended supply chain, risks in supply, demand, compliance and logistics are always lurking, necessitating a new way of thinking that balances traditional cost efficiency focus with the new goal of risk mitigation. Some companies are thinking beyond risk mitigation, and are embracing supply chain risks as a potential for a game-changing competitive advantage. For example, HP has embraced environmental risk and positioned its efforts to build a green supply chain as an opportunity to grow its lead and its market share in a low carbon economy User companies seeking to build risk-focused organizations that continually make educated hets balancing risks with [lotential rewards are investigating SCM technologies to assess their ability to support this new business model. Their findings?
MAY/JLNE 2008
Traditional SCM technologies with a primary focus on cost reduction and efficiency are not adequate in supporting global companies in managing and capitalizing on supply chain risks.
12
TEChNQLOGY
lU'L-cntiy, leaders like Samsung have viewed risk, as an opportunity that ciin he leveraged to improve profit and market sliare. Companies iire heginning to realize that they must take a new approaeli to managing their supply chains: explicitly accounting for risk and making decisions based on the potential eosts and value that each risk introduces. A great example of embracing supply chain risk for growth and profitability comes from Panasonic. In 2004, Panasonic was selling $S,000 plasma TV's ant! introducing new models every year. Migh levels of inventory of the older models were chipping away at its profit margins from new models, Demand for plasma TVs was \'olatile, and there was little collaboration with channel partners to share accurate demand signals. All these factors resulted in the dangerous combination of Inveni()r\ channel stuffing and out-of-stocks. In this situation, Panasonic was faced with a myTiad of supply chain risks: volatile demand, frequent new model introduction, excess inventory, and lost sales. But these risks also offered a potential upside; improvement in margins, growth in market share and better relations with its top customers like Best Buy Panasonic realized that many risks can be mitigated with closer collaboration with its channel partners, so the company worked with them to de\elop annual budget plans and demand shaping events based on seasonality and promotion analysis, and together analyzed POS data to better position their products. Panasonic has reaped stellar benefits, including double-digit improvements in forecast error and in-stock rates combined with a significant reduction in required on-hand inventory.
cnnlinued.
will likely generate additional risks in other areas, such as logistics or demand fulfillment. To manage risk, solutions need to quantifv' the total risk associated with an end-toend process like procure-to-pay or order-to-cash. Finding the "optimal" routing plan for a distribution network might fail to see the upside in accepting the risk of idle transportation resources, as a calculated het to meet potential demand from a key client. Direct costs to expected value and opportunity costs. To simplify supply chains, many technologies focus on direct costs: minimizing working capital or minimizing sourcing spend. With a risk focus, the technologies take into account the expected financial impact and the opportunity costs associated witb each decision. For instance, while minimizing inventor}', the company must contrast the cost savings with the expected redtiction in ability to meet
As risk permeates every supply chain function, risk management logic must permeate every supply chain management solution.
the key customer's fluctuating demand. Making the inventory decision has to be based on a risk/reward analysis of the risk in carrying excess inventory and obsolescence with the potential of market share growth. Without organizational alignment, education and process redefinition, technology cannot drive the fundamental mind shift that companies must embrace to manage supply chain risk. Whenand only whena company bas establish the organizational and process foundation, it should assess if its current SCM tools have the right approach to managing risk, even if they are not deployed in that capacity. For example, can the simulation functionality in the implemented network design tool be used to quantify' risk? For more traditional SCM tools, companies should work v\ith their SCM vendors to find out their plans for re\ amping their solutions to explicitly manage risk. Which brings us to tbe vendor side. For all vendors, "risk management" should not be a mere marketing message. Determine if this is a pain point you'd like to solve. For those \'endors who helieve that they can immediately help companies manage their supply chain risks, clearly explain how your solutions have been deployed in that capacity and present users with actual success stories. For vendors who believe that their tools bave tbe potential to manage supply chain risk, allocate development dollars to achieve the necessary functional enhancements. All SCM vendors must realize that risk will coiUiiuK' In take center stage.
CuArrs MANAGEMENT REVIEW M A Y / J L N I : : 200S 13
SLPPLV