. .
&
..
:
2025
> 480
()
2 85-95%
400
2010
347
350
300
250
2000
150
200
150
100
1985
30
50
0
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
http://www.idf.org/home/index.cfm?node=264
( )
(32%
10 20%
)
(, , ,
, )
.
.
2 4
3
8/10
4
50%
..
1 Fong
(
) 5
/
,
MI/
HCG 2011
&
DCCT
Kumamoto
UKPDS
9 7.2%
9 7%
8 7%
Retinopathy
63%
69%
17-21%
Nephropathy
54%
70%
24-33%
Neuropathy
60%
Improved
Cardiovascular
disease
41%
16%*
HbA1C
*p=0.052
LDL.
Life Style
-
..
..
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
200
126
250
200
150
100
50
0
-
-10
-5
10
15
20
25
30
()
()
(
))
Statement ADA & EASD 2006,2008
+ Metformin
-
*
+ +/-
8%
7%
6%
HbA1c %
9%
10%
10
15
8%
7%
6%
HbA1c %
9%
10%
10
15
2:
(-
))
GIP
GLP--1
GLP
(-
))
GLP-1=glucagon
GLP1=glucagon--like peptide
peptide--1; GIP=glucoseGIP=glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide.
Brubaker PL et al. Endocrinology 2004;145:2653
2004;145:2653
2659; Zander M et al. Lancet 2002;359:824
2002;359:824
930; Ahren B. Curr Diab Rep 2003;3:365
2003;3:365
GLP 11
-
GLP 12,4
GP 3
Visbol etal Diabetes 2001; 50:6091, Kjems etal Diabetes 2003; 52:
3802, Visbol etal JCEM 2003; 88: 48973, Mejer and Nauck Eurr Diab.
Rep 2006;6:1944
A] Glucagon
Glucagon--like peptidepeptide-1 *
Liraglutide
GLP
GLP--1*
Exenatide
B] IV
(DPP--IV)**
(DPP
Sitagliptin
Vildagliptin
* -
Saxagliptin
**
2
2
A 2011
A1c > 8.5%
( )
+ 1
A1C > 9%
()
+
TZD
MET +
GLP-1 DPP-4
SU GLIN
2-3
>7%
+
TZD
MET +
GLP-1 DPP-4
SU GLIN
+ +/-
2-3
>7%
A1c<8%
A1c<8%
A1c>8%
+
TZD + SU
MET +
GLP-1 DPP-4 2 + SU
GLP-1 DPP-4 + TZD
2-3
>7%
1.
2.
3.
DPP
DPP--4 ()
+ +
A1c>8%
2-3
>7%
2 201
2011
1.
) :
--
) - :
--
) - :
2.
) - (3
(3 ), ,
HbA1--c <7% (6,5%)
HbA1
) - : -
+
+ (?)
(?)--
)
20
40
60
80
100
Percent
NHANES III=Third US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994)
*130/85 mmHg or current use of prescription medication for hypertension
&
120--129/
120
80--84
80
130--139/
130
85--89
85
1
()
140--159 /
140
90--99
90
2
()
160--179/
160
100--109
100
3
()
>180/ >110
1-2
3 >
,
J Hypertension 2007
mmHg
1-2
>3
120-129
80-84
130-139
85-89
1
140-159
90--99
2
160-179
100-109
3 AY
>180
>110
(Mean BP 119.3mmHg)
EJM 2010;363:15752010;363:1575-1585
EJM 2010;363:15752010;363:1575-1585
: ARBs vs placebo
11 : 84300
p<0,07
p<0,01
.
.
(SBP<130 mmHg)
Am. J. Cardiol
Cardiol.. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.02.319
.
2011
3 5 gr.
, Lifestyle ,
GFR>30
( ) GFR
GFR<
< 30 (C)
(B)
..
ADA 2012
:
()
()
. DASH (B)
130
130--139 mmHg / 8080-89 mmHg
()
>140 mmHg / >90 mmHg : ()
ACE
ACE--I ARBs
ARBs.. (C)
()
/ ,
()
ACE
ACE--I , ARBs
()
110110-129/65
129/65--79 mmHg
ACE--I ARBs
ACE
()
Diab.Care 2012,Suppl1
LDL.
VLDL
Lp(a) (;)
DL
DL
, LDL
.
TRENDS in Endocrinology & Metabolism 2001; 12 (5) : 225225-30
UKPDS Study:
(n=280)
.
(n=192)
P
value
P value
LDL
<0.0001
LDL
0.0022
HDL
0.0001
0.0074
Hemoglobin
A1C
0.0022
0.025
0.0065
HDL
0.026
0.056
HemoglobinA1C
0.053
10
(n
(n = 16032)
LDL
4S-DM
50%
42.5%
186 to 11mg/dl
(36%)
ASPEN2o
Atorvastatin
10mg vs plac
34%
12.7%
112 to 79 mg/dl
(29%)
HPS-DM
Simvastatin 40
mg vs plac
17%
7.5%
123 to 84 mg/dl
(31%)
CARE-DM
Pravastatin
40mg vs plac
13%
5.4%
136 to 99 mg/dl
(27%)
TNT-DM
Atorvastatin
80mg vs 10mg
18%
4.7%
99 to 77 mg/dl
(22%)
HPS-DM
Simvastatin
40mg vs plac
34%
6.0%
124 to 86 mg/dl
(31%)
CARDS
Atorvastatin
10mg vs plac
35%
4%
118 to 71 mg/dl
(40%)
ASPEN
Atorvastatin
10mg vs plac
19%
1.9%
114 to 80 mg/dl
(30%)
ASCOT-DM
Atorvastatin
10mg vs plac
8%
0.9%
125 to 82 mg/dl
(34%)
1 mmol
mmol/l
/l
LDL
baseline
26
Lancet 2010;376:16702010;376:1670-1681
rosuvastatin atorvastatin
CORALL study
2011
:
LDL< 100mg% (A)
:
LDL< 70mg% ()
LDL ,
LDL 30% - 40% ()
LDL :
TG < 150 mg% HDL > 40 mg% ()
()
HDL > 50 mg% ()
()
non HDL Apo B
- LDL < 100mg%,
100mg%, non HDL < 130 mg%
Apo B < 90 mg% (E)
- LDL < 70mg%,
70mg%, non HDL < 100 mg%
Apo B < 80 mg% (E)
. .:
Screening,,
Screening
ADA 2012
Screening:: .
Screening
profile (LDL < 100mg%, HDL > 50mg% < 150 mg%)
2 ()
:
CVD : LDL <100mg% (A)
CVD LDL < 70 mg% ()
TG < 150mg% HDL>40mg% ()
() >50mg%
>50mg% (
( )
) ( C )
::
- life style (
( . , trans , 3,
) ()
- :
CVD (A)
CVD > 40
( A )
- CVD < 40 LDL > 100mg%
L. S. ()
-
LDL 30 40 %
()
- ,
CVD ()
LDL
LDL--C:
ESC/EAS 2011
EHJ 2011;32:17692011;32:1769-1818
:
ESC/EAS 2011
EHJ 2011;32:17692011;32:1769-1818
ADA 2012
CVD
Statement ADA 2012
<130/ 80 mmHg
LDL
<100 mg/dl
.LDL
>40+ .. ()
LDL>100 . ()
-<150 mg/dl
DL
- 1C <7%
1C (<6%)
(25)
5-7%
150 min/ .
90 min/ .
LDL.
Steno2 Study
NNT:5
Sure Study
Treatment targets:
1) BP<130/80 mmHg
2) HbA1c<7%
3) LDL<100mg%
4) TG<150mg%
5) aMea or ARBs
:
CVD
Hong Kong diabetes Registry:
6386 T2DM patients, 5,7 years FU
0.20
All 3 targets
35
0.16
1c < 7%
BP < 130/80 mmHg
LDL C < 2,8 mmol/L
0.14
0.12
No targets
achieved
30
25
0.10
0.08
1 target
achieved
0.06
0.04
50% risk
reduction
2 - 3 targets
achieved
0.02
20
15
10
0.00
0
0.18
A1c < 7%
10
5
0
Asia
EE
S Am
All
1924
...
Joslin EP. The treatment of diabetes mellitus, 3rd edition. London, H.Kimpton,
1924
2011
201
1
To
,
Editorial: R . Nesto
Nesto.. Am. J .Med 2010
2010;;
!!!!!