Bibliography

Aarts, B. 1992. Small Clauses in English: The Nonverbal Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Abraham, W. 1986. Unaccusatives in German. Groninger Arbeiten Zur Germanistischen Linguistik 28: 1-72. Groningen: University of Groningen Ackema, P. 1995. Syntax below Zero. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht: LOT Ackema, P. and M. Schoorlemmer. 1994. The middle construction and the syntaxsematics interface. Lingua 93: 59-90. Ackema, P. and M. Schoorlemmer. 1995. Middles and Nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173-197. Ackema, P. and M. Schoorlemmer. 2003. Middles. Ms. UiL-OTS, University of Utrecht. Alsina, A. 1992. On the Argument Structure of Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 234:517-555. Aljović, N. 2000. Unaccusativity and Aspect in SerBoCroatian. In C. Czinglar et al. (eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE 8. Leiden: SOLE. Anderson, M. 1979. Noun Phrase Structure. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Connecticut, Storrs. Babby, L. 1980. Existential Sentences and Negation in Russian. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma. Bach, E.1982. The algebra of events. Paper presented at Sloan conference on Tense and Aspect, Ohio State University, Columbus. Bailyn, J. 2001. The Syntax of Slavic Predicate Case. In A. Striginet et al. (eds.), ZAS Occasional Papers in Linguistics: 1-26. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Schprachwissenschaft. Bailyn, J. and B. Citko. 1998. The Morphology of Slavic Predicates. Proceedings of FASL VII. Michigan Slavic Publications. Baker, M. 1988a. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Paper presented at the UC San Diego conference Explanations in Linguistics. In H. and argument structure. Rizzi. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1-34. Thematic structure: Its role in Grammar: 47-64. Belletti. Ž. Active and middle voice in the verb. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291-352. P. and Y. In I. 1992. Squartini. Morphology. Coral Gables. 1984. Italiano. Problems in General Linguistics: 145-151. 1989. In M. and M. Booij.1971.Grodzinsky. 1988b. Morphology and its relation to Phonology and Syntax: 188-212. G. Lexical Cliticization: The Case of Hebrew Dative Clitics.). Beukema and M. (eds. M. Generativa Grammatica. 1988. and L. den Dikken (eds. endo-skeletal explanations: syntactic projections and the lexicon. Aspect and Actionality. J. friulano: fenomeni sintattici a confronto. Johnson and I.). M. D-Structure.. Voice – beyond the passive. Boons. K. Theta Theory and the syntax of applicatives in Chichewa. S. H. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Bertinetto et al. Syntactic vs.Meek (tr. December 1999.). A. Passive Argument Raised. Utrecht: Rosenberg & Sellier. A. Baker. 1988. 1998. Borer. La Structure des Phrases Simples en Français: Constructions Intransitives. H. E. M. Bertinetto. P. Belletti.1992.M. 2000. and Movement into ThetaPositions. Comments on the Paper by Sadock. Borer. Roca (ed. and T. Lapointe et al. 1988. 1986. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. USA: University of Miami Press. Linguistic Analysis 24: 264-286. Bošković. In S.294 Bibliography Baker. semantics. Bennis. H. Bland. 2000. 1994. Borer (ed. 1975. Barber. Roberts. Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1976. veneto. M.Venelli. Berlin: Mouton. Rivista italiana di dialettologia 8: 165-194. & L. The present progressive in discourse: Grammar versus usage revisited. Second position cliticization: Syntax and/or phonology? In F. .). Clitic Phenomena in European Languages: 71-119. Dordrecht: Foris. In M. Theta-Criterion. Temporal Reference. Benveniste. Ž. Volume 1: Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives: 11-26.). Psych-Verbs and Theta-Theory. The Case of Unaccusatives. San Francisco: Academic Press: 175-217 Bošković. Hoekstra. TESOL Quarterly 22: 53-68. Baker. Benincá. Geneva: Droz. (eds. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219-252. NLLT 6: 353-389.). Proceedings 1: 16-24. 1989. Exo-skeletal vs. E. et al.

G.On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Chierchia. PP-Verbs: The Phenomenon of obligatory Ps. G. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 1-23. Ph. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations: 3-86 Cambridge. G. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. MA: MIT Press Bresnan. J. Carlson. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1972. G. The Generic Book: 176-223. J.). Proceedings of NELS 17. Chierchia. Pelletier (eds. 2002. Cambridge. Published 1980 by Garland Press. 1986. The Passive in Lexical Theory. 1989. and L. The Hague: Mouton. Chomsky. Ž. Rothstein (ed. McConnell-Ginet. 1986. 2004. G. Brody. Volume 1: 107-143. In J. 2000. G. Plunkett. Polyadicity. 1957. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph. I. The variability of Impersonal Subjects.).). Tel Aviv University. Quantification in Natural Languages. Ms. G. Theta-Theory and Arguments. In J. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations: 149-172 Cambridge. G. Elsevier. Thematic roles and the Individuation of Events. 1982b.Bibliography 295 Bošković. Linguistics 22: 259-279. & F. MIT. 1998. A Semantics for Unaccusatives and its Syntactic Consequences. Old English Impersonals and the Theory of Grammar. Carlson. In Carlson. Ph. G. 1977.D. Syntactic Structures. (eds. Meaning and Grammar. L. MA: MIT Press Bresnan. Ms. In S. 1995b. London: University College London. 1989.). MA: MIT Press. Bach et al. Volume I: 46-58 Brody. Italian Syntax: A Government and Binding Approach. M. M. In E. Chierchia. Dordrecht: Reidel. Bresnan (ed. Bresnan (ed. Bresnan. dissertation. 2001. Individual-Level Predicates as Inherent Generics. . 1993. N. I. Burzio. 1995a. J. dissertation. Moshi. UCLWPL 1: 262-294. Botwinik-Rotem. On the role of thematic roles in linguistic theory. Bresnan. McDonough & B. Cornell University.). 1990.D.J. 1984. Botwinik-Rotem. University of Tel Aviv. Events and Grammar: 35-51. Theory of Complementation in English Syntax. Broadwell. In J. Multiple Theta-Role Assignment. Object Asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. & S. J.D. Chierchia. 1982a. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147-185. New York. Carlson. dissertation.

N. Keyser (eds. PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. The Middle: where semantics and morphology meet. Cambridge. Knowledge of language: its nature. Pittsburgh. In K. Chomsky. D. In Defense of Spontaneous Demotion. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. Grammatical Relations: Syntax and Semantics 8: 47-58 New York: Academic Press. Oxford: Blackwell. dissertation. Leiden University. 1994. 1989. Delfitto. Chomsky. 1965. V. Davidson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Language 63: 1-30.W. Clark. G. Issues of Syntax. On deriving certain left branch extraction asymmetries: A case study in parametric syntax. The View from Building 20: 1-52. . Rescher (ed. G. 2003. Wilkins. 1995. M. Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society 22: 67-84. den Dikken. Comrie. N. De Swart. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Agreement in Italian Impersonal SI Constructions: A Derivational Analysis. origin and use. Carpenter. The logical form of action sentences. 1977.). On Si Constructions and the Theory of Arb. Cambridge. D.). Particles. Culicover. Ö. N.1992.1985. N. and K. 2002. Cambridge. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5. K. The Logic of Decisions and Action: 81-95. N. Logical Form and Interpretation. MA: MIT Press. Alessandria (Italy): Edizioni Dell'Orso. 1984. 1989. 1993. Orlando: Academic Press. Condoravdi.). Hale & S. de Hoop. D’Allessandro. 1981.296 Bibliography Chomsky. R. & W. MA: MIT Press. B. Lectures on government and binding. 1989. 1986. Ph. Bare Phrase Structure. The notion of source in language acquisition. In N. University of Stuttgart. Chomsky. Italian Syntax and Universal Grammar. H. MA: MIT Press. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 521-581. Sadock (eds. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 16-30. Genericity in Language. N. New York: Praeger. Dordrecht: Foris. Cole & J. Chomsky. 1967. Cinque. 1995. Over indefiniete objecten en de relatie tusses syntaxis en semantiek. N. C.D. 1992. Locality in Linguistic Theory. Dahl. & H. Tense and Aspect Systems. In P. Minimalist Program. 1988. Ms. Chomsky. Cinque. P. Corver. GLOT 12: 19-35.

MA: Harvard University Press. Dowty. Fellbaum. 2000. M. 1985. Nespor (eds. Amherst: University of Massachusetts. S. A. 1986. Volume 2: 181-203. Dordrecht: Foris.). Bloomington. & A. The Dual Analysis of Adjuncts/Complements in Categorial Grammar.). C. Mascaro and M. Dordrecht: Reidel. 1988. Pica (ed. Everaert. C.).M. Fagan. NELS 24-1: 65-79. 1979. The middle construction in French and English: A comparative study of its syntax and semantics. Cambridge. The English Middle. Fellbaum. 1996. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Structure. The encoding of the lexical semantic structure of verbs: The case of Auxiliary selection in Idioms. Dobrovie-Sorin. C. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 399-437. Adverbs in Agentless Actives and Passives. R. Lexical Structures and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1992. Everaert. Fagan. Dowty. The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions: A Study with Special Reference to German. Les parties du discourse en grammaire générative’. 1986. Hundsnurscher (eds. Surface Structure: The Interface of Autonomous Components. Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society. 1994. In J. In P. Fiengo. Grammar in Progress: 125-136. Zribi-Hertz. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Chicago. Di Sciullo.W. 1994. D. 1998. In E. Université de Paris VII. J. Edmonds. Utrecht: UiL OTS. Dowty.Bibliography 297 den Dikken. Everaert 1990. Impersonal se Construction in Romance and the Passivization of Unergatives. 1989. 1980. NP Movement across Secondary Objects. D. 1994. Proceedings of the international conference on Lexicography and Lexical Semantics in Munster. Language 67: 547619. Fellbaum. Dordrecht: Foris. On the Middle Construction in English. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 7. . C. Dimitriadis. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes 14-15: 93-154. M. The Syntax of Reflexivization. Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club. D. CLS 21: 21-48. Tubingen: Max Niemer Verlag. Published in ZAS Papers in Linguistics 17. S. Probus 2: 257-290. Modularity and the Mapping from the Lexicon to the Syntax. A.1990. Ms. Event Semantics for the Theta System. Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Linguistic Inquiry 19. Auxiliaries and Participles. 1991. M. 2003. Weigand and R. 1986. Bloomington.

Passive and Voice: 417-439. Causative/Inchoative Alternation in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279-326. Cognitive Linguistics.L. 1992. al. Baker and J. Harms (eds. T. Everaert & J. Givón. Indefinite Agent. Holt: Rinehart and Winston. Typology and Functional Domains. et. Reprinted in 1995. J. Cognition 41: 153-195. Passive. Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1-90. 1999. MA: MIT Press. A. In C. Grimshaw. Argument Structure. Philology & Phonetics 4: 33-49.298 Bibliography Fillmore. Grimshaw. Cambridge. 1981. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. 1979.). Is there a Pro-drop Parameter for Slavic? Chicago Linguistic Society 18: 140-154. Complement selection and the lexicon. 1992. 1991. 2000. 1967. Grimshaw. Brandeis University. Lexical Specification and Insertion: 115-133 Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. In E. 1968. Grimshaw. In P.D. Folli. Coopmans. Ph. Tale of two Passives in Ute. The case for case. J. J. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. J. J. Franks . Studies in Language 5: 163193. and the Language Acquisition Device.). C. University of California. Grimshaw (eds.). 1995. Gruber. J. Affectedness and Direct objects: the Role of Lexical Semantics in the Acquisition of Verb Argument Structure.1982. 2002. Mass: MIT Press. Semantics and Syntactic Regularities. and Impersonal. Goldberg. Cambridge. Grimshaw. M. G. Form. Amsterdam: North Holland. Bach & R. 1974. J. Extended Projections and Locality. Berlin: Mouton. Function. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Frajzyngier.J. A. Z. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition:165-182. Franks. T. 1990. 1981. Surface Generalizations: an alternative to alternations. McCarthy (eds. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Goldberg. Green. Lingua 58: 267290. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.1988. 1982. R. Givón. dissertation. . S. Extended Projections. Gropen.S. In Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics. Ms.). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Abraham (eds. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Knowledge and Language 2: 183-220.. 1991. Belletti (ed. Reciprocity and Plurality.D. 1985. Rijkuniversiteit Groningen. J.) Structures and Beyond. T. Bennis. May. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 63-101. Jäger. Hoekstra. Mulder. Reflexives in Middles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369-411. 1993. Semantic Structures. Hornstein. dissertation. 1975.). R. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press. Interface Strategies: 207-222 Amsterdam: Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences. Jackendoff. Reuland (eds. emotion. Higginbotham. Arbitrary Plural Nominals. Hoekstra. R. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 89-150. and will. Hoekstra. Jackendoff. H. The Linguistic Review 7: 1-79. Oxford: Oxford University Press Kemmer. Cambridge. R. & W. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547-593. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. O. 1984. E. O. Case Theory and Preposition Stranding. T & I. Jackendoff. On Semantics. A. 1972. In A. Lasnik & R. Kayne. Towards Explanatory Semantic Representations. Kenny. I. Ph. MA: MIT Press. E. R. Topic-Comment Structure and the Contrast Between Stage Level and Individual Level Predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 43-76. R. Jackendoff. Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In H. Everaert & E. N & A. . 1986b. 1986a. 1963. Hulk. Jaeggli. Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. Prepositions as Probes. Unergatives as Copular Verbs: Locational and Existential Predication. S. & R. 2000. 2001. The Middle Voice. MA: MIT Press. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge. Journal of Semantics 18:83-126. M. 1990. T. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. In Reuland. 1990. A. to appear. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 67-84. 1993. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. & L. The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory. 1991. Jaeggli. Middle Construction in Dutch and English. Kayne. 1976. G. Passive. 1987.Bibliography 299 Heim.). R. Cornips. Transitivity: Grammatical Relations in Government and Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587-622. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Hoekstra. Weinberg. Roberts. 1981.

W. .D. Affectedness and Control: a typology of voice system. N. Kirsner. In G.). I. Storrs.). In H. On Binding and Control.D. Ph. Klaiman. Krifka. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory: 1-15. Krifka. MIT. Case and Expletives: Notes towards a Parametric Account. N. In G. 1995. Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. The Generic Book: 125-175. dissertation. Landau. S. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-415. dissertation.300 Bibliography Kerstens. Ph. The Generic Book: 1-124. Subject and Topic. Kratzer. Roeper. J. 2000.). The Generic Book: 238-264. 2001. A. New York: Academic Press. Keyser. Carlson & F. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed. Carlson. Lasnik. A. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. UiL-OTS. Random Thoughts on Implicit Arguments. Kratzer. Koster. 1995. 1995. Palletier (eds. Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. On the Subject of Pseudo-Passives in Standard Dutch and the Semantics of Background Agents: 385-415 In C. Landau. Connecticut: University of Connecticut. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 1-18. H.Rieser (eds. M. The Notional Category of Modality. R. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. M. Carlson & F. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions.N. Koopman. 1976. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. S. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Lasnik. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Koizumi. Ben Gurion University. On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English. University of Amsterdam. 1984. 1984. H. & F. 1995. I.J. Passive and Voice: 25-83. MA: MIT Press. et al. J.). 1992. Subjects and H-Criterion. Lasnik. 1984. 2000. Pelletier (eds. 2002. M.). H. Variable Features and Feature Geometry in Dutch. J. M. 1990. Lasnik. Word Order in Old English. In G. J. 1988. Genericity: An Introduction.J. Li (ed. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. & T. Ms. H. Focus and Interpretation of Generic Sentences. 1988. J. Cambridge. Eikmayer & H.). Linguistic Inquiry 23: 381-405. Palletier (eds. Ms. Linguistic Inquiry 15-3: 417-459. 1981. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Talk given at the TSSS.

Towards One Si. London: Hutchinson. Marantz. Talk given at the Workshop on the Theta System. M & W. Manzini. Lepschy. Marantz. to appear. Sternefeld (eds. 2002b. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 357-382. Penn (www. 2000. In Krifka. Dative: the heterogeneity of the mapping among morphological case. Restructuring and Reanalysis.J.Bibliography 301 Lepschy. Lepschy. and G. 1977. Zaucer. Rappaport. A. B. Levin. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications. A. Cambridge. A. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Marelj. 1992. Icelandic Verbs with Dative Objects. McFadden. & M. A. 2001. Middles in Romance Type Languages. Maling. MIT. In FASL 12 (The Ottawa meeting. J. G. M. T.). MA: MIT Press. Cambridge. MS. Rules that govern the cooccurrences of theta-clusters in the ‘Theta System’.upenn. Stanford: CSLI Publications. In J. Semantics.1977. Unaccusativity. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201-225. 1984. J. Marelj. Maling. P. 2002. 1983. UiL OTS. Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar: 113-150. 1995.2002a. 2003). Marantz. 1986. No Escape from Syntax: Don’t try a morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. and M. Levin. Mass: MIT Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Restructuring the Lexical Domain with a Single Generative Engine. A Reanalysis of the FEELLIKE DativeReflexive Construction in Slovenian.ling. Ms. Lund University. F. Lingua 111: 419-464. L. The Italian Language Today. Masullo. Lyons. Marantz. & R. grammatical functions and thematic roles. Implications of Asymmetry in Double Object Constructions. M. The rise of the to-dative in Middle English. Italian Linguistics 2: 157-160. MA: MIT Press. Rappaport 1994. Berlin: Mouton. Mchombo (ed. R. Quirky datives in Spanish and the non-nominative subject parameter. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 16. Levin. On The Nature of Grammatical Relations. 1997. 1993. J. Marusic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 70: 1-59. A.html) .). Maling et al. B. In S. Cambridge. A Preliminary Analysis of Causative Verbs in English. 1993. U. English Verb Classes and Alternations. 2002. Lingua 92: 35-77.edu/~tmcfadde/papers.). (eds. B.

dissertation. L 1994. de Groot & H. Ph. Neeleman. Ph. D. Postal. Mǿnnesland. Neeleman. D. M.1985. Parsons. and P. Parsons. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A study in Sub-Atomic Semantics. Neeleman. The Balance between Syntax and Morphology: Dutch Particles and Resultatives. Papangeli. Weerman. Mitchell. Spaelti (eds. Speaking of Events. Montalbetti. Underlying events in the logical analysis of English. Farkas & P. Utrecht: LOT. dissertation. 1982. A. 1993. MIT. A. Oehrle.81-93. . Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 89137. Underlying States and Time Travel. Duncan. & F. Neidle. Truth and Interpretation. R. Utrecht: LOT. Pesetsky. In C. OTS Working Papers.D. Perlmutter. C. dissertation. Current Studies in Linguistics Series 21. The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternations. In E. New York: Garland. Oxford: Claredon Press. The Indefinite Extraposition Construction in German and Dutch. Old English Syntax.).302 Bibliography McNelly. 1984. 1984. D. In J. 1994. The Morphosyntax of Argument Realization: Greek Argument Structure and the Lexicon-Syntax Interface Ph.M. Perlmutter. After Binding. 1984.). PP-Complements. 1976. & A. 1984. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 433-475. In D. In D. 1985. Kluwer: Dordrecht. Rosen (eds. T. Aspect Bound: 53-76. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics Series. Studies in Relational Grammar: 171-216 Chicago: Chicago University Press. 1988. Adjunct predicates and the individual/stage distinction. Ph.D. The Slavonic Frequentative Habituals. dissertation.Dordrecht: Foris. MIT. Partee.D.).: MIT Press. Complex Predicates. 1979. Proceedings of WCCCFL 12: 561576. T. S. In J. McLaughlin (eds. The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Neeleman 1997. B. Stanford: CLSI. Ph. Mass. Studies in Relational Grammar 2. LePore & B. Perlmutter & C. Perlmutter & C. Parsons.D.D. Hankamer (ed. B. T. 2000. Cambridge. D. dissertation. 2004. A. In E. Rosen (eds. Tommola (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell. Higginbotham et al. (eds.).). The 1-Advancement Exclusiveness Law.New York: Oxford University Press. 1996. MIT. Chicago: Chicago University Press.). Paths and Categories. Utrecht: University of Utrecht. D. PP-Complements. Subject and Object in Modern English. Zaenen.

UK: Cambridge University Press. Lj. UiL OTS. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. In J. 1990. and E. Utrecht: University of Utrecht. T. In M. Reuland. The Theta System: Syntactic Realization of Verbal Concepts. E. Thematic Arity Operations and Parametric Variations. (eds. MA: MIT Press. Impersonal SIĘ in Polish: A Simplex Expression Anaphor. 2000. University of Tel Aviv. Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Cambridge. Extraction from Nominal Phrases in Polish and the Theory of Determiners. Ithaca. Raposo.) Arguments and Case. Cambridge. 2002. Jackson & Z. T. Rivero. Reinhart. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8-3. B. 2000. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 505 -538. In R. Reflexivity. 1990. Uriagareka. Siloni. UiL-OTS Working Papers. and J. University of Trondheim. The Acc Case Parameter. Lj. 1996. UiL-OTS Working Papers. 1998. Roberts.). Oblique Case in the History of English. Reinhart. Ms. Long-distance Case Assignment. Reinhart. T. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720. Progovac. University of Utrecht. T. Dimitrova-Vulchanova et al. Rappaport.Bibliography 303 Pesetsky.). Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229-290 Berlin: Mouton. Experiencing Derivations. and E. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 199-237. 1983. Events in Serbian. 1997. M. The Theta System – An Overview. Reuland. . Y. Reinhart. Reuland. Lexical Semantics without Thematic Roles. T. 1999. T. 1993. 2000. 2001. Sternefeld (ed. Reinhart. T. Ms. Zvolensky (eds). Syntactic Effects of Lexical Operations: Reflexives and Unaccusatives. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 6: 3-29. Null Object in Italian and the Theory of pro. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 2004. Reuland (eds. I. 1986. Ravin. Ms. Long-distance Anaphora: 281321. 1995. T.L. 2003. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501-557. A. 1991. Oxford: Claredon Press. 1987. G. Koster & E. E. In W. Reuland and T. Anaphors and logophors: an argument structure perspective. (ed. Southern California Occasional Papers in Linguistics 10: Studies in Syntax: 143-159. Rizzi. Reinhart. L. Siloni. University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 31: 79-116.. and T. Utrecht: University of Utrecht Reinhart.). University of Trondheim. NY: CLC Publication Reinhart. Event Pronominal to. Middle Construction in German. Hastings. D. Progovac. Pitz. E.

Ph. Ph. 1996. 1989. The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Y. University of Iceland. Unpublished Ph. Schoorlemmer. In Yehuda Falk (ed. Ms.D. In G. M. Active Lexicon. Carlson & F. M. . Shen.1973. T.). 1985. Bailey & R. Passive and Voice: 243-289. Heidolph (eds. Reciprocal Verbs. dissertation.). A. H. Amsterdam: Benjamins. The Passive in Slavic. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. UiL OTS. DC: Georgetown University Press. I.1984. 2003. Sternefeld (eds. The Hague: Mouton. Tel Aviv University. Indefinites.). 1991. 1974. Institute of Linguistics. Ruwet.). dissertation.A. Talk given at the Anaphora Typology Workshop on Reciprocals. T. and Focus Semantics. T. W. dissertation. The Generic Book: 265-299. Adverbs of Quantification. Bierwish & E. On the state of progressives and statives. Thráinsson. J. University of Utrecht. H.K. I. 2002. 2001. Case Assignment in Ukrainian Morphological Passive Constructions. 1985. In J. Cambridge. M & W. Problems in French Syntax. Siloni. 1995. Smith. Siewierska. Gapping and the Order of Constituents. Shuy (eds. Siloni. Saito.J.R. London: Longman.). Smyth. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1994. The additional wh-effects and the adjunction site theory. H. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed. In C. Washington. 1992. 1985. Greek Grammar. Reciprocal Verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16-4: 649-662. Ms. Ross. 1976. The Structure of Action in Short Narrative Text. London: Croom Helm. Proceedings of IATL 17. Siewierska. Dative Subject and Modality in Russian.304 Bibliography Roberts.D. In M. Reprinted in 1992.). M. University of Connecticut. University of Lund. Pelletier (eds. N. Sigurðsson. In H. Siloni. Berlin: Mouton. N. 1988.J. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 383-400. Sobin. Maling (ed. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 675-736. Dative Sickness in Germanic.D.). The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. Sag. Rooth. In Krifka. et al. New ways of analyzing variation in English: 83-95.). J. Progress in Linguistics: 249-259. Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax II: 226-256. (eds. Los Angeles: University of Southern California Rooryck.J. MA: Harvard University Press. Prepositions and Minimalist Case Marking. 1970. A.

1984. 1992. Event Semantics of Verbal Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and Its Acquisition. T. dissertation. Predication. 1967. Linguistic Inquiry 30:119-131. E. van Hout.D. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Improper movements and chain formation. The Linguistic Review 1: 81-114. Chicago. Rhyme & Reason. Ph. Berlin: Humboldt University. Stowell. 1990. M. Middles and Movement. 1990. van Kemenade. Takahashi. 1981.Bibliography 305 Steinbach. Origins of Phrase Structure. 1996. Untersuchungen zu Reflexivkonstruktionen im Deutschen. MIT. Stroik. MA: Cambridge University Press. Dordrecht: Foris. Illinois: Chicago Linguistic Society: 297-307 Verkuyl. Semantic Parameters and Split Intransitivity. On the Properties of the Passive Affix in Modern Greek. dissertation. Wagner. F. Williams. Uriagareka. van Kemenade & N. University of Connecticut. van Valin. Middles in German. H. Language 66: 221-260 Vendler. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics: 235-260. R. Ms. E. D. Fred. D. Stroik. CLS: 297-307. University College London: London. 1977. MA: MIT Press. M. Middles and Reflexivity.).D.D. A Theory of Aspectuality. . 1989. Cambridge. Vincent(eds. Adverbs of Action. S. Kanda University of International Studies. Cambridge. The internal structure of PPs in Amharic: On postpositions and prepositional case affixes. Ph. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203 -238 Williams. 1993. In: A. A. Tsimpli. Ms. Ph. 1981. 1987. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. I. Clitic Climbing without Climbing out of Seemingly Finite Clauses and Implications for Restructuring. Weerman. 1980. 1993. Tremblay. Linguistics in philosophy. Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change: 427-459. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 127-137. Cambridge University Press. Frankfurt/M. 2001. 2000. Argument Structure and Morphology. 1999. Vendler. T. Timothy. Ph. Kabbaj. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Z. Z. 1998. On the Relation between Morphological and Syntactic Case. University of Tilburg. Current Approaches to African Linguistics 7: 167-178. H. Cambridge. & O. A. 1997. Stjepanović. dissertation. dissertation.D.

In Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 42: 109-128 .D. 1998. 1987. The Relation between Morphophonology and Morphosyntax: The Case of Romance Causatives. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Zribi-Hertz. Nonargument Middles in Dutch. Zubizarreta. MA: MIT. Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameter in Syntactic Theory: 99-124.306 Bibliography Williams.D. PRO and Subject of NP. Williams.). Cambridge. On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax. MA: Blackwell Publishers. In G. The University of Texas at Austin. 1985. Dordrecht: Foris. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax. Zlatić. L. Ph. A. Theta-Theory. Zubizarreta. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 247289. Webelhuth (ed. 1993. 1997. M. Integrating Syntax and Lexical Semantics. Linguisticae Investigationes 6: 354401.1982. dissertation. 1982. Pustejovsky (ed. 1995. Zaenen. dissertation. The “Middle-Se” Construction in French and Its Status in the Triad Middle Voice-Passive-Reflexive. Unaccusativity in Dutch. M –L.W. In Semantics and the Lexicon: 129-161. M. Zubizarreta. In J.-L. Ph. Cambridge. A. L. E. Zwart. 1985.). The Structure of Serbian Noun Phrase. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 297-315. E. J.