PDA

View Full Version : British Israelism/freemasonery

shivalinga
September 5, 2003, 01:57 PM
what is british israelism, and how is it connected to freemasonery ?

it is not about jews living in england.

here is an explanation from David Williams.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Anglo-Israelism (also known as British Israelism) is the unscriptural
theory that Britain and the United States constitutes the 10 lost tribes of
Israel who were carried away as captives by the Assyrians in 722 B.C. It
is held by the advocates of this view that the Kingdom of Israel (consisting
of ten tribes after their separation from the two tribes of Judah and
Benjamin in the days of Rehoboam - I Kings 12:21) never returned to Israel
after Assyrian captivity as did Judah and Benjamin after their 70 years'
captivity in Babylon.
The ten tribes of the Northern Kingdom (Israel) are "lost" after their
capture by the Assyrians in 722 B.C. Through intermarriage with other
nations, their unique national identity is "lost",
Great Britian and the USA are believed to be the Anglo-Saxon ancestors of
the tribes Ephraim and Manasseh (predominantly), so it may be inferred by
British-Israelism that white, English speaking people are really the chosen
people of God.
It is also believed that the Jews who were living in Israel at the time
of Christ are now under a curse for rejecting the Messiah. The Israelites
(the lost 10 tribes) now become the inheritors of God's promises. Ephraim
and Manasseh (the two sons of Joseph) are the major inheritors of the title
"Israelites" along with the other eight tribes whose descendants are spread
in other parts of the world. Because of this dispersal, it is believed that
the Queen of England now sits on the throne of David.
This theory was first put forward around the year 1519.

Some of the main features of this theory are :-

1. The period of "political instability" caused when the Babylonians
conquered Assyria around 650 B.C., allowed the 10 tribes to escape to the
north and east.

2. They fled past the Black Sea, the Carpathian Mts. into Russia,
Scandinavia, Prussia, Germany and then to Great Britain.

3. After the Babylonian captivity, only Judah and Benjamin returned to
Israel. This created a "problem" to British Israelism theology in that
the royal line had to come from the tribe of Judah (which returned to the
south after the Babylonian captivity). Royalty was said to have been
nrought to the ten tribes by the following sequence of events :

4. "The kingly line of Judah (Genesis 49:10) reached Britain when a
daughter of Zedekiah, the last king of Judah before the fall of Jerusalem,
arrived with Jeremiah in 569 B.C. This princess, Tea-Tephi, married the
king of Ireland, who also happened to be a descendant of Judah through
Zarah, Judah's younger son (Genesis 38:30), and so both branches of the
kingly line were established as the Royal House of Ireland. This kingdom
was transferred to Scotland and then to England with James I (James VI of
Scotland) in 1603. Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britian, therefore is a
direct descendant of King David and recipient of his throne." (D. Olinger,
_British Israelism_, Bob Jones University Press)

5. "Jeremiah also brought with him in 569 B.C. the liafail, or Jacob's
pillow-stone (Genesis 28:18) which had been used as the coronation stone of
the kings of Judah (II Kings 11:14 - "pillar"). This stone now rests in
the royal coronation chair of Great Britain in Westminster Abbey. All kings
and queens of Great Britain are crowned while sitting on this chair."
(D. Olinger)

6. The transfer of the kingdom from James VI of Scotland/James I England
(who was of the house of Tudor) to the present queen (Elizabeth II) who is
of the house of Windsor, was achieved through a distant relative, the king
of Bohemia, and then back through George I into the house of Windsor. This,
British Israelists say, completes the lineage back to King David.

7. The eventual emigration to America was said to have occurred with the
pilgrims on the Mayflower.

Because the Northern and Southern tribes are believed to have separated,
there is therefore a great emphasis placed on the distinction that British
Israelists say exists between the use of the terms "Israel" and "Judah".

Herbert W. Armstrong states :

we want to impress here that Israel and Judah are not two names for
the same nation. They were and still are, and shall be until the
Second Coming of Christ, two separate nations. The House of Judah
always means Jews. This distinction is vital if we are to understand
prophecy. Because most so-called Bible students are ignorant of this
basic distinction they are unable to rightly understand prophecy! The
next place where the term "Jew" is mentioned in the Bible, the House of
Israel had been drawn out in captivity, lost from view, and the term
only applies to those of the House of Judah. There are no exceptions
in the Bible.

Now, once an unscriptural perspective has been taken, the next step is to
find a scripture which will support that doctrine. The key verses for
British Israelism is II Kings 17:18-23 - "Therefore the Lord was angry with
Israel and removed them out of His sight, there was none left but the tribe
of Judah only." Here "out of His sight" is interpreted as "disappeared
into oblivion". "There was none left but the tribe of Judah only" is
interpreted as "the descendants of Judah are the only tribes in
existence today."

EVIDENCE FOR THE MIGRATION OF ISRAEL TO THE NORTH AND EAST

Geographical Names.

There are many names of towns in Europe which have names similar in sound
to the "lost" tribes, e.g. Danube, Dneister, Don, Dneiper, Denmark, Danzig
are claimed to be possible towns through which the tribe of Dan passed.
However, by this piece of evidence, it could be suggested that Dan also
went through Vietnam - Danang, DienBien Phu, Don Duong and so forth.

Abraham's Name.

Abraham's name was to be called "Great" (Gensis 12:2). British
Israelists believe this is why the name "Great Britain" arose.

The White Cliffs.

In Isaiah 66:19 the word "Tarshish" means "white border". This is taken
as referring to the White Cliffs of Dover.

The Dream.

The apocyryphal book of II Esdras describes a dream in chapter 13 in which
there is a miraculous parting of the Euphrates river into Armenia where the
10 tribes seemingly remain. However this evidence must be disregarded as
Josephus records in Antiquities XI v2 that the ten tribes of the captivity
were still in Mesopotamia in the first century AD after Esdras was
written, and 750 years after British Israelists claim that they had left for
the north and the east.

The Union Jack.
The Union Jack is claimed to be an abbreviation for "union of Jacob".
The Oxford English Dictionary states that the Union Jack was so named because
of its size - apparantly "jack" was the word used to denote anything small.

Isaac = Saxon and British = Men of the Covenant

By removing the letter "I" from Isaac, Herbert Armstrong derives the word
"saac" which combines with the word "son" to form "Saxon", i.e. "British".
His logic is that "I" should be removed as the Hebrews omitted the vowels
in their writing. This of course, should also require the "a"'s to be
removed. The name "Isaac" is in reality anyway a latinsed form of the
Hebrew name "Yitschak" (as in the late Yitschak Rabin), which would be
significantly more difficult for Armstrong to twist.
"Berith" is Hebrew for the word "Covenant" while "Ish" is Hebrew for "man".
If you join the two, British Israelists claim you obtain the word "British"
which means "men of the Covenant". There is, however, no significant
relationship between Hebrew and English.

Herodatus.

A vital piece of information can be seen from the historical records of
Herodatus. He claims that a fair-haired, fair-skinned people settled on
the shores of the Black Sea (there is, however, no evidence to connect the
ten dark-haired, olive-skinned tribes with those recorded by Herodatus).
There is absolutely no connection between the ten tribes in Mesopotamia and
the tribes around the Black Sea.

EVIDENCE AGAINST THE MIGRATION TO THE NORTH AND EAST

The Stone of Scone.

British Israelists make the claim that the stone under the coronation
chair is the stone that the builders rejected. God strictly forbade the
use of hewn stones in altars (Exodus 20:25). This stone was probably
not the coronation altar of the Old Testament kings.
Secondly, however, Professor A.C. Ramsey of the Geology Department of
London University inspected the stone and identified it as red sandstone,
probably of Scottish origin. The nearest red sandstone to Bethel, where
Jacob found his stone is in Petra, nearly one hundred miles to the south;
the stone around Bethel where Jacob slept is white limestone.

Israel = Jews = Hebrews

From Genesis chapters 1 to 11, God is working on a whole world basis. In
Genesis 12 God begins to work through a man named Abram (later Abraham).
The term "Hebrew" was first applied to Abraham and could also be applied
to all of his physical descendants (Genesis 14:13).
The term "Israel" was introduced in connection with Abraham's grandson,
Jacob (Genesis 32:28).
A third term "Judah" was used in relation to one of Jacob's sons (Genesis
29:35) - Judah was still part of "Israel" - Genesis 49:28 - "All these are
the twelve tribes of Israel."
The term "Jew" was derived from the name of Judah and was first used in
II Kings 16:6.
A member of the tribe of Judah was called a "Jew", and as a descendant of
Jacob he was also called an "Israelite"; and as a descendant of Abraham he
was also called a "Hebrew". All of these terms were applied to the apostle
Paul (Philippians 3:5; Acts 21:39; 22:3; II Corinthians 11:22).
The division of Solomon's Kingdom made it common to use the name "Israel"
in referring to the ten Northern Tribes and to use the name "Judah" in
referring to the two Southern tribes.

EVIDENCE AGAINST THE MIGRATION TO BRITAIN

The Assyrians deported the majority of the captured people of the Northern
Kingdom and mixed the remainder with five other nations (Babylon, Ava,
Hamath, Sepharvain and Cuthah). It was a military tactic for subduing the
conquered people. It was this mixture of the nations that made the
full-blooded Jews avoid dealings with the Samaritans.
Some authors take the position that since the word "tribe" (shebet) is
also translated "sceptre" in several passages (e.g. Genesis 49:10) it may
refer to the ruling class, or the leadership, rather than the entire
population. This theory may be supported by the fact that Sargon II himself
claimed to deport only 27,290 people. Sargon's inscription describing the
deportation has been found at Khorsabad in modern-day Iraq (see James B.
Pritchard, _Ancient Near Eastern Texts_, 1950 ed., p.284-5).
This means that not all of the ten tribes were taken into captivity by the
Assyrians but rather that some remained who were never "lost".

SPECIAL FEATURES ABOURT THE DISPERSAL OF THE JEWS

a) They were scattered among the nations, however they have always managed
to keep their unique national identity. Numbers 23:9 (not reckoning itself
among the nations) and Hosea 8:4-8 speaks specifically of Israel, the
Northern Kingdom.

b) Compared with the populations of other countries, they are relatively few
in number (Deuteronomy 4:27). Their population can certainly not be
compared with the 4-6 hundred million of the British Isles/USA. There is
no more heterogeneous nation in the world than that of the United States.
Or did the "Ephraimites" (Englishmen) become "Manassites" merely by crossing
the ocean in the Mayflower?

c) Did the dispersal of the "ten lost tribes" disorient them enough to
start writing from left to right instead of right to left as was done for
centuries?

THE KEY VERSE EXPLAINED

In the Palestinian Covenant there is a very special place for the Hebrews.
To be out of His sight, indicates removal from _Palestine_ (Israel), i.e.
to be relocated or dispersed. The strict keeping of genealogical records by
the Hebrews would also prevent them from being "lost" and tends to indicate
that they were a tightly knit community which did not mix with the Gentiles.

DID THEY REALLY ESCAPE?

When Babylon conquered Assyria, the slaves did not escape but rather had
a change of masters. This may seem too simplistic a solution but there is
much evidence for it in the numbers of the ten tribes that returned to
Israel.

SPIRITUAL REFUGEES

The books of Ezra and Nehemiah tell of those who returned to Jerusalem,
and the book of Esther tells of those who remained at Babylon.
If the tribes have really been lost then all further records of their
existance would not be available. It will therefore be necessary to examine
what happened prior to the captivity by Assyria and Babylon in order to see
who returned from these captivities.
The following scriptures give direct evidence that the Southern Kingdom of
Judah was in fact a mixture of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin (about which
all agree) and the other ten tribes (which were religious "refugees" from
the Northern Kingdom) :

II Chronicles 11:13-17 - spitual refugees from the North
II Chronicles 15:9 - 913-872 B.C. during the reign of Asa

These scriptures show that many from _all Israel_ left the Northern Kingdom
a long time before the Assyrian captivity. Therefore the Southern Kingdom
now was occupied by all twelve tribes. Members from these twelve tribes
returned after the Babylonian captivity to Israel and were never "lost".
Other scriptures include II Chronicles 17:2; 24:5; 30:1-7, 11, 18, 25;
31:1, 2, 6; 34:1-9; II Kings 25:6-12.
Which tribes did return from the captivity to build the temple, the walls,
and the city itself? Ezra refers to God's regathered people as Israelites
40 times and as Jews 8 times. Nehemiah refers to God's regathered people as
Israelites 22 times and as Jews 11 times. Apart from this, the term "all
Israel" is used in Ezra 2:70; 6:17; 8:25, 35; 10:5 and in Nehemiah 7:73;
12:47.
It is therefore evident that the terms "Jew" and "Israel" are
interchangeable. If Jesus Christ is only "King of the Jews" (the tribe of
Judah only) in Matthew 27:37, then He is not the one that is the Messiah.
The Messiah needs to be "King of Israel" (the twelve tribes) - Matthew 27:42.

SPECIFIC SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCE OF THE RETURN OF THE TRIBES

The following are just some of the many verses possible :

Ezra 2:5 Arah from the tribe of Asher - I Chronicles 7:39, 40
2:10 Bani from the tribe of Gad - Nehemiah 7:15
2:21 Bethlehem from the tribe of Zebulum - Joshua 19:15-16
2:26 Ramah from the tribe of Nephtala - Joshua 19:32-39
2:29 Nebo from the tribe of Reuben - I Chronicles 5:1-8

Luke 2:36 Asher in the Lord
Acts 26:6-7 The twelve tribes
James 1:1 The twelve tribes
I Peter 1:1 The twelve tribes
Revelation 7:4-8 Jews sealed in the middle of the seven years of
great tribulation. Dan is replaced by Levi, but Dan
does reappear during the millenial reign of Christ
Romans 11:26 All Israel will be saved, as it is written.

All Israel (not just Judah as British-Israelism contends) is temporarily
set aside until the "fullness of the Gentiles come in" according to
Romans 11:25-27.

BRITISH ISRAELISM DISTORTS PROPHECY

Adherents of British Israelism appear to have a propensity for date-setting.
Lt. Col. W.G. MacKendrick in his book, "The destiny of the British Empire and
the USA (1921), dated Armageddon from 1928 to 1936. He further states that
the US should seek help from Japan in the battle, since the Japanese, too,
are Israelites (as "samurai" sounds like "Samaria") (D. Olinger).
Literally scores of prophecies and promises would have to be ignored or
"spiritualised" in order to "make them fit" the British-Israel scheme
of things, for example, Deuteronomy 4:27-31; Amos 9:11-15; Hosea 1:10-11;
2:14-23; 3:4-5; Isaiah 2:1-4; 14:1-3; Ezekiel 20:33-44; 34:11-31; 34:40-48;
Micah 4:1-7; 7:9-20; Zechariah 2:4-13; 3:1-10; 8:1-23; 8:12-14.
The first 69 "weeks" of Daniel's vision (Daniel 9) applies specifically to
the nation of Israel. The seventieth week likewise is specifically for the
Israelites.
shivalinga
September 5, 2003, 02:05 PM
this is the homepage for Laurence Gardner,
Grand Poobah for the European Council of Princes.

http://graal.co.uk/

Many european nobility are (they think they are)
supposedly in the bloodline of King David, and Jesus,
the many books on this topic, "holy blood holy grail",
"the Da vinci code' etc, are all about the Priory of sion/knights templar/freemason
conspiracy to install
a king of royal(holy) blood over the planet !

ther are many pretenders to the throne, according
to the authors of "holy blood,holy grail",
the knights templar were the miltary arm
of this conspiracy run by the mysterious group
of "descendents" called the "priory of sion".

in their book they state that there was a schism
between the priory and the knights templars
and the two groups split, with the templars
evolving into Freemasonery, and the Priory
remaining hidden.

this is from Laurence Gardner,
official geneologist of many european royal
familes, from his books "genesis of the grail kings"
and "bloodline of the grail kings".

"In the context of our talks, we have stepped beyond the bounds of the Bible to witness
the alchemical and scientific process which facilitates the genesis of the Grail Kings. This
line of succession from Cain, through Egypt to King David and onward to Jesus, was
purpose-bred to be the earthly Purveyors of the Light. They were the true Sons of the
Gods, who were fed firstly on Anunnaki Star Fire from about 3800 BC and,subsequently,
on "high-spin" metal supplements from about 2000 BC. In short, they were bred to be
leaders of humankind, and they were both mentally and physically maintained in the
"highward" state: the ultimate dimension of the missing 44 per cent-the dimension of the
Orbit of Light, or the Plane of Sharon.
Only during the past 150 years or so, and more specifically during the past 80 years, have
the great storehouses of Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Syrian and Canaanite records been
unearthed from beneath the desert sands. Firs-hand documentary evidence from before
Bible times has now emerged on stone, clay, parchment and papyrus, and these many tens
of thousands of documents bear witness to a far more exciting history that we were ever
told. Had these records been available through out the generations, the concepts of a
particular race enjoying a single Divine revelation would never have arisen, and the
exclusivity of Jehova-which has blinded us for the longest time, setting us in warlike
fashion against those of other faiths who follow their own traditions- would never had
taken such an arrogant hold.

Gradually, as new discoveries are made, it is evident that we are now emerging from the
darkness of our preconcieved but unfounded notions. Even so, our centuries of Church-
led indoctrination make it very difficult to discard the restrictive dogma of inbred third-
hand tradition in favour of a greater enlightment from those who were there at the time.

The truly inspiring prospect is that the learning curve has still not ended. Just as a single
glacier is but a continuation of age old activity, so too are the ancient wisdoms that now
fall to us one by one, with each new facet of learning ready to be stacked upon the former
knowledge.

Fortunately, the dawn of consciousness is already behind us and, although some will
choose to look backwards beyond its veil, many will step with vigor into the new
millenium to witness a bright new sunrise - a revelation of unbounded possibility and a
restoration of our true universal inheritance."

------------------------------------------------------------

"
J.R.R. Tolkien's The Lord of the Rings is one of the most enchanting and successful tales
of all time. First issued in the 1950s, this famous trilogy could just as well have emanated
from the Dark Ages or medieval times, for it has all the qualities and attributes of the
most ancient Grail and Ring traditions. This was made possible by the fact that Tolkien
(an Oxford professor of Anglo-Saxon and English language) had the legendary wealth of
ages at his fingertips and moulded his story accordingly.

In considering the history of the Ring Quest, its parallel association with the Quest for the
Holy Grail becomes increasingly apparent, as do the origins of fairies, elves, pixies,
sprites, gnomes and goblins. Ring lore is also deeply rooted in many of the best loved
nursery tales, and provides the essential facts behind numerous time-honoured characters
of popular legend.

Grail stories are generally associated with Arthurian knights roaming the Wasteland in
search of the sacred relic. But the genre also embodies many other questing tales,
incorporating such characters as Cinderella, Robin Hood, Sleeping Beauty and Count
Dracula. Each account holds its own separate mystery and fascination, but it is not
generally understood that they all stem from a common historical base which is rooted in
the ancient culture of the Ring Lords.

Even though some of the themes have their origins in very old lore, the majority of these
tales were newly slanted from the Dark Ages onwards, when the Church set its sights
against the Ring tradition. This was especially the case from medieval times when the
persecution of heretics was in full swing, leading to the brutal Inquisitions which began
in the 13th century.

From around 4000 BC, the Ring was a primary device of the Anunnaki overlords, who
were recorded as having been responsible for the establishment of municipal government
and kingly practice in ancient Mesopotamia. In view of this, it is of particular relevance
that, in 1967, when Professor Tolkien was asked about the Middle-earth environment of
The Lord of the Rings, he wrote that he perceived its setting to be about 4000 BC.

In this respect, the root of Tolkien's popular tale was extracted directly from Saxon
folklore and was not actually new in concept. Indeed, the early Saxon god Wotan (the
equivalent of the Sumerian Lord, Anu) was said to have ruled the Nine Worlds of the
Rings – having the ninth Ring (the One Ring) to govern eight others.

The contested ownership of the One Ring, as related in The Lord of the Rings, is little
different to the enduring quest for the Holy Grail; they are both quests for the
maintenance of sovereignty. But, in both fact and fiction, the Ring and the Grail are each
seen to be misappropriated by those who perceive them as weapons of power.

As the generations passed from ancient Mesopotamian and Egyptian times, the ideal of
dynastic kingship spread through the Mediterranean lands into the Balkans, the Black Sea
regions and Europe. But, in the course of this, the crucial essence of the old wisdom was
lost and this gave rise to dynasties that were not of the original kingly race. Instead, many
were unrelated warrior chiefs who gained their thrones by might of the sword.

The sacred culture of the ancients was, nevertheless, retained in the Messianic line of
King David of Judah (around 1008 BC), whose significance was in his pharaonic
heritage, not in his generally portrayed descent from Abraham and the Shemite strain. It
was because of this particular inheritance that David's son, Solomon the Wise, was
enabled to create his Egyptian-style Temple project in Jerusalem.

This led to a Holy Land revival of the pharaonic and one-time Mesopotamian Rosi-crucis
movement at a time when Egypt was beset by foreign influences, first from Libya, Nubia
and Kush, and then from further afield. Resultantly, the traditional marriage arrangements
of the pharaohs and princesses gave way to diplomatic alliances.

The Rosi-crucis (whose supporters were called Rosicrucians) is often misidentified as if it
referred to a Rosy (or Red) Cross - but in fact the term has a rather different origin. It
stems from the old Greek 'rosi', meaning 'dew', and from 'crucis' meaning 'fire-cup' (as in
the word 'crucible'). Hence, the Rosi-crucis was the dew-cup of fire – or fiery cup of the
waters.

In symbolic form, the Rosi-crucis was the original and longest standing mark of
sovereignty – and this is where the secondary Rosy Cross definition comes into play, for
this insignia was indeed a red cross within a ring. The early Bible writers condemned this
royal device as being the Mark of Cain.

This same emblem was deemed to be symbolic of the Holy Grail, whose representative
form as the Dew-cup (or Chalice) emanated directly from the Sumerian word 'gra-al'.
This defined the 'nectar of supreme excellence' – the prestigious legacy of the Anunnaki
queen Nin-kharsag, great mother of the kingly bloodline.

Originally, and for the longest time, the Ring was a symbol of perpetually divine justice,
which was measured by the Rod. In ancient depictions various Sumerian overlords, kings
and queens are individually portrayed holding the Rod and Ring devices - characters such
as Marduk and Lilith, Shamesh, Ur-Nammu, Ashur, Samael and others from the 3rd and
2nd millenniums BC. In some instances the Rod is clearly marked in calculable units
(like a modern ruler). In Babylonia it was referred to as the Rule – and the one who held
the Rule was the designated ‘ruler’: which is from where the governmental term derives.

In time, rather than holding the golden rings, the sovereigns began to place them on their
heads where, from a general course of ornate embellishment through the ages, they
ultimately became crowns, while the Rod (or Rule) evolved into the royal sceptre. In the
course of this, the Rosi-crucis emblem of the cross and circle also became a solid object –
a cross surmounted on a sphere – to become the Orb of sovereign regalia.
In all the Grail romances, and in the tales of the Ring, the message is relentlessly clear: in
the wrong hands, both the Ring and the Grail can bring disaster. The power of the Ring
has to be withstood, otherwise it will enslave its master, whereas the Grail will retaliate
with a vengeance if misused. Either way, the moral is the same in that, ultimately, power
is self-destructive when achieved through selling one's soul. Consequently, the Ring can
be a halo or a crown, but it can equally become a noose.

There is, however, an essential difference between Tolkien's 'One Ring', which is
portrayed as dark and divisive, and the Golden Ring of Grail romance, which is a ring of
love and enlightenment. The latter (the ring with which Arthur made his vow to
Guinevere) was further symbolised by the iron-clad ring of knights who sat at the Round
Table – a Ring that was broken (leading the land into chaos and waste) when Guinevere
was unfaithful to Arthur with Lancelot.

Prior to the year 751, kings of the Grail succession were priests in their own right; they
were priest-kings, known as Fisher Kings. But, when their rights to priesthood were
undermined by the Church, the legacy was forsaken in all but the Gaelic realms."

shivalinga
September 5, 2003, 02:09 PM
the stewart family is THE scottish rite masonic family,
and of course believe they are holy and sacred rulers-to-be
because of their descent from the ancient
holy sacred rulers, the bloodline of "authentic"
Kings.(sumerian,King David,Jesus etc)

The Stewart Kings while in Britain and later while in exile were the very forefront ot the
Scottish Rite Freemasonry. The Scottish Rite was founded on the most ancient of all
arcane knowledge and Universal Law. Their Breton heritage was closely allied to the
noble families of Boulogne and Jerusalem. This back ground was largely Templar
inspired.

During the reign of Charles I and Charles II the 'invisible college' of the Royal Society
emerged. The 'college' revealed many great scientific discoveries of all time. The
Freemasons and Templar posed a hugh problem for the Puritans. The puritans were very
narrow minded people who accused many innocent people of witch craft that lead to the
death of the innocents.

The 'invisible college' brought out discoveries such as; the Copernican heliocentric
principle of the solar system, Boyles Law, Halley's Comet, Law of Gravity, Laws of
Motion and the invention of the reflecting
telescope.
The Scottish Rite taught many freedoms like every country in the UK should have their
own parliament, schools should be free to the public, public libraries, freedom of religion
and freedom of brotherhood.

The Scottish Rite became very popular in America and France during the Colonial days.
After Bonnie Prince Charles was put down at Culledon, America was talking
independence. The United States declared their independence based on their teachings of
the Scottish Rite.

The exiles from Culledon were mostly Freemasons. There was a group of Knights
Templar better known as the 'unknown superiors' that were banished. Most of these men
were sent to the Colonies. These men helped to shape the struggle for independence.
General George Washington and Benjamin Franklin were both Knights Templar.

Once the United States won their independence, they wanted George Washington to be
president. Washington refused by telling them the people want a monarch of the Holy
Bloodline. Representatives of the USA were sent to France to invite Bonnie Prince
Charles to become the King of the new formed country. Prince Charles declined the offer
due to his age and ill health. There was no one else who was of legitimate bloodline to
become the King so George Washington was elected the President.

The Scottish Rite is still upheld to the day. Freemasonry spread through out the world.
The Shriners which is a part of the Freemasons had some of the best hospitals in the
world.

A military religious order that began thousands of years ago by the Nazarenes had
survived through the ages to be known as the Scottish Rite. The order had it's days of
darkness and many days of light. But the members of the Scottish Rite continue their
search for enlightenment with the theory, ' be good to all mankind and protect the great
gifts God has bestowed upon them.'

On March 26, 1371, The Royal House of Stewart was founded by King Robert II of
Scots. Before taking on the crown, they had served as hereditary "Stewards" to the
previous Scottish kings, including Robert the Bruce, and that is where the family name
(later corrupted into "Stuart") came from. They have been one of the most prominent
Grail families in history, and their official guardians were the Knights Templar.
According to Laurence Gardner, the family's current historiographer royal, "The Stewarts'
maternal forebears were seneschals in Brittany, and they were of the same ancestral stock
as the earlier Merovingian Kings of the Franks, in descent from the Royal House of
Judah." As his best-selling book Bloodline of the Holy Grail claims, "Their Scots lineage
was of the Arimathea succession, and their Breton heritage was that of Christ himself,
through the Fisher Kings." Their coat of arms contained the fleur de-lys, the Lion of
Judah, and the unicorn, whose horn supposedly represented "the virile Jesus."
After the death of England's Queen Elizabeth in 1603, James VI of Scots was chosen as
her closest living relative, and invited to become king over England as well. Britain was
in Stuart hands until James' son, King Charles I married Henrietta Maria, daughter of
French King Henri IV, and more importantly, a Catholic. Anglicans and Puritans in
parliament were both enraged, and the tension that this caused resulted in civil war
between the parliamentary Roundheads, lead by Oliver Cromwell, and the royalist
Cavaliers, who were loyal to the king. The Roundheads won the day, and after hanging
King Charles, Oliver Cromwell appointed himself as the dictatorial "Lord Protector",
dissolving parliament and enacting martial law to enforce his sanctimonious rules.
Cromwell died in 1658, and his son Richard succeeded him, only to be overthrown two
years later by King Charles Stuart II.

Charles II was a popular king, and it was under his patronage that the Masonic "Invisible
College" (A.K.A. "Royal Society") was formed. However, when he was succeeded by his
brother, King James VII (II of England) more bad luck ensued. For when James issued
his Declaration of Liberty of Conscience, granting freedom of worship to all British
citizens, he was deposed by the Whig parliament and run out of town. The reigns of
power were offered to his daughter, Mary, and her husband, the Dutch William of
Orange. This resulted in the rise of a new, Masonically-influenced Royalist opposition
known as the Jacobites (reminiscent of the "Jacobins" of the French Revolution.) Over
the next several years they staged a number of attempted insurgencies on behalf of James
and his successors, James Edward Stuart (The Old Pretender), and later grandson Charles
Edward Louis Stuart, better known as Bonnie Prince Charlie. The latter campaign
culminated in the "45" of 1745, in which Charlie's force of 2000 men won three battles in
Scotland, invading England as far as Derby. They were defeated at the battle of Culloden,
however, and Prince Charlie fled back to exile in France.

Afterwards, Prince Charlie's inheritance was said to have passed onto his brother Henry, a
Catholic cardinal who died childless, supposedly ending the line of succession. This is
what has gone down in history ever since. However, what has been ignored is that
Charles was married at the time of his death, and had a legitimate son, Edward James
Stewart, whom Charles had declared his successor in his most recent will. And over the
years, the bloodline has been kept intact, resulting six generations later in Prince Michael
James Stewart, who in 1976 returned to Scotland to reclaim his inheritance. Now Prince
Michael and the Royal House of Stewart are making a comeback, with an independent
Scottish monarchy at the forefront of their agenda. In the pages that follow, we offer an
in-depth interview with both Prince Michael and his industrious American Ambassador,
HE Sir Scott Stewart. The result is a startling look into family secrets that have been
passed down from generation to generation, secrets which have a profound importance to
humanity at large.

shivalinga
September 5, 2003, 02:12 PM
of course, being the legitimite rulers that they are,
they will do things by hook or by crook, after all
the rest of us are commoners, or even sub species.
How the KKK got into the U.S. Justice Department

April 4, 1998 marks an extraordinary double anniversary, one that highlights the still-
ongoing struggle between two irreconcilable traditions in American life. One is a
tradition of the American ideal at its best: the tradition of the Lincoln revolution, as it was
carried forward in the twentieth century, by America's greatest civil rights leader, Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr.

The other tradition is that of British-sponsored anti-American treason, personified by the
Confederate General, Southern Jurisdiction Scottish Rite Mason, and Ku Klux Klan
founder, Albert Pike. The Pike legacy still exists today, under various guises: the FBI of
the J. Edgar Hoover tradition, which is engaged in a racist campaign of frame-ups against
African-American elected officials all across America; and the radical jacobinism of
Black Nationalism, which came to the fore as the result of Dr. King's assassination, and
which parades today under the banner of a "rainbow coalition."

Nobody can fully appreciate the still-unfolding struggle over the American ideal, without
knowing the essentials of the struggle between the two, contending forces represented by
Martin Luther King and Albert Pike.

It is, therefore, no small irony that April 4, 1998 marks the 30th anniversary of the
assassination of Dr. King, and also the 100th anniversary of the U.S. Congress's
treacherous passage of a bill authorizing the erection of a statue, on Federal government
property in Washington, D.C., of the traitor Albert Pike.

King and the Lincoln tradition
President Abraham Lincoln's policies were responsible for making the United States into
the world's greatest industrial power. He reversed the "free trade" doctrines by which the
London-allied opponents of the American Revolution had expanded slavery, to the
detriment of American industrial power. He introduced high tariffs to foster steel mills,
government financing of railroad construction, free land and education to create
independent, scientific farmers.

Martin Luther King was firmly rooted in this tradition. He pointed out, for example, how
the advance of human rights depends on technological and economic progress:

"Many of the problems that we are confronting in the South today grow out of the futile
attempt of the white South to maintain a system of human values that came into being
under a feudalistic plantation system and which cannot survive in a day of democratic
egalitarianism.

"First, if the South is to grow economically it must continue to industrialize. We see signs
[then, in the early 1960s] of this vigorous industrialization, with a concomitant
urbanization, throughout every southern state. Day after day, the South is receiving new
multimillion-dollar industries. With the growth of industry the folkways of white
supremacy will gradually pass away.
"This growth of industry will also increase the purchasing power of the Negro, and this
augmented purchasing power will result in improved medical care, greater educational
opportunities, and more adequate housing. Each of these developments will result in a
further weakening of segregation."[1]

King taught that this progress does not occur automatically, but only with the strongest
economic intervention of representative government. He demanded that the nationalist,
activist-government strategy which made America powerful, now be applied to lifting
blacks out of poverty:

"At the very same time that America refused to give the Negro any land, through an act
of Congress our government was giving away millions of acres of land in the West and
the Midwest, which meant that it was willing to undergird its white peasants from Europe
with an economic floor.

"But not only did they give the land, they built land grant colleges with government
money to teach them how to farm. Not only that, they provided county agents to further
their expertise in farming. Not only that, they provided low interest rates in order that
they could mechanize their farms.

"Not only that, today many of these people are receiving millions of dollars in federal
subsidies not to farm, and they are the very people telling the black man that he ought to
lift himself by his own bootstraps."[2]

By contrast, "when the Negro migrated [northward, following the abolition of slavery],
he was left to his own resources . . . herded into ghettos, left in unemployment, or
subjected to gross exploitation within a context of searing discrimination."[3]

What King taught, corresponds to what most Americans knew very well 100 years ago.

Pike: creation of the `indigenous' KKK
Patriotic nationalists continued Lincoln's economic program after the President's 1865
murder. Post-Civil War Reconstruction regimes in several Southern states, led by freed
black slaves and allied whites, began to put through measures of industrial and
agricultural development.

But, the British and their allies in the former Confederacy struck back, using London's
modus operandi of creating "indigenous" insurgencies, to wield against their political
enemies. This was the technique that Lord Palmerston perfected in the mid-nineteenth
century: He deployed a veritable zoo of national, religious, and ethnic insurgencies,
through agents such as Giuseppe Mazzini, the better to retain British global geopolitical
control.[4]

After Lincoln's death, a covert movement known as the Ku Klux Klan, beginning in 1867
in Tennessee, overturned the Reconstruction regimes with violence and riots,
assassinating those loyal to the United States, torturing and killing black people who
asserted rights which black and white Union soldiers had secured in the Civil War.

Many years later, when the criminals were no longer in danger of punishment for these
crimes, some "inside stories" of the post-Civil War KKK were published, glorifying the
Klan in order to re-create it in the twentieth century. A few years after a United States
national monument had been erected in Albert Pike's honor, the leading pro-KKK
historian, Walter L. Fleming, disclosed and praised the kingpin role that Pike had played
in the Klan's terror spree against U.S. law.[5] (An academic darling of the eastern
Anglophile elite, Fleming was considered the pre-eminent historian of Southern
Reconstruction.)

Pike was the KKK's "chief judicial officer," Fleming wrote; Pike thus ruled officially
over the Klan's internal disciplinary or counterintelligence department. In the KKK birth-
state of Tennessee, Pike was the president of the Bar Association and publisher of the
main racist newspaper.

But it was as "Sovereign Grand Commander" of the Scottish Rite, the recognized boss of
the southern white freemasonic order, that Pike exercised the great clandestine power that
welded the KKK together. Fleming cites Pike's masonic colleagues and Klan co-founders
as the main sources for his KKK history. Pike's successor as Scottish Rite masonic Grand
Commander, Congressman James Richardson, introduced the 1898 House resolution
authorizing the Pike statue; Richardson had been Speaker of the Tennessee House of
Representatives in the heyday of the Ku Klux Klan power in that state.

In defense of the Klan insurrection, Fleming writes that "the ex-Confederates . . .
naturally [formed] secret associations . . . for self-defense." Fleming then furnishes
European precedents for Pike's KKK: "the Carbonari of Italy, the Tugendbund and the
Vehmgericht of Germany, the Klephts of Greece, Young Italy, the Nihilists of Russia, the
Masonic order in most Catholic countries during the first half of the Nineteenth Century,
Beati Paoli of Sicily, the Illuminati, etc." Such groups are "textbook cases" of the British
colonial and secret service tradition of manipulating "indigenous" people.

A Massachusetts tory, Pike went south to incite whites against the Union; he helped lead
the Knights of the Golden Circle, which made armed, filibuster attacks against Mexico
and Cuba, and organized the Southern secession. As a Confederate general during the
Civil War, Pike was in charge of enticing American Indians to war on the United States;
his atrocities and war crimes led to his arrest by the embarrassed Confederates, and an
1865 indictment by the United States for treason. Pike fled to Canada, remaining there
under the protection of his British Empire sponsors until the heat was off.[6]

When Pike returned to the South, the old Knights of the Golden Circle logo was
transmuted into the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan--the title taken from the Greek kuklos,
or circle. Pike's Arkansas indictment for war crimes against American soldiers was swept
aside by the power of Pike's own clandestine terrorist movement over the Southern
justice system. Well known in European occult circles for his satanic writings, a sybarite
of massive girth, Pike died in 1891.

A resum� of this quality, today, would surely qualify KKK founder Pike as a leader of
contemporary movements such as the Chiapas "indigenous rebellion" against Mexico's
nationhood.

The Pike statue and war with Spain
U.S. Rep. James Richardson, the masonic Grand Commander, introduced House
Resolution 178 on March 10, 1898, to permit his Scottish Rite to erect on Federal
property a huge memorial statue honoring Albert Pike, a mass murderer who had worked
for several decades to overthrow America's laws and government. This outrageous
initiative was timed to coincide with a racist war frenzy then being pushed by the faction
promoting the Pike statue.

Twenty-three days earlier, on Feb. 15, 1898, the U.S. battleship Maine had been blown up
in the harbor at Havana, Cuba, killing 260 men. This mysterious explosion has never
been explained, but lurid headlines blamed the government of Spain, which still held
Cuba as a colony.

At this time, the Boston tory/Wall Street banker/Southern Klan faction advocated Anglo-
Saxon racial solidarity with imperial Britain, in line with Cecil Rhodes and the British
Round Table's demand that America give up its silly Revolution. This Anglophile faction
was co-sponsoring, with the British secret service, an anti-Spain insurgency in Cuba.
Since the 1840s, the transatlantic anti-republic faction had procured wars and mercenary
filibuster raids into Mexico, Central America, and Cuba, aimed at expanding the slave
territory, and consolidating a Southern secession movement.

During the 1890s, these Anglophile traitors created and operated a new Cuban
"revolutionary" movement, in the tradition of Pike's Knights of the Golden Circle. The
nominal leader, Jos� Mart�, resided in New York City and was an activist in the
insurrectionist networks of Lord Palmerston's masonic trained dog, Giuseppe Mazzini.

The sponsoring clique in the United States included:

Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge, descendant and political heir of the tory anti-Union intriguer
George Cabot;

Assistant Secretary of the Navy Theodore Roosevelt. His beloved uncle and naval
strategy adviser, James Dunwoody Bulloch, had been arrested as a masonic filibusterer in
Havana harbor back in 1854. Bulloch advised nephew Teddy from London, where
Bulloch was in exile for having arranged Britain's building of a pirate fleet of
Confederate ships to attack U.S. commerce during the Civil War;

The Scottish Rite masons and kindred masonic and British secret service circuits.

This Anglophile clique demanded that their pet Cuban revolutionaries be supported by
U.S. troops in expelling Spain from Cuba. The object was neither an independent Cuban
nation, nor expansion of the United States to include Cubans as American citizens.
Rather, the Caribbean was to be subject to the imperial power of the London-New York
banking axis, and to be a permanent adventurers' staging ground for subversion against
the entire Western Hemisphere.

American patriots had always fought against these schemes. Abraham Lincoln had
opposed the 1846-48 U.S.-Mexican war, and, as President, had aligned the United States
with Mexico against the British-French invasion of 1861. Lincoln's nationalist
successors, such as James Garfield (President in 1881) and William McKinley (President
1897-1901) were allied with Ibero-American nationalists and economic protectionists,
against British free trade and British-backed irregular warfare.

We now present the chronology of the Pike statue project, and related developments, in
the context of the power struggle then taking place.

On Feb. 15, 1898, the battleship Maine blew up.

On Feb. 25, President McKinley's Navy Secretary, John D. Long, took the afternoon off--
a fatal mistake. Senator Lodge came to the Navy Department, to work with Assistant
Secretary Teddy Roosevelt, who was Acting Secretary for the remaining three or four
hours of the day. Using Roosevelt's temporary authority, the pair put the U.S. Navy on a
war footing, sending telegrams and cables to all ships at sea, to consuls, to Navy yards
and factories. They ordered ammunition, called on Congress to authorize sailors'
enlistment, and ordered the European, South Atlantic, and Pacific squadrons to prepare
for battle positioning. The cable to clique-member Adm. George Dewey, ordering the
redeployment of his Pacific Ocean battle fleet to prevent Spain's ships from leaving the
Asian coast to defend the Spanish-owned Philippine Islands, was the final act, making
war with Spain a virtual certainty.[7]

On March 10, 1898, while the country was gripped by "Anglo-Saxon" war fever, the Pike
statue resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives. It was subsequently
introduced in the Senate by Henry Moore Teller of Colorado, a member of the Supreme
Council of Pike's Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Southern Jursidiction.

On March 31, 1898, Teddy Roosevelt wrote to British strategist James Bryce, exulting in
his actions to reunify America with the British Empire:

"It will give me great pleasure to meet Mr. [George Macaulay] Trevelyan [British
Mazziniite historian], not only because he is a friend of yours, but because of my
admiration for his father [Sir George Otto Trevelyan, former British admiralty secretary];
and I shall like much to meet the Webbs [Fabian socialist leaders Sidney and Beatrice
Webb] also.

"I have had a very busy time, but anxious only in the sense that I fear this nation will not
do its duty. . . . We should drive Spain from the Western World. . . . I cordially sympathize
with England's attitude in China, and I am glad to say that there seems to be a gradual
coming together of the two peoples [Britain and America]. They certainly ought to come
together."

On April 4, 1898, the Pike statue was authorized by the House, and on April 5, by the
Senate.

On April 11, 1898, President McKinley, who was resisting the intriguers' pressure to
make war, asked Congress for authority to intervene in Cuba to establish peace between
the government and the rebels. "It involves . . . hostile constraint upon both parties to the
contest, as well to enforce a truce as to guide the eventual settlement," said the President's
message.

The Scottish Rite's Senator Teller was a longtime partisan for the Cuban insurrection.
Teller now introduced an amendment smoothing away remaining Senate opposition to
war--it declared that the United States "disclaim[ed] any . . . intention to exercise
jurisdiction or control over said island except for the pacification thereof--and a
determination when that is accomplished to leave the government and control of the
island to the people thereof." The Teller Amendment secured Senate passage of the
declaration of war, April 25, 1898.

Teddy Roosevelt went to his Cuban war as a volunteer officer, and his newspaper friends
puffed up his exploits into heroism. He was made the Vice Presidential running mate in
McKinley's re-election bid in 1900. They were inaugurated in March 1901; six months
later, McKinley was shot, just as his nationalist predecessors Lincoln and Garfield had
been.

McKinley died on Sept. 14, 1901, and Theodore Roosevelt assumed the Presidency. This
was a huge victory for the British, in their bid to regain control over the United States. Its
impact is still being felt in America today.

Teddy Roosevelt's takeover occurred just in time for completion of the Albert Pike
memorial statue, dedicated on Oct. 24, 1901. Two days later, the Scottish Rite Supreme
Council were received in a body by the bullet-installed President Roosevelt, an ardent
fellow mason. They went from the White House to the grave of Albert Pike for a
celebration.[8]

The real story of the FBI
President Teddy Roosevelt set to work immediately to reverse Lincoln's nationalist
policies; he created the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a coercive instrument for that
purpose, as we shall document below.

Under Roosevelt, the nation was told that the western frontier was closed; that
"conservation," rather than agro-industrial development, was the future. Government land
was withdrawn from public use; steps were taken to overturn Lincoln's programs to
create family farms, railroads, and mines. British-backed financier Edward H. Harriman
illegally used vast land grants for speculation, with Roosevelt's blessing, then paid for
Roosevelt's election in 1904. British-run financier J.P. Morgan seized control over the
great industries--steel, electricity, railroads--that had been created by Lincoln's
nationalists; Morgan's trusts were undisturbed by Teddy Roosevelt, despite his false
"trust-buster" reputation. And, TR flouted U.S. laws calling for cooperation with Ibero-
American nations, using Morgan's and Harriman's employees and agents for a proxy war
that broke off the province of Panama from Colombia, to build a canal on terms pitting
the United States against its southern neighbors.

Key to the creation of the FBI as a KKK police-state apparatus, was an operation to
destroy Oregon's Sen. John H. Mitchell, an old Lincoln Republican, who led
Congressional opposition to all Roosevelt's outrages, speaking out against the
international banking syndicate running TR's policy.[9]

But Roosevelt got the U.S. Attorney in Oregon indicted, and his new special prosecutor,
Francis J. Heney, aided by private detective William J. Burns and members of the Secret
Service, were used to falsely prosecute Senator Mitchell and scores of Mitchell's political
allies. A later government investigation disclosed the methods used to force witnesses to
give false testimony and to pack juries with Mitchell's enemies in this politically
motivated prosecution. These are among the reports to Roosevelt's agents on prospective
jurors: "Convictor from the word go," "Socialist. Anti-Mitchell," "Would convict Christ,"
"He is apt to wish Mitchell hung."[10]

Mitchell was convicted of the "crime" of his law firm having accepted $1,700 fees in
aiding citizens to press claims to public land. He was defamed in the press. Congress
understood itself now subject to Roosvelt's detectives, who were "to spy into the private
lives of members . . . and to collect information to be held as a political club."[11]
Mitchell found himself without defenders. He was politically destroyed, and died before
he could appeal.

With such opposition out of the way, the time was now ripe for the creation of a
permanent national secret police. On Dec. 17, 1906, Teddy Roosevelt shifted his Navy
Secretary, Charles J. Bonaparte, to become Attorney General. Bonaparte told Congress
that the Department of Justice must be given "a force of permanent police . . . under its
control."

On May 27, 1908, Congress reacted by prohibiting all Executive departments from using
Secret Service agents as policemen. Then on July 26, 1908, Attorney General Bonaparte,
on Teddy Roosevelt's instructions, ordered the creation of an investigative agency within
the Department of Justice; this later became known as the Federal Bureau of
Investigation.

At issue here was the fundamental question, shall men be ruled by an unelected oligarchy,
or shall self-government order society, in conformance with the dignity of every human
being as in the image of God?
Charles Bonaparte was the grandson of Napoleon Bonaparte's brother Jerome, King of
Westphalia. Napoleon had dissolved his brother's marriage, and Charles's Baltimore
grandmother had spent the rest of her life desperately asserting the claim that Charles's
father was of royal blood. Charles inherited the family's royal jewels, and, before
Roosevelt brought him into the government, he used to ride each day to his investment
house behind a liveried Negro groom, carrying a solid silver lunchbox. His brother,
Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte, was an officer on the staff of Emperor Napoleon III,
throughout the British-French invasion of Mexico and their joint support for the
Confederate rebellion.

Charles was immersed in the society of Anglophiles and their London betters, in the
belief that the American white rabble, immigrants, and Negroes had usurped control
rightfully belonging to the aristocracy.

Teddy Roosevelt and Charles Bonaparte had united as activists in the Civil Service
Reform League during the 1880s. Instigated by Lord James Bryce, this was the London-
Boston-Wall Street-Confederate axis, promoting a "clean" permanent bureaucracy,
chosen by the bankers and their news media, to administer government instead of the
"corrupt" Constitutional system of elected officials and their appointed men. What Lord
Bryce and his American followers most objected to were the urban political machines
whose leaders fulfilled the needs of their voting constituents--Irish, German, and other
immigrants who carried with them hostility to the British Empire and the demand for a
better life; and freed blacks, who were still determined to avail themselves of Lincoln's
reopening of the American Revolution.

Charles Bonaparte despised the spirit of the Constitution. He commented on due process
of law: "Need anybody cry if an officer's revolver does now and then save our Courts the
trouble of trying a burglar, and cut off his chance of `burgling' again when released or
escaped from prison?"

On the subject of the hanging of Negroes by mobs, he said: "I believe that very few
innocent men are lynched, and, of those who have not committed the past offense for
which they suffer, a still smaller proportion are decent members of society. It is, of
course, an evil that the law should be occasionally enforced by lawless means, but it is, in
my opinion, a great evil that it should be habitually duped and evaded by means formally
lawful."[12]

Albert Pike's day had indeed come. A permanent anti-Constitutional bureaucracy and spy
system had been established. This arrangement was sustained by the financier oligarchy,
as witness the editorials of the New York Times (a newspaper which J.P. Morgan had
recently moved under the ownership of what became the Ochs-Sulzberger-Warburg
family combination, that is, the present-day owners). Under the headline, "The Negro
Question," the Times editorialized on May 1, 1899 on why lynching and the new laws
ending blacks' right to vote were not so bad:

"[Foreigners are] shocked and amazed at the news of the outrages in Georgia [lynching
Negroes]. . . . No language can be too severe for the condemnation of the inhuman spirit
shown by the mob. . . . Nevertheless . . . it is not impossible to exaggerate the
significance of the [commission] of these crimes. Much of what significance it has
depends on comparison. If the awful cruelty is increasing, if it is excited by a greater
variety of causes, or even if it is not decreasing, the meaning of it is [different] than it
would be if it were . . . diminishing. It is not easy to make an accurate estimate of the
probabilities in this direction, but we are inclined to think that they are in favor of
improvement. Some of the latest cases reported have been of a more atrocious nature than
ever before, but it is certain that they are occasioned by one particular offense or the
belief in that offense. The general treatment of the negroes in the south has clearly
improved. That they are deprived of the right of suffrage more completely than in the past
is not to be defended, but that this is accomplished peacefully and not by violence is a
gain." Other New York Times editorials called for ending black voting rights throughout
the South; this was accomplished at that time through changes in state constitutions and
the passage of "Jim Crow" laws.

When the Lincoln legacy led Congress in 1908 to try to stop the use of the Secret Service
as spies, the Times editorialized: "It was the combination of `land sharks' . . . that
persuaded . . . the House to pass . . . the Amendment which . . . undoes the deterrent and
detective labors of the Secret Service. . . . The Representatives have, however
unwittingly, become the tools of thieves. The Senators are duly warned."[13]

Teddy Roosevelt's U.S. Attorney in New York, Henry L. Stimson, chimed in with a letter
to Charles Bonaparte, complaining that "I should feel as if the fighting power of my
office were almost crippled by such a statute."[14] Stimson typified the power structure
then being assembled in and out of government. A Morgan-Harriman lawyer and later
cabinet member, he was the patriarch of the Harriman and Bush family Yale secret
society, Skull and Bones--a sponsoring center for the British-U.S. "special relationship"
and its associated white supremacy doctrines.

Pro-KKK historian Walter Fleming reminisced in 1903 on the supposed necessity for the
Klan in the South at the end of the Civil War, for suppressing blacks and those whites
who were loyal to the United States: "The very need for such an organization in the
disordered conditions of the time caused the Dens to begin to exercise the duties of a
police patrol for regulating the conduct of thieving and impudent negroes and similar
`loyal' whites. . . ."[15]

Under President Teddy Roosevelt, a force similar to that post-Civil War KKK began to
operate within the Federal government itself, though the Klan itself had died out. In 1915,
President Woodrow Wilson launched the creation of a new Ku Klux Klan, by praising
and showing in the White House the pro-Klan movie Birth of a Nation.[16] Spreading
from South to North with the mass circulation of the film the President had endorsed, the
new KKK would grow to many millions of members.

Meanwhile, also in 1915, the Southern Scottish Rite Masons dedicated their new House
of the Temple in Washington, D.C. Having moved their headquarters from South Carolina
to the nation's capital, they now celebrated their successful installation within the
government they had fought to overthrow.

In later years, the body of Albert Pike would be interred inside one of the Temple's walls.
A few feet away, they built a complete replication of the office and desk of their second
most honored member, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover.[17] So, today, visitors to the
Temple may conveniently pay homage to the twin giants of Klan and Scottish Rite
history, Pike and Hoover.[18]

J. Edgar Hoover's war against King
Given Hoover's link to the Pike tradition, it is no surprise to discover that, during the
1960s, Hoover's FBI ran a guerrilla war against Martin Luther King. FBI agents and paid
traitors swarmed around King, assigned to find or manufacture dirt that could bring him
down. With constant wiretapping, Hoover fed leaks, lies, and gossip to the news media.
The FBI coordinated this onslaught with the Klan faction in Southern police departments,
and the pro-Hoover, anti-black faction--the Anti-Defamation League--within the Jewish
community.

Hoover attacked with three main allegations: financial irregularities, communism, and
sexual misconduct. The financial angle was ineffective and failed. The communism
smear revolved around associates of King who were said to be communists, while
Hoover knew quite well that King was no communist. The FBI slander has been kept for
retailing by King's opponents, who neither know nor particularly care what King stood
for.

King wrote on the subject:

"In communism the individual ends up in subjection to the state. Man becomes hardly
more, in communism, than a depersonalized cog in the turning wheel of the state. The
popularity of communism, lay in the idealistic concern for social justice. With all its false
assumptions and evil methods, communism grew as a protest against the hardships of the
underprivileged. Communism in theory emphasized a classless society, and a concern for
social justice, though the world knows from sad experience that in practice it created new
classes and a new lexicon of injustice. . . . Communism and Christianity are
fundamentally incompatible. A true Christian cannot be a true communist, for the two
philosophies are antithetical and all the dialectics of the logicians cannot reconcile them. .
. ."[19]

Hoover fanatically pursued details of King's sex life. Government officials who knew
about this considered Hoover to be pornographically obsessed. As posthumous
revelations about "Gay Edgar" showed, their estimations were conservative. This
vendetta climaxed in the production of an audiotape, which was mailed to King's home,
combining presumed "buggings" with the suggestion that King should commit suicide.

King's 1968 murder was followed by a relentless FBI cover-up. James Earl Ray was
intimidated into making a guilty plea, on the threat of a certain death penalty were he to
demand the right to a trial. He immediately protested the set-up, but was not allowed to
change his false plea. Martin Luther King's family is pressing Ray's case, to overturn the
cover-up. But as of this writing, the imprisoned Ray is dying of liver failure, while the
Justice Department attempts to stop a trial from finally taking place before Ray dies.

One of J. Edgar Hoover's claims against King, was that Black Power demagogues were
taking over King's movement. In fact, the opposition to King was backed by the FBI
itself, and by high-ranking members of the Anglophile establishment. The FBI-backed
opposition came in all shapes and colors. Consider the provocateur's substitution of "We
shall overrun" for King's slogan, "We shall overcome"; and the police agent's lyrics:

Jingle Bells, shotgun shells,
Freedom all the way,
Oh what fun it is to blast
A trooper man away.

H. Rap Brown declared in 1967: "The white man is your enemy. You got to destroy your
enemy. . . . I say you better get a gun. Violence is necessary--it is as American as cherry
pie."

King denounced such agentry:

"I have often talked . . . with the proponents of Black Power who argue passionately
about the validity of violence and riots. . . . Their bible is Frantz Fanon's The Wretched of
the Earth. . . . In violent warfare one must be prepared to face the fact that there will be
casualties by the thousands. Anyone leading a violent rebellion must be willing to make
an honest assessment regarding the possible casualties to a minority population
confronting a well-armed, wealthy majority with a fanatical right wing that would delight
in exterminating thousands of black men, women and children."[20]

The role of the Nashville Agrarians
The reader may be surprised, at our assertion that black nationalists were deployed
against Martin Luther King and his movement, by the same historical faction that erected
the statue to KKK founder Albert Pike. But that is the core of the British method of
strategic manipulation against the nation-state. (In fact, it goes back to the "divide and
rule" tactic of the Roman Empire.) In America, we can see the traces of this
manipulation, in the fact that the Klan, in its early years, had "some few Negro
members"!

Researcher Stanley Ezrol has written, in an unpublished report: "One of the claims made
by the KKK and their apologists, is that they had no quarrel with negroes who stuck to
their own kind and stayed in their place, but that they had to defend against the
scalawags, carpetbaggers, and the negroes whom they incited. A frequent claim is that
negroes of the better type even joined the Klan." Historian Walter Fleming boasted:
"There were some few negro members, I have been told."[21]
Using Vanderbilt, Rockefeller and Peabody (J.P. Morgan) money, Vanderbilt University
in Nashville, Tennessee, hired Fleming as historian in 1917 and made him dean in 1923.
Under Fleming's tutelage, a political-literary movement called The Fugitives grew up at
Vanderbilt. The new movement aimed to revive the Confederacy and the Old South, but
its financier sponsors applied these degraded precepts to the more general object of
shaping a managed leftism.

The Fugitives became known as the Nashville Agrarians, after they published a 1930
manifesto in a book of essays called I'll Take My Stand, dedicated to Professor Fleming
and committed to "support a Southern way of life against . . . the American or prevailing
way . . . Agrarian versus industrial. . . ."

Nashville Agrarian John Crowe Ransom, a Rhodes Scholar, whose great uncle James R.
Crowe was Pike's masonic and KKK lieutenant and the chief source of Fleming's Klan
history, wrote in an accompanying essay why he backed the British establishment's aims
as regards America:

"England was actually the model employed by the South. . . . England differs from
America . . . most notably in the fact that England did her pioneering an indefinite
number of centuries ago, did it well enough, and has been living pretty tranquilly on her
establishment ever since. . . . Their descendants have had the good sense to consider that
this establishment was good enough for them. They have elected to live . . . in accordance
with the tradition which they inherited, and they have consequently enjoyed a leisure, a
security, and an intellectual freedom that were never the portion of pioneers. . . . Progress
never defines its ultimate objective, but thrusts its victims at once into an infinite series.
Our vast industrial machine . . . is like a Prussianized state which is organized strictly for
war and can never consent to peace. . . .

"Industrialism is an insidious spirit, full of false promises and generally fatal to
establishments. The attitude that needs artificial respiration is the attitude of resistance on
the part of the natives to the salesmen of industrialism. It will be fiercest and most
effective if industrialism is represented to the Southern people as . . . a foreign invasion of
Southern soil."[22]

With this KKK philosophy, Nashville Agrarians fanned out into the New York, Paris, and
other centers of leftist and bohemian culture, and into American universities, North and
South.

One of Ransom's collaborators, William Yandell Elliott, was a Harvard-based kingpin in
the British takeover of the American foreign policy establishment. Among his prot�g�s
were students Henry Kissinger and McGeorge Bundy; with Elliott, they promoted the
view that a world government which prevents industrial progress is needed to avoid
nuclear annihilation. McGeorge Bundy went on to head the Ford Foundation, a longtime
funder of Vanderbilt and the Agrarians, and poured its money into support of anarchists
such as Mark Rudd's Weathermen, Green eco-terrorists, and black cultural nationalist
agents, complete with dashikis. Klan robes, after all, would not be appropriate native
costumes.

Such "Third Worldists," serving as FBI-managed stooges, have nothing in common with
the pro-technology policy of developing-sector nationalists, who are in accord with the
American Revolution and the Lincoln tradition.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Martin Luther King, speech at the National Press Club, Washington, D.C., July 19,
1962. In James Melvin Washington, ed., A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings
and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr. (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1986), p. 100.

[2] Martin Luther King, 1968 speech, tape recording played Feb. 10, 1998 on WGBH
Boston's "Frontline" program, entitled "The Two Nations of Black America," show 1609;
transcript available on Internet at: www.wgbh.org

[3] Martin Luther King, Jr., The Trumpet of Conscience (New York: Harper & Row,
1967), p. 12.

[4] "Lord Palmerston's Multicultural Human Zoo," EIR, April 15, 1994.

[5] Ku Klux Klan: Its Origin, Growth and Disbandment, written and edited by Walter L.
Fleming, incorporating earlier material by J.C. Lester and D.L. Wilson (New York and
Washington: Neale Publishing Company, 1905).

[6] While Pike was thus exiled, President Andrew Johnson declared, "It appears from
evidence in the Bureau of Military Justice that the . . . murder of . . . Abraham Lincoln . . .
[was] incited, concerted, and procured . . . between . . . Richmond, Va., and . . . rebels and
traitors against the government of the United States harbored in Canada."--Proclamation,
May 2, 1865, Messages and Papers of the Presidents (Washington: Bureau of National
Literature, 1897), Vol. VIII, p. 3,505. In the trial convened on May 9, 1865, the U.S.
convicted seven persons of this international conspiracy to murder Lincoln; four were
hanged.

[7] A somewhat candid account of these actions is in Alden Hatch, The Lodges of
Massachusetts (New York: Hawthorn Books, 1973), pp. 50-51. Naval Secretary Long
also wrote at the time, "I find that Roosevelt, in his precipitate way, has come very near
causing more of an explosion than happened to the Maine.. . . Having authority for that
time of Acting Secretary, he immediately began to launch peremptory orders; distributing
ships, ordering ammunition, which there is no means to move, to places where there is no
means to store it. . . . He has gone at things like a bull in a china shop." Quoted in Henry
F. Pringle, Theodore Roosevelt, A Biography (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company,
1931), p. 178.

[8] James D. Carter, History of the Supreme Council, 33�, Ancient and Accepted
Scottish Rite of Freemasonry Southern Jursidiction, U.S.A., 1891-1921 (Washington:
Scottish Rite Supreme Council, 1971), pp. 152-157.

[9] Congressional Record, June 7, 1902, p. 6,441 ff. See also Anton Chaitkin, Treason in
America (New York: New Benjamin Franklin Publishing House, 1985), Chapter 18,
"How Environmentalism Killed the American Frontier," pp. 513-517.

[10] Report by President William H. Taft's Attorney General, George W. Wickersham,
1911, cited in Don Whitehead, The FBI Story (New York: Random House, 1956), pp. 18-
19.

[11] Ibid., p. 19.

[12] Bonaparte was nicknamed "Soup-house Charlie" because of his comments, echoing
Britain's Thomas Malthus, condemning public education: "There is absolutely no
difference in principle between a public souphouse and a public free school." Quotes are
from David Stacton, The Bonapartes (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1966), p. 358.
Most Bonaparte material has been furnished by researcher Judy Hodgkiss.

[13] The FBI Story, op. cit., p. 20.

[14] Ibid., pp. 20-21.

[15] Journal of the Southern History Association, September 1903, p. 328.

[16] The family of the pathetically pro-British Woodrow Wilson had helped organize the
Klan takeover of South Carolina years before, and Wilson had been vice president of the
Southern History Association that printed the 1903 article by Fleming.

[17] The Scottish Rite's Hoover was also an activist organizer of the KKK's college
affiliate fraternity, Kappa Alpha Society.

[18] The Temple, at 1733 16th Street NW, Washington, D.C., is open for tours Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. through 2 p.m.

[19] Martin Luther King, Jr., The Strength to Love (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), p.
93.

[20] Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community, selections in A Testament of
Hope, op. cit., pp. 589-590.

[21] Ku Klux Klan: Its Origin, Growth and Disbandment, op. cit., p. 26.

[22] I'll Take my Stand: The South and the Agrarian Tradition, by Twelve Southerners,
Biographical Essays by Virginia Rock (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press,
1983; first published in 1930 by Harper & Brothers), pp. 3-
shivalinga
September 5, 2003, 02:19 PM
"The committee feels that the link between Cosa Nostra and institutions is mostly through
the "Massoneria" (freemasonry):

The fundamental terrain on which the link between Cosa Nostra with public officials and
private professions was created and reinforced is the Massoneria. The Massoneria bond
serves to keep the relationship continuous and organic. The admission of members of
Cosa Nostra, even at high levels, in Massoneria is not an occassional or episodical one,
but a strategic choice. The oath of allegence to Cosa Nostra remains the pivot point
around which "uomini d'onore" (men of honor) are prominently held. But the Massoneria
associations offer the mafia a formidible instrument to extend their own power, to obtain
favors and privileges in every field: both for the conclusion of big business and "fixing
trials", as many collaborators with justice have revealed."

Commissione Parlamentare d'inchiesta sul fenomeno della mafia e sulle altre associazioni
criminali similari
(CPA: Commissione Parlamentare Antimafia)
Relazione sui Rapporti tra Mafia e Politica, Page 59
Roma, 1993

for the full story
http://www.freemasonwatch.freepress-freespeech.com/mafia.html

shivalinga
September 5, 2003, 02:46 PM
up to date stuff on the mason powers
that be.

http://www.freemasonwatch.freepress-freespeech.com/newsroom.html

"A more modern example of the potential for problems within Masonic lodges is the "P2"
incident in Italy. This involved the masonic lodge Propaganda Massonica (recognised by
the English Grand Lodge in 1972) and its Master, Licio Gelli. A chance discovery by
police involving a financial swindle uncovered a membership of P2 which included 43
MPs (including 3 cabinet ministers), 43 generals, 8 admirals (including all the armed
forces chiefs), all of the heads of the security services, and hundreds of public servants
and diplomats. A subsequent Parliamentary inquiry established that the lodge was the
focus of nothing less than a right wing conspiracy to take over Italy." (Martin Short,
Inside the Brotherhood, London: Harper Collins, 1997)

"From the early formation of P2, he [Gelli] had the active support and encouragement of
the CIA operating in Italy� Excluding Italy there are still branches functioning in
Argentina, Venezuela, Paraguay, Bolivia, France, Portugal� Members are also active in
Switzerland and the USA. P2 interlocks with the Mafia in Italy, Cuba and the USA. It
interlocks with a number of the military regimes of Latin America, and with a variety of
groups of neo-fascists. It also interlocks very closely with the CIA. (D Yallop, In God�s
Name, Jonathan Cape, London, 1984, p117-8) "

"Four programmes on state television (RAI) allege that the CIA paid Lucio Gelli to
"forment terrorist activities. "In the first programme someone described simply as "Agent
Zero" described how [ex-Swedish Prime Minister Olaf] Palme had been caught in a deal
between the CIA and Iran to release American hostages in Tehran. "Palme was a fly in the
ointment so we got P2 to rub him out," the agent said. The second programme, which
showed the gaunt silhouette of "Agent Zero One", alleged that P2 was not wound up in
the mid-1980s, after the arrest of its leader Licio Gelli. "It still exists. It calls itself P7,"
he said. According to the agent, the lodge is till functioning with branches in Austria,
Switzerland and East Germany. "Zero One" has now been revealed by the Italian press to
be Dick Brenneke, allegedly a career CIA officer" (Richard Bassett, Times, 24/7/90)

"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for
that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country
who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along,
whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the
leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and
denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It
works the same in any country. "

Hermann Goering

shivalinga
September 5, 2003, 03:05 PM
http://www.rense.com/general20/unholy.htm

the leadership of the right wing/christian fundamentalist and their
freemason connection.

shivalinga
September 7, 2003, 03:54 PM
http://www.rense.com/general28/brit.htm

shivalinga
September 7, 2003, 04:12 PM
http://www.rense.com/general5/brit.htm

i know this stuff is fantastic,but very real.

"Preface to Milton" or "Jerusalem"

by william blake

(Blake was one of the best known English poets and painters of the late 18th & early 19th
)

And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England�s mountains green?
And was the Holy Lamb of God
On England�s pleasant pastures seen?
And did the countenance divine
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among these dark satanic mills?

Bring me my bow of burning gold!
Bring me my arrows of desire!
Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire!
I will not cease from mental fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand,
Till we have built Jerusalem
In England�s green and pleasant land.

shivalinga
September 7, 2003, 04:48 PM
http://watch-unto-prayer.org/MasonicPlan.html

plan for america ?

shivalinga
September 7, 2003, 04:52 PM
http://watch-unto-prayer.org/GW.html

George Washingtons letters

shivalinga
September 9, 2003, 03:00 PM
earlier i gave a link to Laurence Gardner, Attache
and geneologist to the European Council Of Princes,
a big shot in the freemaosn establishment,
also on his page he claims a close connection to the Hungarian
Dragon Court.

this is them

The Dragon Court

The Imperial and Royal Dragon Court & Order was one of several occult-inspired secret
societies created by the aristocracies of Europe following the formation of the Catholic
Priory of Sion and the Knights Templar in the 12th Century.

During a time of turmoil within the Holy Roman Empire that controlled most of Europe,
these exclusive inner courts and more accessible outer orders were designed to unify the
power of the aristocratic families under the Holy Roman Emperor, against an increasingly
influential Vatican.

The Dragon Sovereignty, also known as the "Rex Deus" fraternity, was created by
Catholic Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund and occultist Vlad the Impaler--the historical
figure behind the Dracula myths. Following alchemical principles, the order sought to
attain mystical powers that they believed to be their birthright, as inheritors of the
bloodline of the Holy Grail. Vlad the Impaler was a prominent member of the Holy
Roman Emperor's court, and while the occult pursuits of the Dragon Court were not
unusual amongst similar aristocratic brotherhoods, it is of relevance today as one of the
longest surviving and most visible of these secret societies. Recent publications from
within the order such as Sir Laurence Gardner's "Genesis of the Grail Kings" outline their
detailed beliefs about the evolution of Man, and are bestsellers at bookstore Barnes &
Noble. These books describe a belief system similar to that of Madame Blavatsky and her
Theosophy movement, which was largely responsible for the esoteric ideas that led to the
Jewish Holocaust:

"In practical terms the concept of this unique fraternity can be traced back to the original
Grand Assembly of the Annunaki in ancient Mesopotamia".

The aristocratic families of the Dragon Court believe their pure blood makes them the
"genetically engineered" and chosen rulers of Man. They believe the natural social order
of Humankind is Feudalism rather than Democracy as "Incompetant self-seeking, middle-
class idiots more often find themselves voted into control of vast social systems".

Much of the European Community recognizes the Dragon Court as an ethnic racial group
and Sovereign State, similar to the secret society the Knights of Malta, who incidently
have Permanent Observer status at the United Nations. By its own admission, the order
has within its ranks Catholic Bishops, Monsignors, and even a Papal Chaplain -
Monsignor Laszlo Esterhazy of the Mariaremete Cathedral in Budapest. Extraordinary
claims by ex-Jesuit priest and Vatican insider Malachi Martin may finally get the
attention they deserve, albeit after his untimely death in 1999. Martin worked in the inner
circles of the Vatican for over twenty years, spoke 17 languages, and wrote many
respected scholarly books. However, his final book claimed an occult conspiracy was
afoot within the Vatican, and that Satanic rituals were conducted within a Secret Church
dedicated to "Lucifer".

The Dragon Court is directly linked to the European Council of Princes - the political
body of the European Grail families, who participated in the formation of the New World
Order think-tank "The Bilderberg Group". Sir Laurence Gardner is both Chancellor of the
Dragon Court and Presidential Attache to the Council of Princes. By their own admission,
the Council of Princes was supported by the CIA in their fight against global
communism. However, the Princes did not fight communism in order to restore
democracy, but in order to reclaim their birthright as natural rulers within a feudal system
that caused so much suffering to the Russian people prior to their revolution of 1917.

The Dragon Court primarily concerns itself with Witchcraft and alchemical Vampirism,
and considers itself the terrestrial incarnation of the pantheon of the Gods.

It's function is to do "the will of the Gods" as interpreted by the Court's hierarchy.
Gardner bluntly elaborates in his book "Genesis of the Grail Kings":

"The Mesopotamian (Sumerian) accounts indicate a rampant population problem which
had to be curtailed. An ancient Akkadian text states that the people had multiplied beyond
any control and were so noisy that Enlil (Annunaki God) could not get any sleep... they
were still lacking the key elements of wisdom and a properly regulated society. There was
no marital institution and there were no rules governing procreational couples. Until 4000
BC, sexual mating was largely a matter of free will, with a freedom of partners... they
were apparently not conditioned to municipal laws and organized social government. The
tablets reveal that Enlil had tried to reduce the population by means of selective famines
and plagues, but without success. And so the Assembley of the Annunaki elected for a
drastic solution that could quickly pave the way to a new beginning. They agreed to flood
the Sumerian region in its entirety".

The genocidal impulse of the Gods doesn't find any difficulty expressing itself in modern
times. No doubt the recent spread of AIDS in Africa is also the handiwork of the
Assembley of the Annunaki Gods.

Presumably so was the naming of the vast mountain range which covers most of South
Africa - the "Drakensberg Mountains".

In a naive attempt to put a human face to the mask that the Dragon Court has worn since
its inception, Chancellor Gardner and Sovereign Grand Master Prince Nicholas de Vere
von Drakenberg reveal much about their Occult philosophy and belief system. Having
been appointed Sovereign Grand Master by the House of Habsburg (former head of the
European Council of Princes Prince Otto von Habsburg), De Vere von Drakenberg is
attempting to make a case with his website "dragoncourt.org", where he openly discussed
the values of the Order - namely Vampirism, Witchcraft and Satanism. His e-book "From
Transylvania to Tunbridge Wells" candidly admits that their forefathers the Knight's
Templar were a "deeply Satanic organization".

This would be of little consequence were it not for the fact that the Knights Templar are
also the founding fathers of modern Freemasonry, and the role model for the Ivy League
secret society "Skull and Bones" of which past President and CIA director George Bush
was a member. President George W. Bush admitted in a Time magazine interview (Aug 7,
2000) that he too is an initiate. When asked to elaborate, he responds "Without revealing
all the great secrets?", then adds that his father told him "These same secret societies are
behind it all".

Earlier in 2000, Yale's "Skull and Bones" secret society featured Sir Laurence Gardner as
a guest speaker.

Gardner's historical writings have recently been approved and sanctioned by the British
Royal Family's invitation for him to join the House of Windsor's "Society of
Antiquaries", the oldest antiquarian society in the world that was constituted by King
George III. Or maybe it is Gardner's extensive knowledge of Witchcraft that caught the
eye of the "Royal Windsor Coven", as De Vere refers to them in his essays - "During the
late 70's and early 80's a series of privately published papers was circulated with material
that originated from the Royal Windsor Coven, with damning criticism of so-called
initiatory witchcraft, and emphatically asserted that the only genuine valid form of
witchcraft was passed down through the blood". No doubt the rise of right-wing
Conservativism in the 1980's was matched by an equal rise in Occultism and Witchcraft.

Magister Templi (Master Templar) De Vere's internal wires are clearly crossed as he
declares "Evil is good, and good is evil".

His venomous view of Humanity is difficult reading:

"Man is thoroughly stupid and dim-witted... and this condition is genetically inherited.
Nurture seems unable to ameliorate what nature has here ordained. Here the idealist
might argue that a eugenic solution mediated through genetic engineering could produce
a more passive, thoughtful population by weeding out the stupid gene and replacing it".

"Leaders are supposed to be able to function at a faster rate than the followers and
thereby anticipate any given direction the system might go in, and plan sensible strategies
that the system might adopt for its well-being".

"To any intelligent person, to any true seer, concepts like white or black magic or good or
evil are irrational, childish nonsense; both in terms of logic and actual fact".

After proving that Jesus was a "Dragon King of the Grail Bloodlines" and a "descendant
of Satan", De Vere pronounces "The Black Mass was the original Christian Mass of Jesus
which the later Catholics stole and sanitised for public consumption".

De Vere assures us that "technically the crime of murder doesn't exist", and comes to the
defense of "paedophiles and Satanists" claiming the current "FBI and Scotland Yard
investigations are undermining the foundation of the Great Western Civilization". The
vampiric rituals "MUST be repeated", the internationally recognized Prince demands.

Through his website De Vere von Drakenberg was accepting submissions of blood
samples to be DNA tested at a top London facility for purity of stock. If the potential
initiate's blood was shown to be of the authentic bloodlines (and no doubt sufficiently
connected politically and economically) they too could join the ranks of the elite
aristocracy and become a Vampire. De Vere's goal is to reunify the old bloodlines and
create a new Master Race, and no doubt reclaim their aristocratic authority. The
elimination of the sub-races would have to be the next priority, as their evolutionary
belief system dictates.

"If the planet is to survive, then social groups must become smaller, and must be ordered
by economic necessity, not by the global tyranny of the so-called Democracy of
Consumerism... By re-introducing their old social structures and values, the Dragons
hope to establish a naturally ordained system of socio-economic interactions between the
Dragon (Aryan) people".

This new community of born-again Aryans is unlikely to be picking De Vere's apple
trees, more likely they will be running transnational corporations, sitting on the secretive
"Bilderberg Group", or any other high-level political-financial-military body. The
aristocrats of Europe are far from impotent, as illustrated by Prince Bernhard of the
Netherland's position as chairman of the "Bilderberg Group" from its inception in 1952 to
1976. His daughter Queen Beatrix regularly attends the Bilderberg meetings, as do other
prominant Eurocrats.

While De Vere's pursuits may sound bizarre, to outsiders the draconian methods of the
Nazis and the demonic nature of the Holocaust sounded equally unbelievable at the time
it was occurring. In 1919 Germany's occult "Thule Society" had 1750 members,
including industrialists, business men, scientists, aristocrats, military chiefs, judges, and
government ministers. Just over a decade later they had funded and created the Nazi
Party, with Adolf Hitler as its leader. The sudden rise to power of Austria's "Freedom
Party" headed by neo-Nazi Jorge Haider will almost certainly have connections to the
Austro-Hungarian "Sarkeny Rend" inner-council of the Dragon Court. For decades
Austria's Prince Otto von Habsburg has been seeking a restoration of the monarchy in
Austria, and undoubtedly the "Freedom Party" is part of the plan. De Vere clearly puts his
money where his mouth is, believing Gardner's earnings from his bestselling book should
be "invested in organisations whose works are the practical expression of the messages
conveyed in the written word".

Stanley Kubrick felt sufficently motivated to dedicate his final years to exposing the
secret occult pursuits of the Power Elite in his movie Eyes Wide Shut. As Sydney
Pollack's character explains to Tom Cruise's Dr. Bill "If you knew who these people were,
you wouldn't sleep so good at night". The same goes for the seemingly idiosyncratic, yet
dangerously influential and ambitious Dragon Court.
Following the publication of Gardner's "illuminating" book, De Vere's no-holds-barred
website, and the subsequent dismissal of Gardner, the Dragon Court apparently spiraled
into schism. The inner council of Sarkeny Rend has side-stepped out-of-the-closet and
proud Satanist Grand Master De Vere by appointing quasi-Catholic "scion" Prince
Michael Stewart as Grand Protector of a rival order at a ceremony at York Manor,
England, which was strangely attended by representatives for Queen Elizabeth II. This
move allowed Gardner to remain in the fold, but has seemingly sent a tremor through the
Dragon Sovereignty. Concurrently a legal challenge has been made by Scotland's
Cardinal Winning to reverse the British law that bans Catholics from the throne, paving
the way for a Stewart restoration. However, De Vere was appointed Grand Master by
Austria's House of Habsburg, also prominent and influential Catholics.

The shadowy world of European secret societies is seemingly as complex as the
Gore/Bush November 2000 Presidential race - no doubt its correct outcome, unethically
decided by the Supreme Court, was of extreme importance to the Power Elite. The Queen
of England's pre-election October visit to the Vatican, the first in 20 years, followed by
the much protested post-election December meeting between Pope John Paul II and neo-
Nazi Austrian leader Jorge Haider (another Habsburg minion) was undoubtedly all part of
the Master Plan, or Final Battle, for absolute power in the New World Order... or at the
very least to allow the back-room boys to consolidate their interests, stay on top of their
respective power pyramids, and maintain their grip on the hearts and minds of Western
civilization. And the rest, post-World Trade Center disaster, is fast becoming history... if
not Armageddon.

As of late 2002, according to the Dragon Court website Prince Nicholas De Vere is
currently suffering from acute paranoid schizophrenia.

De Vere, whose main contribution to the order was alledgedly adapting rituals "to include
the first menstural blood of pre-adolescent girls", has been replaced as his cousin, Baron
Sir Richard Dufton, due to De Vere's condition and his involvement with "Americans
who wish to remain anonymous" with possible links to the "Dragon Order side of the Ku
Klux Klan." Schizophrenia aside, De Vere is now running his own transnational order in
tandem with the anonymous Americans; which means that there are now three Dragon
Courts to choose from, depending on your personal leanings, and of course, that you are
of the Dragon blood.

However, with their claims that a "child of pure blood was born in the late 1980's and is
being raised by the Jesuits", and that "two children with purer blood are residing in Great
Britain", the plot twists are becoming less Shakespearean, and more Hollywood (as in
The Omen) by the day.

shivalinga
September 9, 2003, 03:04 PM
since I got complaints about revealing sources,
here is the source for this and the previous
post.

Meet the Creators

Dr. Marisa Santeria was born in New Orleans and raised by her mother, a nurse, and a
practitioner of the ancient religion of Santeria. Marisa learned early on from her mother
to live by her intuition and to listen to her ancestral spirits who are her guides. Marisa
showed great aptitude for all the sciences as a child, and at twenty two, won a scholarship
to Cambridge University in England where she completed her PHD in microbiology and
virology. Marisa visited South Africa as a volunteer for the Peace Corp. soon after
graduating. She was deeply moved by the plight of millions of AIDS victims who were
beginning to surface at that time. Marisa returned to America close to an emotional
breakdown, but was lucky enough to be introduced to Dr. Simon Peele, who is now her
very close friend. Together, they have worked on the creation of New World Order - the
Movie and this website. Marisa is also writing a book about her experiences with the
AIDS victims of South Africa that is due to be published in late 2003.

Dr. Simon Peele was born in Ireland to a devout Catholic family of ten siblings. His
father, a lay preacher, and his mother, an aspiring operatic performer, instilled in him
deep spiritual values. From an early age Simon longed to become a Catholic priest, and
after a couple of mis-starts at university, he eventually was accepted by the English
College seminary in Rome, where he studied for seven years to become a Catholic priest.
However, just months before taking his final vows, Simon's world was shaken to its core
when a group of close friends were accused of having homosexual orgies. The scandal
was later shown to be unfounded. While attempting to prove his friends' innocence,
Simon discovered a hidden side to the Catholic Church that made it impossibe for him to
take his priestly vows. Simon consequently traveled to India and worked with a Christian
missionary group where his deep compassion and spiritual questioning found a new road
to travel upon. Simon returned to UC Berkeley to study psychology and earned his PHD
in the controversial LSD treatment pioneered in the 60's by Dr. Stanislav Grof. Simon's
interviews with Dr. Grof were published in 1996 under the title "Out There is In Here" by
Rainbow Press. Simon's continued research into the Catholic Church, its history, and its
psychology, found an awaiting ear when he met Marisa Santeria.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Secret History

The Secret History's most important figures are perhaps self-proclaimed Russian mystic
Madame Helena Blavatsky and her American husband Colonel Henry Olcott. The result
of their collaboration would thrust the world into the abyss and cost the lives of millions.
Their Theosophy ideology became popular amongst the middle classes in Germany at the
end of the 1800's, mostly because of its introduction to Eastern religious and mystical
ideas. Blavatsky claimed to have been party to revelations from Hidden Masters called
the "Great White Brotherhood" who resided somewhere in the Himalayas. But Blavatsky
later admitted in letters to her sister that this was a codename for the Rosicrucian
hierarchy who funded her. It is clear her work is influenced, if not sourced, in the work of
Masonic demagogue General Albert Pike - the American South's Sovereign Grand
Commander of the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree of Scottish Rite Freemasonry,
Civil War war criminal, and leading member of the Ku Klux Klan - who revealed
Rosicrucian/Masonic doctrine and its "Aryan heritage" in his unpublished pamphlet
Morals & Dogma (1871) that was distributed to Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret (32nd
degree) Scottish Rite initiates.

Albert Pike is regarded as bringing "order out of chaos" by rewriting the ancient rites of
Scottish Rite Freemasonry, formerly devised by groups in France including the Council
of the Emperors of the East and West (now known as the European Council of Princes)
and the Royal Stewart's Chapter of Clermont, based at the College of the Jesuits, Paris in
1761. Pike modernized these rituals for the modern American leader, and explained their
Aryan source and meaning in Morals & Dogma and numerous other works. At this time
Pike was head of the Supreme Council of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, based in
Charleston, South Carolina, and following the Civil War and dropped charges of treason
against Pike, the Supreme Council moved to Washington DC.

Blavatsky's breakthrough book The Secret Doctrine (1888) was an attempt to popularize
the racist concepts of Rosicrucian belief at a time of great change and turmoil. America
was recovering from the Civil War, and the abolition of Slavery was forcing a redefinition
of the West's perception of Race. The radical decision to reveal the beliefs of the power
elite came at a time when desperate measures seemed necessary. The Priory of Sion
within the Royal Houses of Europe and various occult circles were attempting to create a
movement with their Synarchy ideology, a politicized form of Rosicrucian dogma.
Synarchy advocated government by secret society - an elite of enlightened initiates who
rule from behind the scenes. This found expression through the writings of Joseph Saint-
Yves d'Alveydre, which called for the infiltration of "the three key pillars of society...
political and social institutions, economic institutions, and religious institutions". The
infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion (commonly known by its Old English
variant "Zion") are clearly some form of manifesto for the implementation of Synarchy's
aims, and are signed by the "representatives of Sion of the 33rd degree". Not surprisingly,
the content of the Protocols have much similarity to Albert Pike's central work Morals
and Dogma. Synarchy was opposed to ideas of democracy and social equality, as only the
Synarchists were the "natural leaders".

As the masses of Europe were rising up rebelliously against their feudal overlords, the
Holy Roman Empire was in disarray. The First Reich, founded in 800 by the 'Emperor of
the West' Charlemagne, had been smashed by Napoleon following the French Revolution.
With Napoleon's eventual defeat, the Holy Roman Empire reformed in a weakened and
splintered state. Prussia/Germany took the former Gnostic Cathar regions of Lorraine and
Alsace back from revolutionary France, and established the Second Empire under Kaiser
Wilhelm I. He was allied with the Austrian-Hungarian-Croatian Empire, which was still
under the control of the Grail bloodline House of Habsburg, who had been ruling for the
previous 600 years. Power was still very much in the hands of the Princes of Europe and
the Vatican, who found unity within their occult "Secret Church" that has historically
always existed behind the "Visible Church".

Theosophy was born in 1875, a key time of political upheavals throughout Europe, as
Russia was moving towards revolution, following the examples set by America and
France. The Theosophy movement was an attempt to occultize the newly emerging
industrial and merchant class and provide a spiritual antidote to Marxism straight from
the Rosicrucian philosophy that previously had been for hand-picked initiates only. The
Grail aristocratic families of the Holy Roman Empire were planning to reunify the old
territories and needed the control and support of the managing classes. It is no
coincidence that their plan to "infiltrate Freemasonry and seize absolute control of the
Western World's social, political and economic institutions" as outlined in the Protocols
of Sion appeared simultaneously with the Synarchy ideology and the creation of Madame
Blavatsky's Theosophy movement. As the Protocols stress "Our philosophers will discuss
all the shortcomings of the various beliefs of the manipulated. But no-one will ever bring
under discussion our faith from its true point of view since this will be fully learned by
none save ours who will never dare betray its secrets".

At the turn of the 20th century this agenda was again outlined in the Priory of Sion's
Hieron du Val D'Or that described "a theocracy wherein nations will be no more than
provinces, their leaders but proconsuls in the service of a world occult government
consisting of an elite. This regime of the Great King will be a double hegemony of the
Papacy and the Empire, of the Vatican and of the Habsburgs". This ambitious scheme was
thwarted with the assassination of the Habsburg heir Archduke Franz Ferdinand of
Austria in Belgrade, Serbia in 1914, an event that ignited the First World War.

Theosophy's teachings about enlightened mystics guiding human evolution towards the
creation of a higher super-race, and pseudo-theories about the ancient Aryan civilization
of Atlantis, promoted dangerous racial theories that formed the core of Austrian and
German anti-Semitism.

From an aristocratic background, Helena Blavatsky, the widow of Russian Army General
Count Blavatsky, designed elaborate genetic family trees that clearly illustrated the
superiority of the Aryan people over the other races of the world. These strange beliefs
were heralded by middle class occultists throughout Germany and Austria-Hungary and
merged with their extreme right-wing nationalist politics. Hence, complete reunification
of the Holy Roman Empire, effectively abolished by Napoleon in 1806, became a priority
not only of the ruling aristocracies, but also of the merchant middle classes.

The ensuing horrors of the First World War was an attempt to take France from the
democratic Republicans by a vengeful aristocracy who had seen their brethren murdered
by the French revolution. The new middle-class occultists such as Guido von List and his
Armanen Order, Baron von Sebottendorf and his Thule Society, and Lanz von Liebenfels
and the Order of the New Templars refered to the First World War as a Holy War,
revealing the quasi-religious and philosophical motives of their Hidden Masters. It has
been documented that Nazi party leaders Adolf Hitler, Heinrich Himmler, Rudolph Hess
and Hermann Goering were all members of these occult secret societies. The Protocols of
the Learned Elders of Sion and the Hieron du Val d'Or are proof that a conspiracy of epic
proportions was at play behind the broader political scene.

The end of the First World War resulted in Kaiser Wilhelm I being banished to Belgium
and the removal of the Habsburgs from the throne of the Second Empire--the global
"hegemony of Great King and Pope" was delayed. The Habsburg's reluctant abdication
was upon the insistence of the Allied nations and their Treaty of St. Germaine.
Incidentally, the Order of St. Germaine is the French Royal Stewart equivalent of the
Habsburg's Order of Sion (each laying claim to genetic superiority and Kingship of
Jerusalem) - such is the secret subtext of European war and politics. The magickally
relevant regions of Alsace and Lorraine were promptly returned to the Republic of France
through the Treaty of Versailles, which not so much infuriated a young Hitler, as his
aristocratic Hidden Masters behind the curtain. While their agenda had brutally backfired,
the Great White Brotherhood were by no means beaten, and a simple reversal of the truth
(a common propaganda technique) would lead them ever closer to their goal, and
introduce the world to perhaps their greatest spin doctor.

In his popular book Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler conveniently used the Protocols of the
Elders of Sion to deceptively "prove" that a global conspiracy was afoot - but led by the
League of Jewish Rabbis. This stirred massive anti-Semitism that ultimately justified the
Holocaust to the German people. Earlier in 1919, the newly formed Thule Society had
distributed copies of the controversial Protocols to troops of the White Russian army
loyal to the Czar, in an attempt to blame the Jews for the ensuing Revolution. This led to
the massacre of 60,000 Jews over two years, and was perhaps the beginning of the Jewish
Holocaust. The Rosicrucian Protocols document is still used by neo-Nazi groups
throughout the world to stir anti-Semitism and hate. Even today Rebublican David Duke
promotes these same anti-Semitic theories on his popular website and continues to blame
the Russian Revolution on the Jewish people, regardless of the historical oppression of
the Russian people that motivated this conflict. The fact that Jerusalem's Mount
Sion/Zion is prophesied (according to St. John's Revelation) as the place of the Second
Coming of Jesus Christ is conveniently ignored by these right-wing groups. As is the fact
that the premier secret organization dedicated to this Second Coming, albeit through a
complex and conflicted view of genetic bloodlines and reactionary socio-political
models, is the Priory of Sion.

Although thought by many academics to be a creation of Russian Czar Nicholas II's
secret police, to those aware of occult references the Protocols of Sion clearly show the
hand of the Grail/Dragon sovereignty. It is likely the Czarists altered the texts to include
traditional Jewish terminology that otherwise has no place in what is obviously a
Rosicrucian agenda with Jesuit undertones.
The Yiddish word "Goyim" (meaning Gentile) has been inserted in as many places as
possible, even in places grammatically inappropriate. Written in a tone of lofty
superiority, echoed in the contemporary writings of Nicholas De Vere, the masses are
refered to throughout as "the Mob", "bloodthirsty beasts", "alcoholized animals" and
"cattle". Passages such as "From the premier-dictators of the day the peoples suffer
greatly and bear such abuses, as for the least of them they would have beheaded twenty
kings... unification must be achieved only under our Sovereign rule", clearly reveal an
embittered post-French Revolution power elite planning to restore the "King of the blood
of Sion whom we are preparing for the World".

Also overlooked in the analysis of the Protocols is their similarity to the little heard of
"Secret Instructions of the Society of Jesus", which outline a goal of bringing in a golden
age or millenium with the entire world under the authority of the Pope to enable the
Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Indeed, the Jesuits' Secret Instructions could be
considered a prototype of the Protocols of Sion with its rhetoric of subterfuge such as
"We must inculcate this doctrine with Kings and Princes, that the Catholic faith cannot
exist in the present state, without politics; but that in this, it is necessary to proceed with
much certainty. Of this mode, we must share the affection of the great, and be admitted to
the most secret councils."

"We must be careful to change our politics, conforming to the times, and excite the
Princes, friends of ours to mutually make terrible wars that everywhere the mediation of
the Society will be implored; that we may be employed in the public reconciliation... the
Society afterwards can count on the favor and authority of the Princes, procuring that
those who do not love us shall fear us."

Discovered towards the end of the Holy Roman Empire's Thirty Year War with itself that
resulted in France being given part of Alsace and Lorraine (only to be later reclaimed by
the Second and Third Empires) and cities ruined and millions dead, the Jesuits' Secret
Instructions clearly are an inspirational source for the Protocols of Sion, which would be
written 200 years later following the formation of Ancient & Accepted Scottish Rite
Freemasonry. With passages such as "If the Pope should return as temporal prince of all
the properties; for as much as it is very necessary to extend little by little, with much
secrecy and skill, the temporalities of the Society; and not having any doubt that the
world will enter the Golden Age" there can be no doubt that The Protocols of the Elders
of Sion are the work of the Jesuits, the European Council of Princes, and their
Rosicrucian allies within 33rd Degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry. As outlined in the final
Protocol "Confirming the roots of King David and the training of the King", the
Grail/Christ bloodline conspirators insist that "sensuality worse than all else disorganizes
the capacities of the mind and clearness of views" and should not be a quality of their
King - thus denying any instinctive connection to his humanity in true Jesuit and
Rosicrucian style. There is little in Judaism about the repressing of the senses in order to
achieve any kind of kinghood.

Following the widespread distribution of the Protocols by the Thule Society and Hitler's
protege Alfred Rosenberg, it was the added "Jewish" elements that were seized upon by
Hitler's Mein Kampf and Henry Ford's The International Jew. Conveniently both of these
fervantly anti-Semitic works chose to ignore the Rosicrucian references of the Protocols,
and the fact that the "Return of the King" agenda is not traditionally Jewish or a historical
goal of Jewish Zionism, but the secret goal of the Catholic/Rosicrucian/Grail elites.
Perhaps the popularization of the altered Protocols was an attempt at damage control, and
a pointing of the finger away from the true authors, as their actual neo-feudalistic agenda
was becoming known by political and occult scholars. Or something even more
nefarious: "It is hardly credible that the baddies would reveal their fell purposes so
blatantly", commented Foucault's Pendulum author Umberto Eco on the current recycling
of the Protocols within popular culture and the disturbing rise of "crude forms of racism
of the neo-Celtic kind" -- and yet the use of the Protocols was the primary justification
for the Holocaust and the attempted annihilation of the Jews, who are regarded as the
historical "perfidious Enemy" of both Jesuit and Rosicrucian elites.

Hitler's Third Empire would go one step further than Theosophy, taking Rosicrucian and
Occult theories directly to the working class people of Germany, and openly running the
country according to their principles. Their use of Rosicrucian symbolism, the Swastika,
the Nuremberg rallies/rituals, and inner occult orders within Himmler's "SS", who like
the Knights of Malta and Dragon Court insisted upon a long heritage of pure Aryan blood
before initiation, clearly illustrates how linked National Socialism was with the secret
agenda and beliefs of the power elite. It is clear the Nazi movement was a new approach
to feudalism, by the same aristocratic ruling powers. Realizing that some sense of
revolution must be fulfilled in the ordinary working classes, Nazism gave the impression
of revolution, but was in fact the Restoration of the feudal overlords of the Holy Roman
Empire, and the beginning of the National Socialist deception.

Hitler's personal aide escaped his clutches and fled to Britain. In 1939 he wrote an eye
witness account of the madness of the Third Reich: "What will the social order of the
future be like? Comrade, I will tell you. There will be a class of overlords, after them the
rank and file of the party members in hierarchical order, and then the great mass of
anonymous followers, servants and workers in perpetuity, and beneath them again all the
conquered foreign races, the modern slaves. And over and above all these will reign a
new and exalted nobility of whom I cannot speak. But of all these plans the militant
members will know nothing. The new man is living amongst us now! He is here. Isn't that
enough for you? I will tell you a secret. I have seen the new man. He is intrepid and cruel.
I was afraid of him" - Adolf Hitler quoted from "Hitler Speaks" by Hermann Rauschning.

Hitler could not have expressed the aims of the Protocols of the Elders of Sion or the
Hieron du Val d'Or more eloquently. Today the agenda of the power elite continues using
its network of Occult and political structures - from the unaccountable Bilderberg Group
to the elite of the Dragon Court, from the undemocratic Trilateral Commission to the
transnational Knights of Malta. Through their influence and control the Synarchists
continue to stay on top of the power pyramid, regardless of how much global suffering
and misery is caused, and maintain the anti-democratic structures of a hidden feudalist
system. By his own admission, the new head of the European Council of Princes HRH
Prince Michael Stewart recently replaced HSH Prince Otto von Habsburg of Austria as
chief representative of the thirty three Royal Houses of Europe. These are the thirty three
Holy Grail bloodline royal families who bizarrely claim descent from Jesus Christ (who
they believe was a Dragon high priest/king), and their historical goal remains the same.
But who exactly are their allies?

Has the Western world finally and completely internalized the values of the Great White
Brotherhood?

Again these same secret societies are revealing the inner secrets of their inverted belief
system, in the hope of converting new followers in key positions of influence. Their
philosophers continue to seduce the highest levels of the military, politics, and business,
and reach out to the public through books, lectures, and the internet. While the economic
and political power of 21st Century Synarchy spin doctors such as Sir Laurence Gardner
and Prince Nicholas de Vere is narrow, their esteemed position and knowledge within
occult circles will almost certainly reach many with genuine clout. While most of the
world naively believes democracy has truly replaced feudalism, the concentration of
wealth in the hands of a few, with majority ownership of stocks, bonds and real estate,
and even the 2000 American Presidential elections, proves the contrary. The richest 254
people in the world own more wealth than 47% of the global population.

Right-wing conspiracy theorists mistakenly believe the goal of the secret societies is a
One World Utopia, or Global Socialist State, but this couldn't be further from the truth.
Synarchy's "Global Village" will be ruled by the Dark Lords from their Castles of
Darkness - reigning supreme, uncontested, and as the past has shown, plotting to starve
the poor to feed the rich, while a divided middle-class competes for the scraps. A
historical socio-political model that is the norm in most developing countries.
Undemocratic and inaccessible political and economic organizations - whether corporate
boardrooms or globalization commissions - are the methodology of fascism, and the
enemies of a truly democratic and open World Unity or Global Village.

The biblical struggle against the anti-Christ is not some future event - it is History, past
and present, and symbolic of the struggle between anti-hero and hero, darkness and light,
feudalism and democracy.

The likely consequences of the Occult Conspiracy suggest that the economic, political,
and social decision making of individuals allied with the aims of the European aristocatic
secret society network, whether in the Vatican, the British Crown, the American
Government, European politics, transnational Corporations, or the vast bureaucracy of
Nato's military machine, will consciously or unconsciously reflect their initiation,
indoctrination, and allegiance to the Aryan/Rosicrucian white supremacist perception of
the world.

Having internalized their Rulers of the Universe values, mega-corporations and
conglomerates backed by the WTO and other spurious organizations, are attempting to
hold the world to ransom by copyright patenting essential items for basic human survival,
such as human DNA, genetically modified rice and wheat that is forced upon Third
World farmers, and life-saving AIDS drugs (most of which were developed by public-
funded universities). While the poorest countries face trade sanctions for trying to stay
alive, more elaborate methods of "bio-piracy" are being devised to more effectively steal
the natural resources of our world. As drug companies reach yearly profits of over $1.3
billion each, the power elite's starve the poor to feed the rich methodology continues into
the 21st Century. Even the CIA admits in its recent Global 2015 report that the gap
between rich and poor will grow greater with the effects of globalization. As South
Africa's Nelson Mandela recently asked "Is there a direct link between Africa's poverty,
and the Western world's wealth?" According to Rosicrucian logic, this inequality is not
only necessary, but vital.

The Spider's Web of cause and effect, of safe-guarding interests, wealth, resources and
position, and the seeking of supreme and ultimate power--economic, political, and
magickal--ultimately opposes all progressive moves towards global democracy and
freedom, human rights and social justice, which are perceived as a direct threat to the
New World Order historical agenda of the Great White Brotherhood, and their
reactionary Secret Church, with all its various denominations, royal courts, orders, and
covens, who find unity of purpose and intent through their Aryan white supremacist
belief system.

shivalinga
September 16, 2003, 02:21 PM
finally got the link to the above articles,
much more here, backround on the various
machinations of the occult minded elites
a little history,though not in complete detail.

http://www.geocities.com/newworldorder_themovie/web_of_intrigue.html

Mike Rosoft
September 17, 2003, 03:57 PM
Holy freaking crap!
Jesus F. Christ on a stick!

I have no idea why you have taken so much effort to fill these about 50 pages with bull's
hit. And while we are talking about it, can you say "copyright violation"?

Mike "moderators notified" Rosoft

shivalinga
September 17, 2003, 04:11 PM
well i have to agree it is jive,
but jive that a lot of serious,powerfull people
believe in.
the entire history of the western world is mixed up
with these various beliefs, who is "divinely" given
the right to rule, wars have been fought over these ideas,
the catholic church has undergone inquisitions(albegensian
crusade) to suppress these cults, the puritans,the pentacostals
including pat robertson and phyllis schafly(see the second link below) the entire british
royal clique under Queen Victoria
held these beliefs, the mormon dogma is based on these
beliefs(mormons more or less run the U.S. intelligence
agencies) and the entire freemason/rosicrucian
european royal establishment also have these beliefs,

i agree they are crazy,

there seems to be 2 prominent theories,
the mary/child of jesus
moving to marsellies, then intermarraige with the
merovingians who were originally from the tribe
of benjamin coming through troy,then greece,then
germany into france, creating with jesus' son a continuation
of the royal line from david.

then the other one is that the ten lost tribes moved into
both ireland by sea, and eastern the western and northern europe
as they escaped bondage from the assyrians.
that in ireland the daughter of the davidic line
had married a son of the tribe of dan ,
that marraige became the basis for the royal line.

these mythologies seem to have been invented
by competing gnostic christian sects in western europe,
each claiming more authenticity then the other
by claiming dynastic connection to jesus, the jewish
messiah,not in the deistic version of christ,
in doing so the cult would have the claim to the
gnostic championship ,and also claim royal privalege
over the many jews
that lived in western europe at the time.

the merovengian claims of jewish ancestory
from troy also may have been partially true,
jews had a long presence in europe, the myths created
by not writing the lineages and histories down,
and the tendency to hyperbole in order to gain
power and authenticity over others couold also have played
into creating these myths .

i'm searching for clues as to the origins of these
ideologies, right now my thought is that they were both made up
to give authenticity to gnostic christian cults that were persecuted
by the catholics, they came together to fight the church
as the knights templars, then split up again
over doctrine of who is more royal,
the british-israel doctrine may be in fact the coming out to the
public of a more ancient belief, even william blake wrote
about jesus in england.

http://www.rense.com/general28/brit.htm

http://watch.pair.com/brit-israel.html

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/biblefraud1.html

http://www.thebiblefraud.com/internalgif/sample.htm

mormons also
http://www.thejournal.org/issues/issue78/mormon.html
they have roots in freemasonry,and british israelism

shivalinga
September 18, 2003, 03:59 PM
this site has nicely put together links to all of the various
stories and ancient dogmas of the various secret
societies,which pretty much are all based
on the concept of a royal lineage from either aliens,Gods
Cain, then
King David through Jesus and continuing
to this day.

http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.com/grail.html

vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.