The Urban Social Pattern of Navi Mumbai, India

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Urban and Regional Planning

John Browder, Chair Wendy Jacobson Paul Knox

April , 1998 Blacksburg, Virginia

Keywords: urban social pattern, Navi Mumbai, Bombay, urban planning - India Copyright 1998, Malathi Ananthakrishnan

The Urban Social Pattern of Navi Mumbai, India Malathi Ananthakrishnan (ABSTRACT) This research thesis examines the emerging trends in urban social patterns in Navi Mumbai, India. Unlike the other planned cities of India, Navi Mumbai was specifically built as a planned decentralization of a large metropolitan city. The research focuses on explaining the urban social pattern of this particular case study. An urban social pattern reflects the social characteristics of the urban setting. In the case of Navi Mumbai, the government had a social agenda of promoting a social pattern based on socioeconomic distribution rather than an ethnic one. Analysis of the data provides an insight to the results of this social agenda, and provides a basis to frame new ones. Thus, the study not only addresses a basic research question, but also has policy implications. The research involves a comprehensive review of secondary source material to establish the theoretical framework for the research. The review also involves an extensive inspection of urban social patterns across the world to better contextualize this particular case study. The research puts forth a model that explains the social pattern of Navi Mumbai by social area analysis using variables, which are drawn from social aspects of any city and indigenous factors of Indian settlements. The model depends not only on statistical analysis but also on interpretation of local conditions. This research situates the emerging social pattern in geographic literature in developing countries. This research was supported in part, by a grant from the College of Architecture and Urban Studies, Virginia Tech.

Acknowledgment

I would like to take this opportunity to thank my Advisor and Chair of my committee, Dr. John Browder. He was supportive of all my efforts to successfully complete this thesis. It would not have been possible without his help. Thank you also to my committee members, Dr. Jacobson and Dr. Knox, for the time and effort they contributed.

Thanks also due to everyone in Navi Mumbai who helped me collect the data and all relevant information. Special thanks to Ms. Adusumilli, Senior planner, CIDCO, Mrs. Raje, Chief statistician, CIDCO, Dr. Venkatachalam and Dr. Sengupta at IIT-Bombay and Dr. BanerjeeGuha at the University of Bombay. I would also like to thank Prachi and Avesh Tapde for their hospitality in Navi Mumbai.

Dr. Dyck and Dr. Bohland clarified many of my conceptual and analytical queries. I would like to give my appreciation for their support. I would also like to thank Dr. Randolph and Dr. Schubert for having made a grant available for me to carry out the field research.

I am also grateful to my good friends Inga, Maneesha and Elda for not only helping me out with proof reading and other mundane things, but also for being there during the ups and downs of the entire process. I would like to thank my family for always encouraging me to think and my fiancé for his patience.

7.3 Indian Cities 3.3 Multiple Nuclei Theory 3.1 Western Cities 3.5 Sociocultural Factors 3.3 Religion 3.2 Sector Theory 3.5.4 Language 3.4 Data Collection 4.2 Cluster Analysis .5.1 Concentric Zone Theory 3.5.6 The Built Form 3.9 Conclusion 4.1 Descriptive Analysis 4.7 Theories of Urban Social Patterns 3.9 The Reality of Implementing the Plan 2.5 Implications of the Sociocultural factors 3.1 Caste 3.8.10 Conclusion 3.7 Social Agenda in the Planning of Navi Mumbai 2.3 The Creation of Navi Mumbai 2.5.3 Organization of the Thesis 1 2.4 The Draft Development Plan of 1973 2.2 The Planning History of Bombay and the Greater Bombay region 2.7.2 Third World Cities 3.1 Research Problem Statement 1.8. Research Design……………………………………………………………… 38 4.1 Social Area Analysis 4.Table of Contents 1.4 The Evolution of the Urban Form of Indian Cities 3. 20 3.6 Design Principles of Navi Mumbai 2.5.7..1 Introduction 3.1 Introduction 2.5 Methodology 4. 3 2.5 Development Potential of the Site 2.5.8.2 Urban Form and Urban Pattern 3.2 Significance of Thesis 1. The Research Setting…………………………………………………………. The Conceptual Framework………………………………………………….3 Factors influencing Urban Form 3.5. Introduction………………………………………………………………….3 Operationalization 4.2 Class 3.8 Case Study of Urban Social Patterns 3.. 1.2 Hypothesis 4.8 Plan Implementation through the Public Administrative Framework 2.

Glossary of Terms Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G 77 .3 Principal Component Analysis 4.3.1 Regional Scale 6.2 Descriptive Analysis 5.1 Principal Components Analysis 5.5.2.3 Summary 6.4.4.2.1 Socioeconomic Status and Sector Theory 6.4 Sub-regional Scale – sectors 5.2.5 Conclusion 6.3 Discussion 5.5.4. Interpretation / Discussion…………………………………………………… 6.3.2 Cluster Analysis 5..1 Principal Components Analysis 5.3 Discussion 5.4 Potential Utility of the Research 43 65 7.2 Cluster Analysis 5.4 mapping and Overlays 4. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………… 74 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………….2 Sub-regional Scale 6.6 Data Analysis 5..3.1 Introduction 5.3 Regional Scale – nodes 5.3 Ethnic Status and Multiple Nuclei Theory 6.4.2 Family Status and Concentric Zone Theory 6. 5. Presentation of Data………………………………………………………….

10 5.5 5.4 5.21 Title Population Density of Bombay Immigrant population of Bombay Land Fragmentation in 1970 Household Income and Capacity to Pay Population Density in Various Sectors of Bombay Land Use of Navi Mumbai Constructs and Variables Survey Sampling Constructs and Variables Work Force Number of Earners Occupational Classification of Workforce Household Income Location of Education Institutions Level of Education Male Population Female Population Family Size Type of Housing Ownership of House Housing built by CIDCO Housing built by Private Enterprise Year of Occupation Previous Place of Residence Religion Language Spatial Pattern of Variables Attributes of Principal Components Attributes of Principal Components page 4 5 6 8 16 17 39 40 43 44 44 45 46 47 47 48 49 50 51 52 52 53 53 54 55 56 57 60 61 .16 5.17 5.6 5.List of Tables Table number 2.20 5.1 5.11 5.2 5.3 2.15 5.2 2.3 5.12 5.1 4.19 5.6 4.7 5.1 2.18 5.9 5.2 5.4 2.14 5.5 2.8 5.13 5.

4 3.18 5.3 3.1 3.11 5.7 5.6 3.9 5.7 3.1 5.19 6.4 5.3 6.6 3.5 3.2 5.List of Figure Figure Number 2.1 6.6 5.5 2.16 5.2 3.10 5.5 Title Expansion of Bombay Twin City Across the Harbor Development Potential of the Site Nodes of Navi Mumbai Institutional Hierarchy in Implementation of Development Plan for Navi Mumbai Land Use of Navi Mumbai Circle and Swastika Town Plans Concentric Zone Theory Sector Theory Multiple Nuclei Theory Urban Social Patterns Plan of Delhi and New Delhi Asian Ports Latin American Cities Pattern of Indian Cities Theories of Urban Social Patterns and Corresponding Case Studies Distribution of Single-earner Families Frequency of Families with Income range Rs.9 3.2 2.14 5.13 5.10 5.3 5.8 3.2 6.12 5.1 2.4 2.4 6.15 5. 2651-4450 Frequency of Families with at least one individual with Secondary Education Frequency of Male Population in the age group 25-45 Frequency of Households with 4 or 5 members Frequency of Houses built by CIDCO Frequency of Housing built by CIDCO Frequency of Houses built by Private Enterprise Frequency of Tenure Frequency of Bombay as Previous Place of Residence Frequency of Hindus Frequency of Muslims Frequency of Marathi Frequency of Malayalam Components in Rotated Space Loadings of Principal Components Dendrogram using Average Linkages between groups Loadings of Principal Components Dendrogram using Average Linkages between groups Cluster of Nodes of Navi Mumbai Average Linkage between Factor Scores Average Linkage between Variables Clustering of Sectors of Vashi Average Linkage between Factor Scores Page 2 5 7 11 15 18 26 28 29 29 31 32 32 33 34 36 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 56 57 57 59 59 60 62 63 65 66 66 67 68 .17 5.5 5.8 5.3 2.

6.18 Average Linkage between Variables Hypothetical Sector Pattern for Socioeconomic variables Distribution of Number of Earners Distribution of Income Hypothetical Concentric Pattern for Family Status variables Distribution of Ownership of Apartment Hypothetical Multiple Nuclei Pattern for Ethnic variables Distribution of Households speaking Marathi Distribution of Households which follow Islam Clustering of Sectors Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 68 69 69 69 70 70 71 71 71 72 72 72 72 .16 6.6 6.12 6.8 6.10 6.11 6.9 6.13 6.14 6.15 6.7 6.17 6.

the study of human settlements has an encompassing view of all the activities it supports. Navi Mumbai (New Bombay) is one of the first planned new town developments built for a diverse. planning regulations. religion. The study of the physical form and structure of cities is the study of urban morphology. this paper will augment existing knowledge about social configurations of planned urban development in Asian regions. A policy emphasizing a uniform distribution of the population is the ideological orientation of the government. An interpretation of the emerging social pattern reveals something of the social character of the city. This research aspires to contribute to basic research in social geography. This research determines how the present social pattern relates to various theoretical frameworks. land use and ownership. migration. and the housing market.Chapter 1: Introduction 1. Traditional Indian cities have evolved over the centuries.2 Significance of Research A holistic approach to the study of settlements involves understanding the interrelationships between their constituent elements at a certain period of time. race. street patterns. Therefore. Physical and economic landscapes. The purpose of this thesis is to delineate and interpret the social pattern of Navi Mumbai. and political events may influence the physical design and pattern of a city. Various processes influence the social pattern of the city. Different characteristics are drawn from the factors influencing the physical design and cultural aspect of the city. land use pattern and ethnic classifications will be used as key variables to study the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. Socioeconomic factors. These include the ethnic composition of the city. and their social pattern is characterized by residential segregation based on ethnic. The pattern of Navi Mumbai will be studied at different hierarchical spatial levels: regional (node / township) and sub-regional (sector / neighborhood). religious and linguistic classes. The pattern suggests not only the outcome of . The literature review shows that a specific study of Navi Mumbai has not been previously documented. Urban patterns occur because of repetition of these elements. The urban form of a city is primarily the result of the characteristics of its physical and social design as well as socioeconomic and political forces.1 Research Problem Statement The overall objective of this thesis is to determine what common patterns. Thus. The basic research here involves the search for an urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. Why is such a study significant? The urban form of the city influences behavioral. housing characteristics. economic and social processes within it (Vance. 1990). middle class population in India. It is a synthesis of the spatial relationships of various elements. if any. 1. The urban social pattern is one of the many aspects of the urban form. exist in the urban social pattern of planned towns in India.

This first chapter is the introduction. .3 Organization of the Thesis This thesis is divided into seven chapters. the research setting. which provides the problem statement and the broader objectives of the thesis. The third chapter is a comprehensive review of the secondary sources to establish a context of the research question. The urban social pattern also serves as a framework for further research. 1. Interpretation and discussion of the analysis and its relationship to the theories discussed in the third chapter is done in the sixth chapter. Chapter seven draws to conclusion the thesis with a review of the problem statement. The presentation of data and its analysis is in the fifth chapter. methodology. The second chapter provides the background to the particular case study used in the research.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 1: Introduction 2 the policy. but also variables that influence this pattern. its contextual framework. analysis and interpretation and the broad outcomes of the thesis. the basic research has many applications in longrange planning in Navi Mumbai. Thus. The fourth chapter outlines the methodology used for analysis of data and explains the data source and method of data collection.

and providing efficient infrastructure (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. The city of Source: Dwivedi and Mehrotra. Bombay had its beginnings in a series of fishing villages until it was taken over by the Portuguese in the 16th century. Urbanization and subsequent suburbanization of Bombay have created a linear city such that the central business district (CBD) and residential areas have become further and further apart (Figure 2. Navi Mumbai was designed to provide a better quality of life. 1957 trading posts. India. The geographical area of Bombay is an island. The East India Company encouraged Indian and East India Company merchants to settle in Bombay. 1995. This range of activities led to crowding at an BOMBAY NAVI unprecedented scale. the King of Portugal gifted the Bombay islands to King Charles II of England when King Charles married Catherine Braganza. In 1668. now as rulers. South Bombay is the center of India’s 1950 banking and service industries.1 Expansion of Bombay The East India Company.2 The Planning History of Bombay and the Greater Bombay region Bombay is not a city built on Indian traditional planning ideas. the shipyard modernized and the city fortified. established in 1972. This planned decentralization was the outcome of efforts by the government to make Bombay more “sustainable” (Bombay Metropolitan Regional Planning Board. was interested in developing the town in a methodical manner. 1995). textile mills and government offices have made it the preeminent port of Western India. Bombay was then established as a trading post. a Portuguese princess. especially to the middle and lower class of people. is a new planned city across the harbor (of Bombay) from Bombay. The harbor was strengthened.Chapter 2: The Research Setting 2. In Bombay. 1965 Bombay’s high concentration of docks. squatter settlements all over Bombay became the way of life.1 Introduction Navi Mumbai (New Bombay). There was a . the East India Company had taken on the new role of ruler (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. By the 1780s. the Crown rented Bombay to the East India Company. In 1661. The first settlement was established in the southern most tip of the island. 2. 1995).1). Figure 2. for Arabian MUMBAI Sea those who could not afford to make the 1910 long commutes. 1973).

Land use zoning and the concept of floor space index were incorporated for the first time. In 1966.000 houses. concentration of industries and offices in certain pockets of Bombay. the Bombay Improvement Trust was created. The Post-War development Committee of 1945 and the ’Master Plan in Outline’ prepared by Albert Mayer and N. The large migrant influx contributed to the overcrowding (Table 2. Greater Bombay came into existence only after the Bombay High Court Act of 1945. and 24 percent of the one and two room tenements were over crowded. 1995). Adequate water is a serious problem. This enclosed the Town and Island of Bombay. 1992). Commuter distances had become larger because of increased suburbanization with no change in location of the CBD. In 1967. This committee appointed the Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board to develop the concept further (Gadgil Committee. They recommended: i the creation of a new town on the mainland across the harbor i develop the suburbs of Bombay further Bombay had reached a level of unmanageable growth by the 1960s. Housing deficits are ever widening and slums like a cancerous growth can be seen anywhere and everywhere. in 1896. lack of housing and infrastructure and high land values were the major problems identified. .Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 4 strong development of mixed land use settlements. These formal government bodies were the beginning of a conscientious effort to regulate the growth of Bombay (Banerjee-Guha. the Bombay Municipal Corporation was established. 1965). Many parts of it are not even tolerably clean and healthy. (BMRPB. Table 2. which would encompass the Fort area as well as the suburbs of Bombay. Transportation is threatening to break down…. some thought was given to ’Greater Bombay’. 1995). In 1865. Bombay’s infrastructure facilities were stretched to the limit. In the 1960s. 1973) Population increase. the suburbs and 42 villages within the definition of the new city limit (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. V. 1986) The Bombay Metropolitan Regional Planning Board in its report wrote Bombay the Beautiful is no more beautiful. The development acts of 1954 and 1964 emphasized the need to relocate industrial activity from the island to the mainland (CIDCO. By the early 1900s.2). Commercial and residential areas were mixed because many merchants carried on business from home (Tindall. and. the Gadgil Committee strongly recommended a multi-nuclear growth using the creation of a new town across the harbor. However. The 1967 development plan estimated a housing shortage of 131. 1995). various planning committees were formed to develop a regional plan for Bombay. 1995). Modak influenced the development of Greater Bombay for the next two decades (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. the Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board set up two committees to study the development of Bombay.1 Population Density of Bombay 1881 1891 1901 1911 1921 1931 1961 1971 Area in acres 14247 14281 14342 14575 15066 15480 16751 16720 Persons / Acre 54 56 54 67 78 75 165 184 (Various Census Reports for Bombay in Kosambi. the Port of Bombay.

3 Sirish Patel.2 Immigrant Population of Bombay 1881 1891 1901 1911 1921 1931 1961 1971 Population 773196 821764 776006 979445 1175914 1161383 2771933 3070378 % 72 75 77 80 84 75 72 63 Immigrants Males per 151 171 162 189 191 181 160 149 100 Females (Various Census Reports of Bombay in Kosambi. the Bombay Metropolitan Regional Planning Board recommended considering a twin city across the harbor. 1986) The concentration of industries and offices at the CBD and suburbs like Chembur and Andheri created unequal development. engineer and planner. Pravina Mehta2 and Shirish Patel3 who presented to the government a proposal in 1964 for constructing new growth centers across Bombay harbor on the mainland (Figure 2. rocketing land prices prevented the acquisition of land for public purposes (BMPRB. Unhealthy and insanitary conditions for 1 million slum dwellers was the result of inadequate housing stock. 1 2 Charles Correa is a prominent architect and urban designer in Bombay. This was in the form of the Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board’s recommendation that a new city be designed within the Bombay Metropolitan region to facilitate the decongestion of Bombay (Correa.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 5 Table 2. The implementation occurred through ’correct’ political and bureaucratic channels in 1969. .2 Twin City Across the Harbor Source: CIDCO. 1997). then this would not be possible (BMRPB. Lack of adequate water supply and sewage facilities worsened conditions. In a final attempt. If the new city was too far away. 1973. It is a narrow piece of land bounded by the Western Ghat mountain ranges on the north. Pravina Mehta (late) was a structural engineer.2). 1973). 1993). air pollution and mixed land use (UNCHS. 1973). 2. south and east. was incharge of the planning and design of Navi Mumbai (1970-75).3 The Creation of Navi Mumbai The prominent authors of the ’twin city concept’ were Charles Correa1. and New Growth Centers Growth Centers of Bombay Town Center Arabian Sea Harbor of Bombay Figure 2. The site that was finally chosen was across the harbor from Bombay island. Also.

1973). Owners were notified about the government’s proposal. >4000 sq. CIDCO used certain development principles in its design. Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (MR&TP Act). The land notified for acquisition for Navi Mumbai was under private and government ownership (Table 2.4 The Draft Development Plan of 1973 The task of planning and developing Navi Mumbai was entrusted to the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO). was designed to accommodate new industrial and commercial activity as well as for secure and affordable housing to workers. financing physical and social infrastructure through land sales. km. The Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board created the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) in 1970 to implement its ideas. 1985). Patel and Mehta designed this regional plan based on three basic objectives: a planned new development. m. m. The new town. m.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 6 the Arabian Sea on the west (CIDCO. The plan hoped to reduce homelessness in Bombay and provide slum dwellers a better life as well as absorb migration from the countryside (Correa. 1995) CIDCO notified all private owners about the compulsory acquisition. 1966. and improving Bombay by drawing off pressures for growth into the new area (Patel. It is a self-contained city independent of Bombay although there is still a visual connection to Bombay. a government agency explicitly set up for this purpose. Navi Mumbai covers an area of 344 sq. >1000 sq. The regional plan was approved in 1970. >10000 sq.3) Table 2. m. 1997). >500 sq. It was hoped that the nearness to Bombay would facilitate the relocation of people from Bombay (CIDCO. 1973): i polycentric pattern of development i acquisition of all land to have better control of the environment and to use land as the main resource for development. The government would acquire land under its power of eminent domain under Section 22. wholly owned by the State Government of Maharashtra (CIDCO. The first step was to identify all the land that needed to be acquired for Navi Mumbai. CIDCO is a limited company. Section 31(6) under the same act gives the government the power to specify land use and proceed with development. 1973). Correa. km) (number) (number) (number) Government 10137 All Private 16677 18412 3338 1579 90 Marsh(wetlands) 84 (CIDCO. They were (CIDCO. 2. The first task of CIDCO was to prepare a development plan for the new town. comprising of a number of nodes (townships).3 Land Fragmentation in 1970 Ownership Area (sq. The finality of the approved Development Plan ensures that the pressure and friction which would develop to obtain land use changes for particular land holdings would be largely eliminated . 1973).

raise the living standards and reduce the disparities in the amenities available to the different sections of the population. leaving enough room for flexibility. container port at Nhava-Sheva. 2. • the plan for a modern. 4. 2. 1973). This was not entirely true. To support a statewide Industrial Location Policy which will lead eventually to an efficient and rational distribution of industries over the State and a balanced development of urban centers in the hinterland. Panvel-Uran rail and road links. • the existence of two municipal corporations at Panvel and Uran. The development plan took into account the Figure 2. To provide physical and social services. 5. To provide an environment which would permit the residents of New Bombay to live fuller and richer lives in so far this is possible. and also attract some of Bombay’s present population. 1973: 10): 1. free from the physical and social tensions. and transport corridors along Thane-Belapur. no new document was ever prepared. which are commonly associated with urban living.3). CIDCO acquired all the land after settling disputes about compensation (CIDCO. Although the main objective of the design of Navi Mumbai was to create a selfsufficient urban environment. 1995). The Draft Development Plan remains the guiding document in use even today. 1995). Although five minor amendments were made to this Draft Plan. Nevertheless. and major law and order problems did occur. Reduce the growth of population in Bombay city by creating a center that would absorb immigrants.5 Development Potential of the Site The chosen site had various development potentials (Figure 2. 1995): • the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) Estates at Turbhe and Taloja. • the newly commissioned bridge across the Thane creek. These were (CIDCO. To provide a physical infrastructure which prevents ethnic enclaves among the population. 3. it also hoped to improve the quality of life of Bombay.3 Development Potential of the Site Turbhe MIDC Industrial Estates Arabian Sea Creek bridge Taloja Panvel Nhava-sheva . The objectives were (CIDCO.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 7 (CIDCO. The success of Navi Mumbai was thought to depend on the adequate creation of jobs (CIDCO. The Draft Development Plan gave only broad guidelines. • the Thane-Pune National Highway 4.

1997). i to decongest Bombay by shifting jobs that are concentrated in the southern part of Bombay. The employment base of Navi Mumbai was planned to encompass manufacturing (industry). large industries. The Industrial Location Policy issued in December 1974 posed various restrictions on the start of new industrial units on Bombay island.4 Household Income and Capacity to Pay (Figures estimated in 1971 income where $1~Rs. 1973). Industrial growth was encouraged only in the MIDC industrial estates of Navi Mumbai (CIDCO. better quality houses was the biggest incentive (CIDCO. trade and commerce (wholesale and warehousing).000 houses needed to be built. A CBD was planned in Navi Mumbai with the aim of creating 40. as well as service sector (office) jobs. A series of controls were made for various regions within Bombay. No new.000 office jobs. 1995): i make Navi Mumbai self-contained and not a dormitory. To accommodate a population of 2 million. Only small-scale industries were allowed in place of old. the availability of cheaper. The authors of the regional plan cited the case of New Delhi to emphasize their idea (Patel. This was necessary to (CIDCO. Table 2. i to use the job centers with matching infrastructure provision as engines of growth for the new city.4 shows CIDCO’s estimates on the capacity to pay for housing by different income groups. 400.7) Household % of Monthly Capacity to pay Affordable size Income Population capacity to pay for housing (in of housing unit (Rs. Although job opportunities were the driving force behind Navi Mumbai’s success.) Less than 200 20 10 1200 3 201-300 16 11 2580 5 301-400 15 12 4140 8 401-500 14 13 5940 12 501-600 12 14 7800 16 601-800 9 15 10800 22 801-1000 7 17 15600 31 Threshold of affordability 1001-1200 3 19 21000 43 1201-1500 2 22 30000 60 1501+ 2 25 37800 75 . 1995). assuming a family size of five. Per month) (% of income) rupees) (in sq.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 8 provision of 750. Almost 87% of the office jobs of Greater Bombay are located on Bombay island with 62% in South Bombay. 1975). large or medium industrial units were permitted on Bombay island. The plan called for the shifting of government offices from South Bombay to Navi Mumbai. m. Table 2.000 jobs for a population of 2 million (CIDCO.

i residential neighborhoods (sector). which would subsidize housing for the lower income groups. 1977).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 9 (CIDCO. Each township had several sectors. The neighborhoods were self-sufficient and had their grocery store and primary school. The cuadra had a detailed zoning plan with single-use zoning on all lots. The housing has to be heavily subsidized to make it affordable. 550 per square meter and the cost of development of land was Rs. Le Corbusier explained "the plan is based on the main features of the 7V rule (Appendix B) determining an essential function: the creation of sectors. 1973). The sector was based on the Spanish cuadra of 110 to 100 meters.6 Design Principles of Navi Mumbai The conceptual design of Navi Mumbai was developed at the height of Modernism. The average cost of construction was Rs. The total land of Navi Mumbai was divided into thirteen townships. 1961). Some of the highlights of the design elements of this plan were sector planning. CIDCO decided to use a maximum surcharge of 15% on housing for highest income group to compensate for a maximum subsidy of 45% to the lowest income group (CIDCO. community centers and residential areas. 40 in 1970. m. land would be leased under a 30-year repayment system to private cooperative housing schemes and private owners. These were: i decentralization by the design of self-sufficient townships(nodes). Children were able to walk to school on the V7 through green belts (Sarin. CIDCO decided to build a large part of the housing as public housing. This would have a great drain on the financial resources of the government. Le Corbusier had played an important role in the design of Chandigarh in Punjab in the mid1950s (Le Corbusier. Capacity to pay for housing divided by cost of construction shows a very small (or no) house could be owned by most families. Many of these principles of Modernism were used in the planning of Navi Mumbai. residential and institutional activity. 2. A sector centrally located within each node took on commercial activities. each family could own only developed land. In Navi Mumbai. 1973). Many of the sectors were residential in character. 1977). Otherwise. The square had a significance in Hinduism as this perfect geometric shape was thought to be . Each of these cuadras was a self-contained unit with primary schools. The sector planning of Modernism is very similar to the grid planning of traditional Indian cities. In India the square was used as the basic unit in the layout of traditional cities. houses or larger (CIDCO. hierarchy of roads and important buildings of a gargantuan scale (Fry. At the same time. it was proposed to use cross subsidies. The Government of India’s policy on publicly financed housing has been to build 21 sq. V4 roads were designed for shopping and commercial activity. No fast traffic was allowed in the sectors. i single-use zoning as opposed to the traditional multiple-use zoning The result was a single-use zoning pattern with distinct areas for industrial. The sector is the container of family life" (Le Corbusier. The higher income groups would pay a surcharge for housing. commercial. 1973) The table shows the ability of each income group to contribute towards owned accommodation. 1961).

Navi Mumbai consists of thirteen townships (or nodes).4). 1973). amenities and utilities with segregation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic (Banerjee.000 to 200. both materials and human) and swatantrya (self-motivation and mutual self-help) (Ganguli. 1984). Airoli and Kopar-Khairane have industrial estates. Each node is self-contained for 100. Kshatriya. The functionality of the city is based on the principle of neighborhood design as seen all over the Western world. warrior/king. Mr. The nodes contain residential. Even in the planning of Mohenjadaro (7th century B. the four castes are Brahmin. 1973). Here in Navi Mumbai the idea of a large “urban village” has been nurtured. The Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board put forth the broad conceptual regional plan of Navi Mumbai. commercial. 1973). Neighborhoods could be placed near each other to form a larger urban framework. The neighborhood unit is used as a building block to build New Towns across the world (Perry.). main streets formed perfect rectangles dividing the city into separate residential areas based on caste. 1991). nodes share some common facilities such as water reservoirs and transport facilities. Vashi is the center of Navi Mumbai's wholesale market. In the case of Navi Mumbai. larger amenities by contiguous neighborhoods. This also facilitated the sharing of other.000 people. As the residential classification was based on the caste. swadeshi (fullest utilization of local resources. 1997). infrastructure and recreational uses (Figure 2. Many cities still reflect this street pattern. All houses in a neighborhood were occupied by a particular caste. Neighborhood planning in the West was a concept put forth by Clarence Perry. let us accommodate nature!" (Gandhi in Engel. Each node was planned to accommodate a range of income groups. The task of designing and detailing the physical design was carried out by CIDCO. At a larger scale. was the Chief Planner of CIDCO for 20 years (1970-90) (Engel. Vaishya and Sudra. Each neighborhood unit was within a one square mile radius. The size of the node depends . an American designer of the 1920s. Parab. 1991). Each node is divided into neighborhoods (or sectors).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 10 the abode of the gods (Henn.C. There would be no rich or poor nodes (CIDCO. people were forced to work within that particular neighborhood. Commercial and residential uses were adjacent to each other or one above the other. merchant and peasant. The indigenous plans all started with a central focal point (either of political or religious symbolism). and progressively moved outward depending on the natural landscape. streets. In India. while Nhava-Sheva houses the new container port. each neighborhood was known as a sector (CIDCO. 1969). This was a model layout for an area with specifications for residences. This is the vision that is the traditional Indian design inspiration for Navi Mumbai. which corresponds to the professions priest. the main philosophical design principles of Navi Mumbai are based on Gandhian ideology (Parab. This is significantly different from the single-use planning of Modernism. This principle of neighborhood planning and its derivative from Modernism was used in Navi Mumbai. "Arguing to turn any weaknesses into strength. Under his leadership. Some of the nodes have special features. So each sector had mixed use. 1929). The goal has been to create a city based on Gandhian principles of swavalamban (self-reliance). Gandhi would have urged: If nature chooses not to accommodate us. a true Gandhian.

4 Nodes of Navi Mumbai recreation and timber. Any change in political power would affect the policies and development strategies of this new town. As financial and economic considerations depended on the government in office. which were closely linked.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 11 BOMBAY Airoli Ghansoli Kopar-Khairane Kalamboli Vashi Sanpada on walking distances to the mass transit stop. flowing from the Western Ghats mountain ranges would irrigate these trees. Private industries would not invest in this particular region unless they were assured of workers and so on. This was partly because of the scale and complexity of the project. 1995). The design concept of Navi Mumbai was very idealistic.7 Social Agenda in the Planning of Navi Mumbai Considerations of social equity were very important in all aspects of development in a country. The streams Source: CIDCO. The Development Plan of Navi Mumbai is an example of the new consciousness for sustainable Kharghar Nerul settlements (CIDCO. Water treated from industrial and sewage waste would be used to develop green areas (Parab. The plan Jui Belapur Arabian envisioned an ecologically friendly Sea city where products of nature would be Panvel used. For industrial growth large finances were required. 1973. The Development Plan for Navi Mumbai called for the planting of one hundred thousand trees every year! (Engel. shopping areas and other facilities. One of the ideas of putting the environmental city into Dronagiri practice was the creation of woodland corridors (Parab. 2. 1997). For example. which would be used in the dry seasons. Hence. The node should be large enough to provide schools. unless sufficient industrial growth existed. It depended very heavily on external factors. which ensured their re-election. 1991). which had been independent for only 20 years. 1997). The plan called for the construction of holding ponds to retain excess monsoon run-off. for its success. the plan had a very important political component. a migration of population would not occur. The primary concerns were related . Politicians use the creation of jobs and better living environments as a common strategy for getting votes. There was also a high degree of uncertainty attached to some of the policies and physical developments. Holding ponds would be used for pisciculture and recreation. only activities. This would also ensure reduction of soil erosion and the development of woodlands for both Figure 2. and then unused portions would Nhava-Sheva be recycled. would be strongly supported.

The residents could design and implement their construction in any way they chose (swatantrya). The Draft Development Plan spelled out "there is a tendency in India that induces people to live in like groups. 1973).social. 1973) .Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 12 to providing better quality of housing. The planners of Navi Mumbai thought this was a fortuitous occasion to provide social justice to the millions of migrants and pavement dwellers of Bombay (CIDCO. Navi Mumbai’s founders saw the construction of large amounts of new housing as an opportunity to break down demographic divisions and to enhance social equity. economic and political . more than 30% of the population of greater Bombay could not afford a pucca (durable) house (CIDCO. To aid residents further.shall inform all the institutions of the national life (Article 38). Housing would be built for the various income groups. caste. Incremental housing was suggested as the solution. 1973). 1973). The design of a completely new city was a very good opportunity to implement these national concerns. The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds of religion. The Gandhian principle of self-help would be used to implement this agenda. It recommended construction using cheaper concrete. Housing for the middle income and high income groups would be in the form of CIDCO housing. Construction would be made with locally available. I). The sites-and-services plots would have services such as roads. walk-up apartments of three to four floors would be designed. 1973). cheap material. ground floor houses would be possible initially. sex. enclaves or ghettos of age long tradition of ’birds of the same feather flocking together’. using bamboo instead of steel reinforcements and setting up of local retail shops where residents would be able to buy inexpensive building materials for building their homes (swadeshi) (CIDCO. medical care and social welfare. For them. The remaining two-thirds of the population could afford more expensive housing. 1973). Thus. education and job opportunities. More durable material could be used in the course of time. For the lower income group." (CIDCO. race. water. In planned towns and cities this should be avoided to a great extent by allocating housing in neighborhoods to members of different communities. Individual families would then have to build their own homes (swavalamban). it was proposed that housing should be constructed so that this income group could afford it. cost-effective. economic and political equity. place of birth or any of them (Article 15. cooperative housing groups or private builders. The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice . electricity and sanitation (CIDCO. The Constitution of India also spells out the need for the government machinery to facilitate social. CIDCO would sell the plot at a highly subsidized rate and with a twenty-year repayment period. In 1970. The plan took into account the fact that one-third of the housing in New Bombay would be sites-and-services plots (CIDCO.

exploited women and leprosyaffected persons would be developed in Navi Mumbai to accommodate the growing population (CIDCO. Institutions for juvenile delinquents. The Development Plan says (CIDCO. 1973). The Greater Bombay region had some of the best social welfare programs in India. schools and colleges and making health education a part of classroom education.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 13 To justify this consideration. one high school for 12. handicapped children. shopping. recreational and other social facilities an should not become a dormitory for Greater Bombay. planners cited the segregation of Bombay as an example. Other private institutions would be encouraged also. diagnostic and investigation services. 1973). Establishment of ethnic enclaves has led to a number of problems in India. The medical center would provide secondary health service." . The planners of Navi Mumbai did not intend to create an identity for the city related to physical objects.500 population and one college for 50. 1973: 17): "CIDCO is anxious that the new city develop its own identity as quickly as possible. The planning was for a comprehensive coverage by taking the services to households. medical care. 1973). It would have out-patient department. These are discussed further in the next chapter. but will also ensure a uniform standard of social and physical infrastructure and see that no one class of residents is better served than another" (CIDCO 1973: 17-18). This led to the development of ethnic enclaves. merchants from neighboring districts migrated into Bombay and constructed homes inside and outside the Fort walls. These were the education facilities to be provided by the government. The nodes (townships) were designed to provide one primary school per 5000 population. Health planning was undertaken as public health projects. This further contributed to the creation of ethnic enclaves within the settlement. The Governor of Bombay also encouraged this development because it reinforced the traditional panchayati (selfgovernment) system of administration by which the council of elders settled religious. Mobile health care units would operate from this community health center. and law and order problems of the community (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. It is expected that this accommodation of residents from various social and income groups within the same physical area will not only make for a healthier environment. Minimum standards for building construction were developed by CIDCO. When the East India Company encouraged merchants to establish residence in Bombay. recreation and afforestation projects (CIDCO. A large hospital for intensive care and for teaching and research purposes would be set up (CIDCO. 1995). It should contain its own jobs. Provision of schools and colleges was a priority in the planning of Navi Mumbai.000 population (CIDCO. The community health care center would primary health care. It would be a small hospital and polyclinic where specialized health care would be provided to cases referred by the community health care center and general practitioners. 1973). "In each node it is proposed that accommodation be made available for the entire range of income groups expected in the city. water supply and sanitation.

Objectives . a strong institutional framework was required for its success. With the creation of these other agencies. the identity of Navi Mumbai is subtler. 1991). the Gadgil Committee Report (1965) had recommended the setting up of a New Town Development Authority (NTDA). CIDCO had to coordinate all planning and development programs. CIDCO has executed the implementation of the plan in various stages (CIDCO. It appears that the monumental style of Corbusier was not an influence on this design.an identity based on the Gandhian value of social equality. However. drainage. 2. These stages include: i Draft Development Plan (programs and policies) . Its identity is only that of a spreading inkblot (Engel. The city of Navi Mumbai was planned to address the issue of social equality through its physical design. New. In particular. Before the creation of these different institutions. planned cities of India such as Chandigarh.Other agencies . CIDCO undertook the task of (CIDCO. Other institutions have also been set up in the Greater Bombay region to facilitate planning efforts in the region. 1995): i developing land and providing infrastructure such as roads. water supply.Data base . 1992): i Bombay Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (BMRDA) in 1975 i Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) in 1992. The physical design would be the instrument to implement this objective. i Bombay Electric and State Transport (BEST). there was no aim to create a monumental city. 1992). the allotment of residential apartments would be governed by a policy. largely.Visualizing the future i Action Plans . In the very beginning. i involving Government agencies for developing public transport and telecommunications. i Specialized services provided by Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA). electricity. i promoting commercial and other employment activity. i developing residential plots for different income groups. However. It is more of a philosophical identity .8 Plan Implementation through the Public Administrative Framework The government authorities of Bombay realized that the effectiveness of regional planning depended. Gandhinagar can be described by their grid system or monumental scales. CIDCO was appointed as the NTDA. which would help implement the objective. CIDCO has a more narrow and defined role. on the institutions responsible for the plan. These are (CIDCO.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 14 Thus. The role of CIDCO is to implement the plan of Navi Mumbai.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 2: The Research Setting

15

- Land use plans - Residential layout plans - Infrastructure plans - Industrial location plans - Environmental assessment i Implementation - Acquisition of land - Finance - Construction - Relocation strategies BMRDA took over such functions as coordination of metropolitan planning, funding, execution of programs, development control and maintenance of the entire Greater Bombay region including Navi Mumbai (UNCHS, 1993). Financial responsibilities and investment decisions are made by a large number of agencies including the Government of India, State Government of Maharashtra, CIDCO and firms in the private sector, but coordinated by BMRDA.

Macro-level Regional Planning Inputs
Bombay Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (BMRDA)

Micro-level Sub-regional Planning Inputs
Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation

Plan Implementation of Navi Mumbai
City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) Figure 2.5 Institutional Hierarchy in Implementation of Development Plan for Navi Mumbai In 1992, an amendment of the Constitution of India affected the functioning of CIDCO. The 74th Amendment of the Constitution of India (the 1992 Amendment Act on Municipalities) spells out the devolution of power to the local bodies and democratization of development planning. This Act emphasizes that the management must be done by elected representatives of the people who will account for two-thirds of the board. This committee is responsible for the preparation of the draft development plan. This ensures a bottom-up process with direct inputs from the citizens (UNCHS, 1993). These municipal corporations will be responsible for their economic development and incorporate all ideas within the

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 2: The Research Setting

16

Comprehensive Plan. The direct result of this Act is the creation, in 1992, of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. This allowed CIDCO to give up its role as New Town Development Authority (CIDCO, 1995). A heavy-handed approach was used by the government to implement its social policy. As most of the housing was built by CIDCO, a government agency, the government could control, if not regulate, the distribution of the population on socioeconomic basis. Households desirous of buying a house built by CIDCO had to submit an application that stated the dwelling size they preferred. CIDCO allotted these houses, depending on when construction was completed, on a rolling basis. This was intended to ensure a random distribution of the various linguistic and religious groups of the population. The pattern expected would now be one based predominantly on income. 2.9 The Reality of Implementing the Plan The planning of Navi Mumbai began in 1971. The results of each of the planning objectives can be studied now. The first objective of the Development Plan of Navi Mumbai was to reduce congestion of Bombay by absorbing immigrants and attracting some of the present population of Bombay. Table 2.5 Population Density in Various Sectors of Bombay(BMRDA, 1978 in UNCHS, 1993) 1971 1981 1991 Population Density Population Density Population Density (in ’000s) (pop/ha) (in ’000s) (pop/ha) (in ’000s) (pop/ha) CBD 1120 1659 1031 1527 849 1258 Central Bombay 1950 1349 2254 1559 2309 1597 Bombay Island 3070 1447 3285 1549 3158 1489 Bombay Suburbs 2900 544 4958 930 6751 1266 Navi Mumbai1 128 600 328 617 Over the 1981-91 period, there was a considerable decline in the population of the CBD and Bombay island. The increase in the population of the suburbs and Navi Mumbai accounts for the decline in the CBD and Bombay island. Outmigration to other cities and countries is negligible (BMRDA, 1978). The main reason for the shift was because of (UNCHS, 1993): i dilapidation of older buildings in Bombay i cheaper and better housing facilities in Navi Mumbai i better employment opportunities in Navi Mumbai i lesser commuter distances involved The second objective of the development plan was to bring maximum jobs consistent with the Gandhian principle of self-sufficiency (swavalambhan). CIDCO’s support of the Industrial Location Policy brought more jobs to Navi Mumbai. The sectors that had maximum growth in Navi Mumbai, were trade (39%), finance and services (27%) and manufacturing (18%) (BMRDA, 1992 in UNCHS, 1993). The wholesale agriculture produce
1

residential area increased from 213 hectares in 1981 to 531 hectares in 1991.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 2: The Research Setting

17

market for vegetables, foodgrains, oil seeds, sugar and spices was moved from South Bombay to Navi Mumbai (CIDCO, 1973). A separate railway siding and truck terminal were constructed to facilitate effective relocation. This involved the relocation of 30,000 jobs from Bombay and the reduction of 5000 truck trips per day. A new iron and steel stockyard complex has been developed in Navi Mumbai. This means the relocation of 25,000 jobs and a reduction of 1000 truck trips per day to Bombay. However, the economic agenda, which was based on agriculture and cottage industries, is no longer effective because of the government’s redoubled commitment to a policy of industrialization. Navi Mumbai continues to be exploited as a major industrial zone (Engel, 1991). CIDCO's third objective was to provide physical and social amenities in Navi Mumbai. The land use of Navi Mumbai shows these amenities (Table 2.6 and Figure 2.6). Table 2.6 Land Use of Navi Mumbai, 1993 (in sq. km.) Land-use Zone 1979 1985 1986 1991 Residential 101.15 133.99 127.08 129.87 Commercial 6.51 6.51 6.51 5.75 Industrial 43.21 43.14 43.14 43.14 Port 12.00 22.7 22.7 22.7 Wholesale market 6.08 4.54 4.54 4.6 Woodlands / Park 90.26 61.24 68.15 69.35 Institutional .76 1.09 1.09 1.09 Fishing and allied 6.14 3.44 3.44 3.44 Transportation 30.86 30.35 30.35 29.73 No development 46.73 36.70 36.70 34.03 Total 343.70 343.70 343.70 343.70

1993 127.61 5.75 43.14 22.70 6.86 69.35 1.09 3.44 29.73 34.03 343.70 (CIDCO, 1997) Primary, secondary and high schools have been provided in all sectors of Navi Mumbai. All primary schools are within walking distance. This eliminates the need of expensive transport for small children. There is at least one college in every node and Vashi node has both medical and engineering colleges (CIDCO, 1995). Medical facilities are provided by private medical practitioners. Every node has a hospital run by the Mahatma Gandhi Medical Trust. Community health car centers are also there (CIDCO, 1995). In its fourth objective to provide an ecologically friendly environment, CIDCO has not been entirely successful. The area of woodlands has been constantly decreasing (CIDCO, 1995). Most woodlands are in the form of mango groves which form a part of neighborhood parks. In the conceptual plan, streams flowing from the hillsides were to irrigate the woodland corridors. No significant effort has been made to utilize this resource. However, holding ponds have been constructed. Promenades have been built along them and they are being used as recreation areas (Parab, 1997). The fifth objective is the primary focus of this thesis. The objective to prevent ethnic enclaves and to promote a pattern based on socioeconomic characteristics was fairly ambitious. In order for its success, a perfect control of the market is required. The analysis of the data will show the outcome of the objective.

1992 128.71 5.75 43.14 22.7 5.76 69.35 1.09 3.44 29.73 34.03 343.70

Social aspects of city planning were given importance with special attention given to considerations of employment opportunities. establishment of more industries and construction of more houses. Though the Navi Mumbai project was begun in 1970. utilities. housing requirements. Growth in other development sectors of Bombay has also had an adverse effect on Navi Mumbai’s growth. CIDCO provides serviced sites for both government and private ownership. the Gandhian principles supported cultural heterogeneity and mixed use zoning. However.10 Conclusion The Draft Development Plan of Navi Mumbai described many broad outlines for the development of a city for the common citizen. The design principles described in the Draft Development Plan were based on the philosophical reasoning of Mahatma Gandhi and the functionalistic approach of Modernism. . the city is no longer a plan on paper. but a living and working reality. Problems of design and development were identified. and improvements made in the next phase of design. While Modernism called for single-use zoning and a pattern based on socioeconomic characteristics. The absence of a port and railway links slowed growth. since 1990 there has been accelerated growth due to the commissioning of Nhava-Sheva port.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 18 NEW BOMBAY BOMBAY Arabian Sea Residential Woodlands Industrial Port Institutional Trucking Wholesale Fishing Wetlands Figure 2. Periodic socioeconomic and household surveys were used to determine the status of constructed environment. and housing occupancy rates are high. Designing. development and implementation of ideas were done in an incremental manner. lower income group. middle-income group and high-income groups.6 Land Use of Navi Mumbai Source: CIDCO. Many attributes of these two design principles are not necessarily harmonious. Commuter services have become operational since May 1992. 1995. Houses have been constructed for different sectors of society economically weaker section. 2. Hence. the development process has been slow. the extension of the railway lines. The poor transportation links between Bombay and Navi Mumbai has been the main contributing factor. recreation and commercial needs.

This also implies that the urban social pattern was predetermined.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 19 This design also strongly supported the need to use the government’s power and machinery to promote the uniform distribution of people and prevent ethnic enclaves. The research setting under consideration is the result of the hybridization of Indian and Western ideas. The aim of this research is to examine the present urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. Navi Mumbai is a modern. Very little analysis has been done on the outcome of CIDCO's social agenda to ensure diffusion of ethnic groups and the urban social pattern that emerged. A heavy-handed implementation strategy of this objective was done by taking complete control of the residential allotment. planned city within the context of a specific historic and cultural setting. . The success of this strategy depended on maintaining this control.

1990). then they reflect their lifestyles. These design ideas seem to have a strong influence of Modernism (CIDCO. This literature review will first trace the human settlements in India. religion. The final outcome of a morphological study is the formulation of a theory which connects facts to form hypotheses. 3. Thus. Where market forces work. economic and physical environments. Whatever the mode of construction.Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 3. Socioeconomic factors have a very important contribution to the pattern. people adapt to the physical environment around them. but four-dimensional. Land ownership patterns. communication and socioeconomic relationships influence urban patterns. urban form is not merely the architectural form of the city (Lozano. changing and modifying it to suit their way of life (Lozano. transportation. occupation and values of housing influence the spatial character. A holistic approach to the study of settlements involves understanding the interrelationships between its elements within the temporal context. Most cities in the Third World and India have been indigenous in origin and organic in growth. The study of the physical form and structure of cities is the study of urban morphology. The pattern of spatial distribution is recognizable in most contemporary cities (Alexander. ethnicity.1 Introduction A human settlement is an establishment created by people for their inhabitation. and bear characteristics of western influence. technology. 1987). 1991). 1968). they are more generic and may not represent the lifestyles of every household. Human settlements contain people and societies in a physical environment consisting of natural and man-made elements (Doxiadis. 1968). Interaction of these elements form a pattern . principles and existing theories for improving the design of cities (Doxiadis. The urban pattern is a result of the relationships between people and their social. . if government agencies or contractors build them. The human-environment relationship is a two-way process termed as the socio-spatial dialectic (Knox. Education. 1973).2 Urban Form and Urban Pattern Every human settlement consists of certain elements. residents soon influence their urban environment. because it changes continuously in a temporal dimension. 1990). Simultaneously. It is a city designed with the design principles of the time. Buildings and spaces are created by people and quite often characterize them (Kostof. Such a human settlement is not just threedimensional. India. income is one of the most important determinants. However. Many of these cities have been under colonial rule. The aim of the thesis is to examine the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. (New Bombay). language and housing character. Navi Mumbai is one of the first cities in India built for the common citizen.the urban pattern. Urban social pattern is the pattern formed by the interaction of various social variables such as household characteristics. Intricacies in relationships have increased the complexity of the urban form over time. 1995). and those of Mahatma Gandhi. If the residents build the buildings themselves. It is also a cultural manifestation.

In most studies this unit is the neighborhood which displays both physical and social aspects of the whole urban development. Since the characteristics are universal (within the frame of study) they may be studied by a spatial representative sector. 1990). society. Traditional cities have used physical forms to interpret cultural and religious beliefs (Lozano. Thus. This representative sector is defined as the smallest area that exhibits the characteristics of the urban settlement. 1987): i land ownership i street patterns i existing land use i economic considerations i planning regulations i political and historical events The physical expansion of the city is always bound and guided by land ownership. Urban spatial patterns occur because of the repetitive spatial distribution of these elements.a fort or a religious building. The rural land may also have been . In the study of Navi Mumbai.3 Factors Influencing Urban Form Many factors influence the form of cities. The physical form is a variable of the social and built pattern of the city. Thus urban social patterns are complex manifestations of underlying cultural values intermingled with global economic forces (McGee. linguistics and ethnic background also influence urban patterns. The change of land use from rural to urban depends on the existing land use. 1971). and the ownership. the node (township) and the sector (neighborhood) will be used as the study areas using aggregated household survey data. Traditional settlements were shaped by (Lozano. The built form is influenced by factors as (Alexander. and natural and manmade obstacles.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 21 Demographics. Time and place may provide them with different characteristics making each city unique and dynamic. For example. Some farmers may sell their land more easily than others may. a hill top site was the utilitarian response to any important building . These features contributed to a particular urban and social pattern. The patterns have similarities. They are the units of analysis of the morphological study (Knox. buildings and infrastructure. every city has certain elements. Urban patterns represent a continuity of time and space. Doxiadis defines five elements in the study of human settlements. human beings. 1995). 3. it is necessary to determine existing land use as a pre-condition to urban growth and form. “The typical sector represents the formal characteristics found throughout the area and thus acquires some universality” (Lozano. Although details may not be identical. 1990): i the way in which nature and man-made features satisfy needs for protection and defense i the way in which physical and economic landscape allows for communication with other regions i the way in which the topography of a site suggests the construction of a human settlement i the way in which climate leads to building solutions These factors influence the cultural and spiritual form of the cities as well. 1990). which may be universal or local. They are nature. A city replaces existing land use.

others are global in scope. personal preferences and many institutional constraints. A particular social pattern brings about a particular built form. The caste system of India separates and hierarchies the Hindus. A household’s choice of place to live is determined by its income level. race and religion (Vance.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 22 subdivided. These factors are (Alexander. Various economic. 1986): i ethnic composition of the city i migration i religion i economic considerations i race i political and historical events The housing market also influences the social pattern of the city. commercial buildings. craftsmen and merchants were born. People as food gatherers advanced to become farmers. Soon. The external . social and political circumstances influence the social pattern (Scargill. 1992a).4 The Evolution of the Urban Form of Indian Cities The traditional theory of urban origin is generally attributed to Childe (Herbert.5 The Sociocultural Factors India is among the most stratified of all known societies in the world (Srinivas. For thousands of years. and Thomas. Plots of varying sizes and shapes influence the layout of the streets and of individual buildings (Knox. Childe put forth a theory that urban centers were a result of agricultural change. 1990). Certain built forms encourage certain social patterns. However. Urbanization took place at different chronological periods. private rental and public sector housing operationalize housing sectors. 1979). Owner-occupier. often because of a city wall. This allowed some of the people to develop other professions. The evolution of the urban pattern of Indian cities is divided into the social pattern and the built form. government offices and warehouses formed the built environment of the city. 1990). they supported a range of activities. Clear differentiation between urban and rural existed. Planning controls influence development to a great extent. 3. The social pattern and the built form are interrelated and contribute to the urban morphology of a city. While some processes are culture-specific. other scholars contend that it is doubtful that surplus can be attributed as the single factor which caused the emergence of urban settlements (Jacobs. surplus food production was achieved. Reasons such as trade and defense have also been used to explain the formation of cities. Kosambi. The factors influencing urbanization were also different. Priests. 3. Instead. The variation in influencing factors and historical circumstance gave rise to different urban forms in different parts of the world. However. cities were very simple although they rarely served single purposes. 1983). Pedestrian movement limited the size of the city. Master plans and regional plans provide long-range strategies for development. 1987. a city contained social distinctions in terms of class. within. Housing. 1995). Domestication of animals and cultivation of land created villages.

1992). language.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 23 manifestation of the separation and hierarchy through particular attributes of the castes brings about social stratification of the urban social pattern (Marriott. and in the case of India. 3. linguistic stratification and religious stratification. sometimes reinforced by common work roles. rituals. The criteria for the differentiation can normally be translated into money or wealth. The social stratification is very deep and varied. diet and dress. linguistic. marriage and death ceremonies distinguish one caste from another.2 Class "Class refers to a system of stratification which is economic in character" (Gupta. religion and language are discussed below. Vaishya and Sudra are said to have come from the mouth. 1992b:14). Although no hierarchy is mentioned in the Sukta. 1992). However. thighs and feet of the Creator. vertical and horizontal systems of stratification exist. Ethnic characteristics refer to language. The caste system varies from village to village and is a local phenomenon. Various combinations of the hierarchy have come about due to regional differentiation in certain attributes of social living. Hierarchy allows elements of the whole to be ranked with relation to each other (example: income and prestige). 3. these single criterion hierarchies can be misleading as they depend on cutoff points related to individual analysis (Gupta. However. 1992a). differentiates itself into only hierarchical status containing inequality (Gupta. Certain customs lower or raise the status of the caste. language. The Indian theory of social stratification depends on caste.1 Caste Castes are the hierarchical divisions of people based on professional and family membership. Vegetarian castes occupy higher positions. 1992b).5. Kshatriya. this popular caste hierarchy is not clear throughout the Indian subcontinent (Srinivas. 1992b). However. The real world. Class systems by contrast define the rank of their members according to their individual attributes and behavior". all elements can not be arranged vertically. 1992). Thus. a hierarchy from Brahman to Sudra has been interpreted (Bougle. religion). religion or occupation (Bougle. class.5. territory. As many individual criteria are . Berreman (1965) says "Caste systems rank people by birthascribed group membership rather than by individual attributes. arms. In India. culture. 1974:8). 1992). Stratification implies a differentiation based on a set of criteria. The term ethnic group refers broadly to people “with some similar characteristics which go beyond their mere place in a societal division of labor” (Brass. Repulsion between castes forced isolation and the creation of distinct residential enclaves (Bougle. Along with the caste exist occupational stratification. The spirit of the caste system is determined by the attitudes of each caste to the other. The characteristics caste. religious and ethnic diversity of the country (Gupta. The dominant caste legend is the Purushasukta legend whereby the Brahman. 1992). the forms of social stratification are many. The population may be stratified based on income. unfortunately. Clothing. theoretically. Certain occupations such as butchery and cobblery lower the rank. The differences may also be placed in a horizontal system (example: language.

1974). Marathi. The wake of Independence brought with it violence and terror in the Indo-Pakistan borders in Punjab and Bengal. occupation. A Hindu revival period in the late nineteenth century to arouse enthusiasm for political action made the Muslims more insecure. Kannada. Muslims became apprehensive of Hindu domination. Telugu. While the Congress party represented the majority of the Indian population. absorbing other religious doctrines and never proselytizing.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 24 linked to other attributes. 3. . not subjects” (Hodson. During the Mughal rule (16th to 18th century). At this time they felt the need for a political party of their own. However. 1974). Jainism and Sikhism stemmed off from Hinduism and are very similar to Hinduism. 1977). 1985). The linguistic distribution is not only diverse but also very complex (Das Gupta. After the decline of the Mughal Empire and the loss of political power to the British. the Muslim League represented only the Muslim population (Brass.3 Religion Religion and language have provided the motive power for nationalism in India (Brass. The framers of the Indian Constitution chose Hindi and English as the official languages of the government (King. prestige and income to form a socioeconomic status. Anger and frustration broke out as violence as Hindus moved from Pakistan into India and Muslims moved from India to Pakistan (Hodson. Tamil.Jainism and Sikhism. the Muslims were in power over most of India. India is the birthplace of two major religions –Hinduism and Buddhism – and two minor religions . The League demanded for a separate electorate and for more employment in public service. Hindus and Muslims drifted apart in the issue of independence from British rule. it may be better to create a composite index of education. 1985). which culminated in the partition of united India into India and Pakistan. The major languages of India are Hindi.5. Islam was a religion that came to India from outside and is culturally very different from Hinduism.5. Gujarati. Malayalam. 1985:11). 1997). The census of India 1951 (immediately after Independence) recorded a total of 179 languages and 544 dialects in India.4 Language A systematic inventory of Indian languages began in the mid-eighteenth century. Hindi was chosen because it was the language spoken by the largest percent of the population while was a result of the British legacy. Bengali. Buddhism. In 1906 they formed the All-India Muslim League. 1970). Urdu and Punjabi. The characteristics of the population regarding bilinguals. An overwhelming view of Hindu-Muslim relations in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is that Hindus advanced due to their enthusiasm to take up western education and government employment (Kaura. From the beginning Islam has been a conquering and proselytizing faith (Hodson. 3. There are many religions in India. A certain degree of animosity between Hindus and Muslims has existed since the first Muslim ruler of 1018 AD. degree of control over the language and relationship between the languages affect their social communication. “In most folk-memory the Muslims of India had been ruler. The Hindu religion has always been a pacifist and tolerant religion.

The union government declared that fifteen year deadline after Independence would be given for transition of official language from English and Hindi to only Hindi.5 Implications of the Sociocultural Factors The implications of caste and class are closely related to those of power and wealth (Dumont. The South Indian state of Tamil Nadu was most vocal in the Anti-Hindi agitation. 1970). 1970). This was not seen in more heterogeneous neighborhoods. a majority of the leaders preferred a composite nationalism. In a multilingual society there may be a plurality of national languages. Compromise was . The separatism movements seen all over India are all based on ethnicity and inter-caste rivalry (Bose. all castes looked up to the farmer caste because they were important landowners and were wealthy (Srinivas. confusion has always existed about the status of Hindi as official or national language. Small Muslim enclaves within a majority Hindu neighborhood were targeted. a synonym for official language and like state religion. However. Certain castes are dominant in a society. Hindu-Muslim riots broke out even in Bombay which has normally been a very peaceful city. ethnic conflicts are easily targeted towards these select neighborhoods. In some villages. In the early 1950s. 1989). In many places. as it was difficult to isolate only one family. and vice versa. This rationale of composite nationalism influenced policies related to religion and language (Das Gupta. 3. The Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India declared the fourteen major languages listed as national language (Gumprez. The partition of United India into India and Pakistan came with many problems.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 25 However. had led them to better job opportunities. 1988). There was strong opposition from non-Hindi areas in general and South India in particular (Hindi is a IndoAryan language while the languages of South India belong to the Dravidian group). many political leaders advocated for the use of Hindi as a national and official language. The Babri Masjid in Ayodhya was broken down by Hindu fundamentalists. Although a minority of Hindu leaders in India felt that India should be declared as a Hindu state. Repercussions were felt all over the country. The better control the Tamil people had over English. there also been conflict between other regional languages. This confusion in terminology is the basis for most language-related problems in Independent India. 1992a). they believed. Language conflicts have also occurred in India. The inequality and economic differentiation cause conflict between the castes and classes. The Tamilnad Students’ Anti-Hindi Agitation Council objected to both the removal of English as an official language and the declaration of Hindi as the sole official language. When the ethnic groups occupy distinct neighborhoods. Although a majority of the rivalry has been for and against Hindi. 1971). the Brahman priests had more power because it was believed that they were the representatives of the Creator on earth. Agitation and violence broke out in many non-Hindi states over this issue. Traditionally these castes had either wealth or power. a demand for a national language also arose. This issue can not only be seen at the time of partition in 1947 but also was seen during the recent communal violence in 1993. a state language with an unique status (Das Gupta. Pakistan officially declared itself as a Muslim state.5. Writers in Hindi commonly refer to Hindi as Rashtrabasha (state language) which may signify language used by the state.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 26 finally reached in 1963 under the Official Languages Act. the creator. This does not imply that social assimilation does not occur. Hinduism.1 Circle and Swastika depended on the natural features of the site. The caste system over the next ten to fifteen centuries became deeply rooted in the Hindu population and became a part of life. cyclical and swastika (Figure 3. which was the terrestrial representation of the cosmic universe inhabited by Brahma. In planning the town a vastupurusha mandala which was most auspicious. governed the alignment of roads. The mandala could be divided into smaller squares. The final shape of the town Figure 3. violence sparked off by language issues has continued to occur in India. If it could not be a perfect square.1). and which had as many padas as there were to be residential sectors was selected. Buddhism. 1969). Stratification of the society had to accommodate these religious factors. Despite the Act. Social assimilation and mobilization are a part of any evolving civilization. The ethnic segregation and conflict has existed from the beginning of the Indian Civilization. C to 12th century AD). The science of architecture and planning. 1974). Jainism. Vastushastra. The multi-dimensional society was soon complicated by the emergence of other religions. Related to castes. religion and language is the issue of group identity which is the cause of most ethnic conflicts. padas. The streets ran from north to south and from east to west. a perfect rectangle was accepted. In the initial stages it was in the form of caste differentiation as prescribed by the Hindu/ Vedic texts. class. These characteristics are derived from the need for defense and administration and the importance of religion (Kopardekara. The temple also influences the siting of other land uses. The Indian society was also stratified horizontally by language.6 The Built Form The historical evolution of the built form of Indian cities can be divided into three distinct phases. Judaism and Christianity found their way into India. Certain other shapes were also considered to be auspicious like the circle. However. the differentiation and assimilation in progress in a multi-ethnic society receives a prominent place in any political conflict. Sikhism were born in India while Islam. The square was used in the creation of the vastupurusha mandala. orientation of buildings and arrangement of internal rooms based on astrological and religious criteria (Volwahsen. . The earliest is the Hindu phase (3000 B. both from within and without the country. A number of languages coexisted in all parts of the country. The temple as the symbol of religion dominates the urban form. which contributes many elements to the urban form. The town wall enclosed the mandala. Prime commercial and residential land was located near the temple. While some groups spoke of an all-India nationality other speaks of a regional nationality (Brass. and four gateways were situated at the cardinal points. 3. 1986).

Vaishyas in the southern part and Sudras in the western district. jali (carved screens) and projecting balconies (Kopardekara. On the periphery of these urban centers. this has led to segregation and creation of enclaves within the city. and wood formed niches in the urban pattern. counting houses. It has been shown that rural values have penetrated the urban philosophy due to large-scale migration.were developed (Hall. Williamson and Mills. 1988). A generalization of these patterns has been made. Kshatriyas in the eastern and southeastern part. Areas for selling of specific goods – cloth. D.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 27 The residential districts were divided among the four castes. There was further subdivisions within each district depending on the sub-caste. The morphological components include buildings used for trade warehouses. As the built form depends on the social characteristics portrayed by its residents. The colonial influence (17th to early 20th century A. At the time of independence in 1947. jewelry. The urban segregation was based on function and occupation premises. and the apparent timelessness and permanence of village life” (Hall. In India where occupation and caste are synonyms. but also on socioeconomic factors (Ramachandran. Many researchers have tried to fit Indian urban growth into a theoretical model. 3.) was the third phase of historical urban form. and Hindu elements of this period are not distinct from earlier ones. The characteristics of the social and built form of the city contribute to its pattern. especially seen in the port cities associated with the East India Company (Mills. This led to the development of commercial centers and zoning based on Western market principles. Residential areas associated with the commercial area were contiguous or within the commercial area (Hall. The residential character throughout this period was segregated. Residential segregation is no longer based only on occupation and caste.). The Islamic elements included the mosque and domestic architecture which emphasized the purdah through enclosed courtyards. and the south-west monsoon. D. “In the case of India. the Brahmans worked and lived in the northern district. and insufficient infrastructure in cities has led to the creation of slums and shantytowns (Misra. 1986). the same theories are being used to describe the social patterns as well. pottery. Generally. 1978). metalware. The Brahmans and Kshatriyas lived in the parts of the town which were climatically more comfortable sheltered from the hot sun.7 Theories of Urban Social Patterns . Diversification of professions due to industrialization in the post-independence era has resulted in further complexity (Becker. 1992). 1989). 1980). Large migration of people from the rural area. many researchers have pointed to the lack of penetration of urban values into the countryside. 1980). 1980).the cantonment . These are the theories which pertain to the built and social form of the city. the Hindu tradition continued. India inherited a complex urban fabric. Characteristics from medieval times are Islamic in nature (14th to 17th centuries A. During this time. The three leading theories described below are based on the built form of the city. military establishments .

This model was based on Burgess’ experience in the American mid-west cities. it is a descriptive framework to CBD analyze spatial organization of land use in a city Transition and its change over time. they moved to better housing districts (Burgess. free Middle income market. High income heterogeneous population and a commercialindustrial base (Herbert and Thomas. The model made many assumptions such as uniform land surface. The basic premise in this model was that of succession and invasion whereby population groups gradually moved out as their economic and social status improved. 1990). The three leading Western models are: i Concentric zone model i Sector model i Multiple nuclei model These models have become frameworks for studying urban social patterns across the world (Hartshorn. Families moved out into the next zone when their zone was invaded. and especially in Chicago. Diversification in employment opportunities gave rise to the growth of mixed land use development. which were being taken over by the expanding CBD. This also forced an outward expansion.7. others dynamic in nature.2). With affluence. The same city may express different models at different time periods (Scargill. 3. The public transport system had also improved significantly and allowed the middle-class to . Mobility and migrant influx were though of as the main cause of the social pattern (Hartshorn. accessibility to a single-centered city. 1929). 1929 various groups of society led him to conclude that the city was made up of concentric zones with the central business district (CBD) at the center (Figure 3. which had factories and slums. In the early 1920s. 1992). 1979). most American cities in the mid-west absorbed many immigrant groups from Europe. The movement was towards the periphery. 1929). The CBD core had all major commercial.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 28 Various spatial theories of the social pattern of cities have been advanced. some static. These immigrants first found cheap housing in the inner city.2 Concentric Zone Theory Burgess’ research on the distributional pattern of Source: Burgess. It also had older residential districts. This was surrounded by a transition zone. Thus. 1992). Burgess was interested in determining a pattern for the social structure of the city.1 Concentric Zone Theory This theory put forth by Burgess in 1925 related population mobility and societal organization to the physical expansion of the city (Burgess. and studying how the city grew (Scargill. political and social activities. and successive zones had higher income residences (Burgess. The next zone had lower income housing. Figure 3. It was partly based on Low income economic factors. 1929). 1979).

The model is very simple and can be used to predict how urban land markets work.3 Multiple Nuclei Theory The multiple nuclei theory was put forth by Harris and Ullman. S (Hoyt. Hoyt studied the city as an economist concerned with how the housing market worked. This model also accommodates growth (Hartshorn. It gives strength to cities with original nucleus in the center. 1979). Burgess has been criticized for not having considered topographical criteria. 1979). 1939 3.2 Sector Theory Homer Hoyt put forth a land use theory after studying over 100 cities in the U. This is because concentration of certain activities may prove to be more beneficial.3 Sector Theory Source: Hoyt. and subsequent decentralization (Figure 3. commercial ethnic group residential industrial Figure 3. Income group 1 Income group 2 Income group 3 Figure 3. It was intended to serve as a framework for studying urban growth and change (King and Golledge. 3. 1978). Hence. This is not a generalized model. It is more specific to some cities (King and Golledge. 1992). The original model did not take into account specialized clusters of industry. empirical studies did not confirm his model one hundred percent (Herbert and Thomas. Neighborhoods for each income group are common.7. 1939). 1990).7.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 29 travel from outer zones to the CBD for work. 1992 . 1978).4). industries may cluster around the railway line or lowincome housing along a riverbank. These reasons complemented a concentric zone development model (Scargill.4 Multiple Nuclei Theory Source: Hartshorn. This model proposes that patterns in many cities be arranged around several centers (Scargill. Concentric zones or sectors may emerge from these nuclei. Rental value was the main criterion for studying the pattern (King. For example.3). 1979). The model also accounts for growth along transport routes. The wedge pattern represents residential area growth (Scargill. However. The real world is more complicated than what was represented by Burgess’ very general model. 1978). He said that residential sectors of similar rent are situated in wedges radiating from the center (Figure 3. 1979). and Golledge. Hoyt also stressed the need to consider zoning laws and slum clearance laws in making models. Hoyt primarily studied residential land use. It also did not explain the impact of transport networks on these zones (Scargill.

1990). However. A neighborhood unit is not the only model or universally appropriate unit of analysis. These were social rank. The values are also related to family. This concept. 1979). has been under strong criticism (Hartshorn. security and identity. but also an expression of socioeconomic and cultural values of the people. which analyze the physical environment under consideration. parenthood. three indices were used. The main assumption here was that social rank is related to transportation links which influence residential location in a sectoral manner (Scargill. employment. 1971). The city was viewed as a part of society.1 Western Cities Many studies of the social and physical urban pattern have been done. 1992). housing conditions and material possessions. value of home. 1971). education.8. This type of urbanization is also related to the housing market described by Hoyt (1939). It serves as the building block to construct the whole town. For example. The non-uniform pattern is consistent over many cities because similar households exert similar housing choices. they move outwards. Critics say that neighborhood unit strongly emphasizes physical environment. ethnic status used religion and social groups. It is only the most convenient one. safety. 3. 1990). The outward mobility is related to different stages of life . ethnic status and family status (Timms. The concept of neighborhood units became popular since the1920s in planned settlements (Perry. housing choices may not be made on economic basis. every city has some constraints. but on cultural ones. social status and retirement (Scargill. 1990). Social rank used the variables. the neighborhood unit is used as the unit of analysis in the study of human settlements (Herbert and Thomas. community and social and civic responsibilities such as aesthetics. it does not address the needs of a social environment. As a family’s needs for space increase.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 30 3. In the built environment this corresponds to ethnic neighborhoods (Timms. It is not only a physical design concept. neighborliness. In Western cities the reasons for non-uniformity have been identified as socioeconomic status. are suitable modifications of the concept (Timms. The use of these three indices for analysis is a social area analysis. Family status in American cities shows a concentric distribution.marriage. This is . family status used the variables related to demographics and type of house. Analysis of individual cities shows that the pattern is not uniform and is characterized by residential segregation. Ethnicity causes the social phenomena of segregation.8 Case Studies of Urban social Patterns The study of the urban social pattern of a city primarily focuses on the residential land use (Herbert and Thomas. A neighborhood is the basis for formally organized residential space. Hence. The broad generalization of the social rank produced a sector model. family status and ethnic status. 1929). It is assumed that any planned city consists of neighborhood units. however. The data source was census tracts. 1971). Individualistic frameworks. 1979). In the analysis of urban social patterns. and social change was expected to be reflected in studies which were repeated over a time period (Herbert and Thomas.

1979). Australia (Timms. 3. youth/migrants and black poverty. Studies of Brisbane. traditional and modern design elements juxtaposed in seemingly dichotomous ways. 1990) showed similar results.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 31 predominant in cities where migration is high. 1995) shows that the four important factors in the social pattern are underclass. 1992.2 Third World Cities commercial ethnic group residential industrial Ethnic Status CBD Transition Low income Middle income High income Family Status Socioeconomic Status Income group 1 Income group 2 Income group 3 Figure 3. The changing pattern of family cycle reflects concentric zones while that of social rank is in sectors. Public open spaces are generally found only . Canada (Herbert and Thomas. but socially with more complex relations to one another. however. Ethnicity. 1971). Winnipeg. Traditional places are typically more dense with narrow streets and housing spaces around central courtyards. 1995.8.5 Urban Social Patterns Source: Knox. does not always emerge as an independent component (Scargill. socioeconomic status. Cities in the Third World are frequently dual environments. Hartshorn. A study of Baltimore (Knox.

A large number of models of Third World cities have been made (Lowder.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 32 around religious buildings. The morphological model of Asian port cities shows a multiple nucleus (Figure 3. along riverbanks). which is adjacent to.7 Asian Ports pattern showed concentric zones for land use. land use. 1986 Literacy and ethnic patterns emerged in a sectoral form.6) (Herbert and Thomas. but formed shantytowns in the peri-urban fringes and in unserviced areas (under bridges. A study of Colombo (Herbert and de Silva. traditional commercial areas and modern commercial areas. The more Figure 3. The social Figure 3. 1986). Thus. as opposed to conglomerations. 1974) found that social status. An analysis of Calcutta showed a pattern based on land use. 1975). The migrants and poor did not live in the core of the city. The nuclei are original village. which contribute significantly to the urban pattern (Kopardekara. The modern place is more spacious. are very complex and have evolved over a very long time. 1986). 1986). The center of the city was the plaza. the morphological pattern of each Third World city is different mainly because of the presence of an indigenous city enclosed by a colonial city. The second and third concentric zones were occupied progressively by poorer people. substandard living conditions and ethnicity were the broad variables that defined the social pattern of the city. Social morphological models constructed for the Third World cities show that there is a central concentration of commercial activity and a number of residential neighborhoods. and surrounds old Delhi (Figure 3. and subsequently surrounded by an industrial city (Lowder. 1980. family ties. .7). Source: Lowder. The model shows that the indigenous elite were closely associated with the commercial area. ethnicity and literacy. 1990). Western ideas of suburbanization and formed their Source: Drakakis-Smith own neighborhoods (Lowder. Around the plaza was the important buildings including a church. 1986). A classic example can be seen in the design of New Delhi.6 Plan of Delhi and New educated and professional classes followed the Delhi. social and economic variables may not be the only factors. But. The colonial cities in Latin America show a centralized social pattern (Portes. Processes quite different from those in western cities govern the pattern of Third World cities. Even single cities. The residences of the richer class formed the first concentric zone around the plaza.

8 Latin American Cities America. In the 18th and 19th centuries. The social ties are horizontal and vertical. 1986). "Particularly in cosmopolitan cities cultural or linguistic diversity and regional associations develop to extol their culture and language and to participate in their own . The horizontal relationships are between people of the same cultural background while vertical relationships are between caste and class. the residences became smaller and public amenities were reduced. status groups help to produce a very obscure patterning of social groups at the micro-level of analysis. and especially to construct a structural model. Soon socioeconomic status related to nearness to the center became related to distance away from the center. new definitions had to be made. In the cities where new professions were created. 1980): i Residences have not yet come to serve the symbolic function they do in the Western world.8. Research findings point out that while caste is important in rural societies for its very functioning. A consistent relationship existed between socioeconomic position of the household and their distance from the center of the city. The outer ring bordered on farmland (Figure 3. Soon. and religious duties performed by the Brahmins. languages and customs. The nature of traditional social status and the interdependence and spatial interpretation of diverse. yet complementary.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 33 Here. spatial segregation based on ethnicity. caste. For example. i Symbolic functionalism is performed by religion and caste and buttressed by regional affiliations. in rural areas. But. the poorer the household (Cornelius. The pattern was a creation of the lifestyle choices of the urban rich (Portes. 3. The pattern is similar to the one described by the sector model of North Figure 3. climatic and aesthetic factors. The greater complexity of urban life and the difficulty of maintaining caste identity through residential segregation alone.8). has created social organizations for each caste (Kopardekara. It has been found that Indian cities defy social modeling. in general.3 Indian Cities In cities of India. In Lima. Santiago and Chile Source: Lowder. the Indian urban social scene essentially reflects two facets of non-western structure (Hall. 1986 residential colonies moved from the center of the city to the urban periphery which were selected for their better geographic. A second indigenous factor suffusing urban society is that of regional affiliation. Many studies have been done to study Indian urban areas. many large cities became crowded. the farther away from the center. 1977). 1975). industrial and office workers belonged to all castes. religion and language rather than demographics and economics can be seen. in urban environments the meaning of caste becomes more important in terms of identity rather than function. Wealthier families began to move out of the center and settle in more isolated locations. farming is done only by the Sudra caste.

i Metropolitan cities (Bombay. i North Indian cities had low female employment rates. and that the temple acted as the most meaningful focus for the spatial distribution of social characteristics. . low literacy. real case studies did not prove this theory. Industrial towns like Jamshedpur were planned around their industrial core. Weinstein (1974) made an attempt to produce a conceptual model for the social segregation of an Indian city. i South Indian cities had higher female employment rate. He had the following conclusions. colonial cities. Pune and Varanasi. had western style CBDs. The centroid of the system represents the optimum location for accessibility to all three functions. Instead. Ahmad (1965) did a factor analysis of the socioeconomic characteristics of Indian cities. He postulated three dimensions as being important contributors to residential segregation. However. 1980:35). Although the neighborhoods that result are not corporate groups in the sense in which they are defined. i The modern planned cities (Jamshedpur. such neighborhoods are the source for the development of the corporate groups. it was found that multiple nuclei were present. 1968). higher literacy. Calcutta) has low-density commercial centers surrounded by high-density residential neighborhoods. Hyderabad had two nuclei – the old city and the colonial city. higher migration and equal male to female ratio. Madras.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 34 regional festivals if not usually celebrated in the region within which they live now" (Hall. 1974 evolutionary pattern. low migration and equal male to female ratio.9 Pattern of Indian Cities Source: Weinstein.9). had retained their residential core (Mehta. These three dimensions would form concentric zones (Figure 3. Chandigarh) have low population densities with no concentration of industrial. commercial or administrative areas. These three dimensions were i socioeconomic dimension symbolized by the bazaar i political dimension represented by an administrative symbol i prestige dimension derived from the religious function of a temple. Calcutta and Madras. Temple Bazaar Centroid Fort Brush (1977) studied 24 cities in India and discerned four types of gradients of population directly related to their Figure 3. cities that were well developed even before the colonial period. Their influence and interplay causes residential segregation. Certain areas are known for their residents speaking a particular language only. Bombay.

These examples show that the urban social pattern of Indian cities is very complex due to the influence of a variety of factors. The existence of multiple physical urban patterns caused by the presence of indigenous settlements. The patterns were attributed to Europeanism. The social patterns were also strongly influenced by the age of the city. Analysis at the level of a single city gave patterns that are more complex. transportation and socioeconomic status (Kosambi. 1901. castes and classes produces a more heterogeneous pattern. Census data from 1881. 1986). commercialism. 1986). A systematic analysis of census data for Bombay was done (Kosambi. 1831 and 1961 was used to determine the evolution and change of the social pattern. The presence of many religions. religious polarity. . British cities and industrial towns within the boundary of the urban area. languages.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 35 Such broad conclusions are results of regional analyses.

10 Urban Social Patterns and Relevant Case Studies.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 36 C oncentric Z one T h eory S ector T heory Incom e g rou p 1 M ultiple N uclei T heory commercial ethnic group CBD Tran sitio n L ow incom e M iddle inco m e H igh inco m e In com e g roup 2 residential industrial In com e g rou p 3 D elhi Latin A m erica A sian P orts C oncentric + S ector T heories C hicago C alcutta C oncentric + S ector + M ultiple N uclei T h eories Figure 2. Source: Lowder. 1992. 1986. . Hartshorn.

. The reasons for migration are also varied – they may be migrating as a result of natural calamities. this is not evident due to the existence of multi-generational families. The residential neighborhoods of such cities are not as well defined as they are in the American cities. The households are generally large with a range of ages. religion and language. class. an effort was made to prevent this social stratification and use residential allotments to fulfill this objective. However. The historical evolution of cities has supported this stratification. the sociocultural factors are related to caste. sector theory and multiple nuclei theory. The lifestyle depends on ethnicity and migration. Status in Third World cities is based on family membership or socioeconomic class. In such a case study. power and status. The growth of cities across the world has been studied. Migration may also be restricted to the men of the family. These are concentric zone theory. Social area analysis assumes that a few independent factors can explain the spatial patterning of a city. Here. it is appropriate to use a social area analysis to delineate the urban social pattern. skills and professions. In the case of India. The components of the analysis of American cities are not entirely apparent in the Third World cities. Traditional Indian cities have grown over a very long period of time.9 Conclusion The urban social pattern is the complex manifestation of the underlying cultural values of the population within a particular built environment. the components derived from social area analysis were termed as socioeconomic status. The lifestyle factor in North American cities relates small nuclear families with higher education achievements and better employment opportunities.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 37 3. family status and ethnic status. the researcher’s knowledge of the local environment is important to contextualize the pattern more appropriately. In Third World cities. These theories have been combined in a social area analysis to describe the social pattern based on a few social variables. Stratification causes social inequality in terms of wealth. Land-use is also similar in that it is predominantly single-use zoning. or in search of opportunities in the city. the residential neighborhoods have been designed using the neighborhood principle as those designed in America. Male dominance. These characteristics stratify the society into vertical and horizontal systems. Three leading western theories describing the urban social pattern of cities dominate the literature on urban social patterns (Hartshorn. 1992). this social area analysis must take into consideration the indigenous factors. In the American cities. A market economy strongly influences the lifestyle of the citizens of Navi Mumbai. migration or ethnic group represent the ethnic factor. In the case of Navi Mumbai. The urban social pattern of these cities has been generalized. In the design of Navi Mumbai.

1978). It was first put forth by Shevky and Williams (1949) in a study of Los Angeles.Chapter 4: Research Design Determining the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai is the primary research objective of this thesis. Generally the economic model showed a sectored pattern. These three factors also corresponded to the theoretical models proposed by Burgess. 1971). Social area analysis shows how family characteristics. These factors are taken into consideration in social area analysis. 1985). This analysis classifies census tract data into three main constructs . A set of variables describing the social structure of the city can be used in the statistical analysis. Cairo and Helsinki showed some useful generalization. studies in Calcutta. Under these conditions. However. and Harris and Ullman will be the theoretical framework for the conceptualization of the social pattern of Navi Mumbai. and ethnic segregation showed a multiple nuclei arrangement. The analysis looks at the variables at once and at their respective locations in their distribution. The aim is to identify key combinations of different measures that provide an adequate basis on which to differentiate the sub-areas from one another (King and Golledge. The increase in industrialization creates an occupational status system (Timms.1 Social Area Analysis Social area analysis provides a broad framework for analyzing the social patterns of a city. The research investigates the relationship between the spatial pattern of Navi Mumbai and the different theories of urban social patterns discussed in the literature review. The basic premise of social area analysis is that a city cannot be studied in isolation from the overall society (Shevky and Bell. religion and ethnic background. The family as a unit becomes weaker. the urbanization component showed a concentric ring pattern. economic. economic status and ethnic background produce a certain spatial pattern in the city. urbanization index. Although these analyses have been more effective for studying North American cities. The study involves the categorization of a city based on social rank. Thus. there was considerable criticism about the choice of variables. The theories put forth by Burgess. Hoyt and Harris and Ullman. They were considered to be very narrow and not universally applicable. the city was analyzed as a composite made up of three layers. Cities are complex entities that have many different functions performed by many different people. 1955). Better transportation systems increase mobility and lead to a greater sorting of population (Cadwallader. The issue of spatial distribution of different kinds of people in Navi Mumbai is of primary interest. mapping of social area analysis for a large sample of cities showed that socioeconomic status. immigration of rural population leads to segregation based on language.socioeconomic status. The social area analysis may be done statistically by a factor analysis. 4. and ethnicity confirmed the validity of the analysis. It is a . These involve population. and housing characteristics. The pattern of the city may be determined by statistical analysis or by discerning people’s mental images of the city. Hoyt. The general issue of social areas will be accomplished through social area analysis. urbanization and segregation. family status and ethnic status. Earlier.

In this case study of Navi Mumbai. The variables are tabulated below: Table 4. Variables that arise from such cultural determinants need to be used in the factor analysis. then the pattern will be explained using the existing theories. The sectors (neighborhoods) are identical to census block tracts. my null hypothesis. This hypothesis is put forth on the assumption that the social agenda put forth in the Development Plan has been successfully implemented. If H0 is false. religion.4 Data Collection The data required for the analysis can be obtained from census tracts of Navi Mumbai. concentric zone theory and multiple nuclei theory. education. The data available is based on a . This provides a spatial hierarchical data set.2 Hypotheses As discussed in the literature review. Social area analysis based on western thinking can not be naively applied to the study of urban social patterns in India. 1980). religious and historic development with both horizontal (kinship. 4.Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 39 device that seeks interrelationships among the set of input variables (Herbert and Thomas.1 Constructs and Variables Construct Variable Socioeconomic status Profession Number of earning members Income Education Family status Demographics Women at home Family size Dwelling size Type of house Year of occupation Ethnic status Religion Language 4. 4. This database provides aggregated information about each node (township). mapping of social patterns in many cities across the world show that the socioeconomic status. is: no significant difference in key variables is expected and hence no social patterning will occur. language) and vertical (occupation. caste) dimensions (Hall. Social structure in India is a result of cultural. 1990). family status and ethnic status correspond respectively to the sector theory. H0.3 Operationalization Certain variables will be used to operationalize the social area analysis to obtain the urban social pattern. and each sector (neighborhood) of the nodes.

Statistics are weighted for spatial data because. and compare it to other cities. An error of 5-8% is expected. For a social area analysis.378 Kopar-khairane 14. is census data. Although principal components analysis is no longer considered the most favorable mode of analysis to delineate patterns.056 New Panvel 9. the sector is the unit of analysis.283 Nerul 16.5. The single variable from that data set is selected and a histogram of it at the . Finally. and at the sub-regional scale attached as Appendix C. The survey was carried out on a ~22% sample basis for each node. These are techniques in multivariate analysis.109 Kalamboli 9. This is a detailed stage of analysis. The variables are expected to cluster based on the constructs described above.1 Descriptive Analysis The first stage of analysis describes the data at both the regional and sub-regional scale. cartographic mapping. 4. The descriptive analysis helps understand the finer dimensions of the data. The GIS and mapping techniques convert all the statistical information into a graphic representation. and GIS overlay techniques are used to determine the social pattern at the regional and sub-regional levels.007 Airoli 13.161 Sanpada 2.Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 40 socioeconomic survey done by CIDCO in December 1995. 4.338 Belapur 9. although variables are related. The cluster analysis puts together cases which are similar based on the relationship between the variables. Table 4. data covering a large area is required.2 Survey Sampling Node Total Number of Dwellings Vashi 27. the units of analysis are not identical. These four methods are collectively used to analyze the data.357 Survey Coverage 6656 4219 2125 2034 2282 2530 2506 544 % of total 24 26 23 22 25 19 18 23 The issues of validity and reliability arise in the use of census data for testing the hypothesis.5 Methodology Four methodologies are used to analyze the data. In this research. The first is a descriptive analysis of the data setting out the parameters that need to be considered to define the meaning of heterogeneity. for the purpose of this thesis it shall be used. All data is standardized. The principal components analysis draws out the relationship between the variables. The only data source that provides this information. The census data is not 100% reliable. The second is a principal components analysis. At the regional scale the data is tabulated. The third is cluster analysis of the cases to see which variables are closely associated.

Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 41 sub-regional scale is drawn. The data matrix is converted into a correlation matrix. The elements of the eigenvectors that are used to compute the scores are called principal component loadings. Generally variables with communalities less than 0. Patterns can be delineated from mapping these components. The cases are the rows and the variables are the columns. the matrix of component scores is computed. The data is interpreted in terms of its mean and standard deviation. The axis has been rotated orthogonally (assuming the factors are uncorrelated).5. This approach to classification is very subjective. 1978). Corresponding communalities are also estimated. The . 1986). then the pattern shall be interpreted as homogeneous. The eigenvalue criterion (eigenvalue greater than or equal to 1) helps eliminate components which are not meaningful. Finally. It has very little theory and depends largely on experience. Rotating the axis more closely intersects the clusters of variables. The first step of principal components analysis is to obtain an initial solution. Comparative figures at the national scale are also given. Cluster analysis classifies the groups according to the observations into moreor-less homogenous and distinct groups (Davis. 1986). Principal components are the eigenvalues of the correlation matrix (Davis. it is necessary to provide a permissible range of variation. If the standard deviation at the 95% confidence interval is within 15% of the mean. the second component accounts for as much of the residual variance left unexplained by the first factor. These restrictions are (1) there are k common components (2) underlying components are orthogonal to each other (3) the first component accounts for as much variance as possible. This is varimax rotation. This matrix is next converted into a factor matrix. Principal components analysis can be thought of as four matrices. The first matrix is a simple data matrix. Characteristics of the urban social pattern can be revealed by considering the relationship within groups. The initial solution is based on the orthogonal solution. In order to interpret this descriptive statistics for homogeneity. The rotation normally removes the negative loadings. The N by M matrix is standardized in terms of standard deviation. 4.2 Principal Components Analysis A principal components analysis reduces a large number of variables to a smaller number of underlying components. and so on" (Kim and Mueller. certain restrictions are imposed. A variation greater than thirty percent of the total population from the mean (15% on either side of mean) is used here to show unequal distribution. This solution determines whether a small number of the components can be used to explain the covariance between a large number of variables. 4.5. "To obtain the initial solution.7 are not significant in the correlation matrix. The second step is to rotate the axis to get a simpler solution. This matrix contains components that represent a group of interrelated variables. and results in a simpler pattern.3 Cluster Analysis Classification of data places objects in one or more homogenous groups. Each original observation is converted into a principal component score. These loadings indicate the strength of the relationships between variables and underlying components.

Distance coefficients are linked at low values. 4.6 Data Analysis Descriptive analysis of the data was done using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. principal components analysis and cluster analysis. The SPSS program was also used to perform a principal component analysis and a cluster analysis on this data set. Both the analyses were done at a regional and sub-regional scale. . then connects the next most similar observations to these. The levels of similarity are used to construct the dendrogram.Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 42 classification procedure used here is hierarchical clustering. This method joins similar observations. as is the correlation coefficient. Analysis was then done of one particular node of Navi Mumbai. Mapping of the principal components determined if any pattern exists in the social characteristics of Navi Mumbai at the regional and sub-regional scales.4 Mapping and Overlays The final stage is the mapping of the descriptive analysis. A measure of similarity between every pair of objects is computed using Euclidean distance. 4. The criteria for clustering is that both observations mutually have the highest correlation with each other. A low distance would indicate that two objects are similar and a large distance would indicate that the two objects are dissimilar. The distance coefficient is not constrained within the range of +1. This mapping helps explain the statistics through a easily interpretable graphic representation.0. namely Vashi. A correlation coefficient or distance coefficient may be used to evaluate similarities.5. and so produces better dendrograms. This stage of analysis integrates the theoretical framework. The aim of these two kinds of analysis was to determine if the data set clustered into the three constructs given above. and the statistical analysis to determine an interpretation of the pattern.0 to -1. The regional scale was comparisons between the eight nodes of Navi Mumbai.

unskilled status Number of earning members 1 earning member Income Rs. Hence. The criteria used to select the variables were based on the expectations of the hypothesis. One or two variables from each set was selected for this study. • sub-regional scale (sectors of a node) The study areas at the regional level of analysis are those of the nodes of Navi Mumbai including Vashi. Kopar-khairane. age 25-45. The variables needed to explain the constructs as well as possible.1 Constructs and Variables Construct Variable Name Variable from data set Socioeconomic Profession highly skilled. Muslim Language Marathi. 5. Panvel. All the variables belonged to closed sets. Kalamboli. it was selected out of the eight nodes. Airoli and Sanpada. age 25-45 Family size 4 to 5 members Dwelling size 26-35 sq. and has fully developed residential sectors.Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 5. m. only then would they bring out the characteristics of the construct. Vashi is the oldest node. Malayalam . Type of housing CIDCO Tenure 1980s Last place of residence Bombay Ethnic status Religion Hindu. Table 5. The analysis is divided into descriptive analysis of variables and detailed analysis at the regional and sub-regional. 2651-4450 Education high school Family status Demographics Male pop. female pop. it was used for analysis. Belapur.2 Descriptive Analysis of Data The different constructs and variable names described in the methodology section are tabulated below (Table 5. only one or two representative variables from each set was selected. The methodological reason for selecting these eight nodes out of the total of thirteen is because data was available for only these eight nodes. This spatial scale is • regional scale (nodes). Then the data set was studied at a sub-regional level by analyzing the neighborhoods of Vashi node.1 Introduction The aim of this research is to study the urban social pattern of the population across a hierarchical scale. As this node had the most complete data. As the 1995 survey data was the most recent data. Data for the regional and sub-regional scale was collected from the 1995 socioeconomic survey conducted by CIDCO. Nerul.1) with the actual variable from the data set.

Data tables for the sub-regional scale are given in Appendix C.15% (a slight increase from 32. Better education facilitates getting better jobs and higher income. while it is 1.1 Socioeconomic Status The socioeconomic status is an indicator of social class.35. Number of earning members: Out of the total population of 91787 recorded in the survey. The percent of males and females is shown in Table 5.8% recorded in the 1987 survey) of the population makes up the workforce of Navi Mumbai. and form the socioeconomic indicator.67 in Greater Bombay.12 1.2. All these variables are closely correlated. An increase in the number of earning members increases family income and the socioeconomic class. 5.3 Number of Earners Single 2 3 4+ Vashi 68 23 6 2 Nerul 78 16 3 1 Belapur 68 22 4 2 Kalamboli 79 15 4 1 Panvel 78 17 3 1 Kopar-khairane 76 17 5 1 Airoli 74 20 4 1 Sanpada 70 19 7 2 Mean 74 19 5 1 Standard deviation 5 3 1 1 .75 8. Table 5.2Work Force Percent of male Percent of female population in work population in work force force Vashi 53 10 Nerul 55 7 Belapur 52 12 Kalamboli 54 6 Panvel 57 8 Kopar-khairane 56 10 Airoli 53 7 Sanpada 58 9 Mean 54.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 44 All data tables are for the regional scale while the histograms are from the sub-regional scale. A profession brings with it a certain prestige and social class. Table 5. 30430 are the working population.99 The average number of earners per household is 1. 33.2. Seventy-five percent of families had one earning member and twenty percent of families had two earning members (Table 5.62 Standard Deviation 2.3).2 and the number of earners in Table 5.

Skilled workers are factory workers.0 75. The distribution of the single earner families is shown in Figure 5.4). In Navi Mumbai this economic class constitutes 38% of the work force. they are 19% of the work force and the standard deviation is 11. Unskilled persons are construction laborers and housemaids. Dev = 7. The pattern is homogeneous.3). and has a normal distribution over eight cases.0 55.0 80.96 Mean = 66. Kopar-khairane has a low number of highly skilled workers and a large number of unskilled workers (Table 5.0 60. 25% of the workforce is employed there. The standard deviation is 11. while service professions such as shops and hotels employ 7% of the workforce.0 50. The mean is 74 with a very low standard deviation of 5. At the sub-regional scale the standard deviation is 7. This is most representative of the entire population. The distribution of the singleearner family at the regional level shows a standard deviation of only 5 (mean=74).0 65. On an average.4 Occupational Classification of Workforce Highly skilled unskilled office selfteacher other skilled worker worker assistant employed Vashi 45 12 12 15 9 4 3 Nerul 38 23 13 15 4 4 3 Belapur 47 12 8 20 3 6 4 Kalamboli 24 31 20 12 8 3 2 Panvel 43 19 9 16 4 7 2 Kopar-khairane 20 9 41 9 9 0 12 Airoli 34 18 44 12 5 1 4 Sanpada 49 9 20 14 3 3 2 Mean 38 17 19 14 6 4 4 Standard Deviation 11 8 11 3 3 2 3 Frequency . single earning member. was selected.0 70. contractors and consultants. Highly skilled professionals hold higher level managerial and supervisory jobs or are professional business persons. The main reason is that this node is presently under construction and has a large workforce of construction workers. Table 5.1 Distribution of Single-earner families For the analysis. Profession: Good employment opportunities are offered by the manufacturing industries of Navi Mumbai.00 45. Professional workers in teaching and medical institutions are 7% of the workforce. This means that the distribution is homogeneous.3). They form 17% of the workforce. construction workers and trainees. For this analysis classification based on skills is tabulated (Table 5. Government offices including banks and public sector enterprises employ 21% of the workforce. the variable.96 (mean=66. carpenters.3 N = 19127. Small businesses account for 15% of the employees.0 0 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 45 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Std. Both the values are within 15% of the mean.1.

46 44517500 30 21 35 21 31 36 34 42 31. 4900 and the monthly average per capita income is Rs. Dev = 10 Mean = 27. in Navi Mumbai it appears that the four income groups have to be redefined based on the median and/or mean income of this region rather than using the national urban averages (Table 5.2 15000+ 3 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1. This shows a proportionately large middle and higher income groups. The proportion of EWS:LIG:MIG:HIG is 2:16:34:48. The monthly average household income is Rs.63 6. Thus. The regional scale shows a standard deviation of 6.46.26 26514450 27 36 27 46 31 32 39 31 33.5).0 15.0 10.9) (Figure 5.38 Standard deviation 0. the standard deviation is 10.13 1. 2650 • middle income group (MIG) earning between Rs.2).0 25.5 Household Income upto 12511250 2650 Vashi 2 14 Nerul 3 27 Belapur 2 12 Kalamboli 2 26 Panvel 2 24 Kopar-khairane 2 9 Airoli 1 14 Sanpada 1 5 Mean 1. Table 5. 2651-4450 was selected for the principal components analysis because the median income of Rs. Income: The income groups are defined by the Government of India’s household income classification into: • economically weaker section (EWS) earning less than Rs1250 per month • lower income group (LIG) earning between Rs. 2651-4450 The income range of Rs.0 45.98 (mean=27. 7500 per month.45) and the sub-regional scale.2 Frequency of Families with income range Rs.9 N = 19127.0 50.29 750110000 15 6 12 3 5 9 8 12 8.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 46 The corresponding data was not available at the sub-regional scale.00 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.0 40.0 35.0 Std. Both cases do not show a homogeneous distribution of people based on income as the standard deviation is greater than 15% of the mean.06 1000115000 7 3 5 1 3 7 2 4 4 2.64 8. 1230. Almost 34% of the population falls within this category.13 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 5.25 7. Frequency .0 20.46 (mean=33. 4451 and Rs 7500 and • higher income group (HIG) earning more than Rs.88 16.0 30. and the standard deviation is 6. 4200 fell within this range.75 4. 1251 and Rs.

13 3. Bachelors and Masters degrees. 10% use bicycles and only 2% go by school bus. Table 5. secondary school education. technical education.25 2. the column titled Vashi shows that some students from all other nodes also go there to attend school or college (Table 5. children.36 technical 1 2 1 2 4 1 1 2 1.6). Vashi has all the major colleges.28 Children Primary secondary 9 5 8 10 8 6 7 8 7.60 14 15 18 20 14 13 16 12 15. The level of education is categorized into illiterate. 12% use public transport.66 27 27 30 34 25 27 37 21 28.04 BS MS 22 4 24 5 15 2 9 1 22 4 29 4 13 3 21 4 19. Table 5.30 . 51% of the children go to schools where the medium of instruction is English.7).75 1. primary school education. Most students attend school and college within their node (township).38 6. 76% of the students walk to their school or college. while 4% of the population is going to college. high school education. Hence. The value given represents the highest level of education achieved by at least one member of the family (Table 5.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 47 Education: The survey shows that 27% of the total population is children going to school.52 1.38 3.7 Level of Education illiterate Vashi Nerul Belapur Kalamboli Panvel Kopar-khairane Airoli Sanpada Mean Standard deviation 4 3 5 7 3 4 4 4 4.63 1. Sanpada is the only node without any education facilities.6 Location of Education Institutions Vashi Nerul Belapur Kalamboli Panvel Kopar.Airoli Sanpada Bombay khairane Vashi 88 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 Nerul 9 77 2 1 1 0 0 0 10 Belapur 10 12 67 1 1 0 0 0 9 Kalamboli 1 0 1 90 4 0 0 0 4 Panvel 2 1 2 8 76 0 0 0 11 Kopar-khairane 17 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 2 Airoli 7 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 10 Sanpada 47 8 1 1 0 0 16 0 27 In the Bombay region literacy rates are seventy-five percent for adult population. and 35% of the children go to schools where the medium of instruction is Marathi (12% did not specify their medium of instruction).25 1.07 high school 22 17 21 16 19 15 18 25 19.5 5.

0 25.8. 5.13 (mean=40.2.8 Male Population below 3 4-5 6 .6 (Census of India. and at the sub-regional scale is 7. Table 5.9). This age group was selected because it is a subset of the population and it makes most of the decision regarding social choices (Table 5.5). Table 5.6).07. The working age group of 25 to 44 is 39% of the 1000 Std. About 9% of the Mean = 40. Dev = 7. The age group 16 to 24 is 10% of the 2000 population.00 0 45 to 59. Cases weighted by population The present pattern clearly shows Figure 5. and only 3% of the 15. Children up to the age of 15 constitute 33% of 3000 the total population. Secondary school means an education of up to Grade 10 and the passing of a government examination (matriculation).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 48 The variable ’secondary school’ was selected under level of education.07 (mean=28.2 Family Status Demographics: The nodes of Navi Mumbai have a female to 5000 male ratio of 848 to 1000 (comparative figures for Bombay 4000 are 819 to 1000). The national average for this variable is 16. 1991) The standard deviation of this variable at the regional scale is 5. This level of education is provided to everyone by the government free of cost.0 40.0 50.13 population. 28.9 10 -15 16 .0 30.3 Frequency of Families with at least one a younger population with a high individual with Secondary Education percentage of children.21 22 -24 25 -44 45 -59 60+ Vashi 4 3 7 15 12 5 34 14 5 Nerul 7 5 10 12 8 5 41 8 3 Belapur 6 4 8 14 12 5 37 11 4 Kalamboli 8 6 11 13 8 5 43 6 1 Panvel 8 4 8 11 9 5 44 9 3 Kopar-khairane 10 6 10 10 8 5 43 6 1 Airoli 7 5 10 14 11 4 39 8 2 Sanpada 7 4 6 10 10 5 43 10 4 Mean 7 5 9 12 10 5 41 9 3 Standard deviation 2 1 2 2 2 0 3 3 1 6000 Frequency .0 35.5% of the population falls under this category with a standard deviation of 5. The variation is not homogeneous at either scale (Figure 5.0 population are in the 60+ range. The demographic indicators used are male and female population of the age group 25-45.0 20.3).0 45.6 population are in the age group of N = 19127.

0 48.0 50. A descriptive analysis of the data over the last 20 years shows that household size has been constantly increasing.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 49 7000 6000 5000 4000 The standard deviation of the population is 3 (mean=41) at the regional level. In Vashi.0 38.0 40.73 in 1987 to 4.39 (mean=38) at the sub-regional level (Figure 5.4 Frequency of male population in the age group 25-45 Figure 5.0 42.76 and the national average is 5. 3000 2000 Frequency 1000 0 32. The comparative family size for Bombay is 4. .00 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.0 36.0 N = 19127.39 Mean = 38. The reason for this is not only marriage and children.9 Female Population below 3 4-5 Vashi 5 3 Nerul 7 5 Belapur 5 4 Kalamboli 15 10 Panvel 8 4 Kopar-khairane 9 6 Airoli 6 5 Sanpada 6 4 Mean 8 5 Standard deviation 3 2 6 -9 8 10 8 16 8 10 10 8 10 3 10 -15 14 13 14 20 11 9 15 10 13 3 16 -21 11 9 11 13 10 12 10 13 11 1 22 -24 5 7 6 12 9 10 6 9 8 2 25 -44 39 40 40 6 40 37 39 39 35 12 45 -59 10 6 8 6 6 5 6 9 7 2 60+ 4 2 3 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 The female population of the age group 25-45 is also uniformly distributed over the study area. average family size has increased from 3.0 34.0 44.4). and 3.52.0 46.10).0 Std.01 for all the nodes (Table 5. but also the need to accommodate older parents. Family size: The average family size is 4.0 52. Dev = 3. The population age structure is uniformly distributed over the whole region.21 in 1985.

9.0 47. At the regional scale the standard deviation is 5.5 55.0 52.0 4.10 Family Size Single Vashi Nerul Belapur Kalamboli Panvel Kopar-khairane Airoli Sanpada Mean Standard deviation 6000 2.3 26 34 31 31 41 41 27 39 33.99 3.5 50.0 67.1 6.9 0.7 14 10 13 14 8 10 15 12 12 2.5 45.00 0 42.5 57 54 53 52 45 45 56 45 50.9).85 (mean=56) at the sub-regional scale (Figure 5.21 3.85 Mean = 56.5 The variation of the data is minimal. Frequency Cases weighted by population Figure 5.10 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0. private builders and cooperative housing began developing residential sectors. CIDCO began all construction in Navi Mumbai.5 60.6 1 2 1 3 5 3 1 3 2.5 65. and 5. . 3000 2000 1000 Std.1 (mean=50.87 4.4 8. Dev = 5. Later.11).03 3. Since Vashi is the oldest node.5).4 1.85 5000 4000 The families with a size of 4 or 5 members was chosen as 50% of the population belongs to this category.5 Frequency of households with 4 or 5 members Type of Housing: Initially CIDCO built ninety percent of the housing stock.0 62.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 50 Table 5.4 Average family size 4. the data shows more diversification of the housing stock. The variable has a standard deviation of 5.22 3.81 4.0 N = 19127.0 57.1.67 3.8 6. All other nodes show a dominance of CIDCO housing (Table 5.9 5.

Dev = 35.77 Pvt. Houses built by CIDCO are 90% of the houses available.24 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 Pvt.0 60. only houses built by CIDCO was selected.0 20. CIDCO is still the major owner. The standard deviation is 12.0 40.11 Type of Housing CIDCO Vashi 64 Nerul 95 Belapur 91 Kalamboli 99 Panvel 80 Kopar-khairane 98 Airoli 100 Sanpada 88 Mean 89.62 Mean = 66.0 10.88 0.24 (mean=89.76 0. resale and rental fall under private ownership. Co-op Commercial 29 2 5 0 9 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0 0 11 0 8. Most government offices that provide housing for their employees obtain long term lease from CIDCO.35 1000 0 0.0 80.62 (mean=66.6 Frequency of Houses built by CIDCO For this variable.24.0 50. the oldest node.4) (Figure 5. The categories.00 Cases weighted by POP Figure 5. This may be one of the main reasons for the greater variability in the pattern at the sub-regional scale rather than at the regional scale.38 9.0 90.00 1.6).12 shows present ownership of the house. The large deviation shows that private construction has taken place. House 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1.74 Other 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 100.0 70. the strong control is no longer evident.38) while at the sub-regional scale it is 35. This is a very significant result. Table 5.0 Std. CIDCO’s aim to promote heterogeneity was to be implemented by having a strong hold over the housing market. private ownership. The standard deviation at the regional scale is 12. At Vashi.38 Standard Deviation 12.4 N = 19127.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 51 Table 5. Some houses are mortgage through CIDCO.13 0.0 30. Frequency .

75 18.64 Dwelling size: The average size of dwelling units constructed by CIDCO is less than that built by private builders (Table 5.63 9.12 Ownership of House Mortgage CIDCO Vashi 11 23 Nerul 21 36 Belapur 8 40 Kalamboli 25 25 Panvel 7 33 Kopar-khairane 0 34 Airoli 0 51 Sanpada 15 32 Mean 10.25 while the mean was 14.25 Standard Deviation 9. 6000 4000 Frequency 2000 Std.7 Frequency of Housing Built by CIDCO .25 0.50 0 Standard deviation 8.25 5. the private builders are predominantly building for the HIG.63 14.09 8.36 12.0 40.76 0 10000 8000 The standard deviation of the data was 21.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 52 Table 5.88 34.43 Rental 23 36 37 43 36 49 42 26 36.0 0 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.5 8.68 Resale 21 16 0 0 0 14 0 18 8.64 6.0 20.0 70. Table 5.13 Housing built by CIDCO <15 16-25 26-35 36-50 51-75 76-100 101-150 150+ Vashi 11 30 22 14 15 3 2 0 Nerul 7 57 18 8 7 2 1 0 Belapur 0 26 10 33 20 11 0 0 Kalamboli 24 37 24 5 7 2 0 0 Panvel 10 33 16 18 22 1 0 0 Kopar-khairane 0 20 10 42 18 9 1 0 Airoli 0 30 28 17 18 6 0 0 Sanpada 0 61 18 12 9 0 0 0 Mean 6.5 4.2 N = 19127.99 0.0 10.50 36.75 Private 17 3 4 1 9 1 0 7 5.13.0 90. Dev = 21.2 (Figure 5.25 18.85 Mean = 14.0 30.7).00 0. Table 5.02 3.14).0 80.0 50.65 6.0 60. While CIDCO is building houses for the EWS/LIG/MIG.52 14.

76 7.00 11.38 Standard Deviation 10.0 30.94 10.0 60. Table 5.12 101-150 8 5 5 0 8 0 0 2 3.13 11. corresponding to middle income Fre 2000 Std.50 15.86 3.50 2. middle phase in 1980s and accelerated phase in the 1990s. For both CIDCO-built houses and privately 6000 built houses.50 16.0 can be divided into three stages: early.67 que groups.99 5. Only Vashi and Belapur had a household population in the 1980s.88 Standard Deviation 3. the dwelling sizes 4000 selected was 26-35 sq.14 Housing built by Private Enterprise <15 16-25 26-35 36-50 Vashi 4 2 2 14 Nerul 0 6 6 6 Belapur 0 1 2 2 Kalamboli 0 8 0 0 Panvel 0 0 1 1 Kopar-khairane 0 91 5 5 Airoli 0 0 0 0 Sanpada 13 60 2 2 Mean 37.50 14.83 3.63 18.78 12.0 40.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 53 Table 5.09 13.13 21.38 29.69 10.00 0 Tenure: The growth of Navi Mumbai 0.0 20.15).88 9.8).0 10. Panvel and Airoli in the latter 1980s and in Kopar-khairane and Sanpada only in the 1990s.2 ncy N = 19127.2 (Figure 5.50 .0 6. Dev = 18.75 3.41 150+ 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 14. m.15 Year of Occupation before 1980 1981-85 1986-90 1991-92 1993 1994 1995 Vashi 11 28 24 8 9 14 5 Nerul 0 6 29 10 6 35 14 Belapur 4 23 24 11 13 18 7 Kalamboli 0 5 31 10 11 37 6 Panvel 0 11 14 15 14 34 12 Kopar-khairane 0 0 0 20 18 34 28 Airoli 0 0 47 14 12 16 11 Sanpada 0 0 0 0 8 48 44 Mean 1.67 76-100 24 23 9 0 24 1 0 5 3.88 15. Families began to reside in Nerul.16 51-75 14 8 33 5 18 42 17 12 5. Kalamboli. Dwelling size was selected 8000 based on type of house.75 2.0 The frequency distribution of houses built by private enterprise shows a 12000 standard deviation of 18.67 and mean 10000 16. Cases weighted by population slow phase in the 1970s. There is a great variation in the Figure 5.8 Frequency of Houses built by Private number of houses occupied between Enterprise nodes (Table 5. Mean = 16.0 50.

58 5.94 0.5 2.04 2.54 7. which can be attributed to the pace of construction.28 3.82 3.23 49.25 1.0 30.16 Airoli 8. Only the middle phase was selected as a representative variable.78 39.29 4.42 0.39 Within state 3.0 60.54 Outside Outside state India 4. However.23 Kalamboli 5. Dev = 18.82 4.65 10.4 4. 7000 6000 5000 4000 The standard deviation at the regional scale is 20.51 20.2 2.94 Nerul 13.45 Standard 5.51 3.2 2.9).55 23.16).27 Kopar 14.57 5.8 Navi Mumbai (Table 5.36 0.25 (mean=52.45 0.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 54 The three time periods of 1970s.63 Mean 11.14 5.8) (Figure 5.75 2.34 13.79 2. Movement within Navi Mumbai shows desire to move to a house of the homeowner’s choice.16 Previous Place of Residence Island City Western Eastern suburbs suburbs Vashi 18.05 1.79 deviation Frequency Thane 3.05 4.0 movement within Navi Mumbai.56 Belapur 10.36 17.53 32.9 Frequency of Tenure the first stage of relocation where the choice of house is not very important.0 40.18 5. There is a very large variability.11 2.1 5.26 6.15 24.8 0.3 68.28 55.34 66.39 Panvel 3.43 Sanpada 17. this table only indicates the year of occupation of the present accommodation.62 2.25 0. It is thus.63 9.19 26.25) and 18.54 0.04 6.25 (mean=30.58 4.00 0 describe migration from Bombay and 0.0 50.58 13.78 0. 2000 Table 5.0 70.94 11.0 10.83 5. 3000 Previous Place of Residence: The two variables describing previous Std.20 2.85 0 6.34 49.06 6.07 19.25 place of residence are Bombay and 1000 Mean = 52.46 3.0 80.89 47.23 4. 1980s and 1990s account for the entire span of growth of the city.53 2.44 2.17 .26 5. This is because any house in Navi Mumbai would be better than the existing living conditions in Bombay.4 0.19 Navi Mumbai 35. Cases weighted by population Migration from Bombay is usually Figure 5.32 5.0 20. These N = 19127.63 17. not entirely accurate as families may have shifted after their first place of residence.

98 Christian 6 3 6 4 2 2 3 9 4. Table 5.38 2.35 Sikh 2 3 7 6 1 1 1 3 3.17). This variable shows diversification of the population based on a cultural variable (Table 5. The Hindu population is the majority and is homogenous.3 Ethnic Status This construct is very important because it is the construct that creates segregation in India. The means of the religion variable correspond with the national averages.75% and the standard deviation is only 4.0 40. The mean is 85.13 0. However.0 55.98.60 Others 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.67. This variable shows the families whose most immediate place of origin is Bombay. The Muslim population is 4.46 The variables Hindu and Muslim were selected for analysis.0 45.0 60. Frequency .45 Islam 6 5 4 5 2 6 3 7 4. Bombay.0 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.00 2.10 Frequency of Bombay as Previous Place of Residence The variables. island city. The standard deviation of the families whose previous place of residence was Bombay is 9.25 0. Dev = 9.42 (mean=26.0 50. Ethnic enclaves are formed mainly by religious and linguistic groups.17 Religion Hindu Vashi 84 Nerul 88 Belapur 79 Kalamboli 84 Panvel 94 Kopar-khairane 89 Airoli 88 Sanpada 80 Mean 85. There is a large variation because there has been migration from the rural areas. Religion: This variable is very important for this analysis because India has a number of well-defined religions.00 0 35.75 1. it is more important to analyze the minority religions to see if they are forming ethnic enclaves.75% of the total and has a standard deviation of 1.01) at the regional scale and 9. 5.0 70.54 (mean=53) at the sub-regional scale. An analysis of the other minority populations also show very large standard deviations.33 Buddhist 1 0 2 1 0 2 5 1 1.0 75.56 Mean = 53.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 55 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Std.75 Standard deviation 4.67 Jain 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 65. western suburbs.50 1. from Bombay and within Navi Mumbai.0 N = 19127.2. eastern suburbs and Thane have been summed up to obtain the variable.

87 Panvel 66.27 16.91 2.19 8.79 Mean 53.83 6.57 3.50 2.75).33 2. Language: The variable language is very important in the Indian context because civil violence due to language has taken place across India. This forms a major minority language.65 2.22 Std.50 3.27 2.47 3.60 5.76 Kalamboli 55.41 4.41 Nerul 45.99 1.17 13.69 5.5 14.36 4.50 1.29 2.14 2.97 1.68 1.32 0.9 N = 19127.34 3.31 3.12 Frequency of Muslims The Hindu population is spread uniformly over the study are with standard deviation 4.53 16. Malayalam is the language of the state 1000 miles away.12 1.26 2.49 11.6 12. Gujarati is the language of the adjoining state.00 0 0 Figure 5.16 16.11 6.32 3.23 7. .18 Language Marathi Vashi 42. Punjabi is a northern language.98 8.04 1.91 Mean = 6.34 3.20 0.90 2.74 3.96 5.43 8.31 9.11 Frequency of Hindus Figure 5.72 1. dev 11. Dev = 3.37 2.22 The two languages selected are Marathi and Malayalam. Malayalam and Kannada southern ones Table 5. The Muslim population and other minority religions show a nonuniform distribution over the study area.32 7.82 3.66 2.Malathi Ananthakrishnan 5000 Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 10000 56 4000 8000 3000 6000 2000 4000 Frequency Std.33 5.78 Kopar 67.80 5.44 2.66 2.98 (mean=85.08 3. Marathi is the local language.35 3.56 3.13 13.50 3.75 Belapur 40. Mean = 82.73 Hindi Gujarati Malayalam Punjabi Tamil Kannada Bengali Other 13.4 N = 19127. This has been used to study if there are any ethnic neighborhoods formed due to linguistic considerations. 54% of the population speaks this language.64 2.72 0.77 1.01 9.74 2. Hindi is the dominant language of the country.19 5.13 14. Marathi is the local language.72 1.53 9.99 10.29 2.68 4.04 3.81 7.48 5.59 12.08 11.00 Frequency 1000 2000 Std.46 Sanpada 63.92 5.48 3. Dev = 4.93 Airoli 42. and there is a large population of Malayalam-speaking people in the greater Bombay region.67 1. Bengali an eastern one and Tamil.11 6.

9 N = 19127.77 Mean = 6.0 50.0 12. Table 5. Dev = 3.5 15. Dev = 15.77 (mean=7.0 30. There is a non-uniform pattern in socioeconomic variables as well as in the ethnic variables.22) at the regional scale and 15.00 1000 Std.5 25.5 20.73 (mean=53.73 Mean = 46.14 Frequency of Malayalam The standard deviation of Marathi is 11.6) at the sub-regional scale (Figure 5.6 N = 19127.0 0 2.14).73 (mean=46.00 0 10.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 57 6000 6000 5000 5000 4000 4000 3000 3000 2000 2000 Frequency Frequency 1000 Std. The standard deviation is very large showing some areas have more Malayalamspeaking persons than others leading to the conclusion that ethnic enclaves do exist. This is probably the result of the many other linguistic groups. which have formed their own enclaves.26 (mean=7.0 70.0 7. The descriptive analysis suggests that the urban social pattern is not defined by homogeneous socioeconomic classes.13).13 Frequency of Marathi Figure 5.68) at the regional scale and 3.5 10.19). This pattern is more apparent at the sub-regional scale rather than at the regional scale (Table 5.6). The standard deviation of Malayalam is 3.0 Cases weighted by population Cases weighted by population Figure 5.0 22. The distribution of families with Marathi as their native language is not very uniform (Figure 5.0 20.0 60.0 40.0 80.5 5.19 Spatial Pattern of Variables Variable Regional scale Number of earning members Uniform Income Non-uniform Education Non-uniform Demographics Uniform Family size Uniform Type of housing Non-uniform Tenure Non-uniform Last place of residence Non-uniform Hindu Uniform Muslim Non-uniform Marathi Non-uniform Malayalam Non-uniform .0 17.

824 and 0. and three components were obtained. the assumption can be made that all the variables are significant and are useful for the study.3.728%. However. Thus. The use of PCA as a method of analysis was limited by the small number of cases. secondary school education. or principle components. Hence. The constructs described on page 1 suggest the need for 12 variables. The outputs obtained from the SPSS program are used to determine which variables. Component 2 with an eigenvalue of 1. Component 1 with an eigenvalue of 3. The variables were weighted by the total population of each node.Nodes 5. income. Cumulatively these three components explain 89.3 Regional Scale . The number of variables used in the analysis could not be more than the number of cases. The components with eigenvalues greater than 1 will be used to explain the variance.347% of the variation. A PCA was run.771% variation and Component 3 with an eigenvalue of 1.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 58 5. The principal components obtained from the rotated component matrix are used as they are more simple to interpret. tenure.1 Principal Components Analysis (PCA) The analysis at the regional scale uses the eight nodes (townships) as the cases for the study.902 explains 23.468 explains 43.18. nearly 90% of the variance of the 8 nodes lies within a 3-dimensional space. the variables selected were number of earning members.985.818 explains a variation of 22. family size.845% of the variation. . religion and language. migration. explaining 90% of the variance. The rotated component matrix is used here for interpretation and discussion (Appendix D). The total of the communality is 7. are needed for the complete explanation of the difference in the data. as PCA limited the number of variables to 8. and in a range of 0. The communalities of all the variables are very high.

15 Components in Rotated Space 1. These loadings help explain the contributions of the variables to each principal component.0 Component 3 0.5 C o m p o n e n ts 1.0 1.5 Component 1 Analysis weighted by population of each node .16 Loadings of Principal Components The eight original variables are combined linearly to define principal components.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 59 Figure 5. 5 -1 FAM. The loadings produced by the principal components analysis for the variables is used to create bar charts to better visualize the magnitude of the loading.5 Component 2 0.5 1 loading 0.5 -.0 . It does not directly express which.0 . if any.5 0.5 RELIGION 0 EARNER EDUCATN INCOME -0 . components contribute more or less to the overall data association MIGRATN TENURE .SIZE LANGUAGE va r i a b l e s Figure 5.0 education income earner family size tenure religion language migration -.5 1.0 -.

3. As the analysis was constrained by the reduced number of variables.20 Attributes of Principal Components Principal Components Variables Component 1 Family size Previous place of residence Tenure Component 2 Education Income Component 3 Number of earners Language Religion Name Family status Socioeconomic status Ethnic status with high number of earners. The three components correspond to family status. 5. Cluster analysis of the scores from PCA ensured that the data was standardized in the same manner for both types of analysis. Nerul. Panvel. this PCA does not directly correspond to the descriptive analysis. only two clusters were formed.3. Vashi. Airoli (Appendix E).17 Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups) .2 Cluster Analysis A cluster analysis was done using the scores obtained from the principal components analysis.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 60 The three components are (Table 5. The first cluster (Cluster 1) had the nodes Belapur and Kalamboli while the second cluster (Cluster 2) had the rest of the nodes. The cluster analysis shows that the two of the Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine Cluster 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ Node Panvel Kopar Sanpada Nerul Airoli Vashi Belapur Kalamboli -+-----------------+ Cluster 1 -+ +-------------------------+ -------------------+ +---+ -------------+-------+ I I -------------+ +-----------------------+ I ---------------------+ I ---------------------------------------+---------+ ---------------------------------------+ Figure 5. As the number of cases was only 8.3 Discussion The principal components analysis produced three components with eigenvalues above 1. Sanpada. This analysis does not show any differentiation based on variables of ethnicity. Analysis of the raw data was not carried out because the SPSS program did not weight the raw data while running a cluster analysis.20): Table 5. Kopar-khairane. socioeconomic status and ethnic status. 5.

463%. . The extracted sums of squared loadings of the first three components is cumulatively 72. From the data. The rotated component matrix is used here for interpretation and discussion (Appendix F).4 Sub-regional Scale . The variables were weighted by the total population of each node. houses built by CIDCO. The PCA shows the communality of the 11 variables to be 8.75 explains 25. and three components were obtained.21) Table 5. 5. 13 variables were selected for the analysis. 2651-4450.21 Attributes of Principal Components Principal Components Variables Component 1 Education Income Ownership of house Previous place of residence Muslim Component 2 Marathi Component 3 Number of earners Malayalam Demographics Hindu Name Socioeconomic status and Muslim enclave Ethnic status Ethnic status with high number of earners. explaining 73% of the variance.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 61 nodes are different from the other six. high school education.Sectors of Vashi 5. The main reason for this is the high variability in the language data set for Belapur.917%.453% variation and Component 3 with an eigenvalue of 2.001% of the variation. A PCA was run. male and female population of the age group 25-45. migration from Bombay. families with 4 or 5 members.4.581 explains a variation of 23. linguistic groups speaking Marathi and Malayalam. Hindus and Muslims. household income range of Rs.01. These were: families with one earning member.690 explains 24. More components could have been used. The attributes of the principal components are (Table 5.1 Principal Components Analysis (PCA) The analysis at the sub-regional scale uses the 23 sectors (neighborhoods) of Vashi as the cases for the study. Component 1 with an eigenvalue of 2. Component 2 with an eigenvalue of 2. tenure of house in the 1980s. and the high percentage of families in the selected income range for Kalamboli. but interpretation would have been more difficult.

8 -1 loadings EDUCATN MIGRATN RELGION1 LANGUAG1 LANGUAG2 OWNRSHIP RELGION2 EARNER INCOME MEN va r i a bl e s Figure 5.2 Cluster Analysis A cluster analysis of the scores obtained from PCA was done. 6 -0 . 2 -0 .8 0. 4 -0 . The first cluster (Cluster 1) had had only sector 5. 14. 28 and 29.18 Loadings of Principal Components The bar chart explains the loadings of each variable on the component.4.2 0 -0 . 17.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 62 C o m po ne nts 1 0. and the third cluster (Cluster 3) had all the rest of the 16 sectors (Appendix G).4 0. These define which values contribute more or less significance to that particular component.6 0. These loadings help explain the contributions of the variables to each principal component. WOMEN . 5. The second cluster (Cluster 2) had sectors 12. 16A. Three clusters were formed using the 23 cases.

Each of the three components have an ethnic variable in them. The cluster analysis shows a segregation in Cluster 1 caused by high number of earners with a high percentage of households speaking Marathi and a low percentage of .75 to 2.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 63 Figure 5. All the components are equally important and separated only by ethnic variables. as Hindus are 83% of the population.3 Discussion The principal components analysis produced three equally important components with eigenvalues in the range of 2. It appears that there is a segregation based on the ethnic component.19 Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups) Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine 0 5 10 15 20 +---------+---------+---------+---------+----Sector 2 6 1 4 16 20 9 10 15 26 21 3 7 9A 8 10A 14 29 12 17 16A 28 5 -+ -+---+ -+ +-+ -----+ +-----+ ---+---+ I ---+ +---+ -+-+ I I -+ +---+ I +-----------+ ---+ +-----+ I I Cluster 3 -------+ I I -----------------+ +---------+ ---+---+ I I ---+ +---------+ I I -------+ +-----------+ I ---------+-------+ +---------+ ---------+ I I -------+---------------+ I I -------+ I I I -+---+ +---------------+ I Cluster 2 -+ +-------------+ I I -----+ +---+ I -------------------+ I Cluster 1 -------------------------------------------------+ 5.4. this component also describes the general population.58. Again. it represents a majority of the population. The first component is one which has a high socioeconomic component dominated by a Muslim population. As the Marathi population is 53% of the total population. This can be translated into a middle-class population. The third component is the economically active age group dominated by the Hindu population. The second component has only the population speaking Marathi.

The descriptive analysis of individual variables also shows this non-uniform pattern. and distinctly driven by an ethnic component at the sub-regional scale.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 64 households speaking Malayalam. In summary. and a strong ethnic component is seen. . PCA and cluster analysis brings forth the variability of the data and shows which variables and which cases cluster together. the outcome of the implementation strategy shows otherwise. At the sub-regional scale as there is a smaller percentage of CIDCO-built houses. Cluster 2 shows a dominance of households speaking Marathi. 5. although the government policy was to prevent the formation of ethnic enclaves. individual households have exercised their choice.6 Conclusion The analysis of the data shows that the urban social pattern appears to be non-uniform at the regional scale.

Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Figure 6. a brief interpretation of the regional scale is described here before proceeding to the detailed interpretation at the sub-regional scale. 6. All the other nodes are in the second cluster. Cluster 1 has two nodes close to each other and BOMBAY Airoli Kopar-Khairane Kalamboli Vashi Sanpada Nerul Arabian Sea Belapur Panvel possibly influenced by one another.1 Cluster of Nodes of Navi Mumbai .Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion A preliminary interpretation of the data analysis in the previous chapter shows the details of the social urban pattern are best seen in the sub-regional scale.1 Regional Scale Figure 6. However.1 shows the spatial distribution of the clusters.

2 shows that different factor scores influence the two Airoli 2 1 clusters. 100 Panvel 80 EARNER EDUCATN 60 FAM. Cluster 1 is influenced by family size. which are contributing to the clustering.2 Average Linkage between Factor Scores Analysis weighted by population Further. previous place of residence and tenure while cluster 2 is affected by income. number of earners and religion. Cluster 1 is linked to Factor score 1 0 score 1 and cluster 2 to score 2 -1 Factor score 2 -2 while score 3 exerts almost equal Factor score 3 67116 67116 67116 14543 14543 14543 -3 N= influence on both cluster. 1 2 Figure 6.3 Average Linkage between Variables Analysis weighted by population .SIZE 40 INCOME Kopar-khaira 20 LANGUAGE MIGRATN 0 -20 1 Sanpada Kopar-khaira RELIGION TENURE 2 Figure 6.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 66 3 Figure 6. have an equal influence on the two clusters. The variables. education and language. Figure 6.3 shows the strength of variables.

12.4 Clustering of the Sectors of Vashi Cluster 3 (red) has sectors 1. there were twenty-three sectors. 8. 4. and Cluster 1 (yellow) has only sector 5.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 67 6. 9A. 15. 28 and 29.4. 28 12 29 26 10 15 9 10A 9A 8 7 5 6 4 1 3 2 17 16 14 20 16A 21 Figure 6. Cluster 2 (green) has sectors 2. . 16A. 10. 17. and 26. 6. 3. The grouping of the sectors into three clusters is shown in Figure 6. 16. More variables could also be used to study these cases. 10A.2 Sub-regional Scale At the sub-regional scale. 21. 20. 9. 14.

5 shows that the 4 2 three clusters are influenced by different factor scores.6 Average Linkage between Variables Figure 6. 1 2 3 Figure 6. Ownership. Cluster 1 is Factor Score 1 8 0 -2 influenced by all three scores. .Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 68 Figure 6. Cluster 1 is also differentiated by Malayalam.5 Average Linkage between Groups Analysis weighted by population 120 EARNER 100 80 EDUCATION INCOME MARATHI 60 40 20 0 -20 1 2 3 MALAYALAM MEN MIGRATION OWNRSHIP HINDU MUSLIM WOMEN Figure 6.6 shows the average linkage between the variables. Cluster 3 is an outlier. income and the language Marathi dominate it. This is a socioeconomic construct. Factor Score 2 -4 cluster 2 more strongly by score 2 Factor Score 3 1892 1892 1892 738 738 738 -6 N = 16497 1649716497 and cluster 3 by score 3. another ethnic variable. but dominated by an ethnic variable. Cluster 2 is the most significant.

8. The colors red and orange are immediately above.7 Hypothetical Sector Pattern for Socioeconomic Variables Figure 6. In both maps the median range is represented by the color purple.9). Figure 6. the study of many cities across the world shows that the socioeconomic construct displays a sector pattern. The two variables selected were income and number of earners.9 Distribution of Income The pattern that emerges on mapping of the number of earners and income variables does not show any particular pattern (Figure 6. and immediately below the median value while yellow and green represent the outliers or extremes. Figure 6.1 Socioeconomic Status and Sector Theory As discussed in the literature review.7 shows a scenario that could be expected from the mapping of any of the socioeconomic variables.2. Figure 6.8 Distribution of Number of Earners Figure 6. .Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 69 6.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion

70

6.2.2 Family Status and Concentric Zone Theory The study of many cities across the world shows that the family status construct displays a concentric pattern. Figure 6.10 shows a possible scenario in Vashi for a variable representing the family status. The variable selected to describe the family status is ownership of apartment. In the descriptive analysis, this variable showed a great degree of variability. The purple color represents the range within which the mean falls. The colors red and orange are immediately above, and immediately below the median value while yellow and green represent the outliers or extremes. Figure 6.10 Hypothetical Concentric Zone Pattern for Family Status Variables The number of sectors which falls within the mean range is very small. Sectors which have slightly more or slightly less percentage of apartments built by CIDCO are represented by red and orange. It is important to note that five sectors are colored green while one sector is yellow (Figure 6.11). This shows a high degree of variability in the data.

Figure 6.11 Distribution of Ownership of Apartment

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion

71

6.2.3 Ethnic Status and Multiple Nuclei Theory Multiple Nuclei theory supports the spatial pattern of the ethnic factor. A possible solution is mapped for any ethnic variable in Figure 6.12. A language variable and a religion variable were selected from the data set for mapping. The mapping of language and religion variables shows a segregation of both of them. Yellow and green colors, which represent the extremes in the data set, are present in both the variables (Figure 6.13, Figure 6.14). This is especially true of the variable Muslim, which shows a largely non-uniform distribution.

Figure 6.12 Hypothetical Multiple Nuclei Pattern for Ethnic Variables

Figure 6.13 Distribution of Households speaking Marathi

Figure 6.14 Distribution of Households which follow Islam

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion

72

6.3 Summary The set of figures below shows the mapping of the cluster analysis as well as the individual factor scores.

Figure 6.15 Clustering of Sectors

Figure 6.16 Score 1

Figure 6.17 Score 2

Figure 6.18 Score 3

Although the four maps above (Figure 6.15, Figure 6.16, Figure 6.17, Figure 6.18) show that there is a different colored sector within a group of one color, the multiple nuclei pattern is not very obvious. However, looking at the descriptive analysis, principal components analysis, cluster analysis and the mapping collectively, the multiple nuclei pattern can be inferred. The descriptive analysis brought out the fact that the spatial pattern is

The mapping of individual variables and factor scores verifies that within a fairly homogeneous group of sectors there exists a dissimilar sector. The clustering indicates that some sectors are dissimilar from others. In conclusion. The principal components analysis shows that the cause of this spatial pattern is ethnicity. . As Navi Mumbai has been constructed over the last 25 years. The aggregation of household data at the sector scale has limited this research from drawing out the finer details of the spatial pattern. examining the policy instruments and policy goals.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 73 not uniform or heterogeneous. However. The policy of the government to promote social heterogeneity influenced the type of residential construction in Navi Mumbai.4 Potential Utility of the Research This research is a starting point for further studies in spatial patterns in Navi Mumbai. as the pattern is not uniform. the pattern is strongly influenced by factors as year of occupation of the house and reasons for moving. • • putting forth a new theory to generalize social pattern in planned cities in India. scaling down the study to stories of individual households to reach a more detailed level of interpretation. the policy has not been successful. This is the multiple nuclei pattern of an ethnically driven spatial organization. Future research could involve: • • Delineating the pattern at intervals of time to study the change in pattern. 6. a pattern did emerge at this present stage.

The Muslims came to India as invaders. Political and administrative boundaries in independent India were decided on linguistic lines. Traditional Indian cities have always had a strong ethnic component in their urban social pattern. The other feature that is unique to India is the existence of many languages. It was also influenced by the concept of the city as a melting pot (Engel. Households would normally place this preference based on how much they can pay. 1991). The government hoped that this would distribute people based on socioeconomics and break barriers based on religion and language. caste. and formulated a policy to support it. sector theory and multiple nuclei theory. The segregation is attributed to the ethnic variables. Navi Mumbai is still dependent on Bombay for much of its activity. It was hoped that a majority of the residential construction could be achieved though a policy of swavalambhan (self-reliance) and swatantrya (mutual selfhelp). This was the first cause of separation in residential neighborhoods. Every effort was taken by the government to make Navi Mumbai an independent city and not a suburb or satellite city to Bombay. Navi Mumbai is separated from the metropolis of Bombay only by the Thane Creek. The religious divide was used in the partition of united India into India and Pakistan. The review of secondary source material shows that urban social patterns have been studied across the world. Religious tensions have always existed in India. Planning policies in Navi Mumbai were strongly influenced by the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi. However. One of the social objectives in the planning of Navi Mumbai was to use the government machinery to diversify the spatial distribution of the population based on socioeconomic criteria. These theories explain the urban social pattern . Housing would be allotted according to the preference of size of dwelling provided by applicants. strongly influenced by ethnic variables. Three leading theories put forth were concentric zone theory. The draft development plan of Navi Mumbai had very strong functional and social objectives. The thesis addresses this social objective. India. thus. Partition and the first years of independence were. This particular case study was chosen for two reasons: Navi Mumbai is the first planned city that is not a capital city or industrial township. The government had a very practical interest in avoiding ethnic confrontation. The important objectives of Navi Mumbai were: attract some of the immigrant population.Chapter 7: Conclusion The purpose of this thesis is to delineate the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. Areas dominated by Muslims are common in most cities in India. support an aggressive industrialization policy. Ethnic enclaves have always characterized traditional settlements in India. Bombay is the financial and economic capital of India. religion and language. The culture of this race of people is very different from the Hindus. and provide an infrastructure which would promote ethnic heterogeneity. The Hindu laws and treatises specified residential locations for different castes. raise the standard of living and reduce social inequalities. The government also decided to take up most of the initial building construction. and the government had a specific social and political agenda.

Heterogeneity of the population is detected if these three constructs emerge from the analysis. The software package SPSS was used to do the analysis. The concentric zone theory relates the pattern of cities to population mobility. The other variables selected were number of earning members. and histogram drawn of the variable selected from each data set. Two religion variables and two language variables have been selected representing the ethnic construct. income and education under the socioeconomic construct. In Navi Mumbai. Using the secondary source material as reference. Next. The variables selected under each construct were drawn out of experience of the researchers. family status and ethnic status. If H0 is false. socioeconomic. Social area analysis broadly classifies variables into three constructs. grouping of variables is expected to be under the three constructs. Analysis of data was done at two scales. That would indicate that enclaves have not been caused by individual variables. The multiple nuclei theory proposes that patterns could be arranged around several centers. Four methods were used to analyze the data. The similarity between the . Since. the analysis allowed a more detailed interpretation. family status and ethnic status. and demographics. The data at both scales is tabulated. The variables selected are reduced into a smaller number of constructs. Analysis was done to map the urban social pattern of many cities across the world. The methodology used was that of social area analysis. These scales were the regional scale of the nodes (townships). and the sub-regional scale of the sectors (neighborhoods) of Vashi node. In the case of Navi Mumbai this is important because of the policy to prevent segregation based on ethnic variables. then the pattern will be explained using the existing theories. The second methodology is principal components analysis (PCA). a cluster analysis was done of the cases of the data set. The methodologies were techniques of multivariate analysis. The first methodology is a descriptive analysis. Twenty-three sectors of Vashi were then analyzed. special emphasis has to be given to the ethnic components. the family component showed a concentric ring pattern. Wedge patterns representing income groups are the outcome of the theory. This hypothesis is put forth on the assumption that the social agenda put forth in the Development Plan has been successfully implemented. Mobility and immigration are the key variables of this theory. family size and type of house under family status. the scale was smaller. Succession and invasion based on social and economic status is the basic assumption of this theory.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 7: Conclusion 75 and its change over time. These are socioeconomic construct. sector theory. and ethnic segregation showed a multiple nuclei arrangement. The second theory. The hypothesis put forth in this study is: no significant difference in key variables is expected and hence no social segregation will occur. Generally the socioeconomic model showed a sectored pattern. At the regional scale the analysis was done between the eight nodes to study their similarity. is an analysis primarily of economic variables. A variation in the data greater than 15% on each side of the mean is considered as unequal distribution. The constructs of the social area analysis have been found to correspond to the three theories. The PCA reduces the dimensionality of the data into a more interpretable form.

physical design and the institutional framework need to be examined closely to realize their full impact and to understand the results in their context. The interpretation of the descriptive analysis shows that the distribution of most of the variables is not uniform. • Was this an experiment in enhancing quality of life or is it a method for the government to exert social control? • The concept of the melting pot has to be re-examined. The distribution of these variables shows segregation. allotment procedure. The pattern could. Even in the houses built by the government resale has taken place. The center is an ethnic enclave surrounded by socioeconomic variables. Control is maximum when the government owns all the houses. Redistribution shows that people have aligned themselves based on ethnic variables. As the socioeconomic variables are expected to take a sectored pattern. The research brings to the fore many questions than answers. although the policy is noble in its aims and aspiration. 2. The urban social pattern is best explained as one of multiple nuclei. The extreme value range in the mapping is important because it represents the dissimilarity in the distribution. The objective. . graphically representing the analysis. In Vashi only 64% of the houses were built and allotted by the government. the socioeconomic variables also show separation. In conclusion.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 7: Conclusion 76 nodes and sectors is determined from this. family status variables concentric zones and the ethnicity variables a multiple nuclei arrangement. it has not succeeded at this stage. The principal components analysis shows that the variables are not grouping under the three constructs. However. The interpretation of the analysis also involves comparing the descriptive analysis. This can be attributed to two reasons: 1. Distribution was originally controlled through allotment of government-built houses based only on purchasing power (and indirectly socioeconomic status). How important is it to promote integration when self-sorting has been the natural process? • Can the Modernist synthesis seeking homogeneity in heterogeneity be used as a template for the Indian culture? • This leads to the question: is the objective valid? Does it have to be redefined or is the implementation strategy to be modified? At this stage it appears that a detailed analysis of the policy instrument and policy goals must be undertaken. however. The hypothesis was proved false. None of the variables selected display a uniform distribution. The overall pattern of Navi Mumbai is one of multiple nuclei. they were mapped under expected and observed conditions. A moral analysis of segregation has to be done in the context of the Indian culture. be explained using the theories of urban social patterns. The spatial distribution of households is still characterized by traditional Indian values of ethnic segregation. The final stage was mapping of the clusters. and clustering to the urban social patterns detailed in the secondary source material. This is especially true of the ethnic variables. The policy has not facilitated the distribution of the population based on socioeconomic criteria. This indicates that the urban social pattern is strongly influenced by ethnicity. thereby. All three new constructs are dominated by an ethnic variable.

India’s Social Crisis: An Essay on Capitalism. The Contemporary Scenario. "Urban Development Process in Bombay: Planning for Whom?" In Patel. Ambition and Miscalculation. 1989. Vol. S. Becker. Bogue. Barnett. Delhi: Oxford University Press. eds. Bose.. 1984. Bradley. ed. Williamson. The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Harper & Row. Banerjee. XIV. Individualism and Indian Civilization. 1992. C. ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Bose. T. Socialism. al. Gupta. Indian Cities: characteristics and correlates. BMRPB. London: Routledge. "The Essence and Reality of the Caste System" in Social Stratification. The Basic writings of Ernest W. C. Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. Buildings. W. 1986. 1993. 1965. Banerjee-Guha. and Mills. 1996. Regional Plan for Bombay Metropolitan Region 1970-1992. A. Berreman. et. J. Angotti. Architecture + Design. 77 . C. S. A. Bombay: Government Press. A Pattern Language: Towns. 1973.Bibliography Alexander. Beyond the Neighborhood Unit: Residential Environments and Public Policy. C. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology. ed. R. 1979. G. D. and Baer. 1987. T. 1992: 64-73. J. E. The role of town-plan analysis in the study of the medieval Irish town in Slater. D. al. 1974. 2. Leicester: Leicester University Press. Alexander. G. Construction. 1965: 115-129. and Thorner. 1990: 39-59. J. No. Burgess. C. Bougle. "The Study of Caste Ranking in India". Delhi: Oxford University Press. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. A. 1978. The Built Form of Western Cities. M. Chicago: University of Chicago. D. J. S. Metropolis 2000. New York: Oxford University Press. S. “The Modern City” in The Elusive City: five Centuries of Design. Bombay: Tata McGraw Hill. et. Bombay: Oxford University Press. India’s Urbanization 1901-2001. 21. New York: Plenum Press. Q. Indian Urbanization and Economic Growth since 1960. T. Ahmad. Banerjee-Guha. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Urbanization in Developing Countries: A Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis. 78 . 1973. The Political Sociology of Cityward Migration in Latin America: Towards an Empirical Theory in Abu-Lughod. London: Cambridge University Press. Vol. 1971. Cadwallader. C. 1977. The New Landscape: Urbanization in the Third World.. Cambridge: MIT Press. How Cities Grew: The Historical Sociology of Cities. C. Rainforest Cities: Urbanization. W. Browder. Correa. Correa. Architecture + Design. R. “Evolution of the Concept”. R. Town-plan analysis in an American setting: cadastral processes in Boston and Omaha in Slater. D'Souza. M. H. No. P.. and Cahnman. J. 1995. D. 1997. Development Planning and Structural Inequalities. R. The Third World City. Comhaire. N. J. CIDCO. O. 1988. Drew. and Globalization of the Brazilian Amazon. 1974. 1989. Religion and Politics in North India. Cherunilam. and Godfrey.Brass. J. V. 1970. The Planner’s Use of Information. and Hay. Belapur: CIDCO. Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House. Drakakis-Smith. Mar-Apr. 1992. eds. New York: Columbia University Press. The Built Form of Western Cities. 1990. J. New Delhi: Sage Publications. Le Corbusier as I Knew Him in The Open Hand: Essays on Le Corbusier. 1984. Washington D. Das Gupta. The Draft Development Plan. Belapur: CIDCO. F. C. CIDCO. Cornelius. 1997. Madison. J.: The Florham Park Press Inc. Sustainable Urban Development: Case Study of New Bombay. 2. London: Methuen. A. J. J. Dandekar. 1990: 142-170. 1985.. C. P. J.: APA Press. Third World Urbanization. Bombay: Government Press. XIV. 1971: 59-70. Twenty Years of Development. W. Chicago: Maaroufa Press Inc. Leicester: Leicester University Press. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. B. Language. CIDCO. T. Berkeley: University of California Press. Cozen. Development. Analytical Urban Geography: Spatial Patterns and Theories. ed. 1987. M. Language Conflict and National Development: Group Politics and national Language Policy in India.

1965. Mass. ed. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Gupta. Gupta. 1974. "Continuous Hierarchies and Discrete Castes" in Social Stratification. Gandhi's Social Philosophy. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Master Plan for New Bombay. Bombay: Govt. ed. Hagget. S. J. P. Gupta. Bombay: India Book House Pvt. S and Mehrotra. 1978. 1995.D’Souza. 1980. New York: Barnes & Noble Books. Press. Gupta. Status and Power: The Caste System and its Implications" in Social Stratification. Stanford: Stanford University campus. D. 1992a: 110-143. Harris. Martin’s Press. D. Fainstein. 79 . Gupta. Ltd. C. A Spatial Analysis of Urban Community Development Policy in India. Cities and Planning: The Case of Bombay. S. D. and Campbell. The City in the Third World. V. New Delhi: Vikas Publications. ed. S. “Building New Bombay: The Future of the Indian Metropolis” in Identity. 1971. Fry. Government of Maharashtra. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study. Report of the Committee appointed for Bombay-Panvel and Poona regions. 1996. Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press. 1973. Gumperz. J. Bombay: Oxford University Press. Delhi: Oxford University Press. New York: St. Dwivedi. Dumont. N. 1966. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Malik. 1992: 471-492. L "Hierarchy.: Blackwell Publishers. The Urbanization of the Third World. “Social Inequality and Social Stratification in India” in determinants of Social Status in India” ed. D. P. Cambridge. Gugler. Engel.. Ganguli. Dwyer. Le Corbusier at Chandigarh in The Open Hand: Essays on Le Corbusier. Readings in Urban Theory. 1992. Gadgil Planning Committee. N. Bombay: The Cities Within. 1970. Language in Social Groups. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1977. 1992b: 1-23. R. ed. M. 1988. eds. Berkeley: Center for Environmental Design Research. "Hierarchy and Difference" in Social Stratification. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. D. Hall. B. J. J. D. Bombay: Government Press. D. 1986: 44-62. Modernity in the Traditional Contemporary Environment.

1961. King. 1990. Charles Correa. Washington. L. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Knox. Muslims and Indian Nationalism. New York: Praeger Publishers. Nehru and the Politics of India. J. 1992. Space and Behavior: The Elements of Urban Geography. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. 80 . Urban Development in the Third World. V. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Henn. New Delhi: Government of India. C. Emerging Trends of Urbanization in India. P. L. Hodson. Foreword in Living Architecture: Indian. J. New York: Random House. 1997. 1957: 70-75. eds. D. G. Kaura.. H. 1979. U. Culture and Environment. Out of Place: Restoring Identity to the Regional Landscape. P. 1971. D. J. Geography: The Study of Location. The Pattern of Indian Towns: A Study in Urban Morphology. J. Cities in Space: Cities in Place. D. Cities. The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities.Hartshorn. Journal of American Institute of Planners. H. Jakobsen. Herbert. C. A. J. R. T. Karan. 1969. L. Columbia: South Asia Books. R. The Great Divide: Britain-India-Pakistan. 1985. Hough. F and Nystuen. Khan. and Won Bae Kun. 1984. Ltd. Ghosh. 23. vol. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.: Federal Housing Administration. D. 1990. Interpreting the City: An Urban Geography. and Golledge. T. Maryland: Barnes & Noble. and Thomas. Urbanization: An Introduction to Urban Geography. Kolars. Jacobs. Herbert. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Hoyt. Urbanization and National Development. and Prakash. M. 1974. V. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Urban Social Geography: An Introduction. D. King. K. 1977. 1939. W. 1994. P. Knox. M. 1995. M. 1993. H. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. Karachi: Oxford University Press. L. Jain. New York: Concept Media Pvt. England: Longman. J. New Haven: Yale University Press. P.

Meier. 1972. From New Bombay to Navi Mumbai. New York: Oxford University Press. Delhi: Oxford University Press. M. London: G. S. The Master Plan. T. 1986. ed. VIII. 1971. ed. M. Brown and Company. Two Worlds. 2. Mar-Apr 1997. P. 1990. The Urbanization Process in the Third World. Community Design and the Culture of Cities. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. 1990: 109-141. R. Leicester: Leicester University Press. M. No. Gupta. 18801980. 1991.Kopardekara. Bombay in Transition: The Growth and Social Ecology of a Colonial City. 1967. G. Million Cities of India. G. E. The Development Plan for Greater Bombay: A Case Study of Urban Planning and Development vis-a-vis the Environment. One Place. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meaning through History. 1986. C. Kostof. National Institute of Urban Affairs. Publishers. London: Croom Helm. 81 . Lowder. XIV. Misra. Kosambi. R. S.. New Delhi: NIUA. 1986. 1986. New York: Frederick A. Berkeley: University of California. Le Corbusier. no. R. McGee. D. Praeger Inc.. and Becker. Nov-Dec. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House. Mehrotra. Bell and Sons Ltd. 1984. 1991. Bombay 1961. Resource Conserving Urbanism in South Asia: The Development of Greater Bombay. R. Vol. Studies in Indian Urban Development.. Architecture + Design. "Multiple Reference in Indian Caste Systems" in Social Stratification. T. Lozano. Marriott. The Built Form of Western Cities. 15. Mehrotra. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. R. M. T. 1978. Cambridge: University Press. D. Inside Third World Cities. 6. The Southeast Asian City. McGee. Mills. No. Social Aspects of Urban development: A Case Study of the Pattern of Urban Development in Developing Countries. 1992: 49-60. Koter. 1978. Marg vol. H.Lodz. Poland 18251973 in Slater. 1. Architecture + Design. The morphological evolution of a nineteenth century city centre. Vol. Boston: Little. S. Bombay: Popular Prakashan. E.

1971: 59-70. Cardiff: Department of Town Planning. 1996. Patel. eds. Clarence. D. S. 1971: 59-70. Patel. Social Area Analysis. The Social Areas of Los Angeles. Spatial Characteristics of Urban Settlements in a part of India in Emerging frontiers of Urban Settlement Geography. Peach. No. 1995: 27-34. S. 1955. R. S. MD Publications. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 1977. Chicago: Maaroufa Press Inc. with special reference to Tanzania in Abu-Lughod. Leicester: Leicester University Press. ed. H. Slater. Mar-Apr 1997: 38-44. Urbanization and Urban Systems in India. T. Singh. New Delhi. Services and the Urban Poor. London: Longman. Chandigarh as a Place to Live in The Open Hand: Essays on Le Corbusier. E. 1969. Vol. E and Williams. Architecture + Design. Neighborhood and Community Planning. Third World Urbanization. New York: Committee on Regional Plan of New York and its environs. Form and Culture. Romaya. A. No. “The thirty-year Journey”. Third World Urbanization.. G. Mar-Apr 1997: 120124. Shelter. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Shevky. ed. 1989. C. I. and Thorner. House. R. 1985. Portes. R. W. Slater. M. S.. English medieval new towns with composite plans: evidence from the Midlands in Slater. Vol. S. and Bell. Perry. 1929. R. Bombay: Oxford University Press. 2. 1990: 60-82. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. XIV. B. 1979. “The Birth of a New City”. Rapoport. J. M and Franklin. Colonialism and the Spatial Structure of Underdevelopment: Outline of an Alternative Approach. Chicago: Maaroufa Press Inc. Ramachandran. 2. T. D. Martin’s Press. Bombay: Mosaic of Modern Culture. and Hay. eds. G.. The Form of Cities. Alejandro. eds.Parab. Urban Latin America: The Political Condition from Above and Below in AbuLughod. New York: St. Shevky. UWIST. R. B. 1975. J. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press. A. M. D. Sarin. and Hay. Architecture + Design. The Built Form of Western Cities. 82 . Scargill. Urban Social Segregation. XIV. Singh. 1949.

N. E. 1992. 1992a: 312-326.Srinivas. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. 1971. N. ed. 1990. Trancik. A. G. "Mobility in a Caste System" in Social Stratification. R. The Urban Mosaic: Towards a Theory of Residential Differentiation. Cambridge: University Press. The Continuing City: Urban Morphology in Western Civilization. Gupta. D. Delhi: Oxford University Press. City of Gold: The Biography of Bombay. M. D. New Delhi: Penguin Books India Ltd. Vance. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. D. UNCHS. J. 1992. 1969. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Finding Lost Space.. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Tindall. Living Architecture: Indian. 1992b: 28-35. Spatial Decentralization: A Case Study of New Bombay and Cairo. Timms. 1986. ed. "Varna and Caste" in Social Stratification. M. 83 . Gupta. Srinivas. Volwahsen. Nairobi: UNCHS.

Glossary of Terms Term Cuadra Jali Masjid Padas Panchayati Pucca Purdahs Purushasukta Rashtrabasha Swadeshi Swatantrya Swavalambhan Vastupurusha mandala Vastushastra Meaning Spanish measurement Carved screens Mosque Subdivisions of the cosmic universe Self-government Durable Enclosure Hindu treatise Language of the State Fullest utilization of local resources Self-motivation and self-help Self-reliance Terrestrial representation of the cosmic universe Science of architecture and planning .

. S. Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act 1966 was passed. Bombay Municipal Corporation decided to prepare a development plan for Greater Bombay. The Gadgil Committee recommended regional planning legislation and regional planning boards. R. CIDCO was designated as New Town Development Authority for Navi Mumbai. The study group on Greater Bombay recommended a rail-cum-road bridge across the Thane creek. State government notified privately owned land in Navi Mumbai for acquisition. CIDCO was formed. The Bombay Metropolitan regional Plan was approved by the State government. G. CIDCO published its Draft Development Plan. Barve. The Board published the Draft Plan with recommendations to set up a twin city. A Committee under Dr. Bombay Metropolitan and Regional Planning Board was constituted. D.Appendix A March 1958 July 1958 February 1959 July 1964 March 1965 March 1966 January 1967 July 1967 January 1970 February 1970 March 1970 March 1971 August 1973 October 1973 Study group on Greater Bombay set up under the chairmanship of Mr. Gadgil was appointed to formulate broad principles of regional planning for Bombay and Poona. Development plan for greater Bombay was submitted to the State Government.

the man of the mechanical civilization could: cross continents: V1 arrive in town: V1 go to essential public services: V2 cross at full speed. the territory of the town: V3 dispose of immediate accesses to daily needs: V4 reach the door of his dwelling: V5 and V6 send youths to the green areas of each sector. where schools and sports grounds are located: V7. One discovered that with 7 types of roads. 1961). without interruption. .Appendix B The 7Vs (les sept voies) The 7V Rule was studied in 1950 at the UNESCO’s request (Le Corbusier.

07 30.89 4.31 3.64 5 46.22 std dev 9.76 1.31 20.10 0.03 1.81 4 70.86 28 52.57 15 72.09 8.70 14 77.79 40.00 35.Appendix C Number of earning members Sector 1 2 3 no.13 6.79 4 1.01 25.76 2.77 21 63.64 3.83 0.25 .52 1. 1 64.60 24.81 7.26 4.48 2.22 26.62 mean 66.48 7 62.64 3.15 9.44 2.57 23.57 8.43 12 65.67 28.60 16A 71.40 6.89 2.96 27.29 22.06 5.77 10 74.37 11.76 9A 74.41 6.58 20.35 7.33 6.38 38.26 23.71 11.28 3.26 2 57.89 5.00 0.63 2.99 3 68.04 26.72 2.25 11.16 30.43 9.69 29.81 1.68 16.42 5.39 2.23 21.38 3.16 10A 50.51 26 77.28 21.00 29 82.17 8.59 27.00 0.23 20 69.49 3.19 19.73 0.09 16 65.86 0.54 0.58 9.83 17 61.08 8 52.92 9 73.15 5.08 5.85 3.01 6 65.52 18.42 2.16 1.43 2.29 4.

79 18.15 16 1.11 24.97 9 2.00 21 2.61 16.65 0.14 25.90 24.47 15.45 5.47 12.84 18.15 15.45 6.53 1.51 5.29 8.92 3.97 28.59 2.59 9.77 26.92 30.82 36.75 26.92 21.45 12.00 16.09 39.4451.26 1.97 0.42 .20 3.87 30.39 34.89 37.35 14 0.53 1.06 9A 1.86 21.125 2650 4450 7500 10000 15000 0 1 3.07 35.18 15 0.33 11.00 4.18 25.47 28.39 4.63 4.81 16.00 0.68 34.07 18.70 3.00 10.62 7.51 24.52 11.46 17.41 12.96 33.46 8.94 4 0.28 4.76 8 0.49 23.90 14.80 5.15 1.48 0.13 3.64 6.20 4.00 0.11 1.49 22.75 6 2.48 6.04 4.07 13.38 7.10001.26 12.30 7 11.45 38.36 36.22 3.00 35.10 23.02 4.71 34.19 16.35 8.18 10.10 15.00 20.39 20.41 37.41 8.17 22.09 13.97 7.48 39.77 22.19 20 6.76 0.26 16A 0.66 9.7500.00 24.47 0.15 9.00 4.00 0.46 21.72 0.27 7.00 29 0.89 45.74 5 2.56 7.77 14.90 2 1.16 24.Household Income Sector upto 1251.08 32.00 2.49 4.82 2.40 8.39 31.67 7.49 3.10 27.18 6.55 30.09 2.86 10.52 4.28 18.73 47.38 10.00 10.63 40.47 26 0.00 25.36 26.02 7.78 10A 0.57 1.87 0.57 25.21 stddev 3. Rs.2651.14 10.76 23.00 28 0.72 44.45 mean 2.16 12.74 28.62 3 1.23 10 1.00 35.00 17.59 18.15 8.15000+ no.48 27.58 0.88 17 0.94 37.77 12 13.37 11.07 0.70 17.99 23.90 11.55 42.78 17.

95 9.27 10.38 4.88 9.92 3 2.47 2.43 4.01 11.68 1.11 34.71 9.94 3.80 12 0.45 11.29 1.19 0.83 2.08 0.52 1.40 1.24 44.61 2.60 6 2.47 28.92 5.54 25.60 17.98 7.12 0.08 13.02 4.26 9A 1.94 4.82 30.09 5.92 2.28 11.89 20.49 16.24 0.42 2.73 2.97 9.67 4.90 22.68 4 1.85 5.89 6.23 3.80 17.24 10.12 stddev 4.09 46.18 7.59 29.43 2.40 0.18 27.26 1.24 8.27 47.48 16A 2.55 2.65 1.69 31.25 11.65 4.78 5.03 50.73 3.64 4.91 17.98 29. e n y ary school 1 3.05 2.41 14.46 5.28 7.65 0.81 14.96 3.61 9.95 8.64 0.63 20 19.80 9 3.63 4.87 15 4.35 2.00 26 3.54 2.75 27.35 10A 1.97 1.37 2.41 8 4.64 2.37 .81 5.30 1.72 9.94 7.77 2.26 48.95 13.91 32.06 1.00 mean 3.64 0.74 40.64 4.45 6.71 7.00 14 2.38 37.03 4.81 0.63 1.25 2.25 28 0.81 42.82 1.64 0.07 1.82 15.74 2.87 5.14 0.72 30.00 21 13.14 7.03 44.19 4.12 1.69 26.00 5.68 5.13 51.31 10 3.24 4.81 5.44 2.11 12.54 33.52 31.44 7 1.27 12.80 2.68 12.28 10.34 16.03 34.32 5.71 3.95 2.38 3.38 8.30 59.60 9.35 10.48 0.03 9.06 8.09 11.05 0.45 7.81 4.14 0.15 1.94 43.58 9.55 3.15 3.48 5 3.91 17 1.79 3.39 35.32 3.30 0.58 2.68 4.00 29 1.41 0.75 4.97 0.44 37.34 16 3.01 15.21 3.11 2.06 2.50 20.91 5.18 3.73 2.Highest Level of Education Sector illiterat childre primar second high vo-tech BS MS PhD no.92 36.44 1.45 0.98 31.07 8.85 34.15 2 3.06 4.01 0.55 9.07 9.16 2.15 13.06 2.90 32.00 5.01 45.57 12.81 19.50 14.90 12.87 9.51 7.43 22.47 8.71 34.42 23.18 21.50 11.59 3.23 3.

30 5.13 3.03 31.43 9.63 3.86 10.69 11.78 29.43 7.20 14.84 19.39 4.77 5.82 10.60 13.57 mean 4.62 8.12 2.16 31.02 3.Male Population Sector below 4.04 7.82 16.59 7.70 3.60 23.87 5.04 4.48 17.62 0.52 9.42 6.45 14.26 2.05 2.56 8.18 33.67 12.68 7.40 7 2.58 16.74 16.77 15 3.08 12.84 8.67 3.87 8.98 8.47 13.49 19.82 29.40 34.80 30.91 2.12 8.66 1.35 3.11 6.68 10 5.89 12.40 20.12 3.56 14.60 6.24 6.88 28 5.89 29 4.83 12.91 14.44 15.11 16.67 12.40 4.65 46.84 12.87 4.93 2.66 6.56 3.65 5.71 18.19 11.12 7.41 1.02 3.78 6.97 37.57 27.55 35.5 6 to 9 10 to 16 to 22 to 25 to 45 to 60+ no.37 8.93 13.95 2.57 10.54 4.28 31.24 12.77 34.60 4.34 20.21 9.89 21.56 4 3.74 17.12 14 5.34 3.35 16 3.88 17.75 12.34 3.25 10.25 3.35 29.02 5.81 2.17 20 8.14 4.44 2.80 1.29 6.99 11.96 4.02 17.00 21 4.26 3.20 12.60 8 3.94 21.23 2.82 16.43 4.54 3.18 30.51 2.79 33.78 3.35 3.60 4.97 35.73 14.14 5.41 16A 3.36 16.38 11.80 4.20 11.87 3.66 8.01 10.59 12 6.90 11.26 9.00 8.42 10.48 12.59 4.42 14.73 9.46 2.83 34.12 2.81 2 4.32 37.57 20.96 8.59 5.35 26 6.38 17.02 1.04 10.46 4.32 9.76 12.32 2.80 3.46 42.84 17 3.99 1.89 11.90 .00 8.86 3 4.25 6.36 32.39 5.93 10.69 6 2.91 5.29 3.90 10A 2.04 4.29 6.97 5. 3 15 21 24 44 59 1 4.10 2.27 3.00 27.52 2.45 8.85 16.65 7.87 7.97 5.61 4.40 stddev 1.93 28.87 9.07 6.29 2.19 6.24 5 2.59 4.60 12.52 15.71 9A 4.38 12.42 11.76 13.73 9 5.32 13.74 4.48 15.59 5.12 36.15 7.98 1.22 4.51 15.

3 15 21 24 44 59 1 3.22 39.96 3.09 2.79 6.66 2.71 6.49 6.51 10.99 3.56 47.03 6.60 4.19 5.07 12.07 10.43 4.17 4.45 17.07 7 2.32 1.72 2.66 17.94 8.77 17 4.09 1.64 6.31 5.35 3.74 41.58 15 4.56 5.57 3.59 8.77 3.01 10.87 17.86 7.29 9.71 5.21 32.57 0.34 4.71 12 6.06 45.72 10.87 8.00 3.49 16.21 14.09 16A 4.95 10.32 12.78 5.54 39.15 13.97 14.76 33.28 5.13 5.20 5.93 11.03 20 8.16 3 4.22 13.90 9.96 7.11 11.39 3.64 6.86 40.41 4.18 52.35 5.Female Population Sector below 4.52 6.22 40.79 34.04 10.78 11.45 15.65 12.14 32.72 10.90 38.01 10A 6.13 16 4.87 2.55 9 5.14 20.27 7.15 6.42 12.98 9.08 5.06 3.82 2.60 11.83 4.14 6.88 2 4.89 2.98 3.43 4.46 8 4.96 10.32 15.46 1.81 11.80 5.87 7.35 38.43 12.39 11.08 2.46 18.82 9.29 4 3.92 4.57 3.36 9.17 37.16 37.76 9.11 11.48 mean 4.29 6.57 1.80 5 4.38 3.50 1.35 2.93 3.31 3.66 4.09 2.99 11.06 15.58 19.86 7.82 10.82 5.40 2.00 13.25 16.61 10.06 2.35 1.13 38.01 9.43 13.29 12.06 28 2.31 12.18 22.44 4.71 8.25 9.39 11.89 4.03 14 4.80 2.13 14.83 .39 13.86 12.09 1.96 11.33 3.11 2.85 9.57 13.55 7.40 11.88 6.22 14.29 5.35 3.83 5.00 5.71 38.14 7.55 12.14 26 7.06 0.83 5.77 9A 3.29 17.06 5.86 6.23 4.32 3.48 1.29 12.30 33.32 12.00 5.84 3.53 7.44 5.77 6 3.15 3.27 41.62 3.07 6.55 4.35 3.07 6.63 9.58 42.28 stddev 1.84 34.88 16.91 10.39 13.22 7.78 2.14 4.68 12.72 38.68 3.78 29 2.98 10 5.29 4.60 7.97 21 5.74 36.5 6 to 9 10 to 16 to 22 to 25 to 45 to 60+ no.

46 15 1.63 15.68 0.71 24.05 stddev 0.18 2.90 4.29 54.19 3 1.18 26.56 25.87 2 1.21 54.00 26.17 54.86 12 0.14 4 0.82 6 3.71 14.92 1.88 36.68 0.99 0.34 2.14 14.43 34.72 15.19 55.50 7.83 14.00 mean 1.92 55.45 62.11 1.19 20.04 20.53 6.49 64.64 19.67 47.49 5.43 44.82 51.23 28.30 44.56 50.83 22.55 23.82 12.00 29 1.46 2.48 9 1.23 36.28 21 0.30 61. 1 2.23 46.41 63.52 62.99 26 2.07 12.98 2.09 1.36 0.57 11.Family Size Sector single 2 to 3 4 to 5 6 to 7 8 to 10 no.51 59.64 1.29 50.92 12.05 66.00 28 0.02 2.87 52.40 9.57 57.95 1.00 1.00 15.45 1.88 10 0.57 19.51 30.00 14 1.00 58.95 1.85 66.91 11.16 9.07 28.95 10A 1.82 9.00 0.23 12.24 16A 0.26 8.93 16 0.79 33.58 1.29 0.86 11.97 19.30 9A 1.67 0.47 20.03 5 0.16 44.23 0.29 7.15 20 0.90 17 1.33 41.53 .66 22.46 54.00 19.37 54.93 32.99 8 0.14 2.64 10.86 1.67 14.38 14.35 13.73 20.40 7 0.

00 92.96 12.00 8 35.00 0.00 0.00 53.00 0.38 0.00 16 83.00 0.25 62.00 29 42.51 0.15 85.00 0.62 0.21 6.00 2.82 7.07 3.00 14 53.00 0.19 3 61.18 0.17 2.00 0.10 0.16 4.52 0.13 2.00 0.81 76.80 0.00 10A 2.00 92.60 19.00 17 0.58 8.13 39.36 0.31 20 100.30 0.81 0.00 0.00 1.00 16. House op comme society rcial 1 100.33 0.67 0.00 0.35 39.00 0.00 21 99.75 stddev 37.86 0.07 0.00 0.12 0.90 0.82 0.Type of Housing Sector CIDCO Pvt.58 .00 15 82.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 17.00 0.83 35.82 0.72 0.00 10 83.12 23.68 2.Pvt Other no.00 0.00 5.77 0.00 0.77 0.02 mean 53.00 0.18 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.23 26 100.00 16A 7.40 6.00 38.00 0.61 13.14 0.39 4.56 0.00 12 17.91 76.40 1.00 23.00 28 0.13 0.62 0.86 0.96 0.74 13.00 2 48.46 9 98. Pvt co.47 0.84 36.00 0.97 0.21 46.00 0.87 20.13 28.00 0.01 1.00 7 89.00 4 45.12 3.78 12.02 5 22.68 0.38 9A 2.00 0.00 97.73 0.00 6 92.

Tenure Sector before1 81-85 86-90 91-92 no.60 1.00 0.63 3.85 5.87 6.44 48.00 47.16 9.00 4.66 0.07 8.00 0.16 5.43 32.94 4.27 1.49 12.83 8.65 31.00 0.61 6 51.31 16.00 28 0.36 21.66 14.00 6.17 6.73 6.53 20.92 11.18 31.61 18.91 6.74 6.35 28.65 17.86 33.71 2 39.52 1.49 32.00 31.34 13.56 6.95 8 24.03 75.42 7.07 4 5.29 12 0.50 12.00 48.81 6.05 20.35 5.80 39.06 1.24 3.82 12.38 37.83 26.19 5.32 6.49 21 13.82 4.87 0.19 8.08 93 3.21 0.16 7.11 15.09 25.56 4.64 15 8.00 13.13 11.17 12.61 6.86 mean 12.46 36.00 29 0.33 6.74 4.82 8.45 6.57 12.56 16.15 .67 36.88 4.86 4.30 6.28 26 0.87 7.09 29.54 6.33 18.82 5.57 stddev 18.71 11.82 48.00 31.05 6.00 0.39 14.87 10 0.37 7. 980 1 43.62 6.17 14 0.13 11.38 56.59 38.38 15.11 17 0.00 0.52 12.26 7.87 1.00 0.06 13.00 35.03 10.95 5.29 41.75 7.50 12.62 4.99 12.56 16A 0.64 10.43 20.82 5.85 4.09 16 27.68 20 0.72 3.52 7.38 10A 0.57 14.42 0.02 17.14 1.88 0.76 5 49.42 12.54 24.73 4.00 20.22 52.02 44.63 1.95 3 11.50 16.40 95 1.92 2.30 6.61 12.82 2.00 0.23 22.60 7.33 9A 0.57 18.94 12.93 10.56 9 0.88 3.87 1.60 94 13.15 18.64 27.10 40.26 28.82 24.86 7 42.19 9.00 0.

32 8.03 6.19 17.88 12.05 18.17 5.67 2.95 9.74 31.82 3.17 8.14 6. Mumba state state i 24.08 0.64 2.23 18.54 5.10 17.43 17.35 15.58 0.00 6.12 7.67 7.83 3.00 32.35 21.92 4.50 6.47 36.83 2.00 45.24 23.62 29.33 0.48 17.93 8.45 2.27 0.33 0.05 30.00 0.69 35.64 7.54 1.88 2.51 10.03 1.52 2.33 0.26 3.83 8.36 4.51 6.47 6.77 6.96 18.62 4.48 20.26 23.30 4.55 8.24 1.90 10.23 12.00 0.54 8.00 20.62 0.46 0.33 8.00 1.93 3.95 12.94 5.55 3.53 2.07 5.17 25.46 1.15 2.63 0.67 8.00 21.63 15.32 27.09 27.38 2.03 24.42 8.82 6.77 2.10 16.09 0.29 8.60 2.84 2. city suburbs suburbs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10A 12 14 15 16 16A 17 20 21 26 28 29 9A mean stddev 21.57 28.45 0.76 0.00 19.63 5.67 3.69 5.09 5.30 0.00 24.39 4.45 3.58 9.48 15.00 26.83 18.58 2.00 30.15 2.23 3.80 37.91 2.62 0.58 0.26 2.74 36.01 Navi Inside Out of Intl.69 2.57 1.20 8.00 2.58 14.79 0.05 19.26 12.02 47.42 26.76 11.71 20.52 22.00 38.53 2.00 0.30 14.63 2.69 4.17 5.94 28.10 16.99 7.74 28.76 3.00 39.19 27.38 5.67 25.60 4.25 31.40 8.15 0.25 4.00 33.24 5.85 33.13 26.90 7.29 0.25 12.71 5.88 1.54 3.30 34.07 3.00 1.33 4.00 31.00 30.33 8.85 47.00 28.33 7.29 20.76 3.42 3.42 4.37 1.00 4.81 4.14 0.29 .24 7.37 10.03 15.53 0.98 0.31 5.81 0.92 7.39 2.30 2.68 3.33 4.50 27.51 7.61 12.73 25.52 1.Previous Place of Residence Sector Island Wn En Thane Vashi no.80 4.44 5.00 0.02 22.87 3.73 4.31 0.90 2.26 19.00 0.60 0.10 4.00 4.00 23.26 7.64 0.26 0.20 6.02 9.39 0.98 3.45 21.

33 6.00 0.99 3.57 14.59 1.34 4.72 5.10 2.67 0.27 2.90 2 44.52 19.19 2.22 3.64 10.85 5.56 5.29 .70 10.21 9 50.93 9.61 5.85 1.98 6.43 4.92 14.46 17.24 7.69 28 28.36 6.29 2.53 2.44 5.92 20 60.79 16A 51.90 17.76 3.17 20.44 2.77 8.63 2.52 0.05 2.21 21.93 4.85 0.50 10.90 3.43 7.44 7.08 4.74 4.21 0.53 9.29 15.87 12.84 4.85 5.71 8.17 9.26 2.36 10 44.77 3.00 11.81 5.61 14.26 3.71 1.09 15.83 14 19.49 10.75 14.67 15 57.48 mean 39.47 2.14 1. i hi lam a 1 51.32 2.00 0.58 2.23 2.09 8.49 10A 24.70 8.55 3.00 12.30 1.66 10.26 5 77.95 4.51 3.03 2.76 14.32 17 21.27 7.63 1.32 7.63 16 54.31 3.Language Sector Marath Hindi Gujarat Malaya Punjabi Tamil Kannad Bengali Other no.57 4 46.43 16.90 3.86 8.84 12.13 20.10 5.76 12.54 1.73 0.49 9.19 3.89 4.17 16.43 24.15 18.73 2.32 1.36 4.37 4.29 29 25.08 7.43 14.03 17.15 16.83 7.54 7.27 7.62 1.32 9A 20.20 4.00 9.55 8.37 4.00 1.28 24.00 4.73 stddev 17.54 4.30 9.96 2.54 27.39 4.57 1.64 3.67 4.90 26 48.33 29.29 2.00 1.60 2.23 9.61 1.97 10.17 16.98 4.96 5.79 12.75 4.18 10.92 3.66 10.57 20.86 4.34 12.70 6.26 13.97 4.76 4.57 15.33 13.47 2.56 8 22.91 6 33.81 4.73 3.54 21 61.98 3.66 8.03 16.93 1.92 1.99 16.87 17.82 4.46 5.13 4.71 12 8.09 6.62 7.10 4.38 14.76 5.72 12.22 2.97 3.96 6.29 2.03 9.91 2.49 4.57 17.38 0.36 11.30 4.00 12.73 2.12 2.05 9.00 4.15 2.36 6.42 3 32.27 5.83 8.55 32.29 0.40 2.89 3.00 7.00 6.27 0.45 2.82 3.13 7 37.29 3.71 1.

61 4.00 6 83.00 12 79.70 2.99 0.45 2.00 0.16 15.03 5.00 4.88 0.22 0.17 2.60 1.23 0.00 29 86.26 6.20 0.44 0.98 0.86 22.21 0.62 0.15 0.70 0.42 0.00 9A 73.18 11.00 16A 91.03 0.82 2.00 5 81.00 6.85 7.32 2 80.85 0.02 0.76 5.00 2.34 6.13 8.51 0.88 0.47 4.47 0.43 1.81 9.00 16 88.00 14 88.36 0.62 20 86.00 0.82 7.20 10.17 0.17 12.00 26 86.01 6.80 3.40 0.51 2.52 3.55 1.82 0.95 0.41 0.47 0.10 0.42 5.57 4 84.00 0.05 0.78 3.50 4.86 1.91 0.33 0.00 1.61 1.71 0.53 3.45 2.67 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 8.00 0.00 0.28 4.68 1.13 0.53 1.46 1.60 8.64 0.55 4.29 9.32 2.54 0.02 0.49 .00 21 81.36 mean 82.75 0.73 1.66 3.24 0.04 5.13 5.00 0.42 1.78 1.26 5.92 7.33 0.82 10.25 stddev 6.46 0.00 0.43 0.00 1.85 0.09 6.16 0.31 0.17 0.42 0.75 5.92 1.65 9.00 0.11 10 80.69 0.66 8 72.59 3 75.57 4.64 9 84.76 8.52 0.32 1.73 1. an st 1 79.88 0.70 1.00 15 83.00 0.21 15.43 1.19 5.00 7 76.79 0.00 17 85.Religion Sector Hindu Christi Islam Jain Sikh Buddhi Other no.72 4.00 10A 72.43 1.00 0.32 6.68 0.00 28 100.74 1.64 5.53 4.20 8.56 3.09 0.68 0.40 2.62 0.37 0.00 0.04 6.00 1.00 7.36 1.

660 98.320 79.4115 81659 32.Appendix D Factor Analysis Descriptive Statistics EARNER EDUCATN FAM.571 55.845 4 .946 24.6076 81659 8.064E-02 .039E-02 1.6486 81659 86.9885 16.000 .2670 81659 Communalities Initial Extraction EARNER 1.926 EDUCATN 1.875 FAM.928 LANGUAGE 1.0403 3.000 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.000 .000 .429 5.2091 4.867 7 1.293 3.000 .8863 81659 28.000 .SIZE 1. . Deviation Analysis N 73.851E-17 .0814 4.9974 81659 49.796 .985 INCOME 1.1087 9.SIZE INCOME LANGUAGE MIGRATN RELIGION TENURE Mean Std.879 TENURE 1.8271 8.005 99.7870 81659 37.955 89.571 2 1.133 100.202 5 .7800 3.824 RELIGION 1.356 95.890 3 .862 6 8.832 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.8538 81659 53.446 55.939 MIGRATN 1.000 .314E-16 100.000 .6705 5.000 8 5.000 . Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues Total % of Variance Cumulative % 1 4.

951 .818 % of Variance Cumulative % 43.925E-02 TENURE -.155 -.317E-02 -8.804 .937 -.926 .383E-02 .634 4.379 -2.880 .136 .845 Component Matrix Component 1 2 EARNER .822 .SIZE -.470 EDUCATN -.118 22.381 .468 1.202 -1.862 LANGUAGE .278 .881 LANGUAGE -.878 -.728 89.796E-04 TENURE .201 .902 -.230 MIGRATN -.293 INCOME .101 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.766E-02 MIGRATN .898E-02 .702 -.771 67.107 INCOME -.430 .156 .236 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. 3 .882 FAM.685 8.SIZE . 3 .455 .785 -7.347 43.888 -7.358 .468E-03 RELIGION .900 FAM.264 .244 -.347 23.Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings 1 2 3 Total 3.255 4.446 .484 EDUCATN .902 1.454E-02 Rotated Component Matrix Component 1 2 EARNER -.230 RELIGION -.

299 10.581 2.108 Cluster Membership 1:Vashi 2:Nerul 3:Belapur 4:Kalamboli 5:Panvel 6:Kopar-khaira 7:Airoli 8:Sanpada 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 .0 8 100.0 Squared Euclidean Distance used Average Linkage (Between Groups) Average Linkage (Between Groups) Agglomeration Schedule Stage Cluster 1 1 5 2 2 3 5 4 1 5 3 6 1 7 1 Cluster 2 6 7 8 2 4 5 3 Coefficients .617 7.919 9.Appendix E Cluster Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N 8 a b Missing Total Percent N Percent N Percent 100.0 0 .946 4.174 4.

3934 9.7324 3.0375 Std.000 .8628 WOMEN 33.527 MEN 1.568 WOMEN 1.9114 MEN 38.5835 Analysis N 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 Communalities Initial Extraction EARNER 1.3183 EDUCATN 40.9421 LANGUAG1 46.0484 MIGRATN 52.675 MIGRATN 1.Appendix F Factor Analysis Descriptive Statistics Mean EARNER 66.000 .000 .855 LANGUAG1 1.000 . .889 LANGUAG2 1.5760 INCOME 27.5535 LANGUAG2 6.571 OWNRSHIP 1.9628 7.000 .9142 3.6247 4.000 .801 RELGION1 1.9759 OWNRSHIP 66.000 .3839 RELGION2 6. Deviation 7.000 .721 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.856 EDUCATN 1.722 RELGION2 1.000 .836 INCOME 1.1339 10.9768 15.7719 3.000 .5580 35.000 .4424 RELGION1 82.7307 3.

136E-02 .917 2.096 .391 LANGUAG2 -.773 -.612 .238 91.638 97.538 .690 3 1.819 72.290 2.740 15.257 87.042E-02 .657 -2.373 -.564 11 4. Component Matrix Component 1 2 3 EARNER .441 5 .592 WOMEN .448 .098 2.475 RELGION2 .234 8.854E-02 .239 MEN 0.466 4.896 98.427E-02 INCOME .838 9 9.748 .161 57. .487 EDUCATN .001 24.688 6.831 99.794E-02 .131 .915E-04 .001 25.424 RELGION1 .880 -.455 23.310 .750 2 2.200 8 .523 81.938 8.093E-03 MIGRATN -.000 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.458 LANGUAG1 .937 2.698 6 .937 34.843 34.453 49.463 72.734 10 9.265 95.127 -.Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings % of Variance Cumulative % 25.816 -5.581 4 .246 .436 100.071E-02 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.917 Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total 1 3.777 -.500 4.359 3.438 22.522 -.565 OWNRSHIP .803 8.473 .935 7 .

Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.399 WOMEN .210 .610E-02 LANGUAG2 -.869 .113 RELGION1 -.647 9.110 -.246 LANGUAG1 .366 .141E-02 MEN -.316 -.795 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.046 -.774 EDUCATN .575 5.855 .877 -9.136 OWNRSHIP .201 .214 .709 .Rotated Component Matrix Component 1 2 3 EARNER .704E-02 INCOME .658 RELGION2 .596 -.742 -.130 .524 .804 MIGRATN 0.333 .231 -.120 .351 -. .240 . a Rotation converged in 6 iterations.

Appendix G Cluster Agglomeration Schedule Cluster Combined Stage Cluster 1 Cluster 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 9 1 12 9 15 3 12 1 13 9 3 1 8 1 1 3 12 12 1 1 1 6 10 2 17 14 18 7 16 4 22 20 23 15 11 9 19 8 21 13 3 12 5 Stage Cluster First Appears Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Next Stage 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 1 9 0 0 8 2 0 11 0 0 13 0 0 12 4 0 18 3 0 13 0 0 19 5 0 15 7 0 17 9 6 15 0 0 17 13 11 16 15 0 20 12 14 20 8 0 19 18 10 21 16 17 21 20 19 22 21 0 0 Coefficients .515 1.918 .558 4.411 1.449 8.151 2.904 2.108 2.837 1.751 .142 13.799 5.487 3.840 1.574 .584 .114 .309 6.653 .726 4.032 1.052 11.

Cluster Membership Case 3 Clusters 1:1 1 2:2 1 3:3 1 4:4 1 5:5 2 6:6 1 7:7 1 8:8 1 9:9 1 10:10 1 11:10A 1 12:12 3 13:14 3 14:15 1 15:16 1 16:16A 3 17:17 3 18:20 1 19:21 1 20:26 1 21:28 3 22:29 3 23:9A 1 .

USA. Virginia Tech. Dec.May 1994 Worked as an intern at Historic Boulder. Worked as an intern with Narendra Dengle Architects. College of Architecture and Urban Studies. April . 1994. • Registered Architect under Council of Architecture. J. 1995 Worked with the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage May 1993 . Aug. Blacksburg.July 1992 Honors and Affiliations • Invited to Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society. Browder. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning. P. Pune.May 1997 Worked as an Architect with Suyojan Architects. . • Won first prize (three member team) for Formica Interior design competition. Boulder. India. October 1997. • Rank holder of the University of Pune. 1994 . Knox.Outstanding First Year Graduate Student. Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. CO. VA Bachelor of Architecture May 1996 University of Pune. May 1997. Pune.July 1996 . Aug. • Awarded Virginia Citizens Planning Associate Fellowship . • Won first prize (three member team) in a design competition . Professor. L.Mar.Reclaiming a derelict river. India. India May . • Student member American Planning Association. 1995. Pune. 1997 – May 1998 Graduate Research Assistant to Dr. India Experience Graduate Research Assistant to Dr. O.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Date of Birth: 30 June 1973 Education: Master of Urban and Regional Planning May 1998 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 1996 . New Delhi.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful