The Urban Social Pattern of Navi Mumbai, India

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

Master of Urban and Regional Planning

John Browder, Chair Wendy Jacobson Paul Knox

April , 1998 Blacksburg, Virginia

Keywords: urban social pattern, Navi Mumbai, Bombay, urban planning - India Copyright 1998, Malathi Ananthakrishnan

The Urban Social Pattern of Navi Mumbai, India Malathi Ananthakrishnan (ABSTRACT) This research thesis examines the emerging trends in urban social patterns in Navi Mumbai, India. Unlike the other planned cities of India, Navi Mumbai was specifically built as a planned decentralization of a large metropolitan city. The research focuses on explaining the urban social pattern of this particular case study. An urban social pattern reflects the social characteristics of the urban setting. In the case of Navi Mumbai, the government had a social agenda of promoting a social pattern based on socioeconomic distribution rather than an ethnic one. Analysis of the data provides an insight to the results of this social agenda, and provides a basis to frame new ones. Thus, the study not only addresses a basic research question, but also has policy implications. The research involves a comprehensive review of secondary source material to establish the theoretical framework for the research. The review also involves an extensive inspection of urban social patterns across the world to better contextualize this particular case study. The research puts forth a model that explains the social pattern of Navi Mumbai by social area analysis using variables, which are drawn from social aspects of any city and indigenous factors of Indian settlements. The model depends not only on statistical analysis but also on interpretation of local conditions. This research situates the emerging social pattern in geographic literature in developing countries. This research was supported in part, by a grant from the College of Architecture and Urban Studies, Virginia Tech.

Acknowledgment

I would like to take this opportunity to thank my Advisor and Chair of my committee, Dr. John Browder. He was supportive of all my efforts to successfully complete this thesis. It would not have been possible without his help. Thank you also to my committee members, Dr. Jacobson and Dr. Knox, for the time and effort they contributed.

Thanks also due to everyone in Navi Mumbai who helped me collect the data and all relevant information. Special thanks to Ms. Adusumilli, Senior planner, CIDCO, Mrs. Raje, Chief statistician, CIDCO, Dr. Venkatachalam and Dr. Sengupta at IIT-Bombay and Dr. BanerjeeGuha at the University of Bombay. I would also like to thank Prachi and Avesh Tapde for their hospitality in Navi Mumbai.

Dr. Dyck and Dr. Bohland clarified many of my conceptual and analytical queries. I would like to give my appreciation for their support. I would also like to thank Dr. Randolph and Dr. Schubert for having made a grant available for me to carry out the field research.

I am also grateful to my good friends Inga, Maneesha and Elda for not only helping me out with proof reading and other mundane things, but also for being there during the ups and downs of the entire process. I would like to thank my family for always encouraging me to think and my fiancé for his patience.

2 Urban Form and Urban Pattern 3.3 Factors influencing Urban Form 3.2 The Planning History of Bombay and the Greater Bombay region 2.6 The Built Form 3. The Research Setting………………………………………………………….6 Design Principles of Navi Mumbai 2.4 The Draft Development Plan of 1973 2.5.1 Caste 3.1 Concentric Zone Theory 3.2 Sector Theory 3.5.8.Table of Contents 1.9 Conclusion 4.5. 1. The Conceptual Framework…………………………………………………..7.7 Theories of Urban Social Patterns 3. 3 2.3 Indian Cities 3.8.7 Social Agenda in the Planning of Navi Mumbai 2.4 Data Collection 4.8 Plan Implementation through the Public Administrative Framework 2.5.10 Conclusion 3.7.5 Sociocultural Factors 3..1 Introduction 2.8.5.1 Introduction 3.5.1 Social Area Analysis 4.5 Methodology 4.5.4 Language 3.1 Western Cities 3.9 The Reality of Implementing the Plan 2.3 Operationalization 4.3 The Creation of Navi Mumbai 2. Introduction………………………………………………………………….3 Organization of the Thesis 1 2.2 Cluster Analysis . 20 3.2 Significance of Thesis 1.8 Case Study of Urban Social Patterns 3.7. Research Design……………………………………………………………… 38 4.3 Multiple Nuclei Theory 3.3 Religion 3.5 Implications of the Sociocultural factors 3.2 Hypothesis 4.2 Class 3.4 The Evolution of the Urban Form of Indian Cities 3.2 Third World Cities 3.1 Research Problem Statement 1.1 Descriptive Analysis 4.5 Development Potential of the Site 2.

3.2 Sub-regional Scale 6.3 Discussion 5. Presentation of Data………………………………………………………….2.5 Conclusion 6.5.3 Regional Scale – nodes 5.3 Principal Component Analysis 4.1 Regional Scale 6.1 Principal Components Analysis 5.2 Cluster Analysis 5.2 Cluster Analysis 5.2.2.3 Discussion 5.4 Sub-regional Scale – sectors 5.. Interpretation / Discussion…………………………………………………… 6.4 mapping and Overlays 4. Glossary of Terms Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G 77 .3.4 Potential Utility of the Research 43 65 7.1 Principal Components Analysis 5.5.4.4.1 Socioeconomic Status and Sector Theory 6.3 Ethnic Status and Multiple Nuclei Theory 6.2 Family Status and Concentric Zone Theory 6.. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………… 74 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………….2 Descriptive Analysis 5.3 Summary 6.4.1 Introduction 5.4.3.6 Data Analysis 5. 5.

18 5.9 5.4 2.20 5.19 5.List of Tables Table number 2.17 5.6 4.5 5.1 5.11 5.2 5.13 5.8 5.3 5.14 5.4 5.5 2.7 5.2 2.12 5.16 5.6 5.21 Title Population Density of Bombay Immigrant population of Bombay Land Fragmentation in 1970 Household Income and Capacity to Pay Population Density in Various Sectors of Bombay Land Use of Navi Mumbai Constructs and Variables Survey Sampling Constructs and Variables Work Force Number of Earners Occupational Classification of Workforce Household Income Location of Education Institutions Level of Education Male Population Female Population Family Size Type of Housing Ownership of House Housing built by CIDCO Housing built by Private Enterprise Year of Occupation Previous Place of Residence Religion Language Spatial Pattern of Variables Attributes of Principal Components Attributes of Principal Components page 4 5 6 8 16 17 39 40 43 44 44 45 46 47 47 48 49 50 51 52 52 53 53 54 55 56 57 60 61 .10 5.1 2.2 5.1 4.15 5.3 2.

5 Title Expansion of Bombay Twin City Across the Harbor Development Potential of the Site Nodes of Navi Mumbai Institutional Hierarchy in Implementation of Development Plan for Navi Mumbai Land Use of Navi Mumbai Circle and Swastika Town Plans Concentric Zone Theory Sector Theory Multiple Nuclei Theory Urban Social Patterns Plan of Delhi and New Delhi Asian Ports Latin American Cities Pattern of Indian Cities Theories of Urban Social Patterns and Corresponding Case Studies Distribution of Single-earner Families Frequency of Families with Income range Rs.6 3.1 6.18 5.7 5.4 2.10 5.5 5.12 5.8 5.3 5.7 3.1 3.1 2.3 3.4 3.List of Figure Figure Number 2.6 5.3 2.5 3.2 3.5 2.14 5.4 5.4 6.13 5.1 5.8 3.10 5.15 5.2 5.17 5.2 2.11 5.16 5.19 6.9 5. 2651-4450 Frequency of Families with at least one individual with Secondary Education Frequency of Male Population in the age group 25-45 Frequency of Households with 4 or 5 members Frequency of Houses built by CIDCO Frequency of Housing built by CIDCO Frequency of Houses built by Private Enterprise Frequency of Tenure Frequency of Bombay as Previous Place of Residence Frequency of Hindus Frequency of Muslims Frequency of Marathi Frequency of Malayalam Components in Rotated Space Loadings of Principal Components Dendrogram using Average Linkages between groups Loadings of Principal Components Dendrogram using Average Linkages between groups Cluster of Nodes of Navi Mumbai Average Linkage between Factor Scores Average Linkage between Variables Clustering of Sectors of Vashi Average Linkage between Factor Scores Page 2 5 7 11 15 18 26 28 29 29 31 32 32 33 34 36 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 56 57 57 59 59 60 62 63 65 66 66 67 68 .9 3.3 6.2 6.6 3.

17 6.9 6.16 6.15 6.6.10 6.13 6.7 6.6 6.12 6.11 6.8 6.14 6.18 Average Linkage between Variables Hypothetical Sector Pattern for Socioeconomic variables Distribution of Number of Earners Distribution of Income Hypothetical Concentric Pattern for Family Status variables Distribution of Ownership of Apartment Hypothetical Multiple Nuclei Pattern for Ethnic variables Distribution of Households speaking Marathi Distribution of Households which follow Islam Clustering of Sectors Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 68 69 69 69 70 70 71 71 71 72 72 72 72 .

Thus. The purpose of this thesis is to delineate and interpret the social pattern of Navi Mumbai. It is a synthesis of the spatial relationships of various elements. Various processes influence the social pattern of the city. The pattern suggests not only the outcome of . The literature review shows that a specific study of Navi Mumbai has not been previously documented. This research aspires to contribute to basic research in social geography. religion. 1.1 Research Problem Statement The overall objective of this thesis is to determine what common patterns. religious and linguistic classes. The urban form of a city is primarily the result of the characteristics of its physical and social design as well as socioeconomic and political forces. The basic research here involves the search for an urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. land use and ownership. and their social pattern is characterized by residential segregation based on ethnic. middle class population in India. The urban social pattern is one of the many aspects of the urban form. Socioeconomic factors. The study of the physical form and structure of cities is the study of urban morphology. race. Different characteristics are drawn from the factors influencing the physical design and cultural aspect of the city.Chapter 1: Introduction 1. These include the ethnic composition of the city. Traditional Indian cities have evolved over the centuries. migration. The pattern of Navi Mumbai will be studied at different hierarchical spatial levels: regional (node / township) and sub-regional (sector / neighborhood). and political events may influence the physical design and pattern of a city. A policy emphasizing a uniform distribution of the population is the ideological orientation of the government. Physical and economic landscapes. Therefore. Urban patterns occur because of repetition of these elements. Why is such a study significant? The urban form of the city influences behavioral. This research determines how the present social pattern relates to various theoretical frameworks. this paper will augment existing knowledge about social configurations of planned urban development in Asian regions. exist in the urban social pattern of planned towns in India. An interpretation of the emerging social pattern reveals something of the social character of the city. street patterns. land use pattern and ethnic classifications will be used as key variables to study the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. and the housing market. planning regulations. Navi Mumbai (New Bombay) is one of the first planned new town developments built for a diverse. 1990). if any.2 Significance of Research A holistic approach to the study of settlements involves understanding the interrelationships between their constituent elements at a certain period of time. the study of human settlements has an encompassing view of all the activities it supports. economic and social processes within it (Vance. housing characteristics.

1. its contextual framework. the basic research has many applications in longrange planning in Navi Mumbai. This first chapter is the introduction.3 Organization of the Thesis This thesis is divided into seven chapters. the research setting.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 1: Introduction 2 the policy. but also variables that influence this pattern. The third chapter is a comprehensive review of the secondary sources to establish a context of the research question. Chapter seven draws to conclusion the thesis with a review of the problem statement. The urban social pattern also serves as a framework for further research. Thus. The second chapter provides the background to the particular case study used in the research. The presentation of data and its analysis is in the fifth chapter. analysis and interpretation and the broad outcomes of the thesis. Interpretation and discussion of the analysis and its relationship to the theories discussed in the third chapter is done in the sixth chapter. which provides the problem statement and the broader objectives of the thesis. methodology. . The fourth chapter outlines the methodology used for analysis of data and explains the data source and method of data collection.

The harbor was strengthened. established in 1972. 1995). especially to the middle and lower class of people. South Bombay is the center of India’s 1950 banking and service industries. By the 1780s.1 Expansion of Bombay The East India Company.2 The Planning History of Bombay and the Greater Bombay region Bombay is not a city built on Indian traditional planning ideas.Chapter 2: The Research Setting 2. The East India Company encouraged Indian and East India Company merchants to settle in Bombay. In Bombay. the East India Company had taken on the new role of ruler (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. the shipyard modernized and the city fortified. There was a . Bombay was then established as a trading post. now as rulers. The first settlement was established in the southern most tip of the island. 1995).1). is a new planned city across the harbor (of Bombay) from Bombay. This planned decentralization was the outcome of efforts by the government to make Bombay more “sustainable” (Bombay Metropolitan Regional Planning Board. The city of Source: Dwivedi and Mehrotra. Figure 2. Navi Mumbai was designed to provide a better quality of life. This range of activities led to crowding at an BOMBAY NAVI unprecedented scale. the King of Portugal gifted the Bombay islands to King Charles II of England when King Charles married Catherine Braganza. Urbanization and subsequent suburbanization of Bombay have created a linear city such that the central business district (CBD) and residential areas have become further and further apart (Figure 2. Bombay had its beginnings in a series of fishing villages until it was taken over by the Portuguese in the 16th century. for Arabian MUMBAI Sea those who could not afford to make the 1910 long commutes. squatter settlements all over Bombay became the way of life. was interested in developing the town in a methodical manner. 1965 Bombay’s high concentration of docks. and providing efficient infrastructure (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. the Crown rented Bombay to the East India Company. In 1668. 2. 1957 trading posts. The geographical area of Bombay is an island. 1973). India. 1995.1 Introduction Navi Mumbai (New Bombay). textile mills and government offices have made it the preeminent port of Western India. a Portuguese princess. In 1661.

In 1865. Table 2. some thought was given to ’Greater Bombay’. By the early 1900s. the Gadgil Committee strongly recommended a multi-nuclear growth using the creation of a new town across the harbor. Bombay’s infrastructure facilities were stretched to the limit. 1995).2). various planning committees were formed to develop a regional plan for Bombay. Transportation is threatening to break down…. 1992). They recommended: i the creation of a new town on the mainland across the harbor i develop the suburbs of Bombay further Bombay had reached a level of unmanageable growth by the 1960s. in 1896. However. Modak influenced the development of Greater Bombay for the next two decades (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. the Bombay Improvement Trust was created. Housing deficits are ever widening and slums like a cancerous growth can be seen anywhere and everywhere. 1995).1 Population Density of Bombay 1881 1891 1901 1911 1921 1931 1961 1971 Area in acres 14247 14281 14342 14575 15066 15480 16751 16720 Persons / Acre 54 56 54 67 78 75 165 184 (Various Census Reports for Bombay in Kosambi. In 1967. The development acts of 1954 and 1964 emphasized the need to relocate industrial activity from the island to the mainland (CIDCO. and 24 percent of the one and two room tenements were over crowded. This enclosed the Town and Island of Bombay. (BMRPB. 1986) The Bombay Metropolitan Regional Planning Board in its report wrote Bombay the Beautiful is no more beautiful. Land use zoning and the concept of floor space index were incorporated for the first time. the suburbs and 42 villages within the definition of the new city limit (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. This committee appointed the Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board to develop the concept further (Gadgil Committee. The large migrant influx contributed to the overcrowding (Table 2. The 1967 development plan estimated a housing shortage of 131. 1995). Many parts of it are not even tolerably clean and healthy. These formal government bodies were the beginning of a conscientious effort to regulate the growth of Bombay (Banerjee-Guha. the Bombay Municipal Corporation was established. the Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board set up two committees to study the development of Bombay. In the 1960s.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 4 strong development of mixed land use settlements.000 houses. The Post-War development Committee of 1945 and the ’Master Plan in Outline’ prepared by Albert Mayer and N. which would encompass the Fort area as well as the suburbs of Bombay. the Port of Bombay. lack of housing and infrastructure and high land values were the major problems identified. 1965). 1973) Population increase. In 1966. Commercial and residential areas were mixed because many merchants carried on business from home (Tindall. Greater Bombay came into existence only after the Bombay High Court Act of 1945. concentration of industries and offices in certain pockets of Bombay. . 1995). V. and. Commuter distances had become larger because of increased suburbanization with no change in location of the CBD. Adequate water is a serious problem.

Pravina Mehta2 and Shirish Patel3 who presented to the government a proposal in 1964 for constructing new growth centers across Bombay harbor on the mainland (Figure 2.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 5 Table 2. rocketing land prices prevented the acquisition of land for public purposes (BMPRB.2 Twin City Across the Harbor Source: CIDCO. 1997).2). It is a narrow piece of land bounded by the Western Ghat mountain ranges on the north. the Bombay Metropolitan Regional Planning Board recommended considering a twin city across the harbor. Lack of adequate water supply and sewage facilities worsened conditions. 1973. was incharge of the planning and design of Navi Mumbai (1970-75). then this would not be possible (BMRPB.3 The Creation of Navi Mumbai The prominent authors of the ’twin city concept’ were Charles Correa1. This was in the form of the Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board’s recommendation that a new city be designed within the Bombay Metropolitan region to facilitate the decongestion of Bombay (Correa.2 Immigrant Population of Bombay 1881 1891 1901 1911 1921 1931 1961 1971 Population 773196 821764 776006 979445 1175914 1161383 2771933 3070378 % 72 75 77 80 84 75 72 63 Immigrants Males per 151 171 162 189 191 181 160 149 100 Females (Various Census Reports of Bombay in Kosambi. Pravina Mehta (late) was a structural engineer. 1973). 1993). 1 2 Charles Correa is a prominent architect and urban designer in Bombay. south and east. The site that was finally chosen was across the harbor from Bombay island. In a final attempt. engineer and planner. Unhealthy and insanitary conditions for 1 million slum dwellers was the result of inadequate housing stock. Also. 1986) The concentration of industries and offices at the CBD and suburbs like Chembur and Andheri created unequal development. and New Growth Centers Growth Centers of Bombay Town Center Arabian Sea Harbor of Bombay Figure 2. . 1973). 3 Sirish Patel. If the new city was too far away. The implementation occurred through ’correct’ political and bureaucratic channels in 1969. air pollution and mixed land use (UNCHS. 2.

km) (number) (number) (number) Government 10137 All Private 16677 18412 3338 1579 90 Marsh(wetlands) 84 (CIDCO. Navi Mumbai covers an area of 344 sq.4 The Draft Development Plan of 1973 The task of planning and developing Navi Mumbai was entrusted to the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO). >1000 sq. >500 sq. 2. >4000 sq. Section 31(6) under the same act gives the government the power to specify land use and proceed with development. a government agency explicitly set up for this purpose. The land notified for acquisition for Navi Mumbai was under private and government ownership (Table 2. wholly owned by the State Government of Maharashtra (CIDCO. 1973): i polycentric pattern of development i acquisition of all land to have better control of the environment and to use land as the main resource for development. The first task of CIDCO was to prepare a development plan for the new town. The finality of the approved Development Plan ensures that the pressure and friction which would develop to obtain land use changes for particular land holdings would be largely eliminated . 1973). The Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board created the City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) in 1970 to implement its ideas.3) Table 2. The plan hoped to reduce homelessness in Bombay and provide slum dwellers a better life as well as absorb migration from the countryside (Correa. financing physical and social infrastructure through land sales.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 6 the Arabian Sea on the west (CIDCO. 1995) CIDCO notified all private owners about the compulsory acquisition. comprising of a number of nodes (townships). 1973).3 Land Fragmentation in 1970 Ownership Area (sq. 1997). Correa. 1973). 1966. m. Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act (MR&TP Act). CIDCO is a limited company. m. The first step was to identify all the land that needed to be acquired for Navi Mumbai. Patel and Mehta designed this regional plan based on three basic objectives: a planned new development. 1985). m. km. m. They were (CIDCO. It is a self-contained city independent of Bombay although there is still a visual connection to Bombay. Owners were notified about the government’s proposal. The regional plan was approved in 1970. The government would acquire land under its power of eminent domain under Section 22. and improving Bombay by drawing off pressures for growth into the new area (Patel. The new town. CIDCO used certain development principles in its design. It was hoped that the nearness to Bombay would facilitate the relocation of people from Bombay (CIDCO. was designed to accommodate new industrial and commercial activity as well as for secure and affordable housing to workers. >10000 sq.

• the newly commissioned bridge across the Thane creek. To support a statewide Industrial Location Policy which will lead eventually to an efficient and rational distribution of industries over the State and a balanced development of urban centers in the hinterland. raise the living standards and reduce the disparities in the amenities available to the different sections of the population. Although the main objective of the design of Navi Mumbai was to create a selfsufficient urban environment. 1995). Panvel-Uran rail and road links.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 7 (CIDCO. This was not entirely true. it also hoped to improve the quality of life of Bombay.5 Development Potential of the Site The chosen site had various development potentials (Figure 2. To provide physical and social services. These were (CIDCO. free from the physical and social tensions. which are commonly associated with urban living. The success of Navi Mumbai was thought to depend on the adequate creation of jobs (CIDCO. Nevertheless.3). Reduce the growth of population in Bombay city by creating a center that would absorb immigrants. 1995). • the plan for a modern. 1973: 10): 1. 4. 1995): • the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) Estates at Turbhe and Taloja. The Draft Development Plan gave only broad guidelines. and transport corridors along Thane-Belapur. • the Thane-Pune National Highway 4. The objectives were (CIDCO.3 Development Potential of the Site Turbhe MIDC Industrial Estates Arabian Sea Creek bridge Taloja Panvel Nhava-sheva . container port at Nhava-Sheva. CIDCO acquired all the land after settling disputes about compensation (CIDCO. 5. 3. To provide an environment which would permit the residents of New Bombay to live fuller and richer lives in so far this is possible. 2. Although five minor amendments were made to this Draft Plan. • the existence of two municipal corporations at Panvel and Uran. 2. no new document was ever prepared. To provide a physical infrastructure which prevents ethnic enclaves among the population. and also attract some of Bombay’s present population. and major law and order problems did occur. 1973). The Draft Development Plan remains the guiding document in use even today. The development plan took into account the Figure 2. leaving enough room for flexibility.

better quality houses was the biggest incentive (CIDCO. Per month) (% of income) rupees) (in sq. The plan called for the shifting of government offices from South Bombay to Navi Mumbai. Table 2. No new.4 Household Income and Capacity to Pay (Figures estimated in 1971 income where $1~Rs. Industrial growth was encouraged only in the MIDC industrial estates of Navi Mumbai (CIDCO. The authors of the regional plan cited the case of New Delhi to emphasize their idea (Patel. Almost 87% of the office jobs of Greater Bombay are located on Bombay island with 62% in South Bombay. 1995). m.000 office jobs. 1973). trade and commerce (wholesale and warehousing). large or medium industrial units were permitted on Bombay island. A series of controls were made for various regions within Bombay. Although job opportunities were the driving force behind Navi Mumbai’s success. Table 2.000 houses needed to be built. assuming a family size of five. i to use the job centers with matching infrastructure provision as engines of growth for the new city. A CBD was planned in Navi Mumbai with the aim of creating 40. 400. The Industrial Location Policy issued in December 1974 posed various restrictions on the start of new industrial units on Bombay island. large industries. 1975). 1995): i make Navi Mumbai self-contained and not a dormitory. The employment base of Navi Mumbai was planned to encompass manufacturing (industry).4 shows CIDCO’s estimates on the capacity to pay for housing by different income groups. To accommodate a population of 2 million. 1997). Only small-scale industries were allowed in place of old. i to decongest Bombay by shifting jobs that are concentrated in the southern part of Bombay.000 jobs for a population of 2 million (CIDCO.7) Household % of Monthly Capacity to pay Affordable size Income Population capacity to pay for housing (in of housing unit (Rs.) Less than 200 20 10 1200 3 201-300 16 11 2580 5 301-400 15 12 4140 8 401-500 14 13 5940 12 501-600 12 14 7800 16 601-800 9 15 10800 22 801-1000 7 17 15600 31 Threshold of affordability 1001-1200 3 19 21000 43 1201-1500 2 22 30000 60 1501+ 2 25 37800 75 . This was necessary to (CIDCO. as well as service sector (office) jobs.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 8 provision of 750. the availability of cheaper.

At the same time. 1961). 550 per square meter and the cost of development of land was Rs. which would subsidize housing for the lower income groups.6 Design Principles of Navi Mumbai The conceptual design of Navi Mumbai was developed at the height of Modernism. Otherwise. No fast traffic was allowed in the sectors. 40 in 1970. each family could own only developed land. i single-use zoning as opposed to the traditional multiple-use zoning The result was a single-use zoning pattern with distinct areas for industrial. it was proposed to use cross subsidies. The sector was based on the Spanish cuadra of 110 to 100 meters. community centers and residential areas. In Navi Mumbai. CIDCO decided to build a large part of the housing as public housing.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 9 (CIDCO. residential and institutional activity. Capacity to pay for housing divided by cost of construction shows a very small (or no) house could be owned by most families. The Government of India’s policy on publicly financed housing has been to build 21 sq. V4 roads were designed for shopping and commercial activity. 1973) The table shows the ability of each income group to contribute towards owned accommodation. 2. The total land of Navi Mumbai was divided into thirteen townships. The higher income groups would pay a surcharge for housing. m. Many of the sectors were residential in character. Children were able to walk to school on the V7 through green belts (Sarin. houses or larger (CIDCO. Le Corbusier had played an important role in the design of Chandigarh in Punjab in the mid1950s (Le Corbusier. land would be leased under a 30-year repayment system to private cooperative housing schemes and private owners. The sector planning of Modernism is very similar to the grid planning of traditional Indian cities. CIDCO decided to use a maximum surcharge of 15% on housing for highest income group to compensate for a maximum subsidy of 45% to the lowest income group (CIDCO. This would have a great drain on the financial resources of the government. Many of these principles of Modernism were used in the planning of Navi Mumbai. In India the square was used as the basic unit in the layout of traditional cities. The average cost of construction was Rs. hierarchy of roads and important buildings of a gargantuan scale (Fry. 1973). Some of the highlights of the design elements of this plan were sector planning. 1961). commercial. The housing has to be heavily subsidized to make it affordable. The neighborhoods were self-sufficient and had their grocery store and primary school. The sector is the container of family life" (Le Corbusier. A sector centrally located within each node took on commercial activities. i residential neighborhoods (sector). These were: i decentralization by the design of self-sufficient townships(nodes). Le Corbusier explained "the plan is based on the main features of the 7V rule (Appendix B) determining an essential function: the creation of sectors. 1977). 1973). Each of these cuadras was a self-contained unit with primary schools. The cuadra had a detailed zoning plan with single-use zoning on all lots. Each township had several sectors. 1977). The square had a significance in Hinduism as this perfect geometric shape was thought to be .

1973). 1984). infrastructure and recreational uses (Figure 2. both materials and human) and swatantrya (self-motivation and mutual self-help) (Ganguli. The task of designing and detailing the physical design was carried out by CIDCO. Mr. All houses in a neighborhood were occupied by a particular caste. merchant and peasant.000 people. swadeshi (fullest utilization of local resources. Here in Navi Mumbai the idea of a large “urban village” has been nurtured. let us accommodate nature!" (Gandhi in Engel. Commercial and residential uses were adjacent to each other or one above the other. Neighborhoods could be placed near each other to form a larger urban framework. 1973). This also facilitated the sharing of other. amenities and utilities with segregation of vehicular and pedestrian traffic (Banerjee. was the Chief Planner of CIDCO for 20 years (1970-90) (Engel. This is significantly different from the single-use planning of Modernism. Under his leadership. The Bombay Municipal Regional Planning Board put forth the broad conceptual regional plan of Navi Mumbai. and progressively moved outward depending on the natural landscape.4). warrior/king. main streets formed perfect rectangles dividing the city into separate residential areas based on caste. Navi Mumbai consists of thirteen townships (or nodes).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 10 the abode of the gods (Henn. 1969). which corresponds to the professions priest.000 to 200. the four castes are Brahmin. The goal has been to create a city based on Gandhian principles of swavalamban (self-reliance). The indigenous plans all started with a central focal point (either of political or religious symbolism). Vaishya and Sudra. At a larger scale. So each sector had mixed use. 1997). Each neighborhood unit was within a one square mile radius. Kshatriya. larger amenities by contiguous neighborhoods. This was a model layout for an area with specifications for residences. 1929). Each node is divided into neighborhoods (or sectors). The size of the node depends . Vashi is the center of Navi Mumbai's wholesale market. The functionality of the city is based on the principle of neighborhood design as seen all over the Western world. Many cities still reflect this street pattern. The neighborhood unit is used as a building block to build New Towns across the world (Perry. streets. Neighborhood planning in the West was a concept put forth by Clarence Perry. Airoli and Kopar-Khairane have industrial estates. the main philosophical design principles of Navi Mumbai are based on Gandhian ideology (Parab. while Nhava-Sheva houses the new container port. There would be no rich or poor nodes (CIDCO. 1991). 1973). Each node was planned to accommodate a range of income groups. nodes share some common facilities such as water reservoirs and transport facilities. commercial. This principle of neighborhood planning and its derivative from Modernism was used in Navi Mumbai. In India. As the residential classification was based on the caste. In the case of Navi Mumbai. 1991). Parab. Even in the planning of Mohenjadaro (7th century B. This is the vision that is the traditional Indian design inspiration for Navi Mumbai.). an American designer of the 1920s. people were forced to work within that particular neighborhood. The nodes contain residential. Each node is self-contained for 100. a true Gandhian. Some of the nodes have special features. each neighborhood was known as a sector (CIDCO. "Arguing to turn any weaknesses into strength. Gandhi would have urged: If nature chooses not to accommodate us.C.

1991). only activities. 1973.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 11 BOMBAY Airoli Ghansoli Kopar-Khairane Kalamboli Vashi Sanpada on walking distances to the mass transit stop. which ensured their re-election. which had been independent for only 20 years. would be strongly supported. 2. One of the ideas of putting the environmental city into Dronagiri practice was the creation of woodland corridors (Parab.4 Nodes of Navi Mumbai recreation and timber. 1997). It depended very heavily on external factors. For example. The Development Plan for Navi Mumbai called for the planting of one hundred thousand trees every year! (Engel. 1995). 1997). and then unused portions would Nhava-Sheva be recycled. a migration of population would not occur. the plan had a very important political component. which would be used in the dry seasons. There was also a high degree of uncertainty attached to some of the policies and physical developments.7 Social Agenda in the Planning of Navi Mumbai Considerations of social equity were very important in all aspects of development in a country. The streams Source: CIDCO. The plan Jui Belapur Arabian envisioned an ecologically friendly Sea city where products of nature would be Panvel used. The node should be large enough to provide schools. The plan called for the construction of holding ponds to retain excess monsoon run-off. Politicians use the creation of jobs and better living environments as a common strategy for getting votes. The Development Plan of Navi Mumbai is an example of the new consciousness for sustainable Kharghar Nerul settlements (CIDCO. flowing from the Western Ghats mountain ranges would irrigate these trees. Holding ponds would be used for pisciculture and recreation. which were closely linked. Private industries would not invest in this particular region unless they were assured of workers and so on. The design concept of Navi Mumbai was very idealistic. As financial and economic considerations depended on the government in office. For industrial growth large finances were required. shopping areas and other facilities. Hence. unless sufficient industrial growth existed. This would also ensure reduction of soil erosion and the development of woodlands for both Figure 2. The primary concerns were related . Water treated from industrial and sewage waste would be used to develop green areas (Parab. This was partly because of the scale and complexity of the project. for its success. Any change in political power would affect the policies and development strategies of this new town.

ground floor houses would be possible initially. Thus. using bamboo instead of steel reinforcements and setting up of local retail shops where residents would be able to buy inexpensive building materials for building their homes (swadeshi) (CIDCO. Incremental housing was suggested as the solution. In planned towns and cities this should be avoided to a great extent by allocating housing in neighborhoods to members of different communities. 1973). cooperative housing groups or private builders. CIDCO would sell the plot at a highly subsidized rate and with a twenty-year repayment period. enclaves or ghettos of age long tradition of ’birds of the same feather flocking together’. Individual families would then have to build their own homes (swavalamban). Housing for the middle income and high income groups would be in the form of CIDCO housing. I). The Gandhian principle of self-help would be used to implement this agenda. Navi Mumbai’s founders saw the construction of large amounts of new housing as an opportunity to break down demographic divisions and to enhance social equity. Housing would be built for the various income groups. To aid residents further. The State shall strive to promote the welfare of the people by securing and protecting as effectively as it may a social order in which justice .shall inform all the institutions of the national life (Article 38). medical care and social welfare. For the lower income group. The Draft Development Plan spelled out "there is a tendency in India that induces people to live in like groups. 1973). place of birth or any of them (Article 15. cheap material. In 1970. The planners of Navi Mumbai thought this was a fortuitous occasion to provide social justice to the millions of migrants and pavement dwellers of Bombay (CIDCO. electricity and sanitation (CIDCO. For them. caste. The design of a completely new city was a very good opportunity to implement these national concerns. The remaining two-thirds of the population could afford more expensive housing. The plan took into account the fact that one-third of the housing in New Bombay would be sites-and-services plots (CIDCO. economic and political equity. 1973) . The residents could design and implement their construction in any way they chose (swatantrya). The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds of religion. 1973). it was proposed that housing should be constructed so that this income group could afford it.social. The Constitution of India also spells out the need for the government machinery to facilitate social. The sites-and-services plots would have services such as roads. walk-up apartments of three to four floors would be designed. water." (CIDCO.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 12 to providing better quality of housing. more than 30% of the population of greater Bombay could not afford a pucca (durable) house (CIDCO. race. economic and political . 1973). sex. education and job opportunities. Construction would be made with locally available. It recommended construction using cheaper concrete. 1973). More durable material could be used in the course of time. cost-effective.

shopping. The medical center would provide secondary health service. Institutions for juvenile delinquents. planners cited the segregation of Bombay as an example. The Governor of Bombay also encouraged this development because it reinforced the traditional panchayati (selfgovernment) system of administration by which the council of elders settled religious. The nodes (townships) were designed to provide one primary school per 5000 population. It should contain its own jobs. These were the education facilities to be provided by the government. Other private institutions would be encouraged also. handicapped children." .000 population (CIDCO. water supply and sanitation. The Development Plan says (CIDCO. schools and colleges and making health education a part of classroom education. It is expected that this accommodation of residents from various social and income groups within the same physical area will not only make for a healthier environment. The Greater Bombay region had some of the best social welfare programs in India. 1973). 1973).500 population and one college for 50. exploited women and leprosyaffected persons would be developed in Navi Mumbai to accommodate the growing population (CIDCO. 1995). When the East India Company encouraged merchants to establish residence in Bombay. "In each node it is proposed that accommodation be made available for the entire range of income groups expected in the city. diagnostic and investigation services. medical care. Mobile health care units would operate from this community health center. 1973: 17): "CIDCO is anxious that the new city develop its own identity as quickly as possible. This further contributed to the creation of ethnic enclaves within the settlement. Minimum standards for building construction were developed by CIDCO. These are discussed further in the next chapter. 1973). The planning was for a comprehensive coverage by taking the services to households. The community health care center would primary health care.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 13 To justify this consideration. one high school for 12. This led to the development of ethnic enclaves. It would be a small hospital and polyclinic where specialized health care would be provided to cases referred by the community health care center and general practitioners. recreation and afforestation projects (CIDCO. The planners of Navi Mumbai did not intend to create an identity for the city related to physical objects. merchants from neighboring districts migrated into Bombay and constructed homes inside and outside the Fort walls. Establishment of ethnic enclaves has led to a number of problems in India. It would have out-patient department. and law and order problems of the community (Dwivedi and Mehrotra. Health planning was undertaken as public health projects. recreational and other social facilities an should not become a dormitory for Greater Bombay. 1973). A large hospital for intensive care and for teaching and research purposes would be set up (CIDCO. Provision of schools and colleges was a priority in the planning of Navi Mumbai. but will also ensure a uniform standard of social and physical infrastructure and see that no one class of residents is better served than another" (CIDCO 1973: 17-18).

New. 1995): i developing land and providing infrastructure such as roads. the Gadgil Committee Report (1965) had recommended the setting up of a New Town Development Authority (NTDA).Visualizing the future i Action Plans . In particular. These are (CIDCO. Other institutions have also been set up in the Greater Bombay region to facilitate planning efforts in the region. CIDCO has executed the implementation of the plan in various stages (CIDCO. i involving Government agencies for developing public transport and telecommunications. CIDCO has a more narrow and defined role. It is more of a philosophical identity . CIDCO undertook the task of (CIDCO.Objectives . which would help implement the objective. 1992): i Bombay Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (BMRDA) in 1975 i Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) in 1992. The physical design would be the instrument to implement this objective.an identity based on the Gandhian value of social equality. In the very beginning. i Specialized services provided by Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA). 2. a strong institutional framework was required for its success. water supply. electricity.8 Plan Implementation through the Public Administrative Framework The government authorities of Bombay realized that the effectiveness of regional planning depended. The city of Navi Mumbai was planned to address the issue of social equality through its physical design. Gandhinagar can be described by their grid system or monumental scales. 1991). there was no aim to create a monumental city. However. planned cities of India such as Chandigarh. Before the creation of these different institutions. CIDCO had to coordinate all planning and development programs.Data base . With the creation of these other agencies. These stages include: i Draft Development Plan (programs and policies) . on the institutions responsible for the plan. Its identity is only that of a spreading inkblot (Engel. drainage.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 14 Thus. The role of CIDCO is to implement the plan of Navi Mumbai. largely. It appears that the monumental style of Corbusier was not an influence on this design. i Bombay Electric and State Transport (BEST). i promoting commercial and other employment activity. CIDCO was appointed as the NTDA. the allotment of residential apartments would be governed by a policy. the identity of Navi Mumbai is subtler.Other agencies . 1992). i developing residential plots for different income groups. However.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 2: The Research Setting

15

- Land use plans - Residential layout plans - Infrastructure plans - Industrial location plans - Environmental assessment i Implementation - Acquisition of land - Finance - Construction - Relocation strategies BMRDA took over such functions as coordination of metropolitan planning, funding, execution of programs, development control and maintenance of the entire Greater Bombay region including Navi Mumbai (UNCHS, 1993). Financial responsibilities and investment decisions are made by a large number of agencies including the Government of India, State Government of Maharashtra, CIDCO and firms in the private sector, but coordinated by BMRDA.

Macro-level Regional Planning Inputs
Bombay Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (BMRDA)

Micro-level Sub-regional Planning Inputs
Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation

Plan Implementation of Navi Mumbai
City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) Figure 2.5 Institutional Hierarchy in Implementation of Development Plan for Navi Mumbai In 1992, an amendment of the Constitution of India affected the functioning of CIDCO. The 74th Amendment of the Constitution of India (the 1992 Amendment Act on Municipalities) spells out the devolution of power to the local bodies and democratization of development planning. This Act emphasizes that the management must be done by elected representatives of the people who will account for two-thirds of the board. This committee is responsible for the preparation of the draft development plan. This ensures a bottom-up process with direct inputs from the citizens (UNCHS, 1993). These municipal corporations will be responsible for their economic development and incorporate all ideas within the

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 2: The Research Setting

16

Comprehensive Plan. The direct result of this Act is the creation, in 1992, of the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. This allowed CIDCO to give up its role as New Town Development Authority (CIDCO, 1995). A heavy-handed approach was used by the government to implement its social policy. As most of the housing was built by CIDCO, a government agency, the government could control, if not regulate, the distribution of the population on socioeconomic basis. Households desirous of buying a house built by CIDCO had to submit an application that stated the dwelling size they preferred. CIDCO allotted these houses, depending on when construction was completed, on a rolling basis. This was intended to ensure a random distribution of the various linguistic and religious groups of the population. The pattern expected would now be one based predominantly on income. 2.9 The Reality of Implementing the Plan The planning of Navi Mumbai began in 1971. The results of each of the planning objectives can be studied now. The first objective of the Development Plan of Navi Mumbai was to reduce congestion of Bombay by absorbing immigrants and attracting some of the present population of Bombay. Table 2.5 Population Density in Various Sectors of Bombay(BMRDA, 1978 in UNCHS, 1993) 1971 1981 1991 Population Density Population Density Population Density (in ’000s) (pop/ha) (in ’000s) (pop/ha) (in ’000s) (pop/ha) CBD 1120 1659 1031 1527 849 1258 Central Bombay 1950 1349 2254 1559 2309 1597 Bombay Island 3070 1447 3285 1549 3158 1489 Bombay Suburbs 2900 544 4958 930 6751 1266 Navi Mumbai1 128 600 328 617 Over the 1981-91 period, there was a considerable decline in the population of the CBD and Bombay island. The increase in the population of the suburbs and Navi Mumbai accounts for the decline in the CBD and Bombay island. Outmigration to other cities and countries is negligible (BMRDA, 1978). The main reason for the shift was because of (UNCHS, 1993): i dilapidation of older buildings in Bombay i cheaper and better housing facilities in Navi Mumbai i better employment opportunities in Navi Mumbai i lesser commuter distances involved The second objective of the development plan was to bring maximum jobs consistent with the Gandhian principle of self-sufficiency (swavalambhan). CIDCO’s support of the Industrial Location Policy brought more jobs to Navi Mumbai. The sectors that had maximum growth in Navi Mumbai, were trade (39%), finance and services (27%) and manufacturing (18%) (BMRDA, 1992 in UNCHS, 1993). The wholesale agriculture produce
1

residential area increased from 213 hectares in 1981 to 531 hectares in 1991.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 2: The Research Setting

17

market for vegetables, foodgrains, oil seeds, sugar and spices was moved from South Bombay to Navi Mumbai (CIDCO, 1973). A separate railway siding and truck terminal were constructed to facilitate effective relocation. This involved the relocation of 30,000 jobs from Bombay and the reduction of 5000 truck trips per day. A new iron and steel stockyard complex has been developed in Navi Mumbai. This means the relocation of 25,000 jobs and a reduction of 1000 truck trips per day to Bombay. However, the economic agenda, which was based on agriculture and cottage industries, is no longer effective because of the government’s redoubled commitment to a policy of industrialization. Navi Mumbai continues to be exploited as a major industrial zone (Engel, 1991). CIDCO's third objective was to provide physical and social amenities in Navi Mumbai. The land use of Navi Mumbai shows these amenities (Table 2.6 and Figure 2.6). Table 2.6 Land Use of Navi Mumbai, 1993 (in sq. km.) Land-use Zone 1979 1985 1986 1991 Residential 101.15 133.99 127.08 129.87 Commercial 6.51 6.51 6.51 5.75 Industrial 43.21 43.14 43.14 43.14 Port 12.00 22.7 22.7 22.7 Wholesale market 6.08 4.54 4.54 4.6 Woodlands / Park 90.26 61.24 68.15 69.35 Institutional .76 1.09 1.09 1.09 Fishing and allied 6.14 3.44 3.44 3.44 Transportation 30.86 30.35 30.35 29.73 No development 46.73 36.70 36.70 34.03 Total 343.70 343.70 343.70 343.70

1993 127.61 5.75 43.14 22.70 6.86 69.35 1.09 3.44 29.73 34.03 343.70 (CIDCO, 1997) Primary, secondary and high schools have been provided in all sectors of Navi Mumbai. All primary schools are within walking distance. This eliminates the need of expensive transport for small children. There is at least one college in every node and Vashi node has both medical and engineering colleges (CIDCO, 1995). Medical facilities are provided by private medical practitioners. Every node has a hospital run by the Mahatma Gandhi Medical Trust. Community health car centers are also there (CIDCO, 1995). In its fourth objective to provide an ecologically friendly environment, CIDCO has not been entirely successful. The area of woodlands has been constantly decreasing (CIDCO, 1995). Most woodlands are in the form of mango groves which form a part of neighborhood parks. In the conceptual plan, streams flowing from the hillsides were to irrigate the woodland corridors. No significant effort has been made to utilize this resource. However, holding ponds have been constructed. Promenades have been built along them and they are being used as recreation areas (Parab, 1997). The fifth objective is the primary focus of this thesis. The objective to prevent ethnic enclaves and to promote a pattern based on socioeconomic characteristics was fairly ambitious. In order for its success, a perfect control of the market is required. The analysis of the data will show the outcome of the objective.

1992 128.71 5.75 43.14 22.7 5.76 69.35 1.09 3.44 29.73 34.03 343.70

However. 2. utilities. establishment of more industries and construction of more houses. 1995. The absence of a port and railway links slowed growth. Designing. Growth in other development sectors of Bombay has also had an adverse effect on Navi Mumbai’s growth. the Gandhian principles supported cultural heterogeneity and mixed use zoning. Hence. Social aspects of city planning were given importance with special attention given to considerations of employment opportunities. and housing occupancy rates are high. the development process has been slow. middle-income group and high-income groups. and improvements made in the next phase of design. CIDCO provides serviced sites for both government and private ownership. but a living and working reality. housing requirements. the extension of the railway lines.10 Conclusion The Draft Development Plan of Navi Mumbai described many broad outlines for the development of a city for the common citizen. lower income group. Though the Navi Mumbai project was begun in 1970. Many attributes of these two design principles are not necessarily harmonious. the city is no longer a plan on paper. The poor transportation links between Bombay and Navi Mumbai has been the main contributing factor.6 Land Use of Navi Mumbai Source: CIDCO. recreation and commercial needs. While Modernism called for single-use zoning and a pattern based on socioeconomic characteristics. The design principles described in the Draft Development Plan were based on the philosophical reasoning of Mahatma Gandhi and the functionalistic approach of Modernism.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 18 NEW BOMBAY BOMBAY Arabian Sea Residential Woodlands Industrial Port Institutional Trucking Wholesale Fishing Wetlands Figure 2. Houses have been constructed for different sectors of society economically weaker section. . Periodic socioeconomic and household surveys were used to determine the status of constructed environment. Commuter services have become operational since May 1992. Problems of design and development were identified. since 1990 there has been accelerated growth due to the commissioning of Nhava-Sheva port. development and implementation of ideas were done in an incremental manner.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 2: The Research Setting 19 This design also strongly supported the need to use the government’s power and machinery to promote the uniform distribution of people and prevent ethnic enclaves. The success of this strategy depended on maintaining this control. This also implies that the urban social pattern was predetermined. . The aim of this research is to examine the present urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. Very little analysis has been done on the outcome of CIDCO's social agenda to ensure diffusion of ethnic groups and the urban social pattern that emerged. The research setting under consideration is the result of the hybridization of Indian and Western ideas. Navi Mumbai is a modern. A heavy-handed implementation strategy of this objective was done by taking complete control of the residential allotment. planned city within the context of a specific historic and cultural setting.

people adapt to the physical environment around them. 1990). changing and modifying it to suit their way of life (Lozano. These design ideas seem to have a strong influence of Modernism (CIDCO. economic and physical environments. Education. religion.Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 3.the urban pattern. 1973). communication and socioeconomic relationships influence urban patterns. income is one of the most important determinants. 3. 1968). If the residents build the buildings themselves. It is also a cultural manifestation. technology. The human-environment relationship is a two-way process termed as the socio-spatial dialectic (Knox. Socioeconomic factors have a very important contribution to the pattern.2 Urban Form and Urban Pattern Every human settlement consists of certain elements. Land ownership patterns. urban form is not merely the architectural form of the city (Lozano. Whatever the mode of construction. Thus. but four-dimensional. then they reflect their lifestyles. 1995). Intricacies in relationships have increased the complexity of the urban form over time. principles and existing theories for improving the design of cities (Doxiadis. ethnicity. The aim of the thesis is to examine the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. and those of Mahatma Gandhi. if government agencies or contractors build them. Buildings and spaces are created by people and quite often characterize them (Kostof. (New Bombay). Most cities in the Third World and India have been indigenous in origin and organic in growth. Human settlements contain people and societies in a physical environment consisting of natural and man-made elements (Doxiadis. Interaction of these elements form a pattern . and bear characteristics of western influence. 1990). residents soon influence their urban environment. Where market forces work. India. This literature review will first trace the human settlements in India. . Such a human settlement is not just threedimensional. 1991). language and housing character. transportation. It is a city designed with the design principles of the time. The pattern of spatial distribution is recognizable in most contemporary cities (Alexander. Simultaneously.1 Introduction A human settlement is an establishment created by people for their inhabitation. The final outcome of a morphological study is the formulation of a theory which connects facts to form hypotheses. occupation and values of housing influence the spatial character. However. they are more generic and may not represent the lifestyles of every household. 1968). The study of the physical form and structure of cities is the study of urban morphology. Navi Mumbai is one of the first cities in India built for the common citizen. Urban social pattern is the pattern formed by the interaction of various social variables such as household characteristics. 1987). The urban pattern is a result of the relationships between people and their social. because it changes continuously in a temporal dimension. Many of these cities have been under colonial rule. A holistic approach to the study of settlements involves understanding the interrelationships between its elements within the temporal context.

Some farmers may sell their land more easily than others may. Time and place may provide them with different characteristics making each city unique and dynamic. Thus urban social patterns are complex manifestations of underlying cultural values intermingled with global economic forces (McGee. “The typical sector represents the formal characteristics found throughout the area and thus acquires some universality” (Lozano. 1971). which may be universal or local. and the ownership. A city replaces existing land use. Thus. Traditional settlements were shaped by (Lozano. Although details may not be identical. In the study of Navi Mumbai.3 Factors Influencing Urban Form Many factors influence the form of cities. every city has certain elements. society. the node (township) and the sector (neighborhood) will be used as the study areas using aggregated household survey data. They are nature. 1990). 1987): i land ownership i street patterns i existing land use i economic considerations i planning regulations i political and historical events The physical expansion of the city is always bound and guided by land ownership.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 21 Demographics. The patterns have similarities. They are the units of analysis of the morphological study (Knox. The rural land may also have been . human beings. 1990). it is necessary to determine existing land use as a pre-condition to urban growth and form. 3. 1990): i the way in which nature and man-made features satisfy needs for protection and defense i the way in which physical and economic landscape allows for communication with other regions i the way in which the topography of a site suggests the construction of a human settlement i the way in which climate leads to building solutions These factors influence the cultural and spiritual form of the cities as well. The change of land use from rural to urban depends on the existing land use. linguistics and ethnic background also influence urban patterns. Urban patterns represent a continuity of time and space. The physical form is a variable of the social and built pattern of the city.a fort or a religious building. buildings and infrastructure. These features contributed to a particular urban and social pattern. Traditional cities have used physical forms to interpret cultural and religious beliefs (Lozano. For example. Urban spatial patterns occur because of the repetitive spatial distribution of these elements. and natural and manmade obstacles. The built form is influenced by factors as (Alexander. This representative sector is defined as the smallest area that exhibits the characteristics of the urban settlement. 1995). Since the characteristics are universal (within the frame of study) they may be studied by a spatial representative sector. a hill top site was the utilitarian response to any important building . Doxiadis defines five elements in the study of human settlements. In most studies this unit is the neighborhood which displays both physical and social aspects of the whole urban development.

Plots of varying sizes and shapes influence the layout of the streets and of individual buildings (Knox. A particular social pattern brings about a particular built form. Urbanization took place at different chronological periods. Master plans and regional plans provide long-range strategies for development. surplus food production was achieved. within. The external . Certain built forms encourage certain social patterns. The evolution of the urban pattern of Indian cities is divided into the social pattern and the built form.5 The Sociocultural Factors India is among the most stratified of all known societies in the world (Srinivas. Soon. 3. a city contained social distinctions in terms of class. The variation in influencing factors and historical circumstance gave rise to different urban forms in different parts of the world. 1990). Pedestrian movement limited the size of the city. The social pattern and the built form are interrelated and contribute to the urban morphology of a city. others are global in scope. The factors influencing urbanization were also different. Various economic. 1983). often because of a city wall. 1992a). A household’s choice of place to live is determined by its income level. The caste system of India separates and hierarchies the Hindus. 1987. People as food gatherers advanced to become farmers. race and religion (Vance. Kosambi. personal preferences and many institutional constraints. This allowed some of the people to develop other professions. other scholars contend that it is doubtful that surplus can be attributed as the single factor which caused the emergence of urban settlements (Jacobs. These factors are (Alexander. and Thomas. commercial buildings. Priests. government offices and warehouses formed the built environment of the city. Housing. Owner-occupier. cities were very simple although they rarely served single purposes. Domestication of animals and cultivation of land created villages. Childe put forth a theory that urban centers were a result of agricultural change. Clear differentiation between urban and rural existed. For thousands of years. Reasons such as trade and defense have also been used to explain the formation of cities. 1979). Instead.4 The Evolution of the Urban Form of Indian Cities The traditional theory of urban origin is generally attributed to Childe (Herbert. While some processes are culture-specific. 1990). 1986): i ethnic composition of the city i migration i religion i economic considerations i race i political and historical events The housing market also influences the social pattern of the city. 1995). craftsmen and merchants were born.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 22 subdivided. private rental and public sector housing operationalize housing sectors. 3. social and political circumstances influence the social pattern (Scargill. Planning controls influence development to a great extent. However. However. they supported a range of activities.

1992). Stratification implies a differentiation based on a set of criteria. Vegetarian castes occupy higher positions. differentiates itself into only hierarchical status containing inequality (Gupta. culture. 1992b). unfortunately. territory. In India. As many individual criteria are . linguistic. The population may be stratified based on income. thighs and feet of the Creator. Various combinations of the hierarchy have come about due to regional differentiation in certain attributes of social living. The Indian theory of social stratification depends on caste. Along with the caste exist occupational stratification. 1974:8).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 23 manifestation of the separation and hierarchy through particular attributes of the castes brings about social stratification of the urban social pattern (Marriott. The differences may also be placed in a horizontal system (example: language. Ethnic characteristics refer to language. religion or occupation (Bougle. 1992). The dominant caste legend is the Purushasukta legend whereby the Brahman. 1992). However. this popular caste hierarchy is not clear throughout the Indian subcontinent (Srinivas. religion). 3. a hierarchy from Brahman to Sudra has been interpreted (Bougle. Kshatriya. language. Certain customs lower or raise the status of the caste. The characteristics caste. these single criterion hierarchies can be misleading as they depend on cutoff points related to individual analysis (Gupta. rituals. Class systems by contrast define the rank of their members according to their individual attributes and behavior".2 Class "Class refers to a system of stratification which is economic in character" (Gupta. The criteria for the differentiation can normally be translated into money or wealth. Although no hierarchy is mentioned in the Sukta. arms. language. 1992b). However. 1992b:14). The spirit of the caste system is determined by the attitudes of each caste to the other. 1992). Certain occupations such as butchery and cobblery lower the rank. the forms of social stratification are many. vertical and horizontal systems of stratification exist. The caste system varies from village to village and is a local phenomenon. The term ethnic group refers broadly to people “with some similar characteristics which go beyond their mere place in a societal division of labor” (Brass. religious and ethnic diversity of the country (Gupta. and in the case of India. Hierarchy allows elements of the whole to be ranked with relation to each other (example: income and prestige). linguistic stratification and religious stratification. Vaishya and Sudra are said to have come from the mouth.5. 1992). religion and language are discussed below. Clothing. all elements can not be arranged vertically. Berreman (1965) says "Caste systems rank people by birthascribed group membership rather than by individual attributes.1 Caste Castes are the hierarchical divisions of people based on professional and family membership. 3. However. sometimes reinforced by common work roles. The real world. theoretically. diet and dress. marriage and death ceremonies distinguish one caste from another.5. class. The social stratification is very deep and varied. Repulsion between castes forced isolation and the creation of distinct residential enclaves (Bougle. Thus. 1992a).

From the beginning Islam has been a conquering and proselytizing faith (Hodson. 1997). However. 1977). Muslims became apprehensive of Hindu domination. During the Mughal rule (16th to 18th century). 1974). degree of control over the language and relationship between the languages affect their social communication. The characteristics of the population regarding bilinguals. “In most folk-memory the Muslims of India had been ruler. A certain degree of animosity between Hindus and Muslims has existed since the first Muslim ruler of 1018 AD. the Muslim League represented only the Muslim population (Brass. 1970). Hindi was chosen because it was the language spoken by the largest percent of the population while was a result of the British legacy. At this time they felt the need for a political party of their own. The League demanded for a separate electorate and for more employment in public service. which culminated in the partition of united India into India and Pakistan. not subjects” (Hodson. The wake of Independence brought with it violence and terror in the Indo-Pakistan borders in Punjab and Bengal. 1974). Telugu. occupation. Urdu and Punjabi. prestige and income to form a socioeconomic status. .5. 3. Buddhism. While the Congress party represented the majority of the Indian population. the Muslims were in power over most of India.5. Tamil. Jainism and Sikhism stemmed off from Hinduism and are very similar to Hinduism. 1985).3 Religion Religion and language have provided the motive power for nationalism in India (Brass. After the decline of the Mughal Empire and the loss of political power to the British. 1985:11). Hindus and Muslims drifted apart in the issue of independence from British rule.Jainism and Sikhism. The census of India 1951 (immediately after Independence) recorded a total of 179 languages and 544 dialects in India.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 24 linked to other attributes. In 1906 they formed the All-India Muslim League. The framers of the Indian Constitution chose Hindi and English as the official languages of the government (King. Bengali. 3. An overwhelming view of Hindu-Muslim relations in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is that Hindus advanced due to their enthusiasm to take up western education and government employment (Kaura. The linguistic distribution is not only diverse but also very complex (Das Gupta. Malayalam. Marathi.4 Language A systematic inventory of Indian languages began in the mid-eighteenth century. India is the birthplace of two major religions –Hinduism and Buddhism – and two minor religions . A Hindu revival period in the late nineteenth century to arouse enthusiasm for political action made the Muslims more insecure. Islam was a religion that came to India from outside and is culturally very different from Hinduism. it may be better to create a composite index of education. The Hindu religion has always been a pacifist and tolerant religion. Gujarati. absorbing other religious doctrines and never proselytizing. The major languages of India are Hindi. Anger and frustration broke out as violence as Hindus moved from Pakistan into India and Muslims moved from India to Pakistan (Hodson. 1985). Kannada. There are many religions in India.

The separatism movements seen all over India are all based on ethnicity and inter-caste rivalry (Bose. Hindu-Muslim riots broke out even in Bombay which has normally been a very peaceful city. had led them to better job opportunities. Certain castes are dominant in a society. The Babri Masjid in Ayodhya was broken down by Hindu fundamentalists.5. Pakistan officially declared itself as a Muslim state. However. The partition of United India into India and Pakistan came with many problems. they believed. This issue can not only be seen at the time of partition in 1947 but also was seen during the recent communal violence in 1993. When the ethnic groups occupy distinct neighborhoods. The Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India declared the fourteen major languages listed as national language (Gumprez. 1970). The inequality and economic differentiation cause conflict between the castes and classes. This rationale of composite nationalism influenced policies related to religion and language (Das Gupta. 3. The Tamilnad Students’ Anti-Hindi Agitation Council objected to both the removal of English as an official language and the declaration of Hindi as the sole official language. all castes looked up to the farmer caste because they were important landowners and were wealthy (Srinivas. The union government declared that fifteen year deadline after Independence would be given for transition of official language from English and Hindi to only Hindi. There was strong opposition from non-Hindi areas in general and South India in particular (Hindi is a IndoAryan language while the languages of South India belong to the Dravidian group). Writers in Hindi commonly refer to Hindi as Rashtrabasha (state language) which may signify language used by the state. ethnic conflicts are easily targeted towards these select neighborhoods. a majority of the leaders preferred a composite nationalism. confusion has always existed about the status of Hindi as official or national language.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 25 However. the Brahman priests had more power because it was believed that they were the representatives of the Creator on earth. a demand for a national language also arose.5 Implications of the Sociocultural Factors The implications of caste and class are closely related to those of power and wealth (Dumont. The better control the Tamil people had over English. In the early 1950s. Although a minority of Hindu leaders in India felt that India should be declared as a Hindu state. In some villages. Although a majority of the rivalry has been for and against Hindi. This was not seen in more heterogeneous neighborhoods. 1989). Language conflicts have also occurred in India. 1988). Small Muslim enclaves within a majority Hindu neighborhood were targeted. Repercussions were felt all over the country. The South Indian state of Tamil Nadu was most vocal in the Anti-Hindi agitation. This confusion in terminology is the basis for most language-related problems in Independent India. Agitation and violence broke out in many non-Hindi states over this issue. a synonym for official language and like state religion. 1992a). 1971). and vice versa. Traditionally these castes had either wealth or power. many political leaders advocated for the use of Hindi as a national and official language. 1970). there also been conflict between other regional languages. In many places. In a multilingual society there may be a plurality of national languages. a state language with an unique status (Das Gupta. Compromise was . as it was difficult to isolate only one family.

religion and language is the issue of group identity which is the cause of most ethnic conflicts. The mandala could be divided into smaller squares. This does not imply that social assimilation does not occur. Jainism. The temple as the symbol of religion dominates the urban form. Stratification of the society had to accommodate these religious factors.1 Circle and Swastika depended on the natural features of the site. . The square was used in the creation of the vastupurusha mandala. violence sparked off by language issues has continued to occur in India. However. Vastushastra. orientation of buildings and arrangement of internal rooms based on astrological and religious criteria (Volwahsen. Hinduism. While some groups spoke of an all-India nationality other speaks of a regional nationality (Brass. The final shape of the town Figure 3.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 26 finally reached in 1963 under the Official Languages Act. C to 12th century AD). 1986). and which had as many padas as there were to be residential sectors was selected. Judaism and Christianity found their way into India. 3. The ethnic segregation and conflict has existed from the beginning of the Indian Civilization. The temple also influences the siting of other land uses. Certain other shapes were also considered to be auspicious like the circle. The streets ran from north to south and from east to west. The Indian society was also stratified horizontally by language. The science of architecture and planning. padas. which was the terrestrial representation of the cosmic universe inhabited by Brahma. 1969). which contributes many elements to the urban form. Buddhism. The multi-dimensional society was soon complicated by the emergence of other religions. Prime commercial and residential land was located near the temple. Related to castes. a perfect rectangle was accepted. Despite the Act. the differentiation and assimilation in progress in a multi-ethnic society receives a prominent place in any political conflict. Sikhism were born in India while Islam. cyclical and swastika (Figure 3. The earliest is the Hindu phase (3000 B. governed the alignment of roads. The town wall enclosed the mandala. If it could not be a perfect square. the creator. A number of languages coexisted in all parts of the country. and four gateways were situated at the cardinal points. In the initial stages it was in the form of caste differentiation as prescribed by the Hindu/ Vedic texts. 1974). In planning the town a vastupurusha mandala which was most auspicious. These characteristics are derived from the need for defense and administration and the importance of religion (Kopardekara. class.1). both from within and without the country. The caste system over the next ten to fifteen centuries became deeply rooted in the Hindu population and became a part of life. Social assimilation and mobilization are a part of any evolving civilization.6 The Built Form The historical evolution of the built form of Indian cities can be divided into three distinct phases.

especially seen in the port cities associated with the East India Company (Mills. D. Areas for selling of specific goods – cloth. the same theories are being used to describe the social patterns as well. There was further subdivisions within each district depending on the sub-caste. During this time. but also on socioeconomic factors (Ramachandran. As the built form depends on the social characteristics portrayed by its residents. Large migration of people from the rural area. In India where occupation and caste are synonyms. D. Diversification of professions due to industrialization in the post-independence era has resulted in further complexity (Becker. The urban segregation was based on function and occupation premises. “In the case of India. 3. 1992). counting houses. and wood formed niches in the urban pattern. This led to the development of commercial centers and zoning based on Western market principles. and the south-west monsoon. Characteristics from medieval times are Islamic in nature (14th to 17th centuries A.were developed (Hall. this has led to segregation and creation of enclaves within the city. The colonial influence (17th to early 20th century A. the Hindu tradition continued. jali (carved screens) and projecting balconies (Kopardekara. India inherited a complex urban fabric. jewelry. and insufficient infrastructure in cities has led to the creation of slums and shantytowns (Misra. pottery. 1988). 1980). The Islamic elements included the mosque and domestic architecture which emphasized the purdah through enclosed courtyards.7 Theories of Urban Social Patterns .) was the third phase of historical urban form. Residential segregation is no longer based only on occupation and caste.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 27 The residential districts were divided among the four castes. military establishments . Many researchers have tried to fit Indian urban growth into a theoretical model. Kshatriyas in the eastern and southeastern part. A generalization of these patterns has been made. The three leading theories described below are based on the built form of the city. The Brahmans and Kshatriyas lived in the parts of the town which were climatically more comfortable sheltered from the hot sun. The characteristics of the social and built form of the city contribute to its pattern. The morphological components include buildings used for trade warehouses. 1989). Residential areas associated with the commercial area were contiguous or within the commercial area (Hall. These are the theories which pertain to the built and social form of the city. 1980). The residential character throughout this period was segregated. 1986). Vaishyas in the southern part and Sudras in the western district.). 1980). Generally. the Brahmans worked and lived in the northern district. At the time of independence in 1947. Williamson and Mills. and Hindu elements of this period are not distinct from earlier ones. and the apparent timelessness and permanence of village life” (Hall. 1978). many researchers have pointed to the lack of penetration of urban values into the countryside. It has been shown that rural values have penetrated the urban philosophy due to large-scale migration. On the periphery of these urban centers.the cantonment . metalware.

These immigrants first found cheap housing in the inner city. which had factories and slums. some static. The CBD core had all major commercial. Burgess was interested in determining a pattern for the social structure of the city. 3. The movement was towards the periphery.2). Mobility and migrant influx were though of as the main cause of the social pattern (Hartshorn. 1929 various groups of society led him to conclude that the city was made up of concentric zones with the central business district (CBD) at the center (Figure 3. and studying how the city grew (Scargill. which were being taken over by the expanding CBD.7. In the early 1920s. 1992). 1990). it is a descriptive framework to CBD analyze spatial organization of land use in a city Transition and its change over time. most American cities in the mid-west absorbed many immigrant groups from Europe. Diversification in employment opportunities gave rise to the growth of mixed land use development. High income heterogeneous population and a commercialindustrial base (Herbert and Thomas. The model made many assumptions such as uniform land surface. and especially in Chicago. It was partly based on Low income economic factors. free Middle income market. Families moved out into the next zone when their zone was invaded.1 Concentric Zone Theory This theory put forth by Burgess in 1925 related population mobility and societal organization to the physical expansion of the city (Burgess. 1929). they moved to better housing districts (Burgess. others dynamic in nature. The next zone had lower income housing. accessibility to a single-centered city. Thus. This model was based on Burgess’ experience in the American mid-west cities. The public transport system had also improved significantly and allowed the middle-class to . 1979). 1929). This also forced an outward expansion. Figure 3. and successive zones had higher income residences (Burgess. 1979). The same city may express different models at different time periods (Scargill. 1992).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 28 Various spatial theories of the social pattern of cities have been advanced. This was surrounded by a transition zone. The basic premise in this model was that of succession and invasion whereby population groups gradually moved out as their economic and social status improved. With affluence. 1929). It also had older residential districts. The three leading Western models are: i Concentric zone model i Sector model i Multiple nuclei model These models have become frameworks for studying urban social patterns across the world (Hartshorn.2 Concentric Zone Theory Burgess’ research on the distributional pattern of Source: Burgess. political and social activities.

The model is very simple and can be used to predict how urban land markets work. 1978). 1939 3. Rental value was the main criterion for studying the pattern (King. Income group 1 Income group 2 Income group 3 Figure 3. 1979). 1978). 1990).3).4). The real world is more complicated than what was represented by Burgess’ very general model. These reasons complemented a concentric zone development model (Scargill. He said that residential sectors of similar rent are situated in wedges radiating from the center (Figure 3.7.3 Sector Theory Source: Hoyt. It was intended to serve as a framework for studying urban growth and change (King and Golledge. It also did not explain the impact of transport networks on these zones (Scargill. empirical studies did not confirm his model one hundred percent (Herbert and Thomas. 3. The original model did not take into account specialized clusters of industry.3 Multiple Nuclei Theory The multiple nuclei theory was put forth by Harris and Ullman. 1979). 1992 . This model also accommodates growth (Hartshorn.4 Multiple Nuclei Theory Source: Hartshorn. 1939).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 29 travel from outer zones to the CBD for work. The model also accounts for growth along transport routes. This is not a generalized model. Hence. 1979). Neighborhoods for each income group are common. Burgess has been criticized for not having considered topographical criteria. 1978). 1979). This is because concentration of certain activities may prove to be more beneficial. It gives strength to cities with original nucleus in the center. Hoyt studied the city as an economist concerned with how the housing market worked. For example. However.7. It is more specific to some cities (King and Golledge. and subsequent decentralization (Figure 3. 1992). The wedge pattern represents residential area growth (Scargill. commercial ethnic group residential industrial Figure 3. Concentric zones or sectors may emerge from these nuclei. This model proposes that patterns in many cities be arranged around several centers (Scargill. S (Hoyt. Hoyt also stressed the need to consider zoning laws and slum clearance laws in making models. industries may cluster around the railway line or lowincome housing along a riverbank. Hoyt primarily studied residential land use.2 Sector Theory Homer Hoyt put forth a land use theory after studying over 100 cities in the U. and Golledge.

The outward mobility is related to different stages of life .8. A neighborhood unit is not the only model or universally appropriate unit of analysis. The concept of neighborhood units became popular since the1920s in planned settlements (Perry. family status used the variables related to demographics and type of house. In Western cities the reasons for non-uniformity have been identified as socioeconomic status. 1971).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 30 3. A neighborhood is the basis for formally organized residential space. 3. The use of these three indices for analysis is a social area analysis. 1979). the neighborhood unit is used as the unit of analysis in the study of human settlements (Herbert and Thomas. employment. 1971). 1990). The city was viewed as a part of society. housing conditions and material possessions. Ethnicity causes the social phenomena of segregation. but on cultural ones. 1992). every city has some constraints. parenthood. ethnic status and family status (Timms. Hence. housing choices may not be made on economic basis. it does not address the needs of a social environment. Analysis of individual cities shows that the pattern is not uniform and is characterized by residential segregation. It serves as the building block to construct the whole town. For example. has been under strong criticism (Hartshorn. 1979). It is assumed that any planned city consists of neighborhood units.1 Western Cities Many studies of the social and physical urban pattern have been done. However. safety. As a family’s needs for space increase. 1971). and social change was expected to be reflected in studies which were repeated over a time period (Herbert and Thomas. family status and ethnic status. which analyze the physical environment under consideration. The broad generalization of the social rank produced a sector model.8 Case Studies of Urban social Patterns The study of the urban social pattern of a city primarily focuses on the residential land use (Herbert and Thomas. Social rank used the variables. This type of urbanization is also related to the housing market described by Hoyt (1939). Individualistic frameworks. are suitable modifications of the concept (Timms. 1929). 1990). Family status in American cities shows a concentric distribution. three indices were used. 1990). they move outwards. education.marriage. security and identity. This is . In the built environment this corresponds to ethnic neighborhoods (Timms. This concept. community and social and civic responsibilities such as aesthetics. ethnic status used religion and social groups. neighborliness. Critics say that neighborhood unit strongly emphasizes physical environment. but also an expression of socioeconomic and cultural values of the people. In the analysis of urban social patterns. The main assumption here was that social rank is related to transportation links which influence residential location in a sectoral manner (Scargill. These were social rank. however. The non-uniform pattern is consistent over many cities because similar households exert similar housing choices. The data source was census tracts. It is only the most convenient one. value of home. The values are also related to family. social status and retirement (Scargill. It is not only a physical design concept.

Public open spaces are generally found only . but socially with more complex relations to one another. 1990) showed similar results. Studies of Brisbane. socioeconomic status. Ethnicity. however. Traditional places are typically more dense with narrow streets and housing spaces around central courtyards.2 Third World Cities commercial ethnic group residential industrial Ethnic Status CBD Transition Low income Middle income High income Family Status Socioeconomic Status Income group 1 Income group 2 Income group 3 Figure 3. 1979). Canada (Herbert and Thomas. 1995) shows that the four important factors in the social pattern are underclass.5 Urban Social Patterns Source: Knox.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 31 predominant in cities where migration is high. Australia (Timms. Hartshorn. 1992. youth/migrants and black poverty. Winnipeg. 3. The changing pattern of family cycle reflects concentric zones while that of social rank is in sectors. traditional and modern design elements juxtaposed in seemingly dichotomous ways.8. 1995. A study of Baltimore (Knox. 1971). Cities in the Third World are frequently dual environments. does not always emerge as an independent component (Scargill.

Even single cities. 1986). 1986 Literacy and ethnic patterns emerged in a sectoral form. 1986). but formed shantytowns in the peri-urban fringes and in unserviced areas (under bridges. which is adjacent to. and subsequently surrounded by an industrial city (Lowder. Source: Lowder. substandard living conditions and ethnicity were the broad variables that defined the social pattern of the city. The social Figure 3. 1986). 1980. the morphological pattern of each Third World city is different mainly because of the presence of an indigenous city enclosed by a colonial city. . An analysis of Calcutta showed a pattern based on land use. 1975). A study of Colombo (Herbert and de Silva. traditional commercial areas and modern commercial areas. The colonial cities in Latin America show a centralized social pattern (Portes. as opposed to conglomerations. Western ideas of suburbanization and formed their Source: Drakakis-Smith own neighborhoods (Lowder.7). Social morphological models constructed for the Third World cities show that there is a central concentration of commercial activity and a number of residential neighborhoods. 1990). The migrants and poor did not live in the core of the city. 1974) found that social status. The center of the city was the plaza. But.6) (Herbert and Thomas. and surrounds old Delhi (Figure 3. The nuclei are original village. social and economic variables may not be the only factors. Around the plaza was the important buildings including a church. family ties.6 Plan of Delhi and New educated and professional classes followed the Delhi. The modern place is more spacious. are very complex and have evolved over a very long time. The model shows that the indigenous elite were closely associated with the commercial area. land use. Processes quite different from those in western cities govern the pattern of Third World cities. A large number of models of Third World cities have been made (Lowder. 1986). The second and third concentric zones were occupied progressively by poorer people. along riverbanks). The more Figure 3. The morphological model of Asian port cities shows a multiple nucleus (Figure 3. The residences of the richer class formed the first concentric zone around the plaza.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 32 around religious buildings.7 Asian Ports pattern showed concentric zones for land use. A classic example can be seen in the design of New Delhi. ethnicity and literacy. Thus. which contribute significantly to the urban pattern (Kopardekara.

spatial segregation based on ethnicity. Santiago and Chile Source: Lowder. Many studies have been done to study Indian urban areas.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 33 Here. The social ties are horizontal and vertical.8 Latin American Cities America. climatic and aesthetic factors. 1986 residential colonies moved from the center of the city to the urban periphery which were selected for their better geographic. Soon socioeconomic status related to nearness to the center became related to distance away from the center. status groups help to produce a very obscure patterning of social groups at the micro-level of analysis. 1986). The outer ring bordered on farmland (Figure 3. in general. Soon. caste. In the cities where new professions were created. farming is done only by the Sudra caste. and especially to construct a structural model. the poorer the household (Cornelius. The pattern was a creation of the lifestyle choices of the urban rich (Portes. languages and customs. has created social organizations for each caste (Kopardekara. Research findings point out that while caste is important in rural societies for its very functioning. yet complementary. In Lima. the Indian urban social scene essentially reflects two facets of non-western structure (Hall. The greater complexity of urban life and the difficulty of maintaining caste identity through residential segregation alone. industrial and office workers belonged to all castes. the residences became smaller and public amenities were reduced. 3. In the 18th and 19th centuries.3 Indian Cities In cities of India. 1975). A consistent relationship existed between socioeconomic position of the household and their distance from the center of the city. But. in rural areas. new definitions had to be made. Wealthier families began to move out of the center and settle in more isolated locations. in urban environments the meaning of caste becomes more important in terms of identity rather than function. i Symbolic functionalism is performed by religion and caste and buttressed by regional affiliations. It has been found that Indian cities defy social modeling.8). 1980): i Residences have not yet come to serve the symbolic function they do in the Western world.8. the farther away from the center. many large cities became crowded. For example. and religious duties performed by the Brahmins. "Particularly in cosmopolitan cities cultural or linguistic diversity and regional associations develop to extol their culture and language and to participate in their own . The horizontal relationships are between people of the same cultural background while vertical relationships are between caste and class. A second indigenous factor suffusing urban society is that of regional affiliation. 1977). The nature of traditional social status and the interdependence and spatial interpretation of diverse. religion and language rather than demographics and economics can be seen. The pattern is similar to the one described by the sector model of North Figure 3.

Pune and Varanasi. . Madras. Hyderabad had two nuclei – the old city and the colonial city. Industrial towns like Jamshedpur were planned around their industrial core. i South Indian cities had higher female employment rate. He postulated three dimensions as being important contributors to residential segregation. real case studies did not prove this theory. such neighborhoods are the source for the development of the corporate groups. commercial or administrative areas. Bombay. Their influence and interplay causes residential segregation. Calcutta) has low-density commercial centers surrounded by high-density residential neighborhoods. i North Indian cities had low female employment rates. low migration and equal male to female ratio. low literacy. 1980:35). Ahmad (1965) did a factor analysis of the socioeconomic characteristics of Indian cities. However. Temple Bazaar Centroid Fort Brush (1977) studied 24 cities in India and discerned four types of gradients of population directly related to their Figure 3.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 34 regional festivals if not usually celebrated in the region within which they live now" (Hall. higher literacy. Although the neighborhoods that result are not corporate groups in the sense in which they are defined. 1974 evolutionary pattern. 1968).9). These three dimensions were i socioeconomic dimension symbolized by the bazaar i political dimension represented by an administrative symbol i prestige dimension derived from the religious function of a temple. had western style CBDs. colonial cities. it was found that multiple nuclei were present. and that the temple acted as the most meaningful focus for the spatial distribution of social characteristics. Certain areas are known for their residents speaking a particular language only. These three dimensions would form concentric zones (Figure 3. cities that were well developed even before the colonial period. i The modern planned cities (Jamshedpur. i Metropolitan cities (Bombay. He had the following conclusions. Calcutta and Madras. higher migration and equal male to female ratio. Weinstein (1974) made an attempt to produce a conceptual model for the social segregation of an Indian city. The centroid of the system represents the optimum location for accessibility to all three functions. Chandigarh) have low population densities with no concentration of industrial. had retained their residential core (Mehta. Instead.9 Pattern of Indian Cities Source: Weinstein.

These examples show that the urban social pattern of Indian cities is very complex due to the influence of a variety of factors. The patterns were attributed to Europeanism. castes and classes produces a more heterogeneous pattern. 1901. The existence of multiple physical urban patterns caused by the presence of indigenous settlements. 1986). British cities and industrial towns within the boundary of the urban area. Analysis at the level of a single city gave patterns that are more complex. . Census data from 1881. languages. transportation and socioeconomic status (Kosambi. 1831 and 1961 was used to determine the evolution and change of the social pattern. The social patterns were also strongly influenced by the age of the city.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 35 Such broad conclusions are results of regional analyses. religious polarity. The presence of many religions. commercialism. 1986). A systematic analysis of census data for Bombay was done (Kosambi.

1986.10 Urban Social Patterns and Relevant Case Studies.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 36 C oncentric Z one T h eory S ector T heory Incom e g rou p 1 M ultiple N uclei T heory commercial ethnic group CBD Tran sitio n L ow incom e M iddle inco m e H igh inco m e In com e g roup 2 residential industrial In com e g rou p 3 D elhi Latin A m erica A sian P orts C oncentric + S ector T heories C hicago C alcutta C oncentric + S ector + M ultiple N uclei T h eories Figure 2. Hartshorn. . Source: Lowder. 1992.

the components derived from social area analysis were termed as socioeconomic status. the residential neighborhoods have been designed using the neighborhood principle as those designed in America. The residential neighborhoods of such cities are not as well defined as they are in the American cities. Stratification causes social inequality in terms of wealth. The urban social pattern of these cities has been generalized. an effort was made to prevent this social stratification and use residential allotments to fulfill this objective. These characteristics stratify the society into vertical and horizontal systems. Three leading western theories describing the urban social pattern of cities dominate the literature on urban social patterns (Hartshorn. Traditional Indian cities have grown over a very long period of time. the sociocultural factors are related to caste. The reasons for migration are also varied – they may be migrating as a result of natural calamities. A market economy strongly influences the lifestyle of the citizens of Navi Mumbai. The historical evolution of cities has supported this stratification. religion and language. In such a case study. The lifestyle factor in North American cities relates small nuclear families with higher education achievements and better employment opportunities. migration or ethnic group represent the ethnic factor. sector theory and multiple nuclei theory. In the case of India.9 Conclusion The urban social pattern is the complex manifestation of the underlying cultural values of the population within a particular built environment. family status and ethnic status. The growth of cities across the world has been studied. In the American cities. Social area analysis assumes that a few independent factors can explain the spatial patterning of a city. In Third World cities. it is appropriate to use a social area analysis to delineate the urban social pattern. class. this social area analysis must take into consideration the indigenous factors.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 3: The Conceptual Framework 37 3. Here. power and status. Migration may also be restricted to the men of the family. 1992). the researcher’s knowledge of the local environment is important to contextualize the pattern more appropriately. However. These are concentric zone theory. Status in Third World cities is based on family membership or socioeconomic class. The households are generally large with a range of ages. These theories have been combined in a social area analysis to describe the social pattern based on a few social variables. The components of the analysis of American cities are not entirely apparent in the Third World cities. this is not evident due to the existence of multi-generational families. The lifestyle depends on ethnicity and migration. Land-use is also similar in that it is predominantly single-use zoning. skills and professions. or in search of opportunities in the city. . In the case of Navi Mumbai. Male dominance. In the design of Navi Mumbai.

economic status and ethnic background produce a certain spatial pattern in the city. Although these analyses have been more effective for studying North American cities. and housing characteristics. It was first put forth by Shevky and Williams (1949) in a study of Los Angeles. The general issue of social areas will be accomplished through social area analysis. The pattern of the city may be determined by statistical analysis or by discerning people’s mental images of the city. The issue of spatial distribution of different kinds of people in Navi Mumbai is of primary interest. Thus. The family as a unit becomes weaker. Under these conditions. The theories put forth by Burgess. and ethnic segregation showed a multiple nuclei arrangement. 1955). This analysis classifies census tract data into three main constructs . mapping of social area analysis for a large sample of cities showed that socioeconomic status. It is a . These involve population. family status and ethnic status. Generally the economic model showed a sectored pattern. Hoyt. and ethnicity confirmed the validity of the analysis.socioeconomic status. The basic premise of social area analysis is that a city cannot be studied in isolation from the overall society (Shevky and Bell. the city was analyzed as a composite made up of three layers. The aim is to identify key combinations of different measures that provide an adequate basis on which to differentiate the sub-areas from one another (King and Golledge. These factors are taken into consideration in social area analysis. The analysis looks at the variables at once and at their respective locations in their distribution. However. Social area analysis shows how family characteristics. and Harris and Ullman will be the theoretical framework for the conceptualization of the social pattern of Navi Mumbai. The study involves the categorization of a city based on social rank. Cairo and Helsinki showed some useful generalization. immigration of rural population leads to segregation based on language. urbanization index. Cities are complex entities that have many different functions performed by many different people. studies in Calcutta. The research investigates the relationship between the spatial pattern of Navi Mumbai and the different theories of urban social patterns discussed in the literature review. 1971). A set of variables describing the social structure of the city can be used in the statistical analysis. urbanization and segregation.Chapter 4: Research Design Determining the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai is the primary research objective of this thesis.1 Social Area Analysis Social area analysis provides a broad framework for analyzing the social patterns of a city. These three factors also corresponded to the theoretical models proposed by Burgess. religion and ethnic background. 4. They were considered to be very narrow and not universally applicable. Earlier. 1985). The social area analysis may be done statistically by a factor analysis. there was considerable criticism about the choice of variables. economic. 1978). Better transportation systems increase mobility and lead to a greater sorting of population (Cadwallader. Hoyt and Harris and Ullman. The increase in industrialization creates an occupational status system (Timms. the urbanization component showed a concentric ring pattern.

The data available is based on a . 1990). language) and vertical (occupation. education. caste) dimensions (Hall. then the pattern will be explained using the existing theories. 1980). Social area analysis based on western thinking can not be naively applied to the study of urban social patterns in India. 4.1 Constructs and Variables Construct Variable Socioeconomic status Profession Number of earning members Income Education Family status Demographics Women at home Family size Dwelling size Type of house Year of occupation Ethnic status Religion Language 4. Social structure in India is a result of cultural. mapping of social patterns in many cities across the world show that the socioeconomic status. and each sector (neighborhood) of the nodes. The sectors (neighborhoods) are identical to census block tracts. The variables are tabulated below: Table 4. This database provides aggregated information about each node (township). If H0 is false. H0.3 Operationalization Certain variables will be used to operationalize the social area analysis to obtain the urban social pattern. Variables that arise from such cultural determinants need to be used in the factor analysis.2 Hypotheses As discussed in the literature review. religious and historic development with both horizontal (kinship.Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 39 device that seeks interrelationships among the set of input variables (Herbert and Thomas. religion. my null hypothesis.4 Data Collection The data required for the analysis can be obtained from census tracts of Navi Mumbai. In this case study of Navi Mumbai. 4. is: no significant difference in key variables is expected and hence no social patterning will occur. This hypothesis is put forth on the assumption that the social agenda put forth in the Development Plan has been successfully implemented. family status and ethnic status correspond respectively to the sector theory. This provides a spatial hierarchical data set. concentric zone theory and multiple nuclei theory.

The first is a descriptive analysis of the data setting out the parameters that need to be considered to define the meaning of heterogeneity. Statistics are weighted for spatial data because. data covering a large area is required. is census data. and GIS overlay techniques are used to determine the social pattern at the regional and sub-regional levels.283 Nerul 16. All data is standardized. 4. These four methods are collectively used to analyze the data. For a social area analysis.5. The third is cluster analysis of the cases to see which variables are closely associated.1 Descriptive Analysis The first stage of analysis describes the data at both the regional and sub-regional scale. The second is a principal components analysis. The only data source that provides this information.357 Survey Coverage 6656 4219 2125 2034 2282 2530 2506 544 % of total 24 26 23 22 25 19 18 23 The issues of validity and reliability arise in the use of census data for testing the hypothesis. Finally.338 Belapur 9.5 Methodology Four methodologies are used to analyze the data. In this research. The cluster analysis puts together cases which are similar based on the relationship between the variables. Although principal components analysis is no longer considered the most favorable mode of analysis to delineate patterns.056 New Panvel 9.Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 40 socioeconomic survey done by CIDCO in December 1995. The variables are expected to cluster based on the constructs described above. the sector is the unit of analysis. An error of 5-8% is expected. These are techniques in multivariate analysis. and at the sub-regional scale attached as Appendix C. The single variable from that data set is selected and a histogram of it at the . The survey was carried out on a ~22% sample basis for each node. although variables are related. The descriptive analysis helps understand the finer dimensions of the data. cartographic mapping.378 Kopar-khairane 14.161 Sanpada 2. This is a detailed stage of analysis. and compare it to other cities. the units of analysis are not identical.007 Airoli 13. At the regional scale the data is tabulated. Table 4. for the purpose of this thesis it shall be used. The principal components analysis draws out the relationship between the variables. 4. The GIS and mapping techniques convert all the statistical information into a graphic representation.109 Kalamboli 9. The census data is not 100% reliable.2 Survey Sampling Node Total Number of Dwellings Vashi 27.

4. The initial solution is based on the orthogonal solution. The axis has been rotated orthogonally (assuming the factors are uncorrelated). "To obtain the initial solution. The cases are the rows and the variables are the columns. If the standard deviation at the 95% confidence interval is within 15% of the mean. certain restrictions are imposed. Comparative figures at the national scale are also given. 1986). Principal components analysis can be thought of as four matrices. The first step of principal components analysis is to obtain an initial solution. and so on" (Kim and Mueller. the matrix of component scores is computed. Patterns can be delineated from mapping these components. the second component accounts for as much of the residual variance left unexplained by the first factor. This approach to classification is very subjective. Principal components are the eigenvalues of the correlation matrix (Davis. In order to interpret this descriptive statistics for homogeneity. A variation greater than thirty percent of the total population from the mean (15% on either side of mean) is used here to show unequal distribution.3 Cluster Analysis Classification of data places objects in one or more homogenous groups. The rotation normally removes the negative loadings. Corresponding communalities are also estimated. These loadings indicate the strength of the relationships between variables and underlying components. The data is interpreted in terms of its mean and standard deviation. The data matrix is converted into a correlation matrix.Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 41 sub-regional scale is drawn. The N by M matrix is standardized in terms of standard deviation. Characteristics of the urban social pattern can be revealed by considering the relationship within groups. The elements of the eigenvectors that are used to compute the scores are called principal component loadings. Rotating the axis more closely intersects the clusters of variables.7 are not significant in the correlation matrix. 4. The . and results in a simpler pattern. 1986). Generally variables with communalities less than 0. This matrix contains components that represent a group of interrelated variables.5. then the pattern shall be interpreted as homogeneous. The first matrix is a simple data matrix. This is varimax rotation. 1978). These restrictions are (1) there are k common components (2) underlying components are orthogonal to each other (3) the first component accounts for as much variance as possible.2 Principal Components Analysis A principal components analysis reduces a large number of variables to a smaller number of underlying components. The second step is to rotate the axis to get a simpler solution. It has very little theory and depends largely on experience. This matrix is next converted into a factor matrix. it is necessary to provide a permissible range of variation. This solution determines whether a small number of the components can be used to explain the covariance between a large number of variables. Each original observation is converted into a principal component score. Finally. The eigenvalue criterion (eigenvalue greater than or equal to 1) helps eliminate components which are not meaningful. Cluster analysis classifies the groups according to the observations into moreor-less homogenous and distinct groups (Davis.5.

6 Data Analysis Descriptive analysis of the data was done using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. principal components analysis and cluster analysis. Analysis was then done of one particular node of Navi Mumbai. Both the analyses were done at a regional and sub-regional scale. The distance coefficient is not constrained within the range of +1. namely Vashi. 4. 4. Mapping of the principal components determined if any pattern exists in the social characteristics of Navi Mumbai at the regional and sub-regional scales.Malathi Ananathakrishnan Chapter 4: The Research Design 42 classification procedure used here is hierarchical clustering. The regional scale was comparisons between the eight nodes of Navi Mumbai. A low distance would indicate that two objects are similar and a large distance would indicate that the two objects are dissimilar. as is the correlation coefficient. The aim of these two kinds of analysis was to determine if the data set clustered into the three constructs given above.0 to -1. then connects the next most similar observations to these. A measure of similarity between every pair of objects is computed using Euclidean distance.5. The SPSS program was also used to perform a principal component analysis and a cluster analysis on this data set. The levels of similarity are used to construct the dendrogram.0. Distance coefficients are linked at low values. A correlation coefficient or distance coefficient may be used to evaluate similarities. This mapping helps explain the statistics through a easily interpretable graphic representation. .4 Mapping and Overlays The final stage is the mapping of the descriptive analysis. and so produces better dendrograms. This method joins similar observations. and the statistical analysis to determine an interpretation of the pattern. This stage of analysis integrates the theoretical framework. The criteria for clustering is that both observations mutually have the highest correlation with each other.

female pop. Type of housing CIDCO Tenure 1980s Last place of residence Bombay Ethnic status Religion Hindu. Hence. This spatial scale is • regional scale (nodes). it was used for analysis. Malayalam . Data for the regional and sub-regional scale was collected from the 1995 socioeconomic survey conducted by CIDCO. The methodological reason for selecting these eight nodes out of the total of thirteen is because data was available for only these eight nodes. Panvel. Vashi is the oldest node. and has fully developed residential sectors.2 Descriptive Analysis of Data The different constructs and variable names described in the methodology section are tabulated below (Table 5. As the 1995 survey data was the most recent data. The criteria used to select the variables were based on the expectations of the hypothesis. age 25-45. One or two variables from each set was selected for this study. Muslim Language Marathi.Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 5. 5. All the variables belonged to closed sets. it was selected out of the eight nodes. age 25-45 Family size 4 to 5 members Dwelling size 26-35 sq. 2651-4450 Education high school Family status Demographics Male pop.1) with the actual variable from the data set. Then the data set was studied at a sub-regional level by analyzing the neighborhoods of Vashi node.1 Constructs and Variables Construct Variable Name Variable from data set Socioeconomic Profession highly skilled. m. Belapur. The analysis is divided into descriptive analysis of variables and detailed analysis at the regional and sub-regional. Nerul. Kopar-khairane. As this node had the most complete data. The variables needed to explain the constructs as well as possible. Airoli and Sanpada.1 Introduction The aim of this research is to study the urban social pattern of the population across a hierarchical scale. only then would they bring out the characteristics of the construct. only one or two representative variables from each set was selected. Kalamboli. • sub-regional scale (sectors of a node) The study areas at the regional level of analysis are those of the nodes of Navi Mumbai including Vashi. Table 5. unskilled status Number of earning members 1 earning member Income Rs.

1 Socioeconomic Status The socioeconomic status is an indicator of social class.75 8. 30430 are the working population. Data tables for the sub-regional scale are given in Appendix C.67 in Greater Bombay.2 and the number of earners in Table 5. Number of earning members: Out of the total population of 91787 recorded in the survey.2Work Force Percent of male Percent of female population in work population in work force force Vashi 53 10 Nerul 55 7 Belapur 52 12 Kalamboli 54 6 Panvel 57 8 Kopar-khairane 56 10 Airoli 53 7 Sanpada 58 9 Mean 54. A profession brings with it a certain prestige and social class.3). and form the socioeconomic indicator. while it is 1.3 Number of Earners Single 2 3 4+ Vashi 68 23 6 2 Nerul 78 16 3 1 Belapur 68 22 4 2 Kalamboli 79 15 4 1 Panvel 78 17 3 1 Kopar-khairane 76 17 5 1 Airoli 74 20 4 1 Sanpada 70 19 7 2 Mean 74 19 5 1 Standard deviation 5 3 1 1 .99 The average number of earners per household is 1. All these variables are closely correlated.62 Standard Deviation 2. Seventy-five percent of families had one earning member and twenty percent of families had two earning members (Table 5.35. Table 5.2.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 44 All data tables are for the regional scale while the histograms are from the sub-regional scale. An increase in the number of earning members increases family income and the socioeconomic class.15% (a slight increase from 32.8% recorded in the 1987 survey) of the population makes up the workforce of Navi Mumbai. The percent of males and females is shown in Table 5. 5. Table 5. Better education facilitates getting better jobs and higher income.2.12 1. 33.

the variable. Government offices including banks and public sector enterprises employ 21% of the workforce. and has a normal distribution over eight cases. Table 5. Kopar-khairane has a low number of highly skilled workers and a large number of unskilled workers (Table 5.4).0 65.0 70. carpenters. Professional workers in teaching and medical institutions are 7% of the workforce.1. The distribution of the single earner families is shown in Figure 5.0 60. On an average.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 45 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Std.3 N = 19127. Skilled workers are factory workers. The pattern is homogeneous. they are 19% of the work force and the standard deviation is 11. At the sub-regional scale the standard deviation is 7. This means that the distribution is homogeneous. The mean is 74 with a very low standard deviation of 5.3). They form 17% of the workforce. The standard deviation is 11. was selected.0 50.1 Distribution of Single-earner families For the analysis. The main reason is that this node is presently under construction and has a large workforce of construction workers.3). Highly skilled professionals hold higher level managerial and supervisory jobs or are professional business persons. 25% of the workforce is employed there. Profession: Good employment opportunities are offered by the manufacturing industries of Navi Mumbai.96 Mean = 66. while service professions such as shops and hotels employ 7% of the workforce. construction workers and trainees.0 55.4 Occupational Classification of Workforce Highly skilled unskilled office selfteacher other skilled worker worker assistant employed Vashi 45 12 12 15 9 4 3 Nerul 38 23 13 15 4 4 3 Belapur 47 12 8 20 3 6 4 Kalamboli 24 31 20 12 8 3 2 Panvel 43 19 9 16 4 7 2 Kopar-khairane 20 9 41 9 9 0 12 Airoli 34 18 44 12 5 1 4 Sanpada 49 9 20 14 3 3 2 Mean 38 17 19 14 6 4 4 Standard Deviation 11 8 11 3 3 2 3 Frequency . single earning member. For this analysis classification based on skills is tabulated (Table 5.96 (mean=66. contractors and consultants.00 45. Small businesses account for 15% of the employees.0 0 Cases weighted by population Figure 5. Dev = 7.0 80. In Navi Mumbai this economic class constitutes 38% of the work force. Both the values are within 15% of the mean. The distribution of the singleearner family at the regional level shows a standard deviation of only 5 (mean=74).0 75. This is most representative of the entire population. Unskilled persons are construction laborers and housemaids.

9 N = 19127. 2651-4450 was selected for the principal components analysis because the median income of Rs.26 26514450 27 36 27 46 31 32 39 31 33.0 35.5). The monthly average household income is Rs.0 40. 2651-4450 The income range of Rs. 7500 per month. 1230.0 Std.45) and the sub-regional scale.06 1000115000 7 3 5 1 3 7 2 4 4 2.0 30. Income: The income groups are defined by the Government of India’s household income classification into: • economically weaker section (EWS) earning less than Rs1250 per month • lower income group (LIG) earning between Rs. 4900 and the monthly average per capita income is Rs. The regional scale shows a standard deviation of 6. and the standard deviation is 6.88 16.63 6. The proportion of EWS:LIG:MIG:HIG is 2:16:34:48.00 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.13 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 5.2).5 Household Income upto 12511250 2650 Vashi 2 14 Nerul 3 27 Belapur 2 12 Kalamboli 2 26 Panvel 2 24 Kopar-khairane 2 9 Airoli 1 14 Sanpada 1 5 Mean 1.46 44517500 30 21 35 21 31 36 34 42 31.0 15.0 50.2 15000+ 3 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1. Table 5.46 (mean=33. Dev = 10 Mean = 27.9) (Figure 5.2 Frequency of Families with income range Rs.98 (mean=27. Thus.0 20. 4451 and Rs 7500 and • higher income group (HIG) earning more than Rs. Both cases do not show a homogeneous distribution of people based on income as the standard deviation is greater than 15% of the mean.0 10. Almost 34% of the population falls within this category.0 25. 4200 fell within this range.38 Standard deviation 0.13 1. 2650 • middle income group (MIG) earning between Rs.29 750110000 15 6 12 3 5 9 8 12 8. in Navi Mumbai it appears that the four income groups have to be redefined based on the median and/or mean income of this region rather than using the national urban averages (Table 5.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 46 The corresponding data was not available at the sub-regional scale. This shows a proportionately large middle and higher income groups. Frequency .64 8.0 45. 1251 and Rs.75 4.46. the standard deviation is 10.25 7.

36 technical 1 2 1 2 4 1 1 2 1. secondary school education.7 Level of Education illiterate Vashi Nerul Belapur Kalamboli Panvel Kopar-khairane Airoli Sanpada Mean Standard deviation 4 3 5 7 3 4 4 4 4. primary school education. Table 5. technical education. Sanpada is the only node without any education facilities.7). The level of education is categorized into illiterate.28 Children Primary secondary 9 5 8 10 8 6 7 8 7. and 35% of the children go to schools where the medium of instruction is Marathi (12% did not specify their medium of instruction).52 1.63 1. Most students attend school and college within their node (township). 10% use bicycles and only 2% go by school bus.6 Location of Education Institutions Vashi Nerul Belapur Kalamboli Panvel Kopar. Table 5. while 4% of the population is going to college.13 3.07 high school 22 17 21 16 19 15 18 25 19. The value given represents the highest level of education achieved by at least one member of the family (Table 5.6).25 1. the column titled Vashi shows that some students from all other nodes also go there to attend school or college (Table 5. children.38 3.04 BS MS 22 4 24 5 15 2 9 1 22 4 29 4 13 3 21 4 19.60 14 15 18 20 14 13 16 12 15.25 2.30 . high school education. Hence.66 27 27 30 34 25 27 37 21 28.Airoli Sanpada Bombay khairane Vashi 88 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 Nerul 9 77 2 1 1 0 0 0 10 Belapur 10 12 67 1 1 0 0 0 9 Kalamboli 1 0 1 90 4 0 0 0 4 Panvel 2 1 2 8 76 0 0 0 11 Kopar-khairane 17 0 0 0 0 81 0 0 2 Airoli 7 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 10 Sanpada 47 8 1 1 0 0 16 0 27 In the Bombay region literacy rates are seventy-five percent for adult population. Vashi has all the major colleges.5 5. 76% of the students walk to their school or college. 12% use public transport.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 47 Education: The survey shows that 27% of the total population is children going to school.38 6.75 1. 51% of the children go to schools where the medium of instruction is English. Bachelors and Masters degrees.

9). This age group was selected because it is a subset of the population and it makes most of the decision regarding social choices (Table 5. Cases weighted by population The present pattern clearly shows Figure 5. 5.07.2 Family Status Demographics: The nodes of Navi Mumbai have a female to 5000 male ratio of 848 to 1000 (comparative figures for Bombay 4000 are 819 to 1000).0 40.3 Frequency of Families with at least one a younger population with a high individual with Secondary Education percentage of children.07 (mean=28. Table 5. This level of education is provided to everyone by the government free of cost. Dev = 7.0 35.0 30. The age group 16 to 24 is 10% of the 2000 population.8 Male Population below 3 4-5 6 . Children up to the age of 15 constitute 33% of 3000 the total population.13 (mean=40.6 (Census of India.5% of the population falls under this category with a standard deviation of 5. 28.0 25. About 9% of the Mean = 40.00 0 45 to 59.21 22 -24 25 -44 45 -59 60+ Vashi 4 3 7 15 12 5 34 14 5 Nerul 7 5 10 12 8 5 41 8 3 Belapur 6 4 8 14 12 5 37 11 4 Kalamboli 8 6 11 13 8 5 43 6 1 Panvel 8 4 8 11 9 5 44 9 3 Kopar-khairane 10 6 10 10 8 5 43 6 1 Airoli 7 5 10 14 11 4 39 8 2 Sanpada 7 4 6 10 10 5 43 10 4 Mean 7 5 9 12 10 5 41 9 3 Standard deviation 2 1 2 2 2 0 3 3 1 6000 Frequency . and only 3% of the 15.2.3).Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 48 The variable ’secondary school’ was selected under level of education.6 population are in the age group of N = 19127. The demographic indicators used are male and female population of the age group 25-45.13 population.5). The working age group of 25 to 44 is 39% of the 1000 Std.6).9 10 -15 16 .0 20. 1991) The standard deviation of this variable at the regional scale is 5. and at the sub-regional scale is 7.0 50.0 45. The national average for this variable is 16. The variation is not homogeneous at either scale (Figure 5.8. Secondary school means an education of up to Grade 10 and the passing of a government examination (matriculation).0 population are in the 60+ range. Table 5.

In Vashi.76 and the national average is 5. A descriptive analysis of the data over the last 20 years shows that household size has been constantly increasing.9 Female Population below 3 4-5 Vashi 5 3 Nerul 7 5 Belapur 5 4 Kalamboli 15 10 Panvel 8 4 Kopar-khairane 9 6 Airoli 6 5 Sanpada 6 4 Mean 8 5 Standard deviation 3 2 6 -9 8 10 8 16 8 10 10 8 10 3 10 -15 14 13 14 20 11 9 15 10 13 3 16 -21 11 9 11 13 10 12 10 13 11 1 22 -24 5 7 6 12 9 10 6 9 8 2 25 -44 39 40 40 6 40 37 39 39 35 12 45 -59 10 6 8 6 6 5 6 9 7 2 60+ 4 2 3 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 The female population of the age group 25-45 is also uniformly distributed over the study area. and 3.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 49 7000 6000 5000 4000 The standard deviation of the population is 3 (mean=41) at the regional level.0 38.0 44.39 (mean=38) at the sub-regional level (Figure 5. average family size has increased from 3.0 50. Dev = 3.0 40.00 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.4). The comparative family size for Bombay is 4. Family size: The average family size is 4. but also the need to accommodate older parents.10).0 34.52.0 48.0 46.0 42. The reason for this is not only marriage and children. 3000 2000 Frequency 1000 0 32.01 for all the nodes (Table 5.73 in 1987 to 4.0 N = 19127. .0 Std.4 Frequency of male population in the age group 25-45 Figure 5.0 52.39 Mean = 38.21 in 1985.0 36. The population age structure is uniformly distributed over the whole region.

Later.0 62.5 57 54 53 52 45 45 56 45 50.6 1 2 1 3 5 3 1 3 2.4 8.4 Average family size 4.1 (mean=50.10 Family Size Single Vashi Nerul Belapur Kalamboli Panvel Kopar-khairane Airoli Sanpada Mean Standard deviation 6000 2.0 52.1.03 3. All other nodes show a dominance of CIDCO housing (Table 5. Frequency Cases weighted by population Figure 5. the data shows more diversification of the housing stock. Dev = 5. 3000 2000 1000 Std. CIDCO began all construction in Navi Mumbai.0 47.5 65. The variable has a standard deviation of 5.1 6.0 N = 19127.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 50 Table 5.0 67.5 55.85 5000 4000 The families with a size of 4 or 5 members was chosen as 50% of the population belongs to this category.5 60.10 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0.11).85 Mean = 56.5).9). At the regional scale the standard deviation is 5. and 5.4 1.81 4.3 26 34 31 31 41 41 27 39 33. .5 45.5 50.7 14 10 13 14 8 10 15 12 12 2.00 0 42.67 3.9. Since Vashi is the oldest node.87 4.22 3.85 (mean=56) at the sub-regional scale (Figure 5.99 3.0 57.0 4. private builders and cooperative housing began developing residential sectors.5 Frequency of households with 4 or 5 members Type of Housing: Initially CIDCO built ninety percent of the housing stock.21 3.5 The variation of the data is minimal.9 5.8 6.9 0.

The categories. Some houses are mortgage through CIDCO.00 Cases weighted by POP Figure 5.38) while at the sub-regional scale it is 35.24 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 Pvt. The standard deviation at the regional scale is 12.00 1.0 80.76 0. The standard deviation is 12. This is a very significant result.77 Pvt.0 30. The large deviation shows that private construction has taken place.0 10.35 1000 0 0.0 Std.13 0.6 Frequency of Houses built by CIDCO For this variable.11 Type of Housing CIDCO Vashi 64 Nerul 95 Belapur 91 Kalamboli 99 Panvel 80 Kopar-khairane 98 Airoli 100 Sanpada 88 Mean 89.0 60. Frequency .24. Co-op Commercial 29 2 5 0 9 0 0 1 15 0 2 0 0 0 11 0 8.0 20.88 0. only houses built by CIDCO was selected.38 Standard Deviation 12. CIDCO’s aim to promote heterogeneity was to be implemented by having a strong hold over the housing market.38 9.12 shows present ownership of the house.62 (mean=66.24 (mean=89.0 50.4 N = 19127. the strong control is no longer evident.0 40.62 Mean = 66.74 Other 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. Most government offices that provide housing for their employees obtain long term lease from CIDCO.0 90. Dev = 35. Table 5. This may be one of the main reasons for the greater variability in the pattern at the sub-regional scale rather than at the regional scale.6). House 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1.0 100. resale and rental fall under private ownership. CIDCO is still the major owner. At Vashi. private ownership.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 51 Table 5. the oldest node.0 70. Houses built by CIDCO are 90% of the houses available.4) (Figure 5.

68 Resale 21 16 0 0 0 14 0 18 8.25 while the mean was 14.0 90.25 18.50 0 Standard deviation 8.75 Private 17 3 4 1 9 1 0 7 5.0 30.09 8.25 0.0 0 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.25 5. the private builders are predominantly building for the HIG.0 70.0 20.00 0.14).2 N = 19127. While CIDCO is building houses for the EWS/LIG/MIG.0 80.0 40.5 4.0 10. Dev = 21.64 Dwelling size: The average size of dwelling units constructed by CIDCO is less than that built by private builders (Table 5.43 Rental 23 36 37 43 36 49 42 26 36.63 9.85 Mean = 14.65 6.63 14.13 Housing built by CIDCO <15 16-25 26-35 36-50 51-75 76-100 101-150 150+ Vashi 11 30 22 14 15 3 2 0 Nerul 7 57 18 8 7 2 1 0 Belapur 0 26 10 33 20 11 0 0 Kalamboli 24 37 24 5 7 2 0 0 Panvel 10 33 16 18 22 1 0 0 Kopar-khairane 0 20 10 42 18 9 1 0 Airoli 0 30 28 17 18 6 0 0 Sanpada 0 61 18 12 9 0 0 0 Mean 6.25 Standard Deviation 9. Table 5. Table 5.76 0 10000 8000 The standard deviation of the data was 21.0 50.0 60.52 14.02 3.13.12 Ownership of House Mortgage CIDCO Vashi 11 23 Nerul 21 36 Belapur 8 40 Kalamboli 25 25 Panvel 7 33 Kopar-khairane 0 34 Airoli 0 51 Sanpada 15 32 Mean 10.5 8. 6000 4000 Frequency 2000 Std.75 18.7).88 34.50 36.7 Frequency of Housing Built by CIDCO .36 12.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 52 Table 5.64 6.2 (Figure 5.99 0.

There is a great variation in the Figure 5.50 15.2 ncy N = 19127. Table 5. For both CIDCO-built houses and privately 6000 built houses.75 3.88 Standard Deviation 3.38 29.76 7.0 20.88 9.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 53 Table 5.8 Frequency of Houses built by Private number of houses occupied between Enterprise nodes (Table 5.0 can be divided into three stages: early. Only Vashi and Belapur had a household population in the 1980s. Families began to reside in Nerul. Dwelling size was selected 8000 based on type of house.50 .0 50. middle phase in 1980s and accelerated phase in the 1990s.88 15.69 10.00 0 Tenure: The growth of Navi Mumbai 0.0 30. Panvel and Airoli in the latter 1980s and in Kopar-khairane and Sanpada only in the 1990s.50 2.63 18.41 150+ 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 14.15).0 10.8). Cases weighted by population slow phase in the 1970s.67 76-100 24 23 9 0 24 1 0 5 3.50 14. Kalamboli.16 51-75 14 8 33 5 18 42 17 12 5.50 16.67 and mean 10000 16. Dev = 18.0 The frequency distribution of houses built by private enterprise shows a 12000 standard deviation of 18.86 3.0 6.13 21.94 10.67 que groups.0 40. the dwelling sizes 4000 selected was 26-35 sq.0 60. Mean = 16.99 5.83 3.12 101-150 8 5 5 0 8 0 0 2 3.78 12.09 13.38 Standard Deviation 10. m.15 Year of Occupation before 1980 1981-85 1986-90 1991-92 1993 1994 1995 Vashi 11 28 24 8 9 14 5 Nerul 0 6 29 10 6 35 14 Belapur 4 23 24 11 13 18 7 Kalamboli 0 5 31 10 11 37 6 Panvel 0 11 14 15 14 34 12 Kopar-khairane 0 0 0 20 18 34 28 Airoli 0 0 47 14 12 16 11 Sanpada 0 0 0 0 8 48 44 Mean 1.13 11.14 Housing built by Private Enterprise <15 16-25 26-35 36-50 Vashi 4 2 2 14 Nerul 0 6 6 6 Belapur 0 1 2 2 Kalamboli 0 8 0 0 Panvel 0 0 1 1 Kopar-khairane 0 91 5 5 Airoli 0 0 0 0 Sanpada 13 60 2 2 Mean 37.2 (Figure 5. corresponding to middle income Fre 2000 Std.00 11.75 2.

19 26. this table only indicates the year of occupation of the present accommodation.79 2.25 (mean=30.3 68.0 40.51 3.39 Within state 3.25 0. However.54 7.29 4.0 30.63 17.4 0.0 70.07 19.55 23.0 80.14 5.00 0 describe migration from Bombay and 0.94 Nerul 13.54 Outside Outside state India 4.0 60. These N = 19127.83 5.26 5.19 Navi Mumbai 35.05 4.9).94 11.34 49.05 1. which can be attributed to the pace of construction.43 Sanpada 17.0 50.0 20. Movement within Navi Mumbai shows desire to move to a house of the homeowner’s choice.18 5.04 2.78 39.45 0.54 0. Dev = 18.58 4.58 5.63 Mean 11.63 9.16 Previous Place of Residence Island City Western Eastern suburbs suburbs Vashi 18.5 2.25 (mean=52.79 deviation Frequency Thane 3.75 2.0 movement within Navi Mumbai.45 Standard 5.20 2.36 17.32 5.94 0.89 47.82 3.8) (Figure 5.42 0.4 4.25 place of residence are Bombay and 1000 Mean = 52.1 5.34 66.34 13.26 6.53 2.23 49.39 Panvel 3.53 32.04 6.23 Kalamboli 5.25) and 18.65 10. This is because any house in Navi Mumbai would be better than the existing living conditions in Bombay.16 Airoli 8.8 0.15 24. 7000 6000 5000 4000 The standard deviation at the regional scale is 20.46 3.06 6.9 Frequency of Tenure the first stage of relocation where the choice of house is not very important. Only the middle phase was selected as a representative variable.82 4.62 2.25 1.2 2. It is thus. There is a very large variability.16). Cases weighted by population Migration from Bombay is usually Figure 5.2 2.51 20.85 0 6.23 4.36 0.56 Belapur 10.27 Kopar 14.17 .11 2.58 13. 1980s and 1990s account for the entire span of growth of the city.8 Navi Mumbai (Table 5.44 2.0 10.57 5. 3000 Previous Place of Residence: The two variables describing previous Std.78 0.28 55.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 54 The three time periods of 1970s. 2000 Table 5. not entirely accurate as families may have shifted after their first place of residence.28 3.

Dev = 9.0 45. it is more important to analyze the minority religions to see if they are forming ethnic enclaves.75% and the standard deviation is only 4.50 1. Frequency .13 0.00 2. Ethnic enclaves are formed mainly by religious and linguistic groups.98 Christian 6 3 6 4 2 2 3 9 4.35 Sikh 2 3 7 6 1 1 1 3 3. from Bombay and within Navi Mumbai.67 Jain 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 Religion Hindu Vashi 84 Nerul 88 Belapur 79 Kalamboli 84 Panvel 94 Kopar-khairane 89 Airoli 88 Sanpada 80 Mean 85.67.01) at the regional scale and 9. The Hindu population is the majority and is homogenous. western suburbs.0 75.98. The mean is 85. Religion: This variable is very important for this analysis because India has a number of well-defined religions. Table 5.54 (mean=53) at the sub-regional scale.0 Cases weighted by population Figure 5.75% of the total and has a standard deviation of 1.45 Islam 6 5 4 5 2 6 3 7 4.33 Buddhist 1 0 2 1 0 2 5 1 1.25 0.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 55 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Std.42 (mean=26. The means of the religion variable correspond with the national averages.75 1.0 55.0 N = 19127. This variable shows diversification of the population based on a cultural variable (Table 5. island city. 5. There is a large variation because there has been migration from the rural areas. The Muslim population is 4.10 Frequency of Bombay as Previous Place of Residence The variables. Bombay.0 70. The standard deviation of the families whose previous place of residence was Bombay is 9. eastern suburbs and Thane have been summed up to obtain the variable.0 40.60 Others 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.2.0 65.56 Mean = 53.17).3 Ethnic Status This construct is very important because it is the construct that creates segregation in India.46 The variables Hindu and Muslim were selected for analysis. An analysis of the other minority populations also show very large standard deviations.00 0 35.75 Standard deviation 4.0 50. This variable shows the families whose most immediate place of origin is Bombay.0 60.38 2. However.

Marathi is the local language.20 0.44 2.66 2.11 6.50 1.36 4. Malayalam and Kannada southern ones Table 5.Malathi Ananthakrishnan 5000 Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 10000 56 4000 8000 3000 6000 2000 4000 Frequency Std.22 Std.97 1.91 Mean = 6.48 5.32 3.19 5.46 Sanpada 63. Hindi is the dominant language of the country.75 Belapur 40.01 9.47 3.33 2.49 11.91 2.73 Hindi Gujarati Malayalam Punjabi Tamil Kannada Bengali Other 13.27 2.87 Panvel 66.04 3.11 Frequency of Hindus Figure 5. Language: The variable language is very important in the Indian context because civil violence due to language has taken place across India.59 12.14 2.04 1. Dev = 4.4 N = 19127.99 10.34 3. Punjabi is a northern language.35 3.17 13. Gujarati is the language of the adjoining state.80 5.5 14.26 2.6 12.13 14.50 2.12 1.31 3.27 16.99 1. Mean = 82.11 6.72 1. Dev = 3. This has been used to study if there are any ethnic neighborhoods formed due to linguistic considerations.50 3. .57 3. Bengali an eastern one and Tamil.29 2.98 (mean=85.23 7.96 5.37 2.08 11. Malayalam is the language of the state 1000 miles away.32 7.08 3.65 2.29 2. and there is a large population of Malayalam-speaking people in the greater Bombay region.77 1. dev 11.83 6.19 8. 54% of the population speaks this language.56 3.53 9.31 9. This forms a major minority language.76 Kalamboli 55.16 16. Marathi is the local language.81 7.75).74 2.92 5.79 Mean 53.50 3.66 2.69 5.32 0.64 2.78 Kopar 67.67 1.33 5.72 1.13 13.53 16.48 3.90 2.60 5.41 Nerul 45. The Muslim population and other minority religions show a nonuniform distribution over the study area.22 The two languages selected are Marathi and Malayalam.00 Frequency 1000 2000 Std.98 8.12 Frequency of Muslims The Hindu population is spread uniformly over the study are with standard deviation 4.9 N = 19127.41 4.68 1.93 Airoli 42.74 3.43 8.72 0.18 Language Marathi Vashi 42.68 4.34 3.00 0 0 Figure 5.82 3.

which have formed their own enclaves. This is probably the result of the many other linguistic groups. Table 5.77 (mean=7. There is a non-uniform pattern in socioeconomic variables as well as in the ethnic variables.0 30.0 40.14 Frequency of Malayalam The standard deviation of Marathi is 11.0 12.0 Cases weighted by population Cases weighted by population Figure 5.13). This pattern is more apparent at the sub-regional scale rather than at the regional scale (Table 5.14).00 1000 Std.13 Frequency of Marathi Figure 5.68) at the regional scale and 3.6 N = 19127.0 60.00 0 10.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 57 6000 6000 5000 5000 4000 4000 3000 3000 2000 2000 Frequency Frequency 1000 Std.0 22.6) at the sub-regional scale (Figure 5.0 17. Dev = 3.9 N = 19127.77 Mean = 6. The descriptive analysis suggests that the urban social pattern is not defined by homogeneous socioeconomic classes. The standard deviation of Malayalam is 3.0 0 2.5 10.5 25.5 15.73 (mean=46.73 Mean = 46. Dev = 15.6).0 7.73 (mean=53.0 70.19 Spatial Pattern of Variables Variable Regional scale Number of earning members Uniform Income Non-uniform Education Non-uniform Demographics Uniform Family size Uniform Type of housing Non-uniform Tenure Non-uniform Last place of residence Non-uniform Hindu Uniform Muslim Non-uniform Marathi Non-uniform Malayalam Non-uniform .0 50. The standard deviation is very large showing some areas have more Malayalamspeaking persons than others leading to the conclusion that ethnic enclaves do exist.19).26 (mean=7.5 5.22) at the regional scale and 15.0 20. The distribution of families with Marathi as their native language is not very uniform (Figure 5.5 20.0 80.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 58 5.3. However.468 explains 43.824 and 0.Nodes 5. Cumulatively these three components explain 89. nearly 90% of the variance of the 8 nodes lies within a 3-dimensional space. Hence. tenure. The variables were weighted by the total population of each node.818 explains a variation of 22.1 Principal Components Analysis (PCA) The analysis at the regional scale uses the eight nodes (townships) as the cases for the study.3 Regional Scale .985. The principal components obtained from the rotated component matrix are used as they are more simple to interpret. religion and language.771% variation and Component 3 with an eigenvalue of 1. Thus.347% of the variation. The rotated component matrix is used here for interpretation and discussion (Appendix D). explaining 90% of the variance. The communalities of all the variables are very high.18. The components with eigenvalues greater than 1 will be used to explain the variance. Component 1 with an eigenvalue of 3. The use of PCA as a method of analysis was limited by the small number of cases. The number of variables used in the analysis could not be more than the number of cases. income. The constructs described on page 1 suggest the need for 12 variables. migration. as PCA limited the number of variables to 8.845% of the variation. and three components were obtained. . the variables selected were number of earning members. The outputs obtained from the SPSS program are used to determine which variables. and in a range of 0. family size. or principle components. A PCA was run.902 explains 23. are needed for the complete explanation of the difference in the data. Component 2 with an eigenvalue of 1. The total of the communality is 7. secondary school education. the assumption can be made that all the variables are significant and are useful for the study.728%.

These loadings help explain the contributions of the variables to each principal component.0 .5 1. components contribute more or less to the overall data association MIGRATN TENURE .5 1 loading 0.5 0.SIZE LANGUAGE va r i a b l e s Figure 5.0 .16 Loadings of Principal Components The eight original variables are combined linearly to define principal components.5 Component 1 Analysis weighted by population of each node .5 RELIGION 0 EARNER EDUCATN INCOME -0 .0 1.15 Components in Rotated Space 1.0 education income earner family size tenure religion language migration -. The loadings produced by the principal components analysis for the variables is used to create bar charts to better visualize the magnitude of the loading.5 Component 2 0. It does not directly express which. if any.5 C o m p o n e n ts 1.0 Component 3 0.0 -.5 -.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 59 Figure 5. 5 -1 FAM.

2 Cluster Analysis A cluster analysis was done using the scores obtained from the principal components analysis. Nerul. Vashi. Panvel. The three components correspond to family status. Kopar-khairane.3 Discussion The principal components analysis produced three components with eigenvalues above 1. As the analysis was constrained by the reduced number of variables. This analysis does not show any differentiation based on variables of ethnicity.3. Analysis of the raw data was not carried out because the SPSS program did not weight the raw data while running a cluster analysis.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 60 The three components are (Table 5. 5. The first cluster (Cluster 1) had the nodes Belapur and Kalamboli while the second cluster (Cluster 2) had the rest of the nodes. Airoli (Appendix E). only two clusters were formed. Sanpada. Cluster analysis of the scores from PCA ensured that the data was standardized in the same manner for both types of analysis.3. this PCA does not directly correspond to the descriptive analysis.20 Attributes of Principal Components Principal Components Variables Component 1 Family size Previous place of residence Tenure Component 2 Education Income Component 3 Number of earners Language Religion Name Family status Socioeconomic status Ethnic status with high number of earners.20): Table 5. 5. The cluster analysis shows that the two of the Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine Cluster 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+ Node Panvel Kopar Sanpada Nerul Airoli Vashi Belapur Kalamboli -+-----------------+ Cluster 1 -+ +-------------------------+ -------------------+ +---+ -------------+-------+ I I -------------+ +-----------------------+ I ---------------------+ I ---------------------------------------+---------+ ---------------------------------------+ Figure 5. As the number of cases was only 8. socioeconomic status and ethnic status.17 Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups) .

690 explains 24. Component 2 with an eigenvalue of 2. and three components were obtained. male and female population of the age group 25-45. 2651-4450.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 61 nodes are different from the other six. From the data. 5.4.Sectors of Vashi 5.75 explains 25. but interpretation would have been more difficult.1 Principal Components Analysis (PCA) The analysis at the sub-regional scale uses the 23 sectors (neighborhoods) of Vashi as the cases for the study. .21) Table 5. The variables were weighted by the total population of each node. These were: families with one earning member.01. The extracted sums of squared loadings of the first three components is cumulatively 72. Hindus and Muslims.463%. linguistic groups speaking Marathi and Malayalam. The rotated component matrix is used here for interpretation and discussion (Appendix F). 13 variables were selected for the analysis. More components could have been used. migration from Bombay.001% of the variation. household income range of Rs. and the high percentage of families in the selected income range for Kalamboli.21 Attributes of Principal Components Principal Components Variables Component 1 Education Income Ownership of house Previous place of residence Muslim Component 2 Marathi Component 3 Number of earners Malayalam Demographics Hindu Name Socioeconomic status and Muslim enclave Ethnic status Ethnic status with high number of earners. families with 4 or 5 members. tenure of house in the 1980s. The attributes of the principal components are (Table 5. explaining 73% of the variance.4 Sub-regional Scale . The main reason for this is the high variability in the language data set for Belapur. houses built by CIDCO. The PCA shows the communality of the 11 variables to be 8. Component 1 with an eigenvalue of 2. high school education.917%.581 explains a variation of 23.453% variation and Component 3 with an eigenvalue of 2. A PCA was run.

14.4 0. 2 -0 . The second cluster (Cluster 2) had sectors 12.4. Three clusters were formed using the 23 cases. WOMEN . 5.2 0 -0 . and the third cluster (Cluster 3) had all the rest of the 16 sectors (Appendix G). 17. The first cluster (Cluster 1) had had only sector 5. 6 -0 .6 0. These loadings help explain the contributions of the variables to each principal component. 28 and 29.2 Cluster Analysis A cluster analysis of the scores obtained from PCA was done.8 0.18 Loadings of Principal Components The bar chart explains the loadings of each variable on the component. These define which values contribute more or less significance to that particular component. 16A.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 62 C o m po ne nts 1 0. 8 -1 loadings EDUCATN MIGRATN RELGION1 LANGUAG1 LANGUAG2 OWNRSHIP RELGION2 EARNER INCOME MEN va r i a bl e s Figure 5. 4 -0 .

The first component is one which has a high socioeconomic component dominated by a Muslim population.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 63 Figure 5.75 to 2. it represents a majority of the population.58.3 Discussion The principal components analysis produced three equally important components with eigenvalues in the range of 2. The cluster analysis shows a segregation in Cluster 1 caused by high number of earners with a high percentage of households speaking Marathi and a low percentage of .4. This can be translated into a middle-class population. As the Marathi population is 53% of the total population. All the components are equally important and separated only by ethnic variables.19 Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups) Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine 0 5 10 15 20 +---------+---------+---------+---------+----Sector 2 6 1 4 16 20 9 10 15 26 21 3 7 9A 8 10A 14 29 12 17 16A 28 5 -+ -+---+ -+ +-+ -----+ +-----+ ---+---+ I ---+ +---+ -+-+ I I -+ +---+ I +-----------+ ---+ +-----+ I I Cluster 3 -------+ I I -----------------+ +---------+ ---+---+ I I ---+ +---------+ I I -------+ +-----------+ I ---------+-------+ +---------+ ---------+ I I -------+---------------+ I I -------+ I I I -+---+ +---------------+ I Cluster 2 -+ +-------------+ I I -----+ +---+ I -------------------+ I Cluster 1 -------------------------------------------------+ 5. The second component has only the population speaking Marathi. Each of the three components have an ethnic variable in them. It appears that there is a segregation based on the ethnic component. The third component is the economically active age group dominated by the Hindu population. Again. this component also describes the general population. as Hindus are 83% of the population.

and distinctly driven by an ethnic component at the sub-regional scale.6 Conclusion The analysis of the data shows that the urban social pattern appears to be non-uniform at the regional scale. At the sub-regional scale as there is a smaller percentage of CIDCO-built houses. 5.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 5: Presentation of Data 64 households speaking Malayalam. In summary. PCA and cluster analysis brings forth the variability of the data and shows which variables and which cases cluster together. . although the government policy was to prevent the formation of ethnic enclaves. individual households have exercised their choice. The descriptive analysis of individual variables also shows this non-uniform pattern. Cluster 2 shows a dominance of households speaking Marathi. the outcome of the implementation strategy shows otherwise. and a strong ethnic component is seen.

a brief interpretation of the regional scale is described here before proceeding to the detailed interpretation at the sub-regional scale. Cluster 1 has two nodes close to each other and BOMBAY Airoli Kopar-Khairane Kalamboli Vashi Sanpada Nerul Arabian Sea Belapur Panvel possibly influenced by one another.1 shows the spatial distribution of the clusters. All the other nodes are in the second cluster.1 Regional Scale Figure 6. Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Figure 6. However.Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion A preliminary interpretation of the data analysis in the previous chapter shows the details of the social urban pattern are best seen in the sub-regional scale. 6.1 Cluster of Nodes of Navi Mumbai .

previous place of residence and tenure while cluster 2 is affected by income. Cluster 1 is influenced by family size. education and language.SIZE 40 INCOME Kopar-khaira 20 LANGUAGE MIGRATN 0 -20 1 Sanpada Kopar-khaira RELIGION TENURE 2 Figure 6.3 shows the strength of variables. 1 2 Figure 6. 100 Panvel 80 EARNER EDUCATN 60 FAM. Cluster 1 is linked to Factor score 1 0 score 1 and cluster 2 to score 2 -1 Factor score 2 -2 while score 3 exerts almost equal Factor score 3 67116 67116 67116 14543 14543 14543 -3 N= influence on both cluster.2 Average Linkage between Factor Scores Analysis weighted by population Further.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 66 3 Figure 6. have an equal influence on the two clusters. The variables.3 Average Linkage between Variables Analysis weighted by population . number of earners and religion.2 shows that different factor scores influence the two Airoli 2 1 clusters. Figure 6. which are contributing to the clustering.

4 Clustering of the Sectors of Vashi Cluster 3 (red) has sectors 1.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 67 6. 16. 9. 16A. 14. 21. Cluster 2 (green) has sectors 2. 4. 20.2 Sub-regional Scale At the sub-regional scale. and 26. 17. 12. The grouping of the sectors into three clusters is shown in Figure 6. 10. 3. . 28 and 29. 28 12 29 26 10 15 9 10A 9A 8 7 5 6 4 1 3 2 17 16 14 20 16A 21 Figure 6. More variables could also be used to study these cases. and Cluster 1 (yellow) has only sector 5. 15. 10A. there were twenty-three sectors. 8. 9A.4. 6.

income and the language Marathi dominate it. This is a socioeconomic construct. . Cluster 1 is Factor Score 1 8 0 -2 influenced by all three scores. 1 2 3 Figure 6.5 Average Linkage between Groups Analysis weighted by population 120 EARNER 100 80 EDUCATION INCOME MARATHI 60 40 20 0 -20 1 2 3 MALAYALAM MEN MIGRATION OWNRSHIP HINDU MUSLIM WOMEN Figure 6. Cluster 3 is an outlier. but dominated by an ethnic variable. Cluster 1 is also differentiated by Malayalam.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 68 Figure 6. Factor Score 2 -4 cluster 2 more strongly by score 2 Factor Score 3 1892 1892 1892 738 738 738 -6 N = 16497 1649716497 and cluster 3 by score 3.6 Average Linkage between Variables Figure 6. Ownership. Cluster 2 is the most significant. another ethnic variable.6 shows the average linkage between the variables.5 shows that the 4 2 three clusters are influenced by different factor scores.

The colors red and orange are immediately above. The two variables selected were income and number of earners. the study of many cities across the world shows that the socioeconomic construct displays a sector pattern. Figure 6.8 Distribution of Number of Earners Figure 6. In both maps the median range is represented by the color purple. Figure 6.9).9 Distribution of Income The pattern that emerges on mapping of the number of earners and income variables does not show any particular pattern (Figure 6.7 Hypothetical Sector Pattern for Socioeconomic Variables Figure 6.8. .Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 69 6.7 shows a scenario that could be expected from the mapping of any of the socioeconomic variables.2. and immediately below the median value while yellow and green represent the outliers or extremes.1 Socioeconomic Status and Sector Theory As discussed in the literature review. Figure 6.

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion

70

6.2.2 Family Status and Concentric Zone Theory The study of many cities across the world shows that the family status construct displays a concentric pattern. Figure 6.10 shows a possible scenario in Vashi for a variable representing the family status. The variable selected to describe the family status is ownership of apartment. In the descriptive analysis, this variable showed a great degree of variability. The purple color represents the range within which the mean falls. The colors red and orange are immediately above, and immediately below the median value while yellow and green represent the outliers or extremes. Figure 6.10 Hypothetical Concentric Zone Pattern for Family Status Variables The number of sectors which falls within the mean range is very small. Sectors which have slightly more or slightly less percentage of apartments built by CIDCO are represented by red and orange. It is important to note that five sectors are colored green while one sector is yellow (Figure 6.11). This shows a high degree of variability in the data.

Figure 6.11 Distribution of Ownership of Apartment

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion

71

6.2.3 Ethnic Status and Multiple Nuclei Theory Multiple Nuclei theory supports the spatial pattern of the ethnic factor. A possible solution is mapped for any ethnic variable in Figure 6.12. A language variable and a religion variable were selected from the data set for mapping. The mapping of language and religion variables shows a segregation of both of them. Yellow and green colors, which represent the extremes in the data set, are present in both the variables (Figure 6.13, Figure 6.14). This is especially true of the variable Muslim, which shows a largely non-uniform distribution.

Figure 6.12 Hypothetical Multiple Nuclei Pattern for Ethnic Variables

Figure 6.13 Distribution of Households speaking Marathi

Figure 6.14 Distribution of Households which follow Islam

Malathi Ananthakrishnan

Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion

72

6.3 Summary The set of figures below shows the mapping of the cluster analysis as well as the individual factor scores.

Figure 6.15 Clustering of Sectors

Figure 6.16 Score 1

Figure 6.17 Score 2

Figure 6.18 Score 3

Although the four maps above (Figure 6.15, Figure 6.16, Figure 6.17, Figure 6.18) show that there is a different colored sector within a group of one color, the multiple nuclei pattern is not very obvious. However, looking at the descriptive analysis, principal components analysis, cluster analysis and the mapping collectively, the multiple nuclei pattern can be inferred. The descriptive analysis brought out the fact that the spatial pattern is

the pattern is strongly influenced by factors as year of occupation of the house and reasons for moving. The aggregation of household data at the sector scale has limited this research from drawing out the finer details of the spatial pattern. As Navi Mumbai has been constructed over the last 25 years. In conclusion. The clustering indicates that some sectors are dissimilar from others. The policy of the government to promote social heterogeneity influenced the type of residential construction in Navi Mumbai. The principal components analysis shows that the cause of this spatial pattern is ethnicity.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 6: Interpretation and Discussion 73 not uniform or heterogeneous. 6. This is the multiple nuclei pattern of an ethnically driven spatial organization. as the pattern is not uniform. However. . • • putting forth a new theory to generalize social pattern in planned cities in India. scaling down the study to stories of individual households to reach a more detailed level of interpretation.4 Potential Utility of the Research This research is a starting point for further studies in spatial patterns in Navi Mumbai. examining the policy instruments and policy goals. The mapping of individual variables and factor scores verifies that within a fairly homogeneous group of sectors there exists a dissimilar sector. Future research could involve: • • Delineating the pattern at intervals of time to study the change in pattern. a pattern did emerge at this present stage. the policy has not been successful.

1991). However. The government hoped that this would distribute people based on socioeconomics and break barriers based on religion and language. and provide an infrastructure which would promote ethnic heterogeneity. raise the standard of living and reduce social inequalities. Political and administrative boundaries in independent India were decided on linguistic lines. The Muslims came to India as invaders. The other feature that is unique to India is the existence of many languages. Households would normally place this preference based on how much they can pay. This particular case study was chosen for two reasons: Navi Mumbai is the first planned city that is not a capital city or industrial township. It was hoped that a majority of the residential construction could be achieved though a policy of swavalambhan (self-reliance) and swatantrya (mutual selfhelp). The review of secondary source material shows that urban social patterns have been studied across the world. Navi Mumbai is separated from the metropolis of Bombay only by the Thane Creek. Every effort was taken by the government to make Navi Mumbai an independent city and not a suburb or satellite city to Bombay. The government also decided to take up most of the initial building construction. The government had a very practical interest in avoiding ethnic confrontation. The religious divide was used in the partition of united India into India and Pakistan. Navi Mumbai is still dependent on Bombay for much of its activity. Three leading theories put forth were concentric zone theory. The segregation is attributed to the ethnic variables. Religious tensions have always existed in India. Partition and the first years of independence were. sector theory and multiple nuclei theory. and formulated a policy to support it. Traditional Indian cities have always had a strong ethnic component in their urban social pattern. The culture of this race of people is very different from the Hindus. thus. India. and the government had a specific social and political agenda. Ethnic enclaves have always characterized traditional settlements in India. Housing would be allotted according to the preference of size of dwelling provided by applicants. Areas dominated by Muslims are common in most cities in India. Bombay is the financial and economic capital of India. The Hindu laws and treatises specified residential locations for different castes. strongly influenced by ethnic variables.Chapter 7: Conclusion The purpose of this thesis is to delineate the urban social pattern of Navi Mumbai. These theories explain the urban social pattern . religion and language. Planning policies in Navi Mumbai were strongly influenced by the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi. support an aggressive industrialization policy. The thesis addresses this social objective. This was the first cause of separation in residential neighborhoods. The important objectives of Navi Mumbai were: attract some of the immigrant population. It was also influenced by the concept of the city as a melting pot (Engel. The draft development plan of Navi Mumbai had very strong functional and social objectives. One of the social objectives in the planning of Navi Mumbai was to use the government machinery to diversify the spatial distribution of the population based on socioeconomic criteria. caste.

and ethnic segregation showed a multiple nuclei arrangement. family size and type of house under family status. Heterogeneity of the population is detected if these three constructs emerge from the analysis.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 7: Conclusion 75 and its change over time. The methodologies were techniques of multivariate analysis. family status and ethnic status. the family component showed a concentric ring pattern. income and education under the socioeconomic construct. The second theory. The hypothesis put forth in this study is: no significant difference in key variables is expected and hence no social segregation will occur. Using the secondary source material as reference. The constructs of the social area analysis have been found to correspond to the three theories. In Navi Mumbai. If H0 is false. special emphasis has to be given to the ethnic components. The software package SPSS was used to do the analysis. That would indicate that enclaves have not been caused by individual variables. The multiple nuclei theory proposes that patterns could be arranged around several centers. grouping of variables is expected to be under the three constructs. socioeconomic. and the sub-regional scale of the sectors (neighborhoods) of Vashi node. The first methodology is a descriptive analysis. Mobility and immigration are the key variables of this theory. Twenty-three sectors of Vashi were then analyzed. In the case of Navi Mumbai this is important because of the policy to prevent segregation based on ethnic variables. At the regional scale the analysis was done between the eight nodes to study their similarity. Wedge patterns representing income groups are the outcome of the theory. sector theory. a cluster analysis was done of the cases of the data set. The other variables selected were number of earning members. A variation in the data greater than 15% on each side of the mean is considered as unequal distribution. Since. family status and ethnic status. This hypothesis is put forth on the assumption that the social agenda put forth in the Development Plan has been successfully implemented. the analysis allowed a more detailed interpretation. Analysis was done to map the urban social pattern of many cities across the world. The methodology used was that of social area analysis. is an analysis primarily of economic variables. The second methodology is principal components analysis (PCA). then the pattern will be explained using the existing theories. Succession and invasion based on social and economic status is the basic assumption of this theory. and histogram drawn of the variable selected from each data set. The concentric zone theory relates the pattern of cities to population mobility. The data at both scales is tabulated. Four methods were used to analyze the data. The PCA reduces the dimensionality of the data into a more interpretable form. The similarity between the . the scale was smaller. These scales were the regional scale of the nodes (townships). Analysis of data was done at two scales. The variables selected under each construct were drawn out of experience of the researchers. Social area analysis broadly classifies variables into three constructs. Two religion variables and two language variables have been selected representing the ethnic construct. and demographics. The variables selected are reduced into a smaller number of constructs. Next. Generally the socioeconomic model showed a sectored pattern. These are socioeconomic construct.

None of the variables selected display a uniform distribution. physical design and the institutional framework need to be examined closely to realize their full impact and to understand the results in their context. The hypothesis was proved false. The principal components analysis shows that the variables are not grouping under the three constructs. Even in the houses built by the government resale has taken place. thereby. 2. be explained using the theories of urban social patterns. The pattern could. • Was this an experiment in enhancing quality of life or is it a method for the government to exert social control? • The concept of the melting pot has to be re-examined. The interpretation of the descriptive analysis shows that the distribution of most of the variables is not uniform.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Chapter 7: Conclusion 76 nodes and sectors is determined from this. In Vashi only 64% of the houses were built and allotted by the government. graphically representing the analysis. The interpretation of the analysis also involves comparing the descriptive analysis. All three new constructs are dominated by an ethnic variable. they were mapped under expected and observed conditions. The research brings to the fore many questions than answers. allotment procedure. A moral analysis of segregation has to be done in the context of the Indian culture. and clustering to the urban social patterns detailed in the secondary source material. Redistribution shows that people have aligned themselves based on ethnic variables. The urban social pattern is best explained as one of multiple nuclei. Distribution was originally controlled through allotment of government-built houses based only on purchasing power (and indirectly socioeconomic status). This can be attributed to two reasons: 1. As the socioeconomic variables are expected to take a sectored pattern. however. Control is maximum when the government owns all the houses. The overall pattern of Navi Mumbai is one of multiple nuclei. The center is an ethnic enclave surrounded by socioeconomic variables. The objective. The spatial distribution of households is still characterized by traditional Indian values of ethnic segregation. . the socioeconomic variables also show separation. family status variables concentric zones and the ethnicity variables a multiple nuclei arrangement. although the policy is noble in its aims and aspiration. The extreme value range in the mapping is important because it represents the dissimilarity in the distribution. it has not succeeded at this stage. The policy has not facilitated the distribution of the population based on socioeconomic criteria. This is especially true of the ethnic variables. How important is it to promote integration when self-sorting has been the natural process? • Can the Modernist synthesis seeking homogeneity in heterogeneity be used as a template for the Indian culture? • This leads to the question: is the objective valid? Does it have to be redefined or is the implementation strategy to be modified? At this stage it appears that a detailed analysis of the policy instrument and policy goals must be undertaken. The distribution of these variables shows segregation. This indicates that the urban social pattern is strongly influenced by ethnicity. In conclusion. However. The final stage was mapping of the clusters.

Bougle. The Basic writings of Ernest W. C. al. G. A. A.. A. M. XIV. Burgess. C. New York: Oxford University Press. Construction. Banerjee. eds. 1979. The Timeless Way of Building. 1993. “The Modern City” in The Elusive City: five Centuries of Design. Gupta. "The Essence and Reality of the Caste System" in Social Stratification. Bradley. Delhi: Oxford University Press. India’s Social Crisis: An Essay on Capitalism. 1973. 1965: 115-129. The role of town-plan analysis in the study of the medieval Irish town in Slater. and Thorner. ed. 1996. S. Leicester: Leicester University Press. C. and Mills. R. 2. Williamson. 1965. Individualism and Indian Civilization. Delhi: Oxford University Press. S. E. D. Bombay: Government Press. New York: Harper & Row. Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. 1986. et. 1989. D. Barnett. Bogue. A Pattern Language: Towns. Bose. Banerjee-Guha. Bombay: Oxford University Press. T. "Urban Development Process in Bombay: Planning for Whom?" In Patel. 1990: 39-59. BMRPB. India’s Urbanization 1901-2001. Bombay: Tata McGraw Hill. Metropolis 2000. J. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. J. S. Alexander. 77 . D. New York: Oxford University Press. No. New York: Plenum Press. and Baer. 1992. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology. 1984. Regional Plan for Bombay Metropolitan Region 1970-1992. T. The Contemporary Scenario. Buildings. 1992: 64-73. Chicago: University of Chicago. et.Bibliography Alexander. Indian Urbanization and Economic Growth since 1960. J. The Built Form of Western Cities. Ambition and Miscalculation. Architecture + Design. 21. 1974. London: Routledge. "The Study of Caste Ranking in India". Chicago: University of Chicago. W. Becker. Banerjee-Guha. ed. Indian Cities: characteristics and correlates. 1978. S. T. J. 1987. C. Bose. Angotti. Q. Beyond the Neighborhood Unit: Residential Environments and Public Policy. ed. C. Ahmad. Socialism. al. G. Berreman. Vol.

Correa. J. M. Das Gupta. New York: Columbia University Press. P. Belapur: CIDCO. 1970. Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House. 78 . Cadwallader. CIDCO. and Hay. Third World Urbanization. 1977. H. The Built Form of Western Cities. Town-plan analysis in an American setting: cadastral processes in Boston and Omaha in Slater. Drew. Browder. Language Conflict and National Development: Group Politics and national Language Policy in India. Washington D. CIDCO. R. “Evolution of the Concept”. 1992. Bombay: Government Press. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. M. 1974. Cornelius. Urbanization in Developing Countries: A Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis. J.. London: Methuen.: APA Press. 1990. J. The Draft Development Plan. J. O. How Cities Grew: The Historical Sociology of Cities. The Third World City. W. 1997. C. J. Architecture + Design. Religion and Politics in North India. N. 1987. New Delhi: Sage Publications.: The Florham Park Press Inc. C. CIDCO. C. P. R. eds. Cherunilam. Cambridge: MIT Press. D. ed.. Language. The Planner’s Use of Information. The Political Sociology of Cityward Migration in Latin America: Towards an Empirical Theory in Abu-Lughod. Mar-Apr. and Godfrey. London: Cambridge University Press. Rainforest Cities: Urbanization. XIV. A. Development Planning and Structural Inequalities. Dandekar. Leicester: Leicester University Press. Development. Madison. Belapur: CIDCO. C. Correa. Comhaire. Drakakis-Smith. 1985. W. Vol. J. Le Corbusier as I Knew Him in The Open Hand: Essays on Le Corbusier.Brass. 1971. Analytical Urban Geography: Spatial Patterns and Theories. V. The New Landscape: Urbanization in the Third World.. J. No. 1973. B. 1990: 142-170. 1989. F. Chicago: Maaroufa Press Inc. 1995. Sustainable Urban Development: Case Study of New Bombay. Cozen. T. 1984. 1997. 1971: 59-70. J. and Globalization of the Brazilian Amazon. 1988. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2. D'Souza. R. Twenty Years of Development. and Cahnman.

1977. Bombay: Govt. Readings in Urban Theory. Status and Power: The Caste System and its Implications" in Social Stratification. ed.. 1971. N. M. Hagget. 1995. S and Mehrotra. Cambridge: MIT Press. L "Hierarchy. New York: John Wiley and Sons. D. Mass. 1973. Hall. Le Corbusier at Chandigarh in The Open Hand: Essays on Le Corbusier. 1978. New Delhi: Vikas Publications. “Building New Bombay: The Future of the Indian Metropolis” in Identity. Gumperz. 1988. D. C. Bombay: Government Press. New York: Barnes & Noble Books. 1992b: 1-23. Language in Social Groups. 1992a: 110-143. Gupta. D. 1970. Press. Bombay: Oxford University Press. 1974. P. The Urbanization of the Third World. 1992. 1966. J. Delhi: Oxford University Press. and Campbell. ed. A Spatial Analysis of Urban Community Development Policy in India. Bombay: India Book House Pvt. New York: St. Gupta. Ltd. Stanford: Stanford University campus. Locational Analysis in Human Geography. Fainstein. 1986: 44-62. 1992: 471-492. 79 . Master Plan for New Bombay. Bombay: The Cities Within. Gupta. Engel. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Government of Maharashtra. J. Dwivedi. Delhi: Oxford University Press. V. Malik. ed. D. D. Report of the Committee appointed for Bombay-Panvel and Poona regions. S. Berkeley: Center for Environmental Design Research. “Social Inequality and Social Stratification in India” in determinants of Social Status in India” ed. Cities and Planning: The Case of Bombay. Dumont. P.D’Souza.: Blackwell Publishers. eds. J. Cambridge. Ganguli. Harris. Gupta. The City in the Third World. Gandhi's Social Philosophy. 1980. Dwyer. D. S. D. Gadgil Planning Committee. R. "Hierarchy and Difference" in Social Stratification. Gugler. New York: Oxford University Press. N. S. Economic Development. 1996. B. Gupta. 1965. "Continuous Hierarchies and Discrete Castes" in Social Stratification. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study. Martin’s Press. ed. J. Fry. Modernity in the Traditional Contemporary Environment.

New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Urban Development in the Third World. New Delhi: Government of India. 1979. P. J. H. 1939. 1993. L. 1985. 1971. Delhi: Oxford University Press. P..Hartshorn. 1961. M. 1994. P. F and Nystuen. 1977. T. Hoyt. L. T. V. R. Hodson. L. Knox. Jacobs. D. Cities. L. C. Emerging Trends of Urbanization in India. P. Kolars. J. New Haven: Yale University Press.: Federal Housing Administration. H. Hough. Khan. Interpreting the City: An Urban Geography. R. Muslims and Indian Nationalism. U. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Herbert. Space and Behavior: The Elements of Urban Geography. 1990. Jain. King. and Prakash. K. New York: Concept Media Pvt. 1992. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Nehru and the Politics of India. A. 1974. 1984. England: Longman. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. New York: Random House. Journal of American Institute of Planners. Charles Correa. Urbanization and National Development. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. and Won Bae Kun. Knox. G. The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Karan. Washington. The Pattern of Indian Towns: A Study in Urban Morphology. Herbert. D. 1997. M. D. Cities in Space: Cities in Place. Karachi: Oxford University Press. 1957: 70-75. vol. 1995. H. M. Foreword in Living Architecture: Indian. J. The Great Divide: Britain-India-Pakistan. 23. Kaura. C. Ltd. Ghosh. D. New York: Praeger Publishers. Henn. Geography: The Study of Location. Columbia: South Asia Books. W. V. 1969. Jakobsen. Out of Place: Restoring Identity to the Regional Landscape. Urbanization: An Introduction to Urban Geography. J. Maryland: Barnes & Noble. 1990. eds. J. and Golledge. Culture and Environment. J. 80 . Urban Social Geography: An Introduction. and Thomas. King. D. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

E. Lozano. 1986. P. 1992: 49-60. R. The Southeast Asian City.. New Delhi: NIUA. Mar-Apr 1997. T. London: G. S. The Development Plan for Greater Bombay: A Case Study of Urban Planning and Development vis-a-vis the Environment. R. Brown and Company. 1972. and Becker. VIII. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House. Koter. 2. Le Corbusier. 1991. Kostof. T. M. Berkeley: University of California. Million Cities of India. XIV. New York: Oxford University Press. 1991. Poland 18251973 in Slater. R. G. 1978. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Meier. "Multiple Reference in Indian Caste Systems" in Social Stratification. E.Lodz. 1986. H. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Praeger Inc. Kosambi. R. Gupta. McGee. 18801980.. S. From New Bombay to Navi Mumbai. Lowder. M. S. The Built Form of Western Cities. 1986. Inside Third World Cities. Vol. 1990: 109-141. Misra. 1971. ed. Nov-Dec. Marg vol. M. Mehrotra. 1978. Bombay in Transition: The Growth and Social Ecology of a Colonial City. Mehrotra. The morphological evolution of a nineteenth century city centre.. The Urbanization Process in the Third World. 15. No. R. Architecture + Design. No. Architecture + Design. 81 . McGee. Studies in Indian Urban Development. Mills. London: Croom Helm. G. Bell and Sons Ltd. Community Design and the Culture of Cities. One Place. 1984. no. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meaning through History. D. Vol. Bombay: Popular Prakashan. 1986.Kopardekara. New York: Frederick A. Two Worlds. ed. National Institute of Urban Affairs. C. 6. M. D. The Master Plan. 1. Marriott. 1990. Resource Conserving Urbanism in South Asia: The Development of Greater Bombay. Cambridge: University Press. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. Bombay 1961. T. Leicester: Leicester University Press. Social Aspects of Urban development: A Case Study of the Pattern of Urban Development in Developing Countries. Publishers. 1967. Boston: Little.

A. M and Franklin. 1955. Sarin. 1979. Clarence. Portes. I. eds. T. MD Publications.. A. Mar-Apr 1997: 120124. The Built Form of Western Cities. Social Area Analysis. Shevky. S. Chicago: Maaroufa Press Inc. Chicago: Maaroufa Press Inc. Urbanization and Urban Systems in India. S. Patel. S. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.. Delhi: Oxford University Press. House. Mar-Apr 1997: 38-44. 1949. 1975. UWIST.Parab. R. with special reference to Tanzania in Abu-Lughod. Leicester: Leicester University Press. D. J. and Hay. Ramachandran. W. Bombay: Mosaic of Modern Culture. R. 1985. Patel. Romaya. Urban Latin America: The Political Condition from Above and Below in AbuLughod. “The thirty-year Journey”. No. Singh. Shevky. Peach. D. Colonialism and the Spatial Structure of Underdevelopment: Outline of an Alternative Approach. English medieval new towns with composite plans: evidence from the Midlands in Slater. 1971: 59-70. Singh. Third World Urbanization. “The Birth of a New City”. Martin’s Press. 1971: 59-70. Spatial Characteristics of Urban Settlements in a part of India in Emerging frontiers of Urban Settlement Geography. eds. New Delhi. G. Cardiff: Department of Town Planning. Architecture + Design. 1990: 60-82. G. Vol. S. The Form of Cities. 1995: 27-34. ed. D. New York: Committee on Regional Plan of New York and its environs. Perry. Vol. Scargill. and Thorner. Rapoport. 1989. and Hay. Neighborhood and Community Planning. Urban Social Segregation. R. S. B. H. 1996. ed. Los Angeles: University of California Press. M. XIV. 2. eds. Bombay: Oxford University Press. Chandigarh as a Place to Live in The Open Hand: Essays on Le Corbusier. 1969. XIV. Architecture + Design. Third World Urbanization. 1929. Form and Culture.. C. T. J. Alejandro. and Bell. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Shelter. 82 . Services and the Urban Poor. E. London: Longman. E and Williams. Slater. Cambridge: MIT Press. The Social Areas of Los Angeles. 2. New York: St. No. R. M. Slater. R. 1977. B. ed.

New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Gupta. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. "Varna and Caste" in Social Stratification. R.. Trancik. Spatial Decentralization: A Case Study of New Bombay and Cairo. J. ed. E. Gupta. 1992. D. 1990. Living Architecture: Indian. N. The Continuing City: Urban Morphology in Western Civilization. Tindall. 1992b: 28-35. New Delhi: Penguin Books India Ltd. 1992.Srinivas. Finding Lost Space. Nairobi: UNCHS. 1992a: 312-326. D. The Urban Mosaic: Towards a Theory of Residential Differentiation. Delhi: Oxford University Press. 83 . Cambridge: University Press. City of Gold: The Biography of Bombay. 1986. M. 1971. D. UNCHS. New York: Grosset & Dunlap. ed. Timms. Volwahsen. M. "Mobility in a Caste System" in Social Stratification. N. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Vance. 1969. Srinivas. G. A.

Glossary of Terms Term Cuadra Jali Masjid Padas Panchayati Pucca Purdahs Purushasukta Rashtrabasha Swadeshi Swatantrya Swavalambhan Vastupurusha mandala Vastushastra Meaning Spanish measurement Carved screens Mosque Subdivisions of the cosmic universe Self-government Durable Enclosure Hindu treatise Language of the State Fullest utilization of local resources Self-motivation and self-help Self-reliance Terrestrial representation of the cosmic universe Science of architecture and planning .

G. . Bombay Municipal Corporation decided to prepare a development plan for Greater Bombay. S. The Bombay Metropolitan regional Plan was approved by the State government. D.Appendix A March 1958 July 1958 February 1959 July 1964 March 1965 March 1966 January 1967 July 1967 January 1970 February 1970 March 1970 March 1971 August 1973 October 1973 Study group on Greater Bombay set up under the chairmanship of Mr. CIDCO was formed. R. A Committee under Dr. CIDCO published its Draft Development Plan. Bombay Metropolitan and Regional Planning Board was constituted. The Gadgil Committee recommended regional planning legislation and regional planning boards. Gadgil was appointed to formulate broad principles of regional planning for Bombay and Poona. The study group on Greater Bombay recommended a rail-cum-road bridge across the Thane creek. Barve. Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act 1966 was passed. CIDCO was designated as New Town Development Authority for Navi Mumbai. State government notified privately owned land in Navi Mumbai for acquisition. The Board published the Draft Plan with recommendations to set up a twin city. Development plan for greater Bombay was submitted to the State Government.

One discovered that with 7 types of roads.Appendix B The 7Vs (les sept voies) The 7V Rule was studied in 1950 at the UNESCO’s request (Le Corbusier. 1961). the man of the mechanical civilization could: cross continents: V1 arrive in town: V1 go to essential public services: V2 cross at full speed. . without interruption. where schools and sports grounds are located: V7. the territory of the town: V3 dispose of immediate accesses to daily needs: V4 reach the door of his dwelling: V5 and V6 send youths to the green areas of each sector.

83 17 61.48 7 62.16 1.35 7.26 23.67 28.43 2.57 8.81 7.37 11.72 2.22 std dev 9.31 20.26 4.89 2.76 2.01 25.16 30.64 3.86 0.03 1.86 28 52.44 2.07 30.77 21 63.15 5.09 16 65.60 24.25 .17 8.54 0.38 3.51 26 77.28 21.57 15 72.00 35.49 3.19 19.43 9.15 9.09 8.Appendix C Number of earning members Sector 1 2 3 no.43 12 65.89 4.22 26.42 5.00 0.79 4 1.06 5.00 29 82.23 21.85 3.83 0.42 2.63 2.41 6.16 10A 50.31 3.04 26.13 6.08 5.68 16.89 5.28 3.10 0.69 29. 1 64.92 9 73.99 3 68.60 16A 71.57 23.29 4.33 6.76 1.38 38.64 3.96 27.79 40.73 0.71 11.59 27.81 4 70.08 8 52.48 2.52 1.76 9A 74.39 2.25 11.58 9.64 5 46.40 6.52 18.01 6 65.81 1.26 2 57.23 20 69.62 mean 66.77 10 74.00 0.29 22.70 14 77.58 20.

48 27.66 9.80 5.92 21.00 29 0.82 36.2651.90 14.11 1.00 4.63 40.00 2.86 21.55 30.28 18.4451.57 25.68 34.00 35.41 8.96 33.00 28 0.39 4.48 0.49 23.41 37.94 37.15 16 1.59 9.33 11.77 22.10 23.18 25.78 17.56 7.10 27.16 12.82 2.97 0.48 6.20 4.45 6.26 16A 0.15 15.26 12.45 12.61 16.26 1.89 45.Household Income Sector upto 1251.47 12.45 mean 2.84 18.48 39.64 6.19 16.47 0.90 24.94 4 0.77 26.00 10.87 0.35 8.75 6 2.39 34.15000+ no.59 2.45 5.40 8.00 0.14 10.10 15.58 0.02 4.76 8 0.13 3.90 2 1.20 3. Rs.78 10A 0.72 44.28 4.77 14.15 8.38 7.45 38.07 0.57 1.81 16.92 3.22 3.59 18.14 25.47 28.65 0.67 7.125 2650 4450 7500 10000 15000 0 1 3.39 20.46 8.36 26.30 7 11.08 32.53 1.97 9 2.62 3 1.09 13.00 10.41 12.10001.00 25.07 18.62 7.19 20 6.00 0.47 15.7500.46 17.71 34.97 28.09 39.36 36.27 7.39 31.07 35.49 22.77 12 13.18 15 0.00 16.51 5.02 7.37 11.18 10.00 4.00 17.97 7.06 9A 1.16 24.04 4.29 8.21 stddev 3.70 17.70 3.63 4.47 26 0.51 24.88 17 0.42 .52 11.46 21.00 0.11 24.00 21 2.23 10 1.92 30.73 47.09 2.49 3.76 0.15 9.07 13.35 14 0.00 20.55 42.99 23.18 6.75 26.72 0.90 11.00 24.49 4.53 1.86 10.38 10.74 5 2.00 35.74 28.15 1.76 23.17 22.87 30.89 37.79 18.52 4.

74 2.63 20 19.07 8.80 17.15 13.37 2.13 51.18 3.40 1.50 20.81 14.47 28.24 10.31 10 3.01 0.35 10A 1.72 30.01 15.61 2.94 7.65 0.60 9.00 mean 3.41 14.52 31.90 32.25 2.74 40.32 3.06 4.80 9 3.98 7.64 0.47 2.85 34.87 15 4.43 2.30 59.67 4.14 0.06 2.81 42.48 16A 2.11 34.90 22.65 1.94 4.15 1.54 33.91 17 1.35 10.79 3.92 2.92 5.87 5.97 1.98 31.64 4.30 1.00 26 3.06 2.94 43.03 50.71 3.00 5.69 26.48 5 3.16 2.03 34.18 7.06 8.19 4.24 44.03 9.75 27.41 0.00 29 1.55 3.23 3.95 2.95 13.38 8.81 5.73 2.63 1.47 8.64 4.82 30.63 4.09 11.82 15.55 2.43 22.34 16 3.85 5.87 9.03 44.12 1.38 37.78 5.00 21 13.91 5.45 6.52 1.44 37.14 7.95 9.61 9.92 3 2.45 0.07 1.68 4.81 0.44 1.24 0.43 4.35 2.06 1.71 34.24 8.02 4.89 20.38 3.77 2.88 9.34 16.40 0.81 5.73 3.54 25.08 13.29 1.91 32.23 3.24 4.68 1.42 23.91 17.80 2.57 12.51 7.50 11.60 6 2.55 9.58 9.27 47.44 2.81 19.09 5.32 5.08 0.73 2.21 3.26 9A 1.64 0.27 12.71 7.42 2.26 48.38 4.14 0.49 16.01 45.28 11.60 17.12 0.59 29.00 14 2.72 9.27 10.05 2.68 4 1.97 0.09 46.64 2.83 2.26 1.68 5.81 4.03 4.69 31.25 28 0.28 10.94 3.71 9.82 1.97 9.25 11.92 36.11 2.39 35.11 12.54 2.68 12.98 29.46 5.59 3.50 14.58 2.Highest Level of Education Sector illiterat childre primar second high vo-tech BS MS PhD no.48 0.01 11.75 4.30 0. e n y ary school 1 3.44 7 1.18 27.15 3.95 8.19 0.05 0.89 6.65 4.41 8 4.45 11.15 2 3.37 .45 7.12 stddev 4.64 0.80 12 0.00 5.07 9.96 3.18 21.90 12.28 7.

69 11.34 3. 3 15 21 24 44 59 1 4.62 0.52 9.42 11.26 9.89 29 4.90 10A 2.86 3 4.98 8.59 5.73 14.46 2.71 18.97 5.60 8 3.60 12.60 6.57 20.19 11.42 14.76 12.29 6.29 2.93 13.40 7 2.59 5.00 8.88 28 5.02 3.59 4.10 2.16 31.59 7.56 14.40 4.45 8.41 16A 3.83 12.82 10.99 11.32 13.25 10.34 3.65 7.39 5.80 4.89 21.78 29.98 1.08 12.11 6.74 17.38 17.57 27.55 35.23 2.12 3.04 4.56 4 3.24 5 2.96 8.78 3.11 16.24 6.81 2.35 26 6.48 12.05 2.87 7.79 33.59 12 6.60 4.43 7.01 10.47 13.94 21.87 8.60 4.02 1.32 9.18 30.38 12.90 11.02 17.56 3.80 1.57 mean 4.12 2.66 8.54 3.74 4.84 19.78 6.24 12.20 14.82 29.36 16.51 2.77 15 3.44 2.68 7.66 1.35 29.60 23.04 4.65 5.32 2.74 16.52 2.77 5.Male Population Sector below 4.60 13.84 17 3.95 2.86 10.87 9.71 9A 4.28 31.40 34.87 3.29 3.65 46.20 12.61 4.87 5.89 12.04 10.70 3.66 6.84 8.77 34.49 19.82 16.63 3.12 2.84 12.73 9.35 3.12 14 5.13 3.89 11.56 8.76 13.02 3.39 4.26 3.88 17.26 2.03 31.22 4.69 6 2.97 37.27 3.35 3.12 7.81 2 4.36 32.40 20.46 42.97 35.67 12.07 6.54 4.90 .80 3.43 9.12 8.14 4.00 27.17 20 8.59 4.96 4.20 11.38 11.40 stddev 1.52 15.37 8.93 10.73 9 5.80 30.93 28.21 9.43 4.85 16.46 4.32 37.51 15.42 6.19 6.15 7.00 8.48 17.02 5.25 6.25 3.67 12.99 1.62 8.75 12.82 16.12 36.83 34.5 6 to 9 10 to 16 to 22 to 25 to 45 to 60+ no.00 21 4.18 33.97 5.34 20.29 6.91 2.14 5.41 1.67 3.58 16.42 10.30 5.91 14.91 5.04 7.68 10 5.57 10.87 4.45 14.93 2.44 15.48 15.35 16 3.

08 5.13 14.71 5.5 6 to 9 10 to 16 to 22 to 25 to 45 to 60+ no.94 8.08 2.16 3 4.82 5.32 12.07 7 2.14 32.89 4.55 12.98 3.39 13.35 2.03 20 8.60 7.39 11.51 10.07 10.57 13.72 10.71 38.25 9.71 12 6.82 9.13 16 4.87 2.72 38.93 11.40 2.43 4.29 6.11 2.03 6.13 5.93 3.58 15 4.25 16.84 3.77 3.80 5.66 2.86 40.72 2.62 3.14 4.32 3.44 4.31 5.43 4.99 3.35 3.77 17 4.11 11.22 39.83 5.96 3.91 10.07 12.06 45.66 4.29 12.35 3.46 8 4.20 5.01 9.96 11.34 4.Female Population Sector below 4.00 3.35 5.63 9.68 3.17 4.57 0.17 37.07 6.90 9.09 1.58 19.31 12.04 10.45 17.44 5.29 4 3.29 4.59 8.41 4.38 3.56 5.71 8.29 5.99 11.22 40.90 38.88 6.64 6.39 3.76 9.35 3.29 12.78 2.42 12.28 5.85 9.22 7.15 13.15 6.82 2.06 3.54 39.80 2.83 5.97 21 5.33 3.39 13.13 38.92 4.09 16A 4.57 1.79 34.00 5.82 10.86 7.68 12.74 36.96 7.29 9. 3 15 21 24 44 59 1 3.86 7.72 10.06 5.50 1.78 29 2.48 mean 4.00 13.01 10.78 11.22 13.64 6.89 2.56 47.14 6.35 1.21 14.35 38.61 10.55 9 5.87 17.14 20.84 34.43 12.55 7.27 7.46 18.78 5.40 11.83 4.86 12.53 7.36 9.14 26 7.06 0.48 1.18 52.55 4.18 22.66 17.98 9.11 11.87 7.88 2 4.39 11.16 37.57 3.06 15.07 6.09 1.77 9A 3.22 14.97 14.95 10.19 5.14 7.65 12.49 16.00 5.29 17.31 3.81 11.01 10A 6.06 28 2.96 10.87 8.32 15.52 6.27 41.06 2.98 10 5.60 4.80 5 4.77 6 3.46 1.28 stddev 1.71 6.88 16.30 33.57 3.86 6.58 42.60 11.32 12.83 .76 33.43 13.09 2.15 3.32 1.45 15.79 6.74 41.49 6.09 2.21 32.03 14 4.23 4.

29 7.02 2.83 14.57 19.56 25.79 33.19 20.18 2.21 54.72 15.48 9 1.43 44.15 20 0.33 41.Family Size Sector single 2 to 3 4 to 5 6 to 7 8 to 10 no.23 0.99 8 0.99 26 2.11 1.00 1.23 46.09 1.95 1.92 1.63 15.51 30.05 66.16 44.82 51.26 8.92 55.85 66.03 5 0.46 15 1.05 stddev 0.46 2.49 5.00 26.51 59.82 12.29 54.57 11.23 28.88 36.40 7 0.68 0.95 10A 1.82 6 3.41 63.97 19.40 9.95 1.49 64.93 32.99 0.30 9A 1.16 9.07 12.07 28.71 14.43 34.67 0.64 19.00 0.87 2 1.83 22.58 1.90 4.04 20.45 1.00 15.47 20. 1 2.38 14.93 16 0.87 52.86 11.36 0.82 9.86 1.29 50.30 44.35 13.00 19.88 10 0.92 12.23 36.66 22.19 3 1.46 54.57 57.14 14.52 62.14 4 0.00 58.67 47.90 17 1.24 16A 0.53 6.37 54.50 7.29 0.30 61.55 23.34 2.00 29 1.68 0.00 14 1.91 11.00 mean 1.00 28 0.64 1.14 2.71 24.67 14.86 12 0.28 21 0.17 54.64 10.56 50.53 .18 26.19 55.98 2.23 12.73 20.45 62.

00 0.96 0.00 0.00 6 92.Type of Housing Sector CIDCO Pvt.68 0.87 20.17 2.58 .00 0.84 36.33 0.18 0.23 26 100.62 0.00 17 0.07 0.00 0.38 9A 2.00 0.40 1.80 0.00 15 82.61 13.00 0.07 3.00 28 0.00 0.68 2.00 97.00 0.74 13.13 39.12 0.01 1.00 0.91 76.00 14 53.86 0.02 5 22.21 6.00 7 89.00 0.00 0.00 16.15 17.82 0.00 8 35.21 46.00 10A 2.00 2.00 16A 7.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.38 0.00 0.00 5.18 0.00 0.86 0.15 85.00 4 45.14 0.19 0.Pvt Other no.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 92.13 2.00 0.00 21 99.90 0.00 12 17.00 0.12 23.81 0.00 0.72 0.82 0. Pvt co. House op comme society rcial 1 100.00 53.16 4.75 stddev 37.19 3 61.77 0.13 28.25 62.00 0.30 0.47 0.13 0.02 mean 53.10 0.83 35.51 0.00 0.00 29 42.82 7.78 12.60 19.12 3.00 10 83.35 39.81 76.46 9 98.52 0.00 23.36 0.97 0.00 2 48.00 0.39 4.58 8.00 0.67 0.62 0.31 20 100.00 38.77 0.96 12.00 92.00 16 83.40 6.

82 8.86 4.36 21.74 6.92 11.00 31.19 5.82 2.42 7.19 8.93 10.94 12.82 12.87 0.63 1.57 stddev 18.00 35.11 17 0.00 20.71 11.13 11.99 12.46 36.09 29.72 3.38 15.61 12.88 0.21 0.86 mean 12.05 6.75 7.13 11.60 94 13.00 29 0.65 17.15 .66 14.95 8 24.87 7.33 18.94 4.09 16 27.86 33.38 10A 0.18 31.33 6.43 32.80 39.03 75.22 52.26 28.06 13.15 18.91 6.61 6 51.49 32.50 12.00 6.28 26 0.61 18.02 44.19 9.Tenure Sector before1 81-85 86-90 91-92 no.95 5.34 13.82 5.00 0.63 3.56 16A 0.00 0.09 25.08 93 3.95 3 11.57 12.39 14.00 0.52 12.56 4.06 1.74 4.56 9 0.16 7.00 0.38 56.24 3.00 0.56 16.54 6.14 1.81 6.00 47.82 5.31 16.64 27.32 6.49 21 13.82 24.87 1.37 7.29 41.54 24.02 17.87 1.60 1.52 7.50 12.07 4 5.00 0.53 20.50 16.82 4.71 2 39.62 4.52 1.42 0.38 37.88 4.00 4.56 6.83 26.33 9A 0.17 14 0.86 7 42.40 95 1.27 1.57 18.00 28 0.00 13.30 6.59 38.42 12.76 5 49.49 12.00 0.88 3.67 36.73 4.64 15 8.00 48.64 10.57 14.17 12.62 6.17 6.85 5. 980 1 43.87 10 0.07 8.30 6.92 2.68 20 0.29 12 0.35 28.26 7.44 48.73 6.05 20.61 6.66 0.45 6.11 15.00 31.00 0.23 22.85 4.83 8.82 48.03 10.65 31.43 20.35 5.60 7.87 6.10 40.16 9.16 5.

51 6.52 1.58 2.83 18.09 27.55 8.23 12.42 4.26 12.26 7.05 30.55 3.58 14.67 7.29 0.44 5.31 0.90 10.57 28.80 4.00 0.99 7.00 0.14 6.00 20.00 0.35 21.80 37.73 25.48 20.00 2.00 1.26 19.45 2.24 23.33 8.10 16.62 29.67 3.63 2.00 4.29 .63 5.15 2.47 36.00 31.87 3.98 0.10 4.62 0.45 3.27 0.74 36.62 0.15 2.13 26.54 3.46 0.79 0.33 8.67 2.02 22.93 8.42 8.69 35.51 10.24 7.26 0.30 34.45 0.17 25.26 3.76 3.25 31.00 6.64 7.00 30.03 1.39 4.76 0.95 9.46 1.33 0.42 3.32 8.54 8.40 8.94 28.38 2.71 5.76 3.33 4.84 2.63 0.02 47.48 15. Mumba state state i 24.20 6.60 0.52 22.24 5.19 27.12 7.19 17.53 2.74 28.36 4.85 33.54 1.71 20.58 9.10 17.03 15.37 1.43 17.39 0.30 4.45 21.14 0.83 3.52 2.83 8.00 32.00 30.98 3.61 12.77 2.60 2.33 7.85 47.81 0.64 0.30 2.88 1.31 5.10 16.90 2.00 38.02 9.00 0.09 0.96 18.07 3.76 11.03 6.20 8.00 24.69 5.69 2.64 2.33 0.Previous Place of Residence Sector Island Wn En Thane Vashi no.94 5.00 39.68 3.00 19.95 12.91 2.51 7.09 5.00 26.60 4.23 18.30 0.63 15.42 26.67 8.01 Navi Inside Out of Intl.93 3.58 0.15 0.23 3.58 0.29 8.25 4.48 17.00 1.83 2.05 19.69 4.50 6.38 5.00 23.92 7.74 31.53 0.17 5.33 4.24 1.57 1.00 33.25 12.00 4.90 7.81 4.92 4.32 27.82 3.88 2.26 23.77 6.17 8.08 0.00 45.54 5.73 4.35 15.00 28.29 20.62 4.00 0.05 18.33 0.30 14.17 5.39 2.00 21.47 6.26 2.82 6.07 5.88 12.03 24.53 2.37 10.67 25.50 27. city suburbs suburbs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10A 12 14 15 16 16A 17 20 21 26 28 29 9A mean stddev 21.

13 7 37.00 7.29 2.75 4.64 10.32 17 21.10 2.92 1.17 16.00 4.13 4.39 4.33 29.57 15.90 3.27 7.43 7.00 0.50 10.76 12.98 4.59 1.32 1.34 12.81 5.53 9.63 16 54.54 4.67 0.92 14.29 0.76 5.30 1.27 0.19 2.55 32.48 mean 39.87 17.44 2.85 0.95 4.66 10.89 4.47 2.93 9.92 3.90 3.57 20.82 3.53 2.84 4.21 9 50.28 24.52 0.74 4.19 3.36 6.91 2.47 2.37 4.08 7.62 7.90 2 44.03 17. i hi lam a 1 51.66 8.70 10.09 15.77 3.05 2.44 5.15 18.63 2.Language Sector Marath Hindi Gujarat Malaya Punjabi Tamil Kannad Bengali Other no.79 12.57 4 46.55 8.85 1.61 1.99 16.05 9.69 28 28.03 16.09 8.17 20.54 1.97 3.89 3.29 15.73 2.38 0.99 3.00 1.22 3.29 2.96 5.70 8.27 2.15 16.37 4.10 5.56 5.73 2.63 1.77 8.61 14.32 9A 20.76 3.49 4.71 8.43 4.61 5.71 12 8.52 19.29 3.83 8.91 6 33.54 27.13 20.00 0.00 12.67 15 57.84 12.73 stddev 17.82 4.40 2.22 2.36 6.76 4.21 0.71 1.45 2.30 9.33 6.96 2.58 2.30 4.57 14.32 2.46 5.49 10A 24.26 2.18 10.51 3.15 2.44 7.83 7.26 5 77.66 10.36 10 44.93 1.86 4.29 .00 9.26 3.34 4.00 6.87 12.67 4.43 14.49 9.71 1.42 3 32.31 3.97 4.33 13.97 10.56 8 22.29 2.70 6.54 7.23 9.17 16.75 14.08 4.00 4.24 7.90 17.20 4.57 1.10 4.46 17.85 5.00 12.23 2.12 2.54 21 61.72 12.49 10.86 8.72 5.27 5.27 7.21 21.60 2.93 4.26 13.62 1.96 6.43 16.32 7.85 5.57 17.64 3.76 14.98 3.00 11.03 9.00 1.38 14.83 14 19.36 11.43 24.17 9.36 4.92 20 60.29 29 25.03 2.55 3.73 3.09 6.14 1.79 16A 51.73 0.98 6.90 26 48.81 4.

44 0.99 0.00 16A 91.13 8.86 22.46 0.00 1.33 0.13 0.00 1.00 29 86.00 4.37 0.00 5 81.00 2.00 7.40 0.00 10A 72.60 8.32 1.17 12.64 0.62 0.26 5.85 0.47 4.13 5.00 14 88.42 0.20 10.68 1.88 0.98 0.55 1.00 0.16 15.92 1.85 7.66 8 72.29 9.71 0.00 0. an st 1 79.18 11.57 4.64 5.00 0.92 7.42 5.93 8.81 9.00 0.28 4.45 2.56 3.34 6.60 0.00 0.19 5.31 0.73 1.20 0.53 1.62 20 86.00 1.23 0.55 4.45 2.00 0.32 2.05 0.00 0.42 0.78 3.69 0.66 3.21 15.62 0.61 1.Religion Sector Hindu Christi Islam Jain Sikh Buddhi Other no.95 0.88 0.47 0.00 0.10 0.00 26 86.00 6.02 0.53 4.36 mean 82.00 0.52 3.49 .91 0.17 0.00 9A 73.00 12 79.32 2 80.03 0.00 0.41 0.72 4.46 1.00 16 88.70 1.11 10 80.82 10.82 2.04 6.65 9.26 6.00 6 83.82 7.22 0.54 0.53 3.80 3.76 8.42 1.79 0.68 0.09 0.70 2.50 4.00 0.75 5.78 1.43 0.00 0.73 1.52 0.32 6.59 3 75.68 0.09 6.15 0.86 1.85 0.00 7 76.88 0.20 8.51 2.40 2.33 0.74 1.00 0.64 9 84.03 5.36 1.00 17 85.82 0.00 21 81.25 stddev 6.43 1.47 0.43 1.17 0.43 1.00 0.01 6.00 28 100.24 0.51 0.70 0.21 0.36 0.57 4 84.16 0.17 2.67 1.00 15 83.76 5.75 0.02 0.04 5.60 1.61 4.

202 5 .000 .293 3.000 .879 TENURE 1.890 3 .000 .946 24.660 98.2670 81659 Communalities Initial Extraction EARNER 1.955 89.005 99.000 .796 .7800 3.8863 81659 28.571 55.875 FAM.832 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.939 MIGRATN 1.314E-16 100.446 55.320 79.7870 81659 37.571 2 1.039E-02 1.928 LANGUAGE 1.824 RELIGION 1.000 .6705 5.000 .0814 4. Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues Total % of Variance Cumulative % 1 4.000 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.867 7 1.2091 4.000 .Appendix D Factor Analysis Descriptive Statistics EARNER EDUCATN FAM.926 EDUCATN 1.000 8 5. .6076 81659 8.8538 81659 53.6486 81659 86.8271 8.4115 81659 32.9974 81659 49.1087 9.356 95.985 INCOME 1.851E-17 . Deviation Analysis N 73.845 4 .9885 16.SIZE INCOME LANGUAGE MIGRATN RELIGION TENURE Mean Std.000 .429 5.SIZE 1.0403 3.133 100.064E-02 .862 6 8.

898E-02 .202 -1.430 .278 . 3 .888 -7.771 67.107 INCOME -.264 .926 .156 .136 .766E-02 MIGRATN .900 FAM.804 .468 1.468E-03 RELIGION .685 8.118 22.862 LANGUAGE .255 4.455 .381 .293 INCOME .880 .925E-02 TENURE -.SIZE .881 LANGUAGE -.317E-02 -8.634 4.902 1.155 -.379 -2.845 Component Matrix Component 1 2 EARNER .822 .796E-04 TENURE .383E-02 .347 43. 3 .470 EDUCATN -.358 .818 % of Variance Cumulative % 43.951 .201 .702 -.SIZE -.230 MIGRATN -.230 RELIGION -.902 -.785 -7.Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings 1 2 3 Total 3.236 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.937 -.446 .244 -.882 FAM.101 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.347 23.878 -.728 89.484 EDUCATN .454E-02 Rotated Component Matrix Component 1 2 EARNER -.

0 0 .919 9.581 2.Appendix E Cluster Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N 8 a b Missing Total Percent N Percent N Percent 100.617 7.0 Squared Euclidean Distance used Average Linkage (Between Groups) Average Linkage (Between Groups) Agglomeration Schedule Stage Cluster 1 1 5 2 2 3 5 4 1 5 3 6 1 7 1 Cluster 2 6 7 8 2 4 5 3 Coefficients .946 4.0 8 100.299 10.174 4.108 Cluster Membership 1:Vashi 2:Nerul 3:Belapur 4:Kalamboli 5:Panvel 6:Kopar-khaira 7:Airoli 8:Sanpada 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 .

000 .7324 3.000 .5580 35.856 EDUCATN 1.Appendix F Factor Analysis Descriptive Statistics Mean EARNER 66.6247 4.000 . Deviation 7.000 .5760 INCOME 27.0375 Std.571 OWNRSHIP 1.9628 7.000 .000 .1339 10.9421 LANGUAG1 46.836 INCOME 1.855 LANGUAG1 1.9114 MEN 38.889 LANGUAG2 1.527 MEN 1.568 WOMEN 1.5535 LANGUAG2 6.000 .4424 RELGION1 82.3934 9.7719 3.3839 RELGION2 6.000 .8628 WOMEN 33.7307 3.9142 3.9759 OWNRSHIP 66.000 .721 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.000 .000 .801 RELGION1 1. .0484 MIGRATN 52.675 MIGRATN 1.9768 15.5835 Analysis N 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 19127 Communalities Initial Extraction EARNER 1.722 RELGION2 1.3183 EDUCATN 40.

564 11 4.071E-02 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.161 57.257 87.427E-02 INCOME .917 Component Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total 1 3.843 34.487 EDUCATN .698 6 .200 8 .001 24.001 25.453 49.234 8.042E-02 .819 72.688 6.880 -.748 .424 RELGION1 .777 -.Total Variance Explained Initial Eigenvalues Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings % of Variance Cumulative % 25.310 .239 MEN 0.458 LANGUAG1 .838 9 9. .917 2.265 95.473 .136E-02 .657 -2.523 81.373 -.734 10 9.896 98.740 15.436 100.690 3 1.565 OWNRSHIP .803 8.246 .475 RELGION2 .466 4.391 LANGUAG2 -.831 99.438 22.238 91.773 -.592 WOMEN . Component Matrix Component 1 2 3 EARNER .937 2.500 4.127 -.794E-02 .937 34.935 7 .816 -5.131 .096 .854E-02 .093E-03 MIGRATN -.455 23.000 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.612 .538 .915E-04 .441 5 .448 .098 2.750 2 2.290 2.522 -.463 72.581 4 .359 3.638 97.938 8.

120 .316 -.596 -.Rotated Component Matrix Component 1 2 3 EARNER .210 .333 .647 9.709 .113 RELGION1 -. .795 Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.658 RELGION2 .110 -.610E-02 LANGUAG2 -.046 -.366 .351 -.774 EDUCATN .136 OWNRSHIP .201 .141E-02 MEN -.231 -. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.804 MIGRATN 0.240 .704E-02 INCOME .246 LANGUAG1 .399 WOMEN .130 .855 . a Rotation converged in 6 iterations.575 5.877 -9.214 .524 .869 .742 -.

309 6.Appendix G Cluster Agglomeration Schedule Cluster Combined Stage Cluster 1 Cluster 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 9 1 12 9 15 3 12 1 13 9 3 1 8 1 1 3 12 12 1 1 1 6 10 2 17 14 18 7 16 4 22 20 23 15 11 9 19 8 21 13 3 12 5 Stage Cluster First Appears Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Next Stage 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 1 9 0 0 8 2 0 11 0 0 13 0 0 12 4 0 18 3 0 13 0 0 19 5 0 15 7 0 17 9 6 15 0 0 17 13 11 16 15 0 20 12 14 20 8 0 19 18 10 21 16 17 21 20 19 22 21 0 0 Coefficients .584 .515 1.837 1.799 5.411 1.114 .726 4.151 2.840 1.052 11.487 3.653 .574 .142 13.558 4.108 2.032 1.449 8.918 .904 2.751 .

Cluster Membership Case 3 Clusters 1:1 1 2:2 1 3:3 1 4:4 1 5:5 2 6:6 1 7:7 1 8:8 1 9:9 1 10:10 1 11:10A 1 12:12 3 13:14 3 14:15 1 15:16 1 16:16A 3 17:17 3 18:20 1 19:21 1 20:26 1 21:28 3 22:29 3 23:9A 1 .

1995 Worked with the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage May 1993 .Outstanding First Year Graduate Student. 1995. . India Experience Graduate Research Assistant to Dr. L. 1994 . CO. Pune. • Rank holder of the University of Pune. May 1997. USA. Pune. 1996 .Mar. J. 1997 – May 1998 Graduate Research Assistant to Dr. India. April . • Won first prize (three member team) for Formica Interior design competition.May 1994 Worked as an intern at Historic Boulder. Blacksburg. Aug. Worked as an intern with Narendra Dengle Architects. Dec. • Won first prize (three member team) in a design competition . Professor. • Awarded Virginia Citizens Planning Associate Fellowship . VA Bachelor of Architecture May 1996 University of Pune. Browder. New Delhi. P.Malathi Ananthakrishnan Date of Birth: 30 June 1973 Education: Master of Urban and Regional Planning May 1998 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. India May . Aug. O.July 1992 Honors and Affiliations • Invited to Phi Kappa Phi National Honor Society. October 1997. College of Architecture and Urban Studies. India. Associate Dean for Academic Affairs. 1994. Boulder. • Student member American Planning Association.Reclaiming a derelict river.May 1997 Worked as an Architect with Suyojan Architects. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning. Virginia Tech. • Registered Architect under Council of Architecture. Knox. Pune.July 1996 .