## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

– – – –

All No Some Some

( ( ( ( P S S

) ) ) )

are are are are not M M P

( ( ( ( M M S

) ) ) ) P S P

Universal Affirmative 1 Universal Negative 1,2 Particular Affirmative 0 Particular Negative 2 P M S M S P Figures↑ <-Moods

Some men are wicked – Men are sometimes wicked. Some times are times when Men are wicked. A chicken is a domesticated animal. – All chickens are domesticated animals. Categorical Syllogism – an argument consisting of two premises and one conclusion, such that the solution is not entailed by either premise alone (by an immediate inference, for example). Each premise must be a categorical proposition (or paraphrasable into a categorical proposition). Must have two premises and a conclusion to have a shot of being valid. If there are three or more propositions, it commits the fallacy of four terms. Only men are rational (= All rational beings are human) No female is a man (= No female is a male being No female is rational DIAGRAM UNIVERSALS BEFORE PARTICULARS!!! Minor term – subject of the conclusion. Major term – Predicate of the conclusion. Middle term – term that appears only in the premises. MP first in Standard form. There are 256 forms – 15 are valid. 1 – AAA EAE AII EIO 2 – EAE AEE EIO AOO 3 – IAI AII OAO EIO 4 – AEE IAI EIO Example – EIO-3 No M are P Some M are S Some S are not P Obvious equivocation of the term “man” - commits the fallacy of four terms.

P M P 1. 2.

3.

4. 5.

6.

Middle Term Rule (Fallacy – Undistributed Middle) – The middle term must be distributed at least once. Minor Term Rule (Fallacy – Illicit Minor) If the minor term is distributed in the conclusion, it must be distributed in the minor premise. Major Term Rule (Fallacy – Illicit Major) - If the major term is distributed in the conclusion, it must be distributed in the major premise. Affirmation Rule (Fallacy – Exclusive Premise) At least one premise must be affirmative Negation Rule (Fallacy – Negation) If the conclusion is negative, at least one premise must be negative. Likewise, if a premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. Quantity Rule (Fallacy - Subalternation) If the conclusion is particular, a premise must be particular

A syllogism may commit more than one fallacy! Contradictory propositions cannot both A -------contraries---------E be true and cannot both be false. Of a | | pair of contradictory propositions, s s exactly one is true and exactly one if u contradictories u false. b b Contrary propositions are propositions | | that cannot both be true, but both can I------subcontraries--------O both be false SC cannot both be false- both can be true Conversion –E and I only- No S are P = No P are S | Some S are P = Some P are S Conversion is not valid for A and O propositions. Socrates is not Greek – No thing identical with Socrates is a thing which is Greek No spitting is allowed – No act of spitting is an act which is allowed. She always cooks ham on new year’s day – All times that are new years day are times when she cooks ham. Sheldon never eats beans – No times are times when Sheldon eats beans.

Barbara, Celerant, Darii, Ferio | Cesare, Camestro, Festino, Baraco | Disamis, Datisi, Bocardo, Ferison | Camenes, Dimaris, Fresison All trespassers will be prosecuted - x import / sub alternation (univer. implies particular) Distributed? A E I O S Yes Yes No No P No Yes No Yes Plurative Propositions – Most S are P Plurative Syllogisms - All M are P, Most S are M, Most S are P – A+B > C

Contradiction – negation of the conclusion. Quantifier – implicit / explicit Cows moo – implicit quantifier – All. A Scout is reverent – implicit All quantifier. A lady is present – some ladies are persons who are present. ONLY – only registered students receive a grade. All those who receive a grade are registered students. /// The word ‘nut’ occurs in ‘donut’. It is impolite to say ‘damn it’. All times when you can’t beat them are times when you should join them. All times when you are late are better than times when you don’t show up. // I want to be kind – All things identical with me are people who want to be kind.

MP IF P THEN Q P Q

MT IF P THEN Q NOT Q_____ NOT P

Truth functional compound – a sentence that contains another sentence. I know. :simple sentence. I don’t know. : compound – negation of “I know.” // The truth value of the compound is a function of the simple part. 1)Not p – ~p Unary function 2) p or q – p ▼ q Binary function 3) If p then q - p → q Binary 4) p and q p·q Binary 5) p if and only if q p ↔ q Binary P Q ↔ ▼ → · T T T T T T T F T F F F F T T T F F F F F T F T Disjunction - Disjuncts | Conditional – antecedent, concequent | Conjunction – conjuncts | Biconditional is true when both parts agree truth value. Truth functional tables – P → Q see if there is a counter _Q___ example row (premises P true, but conclusion false). Invalid! P Q P → Q Q P T T T T T T T T F T F F F T F T F T T T F F F F T F T F

Indirect table – Reducto ad absurdum Assume the conclusion and look for a contradiction – if contrad. exists – VALID Circle the contradiction and write “valid!” TRANSLATION – some humans are not mortal - negation: All humans are mortal. Exclusive “OR” – p or q, but not both P ▼ Q does not satisfy this. (p ▼ q) · ~ (p · q) p or q and not p and q DeMorgan’s laws ~( p · q) = (~p ▼ ~q) - negation of a conjunction gives a disjunction of the negation of the conjuncts. ~(p ▼ q) = ~p · ~q COMMUTATION p ·q=q ·p p ▼ q=q▼p ASSOCIATIVE p · (q · r) = (p · q) · r - wedgies too IDEMPODENCE p=p·p p = p▼ p BICONDITIONAL REWRITE p ↔ q = (p→q) · (q→p) p if and only of q – agree in truth value! If you neglect the tooth, you loose it. Denying the You don’t neglect it You don’t lose it Antecedant P ONLY IF Q p → q P UNLESS Q p ▼ q or ~q → p P BUT Q p·q P IF Q q→ p Neither P NOR Q ~p · ~q or ~ ( p · q) Either P OR Q p ▼ q Exclusive OR (p ▼ q) · ~ (p · q)

Well Formed Formulas (WOOF) If p then q = q is the case if p TAUTOLOGY – true under every truth value assignment (Logical equivalencies) X is logically equivalent to Y if and only if X ↔ Y is a tautology. 'Snow is white' implies 'snow is black or snow is white'. LAWS Duns Scotis – suttle doctor ~p → (p→ q) Export-import law [p-->(q-->r)] <--> [(p.q)-->r] Distributive laws [pv{q.r)] <--> [(pvq).(pvr)] [p.(qvr)] <--> [(p.q)v(p.r)] Law of excluded middle pv~p Law of contradiction ( law of non-contradiction!) ~(p.~p) Peirce's law [(p-->q)-->p] <--> p Laws of simplification (p.q) --> p (p.q) --> q Principle of transposition (p-->q)-->(~q-->~p) Law of Clavius (~p-->p)-->p Principle of the syllogism (p-->q) --> [(q-->r)-->(p-->r))

Informal Fallacy – flawed because of content or manner of presentation – element of deception. FALLACY – plausible, potentially persuasive, but faulty argument. FORMAL – flawed because of it’s defective logical form. Admits counter examples.

**Equivocation – Use of the same word twice in different ways. Amphiboly – Structural ambiguity. Being in a
**

dilapidated condition, I was able to buy the house very cheap.

Weak inductive conclusion is not adequately supported by the premises. Begging the question – form is valid, but a deception is going on. Circular reasoning. Assuming in the premises what ought to be concluded Ad Homonym –(REL) an argument against another argument, but the attack is against the person, not the argument. Abusive – Say something negative about the person in hopes … Circumstantial – Questions a person’s objectivity. May have stake You too – Accuses person of being hypocritical. Red Herring – (relevance) fishy! Gives the appearance of arguing for one claim, but is really changing the topic.

Hasty Generalization – Attempts to generalize from insufficient evidence. Meant to deceive. Non- Sequitor – Any kind of irrelevance. Affirming the p → q Concequent q____ p p→q ~p___ ~q Paridox of implication – I’ll ski tomorrow, therefore if I break my leg, I’ll ski… Equivocation – more than one meaning. dif intension Ampliatives – content of conclusion goes beyond the premises.non- analytic An argument that has as it’s conclusion a logical truth is VALID. © 2005 Shane Lunceford shane@ieee.org Denying the Antecedant

- Rules and Fallacies for Categorical Syllogisms
- An Algorithm for Evaluating the Validity of Singly-Quantified Monadic Predicate Logic Arguments
- Deductive Logic 022 Part 3 Chapter 8
- Logical Fallacies
- Syllogism -Gr8AmbitionZ
- Traditional Categorical Logic
- Verbal Reasoning (1)
- Syllogistic Logic
- 400-654-1-PB
- Aristotle's Theory of the Unity of Science
- Glossary Argumentation Terms
- 17 Quality Characteristics Engineering
- [Alfred R. Mele] Irrationality an Essay on Akrasi(BookZZ.org)
- Dutilh Novaes
- Leviathan - P1C5 - T Hobbes
- Legal Proofs and IRAC
- Philosophy Takeaway Newsletter 45 - Logic
- Final Study Guide

Skip carousel

- Beta is Ing the Alpha Male
- Hrm - Socialization
- Seven Cs Exercise
- Research Questionnaire on Career Counceling
- LAE TIPS
- Textbook eBook Study Materials
- Why Men Obsess Over Sex
- Importance of Educational Psychology
- Cameron White - The Permeable Threshold
- Employee Satisfaction Books
- Exhibitionism Ideas in Psychoanalysis
- Key Issues in Developmental Psychology
- CB Writing 5
- How to Speak So People Will Listen
- Dodo Bird’s Effect
- The Rational Male
- Kay Sunderland Case Solution
- sample Research Paper
- WK 2 PSY 1,2,AND,7 PSY 300 WK 3
- Jumping Bean Report
- Psychotherapy Bulletin 45(2)
- HANA questions-Demo Discovery.pdf
- Marcel Mauss - Techniques of the Body
- Complaint Management
- NCBTS Domain 6
- MB0043
- Humanistic Nursing Theory
- Tick Tack Treat
- The History of Transformational Leadership
- Filipino Psychology, Or Sikolohiyang Pilipino, In Filipino, Is Defined As

Skip carousel

- tmp4CEB.tmp
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ob6301.x28.07s taught by Richard Miller (rxm013610)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for hcs7v98.028.08f taught by (otoole)
- Column
- UT Dallas Syllabus for hcs6332.001.07f taught by (otoole)
- tmp2A0A.tmp
- Cluster Analysis Techniques in Data Mining
- tmpEC6F
- Pisa 2015 Results in Focus
- Clustering on Uncertain Data
- UT Dallas Syllabus for hcs6330.501.06f taught by Alice OToole (otoole)
- Laboratory Safety and Security
- Disabled People With Neuro Sky Mind Wave In Brain Computer Interface
- twb mb project reflection tool
- UT Dallas Syllabus for spau3345.001.11s taught by Diane Garst (dxg022000)
- Sick of Bad Decisions? Founder of Global Community, Access Consciousness, Tells Why Your Body Knows Best.
- Web Page Pattern Prediction Model Based on Dynamic Apriori Algorithm
- Understanding The Comprehensive Facility Management Plan Of Different Plan Environment
- A Single Stone Teachers' Guide
- Conducting Focus Groups
- tmp1A11.tmp
- UT Dallas Syllabus for taught by (otoole)
- Tmp 8212
- Expertise Skill Finder
- tmpAF6D.tmp
- 7 Rules for Self-Development
- UT Dallas Syllabus for comd6305.001.10s taught by (dxg022000)
- tmp5630.tmp
- A Study on Perception of Employees Towards Organizational Climate in It Industry, Coimbatore
- tmpDDED.tmp

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulRead Free for 30 Days

Cancel anytime.

Close Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading