Winding Induction Motor Drive for 3level Voltage Space
Phasor Generation
S. Srinivas
1
and V.T. Somasekhar
2
Abstract – An openend winding induction motor, fed by two
2level inverters connected at either end produces space
vector locations, identical to those of a conventional 3level
inverter. In this paper, two switching algorithms are
proposed to implement space vector PWM for the dual
inverter scheme. The proposed algorithms do not employ any
lookup tables. The time consuming task of sector
identification is altogether avoided in both these algorithms.
The proposed algorithms employ only the instantaneous
reference phase voltages for the implementation of the space
vector PWM. An equal switching duty for both the inverters
is also ensured with one of the proposed PWM strategies.
Also, it is observed that the zerosequence voltage in motor
phases is significantly reduced with the proposed PWM
strategies.
Keywords  Openend winding induction motor drive,
dualinverter system, V/f control, space vector
modulation
I. INTRODUCTION
Threelevel inversion has been extensively researched in
the past and several circuit topologies were suggested. Of
these topologies, the neutral point clamped topology [1],
the flying capacitor topology [2] and the Hbridge
topology [3] have become popular. Recently, a circuit
configuration to obtain threelevel inversion by cascading
two 2level inverters has also been suggested [7].
Stemmler’s pioneering work has shown that threelevel
inversion can be achieved by the openend winding
connection of an induction motor with two twolevel
inverters feeding the motor from either end [4]. In this
work [4], sinetriangular modulation technique is
employed for the control of inverters. Various derivatives
of this power circuit and/or the associated PWM schemes
are also reported in the recent past [6][14]. The inverters
may be controlled with space vector modulation technique
as it improves the DCbus utilization compared to the sine
triangle modulation technique. A space vector modulation
technique for the openend winding topology has been
suggested in [6]. In this work [6], the implementation of
space vector modulation requires sector identification,
which is a time consuming task. Further, this switching
scheme employs lookup tables, enhancing the memory
requirement with a typical Digital implementation.
_______________________________________________
Digital ref: A070101141
1,2
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of
TechnologyWarangal. Andhra Pradesh, INDIA. Pin: 506 004.
email: srsrini@nitw.ac.in
The paper first received on 5 Oct 2006 and in revised form 24 April 2007.
In this paper, two space vector modulation techniques are
suggested, which obviate the need for the sector
identification. Also these PWM schemes do not employ
any lookup table, thus reducing the memory requirement.
This section gives a general background and review of the
paper or work done by other engineers in the field. It
should be well supported by citations. Moreover, the
citations are served as a guide for those who want to learn
more about the field.
Fig.1 shows the basic openend winding induction motor
drive operated with a single power supply. The symbols
BO AO
v v , and
CO
v denote the pole voltages of the inverter1.
Similarly, the symbols
O B O A
v v
' '
, and
O C
v
'
denote the pole
voltages of inverter2. The space vector locations from
individual inverters are shown in Fig.2. The numbers 1 to
8 denote the states assumed by inverter1 and the numbers
1’ through 8’ denote the states assumed by inverter2
(Fig.2).
Table1 summarizes the switching state of the switching
devices for both the inverters in all the states. In Table1,
a ‘+’ indicates that the top switch in a leg of a given
inverter is turned on and a ‘’ indicates that the bottom
switch in a leg of a given inverter is turned on.
As each inverter is capable of assuming 8 states
independently of the other, a total of 64 space vector
combinations are possible with this circuit configuration.
The space vector locations for all space vector
combinations of the two inverters are shown in Fig.3. In
Fig.3, OA represents the DClink voltage of individual
inverters, and is equal to 2 /
dc
V while OG represents the
DClink voltage of an equivalent single inverter drive, and
is equal to
dc
V .
Fig.1: The primitive openend winding induction motor drive
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
96
Fig. 2: Space vector locations of inverter1 (Left) and
inverter2 (Right)
Fig.3: Resultant space vector combinations
in the dualinverter scheme
Table – 1: Switching states of the individual inverters
State of
Inverter1
Switches
turned on
State of
Inverter2
Switches
turned on
1 ( +  ) S
6
, S
1
, S
2
1' ( +  ) S
6'
, S
1'
, S
2'
2 ( + +  ) S
1
, S
2
, S
3
2' ( + +  ) S
1'
, S
2'
, S
3'
3 (  +  ) S
2
, S
3
, S
4
3' (  +  ) S
2'
, S
3'
, S
4'
4 (  + + ) S
3
, S
4
, S
5
4' (  + + ) S
3'
, S
4'
, S
5'
5 (   + ) S
4
, S
5
, S
6
5' (   + ) S
4'
, S
5'
, S
6'
6 ( +  + ) S
5
, S
6
, S
1
6' ( +  + ) S
5'
, S
6'
, S
1'
7 ( + + + ) S
1
, S
3
, S
5
7' ( + + + ) S
1'
, S
3'
, S
5'
8 (    ) S
2
, S
4
, S
6
8' (    ) S
2'
, S
4'
, S
6'
Fig.1 shows the basic openend winding induction motor
drive. It cannot be operated with a single power supply,
due to the presence of zerosequence voltages (common
mode voltages) [5], [6]. Consequently, a high zero
sequence current would flow through the motor phase
windings, which is deleterious to the switching devices
and the motor itself. To suppress the zerosequence
components in the motor phases, each inverter is operated
with an isolated dc power supply as shown in Fig.4.
From the Fig.4, when isolated DC power supplies are used
for individual inverters, the zerosequence current cannot
flow as it is denied a path. Consequently, the zero
sequence voltage appears across the points ‘O’ and ‘O’”.
The zerosequence voltage resulting from each of the 64
space vector combinations is reproduced in Table2 from
[6] to facilitate an easy reference.
In Fig.5, the vector OT represents the reference vector
(also called the reference sample), with its tip situated in
sector7 (Fig.3). This vector is to be synthesized in the
average sense by switching the space vector combinations
situated in the closest proximity (the combinations situated
at the vertices A, G and H in the present case) using the
space vector modulation technique. In the work reported in
reference [7], the reference vector OT is transformed to
OT’ in the core hexagon ABCDEF by using an
appropriate coordinate transformation, which shifts the
point A to point O. In the core hexagon, the switching
timings of the active vectors OA, OB and the switching
time of the null vector situated at O to synthesize the
transformed reference vector OT’ are evaluated. The
switching algorithm described in reference [5] is employed
to evaluate these timings. These timings are then
employed to produce the actual reference vector OT
situated in sector7 by switching amongst the switching
Fig. 4: The openend winding induction motor drive with two
isolated power supplies
Table – 2: Zerosequence voltage contributions in the
difference of the pole voltages of individual inverters
V
d c
/ 2 V
d c
/ 3  V
d c
/ 6 0 V
d c
/ 6 V
d c
/ 3 V
d c
/ 2
87’
8 – 4’
8 – 6’
8 – 2’
5 – 7’
3 –7’
1 – 7’
8  5 ’
8  3’
5 – 4’,
3 – 4’
8 – 1’,
5 – 6’
5 – 2’,
3 – 6’
3 – 2’,
4 – 7’
1 – 4’,
1 – 6’
1 – 2’,
6 – 7’
2 – 7’
8 – 8’, 5 – 5’, 5 – 3’,
3 – 5’, 3 – 3’,
4 – 4’, 5 – 1’,
3 – 1’, 4 – 6’.
4 – 2’, 1 – 5’,
1 – 3’, 6 – 4’,
2 – 4’, 1 – 1’,
6 – 6’, 6 – 2’,
2 – 6’, 2 – 2’,
7 – 7’
5 – 8’,
3 – 8’,
4 – 5’,
4 – 3’
4 – 1’,
1 – 8’
6 – 5’,
6 – 3’
2 – 5’,
2 – 3’
7 – 4’,
6 – 1’
2 – 1’,
7 – 6’
7 – 2’
4 – 8’
6 – 8’
2 – 8’
7 – 5’
7 – 3’
7 – 1’
7 – 8’
1(+)
2(++) 3(+)
4(++)
5(+) 6(++)
7(+++)
8()
V
dc
/2
1’(+)
2’(++) 3’(+)
4’(++)
5’(+)
6’(++)
7’(+++)
8’()
V
dc
/2
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
97
Fig.5: Resolution of the reference voltage space vector
in the middle and outer sectors
combinations available at the vertices A, G and H. The
latter step requires a lookup table in which the space
vector combinations available at each space vector
location are stored.
Thus, it is evident that with this switching algorithm, the
controller negotiates a considerable computational burden
primarily because of sector identification and coordinate
transformation. Also, there is a need requirement for look
up tables, enhancing the memory requirement. Further, the
zerosequence voltage in the difference of the respective
pole voltages of individual inverters (which is dropped
across the points ‘O’ and ‘O’’ in Fig.4) is also high with
this PWM scheme.
II.PROPOSED PWM STRATEGIES
The proposed PWM strategies are based on the following
observations:
1. The resultant space vector locations in the dualinverter
scheme (Fig.3) are obtained by superposing the space
vector locations resulting from inverter2 (i.e. by
superposing the center of the right hexagon, Fig.2) at
each space vector location caused by inverter1 (left
hexagon, Fig.2). Alternatively, the space vector
locations of the resulting dual inverter scheme may be
obtained by superposing the center of the left hexagon at
each of the space vector locations of the right hexagon.
2. Apart from the core hexagon ABCDEF centered around
O, there exist six outer subhexagons namely OBHGSF,
OCJIHA, ODLKJB, OENMLC, OFQPND and
OASRQE centered around the points A, B, C, D, E and
F respectively. For the rest of this paper, they are
referred to as subhexagonal centers.
3. The space vector combinations at the vertices and at the
center of a given subhexagon are obtained by clamping
one inverter to a given state while the other inverter
assumes all the eight states. For example, the space
vector combinations at the vertices of the subhexagon
OFSGHB (centered around the point ‘A’, Fig.3), are
obtained by clamping inverter1 to the state of 1(+),
while inverter2 assumes the states 1’ to 6’ respectively.
The space vector combinations at the subhexagonal
center ‘A’ are given by the active vector to which
inverter1 is clamped (in this case to state1) and the
null vectors of inverter2 (states 8’ and 7’, Table1)
respectively.
4. All the seven locations of a given subhexagonal center
(i.e. six vertices and the corresponding subhexagonal
center) show redundancy of space vector combinations.
For the subhexagon OFSGHB, the space vector
combinations for these seven locations may alternatively
be obtained by clamping inverter2 to state 4’(++)
while inverter1 assumes all the eight states.
5. Of the 20 space vector combinations with a common
mode voltage contribution of zero, 8 are located at the
origin O (Table2, Fig.3). Therefore, any PWM strategy
that makes a good use of these states is expected to
cause a reduction in the zerosequence voltages, in the
difference of the polevoltages of respective inverters.
The following PWM strategies are proposed in this paper:
 The Decoupled PWM strategy
 The Biasing inverter PWM strategy
III. THE DECOUPLED PWM STRATEGY
This PWM strategy is based on the fact that the reference
voltage space vector V
sr
can be synthesized with two equal
and opposite components V
sr
/2 and V
sr
/2, by subtracting
the latter component from the former. It is also based on
the observation that the effect of applying a vector with
inverter1 while inverter2 assumes a null state is the same
as that of applying the opposite vector with inverter2
while inverter1 assumes a null state. Figure 6 shows the
method of this PWM strategy. It is worth noting that the
phase axes of the motor viewed with reference to
individual inverters are in phase opposition.
In Fig.6, the vector OT represents the actual reference
voltage space vector that is to be synthesized from the
dualinverter system and is given by
sr
V Zo. This vector
is resolved into two equal and opposite components OT
1
(V
sr
/2 Zo) and OT
2
(V
sr
/2 Z180º + o). The vector OT
1
is
synthesized by inverter1 in the average sense by
switching amongst the states (8127) while the vector
OT
2
is reconstructed by inverter2 in the average sense by
switching amongst the states (8’5’4’7’).
The basic switching algorithm described in reference [5]
for the classical case of a 2level inverter feeding an
ordinary induction motor is extended for the dualinverter
system to compute the switching timings for individual
inverters.
These two strategies are described in detail in the
following subsections.
This algorithm [5] uses only the instantaneous phase
reference voltages and is based on the concept of
‘effective time’. The effective time is defined as the time
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
98
Fig.6: The decoupled PWM strategy
for which the inverter supplies power to the motor in a
given sampling time period and is denoted as T
eff
.The
sampling time period is denoted as
s
T . The instantaneous
phase reference voltages are obtained by projecting the tip
of the reference vector
sr
V on to the respective phase axes
and multiplying the values of these projections with a
factor of (2/3). These instantaneous phase reference
voltages are denoted as
*
a
v ,
*
b
v and
*
c
v . This algorithm
accomplishes the automatic generation of the gating pulses
for the individual switching devices while placing the
effective time exactly at the center of a given sampling
time period. The symbols
ga
T ,
gb
T and
gc
T respectively
denote the time duration for which a given motor phase is
connected to the positive rail of the input DC power
supply of the inverter in the given sampling time period Ts.
The timings
ga
T ,
gb
T and
gc
T are termed as the phase
switching times. The procedure to generate the gating
pulses for the individual devices using this algorithm in
sector1 is pictorially depicted in Fig.7. A similar
procedure is adopted for all the other sectors.
In the context of a dual inverter drive, there exist two sets
of phase switching times, one for each inverter. The
timings
ga
T ,
gb
T and
gc
T correspond to inverter1 while the
timings
'
ga
T ,
'
gb
T and
'
gc
T correspond to inverter2. The
instantaneous reference phase voltages
*
a
v ,
*
b
v and
*
c
v
correspond to the actual reference space vector
sr
V of the
dualinverter system. As individual inverters operate with
the references V
sr
/2 and V
sr
/2 respectively, it follows that
the corresponding phase references are given by,
2 /
*
a
v , 2 /
*
b
v and 2 /
*
c
v for inverter1 and 2 /
*
a
v ÷ ,
2 /
*
b
v ÷ and 2 /
*
c
v ÷ for inverter2. These references are
then employed to determine the phase switching timings
of each inverter using the aforementioned switching
algorithm [8]. It can be shown mathematically that the
phase switching times of the inverters are related by (the
proof of this result is presented in appendixA):
'
ga
T =
s
T –
ga
T ;
'
gb
T =
s
T –
'
gb
T ;
'
gc
T =
s
T –
gc
T
Fig.7: Generation of switching sequence with algorithm reported
in reference [8]
Thus, the phase switching timings need not be exclusively
computed for inverter2. Both inverters are operated with
the same sequence so that the null vector combinations are
88’ and 77’. From table1, it may be noted that these two
combinations result in the zerosequence voltage that is
zero. If one inverter is operated with onsequence and the
other with offsequence, the null vector combinations
would be 87’ or 78’. From table2 it is evident that the
zerosequence voltage of the difference of the pole
voltages is maximum for these two combinations. It is
interesting to note that this zerosequence voltage is much
lesser with this algorithm than the lookup table approach
used in [6]. This is because the combinations 87’ and 78’
are used extensively with that approach [6]. The merit of
the decoupled control is that there is no computational
burden on the controller and is therefore amenable to be
used with slower controllers (processors) and possibly the
reduced zerosequence voltage in the difference of pole
voltages. However, in this approach, both inverters are to
be switched.
IV. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION FOR THE DECOUPLED
PWM STRATEGY
The performance of the dualinverter scheme is first
evaluated with simulation studies using MATLAB and the
induction motor is operated with the V/f control scheme.
The experiment is performed on a 1 H.P. openend
winding induction motor with V/f control and the gating
signals to the dualinverter are generated with
TMS320F240 Digital Signal Processor. A fixed number of
samples (48) are employed for the implementation of the
space vector modulation per cycle in the entire range of
operation. This means that the sampling time period is a
variable quantity. In the present case, the number of
samples used per cycle is 48. This means that the angular
displacement between successive samples is 7.5
0
(360/48).
Fig.8 shows a typical sample. This is the 4
th
sample from
the beginning of the cycle and occurs at o = 22.5
0
(Fig.6).
The modulation index, denoted as ‘m
i
,’ is given by
dc sr
V V / .
It may be noted from Fig.8 that
ga
T +
'
ga
T =
s
T as
mentioned earlier. Therefore, the phase timings for
inverter2 need not be evaluated separately. They are
obtained simply by subtracting the timings of the
corresponding phases from
s
T .
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
99
Fig.8: A typical sample with decoupled control
The top traces of Fig.9 show the gating signals of the top
devices of the Aphase legs of the individual inverters for
m
i
= 0.4. The bottom trace of the same figure shows the
difference of the two pole voltages, which contains a
significant zerosequence voltage. Fig.10 shows the
simulated (left) and experimentally obtained (right) results
of the pole voltages for phaseA of the inverter1 and
Fig.11 show the same for inverter2 both for a modulation
index of m
i
= 0.4. Fig.12 shows the difference of these
pole voltages and Fig.13 shows the simulated and
experimentally obtained result of the actual motor phase
voltage for m
i
= 0.4. Of these, the latter waveform is
obtained after the subtraction of the commonmode
voltages from the difference of pole voltages shown in
Fig.12. As isolated DC power supplies are employed in the
present case, the zerosequence voltage is dropped
between the negative bus terminals of the individual
inverters. Fig.14 shows the simulated and experimentally
obtained results of the zerosequence voltage. Figure 15
shows the experimentally obtained motor phase current at
noload for the same m
i
of 0.4.
Figures 16 and 17 respectively shows the normalized
harmonic spectra of the difference in pole voltages and
actual motor phase voltage presented in Fig.12 and 13. It
is seen from Fig.16 that the zerosequence voltage in the
difference of polevoltages is significantly reduced
compared with the strategy adopted in [7].
Fig.9: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages derived
as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the aphase
legs of the two inverters for m
i
= 0.4
For example, the normalized third harmonic component is
about 1.4 p.u. with the strategy adopted in [7], while it is
only about 0.2 p.u. (Fig.16) with the decoupled control of
the dualinverter scheme for the same modulation index
of mi=0.4. It may be noted from Fig.16 that, apart from the
fundamental, the 47th and the 49th harmonics are
dominant as the sampling frequency is 48 times the
frequency of the fundamental component. The
corresponding waveforms for a modulation index of
m
i
=0.7 are shown through Fig.18 to Fig.25.
Fig.10: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter1 for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.11: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter2 for m
i
= 0.4
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
100
Fig.12: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for
m
i
= 0.4
Fig.13: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the actual motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.14: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained
result (bottom) of the commonmode voltage for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.15: Experimentally obtained motor phase current at noload
for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.16: The normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of
pole voltages for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.17: The normalized harmonic spectrum of the actual motor
phase voltage for m
i
= 0.4
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
101
Fig.18: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages
derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the
aphase legs of the two inverters for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.19: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter1 for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.20: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter2 for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.21: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for
m
i
= 0.7
Fig.22: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the commonmode voltage for m
i
= 0.7
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
102
Fig.23: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the actual motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.7
Fig. 24: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the
pole voltages for m
i
= 0.7
Fig. 25: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the motor phase
voltage for m
i
= 0.7.
V. THE BIASING INVERTER PWM STRATEGY
This PWM strategy is based on the observation that the
space vector combinations at the vertices and the center of
a given subhexagon are obtained by clamping one
inverter with an active state, while the other inverter
assumes all the eight states. Consequently, one inverter
may be employed as the biasing inverter to realize the
biasing vector and the other inverter may be switched
around this biasing vector. Figure 26 shows the basic
operating principle of this PWM strategy.
In Fig 26, OT represents the reference vector with its
tip situated in sector7. It is resolved into two components
OA and AT. The vector OA may be output with inverter1
with its state clamped at 1(+, Table1) throughout the
sampling time interval. The vector AT is realized in the
average sense by switching inverter2 around the sub
hexagonal center, A. Alternatively, the biasing vector OA
may be output with inverter2 with its state clamped at 4’(
++, Table1) throughout the sampling time interval. In that
case, the switching vector AT is generated with inverter1.
The instantaneous phase references denoted by,
*
a
v ,
*
b
v and
*
c
v corresponding to the reference vector OT are obtained
by projecting its tip on to the respective phase axes and
multiplying the values of these projections (OU, OV and
OW, Fig.26) with a factor of (2/3). The symbols
*
o
v and
*

v respectively denote the components of OT on the o
and the  axes (OU and OX, Fig.26). The modified
instantaneous voltage phase references corresponding to
the switching vector AT are denoted by,
a
v ,
b
v and
c
v are
obtained by the following procedure:
1. The instantaneous phase references
*
a
v ,
*
b
v and
*
c
v
corresponding to the reference vector OT are
transformed into the corresponding equivalent two
phase system references
*
o
v and
*

v using the classical
three phase to two phase transformation given by:
(
(
(
(
¸
(
¸
(
(
(
(
¸
(
¸
÷
=
(
(
(
¸
(
¸
*
*
*
*
*
2
3
2
3
0
0 0
2
3
c
b
a
v
v
v
v
v

o
Fig.26: Principle of biasing inverter PWM strategy
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
103
2. The subhexagonal center situated nearest to the tip
of the reference vector OT is then determined.
3. The coordinates of the nearest subhexagonal center
in the
o
v 

v plane (the point ‘A’ in this example,
Fig.26), denoted as
nshc
v
, o
and
nshc
v
, 
are known for
all the six subhexagonal centers. For example, the
coordinates of the point ‘A’ in the
o
v 

v plane are
given by (Vdc/2,0).
4. Since the vector OA is output by the biasing inverter,
the coordinates of the switching vector (AT in the
present case) denoted as
sw
V
, o
and
sw
V
, 
are given by:
sw
V
, o
=
*
o
v 
nshc
v
, o
and
sw
V
, 
=
*

v 
nshc
v
, 
5. The modified reference phase voltages
a
v ,
b
v and
c
v for the switching inverter are then obtained by
transforming
sw
V
, o
,
sw
V
, 
into the corresponding three
phase variables by using the classical two phase –
three phase transformation given by:
(
(
¸
(
¸
(
(
(
¸
(
¸
÷ ÷
÷ =
(
(
(
¸
(
¸
sw
sw
c
b
a
V
V
v
v
v
,
,
3 / 1 3 / 1
3 / 1 3 / 1
0 3 / 2

o
6. If inverter2 is employed as the biasing inverter, the
modified references are used directly to generate the
switching vector AT with inverter1. On the other
hand, if inverter1 is used as the biasing inverter, it is
obvious that the modified references must be
negated to generate the switching vector AT with
inverter2.
The principal advantage with this PWM strategy is that the
inverter switching is significantly reduced as one inverter
switches only six times, while the other switches for 48
times. With decoupled control both inverters are switched
in all the 48 samples.
It is important to note that the most important part of this
algorithm is to find the nearest subhexagonal center to the
tip of the reference vector OT (Fig.26). Fig.27 and Fig.28
explain the method to determine the same. In the
discussion to follow, the symbol ‘u’ denotes the angle
subtended by the tip of the reference voltage space vector
with respect to an instant where the instantaneous value of
the Aphase reference voltage is zero. Fig.27 shows
various values of ‘u’ corresponding to the positive and the
negative zero crossings of the reference phase voltages in
the
o
V 

V plane. From Fig.27, it may be noted that if 0º s
u s 60º, the tip of
sr
V is situated in the quadrangle OSRQ.
It may also be seen that ‘F’ is the nearest subhexagonal
center for this condition. Should the tip of the reference
vector be situated within the quadrangle OSGH, ‘A’ is the
nearest subhexagonal center to it. Similar observations
may be made for the rest of the subhexagonal centers. It
is desirable to identify the nearest subhexagonal center
directly from the instantaneous phase references without
having to evaluate
sr
V and there by the value of ‘u’, as it
would be very time consuming.
The instantaneous phase reference voltages
*
a
v ,
*
b
v and
*
c
v (solid lines) normalized w.r.t
sr
V and their respective
negations (dotted lines) are shown in Fig.28. From Fig.28
it may be noted that
*
a
v is the most positive quantity
amongst these six quantities when 60º s u s 120 º and ‘A’
is the nearest subhexagonal center as recognized by
Fig.27. Similarly
*
a
v ÷ is the most positive quantity
amongst these six when 240º s u s 300º and ‘D’ is the
nearest subhexagonal center. Figure 27 also reinforces
this fact. Thus, it is clear that by finding the maximum
value amongst these six quantities, one can determine the
nearest subhexagonal center.
Fig.27: Zero crossing of the instantaneous phase voltages
corresponding to the reference voltage space vector
Fig.28: Recognition of the nearest subhexagonal center with
instantaneous reference quantities
VI. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION FOR BIASING INVERTER
PWM STRATEGY:
The top traces of Fig.29 show the gating signals of the top
devices of the Aphase legs of the individual inverters for
mi = 0.4. In this case, the samples of the reference vector
always lie within the core hexagon ABCDEF. The bottom
trace of the same figure shows the difference of the two
pole voltages. Figures 30 and 31 show the respective pole
voltages (both simulated & experimental results) of the
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
104
individual inverters with this PWM strategy. From these
two figures, it is evident that the switching of inverter1 is
drastically reduced as it is made to operate as the biasing
inverter for all samples in a cycle. However, the switching
of inverter2 remains unaltered as it is used as the
switching inverter for all the samples in a cycle. Figure 32
shows the difference of the pole voltages, while Fig.33
shows the actual motor phase voltage (obtained after the
subtraction of the zerosequence voltage from the
waveform shown in Fig.34). In this case, the phase voltage
waveform is similar to the one obtained by a conventional
twolevel inverter. However, the switching ripple with the
openend winding configuration is much lesser compared
to the one obtained with a twolevel inverter. This is
because; the space vector l9 locations situated at the
closest proximity are switched with openend winding
drive. Specifically, if the sample is situated in sector1, the
vertices ‘O’, ‘A’ and ‘B’ are switched, unlike in a two
level inverter, where the location ‘O’, ‘G’ and ‘I’ are
switched to construct the same sample (Fig.3). Fig.34
shows the simulated and experimentally obtained results
of the zerosequence voltage. Figures 35 and 36
respectively show the harmonic spectra of the difference in
pole voltages (shown in Fig.32) and the actual motor
phase voltage (shown in Fig.34). Figure 37 shows the
experimentally obtained motor phase current at noload for
the same m
i
of 0.4.
The corresponding waveforms for a modulation index of
m
i
=0.7 are shown through Fig.38 to Fig.45. In this case,
the tip of the reference vector traverses through the outer
sectors i.e. 7 to 24. It is also evident that the phase voltage
waveform is similar to the one obtained in a 3level
inverter, as the nearest vertices are switched to synthesize
the sample.
With this PWM strategy, the space vector combinations
11’, 22’, 33’, 44’, 55’ and 66’ are exclusively employed,
whenever the location ‘O’ is switched. It is worth noting
that with this PWM strategy, the location ‘O’ is employed
as an ‘active’ location while the subhexagonal centers
constitute the ‘null’ locations as switching is performed
around them. From table2, it may be observed that these
combinations result in a zerosequence voltage that is zero.
In contrast, the PWM strategy proposed in [6] employs the
location ‘O’ as a ‘null’ location. Whenever the location ‘O’
is switched with this PWM strategy [6], the combinations
87’ and 78’ are used. From table2, it may be noted that
these two combinations result in maximum zerosequence
voltages, particularly for low modulation indices wherein
the dwell time associated with the ‘null’ vector location
‘O’ is more. Thus, a significant reduction in the zero
sequence voltage in the difference of pole voltages is
possible with the PWM strategy proposed in this paper.
For a modulation of 40%, the zerosequence voltage
resulting with the strategy adopted in [6] is about 1.4 p.u.,
while with the biasing inverter strategy it is 0.4 p.u. for the
same modulation depth. The normalized harmonics spectra
of the difference of aphase pole voltages of the two
inverters with the PWM scheme adopted in the earlier
work reported [6], and using the two PWM schemes
proposed in this paper i.e. Decoupled PWM scheme and
Biasing Inverter PWM scheme for different modulation
indices are shown in Fig.46.
Fig.29: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages
derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the
aphase legs of the two inverters for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.30: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter1 for m
i
= 0.4
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
105
Fig.31: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter2 for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.32: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for
m
i
= 0.4
Fig.33: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the actual motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.34: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the commonmode voltage for m
i
= 0.4
Fig. 35: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the
pole voltages for m
i
= 0.4
Fig. 36: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the
motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.4
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
106
Fig.37: Experimentally obtained motor phase current at noload
for m
i
= 0.4
Fig.38: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages
derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the
aphase legs of the two inverters for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.39: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter1 for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.40: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of Pole voltage of inverter2 for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.41: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for
m
i
= 0.7
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
107
Fig.42: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the commonmode voltage for m
i
= 0.7
Fig.43: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom)
of the actual motor phase voltage for m
i
= 0.7
Fig. 44: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the
pole voltages for m
i
= 0.7
Fig. 45: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the motor phase
voltage for m
i
= 0.7
VII. CONCLUSIONS
Comparing the resultant motor phase voltages with the
two PWM strategies proposed in this paper, (Fig.23 and
Fig.43) it is clear that it is possible to synthesize a
conventional threelevel inverter waveform with the
biasing inverter PWM strategy. With the biasing inverter
PWM strategy the reference space vector is reproduced in
the average sense by switching amongst the vector
combinations available at the nearest three vertices.
Consequently the switching ripple with this strategy is
lesser than the decoupled PWM strategy. From the
harmonic spectra of the resultant motor phase voltage with
these two strategies (Fig.17 and Fig.29), it is seen that the
distribution of harmonic energy is better with the biasing
inverter PWM strategy. However, as pointed out earlier,
the principal advantage with the decoupled PWM
algorithm is its fastness and its amenability of
implementation with slower controllers. It is interesting to
note that the PWM strategies proposed in this paper result
in a significant reduction in the zerosequence voltage in
the difference of polevoltages compared to the lookup
table approach proposed in [6] at lower indices of
modulation, which could be desirable. Both strategies
obviate the time consuming process of sector identification
and the coordinate transformations. Lookup tables are not
needed with the proposed PWM strategies, reducing the
memory requirements of the controller.
REFERENCES
[1] Akira Nabae, Isao Takahashi and Hirofumi Akagi, “A New
NeutralPoint Clamped PWM Inverter”, IEEE Trans. Ind.
Appl., Vol. IA17, No. 5, SeptemberOctober 1981, pp.
518523.
[2] T.A. Meynard and H Foch, “MultiLevel Conversion: High
Voltage Choppers and Voltage Source Inverters,” Conf.
Proc. IEEE PESC 1992, pp. 397403.
[3] Leon M. Tolbert, Fang Zheng Peng and Thomas G. Habetler,
“Multilevel Converters for Large Electric Drives,” IEEE
Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 35, No. 1, JanuaryFebruary 1999,
pp. 3644.
[4] H. Stemmler, P. Guggenbach, “Configurations of High
Power Voltage Source Inverter Drives”, Proceedings EPE
Conference, 1993, pp. 714.
[5] JoohnSheok Kim, SeungKi Sul, “A Novel Voltage
Modulation Technique of the Space Vector PWM”,
Conference Proceedings IPEC1995, pp. 742747.
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
108
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
1
2
3
4
5
Harmonic number
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Harmonic number
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Harmonic number
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Harmonic number
m
i
=0.1
m
i
=0.2
m
i
=0.3
m
i
=0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.1
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.2
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of V
ao
m
i
=0.3
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vaovado
m
i
=0.1
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vaovado
m
i
=0.3
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vaovado
m
i
=0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
1
1.5
Harmonic order
N
orm
alised H
arm
onic spectrum
of vaovado
m
i
=0.2
(a) (b)
(c)
[6] E.G. Shivakumar, K. Gopakumar, S.K. Sinha, Andre Pittet,
V.T. Ranganathan, “Space Vector Control of Dual Inverter
Fed OpenEnd Winding Induction Motor Drive”, EPE
Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, February 2002, pp. 918.
[7] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, “ThreeLevel Inverter
Configuration Cascading Two TwoLevel Inverters”, IEEE
Proc. Electr. Power Appl., Vol. 150, No. 3, May 2003, pp.
245254.
[8] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, A. Pittet and V.T.
Ranganathan, “PWM Inverter Switching Strategy for a Dual
TwoLevel Inverter Fed Open End Winding Induction
Motor Drive with a Switched Neutral”, IEE Proc. Of Electr.
Power Appl., Vol. 149, No, 2, March 2002, pp. 152160.
[9] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, M.R. Baiju, K.K.
Mohapatra and L. Umanand, “A Multilevel Inverter System
for an Open End Winding Induction Motor with OpenEnd
Windings,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,
Vol. 52, No. 3, June 2005, pp. 824836.
[10] V.T. Somasekhar, K. Gopakumar, E.G. Shivakumar, S.K.
Sinha, “A Space Vector Modulation Scheme for Dual Two
Level Inverter Fed an OpenEnd Winding Induction Motor
Drive for the Elimination of Zero Sequence Current”, EPE
Journal, Vol. 12, No. 2, May 2002, pp. 2636.
[11] V.T. Somasekhar, M.R. Baiju and K. Gopakumar, “Dual
Two Level Inverter Scheme for an OpenEnd Winding
Induction Motor Drive with a Single DC Power Supply and
Improved DC Bus Utilization”, IEE Proc. of Electr. Power.
Appl., Vol. 151, No. 2, March 2004, pp. 230238.
[12] M. B. Baiju, K.K. Mohapatra, R.S. Kanchan and K.
Gopakumar, “A Dual TwoLevel Inverter Scheme with
Common Mode Voltage Elimination for an Induction Motor
Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. Vol. 19,
No. 3, May 2004, pp. 794805.
[13] V. Oleschuk, B.K. Bose, A.M. Stankovic, “PhaseShift
Based Synchronous Modulation of DualInverters for an
OpenEnd Winding Induction Motor Drive with Elimination
of Zero Sequence Currents”, Conf. Proc. IEEEPEDS2005,
pp. 325330.
[14] V. Oleschuk, F. Profumo, A. Tenconi and R. Bojoi,
“Synchronized Pulse_Width Modulation for Control of
InverterFed OpenEnd Winding Motor Drives”, EPE Conf.
Proc., Pelincec, 2005, PaperID: 94.
APPENDIX
The imaginary switching times [5] for inverter1 and
inverter2 are related to the respective phase reference
voltages as follows:
*
) ( 2
a
V
T
as
v T
dc
s
=
(1)
*
) ( 2
b
V
T
bs
v T
dc
s
=
(2)
*
) ( 2
c
V
T
cs
v T
dc
s
=
(3)
* '
) ( 2
a
V
T
ga
v T
dc
s
÷ =
(4)
* '
) ( 2
c
V
T
gb
v T
dc
s
÷ =
(5)
* '
) ( 2
c
V
T
gc
v T
dc
s
÷ =
(6)
When the reference vector is situated in sector1,
For Inverter1:
as
T T =
max
CS
T T =
min
As
] 5 [
min max
T T T
eff
÷ =
cs as eff
T T T ÷ = ¬
Using equations (1), (2) & (3), we have
) )( ( 2
* *
c a
V
T
eff
v v T
dc
s
÷ =
(7)
Similarly for Invertre2:
' '
min as
T T =
' '
max cs
T T =
' ' '
as cs eff
T T T ÷ =
Using equations (4), (5) & (6), we have
) )( ( 2
* * '
c a
V
T
eff
v v T
dc
s
÷ =
(8)
Asian Power Electronics Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, Aug 2007
109
It is obvious that the effectivetime period for inverter1
and inverter2 are equal, as the reference vector is resolved
into two equal halves.
From equations (7) & (8), we have
'
eff eff
T T =
(9)
As
eff s o
T T T ÷ =
&
' '
eff s o
T T T ÷ =
[5]
'
o o
T T = ¬
[from eqn.(9)]
It was shown in [5] that the timeoffset required to place
the effective time period at the centre of the sampling time
interval is given by:
min
2
T
T
T
o
offset
÷ =
Hence for inverter1, the timeoffset is:
*
) ( 2
2
c
dc
s o
offset
v
V
T T
T ÷ =
Similarly,
'
min
'
2
T
T
T
o
offset
÷ =
*
) ( 2
2
a
dc
s o
v
V
T T
+ =
From the algorithm proposed in [5], the phase switching
time for phaseA for inverter1 is given by:
offset as ga
T T T + = (10)
* *
) ( 2
2
) ( 2
c
dc
s o
a
dc
s
v
V
T T
v
V
T
÷ + =
) )( ( 2
2
* *
c a
V
T
o
ga
v v
T
T
dc
s
÷ + = (11)
Similarly for inverter2,
' ' '
offset as ga
T T T + =
* *
) ( 2
2
) ( 2
a
dc
s o
a
dc
s
v
V
T T
v
V
T
+ + ÷ =
2
' o
ga
T
T = (12)
From equations (11) & (12), it is evident that
) )( ( 2
* * '
c a
dc
s
o ga ga
v v
V
T
T T T ÷ + = +
From eqn.7,
eff o ga ga
T T T T + = +
'
s
T =
ga s ga
T T T ÷ =
'
Similarly, the phase switching times for the other two
phases are given as:
gb s gb
T T T ÷ =
'
gc s gc
T T T ÷ =
'
BIOGRAPHIES
S.Srinivas received the B.E degree in
Electrical Engineering from Osmania
University College of Engineering and his
Masters degree from Regional
Engineering CollegeWarangal in 1997
and 2002 respectively.
He is currently working towards the Ph.D
degree at National Institute of
TechnologyWarangal.
He joined the Faculty of Electrical
Engineering National Institute of
TechnologyWarangal in the year 1997.
His research interests are multilevel inverters, PWM Switching
Strategies, Multilevel inversion realized through Openend winding
Induction motor drives, AC drives etc.
Dr. V.T. Somasekhar received his
graduate degree from Regional
Engineering College Warangal (presently
the National Institute of Technology) in
1988 and the post graduate degree from
the Indian Institute of Technology,
Bombay in 1990, his area of
specialization being Power Electronics.
He worked as an R&D engineer at M/s
Perpetual Power Technologies, Bangalore
and as a senior engineer at M/s Kirloskar
Electric Co. Ltd., Mysore. He joined the
faculty of electrical engineering at the
National Institute of Technology in 1993, where he is currently
serving. He received his doctoral degree from the Indian Institute of
Science in 2003. His current interests are multilevel inversion with
openend induction motors, AC drives and PWM strategies.
S.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed ...
110
each inverter is operated with an isolated dc. S4' S3'. S6. 4 – 2’. S1' 8 – 4’ S1'. which is deleterious to the switching devices and the motor itself. when isolated DC power supplies are used for individual inverters.) Switches turned on S6'. 7 – 7’ 5 – 8’. 2: Space vector locations of inverter1 (Left) and inverter2 (Right) Fig. 1 – 8’ 6 – 5’. 5 – 6’ 5 – 2’. G and H in the present case) using the space vector modulation technique. To suppress the zerosequence components in the motor phases. S3. OB and the switching time of the null vector situated at O to synthesize the transformed reference vector OT’ are evaluated. due to the presence of zerosequence voltages (commonmode voltages) [5].. 3 – 3’. 6 – 3’ 2 – 5’.) 3' ( . 4 – 6’.. This vector is to be synthesized in the average sense by switching the space vector combinations situated in the closest proximity (the combinations situated at the vertices A. In Fig. S4'. In the work reported in reference [7]. 2 – 2’. From the Fig. the zerosequence voltage appears across the points ‘O’ and ‘O’”.+ ) 6' ( + . S6 S5. S1. 3 – 4’ 8 – 1’. S5' S4'. 4 – 3’ 4 – 1’. S2' S1'. S3. 4 – 7’ 1 – 4’.1 shows the basic openend winding induction motor drive. S2'. S6'. 4: The openend winding induction motor drive with two isolated power supplies Fig. S1 S1.) 2(++) 3(+) 4(++) 5(+) 6(++) 7(+++) 8() Switches turned on S6.+ + ) 5' ( .+ ) 7' ( + + + ) 8' ( . S3'. S1'. S2 S1. a high zerosequence current would flow through the motor phase windings.power supply as shown in Fig.4. S3'. with its tip situated in sector7 (Fig. S5 S4. 1 – 1’.3: Resultant space vector combinations in the dualinverter scheme Table – 1: Switching states of the individual inverters State of Inverter1 1 ( + . Consequently. 6 – 4’. 5 – 1’. S3' S2'. 5 – 3’.3’ 5 – 4’.5. the reference vector OT is transformed to OT’ in the core hexagon ABCDEF by using an appropriate coordinate transformation. 6 – 6’.4.3). 4 – 5’. S6' 87’ 8 – 6’ 8 – 2’ 5 – 7’ 3 –7’ 1 – 7’ Table – 2: Zerosequence voltage contributions in the difference of the pole. 6 – 7’ 2 – 7’ 8 – 8’. The switching algorithm described in reference [5] is employed to evaluate these timings. S6' S5'. Consequently. In the core hexagon. [6]. S3 S2. S5'. which shifts the point A to point O. The zerosequence voltage resulting from each of the 64 space vector combinations is reproduced in Table2 from [6] to facilitate an easy reference. 7 – 6’ 7 – 2’ 4 – 8’ 6 – 8’ 2 – 8’ 7 – 5’ 7 – 3’ 7 – 1’ 7 – 8’ Fig. the vector OT represents the reference vector (also called the reference sample).+ . S5 S2. S4. 1. the switching timings of the active vectors OA. No. 1 – 5’. S4'. 2 – 6’. S5. Aug 2007 3(+) 2(++) 3’(+) 2’(++) 4(++) 8() 7(+++) 1(+) 4’(++) 8’() 7’(+++) 1’(+) flow as it is denied a path. 5 – 5’. 6 – 1’ 2 – 1’. It cannot be operated with a single power supply. These timings are then employed to produce the actual reference vector OT situated in sector7 by switching amongst the switching 5(+) 6(++) Vdc/2 5’(+) 6’(++) Vdc/2 Fig. 1 – 6’ 1 – 2’. 2 – 4’.Asian Power Electronics Journal. Vol. 3 – 6’ 3 – 2’. 3 – 8’. the zerosequence current cannot 97 . S4 S3. 4 – 4’. 3 – 5’. S4. 1. 3 – 1’.) 2' ( + + ..voltages of individual inverters V d c /2 V d c /3 V d c /6 0 V d c / 6 V d c /3 V d c /2 85’ 8 . S2. 2 – 3’ 7 – 4’. S6 State of Inverter2 1' ( + .) 4' ( . 6 – 2’. S5' S2'. 1 – 3’.
e. All the seven locations of a given subhexagonal center (i. Of the 20 space vector combinations with a commonmode voltage contribution of zero.PROPOSED PWM STRATEGIES The proposed PWM strategies are based on the following observations: 1. there is a need requirement for lookup tables. For example. the vector OT represents the actual reference voltage space vector that is to be synthesized from the dualinverter system and is given by V sr D. II. they are referred to as subhexagonal centers. the space vector locations of the resulting dual inverter scheme may be obtained by superposing the center of the left hexagon at each of the space vector locations of the right hexagon. there exist six outer subhexagons namely OBHGSF. For the subhexagon OFSGHB. in the difference of the polevoltages of respective inverters. The effective time is defined as the time combinations available at the vertices A. The space vector combinations at the subhexagonal center ‘A’ are given by the active vector to which inverter1 is clamped (in this case to state1) and the null vectors of inverter2 (states 8’ and 7’. 4. any PWM strategy that makes a good use of these states is expected to cause a reduction in the zerosequence voltages. The vector OT1 is synthesized by inverter1 in the average sense by switching amongst the states (8127) while the vector OT2 is reconstructed by inverter2 in the average sense by switching amongst the states (8’5’4’7’). 8 are located at the origin O (Table2.. Apart from the core hexagon ABCDEF centered around O. Fig. The space vector combinations at the vertices and at the center of a given subhexagon are obtained by clamping one inverter to a given state while the other inverter assumes all the eight states. the controller negotiates a considerable computational burden primarily because of sector identification and coordinate transformation.3) are obtained by superposing the space vector locations resulting from inverter2 (i. C. Therefore.6. The latter step requires a lookup table in which the space vector combinations available at each space vector location are stored. Figure 6 shows the method of this PWM strategy. Fig. by superposing the center of the right hexagon. the zerosequence voltage in the difference of the respective pole voltages of individual inverters (which is dropped across the points ‘O’ and ‘O’’ in Fig.e. ODLKJB. are obtained by clamping inverter1 to the state of 1(+). 98 . It is worth noting that the phase axes of the motor viewed with reference to individual inverters are in phase opposition. Alternatively. the space vector combinations at the vertices of the subhexagon OFSGHB (centered around the point ‘A’. the space vector combinations for these seven locations may alternatively be obtained by clamping inverter2 to state 4’(++) while inverter1 assumes all the eight states. 5. Fig. Thus. Also. THE DECOUPLED PWM STRATEGY This PWM strategy is based on the fact that the reference voltage space vector Vsr can be synthesized with two equal and opposite components Vsr/2 and Vsr/2.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed . OCJIHA.2). The resultant space vector locations in the dualinverter scheme (Fig. enhancing the memory requirement. This algorithm [5] uses only the instantaneous phase reference voltages and is based on the concept of ‘effective time’. Fig. while inverter2 assumes the states 1’ to 6’ respectively. D. It is also based on the observation that the effect of applying a vector with inverter1 while inverter2 assumes a null state is the same as that of applying the opposite vector with inverter2 while inverter1 assumes a null state.3). six vertices and the corresponding subhexagonal center) show redundancy of space vector combinations.2) at each space vector location caused by inverter1 (left hexagon. These two strategies are described in detail in the following subsections.S. In Fig. E and F respectively. 2. OENMLC. The basic switching algorithm described in reference [5] for the classical case of a 2level inverter feeding an ordinary induction motor is extended for the dualinverter system to compute the switching timings for individual inverters. OFQPND and OASRQE centered around the points A.4) is also high with this PWM scheme.3). Table1) respectively. 3. For the rest of this paper. This vector is resolved into two equal and opposite components OT1 (Vsr/2 D) and OT2 (Vsr/2 180º + D). B.. G and H. by subtracting the latter component from the former. it is evident that with this switching algorithm. Fig. Further.5: Resolution of the reference voltage space vector in the middle and outer sectors The following PWM strategies are proposed in this paper: x x The Decoupled PWM strategy The Biasing inverter PWM strategy III.
50 (360/48). it may be noted that these two combinations result in the zerosequence voltage that is zero. Tgc = Ts – Tgc mentioned earlier. 99 . This is because the combinations 87’ and 78’ are used extensively with that approach [6]. Therefore. This means that the angular displacement between successive samples is 7. there exist two sets of phase switching times. The modulation index.’ is given by V sr / V dc . EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION FOR THE DECOUPLED PWM STRATEGY The performance of the dualinverter scheme is first evaluated with simulation studies using MATLAB and the induction motor is operated with the V/f control scheme. * * * * va / 2 . These references are * then employed to determine the phase switching timings of each inverter using the aforementioned switching algorithm [8]. No. It is interesting to note that this zerosequence voltage is much lesser with this algorithm than the lookup table approach used in [6]. The merit of the decoupled control is that there is no computational burden on the controller and is therefore amenable to be used with slower controllers (processors) and possibly the reduced zerosequence voltage in the difference of polevoltages. The timings Tga . one for each inverter. the null vector combinations would be 87’ or 78’. it follows that the corresponding phase references are given by. They are obtained simply by subtracting the timings of the corresponding phases from Ts . both inverters are to be switched. vb and v c* correspond to the actual reference space vector V sr of the dualinverter system. Tgb and Tgc correspond to inverter2. vb and vc* .Asian Power Electronics Journal.6: The decoupled PWM strategy Fig. in this approach. vb / 2 and vc / 2 for inverter1 and va / 2 . Aug 2007 Fig. Tgb and Tgc are termed as the phase switching times. the phase timings for inverter2 need not be evaluated separately. The instantaneous phase reference voltages are obtained by projecting the tip of the reference vector Vsr on to the respective phase axes and multiplying the values of these projections with a factor of (2/3). The procedure to generate the gating pulses for the individual devices using this algorithm in sector1 is pictorially depicted in Fig.8 shows a typical sample. Fig. Vol. This means that the sampling time period is a variable quantity. the phase switching timings need not be exclusively computed for inverter2. denoted as ‘mi. T gb = Ts – Tgb . A fixed number of samples (48) are employed for the implementation of the space vector modulation per cycle in the entire range of operation. Tgb and Tgc respectively denote the time duration for which a given motor phase is connected to the positive rail of the input DC power supply of the inverter in the given sampling time period Ts. However. ' It may be noted from Fig. Tgb and Tgc correspond to inverter1 while the ' ' ' timings Tga . IV. It can be shown mathematically that the phase switching times of the inverters are related by (the proof of this result is presented in appendixA): ' ' ' ' Tga = Ts – Tga .7: Generation of switching sequence with algorithm reported in reference [8] for which the inverter supplies power to the motor in a given sampling time period and is denoted as Teff. Both inverters are operated with the same sequence so that the null vector combinations are 88’ and 77’.7. A similar procedure is adopted for all the other sectors. The symbols Tga . the number of samples used per cycle is 48.The sampling time period is denoted as Ts . 1.6). 1. These instantaneous phase reference * * voltages are denoted as v a . Thus. The experiment is performed on a 1 H. In the present case.8 that Tga + Tga = Ts as * vb / 2 and v c / 2 for inverter2.50 (Fig. The * * instantaneous reference phase voltages v a . If one inverter is operated with onsequence and the other with offsequence. The timings Tga . openend winding induction motor with V/f control and the gating signals to the dualinverter are generated with TMS320F240 Digital Signal Processor.P. As individual inverters operate with the references Vsr/2 and Vsr/2 respectively. From table1. This algorithm accomplishes the automatic generation of the gating pulses for the individual switching devices while placing the effective time exactly at the center of a given sampling time period. This is the 4th sample from the beginning of the cycle and occurs at D = 22. In the context of a dual inverter drive. From table2 it is evident that the zerosequence voltage of the difference of the polevoltages is maximum for these two combinations.
Fig. with the strategy adopted in [7].7 are shown through Fig.10 shows the simulated (left) and experimentally obtained (right) results of the pole voltages for phaseA of the inverter1 and Fig.9 show the gating signals of the top devices of the Aphase legs of the individual inverters for mi = 0.4 Fig. The bottom trace of the same figure shows the difference of the two pole voltages.16 that.12 and 13. Fig.11: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter2 for mi = 0.4.4 p.16) with the decoupled control of the dualinverter scheme for the same modulation index of mi=0.25.14 shows the simulated and experimentally obtained results of the zerosequence voltage. which contains a significant zerosequence voltage.4. Figures 16 and 17 respectively shows the normalized harmonic spectra of the difference in pole voltages and actual motor phase voltage presented in Fig. Fig. (Fig.u. Of these.4 100 . while it is only about 0.10: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter1 for mi = 0.13 shows the simulated and experimentally obtained result of the actual motor phase voltage for mi = 0. It may be noted from Fig.18 to Fig. The corresponding waveforms for a modulation index of mi=0.11 show the same for inverter2 both for a modulation index of mi = 0.8: A typical sample with decoupled control The top traces of Fig..Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed . the latter waveform is obtained after the subtraction of the commonmode voltages from the difference of pole voltages shown in Fig.16 that the zerosequence voltage in the difference of polevoltages is significantly reduced compared with the strategy adopted in [7].S. It is seen from Fig. Fig.4.9: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the aphase legs of the two inverters for mi = 0. As isolated DC power supplies are employed in the present case.4.12. apart from the fundamental. the 47th and the 49th harmonics are dominant as the sampling frequency is 48 times the frequency of the fundamental component.4.4 Fig. Fig. Figure 15 shows the experimentally obtained motor phase current at noload for the same mi of 0.12 shows the difference of these pole voltages and Fig. the normalized third harmonic component is about 1. For example.u. the zerosequence voltage is dropped between the negative bus terminals of the individual inverters.2 p..
Vol.4 Fig.4 101 .12: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for mi = 0.14: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the commonmode voltage for mi = 0.4 Fig. Aug 2007 Fig.15: Experimentally obtained motor phase current at noload for mi = 0.16: The normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of pole voltages for mi = 0. 1.17: The normalized harmonic spectrum of the actual motor phase voltage for mi = 0.4 Fig. 1.Asian Power Electronics Journal.4 Fig.13: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the actual motor phase voltage for mi = 0.4 Fig. No.
7 Fig.7 Fig.20: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter2 for mi = 0.18: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the aphase legs of the two inverters for mi = 0.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed .19: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter1 for mi = 0..7 102 .21: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for mi = 0.S.7 Fig. Fig.7 Fig.22: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the commonmode voltage for mi = 0..
7 º » » » ¼ ª3 «2 « « «0 ¬ 0 3 2 º 0 » » 3» 2 » ¼ * ªva « * «vb « * «vc ¬ º » » » » ¼ Fig. Fig. while the other inverter assumes all the eight states. Figure 26 shows the basic operating principle of this PWM strategy. one inverter may be employed as the biasing inverter to realize the biasing vector and the other inverter may be switched around this biasing vector. v a . 25: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the motor phase voltage for mi = 0. A.7. Table1) throughout the sampling time interval. Fig. the switching vector AT is generated with inverter1. The vector OA may be output with inverter1 with its state clamped at 1(+. vb and v c* corresponding to the reference vector OT are transformed into the corresponding equivalent two* * phase system references vD and v E using the classical three phase to two phase transformation given by: * ª vD « « « * ¬v E Fig. Vol. v b and v c are obtained by the following procedure: * * 1. v a . the biasing vector OA may be output with inverter2 with its state clamped at 4’(++.26) with a factor of (2/3). Fig. In Fig 26.Asian Power Electronics Journal. 24: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the pole voltages for mi = 0.26: Principle of biasing inverter PWM strategy 103 . Alternatively.axes (OU and OX. Consequently. THE BIASING INVERTER PWM STRATEGY This PWM strategy is based on the observation that the space vector combinations at the vertices and the center of a given subhexagon are obtained by clamping one inverter with an active state. The vector AT is realized in the average sense by switching inverter2 around the subhexagonal center. The symbols vD and * v E respectively denote the components of OT on the D and the E. vb and Fig. 1. OV and * OW. Aug 2007 V. In that case. It is resolved into two components OA and AT. The modified instantaneous voltage phase references corresponding to the switching vector AT are denoted by. * * The instantaneous phase references denoted by.26).23: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the actual motor phase voltage for mi = 0. Table1) throughout the sampling time interval.7 vc* corresponding to the reference vector OT are obtained by projecting its tip on to the respective phase axes and multiplying the values of these projections (OU. The instantaneous phase references v a . 1. No. OT represents the reference vector with its tip situated in sector7.
the samples of the reference vector always lie within the core hexagon ABCDEF.v E plane (the point ‘A’ in this example.27 and Fig. Similar observations may be made for the rest of the subhexagonal centers. sw . it may be noted that if 0º d T d 60º. * * The instantaneous phase reference voltages v a . 3. On the other hand. the symbol ‘T’ denotes the angle subtended by the tip of the reference voltage space vector with respect to an instant where the instantaneous value of the Aphase reference voltage is zero.28. sw º » » «V « ¼ » ¬ E .26). vb and v c for the switching inverter are then obtained by transforming VD .. Fig. the tip of V sr is situated in the quadrangle OSRQ. It may also be seen that ‘F’ is the nearest subhexagonal center for this condition. For example. nshc are known for all the six subhexagonal centers. 0 ª 2/3 « 1/ 3 1/ 3 « « 1 / 3 1 / 3 ¬ º » ªVD . directly from the instantaneous phase references without having to evaluate Vsr and there by the value of ‘T’. The bottom trace of the same figure shows the difference of the two pole voltages. the coordinates of the switching vector (AT in the present case) denoted as VD . sw » ¼ If inverter2 is employed as the biasing inverter. It is desirable to identify the nearest subhexagonal center Fig.27: Zero crossing of the instantaneous phase voltages corresponding to the reference voltage space vector The principal advantage with this PWM strategy is that the inverter switching is significantly reduced as one inverter switches only six times.4.. It is important to note that the most important part of this algorithm is to find the nearest subhexagonal center to the tip of the reference vector OT (Fig. Fig.v E . From Fig. EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION FOR BIASING INVERTER PWM STRATEGY: The top traces of Fig.r. sw = v E . In this case. 2.S. as it would be very time consuming. denoted as vD . Figure 27 also reinforces this fact.28 explain the method to determine the same. In the discussion to follow.v E plane are given by (Vdc/2. it is obvious that the modified references must be negated to generate the switching vector AT with inverter2.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed . sw = vD . nshc and V E .27 shows various values of ‘T’ corresponding to the positive and the negative zero crossings of the reference phase voltages in the VD . sw are given by: * * VD .27.vD . the modified references are used directly to generate the switching vector AT with inverter1. The subhexagonal center situated nearest to the tip of the reference vector OT is then determined. Since the vector OA is output by the biasing inverter.26). if inverter1 is used as the biasing inverter. Should the tip of the reference vector be situated within the quadrangle OSGH. V E . sw into the corresponding three phase variables by using the classical two phase – three phase transformation given by: ªva º « » « vb » « vc » ¬ ¼ 6. nshc 5. one can determine the nearest subhexagonal center.0). while the other switches for 48 times.28 * it may be noted that v a is the most positive quantity amongst these six quantities when 60º d T d 120 º and ‘A’ is the nearest subhexagonal center as recognized by * Fig. the coordinates of the point ‘A’ in the vD . ‘A’ is the nearest subhexagonal center to it. From Fig.28: Recognition of the nearest subhexagonal center with instantaneous reference quantities VI.nshc and v E . Figures 30 and 31 show the respective pole voltages (both simulated & experimental results) of the 104 . Similarly va is the most positive quantity amongst these six when 240º d T d 300º and ‘D’ is the nearest subhexagonal center.27. sw and V E . The coordinates of the nearest subhexagonal center in the vD . Fig. 4.t V sr and their respective negations (dotted lines) are shown in Fig.V E plane. vb and vc* (solid lines) normalized w. Fig.29 show the gating signals of the top devices of the Aphase legs of the individual inverters for mi = 0. The modified reference phase voltages v a . Thus. With decoupled control both inverters are switched in all the 48 samples. it is clear that by finding the maximum value amongst these six quantities.
the zerosequence voltage resulting with the strategy adopted in [6] is about 1.30: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter1 for mi = 0. With this PWM strategy.4 105 . This is because.34 shows the simulated and experimentally obtained results of the zerosequence voltage. unlike in a twolevel inverter. while Fig. Thus. the space vector combinations11’. it may be noted that these two combinations result in maximum zerosequence voltages.32) and the actual motor phase voltage (shown in Fig. In this case.34).46. ‘A’ and ‘B’ are switched. the space vector l9 locations situated at the closest proximity are switched with openend winding drive. Aug 2007 individual inverters with this PWM strategy. 1. However. ‘G’ and ‘I’ are switched to construct the same sample (Fig. For a modulation of 40%. for the same modulation depth.45.4 p. whenever the location ‘O’ is switched. Figure 32 shows the difference of the pole voltages. From table2.e.7 are shown through Fig. it may be observed that these combinations result in a zerosequence voltage that is zero.33 shows the actual motor phase voltage (obtained after the subtraction of the zerosequence voltage from the waveform shown in Fig. it is evident that the switching of inverter1 is drastically reduced as it is made to operate as the biasing inverter for all samples in a cycle. Figures 35 and 36 respectively show the harmonic spectra of the difference in pole voltages (shown in Fig.38 to Fig. the phase voltage waveform is similar to the one obtained by a conventional twolevel inverter. Figure 37 shows the experimentally obtained motor phase current at noload for the same mi of 0. 33’. The normalized harmonics spectra of the difference of aphase pole voltages of the two inverters with the PWM scheme adopted in the earlier work reported [6]. and using the two PWM schemes proposed in this paper i. the tip of the reference vector traverses through the outer sectors i. Decoupled PWM scheme and Biasing Inverter PWM scheme for different modulation indices are shown in Fig. From these two figures.4 Fig. It is also evident that the phase voltage waveform is similar to the one obtained in a 3level inverter. 55’ and 66’ are exclusively employed. 1. if the sample is situated in sector1. No.29: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the aphase legs of the two inverters for mi = 0. Vol. 44’. Fig. 22’.34). the location ‘O’ is employed as an ‘active’ location while the subhexagonal centers constitute the ‘null’ locations as switching is performed around them.. It is worth noting that with this PWM strategy.Asian Power Electronics Journal. particularly for low modulation indices wherein the dwell time associated with the ‘null’ vector location ‘O’ is more. In this case. the PWM strategy proposed in [6] employs the location ‘O’ as a ‘null’ location. In contrast. Fig.u. the vertices ‘O’. 7 to 24. Specifically. where the location ‘O’. The corresponding waveforms for a modulation index of mi=0. the combinations 87’ and 78’ are used.e. as the nearest vertices are switched to synthesize the sample. while with the biasing inverter strategy it is 0.u. a significant reduction in the zerosequence voltage in the difference of pole voltages is possible with the PWM strategy proposed in this paper. From table2.4. the switching of inverter2 remains unaltered as it is used as the switching inverter for all the samples in a cycle. the switching ripple with the openend winding configuration is much lesser compared to the one obtained with a twolevel inverter.4 p. Whenever the location ‘O’ is switched with this PWM strategy [6]. However.3).
4 Fig.4 Fig.31: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter2 for mi = 0.4 106 .. 35: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the pole voltages for mi = 0.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed .32: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for mi = 0. 36: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the motor phase voltage for mi = 0.4 Fig.. Fig.4 Fig.S.33: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the actual motor phase voltage for mi = 0.34: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the commonmode voltage for mi = 0.4 Fig.
No.4 Fig.40: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter2 for mi = 0.39: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of Pole voltage of inverter1 for mi = 0.7 Fig. 1. Aug 2007 Fig. 1.Asian Power Electronics Journal.41: The difference of pole voltages of individual inverters for mi = 0.7 Fig. Vol.38: Gating signals and the difference of polevoltages derived as the difference of two gate signals of top switch of the aphase legs of the two inverters for mi = 0.7 107 .37: Experimentally obtained motor phase current at noload for mi = 0.7 Fig.
7 Fig.” Conf. JanuaryFebruary 1999. Lookup tables are not needed with the proposed PWM strategies. Appl. Proceedings EPE Conference. Ind. SeungKi Sul. 518523.7 108 ..23 and Fig. pp.7 Fig. “Multilevel Converters for Large Electric Drives. Vol. 714.S. From the harmonic spectra of the resultant motor phase voltage with these two strategies (Fig.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed . 3644. “A New NeutralPoint Clamped PWM Inverter”. “MultiLevel Conversion: High Voltage Choppers and Voltage Source Inverters. Fig. It is interesting to note that the PWM strategies proposed in this paper result in a significant reduction in the zerosequence voltage in the difference of polevoltages compared to the lookup table approach proposed in [6] at lower indices of modulation. Habetler.43) it is clear that it is possible to synthesize a conventional threelevel inverter waveform with the biasing inverter PWM strategy.A. 5. Meynard and H Foch. 742747. CONCLUSIONS Comparing the resultant motor phase voltages with the two PWM strategies proposed in this paper. Isao Takahashi and Hirofumi Akagi.. Ind. No. pp. Appl. Vol. “A Novel Voltage Modulation Technique of the Space Vector PWM”.43: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the actual motor phase voltage for mi = 0. Stemmler. 45: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the motor phase voltage for mi = 0. Tolbert. “Configurations of HighPower Voltage Source Inverter Drives”.29). Fig. With the biasing inverter PWM strategy the reference space vector is reproduced in the average sense by switching amongst the vector combinations available at the nearest three vertices. Fang Zheng Peng and Thomas G. 1. it is seen that the distribution of harmonic energy is better with the biasing inverter PWM strategy. SeptemberOctober 1981. (Fig.7 VII. the principal advantage with the decoupled PWM algorithm is its fastness and its amenability of implementation with slower controllers. REFERENCES [1] Akira Nabae.. 35. 397403. [5] JoohnSheok Kim. [3] Leon M. [4] H. However. IEEE Trans. reducing the memory requirements of the controller. No. which could be desirable.. pp. IEEE PESC 1992. P.42: Simulated (top) & experimentally obtained result (bottom) of the commonmode voltage for mi = 0.” IEEE Trans. as pointed out earlier. 1993. 44: Normalized harmonic spectrum of the difference of the pole voltages for mi = 0. Conference Proceedings IPEC1995. pp. Proc. IA17. pp.17 and Fig. Consequently the switching ripple with this strategy is lesser than the decoupled PWM strategy. Both strategies obviate the time consuming process of sector identification and the coordinate transformations. Guggenbach. [2] T.
M. 2005.3 1.8 1 0. No.1 N rmlis dH rmn s e tru o v ov d o a e a o ic p c m f a . May 2004.5 1.5 0. Ranganathan. (5) & (6). Somasekhar. B. Vol..M. pp.G. we have T When the reference vector is situated in sector1.4 N rm lis dH rm n s e tru o V o o a e a o ic p c m f a 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 2 1.8 1 0.6 0.4 1. “A Multilevel Inverter System for an Open End Winding Induction Motor with OpenEnd Windings. pp. K. March 2004.2 1. 152160. pp. V.2 1. Somasekhar.4 0. No. 794805. Sinha. Conf.5 0. [10] V..2 0.2 3 1 0.. Oleschuk. Oleschuk. Ranganathan. 245254.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. IEEEPEDS2005.6 mi=0. of Electr. V.3 N rmlis dH rmn s e tru o v ov d o a e a o ic p c m f a . “A Space Vector Modulation Scheme for Dual Two Level Inverter Fed an OpenEnd Winding Induction Motor 1. Electr.6 0. Sinha. 2. M. “PhaseShiftBased Synchronous Modulation of DualInverters for an OpenEnd Winding Induction Motor Drive with Elimination of Zero Sequence Currents”. February 2002. 12.R.5 0. 1. S.5 1 0. IEE Proc. Gopakumar. 2636.2 0 0 0 10 20 30 Harmonic number 40 50 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 1.6 1. Gopakumar.6 0.4 0. Vol. 230238.2 mi=0. IEE Proc.5 0.5 1.4 1 0. EPE Conf. Vol.6 0. No. Shivakumar. 150. Pelincec. Proc.T.4 mi=0.8 0.5 0. March 2002. [8] V.K.6 N rmlis dH rmn s e tru o V o o a e a o ic p c m f a 5 mi=0. IEEE Proc. Appl. Umanand. No.R.5 mi=0. Vol.5 0. pp. Baiju and K. No.Asian Power Electronics Journal.4 0.8 1. A. we have T T 2( V s dc * )vc * )va (7) Similarly for Invertre2: ' Tas ' Tcs T 2( V s dc T * 2( V s )vc dc ' ? Teff ' Teff ' ' Tcs Tas * * 2( V s )(v a vc ) dc * 2( V s )vc dc T Using equations (4). Bose. 3. K. 2.T.3 N rm lis dH rm n s e tru o V o o a e a o ic p c m f a 1 1. No.2 0 0 0 10 20 30 Harmonic number 40 50 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 3 mi=0. pp. 3.2 0 0 10 20 30 Harmonic number 40 50 0 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 0 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 1. Gopakumar. EPE Journal.4 N rmlis dH rmn s e tru o V o o a e a o ic p c m f a 1 1.2 0. Somasekhar.4 1. Gopakumar. 149. May 2003. “Synchronized Pulse_Width Modulation for Control of InverterFed OpenEnd Winding Motor Drives”. A. 2. Vol.S.4 0.4 1 1. V.5 2 mi=0.a o mi=0. Mohapatra and L. Vol. Stankovic. 52. No. 3. 19. Andre Pittet. Gopakumar.2 1 1. [9] V. “Dual Two Level Inverter Scheme for an OpenEnd Winding Induction Motor Drive with a Single DC Power Supply and Improved DC Bus Utilization”.a o mi=0.6 0.2 1 1.a o mi=0. No. V. 1. E. Proc. “PWM Inverter Switching Strategy for a Dual TwoLevel Inverter Fed Open End Winding Induction Motor Drive with a Switched Neutral”.. 918. Vol. pp.8 1. K.a o 1.2 0 0 0 10 20 30 Harmonic number 40 50 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 0 10 20 30 Harmonic order 40 50 (a) (b) (c) APPENDIX The imaginary switching times [5] for inverter1 and inverter2 are related to the respective phase reference voltages as follows: Tmax Tas Tmin As TCS Tmax Tmin [5] Tas Tcs * * 2( V s )(va vc ) dc Teff Tas Tbs Tcs ' Tga ' Tgb ' Tgc * 2( V s )va dc T (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Teff Teff ' Tmin ' Tmax * 2( V s )vb dc T Using equations (1). “A Dual TwoLevel Inverter Scheme with Common Mode Voltage Elimination for an Induction Motor Drive”. June 2005. May 2002. Baiju. Bojoi. Profumo. A. 1. EPE Journal.T. Kanchan and K. 325330. 824836. 151. K.8 2.1 1. [7] V. Tenconi and R.6 mi=0.8 2 0. PaperID: 94. Baiju. Gopakumar. Mohapatra.T.K. Somasekhar. mi=0. pp. Power Appl.1 4 1. Somasekhar. (2) & (3). Pittet and V.K.T. B. pp.5 0. “Space Vector Control of Dual Inverter Fed OpenEnd Winding Induction Motor Drive”. Of Electr. Power Appl. “ThreeLevel Inverter Configuration Cascading Two TwoLevel Inverters”.5 [11] [12] [13] [14] Drive for the Elimination of Zero Sequence Current”. For Inverter1: (8) 109 . IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. Gopakumar. R.8 1 0.K.T. 12. K. Power.T.4 N rmlis dH rmn s e tru o v ov d o a e a o ic p c m f a . Shivakumar. Vol. S. K.K.G. K.2 N rmlis dH rmn s e tru o v ov d o a e a o ic p c m f a . M. F. Aug 2007 [6] E.4 1 1.
T.7. PWM Switching Strategies.Srinivas et al: Switching Algorithms for the Dual Inverter fed . his area of specialization being Power Electronics. Multilevel inversion realized through Openend winding Induction motor drives. Ltd. AC drives and PWM strategies. His research interests are multilevel inverters. ' Tga ' ' Tas Toffset (11) Ts * To T * )va 2( s )va Vdc 2 Vdc To ' ? Tga 2 2 ( (12) 110 . Ts * To T * )va 2( s )vc Vdc 2 Vdc To T * * ? Tga 2( V s )(va vc ) dc 2 2( Similarly for inverter2.E degree in Electrical Engineering from Osmania University College of Engineering and his Masters degree from Regional Engineering CollegeWarangal in 1997 and 2002 respectively. Dr. Bangalore and as a senior engineer at M/s Kirloskar Electric Co. To T * 2( s )va 2 Vdc Toffset From the algorithm proposed in [5]. where he is currently serving. He worked as an R&D engineer at M/s Perpetual Power Technologies. He joined the faculty of electrical engineering at the National Institute of Technology in 1993. the phase switching times for the other two phases are given as: ' ? Tgb ' ? Tgc It was shown in [5] that the timeoffset required to place the effective time period at the centre of the sampling time interval is given by: Toffset To Tmin 2 Hence for inverter1.S. Somasekhar received his graduate degree from Regional Engineering College Warangal (presently the National Institute of Technology) in 1988 and the post graduate degree from the Indian Institute of Technology.Srinivas received the B. From equations (7) & (8). His current interests are multilevel inversion with openend induction motors. as the reference vector is resolved into two equal halves. V. the phase switching time for phaseA for inverter1 is given by: (10) T ga Tas Toffset S. He received his doctoral degree from the Indian Institute of Science in 2003. He joined the Faculty of Electrical Engineering National Institute of TechnologyWarangal in the year 1997.(9)] Similarly.D degree at National Institute of TechnologyWarangal. the timeoffset is: To T * 2( s )v c 2 Vdc To ' ' Toffset Tmin 2 Similarly. AC drives etc.. He is currently working towards the Ph. ' ? Tga ' Tga Tga To Ts Teff To' ' Ts Teff [5] Ts Tga Ts Tgb Ts Tgc BIOGRAPHIES To To' [from eqn. Mysore.. it is evident that ' Tga Tga To 2( Ts * * )(v a vc ) Vdc To Teff Ts Teff As ' Teff (9) & From eqn. It is obvious that the effectivetime period for inverter1 and inverter2 are equal. Bombay in 1990.. we have From equations (11) & (12).