You are on page 1of 2

Rhode Island TSA School: __________________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________ Score: ________

Computer Aided Design and Drafting


Drawing and Blueprint Rubric Project Name: _________________________________________
Below Expectations Needs Work Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations Total 75
Self Evaluation Teacher Evaluation

Criteria

1 Accuracy
Less than 85% of the assigned objects/structures are drawn and/or labeled accurately. Drawing is sloppy; drawing has countless smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines which make the information hard to read accurately.

2
9485% of the assigned objects/structures are drawn accurately and are recognizable. 9485% of the assigned objects/structures are labeled accurately. Drawing is fairly neat but has many smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines. Title block is filled out. Two items are missing in the Drawing Name, Designer Name, School name and address, Date, Scale, or sheet numbers indicated.

3
9485% of the assigned objects objects/structures are drawn accurately and are recognizable. All assigned objects/structures are labeled accurately. Drawing is neat and somewhat free of smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines. Title block is filled out. One item is missing in the Drawing Name, Designer Name, School name and address, Date, Scale, or sheet numbers indicated.

4
95% or more of the assigned objects/structures are drawn accurately and are recognizable. All assigned objects/structures are labeled accurately. Drawing is exceptionally neat and free of smudges, erasure marks and/or ghost lines. Title block is completely filled out. No items are missing in the Drawing Name, designer Name, school name and address, Date, Scale, or sheet numbers indicated.

_x 3_

_x 3_

Title Block
Title block is not filled out properly.

Drawing General

Overall, the quality of the drawing is poor. Major improvements are needed to be able to build from prints. A large amount of critical information is missing.

Overall, the quality of the drawing is fair. There are several minor improvements needed to make it acceptable to build from prints. Some critical information is missing

Overall, the drawing is good. However, the appearance can be enhanced by a few minimal improvements. All critical information is present.

Overall, the drawing is excellent. Drawing is laid out correctly, utilizing the practices covered in class and/or text. All critical information is present with extra reference information.

_x 4_

_x 4_

CADD Drawing Project Rubric

Page 1

Rhode Island TSA School: __________________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________ Score: ________

Object /structure drawn would easily be built from prints.

Object /structure drawn would easily be built from prints.

Dimensions

74% or less of the items are properly dimensioned.

75% or more of the items are properly dimensioned.

Over 85% of the items are dimensioned properly.

All items are dimensioned properly.

_x 2_

_x 2_

View Placement

74% or less of the objects or structures views are used and placed properly.

75% of the objects or structures views are used and placed properly.

85% of the objects or structures views are used and placed properly.

All of the objects or structures views are used and placed properly.

_x 3_

_x 3_

Printed Scale

74% or less of the drawing views are scaled properly.

More than 70% of the drawing views are scaled properly.

More than 80% of the drawing views are scaled properly.

All drawing and detail views are printed properly to scale.

_x 2_

_x 2_

Total Scoring Chart 100 60 97 58 94 56 92 55 89 53 85 51 82 49 80 48 78 46 75 45 72 43 69 41 65 39 62 37 57 34 56 33


Grade Equivalency Total points

Judge's Comments:

CADD Drawing Project Rubric

Page 2