This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Hairston© 1701 Coolidge Ave. Willow Grove, Pennsylvania 19090 Tort Claimant Mr. Barry Scott, Risk Manager Philadelphia Risk Management 1515 Arch Street, 14th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19102 Lien Debtor
MEMORANDUM OF RECORD
WITH ASSESSMENT FOR DAMAGES SUPPORTED BY AFFIDAVIT AND AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT
NOTICE OF TORT CLAIM
RE: NOTICE OF TORT CLAIM, UNDER NECESSITY TO PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CASE/ACCOUNT # 080503674 and 524706 TORT CLAIMANT: Derek Kimball Hairston©, Authorized Representative on behalf of DEREK K. HAIRSTON©, Ens legis TORT CLAIM/SUM CERTAIN AMOUNT: $500,000,000.00 USD (FIVE HUNDRED MILLION AND NO/100) USD, Money on Account, Amero Dollars, or payable in Gold or Silver LIEN DEBTOR; PHILADELPHIA COUNTY TORT FEASORS: Idee C. Fox, Sandra M. Moss, Esther R. Slvester, Robert D. Aversa, Mary E. Butler, Gary F. Divito, Michael A. Nutter, Richard Glazer, Lokia Owens, Sheriff John D. Green, Barry Scott, Robert E. Sadler, Jr.- M & T Bank Corporation -One M&T Plaza, 12th Floor, Buffalo, NY 14203-2399, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company – 213 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 19102 (herein M&T Bank), Shahan G. Teberian and Morton R. Branzburg- Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, LLP 260 S. Broadway Street Suite 400 Philadelphia, PA 19102 Date of Alleged Occurrence: Date of Complaint was filed into court May 29, 2008
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Dear Mr. Scott: Said Tort Claim is presented as a matter of right, arising out of private injuries and violations of due process of law, violation of State and Federal statute of ‘violation of equal protection of the law,’ violation of Commercial Law, fraud, collusion, conspiracy, treason, dishonor and
Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 1
and international fraud as perpetuated upon the Tort Claimant. Constitution at Article I. as evidenced and attached hereto. due process of law/rights and peace of mind and otherwise to wit: for the injuries committed by the ‘agents’/agency identified above as Tort Feasors. 4563. (see attached CAFV. M & T Bank had agreed that there was fraud on the mortgage contract. and Pursuit of Happiness. United States Code. was but their own ‘custom and policy’ that is known National as ‘Mortgage Fraud. the Court by and/through judge Idee C. commercial. via the court action.L. Affidavit of Non-Response) Some time later. and as agreed and stipulated by the act(s) of the Tort Feasors. and in respect to all the matters heretofore agreed upon by M & T Bank (by previous agreement of the parties via Conditional Acceptance For Value (CAFV# 121907-1/CAFV/DKH ).C. Fox committed Treason to the Constitution(s). 2674. financial. where applicable. pursuant to and by their act(s) did defraud and injure Tort Claimant. The Tort Claimant herein files this Claim for Damages under necessity. settle and/or pay the stipulated monetary damages via the act(s). Affidavit of Default. M&T Bank failed to file in as exhibits the commercial instrument and supporting documents. property rights. thereby committing fraud on the Court. 100-694.’ You are hereby notified of this ‘Notice of Tort Claim’ (Claim for monetary damages) as ‘Tort Claimants’ exclusive remedy pursuant to Title 5 Section 2679(b) of Title 28. via their silent tacit agreement. stipulating. Tort feasor. violation(s) and/or negligence or otherwise in via this claim. therefore M&T Bank actions. M&T Bank could loan its money nor loan its credit or the so-called funds of it’s depositors. rights. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Article XI. as a matter of right. that the mortgage contract was unconscionable. Liberty. and as well known. 2679 (b and d) and state statute. herein identified. support and defend the U. M&T Bank accepted the ‘private credit’ of the Tort Claimant via a duly signed and tendered ‘promissory note’ of which M&T Bank ledgered into their accounts via the accounts receivable side of their books and the liability side of the account in their books (double entry bookkeeping). M&T Bank stipulated and agreed that the M&T Bank would accept a commercial instrument for the discharge of the mortgage debt/liability as they were in agreement that there is no lawful constitutional money of exchange by which to pay debts at law Claimant. (P. as identified above. justice. Section I of the Constitution of the State of Oregon. transaction. that M&T Bank failed to give the Tort Claimant full disclosure and that M&T would accept said commercial instrument. thereby admitting. interest(s) and otherwise. confessing and agreement to causing injury to claimants’ private rights. responsibility and obligation via your ‘due diligence’ to investigate. 102 Stat. property ownership. 2671(note). however. and judge Idee C. 2007` and found in default. and by the act(s) of the Tort Feasors. 28 U. Section X and similar point in the Constitution for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and per the Para matera Rule. uphold her Oath of Office to uphold. In respect to the Tort Claim being the exclusive remedy. title(s). thereby causing injury to Claimant’s Right to Life. mortgage contract and the court action was fraudulent and merely supported their own banking. 2007 and received by M&T on December 24. 2679 (note). M & T Bank’s silence and dishonor to the particular requested proofs claims via Conditional Acceptance For Value (CAFV) (private administrative process) certified mail number # 7007 2680 0000 7910 5879 dated December 21.S. rebut attached affidavits and is fully bonded and completely financially responsible to financially cover. When M&T Bank filed the action into COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and the Court being informed by the Tort Claimant of the fraud of and by M&T Bank (the Plaintiff). M&T Bank filed an action into THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and by admission. Risk Management of Philadelphia County is under duty. and therefore judge Idee C. Opportunity to Cure. Fox joined the fraud and began to collude and conspire to deny the Tort Claimant due process of law. and such Claim for Damages arises out of violations as enumerated below. Fox failed to uphold federal and state Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 2 .S. working under the control and within the venue of the County of Philadelphia. under the Pari Materia Rule.otherwise as set out below.
if not accepted. Constitution for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and per their Oath of Office and such created the liability whereby the Tort Feasors individually and collectively. in a political body which all officers and elected officials have sworn to protect. as government agents/employees and officers of the County of Philadelphia and the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. whether it Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 3 . “If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused. Tort Feasors. and 5) M & T Bank failed to give or make full disclosure that (Federal Reserve) Notes do not operate as payment in the absence of an agreement that they shall constitute payment and M&T Bank failed to initiate such an agreement. commercial fraud(s). commit fraud. 2) M & T failed to give or make full disclosure to the Undersigned that the United States removed the ‘silver’ as a substance backing our Nations money. 2007. monetary or otherwise. acted in concert with M & T Bank in collusion to injure and cause to ordered an unlawful taking and seizure of real-estate property (Apartment Buildings). Tort Claimant in an attempt to resolve issues and ask questions as to the mortgage. State of Pennsylvania has become liable to DEREK KIMBALL HAIRSTON©. During the transaction. equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money. an agency/entity of Philadelphia County or as an independent corporation for profit acting as a cobusiness partner of Philadelphia County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. title(s). On or about December 21. usurpation and otherwise stated injuries herein. colluded. thus causing direct injury to the Undersigned/Tort Claimant. and that such violations. An offer in writing to pay a particular sum of money or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property is. By their silent admission. 1) the United States declared Bankruptcy in 1933. has violated the said secured rights. frauds. They have individually and collectively breached their agreement pertaining to their mandated duties responsibilities and obligations. M&T Bank failed to make full disclosure to the Tort Claimant that. whereupon Tort Claimant want clarification and Proof of Claim(s) as to the mortgage contract.(commonwealth) commercial law as found in the National Uniform Commercial Code and the Commercial Code as found in the private business statutes of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.. M & T Bank. was injured by Tort Feasor.010 “Effect of unaccepted offer in writing to pay or deliver. in the interest(s) of the Tort Feasor/Undersigned. conspired by act(s) to deny due process. Lien Creditor sought to obtain a mortgage on real property from M & T Bank. as the authorized representatives upon their acceptance of their Contract. sent M&T Bank correspondence in the nature of Private Administrative Process known as a ‘Conditional Acceptance for Value’ (CAFV).e. Derek Kimball Hairston©. property rights and interest(s).” The presumption is that COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. instrument or property. misapplication of statute and cause the unlawful taking of private (real-estate) and by their act(s) admitted to the non-authorization of said violation(s) and misapplication of statute(s) and Tort Feasors failed or refused to enforce the contract (State Constitution) thereby committing constitutional impermissible application of statute in respect to the rights of DEREK KIMBALL HAIRSTON© via the Tort Feasor/Undersigned. there is discharge. i. Tort Claimant. Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness] of the Tort Feasor/Undersigned as the Principle. UCC 3-603. and the ‘Political Will’ [The Right to Life. breaches. 4) that there was a ‘meeting of the minds’. Tort Feasors had a mandated duty by their ‘Oaths of Office’ to uphold the sanctity of the Supreme Law as it pertains to the Tort Claimant/ undersigned. which removed gold as a substance backing our Nations money and impaired the obligations and considerations of contracts. the Tort Claimant. via the Undersigned. 3) M & T Bank failed to give or make full disclosure to the Tort Claimant that the Tort Claimant had NO access to ‘lawful constitutional money of exchange’ that constituted “LAWFUL (sufficient) CONSIDERATION’ to ‘pay’ debt(s) in regards to the mortgage contract entered into by parties therein. act(s) of Treason. to the extent of the amount of the tender…” and ORS 81.
is only a lien. M&T Bank accepted a promissory note from the Tort Claimant. failed to cure and was placed in default. M&T Bank committed fraud on the Court by failing. M&T Bank failed or refused to ‘refuse and return the instrument within three days (Truth & Lending).was unconscionable. that M&T Bank did not loan Tort Claimant money and that M&T agreed that they did not give full disclosure to Tort Claimant. M&T Bank was asked to produce and provide the original promissory note and M&T Bank failed and refused to so. Continental Resources.) Tort Claimant. M & T Bank failed to disclose to the Tort Claimant that it was the Tort Claimant that lent M & T Bank the so-called money. 598 N.W.for reference only) Soon after M&T Bank’s dishonor. they have no authority to foreclose. (See Nygaard v. M&T Bank filed suit in the Common Pleas Court for Philadelphia County. withheld as exhibits. The Tort Claimant’s Promissory Note signed at the original first closing did provide the ‘value’ (credit) and that such Promissory Note was most likely monetized to benefit of M & T Bank. Courts have ruled that if a bank or mortgage company fails to produce the promissory note. or that is what the Tort Claimant was led to believe. per the agreement of M&T. In filing the action. ledgered the ‘private credit funds’ ($ figure) onto M&T Bank’s ‘accounts receivable side of their books as well ledgered the amount on their ‘liability side of the account’. the promissory note! M & T Bank failed to give or make full disclosure to the Tort Claimant that the mortgage contract on the property. 2008. Op to Cure. if there was any fraud on the contract. Please note that a bank cannot loan its own credit or their depositor’s money. Per the CAFV.S.. in light of the U. act of/to defraud the Tort Claimant. agree to the facts and agree that the Tort Claimant could discharge the mortgage debt/liability/lien with an instrument engaging the private credit of the Tort Claimant. what was loaned to the Tort Claimant. Pursuant to commercial law. M&T Bank failed and/or refused to respond. M&T Bank was asked to provide. as M&T is in the business of loaning money. tendered an instrument on or about March 18.C. did M&T Bank give full disclosure and other necessary Proof(s) of Claim. All M&T Bank could do by scheme and device was to take Tort Claimants private credit via the instrument (a promissory note). Inc. due to their silence and/or dishonor. they would be in agreement to the facts as they would operate in favor of the Tort Claimant and as such.C. M&T Bank by their silence agreed to that there was fraud on the mortgage contract. of which M&T Bank still owes those funds to Tort Claimant. M & T Bank holds/held and possesses/ed the original Promissory Note and did sell the Promissory Note signed and tendered by the Tort Claimant. The Tort Claimant’s signature on the original ‘contract(s)’ did not create the value to the loan. credit or otherwise and M & T Bank was/has to pay the Tort Claimant back. Bankruptcy. what documents and instruments Tort Claimant tendered to M&T Bank via ‘agreement of the parties’. that the contract was unconscionable. Please note that via the original transaction. Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 4 . to the benefit of M & T Bank. 2d 851. the piece of paper did. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. due to various Proof(s) of Claim on other aspects of the money issue. 39 U. M&T Bank was notice via the CAFV that should they silent or refuse to respond. refusing or to defraud both the Court and the Tort Claimant. (See Tort Claimant’s CAFV. Affidavit of Default and Affidavit of Non-Response made a part hereof. M & T failed to inform and disclose the Tort Claimant that the Tort Claimant was the originator under 4A-104C of the first funds transferred via the promissory note as tendered. That a ‘Notice of Security’ (emanating from the Tort Claimant’s Promissory Note) once deposited by M & T Bank in an account becomes equivalent of money. 2d 851 (1991). was given an opportunity to cure their fault of non-response.
to commit fraud in the factum. as dollar. the U. Teberian and Morton R. in the court filing of May 29.M & T Bank by and through its attorneys..e. Teberian and Morton R. Branzburg) or other contracted agent or agency filed action and tendered to the Clerk or Court for the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY either an instrument (check) for the filing fee which transferred only ‘bookkeeping entries’ and/or worthless federal reserve notes as so stated by the Federal Reserve Bank.LLP did dishonor the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and the due process of law by their non disclosure of the Release of Lien filed in the PHILADELPHIA RECORDERS OF DEEDS in PHILADELPHIA COUNTY of PENNSYLVANIA on April 13th 2008. 2008. and Federal Reserve Notes are valueless. Mortgage Accepted for Value. the due process of law and Uniform Commercial Code standards and practices by their non disclosure of previous legal Affidavit. 3) that there was no lawful constitutional money of exchange in circulation of which the Tort Claimant could pay the mortgage debt/liability.M&T Bank along with attorneys Shahan G. M & T Bank. upon the action filed by M & T Bank into the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. 1) did not submit to the Tort Claimant an ‘conscionable contract’ for the Tort Claimant to sign. a dollar bill is just a piece of paper.LLP did dishonor and perpetrate the ongoing fraud of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and the due process of law by filing motions into the Court and hereby implicating the Philadelphia County employees. Robert E. agents and court officers to federal. 6) that per the bankruptcy. Jr.C. 7) that Tort Claimant had NO access to ‘lawful constitutional money of exchange’ to ‘pay’ the debt in regards to the mortgage contract.) Upon the action filed by M & T Bank into the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY Idee C.1001-1 (4657) C. Caveat UCC2-302 Adhesion Contract. Branzburg. evidence that M & T Bank had accepted the financial instrument as payment in full and filed said exhibits of all related documents and the instrument in question. Jr.Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ellers. Teberian and Morton R.S. accord and satisfaction by acceptance of Registered and Bonded International Promissory Note #1031507PN – UCC-3 #2008-077-5891-7 dated March 18.Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ellers. Teberian and Morton R. therein and as agreed. 2008. Sadler. state and international fraud. Intrinsically. agents/employees and Tort Claimant by failing to file.M&T along with attorneys Shahan G. Branzburg . i. Robert E.Modern Money Mechanics – Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago – page 3 – Revised 6-1992. and receipt of the Private Indemnification Bond #103170-2B on March 18. 4) that there was fraud on the mortgage contract… which voided the mortgage contract. Fox (judge) accepted. For the record. Sadler.LLP did dishonor the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY.H. 5) that the U. Teberian and Morton R. codes or otherwise. committed Treason in Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 5 . Sadler. LLP did intentionally commit fraud upon the Philadelphia County Court and fellow officers. declared Bankruptcy and the same operates within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Jr. property description. . committed act(s) of usurpation. misapplied statutes.Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ellers. Shahan G. deposits [check-book] merely book entries…” . violated due process. . upheld and promoted the fraud perpetuated by M & T Bank to the detriment of the Tort Claimant. did collude and conspire to defraud. . (See IRS Codes Section 1. Branzburg . 2) there was no ‘meeting of the minds’ in respect to the mortgage contract(s). did remove the Gold and Silver. Robert E. “In the United States neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. 2008 for Set-Off of M&T Bank identified in/via account #524706. BranzburgKlehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ellers. to commit fraud of scienter. 8) and agreed that ‘Federal Reserve Notes’ do not operate as payment in the absence of an agreement that they shall constitute payment and M&T Bank failed to initiate such an agreement and agreed to all the other points raised in the CAFV and failed to give full disclosure.M&T Bank along with attorneys Shahan G.S. M & T Bank’s attorney (Shahan G.
Philadelphia Pennsylvania Tax Lot and Block Parcel ID No. Pay the mortgage in real money backed by substance. also properties located at 4500. actions. ignored the ‘agreement of the parties’ causing a violation of due process. as Idee C. fraudulent filed documents and blatant rejection of the commercial process and/or commercial law as it operates within the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. 50075168 and was involved with the conspiracy and collusion with the County of Philadelphia. estopped Tort Claimants exercise the Public Policy (HJR-192) as established by the U. Such act(s) by M & T Bank and Idee C. to acquire both possession and title. Page 321. Fox (judge) aided and abetted to stop Tort Claimant from doing so and at the same time denied. ‘Trustee’ or ‘Beneficiary’ in the case.S. Philadelphia Pennsylvania Tax Lot and Block Parcel ID No. Deed Book 1060. and felony actions against the Tort Claimant by the lack of due diligence in reference to the Tort Claimant’s civil and constitutional rights and in the refusal to support nor acknowledge the commercial and international legal processes and procedures. Aversa refused to provide the Oaths of Office. 881145020 Philadelphia Recorder of Deeds Document No. Constitution and aided and abetted in the unlawful taking(s) of real property by fraudulent court orders or other letters or documents of device to/for the obstruction of justice over and above the Right(s). Idee C. Tort Claimant was not informed nor disclosed that Idee C. Fox (judge) still could not and can not compel the Tort Claimant to do the impossible. at law. Bankruptcy as it operates within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as no lawful constitutional money of exchange circulates within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Philadelphia County by which the Tort Claimant could pay his debt(s) at law (mortgage debt/lien) of which said court and Idee C. failure to disclose the operation of a trust. Fox (judge) knew or should have known. however. Green of Philadelphia County did conspire to fraud the Tort Claimant as he was notified on March the 2009 of the illegal ‘Sheriff Sale’ and that the Court’s actions having failed or refused to render ‘due process’ decision/judgment pursuant to ‘facts’ and ‘commercial law’ which violated the rights.violating her Oath of Office to Article I. as referenced in the facts provided by and filed into the above case/court by the Tort Claimant under necessity. Aversa (Deputy city solicitor ) was an active party to harassment. City of Pennsylvania and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the ongoing fraud and felony actions against the Tort Claimant. failure to disclose status of Tort Claimant either as the trustee or the beneficiary. commercial law (Uniform Commercial Code) at both state and/or National level which is perceived as federal common law due to the U. but only an ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL administering the bankruptcy via the Trust created. Whereas Robert D. Sheriff John D.S. decisions. to the detriment of the Tort Claimant. Fox (judge) are in violation of the/that Public Policy to the detriment of the Tort Claimant and his property rights and are outside the law (of bankruptcy) as the ‘ship of state’ is in state of receivership and the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY by and through Idee C. fraud. Fox (judge) was administering a Trust per the filing by the Plaintiff and Tort Claimant was not informed nor disclosed how she was seen or the ‘office’ she held.4502 Chestnut Street City of Philadelphia. CREATING A VOID JUDGMENT.S. having ‘superior knowledge of the law’ per this matter. Robert D. City of Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the ongoing fraud and felony actions against the Tort Claimant. 881611910 and 881611915. title and security interest of the Tort Claimant on said properties located at 4437-39 Chestnut Street City of Philadelphia. Congress in light of said bankruptcy to discharge debts ‘dollar for dollar’ and was involved with the conspiracy and collusion with the County of Pennsylvania. inclusions to the docket or otherwise and by allowing and accepting felonious and fraudulent testimony. proof of (performance) bonds and information subpoenaed during Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 6 . Title(s) and Interest(s) of the Tort Claimant in violation of public policy. Section X of the U. Fox (judge) did violate the commercial process multiple times by/and through court proceedings as a sitting judge via her arguments. as it is perceived that the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY is not a court of Constitutional due process. orders.
injuries and damages made and done to and upon Claimant. Green. unlawful taking/theft of private property. duress. fraud. Lokia Owens. fraud in the factum. Dominic J. This Tort Claim also contains an Assessment of Damages. NOTICE: Tort Claimant is aware that the named Tort Feasors may be de-jure county agents/employees but was not informed nor noticed that some or any of the named agents/employees or otherwise are Non-Government Organization (Operatives) (NGO). Sandler.LLP. violations of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. such breach of their mandated duty caused injury to the Tort Claimant as stated herein and otherwise herein Tort Claimant states a claim for said injuries herein and as supported by Affidavit in Support of Tort Claim. sub-contractors.the May 2008 term. harassment. without oath. Teberian and Morton R. physical and mental anguish. conspiracy. Shahan G. violation of Due Process of law. directing adverse actions to injure and/or defraud Tort Claimant under/or World Government. agents. Treason. Sadler. Rossi. did by their willful acts cause damage and injury to Tort Claimant. defamation of character or otherwise as stated herein. I §X). violations of the Constitution of the United States (Art. bond. Aversa. Branzburg. emotional. slander. Sheriff John D. coercion. Nutter. accepting and moving on fraudulent filed declaration/testimony or otherwise. fraud by scienter. Ester R.Jr. Robert D. Mary E. Fox. contractors. obstruction of justice. as attached and made part of this claim under the ‘Security Tracer Flag’ has been flagged Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 7 . Idee C. or otherwise. City of Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the ongoing fraud and felony actions against the Tort Claimant. Moss as a judge/clerk/employee of Philadelphia County refused to stop the illegal court actions and notify the Court of their lack of authority in such commercial matters and recuse herself and was involved with the conspiracy and collusion with the County of Philadelphia. omission and denied evidence. Moss. were not to do and the same constituted a breach of that ‘Oath’ and/or Professional Code of Ethics. unjust enrichment. bar members. Such Affidavits are Annexed in and attached hereto are made a part hereof. with de-jure County government’s knowledge and agreement and that of COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. Michael A. Robert E. violation of Public Policy. acting in concert with so-called de-jure county government. It is the said mandatory duty of the County of Pennsylvania by and through its employees. Richard Glazer. violation of civil rights. NOTICE: that non-rebuttal (denial) of the attached ‘commercial’ affidavits in support of tort claim. Barry Scott. City of Pennsylvania and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to the ongoing fraud and felony actions against the Tort Claimant. Sandra M. collusion. and Affidavit of Negative Averment. injuries and damages was not committed against the Tort Claimant and that said Tort Feasors did not breach their mandated duty which. Robert E. judges as named herein or otherwise John & Jane Does 1 to 100 pursuant to their Oaths of Office and/or Professional Code of Ethics and via the acts. non-government operatives and all court officers. threat(s). Risk Management is to do their ‘Due Diligence’ and ‘investigate’ this Claim within the time period specified and determine if that said stipulated acts. The Tort Claimant further states that Tort Feasors. Slvester. and those injuries are: Misapplication of (of the State and Federal) Statutes (Uniform Commercial Code).M&T. Violation of Federal Banking and Monetary Rules/Laws. financial distress. which are of public record and to be made available upon any request by any means at any anytime to the public and was involved with the conspiracy and collusion with the County of Pennsylvania. financial deprivation. breaches. Butler. Jr. Sandra M.Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ellers. Gary Divito. .
deposition. real or otherwise. HAIRSTON©. Hairston© in the nature of a debt due and owing. NOTICE: The Tort Claim Notice and all affidavits must be responded to and rebutted within 30 calendar days upon receipt hereof or otherwise goes into dishonor or default. and 4) NOTIFY FEDERAL PROSECUTORS OF FELONY VIOLAIONS as caused and committed against One Derek Kimball Hairston©.000.E. 1) PAY 25% OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT AS CLAIMED ABOVE.S. said Tort Claimant herein allowing Barry Scott / Risk Management to do the honorable thing on behalf of his Principal (limited liability) offers this pre-settlement offer for consideration and acceptance within 15 days. NOTICE. or by subornation of an affiant or other person. on behalf of said injuries to Tort Claimant – however pervaded for full settlement and closure of this private matter/claim. or payable in Gold or Silver.C. to wit. State. Ens legis a flesh and blood sentient man. the whole truth and nothing but the truth. for said injuries as stated herein. dishonor and default of Risk Management file a UCC-1 Lien on any property. committing a Mixed War. PLEASE BE ADVISED: that pursuant to International Law. being due and payable to Tort Claimant. either directly or indirectly. that Philadelphia County Risk Management or any of its agent(s). PRE-SETTLEMENT OFFER. Upon Barry Scott / Risk Management’s silence. admits to the injuries and all facts stand in this record as true and Risk Management by/and through Barry Scott / Risk Management Office representative of the Philadelphia County (and to the County’s insurer. in a sovereign capacity among other people… or face the full liability (silence equates to agreement) of whole amount SUM CERTAIN if not discharged (paid) via this pre-settlement offer per the terms and conditions herein. therein the claim and the facts stand in the record as true and owing in respect to the Claim and its sum certain amount. 2) RECONVEY THE REAL PROPERTY UNLAWFULLY TAKEN PER CASE NUMBER 080503674 and 524706 (VOID JUDGMENT AB INITIO). either in person or by proxy. upon the silence. settled and reconveyed on the 40th day from receipt of this Notice of Tort Claim. aside from binding his principal to the liability. by/and through DEREK K. tracking and regulation. Any judge or officer or government employee or otherwise who tampers with testimony. PLEASE NOTICE: The whole legal system consists of “telling the truth. This amount must be tendered in full.into commerce and as such is now a Federal Document under the U. Money on Account.00 USD (FIVE HUNDRED MILLION AND NO/100) USD. deposition. One sworn to tell the truth is compelled by high principles to protect truth and do nothing to tamper with that truth.S. also agrees that Risk Management can use the private property and the bodies of the Tort Feasors as the collateral necessary to satisfy this claim/debt and Barry Scott/ Risk Management that tort Claimant may. sovereign and Secured Party Creditor and beneficiary and One of the people constituting the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. CLAIM AMOUNT: Tort Claimant. Amero Dollars. be it a bank certified check or wire transfer of funds in full satisfaction and accord.” either by testimony. and/or by affidavit.000. officers or otherwise cannot deny the claim! Tort Claimant Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 8 . rebut the affidavits in respect to this Tort Claim. herein claims a SUM CERTAIN amount of $500. if any) speaks for the County of Philadelphia and binds his Principal (Philadelphia County) and binds the liability/ financial compensation and assets of said Philadelphia County Corporation to this claim to the benefit of the Tort Claimant/Derek K. and United States of America. and acts in the nature of a foreign enemy agent. or affidavit(s) is a threat to the Commercial Peace and Dignity of the County. in the interest of justice to secure collateral. dishonor or default in this matter. In the event that by and through Risk Management of Philadelphia County fails and/or refuses to do their ‘due diligence and investigate’. in the interest of Justice. under necessity. and by doing so establishes this tort claim and all concluding documents becomes a Security subject to observation. 3) ENFORCE THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AND ARREST THE BONDS. of the Tort Feasors.
Derek Kimball Hairston. employees.commands and demands that Barry Scott / Risk Management engages due diligence and investigation and rebuts the affidavits. of the injures and violations stated herein.000. employees and State officers. at a SUM CERTAIN AMOUNT of $500. being due and payable to Tort Claimant. a Notary. Without Prejudice _________________________________________ Derek-Kimball: Hairston©. employees (Trustees & Trust officers) of Philadelphia County via their ‘Oath of Office’ or that of the County commissioners or that of their Governor.S. city officers. that the County of Philadelphia by/and through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is accountable and liable in this matter for the acts of its ‘agents’. and of the stated monetary damages. DEREK K.000.on behalf of the Debtor. personally appeared and known to me to be the man whose name subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to be the same and executed the foregoing. Money on Account. Attorney-In-Fact. THEREFORE AGREED: Pursuant to this Claim as supported by affidavit(s) attached hereto and made a part hereof. officers. Secured Party. that. employees would act and operate in ‘Good Faith’ and with ‘Clean Hands’ in protecting the Right(s). Amero Dollars. // // // Sincerely. county officers.00 USD (FIVE HUNDRED MILLION AND NO/100) USD. ‘employees’. Authorized Representative. HAIRSTON© Ens legis ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ) ) Scilicet County of Montgomery ) SUBSCRIBED TO AND SWORN before me on this_____ day of December. Tort Claimant herein claims monetary damages as real and appropriate as so enumerated herein and assessed for cause. Tort Feasors identified herein has and had a mandatory duty via their Oath of Office and pursuant to the expressed expectation contained in your county or states ‘Oath of Office’. employees. duty. Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 9 . 2009 AD. title(s) and interest(s) of the people and that of the Tort Claimant via said Oath(s) in respect to the Bill of Rights of the first Ten Amendments to the U. ‘court officers’ and otherwise stipulated herein. HEREIN PRESENTED. Constitution as it/they operate upon the ‘agents. employees. or payable in Gold or Silver. responsibilities and obligations in that all agents. court officers.
Notary Public My Commission Expires_________________ /S/_________________________________ Notice of Tort Claim Supported by Affidavits of Derek-Kimball: Hairston Page 10 .Witness my hand and seal: ______________________________________ Seal.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.