Письмо «Re: Query from The New Yorker» — Nicholas Schmidle — ...

https://mail.yandex.ru/neo2/

Re: Query from The New Yorker
Nicholas Schmidle <nickschmidle@gmail.com> Кому Hi Richard, Hope all is well. I had a couple more questions I hoped you could help with. Viktor mentioned to me that Air Cess had been named the second-largest cargo operator out of Sharjah in 1997. Is there any chance you have any record or confirmation of that? Also, regarding the FBI raiding your office in 2005, how soon after that did you leave the US? I was told that, because of frozen assets, you traveled to Egypt on frequent flier miles from Lufthansa. Is any part of that accurate? Thanks! Best, Nicholas Chichakli R <chichakli@yandex.ru> 26 янв. в 19:09 почта

From: Chichakli R <chichakli@yandex.ru> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:21:37 +0400 To: Nicholas Schmidle <nickschmidle@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Query from The New Yorker
Dear Nicholas: Thank you for your message. Concerning Johan Peleman, there is plenty of grounds to cover. Unfortunately, there isn't enough hard evidence that would allow me to pinpoint what I may know to be true about the prson, his ethics, the level of his knowledge, and certainly his corruption. Concerning his Ethics, we have many proven lies he cannot deny. The first and the most important one is what he forged in black and white in the infamous UN report on Angola and in which he invented Victor Bout and my alleged relation to Victor. The report known as S/2000/1225 and which Peleman likes to call it "Sexy Report" as you can see in this video here: http://youtu.be/BLsQsyAANCQ Article-6 of the report states "Every one mentioned in the report was contacted and provided the opportunity to reply" and this is a lie. Actually this is a very major lie because this supposed t be the mechanism of investigation, and which was turned by Peleman to Assassination as he did not contact the people, and I know that because I was one of those mentioned in the report and was never contacted. I certainly know several others who are mentioned and indeed were not approached. The reason Peleman did not contact the people he claimed to be involved in sanction busting is obvious and that is, if he contact the people they are likely to respond and that will ruin his plan to invent a smoke screen to be used to hide the actual sanction busters with $870,000,000 of admitted arms trafficking to Angola as it was revealed in the Angola Gate trials in Paris and the 82 convections that were handed out by the court. Of Course Peleman did not mention one single name of those convicted in Paris after admitting trafficking nearly one billion dollar of Arms to Unita. Now think about the fact that Peleman stated in the report that Victor Bout was the main dealer and the main trafficker with an alleged 10 to 12 million in sale and 23 flights. Compare that to 870 million in sale and more than 2,000 flights!!! Peleman cannot miss the 2000 flights and Billion in sale unless he intentionally did that, or otherwise, he is incompetent and lack the knowledge and expertise. Victor Bout was made up create smoking mirrors in order to hide the true arms traffickers and sanctions busters, and such thing never for free. Other questionable relations of Peleman is his relation to Alexy Yanshuk, the owner of a company heavily involved in arms trafficking and which named "Phoenix Aviation", founded in Sharjah, UAE, and its aircraft are on registered in Kyrgyzstan "EX" registry. Corruption or not is a question that should be addressed to Peleman for WHY is what Peleman failing to mention the company in his infamous report, and worse, failing to mention the Phoenix IL-18 crashed in Angola just short of the runway with more than 20 tons of arms and ammunition. Thus, worthy to mention that Yanshk and Peleman happened to be "Friends", well, at least, until Yanshuk picked up the illegal rendition flights for the CIA in 2002 using his G-II. The lies, deceit, and the manufacturing of story are proven element of Peleman’s work, no question about it. Thus, no one is yet to ask Peleman why did he lie in the UN S/2000/1225 report, and should he say “I did not” the few immediate statements/questions to follow:

1-

You did not contact Richard Chichakli, thus, you lied about the method of investigation and what you claimed to have done – contacting those

1 of 2

04-Mar-12 11:26 AM

Письмо «Re: Query from The New Yorker» — Nicholas Schmidle — ...

https://mail.yandex.ru/neo2/

mentioned. Why?

2-

You completely omitted Richard Chichakli from your follow-up UN reports on Bout in S/2001/363 and S/2001/1015 and which detailed the Bout organization. How come the person you named as the day-to-day financial director in the earlier report was not even mentioned as part of Bout organization few month later in the follow-up reports? Was the insertion of Chichakli in 1225 a fabrication, and that is why you did not contact him?

3In the year of 2000 in your report you stated that Victor Bout has been a major arm dealer for more than a decade; thus placing his alleged start in trafficking arms to 1989 when the Soviet Union was still in existence and Victor Bout was just 22 years old soldier serving in the Soviet Army. How can you explain that? How can you explain claiming in that very report that Chichakli been an associate or employee of Bout for more than a decade; at the time when Richard was serving in the United States Army? 4You claimed o have conducted a fair and thorough investigation; thus, how do you explain that you – let us just say “missed” nearly one billion dollar in illegal arms trafficking and more than 2,000 flights as was documented in the Angola Gate trial? Compared to what you alleged concerning Victor Bout trafficking activities, Victor seems to me “nothing” in comparison, an armature that you portrait as the evil of all evils, and the largest arms dealer in the world at the age of 22? Explain that
Nicholas, these are very simple and very obvious questions that no one is asking, and they are not asking because no one is interested in revealing the truth about the “white elephant story”. The matter of Victor Bout has became an institution, a political platform, and a source of revenue and fame to so many; and until someone brave enough, driven enough, and hungry enough for fame and fortune, until such a person shows up, everyone, perhaps including you will just regurgitate what been intentionally placed out there for that purpose since more than 10 years. Best regards Richard Chichakli

15.01.2012, 02:19, "Nicholas Schmidle" <nickschmidle@gmail.com>: Sure thing. Wanted to ask you a bit about Peleman. I think you’d suggested to me some dubious (potentially criminal) facets of his background. Could you tell me more? Best, Nicholas

From: Chichakli R <chichakli@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:11:19 +0400 To: Nicholas Schmidle <nickschmidle@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Query from The New Yorker
Dear Nicholas: I wounder if you could write me with a link to the article when your article gets published, I would love to read it. Thank you

2 of 2

04-Mar-12 11:26 AM

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful