You are on page 1of 7

American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB) Subject


Submitted to:

Submitted by:

Date of Submission:

A contract is said to come into existence when acceptance of an offer (agreement to the terms in it) has been communicated to the offeror by the offeree and there has been consideration bargained-for induced by promises or a promise and performance. . made with the intention that it shall become binding as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom it is addressed".Offer and acceptance Offer and acceptance analysis is a traditional approach in contract law used to determine whether an agreement exists between two parties. the "offeree". Hughes). An offer is a statement of the terms on which the offeror is willing to be bound. The "expression" referred to in the definition may take different forms. developed in the 19th century. newspaper. price. As a minimum requirement the conditions for an offer should include at least the following 4 conditions: Delivery date. Hughes the court emphasized that the important thing is not a party's real intentions but how a reasonable person would view the situation. Agreement consists of an offer by an indication of one person (the "offeror") to another (the "offeree") of the offeror's willingness to enter into a contract on certain terms without further negotiations. email and even conduct. This is due mainly to common sense as each party would not wish to breach his side of the contract if it would make him or her culpable to damages. Offer Treitel defines an offer as "an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms. Whether two parties have an agreement or a valid offer is an issue which is determined by the court using the Objective test (Smith v. as long as it communicates the basis on which the offeror is prepared to contract. It is the present contractual intent to be bound by a contract with definite and certain terms communicated to the offeree. Without one of the minimum requirements of condition an offer of sale is not seen as a legal offer but rather seen as an advertisement. The offer and acceptance formula. such as a letter. In the English case of Smith v. This classical approach to contract formation has been weakened by developments in the law of estoppel. misleading conduct. it would especially be contrary to the principle of certainty and clarity in commercial contract and the topic of mistake and how it affects the contract. misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. terms of payment that includes the date of payment and detail description of the item on offer including a fair description of the condition or type of service. fax. Therefore the "intention" referred to in the definition is objectively judged by the courts. identifies a moment of formation when the parties are of one mind.

A shop owner displaying their goods for sale is generally making an invitation to treat (Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953] 1 QB 401). This was illustrated in the case of Spencer v Harding (1870) LR 5 CP 561.) This distinction was legally relevant in Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394.S. where it was held that displaying a flick knife for sale in a shop did not contravene legislation which prohibited offering for sale such a weapon. even if additional signage such as "special offer" accompanies the display of the goods. (But see bait and switch. The distinction between an offer and invitation to treat is best understood through the categories that the courts create.) process. an invitation for tenders may be an offer. They are not obliged to sell the goods to anyone who is willing to pay for them. Case law The clearest example of an invitation to treat is a tender (or bidding in the U. with the property owner asking for offers of a certain amount and then selecting which to accept as illustrated in Payne v Cave (1789) 3 TR 148. and an invitation for tenders (or competitive bids). Invitations to treat include the display of goods. where the defendants offered to sell by tender their stock and the court held that they had not undertaken to sell to the person who made the highest tender. the advertisement of a price or an auction. which can be accepted to form a contract (subject to other conditions being met). but were inviting offers which they could then accept or reject as they saw appropriate. so consumer protection laws prohibit misleading advertising and at auctions without reserve there is always a duty to sell to the highest bona fide bidder. In certain circumstances though. However. Generally an auction may be seen as an invitation to treat. An auction may be more ambiguous. The distinction also means . Or as Andrew Burrows writes. an invitation to treat is "An expression of willingness to negotiate” A person making an invitation to treat does not intend to be bound as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom the statement is addressed. if it is stated by the owner that there is no reserve price or that there is a reserve price beyond which offers will be accepted then the auction is most likely a contractual offer which is accepted by the highest bidder. where the defendants had made it clear that they were going to accept the highest tender. The clearest example of this was seen in Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust of Canada (CI) Ltd [1986] AC 207." Contract lawyers distinguish this from a binding offer. the court held that this was an offer which was accepted by the person who made the highest tender and that the defendants were in breach of contract by not doing so. this was affirmed in the Court of Appeal in Barry v Davies [2000] 1 WLR 1962. There may however be statutory or complementary obligations. It comes from the Latin phrase invitatio ad offerendum and means "inviting an offer".Invitation to treat Invitation to treat (or invitation to bargain in the United States) is a contract law term.

The important point to note is that.that if a shop mistakenly displays an item for sale at a very low price it is not obliged to sell it for that amount. who advertised that they would pay anyone who used their product in the prescribed manner and caught influenza £100 and said that they had deposited £1. the auctioneer calling for bids is not making an offer but is asking for offers from prospective purchasers. In certain circumstances however. an invitation to treat is not capable of an acceptance which will result in a contract Auctions Principle: Where there is a ‘reserve price’. as the person making the advertisement may find himself in a situation where he would be contractually obliged to sell more goods than he actually owned. The offerer must have been initiating negotiations from which an agreement may or may not in time result. For an offer to be capable of becoming binding on acceptance. Lord Parker CJ commented that it did not make "business sense" for advertisements to be offers. so the person advertising is not compelled to sell to every customer. advertisements are invitations to treat. Generally. the offer must be definite. a well known example being the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 QB 256. CASE: Harrison v Nickerson [1873] . and final.000 in the bank to show their good faith. If there is no ‘reserve price’ the auctioneer becomes the offeror and must sell the goods to the highest bidder. it is not an offer but an invitation to treat. clear. has made an offer to the whole world and were contractually obliged to pay £100 to whoever accepted it by performing the requested acts. it was held that where the appellant advertised to sell wild birds. an advertisement can be an offer. where it was held that the defendants. In Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204. but rather a phenomenal preliminary to an offer. since an invitation to treat is not an offer. was not offering to sell them. If it is a mere preliminary move into negotiation which may lead to a contract.

brought forward information against the Defendant alleging the Defendant has contravened section 1(1) by offering the flick knife for sale. section 1(1). such display is treated as an invitation to treat by the seller. or lend to any other person. and not an offer. it was illegal to manufacture. CASE: Spencer v Harding (1870) Goods in shop windows and on shelves CASE: Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953] Fisher v Bell Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394 is an English contract law case concerning the requirements of offer and acceptance in the formation of a contract.Tenders Principle: Tenders are not normally offers unless the tender states its exact needs. and that this constituted an offer ." Under the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959. On 14 December 1959. This loophole was closed by Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1961 Ban on Flick Knives: which inserted after the words “offers for sale or hire” the words “or exposes or has in his possession for the purpose of sale or hire”." Judgment High Court At first instance. sell. the Claimant. where goods are displayed in a shop together with a price label. spring or other device in or attached to the handle of the knife". the Prosecutor submitted that the Defendant has displayed the knife and ticket in the window with the object of attracting a buyer. or offer for sale or hire. amongst other things. hire. Acceptance occurs at the point the cashier takes payment. The case established that. a chief inspector of police force. any knife "which has a blade which opens automatically by hand pressure applied to a button. Facts The Defendant displayed a flick knife in the window of his shop next to a ticket bearing the words "Ejector knife – 4s. The offer is instead made when the customer presents the item to the cashier together with payment. as distinct from what it may only require.

99. and a contract comes into being. It is very important to distinguish an offer from an invitation to treat – that is. the bookshop owner has made an invitation to treat. but merely . the winning ‘offer’ has been accepted. Advertising something is like putting it in a shop window. an invitation for other people to submit offers.  When a book is placed in a shop window priced at £7. and that it would be "nonsense to say that [it] was not offering it for sale". The Prosecutor appealed the judges' decision. When the hammer falls. noting that other legislation prohibiting the sale of weapons referred to "offering or exposing for sale" (emphasis added). The court dismissed the appeal. When I make a bid. If an individual is not willing to implement terms. Auctions: • • • The original advertising of the auction is just an invitation to treat.99. the shop accepts my offer. The judges at first instance found that displaying the knife was merely an invitation to treat. Some everyday situations which we might think are offers are in fact invitations to treat: Goods displayed in a shop window or on a shelf. Court of Appeal The court upheld that. The lack of the words exposing for sale in the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959 suggested that only a true offer would be prohibited by the Act. Adverts basically work in the same way as the scenario above. He also read the statute on an exclusive construction (inclusio unius exclusio alterius est).  When I pick up that book and take it to the till. not an offer. I make the offer to buy the book for £7. according to Richard's Law of Contracts. whether an item is offered for the purpose of the statute in question must be construed in the context of the general law of the country. I am making an offer. The seller now has a legally binding contract with the winning bidder (so long as there is no reserve price that hasn’t been reached) In short.  When the person at the till takes my money.of sale sufficient to create a criminal liability under section 1(1) of the Act. an offer is an expression of willingness to contract on certain terms made with the intention that a binding agreement will exist once the offer is accepted. He stated that the general law of the country clearly established that merely displaying an item constituted an invitation to treat. and thus no liability arose. The Defendant ( ) submitted that this was not sufficient to constitute an offer. although the display of a knife in a window might at first appear to "lay people" to be an offer inviting people to buy it.

.seeking to initiate negotiations. this is not an offer but an "invitation to treat". So offer & invitation to treat though originate from the same concept but have different legal effect.