-pf

From:

To:
Subject: Date: Attachments:

CMHT HQ0 Hoc;

ja

oH;

PMT2;Hoc; HocfP_1 2

FW: Radiation data by MEXT Sunday, March 20, 2011 9:10:30 AM 20110320 Qj .pdf

---- Original Message ----From: JapanEmbassy, TaskForce [Imailto:JaoanEmbassvTaskForcenastate.gov] $9en: ITo: Sunday, March 20, 2011 8:52 AM (b)(6)

FEW-

Subject: FW: Radiation data by MEXT

Jennifer Clever Japan Emergency Command Center U.S. Embassy, Tokyo

SBU This email is UNCLASSIFIED ----Original Message ----From: Cherry, Ronald C Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 9:50 PM To: JapanEmbassy, TaskForce; NITOPS; NNSA CMT; NRC PMT Cc: Duncan, Aleshia D; Uchida, Koichi Subject: FW: Radiation data by MEXT Forwarding. MEXT sent a follow up email with the following correction: We have corrected the data in the file '20110320_02.pdfr 14 Kanagawa 1-131 Mistake Not Detectable Correct 40 Thanks. Ron ---Original Message -----From: saigai03@mext.go.jp [lmj1:saigai03lmext goini Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 10:36 AM To: Cherry, Ronald C

-

(b)(6)
I

uject: Kadiation clata by MtX I

ar Mr. Cherry,

Please see attached the document. I send English Version, because we have been able to prepare English Version as same time as Japanese version.

Sincerely yours, Eiko SENAMI (Ms.) Office of International Relations, Nuclear Safety Division, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology - Japan

Sincerely yours, Eiko SENAMI (Ms,) Office of International Relations, Nuclear Safety Division, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology - Japan
This email is UNCLASSIFIED

Reading of environmental radioactivity level by prefecture (3.18.9AM-3.199AM) 2011 3.20 10:00
(MP,.. /I #

J

Prefecture

I
12
3 4 5

__--______

1-31
Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable

T

Fallout Cs--1 37
Not Detectable Not Detectable

Remarks

Hokkaido Aomori Iwate Miyagi Akita

Not Detectable
Not be measured because of the earthquake disaster damage Not Detectable

6• 7

Yamagate
Fukushima [baraki Not Yet Reached 1,300 230 64 21 51 Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable 175 Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable

Not Detectable
Imo u. Uiimeasurea cU u wUu Uv

dealing with the earthquake

Not Yet Reached 62 84 Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectabble
Not Yet Reac hed Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

18
19

20
21 22

Tochigi Gunma Saitama Chiba Tokyo Kanagawa Niigata Toyama Ishikawa Fukui Yamanashi Nagano Gifu Shizuoka Aichi] Mie

be delayed measuring because of the dealing with earthquake disaster_______ dsse .. .. ................ ................. ..

23
24 25 26 27 28

Shiga
Kyoto .. Osaka Hyogo

29
30 31 32

-- I-

Nara Wakayama Tottori Shimane

-ii

Okayama 33 H .. _o ____ 34 ... ............... Hiroshima__h _____ Yamaguchi 35 36 Tokushima 37 Kagawa 38

-

39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Ehime Kochi Fukuoka Shiga
____Nagasaki

Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Yet Reached Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable

On Setting up the equipment

Not Detectable
Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Not Not Not Not Detectable Detectable Detectable Detectable Detectable . .. ........ ....... . .. . .......

....N.•.•............ ........... ... ..........

Kumamoto O ita Miyazaki Kagoshima Okinawa S - -~ *The table was made by MEXT,

Not Detectable Not Detectable Not Detectable

Not Detectable . based on the reports from prefectures

Radiation inDaily-life
1250,000 g Sv/year]

r-t................

of Upper limitradiation dose permitted for people who engage inemergency work.

of Upper limitradiation dose permitted for radiation workers, _ police, and firehighters who engage indisaster prevention.

[50,000 ASv/year]

Se ("2 10,000

•v/year]
Radiation dose in Guarapad(Brazil) per year,

Chest CT scan

Ki: 16,900# Sv/each time]

H2,400 uSvI year]

Spac0.39

res•.•o 029

for per puthc year
Ear O,4
__

~

Radonaabsoroedl inair 126

orrnedcal care).

_
,

[11000 pSv/yearl

Maxinrum oftht differerrce averageof
dose each prefecture. radiation in natural

vu

-"400 Sv/year]
York and An travel a, between Tokyo New (RT).

athigh (lincreasedc =mic radiation afltude.)

P- 9Svi/round tirip]l 200
[22g Sv/year]
radioactie Evaluated redation from dose of emited from nuclear substance the fuel repmcessin pant per year.

[l0# Sv/year]

Standard radiation dose from
Clearance level

(Ref) Average dose rate at the monitoring post of Tokyo (3/17 9:00-'3/18 9:00, March) :0.050 pSv/h =438 p Sv/y