corporate social responsibility.

Are businesses responsible for social issues

1

agenda.

2

Say pretty quickly. keep it moving!

agenda.
What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Jamie

2

Say pretty quickly. keep it moving!

What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Arguments FOR Jamie Tom 2 Say pretty quickly.agenda. keep it moving! .

What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Arguments FOR Arguments AGAINST Jamie Tom Jennifer 2 Say pretty quickly.agenda. keep it moving! .

What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Arguments FOR Arguments AGAINST Case Study: Microsoft Jamie Tom Jennifer Jamie 2 Say pretty quickly. keep it moving! .agenda.

What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Arguments FOR Arguments AGAINST Case Study: Microsoft Case Study: Microsoft Jamie Tom Jennifer Jamie Marie 2 Say pretty quickly. keep it moving! .agenda.

agenda. keep it moving! . What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Arguments FOR Arguments AGAINST Case Study: Microsoft Case Study: Microsoft Conclusions Jamie Tom Jennifer Jamie Marie Marie & Jen 2 Say pretty quickly.

keep it moving! . What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Jamie 2 Say pretty quickly.agenda.

....gov.the business contribution to our sustainable development goals. “..” csr.definition.uk 3 . Essentially it is about how business takes account of its economic.. social and environmental impacts in the way it operates – maximising the benefits and minimising the downsides.

social and environmental impacts in the way it operates – maximising the benefits and minimising the downsides.. “.definition..gov..uk 4 .the business contribution to our sustainable development goals... Essentially it is about how business takes account of its economic.” csr..

Clear business case 5 Stakeholders and customers are increasingly concerned about the environmental and social impacts of the products they buy. not less. business can become more competitive. .

6 .

7 .

£10 7 .

£10 7 .

£13 7 .

7 .

8 .

8 .

9 .

9 .

Shareholders 10 And this is the basic argument that exists today when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility. Shareholders have to balance out whether THEIR investments and dividends should be used to fund social initiatives .

Profit distribution CSR Reinvest Employee bonus Shareholder 11 .

Profit distribution 12 .

Profit distribution Reinvest Employee bonus Shareholder 12 .

derives from many different areas 13 As you are probably all aware. CSR consists of many different elements .

14 Poverty .

15 investing in the community (both monetary and time investment) .

16 and... And to tell us about why they should. but interestingly there is a debate going on about why MNEs should and shouldn’t invest heavily in CSR.. here is Tom .

Tom Fitton 17 .for.

.Neo-Classical View 18 A Neo-Classical View of CSR which epitomizes capitalism is that the only responsibility of the firm is to maximize profit for the shareholders whilst remaining inside existing laws. for example paying wages and at least minimum wages.

1962 19 .“Few trends would so thoroughly undermine the very foundations of our free society as the acceptance by corporate officials of a social responsibility other than to make as much money for their shareholders as they possibly can” Milton Friedman.

Behavioural View 20 .

who believe management may. business should help to solve social problems whether or not business helps to create those problems even if there is probably no shortrun or long-run profit potential” Holmes. be influenced by non economic factors.“In addition to making a profit. political aspects. 1976 21 A contrasting perspective is one of the behavioral theorists. regardless of shareholder pressures. personnel preference resulting in a firm which takes into consideration ethics and morals whilst conducting their business. .

this can be attributed to. an increased customer awareness of business operations through global media exposure.Increase Customer Awareness 22 More recently academics have accepted that CSR has become an important aspect of corporate strategy. .

• • • • Sustainability and environmental issues Health and obesity International operations. worker conditions. exploitation & human rights General ethics and morals.Media increases coverage and awareness of. 23 .

Workplace 24 .

Marketplace: Customer 25 .

Marketplace: Customer 26 .

Marketplace: Supplier 27 .

Community 28 .

Ethics
29

Human Rights

30

Paradox
31

not incorporating the minimum requirements of what is deemed socially responsible in the modern business environment can have catastrophic effects in today’s media driven society… and for this reason not taking measures to do so could lower share value, so the argument that a business should concentrate on profit only is somewhat a paradox.

“Companies with a defined corporate commitment to ethical principles do better financially than companies that don't.” DePaul University. 1997 32 Furthermore recent research has found that a proactive approach to CSR can result in increased corporate performance .

An 11-year Harvard University study found that "stakeholder-balanced" companies showed four times the growth rate and eight times the employment growth when compared to companies that are shareholder-only focused 33 .

selling recycled materials. increasing energy efficiency and in some cases. . Over time. improved environmental management systems do not automatically result in greater cost.Reduced Costs 34 Contrary to widely-held opinion. they improve operational efficiency by reducing waste production and water usage.

4 million Euros per year BECAUSE IT COSTS THEM A LOT OF MONEY TO PROPERLY DISPOSE OF TOXIC WASTE . we know this isn’t to scale) 35 There are also company specific ways of reducing operating costs e.Production of 26 toxic chemicals reduced €5.g.4m saved per year (yes. Dow Chemical Co has set themselves a target of reducing production of 26 toxic chemicals which will save them 5.

A strong reputation in environmental and social responsibility can help a company build this trust. .Enhance brand image and reputation 36 A good reputation is often very hard to build . However. So much of a company's reputation results from 'trust' by stakeholders. it needs to result from real practices and policies and an integrity towards the companies responsibilities.and yet can be destroyed in less than a day. and has in place solid management practices for rectifying the situation .and for learning and improving to prevent any repeat occurrence. Stakeholders are not stupid and can see through 'fluff'. Non Government Organisations (NGOs) and local communities are far more willing to not take action as a result of an environmentally-damaging incident if it is evident that the company has genuinely worked hard to prevent it happening in the first place.quickly .

. but they also want to know that what they buy was produced in a socially and environmentally responsible way.Increased sales & customer loyalty 37 <The coins will swap round automatically> Research has shown that consumers not only want good and safe products.

but they also want to know that what they buy was produced in a socially and environmentally responsible way. .Increased sales & customer loyalty 37 <The coins will swap round automatically> Research has shown that consumers not only want good and safe products.

Employees stay longer. People want to work for a company that is in accordance with their own values and beliefs.Increase ability to attract and retain employees 38 A company's dedication to CSR can help to recruit and retain employees. reducing the costs and disruption of recruitment and retraining .

<I am now going to pass you over to Jennifer who will be debating the other side of CSR> .“78% of employees would rather work for an ethical and reputable company than receive a higher salary” The Cherenson Group 39 Employees are not just worried about promotion and salary any more.

against. Jennifer Chan. 40 .

Conflicting stakeholder interests 41 .

Companies under pressure to be “Green” .CSR or PR? 42 Commercialised.

Green 43 Voluntary? Companies feel obliged to have programmes for fear being singled out and losing competitive advantage. Not the true spirit of implementing CSR. Should be about benefiting society rather than being used as a tool for PR. Important .

Green Peace? 44 An example of this is with Greenpeace. Greenpeace have a long history of pulling publicity stunts to raise their own profile and funds rather than concentrate on the real matters of CSR .

Greenpeace have a long history of pulling publicity stunts to raise their own profile and funds rather than concentrate on the real matters of CSR .Green Peace? 44 An example of this is with Greenpeace.

Greenpeace last year ran a campaign to get people to create videos which damned Apple for their “green” initiatives. Here is one of the videos . No other manufacturer of PCs was highlighted in this way. Greenpeace were using Apples brand image and publicity for their own benefit.Video from Greenpeace 45 We want to show you an example of this.

46 .

47 Used Apple as a publicity tool to benefit their own agenda. No worse than other brands. but Apple are an easy and famous target . Other brands not singled out Hazardous materials in Apple Computers within EU regulations of whats allowed.

48 The move prompted Apple to make a response in order to defend themselves against the bad publicity. Long essay was posted highlighting their current status as well as future green initiatives. .

Weight Recycled as a % of Total Sales 30.0 28 22.0 13 7.5 6 5 10 0 2 2002 2 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 49 Apple pointed out that they lead the industry in respect to weight recycled as a % of past sales But why should they have to do this? Are Greenpeace using bullying tactics? .5 20 24 15.

“Apple completely eliminated the use of CRTs in mid-2006. Gateway. A note of comparison — Dell. Hewlett Packard and Lenovo still ship CRT displays today” Steve Jobs 50 Apple retaliated for being singled out .brought other manufacturers into the conversation .

worsening relations between business and local communities” 51 This leads me onto the next point....“. the Greenpeace/Apple thing is an example of this..businesses are using corporate social responsibility as a shield behind which to campaign against environmental and human rights regulations. CSR is in some cases counter-productive. (read quote) the key point here is that CSR is worsening relations.. .

CSR is in some cases counter-productive... (read quote) the key point here is that CSR is worsening relations..“.. the Greenpeace/Apple thing is an example of this. worsening relations between business and local communities” 51 This leads me onto the next point.businesses are using corporate social responsibility as a shield behind which to campaign against environmental and human rights regulations. ..

Tool for Risk Management 52 .

Benefits are unclear and difficult to measure 53 .

... why do they invest in certain charities etc over others? creates problems on fairness..How do you quantify? How do you benchmark? Where do you prioritise? 54 who decides where to invest money.

Diversion of attention from more important issues 55 .

“If efforts to do good become a distraction from the core business they may actually be downright irresponsible” 56 .

57 .case study.

58 Microsoft is the largest contributor in the high-tech industry and one of the largest among all businesses in the United States. . Microsoft employees give more per person than any other company's employees.$400m donated last year to non-profit organisations throughout the world.

59 The Microsoft Unlimited Potential programme is perhaps their biggest scheme aimed at CSR. Its about helping individuals around the world have access to affordable technologies in order to transform education. foster local innovation and enabling job opportunities The goal is to create a cycle of sustained social and economic growth for everyone and not just the most economically developed countries .

.1
bn New computer users by 2015 60 That's also the United Nations' target year for achieving the eight Millennium Development Goals.

.It can't take us another 35 years to reach another 1 billion.“It took about 35 years to get about 1 billion people access to computers. 61 Basic goal was elaborated by Orlando Ayala..” Orlando Ayala. Senior VP of the Emerging Segments Group . Senior VP for Microsoft Emerging Segments Group...

62 .

much like tech has changed the way we learn innovation (put tech into the hands of more people. . greater innovation occurs).Focus Areas 3 63 transforming education . economic opportunity (amalgamation of the above two.

they have activities in most of the worlds countries.putting technology into the hands of the youth worldwide . <Click> And here are a few pictures of this kind of thing in action .64 As you can see from the map above.

65 .

66 .

Just a few months ago Microsoft announced that they were to sell a package of Windows.Software package for Teachers and Students 67 As part of this. Office and other software to government programs that distribute subsidized PCs to students around the world. Called this the Student Innovation Suite .

68 They priced this at just $3 .

This represents a huge threat to Microsofts business and hence this move. Although Microsoft wants to "make good for the world" by increasing access to computers. Governments have got wise to Microsofts tactics in Western society and are going with Linux. Catch 22. If they sold at full price these countries couldnt afford it and people would complain that Microsoft isn’t doing enough. charge them full price. it also wants to position its business to be part of the market expansion in countries like China and India. the risk is that there may be billions of these computers that will not have Microsoft software. 69 There have been a few critics of this move however.If Microsoft doesn't take action.when they become developed. So its a tough situation for MS but I believe they did the right thing . Lots of growth in mobile phones and PCs in these markets. Get countries hooked on MS software. Sell them cheap and people become cynical about it..

.. The OLPC runs Linux and NOT Microsoft Windows. . one laptop per child initiative which has a similar goal of putting technology into the hands of children in developing countries.70 Other people saw this as a move against Negoponte’s OLPC.

“It's a scary concept for Microsoft to have 100 million to 200 million people potentially growing up using open-source software and Linux. Gartner 71 . Never underestimate the ability of Microsoft to respond to that threat” Steve Kleynhans.

72 Just to wrap this up here is a short video from Microsoft founder Bill Gates who puts the Unlimited Potential programme into his own words .

case study. 73 .

Pollution Sources In a Car 74 .

Evaporative emissions Exhaust emissions Refuelling losses Pollution Sources In a Car 74 .

Ford has always led the way when it comes to innovation So does it when it comes to reducing the environmental impact of the vehicles Ford was the first vehicle manufacturer in Europe to offer production passenger vehicles with Flexifuel vehicle (FFV) Technology. 75 .

Priced at a similar level to their petrol-only equivalents

all the advantages of bio-Ethanol

good for the environment and economic as well.

76

Ford is the only vehicle manufacturer developing the five serious environmentally advanced technologies of clean diesel, Flexifuel, electric hybrid, hydrogen internal combustion and fuel cell.

77

For example, the new Mondeo 1.8-litre TDCi has significantly better performance and fuel economy and produces around 20% less CO2 than the equivalent 1993 Mondeo model

78

Ford is committed to sustained progress as many areas as possible that will reduce its impact on the environment – and help people to do so too. 79 . These include: wind turbines at Dagenham. solar panels at Bridgend and new recycling initiatives in both its products and manufacturing processes.

conclusions. 80 .

The relationship between the corporation and society is inseparable. in that society needs corporations for products and corporations needs society for profits. 81 .

Profits and CSR are not mutually exclusive but go hand-in-hand. 81 .

82 .The global business environment has changed hence the classical view of corporations to solely make profits is short-sighted.

companies are not only under managing their impact on society and the environment. they are under managing their own economic self-interest. Those that get left behind are missing business opportunities.“Evidently. embracing corporate social responsibility not only makes good business sense. competitor advantage and improved management opportunities in this increasingly globalised world.” 83 . By not engaging in CSR.

MNE’s. who will? 84 .. Governments and Citizens have to take responsibility for CSR.... we feel that everybody .While there are some who abuse it. because if we don’t..

Thank you. 85 .

86 “So just to close this up are there are questions?” .

? 86 “So just to close this up are there are questions?” .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful