Table of Authorities - Claim of Right "An entry upon land with the intent to claim the land and to hold

it." Title and Trust Corp v U.S. 264 US 200, 204. "As regards adverse possession, claim of land as one's own to hold it for oneself." Tex.Civ.App., 186 S.W.2d1019, 1020. "Claim of right, claim of title and claim of ownership are synonymous." Ewing v. Tanner, 193 S.E. 243, 247. Also one in Wyoming. Description This section is from the book "The Law Of Real Property and Other Interests In Land", by Herbert Thorn Dike Tiffany. Also available from Amazon: A Treatise on the Modern Law of Real Property and Other Interests in Land . Sec. 520. Necessity of claim of right It is frequently stated that, in order that one may acquire a right by prescription, the user must be under claim of right.85 Sometimes this requirement is stated as adof such space by another even for his own purpose is permissive. Gascho v. Lennert, 176, Ind. 677, 97 N. E. 6. 83. See Bennett v. Biddle, 150 Pa. St. 420, 24 Atl. 738. 84. Thompson v. Easley, 87 Ga. 320, 13 S. E. 511; Clark v. Hen-ckel - (Md.) - , 26 Atl. 1039; Dow-ling v. Hennings, 20 Md. 179, 83 Am. Dec. 545; Barnes v. Haynes, 13 Gray (Mass.) 188, 74 Am. Dec. 629; Jensen v. Showalter, 79 Neb. 544, 113 N. W. 202; Nicholls v. Wentworth, 100 N. Y. 455, 3 N. E. 482; Craven v. Rose, 3 S. C. 72 See Scott v. Dishough, 83 Ark. 369, 103 S. W. 1153. But see Wilkinson v. Hutzel, 142 Mich. 674, 10G N. W. 207. 84a. Watkins v. Peck, 13 N. H. 360; Shaughnessey v. Leary, 162 Mass. 108, 38 N. E. 197. 85. Union Mill & Mining Co. v. Ferris, 2 Sawy. 176, Fed Cas. No. 14371; Trump v. Mcdonnell, 120 Ala. 200, 24 So. 353; Barbour v. Pierce, 42 Cal. 657; Brandon v. Umpqua Lumber & Timber Co., 26 Cal. App. 96, 146 Pac. 46; Clarke v. Clarke, 133 Cal. 667, 66 Pac. 10; Medlock v. Owen, 105 Ark. 460, 151 Table of Authorities - Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 1

S. W. 995; Brossard v. Morgan, 7 Idaho, 215, 61 Pac. 1031; Dexter v. Tree, 117 111. 532, 6 N. E. 506; Hill v. Hagaman, 84 Ind. 287; Parish v. Kaspare, 109 Ind. 586, 10 N. E. 109; Bowman v. Wickliffe, 15 B. Mon. (Ky.) 84; Rollins v. Black-den, 112 Me. 459, Ann. Cas. 1917A 875, 92 Atl. 521; Sargent v. Ballard, 9 Pick. (Mass.) 251; Brace v. Yale, 10 Allen (Mass.) 441; Bigelow Carpet Co. v. Wig-gin, 239 Mass. 542, 95 N. E. 938; Wallace v. Fletcher, 30 N. H. 434; Burnham v. Mcquosten, 48 .N. H. 446; Cobb v. Davenport, 32 N. J. L. 369; Felton v. Simpson, 11 Ired. L. (33 N. C.) 84; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Ihiys, 11 Lea, ditional to that of the adverseness of the user, and sometimes as explanatory of what the requirement of adverseness means. In whichever way it be asserted, the recognition of such a requirement, like that of claim of title as a prerequisite to the running of the statute of limitations in favor of one wrongfully in possession of land, involves considerable difficulty. It appears to be conceded that this requirement of claim of right does not involve any necessity of a verbal assertion, during the period of user, of a right to exercise such user, and that it is sufficient if an assertion of such a claim can be inferred from the circumstances of the user itself.86 And so it has been stated that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the user of another's land without interruption for the prescriptive period will be presumed to have been under claim of right.87 This requirement of claim of (Tenn.) 382, 47 Am. Rep. 291; Dodge v. Stacy, 39 Vt. 558; Wilder v. Wheeldon, 56 Vt. 344; Kent v. Dobyns, 112 Va. 586, 72 S. E. 139; Bisbee v. Lacky, 97 Wash. 447, 166 Pac. 638. In Boyd v. Morris, 32 Ky. L. Rep. 642, 106 S. W. 867, it is said to be immaterial whether the adverse use of a passway over the land of another is claimed as a matter of right or merely as a matter of convenience. 86. Deerfield v. Connecticut R. R., 144 Mass. 325, 11 N. E. 105: Smith v. Putnam, 62 N. H. 369; Hammond v. Zehner, 21 N. Y. 118; Townsend v. Bissell, 4 Hun (N. Y.) 297; Snowden v. Bell, 159 N. C. 497, 75 S. E. 721; Pavey v. Vance, 56 Ohio St. 162, 46 N. E. 898; Hall v. Austin, 20 Tex. Civ. App. 59, 48 S. W. 53; Barber v. Bailey, 86 Vt. 219, 44 L. R. A. (N. S) 98, 84 Atl. 608; Dodge v. Stacy, 39 Vt. 558. An Iowa statute provides that user shall not be evidence of a claim of right, and that express notice of the claim must be given. See Gates v. Colax Northern R. Co., 177 Iowa, 690, 159 N. W. 456; Mcbridge v. Bair, 134 Iowa, 611, 112 N. W. 169. 87. Smith v. Ponsford, 184 Ind. 53, 110 N. E. 194; Mitchell v. Pratt, 177 Ky. 438, 197 S. W. 961; Blake v. Everett, 1 Allen (Mass.) 248; Miller v. Garlock, 8 Barb. (N. Y.) 153; Pavey v. Vance, 56 Ohio St. 162, 46 N. E. 898; Barber v. Bailey, 86 Vt. 219, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 98, 84 Atl. 608; Poronto v. Sinnott, 89 Vt. 479, 95 Atl. 647; Muncy v. Updike, 119 Va. 636, 89 S. E. 884; Rogerson v. Shepherd, 33 W. Va. 307, 10 S. E. 632; Wend-ler v. Woodward, 93 Wash. 684, 161 Pac. 1043. Table of Authorities - Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 2

But the burden of proof, in the sense of risk of non persua right thus appears to resolve itself into a requirement merely of a user which will justify an inference or presumption of such a claim, and the only user which can possibly satisfy this requirement is obviously a user "as of right," that is, a user unaccompanied by any recognition of a right in the landowner to stop such user. It would be more satisfactory if the courts, instead of asserting that the user must be under claim of right, would assert merely that it must be "as of right"88 or would be satisfied with the statement that it must be adverse, which apparently means the same. As it is not necessary that the person exercising the wrongful use verbally assert a claim of right to make such use, so, it is conceived, it is not necessary that he believe himself to have such a right, that is, a mental claim of right is no more necessary than a verbal claim of right. It is recognized that good faith is not necessary to entitle one to the benefit of the statute of limitations,89 and there is no reason for regarding it as necessary for the application of the doctrine of prescription.90 sion of the jury, is necessarily upon the person asserting the prescriptive right. Shea v. Gavitt, 89 Conn. 359, L. R. A. 1916A 689, 94 Atl. 360; Rollins v. Blackden, 112 Me. 459, Ann. Cas. 1917A 875, 92 Atl. 521; Smith v. Sedalia, 152 Mo. 283, 48 L. R. A. 711, 53 S. W. 907; St. Martin v. Skamania Boom Co., 79 Wash. 393, 140 Pac. 355; District of Columbia v. Robinson, 180 U. S. 92, 45 L. Ed. 440 (dictum). 88. As in Polly v. Mccall, 37 Ala. 20; Stevens v. Dennett, 51 N. H. 324; Worrall v. Rhoads, 2 Whart. (Pa.) 427; Webster v. Lowell, 142 Mass. 324, 8 N. E. 54. In the English Prescription Act, the two expressions "as of right" and "claiming right" are used, and they are regarded as similar in meaning. Tickle v. Brown, 4 Ad. & El. 369, and "as of right," it has been decided, means as a person rightfully entitled would have enjoyed the user. Bright v. Walker, 1 Cromp. Mees. & Ros. 211, while the user is not "as of right" if permissive. International Tea Stores v. Hobbs (1903) 2 ch. 165; Gardner v. Hodgson's Kingston Brewery (1903) App. Cas. 229. 89. Ante, Sec. 504 note 72. 90. The decision in Wilder v. Wheeldon, 56 Vt. 344, that the claim of a right of way by prescription was defeated by Similar idea in Jersey http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/criminal/charges/theft002.pdf Table of Authorities - Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 3

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-04-29.pdf Defense of Property under the Common Law - LexisNexis http://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/outlines/html/crim/crim10.htm [3] Claim of Right – When a person asserts a claim of right to property in the possession of another and seeks to reclaim such property, the possessor is not justified in using force to thwart the dispossession if he knows, believes, or as a reasonable person should believe, that the claimant has a legitimate claim of right to possession of the property in question. Since the use of force to protect property is legitimate only if the act/attempted act of dispossession is unlawful, in such cases of a legitimate claim to property, the act of dispossession is lawful. [A] Common Law – A person in possession of real or personal property is justified in using non-deadly force against a would-be dispossessor if he reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent and unlawful dispossession of the property. Under no circumstances may a person use deadly force to prevent dispossession. CANADA CODE

39. (1) Defense with claim of right - Every one who is in peaceable possession of a personal property under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending that possession, even against a person entitled by law to possession of it, if he uses no more force than is necessary. (2) Defence without claim of right - Every one who is in peaceable possession of personal property, but does not claim it as a right or does not act under authority of a person who claims it as of right, is not justified or protected from criminal responsibility for defending his possession against a person who is entitled by law to possession of it. [R.S. c.C-34, s.39.] This article is © Research Machines plc 2009. All rights reserved. Helicon Publishing is a division of Research Machines plc. Canadian Claim of Right Declaration! Table of Authorities - Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 4

and.Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right I. Whereas it is my understanding Canada is a common law jurisdiction. Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent. and. Whereas it is my understanding Section 32 of the Constitution Act limits it to members and employees of government.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 5 . and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that for something to exist legally it must have a name. Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Canada is a representative one. Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory. and. determine and act for a common goal. Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law. and. Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution Act. do hereby make Oath and state the following is My Truth and My Law. and. Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate. Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist. and. a flesh and blood man and Sovereign Spiritual Being. [First]-[Middle]: [Last Name]. Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SIN (Social Insurance Number) are in fact employees Table of Authorities . and. and.

Whereas it is my understanding that if one has lawful excuse one may choose to not obey a court. tribunal. and. Whereas it is my understanding that all existing courts and governments are de facto only and not de jure. Whereas it is my understanding that a man by the name of Marc Dumais did while acting as a General in the Canadian Armed Forces sign an agreement allowing for foreign armed soldiers to be used in Canada against Canadians. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that Section 15 of the Criminal Code of Canada does not clearly express that one may be charged for failure to obey a de facto government or court.of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government. Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed. and. Act or order. and. Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that Section 46 of the Criminal Code of Canada states that everyone commits treason if amongst other things they levee war against Canada or do any act preparatory thereto. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that a claim of right establishes a lawful excuse and that this factual truth is expressed in Section 39 of the Criminal Code of Canada. Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one's SIN. and. or without lawful authority. communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other Table of Authorities .Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 6 . Whereas it is my understanding that this agreement was signed in conspiracy with Stephen Harper. and that this factual truth is expressed in Sections 126 and 127 of the Criminal Code of Canada. statute. a man playing the role of Prime Minister of Canada.

and. Whereas it is my understanding that as a Freeman-on-the-Land in this common law jurisdiction that I have the duty to stand in defence of the country of Canada and its sovereign people against foreign armed troops who attempt to invade. and. unity of Canada. Whereas it is my understanding that agreements made on behalf of Canada by traitors to Canada do not bind the people of Canada. Whereas it is my understanding that the agreement they entered into was done in secrecy and without public input or discussion and in contravention of Section 46 of the Criminal Code of Canada. and. military or scientific information which is aiding or abetting any foreign state or entity which threatens the sovereignty. and. govern or police me or my Country. and.than Canada. _________________________________________ am a Freeman-on-the-Land. Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities. obligations. and. Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions. Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully and does not violate common law.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 7 . Whereas I do firmly and truly believe the aforementioned agreement is an overt act of treason. especially from those who claim limited Table of Authorities . and. Whereas it is my understanding that this duty is not affected by agreements made by treasonous and de facto government agents. Whereas it is my understanding that a Canadian General does not have the power or mandate to enter into Treaties with a foreign power. and. Whereas I. and limitations. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that agreeing or conspiring to agree to allow armed foreign troops to patrol and police our streets is an act of treason. and.

and. and to have free-men. harvesting timber.liability. Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation. Whereas it is my understanding that I must steward the land properly. and. lawful. Whereas it is my understanding that I must live on it as my main place of domicile. byright and just title. Table of Authorities . and any other people whom violate my common law rights and/or the rights of my friends and family tried in a court de jure. and. and own. Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it. medication and other peaceful purposes. Whereas it is my understanding that I have the right to possess and use all of God's plants and their natural products for consumption. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties. and I understand that it reverts to being claimable if I do not do so. settle on. Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to create and maintain a court de jure of right. Whereas it is my understanding that I can use a Notary Public and/or three witness signatures to perform duties found under any Act including thus a Notary Public or three witness signatures gives the power to hold court and hear evidence and issue binding lawful judgments. and. and grant myself full Allodial Title to it. or otherwise. existing unsurveyed Crown Land and lawfully claim it as mine (without limitation). improve it in some fashion. either by clearing land for argriculture.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 8 . and. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that I have the right to claim up to 160 acres. and. and. legitimate. Whereas it is my understanding that I may pass the land on to my heirs if I have any when I die. government agents. "by law".

and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that free unencumbered possession and use of arms and firearms for protection of person. Whereas it is my understanding that I have the common law right to travel on public roads for non-commercial purposes. and. and. or insurance. license. Whereas it is my understanding that permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer and/or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time.Whereas it is my understanding that public transportation is in fact and actuality public property to which I have the right of use and access without having to pay. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that the act of registering the birth of a baby creates a legal Table of Authorities . property. Whereas it is my understanding that the common law right to travel on the highways without license is lawful and still exists although it does appear to have been deceptively hidden. Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law. Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued in my province create no obligation or dishonor if ignored. Whereas at my discretion I may possess arms and firearms free of statutes and regulations for lawful purposes. and. Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Social Insurance Number.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 9 . without registration. and. and. Whereas it is my understanding that I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me violate common law. country and livelihood is considered lawful and just. and.

concerned or affected parties. Whereas it is my understanding that the people in the government are merely playing roles. Whereas it is my understanding that this creation of a person and transfer of authority is not fully disclosed to the parents. Table of Authorities . Furthermore. restrictions and that I maintain all rights at law to trade. and. restrictions or regulations created by others and without my consent.entity called a person that exists in association with that baby and that the manner in which offspring are registered transfers superior guardianship rights over that offspring to the government.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 10 . Whereas it is my understanding that I am not obliged to obey the orders of anyone claiming to be a Queen or King or those acting on behalf of such an entity. and. Therefore be it now known to any and all interested. Whereas I AM NOT PLAYING. and. Whereas it is my understanding that if I do not exist in association with a person I cannot be lawfully governed by the people playing roles in government. and. _____________________________ am a Freeman-on-the-Land and do hereby serve notice and state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations. exchange or barter and exist without deceptive governance and to do so without limitations. and. and. and. that I. Whereas it is my understanding that the person and the human being to which it is associated are two very separate and different things and that the people playing roles in government only have the right to act upon the legal person and not the Sovereign Spiritual Being. as no one who does make preposterous claims that abandon and erode the concept of equality has any authority over me. I claim that these actions are not outside my communities' standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

I claim the right to use a Notary Public and/or three witness signatures to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests. Furthermore. I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the Criminal Code of Canada. incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized (and/or witnessed by three signatures) consent. government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. directly or by proxy in any way. cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. Table of Authorities .Furthermore. Furthermore. I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act. I claim that the de facto courts in Canada are bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting. Furthermore. Furthermore. Furthermore. harrassed or otherwise regulated and FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 11 . witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. Furthermore. I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law. I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers. transported. interrogated or in any way detained. government principals or agents or justice system participants is FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned. I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers.

Place of Claim of Right: (City).org/secure/Notice-Of-Understanding-And-Intent. freedoms and duties. and I mean.html ---------Claim of Right for Americans 4:07 PM on Apr. applies to this name only. (Province). Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. 10. We are the voluntary surety for this name only. 2008 We all use artificial entities everyday. We are all free and don't know it. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein and then successfully defeating these claims in a proper court of law will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act or regulation against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land ______________________for exercising these lawful and properly established rights. upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. Our all caps name registered with the government. I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. not us. Table of Authorities . (Country) and/or: Notary Public: ____________________________________ http://www.pnnac. All law. Responses must be under Oath or attestation.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 12 .Furthermore. ALL LAW.

an article IX entity of the Bill of Rights.only our non-living identification as a legal entity is. Another way to claim our rights is to bind public officials to the Bill of Rights of the Constitution and claim the political status of "the people". are not "citizens". or criminal or civil charge. Since governments are non-living entities and can't have authority over a living being. One way that seems to be working for a lot of people is through establishing by tacit admission (non-response and admission thereby) of those in control of the government. claiming not to have rights. We. or with questions that we ask to them about the nature of the de facto corporate governments. as living beings. and resident status. "persons". Table of Authorities . Then we are. These legal entities are governed by the federal registry and US Code (commercial code based on the Napoleonic Civil Code). This name become "identification". There are a few ways to establish private law which can be the exonerating facts in any government case imposed upon the legal name that we once thought was ours. "I do not consent to be surety for the debt or charge on that artificial entity". One way to be free is simply agree not to be surety for any debt. the fourteenth amendment "citizen of the United States" through social security. for certain claims we are making about our freedom. in effect. "residents" or "persons" then we have lowered our political status as is recognized by governments. driver's licenses. or admissions of truth that we make about ourselves as living entities.. It's a legal entity to which all government law applies. not rights. "residents". nor "taxpayers" . This identification is.Writing up a claim of right for Americans who want some ideas on how to extricate themselves from the deception of the commercial federal United States government (a corporation) and the State governments that have contracted with this federal legal entity. If we claim to be "citizens". not us. voting registration. We have volunteered into commercial law acting a non-living legal entity. Another way is to set things up ahead of time by establishing material facts as our private law about who we are as living beings. the "identity". The fourteenth amendment grants only privileges to "citizens". The New World Order uses commerce (communism) to control us and tax us via a legal entity it creates when we register our name with government. and through which we used to think we have no choice but to act.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 13 . and the nature of the non-living de facto federal and state governments. they have to go through an interface. which itself is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. in fact. unless we then actively claim them from that position.

Governors. "the people" are the political status that is free. Be sure to claim that the men and woman acting as public officials are to uphold the Bill of Rights. that among these are the right to Life. please comment if you notice conceptual errors. Listen to Eric WhoRU on WTPRN. I'm still working on this.ca forums for more details and discussion and watch the videos by Robert-Arthur:Menard. Irene Gravenhorst. claims or charges that you make of them. President.. I would like to have a consensus of people on whether or not we should be referring to ourselves as Sovereign State Citizens. talking to them directly man to man. etc) using a notary process similar to Jack and Margy Flynn. One of them is to send a claim of right to the men and women (in their private capacity) doing business as the public officials in government. Many people are having great success with using ideas like this. Mayors. This is very powerful stuff. Senators. and. Freedom and the right to sole ownership of both property and land.There are also several methods by which one can establish tacit admission of facts.is not in dispute).Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 14 .. that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. By doing this we are both bypassing the corporate entity name that we use in commerce. or as Sovereign Free Men-on-the-land (the fact that we are not de facto citizens -small c. This is all brand new stuff for me so please visit thinkfree. They all involve nonresponse by government officials to the questions.com for more information on political status of "people" vs "citizen". as those people who are supposed to be under oath to the Constitution. Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right Whereas it is my understanding that: the common law is that which derives its force and authority from the universal consent and immemorial practice of the people. that all men are created equal. and that you are of the political status of "the people". Table of Authorities . and also bypassing the corporate non-living entities in which they are unlawfully acting as de facto members of the United States. the men and which are supposed to be under Oath of Office and acting in their private capacity to protect our rights (ie. and Winston Shrout in my Must See Freedom Videos post.

" Cruden v Neale 2 NC. and." --Thomas Jefferson: Rights of British America. Papers 1:134 That "every man is independent of all laws except those prescribed by nature. ME 1:209.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 15 . He is not bound by any institution formed by his fellow men without his consent. the United States of America is a federation of fifty artificial nation states. the government of each state bound by the Constitution for The United States of America. and. A society is defined as a number of persons joined by mutual consent to deliberate. only those who work in a capacity of government officials and agents and employees in their lawful duty to protect the life. The Constitution for The United States of America. The Constitution of The United States of America is a document to which all public acts must abide. the current acting federal government on the land commonly known of as the United States of America is a Table of Authorities . and. the lawful functions of any government cannot infringe upon the freedom granted to men and women on the mand by their creator. not under. and.E. the law is paramount and mandatory. and the public acts of all states and the federal government. and. established corporate legal entities called governments on the land known as the United States and the several States. and.equality before. determine and act for a common goal. liberty and property. 70 no law of man can ever govern the conduct of people on the land.338(1796) 2 S. and: A by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation. Thomas Jefferson said: A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature. and not as the gift of their chief magistrate. and. and. 1774. A statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law only within that society.

power de facto. and. the Law Societies and Bar Associations of the United States and the respective states are the societies whose members create the statutes of the United States. agents and employees of each level of governments. the Constitutions and public acts of each of the respective states. a "person" "resident" or "citizen" of the Constitution of the United States of America and the Bill of Rights and all statutes. and only with full disclosure between the agents thereof. persons and the like . and. The United States and all governments and courts on the land commonly known of as United States of America are corporations. The United States is a corporation as per public policy 29 USC 3002. and. and. apply only to citizens.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 16 . all law of the United States and respective States applies only to artificial persons. Table of Authorities . and. therefore these statutes apply only to citizens of those societies.artificial persons representing the government officials. The Constitutions and public acts for The United States of America and the respective States do not bind nor extend to people on the land. code. full disclosure of the definition of all words. and has no authority over men and women on the land. corporations are artificial legal entities that can contract only with other legal entities by the hand of living agents. and have no authority over sovereign men and women on the land. The Constitution of The United States of America and it's public acts. and all de facto counterparts. or those artificial persons whose trustee acts in his personal capacity as an employee of those societies. and. only to natural and artificial persons. and those sworn to uphold these laws. the assumption that those definitions rest upon. is referred to as the United States. and the implications that extend therefrom of all clauses of such contracts in order to claim authority. the artificial persons who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. ordinances and by-laws of the United States and of all States and Municipalities refers to artificial political entities. residents. and. and. power or control over those contracting parties.

A citizen is an artificial person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States as per the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution for the United States. and. that the term 'citizen' as defined in the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America is the term used to denote the political status of the artificial entity of government employee or officer. and. one who does not consent to act as surety for an artificial entity may choose not to. there is no such thing as a contract.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 17 . or the surety for issues involving artificial persons with their continual agreement and consent over time. and in that capacity may not be exerting his sovereign freedom and rights. and. and. that one unknowingly acting as the legal entity of a citizen under the fourteenth amendment is interpreted by those running the United States as not enjoying the full extent of freedom God allows. people may only act as the priniciple of any contract. and. has the freedom and private right to do so and may choose to do so at any time. living beings who act as surety for an artificial entity subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. without the universal agreement of parties thereto over time. the terms "community" and "community standards" are deceptive and used to impose unlawful legal control and conformity upon the people on the land and the land itself. and. and. and. or social contract. and. even though full disclosure of this legal status has not been established. are commercial law governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. Table of Authorities . for something to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States it must be an artificial person subject to the jurisdiction pursuant to the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of The United States of America. and that there can be no lawful consequence for not doing so.The US Code and State Codes. and is also subject to those corporate state entities which have contracted with the United States. and.

and. and. and/or submit to the United States for creation and use of a artificial entity. and. nor information stemming from second hand knowledge of one's birth can lawfully be used to in a court of law.a name is that which is designated to property by the owner thereof. what they are or where they are. and refer to them and tax them through commerce as their chattle property. and. nor do they have first hand knowledge of who their parents are. and. and offering such information would be entering into fraud. the name and date of birth on a birth certificate are merely proof of the facts so certified thereon in any court in the United States. no information stemming from a birth certificate. and therefore as de facto government employees/citizens. Table of Authorities .therefore any knowledge of who our parents are or what the people we commonly know of as our parents have told us regarding our supposed time and date of birth in a de facto court of law for purposes of "identification" is hearsay. register. and. that those in control of the government de facto of the United States of America deceptively entice others. being legally "owned" by the United States. can only be used by those acting as artificial entities in a de facto manner (in fraud). is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States under the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States. limited liability. and. using a Social Security Number is prima fascia evidence of acting in the capacity of a citizen or artificial person. when someone is born they do not have first hand knowledge of who they are. government employee or officer. and use of a social insurance number. or any of the States. and. and cannot lawfully used for purposes of "identification". but only the legal name created.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 18 . nor could they pick them out of a line up of two . to act in commerce in a capacity of an artificial entity created and controlled by the United States. have no relation to any sovereign man or woman. and use of such by the courts is in fraud. through application for citizenship or residency. a legal name similar to the lawful name of the one who applies. someone's given and family names under their creator are not the same as the first and last names written on any commercial instrument or court document which may resemble one's God given name. one may apply.

and.those who use a Social Security Number (SSN) are acting through a legal name as officers or employees of the de facto federal government. and. or by legal contractual extension. women and children into acting as legal entities for the purposes of taxation and control. that any transaction of a security interest requires the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. statutory or by-laws stating that persons must identify themselves refer only to non-living legal entities themselves. that the income tax is an excise tax derived from what those in control of the legal entity the United States consider as for use of their legal property. only the legal person to which they are trustee bound by the de facto statutes and bylaws created by the Federal government. Table of Authorities . which is unlawful. and lure men. and. and do not extend to men women or children who may use a legal entity name of the United States. and. for the "privilege" of using "benefits" offered by this de facto government. those who are in control of the government of the United States of America consider men and women as instruments of production.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 19 . and. and. the current courts in the United States and in the several states are corporations. and. and. use of the current court system of the United States and States and Municipalities is a benefit in fact. that courts and tribunals of federal jurisdiction and those courts of the fifty states that have contracted with the de facto United States cannot be of lawful authority without the full consent of all parties involved in a case. and. the de facto State and Municipal governments. and operate on a system of double entry accrual bookkeeping. the courts of the United States and States conduct the profitable business of witnessing and facilitating transactions of security interests.

the term "police officer" means a corporate policy enforcer. and.there is no lawful obligation for anyone to ever "identify" themselves. and. and. that the Federal Reserve is a private corporation. and. as committed by a sovereign Free Man-on-the-Land. by an artificial entity. and. and. agent or employee against the lawfully protected interests of the people on the land. and. and that the lawful money of the United States of America has been replaced with private legal tender and credit. agents and employees are governed. or by-law. statute. and. the use thereof by those acting through their legal entities are considered as taxable events by the de facto corporate government of the United States. and. is not equivalent to a crime as committed by someone acting in the name of government or under the de facto government. breaching of the peace is the breaching of de facto code. peace officers are under United Nations contract. "eminent domain" only involves legal title to property. police officers who ask for identification are not acting under their oath of office and therefore are not acting lawfully. Table of Authorities . breaking the law. nor to the breaching of a statute or by-law by which government officials. a crime is that which is committed by a government official.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 20 . nor breach a statute or code. and. not lawful claim. a free man or woman on the land cannot breach the peace nor break the law of any corporation or government on the land. HJR-192 and the Bretton-Woods Agreement removed lawful money from circulation in the United States of America. and. that as a sovereign Free Man-on-the-land I cannot commit a crime nor break a law of the United States.

and. and this not depend on. and. and. any artificial legal entity of any government including the United States. that it is perfectly lawful to own land of any of the several States by allodial title or land patent or Claim of Right. by arguing that a peace officer had "reasonable belief" or "probable cause to believe" a crime was committed. even though the civil. when in fact it's the officer's complaint itself which is based on hearsay and there is no evidence of an unlawful event. nor can be supplanted by any concurrently registered legal title of the land with any de facto local. Table of Authorities . natural and political rights of the artificial person/citizen created are not equivalent to God-given freedom and the rights of the man or woman who has applied. because no lawful money of the Constitution of the United States of America is in circulation does not mean that we cannot use federal reserve notes to buy and lawfully own land of what is commonly known of the United States of America or any of the States thereof.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 21 . including what de facto governments term "public land or highways".de facto courts often try to deflect the fact that they have no evidence of the existence of an injured or complaining party and therefore no probable cause for a case. or that an accused's defense is hearsay. therefore does not need a licence and/or registration. I may claim damages and bill those people acting as lawful or legal entities of any government or acting de facto government infringes on the freedom granted to me by my creator as a living sovereign man on the land. and. and. has not had their God-given freedom and the rights as a sovereign infringed. and use. or existence of an injured or complaining party. that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action and does not need a licence. anyone who has already applied and registered for. and. and. and. that anything for which one can apply for insurance must lawfully be something for which one can own and use under full liability and is not obliged to have limited liability insurance for. that automobiles for which one can apply for and receive a license and/or registration to own and use on the land must fundamentally be lawful to own and use on the land. state or federal government.

must be bonded and under oath to uphold the Constitution of The United States of America so as to protect and indemnify those they serve. or acting in a de facto capacity as a public official.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 22 . Constitution for the United States of America. someone unknowingly acting as a legal entity can. do not force people into involuntary servitude and. it is perfectly lawful for anyone on the land commonly known of as the United States of America to not be known as. can simply deny consent to be surety for criminal or civil charges on that legal entity. agent or employee under oath to uphold the Constitution for the United States of America and it's laws. Writs of Indictment or verified criminal complaints can be presented by a sovereign Free Man-on-the-land before a properly convened Grand Juries and courts de jure to indict those members of corporations and de facto governments who infringe upon the God-given rights of the people. or act or perform as a legal entity. lest he or she be subject to criminal charges or commercial processes and. upon learning he is acting as a legal entity. and as the definition of the words "shall" and "must" are yet to be construed in the imperative sense. and. exist for those who have unknowingly been enticed to act as legal persons . courts and police. or do business as an artificial entity. and. the de facto government. government officials must be bonded and under oath to uphold their respective State Constitution. acting as a unbonded de facto government employee citizen. and cannot lawfully evade prosecution or commercial processes for not upholding these laws.as employees of the de facto governments on the land mass known as the United States of America. in the imperative. and operate in obedience to. agent or employee of the United States and subject to uphold the laws of the United States. one acting in the capacity of an artificial entity may deny consent to be governed through it. to lawfully hold office. and to abandon one's legal name and SSN altogether and act Table of Authorities . therefore. whether acting knowingly or not as a legal entity. that. as de facto statutory law is always speaking. and. unless one is a public official. remedy exists because. and. and are always subject to these laws. so as that those who operate. all those who work for government agencies. this means that the words "shall" and "must" have not currently been defined in statutory law. and also the State statute and code and federal statute and code that applies to their office.that remedy from unbonded de facto statutes and by-laws must.

if anyone does revoke or deny consent to be governed as an artificial legal entity/government employee. on the land. Table of Authorities . and property over. and limitations. the de facto legal title that denotes chattle property . or the like.establishes lawful excuse. by claiming the eternal truth of ownership and possession of one's body. by those acting for government. court. order. traveling freely. and may not be detained or restrained against his liberty. or deprived of this life or property. regulation. and. the people on the land and notaries are senior to any judge of the United States of America and it's repective States. a common law claim of right in one's God-given name. highways and seas is a God-given right that cannot be forcibly regulated or taxed by commerce.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 23 . and/or running private non-commercial business. an artificial entity. or through. and.to lawfully exist free of all government control and statutory and commercial code restraint that exists and acts upon the legal name fraudulently misrepresenting the God-given name of people on the land. the de facto possession of sovereign power. and. claiming and clarifying that which is eternally true that of the God-given freedom and right to exist free of involuntary servitude. warrant. land. and. one with lawful excuse may choose to not obey a statute. someone from another country may live on the land commonly known of as the United States of America. giving lawful notice. and to be free from governance as. obligations. and. tribunal. by any means. they are clarifying their status which is eternally true . a Free Man-on-the-Land has lawfully claimed to be free from governance. above. roads. and thus to be governed through the legal name to which they can act as trustee. Act. and. summons.solely as a Free Man-on-the-land of what is commonly known of as the United States of America. that are created and used by those in. and. and. or who represent. and exists free of all statutory or codified restrictions. people on the land commonly known as the United States of America have the God given freedom to revoke or deny consent to be known as a citizen or Citizen. and. and separate from.

undisturbed by de facto statutory law and the law of persons. agency. • To lawfully exist free of all statutory and commercial obligations and restrictions. over and above the land commonly known of as the United States of America forevermore with full God-given freedom and the rights which stem therefrom. Lake-Shore:Baby. and maintain all rights at law to trade. to communicate clearly to the de facto governments on the land of the United States of America. court or police of the United States or the States. or any other entity thereby contracted to any government or court acting on the land. • to act and be recognized by all governments courts and public officials and officers operating on. court or police operating on the land commonly known of as the United States of America. the following unalienable freedoms and rights: •this is lawful notice that I have a bilateral binding contract with all men and women acting as public officials and agents of the United States and all States. use and sell anything without interference from any government. •to lawfully buy. and.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 24 . and. and. courts or police. and. own. a Free Man-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly. Therefore. •to do anything I so wish without interference from any government. specifically and unequivocally my intent: • to claim that my body and all property in my possession is my own and cannot be used by others without my consent. granted to me by my creator. and. agency. and all corporations they underwrite. exchange or barter. I claim from my authority as a living man on the land.Therefore be it resolved and known to any and all concerned and effected parties. possess. involving the Constitution of the United States of America. that I. • To travel lawfully on the land commonly known as the United States of America by whatever means I deem necessary without interference from de facto governments. including but not limited to the Bill of Rights and what is Table of Authorities .

man or woman that acts on their behalf and. •I do not need to ask permission from any government to engage in any activity. agencies. person. •as a soul in the knowledge of God and not the chattel property of anyone nor anything. any government. acting under his authority and power alone. •that I am Lake-Shore:Baby. the right to use the legal entity that represents me with the United States to conduct business of any type without having the freedom and rights granted to me by my creator infringed. person. my given and family names as granted to me by the creator of all living things. and. employee of. taxpayer. the ownership and the right to soul possession of my body. courts and police. •that I am of not of any political class or jurisdiction of the Constitution for the United States of America. and. free from any interference from corporations and de facto governments. citizen. and any entity. a living sovereign Free Man-on-the-Land. •as I am not chattle property. resident. or residing with.commonly known of as the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America. •that I claim and reserve all freedoms and rights as granted to me by my creator. •that the above claims generate lawful excuse to disobey any law of the United States or the respective States and Municipalities. nor a child. but am of equal or greater political status of any entity defined therein. and. and enjoyment of it in any way I see fit. •the right to use the any law of the United States and a Notary Public to perform duties found under any Act to claim recourse against those public officials who violate my freedom and rights and. may hold court and hear evidence and issue binding lawful judgments and.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 25 . free from intimidation to myself or to the Notary. and. nor any other word that denotes an entity with diminished freedom and/or rights. and that the judgment of the Notary I use will be fully binding upon Table of Authorities . and. •Notaries having the superior authority to any judge of the United States and the States. •since private commerce has an unlawful monopoly on the land.

rules and regulations of the United States and the States. •that peace officers.those whom are involved in the claim. all men and women acting as public officials and agents of the United States and States are bound by the Constitution for the United States of America including but not limited to the Bill of Rights and what is commonly known of as the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 26 . and my claim to exist free of all statutory. •the authority to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace and law enforcement officers and anyone else representing corporations or de facto government powers. •the right to generate further lawful excuse. and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Free Man-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law and. and. to defend myself and the liberty of my body and private property. and codified laws. have a duty to act under their Constitutional oath of office and distinguish between statutes created by the de facto government. Furthermore I claim Table of Authorities . •the authority to use the full extent of the sovereign power. or to enforce consequences on those who commit treason and obstruction of justice in their actions to block me in my pursuit of freedom. and law. and all other men. women and entities. •all men and women acting as public officials and agents of the United States and State governments and the corporations they underwrite are bound to understand my intent to claim. •for the purposes of this claim. who have not observed me infringe upon the God given freedom and rights of others and. despite how this document is worded. remedy and recourse. which includes all of the defenses which God and the common law considers sufficient reason to excuse a man from criminal liability as administered by de facto governments. any writs from the common law. and any commercial procedures. courts and police.

and. Table of Authorities .•The right to determine what is best for myself. •that notice in any public newspaper is lawful notice. and. and. and. •soul ownership. •The right to use Federal Reserve Note money and private bank credit as if it were lawful money. •I have the right to claim uninhabited land anywhere in the geographic area commonly referred to as the United States of America. whether or not regulated by de facto government statutes and by-laws. which have been given to me. •the right to use my property without having to further pay or be taxed for the use or enjoyment of it. •the right to earn a living without having my earnings taxed. •The right to buy and own and sell anything. my family or anyone or any one under my care. •that I am not a taxpayer. and any capacity I act in is not a taxpayer. and. and that I am the lawful owner of this property. and that if not responded to in a timely fashion. that these monies are considered for all intents and purposes lawful money and untaxable. or to which I have claimed ownership undisputed in the common law. and. and. that a notice of claim published as such will create allodial title or patent to any land that I claim that is not lawfully responded to. and. and all acts and events while using it as untaxable.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 27 . and. and. •The right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property lawfully held by me is held under a claim of right as mentioned in the United States Code and juris prudence. since lawful money has essentially been removed from the land. •ownership as my private property all monies that I earn and that. without interference. possession and enjoyment of my property which I have bought with any monies (whether or not Constitutionally lawful money) earned from my labor. and.

and that to consent to taxation. and all those acting as public officials and government employees. •ownership as my property of all monies I have paid into a government Pension Plan. those around me. and all my actions either directly or through any entity. and. and that these must be returned in full. to buy. and/or Table of Authorities . And I claim •the right. and the right to oblige the lawful government of the United States of America to provide a passport recorded in my lawful name as a sovereign Freeman-on-the-Land or National. having all God's freedom and rights that extend therefrom. •the right to be free from. •all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act. on demand. or bylaw for as herein stated as a Freeman-onthe-Land I am not subject to any government statutes or de facto government or corporate laws. and. or surety for. in gold or silver coin equivalent to the price of gold or silver on the day that these monies were paid. and. without government restriction. as a sovereign Freeman-on-the-Land. and my property from trespass with whatever level of force I deem is necessary. I must be presented with full disclosure for inspection negotiation and agreement thereto. of any liabilities I may incur for the fair use of services. and. and delivered to me at a fair cost.•the right to defend myself. carry freely. bill. and. •the right to deregister anything that has been registered in the legal name to which I act as trustee. to be free from.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 28 . all taxation to which I do not voluntarily consent to. use any weapon in any manner that does not infringe upon the God given rights of others. and. And I claim •the right to be considered by all those in de facto possession of the sovereign power. •the right to the unmolested pursuit of my trade or occupation and free use of all road and highways on the land commonly known of as the United States of America. sell own.

•that I claim and reserve all rights as reserved to the people of the ninth amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America. and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR if handcuffed. agents or justice system participants is FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS or portion thereof if being questioned. or infringement against my freedom and rights as granted to me by my creator. •anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law. and a minimum TEN MILLION DOLLARS for any restraint or violence not limited thereto. both to my body and my property. transported. so that said governments act to protect my property instead of usurping it through fines and taxes and/or de facto court judgments. damage and loss. and. cannot claim good faith or color of right. harassed or otherwise regulated. or the acts or omissions of your agents. my family. •the right to record with my county recorder the lawfully cured claim to any property I own without having it registered with a legal title in any fashion. and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. anyone under my authority or care. brought against me. •your agreement to indemnify me in the equivalent in value in gold of ten million Federal Reserve Note dollars at the time that this notice is received.record such property with the de facto governments as if they were lawful governments. Table of Authorities . •the right to chose a method of payment upon demand. interrogated or in any way detained. government principals. and representatives or the agents and representatives of any corporation working under you in the United States and any of the States. and. •the right to establish for myself. and any one under my authority or care a FEE SCHEDULE for any transgression(s) against our God-given freedoms and rights perpetrated by peace officers. against any and all injury. which stems from your acts or omissions. •that all freedom and rights under my creator as a living man not expressly claimed and reserved in this document are implied to be claimed and reserved in my dealings with all men and women acting in any capacity as a lawful or legal entity.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 29 .

contract or change in status in any manner. •the right to engage the services of a Notary Public. by their actions or omissions. or those acting on behalf of any private company. and with lawful reason by this should not be so. •the right to convene a proper court de jure with verified criminal complaints in order to address criminal actions of any peace officers. directly or by proxy in any way. government principals or agents or justice system participants who. judge. upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. and registered in the Notaries or Commissioner's Office herein provided no later than fourteen days Table of Authorities . permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer. under lawful oath of office and full liability. •that if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time. All rights reserved without prejudice. or my interests. and. and. Responses must address point by point each of the claims herein. Commissioner for taking affidavits and/or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to attest to my signature for verification purposes and does not constitute adhesion. and. from bringing de facto charges without probable cause against myself or compelling my being surety for any criminal charge. anyone under my authority or care. or considered as acting as trustee of the legal name which I use. harms myself. and. prosecutor.•the right to use a Notary Public. then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of my properly claimed and established freedoms and rights. •the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit and. whether I am acting as a Freeman-on-theLand. having been served notice of this claim and fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim. •affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of service of notice of this action. Commissioner or any two (2) people not related to me by blood or marriage to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressor who. •the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both/all. and. under Oath of office. or in rem as the legal name I may use. civil charge or other debt. government official. justice of the peace. or considered as acting in personem.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 30 .

Here is the Affidavit of which Joyce. 2006 that I wish to record in the Books of Records for the Township of Ripton. individuals or persons will sheepishly comply with these injustices basing their actions upon the premise that they are entitled to a benefit or feeling that their freedom is owed to them. the issue of sovereignty may seem rather complex. The machinations that continually Table of Authorities .Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 31 . and any action not having been assessed for probable cause by a magistrate. one must consider the history and nature of the federalization of these union States and the contractual legalese of the corporate central government.from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service. 2006 Dear Sally. In retrospect.myspace. is quite simple to comprehend. •use of a Notary or Commissioner of Affidavits is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.cfm?fuseaction=blog. forevermore barring the bringing of de facto charges under any statute or Act. the social engineering (operant conditioning) of the core beliefs and values of the American Citizenry. our unlawful monetary system and it’s trail to those who benefit. uSA Non-domestic [05766 TDC] Sally Hoyle Town Clerk Ripton. this fully binding claim of right upon the parties named herein. Coupled with this corruption. Vermont state. \ http://blogs. on your behalf. had notarized on the 3 rd of May. and their respective offices. and. Winter c/o General Post Office Ripton. Today. yet a sovereign. It includes my Declaration of Sovereignty and Removal of Unqualified Signatures and Power of Attorney. and. •failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein under the terms above will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence. against My Self a sovereign Freeman-on-the-Land Lake-Shore:Baby. Vermont state May 22. when considering a man or woman of flesh and blood.view&friendID=136156749&blogID=412749579 Michael-Hans.com/index.

willingly and voluntarily. forced destruction of other sovereign countries and their citizenry. jure divino.C. 2006. do hereby declare my proper and lawful status with respect to Citizenship. Michael-Hans. 3101. protest or dispute to this Affidavit should be done within twenty (20) days from the last date of the public notice of the recording of this Affidavit and must be directed as exactly prescribed above without the elimination of any brackets or case lettering. Winter. and 3. then please see 31 U. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein. without prejudice.A 1502) for approximately nine years. inviolate. Please see the following Affidavit: Declaration of Sovereignty and Removal of Unqualified Signatures and Power of Attorney. If the proverbial "writing on the wall" is not obvious. Otherwise." I am not a "customer" of the United States Postal Service™. Respectfully yours. by special appearance. Christian. Winter. living on the land in Addison county in Vermont state. Michael-Hans. Removal of Unlawful Signatures and Powers of Attorney to-wit: 1. pages two through eleven. mind and soul. but not of this country. suae potestate esse Free.00 of the unconstitutionally circulated Federal Reserve Bank notes. I am neutral. Table of Authorities . 4. I will not be party to the destruction of this great Nation that has stood as a model of freedom. Enclosed are $84. I am a Citizen.S. with limited use. Good and Lawful. without prejudice and with the explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights. any attempted correspondence with the Affiant will be returned to sender. I am publicly declaring my sovereignty. Winter AFFIDAVIT: DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGNTY.A. Any response. nor will I be complicit in the unjust. I.perpetrate treasonous acts repugnant to our free. Michael-Hans. a denizen within the Republic of Vermont. I am. I am of lawful age of majority and otherwise competent to make this affirmation. In flesh and blood.C. knowingly. "Refused. and have been a Citizen in the de jure union state of Vermont (see 8U.A. Winter. Michael-Hans. Sovereignty.S. REMOVAL OF UNQUALIFIED SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: I. 1671) for this cover and the 11 pages that follow. hereby affirm and state as follows: 2. in propria persona.S. with such citizenship being synonymous with "the People" wherein sovereignty rests. the undersigned. having first-hand knowledge of the facts as stated herein.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 32 . I. amended March 16. to discharge the recording tax (32 V. a natural man. constitutional republic are set in place… follow the money. am in this country (the UNITED STATES). and.

Hauge v. 11. as it is wholly owned by myself as private property. a TRADE NAME. 407 (1873).785. I am a Citizen as originally established by the Declaration of Independence (1776) with "certain unalienable rights" granted by our Creator and as established by the Articles of Confederation (1777). one of the de jure states of the union of America. a free male born on the 10th day of July 1927. and. 43 Cal Rpts 43. I. a Free Private Christian male.S. Alfred H.5. Winter. Vermont state. Virginia Bedard and Charles-Pius. 6th Edition. U. 29 (1867). Table of Authorities ." a Free Private Christian male. New Jersey. a. and. 509 520 note 1 (1936). 8. 9.S. Winter." nor unlawful consequences of the coerced Reconstruction Acts of 1867 of the 39 th Congress. benefit. Winter. It is not. I was given birth by Virginia Bedard. 7. a living soul. the genealogy of Winter. nor a "dummy corporation" name. CIO. in Hackensack.S. without boon. nor never was. 47 (1872). by virtue as an American National living in the republic state. were one. without implications of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States "being born or naturalized. 1957 and unto them. Winter. a war name. I was conceived and born. 496. a living soul. nineteen hundred and sixty-one in Suffern township in de jure county of Rockland. Rep. See also Bowlin v. statutory franchise nor contractual adhesion that could cloud my natural citizenship or the unalienable rights endowed by my Creator: and.a. Slaughterhouse Cases 83 U. Van Valkenburg v. 379 F2d 33. as designated in the Constitution for the united States of America (1787)." Jones v.S. Winter. I am not a United States citizen. I was sired by Charle-Pius. Michael-Hans. v. Vermont. in Middlebury township in Addison county. and. Rhodes. naturalized on December 15th. Winter. 307 U. Michel-Hans. joined in Holy wedlock at the time of July 24. born on the 2nd day of April 1926. Brown. Cas. 27 Fed. Cruikshank. was born to my parents on the 12th day of December on the twelfth day of the twelfth month of the year of our Lord. one of the de jure states of the union of America. I have no fictitious name. Commonwealth. and nor will it ever be. and. 43 (1967). As per Article 8 of the Vermont Declaration of Rights I am a "Freeman. Mayer Co. 10. see U. 92 US 542 (1876). New York state. 1949. have never voluntarily surrendered the rights to my name. 5.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 33 . and.k. 65 Kent. Bedard-Winter.. My Christian name is Michael-Hans. See Black’s Law Dictionary. v. I. and. 395. 749 (1866). 6. 12. in Vienna Austria. a free female. one of the de jure states of the union of America. Michael-Hans. "Citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment has expressed territorial limitation which prevents its extension to every place over which the government is Sovereign. I am an American Citizen.

Within the Constitution for the United States for America. but also to where the jurisdiction lies… "thereof… the United States" implying the Federal government granting such privileges and having jurisdiction "thereof" rather than respect to the unalienable Rights in the above mentioned Declaration of Independence." The 14th Amendment (private unilateral contract law) clearly was set forth to establish another rule and structure of government. fourteenth and fifteenth Table of Authorities . namely one centralized in nature. Federalist Papers 42. 357 U. chapters 61 and 62. "No Person except a natural born Citizen. Section 8 Clause 17 of the Constitution for the United States of America and any purported allegiance to the United States is hereby renounced. "that all men are created equal. and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.DECLARATION of sovereignty "And ye shall know the truth. that to secure these rights. that among these are Life. The Declaration of Independence states: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. there exists a clear distinction between natural born Citizens and United States citizens. that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 34 ." 14. 235 (1958). I. W. Section 8 Clause 17 of the Constitution for the United States of America.S. Winter.) 16. Liberty. and the truth shall make you free. section 1. Guam. shall be eligible to the Office of President:…" Article 2. nor a citizen of the United States. Tex (1897). An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia. am "alien" to the Federal government. Michael-Hans. Virgin Islands. the ten-square miles and the territories thereof. deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.. 14th Amendment. and the pursuit of Happiness. citizen. Winter. I do not reside within the District of Columbia. I. See Hanson v." John 8:32 13.… have a seal…" the District of Columbia as declared by the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.S.S.D. also known as the "federalization" of the many states of the union of America as territories. or a Citizen of the United States. See also. 337. Governments are instituted among Men. Denckla. " a body corporate for municipal purposes. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States. The distinction is not only evident in the proper usage of English (proper nouns being capitalized). I am an American." Bill of Rights. clearly am not a "person" subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress as defined in Article I. Enclave or Possession of the United States. Section 34. "…thirteenth. 41 st Congress. at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution. nor in any other Federal Overlay. and not a 14 th Amendment U. Territory. 81 F. see also In re Rodrigues.. clause 5 and. Michael-Hans. Session III. Puerto Rico the U. (See Article I. 15. are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.

" Jones v." Julliard v. 1912." U.S. and must be defined with respect to issues of law and citizenship.. Elk v. Winter. It does not protect those rights which belong to state Citizenship. citizen" nor a "citizen of the United States": "We have in our political system.’ Bill of Rights. Winter. Cas. Authority and pre-eminence of a Sovereign. 18. I am a Sovereign Citizen with all the unalienable Rights. Temmer. 829 F. Cruikshank. Greenman.Mo.S. as case law demonstrates. Lyne.165. I. nor naturalized in a territory over which the United States ("not exceeding ten square miles") is sovereign. 92 US 542 (1876). (3) It may be the collective names of the several states which are united by and under the Constitution. Amendment 14. sovereignty resides with the people. 200 F. 1226 (1993).Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 35 .amendments were designed mainly for the protection of newly emancipated negroes…" and further cited that the "…fourteenth amendment creates and defines citizenship of the United States. Anthony. 24 Fed. have become aware of 8 U.Supp 1247. but completely subject. See also 8 U. §§ 1481 & 1483. Michael-Hans. but who has not been naturalized or taxed or recognized as a citizen.C. Wilkins. Hammerstein v. not jurisdictions thereof). (2) It may designate the territory over which the United States is sovereign or. W. I am not a federal "U. however. either by the United States of by the State. "The privileges and immunities clause of the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. See also. I am not a citizen subject to United States jurisdiction. 296 F. D. Table of Authorities .C.D. Each is distinct from the other and has citizens of its own. 17. clearly understand the difference between a "state Citizen" and a "United States citizen. (1969). I was not naturally born. 112 US 94. Michael-Hans. a government of each of the several states and a government of the United States. Bellei v. I.A.A 1502. 19." United States v. clearly understand that the term "United States" has three different meanings." Hooven & Allison v. Winter. (1884). and have noticed that the terms "United States citizen" and "American citizen" appear to be used interchangeably in the notes. Supp. "The term ‘United States’ may be used in any one of the following senses: (1) It may merely be the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations or. "The persons declared to be citizens are ‘…all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. Rusk. there has been established a clear distinction between the two terms.S. v. See also. 421 (1883). Instead this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government. …. 110 U. not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States (jurisdiction thereof. "In this country. The evident meaning of these last words is.C. I. Michael-Hans.S. Furthermore. 829 (1873). is not a citizen of the United States within the meaning of the 1 st section of the 14th Article of Amendment of the Constitution.S.

16 Wall.A. 201 U. 870. in Puerto Rico. 36 (1872). Hopkins 118 US 356 (1886). that there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a State. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business. beyond the protection of his life and property. Michigan state Police 491 U. 43 (1906) The Michigan Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court concurred and made it perfectly clear that the "word ‘person’ is ordinarily construed to exclude the sovereign" and that for a sovereign to be bound by statute the sovereign must be "specifically" named.C." Slaughter House Cases. 4th Edition. not subject to law. Will v. note 6.Ed. Hopkins and Woo Lee v.2nd 45 (1989).S. "… include any act of Congress locally applicable to and in force in the District of Columbia.S. department. 36. the ''United States'' means: (A) a Federal corporation. of course. for it is the author and source of law.S. so far as it may tend to criminate him. or other entity of the United States. Lynham 100 US 483 (1879). the term "person" does not include the sovereign and statutes employing it will ordinarily not be construed to do so. In common usage. Furthermore.Evatt. "The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. but in our system. Black’s Law Dictionary. or to open his doors to an investigation." Hale v. which are distinct from each other and which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual." United States v. while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government. 83 U. 58. (B) an agency. "Acts of Congress" are not applicable to "sovereigns" in the 50 states. 65 S. "There can be no limitation on the power of the people of the United States (of America).S.Ct. 1703.S. He owes no such duty to the state. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state. According to the United States Code." Yick Wo v. 880. in a territory Table of Authorities . Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. commission. By their authority the State Constitutions were made and by their authority the Constitution for the United States (of America) was established and they had the power to change or abolish state Constitutions or to make them yield to the general Government and treaties by their authority.S. United Mine Workers. p. then. since he receives nothing therefrom. 330 U. sovereignty itself remains with the people. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. "Sovereignty itself is. 3002 (15). and can only be taken from him by due process of law. 324 US 652. by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.C. "It is quite clear. or (C) an instrumentality of the United States.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 36 . board." Hauenstein v. and in accordance with the Constitution. 1 U. 105 L. Henkel. § 1. 28 U. His power to contract is unlimited. 258 (1946).

18 U. 17 S. 9 L ed 364 (1948). is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States." Foley Brothers v.S. 152 (1868) "No action can be taken against a sovereign in the non-constitutional courts of either the United states or the state courts and any such action is considered the crime of Barratry. though within the United States were not citizens. 513. 336 U. as when it is legislating for the United States." Hooven and Allisons Co." People v. said Title being. "The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. 74 U. United State. Butler. the people of the several States are unconditionally and absolutely sovereign within their respective territories. "It had been said by eminent judges that no man was a citizen of the United States except he was a citizen of on of the state composing the Union… those residing in the District of Columbia or in the territories. Filardo.or in an insular possession." Ohio L. 281.A.Ct. 1. All other provisions of the Constitution sedulously framed to define and limit the power of the United States and preserve powers of the states. "It is a familiar doctrine of the common law.S. Ballard 155 NYS 2d 59." The Siren v. 428 (1853) "The canon of construction which teaches that legislation of congress.S. 324. 16 How. 56 S. Thompkins." United States v. 297 U. where private law (contracted opinions and beliefs for profit and gain promoted by non-governmental special interest groups and lobbyists) is now set forth as public policy by "law-makers" (see Erie Railroad v. unless contrary intent appears. 64 (1938)) and applies only to the District of Columbia and all of it’s Federal territories. that the sovereign cannot be sued in his own courts without consent. 304 U." State v.S.C. the independence of the States obliterated and the United States converted into a central form of government exercising uncontrolled police power throughout the union superceding all local control over local concerns. could be broken down. Batson.S. within it’s "ten square miles" since 1933 operates in a style of private equity or merchant law. U. 914 (1935) Table of Authorities . similar to that of (Roman-Ecclesiastical) Civil Law. Congress is not subject to the same constitutional limitations. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. "The Common Law is absolutely distinguishable from the Roman or Civil Law systems. Congress. Debolt. 652.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 37 . 512.L. Crimes and Criminal Procedures. v. "In exercising this power.E. enacted into Positive Law. Barratry is an offense at common law. Co. Rule 54 C. 312. & T.R. Evatt. Ins. "It will be admitted on all hands with the exception of the powers surrendered by the Constitution of the United States." Additionally.S. v. 2d 511. 102 A.

see also 31 CFR 51. The successful war for American Independence was formally brought to a close in the year 1783 with the signing of the Treaty of Peace. Winter. citizens (or citizens of the United States) to vote and hold office therein.2. 133 Tex." United States v. was laid dormant as of the 1st of the "Reconstruction Acts" on 2 March 1867 and with the demise of the of Vermont’s Council of Electors in 1869. 624 (1952). do not recognize the de facto State of Vermont. a Constitutional Republic. a constitutional form of government still in existence. 296 U. and territorial rights of the same…" "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free. 287 (1935). hereby declare that any and all contract(s) or agreement(s) which may be claimed to exist between myself. Article 1 of the Treaty clearly states that King George of England "acknowledges the United States viz the thirteen colonies are free. Michael-Hans.S. will recognize the de jure Vermont Republic.S. and the de facto STATE OF VERMONT to be Table of Authorities . 344 U. Georgia. the de jure state of Vermont existed as an independent Republic prior to joining the Union in 1793 and. Henceforth. "a state within a state".S. Black’s Law dictionary defines de facto government as. sovereign state . only allowing 14th Amendment U. "One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful.2d." Galitians 5:1 20. " Black’s Law Dicitonary. I.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 38 . Winter.W. 128 S. page 5044. sovereign and independent States… and relinquishes all claims to the government. "All states whatever are corporations" Chisholm v. I. in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof. Sinking Fund of Louisville. Winter. it cannot be taken away by any form of legislation. completing the creation of a federal overlay. 22. Constantine.S. property. Section 4 of the Constitution for the United States of America guarantees to each state a Republican Form of Government. have discovered that the de jure Vermont state. and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Through the study of history. 21. 4th Edition. However. "The affirmation of such proposition would obliterate the distinction between the delegated powers of the federal Government and those reserve to the states and to their citizens. 255. Michael-Hans. 468 (1793). a de jure. Said State is a de facto corporation operating as a territory of the District of Columbia. in propria persona. as Article IV. a district known as the State of Vermont. Worthham v. at least temporarily. I. Michael-Hans. 2 Dall U. Walker. 1138. I. a new "constitution" was forced upon her.The sovereignty of the State essential to its proper functioning under the Federal Constitution cannot be surrendered. a de facto. 1145. 419.2 & 52. Howard v.

" officers and employees of the Government of the United States . "benefactor". the Supreme Ruler." In re Merriam's Estate. §§ 1481 & 1483.S. as any such contract/agreement was not entered into knowingly. or an implied Redeemable Instrument. Municipal body politics.S. Chapter 5 (a) (13). "property of". regulations.S. "stockholder" "donor" or "contributor" with respect to funds of the United States General Trust Fund. Winter. collateral or liable to any debt. Michael-Hans. Section. or corporate City.A § 1. corporate County. officers. Michael-Hans.Ed. I am not a "federal personnel. 3. Decline and reject dual citizenship (state/Federal).S.C.C. I. or corporate City. or Municipal body politics. Make a formal declaration of allegiance to the Constitutional Republic of Vermont (see 8 U. IV. 3002(15)). I. or laws contrary to those of our Creator.S. or agents deriving their authority therefrom. corporate or otherwise. Constitution Article I. see 5 U. d." U. I. or "subject to the jurisdiction of" the state of the forum of any United States territory. 1973. hereby do with full disclosure. Winter. c. (see Amendment 14 U. a de jure state foreign to the state of the forum. voluntarily and intentionally and constitutes constructive fraud. Section. corporate County. "trustee". Clause. God. Clause 2 of the Constitution for the united States of America and I am not subject to any private-civil legislation created by or under the jurisdiction of any employees. corporate State. treaties. am not "ward of ". territory or enclave created under the primary authority of Art. Note 25) an "inhabitant of" or "domiciled within" the United States. Federal being the incorporated "10 square miles. corporate State. and Table of Authorities . 552a. nor any constructive or implied (charitable) trust or fund created by the state of the forum of any United States territory. Section 8 Clause 17 & District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871.C. or any federal overlying areas within a state. 23. enter into a covenant first and foremost with my Creator.null and void. 8. I am not a fictitious entity. a "franchisee of". voluntarily and intentionally: a. nor any federal jurisdiction thereof. 287 and thereby securing the right to vote as a qualified elector in this state of the Union.A 1502). "subject of". I am not an "individual" nor "actor" subject to any agencies (28 U. Pursuant to 8 U. I am not a "fiduciary agent". knowingly.A. 41 L. or agreements repugnant to the organic constitution of the united States of America or to the Constitutional Republic of Vermont. 17 and Art.C. 1441 S. "franchisee". "chattel of". the United States.CT. Winter.C. Michael-Hans. b. 36 NE 505 (1894). nor held by their administrative codes.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 39 . or certificate of equity as employed in commerce nor subject to a jurisdiction under the Uniform Commercial Code. Declare that I am not a "resident of". "transferee". the Almighty provider of liberty and justice. I.S. "The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to the state.

Zdunic v. I.Ct. Michael-Hans. it is intended for renunciation. the Republic of Vermont’s Declaration of Rights and the Constitution for the united States of America. 1082. as my above referenced biological parents were misled into applying for and obtaining a birth certificate (also known as a certificate in equity) and subsequently filed with the agency. 176. nor will I at any time.Ed.(see Sheppard-Townsend Maternity Act Table of Authorities .Ed. in the de jure County of Addison of the Republic of Vermont.A. Michael-Hans. and Vermont Constitution. 36 NE 505 (1894). C. see Article 1.) I am a Citizen under the 1787 Constitution as amended and ratified in 1791. but not limited to said birth certificate and the application for a social security number for the following reasons listed below. Unknowingly. (1982) 455 US 302. Winter. having apparently been made ward of the corporate state and Federal government without my permission. 1. hereby remove any unqualified signature and power of attorney on the following documents. See United States ex rel. with my presence being in the township of Ripton." federal citizen.e. repudiation. 137 F. intentionally with full disclosure. Uhl.A. rejection of implied domestic Federal citizenship and is to claim exclusive lawful nondomestic State citizenship/denizenship.N. I. and precedent decisions of Article III Justice Courts of Law. nor any of its territories. Winter. Michael-Hans. Michael-Hans. I. voluntarily. undisclosed contract(s) or commercial agreement(s) and I reject any assumptions/implications to any such benefits. 102 S. 2.C.2d 858. 287) of either. hereby reserve all of my common-law natural rights to not be compelled to perform under any contract/agreement into which I did not enter into knowingly. (not an Article I ecclesiastical. NOTE: This affidavit is not intended for national expatriation. 41 L. §242k(h). yet a denizen with respect to the Federal government and it’s respective territories. (see Jewett v.Y. 4. legislative or administrative court) and I have Rights. REMOVAL OF UNQUALIFIED SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY 3. secured and protected by the original articles of the Bill of Rights. Vermont Constitution. Chapter 2. a (North-) American National and not a "U.S. section 39.C. was born into the American Republic and not in the District of Columbia. and any and all documents or instruments of incorporation implying 14th Amendment citizenship. declare that I am first and foremost a Vermont state Citizen. I. I. Winter. I do not waive any of my absolute Rights. I do not accept the liability associated with the compelled benefit(s) of any unrevealed. 311.S. Bureau of Vital Statistics (42 U. Declaration of Rights. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 40 .CT. 170. 71 L. 1973. but not of the body politic and corporate (see In re Merriam's Estate. natural-law covenant with a state foreign to the United States for the protection of my absolute rights and property. 1793. and further-more. 1441 S. which are unalienable that were endowed by my Creator. secondly. Winter enter into a common. 1793.

June 5. entered into after the suspension of Americas true monetary standard of a gold backed currency (House Joint Resolution 192. revoke. signed either by me or anyone acting as my agent. namely in Title V of the Social Security Act of 1935. or legal guardian. 67th Congress. described as an emergency. not under any legal disability or mental deficiency. Session I. Public Law 97. as it pertains to documents implying 14th Amendment citizenship. Session 1. Washington D. endorsement or subscriptions on any instruments and any express or implied power of attorney therewith.of 1921 via the Children’s Bureau creating a federal birth certificate registration area."He who receives the benefit should also bear the disadvantage" Common Law Maxim "One who avails himself of the benefits conferred by a statute cannot deny its validity. Michael-Hans.C. Chapter 135. that benefited only the extremely wealthy investment bankers of the world. Table of Authorities . also known as the District of Columbia) see District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. government sponsored advertisements and IRS-instructed tax-paying businesses. I. adhesive contract binding to a private charitable trust.S. ab initio. or any unsigned constructive instruments. a period of economic turmoil. U.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 41 . Winter. (see paragraphs 12 through 19) 6. 742.. are hereby." incorporated numerical entity employed a social security number so that I could enjoy the fruits of my labor. rescind. this "strawman. Now of my own right." Brady v. I have never entered nor made any "knowing(ly). 316 (1924). government agencies. 73rd Congress. ("10 square miles") and equally liable for its repayment. intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness. ab initio. public institutions. 397 U. Kuykendall. do hereby negate. and all such instruments are null and void. which were created by the federal United States government (10 square miles. parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. who have adamantly stated that I had to have a social security number in order to work and carry on in life. Having been unknowingly misled as a teenager (minority) by persons of authority. or guardianship. remove. This was executed without any knowledge of the facts that this unilateral. all [unqualified] signatures. unknowingly made me a beneficiary/contributor to the national debt created by the de facto federal corporate government. the membership to the International Monetary Fund and World Bank under the Bretton Woods Agreement Act (22USC 286-286k-2). in fact or assumption. 1933) in 1933. 5.S. acting in its questionable insular capacity. 307.S. and. Cujus est commodum ejus debet esse incommodum . (1969) with regards to such instruments. 267 U. although eventually repealed in 1928. null and void." Buck v. or the power or threat of another.

as any such contract/agreement was not entered into knowingly. and the de facto DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (see Article I. 407 (1916). mistake.W. Parrot Silver and Copper Co. accept any benefits or privileges under threat. Due to the use of various elements of fraud and misrepresentation under tactics of threat. Messages and Paper of the Presidents..Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 42 . ‘benefit’ means that the promiser has in return for his promise has acquired some legal right to which he would not otherwise have been entitled. Michael-Hans. St. Arizona."A benefit is not conferred on one who is unwilling to receive it. Sizemore. 113 (1942). "… expending public monies for asylum beyond the 10 square miles…". that remain outside the confines of the Constitution for the united States of America. I. 8. 105. 230 F 2d 486 (1956).. 105-113." Woolum v. 491 (1966). Nor will I. 7." and agencies (see President Andrew Johnson’s veto messages to the Reconstruction Acts. "A State may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a Right granted by the federal Constitution." Murdock v Pennsylvania. that is to say.S. "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime. with or without my full knowledge. Michael-Hans. Miranda v. in the future. but rather. 319 U. 3224. 244 U. Government Printing Office. nor do I fall within the jurisdiction thereof "and nothing in this Constitution shall Table of Authorities . 260 U.S. do not live within the federal overlay area as created within every sovereign State in reference to the Buck Act 1940. Michael-Hans. by the aforementioned agencies/entities. hereby declare that any and all contracts or agreements which may be claimed to exist between myself. Winter. 102 S. 9. 4 U. 398) not limited to the birth certificate and/or social security number. Winter. Rights. hereby cancel.S. 17891887. "They cannot claim the benefit of statutes and afterwards assail their validity. bankruptcy. U. I. it may not extract a license tax for the privilege of carrying on interstate commerce.." Miller v. 398-405. p. Winter. Prendergart Construction Co. secured in the organic Constitution for the united States of America and the Bill of Rights.C. 323. Section 8 clause 17 of the Constitution for the united States of America) and the STATE OF VERMONT to be null and void. 436." Wall v. 384 U. 469 (1922)." Justinian Code "When it is said that a valuable consideration for a promise may consist in a benefit to the promiser. also known as the Public Salary Tax Act.S. coercion. Volume 6.S. in persona propria. no one can be compelled to accept a benefit against his consent. I. Louis Malleable Casting Co. duress. franchises and or privileges attached to the above mentioned (Roman) civil law "socialist agreements. voluntarily and intentionally and constitutes constructive fraud. duress or coercion. v. Thus. There is no sanctity in such claim of Constitutional right as prevents its being waived as any other claim of right may be waived. I am exercising no commercially taxable privilege. repudiate and refuse to accept any benefits. The requirement to pay a license fee involves the exercise of a privilege.S.

as it pertains to all private property.1-1(c). with or without my consent and/or knowledge. Any and all contracts or agreements which would tend to indicate. p. I. Fraud." In re Merriam's Estate. Removal of Unqualified Signatures and Powers of Attorney. Table of Authorities . Michael-Hans. Michael-Hans. I. 1441 S. 287. obtained in the past. negate. 1973.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 43 . hereby affix my own signature with explicit reservation of ALL unalienable rights and without prejudice to ANY of those rights. and further. 15. renounce. cancels. disavow. 789. I. Winter. Winter. annul.S. Subscribed. Clause 2. and relinquish all [unqualified] and powers of attorney. Article 4. 6th Ed. do hereby remove. repudiate. citizen".R. 36 NE 505 (1894). Winter. I am the sole and absolute possessor/owner and possess absolute unqualified full right and allodial title to any and all such property. any and all [unqualified] signatures implying 14th Amendment citizenship. 13. nullify. Michael-Hans. I have no effectively connected business within the United States government and its inflationary laws of equity. sayeth naught. also reserve the right to revise and extend any and all remarks made in this document of Affidavit: Declaration of Sovereignty. Winter. I.be construed as to prejudice any claims of the United States. hereby declare that any such contract/agreement was not entered into knowingly. 1. 4th Ed. Section 3. Michael-Hans. abrogate. real or personal." Constitution for the United States of America. or presume. withdraw. make void for lack of good faith and notice on the part of the United States government. Vermont state. sealed and affirmed this________________ day of April in the Year of our Lord. recant. are hereby declared to be null and void. 314.Ed. I have never been a "United States citizen" as defined in 26 C. repudiates the prior instruments that are filed with the United States Government and any and all other governmental entities anywhere which may execute on said prior instrument(s). Twothousand and six. that the foregoing document is true and correct. a citizen of the Federal government. Winter. I. Michael-Hans. expunge. Winter. and this document shall become a permanent part of the records of the United States government and the State of Vermont principles. Michael-Hans. voluntarily and intentionally with or without full disclosure. that I. 12. I. Winter. in fact or assumption. cancel. nor do I practice interstate commerce between the United States government and any federal state including the STATE OF VERMONT’S "… body politic and corporate. present or future. am a ‘U. p.F. This instrument replaces.CT. 10. delete. and therefore was the result of Constructive Fraud (Black’s Law Dictionary. in Addison county. Michael-Hans. or of any particular State. constructive). 11. 41 L. As practiced by the Congress for the United States of America. declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united States of America and to the best of my knowledge. 14.

2006. a Notary in and for the Vermont state. "Without Prejudice" to any unalienable rights.S. Michael-Hans. by the authority of the Almighty Creator. Pages 207–218. Winter. Said recording may be found in the Land Records Book. A." _______________________________________ ___________________ Witness Date _______________________________________ ___________________ Witness Date _______________________________________ ___________________ Witness Date For the purpose of verification of signature only. Volume 40. Verse 1: "In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.Michael-Hans. Special. Vermont state. any attempted correspondence with the above named Affiant will be returned to sender. on this ________ day of April. within the county of Addison and the Vermont Republic. received for recording on May 22.A Table of Authorities . Anyone who wishes to refute. before me the undersigned. Otherwise. Winter. with Assistance.Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 44 . 2006 Michael-Hans. whose name is subscribed herein and who is the custodian of this instrument. Chapter 13. suae potestate esse. as Unacceptable. protest or dispute the facts recorded. at the Town Clerk's office.D. Winter. 2006. Winter c/o General Post Office Ripton. _______________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires___________________ Public Notice Declaration of Sovereignty and Removal of Unqualified Signatures and Power of Attorney I. Citizen/Principal. have recorded the following Affidavit: Declaration of Sovereignty and Removal of Unqualified Signatures and Power of Attorney. he/she must do so within thirty (30) days from the last date of the publication of this notice and must direct same exactly as prescribed below without elimination of any brackets or case lettering. personally appeared Michael-Hans. u. who satisfactorily proved to me to be the above signer. Dated: May 22. As stated in the second Book of Corinthians. township of Ripton. hereby giving Public Notice. proceeding jure divino.

Non-domestic [05766/TDC] Name of Publication: The Burlington Free Press First Publication Date: _____________________ Second Publication Date: _____________________ Third Publication Date: _____________________ Table of Authorities .Claim of Right – Compiled by Michael James Anthony – Page 45 .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful