9 views

Uploaded by IPT

space and volume relationships and defintions and theories of existence

save

- ENG 10 Time Concept Paper PDF
- AS Physics Notes
- Espacio y Capitalism o
- 9j planning gravity and space
- Gravitational Model to Predict the Megalopolis Mobility of the Center of Mexico
- Mayeul Arminjon- Scalar ether theory of gravity: a modification that seems needed
- 2.8 Gravity
- AP Lab-Atwoods Machine
- Design Development Document Interim portfolioTest2sm
- Rolled Bulb Flats.pdf
- Word Problem Primer
- Maudlin - Buckets of Water and Waves of Space
- l7 the Earth’s Size -Shape and Gravitation
- HW02 - MathematicalModels01
- Ch-04 Forces Newtons Laws
- Grade 5 Properties of Matter Worksheets
- 1 4 bookmark a crash course in forces motion
- Differential Equations Solution Manual - Chapter 1
- containment theory and variation
- gravitational field strength
- the balance of nature
- the balance of nature
- rotational motion theory
- atomic structure ( redefined)
- SPACE TIME RELATIONSHIP (ISOLATED)
- an interesting change

You are on page 1of 2

**I noticed something recently about space. Some call it outer-space. When we
**

discuss space we refer to each object in space as a mass. Think about this. If you

ask how big is the sun in space, most would say it has a specific mass. That is

where I got an idea about motion, time elapsed of said motion, and volume. Why

volume. Simple. What is space defined as… length x width x height… basically, 3

dimensions. So why we say how big is something in space do we always define it in

mass? I mean do we mean to talk about density (m/v) or space itself.

So I guess my odd look at space takes a literal look at it. If space is defined in

3 dimensions how big is the universe really? And of that total space, how much

space is displaced by mass? Or should I say the volume of said mass? I mean its

like comparing apples to oranges. Mass and volume unless we mean density.

I guess what matters is there is the total volume of space and the total amount of

space we occupy in it. Does it really matter how much mass the volume contains? A

one cubic inch square of lead takes up the same amount of space as a one inch

cubic square of aluminum. The volume is the same. I guess that’s where I look at

things a little differently. An object in space controlled in a gravitational

orbit would have an interaction with a second object , a star, for example. But

overall does this effect the volume of the total space? Of course not. So why is

it important?

In time I can explain. If we are to travel in space in a “spaceship” , does this

ship have enough mass to really be effected by gravity. Not really. The effect is

small as the mass is small. Also the volume is small. We are like a mosquito on a

whale. We , in our spaceship, are barely noticed. But we have the ability and

knowledge to use this gravity to propel ourselves through space if we control our

proximity to mass. Using motion.

How far we travel will be an elapsed time of how long we travel at a given motion.

Our mass is related to how much motion we will have and by gravitational strength.

Correct? So why is volume so important? I have heard this phrase many times. The

fabric of space. The earth, for example, cuts through this fabric a it orbit’s the

sun so how is that fabric affected? By its mass? No I say its size, its volume.

So in my theory of the motion and gravity relationship volume becomes a factor to

take into consideration. I think we are having an effect on space relating to

volume. How big an effect is determined by volume. Volume in motion for an elapse

period of time. Space-time and motion. Is it another dimension? I don’t know. But

I will say this. A bullet fired from a gun has mass, volume, motion, and time

traveled, how fast it gets to its target is determined by the energy which put it

in motion. But the “hole it leaves” in its target is most definitely related to

volume.

I guess I have made a leap of faith by believing in the fabric of space. I cannot

believe space is an empty void. Matter/ antimatter. We know they both exist.

Space I believe is a wall that separates an protects us from annihilation. The

outermost edges of the universe are these walls… and as we travel we will find

someday like in a living cell, the walls protect and contain us. And there is a

substance like water here on earth that we are just too close to, to define. But

we can see its effect and theorize. But can we believe it.

**We have discovered the power of the atom in out lifetime and we refuse to believe
**

what is there. We know the reason the atom vibrates. Because the electron is in an

elliptical pattern. But do we truly see that electron as energy that when it

reaches it maximum point of distance as turning, because it is actually bending

back to where it began. Speed of light squared. And the vibration of the nucleus.

Two motions. The electron is tearing through the fabric of space at the speed of

light and back in a time elapsed that is impossible. Speed of light squared. The

end of that electrons universe is protecting it from annihilating itself.

Existence. Its mass and its motion determine energy. Its volume at that speed is a

path that never closes. It leaves a hole in the space-time fabric that is

constant. (It will allow us to maybe someday realize that matter can be in co-

existence with antimatter on a sub-atomic level.)

I would say my theory which is volume x motion squared x time(elapsed) = energy =

mass x speed of light squared may be ludicrous. But I need to know how big is

that path that electron is leaving. What is the nature of our very existence. It

seems the actual path would be quite small as it appears that the answer to this

equation seems to be the dimension of space to the fourth power divided by the

mass. Yes density is mass divided by volume. And my theory would state that space

to the fourth power or volume to the fourth power divided by mass is a small

number. The opposite of density with an added dimension from motion. And this

added dimension it this equation baffles me yet it somehow makes me think to

travel the speed of light squared is impossible or is it. So why can’t there an

extra dimension from motion or is it impossible? I have a to ponder that electron

and the path/hole it is leaving which I think would have a tendency to close in

most cases but that electron is moving so fast it is arriving back to the spot it

was just in just as that path/ hole is about to close. Pulsing the very nature of

the universe in the universe and the next one. Crazy.

- ENG 10 Time Concept Paper PDFUploaded byCarmela Cruz
- AS Physics NotesUploaded byWaseem Ahmed
- Espacio y Capitalism oUploaded byDanny Bendtner
- 9j planning gravity and spaceUploaded byapi-314389226
- Gravitational Model to Predict the Megalopolis Mobility of the Center of MexicoUploaded byIjaems Journal
- Mayeul Arminjon- Scalar ether theory of gravity: a modification that seems neededUploaded byOppekee
- 2.8 GravityUploaded byShidev
- AP Lab-Atwoods MachineUploaded byrnguyen7007
- Design Development Document Interim portfolioTest2smUploaded byFizaa Esmail
- Rolled Bulb Flats.pdfUploaded byLaurentiu Gavrila
- Word Problem PrimerUploaded byMohamed Jameel
- Maudlin - Buckets of Water and Waves of SpaceUploaded byDaria Ustinova
- l7 the Earth’s Size -Shape and GravitationUploaded byAmmar Danial
- HW02 - MathematicalModels01Uploaded byEinar Hm
- Ch-04 Forces Newtons LawsUploaded bystring101
- Grade 5 Properties of Matter WorksheetsUploaded byCassandra
- 1 4 bookmark a crash course in forces motionUploaded byapi-115513756
- Differential Equations Solution Manual - Chapter 1Uploaded byVictor S. Washington

- containment theory and variationUploaded byIPT
- gravitational field strengthUploaded byIPT
- the balance of natureUploaded byIPT
- the balance of natureUploaded byIPT
- rotational motion theoryUploaded byIPT
- atomic structure ( redefined)Uploaded byIPT
- SPACE TIME RELATIONSHIP (ISOLATED)Uploaded byIPT
- an interesting changeUploaded byIPT