You are on page 1of 10

Thermodynamics of Fuel Cells Leibhafsky and Cairns, Hoogers, Smith and Van Ness 1.

Background Thermodynamics may be broadly defined as the study of energy conversion in a given system. Thermodynamic laws govern all changes of energy occurring in such a system. These laws are based on experience, and have been found to be very sound from a fundamental standpoint. However, while they may be used to predict what changes should occur in a system, they do not explicitly tell us precisely what changes (if any) will occur, and at what rate they will occur. Such precise predictions lie within the purview of kinetics, which will be discussed in detail in further chapters. Initially, thermodynamics was principally concerned with the relation between mechanical work and heat, as such relations were of fundamental importance during the days of the industrial revolution. However, in later years, there was a growing awareness that work could also be done by devices that had no moving parts, particularly from changes in chemical composition. This approach led to the development of the concept of chemical potential, and to the development of chemical thermodynamics. The thermodynamics of a complete fuel cell may be entirely based upon the first and second laws of thermodynamics, and, more pertinently, upon the application of these laws to electrochemical systems. A brief review of these concepts is provided below. Detailed information about any of the fundamental concepts discussed is readily available in standard chemical engineering thermodynamics texts 2. A Quick Review a. The first law of thermodynamics: This law (also called the law of conservation of energy) states energy may neither be created nor be destroyed, but may be converted from one form to another. In other words, the total quantity of energy available in a system does not change, but the form in which it is available may change. This may mathematically be represented as follows: dE = Q - W (1) where E is the system energy, and Q and W refer to the heat input into the system and the work done by the system respectively. Q and W are path dependent functions, while E is a path independent function. A system is defined as an open system if it permits both mass and energy transfer, a closed system if it permits only energy transfer, and an isolated system if it permits neither mass nor energy transfer through its boundaries. A fuel cell is an open system, which permits the flow of mass and energy through its boundaries. Equation 1 on integration gives: E = Q W (2)

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

For an open system, the change in energy may be expressed as follows: E = U + KE + PE + (PV) (3) Where U is the internal energy of the system, KE and PE are the kinetic and potential energies respectively, and PV refers to the pressure-volume work done on the fluid to keep it flowing through the system. At this point, we can introduce a new thermodynamic property, namely the enthalpy (H). The enthalpy combines the internal energy and the PV work terms as follows: H = U + PV (4) Combining equations 3 and 4, we get the following equation for the energy change in an open system: H = Q W (5) Equation 5 is valid only for steady flow conditions, where KE and PE = 0. The fuel cell may be represented as a control volume as shown in Fig. 1 (Hoogers) below. It is seen that the work obtained in this case is from the transport of electrons across a potential difference and not from rotation of turbine blades or any such mechanical means.

Fig. 1 b. Application of the first law to fuel cells: In an operating fuel cell, the following reaction occurs: Fuel + oxidant = products (6) As this reaction is accomplished electrochemically, it involves the transfer of electrons from one electrode to the other. The no. of electrons transferred is proportional to the no. of equivalents of chemical change (N, obtained from stoichiometry) that occur when the fuel is oxidized. By definition, for each equivalent of chemical change, 6.023 x 1023 (Avogardos number A) of electrons are transferred. The amount of electricity represented for this quantity of electrons transferred (corresponding to one equivalent of chemical change) is given by: F = Ae (7)

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

Where e is the unit electronic charge in coloumbs (1.6 x 10 19). This quantity comes out to be equal to 96493 coloumbs and is referred to as Faradays constant (F). From this one can state that the amount of electricity transferred when reaction (eqn. 6) occurs is given by: Electricity = NF (8) This amount of electricity transferred corresponds to a certain amount of electrical work being done by the cell, given by: - We = NFE (9) Where E is the cell voltage (the potential difference between the two electrode terminals of the operating cell). The negative sign indicates that work is being done by the system. This work can also be described in terms of voltage, current and time as: We = 0,t EIdt (10) Where I is the current and t is the time. This is identical to stating that the current is the rate of change of charge (I = q / t). Substituting equation 9 in equation 5, we get a mathematical statement of the first law for a fuel cell: H = Q NFE (11) c. The second law of thermodynamics: While the first law of thermodynamics states that the total energy of a system is conserved, it does not impose any restrictions on the direction of energy transfer (but we know that heat cannot flow from a cooler body to a hotter body). Furthermore, it considers the energy content of work and heat to be equivalent. However, from day to day experience, this is evidently not true. While work can readily be transferred from one form to another with conversion efficiency limited only by frictional losses, it is very difficult to convert heat efficiently to work. Indeed, efficiencies of 40% are considered to be excellent for these processes. Therefore, heat is a less useful form of energy than an equivalent quantity of work. These shortcomings of the first law are addressed in the second law. The second law can be stated in several ways. One such statement is (Smith, Van Ness and Abbot): i. No apparatus can operate in such a way that its only effect on the system and surroundings is to convert heat absorbed by a system completely to work done by the system (or) it is impossible by a cyclic process to convert the heat absorbed by a system completely into work done by the system No process is possible that consists solely in the transfer of heat from one temperature level to a higher one.

ii.

Thus, while the second law does not proscribe the conversion of heat to work, it places a limit on the fraction of heat that may be converted to work.

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

d. Reversible processes and the concept of entropy: The concept of reversibility is fundamental to the second law of thermodynamics. A system is said to undergo a reversible change if it remains in equilibrium as it passes from its initial state to its final state. A reversible process is a reversible change in which the system remains in equilibrium with its environment. The visualization of a reversible change is especially easy for an electrochemical cell, and is implicit in the definition of a perfect electrochemical apparatus (as defined by Gibbs): If no changes take place in the cell except during the passage of current, and all changes which accompany the current can be reversed by reversing the current, the cell may be called a perfect electrochemical apparatus In a fuel cell with reactions described by equation 6 occurring, if the reactants are identified as the initial state and the products as the final state, then it is always possible to arrest the reaction by imposing an opposing electromotive force on the system. It is also possible to reverse the reaction by such means. Therefore, it is not difficult to visualize a fuel cell as a perfect electrochemical apparatus. The second law of thermodynamics defines a property called entropy, which is a measure of the disorder in a system. An irreversible process generates entropy via the mechanisms of frictional heat loss or heat transfer through a finite temperature difference. Such processes (involving heat transfer) can be made reversible by reducing the finite temperature gradient into an infinitesimal difference (thereby leading to a vastly reduced rate of heat transfer). Entropy is based on such reversible heat transfer and is expressed as follows: dS = (dQ/T) rev (12) In other words, entropy is a system property whose differential changes are given by the quantities (dQ/T) rev. These quantities sum to zero for any series of reversible processes that causes the system to undergo a cyclic process. For a reversible adiabatic process, dQ is evidently zero, and hence the process is said to be isentropic (constant entropy). For an irreversible process, the entropy is calculated by assuming a series of reversible processes that have the same initial and final points. This is valid because entropy is a state function and is independent of the path taken. This is further seen in the integrated form of equation 12: S = S2 S1 = 1, 2 (dQ/T) rev (13) If the process undergoes reversible heat transfer Q rev at a constant temperature To, then the entropy is given by: S = Q rev / To (14) Mathematically, the second law may be expressed as:

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

S total = S system + S surroundings 0 (15) Where the equality applies for a reversible process. e. The second law and the reversible fuel cell, the Gibbs free energy: From equation 11, we have: H = Q NFE (11) From the discussion of entropy (eqn 14), for a reversible fuel cell, Q can be substituted as follows: H = TS NFE (16) In differential form, this becomes: dH = TdS FEdN (17) Since the cell is operating reversibly, the work obtained from it is the maximum possible useful work obtainable (minimal losses). This work is expressed in a function called the Gibbs free energy (G) dG = -FEdN (18) Thus, by substituting equation 18 in equation 17, we can get an expression for the maximum useful work obtainable from the system in terms of thermodynamic state functions: dG = dH TdS (19) From equation 19, we arrive at yet another way of looking at G, H and S. H may be considered to be the total energy possessed by a system, and S may be considered to be unavailable energy, thereby stating that G is the maximum possible useful work that can be extracted by the system at constant temperature and pressure, and hence is known as the free energy or energy free to be used. f. Understanding the significance Gibbs free energy the chemical potential: A glance at equation 19 reveals that the free energy is related to the enthalpy and the entropy neither of which is an intrinsic chemical energy term that can be directly related to the reaction occurring in eqn. 6. However, intuitively it is clear that the reaction is in some manner involved in the production of energy. Therefore, there is evidently some property of the reactants and products that defines the tendency to these substances to react, and this property most likely influences the free energy. Gibbs postulated the

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

existence of an intensive (independent of mass) state function (path independent) that has a constant value at equilibrium for a given substance through all the phases in which the substance is present as a component. He called this quantity the chemical potential (). Mathematically, it was introduced as follows: dU = dQ dW (20) for a reversible process, Q = TdS. Therefore: dU = TdS PdV + idni (21) where i is the chemical potential (intensity factor) for each species present and ni is the amount of each species present (capacity factor). The product of the two represents the useful work done by each species, and the summation is performed to include contributions of all species. Since H = U + PV, 21 becomes: dH = TdS + idni (22) Combining equations 17, 18 and 22, we arrive at a relation between the Gibbs free energy and the chemical potential, which is an intrinsic quantity and bears a relation to the reactants and products in equation 6: dG = idni (23) g. The chemical potential and the electromotive force the Nernst equation: The chemical potential is an intensive property, and does not define the amount of a particular species present in a given volume. This is obtained from gas pressures or concentrations. A direct link between chemical potential and readily obtainable measures such as concentration is not possible. Links have been established by using invented functions such as activity. Conveniently, the activity of an ideal gas is equal to its partial pressure The following treatment is limited to ideal gases as a detailed discussion of the activity, fugacity and related concepts are more suited for a thermodynamics class. We have the following relation for G from G = H TS (24) dG = dH TdS - SdT (25) Since H = U + PV, dH = dU + PdV + VdP. Therefore: dG = dU + PdV + VdP TdS SdT (26) Substituting for dU from equation 21, dG = TdS PdV + idni + PdV + VdP TdS SdT (27)

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

Which simplifies to: dG = VdP SdT + idni (28) Now, by partially differentiating equation 28 with respect to P: (G/P) T, n = V (29) However, since we are considering ideal gases, we also have: V = nRT / P (30) Combining equations 29 and 30, we have: (G/P) T, n = nRT / P (31) Since only differences in G (and not absolute values of G) are significant from a practical viewpoint, a standard state is generally chosen, and is represented by the superscript o. Integrating equation 31, we have: G = G - G o = nRT ln (P/P o) (32) Equation 32 can be written for a species in solution by replacing the pressure for the component partial pressure: Gi = Gi - Gi o = niRT ln (pi/pi o) (33) Now applying the definition of the chemical potential (equation 23) we can write: i = io + RT ln (pi/pi o) (34) In equation 34, we have a relationship between the chemical potential, and a measurable quantity such as pressure. It may be recalled that this is precisely the link we have been seeking. Now, for a given reaction, the change in Gibbs free energy may be written as follows: G = pp - rr (35) Where is the stoichiometric number, and the subscripts p and r refer to products and reactants respectively (in some ways, equation 35 may also be considered as a statement of the first law). We also know from equation 18 that : G = - NFE (36)

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

Now, substituting equation 34 into equation 35, and combining equations 35 and 36 we have: G = pp0 - rr0 + RT ln{(ppp/prr)} = - NFE (37) We can now consider two states that merit further discussion. We can define a standard state, where all the gases (reactants and products) are at unit pressure. In this case, ln{(ppp/prr)} is equal to 0, and equation 37 reduces to the form: Go = pp0 - rr0 = - NFEo (38) The second state is the equilibrium case, where G = 0, and (ppp/prr) equals the equilibrium constant K. In this case equation 37 reduces to: 0 = pp0 - rr0 + RT lnK (39) Substituting equation 38 into equation 39, we obtain the following equilibrium relationship: Go = -RT lnK = - NFEo (40) Equation 40 is valid only at equilibrium. A more general representation of equation 37 is given below: G = Go + RT ln{(ppp/prr)} = - NFE (41) Now if we take the latter equality in equation 41, and divide throughout by NF, we get: Go/ NF + (RT/NF) ln{(ppp/prr)} = -E (42) Substituting for Go/ NF from equation 40, we have: Eo + (RT/NF) ln{(ppp/prr)}= -E (43)

On rearrangement, equation 43 gives: E = Eo - (RT/NF) ln{(ppp/prr)}(44) Equation 44 is called the Nernst equation, and is widely used in electrochemistry to evaluate the effect of simple changes in reactant or product activity, and temperature on the cell voltage. It must be noted that the free energy route (using tabulated values of G) is still preferred for complex changes. h. Fuel cell vs. Carnot efficiencies: Briefly, any heat engine that absorbs heat at a high temperature (T1) must reject energy at a lower temperature (T2) to do useful work. The

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

efficiency (called Carnot efficiency after the scientist who developed this postulation) of an ideal engine was found to be second law limited, and can be written (sans derivation) as: carnot = 1 T2/T1 (45) From equation 45, it is seen that the efficiency is 1 only at an infinitely hot source. More realistically, the higher the hot source, the higher the efficiency. However, this is a specious argument, because the amount of energy lost due to irreversible processes in maintaining the temperature of the hot source far exceeds the work output of the cell, thereby leading to reduced efficiencies. In a fuel cell, the operation is essentially isothermal, and therefore less energy is lost in maintaining the temperature of the hot source. Therefore, the fuel cell is inherently less irreversible. Also, due to the absence of temperature cycling, it does not follow the Carnot cycle, and therefore not limited by the Carnot efficiency. Therefore, the efficiency of the fuel cell is expressed by other means. It is often reported (erroneously) that a fuel cell is 100% efficient. This is better stated as The fuel cell is not limited by the Carnot efficiency. In reality, the fuel cell is far from 100% efficient. The efficiency based upon the first law of thermodynamics is readily expressed as: = W out / Q in (46) We know that for a fuel cell, the work done is given by the G (or equivalently by NFE), and that the heat input may be calculated based upon the higher heating value (HHV) of the fuel. Thus: = G/HHV = NFE / HHV (47) In a similar manner, the maximum efficiency is obtained at the highest cell voltage (namely the open circuit potential), and is given by: max = Go/HHV = NFEo /HHV (48) For a typical H2/O2 fuel cell, the maximum efficiency calculated from eqn. 48 is 83% (with the rest being entropic losses), and a Carnot engine would have to have a high temperature of 1753 K (with a corresponding low temperature of 298K) to achieve this efficiency. However, it must be noted that while the work done by a Carnot cycle engine (and hence the Carnot efficiency) increases with increasing temperature (of the hot source), the reverse is true for the G based fuel cell efficiency. This is because G (and hence E) decreases with temperature (remember the Nernst equation). Thus there exists a temperature beyond which the fuel cell efficiency is actually lower than the Carnot efficiency. This is illustrated in Fig. 2 (Hoogers). The temperature at which this occurs is approximately 950 K for a H2/O2 system (and they run SOFCs at .. temperatures above 950K! not a fair comparison as the mechanisms are different).

Vijay Ramani, J. M. Fenton

Fig. 2 Now, the maximum efficiency predicted by equation 48 is quite meaningless from a practical viewpoint (no current is drawn!). therein lies the limitation of the efficiencies predicted by the first law. This can be redressed by defining efficiency from a second law viewpoint, which indicates the actual work obtained to the maximum possible work obtainable. This is also referred to as a voltage efficiency. In some ways, it is merely a ratio of equations 47 and 48: 2nd law = NFE / NFEo = E / Eo (49) The value of the actual voltage is always less than the value of the theoretical open circuit voltage (even at open circuit!) due to inefficiencies within the fuel cell also called overpotentials (or should we say underpotentials?). These overpotentials arise due to several reasons, the most important of which will be discussed in detail in later chapters. A current efficiency may also be defined based upon the ratio of the current produced to the current expected (based on Faradays law) for the amount of fuel fed to the cell: I = I / NF (dn/dt) (50) where n is the number of moles of fuel. This efficiency can indeed be close to 100%, but is misleading as it does not refer to the efficiency with which work is being done by the cell. The product of the current and voltage efficiencies is sometimes used as a more comprehensive definition of cell efficiency (this is also called the Gibbs free energy efficiency)