This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND RANGE MANAGEMENT
THE INFLUENCE OF PLANT SPECIES ON DISTRIBUTION OF KOB AT THE HEADQUARTERS AREA OF MOLE NATIONAL PARK.
HOWARD HENRY ABUAKU MAY, 2012
KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES FACULTY OF RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND RANGE MANAGEMENT
THE INFLUENCE OF PLANT SPECIES ON DISTRIBUTION OF KOB AT THE HEADQUARTERS AREA OF MOLE NATIONAL PARK.
A THESIS SUBMITTED TO FACULTY OF RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT.
HOWARD HENRY ABUAKU MAY, 2012
CHAPTER ONE 1 1.1 Background INTRODUCTION
The number of plant species in an area might be expected to influence the number of animal species, and at small spatial scales such positive associations have been widely found in both experimental and observational studies (Siemann et al., 1998; Knops et al., 1999; Haddad et al., 2001). Such associations have also been used to argue that one of the ecosystem functions provided by diverse plant communities is the maintenance of rich animal communities (Knops et al., 1999). However, whether or not this ‘function’ operates at larger extents or for all animal groups is less certain.
At some very gross level plant and animal richness patterns must be congruent, since both increase from the poles to the tropics. But even if true, it begs the more interesting ecological question of the extent that this covariation is causal or coincidental. If plant diversity strongly influences animal diversity at broad scal es , then it follows that to understand animal diversity gradients we need only know what drives plant diversity and then explain total biotic diversity as a special case of resource–consumer interactions, whereas if links between plant and animal diversity are non-causal, then we need to understand what aspects of the environment can drive both patterns simultaneously.
1999). Hawkins et al. 2000. Plant-animal interactions and their effects on ecosystem properties assume particular importance in protected areas where management decisions have to be taken according to vegetation status and animal distribution and density. the key to answering this question is not simply to correlate plant and animal richness gradients. 2003).. Laidlaw. Lopes and Ferrari. 2000). 2000. 1996. 4 . Carrillo et al.... 1993.Given that there is widespread evidence that elements of climate influence both plant and animal diversity gradients at broad spatial scales (Wright et al. The study focused on kob (Kobus kob) that have been widely used as indicators of forest fragmentation and habitat disturbance due to their close relationships with forest cover and vegetative complexity (Chiarello. and animal distribution and density. Another reason for the study of kob was that they serve as important sources of food for indigenous people and are the focus on many ongoing conservation efforts in the region (Palminteri et al. Browsing impact on vegetation communities assumes particular importance in protected areas where management decisions have to be taken according to vegetation status. 2000) and can be sampled with relatively simple methods like transects (Conroy and Nichols. but to include simultaneously both plant richness data and climatic variables in analyses of animal diversity patterns to determine how they covary in concert. making it an ideal setting to test the joint effects of vegetation modifications on species distributions. The headquarters area of the Mole National Park (Mole) was selected for this study because the high visitor influx in the area has resulted in substantial variation in the level of anthropogenic disturbance.
5 . and one of the first comparisons across vegetation types. there is general lack of ecological research on kob in Ghana which limits our ability to make even generalizations about the habitat requirements of the species living in such landscapes. This requires understanding how both species’ density is influenced by local-level habitat factors like vegetation type and its implications for tourism. Estimate kob sign density (encounter rate) at the headquarters area of MNP. Monamy and Fox. Hence. Determine the influence of plant species density on kob sign density. 2004. 2.1.3 Aim and Objectives The study provides some of the first quantitative data on kob species composition and density in the headquarters area of the Mole National Park (MNP). it is vital that we understand the habitat requirements and sensitivities of the species. Estimate the density of plant species in the study area. and hence suggest management recommendations.2 Justification Effective conservation of kob in Mole National Park requires scientific knowledge underpinning management decisions and on-ground actions. A further complication is the large variation in habitat requirements among species (Jellinek et al. the objectives of the study are to.. 3. 1. Yet. conservation managers face significant uncertainty regarding the most appropriate management strategies for achieving long-term conservation outcomes for kob and the diversity of native fauna species in Mole. Specifically. If kob are to be conserved in Mole. 2005). 1.
kob concentrate in areas of short grass and higher. or adequate water (Kingdon. Having likely evolved from a reedbuck-like ancestor. 1991).The bushy tail is white underneath and terminates with a black tip with a length of 20-40 cm. 1982). Kob are herbivores and its preference for perennial grasses in early. and south-east Ethiopia (IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group (2008).1 Kob Traits and Ecology The Kob (Kobus kob) is a medium sized antelope in which only males are about 50-100% heavier than females standing approximately 92cm high at the shoulder.CHAPTER TWO 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2. Kobus kob has a short reddish brown coat with a white throat-patch and white underparts. dry ground and keep these pastures short while ungrazed grassland grow tall and rank (Estes. Kob are able to congregate and move from one resource to another.1982). During the rainy season. southern Sudan. However. 1991). The male kob is robustly built and has a muscular neck and thick. Females are 82-92 cm long and weigh on average 63 kg (Kingdon. These 6 . it is not cover-dependent and avoids flooded ground and steep slopes (Estes. the kob is largely tied to floodplain grasslands. The kob has a scattered and patchy distribution ranging from Senegal and Guinea-Bissau to Uganda. 1991). 1982). Males are 90-100 cm long and have an average weight of 94 kg. Females are more slender and lack horns (Kingdon. palatable stages and its need to drink daily makes it tied to green pastures that are well watered (Kingdon. any extension of ecological range into drier habitats stops short of the point where there is no more access to moist green growth. It requires low-lying flats or gently rolling country close to permanent water with no severe seasonal extremes (Kingdon. Due to its dependence on water. lyrate horns. 1982). 1982) (Estes.
1991). In areas with extensive flooding. Individual young kob learn their routines from their mothers. At average or low population densities. Nonterritorial males. Adult males try to establish their territories in the best habitat available which are inhabited by herds of females and their young. 2. On floodplains. However. scale or proximity. 1982). the higher the density of individuals the more females will take their cues from other females (Kingdon. 1982). around two thirds of the territorial males defend conventional territories while the rest live in clustered territories known as leks (Estes.movements follow seasonal changes in pasture (Kingdon. All-males herds that number up to several hundred individuals may associate with females during the dry season marches. The females also tend to be more mobile and more social than territorial males which remain attached to their static territories as long as possible (Kingdon. changing composition and size as the animals move about their range searching for greener pastures. live in bachelor herds and are segregated from the females by the territorial males. These clusters may be no larger than a single conventional territory. It is the females that lead the daily movements to water regardless of the length of time. traveling can involve many hundreds of kilometres. however females live in herds of which can reach thousands. 1982). The social and reproductive organization of kob can vary. where kob live in high population densities. particularly young males. These herds are loosely structured and have open. Daily treks to water in the dry season may require a walk of 10 km or more (Kingdon. 1991).2 Kob Social Behaviour Kob have few strong social bonds. Lek clusters are located on short grass and bare ground and are surrounded 7 . 1982). Males follow the females and may be an integral part of their herds. males establish conventional territories that are spaced at least 100-200 m apart (Estes.
20 to 200 males defend territories 15 to 200 meters in diameter (Nowak. Where are in the middle of the best pastureland and are near waterholes and well-travelled routes. 1991).3 Reproduction in Kob Females begin to mate at the age of one. 8-9 of every 10 females visit leks to mate which makes it worth it for males to forego space and food for greater reproductive success (Estes. where most mating occurs. 2. Within a lek. 1991). Females and bachelor males live in large herds of up to 2000 and circulate around a lek. As such. Females begin to ovulate at 13-14 months and come into oestrous every 20-26 days until they are inseminated. but males must normally wait for several more years (Nowak. Male territories are smallest and most highly-contested in the center of the lek. 1991). Courtship by males differs between males of conventional territories and lek 8 . Larger numbers of females associate with larger leks. This mating system may have evolved because males cannot defend the widely-dispersed food resources or the dynamic and temporary female herds (Deutsch. males are spaced farther apart and hold their territories for longer periods of time (Nowak. possibly because females stay on the lek longer when more males and other females are present (Deutsch. 1994b). 1994a). 1991). These territories maintain their popularity among females despite rapid male turnover (Deutsch. and males provide no parental care.by taller grassland. In areas of lower population density. Each lek is associated with a female herd of about 100 individuals. 1994a). these territories have litter to no value other than the males that reside in them. Females visit these leks only to breed.
olive baboon Papio anubis and lion Panthera leo (Wanzie. 1991). although they try.territories. with a sex ratio of about 1:1 (Haltenorth and Diller. flowers. shrub. The plant kingdoms comprises about 260. males join bachelors groups (Estes. grasses. 1994. which gives them their green colour.5 Plants Plants include family organisms such as trees. Mothers and their calves use their noses to identify one another. Kingdon. vines. 2004). When they are 3-4 months old. a female may copulative up to 20 times by one or more of the central males. When they pass the hiding stage. At leks. For their first month. The group is also called Green Plant or Viridiplantae in Latin (Lewis. ferns. pp. calves lie concealed in high grass. 1991).1982). including common jackal Canis aureus. When they mature. liverworts.They obtain most of their energy from sunlight via photosynthesis using chlorophyll contained in chloroplasts. 2. herbs. fern.4 Predation The kob is preyed upon by several species. 73–74). Kob courtship may last as little as 2-3 minutes and copulation may only last 1-2 seconds (Buechner and Schleoth. They rest together in available shades.000 known species of mosses. mosses and green algae. 1986. calves join crèches and rarely go into tall grass. shrubs. herbaceous and woody plants. Lek males are unable to keep females from escaping. Males of conventional territories will try to prevent females from leaving and will chase and herd them (Estes. the young join the female herds and associate with their mothers until they are weaned at 6-7 months. 2. spotted hyena Crocuta crocuta. 1965). Gestation lasts 261–271 days after which a calf is usually dropped. 9 .
carbon. At maturity. They also play an important role in producing oxygen and reducing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as well as moderating ground temperature (Tudge. although some take a more direct approach example. phosphorus. hydrogen and oxygen – the three elements found in all organic compounds as well as nitrogen. Plants acquire these nutrients primarily from soil through their roots. trees and various other forms that mantle the earth and are also found in its waters (Raven. They are an important component of the natural landscape because of their prevention of erosion and provision of weather-sheltered ecosystem in and under their foliage. the carnivorous plants are able to obtain some nutrients directly from small animals. calcium. such as carbohydrates. 2008). A minimum height specification at maturity varies from 3m to 6m. Some of these are macro nutrients which the plants need in relatively large amount and others are micro nutrients.6 Trees Trees are woody plant with distinct main stem or trunk. magnesium. Trees are perennial woody plants that live for at least three years. trees are usually the tallest of plants and their height and single main stem differentiate them from shrub which are shorter and have many stems. which are required in trace amounts. amino acids. 2. There are nine macronutrients. Lack of important nutrient may slow a plants growth or make the plant more susceptible to disease or even death. 2005). potassium. Plants require a number of inorganic nutrients. plants also need various nutrients to remain alive and healthy.7 Plant Nutrition Just as animals need certain nutrients. and vitamins to survive. and sulphur 10 .vines. 2.
molybdenum. Key factors limiting ungulate foraging selectivity. 2. zinc. 1982). and boron which constitute from less than one to several hundred parts per million in most plants. The selectivity of ungulate herbivory leads to the dominance of unpalatable chemically defended plant species in communities. unpalatable species. early growing season and post-fire 11 . copper. 1998). as in the case with carbon.8 Plant and Animal interactions Large mammalian herbivores not only depend on plant communities for their existence but cause major changes in plant community composition and structure (Augustine and McNaughton. and can even increase the dominance of highly palatable species (Augustine and McNaughton. Each of these nutrients approaches or. High levels of nutrient inputs or recycling and an intermittent temporal pattern of herbivory (often due to migration) are key factors increasing the regrowth capacity of palatable species and hence maintaining their dominance in plant communities and supports abundant herbivores. manganese. and differences among plant species in their ability to recover from tissue loss (Augustine and McNaughton. chlorine. studies have also demonstrated that intensive long-term herbivory does not lead to the invasion of unpalatable species into the community. include herding behaviour. may greatly exceed 1% of the dry weight of a healthy plant.( Kirkby. 1998) The effect ungulates exert on plant communities depends on the balance between feeding selectivity of herbivores thus the degree to which different plant species or ecotypes experience different levels of tissue loss. 1998). again limiting herbivore-induced dominance of slow-growing. The seven micronutrients elements are iron. However.
density determination is useful when one is more interested in the number individuals rather than the cover or biomass. 1980). It can also provide an indication of the structure of a habitat and the amount of wildlife food and cover (Sanford. 2. and low relative abundance of unpalatable species (Augustine and McNaughton. 1980) 12 . 1998).9 Density Density is the number of individuals per unit area (Wayne and James 1986. such as in evaluation of trees or shrub stand. Sanford.herbivory. asynchronous phenology of palatable versus unpalatable species. According to Wayne and James (1986).
Kalaba. and between 1° 22’ and 2° 13’ W. Fig.1.590 km².1). 3.CHAPTER THREE 3 3.1 Materials MATERIALS AND METHOD 3. It lies between 9° 11’ and 10° 10’ N. Sawla – Tuna . Wa East and West Mamprusi Districts. It is almost entirely located in the Northern Region and includes parts of West Gonja.1 Map of Study area 13 .1 Study area description Mole National Park is Ghana’s largest protected area and covers about 4. between Wa and Tamale (Fig 3.
Their abundance is generally low and they are often confined to small areas (Wildlife Department.1.1. with temperatures sometimes in the 40°s. Ghana. hazy weather. The dry season lasts from November to March. 12 disjunct and 24 species which are rare or have a very limited distribution) is relatively high. The Harmattan . 3. 1994).Most of the 742 plant species found in Mole are widespread throughout the savannah zone.3 Vegetation The vegetation of Mole National Park can be grouped into eight broad vegetation types. The relative humidity reaches 90% at night in the rains and falls to about 70% in the afternoons. The mean annual temperature of 28°C varies from 26°C in December to 31°C in March.the dry wind from the Sahara – may blow during December to February bringing dusty. 14 . the species of conservation value (4 endemic. 1993). More than 90% of the rain falls in the rainy season from April to October.2 Climate The average annual rainfall is about 1100 mm. The average range from day to night is 13°C. However. decreasing to 1000 mm in the north of the park. 3. Their distribution is mainly determined by soil depth and drainage (Schmitt and Adu-Nsiah. with peaks in July and September. It can be unpleasantly hot in March and April. In the dry season the figures are 50% and 20% respectively.
The savannah woodland is divided into three main groups: The Burkea .1.3.3.Terminalia savannah woodland with Detarium microcarpum is confined to shallow and rocky soils.Polycarpaea tenuifolia community) comprises all plant communities on flat iron pans with patches of shallow soil. which can reach up to 100%. Only annual species can compete on such sites which are flooded and species-rich during the rains and subject to extreme water-stress during the dry season. The Burkea . The ground cover. The average tree height is 11 m with individuals reaching 22m.2 Boval (open grassland) The boval vegetation (Loudetiopsis kerstingii . is dominated by grasses up to 3m tall. The tree cover varies from 5% to 65%. Anogeissus with Vitellaria paradoxa is found on the granite outcrops.Terminalia savannah woodland with Vitellaria paradoxa (the shea-nut tree) comprises all savannah woodland on well-drained and often deep soils. 3.1. with an average of 30%. 15 .3.1 Open savannah woodland This is the dominant vegetation type. The main grasses are species of Andropogon and scattered herbs are found between them.
5 Communities covering small areas These are sites with special vegetation such as old termite mounds or depressions in the sandstone plateau on top of the Konkori escarpment.1. 3.3.3 Riverine forest This is found along most of the rivers in the park. There is also a scarp forest along the foot of the Konkori escarpment. It often forms bands of generally dense and species-rich forests of up to 38m in height.1. 3.3. which are water-filled during the rainy season.3. The width of these bands varies from a few metres to more than 100 m on either side of the river and is mainly determined by topography and geology.4 Flood plain grassland and swamps This vegetation type comprises four plant communities of seasonally water-logged valley bottoms and badly-drained depressions and areas around water-holes which are mainly dominated by grasses and sedges.3. 16 .1.
2. 2000).2. 3. The map of the area was gridded and 8 transects of 1000m was systematically laid to sample the area (Fig. This was done to determine the condition of the area and was assisted by the head ranger at Mole National Park.3.2. 17 .1. 3.1 Reconnaissance survey Two-day reconnaissance survey was conducted in the study area. Three quadrats of 10m x 10m was systematically laid on each transect to sample animals and plants (William.2).1 Methods Data collection procedures 3.1.2 3.2 Sampling techniques Quadrats and transects were used to sample the plants and animals in the area respectively.
2 Map of study area showing transects origins. 3. In each quadrat plants were identified and their numbers recorded. All quadrats were established to the right of each transect.Fig. From the gridded map a reference transect was established and all other transects according to its direction. 3.3 Field survey The coordinates of sampling points on the map were entered into the Global Positioning System (GPS) device to locate the sampling points on the ground.2.1. 18 .
1 was used.2.0. Descriptive analysis was used to present the results in tables and figures. Secondly. a correlation matrix using correlation coefficient (r) was performed to access the strength of a general relationship or influence of each plant species on kob density.2.2.2. .1 Estimate of plant density The density of plants was calculated using the formula.3 Influence of Plant Species on Kob Density The influence of plants species on kob density was analysed in two stages.2.2. The goal was to build mathematical models that described the distribution of kob species. the statistics package StatView 5. Firstly.2 Estimate of Kob sign density The kob sign density was calculated using the formula. 3. based the on the results. (Wayne and James.3. . regression analysis was performed on the plant that had significant influence on kob density to further investigate the trends in these relationships. 19 . (Wayne and James.2 Data analysis 3. 1986) 3.2. 1986) In all cases.
0125 m2). 20 . Afrormorsia laxiflora (0. Vitellaria paradoxa (0.2).east to south-west gradient with most species occurring in the north-east direction and south-west direction with fewer species occurring around the Headquarters and Dam areas and most occurring further away (fig.002917 m2).00375 per m2).005833 per m2).3. 4.002083 per m2). Crossopteryx febrifuga (0.1 Estimate of Plant Density In all 46 plant species were encountered and identified in the quadrats laid on the transects (Appendix 1). Piliostigma thonningii (0. Annona senegalensis (0. Kob sign density was approximately 10 signs per kilometre.CHAPTER FOUR 4 RESULTS 4.00125 per m2) and Burkea africana (0.007917 m2).011667 per m2).2 Estimate of kob sign density Kob sign density in each cell ranged from 3 to 27 species. Daniellia macrocarpa (0.0775 per m2) Daniellia oliveri (0. Major plant species recorded were Nauclea latifolia (0. The spatial patterns show a north.
Nauclea latifolia was the best predictor of kob distribution pattern followed by Piliostigma thonningii. Crossopteryx febrifuga. Afrormorsia laxiflora.Fig.3.1).3 Influence of Plant Species on Kob Sign Density In the study 47 plants species were identified but only 9 had significant correlation with kob density (Table 4. However Daniellia macrocarpa. When the plants species were considered individually. Annona senegalensis. and Burkea africana all had an inverse influence on kob distribution pattern. Spatial pattern of kob signs distribution in Mole National Park 4. 21 .2. Vitellaria paradoxa and Daniellia oliveri and had a positive influence on kob distribution pattern.
P<0.01 < 0.01. R^2 = . Fig.982 0.2C). Vitellaria paradoxa (r2=0.05 Fig. P<0. 4.01 < 0. of Kob signs per km (B) 22. Piliostigma thonningii Vitellaria paradoxa Afrormosia laxiflora Daniellia oliveri Daniellia macrocarpa Annona senegalensis Crossopteryx febrifuga Burkea africana 4. 4.971.5 15 12.5 10 7. Correlation coefficients (r) between kob signs per km and a suite of plants species recorded on transects.5 20 17.975 0.996.01 the Nauclea latifolia (r2=0.3. 4.2E).971 0.0.943.1.5 5 2.1 Regressional analysis Each plant species was regressed against kob sign densities. Fig.027 * X ..01 > 0.943 .01 < 0.0.0. Kob density was positively influenced by r 0.825 P < 0.023 * X^2. Afrormosia latiflora (r2=0. Fig.Table 4. 4. Piliostigma thonningii (r2=0.01. of Nauclea latifolia per metre Y = 3. P>0.982.01 < 0.209 + 2. Description of Plant species Nauclea latifolia.05 < 0. P<0. (A) 27. 4.2B).2A).01.5 25 No. Fig.975.01 < 0.5 -2 2 4 6 8 10 12 No. Sample size is 8 transects.996 0.01 < 0.994 0 14 16 22 .861 .01. P<0.982 .2D) and Daniellia oliveri (r2=0.0.873 .
Annona senegalensis (r2=-0.982. P>0.982. Crossopteryx febrifuga 23 . Afrormosia latiflora (r2=0.01) Piliostigma thonningii (r2=0. The regression models showed increasing kob abundance with an increasing plant density per metre.01.01.05). Vitellaria paradoxa (r2=0.3A). P<0.2 Relationships between kob signs per km and Nauclea latifolia (r2=0. P<0.01).943.975.971. On the other hand kob density was inversely influenced by Daniellia macrocarpa (r2=-0. Fig. 4. Fig.01).0061).873. P<0.996. P<0. Daniellia oliveri (r2=0.3B). 4. P<0.(C) (D) (E) Figure 4. P<0. in a polynomial regression model.
of Kob signs per km 22.861.5 . of Annona senegalensis per metre Y = 26.(r2=-0.5 10 7.5 2 2.5 20 17.01. Fig.5 -. Fig.5 1 1. These models allow us to calculate the number of kob signs expected given the number of available water sources and length of forest traversed in a particular area.3C).5 (C) (D) Figure 4.5 15 12. and Burkea africana (r2=-0.111 * X + 2.3D).5 5 2.01. 4.889 * X^2.889 .893 0 3.825.3 Relationships between kob signs per km and the plant species in a polynomial regression model. 4.5 3 No. P<0.16. 24 .5 25 No. R^2 = . (A) (B) 27. P<0. The regression models showed that highest kob abundance occurred at lowest plant densities per hectare.
hunting activities might have reduced the large ungulate populations in comparison to past levels of abundance.1 Kob densities DISCUSSION The generally high record of kob signs in the study area corresponds well to established increased activity levels (Mr. In addition. The flowers are joined with their calyces. especially kob. Zakaria Alhassan). 1996). Ungulates may be adapted to the habitat conditions in MNP. The fruits are ripening from July to September. thereby persisting or increasing and do not appear to have suffered to the same extent as other species groups like primates or larger carnivores due to human activities. Baboons and other livestock feed on them and they serve as medicinal to rural folks. The tree is flowering from April to June. The fruit is syncarp. Piliostigma thonningii Piliostigma thonningii is a tree 4-15 m in height with a rounded crown and a short but often crooked bole with rusty-hairy twigs. Most kpopulations have also been assessed as stable or increasing in Ghanaian forests (Table 6-3. being creamy25 . Summary of status of key plant species Nauclea latifolia Nauclea latifolia is an evergreen multi-stemmed shrub or a tree. can probably withstand hunting pressure to a greater degree than the more susceptible primate species. It is widespread in the humid tropical rainforest zone or in savannah woodlands of West and Central Africa Nauclea latifolia has an open canopy and terminal spherical head lined cymes of white flowers. The bark is rough and longitudinally fissured.5 5. IUCN/SSC. it grows up to an altitude of 200 m. Nevertheless. most antelopes.
The leaves are edible and chewed to relieve thirst. ovary topped by a thick flattenedglobose stigma. glossy above and heavily veined and somewhat rusty-hairy below. Flowers with 5 white to pink petals. The fruit and seeds are edible. the fruits are also taken in considerable quantities. Leathery green leaves up to 15 x 17 cm. The pods are nutritious and relished by cattle and antelopes. This is a preferred browse species of the African elephant (Loxodonta africana). bi-lobed one eighth to one third the way down with a small bristle in the notch. unisexual with male and female usually on separate trees. pendulous.brown when fresh and grey-brown later. 26 .
011667 0.00125 0.0025 0.0925 0.002917 0.0025 0.002083 0.00375 0.010417 0.0775 0.001667 0.005833 0.005 0.007917 0.0125 0.001667 0.00375 0.000417 0.APPENDIX 1: Plant Species Plant species Gardenia tomatosa Burkea africana Vitellaria paradoxa Terminalia avicennoides Hanila acida Piliostigma thonningii Gardenia aquala Combrentum senegalen Maytenus senegalensis Piliostigma polyendra Combrentum mole Crossopteryx febrifuga Bridelia ferogina Parinari crotifolia Tericarpus erinacius Lania acida Annona senegalensis Sicuridata longicudata C.00125 .00125 0.005833 0. spps Aflagyl peninculata Daniellia olivera Azilia africana Grunia mole Daniellia macrocarpa Hanila ungulata Tericarpus erinacius Afrormosia laxiflora Xymenia americana TRAN1 TRANS 2 TRANS 3 TRANS 4 TRANS 5 TRANS 6 TRANS 7 TRANS 8 TOTAL 10 9 3 1 1 0 0 1 25 3 4 4 2 1 0 9 5 28 28 19 11 83 2 0 25 18 186 33 6 70 53 15 0 23 22 222 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 3 14 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 4 14 2 9 5 23 18 2 10 83 8 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 12 4 17 7 2 0 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 1 2 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 5 2 15 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 1 7 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 6 3 0 0 0 3 7 19 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 28 DENSITY 0.000833 0.034583 0.00375 0.00625 0.005 0.00125 0.000417 0.
00125 0. Diasparos spp. Continum Sodioli kochai Nauclea latifolia Maligyina inermis Terminalia microcarpa Cidio ceduella Anogaysis leocarpus Acasia spp.001667 0.000833 0.000833 0.0075 0.000417 0.Trigilia roca Tilopsis subanopsa Cocosp.000417 0.005833 0.000417 29 .000833 0.004167 0.000417 0.00125 0.000417 0. Metrogina inermis Electrofolium acida Sicuridata longicudata Asobelinilia doka Garmenia amerio 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 2 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 10 2 1 4 14 1 1 3 28 2 1 18 3 1 2 1 0.011667 0.000417 0.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.