This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
” We see this clearly in the aesthetic of geometric shapes such as a circle or a square, because these shapes when cut in half will produce a mirror image to the other half. But we can apply the ideal of symmetry to things beyond the equally balanced sides of shapes. We already do this in physics, but it can also be applied to the field of philosophy as well. In physics, symmetries are things that affect systems (time measurements direction etc.) that behave identically if you change only that specific thing. An example of this is if you measure a meter in one place then move, and measure it again, it will be the same, making it space symmetric. If you throw a ball and it goes a certain distance in a certain amount of time, that ball going reverse in time (for the same amount of time) will go the same distance; i.e. if it goes from A to B in 20 seconds, then it will go to B to A in -20s following the same path, making it time symmetric. When determining a fundamental property of the universe to be a law, it is also considered to be a symmetrical principle. It’s referred to as a portion of the universe that is unchanged or unaffected by external influences & affects material objects on a scale from the very small to the very large. Things like gravity & electromagnetism are fundamental forces of the universe & relay these affects as such from everything pertaining to the smallest particle in the atomic structure to the largest celestial body known to man. Thus these forces are considered to be symmetrical. Thus no physics law is inherently symmetric, but establishes presuppositions of symmetries that allow it to be true. Within physics and Math, these constantly get updated, and are true until you reach a certain point where they aren't, this point is where most math and physics research takes place. Symmetry can be equally applied in the realm of philosophy where as when we want to understand the true nature of a concept, we break it down to the simplest form it can applicably be, by defining the concept that explains the
unnecessary to know & will eventually be forgotten.” In other words. however until it is factually proven that there is a fundamental human nature that all humans derive a similar sense of purpose from. Thus the process of transference of information will cease. Knowing this we can understand deeper that symmetry in philosophy is only applicable when we find there are no exceptions to the concept(s) in question. the philosophy of it can not only be considered a principle. will become superfluous. but can be viewed as being symmetrical as well. it’s not a symmetric principle. one who lives without a sense of social cultural connection or identity. Once an exception is found. culture is the system in which we transfer our beliefs & understanding to others. I do not see however that this can be applied to every situation that a human can possibly think to engage with. especially of a didactic platform. we must think of the ideal of culture not just in a social context but also in it’s most abstract form that any human could interact with in order to truly grasp the concept of what it is that we . thus needs to be accepted as such or re-evaluated until the ideal can be applied to every situation the imagination &/or level of personal experience will ever encounter. This concept does not seemingly apply interspecies interactions such as a relation to plants & animals or to the idea of the culture of one. It has & can be argued that humans are naturally social creatures. any information offered regardless the level of cognoscente understanding. When the ideal is broken down to such a degree as to produce a level of understanding that can be applied to every situation from the most accessible to the most abstract. beliefs & behaviors that depend upon the capacity for learning & transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations. we define culture to be the “integrated pattern of human knowledge.application of why a habit or an action of situations has come to manifest itself as such derived from it’s use in social conduct. If we were to look at the ideal of what culture is. for this definition only applies to culture by human to human interactions. For how can there be a transference of information to establish an understanding unless an initiative is taken to learn about another’s culture? Any one person may or may not have a desire to learn about the other’s culture but if there is no desire to learn.
So how can culture be symmetrically understood? It is perhaps more observant to see what is common in the extremities of situations.are presenting & understanding for ourselves. accepting with sentiments of analysis or rejecting with such statements as ‘I don’t get it. We see the emergence of cultural agreements & understanding more clearly in arts culture. is not how culture may be maintained for others. it could also be an agreed understanding of the self. I’m proposing to think of culture in its most fundamental form in that perhaps it may be nothing more than the result an agreed understanding. Based on observations. financial institutions & religious creed. Thus culture for them. It is known within the Botany community that plants electromagnetic energy field can not just be affected by the environment but also by different types of music & intentions made from external influences onto the plant. music. how well & what one person agrees upon with them self. poetry. All of these different types of cultures can be better understood simply by spending enough time in each of them as to acquire a more visceral perception of the values that are shared. An understanding of the self in one sense can be understood by a comparison to others. etc. monks isolate themselves for years in mountain caves & hermits reject the norms of society at large to live alone. than to define it based purely on criterion & conforming all actions thereafter. painting. If symmetrical theories were to be applied & agreed upon to every situation we can think of. For in truth. An understanding between people or between people to their environment establishes their own cultures respectively & is the most obvious construct of this ideal. whereas some people understand the object of what’s being expressed & others do not. like that of an isolated hermit to the influence of the masses to the relation of man to it’s environment. What this understanding does naturally is establish context for the information observed shared regardless the direction of informational flow. but the ideals set in a society will have no value within the person if an extended amount of time is not spent alone in order to obtain a rounded . but if this were to be applied symmetrically. dance. we must take these types of situations into account as well.’ We also see cultural staples in athletic sports. so our actions thereafter can match appropriately from the source.
As aforementioned. mannerisms. Thus culture can be considered to be the result of an understanding between one or more parties. sounds. gestures or marks. “who am I?” “what is the meaning of (life/love/justice/etc. & any other form of expression that is a means to translate & communicate abstract or personal thought. we can determine it’s origin. Concordantly.” in other words. The origin of thought & habit are the symmetries that all actions stem from. an understood system to convey ideas between different parties. ethnic communities. as axioms are “self-evident truths that require no proof. Clearly communication plays a large part of how culture is relayed whether speaking to oneself or speaking to others. culture emerges. Essentially. Language is “a systematic means of communicating ideas or feelings by the use of conventionalized signs. it is in arts.)?” Symmetrical principles could be viewed as finding the axiom of an ideal but differs from an axiom. that have understood meaning. idiosyncrasies. A language not only represents the culture but also establishes it by its arcane performance. & personal culture can emerge.” & symmetry requires a process of reasoning based on how the application presents itself in all situations regardless of it’s level of abstraction. examining the natural workings of it’s function to be able to compare & contrast the values of each so when similarities between all situations arise. Certain religions. Not all interactions need be spent with others or alone. the process of finding symmetry is garnered by acknowledging the polar extremities of any type of philosophic ideal or psychological construct. understanding is better established. Understanding these symmetric principles only help to establish things such as a culture of one when faced with such existential questions as. Observationally culture can be carried through the language because language is not always limited to verbal form. often we call this representation the character of a person. we see this principle being applied more clearly when observing the corporeal world & . but when the extremes are acknowledged & explored. once that understanding is established.contrasting perspective. & others of the like have words in their language that can’t be translated into other languages & can be only understood by being apart or immersed in that culture.
it has no width or depth. & is to be understood as a theoretical position in space. length or depth. electrons. Ultimately the point doesn’t actually exist. We consider this plane to be 2 dimensional. a dimension of length. you make a line. protons. A clearer example of this can be seen when we think of the fundamentals of geometry. Reversely if we were to travel into the atomic structure of our own hand. 1D. atoms. This dimension exists because this is the dimension that we live in. etc. DNA. When they first teach you the principles of geometry. the line still doesn’t exist because even though it may have a length. fermions. from the infinitely small to the infinitely large. the universe is made up of a series of points. relative to the perspective of the traveler. If that person were to keep traveling through space. ever since the days of Euclid & Pythagoras to Kurt Gödel & Buckminster Fuller. Imagine a person flying above the earth to the point where the earth would appear to be a point in space. people have pondered the philosophical cavity of how is it that the basis of our reality is built upon three levels of dimensions that don’t independently exist in & of themselves (0D. as we know it. they teach you that a point has no dimension because it has no width. which we consider to have 1 dimension. For thousands of years. quasars & super clusters would also eventually become a point should one travel far enough away. they would see the solar system to become a point.the shapes that we can perceive in it. Thus observationally. Nebulas. we can see that at different scales of size. we would see a series of points in each scale smaller that we can go. we take a different approach to understanding the situation to begin with. quarks. width & depth. it would clearly seem to make more sense to potentially reverse the axiom & instead of saying that none of the dimensions exists until it’s in the 3rd . we’ve reached the 3rd dimension. Finally when we stack a series of planes together. However. If you were to put a series of lines together that intersect in any way. & 2D) yet create something that does exist (3D). yet it still doesn’t exist because it doesn’t include volume. When you put a series of points together. galaxies. Perhaps in order to truly resolve the dilemma. When we observe the universe. blood cells. it creates what we call a plane. It has become an obvious axiom to consider this to be true because none of the other observable dimensions support life.
We can divide our boundary shape with another boundary shape. We use a circle because a circle is the most efficient shape. possibly saying to him/herself. how are they all contained in such a way as to make up reality. So if the universe is infinite in both directions on the scale of size. I consider the ideal that the universe could have a size limitation to be ridiculous. Meaning that fundamentally. as we know it? We can understand this dilemma by first creating a boundary for ourselves.dimensions. the points would have to be infinitely divided on all scales in each direction of the very large to the very small because the points are set as larger or smaller divisions of themselves. let’s create a circle. In order for this philosophy to be symmetrical. For our example. The most efficient shape with the fewest straight lines is an equal lateral triangle. but for our example we’ll use this circle for its simplicity. This circle is a 2 dimensional representation for what could be a 3 dimensional object. there can be no Higgs/Boson or “God” particle because it would essentially be saying “God” decided to stop the universe at a particular size. “that’s the smallest or largest thing that shall ever be created.” Although I am no God. . We could imagine the circle as a sphere if we’d like. & say that the only thing that exist is the point (0D/no dimension). Of course 3 dimensionally it would be thought of as a tetrahedron. how is it possible that we should have boundary conditions? If the human body contains an infinite amount of sizes of particles.
up & down.We have to also include another observation that the universe provides for us in that the universe is polarized. However. what I’m explaining is that the universe could work on a fractal geometric basis since it is already apparent in all things observational. with this process. fire & water. Fundamentally. left & right. thus giving us the opportunity to divide our shape into smaller & smaller portions. Spirals are seen from shells in the sea to the rotation of galaxies. we can divide these boundaries infinitely. sky & earth. With these boundaries in place. man & woman. we can create a new boundary for ourselves. we would never actually exceed the first boundary that we’ve created for ourselves. light & dark. All of this stems from the basic understanding of reversing the old axiom of the dimensional dilemma & applying it in a symmetrical way. good & bad. Polarization meaning every condition is contrasted by an equal & exact opposite. stillness & motion. So our boundary condition that we’ve created for ourselves must be polarized as well in order to match universal conditions. large & small. with this pattern. Plants grow in the golden ratio/phi pattern. Animals create smaller fractions of themselves through procreation (2 to make 1). Essentially. .
would seem to be symmetrically plausible that it would not exist if there were no gravity. Thus the speed of time is directly proportional to the amplitude of the gravitational flux. But in truth. it would seem to make more sense that reality should fall into an anarchy of perceptions. the human eye can only see between . Time itself. Such as the fact that within the entire spectrum. as it is being affected by gravitational pull. it would also mean that the present moment is the only thing that is actually happening. ‘the now is the only thing that exists. is based on an empirical residue of impressions.00007 cm (red) to . gamma rays. otherwise considered to be motion or time. etc. then as the no dimensional point was the only thing that would exist. if our new axiom of dimensions were to remain symmetrically true. To borrow a colloquialism from Buddhist doctrines. Our observation of time is based on a continuum of points we call moments that are stacked next to each other along a linear basis.We can even extend this philosophy into our observation of what we consider to be the 4th dimension. ultraviolet. where the gravity of a Black Hole becomes more intense the closer you get towards it’s center. time itself is being warped to the point that it speeds up. everything experienced is left to opinion & personal interpretation opposed to facts.’ We can see this even more prevalent in our observation of things like Black Holes. Without the use of tools for objective observation. living along an unchangeable line until we reach the point when we die. (Cosmic rays. It is theorized that as an object moves closer to the center of a Black Hole.00004 cm (violet) wavelength of the myriad types of light that the sun emits. Thus once the event horizon is crossed. is actually an illusion the same way a hologram can deceive the eyes. The past & the future are merely perceptions of our own experiences. Time is seemingly more abstract & complicated than can be put simply into a paper of postulates. like most of all-observational reality. x-rays. Time. we’re born at one point in time. not excluding light or time. It is almost alarming how limited the human senses are at actually comprehending reality considering every sense within human experience is completely subjective. nothing can escape it’s gravitational pull. radar. Time.) Although no human could ever truly know if their sensation of color like their sensation of Middle C is the same as . infrared. However.
as if there might be an under current of objective reality that filters through our senses. but a standard model for how economical & social sciences can be applied as well. it seems safe to assume that every human sees colors or hears tones. But fundamentally. or experiences other senses more or less alike. subtracted from. But in truth. To the beginner student of the academic & arduous practice of arithmetic. Thus a curious order runs through our perceptions. Thus mathematics is more of a symmetrical language that the universe expresses itself on. the principles are still the same.another’s. mathematics runs deep through in the veins of reality & doesn’t justify the ideal of humans creating the system that the universe itself expresses on. we would see a different perspective of the picture & instead of saying that humans invented mathematics. math was there before humans ever existed. (E. So perhaps if we were to reverse the axiom again. Although it may be called something else in another country or on another planet. as aforementioned. divided & multiplied. the principles have somehow morphed into the axiom that humans are the sole inventors mathematics. you can create a whole other unit that we respectively call 4. if you add 2 units of anything to another 2 units. With this ideal in mind. It took observational man & an analytical mind to realize that objects can be grouped together. Humans invented the characters that we use to categorize the ideas of groupings & their operations together. the core philosophies are commonly lost under mountains of equations used to practice the fundamentals principles. generally speaking of course. than just a system derived from human ingenuity to quantify the relations between observable objects or a theoretical framework on the . E=Mc^2) Becoming the basis of not just physical sciences. it is observationally understood that the mysterious nature of reality for some reason runs under mathematical principles. such as the character for the number one (1) or two (2) or the processing characters of addition (+) or subtraction (-) & so forth.g. It is the orthodox of mathematics that enables people to predict & discover natural. Like coal being pressurized for thousands of years to produce diamonds. symmetrical laws of the universe simply by the solution of equations. it should be said that humans discovered mathematics. added to. For in truth.
cycles of seasons. the number of Facebook friends. growth of a tree. calculating the distance of travel. calculating the time of travel. it is understood universally. Not just by knowing how humans can attain mastery over nature. Mathematics is the key to understanding the objective universe. Mathematics is the only objective language of reality that everything expresses on without personal or subjective interpretation. Those who truly understand mathematics are able to manipulate the stock market. the context of the words that you use in your conversations. No matter where you are from. airplane flights. or whom you speak too. the expression will always be the same.functions of numbers. Anything that can truly be measured is done under the principles of mathematics. how much force & fuel it would take to get there. build rocket ships & calculate their flight path. Thus mathematics is the only language in the universe that is purely symmetrical because no matter who or what perspective you are looking at from. It can be considered to be a language when you take into to account that understanding mathematics helps keep track of football scores. will always be the same regardless the situation. bank account statements. we can understand the esoteric culture that the universe presents itself on to us in it’s most abstract form of expression. the fundamental principles of the ideal being applied. This ideal of philosophic symmetry is symmetrical in & of itself because this philosophy applies to all things potentially able to be conceptualized. Symmetrical principles are what’s found to be the undertone of a concept so that no matter where you go. the fundamental structure of music. *All quoted definitions taken from Merriam-Webster 2011 dictionary *Dimensional dilemma based on the research of Nassim Haramein . An understanding of those concepts become deeper when the core that it stems from is recognized & embraced regardless of the words or tools to communicate the expression of the concept. If something can be understood mathematically. 2 + 2 will always equal the same fundamental understanding of what our number 4 represents. Thus by better understanding the expressions of a mathematical universe. but for how humans can relate themselves to the larger perspective that has already been established for far longer than humans have been known to exist. the movement of planets.