Marketing is the process used to determine what products or services may be of interest to customers, and the strategy to use in sales, communications and business development. It is an integrated process through which companies build strong customer relationships and create value for their customers and for themselves. 1.1.1 OUTLINE OF THE STUDY Marketing is used to identify the customer, satisfy the customer, and keep the customer. With the customer as the focus of its activities, marketing management is one of the major components of business management. The adoption of marketing strategies requires businesses to shift their focus from production to the perceived needs and wants of their customers as the means of staying profitable. 1.1.2 DEFINITION Marketing is defined by the AMA as "an organizational function and a set of processes for creating, communicating, and delivering value to customers and for managing customer relationships in ways that benefit the organization and its stakeholders."
"Marketing is the set of human activities directed at facilitating and consummating exchanges."- Philip Kotler
1.1.3 DEFINITION OF BRAND POSITIONING Brand Positioning probably the most common is identifying a market niche for a brand, product or service utilizing traditional marketing placement strategies. Positioning is defined as the way by which the marketers create impression in the customers mind.
1.1.4 Brand positioning process Effective Brand Positioning is contingent upon identifying and communicating a brand's uniqueness, differentiation and verifiable value. It is important to note that "me too" brand positioning contradicts the notion of differentiation and should be avoided at all costs. Generally, the brand positioning process involves: 1. Identifying the business's direct competition (could include players that offer your product/service amongst a larger portfolio of solutions) 2. Understanding how each competitor is positioning their business today (e.g. claiming to be the fastest, cheapest, largest, etc.) 3. Documenting the provider's own positioning as it exists today (may not exist if start up business) 4. Comparing the company's positioning to its competitors' to identify viable areas for differentiation 5. Developing a distinctive, differentiating and value-based brand positioning statement, key messages and customer value propositions.
1.1.5 Product positioning process Generally, the product positioning process involves: 1. Defining the market in which the product or brand will compete 2. Identifying the attributes that define the product 'space' 3. Collecting information from a sample of customers about their perceptions of each product on the relevant attributes 4. Determine each product's share of mind 5. Determine each product's current location in the product space 6. Determine the target market's preferred combination of attributes 1.1.6 Positioning concepts More generally, there are three types of positioning concepts: 1. Functional positions
o o o
Solve problems Provide benefits to customers Get favorable perception by investors and lenders
2. Symbolic positions
o o o o
Self-image enhancement Ego identification Belongingness and social meaningfulness Affective fulfillment
3. Experiential positions
Provide sensory stimulation Provide cognitive stimulation
Upscale restaurants.8 Repositioning a company It can be necessary .1. business approaches that were effective during healthy economies often become ineffective and it becomes necessary to change a firm's positioning. clients and regulators all needed to shift. rather than just a product line or brand. Repositioning a company involves more than a marketing challenge. the expectations of investors. Doing so involves repositioning the entire firm. When Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley suddenly shifted from investment to commercial banks. many of which often lack strong brands for individual product lines. may for the first time need to stress value as a sale tool.7 Measuring the positioning Positioning is facilitated by a graphical technique called perceptual mapping. 1. factor analysis.
.1. various survey techniques. and logic analysis.1.even urgent . POSE Analysis offers a somewhat more sophisticated approach than perceptual mapping and allows one to not only determine the positioning of a brand but also the overall strength of a brand's proposition. for example. and statistical techniques like multi dimensional scaling. In a prolonged recession. conjoint analysis. which previously flourished on expense account dinners and corporate events.to reposition an entire company. It involves making hard decisions about how a market is shifting and how a firm's competitors will react. employees. This is especially true of small and medium-sized firms. for example. and each company needed to influence how these perceptions changed.
Brand positioning is the ―space‖ that your services and solutions occupy in the minds of your target audience. It is the disciplined thinking that guides the basis for building relationships between brands and customers. lies in the mind of the buyer. Build a powerful perception of quality. Quality. Once you determine the way in which you can reach your market. It is the foundation to all communications and brand strategy. authors of The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding say the best way to increase perception of quality is to narrow the company’s focus. The right positioning incorporates strong values and differentiators that are important to your customers. Quality positioning Perception of quality is probably one of the most important elements for a brand to have and can be combined with any of the other prompts below. or the perception of quality. Brand Positioning permeates virtually everything we do. the next thing to look at is how you are going to lure your customer to try your brand.
. and you will succeed in creating a powerful brand. Al Reis and Laura Reis. Brand positioning is important in deciding where you want to position your brand within its category and relative to the competition. Here is a list of nine positioning types you can think of before deciding on which one you will attach to your brand: 1.
2. items that were considered to be a good ―value‖ meant that they were inexpensive. The advantage is that the message is clear. 3. Value positioning Although at one time. Unfortunately. 4. that stigma has fallen by the wayside.
. In fact. and the positioning will be credible if you stick to the facts about the product. Today. they explain.When you narrow a product’s focus. you become a specialist rather than a generalist. For instance. Southwest Airlines is probably the best example of how a company has been able to offer discount prices and still keep a strong brand identity. Feature-driven positioning More marketers rely on product/service features to differentiate their brands than any other method. The product or service does need to have some perk or difference to justify the higher price. or be of ―higher quality‖ than a generalist. feature-orientated stances are often rendered useless if the competition comes out with a faster or more advanced model. and a specialist is perceived to know more. Relational positioning One of the most effective ways to create interest in a brand is to send out a positioning prompt that resonates well with potential buyers. most of the other major airlines have followed Southwest’s lead by rolling out value-priced flights under new. brands that are considered a value are rising in popularity amongst consumers. co-branded names.
1. Aspiration positioning These are positioning prompts that offer prospects a place they might like to go. or a person they might like to be. 3. your competitors’ prices. problem/solution prompts show the consumer how a sticky situation can be relieved quickly and easily with the brand or service. Problem/solution positioning As the name implies. the high-end. Price An easily quantifiable factor is your prices vs. Brand Attributes What the brand delivers through features and benefits to consumers. Competitor attributes What the other brands in the market offer through features and benefits to consumers.
1. does your brand offer the cheap solution. 2. 6. 5. Consumer perceptions The perceived quality and value of your brand in consumer’s
minds (i. high price tag solution. etc..5. 4. or a state of mind they might like to achieve. Consumer Expectations What consumers expect to receive from the brand.e.
. the good value for the money solution.8 5 Factors of Brand Positioning
436 units of two-wheelers were sold in the country in 9MFY2005 with 256. 1 two wheeler company has posted growth of 14. 4.591 units exported during the first nine months of FY2005 (9MFY2005). the industry (excluding tractors) marked a growth of 17% over the corresponding previous. This is the thirteenth consecutive month where Hero Honda has sold more than 4 lakh
.2. 1. Hero Honda: Hero Honda the world’s no.822.35.1 INDIAN TWO-WHEELER INDUSTRY INTRODUCTION The Indian automotive industry consists of five segments: commercial vehicles. multi-utility vehicles & passenger cars.963 units sold in the domestic market and 453. The total two-wheeler sales of the Indian industry accounted for around 77. two-wheelers.613.1. and tractors. The two-wheeler sales have witnessed a spectacular growth trend since the mid nineties.933 units of two wheeler sold in the month of May 2010. The company has sold 5.2.2 TWO-WHEELERS: MARKET SIZE & GROWTH In terms of volume.75% in the month of May 2011 compared to May 2010. three-wheelers.00. With 5.5% of the total vehicles sold in the period mentioned.234 units of two wheeler in the month of May 2011 compared to 4.765 units exported.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE
Bajaj Auto has reported growth of 18.00 % in the month of May 2011.812 units in the month of May 2011 compared to 25.17.930 units in the month of May 2011 up by 18. This is by far company’s highest ever monthly sales for May month.69.04% in the month of May 2011 compared to May 2010.
. Total sales stood at 1.60% in the month of May 2011. The company reported month on month basis sales is grown by 12.818 units in the month of May 2011 TVS Motors: TVS Motors has posted growth of 17.033 units last year in the same period.81. Total sales stood at 38. The company has sold 3. The company sold 34.488 units in the month of May 2010.26. The company exported 1.54.980 units sold in the same period last year Yamaha India: Yamaha India has reported sales growth of 55.667 units sold in the month of May 2010.units and the firth time and consecutive three times more than 5 lakh plus sale in the history of company. Bajaj Auto: Country’s second largest two wheeler maker.56. The company has sold 1.85.44% compared to 1.989 units of motorcycle in the month of May 2011 compared to 2.476 units in the April 2011.58%.891 units in the month of May 2011 compared to 1.
842 units in the May 2010. The company sold 1.
Some of the features that deserve attention in respect of the Indian two wheeler segment are as mentioned:
The production of two wheelers in India is expected to reach a staggering 17. and increasing availability of fuel efficient two-wheeler models.723 units in the month of May 2011 compared to 1.45. 1. However. On month on month basis the company’s sales is up by 8. sales picked up thereafter mainly on the strength of an increase in the disposable income of middle-income salaried people (following the implementation of the Fifth Pay Commission's recommendations).3 SEGMENTAL GROWTH OF THE INDIAN TWO WHEELER INDUSTRY After facing its worst recession during the early 1990s. The company reported sales of 1.13%.72% in the month of May 2011.36.2. the industry bounced back with a 25% increase in volume sales in FY1995.85 million units by 2011-12.37.623 units in the month of April 2011.HMSI: India’s largest scooter manufacturing company Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India Ltd reported sales growth of 5. more than double of the current production level. higher access to relatively inexpensive financing.
The two-wheeler production capacity is to reach 22. Increasing availability of fuel-efficient and low-maintenance models. Hero Honda. Increasing urbanisation. Bajaj Auto and TVS Motor remain the leading players in terms of sales and popularity of their two wheelers. The key demand drivers for the growth of the twowheeler industry are as follows: ▪ Inadequate public transportation system.4 DEMAND DRIVERS: The demand for two-wheelers has been influenced by a number of factors over the past five years. Total investment for new capacity generation in two-wheeler segment is likely to be more than $2.78 million in 2006-07.2 billion (INR10. 1. Changes in the demographic profile. India is likely to export 1. which makes
two-wheelers the entrylevel vehicle. and
.31 million units in 2011-12 compared with 10.2. which creates a need for personal transportation. ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ Increased availability of cheap consumer financing in the past 3-4 years. Difference between two-wheeler and passenger car prices.000 in 2006-07. ▪ Steady increase in per capita income over the past five years. especially in the semi-urban and
rural areas.39 million two-wheelers in 2011-12 compared with 590. 000 core).
While the first two emerged as a response to demographic changes. these prominent sub-segments. 1. etc.
Increasing number of models with different features to satisfy diverse
consumer needs. the Indian two-wheeler industry is highly concentrated. and 4-stroke scooters. However.6 MANUFACTURERS: As the following graph indicates. Examples include 125cc motorcycles. Yamaha Motors India Ltd (Yamaha). viz.2. gearless scooters.2.5 MARKET CHARACTERISTICS The three main product segments in the two-wheeler category are scooters. Besides. The other key players in the two-wheeler industry are Kinetic Motor Company Ltd (KMCL). 100-125 cc gearless scooters.accounting for over 80% of the industry sales as in 9MFY2005. Bajaj Auto Ltd (Bajaj Auto) and TVS Motor Company Ltd (TVS) . product groups within these subsegments have gained importance in the recent years. While the demand drivers listed here operate at the broad level. the introduction of 4-stroke scooters has followed the imposition of stringent pollution control norms in the early 2000. The characteristics of each of the three broad segments. motorcycles and mopeds. other sub segments emerged. Kinetic Engineering Ltd (KEL). segmental demand is influenced by segment-specific factors. with three players-Hero Honda Motors Ltd (HHML). LML Ltd (LML).
. in response to evolving demographics and various other factors. Scooters.
accounting for 32% of the two-wheeler industry volumes in the country that year. the 100% owned subsidiary route .found favour in the early 2000s. Although the three players have dominated the market for a relative long period of time. and almost doubled its market share from 20% in FY2000 to 40% in 9MFY2005 to emerge as the market leader. as the demand started shifting towards motorcycles. was the main beneficiary. a 100% subsidiary of Honda. Japan. their individual market shares have undergone a major change.Majestic Auto Ltd (Majestic Auto). which had concentrated on the motorcycle segment. Bajaj Auto dominance arose from its complete hold over the scooter market. Bajaj Auto was the undisputed market leader till FY2000. 1. However. Royal Enfield Ltd (REL) and Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India (P) Ltd (HMSI). and joint ventures (HHML).2. A case in point is HMSI. HHML.8 TRENDS IN THE TWO-WHEELER INDUSTRY Companies raising capacity to meet the growing demand
1.that is. technology transfer to the Indian two-wheeler industry took place mainly through: licensing and technical collaboration (as in the case of Bajaj Auto and LML). Table 2 details the alliances of some major two-wheeler manufacturers in India.2. A third form . the company witnessed a gradual erosion of its market share.7 TECHNOLOGY Hitherto.
the company plans to set up a new plant. Most of the players have either expanded capacity.8 million units in FY2003 to 2. viz.All the major two-wheeler manufacturers.8 million units per annum (FY2003) as against total market sales of 3. In light of the increase in demand for motorcycles. TVS. HHML increased the capacity of its plants from 1. The move has been prompted by the rapid growth reported by the motorcycles segment since FY1995. Since its entry in the Indian market during FY2002. HMSI and others. have increased their manufacturing capacities in the recent past.8 million units in FY2002. HMSI has aggressively expanded its capacity.
.25 million in FY2004 and has been able to achieve 92% capacity utilisation. The total capacity of these players stood at 7. Bajaj Auto. or converted their existing capacities for scooters and mopeds into those for manufacturing motorcycles. HHML.
The type of business was partnership within the family contain 6 members.1. the Nagappa motors pvt Ltd began to work hard to extend their services in order to ensure customer satisfaction at all level to the maximum extent possible. Palaniappan & Mr. hard work and progress achieved by them in the field two wheeler business.
. P. They established this Nagappa motors pvt Ltd at Balfour road. appointed in the style of ―Nagappa motors pvt Ltd‖ as the Hero Honda authorized dealer for the Chennai District in the year 1985. New Delhi after seeing their sincere.
The Nagappa motors pvt Ltd is the dealer of the Hero Honda company in Chennai. The founder of the Nagappa motors pvt Ltd Mr. LTD. in the year 1982 and commenced the Hero Honda moped two wheeler business in chennai. They started their workshop at kilpauk & perambur in the name of ―Nagappa motors pvt Ltd‖ In the years 1994. P. Besides improving their business to the Optimum level.3 COMPANY PROFILE
PROFILE OF THE NAGAPPA MOTORS PVT. they started their automated service center exclusively or the service of Hero Honda two wheeler. Muthu palaniappan.
ft. they are concentrating and hard to achieve ―CUSTOMERS QUALITY‖ which is their MOTTO. The showroom is functioning in a building with floor area of 2500sq. Their automated service center is situated in their building with total area of 7000sq.Sale of Hero Honda spare parts required by the customer are also being under taken at this automated service center also functioning well to achieve their goal.
Sales of Hero Honda Motor cycle Year No.1 company in the sales two wheelers they are also trying their best level to contribute their share in their Endeavour to maintain their above success in the coming years also. 300 numbers of two wheelers are being sold monthly in this showroom. At Perambur and average service of 2000 vehicles per month is being undertaken in this center. Motor cycle Source: For the last five years sales report of Nagappa motors pvt ltd. Their objective is to become world’s No. Besides their hard and sincere efforts to maximize the sales and service of Hero Honda two wheelers. Kilpauk on an average.ft on the Balfour road. 2004 – 05 of 4200 2005 – 06 4600 2006 – 07 5100 2007 – 08 6000 2008 – 09 7600
64 26. performance of the two wheeler and the expectations are fulfilled by the produces of these vehicles.6 10.The following table shows the trend growth of sales of two wheelers in Nagappa motors pvt ltd Chennai.67
From the above it is clear that a sale of two wheelers keeps an increasing steady year after year.
.No. Years Sales Increase Decrease % on
Increase or Decrease 1 2 3 4 5 2004 – 05 2005 – 06 2006 – 07 2007 – 08 2008 – 09 4200 4600 5100 6000 7600 400 500 900 1600 9. The reasons were better dealer service.86 17. S.
Hero Honda started in 1984 as a joint venture between Hero Cycles of India and Honda of Japan. A joint venture between the Hero Group and Honda Motor Company was established in 1984 as the Hero Honda Motors Limited At Dharuhera India. A popular advertising campaign based on the slogan 'Fill it . These plants together are capable of churning out 3 million bikes per year. In 2010. Contents ―Hero‖ is the brand name used by the Munjal brothers for their flagship company Hero Cycles Ltd. Hero Group bought the shares held by Honda. When Honda decided to move out of the joint venture.Shut it . it was reported that Honda planned to sell its stake in the venture to the Munjal family. the company introduced motorcycles that were popular in India for their fuel economy and low cost. in August 2011 the company was renamed Hero MotoCorp with a new corporate identity.HERO MOTOCORP Formerly Hero Honda is a motorcycle and scooter manufacturer based in India. Subsequently. The technology in the bikes of Hero Honda for almost 26 years (1984–2010) has come from the Japanese counterpart Honda Hero MotoCorp has three manufacturing facilities based at Dharuhera. Munjal family and Honda group both own 26% stake in the Company. Gurgaon in Haryana and at Haridwar in Uttarakhand.
.Forget it' that emphasised the motorcycle's fuel efficiency helped the company grow at a double-digit pace since inception. During the 1980s. The company is the largest two wheeler manufacturer in India. In 2010.
1956 -. 1991 -.Hero Honda motorcycle CBZ launched. 1989 -.Hero Cycles becomes largest bicycle manufacturer in India.HISTORY Hero MotoCorp was started in 1984 as Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 2003 -.Hero Honda motorcycle Street launched. 2001 -.Hero Honda .Hero Honda motorcycle CD 100 launched.Hero Honda Motors Ltd.Joint Collaboration Agreement with Honda Motor Co. 1997 -. Ltd. 2002 -. 1994 -.Hero Honda motorcycle CD 100 SS launched. 1983 -. 1999 -. Hero Honda motorcycle Passion Plus and Hero Honda motorcycle Karizma launched.Formation of Hero Cycles in Ludhiana 1975 -.Hero Honda motorcycle Sleek launched.Hero Honda motorcycle Dawn and Hero Honda motorcycle Ambition launched. motorcycle CD Dawn.Hero Honda motorcycle Splendor launched. Hero Honda motorcycle Splendor. Japan signed Shareholders Agreement signed 1984 -.Hero Honda motorcycle Passion and Hero Honda Joy launched. incorporated 1985 -.
New Models of Hero Honda motorcycles Pleasure.2004 -. 2008 -. Glamour FI.New Models of Hero Honda motorcycle Splendor NXG. November 2011 -.New Models of Hero Honda motorcycle Karizma:Karizma . August 2011 -.New Models of Hero Honda motorcycles Glamour.Hero and Honda part company. Hero Honda motorcycle CD Deluxe.Hero Honda motorcycle Ambition 135 and Hero Honda motorcycle CBZ launched. Hero Honda motorcycle Glamour. New Models of Hero Honda motorcycle CD Deluxe. 2007 -. Hero Honda motorcycle Achiever and Hero Honda Scooter Pleasure. thus forming Hero MotoCorp and Honda moving out of the Hero Honda joint venture.Hero launched its first ever Off Road Byke Named Hero "Impulse". CBZ Xtreme. Glamour Fi and Hero Honda motorcycle Passion Pro launched. Karizma launched. 2005 -. Glamour.Hero Honda motorcycle Super Splendor. New Models of Hero Honda motorcycle Passion Plus and Hero Honda motorcycle Hunk launched. 2009 -.
.ZMR and limited edition of Hero Honda motorcycle Hunk launched 2010 -.New Models of Hero Honda motorcycle Splendor Pro and New Hero Honda motorcycle Hunk and New Hero Honda Motorcycle Super Splendor launched. 2011 -. New licensing arrangement signed between Hero and Honda. CBZ Xtreme.
Hero Honda sells more two wheelers than the second. Hero Honda's bike Hero Honda Splendor sells more than one million units per year. third and fourth placed two-wheeler companies put together.
. a growth of 12% over last year. the Hero Group relied on their Japanese partner Honda for the technology in their bikes. the company sold 3.
COMPANY PERFORMANCE During the fiscal year 2008-09. In the same year. the Board of Directors of the Hero Honda Group have decided to terminate the joint venture between Hero Group of India and Honda of Japan in a phased manner. So there are concerns that the Hero Group might not be able to sustain the performance of the Joint Venture alone. Since the beginning. The Hero Group would buy out the 26% stake of the Honda in JV Hero Honda. the company had a market share of 57% in the Indian market. Under the joint venture Hero Group could not export to international markets (except Sri Lanka) and the termination would mean that Hero Group can now export.TERMINATION OF HONDA JOINT VENTURE
In December 2010.7 million bikes.
CD 100 SS. Splendor+. Ambition 135 CBZ. CD Deluxe. Passion+. Splendor+ (Limited Edition).MOTORCYCLE MODELS Category: Hero Honda motorcycles Sleek Achiever Ambition 133. CBZ Star. Karizma ZMR FI Passion. Super Splendor. Splendor PRO
. Karizma R. CBZ Xtreme CD 100.I Hunk Karizma. Glamour F. Passion Pro Pleasure Splendor. Splendor NXG. CD Deluxe (Self Start) Glamour. CD Dawn.
symbol. With this strategy the responsibility of the brand was solely the
concern of the marketing department (Davis 2002). Branding and the role of brands. intended to identify the goods and services of one seller or group of seller sand to differentiate them from those of competitors‖ (p. term. Aaker and Joachmisthaler (2000) discuss the traditional branding model where a brand management team was responsible for creating and coordinating the brand’s management program. 404). American Marketing Association (AMA) definition of a brand is ―a name.
. his focus was the short-term financial results of single brands and single products in single markets. sign. or a combination of them. or design. A traditional definition of a brand was ―the name. were subject to constant review and redefinition. associated with one or more items in the product line that is used to identify the source of character of the item‖ (Kotler 2000). The basic objective was the coordination with the manufacturing and sales departments in order to solve any problem concerning sales and market share. as traditionally understood. In this situation. the brand manager was not high in the company’s hierarchy.REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The central concern of brand positioning literature experienced a dramatic shift in the last decade.
2002. to occupy a particular space in the market The commercial utility of positioning The entire enterprise of branding itself can be understood as an exercise in positioning. 2002). benefit-driven positioning. identification and understanding of a product is intrinsic values become critical (Fill. Hankinson and
. Alternative positioning types. feature-driven prompts. There is a great deal of subjective interpretation and high degree of risk involved in choosing to seek one positioning strategy over another (Upshaw 1995). using product experience and marketing initiatives to increase profitability by associating trademarks with compelling consumer values (Marsden.The brand was always referred to as a series of tactics and never like strategy. In markets where the intensity of rivalry and competition are increasing and buyers have greater choice. p 323). competition driven positioning. target driven positioning. Positioning is about visibility and recognition of what a product/service represents for a buyer. Positioning is the process whereby information about the organization or the product is communicated in such a way that the object is perceived by the consumer/stakeholder to be differentiated from the competition. inspirational positioning and value positioning. The model itself was tactical and reactive rather than strategic and visionary (Aaker and Joachimsthaler 2000).In general. Positioning are not verifiable scientific hypotheses. most companies thought that focusing on the latest and greatest advertising campaign meant focusing on the brand (Davis and Dunn 2002).
emotional/psychological positioning. problem/solution prompts.
• They serve as an integrated base with a personality. • There is a credible brand fit. secondly. first indicate to what category the brand should be associated and compared with. According to Upshaw (1995) positioning campaigns that work often share common characteristics that can serve as a guide for marketers. but what it means in someone is life is derived from its positioning. Positioning can be seen as a two step process. • Their promises are backed up with persuasive support. • They promise relevant benefits. 1997).Cowking (1997) states that a brands positioning defines the brands point of reference with respect to the competition.
. • They are supported by sufficient market spending.
How a brand is recognized in the marketplace is based largely on its personality. To identify a brands position and its future position opportunities (Aaker 1996). Some of the most important factors are.
According to Kapferer (1997) positioning does not reveal the entire brand is richness of meaning nor reflect all of its potential. indicate what the brands essential difference is in comparison to other products and brands of that category (Kapferer. • They are correctly and clearly targeted. The brand is restricted once reduced to four questions.
1 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
1. 3. This makes to know how effectively the product reaches the customer mind and how to retain the customer in the market. 4. 2. The study helps to gather information about consumer thoughts and various competing concern of the same product.
.2. The study helps to know the brand positioning towards hero Honda. The study reveals a lot of information such as awareness perception and consumers expectation towards the product.
This will helps them to create their brand image much better than present condition 4. Through this they come to know how much the consumer feel satisfy and all their opinion about the brand. This will help them to know the level of customer aware about the brand of hero Honda 2.2 NEED FOR THE STUDY
1. Through this hero Honda can know their brand positioning in market 3.
4. To give suitable suggestions to improve the brand image in customers mind.3. To identify the awareness level towards the product of Hero Honda. 3.2 Secondary objective 1.1 Primary objective To study on brand positioning about the product of hero Honda in Chennai city.
. To find out the customer attitude level towards the product of Hero Honda.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
2. To know the customer satisfaction level towards the Hero Honda.2.
The respondents might be given biased informations.LIMITATION
The survey has been conducted to the customers in Chennai city. It is very difficult to cover the entire market because of the study period was only 60 days.
. Most of the customers show hesitation to fill the question.
S.NO 1 2 3 4 6
PARTICULAR Type of research Type of research design Population size Sample size Type of data
DETAIL Descriptive research Descriptive Chennai 120 (a) Primary data (b) Secondary data
Data collection method
Data collection instrument
Statistical tool for analysis
(i) Simple percentage analysis (ii) Chi-square analysis (iii) Weighted Average Method (iv) correlation
NO GENDER NO OF RESPONDENTS 1 2 Male Female Total 90 30 120 PERCENTAGE % 75 25 100
CHART 3.1.1 GENDER S.1 GENDER
25% Male Female 75%
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that the majority of the respondents 90% are male and few no of respondents 30% are female.DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPERTATION
% of respondents
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Below 25
14.5% 15.NO 1 2 3 4 5 AGE Below 25 26-30 31-40 41-50 Above 50 TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 36 27 17 19 21 120 PERCENTAGE 30 22.5%) of the respondents at the age group of 26-30.83%) of respondents are under the age group of 41-50.5 14.5) of respondents are under the age group of above 50.
.TABLE 3. (22. and only few number (15.2 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION
35 30% 22. few number (17.1.17 15.17%
particulars INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that almost 30% of the respondents at the age group of below 25. and very few number of respondents are under the age group of 31-40.2 AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION S.83% 17.5 100
3 CLASSIFICATION BASED ON QUALIFICATION
40% % of respondents 30% 20% 10% 0% SSLC ITI HSC particulars Diploma Others 15% 9% 37% 28%
INTERPRETATION: 37% of the respondents are belonging to SSLC.TABLE 3.1.NO PARTICULARS NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 2 3 4 5
SSLC HSC Graduate/diploma Post Graduate Others Total
37 15 28 9 11 100
37 15 28 9 11 100
CHART 3. 9% of Respondents are having diploma
.1.3 CLASSIFICATION BASED ON QUALIFICATION
17% 10% 5%
INTERPRETATION: Almost(50%) of respondents i. majority (20.83%) of the respondents are government.TABLE 3. and only few no of respondents are others. are private.4 OCCUPATION S.NO 1 2 3 4 5 OCCUPATION Government Private Professional Student Others TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 25 60 12 17 6 120 PERCENTAGE % 20.
.83% 14..1.1.17 5 100
CHART 3.4 OCCUPATION
50% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
% of respondents
20.e.83 50 10 14.
51.67%) of respondents are earning 5001-10000.5 INCOME WISE CLASSIFICATION
60 50 % of respondents 40 30 20 10 0 Upto 5000 24.67%
9. (24.5 INCOME WISE CLASSIFICATION S.16 51.NO 1 2 3 4 5 INCOME Upto 5000 5001-10000 1001-15000 15001-20000 Above 20001 TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 29 62 11 10 8 120 PERCENTAGE % 24.33 6.67 100
CHART 3.1.16%) of the respondents are earning upto 5000.17% 8.1. and only few no of respondents are earning above 20001.33% 6.67 9.TABLE 3.67%
INTERPRETATION: Almost (51.
NO 1 2
PARTICULAR Yes No TOTAL
NO OF RESPONDETNS 110 10 120
PERECENTAGE 91 9 100
CHART 3.6 AWARING OF HERO HONDA TWO WHEELER
.. are not aware of the Hero Honda two wheeler.1.6 AWARING OF HERO HONDA TWO WHEELER
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that (91%) of respondents are aware of Hero Honda two wheeler and only very few (9%) of respondents i.e.TABLE 3.
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
% of respondents
2.7 INFORMATION ABOUT HERO HONDA
43.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Media Friends Neighbours Relation Others TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 52 36 5 3 24 120 PERCENTAGE 43.7 INFORMATION ABOUT HERO HONDA S. of respondents (3%) are gets from neighbors and relations.TABLE 3.34 30 4.
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that the majority (43%) of the respondents are get the information from media and (30%) of respondents gets information from friends and most of respondents gets information from others and very few no (4%).1.5 20 100
.TABLE 3.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Yamaha Hero Honda Honda Bajaj TVS TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 10 60 15 20 15 120 PERCENTAGE 8 50 13 17 12 100
.8 BRAND MOSTLY PREFER FOR TWO WHEELER S.1.e.8 BRAND MOSTLY PREFER FOR TWO WHEELER
50% 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
% of respondents
17% 8% 13% 12%
INTERPRETATION : Almost (50%) of respondents i. are mostly prefer hero Honda two wheeler and few no of respondents (17%) are prefer Bajaj and also some of
the respondents prefer Honda and TVS and very few no of respondents (8%) are prefer Yamaha.1.
NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Splendor Passion Hunk CBZ ZMR TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 53 37 12 15 3 120 PERCENTAGE 44 31 10 12 3 100
CHART 3.TABLE 3.1.
.1. (3%) are preferred HUNK.9 POSSESS THE SUB BRAND OF HERO HONDA
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 44% 31%
% of respondents
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that majority (44%) of the respondents are possess the subbrand of the Hero Honda is SPLENDER and most of the respondents (31%) is prefer PASSION and Only very few no of respondents (10%). (12%). CBZ and ZMR.9 POSSESS THE SUB BRAND OF HERO HONDA S.
10 BRAND PREFERANCE OF HERO HONDA
31% 26% 16% 3% 24%
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
% Of respondents
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that most of the respondents (31%) are prefer that Hero Honda brand is giving the best quality and also (26%) of the respondents prefer that hero Honda brand is reasonable price and (24%) of respondents said that hero Honda is brand image and only few (3%) of the respondents for show room.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Reasonable price Attractive design Quality Brand image Show room TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 31 19 37 29 4 120 PERCENTAGE 26 16 31 24 3 100
.TABLE 22.214.171.124 BRAND PREFERANCE OF HERO HONDA S.
TABLE 3.11 ATTRACTION OF PURCHASE THE BRANDED PRODUCT S.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Brand name Price Fuel capacity Model Resale value TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 28 35 38 14 5 120 PERCENTAGE 23 29 32 12 4 100
CHART 3.1.11 ATTRACTION OF PURCHASE THE BRANDED PRODUCT
32% 29% 23
35 % of respondents 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Brand name
Fuel capacity particulars
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that majority (32%) of the respondents are view that fuel capacity is attract to purchase that branded product and also (29%) of the respondents for favorable price of the branded product and only few (4%) of the respondents view that resale value.1.
1.1.12 CUSTOMER USAGE OF HERO HONDA S.TABLE 3. (16%) are using for past 3-5 years 1-6 months.12 CUSTOMER USAGE OF HERO HONDA
30 20 10 0 1-6 months 7-12 months 1-3 years 16% 26% 17% 20% 21%
% of respondents
3-5 years Above 5 years
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that majority (26%) of the respondents are view that they using hero Honda for past 7-6 months and almost (21%) of the respondents are using Hero Honda for above 5 years and also (20%) of the respondents using hero Honda for 3-5 year and few no of respondents i (17%).
.NO 1 2 3 5 PARTICUALR 1-6 months 7-12 months 1-3 years 3-5 years Above 5 years TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 19 31 21 4 24 25 120 PERCENTAGE 16 26 17 20 21 100
13 INFLUENCE OF BRAND ON PURCHASE DECISION
% of respondents 60 40 20 0 Strongly agree Agree Moderate 46% 25% 21% 7% 1% Disagree Strongly disagree particulars
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that the table shows majority (46%) of the respondents are strongly agree on influence of brand on purchase decision and most of the respondents i..13 INFLUENCE OF BRAND ON PURCHASE DECISION
S.1. (1%) are responsible for disagree and strongly disagree.NO 1 2 3 4 5
PARTICULAR Strongly agree Agree Moderate Disagree Strongly disagree TOTAL
NO OF RESPONDENTS 55 30 25 8 2 120
PERCENTAGE 46 25 21 7 1 100
.e. (25%) are agree with the influence of brand purchase and (21%) are moderate with purchase decision and very few no of respondents (7%).1.TABLE 3.
(1%) are disagree and strongly disagree with the price of the product..14 REASONABLE PRICE OF THE PRODUCT
50 % of respondents 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree Moderate particulars 50% 27% 17% 5% Disagree
1% Strongly disagree
INTERPRETATION: Almost (50%) that the table show that majority of the respondents are strongly agree with that the product of the price is reasonable and (27%) of the respondents are agree the price is reasonable and (17%) of the respondents are moderate with the price and some of the respondents i.(5%).1.TABLE 3.1.e.
.NO 1 2 3 4 5
PARTICULAR Strongly agree Agree Moderate Disagree Strongly disagree TOTAL
NO OF RESPONDENTS 60 32 20 7 1 120
PERCENTAGE 50 27 17 5 1 100
CHART 3.14 REASONABLE PRICE OF THE PRODUCT
1.1..TABLE 3.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICUALR Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 58 34 18 8 2 120 PERCENTAGE 48 28 15 7 2 100
. (2%) are poor and very poor.15 QUALITY OF THE PRODUCT
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 48%
% of respondents
15% 7% 2% Excellent Good Average particulars Poor Very poor
INTERPRETATION: This table show that majority (48%) of the respondents are view that quality of the product is excellent and (28%) of the respondents are view that good in product quality and (15%) of the respondents is responsible for average and some of the respondents i.15 QUALITY OF THE PRODUCT S.e.
NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 55 30 25 6 4 120 PERCENTAGE 46 25 21 5 3 100
CHART 3.16 FEEL ABOUT PRODUCT FEATURE
50 % of respondents 40 30 20 10 0
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that the table shows majority (46%) of the respondents are feel excellent about product feature and (25%) of the respondents are view that good about product feature and (21%) of the respondents are average about feature of product and some of the respondents i.
.1. (3%) are responsible for poor and very poor.e.TABLE 3.1.16 FEEL ABOUT PRODUCT FEATURE S.(5%)..
1.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 60 40 15 4 1 120 PERCENTAGE 50 33 13 3 1 100
CHART 3.1. (1%) of the respondent are responsible for poor and very poor.17 PEER GROUP INFLUENCE IN PURCHASE DECISION S.
.TABLE 3.17 PEER GROUP INFLUENCE IN PURCHASE DECISION
50% 50 40 30 20 10 0 Excellent % of respondents 33% 13% 3% Good Average 1%
Poor Very poor
INTERPRETATION: Almost (50%) of the respondents are view that excellent of peer group influence in purchase decision and (33%) are view that good in peer group of purchase decision and (13%) of the respondents are average and very few (3%).
.1.18 SATISFACTION OF HERO HONDA ADVERTISEMENT S.TABLE 3.18 SATISFACTION OF HERO HONDA ADVERTISEMENT
70 60 % of respondents 50 40 30 20 10 0 Highly satisfied Satisfied Moderate particulars 13% 20% 5% Dissatisfied 0 Highly dissatisfied 62%
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that almost (62%) of the respondents are satisfied with the hero Honda advertisement and (20%) of the respondents moderate with advertisement and (13%) of the respondents are highly satisfied and only very few are dissatisfied and none of the respondents are dissatisfied.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR NO OF RESPONDENTS Highly satisfied 16 Satisfied 74 Moderate 24 Dissatisfied 6 Highly dissatisfied 0 TOTAL 120 PERCENTAGE 13 62 20 5 0 100
19 OVERALL LEVEL OF SATISFACTION
% of respondents 60 40 20 0 Highly satisfaction Satisfaction Moderate Dissatisfaction Highly dissatisfaction particulars 53% 30% 12% 4% 1%
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that the table shows majority (53%) of the respondents are highly satisfied with overall level of satisfaction and (30%) of the respondents are satisfied and (12%) of the respondents are moderate and very few (4%).1.TABLE 3.1.
. (1%) are dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied.19 OVERALL LEVEL OF SATISFACTION S.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR NO OF RESPONDENTS Highly satisfaction 63 Satisfaction 36 Moderate 15 Dissatisfaction 5 Highly 1 dissatisfaction TOTAL 120 PERCENTAGE 53 30 12 4 1 100
are Bajaj and Yamaha two wheeler availability and very few (7%) are response for Honda.20 AVAILABLE OF TWO WHEELER MARKET S.1..NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Hero Honda Yamaha TVS Honda Bajaj TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 34 14 42 8 22 120 PERCENTAGE 28 12 35 7 18 100
CHART 3.(18%) .20 AVAILABLE OF TWO WHEELER MARKET
35% 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Hero Honda Yamaha TVS Particulars 28% 18% 12% 7%
% of respondents
INTERPRETATION: Majority (35%) of the respondents view that TVS brand is available in two wheeler market and also (28%) of the respondents are view that the Hero Honda is available in two wheeler market and few no of respondents i. (12%).
INTERPRETATION: This table show that the majority of the respondents i.1.(29.5%) are view that HERO HOND and BAJAJ are fast moving brand in two wheelers marker and mostly (25%) of the respondents are view that TVS and only few supported for HONDA and very few response for YAMAHA
..21 BRAND RANKING OF TWO WHEELER
29.TABLE 3.21 BRAND RANKING OF TWO WHEELER S.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Hero Honda Yamaha TVs Honda Bajaj TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 35 5 30 15 35 120 PERCENTAGE 29.5 4 25 12 29.e.5% % of respondents 30 20 10 0 Hero Honda Yamaha TVs 4% 12% 25% 29.1.
22 RATE THE DESIGN OF HERO HONDA S.22 RATE THE DESIGN OF HERO HONDA
40 30 20 10 0 Excellent Good Average 25% 21% 12% 4% 38%
% of respondents
Poor Very poor
INTERPRETATION: This table show that rate the design of hero Honda the majority of the respondents i..e.TABLE 3.
.1..NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Excellent Good Average Poor Very poor TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 30 45 25 15 5 120 PERCENTA GE 25 38 21 12 4 100
CHART 3.e.(38%) are view it was good and (25%) are view that excellent rate of design and (21%) of the respondents are average with rate of design and some of the respondents i. (4%) are responsible for poor and very poor.(12%).1.
.e.23 BEST MEDIA FOR ADVERTISMENT
50 40 30 20 10 0 46% 30%
% of respondents
8% 3% T. (46%) are responsible of TV advertisement and mostly (30%) of the respondents are view that newspaper is the best and some of the respondents i.TABLE 3.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR T.(13%) are responsible for magazine and very few responsible for bit notice and radio..1.V Newspaper Radio Bit notice Magazines TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 55 36 9 4 16 120 PERCENTAGE 46 30 8 3 13 100
CHART 3..e.V Newspaper Radio Bit notice
INTERPRETATION : This table show that the best media for the advertisement of hero Honda that is majority of the respondents i.1.23 BEST MEDIA FOR ADVERTISMENT S.
INTERPRETATION: This table show that the majority of the respondents i.24 BRAND RANKING OF TWO WHEELER
29..e.(29.TABLE 3.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Hero Honda Yamaha TVs Honda Bajaj TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 35 5 30 15 35 120 PERCENTAGE 29.5% % of respondents 30 20 10 0 Hero Honda Yamaha TVs 4% 12% 25% 29.5 4 25 12 29.1.5%) are view that HERO HOND and BAJAJ are fast moving brand in two wheelers marker and mostly (25%) of the respondents are view that TVS and only few supported for HONDA and very few response for YAMAHA
CHART 3.1.24 BRAND RANKING OF TWO WHEELER S.
25 PREFERANCE OF PRICE RANGE OF HERO HONDA S.51000-60000 and (35%) of the respondents are prefer Rs.(38%) are mostly prefer that price range of the Hero Honda is Rs.e. 6100070000
Rs.NO 1 2 3 4 5 PARTICULAR Rs. 71000-80000 Above 80000 TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS 43 46 15 12 4 120 PERCENTAGE 35 38 12 10 3 100
CHART 3.40000-50000 and (12%) of the respondents are prefer Rs.
. 61000-70000 Rs.TABLE 3.1.80000..1.25 PREFERANCE OF PRICE RANGE OF HERO HONDA
% of respondents
40 30 20 10 0
12% 10% 3% Rs. 7100080000
INTERPRETATION: It is inferred that majority of the respondents i.61000-70000 and (10%) of the respondents are prefer Rs. 51000-60000 Rs. 40000-50000 Rs.71000-80000 and only few (3%) of the respondents is above Rs. 4000050000 Rs. 5100060000 Rs.
. ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS (H1) H1: There is relationship between brand preference and attraction of purchase the branded product. CHI-SQUARE TEST
TABLE ( 10 & 11 )
Chi-square test was conducted to analyze the relationship between the brand preference and the attraction of purchase the branded product.1. BRAND PREFERENCE VS ATTRACTION OF PURCHASE THE BRANDED PRODUCT NULL HYPOTHESIS (Ho) H0: There is no relationship between brand preference and attraction of purchase the branded product.
TABLE 1 OBSERVED FREQUENCY Two wheeler Attribute Brand name 1 12 6 5 14 28 price Fuel capacity 6 16 3 7 3 35 2 24 2 5 5 38 1 6 3 3 1 14 Model Resale value 0 2 1 0 2 5 TOTAL
Yamaha Hero Honda Honda Bajaj TVS TOTAL
10 60 15 20 15 120
CALCULATION OF EXPECTED FREQUENCY Row total x Column total E = -----------------------------------Grand Total
33 14 3.50 0.75 2.33 1.83 4.62 0.TABLE 2 Two wheeler Attribute Brand name 2.5 4.67 3.38 5.17 19 4.17 7 1.5 Price Fuel capacity 2.83 0.38 3.91 17.75 1.75 Model Resale value 0.62
Yamaha Hero Honda Honda Bajaj TVS
.75 6.42 2.33 4.5 4.
(O-E)2/E 0.17 0.77 9.75 0.43 0.28 0.29 0.10 1.37 0.024 0.38 4.43 1.14 0.33
(O-E)2 1.02 0.14 0.22 0.029 0.18 4 2.25 6.13 1.62 5.56 0.77 0.25 25 1 0.31 0.83 6.17 1.11 1.33 2.91 3.37 1.FREQUENCY VALUES
O 1 6 2 1 0 12 16 24 6 2 6 3 2 3 1 5 7 5 3
E 2.5 4.55 1.23 0.42 14 17.90 7.75 1.5 3.76 3.25 1.89 0.5 19 7 2.19
.28 0.78 0.62 4.59 0.43 0.56 1.33 2.
01 0.0 4 3 5 1 2
0.69 0.75 0.62
0.75 1.25 1.32 3.062 0.90
0.43 0.83 3.5 4.38 4.90 0.56 1.07 0.83 0.254
DEGREE OF FREEDOM = (R-1) (C-1) = (5-1) (5-1) = (4) (4) = 16
V So H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected
CONCLUSION: Hence there is no significant between brand preference and attraction of purchase the branded product.296 Tabulated value =26.254 At 5% level of significance 16 is 26.FORMULA FOR CHI-SQUARE: χ2=Σ(O-E)2/E Calculated value = 17.
.V < T.296
Since calculated value is less than the tabulated value C.
12& 126.96.36.199 Correlation between which brand is always available in two wheeler market with which brand is fastly moving two wheeler in market. CORRELATION
TABLE: 3.3.1. HERO HONDA X Y 34 35 YAMAHA 14 5 TVS 42 30 HONDA 8 15 BAJAJ 22 35
Calculation of simple correlation
X 34 14 42 8 22 ΣX=120
Y 35 5 30 15 35 ΣY=120
X2 1156 196 1764 64 484 ΣX2=3664
Y2 1225 25 900 225 1225 ΣY2=3600
XY 1190 70 1260 120 770 ΣXY=3410
5 is said to be highly correlated and the value for this correlation is 0.9.FORMULA FOR CORRELATION
ΣXY √ ΣX2 ΣY2
3410 √ 3664*3600
0. So it is correlated.
The value more than 0.
WEIGHTED AVERAGE Customer view on factors influencing buying decision:
OVER ALL SATISFACTION 63 36 15 5 1
1 2 3 4 5
58 34 18 8 2
60 32 20 7 1
16 74 24 6 0
QUALITY RANK(X) 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS (W) 58 34 18 8 2 120 WEIGHTAGE (WX) 58 68 54 32 10 222
Weighted average = ∑WX/∑W =222/120 = 1.3.85
PRICE RANK(X) 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENTS (W) 60 32 20 7 1 120 WEIGHTAGE (WX) 60 64 60 28 5 217
Weighted average = ∑WX/∑W =217/120 = 1.80
RANK(X) 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
NO OF RESPONDENTS (W) 16 74 24 6 0 120
WEIGHTAGE (WX) 16 148 72 24 0 260
Weighted average = ∑WX/∑W =260/120 = 2.17
OVER ALL SATISFACTION
RANK(X) 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
NO OF RESPONDENTS (W) 63 36 15 5 1 120
WEIGHTAGE (WX) 63 72 45 20 5 205
Weighted average = ∑WX/∑W =205/120 = 1.70
The following are the weighted average for customers buying decision towards Hero Honda
PARTICULARS QUALITY PRICE ADVERTISEMENT OVER ALL SATISFACTION
WEIGHTAGE 1.85 1.80 2.17 1.70
RANK 2 3 1 4
Since advertisement have the highest rank ; Therefore it is the factor which influencing the customers buying decision towards Hero Honda.
.(24. 9% of Respondents are having diploma
Almost the no of respondents i..e.. majority of the respondents i. (30%) at the age group of below 25. Almost of the respondents i.
Almost no of the respondents i. majority of the respondents i. Majority of the respondents i.e.
50% of the respondents mostly preferred hero honda two wheeler .FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
It is inferred that the majority of the respondents 90% are male and few no of respondents 30% are female.e..16%) are earning upto 5000 Majority of the respondents i. 91% are aware of hero honda two wheeler in the market.
Almost of respondents i.e. (22. (51.e. (44%) are possessing the sub-brand of hero honda splender.e. (43%) are get information for media.. (31%) are prefer hero honda brand giving the best quality and only few 24% of respondent for brand image.e..67%) are earning 5001-10000.5%) at the age group of 26-30
It is inferred that 37% of the respondents are belonging to SSLC.e.
Around 46%of the respondents are strongly agreed on influence of brand on purchase decision. 32% are view that fuel capacity is attract to purchase that branded product.e.
. It is found that 28% of the respondents are view that the hero honda is available in two wheeler market. Around 29..5% are view that hero honda and bajaj are the fast moving brand two wheeler in the market. Majority nof the respondents i.
Almost 46% of the respondents are felt excellent about product feature.e. 48% of the respondents are view that hero honda product quality is excellent. 50% of respondents are view that excellent of peer group influent in purchase decision.(50%) are favourable and strongly agree that hero honda is providing that the product of the price is reasonable value...e.
Majority of the respondents i. Almost of the respondents (62%) are satisfied with the hero honda advertisement
Majority of the respondents i.(53%) are highly satisfied with overall performance of hero honda.
. Majority of the respondents i.
.. (38%) are preferred the price range of 5100060000 and (35%) of respondent are preferred 40000-50000.e.e..
Most of the respondents i.e. It is found that 49% of the respondents are brand recommend for two wheeler is hero honda and only few respondents for bajaj. 46% are view that media is the best advertisement. 26% are view that they using hero honda for past 7-12 months and most of the respondents using 3-5 year and 5 above. Around 46%of the respondents are strongly agreed on influence of brand on purchase decision.
Most of the respondent i.
Company should organize seminars. dealers meeting to promote sales quarterly. By giving some gifts and best wishes cards to the customer that your buying decision is very good.
. Company should increase availability of the product which can be increase the sale and brand image. conferences. So that company creates good brand image.
For customer care services company should concentrate on information provided by mobile Company conducts society welfare program in rural area. marketing experts dealing with dealers in all areas. more advertisement.SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
From the above findings it is suggested that if the company has good quality.
The company should focus more on sales promotion & public relation.CONCLUSION
The project was concluded from the topic a study on brand positioning towards the hero Honda in nagappa motors PVT Ltd the market of Hero Honda is growing at rapid speed. Most of the customers are fully satisfied with the price of Nagappa motor Pvt Ltd. Hero Honda being one of the dominating and leading players in two wheeler market. so here Nagappa motor pvt limited maintaining good will with the customers.
. Hero Honda has a good brand image in the dealer & customers mind and improve the availability of two wheeler in the market and concentrate on distribution network. Most of the customer buying decision depends on the quality and price of the product.
QUESTIONNAIRE A STUDY ON BRAND POSITIONING TOWARDS THE HERO HONDA IN NAGAPPA MOTORS PVT LTD
PERSONAL DETAILS: 1) Name of the respondent__________________________________ 2) Address _______________________________________ ______________________________________ 3) Gender (a) Male (b) Female 4) What is your age? (a) 18-26 (b) 26-34 (c) 34-42 (d) 42-50 (e) above50 5) Educational Qualification (a) Below 10th (b) 10th-+12 (c) Graduate/diploma (d) Post Graduate (e) Others 6) Profession Type (a) Government (b) Private (c) Professional (d) Student (e) Others______________ 7) Monthly Income (a) Up to 5000 (b) 5001-10000 (c) 10001-15000 (d)Above15001 (e) Nil
1) Are you aware of Hero Honda two wheeler (a) Yes (b) No
2) From which source you get the information about Hero Honda (a) Media (b) Friends (c) Relation (d) Exhibition (e) others
3) Which brand you mostly prefer for two wheeler (a) Hero Honda (b) Yamaha (c) Honda (d) Bajaj (e) TVS
4) Which sub brand of Hero Honda do you possess (a) Splendor (b) Passion (c) Hunk (d) CBZ (e) ZMR
5) Why do you prefer Hero Honda brand (a) Reasonable price (b) Design (c) Quality (d) Availability (e) showroom
6) Which attribute did attract you to purchase Hero Honda (a) Brand name (b) Price (c) Fuel (d) Performance (e) Resale value
7) Since how many months/years have you been using Hero Honda (a) Up to 6months (b) 7-12 months (c) 1-3 years (d) 3-5 years (e) Above 5 years
8) What do you influence of brand on purchase decision (a) Strongly agree (b) Agree (c) Moderate (d) Disagree (e) Strongly disagree
9) Are you think price of the product is reasonable (a) Strongly agree (b) Agree (c) Moderate (d) Disagree (e) Strongly disagree
10) How do you feel about quality of the product (a) Excellent (b) Good (c) Average (d) Poor (e) Very poor
11) What do you feel about the product features? (a) Excellent (b) Good (c) Average (d) Poor (e) Very poor
12) How the peer group influence in purchase decision (a) Excellent (b) Good (c) Average (d) Poor (e) Very poor
13) Are you satisfied with the advertisement of Hero Honda (a) Highly satisfied (b) Satisfied (c) Moderate (d) Dissatisfied (e) Highly dissatisfied
14) Mark your overall satisfactory level.V (b) Newspaper (c) Radio (d) Bit notice (e) Magazine
. (a) Highly satisfied (b) Satisfied (c) Moderate (d) Dissatisfied (e) Highly dissatisfied
15) Which brand is always available in two wheeler market (a) Hero Honda (b) Yamaha (c) Honda (d) Bajaj (e) TVS
16) Rank the brand according to fastest moving in two wheeler market (a) Hero Honda (b) Yamaha (c) Honda (d) Bajaj (e) TVS
17) How do you rate the design of Hero Honda (a) Excellent (b) Good (c) Average (d) Poor (e) Very poor
18) In which media have you seen the advertisement (a) T.
.19) Rank the brand of two wheeler would you recommend to others (a) Hero Honda (b) Yamaha (c) Honda (d) Bajaj (e) TVS
20) Which price range of Hero Honda do you prefer most (a) Rs 40000-50000 (b) Rs 50001-60000 (c) Rs 60001-70000 (d) Rs 70001-80000 (e) Above Rs 80000
21) Kindly give your suitable suggestion.
Functional Positioning of Brands.R.answer. 2003 2. K. 3.wikipedia.scribd. Reddy. Research Methodology. Published by Pearson Education Pvt.BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Second Edition.amzon.kothari.herohonda.
www.Ltd. published by Wishaprakashan Publishing Company. Marketing Management.com www.com
.com www.com www.New Delhi . Philip Kotler. New Delhi. Journal of Consumer
Marketing 1998.com www. S. C.