Zakir Naik – A Danger to India by Jagmohan Singh Khurmi How should the Indians treat Zakir Naik ?

Should he be dismissed as just another demagogue and ignored in the name of multiculturalism ? Last time people like him came to scene they became the cause of division of India into two states. And since “purity” was central to the very existence of the ideal Islamic state of Pakistan, what the world saw was one of the greatest forced immigration of Hindus and Sikhs from the lands that were required to be pure by the very literal meaning of “Pakistan”. And since these wretched infidels were far more prosperous culturally and financially, it took much more than simple request to uproot them from the lands that had been there for centuries – the forced immigration had to be lubricated with a colossal bloodbath that has no parallel in annals of history. But there was bright side too to the ugly picture – the faithful were amply rewarded with real estate, and the other worldly possessions of the kafirs, including their women. See how prophetic the holy Koran is ! Is it okay to ignore Zakir Naik as just another demagogue for a country that is biggest victim of islamic terrorism for the last few decades. We can not bring to life our countrymen who have fallen victim of this demon but is it not our right to try to stop what calamities are about to fall ? What is worrying here is that this Zakir guy has a become almost a star, he has an immense following among muslims. We may find his arguments void of logic, ( but then what’s logic have to do with the world of muslims !) Ali Sina was perhaps the first writer to openly oppose Zakir Naik’s fanatic sermons. We were discussing the battle between Mr Ali Sina and Zakir Naik on a Hindu blog called when we came across this wonder of nature ! This creature, who calls itself Mohammed Ali, is the most staunch adherent of the witchdoctor Zakir Naik, is ready to fall to any depths of indignity to prove that his idol is right. Listen to him : Here’s my point of view: Every human being, Muslim or non-Muslim should be a “terrorist for the antisocial elements of society”.(Anybody disagreeing with the above statement can stop reading right now, as your mind is not mature enough to understand the topic). So this is the islamic criteria for determining whether one’s mind is mature or not ! That is a great breakthrough in psychology ! He carries on : Now that we have agreed to the above statement, lets see what has to say.According to, “But isn’t it the job of the police to go after the criminals?” So according to, if a man is walking on the road, and he sees a woman

being gang-raped by a feral pack of goons, he should just walk away, call the police and then wait till the police comes while this woman is being stripped of her dignity. EVERY HUMAN BEING SHOULD STAND BY THE SIDE AND WATCH WOMEN GET RAPED, MEN GET STABBED ETC. BECAUSE IF YOU DO INTERFERE YOU WILL BECOME A “TERRORIST FOR ANTI-SOCIAL ELEMENTS.” Mr. Khurmi opposes what Dr. Naik says and agrees with Now the funny thing is that at that time I had not even stated my agreement with ! Mohammed Ali’s reason for getting mad at me is somewhere else ! – he will admit himself later on ! So IF Mr. Khurmi sees his sister (all Indians are my brothers and sisters, remember?) getting raped by 5 people, he will not interfere, rather, he will call the police and wait for them to come. If the police comes, well and good. But if it doesn’t come, he will still stand around and watch his sister get raped, because if he gets into a fight with the rapists and terrorizes them, he will become a “TERRORIST FOR ANTI-SOCIAL ELEMENTS”. And NO, Mr. Khurmi strongly opposes that, don’t you Mr. Khurmi? P.S.: Harebrained people like you who do not have any idea of Islam, haven’t read a single verse of the Quran like to make profound criticisms of the religion. Seriously man, how low on self-respect and dignity do you have to be make statement against Islam because of what few idiotic people calling themselves Muslims are doing? Note the word “harebrained”. Mohammed should look at the meaning of this word in a standred dictionary and then ask himself whether the muslims have any right to call others “harebrained” ? Mohammed Ali, Here is what Mr Khurmi will do : He will bravely and fiercely fight to save the life and honor of the woman in trouble ( even if she is not his sister ) , because he is a proud citizen of a modern and secular nation, And to save the honor of the woman he does NOT need be a terrorist ! being a brave man is enough ! Fortunately, Mr Khurmi does not belong to the religion that approves of raping women, yes sir, not even the women who oppose his religion. On the contrary, if one is a terrorist then there is almost NO chance that he will have the guts to take any effective action, that is because a terrorist is a coward by nature, if he has a healthy mind he would never become a terrorist in the first place. Shooting at unarmed people and then run away to hide in a rat-hole can not be described an act of bravery. Infact, if Mr Khurmi is a terrorist like Zakir Naik or Mohammad Ali, the chance to engage in such a secular struggle are zero, because in that case he will be busy rehearsing where to plant his next RDX package or decideing what time to set the detonator…!

And there is one very-very serious complication in this situation : what if the rapists happen to be Muslims ? ( and that is high on chance because of tight “moral policing”, muslim males are far more sexually-repressed ). And then there are differnet sets of rules about how to punish/reward the rapists ! (Please consult Dr Zakir Naik on what the holy koran says about this ) And what if the woman being raped happens to “what your right hand possess !” then your brothers instead of stopping the rape will probably help their co-religionist or make up a queue behind the faithful and wait for their own turn to enjoy themseleves the sweet fruit Allah tallah has bestowed to those who fight for din ! And now the actual reason why this Mohammed Ali became so angry at me… …post was directed to a Mr. Khurmi who says things like, ‘Yusuf Khan’ had to change his name to ‘Daleep Kumar’ ! “Now a days it has become EXACTLY opposite ! Today a Daleep Kumar had change his name to ‘A. R. Rahman’ to get a foothold in the industry ! This is because now the things move according to wishes of his excellency Mian Dawood Ibrahim and his other bhai-log from the wonderful world of Islamic terror. No wonder today to become a hero you have to be a Khan.” That is the rhetoric he (that means myself) exudes. So I had to use an extreme example.

So this is the actual reason he got mad at me ! : I criticised Dawood Ibrahim, an extremly dangerous underworld mafioso who makes it sure that his co-religionists are never short of the cutting edge techonology when it comes to firearms and all the plastic explosives they need, who controls narcotics trade all over India, who has total monopoly over real-estate mafia in Mumbai, who is a ruthless mass murderer wanted by the authorities in connection with numerous gang-massacres ! But taking the full advantage of being a muslim he is as free as air – the islamic states in gulf are fully commited to his well-being and treat this most dangerous criminal like a son-in-law. This indeed is very shocking to find for any modern indian that the muslim community loves this devil so much inspite of all the damage he has done, and Insha-Allah continue to do ( it is highly unlikely that our secular govt will really try to confront him even if he comes back, our chicken-hearted politions may find a normal Dawood-Police encounter to be mistaken for Hindu-Muslim riot ! )
"All muslims should be terrorists..."! This is astounding ! This is the insult of the government, the state itself, contumely of law and order ! Zakir Naik should be arrested for saying such a thing but, alas, one cannot even openly condemn him !