You are on page 1of 23

For release 10:00 a.m.

(EDT) Tuesday, April 10, 2012

USDL-12-0663

Technical information:
Employment:
(202) 691-6559 • sminfo@bls.gov • www.bls.gov/sae
Unemployment:
(202) 691-6392 • lausinfo@bls.gov • www.bls.gov/lau
Media contact:

(202) 691-5902 • PressOffice@bls.gov

METROPOLITAN AREA EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT — FEBRUARY 2012
Unemployment rates were lower in February than a year earlier in 344 of the 372 metropolitan areas,
higher in 19 areas, and unchanged in 9 areas, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today.
Thirteen areas recorded jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent, while 12 areas registered rates of less than
5.0 percent. Two hundred sixty-seven metropolitan areas reported over-the-year increases in nonfarm
payroll employment, 98 reported decreases, and 7 had no change. The national unemployment rate in
February was 8.7 percent, not seasonally adjusted, down from 9.5 percent a year earlier.
Metropolitan Area Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
In February, 77 metropolitan areas reported jobless rates of at least 10.0 percent, down from 137 areas a
year earlier, while 90 areas posted rates below 7.0 percent, up from 54 areas a year earlier. El Centro,
Calif., and Yuma, Ariz., recorded the highest unemployment rates in February, 26.7 and 23.7 percent,
respectively. Ten of the other 11 areas with jobless rates of at least 15.0 percent were located in
California. Bismarck, N.D., and Midland, Texas, registered the lowest unemployment rates, 3.8 percent
each. A total of 205 areas recorded February unemployment rates below the U.S. figure of 8.7 percent,
158 areas reported rates above it, and 9 areas had rates equal to that of the nation. (See table 1 and the
map.)
The largest over-the-year unemployment rate decreases in February were registered in three Michigan
areas: Flint, Holland-Grand Haven, and Jackson (-2.2 percentage points each). An additional 161 areas
had decreases of 1.0 percentage point or more. Yuma, Ariz., reported the largest over-the-year jobless
rate increase (+2.0 percentage points). Two other areas had increases of more than 1.0 percentage point
from a year earlier.
Among the 49 metropolitan areas with a Census 2000 population of 1 million or more, the highest
unemployment rates in February were registered in Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, Calif., 12.5
percent, and Las Vegas-Paradise, Nev., 12.2 percent. Five additional large areas posted rates of 10.0
percent or more. The lowest jobless rates among the large areas were recorded in Oklahoma City, Okla.,
and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, D.C.-Va.-Md.-W.Va., 5.8 percent each. Forty-six of the large
areas reported over-the-year unemployment rate decreases, while three areas registered increases.
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, Mich., experienced the largest unemployment rate decline from February 2011
(-2.0 percentage points), followed by Birmingham-Hoover, Ala., Las Vegas-Paradise, Nev., and Tampa-

St. Petersburg-Clearwater, Fla. (-1.8 points each). Nineteen other large areas reported rate decreases of
at least 1.0 percentage point. No large area had an increase greater than 0.4 percentage point.
Metropolitan Division Unemployment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
Eleven of the most populous metropolitan areas are made up of 34 metropolitan divisions, which are
essentially separately identifiable employment centers. In February 2012, Los Angeles-Long BeachGlendale, Calif., registered the highest jobless rate among the divisions, 12.1 percent. BethesdaRockville-Frederick, Md., reported the lowest division rate, 5.4 percent. (See table 2.)
Thirty-one of the metropolitan divisions recorded over-the-year jobless rate decreases in February, while
two divisions registered increases and one had no change. Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills, Mich., posted
the largest rate decline from a year earlier (-2.2 percentage points). Nine other divisions reported rate
decreases of 1.0 percentage point or more. New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-N.J., experienced the
largest unemployment rate increase from a year earlier (+0.7 percentage point).
In 4 of the 11 metropolitan areas that contain divisions, the ranges between the highest and lowest
division jobless rates were 2.0 percentage points or more in February. Boston-Cambridge-Quincy,
Mass.-N.H., recorded the largest rate difference among its divisions, 6.3 percentage points (LawrenceMethuen-Salem, Mass.-N.H., 11.9 percent, compared with Framingham, Mass., 5.6 percent).
Metropolitan Area Nonfarm Employment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
In February, 267 metropolitan areas reported over-the-year increases in nonfarm payroll employment, 98
reported decreases, and 7 had no change. The largest over-the-year employment increase occurred in
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. (+117,700), followed by Houston-Sugar
Land-Baytown, Texas (+93,400), Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas (+79,400), and Atlanta-Sandy
Springs-Marietta, Ga. (+43,900). The largest over-the-year percentage gain in employment was reported
in Ocean City, N.J. (+11.7 percent), followed by Odessa, Texas (+10.0 percent), and Columbus, Ind.
(+9.7 percent). (See table 3.)
The largest over-the-year decreases in employment occurred in Fort Smith, Ark.-Okla. (-5,800),
Augusta-Richmond County, Ga.-S.C. (-5,000), and Sacramento—Arden-Arcade—Roseville, Calif.
(-4,700). The largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment was reported in Ithaca, N.Y.
(-6.1 percent), followed by Dalton, Ga. (-5.2 percent), and Fort Smith, Ark.-Okla. (-5.1 percent).
Over the year, nonfarm employment rose in 35 of the 37 metropolitan areas with annual average
employment levels above 750,000 in 2011. The largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment
in these large metropolitan areas was posted in Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, Texas (+3.7 percent),
followed by Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, Texas (+3.3 percent), and San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa
Clara, Calif. (+3.1 percent). The largest over-the-year percentage decrease in employment occurred in
Sacramento—Arden-Arcade—Roseville, Calif. (-0.6 percent).
Metropolitan Division Nonfarm Employment (Not Seasonally Adjusted)
Nonfarm payroll employment data were available in February for 32 metropolitan divisions, which are
essentially separately identifiable employment centers within a metropolitan area. Twenty-nine of the 32
metropolitan divisions reported over-the-year employment gains, while 3 reported losses. The largest
over-the-year increases in the metropolitan divisions occurred in New York-White Plains-Wayne, N.Y.-2-

The over-the-year decreases in the metropolitan divisions were in Nashua. -3- . 2012. (-2. Texas (+2. (-0.-N.m.J. April 20. Ill. 2012.400).) The largest over-the-year percentage increase in employment among the metropolitan divisions was reported in Fort Worth-Arlington. Mass. Dallas-Plano-Irving.H.0 percent). Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton. (See table 4. DetroitLivonia-Dearborn. (+78.-Mass. Mass. at 10:00 a. Texas (+53. Mich.100).5 percent each). (EDT). Texas (+3. _____________ The Regional and State Employment and Unemployment news release for March is scheduled to be released on Friday. (EDT). and Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton.6 percent). and Chicago-Joliet-Naperville.1 percent).N. N. (+38. (-900). at 10:00 a.Mass. The over-the-year percentage decreases in employment occurred in Nashua. and Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford. Mich. The Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment news release for March is scheduled to be released on Wednesday. (-2.700).H. Mass.. (-1. followed by Dallas-Plano-Irving.H. and Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn. and Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills.1 percent). Mich.600).m.300). May 2. (+2.3 percent). (-2. N.

All substate estimates are reestimated and adjusted to add to the revised model-based estimates. called benchmarks. illness. Employed persons are those who did any work at all for pay or profit in the reference week (the week including the 12th of the month) or worked 15 hours or more without pay in a family business or farm. any revisions in the other data sources. for such reasons as labor-management dispute. Nonfarm payroll employment estimates from the Current Employment Statistics (CES) program (tables 3 and 4) are provided for most of the same areas. Estimates for 34 metropolitan and NECTA divisions also are presented. Employment estimates. The labor force is the sum of employed and unemployed persons. plus those not working who had a job from which they were temporarily absent. those appearing on more than one payroll are counted on each payroll. Labor force and unemployment data shown for the prior year reflect adjustments made at the end of each year. Unemployed persons are those who were not employed during the reference week (based on the definition above). Annual revisions. The unemployment rate is the number of unemployed as a percent of the labor force. the indirect estimation methods described below will be used for this area until further notice. Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall.) Modeling improves the statistical basis of the estimation for these areas and provides important tools for analysis. Census Bureau. Method of estimation. whether or not paid. Regional and State Employment and Unemployment. the District of Columbia. and New York City are produced using time-series models with real-time benchmarking to national CPS totals. and were currently available for work. are adjusted to refer to place of residence as used in the CPS. (Model-based estimation of the New OrleansMetairie-Kenner metropolitan area was suspended following Hurricane Katrina. Annual revisions. Estimates for states.Technical Note This release presents labor force and unemployment data from the Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS) program (tables 1 and 2) for 372 metropolitan statistical areas and metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs). MI Metropolitan Statistical Area. The labor force and unemployment data are based on the same concepts and definitions as those used for the official national estimates obtained from the Current Population Survey (CPS). LA Metropolitan Statistical Area. The universe for each is the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years of age and over. The estimates of employment for the current month are obtained by multiplying the estimates for the previous month by these ratios. The benchmark information is used to . Unemployment estimates are aggregates of persons previously employed in industries covered by state unemployment insurance (UI) laws and entrants to the labor force data from the CPS. and Seattle-Bellevue-Everett. The LAUS program measures employment and unemployment on a place-of-residence basis. Model-based estimation was extended to the following areas and their respective balances of state in 2005: the Chicago-Joliet-Naperville.S. WA Metropolitan Division. A detailed description of the estimation procedures is available from BLS upon request. plus 8 areas in Puerto Rico. a sample survey of households that is conducted for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) by the U. The employment data are estimated using a “link relative” technique in which a ratio (link relative) of current-month employment to that of the previous month is computed from a sample of establishments reporting for both months. Method of estimation. derived principally from tax reports that are submitted by employers who are covered under state unemployment insurance (UI) laws. usually implemented with January estimates. The adjusted model-based estimates reflect updated population data from the U. OH Metropolitan Statistical Area. Employment—from the CES program Definitions. Small-domain models are used as the official estimators for the approximately 39 percent of CES published series which have insufficient sample for direct sample-based estimates. Persons are counted at their place of work rather than at their place of residence. or vacation. New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner. State estimates were previously published in the news release. Detroit-Warren-Livonia. which are based largely on “place of work” estimates from the CES program. the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale metropolitan division. FL Metropolitan Division. Census Bureau. IL Metropolitan Division. estimates are prepared through indirect estimation procedures using a building-block approach. and are republished in this release for ease of reference. Employment estimates are adjusted annually to a complete count of jobs. are adjusted proportionally to ensure that they add to the independently estimated state or balanceof-state totals. Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor. Labor force and unemployment—from the LAUS program Definitions. Industries are classified on the basis of their principal activity in accordance with the 2007 version of the North American Industry Classification System. The LAUS and CES programs are both federal-state cooperative endeavors. persons on layoff expecting recall need not be looking for work to be counted as unemployed. which geographically exhaust the entire state. For all other substate areas in this release. and model reestimation. Employment data refer to persons on establishment payrolls who receive pay for any part of the pay period that includes the 12th of the month.S. such as measures of errors and seasonally adjusted series. had actively looked for a job sometime in the 4-week period ending with the reference week. The substate estimates of employment and unemployment.

and seven substate areas are available in the news release.gov/opub/ee/home. variation that occurs by chance because a sample rather than the entire population is surveyed. but additional information on the subject is provided in Employment and Earnings Online at www. metropolitan areas.gov/sae/. Employment data from the CES program are available on the BLS Web site at www. Measures of nonsampling error are not available. Measures of sampling error for state CES data at the supersector level and for metro- politan area CES data at the total nonfarm level are available online at www. thus.gov/lau/lausmsa.bls. Employment estimates. Thus. labor market areas. administrative data.htm. Area definitions The substate area data published in this release reflect the standards and definitions established by the U.S. 2009.htm.htm. rather than county-based definitions.bls. and modeling and.bls. Reliability of the estimates The estimates presented in this release are based on sample surveys. census regions and divisions.bls.htm. Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. counties.gov/lau/.000 or more. Estimates of unadjusted and seasonally adjusted labor force and unemployment data for states. Estimates of labor force and unemployment for all states. Modelbased error measures are available for states on the Internet at www.bls. and other areas used in the administration of various federal economic assistance programs are available on the Internet at www. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200. the benchmarking process establishes the level of employment. Information on recent benchmark revisions for states is available on the BLS Web site at www. Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339. in the six New England States. Sampling error is a measure of sampling variability—that is.bls. cities with a population of 25. Labor force and unemployment estimates.adjust the monthly estimates between the new benchmark and the preceding one and also to establish the level of employment for the new benchmark month. are subject to sampling and other types of errors.gov/sae/.bls.gov/sae/790stderr. Data reflect New England City and Town Area (NECTA) definitions. Office of Management and Budget on December 1. Regional and State Employment and Unemployment. Survey data also are subject to nonsampling errors. The sums of individual items may not always equal the totals shown in the same tables because of rounding. . Unemployment rates are computed from unrounded data and thus may differ slightly from rates computed using the rounded data displayed in the tables.gov/lau/lastderr. A detailed list of the geographic definitions is available at www. and the sample is used to measure the month-to-month changes in the level for the subsequent months. such as those which can be introduced into the data collection and processing operations. Additional information More complete information on the technical procedures used to develop these estimates and additional data appear in Employment and Earnings Online. Estimates not directly derived from sample surveys are subject to additional errors resulting from the particular estimation processes used.

..0 67.8 8..2 10.8 114..5 134.0 11.5 43......8 913.7 9..........5 95.......6 14........ 2.3 110.2 37......2 23.....9 8..7 44..7 34......7 3......8 2.1 7...........1 5............6 117..6 102...7 4.....0 4.......2 6.4 20........5 101.......6 14.......7 21............ Anchorage ..3 70...9 8....0 92.............. Bakersfield-Delano ......4 10.2 7....2 312.......8 225.7 6...496..4 7...1 9...........9 2.9 8.299.......4 58.........3 226.. Stockton ......6 7.4 11.........5 11..8 437...247..........0 46......0 11....7 20.....8 441........0 471.1 23.....9 25......4 6.....1 33...8 12......................2 11.....3 9...2 9...5 9......4 8.....6 69...........2 1...2 256....315.9 9.. Hanford-Corcoran .....8 7.8 29.6 363.8 218...3 171........1 6. Madera-Chowchilla ..8 9.........7 17...8 7.6 8.5 462.9 26......8 347.....5 10.......9 10.0 255........0 114........2 43...5 207.....4 9.........5 318...8 8....1 8...0 8.....8 75...7 147....3 22.................814..6 38..4 5.....3 85... Grand Junction .....9 6..5 10...5 9..0 4.8 6..9 11.1 8...9 200........5 15....7 8......0 175..2 151....6 8...6 36....4 Arizona ....1 75.......3 185......3 8.9 7.5 1..........8 25......6 152..5 9...8 14......9 10... Vallejo-Fairfield ..9 44.7 13.8 14..7 4...... Hot Springs .7 18...2 10.......6 7.3 12.......3 1.......1 18..........0 75.....3 164....7 11...8 71..027.4 3.6 9..9 2.0 71..............6 7...9 4.....1 8.....0 116......2 12.1 70.7 9..3 6.9 210.9 9........3 23.......1 21.....4 22........ Fort Smith ..4 7.0 26.0 17.0 201....7 3.7 72.5 16.........8 8.3 8.6 14.4 18.6 7.9 15..0 2011 2012 2011 2012p February 2012 2012 See footnotes at end of table...1 5.4 9........3 127...6 3.2 175......4 1.9 9......6 9..2 44... Merced ...1 8......8 148...573..3 66....0 21.0 9..9 9.....6 7....4 10...3 1...1 45......1 7.3 15...2 88...5 20...3 8....6 3...........6 62......9 6......0 6....1 65.031.....3 88.3 8.........2 3....6 17.9 10.. Greeley .359...4 308.5 9.2 302....5 318.3 66..........9 114..........7 110.1 28...............6 7...8 21.......2 58...2 10...6 2.....130...052.5 515.5 8..7 11......5 26.2 210..5 1........5 98.1 8..4 2........4 15................3 15......5 8...........9 101.5 11.3 223....8 6......3 15......6 11............ Fort Collins-Loveland ..0 8...7 2011 Alabama ..........8 92.1 297......1 20.....0 33...........................1 8..9 8.. Decatur ..0 517.8 436..........2 187.1 7.9 16.8 42....5 14...4 8. Santa Cruz-Watsonville .3 8.. Montgomery .....0 8.....247.......0 6..0 8........................6 722.4 1.....9 16.......7 13.....9 476.....6 12.1 15..5 27....7 15...3 6...........8 255.. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario ...........3 605...6 7......9 137..3 149..4 339...... Dothan ....3 16.......8 50.........8 13.................7 161.6 10.4 51...8 221.......2 11.8 18..................................0 118....3 98.....388....704..183.......3 9..4 15.7 14...9 36.....8 10..8 9..4 12.8 20.........6 10....397.........7 1.............081.......3 18...........0 481.0 71..................9 22.....1 297........3 936.....5 35.6 21...3 85...363..........0 175........5 10...0 2..3 13..1 7..3 176..8 9..7 1.........3 376....3 307.4 8....5 238.6 28.7 8...8 5............8 7..7 33.8 247........4 208.......3 603.......586..........0 9....8 6.7 11....451........ Dover ..6 36...2 7...0 1..8 8.......7 8.....7 192.0 102.6 9.........5 8..........9 54.....4 8....2 9...1 13..........7 147.............2 189..4 75.......9 220.716.......9 99.....................4 21....7 120.......0 10..2 83.....LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 1.4 54.3 8..8 214....9 109..4 16.. Waterbury ...905......795...0 2......2 80....9 9....8 6..7 10..7 7....9 15.............. 2...7 7.9 152..6 9....048...........5 199.....1 43...249.... Fairbanks ...1 1..0 6.4 31.....4 21.4 11....................286.2 10..4 39.3 9.1 5.5 73.....6 63...........269...5 11.3 3.........4 58.0 225..........0 45.....1 10.5 261....2 12..............3 89..1 9.....1 8..7 378.3 16.....4 7.4 76.....0 312.....3 46......1 42.9 207..7 299.0 13......044...0 7..........8 175..9 1...376...703.9 9........5 7.......8 75................6 236............537.1 36.....5 62..3 Connecticut ....3 263..9 20..8 36.........6 26.........8 10.......2 11.....3 47...5 9...... Salinas ....0 233....1 10.3 5....365.......0 37.6 11.......9 133..0 9.........9 41....1 11..5 45.....0 7........ Sacramento—Arden-Arcade—Roseville ..........4 605.9 228..3 85....8 78...1 8..2 10.8 93........ Denver-Aurora-Broomfield ........4 226.....2 40.......................9 9..1 188...6 45.3 31. January 2011 2011 2012p ..........1 780.. 18...5 2..0 29.....1 27.....3 8.6 1.......2 8.....4 217..6 5.3 8.6 44....9 216.....4 312..............2 172.0 28.3 236...3 17.......6 7..2 63..........7 9..5 1.........8 79......2 64...8 11.2 44..7 16.5 77.3 10..3 9...344.4 102...........9 15....9 13. Huntsville ..6 17......6 82...7 911...2 Arkansas .....3 45..6 137.........2 74..1 118.2 11.. San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos ..2 436..........3 21..7 8.... 3.0 295...9 12..2 9.............1 11..............4 9......8 12.......0 84.... El Centro ...1 11.7 11.......................2 11...4 10...................4 3...9 5........0 18....0 177...577....6 6.. Florence-Muscle Shoals .4 136..0 68..6 14...........2 3..........4 7.....6 60...9 13.5 75.....5 210.8 58........3 92..1 13.......0 13..3 9.2 72..7 49.0 344..7 10...4 6....8 7.1 1.7 175..5 16. Yuma ..9 10..8 10.4 84..7 4...9 32..........6 4..4 6....1 19. 1.4 231......6 11...7 5..6 84..3 7..9 8........7 3.....9 75..6 12.4 12......5 26..8 166........6 173......4 6..6 12.4 228.........7 90..2 20.....................0 192.........9 9..1 85. Anniston-Oxford .......036...0 750.8 9.3 16.. Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway ...............0 13...1 102.8 208.1 8.0 7..................395.....8 4.........394......8 361..0 70.....9 10......5 44........8 225....2 75.......4 8.....7 9.6 7........6 125.....9 76....4 11.. Flagstaff ....6 18.... Gadsden ....0 120.......2 10.6 92.....1 480...2 317.8 17...8 23...1 9..........1 254......1 10..3 380.....132...9 13..9 208.2 363....0 20...5 8............ Prescott ..........9 6.4 7.3 929.............9 18.5 12....9 13...7 2. Modesto .......7 9.............1 9...2 67.......193.2 134......2 5.3 12.....7 8....0 9....4 10......6 13...5 86.6 37......7 9.......6 101.4 436....0 383....7 25.........5 65..9 215.3 128....8 193..3 226.2 442.....1 13.....1 12...1 9.......0 57.055..0 347.........2 15.....5 122....9 17...5 12....2 101.3 17.......8 17........4 21...... Birmingham-Hoover .....2 101...2 1.......7 54................2 202..6 Colorado .3 18.......5 17....1 8..0 16. 362.8 13.....9 432...9 7.....1 9.. Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford ............... Visalia-Porterville ...9 8............2 52...3 10...5 2.......5 165..........5 66...6 2........... Pine Bluff . San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont .......6 119....3 6.......5 4......5 29....2 6.9 8..9 1..7 12...6 77.. Auburn-Opelika ...3 13....3 California ........7 1..3 10.......4 220.............2 110....0 10.9 73..6 7..7 8..2 83........0 11.... Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk .........2 35............7 12...6 2.... Santa Rosa-Petaluma .4 7..6 48.....9 458...8 441.8 6...6 Delaware .......7 41...3 6..........6 2...4 6.....9 6....1 254.5 68.8 12...9 9.......8 30.....6 15..0 13...9 14.. Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura .3 7. Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta ......6 139.2 32.5 213.9 20...6 9...............2 14.......2 79.6 23.........9 11.......9 16............4 5..1 8.5 13.9 9.........8 2.......9 9.......8 8...4 7.0 26...9 32.5 148......6 13...............4 7..5 8..0 1....0 251..........6 19.2 7.... Norwich-New London .......... Mobile ....9 10.......3 2..7 9.................................8 41....0 10..2 7.4 8....3 18.2 183.1 476........4 5....6 60.... San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara .518......8 158.0 12.......4 8....5 7.0 16.1 21....5 102...5 43.2 9.....3 8..0 8... Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers ...6 9.7 7....5 6....5 16... Tuscaloosa ........5 42..6 160...1 10.....1 175....4 9..6 437.........4 23.521..........0 2.................. Chico ..3 23...1 243. Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale ..1 15........4 21.3 72..4 716.. Lake Havasu City-Kingman ........0 441.3 4.......2 8....2 69.4 68.9 2...8 7...... New Haven .0 Alaska ...0 7....3 237....5 8........2 9...5 78...316.....7 12.......6 61......6 10.8 52.4 214..6 93..... 1. Yuba City ......5 31.....6 9.....2 7.7 8....589..007.....7 8....8 9......8 47.5 36..6 8.......6 1..1 20.................1 434.....0 43..5 14.8 200.6 26............. Pueblo ....044....5 10.....9 42..5 129..2 23.8 2......5 60.... Redding ..2 149....6 3..3 10.2 10........903.4 85.1 607.. San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles .....1 73..0 217.....3 66.6 10.1 70...2 18.3 18....7 9..897.009..........9 531..1 7.......3 1..0 20........8 4... Napa ..2 154..798....704.3 59.....2 14.8 6.....2 130....3 9.....2 49....981.........8 14...9 5. Jonesboro ..4 8.2 10....7 80.......................8 2...7 10...9 24.. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State and area January February January February 2011 2012p 169....2 18..8 13..102..6 14......2 69......6 77...9 4..810....8 4................ Boulder .....8 75..8 529..3 14... Tucson .....047.7 317..0 158....7 12.........2 208. 437.........0 15......1 59....6 148.... Fresno ..6 6..............7 1....3 9.......9 74..5 10........1 197..... Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana .5 3...........1 55..9 7....8 7.0 38..2 11.... Danbury .3 4...1 219..7 76....8 11.............. Colorado Springs .....7 8..5 16.....2 18.1 8...894.1 471.2 18....0 4......0 121.

.......0 194...1 9.3 4.....6 9.0 307.6 10...4 184.3 11.........4 3...4 80.6 7.6 11.2 9.8 8..1 10.140...9 10..6 9.....5 18.4 1...2 5.2 8.....6 10. Macon ........7 11..0 10....3 29. Indianapolis-Carmel ..................5 70.....5 123.7 2.0 9.6 72.3 12........ 761.....5 8........... Terre Haute ....1 8..9 10...........6 44..1 7..771...6 77.............735..4 475..0 9.....3 7..........2 178.3 7..0 8.8 14....8 6...0 6..... South Bend-Mishawaka .. Lewiston .9 76....2 344.0 206..................... Boise City-Nampa .9 29..6 97.303..4 98.8 6..........2 298..7 8...8 115...........4 6..8 110......8 10..4 306... Brunswick ........8 7........9 11.669..6 10..0 42.2 255..3 7..6 23.....6 14........6 9.....4 3........4 15.........5 4......8 24...........8 88.7 5. Lafayette ...8 8.........5 7........1 53.2 8...0 79..7 1......5 8..................9 8.4 12..4 71..7 94......2 10.....0 5...5 9....5 768.....7 Hawaii ..3 114....9 11.9 7...9 53......3 9.8 152.......3 8..0 656..........839..9 182..1 10. Tampa-St....3 20....9 9... Elkhart-Goshen ..4 145..2 259...7 11..8 4...........2 9................4 10.0 106..6 14...6 245..............1 11.........108..8 132...8 53....4 444....8 5.8 10.7 899.2 12.....9 6...9 29.........8 2......5 132.9 33........0 11.....9 97..........0 119.3 26.8 9...7 29..1 38.......4 8...9 8...7 Florida ......2 199............7 3....6 6....6 7..0 33.4 5..4 7.....6 11.7 10...6 200. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area—Continued (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State and area January February January February 2011 2012p 34.....5 8....1 16..1 3......4 8..1 2.....6 647.............9 3......0 9..9 8.......2 11......6 191.........1 9.6 88..9 74..2 136..8 10......0 8.1 60..8 8...8 7.2 48.........6 36.......2 213...5 11..............1 176............1 206. Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent ...0 8....7 112..9 682....0 9..8 9.....7 10.7 7..6 6.......0 26...9 10.....................839...9 14........8 131......1 9.8 10...1 11...2 9.......9 7..4 16..........8 164........4 17....0 8.3 4.........8 5...2 10..1 12.. Lucie ..0 8..7 13.1 98..1 10.3 7.....6 10.7 11......9 22..3 11.8 9.1 137................8 7.3 132................1 264....5 11. Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach ..0 12.9 13...........2 250....6 189.....9 11...2 149........... 9..... Kokomo .8 10.....4 88.0 10.7 27...6 132........ Kankakee-Bradley ..2 11..4 44......5 5...7 9...6 27..170...............2 116...............6 12..9 10..6 883.2 11.6 90..6 49... Evansville ......0 9....8 27....6 71....3 175..........1 11......5 774....7 78..... Peoria ..... Idaho Falls ...7 2..5 70.. Champaign-Urbana ..3 6.......2 7.......9 8......5 29..... Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta ..........5 270..8 10.......5 6.....835....6 7...4 10...9 70.5 13.8 8.....3 33.... Washington-Arlington-Alexandria ..8 8.........2 9.3 42.8 30....9 192.1 347.. Hinesville-Fort Stewart .6 47......5 263....0 6..................4 10....8 11..5 7..3 5.... 3........890.............777...0 11.....3 50.5 9.....1 Idaho ...7 64.7 60..4 5...3 122......... Valdosta .....5 33....4 63.....5 5........................ Savannah . 4......2 7...7 4.............3 10..........8 207...........0 9..8 8......3 18....8 7.....7 11.3 199.1 8............3 9.4 154...0 69.5 11..9 92..2 249...0 9.....5 8..0 62.8 56..0 11...0 11..........4 11.8 34.2 302...5 9.....3 7...7 8.2 7.9 12...4 87.....4 457.1 46.4 6.....6 9.0 19..6 462........3 149.......8 33.7 246.......3 47.........0 9.9 5..4 14.....4 13....0 3...7 249.....7 291...3 90.........3 21.....3 11.4 9....1 10....3 72....149...5 4.6 23..4 7..0 7.2 10. Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford .........0 73.7 1...8 182..................7 73...1 5..........9 8. Danville ...110..3 151.........6 7.3 97.1 115....1 10....4 9.....8 93..9 281......2 8.106.....3 112.6 9.0 8..........2 35.1 11........2 9.1 9.5 2011 District of Columbia ........1 73....1 43.4 88.7 13.3 167.....1 153.9 3.0 66...5 12...2 70........2 9...7 10....8 7.....3 27.........3 7.........6 23.........4 42....2 9....175.......1 281..1 7.........2 70.....7 23............9 25.5 8..2 7.5 151........8 8.7 8..9 300...0 10.......3 19........5 19...0 3......0 2.2 299... Gainesville ..1 8.3 91.3 11..........1 54..5 15...6 3...6 5..7 11......4 153..1 196.3 89..2 33. Davenport-Moline-Rock Island .8 42.....0 891..7 9......6 13..1 9...7 7....... 344..705.... Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach ....8 10.......9 437......9 7..5 168...8 7..522...5 11......9 5.3 5.........9 9.1 9........2 463...140...4 91...8 9.....3 76... Chicago-Joliet-Naperville .....4 137..4 64.4 5.......3 7..0 9.......7 9........3 56. Albany .......4 7...2 70.......4 8..5 11..........0 149.7 1.6 6...1 4......6 8....6 9....9 259.2 29..3 7.8 462...0 14.......7 205..5 14.4 129.........4 113.5 8...6 10....1 54....0 16.. Augusta-Richmond County .9 10......8 9..1 73...3 101...7 9.........8 10....8 209.2 7.....6 441..1 9.....2 7......4 3.8 33...2 10.......... Decatur ......2 53....3 11...9 9.......3 28.2 33........ Columbus ...6 268....3 7.0 114...9 4...................2 9..6 10...5 12...............223..8 8.4 264... Springfield ....5 28.....9 659..2 196..6 9....................9 9.0 8...2 7.4 9....2 10........... Michigan City-La Porte .. Gainesville .0 10...4 8......286............. Athens-Clarke County .3 4.....9 3.8 979.....7 282..7 2........1 98.........9 50....................4 211.............0 11..5 75...6 78........2 11........0 29...7 6..........2 41...2 15..........8 6..5 192.........9 20....0 489..................9 107.....4 10....7 19...1 15........0 11...........9 108..7 9....7 115...8 4......3 111.....8 6..7 10...........3 4..........1 8.. Coeur d’Alene ...3 55.8 25.....0 12...2 884.......8 8....0 50.....................3 36..... Tallahassee ..3 10.............9 7.. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville .143......5 2.............5 6. Petersburg-Clearwater . Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin .2 9...2 8.0 5.5 50...........8 33.....6 9...1 1.. Honolulu .........3 186...........8 9....8 15....2 25...........2 Illinois .9 7.3 297..4 9..9 6.5 681.8 7....0 50..1 105.....8 2..... Anderson .5 8...7 299......1 5....2 15..8 6..4 4.8 2011 2012 2011 2012p February 2012 2012 See footnotes at end of table.........6 44.0 70.9 7.1 26......2 62.4 132..8 9...0 6....5 165..6 8..0 2........4 11...8 11........6 42.7 11...2 763....5 4..4 300.......2 5.........5 60..2 62..6 11........9 187..9 9..9 10............1 7..4 5...6 190....8 50.......3 18... Jacksonville ...2 174..................................7 9....0 12... Bloomington .8 1...8 13...4 473..........1 69........2 15...........130............496.3 5......4 33.2 15..0 6..2 3...3 9.....6 8...8 9....6 5..........806....7 7...0 11...9 5..........4 686.......4 5...9 10.........1 72. Dalton ......3 10.......5 461........2 5..290...8 7.....6 13.9 877......703.7 8...4 62........0 7.........0 8.........7 8..0 10........1 11.............9 197...........5 40...5 99......9 33.....................1 7.........3 6...1 7.3 4...0 41......1 6..4 63..5 6......1 9..8 7........2 17...6 5.........7 202.....LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 1....9 2..9 7..9 129..2 Georgia ....6 14.202..3 43.......7 4.1 54.........2 91.7 189.......5 59...9 2... Punta Gorda ..6 5.3 345...4 255..7 8.1 4.......6 181........4 19.6 96......5 2.....7 78....8 9..............0 8.......3 5...............5 12............2 10.4 4.8 8....4 21.9 32..... Muncie ..0 60.. Sebastian-Vero Beach ........5 33...0 9...4 8..7 17.3 10...........4 11..............2 9. Fort Wayne ..............296.6 248...2 59...8 36.3 9.3 1.5 6..663.....2 65..... 6......1 16.5 11.5 115....0 10............6 8.0 36..9 12.....0 4....8 2...1 6.....4 26.....1 66.....5 463....1 9....011.5 23..6 10..1 300..2 1...7 96..5 112............7 8.......8 129..0 9.752. Columbus ...896...3 281....8 11...183.....3 9.3 18..8 15.698...8 28.... January 2011 2011 2012p .....6 10..8 5..2 7.189...5 654......2 10............... 657....0 10............7 9.1 21....7 31.7 49.........6 137................7 616.1 9.0 10........1 89......8 15.....5 3.7 281...... Cape Coral-Fort Myers ......2 17......6 4........ Warner Robins .....3 89.....714.5 11..1 62...5 273....6 209.4 686.8 5...............0 2.9 91.. Palm Coast .......3 24.....0 11. North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota .......3 60......................2 17..6 8............9 23.9 12....4 36..8 273..7 12......0 8...5 8.7 7.......6 299...4 9......4 8. Port St..5 15.. Naples-Marco Island .4 Indiana .. Bloomington-Normal ...3 2.. Lakeland-Winter Haven .....5 273........105.......0 71...... Pocatello .8 11.7 38... Ocala ..6 7......6 10...9 7....6 4..8 10.3 92....4 26...1 14.2 643....1 839.....9 9.............6 656.5 9....9 187...8 10.....5 181....9 1..........4 9.9 12...1 5.........7 12.6 4....9 10.1 66.....8 47...1 10.......3 8.........3 14.8 258.7 11....... Rome ........5 8.9 8...6 11.......2 96...........2 8......0 10....0 7..1 10....0 12..498....3 6....9 9...3 271.3 7.....3 10.7 175...8 54...0 263....9 7............0 26.......8 6..566.3 11.2 299..4 63....2 7....5 18.....1 5... Rockford ......7 9.........143.................5 6...7 53..........0 9.......9 64........9 23...1 8..2 70.7 30...0 265....2 5...0 3....4 201.

......5 58.......1 151.........................6 1......... Boston-Cambridge-Quincy . 2..655...................1 62.0 4.8 6....1 8.5 23.....2 5...1 3...8 8..3 10....067........8 15......1 10........4 308. Dubuque .1 4.... Manhattan ......2 8......0 131.............0 6....8 63.6 62.....9 8... St....9 2011 Iowa ...5 4.....2 63........ Cumberland ..........2 7.6 8..............6 11...8 2..6 7..4 5..8 89.4 3....6 538.9 4....439... Mankato-North Mankato .2 5..... Louisville-Jefferson County ....3 9.. Rochester ....7 86..3 6.......6 7..7 91...2 630.................9 203...5 3.1 3.....7 6.... Monroe ..3 56..0 89....1 7.7 6..2 67...0 6.2 7..8 8....1 7...5 89..7 224...................7 24.......6 113...5 374... Bangor ..........6 6..........2 8....7 67....4 126.....1 Michigan .6 7.....3 Kentucky .0 4...9 4........048.947.4 8....0 3......9 201....5 178..9 219...2 7......990........6 10.1 8.......4 57.............2 5.......2 60. 3.7 9...0 144..1 101.7 9.....3 12...3 536.6 12.............6 6.......4 11.........0 5...........0 6....8 64...........7 7.....1 79.1 6......9 10..4 3....3 11..044......7 102........3 236..6 23...... 3. Muskegon-Norton Shores ......2 7..2 10..2 3....5 77.3 81........ Monroe ..6 63...6 7...7 9.....0 9.....8 12...1 11..628......2 10...4 3..........5 64....4 7..6 7.0 108.4 308......6 Louisiana ..1 203.........3 309...4 7..7 3....7 6... New Bedford ..9 3......6 9..........6 153................ 1.8 61.....5 8.5 23....7 6.8 7...............0 7..7 699.......9 447.3 4....2 9..0 146..4 7.3 58.......2 3..1 7.....4 49.3 9....5 7..8 68..4 141..1 1.6 70.4 5..........1 146.7 5.9 186.6 3..5 3..4 7...6 378..6 698..6 2.......1 6........4 121.037........2 2. Pittsfield ...4 9............5 62...1 37..0 14...4 28... Grand Rapids-Wyoming ........0 11.....3 134...........6 201..7 10..5 9..... Shreveport-Bossier City ......2 20.....948.....2 3..7 5.5 20.4 5...6 7.......0 5.........4 62.......9 6.........9 8.....1 7.....8 8...3 7..8 10....5 7...6 11......6 56.. Des Moines-West Des Moines .........1 72.1 8....6 38.....498....8 9........7 26.3 625............ Owensboro .......7 9.....1 107..8 9..........0 1...9 11....9 9......3 63.8 17....5 9..0 8.......0 94........6 7....4 6.0 182......2 57.....5 90...1 233....7 187..........1 3........3 11....1 9.....0 9.4 71....7 2..6 63...........1 229............652..9 296.....................8 7......0 12.0 7...6 21.. Wichita ..7 4......845.9 7.1 3..4 8..3 26......9 7...3 61....3 5....8 6..6 10...............2 12.......... Lake Charles .......5 10........5 6........6 107.2 6...437.. Worcester ....2 216..............4 9...0 9.........2 128....3 8.........6 5.....0 126...2 114...........4 7.5 8..5 2.5 9.......0 7...........6 5.7 9.......9 5....7 20.......3 4..425..0 9..4 57......6 2............8 8....4 9.......0 5.......2 28....0 9....3 3....6 8.....523...8 6...1 138....2 4.8 5.7 13.513.5 6.429......3 12.2 141.2 5.........019.......1 8. Lexington-Fayette .. Cloud ..2 12......9 7.5 107......4 8...9 108...2 6...3 9. Minneapolis-St.. Saginaw-Saginaw Township North ...5 9.5 342...........8 7.5 31..6 103..........5 34..8 8.5 7...0 10...2 1..4 62.3 9.1 9.....7 3....2 94.2 1...1 4.3 5..3 693......6 7.....5 92..3 184..3 7...7 161.........1 8..0 14.1 381....0 8.......5 8...................0 8..7 101.....050.....................4 82...LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 1.1 67............0 18..........6 3...............5 10..1 53............834.....4 9... Ann Arbor ......9 2......7 4..................6 8....9 18....8 377..8 92.........0 6.520...4 7.1 190.......5 71..3 5.. Barnstable Town ...2 13.5 79.4 120.......4 53...9 80.3 60...7 1.1 9..5 48.3 522....6 12...3 6.......0 7.........9 14.8 51....2 7.9 52.... Baton Rouge .9 8...9 103..0 7.....4 220..3 6.3 3...9 237..1 125.4 13.....8 10.7 9. Iowa City ...8 134.6 48............6 89..0 8..........5 11....047.......1 5..........9 71.. Lewiston-Auburn ...........2 51...........1 2..7 95.0 119...2 3.............9 534.940................7 307...7 6..1 9....................0 57..1 7.........6 24..0 38...... Baltimore-Towson ....6 5..6 5.......6 6....7 6.........3 6..8 6.432.7 6.......9 4........6 183.................0 5..1 57......... Niles-Benton Harbor ......2 144.5 6.595....8 310......7 367....6 535..........5 8.............8 7.2 346.....4 2..2 35........1 5..8 4...1 108. Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux ...7 71..3 7...................041............ Paul-Bloomington .......3 4..7 4...1 43.....833... Kalamazoo-Portage .8 345...1 6.....9 6....3 8................... Detroit-Warren-Livonia .8 12....1 4......2 6............................0 Kansas .1 12....0 9.5 8...5 12........1 95.4 195........... Hagerstown-Martinsburg ....9 4...........7 11.. Waterloo-Cedar Falls ..7 7..5 131...1 72..5 55...1 3.........6 21..........6 6..9 21.4 2........823.8 72..1 312.... 692...8 11..6 61....0 7.........5 6........6 5.....6 6..1 64.497.....6 9.0 6....007....4 6.5 56.............9 213.......1 147....1 9.......9 6.5 11........7 212.7 3.6 180.4 Maine .3 8.9 4......4 67.8 295.......4 38.....0 632.4 6.2 63...8 10.............7 5. Salisbury .4 18..0 5..........8 57..5 2......5 64.............5 2.7 71...0 62........4 294...3 86.... Bay City .....041..2 8..9 12.4 10...941..3 3........9 18.......9 8..7 194....4 8..4 6................. Portland-South Portland-Biddeford ........1 5.......1 104....1 7.........9 122..7 5....2 10.6 245.....9 72....4 113.......7 8...3 531.... Duluth ..8 11..6 7...5 6...441....4 5.....4 53........2 7.9 61.......5 8....................5 7...4 22......7 11........5 3...5 98...0 49.. January 2011 2011 2012p .6 63..4 12.....6 10.8 251.......6 8........8 8.6 60.6 8. Leominster-Fitchburg-Gardner .5 8.1 4..9 6.5 7.4 179...3 1.8 4....5 110... Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area—Continued (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State and area January February January February 2011 2012p 99..6 77....1 16....2 2..7 11... Lafayette .......3 9........4 7.1 5.3 70..9 10.0 102......0 12..........4 56.....3 203.............3 32.....7 5..2 8..9 179..0 4...........7 9. New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner .9 81............4 9.9 7...4 6.........6 6...8 7.......6 9...5 142......1 173.....0 6..............5 8..2 4.....2 8..........1 49..9 9......2 34....3 86.8 8... 1..9 1.8 236......4 12.6 8.......3 62.........0 8....0 9..................9 27..3 8.6 7.....8 4.....1 29..1 8...3 7.........7 95...3 2......7 626..5 434.3 122.9 305.8 66...9 370....4 91..4 4...0 7.....9 12..............5 178....................2 119...........1 12.9 161....9 59..........0 4............0 9.1 8......996...5 5.............1 8..7 6..442......9 4............4 294...636.1 5.9 237.....0 281.4 10......8 6....... Ames ...6 10....2 6....9 9.0 2.6 2.4 11.9 72.......... 2011 2012 2011 2012p February 2012 2012 See footnotes at end of table............. Holland-Grand Haven ..........2 180..4 6....2 7..6 1.............049...4 4..8 5...............7 10.....5 62.......4 1....3 6...............6 6.....9 10............5 6..........5 79..........3 7..6 90...9 373...5 1.9 11..3 7....6 9..8 38......5 124.........4 38...9 5...6 182... Minnesota ....0 7..7 9.0 184...5 57......6 2...........0 12........658....8 9.....2 6.9 59.2 5..... Battle Creek .7 9.5 123.8 72......652...431...5 6..498...4 77.........6 70................3 144..8 129......3 237...9 Massachusetts .... Cedar Rapids ............7 7.3 1..7 86.6 11...0 5.....4 13.2 58.....4 6.... Sioux City .4 92.7 9....8 28.5 7....7 7..7 9.8 67...5 7.9 9.3 11...4 6......626...5 5...... 2.......498..8 8.4 234....8 295.1 52........8 12..9 258........4 49.0 237. Topeka ......1 10.2 7.....1 9.......0 11.3 7...8 7.....1 108....9 4.2 30....5 8.3 166.7 4.6 6.0 4.6 76.6 1.....5 115...........4 1...1 2..033..4 7...5 5..0 90.4 6...1 8.............0 14.......050.000..6 5. Lansing-East Lansing ...... Flint .5 194..8 23..1 7.0 7....4 39................6 10.5 68.......9 61.6 8............6 6........1 7.6 5.....5 7..6 80...6 4...1 6......1 6....4 1.....8 28........4 182.. Bowling Green ... Lawrence ...9 122..6 8.4 3..7 8................8 9.1 6....4 128....5 2....521...7 26....0 8..1 311.9 160.....7 52............0 1..6 235.1 5.2 9.............6 116..3 Maryland ........3 18..........6 9.1 17..1 8.... Alexandria ....7 378.7 53.3 5.6 6.....3 10....9 102....6 170......4 5....7 158.1 70....5 6......2 2........ Jackson .8 18...2 10..5 51.. Springfield ....5 218....4 5..2 142...3 6.9 126...........0 10....... Elizabethtown ...2 5.........3 338.....5 264....8 6.7 10..3 8.........7 72......................4 98.......5 5.......7 99..

0 38....4 7.....2 8......0 9....6 9........1 87.....3 44.1 10.8 44..3 6.........7 5.5 179...2 178...6 460..395....7 7.......4 9...4 8...2 267........8 4........7 13...5 72...3 7...0 74......3 11.9 569..........970.....6 92.......5 261.......0 83....0 29.....3 72.........4 8.5 3..0 7.. Wilmington ...3 10.8 509.9 564......8 9....9 4...........4 46..8 6....1 12.6 6...9 22....3 9...8 5......9 896..5 4..0 3..... Durham-Chapel Hill ..................1 20.9 67..4 895....2 88...1 90..............4 7.2 8............................4 3..9 9....9 84....1 45..........0 54. Rochester-Dover .......4 7.1 9. 1.....7 5.....3 9......8 8.......0 85.....6 10..........4 4...0 139..323........4 1.7 58...........................9 40....2 9.......... Louis1 .1 71...9 9..........4 11....2 448..5 51........1 6....3 58....8 9..0 4.6 85......2 12......5 52........942.....1 40....8 262....4 11.4 933..............5 34......1 316....2 6....6 68.............. 496....1 66.............1 1........2 9.....9 50....1 1.........3 107..9 222.8 100....8 8.... Billings ...4 14...998..8 6....1 51.9 30.......7 4.......6 206.5 6. Joplin ...8 3.6 316..4 North Carolina ...... Springfield .7 26......0 14.........8 6...........4 10..... Columbia ........9 1.....4 5......4 520...9 9...1 403.....8 2......8 14.3 23..................7 10....7 117.9 243.......9 119....2 9....6 16.1 995.9 8....396..6 293. New York City ..8 4..9 997.7 835.....2 6.....0 44...........0 118...7 55.....3 8...1 23......7 9..5 4...3 376.5 3.6 7.387....1 5.515.....8 35...1 11....1 9.9 51.3 9.0 219.001.9 3..1 8......... Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton ..5 7........9 116....................0 6...6 95....2 8..........2 25..........429..........3 8...8 10...1 523.....4 5.......5 18...4 4.......4 9................2 10...7 18...6 9.......3 14...........0 9.....2 43.1 10..1 178......0 10..1 93..5 497..0 3...6 138.9 11.....4 3.....2 92....9 438..............7 26..................5 14.. Lincoln ...................0 8..6 70...044.......................045...0 9...7 843.....8 73..0 17...1 8.4 75..7 92........... Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area—Continued (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State and area January February January February January 2012 2011 2012p 126.4 19..2 209.5 170......4 6...9 9...9 5.....6 14..4 6.........9 3..4 2....8 58..........2 9... Syracuse ...8 8.0 139...5 5.5 4.6 23...0 5.............6 68.......2 50.... See footnotes at end of table.....2 4...7 8..9 25......7 30...6 New Mexico .....3 145.0 7.. Rocky Mount ....8 875..4 86........9 2.0 170..0 78......6 120.6 16......5 10........8 6........... Winston-Salem ..........2 5.........0 168.8 11....365....9 101.5 51.....6 10....9 221.2 2.6 6.2 20...8 10..... Buffalo-Niagara Falls .7 44..LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 1....1 12...9 67......5 47.1 23..6 10..5 486...........4 228..........9 72........3 87.......9 8........5 5....9 1...8 8.....1 176........4 5....6 171..331.8 10.6 394......0 6...............3 73..1 10..7 54.............8 7.......3 58...5 72...0 500........... Ithaca .3 4...6 7....9 5............2 244........3 5..0 20..........2 22.........0 134......9 44...1 240.2 8.6 72...3 10.9 240.5 17.4 23.2 170...5 3..........4 7..0 13..0 9.......6 5...4 Missouri .....2 165.. Reno-Sparks ..3 51.2 44...0 13........1 4... Jefferson City ......2 17...............2 72.. St...9 13.....2 49...............0 9....1 136....2 9.................7 32........6 21...9 7...5 86.................4 37.3 90.7 4......4 74....400.0 3...1 8...5 369.2 10. Carson City ....7 12.. 9...............3 71...9 8..1 11..........0 9.6 4........3 11.0 880......4 11....0 218.2 135....4 5.......5 4....2 40......8 12...6 10.......8 9..9 191.......6 9...5 269...0 127...4 9.0 13.2 10.....1 162..0 11...1 8...437..8 10........ Farmington .......5 8.6 4.....6 9.......0 9.....7 6..5 8.4 9...4 120.1 251.....8 889.......3 86.......1 49........ Pascagoula .5 8.....452.9 7...4 443................1 42......032...........6 35........6 7....... Las Cruces ......6 11..3 68......5 16.....5 26.......0 30.3 4.....9 8..9 501..3 7....8 6.3 10.4 20..........9 45.... Ocean City ..0 520.4 437..........6 8..8 269.........1 6......... Rochester .6 20..2 3....5 227..0 13..5 9...8 7.6 1.3 9................. Burlington .7 500...2 7.2 10..........9 47..0 9.......3 11......1 6.7 442......8 92..8 138.3 98...1 4....8 7.........1 166.......9 3.0 71.. Kingston ...7 90.....4 6..4 6................5 10....0 7...2 207............2 5. Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill .5 3.....9 82...2 11... Cape Girardeau-Jackson .............0 226.3 9..6 9.........4 7....... Jackson .4 72.6 992............... Kansas City ..0 73.9 11.7 54........4 8..435.....1 103....433.3 53...5 66.2 3..5 9...............8 8. Las Vegas-Paradise ..5 87....9 574.......6 6..2 6..........7 32..2 1...... 734..............6 398...4 71.....1 54.1 86.........4 29......1 7...4 51.1 9.568.....0 981.4 New York ...........1 175...9 161..9 1...6 23.....6 9.........6 9..........601......5 92.........7 8.......6 2..3 27...5 38...7 4..1 9.3 38..043.....1 6..4 78.......0 5...487....1 5... Great Falls ...8 5.4 8...0 17........7 38.1 27... Atlantic City-Hammonton .8 592....7 87....... Greensboro-High Point ..4 8..7 34.6 9........9 71..........6 7..8 4.3 72.................9 319..7 9.9 77................1 8.3 8..................5 7.... Gulfport-Biloxi ..8 73.. Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown .... New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island .....335.0 739.........0 14..........7 7.........2 9....6 73.....1 41..948.....3 6......503.........385.5 4.............9 6..........8 11....5 68..447............4 8...2 10..6 11.....3 9..... Greenville .2 6..7 6...2 143.....1 2.4 5......7 3..7 8..6 4. Santa Fe ..0 45........................ Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton ...6 11. Glens Falls .......1 14.................................4 317.. Binghamton ..6 16.......2 93. Jacksonville ....2 290..5 9.4 5...9 13.......4 10........530..5 43..........8 128. St.......9 7......941......7 8....0 321.....7 7...2 9. Utica-Rome ... 3.......8 40...0 5...2 733.......7 67...8 8..9 144................7 220...6 9......2 1....4 573.....4 520...8 317....528..7 224..2 400..........2 9.....1 6.4 6. Fayetteville ....1 42....4 8...5 6.2 5......5 12.3 2...........6 20.......7 5...1 9..............9 14.9 5.....8 14.....7 887.3 10......8 5... Trenton-Ewing .... Omaha-Council Bluffs ...1 197...8 452...7 40.3 3....9 926..5 25...3 54...............0 6.6 18...9 21........8 165.7 10..9 13....7 169...2 8.....9 357......1 73......1 9.4 2012 2011 Mississippi ......3 6.......2 8..653......5 46.....8 3....5 269.....4 9....0 19.9 29...8 7...0 8..8 211..5 460.....0 452......... Portsmouth .........7 19...................7 4.......... 987.....6 19.......1 9.........8 568...0 19.......0 5...2 4...2 108..........1 8.7 87...........2 8.........9 9..1 8..............8 270...4 6..3 8......................8 5..9 9..........9 920................1 9..2 70.....1 14....9 68....2 19.......9 16.........590......3 8.................0 5.0 78.....6 68......2 1..7 18.............4 6...9 4............1 440.....2 New Jersey .0 28.....3 1......2 8...........8 40.....5 222.....3 9.6 1.......5 319..1 13......3 28.... Asheville .2 4..1 9....1 12......5 3.....6 3.4 4..7 16.....7 117.......1 8..0 6.2 21.. 2011 2012 2011 2012p February 2011 2011 2012p ..........4 6...0 8.6 5.7 35....0 9.1 4..... 4.8 47.0 94....8 11.2 590...2 7.. Goldsboro ....6 Nebraska ....1 133................0 10..8 107.......1 6..1 10.3 11..8 9...0 80....3 21..........5 8..8 54. 4..............6 207...1 16...... Albany-Schenectady-Troy ...1 1.....9 6....2 42...9 5.0 139.......6 11.6 6......7 9..............9 75.....7 14............5 6.....0 574....4 177..8 739.7 7....9 4....4 9.3 57....7 4... Albuquerque .7 73....0 472.....2 9.6 Nevada ....9 10..0 6....5 13.............2 139.........4 10....5 394...7 265..............8 8...9 861.8 5.......8 116...1 2.....2 48.......7 13.....6 4.....9 376.2 32............1 8..7 92....2 20....8 13...3 6...........3 222..4 107.1 8.4 6...........8 4...0 6.8 211......0 1..1 8..7 Montana ............366.7 6.....027...1 19....7 432....6 4.............4 7.....2 4....7 8................... Raleigh-Cary ..............2 6.4 26...6 5.........4 40......0 10... 1..5 9.0 369....2 12.........3 9..330.7 72..5 138..........0 2.......4 5.6 8.5 133...6 6..005.........2 9..............044........2 50..1 54..6 11..9 983..5 29........4 7..0 26.. Joseph .....5 4.8 7.6 8.0 818.3 920...6 451..3 55....0 87.......7 8............657..2 15........9 19.1 8...9 8.......7 67..2 32.1 9..0 10..8 8..9 8.......9 369..2 97......4 7..6 8..8 321....1 173.8 14.2 8....5 1...7 7.....9 1... Hattiesburg . Elmira ...0 851....2 118.4 9...8 9.....4 9..007....4 New Hampshire ....2 10.3 55....8 6...4 16.5 9....0 394.8 55.1 9.............3 10..4 13...5 40... Missoula ....5 5.7 28....2 115...1 7.......1 7..3 14.. Manchester .....480......2 65...3 72......9 862..........

.................222..2 5...4 5................4 28........ Lancaster ...3 9.....4 407.....5 9..9 2..........7 5..3 5.....4 7...........5 61.2 2.....5 44...9 7.....6 13.....5 8.9 Oregon .........9 209.....8 308...6 44..0 79.4 192....1 79..4 10.751...6 281......9 8.....5 8..3 91...........6 131...5 138..7 18.4 30.....4 40.0 9............. Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville ................365.......2 11..6 9.8 13.......6 29.....7 53..3 18....8 4.6 10..9 1...1 3..........6 11...1 138...8 949.......7 10.......2 53.0 3. 371...........7 5.........0 103..0 11......9 44..........2 100.............5 77....5 3..6 See footnotes at end of table...8 30.........9 24...8 8...9 10.3 66.3 12..............2 439........8 279....6 21......0 114...7 3..2 1........0 18....5 10..0 6....8 7.......6 29.......1 101..1 436...9 43. Harrisburg-Carlisle .....086....6 68.3 34..4 438...7 64...5 13.. Chattanooga ...9 9...6 8.1 12..2 383....... Steubenville-Weirton ....6 329....3 9..1 14...........6 3...0 10......8 4...9 3..1 128..............4 5.2 39....5 9... 564....9 315...7 3..8 23...9 7......9 4..2 63.2 27......1 8..........8 11.....9 364.8 11......3 5. Sumter ..3 203......4 8...0 183...5 14....5 124...1 371...........5 49...............8 316. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton ...7 8.....8 4.131.........9 281................0 8........3 197.....3 7.9 11.9 122......0 2..8 12.......9 10...7 7.....1 7...5 580.8 9....7 10.2 193.. Anderson ..973......088.....0 South Carolina ..2 421.3 18..3 8...1 118....... Lima .0 317.4 6.......4 19.1 4......6 8..5 120...........9 263.4 5..........7 8....9 4..9 9..............8 31......7 14........1 12..8 4............2 2.6 131.0 91.... Erie ..972.4 65.9 6.................5 5.5 188...0 199.6 9.......4 112..........6 1.5 139........3 19.5 10.........0 8.....9 5.....5 264..2 10.4 5..........8 6...8 268...3 13.5 84....7 33.............9 223......5 8..4 133................6 12....3 7...........0 7.4 9..7 30.......6 9..075.5 62.9 48...8 68.....4 2.7 11....1 1................4 19.2 120.6 5.....2 5....4 10....0 22......7 8. Spartanburg ....8 8...5 7...199.083.6 2....213...0 54.7 10..3 946.....8 37....6 40.8 24..9 79.......2 121.9 8.2 3..6 9............5 10.......6 5..................9 13...................4 222...4 8.085.........3 8.7 13..LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 1..8 10.1 101..............9 33.....7 9... Lebanon ......6 5......5 266... Clarksville ....7 555.5 8..........5 4....6 13...7 264..............8 381.8 61...5 90.3 323.5 22.2 73.5 561....5 20......5 65.1 573... ....2 4.... Pittsburgh .....8 5......................9 5..1 36......7 10.9 8.....9 5...........6 93....7 9..4 114.5 700....8 407..8 14........0 9..5 7...1 68...3 28...4 12......3 12.2 10...4 5............ 5..2 203...5 7....5 67.5 282....2 282.2 572.......... Springfield ....0 10........7 105........... Cleveland .....4 17.3 128........7 9.......6 92..8 16..6 12..9 11.... Mansfield .........6 47..9 556.0 366.6 49....3 4........0 3...3 2....4 4........2 131.....9 8....5 4......4 8.6 14.0 42...... Toledo .195.... Greenville-Mauldin-Easley ..........8 6..............6 23.5 7.....2 11....................6 6.2 75.......8 259.1 19.....1 86........1 4.........9 261....7 34.2 28.8 5.....8 442...........6 2...0 2......0 12..776.......1 2.....7 6..3 9.3 421.0 7.........8 4.7 6.....9 10..0 280.........7 373..........0 30.3 6.7 3.7 5...1 45.............7 32..0 40.7 91.3 16... Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro .5 5..5 8.7 10.....1 7...8 73.7 281........7 373..9 310....2 8...........5 84........0 8.......345.....1 Oklahoma ......9 69.......1 8.0 9.9 98.....1 6......9 80...6 3.....4 9...........7 4..... Reading .....7 9....9 72...0 11...............0 72..............0 575.. Rapid City ........3 121......2 54.........4 7.....1 33.9 6..9 1.......8 223.5 10.....5 5...4 15..0 15...9 1..7 122.0 10......5 40.8 32....6 177..5 8...... 6........6 9..6 7...8 86..............9 3....5 44.750....3 6.....8 420..........5 35..3 10.5 114.6 4.0 7..8 9.9 30.5 19.8 1.....1 10........2 8.....3 6............5 317......7 235..4 22....8 24. Jackson ...4 103...6 8.................. 1......7 442.8 7........4 37..763.......1 5.4 7.....1 17....2 13.7 231.........7 7...1 8.... Williamsport ...............4 10.......0 8..5 8........1 7...8 5.....3 318.4 49.....121........9 955.....4 4..3 197....0 2.......5 6....7 5...........6 22...7 8....193......8 7.6 8..0 7..................6 11.......6 123.069...9 1...........1 7..1 19....221....0 6..2 8.......7 420............ Salem ...............................3 18.....2 204.0 529.1 6.........9 433..5 57.......... Providence-Fall River-Warwick ...0 Rhode Island ..7 6......2 10... 3.........223.0 556.... State College .....4 63.4 115....4 262. Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area—Continued (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State and area January 2011 February 2012 2011 2012p January 2011 February 2012 2011 January 2012p February 2011 2012 2011 2012p North Dakota .9 6......4 7.....7 10.3 24...........4 1............8 11.........8 10........0 6.................7 64......3 34..... Sandusky .1 1.5 7..8 5.8 9.2 8...128..9 6...... Florence .7 4...200.6 65.........0 9....8 322......0 4...7 12.......8 82.3 6.2 27.6 1..335...... Columbus ....6 570...1 5.4 4......9 3..2 39.....................4 5..8 67....... Canton-Massillon ........6 10......3 9..7 59..5 5.....0 20..5 8..976..8 Tennessee ..0 12.8 5.5 6...........9 1.6 9.6 11.....7 4..3 203...1 10........4 85........1 9..8 68.......6 35...7 16.9 9.3 91...6 56..... Oklahoma City ....3 61...........1 9.....4 102..8 7.5 5.096.9 9.......8 1........8 14....9 8.762.7 7...9 100..........8 47.2 4...........3 8..4 24..2 11...2 55...1 55.8 280....9 12....0 12....9 36...4 1............. Medford ....0 9....0 9.......6 8......1 76.......5 6.8 15.979..............081.6 7.981.9 12....8 7.......0 7.........8 6..8 102.6 195.2 9.6 8.1 8..2 104..4 4...5 486..3 7..9 7.4 62....6 7...4 7......1 25....... Cincinnati-Middletown ...5 690...4 83....................0 9......2 3...9 10...1 4.6 9...1 195.0 224........7 68.....9 4......6 8....6 260..3 11..1 5.. Sioux Falls ...........747.2 6.....6 2.......1 112..6 10.8 27....0 10.0 5....967...151. Tulsa .9 7.4 265...8 49... York-Hanover ..7 4...4 8....7 South Dakota ..3 27......7 5..................2 9..4 1..... Bend ......3 177...............3 56...0 81....5 5...9 6............9 9.9 9...2 203..2 12..................0 53.9 8....9 211..2 12..6 181..2 8.........3 1..7 8....6 17...4 64............ Bismarck ...8 8... Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington .9 18..1 5...........1 10... Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor ....3 73.6 325.5 11................6 131...4 4.......9 27..0 691.2 546.8 8........2 11...................4 55.... Lawton ........0 309.1 370... Eugene-Springfield ....8 518.........7 9....9 69..2 259............0 55.......9 11..6 21.....7 64........345.0 10.0 53.3 1....9 5.....2 101....6 8......1 9.....7 40..........1 57....3 92....... Youngstown-Warren-Boardman ...2 21..........6 65................7 9....2 10...0 35........0 2..105..0 8.. Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway ...0 8..4 1....1 69.....962..7 14....2 9.....9 58..........6 9......5 58......2 Ohio .......1 18....8 406......................4 10..3 268.. Johnstown ........2 6....7 4...1 113..........2 5....5 9..........8 11................2 92..724..4 80..3 12.1 9.........6 259...0 203..8 9..5 552....5 2.......3 9........9 29.............. Grand Forks ..........6 8...6 138...........0 11..0 74..0 372..6 262.....4 319.. Columbia ......2 265.3 13...9 2...1 194.8 130...0 32.......1 3.. Fargo .....6 312...........3 67..2 121.9 3.8 10.9 8........4 68.. 435.8 7..5 97....5 7.....1 4.......1 Pennsylvania .4 19..3 198.........9 10...3 5.8 20..0 18...........3 16.....069........................4 945. Dayton ....2 82........7 55..3 366..8 48......2 4..1 94. Akron .8 3..4 259........1 697......2 6....7 9.....9 18....7 266....................9 8.7 7..0 6....0 44.......5 6...............4 8.......754..3 121........ 2..8 61.. Scranton—Wilkes-Barre ....097..4 262..............064..3 4....6 45....5 68..8 9.........5 59.......... Altoona ....0 17....3 4......6 10..3 24...9 28........8 11...................1 1.8 1....8 435....6 1...........8 3..7 56........5 5................956....1 11......8 79.......0 10....1 9........4 5.......6 2.0 2.6 494....9 366.......5 21..7 5.5 12...8 16.. Johnson City ................ Corvallis ..2 405....2 10. 1.....9 101.........7 20.........8 1.

...7 7......9 162..2 132.7 13.....5 7.4 9........... Memphis ...6 4....7 78...........6 6....1 8.....1 1.5 69..1 328.....7 4....3 8.9 11...... Morgantown .3 4.6 114......3 21..........8 111.....3 57.1 13.....9 162..........0 60.........9 8......... Harrisonburg ........8 213...9 20......1 69..7 9...... Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown ......1 16.1 7.....1 10.6 25....3 34.5 8........................2 64. Laredo ..........5 12.5 106.0 83......3 7........256..........6 829...6 9.....284.6 218....5 8....9 9.4 73..2 5..........9 135...7 7......3 148......3 48......1 127.....2 7..9 3......2 16..9 3..... Burlington-South Burlington .7 6..........7 25.........7 55.5 1..4 12..... El Paso .......8 6...........2 218.6 291..........9 112.....6 3.4 20......1 130..........2 123.......5 5.....4 6. George ......6 123..4 7.6 8...1 358.1 8.2 8.........8 10...3 4....004.... Odessa .9 81..8 11.4 5..5 7.2 8...5 6... 12....1 115..1 16..2 7..7 3.....6 6.1 8.....9 68.7 6....3 10..........5 5.....1 12.3 63..3 6......4 57.8 4...........5 25.1 68.5 5........2 235......7 3.... Knoxville ............343...4 6......5 602.......2 3.......8 8...483........7 7....7 6..0 9..9 8..472...9 5..........7 171........0 790.....9 82.2 31.... Lubbock .0 5......0 113..............9 20...7 9....6 10..9 17..4 5.5 7.....7 4....8 8....7 180....2 103.7 9..0 61....6 73..7 10.........8 81...5 7.....4 9...9 4...........2 222...4 10........ .......... Charlottesville .0 127...8 1...3 8........1 10......8 8.7 136.5 35....5 71...6 3. Abilene ...............1 5.............7 10.8 184... Longview .....0 146......2 10....3 327.6 8.......3 9..8 6.......3 8.6 7......2 7.4 6....................9 616..2 5.7 12.. San Angelo ..6 3..2 115....0 10..................4 11..8 358........0 22...2 3...4 10......2 7.8 76.........6 136...0 17..........0 60...7 4...8 11..0 188..8 170..8 10....2 67.....0 10...5 5..8 677.........2 62....9 5....2 13..... Yakima .0 246........9 107....0 67.5 838..........6 179..9 West Virginia .9 5..3 5.....1 5...7 65..9 56...8 71.5 6.2 12..6 23.4 8..9 264...5 132..4 81........1 7..5 1.............7 75....1 6......2 113.7 6...9 5...4 9.8 262..7 5...880.9 8..2 76. Nashville-Davidson—Murfreesboro—Franklin 148..9 5..........4 3.5 136......4 8.......9 5....4 7........ 3........6 9..2 89.7 56.9 8.6 11....8 7..8 8...5 4.... Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News .2 6.....2 5...5 134.......8 43....0 116.... Salt Lake City .7 8....1 20........1 10...........1 8.....0 4...9 5.8 11...2 83.5 7.....................6 75..8 11.....292..8 7.6 3.......9 7.4 4....1 8......6 99.........4 13..0 58...8 6..1 115....8 235.7 230.7 10. Waco ..0 133......1 9.... Winchester ........ Logan .4 3.......4 828.......9 84...9 680... Amarillo ....5 4....3 8.0 76....7 317.....6 8.5 17.........8 6..3 6.7 12.5 59.........0 5....7 11.....1 326.6 8.. Wichita Falls .1 3....6 5........6 7..........5 9...325.......1 11.6 7......0 44.........1 11.....5 6.9 10..3 9.................004.8 8..6 231.. Roanoke ..9 14.......................8 161..1 839.......5 11..3 58.......3 6. Spokane ........4 60....... Olympia ......4 44....2 949..3 57........5 11..........8 99....9 163.... Corpus Christi .4 12..........5 7.0 114...........2 6.9 81.......6 131........6 65.6 68..7 11..6 18...3 7...5 216..5 8.... Richmond .9 50.. St.......9 5.................1 4.........1 9.....0 11...3 52..0 10........0 129.9 6..6 3.....1 8...4 7.........0 59.5 8........3 9............8 81..4 6...5 34...8 5....6 65.......8 5.2 13...5 7..9 102.........6 6.........4 599.0 10.9 146.0 6.................8 7...................8 159.1 4.0 111.....8 106..7 4..................0 6..9 8...9 6.....8 12.....0 64..5 14... Wheeling ...2 928..3 10.................3 894.5 61. Tyler ...0 114.1 3..1 34...7 7.7 58.3 117.9 79.............2 123..................7 7.........7 832.7 5.1 5.4 6.8 29....7 7.5 84.............3 8......2 235....8 6...2 123.0 244..0 44.2 10....... San Antonio-New Braunfels .5 8..8 4.......3 7............ Longview ...0 6....9 9........................1 4.....3 10......2 4..4 3..........2 10..9 6..4 1..2 18.....1 10..5 4..6 5..9 10.3 13.........7 38..... McAllen-Edinburg-Mission .8 9...6 67. Charleston .....8 7.....461.9 8....8 53....3 30.339..257.. Beaumont-Port Arthur .....0 3.5 56..0 4.....008............8 73...8 22....3 Virginia ....6 58....8 6....6 7......5 11....2 10..3 7.0 10........8 57..2 19.......0 66.........5 13..7 11...9 3......6 160..8 6........007.1 5.3 170......498....6 160...........0 133......6 17.1 7.8 7.5 4...4 6...9 368..0 63...7 189.2 6..7 10..........2 7.................2 6................1 11.0 65.....4 6.............1 83............3 9.........4 7..1 9.....6 9........9 5...........8 131...................7 134.8 233..3 833.8 3.. Mount Vernon-Anacortes ...2 7.7 54.....3 67........7 106.251.6 5...8 6....6 946............0 8.2 5.1 317..........9 668........2 8...4 63.9 5.......1 84.....2 600..9 Vermont .4 65. Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood .1 68.........6 6....6 7....3 63. 358..........3 11.7 14....9 6......7 65........3 10..4 5..040...................2 7.6 119.0 5......7 8.3 6.........8 113........8 4.8 6...0 374........5 11. Lynchburg .............5 7..1 14......4 119.......3 108....7 615.5 1...6 149.. Midland .... Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington ..1 667....8 103..........6 7..........2 12.1 7...3 23.0 5....0 127....4 8........6 8. Provo-Orem ...4 792.4 6..........4 8...6 6........9 8..............7 599..9 1.8 5..6 7...2 124....1 6........944.5 8....3 13..6 3..........6 6...1 14..4 6.8 82..4 67.. Bellingham ... Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna ....4 113......6 12.3 6.............3 5.............8 189.......6 7.7 5.5 10...4 13.. 790..5 6..7 146..3 9..1 55.........4 10.....343.....0 8.9 6.........3 7..873...7 44......4 41.......6 11..2 8.........................4 Washington ...0 3..8 7.......8 10..7 57...7 3....3 6..7 4.........7 270.2 3...6 6. Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford .8 8.8 620......2 7..8 24..... Sherman-Denison .....2 316..............4 326......6 61.........2 56.....6 9....0 6...3 621...4 3.6 10..7 73..................4 171...4 11.....8 223.....1 58.....5 67..........8 73.....6 76..7 8...........1 105......7 11.........7 5......2 35...0 6....2 105......................... College Station-Bryan .... Texarkana .....4 11..7 71....1 799..1 7.2 8..4 4.880..1 6..6 5.......1 7... Morristown .........6 253.....2 115.....7 7......7 103.1 75.............9 6..332.7 358.9 68..7 6....5 4..2 5..4 60...1 254...9 7.........0 4.6 7.4 369......1 5....9 7..........1 6..1 4.. Ogden-Clearfield .9 7....0 258. Kennewick-Pasco-Richland ..2 5....6 7..... Danville ............1 3.2 7.....3 58.0 223.3 7..1 5...........7 312..8 7.....4 9.1 324.3 2..6 5....7 69............7 6.2 7...6 114...3 5...1 162.....9 124.......9 19..4 5......8 62...........2 7..9 5.........2 6.5 12.8 10.........008...1 114.......8 6..5 147.7 6...0 1...6 57........295...0 4.2 5.....0 320......7 11.9 8......9 4......9 8.....0 8........4 7.946..464.1 112.9 8..8 258......4 59...........0 4.9 7........5 58...9 18...9 5........ Brownsville-Harlingen .3 63..8 359.8 933..........8 8...9 4...4 67.0 9......6 55. Victoria ..1 4....004......6 1.889....8 6..6 7.1 5.3 4.254...9 6.........9 10..9 130.....0 1..4 831......7 8.............7 7......8 7....8 See footnotes at end of table........7 3.....3 1...6 5..4 Utah ..1 9...7 121...6 153.......3 20..2 6.0 7...0 56.......9 104..... Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue ..5 258....2 131..3 156......4 280....8 66.... Huntington-Ashland .......4 7.4 830......4 134.....0 9....1 52...335.6 7...................... 4..............5 32..6 12.......7 2.2 14.........5 6.....5 6.....LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 1.............7 7.............8 123.........4 8... Wenatchee-East Wenatchee .1 8.....4 359........9 1.......1 944.4 372..6 59.....4 43.....7 148..1 39...2 68....5 43....8 72.......1 52...9 10..6 6.....6 45.4 125...4 10..........5 24................5 221.....0 80............2 4......2 102.....2 10....4 6.... Bremerton-Silverdale ......008.1 57..................1 58..4 8.....9 6.5 5.........0 8.6 255....... 1...0 213.....476.........4 6..1 125........2 3..3 11.322............... Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos .......3 11............7 9...0 4.......3 8..........9 8.....4 1..1 Texas .5 7...3 4.0 67..7 7.2 5.1 6.... Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area—Continued (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State and area January 2011 February 2012 2011 2012p January 2011 February 2012 2011 January 2012p February 2011 2012 2011 2012p Tennessee—Continued Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol ....0 7..

.....7 25................7 5.....6 35..7 8.289.4 8..........6 8...8 34................ 1.......5 25.6 127.7 13........4 6...9 6.9 5...5 26.7 6....8 16.......1 88.....7 68.9 73....4 4.....2 7......3 17...0 6..6 6.3 790....6 25...8 8.....9 16..9 4.....6 6... Data for Puerto Rico are derived from a monthly household survey similar to the Current Population Survey..6 18..9 7.....9 16...9 7......2 6..................2 22.......3 62.0 8....7 124.1 858....6 36......7 191...1 4.5 264..........9 4...9 8..8 6..6 8.......... Mayaguez ..............0 98...3 17.......5 25.7 7..bls...5 8..0 7....3 86....8 35...........9 96...2 36..6 7........ La Crosse ...5 17...............5 9.5 17..7 88......2 67......2 7...0 60..........2 229..1 42.7 5....8 13.9 6......4 6.............. Oshkosh-Neenah ......6 9...........1 7......050..1 344.4 18.2 61.2 8...... Iowa-Ill.....1 90... They are listed under the state that appears first in their titles......8 1......LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 1....269......7 175...4 7.9 171.4 6........5 5......6 106..3 9.4 44.... and are available on the BLS Web site at www....9 7.....5 13.............. Racine ....... Civilian labor force and unemployment by state and metropolitan area—Continued (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State and area January February January February 2011 2012p 240..3 7.9 14.....7 19....2 4......9 124.6 173.2 35.....6 109......3 13.............2 7.......3 15.4 257.5 6..5 7.2 26... Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian ....1 107.........4 6......... Madison ..1 12.....9 1...1 9..0 42....6 9...8 8....7 98..7 15.....4 88........6 14..........9 8. Davenport-Moline-Rock Island.5 6...0 8. Janesville . Area definitions are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No.. 300..9 76...4 10.......6 6...1 61........5 26..8 343...9 3...4 5..gov/lau/lausmsa.....5 119...........026.....2 2.............7 6.......0 7.htm.2 43..8 9......1 9........2 20. Yauco ...3 7...2 1.7 860...8 9....4 43..3 76. while areas in other states are county-based..8 54.......9 5...4 20..1 13..8 7........ Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states....9 5.9 5..7 202...7 95... 2009..9 8.1 2..........0 6..2 16.........0 15.. NOTE: Data refer to place of residence...6 72.......9 5......7 14...9 26.9 3.........3 5........ Green Bay ....5 300.......6 127.......5 3...............6 2....3 7.... Cheyenne ....6 8..............1 844.....2 97.... is the exception in that it is listed under Illinois for operational reasons..7 18..8 21.5 125....6 1 Area boundaries do not reflect official OMB definitions.............1 124....1 8.3 16....8 6...3 8.......2 55....7 17...9 4..7 4.....6 5.............6 5....0 797........ Fond du Lac ..1 18..6 5..0 7.7 46........9 7.....9 19.............4 202....6 22.......0 3................... Wausau ....... San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo .......4 8...1 88....7 16.....8 98. Data for 2011 have been revised to incorporate updated inputs and adjustment to new state controls....1 7...6 198..9 7......6 45... Appleton .4 15......9 7...1 3.1 10..3 4.....1 341............4 4.....8 18....9 17.0 77.......3 36...... San German-Cabo Rojo .....9 6...2 14.7 17...0 10..285. Casper ..2 4.........6 96.....7 108.1 9.....5 2011 Wisconsin ............3 172.....0 16.....7 15........9 35..3 3..2 17.8 6.....7 18...........5 49..0 72.9 79. Areas in the six New England states are 2012 2011 2012p February 2012 2012 2011 January 2011 2011 2012p Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs).......9 49..2 5....1 794.7 18.......9 96.....6 5... Fajardo ........055..9 6....0 12.5 77. Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month.....4 72........8 8.....7 304......7 8. p = preliminary..5 4.........3 9.043...0 89.........0 75...9 7....... 3....2 61.......6 6...3 6....6 8........8 55.......7 14....297.. Guayama ..1 9.......0 55.. dated December 1....6 5.........0 337.1 15.9 15.................2 77..... Sheboygan ........6 867...1 22......2 15......2 20............4 124......2 15.........8 788..............0 3.......8 79. Ponce ...4 Wyoming ...7 7.. ..0 48...... Eau Claire ......3 17.....6 7..7 16...8 7..............8 21.....4 5.......1 3......6 303.1 63..................4 7...4 7.... 10-02..3 Puerto Rico ...7 6..7 7.......................... Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis ...0 7.....8 7..2 4.0 87....5 48.9 16.5 5..........3 44...8 6..

Three sets of metropolitan areas and divisions have similar or identical titles.6 6.0 Washington .. like Camden.9 176........186.....4 321..4 391....1 1......5 163.522............1 7.4 2.198.......8 6..... selected metropolitan area..8 9..447.......097..5 9. and some..143....6 125.......9 33.. 344.1 30......5 9.2 9. Dallas-Plano-Irving ......839.0 190.9 11...C.....2 3.1 1......890.3 3..3 108..3 9...8 9.9 7....5 2....5 1..2 8.8 7..... Some divisions lie in more than one state.518.8 397...3 10.1 616.1 7.3 12..223.... Washington-Arlington-Alexandria 2 .......7 268.2 18..3 1.....211..3 661.5 7.....7 5. Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall .. respectively.....3 124...2 7..... For Washington-Arlington-Alexandria....652....2 11.......293..9 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria 2 .2 10.... 6..........5 147.8 4. Edison-New Brunswick 3 .4 295..487....189.5 1........8 9.......3 6.612.... Data for 2011 have been revised to incorporate updated inputs and adjustment to new state controls....1 8..7 6.... Civilian labor force and unemployment by state. ...3 7.1 8..... the division titles are similar but include only Massachusetts and Illinois...8 8....2 9.2 92.2 11.... 9....0 199.. Detroit-Warren-Livonia ..9 9.... Peabody .........3 1. 9.....437..7 9...494....... Framingham ......1 2...8 3.1 63.3 3...8 979...8 9.4 4..068.7 946.2 8...175......0 8....3 10.....4 106......8 85.7 9.1 7....... San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont .1 1...3 12..9 9...1 149..990.....3 2....3 475......4 1.976.2 7..538.7 9.5 643......7 851....4 56..1 10...1 65......3 6.0 4.8 10.......3 9........483..962.4 106....0 518..5 6...0 386.8 5.....5 45..6 12.956...0 130.6 8.....480...8 2.......8 7..7 11.5 8...1 10...929....3 2..0 170......... Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills .....................6 666..3 6............ 6.5 442...130.7 12.659..094...9 7....9 9.3 651.472........6 67...4 9. Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford 2 ..9 9.....9 9.7 10.8 9.4 106..... 10-02............ Bethesda-Rockville-Frederick 3 .487.4 4..3 8....481....2 1.2 11.3 228..8 463.9 3.1 616..1 9.8 261...-N.0 12.080..496....... San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City ......6 197..2 8...4 45.....521....0 353...0 12...0 180...9 9. Oakland-Fremont-Hayward ..0 819..9 264.4 259.8 146.........7 127... Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach ....6 617.5 10.8 9...0 9......9 213..3 540.6 5...7 30..6 8...5 63..1 12..452.0 113.256..4 10......8 1.......0 5..9 129.5 164......5 11.....395..1 9...523.0 11..6 1...0 151..3 438.8 126... Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn ...9 1..1 81........... Mass.........451.6 7.5 8.....4 5...5 12..........8 73.0 7.0 552.......9 153..595.......651...257. and division January 2011 California .6 94. and metropolitan division 1 (Numbers in thousands) Unemployed Civilian labor force Number Percent of labor force State..5 750.....-Ind.2 615.9 5.0 107.Va.....2 128...3 8...4 1.201...777...8 12.....1 607. available at www...5 9....891.0 985. They are listed under the state that corresponds to the first city in their title..476..7 9.0 10...4 123..........1 2...........2 7..0 7..447.6 7..243.....0 2..9 1.....7 10.......3 11.8 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue ...5 46.. dated December 1.1 648...3 1............491......6 6.3 91... Boston-Cambridge-Quincy 2 ...149.....496.7 9..8 1....247.0 Michigan ...9 95....4 3..9 11...280....7 9.8 3.....012...3 652......4 146..0 4......9 9...7 312..6 7.......7 34....3 820...5 1..2 633........7 9......2 270..7 1..7 1..........6 2.315......365.. 2009.9 11..7 167......5 142.....4 7.4 9......8 5...7 2.2 4..525.296.. Wilmington 3 .180.636......345....4 2..040.4 127..175...6 7.....4 3......... 6.496...........1 3.....0 8..... Lake County-Kenosha County 2 .....498....H.2 8.880.7 875..042..........9 10...5 307....2 722..5 1. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale .4 9..6 144. D.....9 843..2 321............0 9...096.....6 11......6 808.8 82.. Newark-Union 3 .0 4.....447..5 138........4 180...6 880..524...0 8...9 980....4 221.2 2.......3 8.0 166..279........8 113.5 123...7 76...7 258..... 18.......6 9..0 18.......8 123....6 9.5 7...335............345.1 112.......3 4...5 1...3 86......5 1..2 4.....880.439.....2 178.8 9......566...9 9.896.8 593..2 2..7 8.0 144......5 109.1 1..513.........1 654........1 9.........5 4.....6 5........... Chicago-Joliet-Naperville .489.441.0 90..1 111............ Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine .....4 148..2 7....................365....0 3.......-W.......3 11..2 11.5 9.9 5...9 2..4 1. and Chicago-Joliet-Naperville...3 8..2 7.....3 156.......1 2.432..103.8 877.7 11........ Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington .0 11.1 2..0 7.9 391.3 1.....4 11..1 8.9 9.....6 2.195..6 9..8 34.7 1..4 11.....0 325....1 9......2 649...6 1...0 978...0 8....6 13..9 10...6 9.6 9....... Taunton-Norton-Raynham ....6 552...4 36..946.4 112......4 9.9 110.....3 396..3 233....7 166..6 12...9 3. Fort Worth-Arlington ....0 436....2 75.5 384...1 10......4 3.....996.4 8.-Md...........198... Seattle-Bellevue-Everett ....2 251..6 9..5 68..2 8......925...6 63..2 7...0 8.. Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states..461...286............... Haverhill-North Andover-Amesbury 2 .5 8......4 8....1 177..0 9.2 126....9 1.1 69........5 5.9 12.2 37.4 Pennsylvania .......3 10.....4 80...5 2.......6 6.3 8....4 184.....4 10.. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach Chicago-Joliet-Naperville 2 .8 666....3 8.....7 2....8 9.........3 1.....8 1..4 522.3 8.....8 1....1 74. metropolitan areas........ 3. 3..7 10.... Boston-Cambridge-Quincy ..3 67.. 2 Part of the area (or division) is in one or more adjacent states..6 137..1 588...0 7..8 1....9 124......6 127..4 6...5 7. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs)..4 6....6 89....7 9.3 111..9 11...6 362.000. Estimates for the latest month are subject to revision the following month......6 1...7 38.7 142..3 1..1 10....9 179......1 101.7 347..... New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island 2 .287..7 138.5 10.6 110. New York-White Plains-Wayne 2 ..940...1 9.835.....8 28.5 176.3 8.......-Va...7 546..8 2..7 36..6 6......6 95...7 9.7 9..... while areas in other states are county-based....8 11.8 5..292.......5 6..9 6.....2 990...6 4.. p = preliminary.....498...9 30...0 12.6 103.0 47..LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED LABOR FORCE DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 2.3 153.8 203........6 12..6 344..6 6...5 13..182..247....0 716.8 9.3 10..0 Texas ....1 8....011.0 9.592. NOTE: Data refer to place of residence...521....7 981........1 175....889..5 8.. Camden 3 ......7 1.9 69.3 1.. the metropolitan area and division titles are identical...1 317.....3 2....839..7 155..9 9........gov/lau/lausmsa....4 5...0 73..2 839....6 42........6 9..1 3..2 325..6 12.6 District of Columbia ...4 1.1 7...102.7 8......9 529......591.....3 177.3 35.....3 32..9 1.....4 2.....4 127.6 4.4 168..... Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach ..7 12.873..0 10...9 10...3 1.941.. Ill..3 862.7 835.442......3 7.bls..5 245.. Metropolitan divisions are listed under their metropolitan areas...9 6...1 8...2 463..8 1....4 9...806...........7 2..186.....4 967...7 7.1 8.2 11..4 9..3 647........771........143.967..... Nashua 2 .....2 1....5 32.1 77..3 156.290....8 12................ Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton .....6 73.J...1 9...9 35.2 156..189...............2 8.......9 9...... N..1 2.098.... For the Boston-Cambridge-Quincy..628..............523...3 101.. area.6 9...5 New York ...2 1..7 9.7 73..9 300..6 9.5 18..9 10..503..7 27....5 11...9 138.1 148..4 8.081..9 Florida ...3 1..604........3 180. Area definitions are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No.0 818........1 2.1 8...2 10.0 31.............3 10........2 281......2 5.020...8 12......6 358....4 268.8 10.. Lawrence-Methuen-Salem 2 .9 2.690...8 1.6 8.9 41.8 538.396..1 10.....3 10.343.1 6...5 437.8 129........ are totally outside the states under which their metropolitan areas are listed.8 59..3 2.7 9.5 982.3 1..2 124......299...8 968...520...9 5......htm.464.9 5...1 1.....2 5...004.7 354....0 6.249..1 8.2 780.284....9 154.....1 63...2 13.................0 8...3 393...6 9.1 10.. Tacoma ..9 8..1 9.. 3...7 February January February January February 2012 2011 2012p 2011 2012 2011 2012p 2011 2012 2011 2012p Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana .....3 9.... 12..2 Massachusetts ...093...0 8..9 667.....5 5.316.....3 2...4 354...6 155...8 6....8 10.1 36.......... Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington 2 ..7 345..1 9.. 3 All of the division is in one or more adjacent states......6 8........4 9...2 Illinois .5 118..0 1....2 9.3 9. Philadelphia ..8 1..9 2......9 6....-Wis.....9 1........1 437..954......5 6...202.3 4....9 810.5 434...9 521......7 4....8 8..335...9 9...9 9.6 244............0 8.... Gary 3 ....521...9 187.0 265.9 447.2 6.0 116...1 1...................523......8 861.7 9....8 8..4 8.........7 2......007..7 6..4 259.9 616..6 1..1 5.....3 1.4 507.... 4..9 9..926......451..5 4.1 9.....6 7.8 894..3 7..........6 10...0 194...9 9..1 1.......... Nassau-Suffolk ..5 129..080.......0 12.2 9.245... 1 These 11 areas contain all of the 34 metropolitan divisions..8 141..626.......4 359..176.......269...6 355....3 8...6 117..6 7....7 9.537....0 8..8 262.2 5....400..7 140......7 9.........

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 3. . .5 3.6 -0. . . . .5 109. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .202. .149. . . . . . . . . . .2 169. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 481. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fairbanks. .4 36. . Number Percent . . . . .2 -0. .1 58. . . . Napa. . . . . . . .5 207. . . . . .1 92.1 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 161. . . . . . .4 484. . . . . . . . .7 166. . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . .9 278. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 317. . . . . .0 59. . .8 -1. . Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville. . . . . . .9 0. . . . . . . .4 864. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 45. . . . . . . . . . .2 167. . . . . . . . . .4 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 -0. . . . . . . . . .4 48. . . . . Visalia-Porterville. . . . . . . . . . . .5 36. . . . . . . . .3 0. .7 93. . . .5 0.5 -0. .8 1. . . Santa Rosa-Petaluma. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . 308. . . . . . . . .6 55. . . . . . . . . Stockton. . . . . .1 13. . . . . . . . Vallejo-Fairfield. . . . . .853. . . . . . . .9 36. . .2 1. .3 1. . . . . . . .136. . 1. . . . . . . Salinas. . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 39. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 1. . . . Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura.3 8. Dothan. . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. .8 7.5 274. . . . . .7 44.0 103. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 1. . . .7 56. . . . . . . . . . Huntsville. .9 35. . . . .8 35. . . . . . . . .9 1. Tucson. . . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . . . . .0 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 482.6 37. . .4 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 66. . . . . . . . .140. .4 273. . .8 53. . . . . . . . . . . . San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos. . . . . . . . Anniston-Oxford. . . . . . . . . . .9 108. . .3 48.0 -0. . .839. . . . . . . . . . .6 37. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 52. .2 -1. . . . . . . . . .4 95. . . . . . . . .5 See footnotes at end of table. . . .8 333. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . 13. . . . . . Fresno. . . . . . .5 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2. . .3 122.2 26. . . . . Yuba City. . . .0 2. . . . . . . . . .6 53.9 2. . . . . .2 1. . . .7 174. . . . .9 96. . . . . . . . . . .8 0. .140. . . . . . . . . . .4 52. .4 58. . . . . . .9 1.8 337. . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . Chico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 2. . . Merced. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 0. . . . . .9 -0. . . . . . . .6 891. .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.224. . . . . . . . . . . Lake Havasu City-Kingman. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 -0. . . Redding. . . . . . . . .741. . . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area [In thousands] January State and area Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2011 2012 2011 2012p Alabama.5 -1. . . . . . . Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 36. . . .3 14.4 802. .441. . .9 36. . . . . . . . .8 2. . . . . .0 1. . . . . .2 1. . .9 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 4. . .2 190. . . . . . . . San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont. .9 114. . . . .376. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 44. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2. .0 228. . . . . . .5 198. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .137. . . . . .217. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 280. . . . . . . . . . . . . Hot Springs. . . . . . . .5 52. . . . . . . . . 2.0 54. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 140. . . . . . . . . . .4 233. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 485. . . . . . . . . . . .7 173. . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 0. . . . . . .0 34. .155. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2.911. . .ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. .7 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .398. . . . . . . . . .7 93.4 142. . . . . . . . .877. . . .2 57. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 5. . . .5 37. . . . .6 163. . . . . . .0 57. . . . . . .8 799. .3 36. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 36. . . . . . .9 273. . . . . . . . . . . . .723. .9 59. . . . . . . . . . . . Anchorage. . . . . . . . . .3 0. . . . . .6 14. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 0.4 163. . . . .1 859. . . . . . . . . . . . . San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles. . . .1 -0. .3 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 358. . . .0 117. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 2. . . .4 -0. . . . . . Decatur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . . . .4 1. . . . . . .4 160. . . . .1 1. . . . . . . .146. . . . . . . . . . . .9 0. . . . . .5 166. . .3 119. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 86. . . .3 2. . . . .8 47. . . . . . . .5 51.9 0. . . . . . . . . . Gadsden. . . . .4 233. . .3 -4. . . . . . . .0 -5.1 0. . . .4 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .233. . . . . . . . .8 66. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 34. . .6 2. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana. . .3 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 36. . . . . . . . .2 0. . . . . Flagstaff. .7 352. . . . . .0 173. . . . .1 2. .0 54. . . . . . .9 14. . . . . . .6 114. . . . . . . . 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 3.8 203.8 31. . . . . . . . . . .6 48. . . . . . . . . . .7 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 36. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.4 205. . . .5 0. . . . . . . . . . . .7 36. . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . .8 3. . .2 172. .9 243.8 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . . .1 103. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 884.0 48. . . . . . .1 1. . . . . .249. . . . .1 -0. . . . . .5 335.9 0.6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 168. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 226. . . . . . .6 5. . .5 55. . . .8 158. . . . . . . . .3 Alaska.9 56. . . . . . . .1 1. . .0 163. . . . Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers. . . . .1 1. . .705. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 53. . . . .6 0. . .5 55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 -0. . . . . . . . . .8 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 55. . . . . . . . . . . .0 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jonesboro. . . . .3 -0.261. . . . . .3 202.6 165. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 45. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 53. . . . . . . . .8 97. . . . . . .8 0.3 -0. . . . . . . . . . Bakersfield-Delano. . . . . . .1 1. Auburn-Opelika. .2 57. . .2 -0.2 203. . . . . .3 4. . Santa Cruz-Watsonville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 2. . . . .116. .6 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 243. . . . .1 1. . . . .0 0.4 356.7 57. .1 164. . . . . . . . . . .3 95. . . . . . Yuma. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 44. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 49. . . .6 45. . . . . Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta. . Fort Smith. . . . .213. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 245. . . .228. . . .3 198.1 5.4 1. . . . . .691. . . . . . . . . .3 116. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 169. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 45. Pine Bluff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . .1 50. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 119.5 -5. . Madera-Chowchilla. . . . . . . .7 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 183. . . . . .9 158. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 182. . . . .0 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 272.125.0 0. . . . .4 85. . . . . . . . . .8 -2.3 36. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 2. . .8 31. .8 31. . . . . . . . San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara. . . . . . . . .7 Colorado. . . . . . . . . . El Centro. . . .8 Arkansas.1 4.2 2. .5 278. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 52. . .844. . .3 53. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 54. . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . . .3 797. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 115. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 188. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 59. . .7 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . .857. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 50. Montgomery. . .6 48. . . . . . .6 143. . . . . . . . . . . .120. . . . .7 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hanford-Corcoran.2 -1.2 -1.4 52. . . . . . Birmingham-Hoover. . . .2 206. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 California. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 92.3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 35. . . .0 143. . . . . . . . . . .8 31. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 120. . .144. . .7 57. . . .861. . . .413. . .2 -1. . . . .2 167. . . . . . . . . . . Mobile. . . . . . . . .4 84. . . . . . .3 309. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 273. . . . . . . . . . . .7 0.8 120. .175. . . . .9 -4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 244. . . .3 48. . . . . . . .9 1. . .6 55. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . .9 2. . .2 2. . . . . . . . . Colorado Springs. .8 168. . . . . . . .1 47. . . . .2 35. .4 169. . . . . . .8 35. .4 -0. . . . .9 0. . . . . . . .4 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 791. . . . . . . . . . . .4 48. . . .6 -2. . . . . Boulder. . .9 7. .9 105. . . . . . . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . . . . . .8 0. . .1 59. . . . . . . . . .0 0. .947. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 57. . . . . . . .5 36. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 164. . . .8 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 163. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .026. . . . .2 54. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Arizona.9 334. . . .5 0. . Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 36. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .891. . . . . . . . . Modesto. . . . . .4 66. . . . . . . . . . . . . .109. . . . . . . . . . . Florence-Muscle Shoals. . . . .2 314. . . . . . . . . . . . .1 66. . .4 4.1 0. . . . . . . .8 88. . . Tuscaloosa. . . . . . . .6 102. . . . .5 42. . . . . . . . . . . . Prescott. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 1. . . . .5 52. . . .8 46. . . . . . . . . .6 -1. . . .6 165. . . . .6 355.869. . . .3 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 3.2 0. .

. . . . . . . Brunswick. . . . . . . .9 0. . .8 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 155. . .1 155.944. . . . . .7 152. . . . . . . . . .3 121. . . . .8 39. .8 1.7 7. . . .6 -0. . . .8 3. .8 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 80. .1 66. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 -5. . .206. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 169.9 63. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 585. .9 18.2 64. . . .7 251.1 595. . . . . . . . . . . . .3 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 123. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1. . . .1 201. .0 95. . . . . . . . .1 0. Dalton. . . . .9 94. . . .7 -2. . . . . . . . .132. . . . . . . . . . . .5 Delaware. . . . . .0 0. .6 -3. . . . .7 148. . . . . . . . Tampa-St. . . . . . . .989.9 583. . . . . . . . . .5 155. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 2. . . . . . . Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford. . . . . . .7 57. . .838. . . . . . .112. . . . .3 263. . . . .7 1. .2 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 0. .7 191. . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 41. . . . .316. . . . . . . . . . . Gainesville. . . . . . .0 390. . . . . . . . . . .6 57. . . .7 62. . . .9 588. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 51. . . . . . . . . .4 130. . . . .1 71. . . . . . .1 -2. . . . . . . . .005. .8 193. . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 -1. . . . . . . . . . . .5 71. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 154. . . . . . . . . . .1 592. .8 61. . . . . . .246. . . . . .5 539. . . . Warner Robins. . . . . . . .210. . . .3 2. .5 19. . . . . .3 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent. .1 19. . . . . . . . . . . . .864. . . . . . . . .3 192. . . . .8 3. . . .8 170. . . . . . . .2 1. . .5 2. .7 82. . . . . . . Rome.2 82. . . . . . . .274.5 242. . . . .1 0.0 1. . . . . .9 388.5 36. . . . . . . . . .0 1. . . . .8 15. . . Coeur d’Alene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1.3 -3. . . . . . . Cape Coral-Fort Myers. .5 1. . . . . Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin. . .5 -2. . . . . . . . . . .9 79. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 57. 1. . . . . . . .9 20. . . . . .0 89. . .7 91. . .3 1. . . . 583. . . . . . .8 147. .2 80. . . .5 1. . . . . .8 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 408. .2 0. . . . . . . . . .3 205. . . . . . . . . . . Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta. . . Hinesville-Fort Stewart. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . .7 8. . . . . . . . . . . .4 7. . . . . . . . . . . .2 Florida. . . . . . .2 26. . . . Sebastian-Vero Beach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 44. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boise City-Nampa. . . .8 0. . . . . . . . . . . .7 76. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1.0 195. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2.4 391. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Norwich-New London. . . . . . . . . . .3 51. . . . Palm Coast. . . . . . . .9 126. . . .7 4. . . . .3 589. . . . . .4 Colorado . . . . . . . .4 205. .2 82. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville. . . .0 Idaho. . .2 6. . . . . . .6 60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 119. . .9 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 39. . . . . New Haven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 128. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 46.0 1. . . . . . . . .7 51.3 64. . . . . .006. . . . . . . .8 19. . . .2 2. . . . . .5 0. . . . . . . . . .2 44. . . . . . Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach. . . Pueblo. .4 71.5 52. . . . . . . .5 75. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 1.5 237. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 Hawaii. . . . . . . . . . . .0 84. .4 59.183. . . . . .8 431. .2 1. . . . . . Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 36. . . .4 0. . . . . . . . .0 126. . . .6 57. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 196. . . . . . . .1 42. . . . . .7 95. . . . .2 118. . . . . . .9 -1. . . . . . . . . .4 37. . . . .8 262. .2 0. . .2 1. . . .7 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lakeland-Winter Haven. . . . . .2 59. . . . . . . . . . .4 0. . . . . . . . Tallahassee. . . . . . . . . . Ocala. . . .9 -2. . . . . . .0 253. . . .5 3.1 263. . . . .5 1. . . . . . .4 41. . . .6 1. . . .8 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 63. . . . . . . .7 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 119.8 435. . . . . . . . .5 251. . . . . Greeley. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Danbury. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Macon.3 204. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .880. . . . . . .5 3. . . . .1 65. . . . . . . . . .9 Georgia. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 61. .2 193. . . .609. . . . . . . . . . .2 5. . . . . .6 1. . .4 59. . . .5 1. . . .8 78. . . . . . .3 -2. . . . . . . . Columbus. . . . . . . . . .7 96. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 7. . . . . . 7. . . . . . .9 7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 66. . . . . .3 -1. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria. Gainesville. . . .3 533. . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area — Continued [In thousands] January State and area Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2011 2012 2011 2012p Number Percent Denver-Aurora-Broomfield. . . . . .6 36. . . . . Athens-Clarke County. . . . . . Dover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .121. . . . . . . . . . . .8 62. . . . .8 1. . . . . . . . . Waterbury.0 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 58. . . . . . . . .2 2. . . .2 1. . . . Valdosta. . . . . . . . . . .4 20. . . . . . . . . . .1 1. . . . . . . . . . .3 119. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1. . . . . . . . . . .7 194. . . . .7 114.7 126. .1 3.4 -0. . . . . . . . . .6 -1. . .272. . . . . . . . . . .4 241.5 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 116. .977. . Grand Junction. . . . .0 193. . . Augusta-Richmond County. . . . . . . . . . .9 46. . . . . . . . . . . .0 27. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Punta Gorda. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 18. . . . . . . . . . . .1 207.9 731. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 65. . . . .0 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1.9 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 72. . .8 63. . .5 76. . . . . . . .9 58. . . . . .7 240. . . . . . .303. .8 39. . . .3 District of Columbia. . . . . .4 596.8 530. . . . .8 -5.4 203. .Continued See footnotes at end of table. . . .7 -0. . . .6 69. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 -1. . . . .0 0. . . . . .9 11. . . . .6 90. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 115. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 159. . Port St. . . . . . . . .9 -3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 716. . . .5 209. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 439. . . . . . Savannah.4 61. . . . . . . . 406. .5 Connecticut. . . .1 0. . . . .180. .9 3. .4 19. .201.2 1. . .6 19. .1 587. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 78. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach. . . . .6 591. . . . .7 -0. . . . .7 150. . . . . . . .8 131. .5 265. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 57. . . . .5 3. . . . . . . . 3. .3 52.7 80.4 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3. .5 1. . .0 123. . .6 60. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 50. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 592. . Fort Collins-Loveland. . . . . . . .0 59. . .9 149. . . . . .6 -0.4 1. . . . . . . . . . . .9 249. . . . . .591. .1 407. . . .9 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 2. . . . . .1 41.ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. . . . .5 56. .2 998. .238. .0 60. . . . . . .3 0. . . . . .329. Honolulu. .1 -0. . . . . . . . . . .3 -3. . . . . . . . .2 -0.5 169. . . . . . . .0 41. . . . . . . . . . . .2 125. . .2 0. . .3 50. . . . . . . . . . .9 1.012. 1. . . . . . . .1 72. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .786. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 158. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 3. .3 39. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 0. . . . . . . . . . . .227. . .8 63.3 2. .597. . . . . .7 52. . . . . . . Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford. . . .196. . . . . . . . . . . .5 90. .0 115. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 124. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . . .3 119. . . . . .6 2. . .8 1. . .241. . . . . .6 58. . . . . . . . . . .6 -0. . . . . . . . . . . .3 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 -2. . . . . . . . . Naples-Marco Island. . . . . . . . .9 118. . . . . .7 58. .8 1. . . . . .9 2. . . . . . Jacksonville. . . . . . . .4 4. . . . . . . . . Albany. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 120. . . . . . . .0 155. . Lucie. Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach. . . . . . . . . .5 533. . . . . .7 -0. . . . . . . . . .1 1. . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 0. . . .7 0. . . .1 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 169. . . . . . . . . .9 134. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 -0.6 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota. . . . . . .0 407. . . . . . . . . . .4 204. . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .952. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 0. Petersburg-Clearwater. .2 0. . . . . .1 439.9 2. . . . .9 392. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 713. . . . . . .5 601. . . . . .4 725. . . .5 37. .2 -0. . . . . . . .599. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 135. . . . . . .5 43. . . . . . . . . .3 80. . . . . . . .7 1.3 75. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .214. . . . . .142. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . .0 50.8 861. . . . . . .7 88. . .2 40. . . . . .8 315. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manhattan. . . .4 584. . . Monroe. . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 0. . . . .2 1. .1 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 5. . . . . .4 29. . . .6 89. . . . . . . . . .6 1. .4 2.3 41. . . . . . . . . . Springfield. . . .5 71. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 47. . . . . . . . .9 46. . . . . . . . .6 4. . .1 -0. . . . . . . . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 See footnotes at end of table. . . . . . . . .9 47. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . .3 79. . . . . . . . . .8 0. . . . . . . . . . .7 102. . . . . . . .8 0. . . . .5 91. . . . .5 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . .2 175. . . . . .0 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 -0. . .2 366. .9 28. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 209.7 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . Cedar Rapids. .7 2. . Louisville-Jefferson County. . . . . . . . . . . .2 47. . . . .4 199. . . . . . . . .4 1. . .0 1. . . . . . . . . . . .3 157. . . . . New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner. . . . . . . . . . .5 365. . . . . . . . . . . . .468. . . .8 172. . .2 88. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 50.3 34. . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Terre Haute. . . . . . . .4 4.1 2. . .7 88. . . .6 39. . . .3 574. . . . . . . . Sioux City. . . . . . . Muncie.0 46. . .4 1. . . .3 1. . . . . . . . .8 4. .5 1. . . . . . . .182. . .2 80. . . .8 133. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . Lafayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 Kentucky. . . . . . .2 75. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .443. . . .5 57. . . . . . . . . .1 1.4 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 5. . . . . . . . . .8 58. . . Owensboro. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 133.3 41. . . . .5 89. . .4 12.802. .329. . . . . .5 39. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1.784. . .4 0. . . Rockford. .9 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .575. . . . .2 1.4 47. . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 53. . . . .4 3. . . .7 -1. . . . . . . . . . Davenport-Moline-Rock Island. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 135. . . . .2 25.1 69. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 -1. . . . . . .8 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 62. . .4 0. . .5 50. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 -0. . . . . .2 874. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 88. . . . .0 -0. . . . .9 362. . .2 1. . . . . . . . . . . .7 109. . . . . . .5 91. . . .3 3. . . . . . . .0 87. . . . . . . . . . . .0 -0.3 176. .2 5. . .7 89. . . . . . . . .9 245. . . . . .5 280.3 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 2. .4 107. . . . .8 38. .5 94. . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bloomington-Normal. . . .1 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 14. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 109. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Waterloo-Cedar Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 1.2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 177. . . .5 5. . . . . . .1 206. . . .8 90. .7 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area — Continued [In thousands] January State and area 2011 Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2012 2011 2012p Number Percent Idaho .3 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 0. . . . .0 133.6 70. . . . . . . . . .3 868. .5 600. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pocatello. . . . . . . . . .8 242. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1.1 49. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 577. .2 55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lawrence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .817. . . . . . . . . . Fort Wayne. .7 4. . . . . . . . .4 3. . .8 1. . . . .9 49. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 41. . . . .2 -0. . . .3 86. . . . . . . . .0 61. . . . . . . . .2 42. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 4. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 2. .1 81. . . . . .3 72. . . . . . .5 46. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 -0. .3 147. . .8 144. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 41.6 Maine. . .1 160. . . .231. . . . .7 280. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lafayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 0. . . . . . . . .9 52. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 572. . . . .1 Indiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 63. . .1 2. . . . .7 5.2 Louisiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .545. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Baton Rouge. . . . . . . .5 88. . . . . . . . . . Elizabethtown. . . South Bend-Mishawaka. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 71.7 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 171. . Des Moines-West Des Moines. . . . . . .449. . . . . Indianapolis-Carmel. . . . .2 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 313. . . . . . . . .8 133. . . . . . . . . . . .0 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 107. . . . . .9 46. . . . . .3 42. . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 25. . . . . . .6 522. . . . . . . . . .4 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1.9 40. . .1 42. .4 178. .5 104. . . . . .4 -1. . . . . . . .2 18. . . . . . . . . . . .0 88. . . . . .3 283. . . . . . .7 28. . . .3 519.2 140. . . . . .8 -0. . . . . . . . .7 35. . .0 89. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 41. . . . . .9 42. . .8 176. . .559. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 1. .0 171. . . . . . . . .4 4. . . . . . . .2 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michigan City-La Porte. . . . . . . . Lake Charles. . . . . . . . . . .9 4. . . . .2 48. . . . . . . . . . .5 94.8 51. . . . . . . . . . . 5. . . . . . . .771. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 39. . Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux. . . . Dubuque. .5 4. .7 39. . . . . . . . . . . Kankakee-Bradley. . . . . . . .2 0.0 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 61. . . . . . . . .6 47. . .2 -0. .6 3. . .7 173. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 36. .5 1.8 55.5 5. . . . . . . . .9 -2. . . . . . . .0 69. . . . . . . .5 280.5 585. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . Decatur. . . . . . . .3 109. . Iowa City. . . . .1 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 13. . . .3 526.7 176. . .6 176. . . . . . . . . 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 72. . . .6 132. . . .4 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . Champaign-Urbana. . . . . . .7 173.0 56. . .315. . . Bloomington. . . . Lexington-Fayette. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wichita. . . . .1 1. . . . . .9 49. . . . . . . . . .1 76.453. . . .6 47. .3 136. . . . . . . . .5 -2. . . . . . . . . . . .5 311. . Evansville. . . . .1 43. . . . . . . . . . . .8 145. . . . . . .9 -0. . . . . . . . . . .2 68. . . . . . Shreveport-Bossier City. . . . . . . . .527. . . . . .0 51. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 48.1 -0. . . . . . .7 1.3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .224. . . . . . . .9 39. . . . . . .4 177. . . . . . . .1 18. . . . .942. . . . . . . .3 50. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peoria.7 1. .4 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. .1 49. . .1 104. . . . .0 Iowa. . . .0 Kansas. . . . . . . . .6 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .749. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 105. . . . .761. .4 54.4 3. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 574. . . 47. . . . .9 599. . . . . . . . . . . . . .880. . . . . . . . . . .7 0. . . . . . .333. . . .7 6. . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . .5 107.2 95. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 141. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1. . . . Columbus. . . . .313. . . . . . . .9 2. . .8 1. . . . . . . Kokomo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .926. . . . . .1 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 80. . . . . . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . Danville. . . . . .5 369. . .4 Illinois. . . . . . .895. . .188. .6 1. . . . .6 199. . . .7 54. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 90. . . . .5 58. . . . . .4 51. . .6 2. . . .9 93. . . . . . . . . . . .1 0. . .7 179. . . . . . . . . .7 1. . . . . . Bowling Green.7 174. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Elkhart-Goshen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 93. . . . . . . . . . . .2 131. . . .5 109. . . . . . . . . . Ames. . .9 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Alexandria. . . .7 148. .4 246. .3 -1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 56. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 40. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 311. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 1. . . .792. . Anderson. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 2. .4 176.0 26. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Continued Idaho Falls. . . . .7 39. . .0 4. .0 28. . . . . . . . . . . .2 103. . . . . . . . . . .8 242. . . Lewiston. . . . . . . . . . .7 1. . . 1. . . . . . .6 -2.2 58. .754. . . . . . . . . . . . . Topeka. . . .0 49. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 861.9 109. . . .3 -0.1 90.7 75. . . .8 103. . . . . . . . . .0 76. . .6 47. . . .ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. . . . . . . . . . . .8 100. .5 47. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 0. . . . .5 -0.4 25. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 86.6 105. . . .7 48. . . . 1. . . .6 531. . . . . . . . . . .1 0. . . . . . . .2 88. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chicago-Joliet-Naperville. . .1 28. . . . . . . .7 0. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 279. .6 198. . . . . .7 240. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . . . . .8 57. . . . . . . .8 193. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .274. . . . . .1 1. Saginaw-Saginaw Township North. . . . . . . .6 196. . . . .2 169.6 98. . . . . .1 168. . . . .5 127. . . . . . . . . . . .8 413. . . . .5 Maryland. . . . . . . Louis1 . . . .0 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2. . . . . . . .2 2. . . .7 1. . . . . . . . . Minneapolis-St. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Paul-Bloomington. . .5 50. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 1. .2 239. . . . . . . . .4 0. .3 1. . . . . . . . .0 Michigan.1 47. . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . Jefferson City. .8 96. . . . . . . . . .1 59. . .9 34. . . .9 1. .4 104. . . .0 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 90. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 183. . . .2 0. . . . .0 -1. . . . . . .0 214. . .5 104. .288. . . . . . . . . . . . .1 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area — Continued [In thousands] January State and area Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2011 2012 2011 Bangor. . . . . .3 9. . . . . . . . .612. .7 2. . . . . . . . . . . . .276. . . . . . . . . Joseph.418. . . . .5 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 172. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Great Falls. . . . . . . . . .0 0. . . . . . . . .7 1. . . . . .6 100. . . . .9 369. . . . . . . .5 90.8 51. . . .8 34. . . . . .4 -1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 0. . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 97. . . . . . . . . . . .1 -0. . . . .4 2. . . . . . . . . Salisbury.7 3. . . . . . . . . . . . .705. .4 191. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .404. . . . . .2 1.9 133. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1.7 42. . . . . . .2 1. . . . . . . . . . . Billings. . . . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . .636. . . . . . .0 134. Columbia. . . . . . .3 3. . . . . Hagerstown-Martinsburg. . . . .2 1. Baltimore-Towson. . . . . . .257. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 0. . . . . . . .5 113. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Holland-Grand Haven. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 38. .6 -1. . . . . . . . . . . .0 956. . .7 28. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leominster-Fitchburg-Gardner.602. .2 2. . . . .8 125. . . . . . .5 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 43. . . . . . . . .9 0.685.5 63. .3 Missouri.0 85. . . . . . . Detroit-Warren-Livonia.1 59. Springfield. .0 973. . . . . . .0 Nebraska. . . . .7 14. . . . . . . . .6 -0.3 36. . . . . . . .9 34. . . .6 201. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 -0. . . . . . . . . . . .9 52. . . Missoula. . . .3 123. . . .135. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . .1 63. . . . . . . . .7 1. . . . .9 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . .5 40. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 2. . . . . . . . . . . . .1 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 37. . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ann Arbor. . . . .1 3. . . .642. . . . . . . . . . Gulfport-Biloxi. . .1 1.0 57. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boston-Cambridge-Quincy. . . . . . . . . . . .831. . .3 33.1 -2. . .2 36. . . .7 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 58. . . . . . .3 280. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Duluth. . . . . . . .0 0. . . . . .8 58. . . . . . . . . .1 1. . .1 57. .846. . . . . . . . . .9 63. . . . . . .4 0. . . . . . . .0 78. . . . . .5 1. . . .4 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kalamazoo-Portage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . . . . . . . .7 0. . Muskegon-Norton Shores. . . . . . .614. . . . . . . . . . . .2 0. . . .7 3.9 1. . . . . 2. . . . . .397. . . . . . .7 0. . . . .8 55. . . . . . . . . .5 5.0 930. . . .607. . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 97. . . .0 81. . . . . . .3 276. . .1 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 64. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .264. . . . . . . . .5 2. . . .8 43. . . . .7 0. . . . . . . .5 47. . . . . . . St. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . .0 76. . . . . . . . . . . .077. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 52. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bay City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 -0. . . . .907. . . .3 54. . . . . Mankato-North Mankato. . . .9 75. . . .1 105. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 55. . . . Rochester. . . . . . . . . .2 104. . . .082.1 78. . . . . . .417. . . . . . . . . . . . . 62. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Barnstable Town. .9 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 55. . .3 6. . . . . . . . . . . .7 47. . . . Battle Creek. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 281. .4 23.5 4. .5 41. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 968. . . . .0 62. .4 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 4. . . . . . .4 252. . . . . .083. .2 216. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 75. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . .9 34. . . . . .6 363. . .5 52. . . .2 Mississippi. .5 1.1 0. . .6 2. . . .2 59. . . .4 131. . . . .7 57. . .3 -1. . . . .6 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 2. . . . . . . . . . . .703.6 3. . . . . . . . . . . . .3 36. . . . . . . .4 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 63. . . . . . . .1 111. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .593. . . . . . . . . . .6 55. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012p Number Percent 63. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pittsfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 47. . . . . . . . . .2 86. . . .9 1. . .8 33. . . .8 Montana. . .4 0. . . . . . . . . .8 54. . . . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . . .8 55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 -2. . .0 -1. .1 33. . . . . Lewiston-Auburn. . . . . . St.8 53. . . . . .515. . . . . . . .9 36. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 76. .8 0. . . . . Jackson. . . . . . . . . .755. . . . . . . .0 132. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 413. . . .0 1. . . . . . . .149. .8 3.6 -1. . . . . . . . . . . .4 -0. . . . . . .536. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 14. . Lansing-East Lansing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .738. . . .3 216. . . Springfield. . . . .8 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 105. . . .4 46. . . . .5 42. .1 134. . . . .1 100. .7 2. . . . . . .9 50. . . .2 2. . . . . . Cumberland. . . . .4 99. . . . . . . . . . . .6 57. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 83. . . . . . . . . . .9 2. . .762. . . . . . .732. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 2. . .8 76. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 -0.9 54. . . . . . .3 60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 53. . .2 0. . . . . . .3 6. . . . . . .4 35. .3 61. . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3. . . . . . . . .1 959.2 1. Kansas City. .5 197. . .1 -1. . . . . . . . . . . St.5 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 96. . . . .2 371. . . .474. .2 33. . . Cloud. . .4 83. . . . .8 54. . . .2 56. . . . . . . . . . Grand Rapids-Wyoming. . . . .1 249. . . . . .2 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3.8 249. .7 97. . . . . . . . . . . . .148. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 0. .3 2. . . . . . .3 -1. Portland-South Portland-Biddeford. . . . . . . . . Niles-Benton Harbor. . . . . . . . . . .7 240. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . .7 47. . . . . . . . . . 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 51. .7 8. . . . . . . .1 0. . . . .5 2. .9 88. . .4 52. . . . . . .2 2.7 51. . . . . . .597. .271. . . . . . . .8 59. .8 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 78. . . . . .9 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 412. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Massachusetts. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 83. . Hattiesburg. . . . . . . . . . . .9 52.6 2. . . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . . .3 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Continued See footnotes at end of table. . . .078. . . . . . .3 74. . .0 15.1 1. . . . . .5 3. .2 57.ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .488. . . . Cape Girardeau-Jackson. .9 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 52.2 1. . . . . . . . . . . . .8 -0. . . . . 923. . . . .0 91. . . . . . .5 189. . . . . . . .2 Minnesota. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 104. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Joplin.3 38. . . . .6 361. .1 0. . . . .4 Maine . . . .9 2. . . . . . .7 1. .4 0. . . . . . . .5 131. . . . . . . .3 218.6 1. .4 75. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Flint. . . . . . 2. . Worcester. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . .5 133. . . . . . . . . . .8 59. .7 6. . . .9 7. . . . . . . . . .0 0. . .4 182.0 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 76. . . . . .8 189. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 182. . . .1 0. . . . . . . New Bedford. . . . . .5 97. . . . . . . . .275. . . .3 83. . . . . . . . . . .2 94. . . Lincoln. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 46. . . . . . . .5 2. . . . . 1. . . . .1 1. . .8 98. . . . . . . .8 24. . .163. . Jackson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .690. . . .3 1.4 1. . . . . . . . . . .1 171. . . . .272. . . . . . . .1 96. . .6 14. . . . . 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 239. . . . . . . . . . . . Pascagoula. . . . .5 134.9 253.1 1. . . . . . . .3 183. . .1 -0. . . . . . . . .3 54. . . . .3 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 46. . Monroe. . . . . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 926. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 928. .0 1. . .880. . . . . . .3 125. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 35.3 100. . . . . . . . . .1 1. . . . . . .3 1. . . .

. . . . . . .8 28. . . . . . .9 55. . . . . . . . . . .5 2. . .2 27. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 133. . .9 120. . . . . . . .1 130. . .7 60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 430. . . .1 820. . . . Grand Forks. . . 4. . . . . . . . . . . .2 8. . . . . . .0 107. .1 1. . . . . . .8 615. . . . . . . . . Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown. . . .0 59. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 47. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 509. . . . . . . . . .1 4. . . . . . . . . . . .0 12. . . . . . . . . .4 795. .3 42. . . . .4 55. . . . Albuquerque. . . . . . . .4 New Mexico.7 369. . . . . . . . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area — Continued [In thousands] January State and area 2011 Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2012 2011 2012p Number Percent Nebraska . .977. .2 3. . . . . . . .887. .3 531. . .6 1.7 235. .7 New York. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 11. . . . . . . . . .ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. . . . . . Syracuse. . . . . . . . . . . .4 57.4 965. . . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Manchester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Las Vegas-Paradise. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 56. . . .0 0. . Burlington.3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 39. . . . . . . . .1 802. .8 239.0 67. .8 127. Portsmouth. .0 56. . .8 451. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 42. . . . . . Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton. . . . . . . . . Rochester. . .5 61. . . .4 0. . . .763.238. . .5 47. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 313. .113. . . . . .2 807. . Reno-Sparks. . . .6 -0. . . . . . . .2 130.0 60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 619. . . . . . . . . . .3 48. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 165.6 See footnotes at end of table. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 42. . . . .5 379. . .3 343. . . .6 274. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 58. . . . . . .8 125. .6 5. . .3 4. . . . . . .2 306. . . . . . . .807. . . . .5 56. . . . . . . .0 0.1 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kingston. . . . . . . . . . . .9 2. .1 170. . . .4 -0. . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . .1 60.3 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 129. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 495. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Greenville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 270. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 405. . . . . . . .8 977. . .4 3. .4 500. . . .3 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 130.7 54. . . .2 184. . . . . . . . . . Winston-Salem. . .4 -4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 59. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 56. . .8 59. . . Cincinnati-Middletown. . . .7 8. . .3 67. . .4 31. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 275. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 797.1 456. . . . .1 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .818. . . . . . . . .5 53. . . .2 1. . . .3 508. . . .8 969. .0 59. .6 North Carolina. . . . . . .7 3. . . . . .9 74. . .0 1. . . . . . . .8 39. . .2 8.4 435. . .7 61. . . .9 53. . . . . . . . . .1 1. Durham-Chapel Hill. . . . . . .9 131.6 454. . . . . . . . . .3 6. . . . . . . . . . .2 New Hampshire. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 163. . . . . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 981. . . . . Farmington. .0 504. . .1 497. .1 2. . . . . . . . .9 69.9 31. . . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . .5 186. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .319. .0 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 52. . . . . . . . . . . . .8 430. . . . . . . . .4 2. . . . . . . . . . . .1 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 0. . . . . . .0 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3. . . . . . . . .5 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 35. . . . . . . . . . . . .8 915. .6 164. . . . .5 -0. .3 132.5 43. . . 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 314. . . . . . .8 1. . .108. . . . . .3 129. . . . .8 244. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 14. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .638. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 202. . . . . . . . . .913. . . . . . . . .4 47. . . . . .5 122. .6 9. .8 47. . . . . . . .1 3. . . . .3 0. . . . . . Trenton-Ewing. .1 0. . . . . . . .Continued Omaha-Council Bluffs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 0.8 58. .4 38. . . .4 64.9 70. . . .8 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 106. . . . . . . . . . 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 8. .0 2.0 200. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 311. . . . . . . .6 248. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 170. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 787. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 97. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 142. . . .6 57. . . . . . . . .956. . . .2 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 0. . . . . . . . . Wilmington. . . . . . . . . . . . . Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 530.4 1. . . . . . . . .0 North Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451. . . . . . . . . . . .202. . . . . . . . . . . .6 65. . . . .012. . .2 1. Columbus. . .2 -0. . . . .4 6. . . . . . .3 1. . . . . . . . .7 52. . . . .4 1. . . . . . . .9 132. . . . . . . . .1 55. . . .6 26. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 96. . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . Asheville.2 268. . . . . . . . .5 1. . .2 New Jersey. . . . . . . Glens Falls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3. . 1. .1 158. . . .2 0.6 338. . . . . . .3 335. . . . . . . . . . Goldsboro.5 2. . . . . . .7 48. . . . .1 2. . . . . .4 -3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 4. . . . . Ithaca.7 5. . . . . . . .3 365. Ocean City. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 38. .7 162. .4 -0. . . . . . .0 55. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 3. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 800. . .8 369. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 141. . Bismarck. . . .5 250. . . . . .6 47. . . .3 240.4 47. . . . . .7 -4. . Atlantic City-Hammonton. . . . . . . . . . . . . Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 3. . .1 16. .6 237. . . . .3 8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 55. . . . . .4 52.4 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 27. . . .9 341. .1 0.5 -0. .117. . . . . . . . . . . . .1 -0. . .1 5. . . . Canton-Massillon. .1 1. . . . .5 59. . . . . . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . Greensboro-High Point. . . . . . . .515. . . . . Utica-Rome.6 204. . . Las Cruces. . . . . . .7 5. . . . . . . .2 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 53. . . . . . . . . .5 -6. . . . . . . . . .453. . . . . . .6 499. . . . . . . . .5 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 3.5 Nevada. . . . . . .1 141. . .9 365. . .3 0. 377. . . . . . . . . . . .4 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 62. . . . . . . .6 536. . . . . . .0 793. . . . . .8 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 797. . . . . .6 51. .106. .3 186. . . Akron. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 618. . . . . . . . . . .7 -0. . . . . . . . . .4 310. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . Carson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 142. . . . . . .2 1. . . . . . . . . .1 27. . . . .8 56. . . . . .3 309. .2 532. . . .4 897. . . . . . . . . .7 204. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 -0. . . .356. . . . . . . . . .0 2. . . . . . . . . .4 6.4 53. . . . . . . . . . .8 816. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 52. . . .4 1. . . . .3 3. . . .8 0. . . .5 -0. . . . . . .1 58. . . . . . . 8. . Fargo. . Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill. . .3 311. . . . . . . . . . . .3 3. . . . . . . . . Santa Fe. . .048. . . . . . . . . . .835. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 0. . . . . . . . . . . Elmira. . . .9 185.5 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 825. . . . . . . . . . . .9 978. . . .5 4. . . Rochester-Dover. . .3 132. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 63. . .3 799. . . . . .2 70. .1 971. . . . . . . .6 126. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 5. .9 120. . . .8 129. . . . . . . . . . . . .8 1. Jacksonville. . .1 96. .8 157. . . . .2 401. . . . . . . . . .8 962. . . . . . . . . . Raleigh-Cary. . . .5 -0. . . . . Fayetteville. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 977. . . .8 Ohio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Albany-Schenectady-Troy. Binghamton. .2 68. . . . . . . . . . . .2 901. .7 129. . . . . . . . .9 108.2 3. . . . .7 5.6 74. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 513. . . . .8 75.7 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 74. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 107. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rocky Mount. . . . . . .871. . . . .6 52.7 9. . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . . .7 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 133.8 126. .6 127. . . .6 1. . . . . . . 613. . . .9 243. .5 117. . . . . . . . . . .8 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .568. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 -1.0 96. . . .3 60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 42. . . . . . . . . . .2 424. . . . . . . . . .756. .0 306. . . . . . Buffalo-Niagara Falls.3 911. . . . . . . . . .4 0. . . . . . . . . . . .4 3. . . . .7 5. . . .3 1. . . . . . . . New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island. .9 59.

. . . . . . . . .6 59. . . .Continued See footnotes at end of table. . . . . . .0 59.6 -3. .2 South Carolina. . .8 223. . .0 291. .7 38. . .0 102. .3 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . .7 136. . . . . . . . . .3 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1. . Lima. . . . . . . . . . .1 220. . 367. . . . . . . .4 -0. . . . . . .9 394. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .808.9 36. . . .0 1.6 0. . . .5 331. . . . . . . . . . .2 36.1 1. . . . . . . . . .8 1. .9 531. . . . . . .2 338. . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 172.3 1. . .2 133. . . . . . . . . .0 116. . . . . . .9 -0. . . . . . . .1 0. . . Youngstown-Warren-Boardman. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 293. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 49. . . . . 1. . . . . . .1 -1. . . . . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . .5 Rhode Island. . Tulsa. . . . . . . Bend.8 50. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 -0.0 223. . . . .557. . . .4 72. . . . . . .6 448.7 53. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 337. . . . .8 372. . . .6 0. . . . . .0 566. . . . . . . . . . .6 51. .9 6. . . .5 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 1. . . . . . . .1 165. . . .1 229. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 74. . . . . .1 328. .3 116. .1 316. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . .0 5. State College. . . . . . . . . . . . . Lawton. . .2 0. . . . .6 294. . . . . . . .0 60. . . . . . . .0 58. . .5 593. . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . Toledo.8 2. . . . . . .1 81. . .7 981. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 0. . . . . . . . . .7 58.5 127. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . Springfield. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 168. . . . . . . . . . .6 -0. . . . .5 986. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 128. . . .4 132. Columbia. . .641. . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Oregon.6 2. . . . . . . . Providence-Fall River-Warwick. . . . . . . .2 413. . . .3 584. . . . . . . .9 100. .560. . .651. . . .0 Oklahoma.1 52. .7 254. . . .1 -1. . . . . . . . . . . .6 220. . .2 42. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 79. . . . . . . .8 36. . . . . . . . . . .638. . . . . . . . . . .6 60. . . . . . . . .2 315. . . . . .1 1. . . . . . . . . . . .5 2. . . . . . . . . .1 1. . . . . . . .589. . . . . . . .9 172. . . . . .9 52. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . .7 -0. . . . .7 5. . . .670. . .9 57. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 33. . . . . . . . . . Greenville-Mauldin-Easley. . . . . . . .3 140.5 5. . . . .6 49. . . .0 288. . . . . . .9 77. . . . . . . .9 Pennsylvania. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Williamsport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 2. . . . . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 397. . . . . . . . . .7 320. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .798. Cleveland. . . . . . . . .9 42.596. . .1 1. .3 South Dakota. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 337. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 73. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area — Continued [In thousands] January State and area Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2011 2012 2011 Dayton. . . . . .5 4. . .1 2. . . . . .118. . . .0 38. . . . . . .6 58. . . . . .2 0. . . . . . . . . . .3 78. . .9 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sandusky. . . .9 57. . .0 332. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 75. .9 9. . . . . . . . . Corvallis. . . . . . .4 115. . . .5 346. . . . Eugene-Springfield. . .0 400. . . . . . . .4 1. . . . . . . . . . . . .8 2. . .5 71. . 2012p Number Percent 370. . . . .5 597. . . . . . Lancaster. . . . . . .7 59. . .6 134. . . . . . . . .2 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 34. . . . . . . . . . . Mansfield. . .135.3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pittsburgh. . . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 219. . Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Steubenville-Weirton. . . .0 51. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 528. . . . . .6 582. . . . . . . . . . . .4 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 2.6 1.3 42. .674. . . . .3 0. . . . .3 1. . . . . . . Lebanon. . . . . .0 6. .4 132. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 36. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 78. . . . Harrisburg-Carlisle. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 49. . . . . . . . . . . .8 368. . . .3 168. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 225. . . . . . . . .7 28. .779. . . .2 -0. . . .5 1.0 166. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 218. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 216. . .3 0. . . . . . . . . Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro. . . . . . . .8 59. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Medford. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 -0. . . . .0 0. . Johnstown.0 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 59. . .7 293. . . .9 316. . . . . .8 -0. . . . . . . . .2 42. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Erie. .9 72. . . . . . .9 299. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 37. . . . . . .3 2. . . . . . . .9 448. . . . . .593. . .3 51. . .1 2. . . . . . . . . . Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 296. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Reading. . .6 222. .3 59. . . . . . . . . .8 138. . .9 139.9 139. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 49. .6 79. . . .2 60.8 83. . . . . . . . . .7 252.3 7. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 1. . . . . . . . . .2 37. . . . .5 301. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 174. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Johnson City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 -1. . . . . . . . . .0 444. . . . . Knoxville. . .8 57. . . . . . . . . .6 137. . . . . . . 393. . . Jackson. .3 571.8 -1. . . . . . . . . .3 -1. . . . . . .3 1. . . . . . . . .9 37.ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 349. .5 303. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1. . . . . . . .8 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .116. .9 57.6 82. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Anderson. . . . . . .0 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 -0. .7 175. . . . . . .2 49. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 2. . . . . . .3 82. .6 1. . .2 395. . . . . . .5 -2. .0 966. . . . . . . . .609. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . .7 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 59. .5 126. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. .7 44. . .7 409. .9 -0. .7 57. . . . .0 1. . . . . . . . .0 59. . . . . .0 58. . . . . .583. .2 248. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .599.6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 556. . . . . . . . . .9 323.9 1. . . . Oklahoma City. . .7 117. . . . .552. . .6 1.1 2. . .3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 43. . . . . . . . . . .7 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 1. . . . . . .1 0.8 342. . . . . . .6 1. .662. . . . . . . . . . . .7 250. . . . .4 0. . . . .7 52. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 107. . . . . . . . . .8 83. . . . . . .7 0. . . . . . .7 43. 445. . . .0 2. . . . . . . .8 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 37. . . . 2. . . .6 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 43.9 1. . . . . . .6 1.4 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 51. . .1 73.5 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sioux Falls. Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol. . . Sumter. . . . . . . . .2 13. . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 3. . . . . . .132.6 1. . . . . . . .9 0. . .2 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .683. . . . .6 82. . . . . . . . .6 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 -0. . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 115. . . . . . . . . . . .6 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 115. . . .8 17. . . . . .9 37. . . . . . .9 59. . . . . . . . . . .6 138. .2 42. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 0.5 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . York-Hanover. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Spartanburg. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 36. . . . . . . . . .1 59. . . . .0 73. . . . . . . . . . . .7 54. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 8.4 54. . . . . .0 526. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 228. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scranton--Wilkes-Barre.9 231. . .587. . . . . . 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Memphis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Altoona. . . . . . . . . . . .515. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 113. .7 331.3 Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 0. . . . . .2 2. . . . Rapid City. . . . . . .0 295. . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 42. . . . . . . . . .5 107. . . . . .8 318. . .8 3. . . . . . .4 1. . . . . . . .5 79. . . . .516. . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington. . . . . . . . .8 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 49. . .4 -1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 52. . . . . .0 530. . . . . .7 114.2 0. . . . . .1 1. . .8 5. . . . . . . .5 127. . .5 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .826. . .2 559. . . . . . .0 287. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 4. . . . . . . .5 33. . . . . . . Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 Tennessee. . . . . . . . . .1 397. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 16.3 973. .9 12. . . . . . . Clarksville. .9 2. . . . . . . .3 139. Chattanooga.4 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 13. . .4 3. . . . Florence. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 48. . . . . .6 4.4 299. . .601. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Salem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . .5 34. . . . . . . . .5 79. .5 68. .5 748. . . . . . . . .6 64. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .769. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 183. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 110. . . . . . . .5 299. . .5 1. .9 5. . .0 1. . . . . . .8 110. . . . . . . . .1 3. . . .8 2. . . . . . . Charlottesville. . . . . . . Odessa. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 281. Winchester. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 191. .4 633. . . .4 10. . . .3 230. . . . . . . .2 37. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 15. . . . . .8 103. . . . . .5 81. . . . . . . . .4 92. .7 299. . . . . . . .665. . . . George. . . . . . . . . . . .4 97. . .5 West Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 69. . . . . . . . .4 34. .8 -0. . . . . . . . . . .0 37. . . . . . . .8 42. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 49.2 3. . . . . . .ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. . . .3 101. . 3. . .0 44. .1 0. . . . . .603. . . . . . . . . . .588. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 126. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 -0. .9 98. . .9 0. . . . .9 2. .3 104. . . . . . . . . .8 2. . . . . .9 3. . . . . . . . . . .2 75. . .630. . .8 97. . . .656. . . . . .7 849. . . . . . .7 37. . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 -1. . . 10. . . . . . . .6 -1. .9 4. . . . . . .798. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 10. . . . .1 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 231.4 198. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 126. . . . . . . .3 -1. . . . . .5 797. . . . . . . .4 610. . . . . .9 718. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 2. . . . . . . . . .1 2. . . . . . . . . Laredo.5 110. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 735. . . . . . .7 2. . . . . .2 4.3 0.0 49. .2 0. . . . Bellingham. . . . . .0 191. . . . . .3 152. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 0. . . . . . . .3 3. .8 2. . . . .2 302. . 296. .6 93. . . . .2 113. . . . . . . . . 1. . . . . .2 -1. . . . . . . . . .9 62. . . . . . . . .4 1. . . . . . . . Lubbock. . . . . . . . . . . .1 129. . . . .7 43. . . . . .5 89. .5 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 609. . . . . . . . .4 266.1 2. . Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin. . . . . . . . .2 1. . .5 2. . Ogden-Clearfield. . . . . . . .9 597. . . . . .8 749. . .6 56. . . . . . . . .0 0. . .3 2. . . . . . . . .3 855. . . . . . . . . .3 100. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .649. .3 71. .0 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 -2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 7. . .870. . . . . . . . .4 74. . . . . . .5 113. Corpus Christi. . . . . . . Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos. . . . . . . . .2 63. .7 94. .3 53. .756. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 278. . . . . . .637. . . . . . Olympia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 0. . . . . . . . . . . . Bremerton-Silverdale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Richmond. . . . . .1 97. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 126. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 2. . .0 8. .0 6.6 223. . . . . . . . . . . . Abilene.1 Virginia. . .5 44. .1 1. . . . . . . .5 80. . .0 95. . .0 1. .0 1. . . .8 3. . . Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. . . . . . . .6 2. . .6 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 155. . . . . .1 39. . . .3 40. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 153. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 63. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 74. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood.9 178. . . . . . . . . . .0 3. . . .9 56. . . . .0 772. Longview. . . . . . . . . .5 -0. . .7 10. . Danville. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Spokane. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 97.207.4 102. . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . . . . . . .5 34. .5 -0. . . . . . . .2 10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 3. .9 192. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Continued Morristown. . . .7 0. . . . . . . . . .6 100. . . . . . . . . . . . Wichita Falls. . . . .620. .3 74. . . . . . . . .8 39. . . . . . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . . .4 56. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 0. . . . . . . Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 96. . . . . . . . . . . . .8 56.1 2.658. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .810. . . . . . . . . . .1 201. . . . . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area — Continued [In thousands] January State and area 2011 Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2012 2011 2012p Number Percent Tennessee . . . . . . . . . .4 42. . .3 64. . . . . . . . . . . .3 3.9 42. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 35.4 3. . . . . Texarkana. . . . . . .4 176. .7 156. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 100. . . . . . .0 92. . . . Roanoke.0 49. . . . . .0 -0. . . . . . .9 632. . . .9 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 127. . . . . . . . . . .0 201. . . . . . .1 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mount Vernon-Anacortes. . . . .6 0. . . . . . . . . . Lynchburg.5 -1. . . Amarillo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . McAllen-Edinburg-Mission. . . . . . . . .1 5.6 284.8 0. . .6 100. . . . . .3 78. . . .0 3. . . . .7 95. . .3 2.8 749. . .6 57. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 90. . . . . . . .0 178. . . . .182. . . . . .6 37. . . . . . .638. . . . . . . . .5 79. .1 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 94. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kennewick-Pasco-Richland.5 2.9 42. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 30. . . . .928. . . .2 41.3 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .177. . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 1. .4 78. . . College Station-Bryan.3 54. . .8 1. . . . .4 Vermont. . .2 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 129. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 189.5 184. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 58.3 44. . . . . . . .4 2. . . . . . .857.2 0. . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . .5 95.2 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 39. . . . . . . . . . . .543. .0 1.1 62. . . . .8 -1. . . . . . . Yakima. . Beaumont-Port Arthur. . .7 128. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Harrisonburg. . . . . . . .7 81. . . . . . . . . . .7 70. . . . . . . . .4 44. . . 729. .527.1 2. . . . . . . . . . .9 111.5 2. . . Victoria. . . . . . .1 34. . .9 1. . . . . . .4 13. . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . .212. . St. . . . . . . . Waco. . . . . . . . . .949. . .8 1. . . .8 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 612. . . . . .1 -0. .8 21. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 57. .3 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 2. . . . . . . .9 737.7 42. . . . . . . . . . . .325. . . .3 57. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 49. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 806. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 74. . .8 222. . . 2. . . . Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News. . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 174. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wenatchee-East Wenatchee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 845. . . . . . . .3 92. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 111. . . . . . . .7 64. . . .7 62. . . . . . . .5 79. . . . . . .4 52. .4 1. . . .0 780. . . . . . .2 43. . . . . . . . . 43. . . .8 97. . . .6 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 127. . . . . . .3 Washington. . . . . . .1 0. . . . .9 102. . . . . . . .2 41. . . . . . .3 -0. . .1 0. . . . . .9 130. . . . . . . . . .1 57. . . . . .9 97. . .3 54. . . . . . . . . . . . . Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown. . .8 44. . . San Antonio-New Braunfels. . . . . . San Angelo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 838. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 95.7 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 10. . .6 69. . . . . Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue. . . . . . . .3 3. . . . . . . . . . .6 81. . . . .7 75. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Burlington-South Burlington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El Paso. .4 6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 43. . . . . . . . . . . .7 182. . . . . . . . . .6 731. . .5 42. . . . . . . .4 1. . . . . . . .8 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 25. . . . . . .390.2 609. . . . . . . . .5 1. .0 65. .3 157. . . . . . . . .5 130. .3 0. Sherman-Denison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 10. . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 36. . . . . . . . .2 156. . . . .9 63. .6 1. . . . . .0 74. . . . .9 98.6 2. . . . . .3 4. .4 103. . . . . . Logan.6 97. . . . . . .8 -0. . .3 8. Tyler. .6 63.7 723. . . . . .3 2.1 0. . . . . . . . . .6 57. .7 720. .622. . . . .1 101. . . . . .1 Texas. . . . . . . . .6 599. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 153. . .5 1. . . . . . . Provo-Orem. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 152. . . . . . . . . . .9 99. . . . .1 2. . . . . . . .5 99. . .1 752. . . . Salt Lake City.3 46. . . . . . . . .9 97. . . . . .5 111. . . Midland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 129. . . . . . . . . .6 0. . . . . . . . . . . . .2 278. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Longview. . . . . . . . .4 5. . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 45. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 53. . . .2 71. . . . . .2 53. . .6 46. . . . . . Brownsville-Harlingen. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Utah. . . . . . . . . .3 -2. . . .6 94. .7 184. . . .7 3.7 2. .672.8 See footnotes at end of table. .1 41.4 126. . . . .8 2. .6 722. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 200. . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . .2 15. . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 0. .5 56. . . . .2 275. . . .9 113. . . . . . . . . . . . They are listed under the state that appears first in their titles. . . . . . . . . . . Fond du Lac. . . . .5 0. . . . . . . . . .0 2.688. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 0. . . . . . .7 340. 273. . . . . .3 1. . . . . .6 277. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 20. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1. . . . .3 13. . . . . . . . . . . . . .Continued 1 Area boundaries do not reflect official OMB definitions. . . . . . .6 36. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 72. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 115. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . Huntington-Ashland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oshkosh-Neenah. . . . . . . . . .0 66. . . . . . . . . . .0 -0. . . . .7 58. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 78. . . . . . . . .6 13.9 40. . . . .6 67.3 65. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 35. . . . . p Preliminary NOTE: Data are counts of jobs by place of work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Morgantown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 15.1 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 38. . . . . . . . Appleton. . . . . . . . . . . . .7 73. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian. . 2. . 44. . . . .5 45. . . . . .5 1.0 -1. . . . . . . . .7 65. . .5 -0. . . . . . .5 917. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . La Crosse. . . . . . . . .4 59.0 -0. . . . .6 2. . .0 20. . .1 44.3 44.4 -3. . . . . . . . . . .1 43. . .1 796. . . . . .0 -0. .6 -1. . . .1 42. . . . . . Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states. .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 799. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 16. . .9 115. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Davenport-Moline-Rock Island. . . . . . . . . . 10-02. Fajardo. .8 678. .5 15. .9 68. . . . . . .2 -4. . . . . . . . . . . .6 -22. . Eau Claire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 35. . . . . .1 44. Yauco. . . .5 65. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 43. .0 2. . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 77. . . . . . . .2 0. . . . . . . . .7 64. .3 46. . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . . . . . . Madison. Mayaguez. . . . . . . . . .7 64. . . . . . . . . .3 -1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Puerto Rico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 65. . . . . . . . . . Green Bay.2 799. . . .7 58. . . . .0 -0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009. .8 73. . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 74. . . . .5 4. . . . . . . . . . .0 13. . . while areas in other states are county-based. . . . . .9 65. . . .3 Wyoming. . . . .1 3.5 0. . . . . . .gov/lau/lausmsa. . . . . . . . . . . .8 0. . . .8 65. .5 -3. .7 60. . . . . . . . . .5 44. . . . . . . . . . . . Racine. . . . . . .2 92. . . . . . . . . . . .9 62. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 42. . . . . . . .9 165. . . . . . .7 73. . .3 2. .htm. . . . . . . . . . .6 20. . . . . . . .9 55.3 0. . . Iowa-Ill. . . . . . . Ponce. . and available at www. . . . .0 78. . . . . . . .5 145. .2 73. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 64. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state and metropolitan area — Continued [In thousands] January State and area Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February 2012p 2011 2012 2011 Number Percent Charleston. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 162. . . . .3 48. . . . .0 335. . . . Cheyenne. . . . . . . . . .7 -7. . .8 60. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 0. . . . . . . . . . Wheeling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . dated December 1.1 146. . . . . . . . . . . . Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs). . . . . . .1 0. . . . . . . .7 0. . . . .7 146. .7 0. . . . . . . . .2 162.2 4. . . . .7 681. . . San German-Cabo Rojo. .681. . . .9 59. . . .1 2. Sheboygan. . . . .4 44. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 -0. . . . . . is the exception since it is listed under Illinois for operational reasons. . .2 92. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Janesville. . . .7 279.7 14. . . .0 0. . . . . . . . . . .3 West Virginia . . . .4 797. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 71. . .9 164.2 -0. . . . . . . . . . .8 336. . . . . . . . . .5 -0. . . . . . . . . Area definitions are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. . . .7 2. . . . . . . .4 92. . . . . .2 0. .7 13. . Wausau. . . . . . . . . Casper.3 47.7 676. . . . . .0 0. . . . . .4 0. . . . . .1 110. . . . .2 56. . .9 65. . . . . Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna.8 Wisconsin. . . . . . . .bls. .8 -1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 0.7 -0. . . .9 -0. . .2 35. . . . .6 16. . . . . . . .0 111. . . . .5 77. . Guayama. . . .666. . . . .5 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 48. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 40. . . . . . . . . . .0 112. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 16. . . . .7 67.6 677. . .6 114. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 340. . .0 20. . . . . . . .6 4. . . . . . . . . . .7 72. . . . . . .7 -1. Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 61. . .7 61. . . . . . . . . . . .8 -1. . . . .3 921. . . . .4 16. . . . . . .2 0. . . . .2 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo. . . . . . . . . . . . .654. . . . . . . . .9 38. .4 917.3 92. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 67. . . . . . . . .5 43.7 1. . . . .5 114. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144. . . . . . . 913. . . . . .6 5.5 56. .8 2. . . . . . . . . . . Estimates subsequent to the current benchmark are preliminary and will be revised when new information becomes available. . . . . . . . .5 Virgin Islands. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .4 2. . . . . . .660. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 3.4 8. . . . . . . .397.3 1.7 75. . . . . . . . Bethesda-Rockville-Frederick2 . . . . .364. . . . . .2 1. . . . . . . . . . .gov/lau/lausmsa. . . .3 2. . . . . . . . . Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach. . . . . .6 953. . .0 Pennsylvania. . . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13. . . . . . . . . .781. . . . . . . . Washington-Arlington-Alexandria1 . . . . . . .1 1. . .1 3. . . . .638. . . . . . . .674. . . . .9 0. . . . . . . . . . . .5 Florida. . . . . .2 0.880. . . . . Fort Worth-Arlington. . .046. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 New York. . .857. . . .200. . . .3 District of Columbia.9 27. . . . . . .2 2. . . . .2 2.6 366. . . . .6 0. . . . . . . . . .200. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .545.4 8. . . . . . . .7 100. . . . . . . . . . . .7 1. .810. . . . . . . .672. 10-02. . . . .181. . . . .246. . .219. . .5 1. .9 117. . .4 3. . . . . . . . . . 2009.2 1. Some metropolitan areas lie in two or more states. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . They are listed under the state that appears first in their titles.949. . . . .3 41. . . . . . . Philadelphia.5 1. . . . . . .7 5. . . .7 1. .5 1.4 266. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 21. . . .1 1. . . . dated December 1. . . . . . . .214. . . . . . . . . . . . .855. . . . . . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . . .2 13. .241. . . . . Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 1. . . . . . . . .4 691. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lowell-Billerica-Chelmsford1 . Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine.9 8. . .9 945. . . . . . .1 Washington. .7 1. . .6 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .137. . . .376. . . . . . . . . . .4 725. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .588.1 1. . West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Boynton Beach. like Camden. . . . . . . . . . . Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington1 .3 14. .7 706. . . . .2 Michigan. . . . . . . . . . . .2 715. . . . . .2 5. . . . . . . . . . . . New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Newark-Union2 . . . . . .4 1. .6 366.135. Lake County-Kenosha County1 .1 937.6 4.227. Framingham. . . . . . . . . .5 2. . . . . . .2 34. . . .3 84. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 946. . . Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall. . . . . .849. . . . . . .4 5. . .3 958. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peabody. . .9 155. .2 12. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 503. . . . .5 14. . 3. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs). . . . . .8 846. . . . . . .4 122. . . . .4 496.238. .0 0. . .9 -2. .3 507. . . .563.665.202. . .3 2.7 114. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0 2. . .557. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach. . . . . . 5. . . .4 8. . .568. . . . Wilmington2 .3 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 4. . . . . . . .072. . . . . .7 997. . . . . .7 949. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .977.6 1. . . . . .6 122. . . . .656. .3 2. . . .355. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Edison-New Brunswick2 . . . . . . . . .9 955.7 731. . .329. . . . . . .8 2. . . . . . .396. . .453.5 1. . . . . . .201. . . . . . . . .408. . . . . . .2 5. . . . . . . . . . . Camden2 . . . . .016. . . . . . . . .2 116. . .6 1.325. . . . . .402. . . . .6 1. .2 1. . . .067.6 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 85. . . . . . . . . . . . .116. . .861.0 1. .5 4. . . . . . .8 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 8. . . . . . .6 2. . . . selected metropolitan area. . . .8 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 84. . . . . . . . . . . 3. . . . . . . .4 556. . .4 19. . . . . . . . . .1 1. . . . . . . . . .891. . .3 Massachusetts. .7 9. . . . . .4 1.5 2. . . . .2 0. . .4 48. . . . . . . .7 -1. . . . . . . . . .601. . . . .595.4 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .163. . . .638. . . .8 2. .8 557. . . . . .4 5. . . .4 39. . . . . .2 8.175. . . . .0 2.0 1. . .5 962. . . . . . . . . . 5. . . . . . . .061. . .9 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 3. . . . . . . .4 1. .7 35. . . . . . .2 0. Nassau-Suffolk. . Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . .148. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .023. . . .8 18. . . . . . . .9 99. . . . San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City. . . .9 8. . . . . . . . . . . . .9 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 1. .4 1.6 77. . .842. . . . . . . . . . . . .0 709.8 2. .3 14. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .214. . .1 1 Part of the area is in one or more adjacent states. . . .601. . . . . .6 957. . .6 494.6 260. . . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . . .6 262. . . . . . .1 1. . . . . . . . . Tacoma. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.htm. . . . . . . . .6 1. .5 36. .8 61. . .0 20. . . .6 31. . . . . . . . . San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont. . . . . . .9 0. . .7 1. .9 3. . . . . .8 3. . .989. . . . . . . . . .762. . . . . . . . . and division 2011 2012 2011 2012p Number Percent California. . . . .7 -2. . . . . . .5 7. . . . . Chicago-Joliet-Naperville1 . . .8 1. . . . . .952. . .356.756. .0 326. . . . . Boston-Cambridge-Quincy1 . . . . . . . . .2 0.8 0. . 10. . . .3 1.1 259. . . . . . . .8 329. . . . Some divisions lie in more than one state. .3 1. . .738. . .1 120.802.8 2. . . . . . . . . . .077. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .418. . . . . . . .0 687. .5 1. . . . . . . . . . . .6 1. . . . . . . 2.2 79. . . . . . .231. . . . . . . . . . . . .5 261. .2 1. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills. . .8 3. . . .5 689. . Area definitions are based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. .5 1. .136. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . area. . . 713.3 2. . . . . 8. . . . .0 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Haverhill-North Andover-Amesbury1 . . . . . are totally outside the states under which their metropolitan areas are listed. . New York-White Plains-Wayne1 . p Preliminary NOTE: Data are counts of jobs by place of work. .928. . .869. . . . . . . . . .653.5 76. . . . .6 2. . . . .3 326. .9 8. .8 3. . . . . . . and available at www. . . . . . . . . . . . Chicago-Joliet-Naperville. .5 14. . . . . . . .7 78. . . . .1 12. . .758. . . . . . . . .5 5. . . . . . . . . . . .J. . . .9 556. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 29. . . .3 2. . . . .3 1. . . . . .0 7.773.5 Illinois. . . . . . . .6 1. . . . .4 959. . . . . . . . .755. .7 7. . . . . . . . .0 1. . . . . .1 38.1 3. . .3 2. .4 124. . . . . . . . . . . .351. . . . . . . . .0 1. . . . . . . . . . . . Employees on nonfarm payrolls by state. . . . . . .2 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .431. . . . . .4 367. . . and some. . .6 0. .100.417. . . .0 2. .557. . . . . . . .9 42. . . . . . . . . .2 0. . . . . .404. . . . . .769. . . .1 262.7 946. .388. . . . . .6 493. . .9 1. . . . . . . . .0 2. . .224. . . . . . . . . . . . . Gary2 . . . .4 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 1. .3 2. . . . . .1 1. .6 494. .9 5. .7 866.319. . . . . . . .8 952.3 5. .1 2. . . . .1 2.ESTABLISHMENT DATA NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Table 4. . . . . . . . .8 2. . .732. . . . .2 2. . . . . . . . Estimates subsequent to the current benchmark are preliminary and will be revised when new information becomes available. . . .4 26. . . . .798. . . .4 991. . . .0 259. . . . . . . . .1 2. .630.670. . . . .6 2. . . . . . . . . . . . .911. . . . . . . . .5 0. .9 156. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 1.9 2. . Seattle-Bellevue-Everett. .662. .220. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .042.2 872. . Dallas-Plano-Irving. . . . . . . . .026. . . .3 5.8 1. .188. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 506. . .3 264. .8 1. . . . . . . . . . .3 169.0 98. Nashua1 . . . .5 -2. . .2 152. . . . . . . .4 -0. . . .7 1.6 1.589. . . .9 15. .0 5. . . .0 262. . . .6 509. . . . Brockton-Bridgewater-Easton. .6 3. . . . . . .274. . . . .1 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 325. . .870. . . .5 2. . . . .3 10. . . . .8 152. . . Oakland-Fremont-Hayward. . . .4 366. . . . . . . . . .6 117. . . . . . . .2 5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2. . . . . . . . . . . . .4 53. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .857. .015. . .3 0. . . . . . . while areas in other states are county-based. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .196.010. . . .8 1.8 3. .7 2. . . . . . . . .390. . . .6 2. .527. . . . . .9 113. . . . . . . . . . .9 554. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .135. . . . . .515. .0 2. .5 716.3 1. . . .4 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .877. . . . . . . . . . . . .672. . . . . . . . .2 123.7 1.8 3. . . .4 2. .1 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .559. .6 19. . . . . .423. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 All of the area is in one or more adjacent states. . .0 2. . . .149. . . . . . . .369. . . . . . .8 931. . . . . . . .638. .4 5.2 75. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .182. .0 1.7 3. . . . . . . . . .8 961. . .4 1. .944. . . . .0 5. . . . . . . . .7 2. . .3 26. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana.8 842. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .575. .2 34. . . . . . Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue. . . . . . . . . . . . .bls. . . . .8 1. . . . . . and metropolitan division [In thousands] January Change from February 2011 to February 2012p February State. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 689. .3 85. .109. . . . . . . .9 936. . . . . . . . . . . . .1 23. . . Detroit-Warren-Livonia. . . . . . . .0 10.6 2. . . . . . . . . .907. . . . . . . . . . .9 711. . . . . .7 9. .668. . .9 5.1 2. .846. . . .4 940. . . . . .2 0. . . . . . . . . . . . . Boston-Cambridge-Quincy. . .8 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Texas. . . . . . .4 10. . .5 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington-Arlington-Alexandria1 . . .4 -0. . . .1 1. . . . . 7. . .3 98. .373. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .831. . . . N. .947. . . . . . . . . . . .5 82. . .7 2.8 3. . .683. .1 2. .

Unemployment rates for metropolitan areas.7 7 percent) NOTE: Map includes data for 372 metropolitan areas based on Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No.S. 1002. Above U. Areas in the six New England states are Metropolitan New England City and Town areas (NECTAs).S. average or below . while areas in other states are county-based.S. 8. not seasonally adjusted. February 2012 (U S rate = 8 (U. average U.