You are on page 1of 6

Artful Race: The Idea of Physical Beauty andUglines

The idea of physical beauty — and its plastic, graphic, or verbal expression — is of European origin. The grotesque reality is that non-White races and ethnicities know this fact, but for obvious reasons do not wish to admit it. Or rather, over the last half a century, they have been forced, by their White repentant masters, along with their leftist Marxist acolytes — not to admit it. The irony is that even when racial out-groups publicly rebuke the European idea of beauty for its alleged Eurocentric and xenophobic message, or when they forcefully attempt to express their own endogenous beauty — they end up mimicking the White European style and form. Therefore the much vaunted noun ‘diversity’ is both a lexical and conceptual fraud — whose victims are not just Whites but also non-Whites. Diversity presupposes that that there is a plurality of beauties. Yet in real life within Western societies, ‘diversity’ carries the denominator of distorted Whiteness — in style, looks, form, narrative, etc. The examples are startlingly numerous — beginning with the physiognomy of Oprah Winfrey to that of Barack Obama, or for that matter to movies from Bollywood (India) in which, as a rule, a Hindu hero displays some European features, sports a quasi-dolicochephalic face, or short of that, postures with his tall stature. Soap operas throughout Latin America notoriously feature blond, blue-eyed Whites in the main roles. Racial Self-Image: The Ideal of Beauty Theologies and ideologies come and go but the merciless laws of racial biology are here to stay. One can flee his country’s oppressive rulers, but one cannot escape his heredity. It was not some wicked proverbial “Nazi,” but the Jewish British Prime minister and author Benjamin Disraeli, who said: “The difference of race is one of the reasons why I fear war may always exist; because race implies difference, difference implies superiority, and superiority leads to predominance.” Not tons, but megatons of book titles were seized, burned down or simply shoved down the Orwellian memory hole by the victorious Allies in defeated Germany. And among those were works by prominent European geneticists, anthropologists, artists and biologists, whose work long predated the National Socialist seizure of power. The entire Allied inquisition against European scholarship and science was euphemistically called the “The List of the literature to be singled out (Die Liste der auszusondernden Literatur); see hereand here. The Lamarckian-Marxian idea of racial equality and human interchangeability has become so powerful that the most modest academic skepticism regarding contemporary “self-evident truths” is severely punished. Figurative and plastic forms of art are the best vectors for studying racial types and subtypes, but also an ideal mirror of physical beauty among Western men and women. Ideas of race and beauty were perhaps best described by PaulSchulze Naumburg, the much acclaimed art critic and artist himself in the Third Reich, and Hans Günther, a racial anthropologist. Both were among the thousands of authors banned by the post-WWII Inquisition. One does not need to be an expert in anthropometry or eugenics to distinguish between racial ugliness and racial beauty. Glancing at classical art exhibits in European museums tells us all. As a rule, artistic creation reflects not just the personality and the race of a depicted human, but also of the subject, i.e., the artist himself. Portraits and pictures of naked women tell us much about the idea of race and beauty of a given nation, at a given historical time period. Schulze Naumburg writes that every artist crafts his characters in his own image. Sandro Botticelli’s face, his blue eyes, lank stature,

beauty with high cheekbones. elegant and long-limbed Nordic looking. particularly in his famous. Botticelli: Primavera . the Primavera — albeit embellished in a timely fashion.and his racial Nordic-Mediterranean (“westisch”) makeup found their way on his canvasses.

b) the personality and Nordic racial makeup of Titian himself. shown on some of the 17thcentury Japanese woodcuts. flat hips and breasts. The brush of vivid and different colors is nonexistent. It appears quite obvious that each artist presents that which in his perceptions lives and what is preferably his subject of preoccupation. Kunst und Rasse (Art and Race) ( 1928. find its way on his canvass. The portraits of Titian’s naked females tell us two things: a) the idea of female beauty in Europe of his time. (p. Surely. have expressionless faces.Botticelli: Self-portrait So does Rembrandt’s own facial combination of a Nordic-Dinaric-Mediterraneanman. . and instead of the eyes one can see two slits above their tiny nose. there are cases in which harmony occurs — which is more likely the closer the races that are to be mixed are. there is a likelihood that the rhythm will be upset or that it will disappear. 1942) [adrotate group="1"] Japanese or African art differs from European art because it reflects a different gene pool. What strikes the eyes of the White observer is that the women bathing. The African woodcutting has nothing in common with the German woodcuts of Nordico-Dinaric artist Albrecht Dürer. One could probably explain the relationship between the artist and his work simply as a preference of every human being for his own race and his own type. 34)(my translation) Schulze-Naumburg. 31–32) When two races mix. A Black artist or an Asian artist can never ever have such racial empathy. Decisive is the choice of the role model based on preference for his own race or (corporal) type. including his stocky limbs. Thus the relation between the Nordic and the Dinaric man will be easier achieved than the relation between a member of the Nordic race and an Oriental man (“einem Mongoloiden”) (p.

Dürer: The Knight. Death. and the Devil .

albeit in a reverse manner. It is debatable to what extent the much vaunted Jewish Russian painter. the main Kafka’s hero identifies himself constantly with images of ugliness (The Castel. A good connoisseur of the Jewish spirit. But one could use exactly the same procedure. The Metamorphosis). The poor sense for imagery and the lack of the metaphor seems to be primal racial traits of Jews. Jews have never excelled in plastic and figurative art. Their religion strictly forbids them worshipping of idols and their pictorial representation. His paintings depicting flying goats or Jewish newlyweds floating in the sky above a shtetl in Russia make one wonder whether Chagall was high on vodka at the moment of his artistic exuberance. despite their high verbal IQ and their proverbial ears for music. to describe racial psychology of many Jewish writers. as for instance Franz Kafka. In his convulsive prose. The Frankfurt school attempt at pathologizing European art and particularly the concept of European physical beauty was in full swing shortly after WWII. Ernest Renan wrote that “the desert is monotheistic” (“Le désert est monothéiste“) — hence by definition devoid of mystery and pictorial imagination.African Woodcut For obvious reasons. the French linguist and philosopher. Marc Chagall fits into the European artistic and racial consciousness. For that matter even books by the famed Jewish “father of .

they also express artistic feelings differently. as seen on Nietzsche’s own face. … ‘German accuracy’ is a Nordic-Alpine feature. The Alpine round-headed man (‘ostisch’) appears all over the White race in the USA and Europe.… The Alpine streak transpires in precision. Northwestern Germany. A Western man with predominately Nordic features (Scandinavia. The Alpine man is sentimental and home-bound. Older comics and caricatures in Europe and the USA. are racial features that one encounters in the European Dinaric racial subtype (Bavaria. occasional theatrical posturing. Scores of Jewish intellectuals. love for music and dance. In his classic Rasse und Stil (Race and Style. but also tends to be moody and cranky. Holland. combined with pettiness and grumbling” (pp. 70. central Britain) shows unwavering perseverance.” and disinterestedness — what Nietzsche called the “pathos of distance. unwavering friendship. ” Sigmund Freud testify of a troubled man with compulsive neurosis. Austria. Günther points out that vividness. Günther writes that “the work of an artist with an Alpine (‘ostisch’) trait is mostly calm. Nordic man is punctual. ascribing them a barbaric character — while prudently avoiding to delve into morbid tales from the Old Testament — whose violence is proverbial . is no longer considered very serious — even by his former disciples. verbosity. This is best seen in popular folk costumes. he loves order and discipline — as long as he can combine this proclivity with generosity. in contrast to the Nordic artist whose work appears shocking and demanding. conciliatory. western Balkans). Lombardy. when depicting a petty bourgeois.” This is despite the fact that Nietzsche and scores of “Faustian-Promethean” Western thinkers had a clear streak of Dinaric genes. like Bruno Bettelheim went to great lengths in order to criminalize the beauty of European fairy tales (and by detour provoke guilt feelings among non-Jewish parents). and love for ornaments — so typical for the spirit of the Central European Baroque. after having done so much damage in creating guilt feelings among Whites. although historically the bulk of Alpine Europeans are located in Eastern Europe and Russia. or an un-intellectual person. use the round-headed Alpine as a symbol of social derision. 79). Hans Günther writes that different White racial subtypes are not only physically and facially different. “will to power.psychoanalysis. whose work today. yet amazing courage in military close combats. 1926). From the architectural point of view the Nordic spirit is best embodied in Gothic cathedrals. .