Professional Documents
Culture Documents
eff
=
con
+
n
3
3
i=1
i
1
n
3
con
3
i=1
i
N
i
(1.2)
An expression for polarizability of an object with a dielectric permittivity
o
placed
inside a homogenous medium with a uniform incident static electric eld as given
in [20]
i
= v
con
1
con
(
con
o
)
+N
i
(1.3)
which for a conducting object as steel ber (
o
) in our scenario can be ap-
proximated as
i
= v
con
1
N
i
(1.4)
where v is the volume d
2
fib
l
fib
/4 of steel ber Using the depolarizing factors for a
given metallic spheroid as stated in [1]
N
1
=
(d
fib
/l
fib
)
2
2(1 (d
fib
/l
fib
)
2
)
3
2
_
ln
(1 +
_
1 (d
fib
/l
fib
)
2
)
(1
_
1 (d
fib
/l
fib
)
2
)
2
_
1 (d
fib
/l
fib
)
2
_
(1.5)
N
2
= N
3
=
(1 N
1
)
2
(1.6)
Using equation 1.4 and putting in equation 1.2 we can obtain the steel ber density
in the host concrete medium, knowing the mass m of the steel ber used in the
concrete mixture by the following expression.
=
v
m(1 +
con
3(
eff
con
)
3
i=1
1
N
i
)
(1.7)
1.4 Initial Study
In order to determine specications of the antenna to be used for measurements an
initial study was carried out. In order to achieve better penetrability, resolution
and discrimination, a compromise between high and low frequencies was made. In
the experimental investigations and a theoretical explanation by [21] a criteria for
the frequency of antenna can be estimated as:
=
2
(1.8)
1.4. Initial Study 5
where is the longest dimension of the steel ber in the host medium (concrete)
and is the eective wavelength. In our case length is the longest dimension of
steel ber.
An initial free space measurement setup for SFRC blocks with UHF Horn antennas
was prepared. Due to mismatching and poor impedance bandwidth of antennas
with concrete, measurements suered from reliability, accuracy and repeatability.
It requires more accurate and complex calibration methods. Also the weight and
big size of the antennas presented an unappealing solution. A next step towards
the analysis of concrete slabs was a monopole patch antenna. This was designed
with wide impedance matching in concrete material. But due to the omnidirec-
tional pattern of the antenna, measurements for real permittivity suered from the
back lobe radiation. Therefore, a more compact, directional and wide impedance
bandwidth antenna at UHF was proposed for further measurements.
Chapter 2
Antenna Design, Analysis and
Manufacturing
2.1 Why Microstrip Wideband antennas?
A wideband antenna is required to achieve a narrow transmitting pulse in time
domain. Narrow pulse provides better resolution in microwave imaging and also
minimizes measurements sensitivity against frequency dependent material proper-
ties. Wideband antenna designs are mainly inspired from a monopole or dipole
antenna. As explained in [22], they can be tapered slot or loop antennas. Printed
circuit antennas due to their low form factor and practical applicability has at-
tracted many researches for their use in modern applications. On the other side,
PCB or microstrip antennas severely suer from narrow bandwidth as for a sim-
ple patch antenna the maximum achievable bandwidth is around 1%. A simple
relation for PCB antennas taking height h of dielectric substrate and its relative
permittivity
r
is given as [23].
BW
kh
r
(2.1)
Thus in order to increase the bandwidth, we can decrease dielectric substrates
r
but this is hard to achieve beyond a certain value and also an expensive solu-
tion. It also increases the size of the antenna which overshadows the advantage
of compactness inherited with these antennas. Increasing height can also pro-
vide wideband properties, which includes multilayered substrate antennas. It is
technologically dicult and expensive to manufacture multilayered or large height
substrate printed circuit boards. Also adding substrate layers and increasing sub-
strate height compromises the advantage of low form factor aliated to these
antennas.
7
8 Chapter 2. Antenna Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
2.2 Ground-Plane Slot Antennas
Keeping intact the merits inherited to microstrip antennas, use of slot in ground
plane provide wide impedance bandwidth along with reduction of the size of an-
tennas. This conguration has received greater attention over the past three and
a half decades due its compactness and wideband features. First Microstrip slot
antenna was proposed by Yoshimura in 1972 [24]. Later Pozar , Das and Kim in
[25] employed a reciprocity method to provide a theoretical and electromagnetic
explanation for microstrip fed and aperture coupled slot antennas.
Initially, a practical implementation of slot antennas was considered to be short-
ing of the slot with a feeding line using a via wire. This was later replaced by a
design where an extension of feeding line to /4 length realized a short circuit to
the slot. This gave an ease of manufacturing and applicability to the antenna. A
circuit model for a radiating and broadband slot has been explained in [26, 27],
whereas a more design oriented study has been carried out in [28]. In recent years,
due to demands of low transmit power, high throughput eciency and high data
rates in wireless communications several designs using printed slot are considered
in current research topics [34].
2.3 A Single Microstrip Feedline Slot
In order to develop relationship for a tuning fork shaped microstrip line fed slot
antenna, it is necessary to study modeling of a single microstrip line fed slot
antenna. An approximate model for centered microstrip fed slot has been discussed
in [29]. Normalized admittance of the radiating slot can be given as [33]
Figure 2.1: A single microstrip
feedline slot
Figure 2.2: Circuit model
Y
s
= G+jB (2.2)
2.3. A Single Microstrip Feedline Slot 9
where G and B are the slot radiation conductance and susceptance respectively.
B is stated in [29] as
B = (
2
Z
cs
) cot
L
s
(2.3)
where Z
cs
is the characteristic impedance of the slot, and L
s
is the eective length
of the slot i.e. L
s
W
t
, W
t
being the width of the transmission line. In above
equation
s
=
o
rs
,
o
being the free space wavelength and
rs
is the eective
permittivity of the slot. This is an important factor in determining the resonant
frequency of the slot as discussed in [33]. G slot radiation conductance can be
obtained using [29]
G =
Total Power Radiated by Slot
(V oltage Across the Centre of Slot)
2
G =
_
0
sin
2
(
L
cos ) tan
2
sin d
120
2
(2.4)
where for asymptotic values derived given in [32] when L
s
<<
o
this can approx-
imated as
G =
1
90
(
L
o
)
2
(2.5)
Self inductances of the slot and the transmission line can be found using following
equations
L
1
=
Z
ct
rt
W
t
c
(2.6)
L
2
=
Z
cs
rs
W
s
c
(2.7)
c is equal to 3 10
8
m/s speed of light in vacuum and Z
ct
is the characteristic
impedance of feeding transmission line. Mutual inductance between the slot and
feeding line can be obtained using [30]
M =
W
s
ln sec(tan
1
(Ls
/2h))
2
(2.8)
where h is the height of the substrate In a similar manner equivalent admittance
of open-circuit stub can be found using [29] derivation
Y
o
= G
o
+B
o
(2.9)
where B
o
open ended susceptance can be found using open ended capacitance C
o
due to the extra length of fringing elds which can be computed using [32]
L
o
= 0.412h
(
ro
+ 0.3)(W
t
+ 0.264h)
(
ro
0.258)(W
t
+ 0.8h)
(2.10)
10 Chapter 2. Antenna Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
C
o
=
L
o
ro
cZ
co
, B
o
= C
o
(2.11)
here
ro
is the eective permittivity of open ended stub of length L
o
. Radiation
conductance of the stub is given by [30]
G
o
= 160(
h
Z
co
ro
)
2
(2.12)
Thus nding the input impedance for a single microstrip fed slot can be concluded
as [29]
Z
in
= 1/Y
s
+ 1/Y
o
(2.13)
In our case antenna requirement is to have wide impedance matching when con-
tacted with concrete. Dry concrete can be modeled as a dielectric medium with a
real permittivity reported to be 4 <
rcon
< 7 in [36]. Slot aperture is sandwiched
between a dielectric layer of concrete and Fr-4 substrate. If the eect of thickness
of concrete is ignored, the eective permittivity of slot can be approximated as an
average of relative permittivities of substrate and concrete as shown in equation
below. Therefore matching antenna to a x wide band impedance in a concrete
medium, slot eective permittivity has to be approximated as
rs
=
con
+
r
2
(2.14)
Electric eld lines are mainly conned inside the dielectric substrate for these kind
of structures so the eective permittivity for transmission lines is calculated using
rt
=
r
+ 1
2
+
r
1
2W
(W + 12h)
1
2
(2.15)
A slot aperture antenna has a Qausi-Omni directional radiation pattern discussed
in appendix A. Use of an aperture as a radiating element results in a high level of
coupling, which must be controlled reduced to properly achieve wide impedance of
slot. This can be achieved by varying the size of aperture or using complex feeding
topologies. As discussed in [28] an oset feedline can achieve greater impedance
bandwidth as compared to center feedline topology. But this method suers from
increased cross polarization. A method to overcome this problem and achieve
greater impedance bandwidth is an approach of dual-oset feedline as shown in
gure 2.3. This also provides multiple resonant modes in the structure in order to
achieve wide impedance bandwidth of antenna.
2.4 Design Parameters
In order to achieve compactness and greater impedance bandwidth, a FR-4 sub-
strate with dielectric permittivity of
r
= 4.4 is used with a thickness of h =
2.4. Design Parameters 11
1.6mm. In this section antenna design parameters are calculated, keeping in con-
sideration the requirement of operating frequency from 350-650MHz at-least indi-
cated in [18].
Slot resonant frequency is dependent mainly on the slot length which should be
approximately half of an eective wavelength. In this design slot length S
l
is taken
to be
g
/2 where
g
=
o
rs
at 400MHz.
rs
is calculated using equation [above]
with
rcon
= 6. Self inductance of the slot is controlled by the slot width S
w
and
is taken to be 0.16 S
l
. Many authors have shown that increasing the width of
slot can result in greater impedance bandwidth [31]. As in PCB antennas, orien-
tation of eld lines is from transmission line towards slot plane (ground plane).
Therefore, ground plane width G
w
=
o
/2
rt
and ground plane length is taken to be
slightly smaller than width G
w
= 0.83 G
l
. This results in an eective size of
the ground plane to be 0.3
o
0.25
o
which is the smallest size reported at UHF
band compared to the antennas designed previously. Feedline structure consists
Figure 2.3: Antenna Design - Top View
of a 50 impedance line divided into dual-oset 100 lines. In order to achieve
the specied characteristic impedance on Fr-4 substrate width of the transmission
12 Chapter 2. Antenna Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
line is calculated using
Z
ct
=
60
rt
ln[
8h
W
t
+
W
t
4h
]
W
t
h
1 (2.16a)
Z
ct
=
rt
[
W
t
h
+ 1.393 + 0.667 ln(
W
t
h
+ 1.444)]
W
t
h
> 1 (2.16b)
Transmission Feeding line length of 100 as suggested in [28] is selected such that
it is.
F
l
=
o
4
rt
. Oset distance between the two feeding line is critical and quite
sensitive to impedance bandwidth. It is chosen to be F
off
=
g
4
where
g
is guide
wavelength of slot.
2.4.1 Use of Reector
A drawback related to this antenna is equal amount of power radiated in upper
and lower hemispheres. A traditional approach towards reducing the backward
radiation is a use of metallic reector below the feeding line. Reector cancels
the backward radiation and provides gain in end-re lobe, but at the same time it
also reduces the impedance bandwidth if separation distance S between reector
and feeding structure is less than quarter of a free space wavelength. Therefore,
reector dimensions and separation distance play an important role in volumetric
dimensions of a complete antenna.
One approach to reduce separation distance S is to ll a high dielectric mate-
rial in between. Therefore distance between reector is reduced by a factor of
1
rmat
. If epoxy (currently available) is used which has a relative permittivity of
3.15 separation distance is reduced by almost half. But at the same time weight
of the epoxy ( = 1kg/dm
3
) becomes a big contributor to the total weight of the
system.
To achieve greater front-to-back ratio with minimal impedance bandwidth lost,
reduction in reectors width R
w
is proposed in [34] such that coupling aect to
feedline is avoided. In this way, reector separation distance can be decreased
and reduction in the total weight of antenna. In simulations separation distance
between reector and feeding line is optimized to achieve maximum impedance
bandwidth along with Front-to-Back(FBR) ratio greater than 10dB.
Reector length is taken to be R
l
=
o
2
, increasing this increases the front to
back ratio. Reducing reector width increases impedance bandwidth whereas it
2.5. Simulations 13
has inverse eect on FBR ratio. Reector width is adjusted to achieve maximum
impedance bandwidth while maintaining FBR ratio greater than 10dB.
2.4.2 Use of Resistive Loading
A technique to enhance antenna impedance bandwidth is to absorb the capacitive
eects using resistor specially used in Ground Penetrating Radar antennas. This
is also benecial in removing ringing eects and obtain a smooth sharp impulse in
time domain. As we are interested in time domain analysis of a transmitted pulse
use of resistor is recommended.
It is observed that resistor greatly increases the impedance bandwidth. There
is no signicant change in the directional pattern of the antenna. But it is impor-
tant to mention here that it come at cost of low radiation eciency. Radiation
eciency is reduced to almost 60%. Bandwidth increases from 32% to almost
75% with use of a 1 kilo Ohm but at a cost of eciency reduction. As concrete
measurements are taken in near-eld where radiation eciency does not inuence.
Therefore signicance of high radiation eciency is not signicant in this study.
2.5 Simulations
Numerical techniques are required to solve big structures which have complex
and irregular geometries and can not be solved manually. These numerical tech-
niques for electromagnetic problems are known as Computational Electromag-
netic(CEM). The most common methods used these days are Finite-Dierence
Time Domain method(FDTD), the Finite Element method(FEM) and the Method
of Moments(MoM). Currently available softwares at UPC are Ansoft HFSS and
CST Microwave Studio.
HFSS employs a FEM technique to solve for electromagnetic behavior of a struc-
ture. HFSS computes E-eld in frequency domain directly and calculates H-eld
using Maxwell equations indirectly. Time domain parameters are calculated using
inverse fourier transform. Instead, CST uses a FDTD approach and solves for
E-eld in time domain, it obtains the H-eld indirectly using Maxwell equations
in time domain. Frequency dependent parameters are calculated using the Fourier
transformation.
Both numerical techniques use a volumetric based solution therefore simulation
parameters for example mesh size, density etc. can be optimized to achieve accu-
rate results and is used in this study to achieve a robust modeling of the antenna
14 Chapter 2. Antenna Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
design.
The antenna structure is modeled in HFSS and a concrete block of 40 40 30
is placed above the antenna. An exploded view of the antenna is shown in the
gure 2.4. Optimized parameters for the antenna dimensions are shown in table
2.1. The antenna is modeled and simulated in Ansoft HFSS v11 on a machine
Figure 2.4: HFSS Model - Exploded View
Design parameters Optimized Values Dimension
Ground plane length (G
l
) 22.4 cm
Ground plane width (G
w
) 18.9 cm
Slot length (S
l
) 16.6 cm
Slot width (S
w
) 2.75 cm
Fork arm length (St
1
+St
2
) 11.6 cm
Fork arm oset (F
off
) 11.6 cm
Reector length (R
l
) 37.5 cm
Reector width (R
w
) 8 cm
Reector separation distance (S) 10 cm
Substrate height (h) 0.16 cm
Substrate
r
4.4
Resistor (R) 1.1k ohms
Table 2.1: Model Design Parameters
with a processor speed of 1.8GHz, RAM size of 512 Mbytes and Hard disk size
2.6. Manufacturing 15
of 60Gbytes. A single simulation over a frequency of 300-700MHz with discrete
8 sampling points takes an average of 70,000 tetrahedral mesh cells to converge.
Completion time for a simulation varies from 11-12 hours approximately which
has been a limiting factor in simulating such kind of structures. Due to bigger
structure, multiple dielectric materials and broadband analysis of the antenna
processing machine memory size plays a critical role.
2.6 Manufacturing
Manufacturing of modeled antenna is carried out using a positive Photo Chemical
Machining(PCM) process. This process is carefully performed at Antenna Lab
in UPC. A stepwise approach towards manufacturing is explained in appendix B.
Manufactured antenna is shown in gure 2.5
Figure 2.5: Manufactured Antenna
2.7 Results
2.7.1 Impedance Bandwidth
In gure 2.6 measured and simulated S
11
or impedance bandwidth of the antenna
is shown. It was required to achieve an wide impedance bandwidth with criteria
S
11
10dB. Measured results of the antenna has shown an impedance band-
width of approximately 75%. Greater bandwidth in frequency domain results in
16 Chapter 2. Antenna Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
a narrow transmission pulse in time domain which in terms of imaging provides
better resolution inside host medium.
Figure 2.6: Impedance Bandwidth (S11) - measured and simulated
2.7.2 Radiation Pattern
It is dicult to measure radiation pattern (D()) for this antenna in anechoic
chamber because medium of propagation is air. The antenna is designed with
concrete being the medium of propagation. To overcome this problem a setup
is made along with a uniform concrete wall without any metallic objects inside.
Receiving antenna is mounted on a PC-controlled positioner and transmitting
antenna is placed on the opposite of the concrete wall mounted on a stationary
Tripod-stand. Forward transmission S
21
is recorded using a Personal Network
Analyzer(PNA) at every scanning step. If Far-eld condition (d <
2D
2
) where is
the eective wavelength in the medium, is fullled then S
21
can be approximated
as
S
21
= D()
4r
21
e
r
12
e
jr
21
(2.17)
Here is the attenuation constant and the unknown parameter. For relative
permittivity of concrete is taken to be 4.5. is determined using the reection
parameter S
11
of concrete. A metallic object assuming it to be a perfect reector
is placed on one side of concrete wall and its reection is measured using antenna
on other side. This is more like a radar approach as transmitter and receiver is
the same antenna. In time domain reection is gated to isolate other reections.
This gated pulse is converted to frequency domain and recorded. This measured
S
11
is given as 2.18 and a measurement setup in gure 2.7.
S
11
= D( = 0)
42d
e
2d
e
j2d
(2.18)
2.7. Results 17
Using equation 2.18 and putting relative permittivity given above attenuation
constant is obtained for respective frequencies. Putting the values obtained in
equation A.3 and solving for D() gives the radiation pattern shown in gures
below. This method considers far-eld assumption which is a strict assumption.
Also the environment reection may eect the measurement as readings are not
taken in a perfect isolated environment like anechoic chamber.
Figure 2.7: Measurement Setup - computing attenuation constant
It is seen in the radiation plots that FBR 10dB. Being a rectangular slot
aperture width is smaller than its length therefore radiation pattern is better in
Hplane than Eplane. As discussed in appendix A Eplane radiation pattern depends
on width of aperture slot whereas Hplane is dependent on length of aperture slot.
Side lobes are also strong in Eplane due to the same fact discussed in appendix
A. As the reector used is not exactly a broadband reector so the separation dis-
tance plays an important role in achieving directionality at dierent frequencies.
Antenna is more directional at higher frequencies, greater than 350MHz.
18 Chapter 2. Antenna Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
Figure 2.8: Hplane 350-450MHz
Figure 2.9: Hplane - 550-650MHz
2.7. Results 19
Figure 2.10: Hplane 700-800MHz
Figure 2.11: Eplane 350-450MHz
20 Chapter 2. Antenna Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
Figure 2.12: Eplane - 550-650MHz
Figure 2.13: Eplane 700-800MHz
2.7. Results 21
2.7.3 Radiation Eciency
As discussed before that resistor is used in order to remove the ringing eects
at higher frequencies but radiation eciency is dropped in this case. The eect
of using resistor is shown in gure2.14 in terms of radiation eciency which is
determined through simulations. It can be seen that radiation eciency is dropped
to approximately 60% in operating bandwidth. As measurements are taken in near
eld therefore we are not concerned about eciency due to the fact that we have
enough received power from the point of view of signal-to-noise ratio.
Figure 2.14: Radiation Eciency
Chapter 3
Measurement Techniques
In order to characterize dierent densities of concrete materials, sample concrete
blocks were prepared by the Civil Engineering Department at Universitat Politec-
nica de Catalunya (UPC). These blocks of dimension 0.15 0.15 0.15m
3
contained
variable steel ber densities 0kg/m
3
, 20kg/m
3
, 40kg/m
3
and 60kg/m
3
. A mea-
surement setup was established consisting of Agilent Personal Network Analyzer
E8362B (20 MHz - 20GHz), microwave low loss cables with SMA connectors on
each end and a stand for holding the blocks and the antennas. In gure 3.1 test
setup for lab measurements is shown In order to determine real permittivity value
Figure 3.1: Lab Measurement Setup
of SFRC blocks, two types of methods are considered here
Reection
Transmission
23
24 Chapter 3. Measurement Techniques
3.1 What is a Reection Approach?
It comprises of an antenna attached to Material Under Test (MUT) with a metal-
lic reector on opposite side. When a transmitted signal experiences a medium
change not whole of the signal is transmitted and some portion of the signal is
reected back known as the reected signal. In this method this reected signal
from MUT is measured using S
11
scattering parameter in PNA. This approach
requires complex calibration and also removal of the undesired signals such that a
reection coecient of MUT is extracted. This technique can be performed in
both time domain (reected pulse) or frequency domain (phase shift) to acquire
real permittivity
con
of concrete.
=
1
con
1 +
con
(3.1)
3.2 What is a Transmission Approach?
Material Under Test is placed between two antennas as shown in gure 3.1. It
determines S
21
transmitted signal through MUT. It is like a free-space transmission
technique employed in [35] in past. Due to its simplicity, many authors have
previously used this technique and have dened simpler calibration procedures
such as TRL, TRM and LRL. This technique can also be performed in time domain
(transmitted pulse) or frequency domain (phase shift) to acquire concretes real
permittivity value
con
. These approaches are discussed next in detail along with
practical measurements.
T =
(1
2
)
1
2
e
2d
(3.2)
3.2.1 Time Analysis
In time domain wave propagation time is dependent on the distance d and eective
velocity in the medium, considering c = 3 10
8
m/s as the velocity of light then
t =
d
r
c
(3.3)
This time delay can be measured with the help of a modern Personal Network
Analyzer E8362B by recording the S
21
orS
12
measurement in frequency and then
post processing it using IFFT algorithm to determine the time domain response.
In this measurement Port Extension feature of the network analyzer is utilized so
as the measurement reference plane is in the center of xture in air. This will
perform the phase shift and zero the time delay for air. Now time delay seen due
3.2. What is a Transmission Approach? 25
to a material placed between the transmitting and receiving antenna will be the
absolute time delay due to the material. In other words t t
mut
for 3.4
t = t
mut
t
air
=
d
air
d
mut
r
c
(3.4)
It can be clearly seen in 3.2.1 time delay is increased as the density of steel ber is
increased in the concrete. This clear distinction in the delay can help us developing
a relation between the ber density and the real permittivity. Therefore solving
3.4 and assuming feeding line length in air i.e. d
air
d
mut
and concrete to be
constant real permittivity can be obtained as
Figure 3.2: Impulse Response
r
= (1 +
ct
d
)
2
(3.5)
A drawback in using the time domain analysis for permittivity measurements is
multiple path reection. Due to multiple path reection main pulse received cannot
be due to shortest path available. It can be due to reections within the medium.
It has been proposed in [35] to avoid this ambiguity a path length should be such
that a 10dB one way attenuation exists.
3.2.2 Phase Analysis
A ratio of complex amplitude of electromagnetic wave at the source to the am-
plitude at a distance d is known as the propagation constant . Propagation
26 Chapter 3. Measurement Techniques
Figure 3.3: Real Permittivity vs SF Density
constant depends on the attenuation constant of the material and phase constant
by relation.
= +i (3.6)
The forward transmission scattering parameter S
21
measured using PNA is related
to propagation constant
S
21
e
d
(3.7)
Therefore phase angle in radians of material under test, measured is equal to
d.
= d (3.8)
where = 2
r
/. Taking derivative of the phase angle can lead to the real
permittivity value of material under test (concrete).
d
df
=
2d
r
c
(3.9)
Due to greater number of unknown and ambiguous parameters absolute phase
constant is dicult to measure. A relative approach is adopted here such that a
relative phase change due to material as compared in air is used to calculate real
permittivity value of concrete. This can be achieved by extending the measurement
reference plane to the center in air. In this case change of phase angle measured
when concrete block is placed, is related to real permittivity by
=
_
1 +
o
2d
_
2
(3.10)
3.2. What is a Transmission Approach? 27
Instead of having a frequency as a function permittivity, an approximate value of
the permittivity can be obtained using the phase derivative approach mentioned
above which makes equation 3.10 as
=
_
1 +
d
df
1
2d
_
2
(3.11)
In gure 3.6 it can be seen that both approaches result in approaches same
cos
ds
(A.2)
A
e
jkr
4r
_ _
s
J
s
(r)e
jkr
cos
ds
(A.3)
introducing variables N and L
L =
_ _
s
M
s
(r)e
jkr
cos
ds
(A.4)
N =
_ _
s
M
s
(r)e
jkr
cos
ds
(A.5)
In far-eld for TEM waves only and components of E and H are dominant.
Radial components are negligible in comparison and can be approximated to to
be zero [32]
E
= E
A
+ E
F
jA
+jF
(A.6)
E
= E
A
+ E
F
jA
+jF
(A.7)
43
44 Appendix A. Aperture Theory
Likewise equations for H
and H
jk exp
jkr
4r
(L
+N
) (A.8b)
E
+jk exp
jkr
4r
(L
+N
) (A.8c)
H
r
0 (A.8d)
H
jk exp
jkr
4r
(N
+
L
) (A.8e)
H
jk exp
jkr
4r
(N
+
N
) (A.8f)
The components are derived in [32] for a general aperture. Here next we will only
give the rectangular apertures derived components. In a rectangular aperture
shown in gure A with dimensions of length a and width b on an innite ground
plane is assumed to have a uniform electric eld distribution over aperture opening
which is given as
E
o
= a
y
a/2 x a/2, b/2 y b/2 (A.9)
Electric eld is zero elsewhere. Using Babinets principle [32] for apertures magnetic
and electric current densities over the aperture can be approximated as:
M
x
= 2a
z
a
y
E
o
= +a
x
2E
o
: a/2 x a/2, b/2 y b/2 (A.10a)
J
x
= 0 (A.10b)
These assumptions lead to derivation of N and L for rectangular opening in an
innite ground plane as
L
= 2abE
o
_
cos cos
_
sin(
ka
2
sin cos )
ka
2
sin cos
__
sin(
kb
2
sin sin )
ka
2
sin sin
__
(A.11)
Similarly L
and N
lead to zero simplifying the solution. Putting all these derived components into
equation A.12 to A.17 lead to the elds radiated by a rectangular aperture.
E
r
0 (A.12)
E
jabkE
o
e
jkr
2r
_
sin
_
sin(
ka
2
sin cos )
ka
2
sin cos
__
sin(
kb
2
sin sin )
ka
2
sin sin
__
(A.13)
45
Figure A.1: Rectangular aperture over an innite ground plane
E
jabkE
o
e
jkr
2r
_
cos cos
_
sin(
ka
2
sin cos )
ka
2
sin cos
__
sin(
kb
2
sin sin )
ka
2
sin sin
__
(A.14)
H
r
0 (A.15)
H
(A.16)
H
(A.17)
For the rectangular aperture discussed it will be important to derive E-plane and H-
plane which is measured in section radiation pattern of this report. Using equations
46 Appendix A. Aperture Theory
for E elds above we can conclude
E plane; = /2 (A.18a)
E
r
= E
= 0 (A.18b)
E
j
abkE
o
e
jkr
2r
_
sin(
kb
2
sin )
kb
2
sin
_
(A.18c)
Hplane; = 0 (A.19a)
E
r
= E
= 0 (A.19b)
E
j
abkE
o
e
jkr
2r
_
cos
_
sin(
ka
2
sin )
ka
2
sin
__
(A.19c)
Appendix B
Stepwise Guideline for Positive
Photo Chemical Machining
Print antenna design layout on A4 size transparent sheet with black as metal
(copper) and white (transparent) as non metal part.
Sharpen the black portion of the print with marker (black ink) so that all
white tiny spots seen under microscope are removed.
Cut the plaque according to maximum dimensions of the antenna.
Remove the upper protective layer of the plaque such that photographic layer
is exposed.
Align the printed sheet of antenna layout on the plaque.
Open the tray of photographic synthesizer and place the plaque along with
antenna sheet on it.
Close the tray and rotate the timer knob to 2-2.5 minutes.
Press the layer (upper or bottom or both) button according to designing
conditions.
Plaque will be exposed to bright light for specied time.
Plaque is then taken out of the tray and placed in liquid called developer to
develop the image of antenna layout. It takes 2-3 minutes approximately.
Plaque is washed with tap water to remove the developer layer.
47
48
Appendix B. Stepwise Guideline for Positive Photo Chemical
Machining
Make a highly metal corrosive solution of oxygenated water, sulfomate and
distilled water with a ratio of 1:1:2 e.g. 200:200:400 mL. Wear protective
gloves during this process.
Dip the exposed metallic layer of plaque in the solution so that it is etched
away. This will take 5-10 minutes if the solution is not saturated. Please
remove the solution and add new one if etching of the metal is stopped and
the solution is saturated.
When all the metal is removed from the plaque, antenna layout and substrate
layer is clearly visible. Antenna is ready to use!