UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Western Division - Los Angeles) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE

#: 2:04-cv-09484-AHM-SH
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Assigned to: Judge A. Howard Matz Referred to: Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman Member case: (View Member Case) Related Case: 2:02-cv-07624-AHM -SH Case in other court: 9th CCA, 06-55406 9th CCA, 06-55425 9th CCA, 06-55759 9th CCA, 06-55854 9th CCA, 06-55877 9th CCA, 10-56316 Cause: 17:101 Copyright Infringement Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc a California corporation represented by Daniel J Cooper Perfect 10 72 Beverly Park Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 310-205-9817 TERMINATED: 01/06/2010 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey N Mausner Law Offices of Jeffrey N. Mausner 21800 Oxnard Street Suite 910 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 310-617-8100 Email: jeff@mausnerlaw.com TERMINATED: 05/02/2012 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Sean E Macias Macias Counsel Inc 302 West Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, CA 91105 626-844-7707 Fax: 626-844-7717 Email: sean@maciascounsel.com TERMINATED: 10/24/2008 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED David Nathan Schultz JJ Little & Associates PC 11500 West Olympic Boulevard Suite Date Filed: 11/19/2004 Date Terminated: 04/26/2012 Jury Demand: Both Nature of Suit: 820 Copyright Jurisdiction: Federal Question

316 Los Angeles, CA 90064 310-622-9527 Fax: 310-477-9527 Email: schu1984@yahoo.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey D Goldman Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmaro 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-4120 310-203-8080 Email: jgoldman@jmbm.com TERMINATED: 04/15/2008 Natalie H Locke Natalie Locke Attorney at Law 11803 Norfield Court Los Angeles, CA 90077 310-476-8231 Fax: 310-476-8138 Email: nataliehlocke@yahoo.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Peter R Dion-Kindem Dion-Kindem & Crockett PC 21271 Burbank Boulevard Suite 100 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 818-883-4400 Fax: 818-676-0246 Email: peter@dkclaw.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Russell J Frackman Mitchell Silberberg and Knupp 11377 W Olympic Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683 310-312-2000 Fax: 310-312-3100 Email: rjf@msk.com TERMINATED: 09/17/2008

V. Defendant Google Inc a corporation represented by Charles K Verhoeven Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 50 California Street 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415-875-6600 Fax: 415-875-6700 Email:

charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jennifer A Golinveaux Winston and Strawn 101 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94111 415-591-1506 Email: jgolinveaux@winston.com TERMINATED: 02/20/2008 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Michael S Brophy Russ August & Kabat 12424 Wilshire Boulevard c12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025 310-826-7474 Fax: 310-826-6991 Email: mbrophy@raklaw.com TERMINATED: 02/20/2008 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Michael T Zeller Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 865 South Figueroa Street 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543 213-443-3000 Fax: 213-443-3100 Email: michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Andrew P Bridges Fenwick & West LLP 555 California Street 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415-875-2300 Fax: 415-281-1350 Email: abridges@fenwick.com TERMINATED: 02/20/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradley Robert Love Barnes & Thornburg LLP 11 South Meridian Street Indianapolis, IN 46204-3535 317-236-1313 Fax: 317-231-7433 Email: bradley.love@btlaw.com

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bridget Anne Hauler Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-443-3402 Fax: 213-443-3100 Email: bridgethauler@quinnemanuel.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Margret M Caruso Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5000 Fax: 650-801-5100 Email: margretcaruso@quinnemanuel.com TERMINATED: 10/20/2011 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Marguerite F Ethier Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP 130 Adelaide Street West Suite 2600 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3P5 CANADA 415-865-2979 Fax: 416-865-9010 Email: methier@litigate.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew Alex Scherb Winston & Strawn LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, CA 94111 415-591-1000 TERMINATED: 02/20/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Rachel H Kassabian Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 650-801-5000 Fax: 650-801-5100 Email: rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Defendant

Does 1 through 100, inclusive Counter Claimant Google Inc a corporation represented by Andrew P Bridges (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2008 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Charles K Verhoeven (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Michael T Zeller (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Bradley Robert Love (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jennifer A Golinveaux Winston and Strawn 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415-591-1506 Email: jgolinveaux@winston.com TERMINATED: 02/20/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Margret M Caruso (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/20/2011 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Matthew Alex Scherb (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Rachel H Kassabian (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc a California corporation represented by Jeffrey N Mausner (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/02/2012

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED David Nathan Schultz (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Jeffrey D Goldman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 04/15/2008 Natalie H Locke (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Peter R Dion-Kindem (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 11/19/2004

# 1

Docket Text COMPLAINT against defendant Google Inc.(Filing fee $ 150.) Jury Demanded. , filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.(rrey, ) Modified on 8/20/2008 (smo). (Entered: 11/24/2004) 20 Day Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Google Inc. (rrey, ) (Entered: 11/24/2004) 2 CERTIFICATION of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (rrey, ) (Entered: 11/24/2004) REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING COPYRIGHT (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.) (Opening) (rrey, ) (Entered: 11/24/2004) REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING TRADEMARKS (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.) (Opening) (rrey, ) (Entered: 11/24/2004) 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PILOT PROGRAM filed.(rrey, ) (Entered: 11/24/2004) MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Counsel are notified that the action has beenrecently assigned to this Court. The correct number forthis case is now CV04-9484-NM(CWx). All subsequentdocuments filed with the court must reflect this casenumber. All documents must be in Times Roman 14 font,pursuant to Local Rule 11-3.1.1. Counsel are encouraged toreview the Central District's website for additionalinformation. The address is "http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov".by Judge Nora M. ManellaCourt Reporter: None Appearing. (pj, ) (Entered: 11/24/2004) STANDING ORDER: This controls this case and differs in somerespects from the local rules by Judge Nora M. Manella,(pj, ) (Entered:

11/19/2004

11/19/2004

11/19/2004

11/19/2004

11/19/2004

11/23/2004

4

11/23/2004

5

11/24/2004) 12/09/2004 6 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, upon Google Inc served on 11/24/2004, answer due 12/14/2004. The Summons and Complaint were served by federal express service, no Statute indicated, addressed to Andrew Bridges Esq of Winston and Strawn. Due Dilligence declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (pj, ) (Entered: 12/10/2004) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. standing order was served on 12/7/2004. (pj, ) (Entered: 12/14/2004) AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Google Inc, Does amending Complaint - (Discovery) 1 ; Demand for Jury Trial ,filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (pj, ) (Entered: 01/20/2005) ANSWER to Amended Complaint 8 JURY DEMAND., COUNTERCLAIMS against Perfect 10 Inc filed by defendant Google Inc.(pj, ) Modified on 8/20/2008 (smo). (Entered: 02/04/2005) FAX number for Attorney Andrew P Bridges is 415-591-1400. (pj, ) (Entered: 02/04/2005) 10 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (pj, ) (Entered: 02/04/2005) MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Counsel are notified that a Scheduling Conference set for 3/28/2005 09:00 AM. Counsel joint Status Report filed no later than 3/7/2005 by Judge Nora M. Manella.Court Reporter: None Appearing. (pj, ) (Entered: 02/18/2005) ANSWER TO GOOGLES Counterclaim 9 filed by Counter defendant Perfect 10 Inc. Demand for Jury Trial (pj, ) (Entered: 02/23/2005) ADR PILOT PROGRAM QUESTIONNAIRE filed by attorney Jeffrey D Goldman on behalf of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc and attorney, signature illegible for Defendant Google Inc.(dw, ) (Entered: 03/09/2005) JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Meeting; estimated length of trial 5 to 20 days. filed by Plaintiff Perfrect 10 Inc and Defendant Goodgle Inc(dw, ) (Entered: 03/14/2005) MINUTES Scheduling Conference by Judge Nora M. Manella: Court sets the following schedule: Deadline for filing Settlement Selection: 4/4/05; Discovery Cutoff, Fact: 2/24/06, Expert: 5/26/06; Motions due by 6/26/2006. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2006 08:30 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2006 10:00 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. (See document for further information)Court Reporter: Not Applicable. (dw, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005) ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Nora M. Manella: ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties to be filed no later than 4/4/05. (dw, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005) ORDER RE CIVIL TRIAL by Judge Nora M. Manella: Court has ordered

12/09/2004

7

01/18/2005

8

02/03/2005

9

02/03/2005

02/03/2005

02/17/2005

11

02/17/2005

12

03/07/2005

13

03/07/2005

14

03/28/2005

15

03/29/2005

16

03/29/2005

17

the dates as indicated above and described as follows: Discovery cut-off 5/26/2006. Motions due by 6/26/2006. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2006 08:30 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2006 10:00 AM before Honorable Nora M. Manella. (See document for further information(dw, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005) 04/05/2005 18 SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE SELECTION NOTICE REQUEST AND ORDER by Judge Nora M. Manella: IT IS SO ORDERED, the above request is approved: Settlement Procedure No. 3 - The parties shall appear before a retired judicial officer or other private or non-profit dispute resolution body(dw, ) (Entered: 04/06/2005) JOINT Report Re: Selection of mediator and schedule of mediation filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (ca, ) (Entered: 06/16/2005) PREPARED ORDER RE TRANSFER Pursuant to General Order 224 (Related Case) by Clerk; related to CV 02-7624 AHM (SHx). (rn, ) (Entered: 08/18/2005) 20 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 02-7624 AHM (SHx). Case transfered from Judge Nora M. Manella and Carla Woehrle to Judge A. Howard Matz and Stephen J. Hillman for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 049484 AHM (SHx).Signed by Judge A. Howard Matz (rn, ) (Entered: 08/24/2005) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc for Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/19/2005 at 10:00 AM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. Lodged Proposed Order. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc For Preliminary Injunction re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) DECLARATION of Norman Zada In Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc For Preliminary Injunction re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) DECLARATION of Patrick Swart In Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. For Preliminary Injunction re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) DECLARATION of Dave Moreau In Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc For Preliminary Injunction re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE In Support of MOTION for

06/03/2005

19

08/18/2005

08/24/2005

08/24/2005

22

08/24/2005

23

08/24/2005

24

08/24/2005

25

08/24/2005

26

08/24/2005

27

Preliminary Injunction 22 ; Declaration of Russell J. Frackman filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) 08/24/2005 28 EXHIBITS To Declaration of Norman Zada In Support of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 Volume I, Exhibits 1-36 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) EXHIBITS To Declaration of Norman Zada In Support of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 Volume II Exhibits 37-76 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) EXHIBITS To Declaration of Norman Zada In Support of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 Volume III Exhibits 77-117 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.(dw, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) INITIAL ORDER Following Filing of Complaint Assigned to Judge Matz by Judge A. Howard Matz: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge A. Howard Matz. Counsel for Plaintiff shall serve this order on all defendants and/or their counsel along with the summons and complaint or if that is not practicable as soon as possible thereafter. (See document for further information)(dw, ) (Entered: 08/29/2005) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : The Court hereby orders Defendant Google, Inc. (Google) to obtain a copy of Amazon.com's Motion To Stay Action Until Conclusion Of First Filed Related Action Or Alternatively For Consolidation, filed by Amazon.com on 8/25/05, in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al., CV 05-4753. The Court further orders Google to file, by not later than 9/7/05, a statement not to exceed five pages regarding Google's position on consolidation with that case. Google shall serve copies on both Amazon.com and Perfect 10.Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, ) (Entered: 08/30/2005) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING AND FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge A. Howard Matz : Defendant shall file and personally serve its brief in opposition to the motion on 9/26/05. Plaintiff shall file and serve by overnight courier its reply brief in support of the motion on 10/17/05. Hearing on MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 is continued to 10/31/2005 at 10:00 a.m.(smo, ) (Entered: 09/02/2005) RESPONSE to 8/30/05 Minute Order Re Consolidation filed by Defendant Google Inc. Re: Civil Minutes 31 (dw, ) (Entered: 09/13/2005) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the above Motion (Motion to Stay Action or Alternatively for Consolidation filed 8/25/05) filed in CV05-4753 AHM. Court specifically denies the request to stay action and grants the request to consolidate CV05-4753 AHM (SHx) with CV049484 AHM. Court continues plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction in CV04-09484 AHM (SHx) to 11/7/05 at 10:00am to be heard with plaintiff's 11/7/05 motion for preliminary injunction in CV05-4753 AHM (SHx). Court also sets a further consolidated scheduling conference for 11/21/05 at 1:30pm. RE: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 ,

08/24/2005

29

08/24/2005

30

08/26/2005

21

08/30/2005

31

09/02/2005

32

09/12/2005

33

09/19/2005

34

Resetting Hearing as to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/21/2005) 09/20/2005 35 ORDER Setting Further Consolidated Rule 26(f) Scheduling Conference by Judge A. Howard Matz: This case has been assigned to Judge A. Howard Matz. Scheduling Conference set for 11/21/2005 01:30 PM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. (See document for further information)(dw, ) (Entered: 09/21/2005) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Protective Order For Conferences With Counsel Not a Non-Lawyer Representative of Their Client on Discovery Disputes Under Local Rule 37-1 filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 10/17/2005 at 02:00 PM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/27/2005) JOINT STIPULATION Re Google's Motion for Protective Order for Conferences with Counsel Not A Non-Laywer Representative of Their Client On Discovery Disputes Under Local Rule 37-1. filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/27/2005) MOTION to Strike Declaration of Norman Zada 24 filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 11/7/2005 at 10:00 AM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/29/2005) DECLARATION of Alexander MacGillivray In Support of Goggle's Opposition to Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/30/2005) OPPOSITION to Perfrect 10's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/30/2005) DECLARATION of John R Levine In Support of Opposition to Perfect 10's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/30/2005) DECLARATION of Susan E Lee In Opposition to Perfect 10's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/30/2005) DECLARATION of Andrew P Bridges In Oppoisiton to Perfect 10's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/30/2005) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc. re Declaration 42 , Opposition to Motion 43 , Declaration 44 , Declaration ) 45 , Declaration 46 , was served on 9/26/05. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/30/2005) NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz ORDERING Notice of Moiton to Strike Declaration of Norman Zada submitted by Defendant Google Inc received on 9/28/05 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(dw, ) (Entered: 09/29/2005) NOTICE OF MOTION to Strike Declaration of Norman Zada re

09/21/2005

36

09/21/2005

37

09/26/2005

39

09/26/2005

42

09/26/2005

43

09/26/2005

44

09/26/2005

45

09/26/2005

46

09/26/2005

47

09/28/2005

38

09/28/2005

40

MOTION to Strike Declaration 39 filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 11/7/2005 at 10:00 AM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. (dw, ) (Entered: 09/29/2005) 09/28/2005 41 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz ORDERING Defendants' Motion to Strike Declaration, Declaration of Norman Zada submitted by Defendant Google Inc received on 9/26/05 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(dw, ) (Entered: 09/29/2005) PROOF OF SERVICE re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (See document for additional documents served) (dw, ) (Entered: 10/17/2005) NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Ordering Motion of Amicus Curiae For Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brie; Declaration of Jason Chulty In Support of Service; Brif Amicus Curiae filed by (Filer not specified) to be rejected and not filed and is ORDERED returned to Counsel. Reason for rejection: Local Rule 6.1 Written notice of motion lacking or timeliness of notice incorrect; Other: Court requires 14 Point Font Size(dw, ) (Entered: 10/14/2005) MOTION for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation (dw, ) (Entered: 10/17/2005) NOTICE OF MOTION of Electronic Frontier Foundation for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae re MOTION for Leave 50 (dw, ) (Entered: 10/17/2005) DECLARATION of Jason M Schultz In Support of MOTION of Electronic Frontier Foundation For Leave to File Amicus Curiae 50 filed by Amicus Curiae, Electronic Frontier Foundation (dw, ) (Entered: 10/17/2005) PROOF OF SERVICE of Notice of Motion of Electronic Forntier Foundation for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae (See document for additional documents served) filed by Amicus Curiae was served on 10/13/05. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/17/2005) NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Ordering the Notice of Moiton of Electronic Frontier Foundation For Leave to File Amicus Curiae; Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae; Declaration of Jason M Schultz in Support; Proposed Order Brief Amicus Curiae; Proof of received 10/13/05 is to be filed and processed. Filing date is ORDERED to be the date the doucment was stamped received but not filed with the Clerk. processed. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/17/2005) CERTIFICATION AS TO INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Amicus Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation (dw, ) (Entered: 10/18/2005) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : Telephonic argument held. Motion for Protective Order is DENIED.

10/11/2005

54

10/13/2005

48

10/13/2005

50

10/13/2005

51

10/13/2005

52

10/13/2005

53

10/14/2005

49

10/14/2005

56

10/17/2005

55

However plaintiff's counsel is expected to be as prepared as possible for discovery meet and confer sessions, so that Dr. Zada's participation is kept to a minimum.Tape #: 05-38. (sbu, ) (Entered: 10/18/2005) 10/17/2005 57 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS of Perfect 10 Inc to the Declaration of Alexander MacGillivray re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) REPLY DECLARATION of Norman Zada In Support of MOTION Of Plaintiff Perfect 20 Inc for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) DECLARATION of Jeffrey D Goldman In Support of MOTION of Plaintiff Perfect 20 Inc for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS Of Perfect 10 to the Declaration of Andrew Bridges to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS of Perfect 10 Inc to the Declaration of Susan E Lee Re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS of Perfect 10 Inc to the Declaration of John R. Levine to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) REPLY MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) DECLARATION of Allen Wang In Support of Perfect 10's Reply Re: Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) PROOF OF SERVICE Re Reply Documents in Support of Motion of Perfect 10 Inc for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Response in Opposition to Motion 57 , Response in Opposition to Motion 61 , Response in Opposition to Motion 62 , Memorandum in Support of Motion 63 , Declaration (Motion related) 64 , Declaration (Motion related) 58 , Declaration (Motion related) 59 , Response in Opposition to Motion 60 , was served on 10/17/05. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/19/2005) NOTICE of Appearance of James G> Gilliland Jr. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/21/2005) OPPOSITION to MOTION to Strike Portions of the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada (Motion related) 24 39 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (yl, ) (Entered: 10/26/2005) MEMORANDUM Of Points and Authorities of Plaintiff Perfect 10 in Opposition to Motion of Electronic Frontier Foundation for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae re MOTION 50 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.

10/17/2005

58

10/17/2005

59

10/17/2005

60

10/17/2005

61

10/17/2005

62

10/17/2005

63

10/17/2005

64

10/17/2005

65

10/20/2005

66

10/21/2005

67

10/24/2005

68

(dw, ) (Entered: 10/26/2005) 10/24/2005 69 DECLARATION of Elena Segal In Opposition to Motion of Electronic Frontier Foundation For Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae re MOTION for Leave 50 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 10/26/2005) NOTICE OF REQUEST TO CROSS-EXAME DECLARANT NOTMAN ZADA filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc, Google Inc. (shb, ) (Entered: 11/02/2005) REPLY to response to MOTION to Strike Declaration of Norman Zada 24 39 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (shb, ) (Entered: 11/02/2005) NOTICE of Filing Original Proofs of Service filed by Defendant Google Inc, re Notice (Other) 70 , was served on 10/31/05. (dw, ) (Entered: 11/03/2005) RESPONSE to Perfect 10's Objections to Declaration of Susan E Lee in support of Opposition to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (shb, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) RESPONSE to Evidentiary Objections of Perfect 10, Inc to the Declaration of Andrew Bridges filed by Defendant Google Inc (shb, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) DECLARATION of Susan E Lee in support of Google's Response to Objections to Lee Declaration filed by Defendant Google Inc. (shb, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) RESPONSE to Evidentiary Objections of Percect 10, Incv to the Declaration of John R Levine filed by Defendant Google Inc (shb, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) RESPONSE to evidentiary Objections of Percect 10, Inc to the Declaration of Alexander MacGillivray filed by Defendant Google Inc (shb, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to file Sur-Reply in Support of Google's Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant Google Inc. (shb, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re Response (nonmotion) 75 , Declaration (non-motion) 76 , Response (non-motion) 77 , Response (non-motion) 78 , EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to file Sur-Reply in Support of Google's Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction 79 , was served on 11/4/05. (shb, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz : Court issues draft outline and questions counsel. For reasons stated on the record, the Court GRANTS Electronic Frontier Foundation's Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Norman Zada. Court also GRANTS the request for judicial notice and DENIES the Ex Parte Application to File a Sur-Reply. The proposed Sur-Reply will be stamped "PLACED IN FILE NOT

10/28/2005

70

10/31/2005

71

11/01/2005

72

11/04/2005

73

11/04/2005

75

11/04/2005

76

11/04/2005

77

11/04/2005

78

11/04/2005

79

11/04/2005

80

11/07/2005

74

USED." Court takes UNDER SUBMISSION both of Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction.Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (smo, ) (Entered: 11/08/2005) 11/07/2005 PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re [Proposed] Sur-Reply Declaration of Alexander MacGillivray In Support of Google's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction submitted by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005) PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re Proof of Service submitted by Defendant Google Inc. Service on 11/7/05 (dw, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005) 84 OPPOSITION to Google's EX PARTE APPLICATION for Leave to file Sur-Reply And Supporting Declarations In Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 79 ; Declaration of Norman Zada filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005) PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re [Proposed] Order Granting Electronic Frontier Foundation Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae submitted by Amicus Curiae (yl, ) (Entered: 11/16/2005) PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re [proposed] Order Granting Google's Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Sur Reply Papers submitted by Defendant Google Inc. (yl, ) (Entered: 11/16/2005) PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re [proposed] surreply memorandum in opposition to plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction submitted by Defendant Google Inc. (yl, ) (Entered: 11/16/2005) PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re [proposed] surreply declaration of Jennifer A Golinveaux in support of oppositon to motion for preliminary injunction submitted by Defendant Google Inc. (yl, ) (Entered: 11/16/2005) 81 STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Robert J. Kelleher: Having reviewed the terms of the foregoing Stipulation and finding that good cause exists for said Protective Order requested IT IS SO ORDERED. (dw, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005) NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz ORDERING 1) Proposed Sur-Reply Declaration of Alexander MacGillivray ; 2) Proof of Service by E Mail 3) Proof of Service by Hand delivery submitted by Defendant Google Inc received on 11/7/05 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(dw, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005) PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re Proof of Service submitted by Defendant Google Inc. Service on 11/6/05 (dw, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005) 89 BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF Electronic Frontier Foundation (yl, ) (Entered: 11/21/2005) NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Document No. 81, Stipulation for Protective Order was erroneously docketed to CV04-

11/07/2005

11/07/2005

11/07/2005

11/07/2005

11/07/2005

11/07/2005

11/08/2005

11/08/2005

83

11/08/2005

11/08/2005

11/09/2005

82

09484 AHM (SHx) Re: Stipulation and Order, Protective Order 81 (dw, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005) 11/09/2005 85 EVIDENTIARY CITATIONS SUBMITTED BY Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. In Response to Court's Questions at Hearing On Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc 74 (yl, ) (Entered: 11/17/2005) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby continues the Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference 35 from 11/21/05 to 12/12/05 at 1:30 p.m. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/5/2005. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, ) (Entered: 11/17/2005) RECEIPT OF REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following dates: 11/7/05 Court Reporter: Leslie A. King (mo, ) (Entered: 11/18/2005) TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 11/7/05. Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (mo, ) (Entered: 11/18/2005) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Protective Order filed by defendant and counterclaimant Google Inc, Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 12/19/2005 at 2:00 PM before Honorable A. Howard Matz. (ca, ) (Entered: 11/29/2005) JOINT STIPULATION RE: re MOTION for its Protective Order 90 filed by defendant and counterclaimant Google Inc, Google Inc. (ca, ) (Entered: 11/29/2005) MINUTES OF (In Chambers) by Judge A. Howard Matz: On the Court's own motion the Court hereby continues the Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference to 1/10/2006 01:30 PM.Court Reporter: Not Reported. (dw, ) (Entered: 11/30/2005) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : Following oral argument on 12-21-05, the court now rules on Google's Motion for entry of Protective Order. Defendant Amzon hhas joinded in defendant Google's Motion papers, and oral argument, though Amazon has not filed otion papers on its own. Accordingly, the court enters plaintiff's Proposed Protective Order.Tape #: 05-51. (sbu, ) (Entered: 12/28/2005) PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman: IT IS SO ORDERED. (See Document for further information)(dw, ) (Entered: 12/29/2005) DISCOVERY MOTION: NOTICE OF MOTION to Compel Goodgle Inc to Produce Documents; Joint Stipulation; Declarations of Norman Zada; Jennifer Golinveaux filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 1/23/2006 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (jp, ) (Entered: 01/06/2006) JOINT STIPULATION Regarding Plaintiff MOTION to Compel Defendant Goodgle Inc to Produce Documents 96 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 01/06/2006)

11/17/2005

86

11/18/2005

87

11/18/2005

88

11/22/2005

90

11/22/2005

91

11/29/2005

92

12/27/2005

93

12/27/2005

94

12/28/2005

96

12/28/2005

97

12/28/2005

98

DECLARATION of JENNIFER A. GOLINVEAUX in support of Opposition to MOTION to Compel Goodgle Inc to Produce Documents 96 filed by plaintiff Google Inc. (jp, ) Modified on 1/6/2006 (jp, ). (Entered: 01/06/2006) DECLARATION of NORMAN ZADA in support of MOTION to Compel Goodgle Inc to Produce Documents 96 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 01/06/2006) NOTICE OF MOTION to Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 1/30/2006 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (dw, ) (Entered: 01/10/2006) DECLARATION of Norman Zada and Jeffrey N Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's MOTION to Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 01/10/2006) DECLARATION of Jennifer A Golinveaux In Support of Google Inc's Opposition to Perfect 10's MOTION to Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 01/10/2006) JOINT STIPULATION Re Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answers Interrogatories filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, and Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 01/10/2006) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby vacates the 1/10/06 Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference. The Court will reset the scheduling conference after it rules on the pending preliminary injunction motions.Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, ) (Entered: 01/05/2006) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman :, Resetting Hearing as to MOTION to Compel 96 , MOTION for Order for Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 Motion set for hearing on 2/21/2006 and 2/22/2006 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman.Court Reporter: none present. (sbu, ) (Entered: 01/30/2006) NOTICE of Appearance of Mark T Jansen and Anthony J Malutta filed by Defendants Amazon.Com Inc and A9.Com Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/03/2006) REVISED JOINT STIPULATION Re Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories filed pursuant to Order of Judge Hillman filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/14/2006) DECLARATION of Norman Zada and Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's MOTION Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 Filed With Revised Joint Stipulation Pursuant to Order of Judge Hillman filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/14/2006)

12/28/2005

99

01/03/2006

100

01/03/2006

101

01/03/2006

102

01/03/2006

103

01/05/2006

95

01/27/2006

104

02/01/2006

105

02/09/2006

106

02/09/2006

107

02/09/2006

108

DECLARATION of Jennifer A Golinveaux, Radhika Malpani, and Diane Tang In Support of Google Inc's to Answer Interrogatories Filed Pursuant to Order of Judge Hillman re MOTION for Order for Compel Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/14/2006) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Production of Documents and Responses to Interrogatories of Plaintiff, filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 3/13/2006 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/17/2006) DECLARATION of Susan E Lee In Support of Google's MOTION to Compel Producito of Documents and Respones to Interrogatories 109 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/17/2006) DECLARATION of Norman Zada and Jeffrey N Mausner In Support of Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Google to Produce Documents Filed With Revised Joint Stipulation Pursuant to Order of Judge Hillman re MOTION to Compel 96 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/17/2006) NOTICE that Revised Joint Stipulation Re Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel Defendant Google Inc to Produce Documents After Second Set of Conferences of Counsel Filed Pursuant to Order of Judge Hillman is Being Filed Under Seal Pursuant to the Request of Defendant Google Inc filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/21/2006) JOINT STIPULATION Re Google's MOTION to Compel Production of Documents and Responses to Interrogatories 109 filed by Defendant Perfect 10 Inc, Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/21/2006) DECLARATION of Andrew P Bridges In Support of Google's MOTION to Compel Production of Documents and Responses to Interrogatories re: MOTION to Compel 109 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/21/2006) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Plaintiff MOTION to Compel 109 , Declaration (Motion related) 110 , Motion Related Document 113 , Declaration (Motion related) 114 , was served on 2/13/06. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT RE: Spreadsheets (Exhibits 1-5) for Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Responses to Interrogatories re MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories 109 (dw, ) Modified on 2/21/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 02/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT re: SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS of Radhika Malpani, Lawrence You, and Jennifer A Golinveaux In Support of Opposition to Revised Motions to Compel to Produce Documents and to Answer Interrogatories Filed Pursuant to Order of Judge Hillman (dw, ) Modified on 2/21/2006 (dw, ). Modified on 2/21/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 02/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT RE REVISED JOINT STIPULATION Re

02/13/2006

109

02/13/2006

110

02/13/2006

111

02/13/2006

112

02/13/2006

113

02/13/2006

114

02/13/2006

115

02/13/2006

116

02/13/2006

117

02/13/2006

118

Motion to Compel Defendant to Produce Documents After Second Set of Conferences of Counsel Filed Pursuant to Order of Judge Hillman (dw, ) Modified on 2/21/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 02/21/2006) 02/17/2006 119 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying In Part Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Google by Judge A. Howard Matz: Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Perfect 10's motion for a preliminary injunction aginst Google. re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 (dw, ) (Entered: 02/21/2006) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Court DENIES Perfect 10's motion for preliminary injunction against Amazon. RE: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction 22 Court Reporter: N/A. (dw, ) (Entered: 02/22/2006) ORDER SETTING FURTHER RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge A. Howard Matz: The conference will be held pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) to disclose information (without awaiting a discovery request) and under R. 26(f) to confer on a discovery plan not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduling conference and to file a report with the Court entitled "Further Joint Rule 26(f) Report" not later than fourteen (14) days after they confer. Further Joint Rule 26 Report due by 3/27/06. Further Scheduling Conference set for 4/3/06 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge A. Howard Matz.(smo, ) (Entered: 02/24/2006) ***Terminated all old scheduling deadlines and hearings. (smo, ) (Entered: 02/24/2006) 122 JOINT STATEMENT Regarding Proposed Preliminary Injunction. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/17/2006) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF APPEAL AND REPRESENTATION STATEMENT to 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Appeal of Order, 119 Filed On: 2/17/06; Entered On: 2/21/06; Filing fee $255, Paid receipt number 83391. cc: Jeffrey N. Mausner; Mitchell, Silberberg and Knupp; Daniel J. Cooper; Winston and Strawn, San Fransisco, California; Winston and Strawn, Los Angeles, Califronia; Townsend and Townsend and Crew. (ghap, ) Modified on 3/21/2006 (ghap, ). (Entered: 03/21/2006) Civil Appeals Docketing Statement received from plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc forwarded to 9th CCA. RE: Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 . (ghap, ) (Entered: 03/21/2006) 124 APPLICATION to File Exhibits to the Declaration of Heraldo Botelho in Support of Memorandum in Support of Google's Proposed Form of Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to 2/21/06 Order Under Seal filed by Defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (dw, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006) MEMORANDUM in Support of Google Inc's Proposed Form of Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to 2/21/06 Order APPLICATION to Seal 124 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006)

02/21/2006

120

02/24/2006

121

02/24/2006

03/08/2006

03/20/2006

123

03/20/2006

03/20/2006

03/20/2006

125

03/20/2006

126

DECLARATION of Heraldo Botelho In Support of Goodle's Memorandum In Support of Google's Proposed Form of Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to 2/21/06 Order. re APPLICATION to Seal 124 Exhibits A through C Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order Entered 12/27/05 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006) DECLARATION of Andrew P Bridges In Support of Google's Memorandum in Support of Google's Proposed Form of Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to 2/21/06 Order re APPLICATION to Seal 124 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re Memorandum in Support of Motion 125 , Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related) 126 , Declaration (Motion related) 127 , was served on 3/20/06. (dw, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006) PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF Re Form of Preliminiary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 04/13/2006) DECLARATION of Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Brief re Form of Preliminary Injunction 153 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 04/13/2006) Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 . (ghap, ) (Entered: 03/22/2006)

03/20/2006

127

03/20/2006

128

03/20/2006

153

03/20/2006

154

03/22/2006

03/22/2006

129

ORDER Granting Application to File Exhibits to the Declaration of Heraldo Botelho In Support of Memorandum in Support of Google's Proposed Form of Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to 2/21/06 Order Under Seal by Judge A. Howard Matz: GRANTED. re APPLICATION to Seal 124 (dw, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT RE: EXHIBITS A THROUGH C to the Declaration of Heraldo Botelho In Support of Memorandum in Support of Proposed Form of Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to 2/21/06 Order (dw, ) (Entered: 03/23/2006) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF CROSSAPPEAL/Representation Statement to 9th CCA filed by defendant Google Inc. Appeal of Order 119 Filed On: 02/17/06; Entered On: 02/21/06. Filing fee $255, Paid, receipt number 83451. cc: Andrew P. Bridges; Russell J. Frackman; Jeffrey N. Mausner; Daniel J. Cooper; Anthony J. Malutta. (cbr, ) Modified on 3/24/2006 (cbr, ). (Entered: 03/24/2006) Civil Appeals Docketing Statement received from defendant Google Inc forwarded to 9th CCA. RE: Appeal to Circuit Court 131 . (cbr, ) (Entered: 03/24/2006)

03/22/2006

130

03/22/2006

131

03/22/2006

03/22/2006

132

TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: 11/7/05; Court Reporter: Leslie A. King; Re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 . (ghap, ) (Entered: 03/24/2006) Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of

03/24/2006

Appeals re: Appeal to Circuit Court 131 . (cbr, ) (Entered: 03/24/2006) 03/27/2006 133 ORDER Granting Application to File Declarations of Radhika Malpani and Jessie Jiang and Portions of Goodle Inc's Response to Plaintiff's Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction Under Seal by Judge A Howard Matz: GRANTED. (dw, ) Modified on 3/28/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 03/28/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT RESPONSE to Plaintiff's Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction (Unredacted Version) (dw, ) Modified on 3/29/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 03/28/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT DECLARATION of Rahika Malpani in Support of Google's Response to Plaintiff's Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction (dw, ) Modified on 3/29/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 03/28/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT DECLARATION of Jessie Jiang In Support of Google's Response to Plaintiff's Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction (dw, ) Modified on 3/29/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 03/28/2006) RESPONSE to Plaintiff's Brief Regarding Form of Preliminary Injunction (Redacted Version) filed by Defendant Google Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) DECLARATION of ANDREW P. BRIDGES in support of Google Response to Plaintiff's Brief Regarding Form of Preliminary Injunction 137 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) APPLICATION to File Portions of Goodle Inc Response to Plaintiff Brief regarding form of preliminary injunction and Declarations of Radhika Malpani and Jessie Jiang Under Seal filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order and Under Seal Documents. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) PROOF OF SERVICE Response to Plaintiff's Brief Regarding Form of Preliminary Injunction (Redacted Version) 137 , Declaration of ANDREW P. BRIDGES in support of Google Response to Plaintiff's Brief Regarding Form of Preliminary Injunction 138 , APPLICATION to File Portions of Goodle Inc Response to Plaintiff Brief regarding form of preliminary injunction and Declarations of Radhika Malpani and Jessie Jiang Under Seal 139 , was served on 3/27/2006 filed by defendant Google Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) REPLY BRIEF of Plaintiff regarding form of preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) DECLARATION of NORMAN ZADA in support of Perfect 10 BRIEF regarding form of preliminary injunction 141 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) DECLARATION of OFFIR GUTELZON in support of Perfect 10 Reply Brief regarding form of preliminary injunction 141 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of BOB SLUMAN in support of Perfect 10 Reply Brief regarding form of preliminary

03/27/2006

134

03/27/2006

135

03/27/2006

136

03/27/2006

137

03/27/2006

138

03/27/2006

139

03/27/2006

140

03/27/2006

141

03/27/2006

142

03/27/2006

143

03/27/2006

144

injunction. (jp, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) 03/27/2006 145 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: 11/7/05; Preliminary Hearing; Court Reporter: Leslie King; Re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 131 . (ghap, ) (Entered: 03/29/2006) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz : On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby continues the Further Consolidated Scheduling Conference 121 from 4/3/06 to 4/17/06 at 1:30 p.m. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (smo, ) (Entered: 03/30/2006) NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 0655406, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 filed by Perfect 10 Inc. (ghap, ) (Entered: 03/30/2006) FURTHER JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f)Meeting filed; estimated length of trial 12 to 20 days. (dw, ) (Entered: 04/10/2006) ORDER from 9th CCA filed as to Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, Appeal to Circuit Court, 131 filed by Google Inc, CCA # 06-55406, 06-55425. Order received in this district on 4/6/06. Appeals Number 06-55405, 06-55406, 06-55425 are preliminary injunction appeals. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The court sua sponte consolidates appeal number 06-55405 and 06-55406. Additionally, the court notes that number 06-55425 is a cross-appeal of the same order at issue in number 06-55406. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days of the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an officical transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The brief schedule is set. (ghap, ) (Entered: 04/11/2006) CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA re Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, ; Court of Appeals Case Number: 0655406. (ghap, ) (Entered: 04/06/2006) REFILING OF PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF re Form of Preliminary Injunction; Brief was Previously Filed on 3/20/06 But Does not Appear on the Docket filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 04/13/2006) REFILING of the DECLARATION of Norman Zada In Support of Perfect 10's Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction; Declaration was Previously Filed on 3/20/06 but does not appear on the docket re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 155 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 04/13/2006) NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 0655425, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 131 filed by Google Inc. (cbr, ) (Entered: 04/07/2006) JOINT STIPULATION For Stay of Proceedings Regarding Amazon.Com and A9.Com Only Pending Ruling By Court of Appeals and ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties and finding good cause therefore the Court hereby ORDERS: Discovery, motions, and all other proceedings in the above-entitled consolidated action against Amazon.com and A9.com only (Case 05-4753) shall be

03/30/2006

146

03/30/2006

147

04/03/2006

150

04/04/2006

151

04/06/2006

148

04/06/2006

155

04/06/2006

156

04/07/2006

149

04/11/2006

152

stayed until either i) the 9th Circuit issues a decision on Plaintiff's pending appeal from the Court's 2/22/06 order denying Plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion against defendants Amazon.com or ii) a period of 10 months from the date that Plaintiff files it opening brief on appeal whichever comes first. (See document for further information)(dw, ) (Entered: 04/12/2006) 04/11/2006 159 Google Inc's OBJECTIONS to Declaration of Zada Gutellllzon and Sluman in support of Plaintiffs Reply Brief re Form of Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant Google Inc. (shb, ) (Entered: 04/18/2006) REPORT to Court Re Status of (Proposed) Order Re Discovery Motion re MOTION to Compel 96 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 04/19/2006) MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court issues tentative Preliminary Injunction Order and questions counsel. The parties are to submit via email a red-lined version of the proposed preliminary injunction order. The parties are also advised of the possible retention of a court-appointed special advisor. Court orders the parties to meet and confer regarding a possible stay of discovery and to notify the Court of the outcome of their discussions. As a result of the pending appellate briefing schedule, the Court declines to set any pretrial and trial dates at this time.Court Reporter: Leslie A. King. (smo, ) (Entered: 04/18/2006) CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA re Appeal to Circuit Court, 131 filed by Google Inc, ; Court of Appeals Case Number: 0655425. (ghap, ) (Entered: 04/18/2006) ORDER from 9th CCA filed as to Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, Appeal to Circuit Court 131 filed by Google Inc, CCA # 06-55406, 06-55425. Order received in this district on 05/04/06. These consolidated cases are preliminary injunction appeals. The parties' stipulated motions to amend the briefing schedules are granted. Brief schedule set. (cbr, ) (Entered: 05/09/2006) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS AND DECREES AS FOLLOWS: 1) Google is preliminarily enjoined from engaging in the infringing conduct described in the Initial Order. (See document for further information)(dw, ) (Entered: 05/09/2006) TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 4/17/06. Court Reporter: Leslie King. (ghap, ) (Entered: 05/24/2006) ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Plaintiff MOTION to Compel 109 (sbu, ) (Entered: 05/22/2006) RECEIPT OF REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following dates: 4/17/06 Court Reporter: Leslie King (ghap, ) (Entered: 05/24/2006) ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION for Order for Compel

04/13/2006

160

04/17/2006

158

04/18/2006

157

05/02/2006

162

05/08/2006

161

05/16/2006

167

05/19/2006

164

05/21/2006

166

05/22/2006

163

Defendant Google Inc to Answer Interrogatories 100 (sbu, ) (Entered: 05/22/2006) 05/22/2006 168 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Appeal of Preliminary Injunction, 161 Filed On: 5/8/06; Entered On: 5/9/06; Filing fee $ 455 paid. cc: Jeffrey N. Mausner; Andrew P. Bridges; Mark T. Jansen (dmap, ) (Entered: 05/26/2006) APPEAL FEE PAID: re Appeal to Circuit Court 168 as to Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc; Receipt Number: 85850 in the amount of $455. (lr, ) (Entered: 06/09/2006) 165 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : Plaintiff has previously indicated that it will not be filing a Motion to Stay Discovery. If Google intends to do so in the near future,it shall advise the court no later than June 1, 2006. If Google does not file a Motion to stay discovery in the near future, the court will proceed with the discovery matter which have previously been taken under submission.Court Reporter: none present. (sbu, ) (Entered: 05/23/2006) TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: 4/17/06; Court Reporter: Leslie A. King; Court of Appeals Case Number: 06-55406; Re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 (ghap, ) (Entered: 06/15/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Modifying the Preliminary Injunction Order Entered 5/9/06; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (Unreadacted version) (dw, ) Modified on 6/12/2006 (dw, ). (Entered: 06/12/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT DECLARATION of Radhika Malpani in Support of Google's Ex Parte Application for an Order Modifying the Preliminary Injunction Order Entered 5/9/06 (dw, ) (Entered: 06/12/2006) EX PARTE APPLICATION to modify Preliminary Injunction 161 ; memorandum filed by defendant Google Inc. (lc, ) (Entered: 06/15/2006) APPLICATION for Leave to File portion of ex parte to modify preliminary injunction order and declaration of Radhika Malpani under seal filed by defendant Google Inc. (lc, ) (Entered: 06/15/2006) PROOF OF SERVICE re EX PARTE APPLICATION to modify re Preliminary Injunction, 161 176 , APPLICATION for Leave to File portion of ex parte to modify preliminary injunction order and declaration of Radhika Malpani under seal 177 and supporting documents were served on 6/2/06 by fax and mail filed by defendant Google Inc. (lc, ) (Entered: 06/15/2006) OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Modifying the Preliminary Injunction Order 171 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (pcl, ) (Entered: 06/14/2006) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting defendant Googles APPLICATION for Leave to File portion of ex parte to modify preliminary injunction order and declaration of Radhika Malpani under

05/22/2006

05/23/2006

05/23/2006

175

06/02/2006

171

06/02/2006

172

06/02/2006

176

06/02/2006

177

06/02/2006

178

06/05/2006

174

06/05/2006

179

seal 177 (lc, ) (Entered: 06/15/2006) 06/06/2006 169 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 0655759, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court 168 filed by Perfect 10 Inc,. (dmap, ) (Entered: 06/06/2006) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF APPEAL AND REPRESENTATION STATEMENT to 9th CCA filed by defendant Google Inc. Appeal of Preliminary Injunction, 161 Filed On: 5/08/06; Entered On: 5/09/06; Filing fee $455; Paid; receipt number 85850. cc: Andrew P. Bridges; Russell J. Frackman, Jeffrey N. Mausner, Daneil J. Cooper, Anthony J. Malutta (lr, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006) Civil Appeals Docketing Statement received from defendant Google Inc forwarded to 9th CCA. by Fedex; RE: Appeal to Circuit Court, 183 Filed on: 6/07/06; Entered on: 6/19/06 (lr, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006) 170 ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Google's Ex Parte Application for an Order Modifying the Preliminary Injunction Order Entered 5/9/06 is DENIED. (smo, ) (Entered: 06/08/2006) NOTICE of Deposit of Cashier's Check ($100,000) Pursuant to Preliminary Injunction Order filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/13/2006) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Discovery filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 7/24/2006 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (klg, ) (Entered: 06/16/2006) DECLARATION of Susan E Lee in support of MOTION to Stay Discovery 180 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (klg, ) (Entered: 06/16/2006) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc, re MOTION to Stay Discovery 180 , Declaration of Susan E Lee 181 , Exhibit E, G, I, J, K (all Exhibits confidential--FILED UNDER SEAL) was served on 6/9/06. (klg, ) (Entered: 06/16/2006) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Joint Stipulation Re: Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Google to Produce Documents (Exhibit E) and the Declarations of Radhika Malpani (Exhibits G and I) Diane Tang (Exhibit J) and Lawrence You (Exhibit K) in Support of Google's Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Pursuant to Protective Order Entered December 27, 2005 filed by Defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order Exhibits E & G, I - K. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/20/2006) ORDER Re Application to File Exhibits E,G,I,J and K of the Declaration of Susan E Lee in Support of Google Inc's Motion to Stay Under Seal by Judge A. Howard Matz: GRANTED. re APPLICATION to Seal 188 (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT EXHIBIT E to the Declaration of Susan E Lee in Support of Google Inc's Motion to Stay Discovery (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006)

06/07/2006

183

06/07/2006

06/08/2006

06/09/2006

173

06/09/2006

180

06/09/2006

181

06/09/2006

182

06/09/2006

188

06/12/2006

191

06/12/2006

194

06/12/2006

195

SEALED DOCUMENT EXHIBIT G To the Declaration of Susan E Lee in Support of Google Inc's Motion to Stay Discovery (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT EXHIBIT I to the Declaratoin of Susan E Lee in Support of Google Inc's Motion to Stay Discovery (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT EXHIBIT J to the Declaration of Susan E Lee in Support of Google Inc's Motion to Stay Discovery (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT EXHIBIT K to the Declaration of Susan E Lee in Support of Google Inc's Motion to Stay Discovery (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $100,000.00 into the registry of the Court from Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (ek, ) (Entered: 06/13/2006)

06/12/2006

196

06/12/2006

197

06/12/2006

198

06/13/2006

06/13/2006

184

APPLICATION to File Portions of Google's Ex Parte Application For Stay of the 5/9/06 Preliminary Injunction and Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jennifer A Golinveaux Under Seal filed by Defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order and Ex Parte Under Seal. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006) EX PARTE APPLICATION For Stay of the 5/9/06 Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof; Supporting Declaration of Jennifer A Golinveaux (Redacted Version) filed by Defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to Seal 184 , EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending Preliminary Injunction 185 , was served on 6/13/06. (See document for additional documents served) (dw, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006) OPPOSITION to Google's EX PARTE APPLICATION For Stay Of the Preliminary Injunction Order 185 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) ORDER Granting Application to File Portions of Google's Ex Parte Application For Stay of the 5/9/06 Preliminary Injunction and Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jennifer A Golinveaux Under Seal by Judge A. Howard Matz: GRANTED. re APPLICATION to Seal 184 (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT EX PARTE APPLICATION For Stay of the 5/9/06 Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Ponts and Authorities; Supporting Declaration of Jennifer Golinveaux (dw, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS a temporary stay to permit Goodle to apply to the Ninth Circuit for a stay of the preliminary injunction. Stay shall remain in effect until 6/23/06. (See document for further information) RE:

06/13/2006

185

06/13/2006

186

06/14/2006

189

06/14/2006

190

06/14/2006

193

06/15/2006

187

EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending Preliminary Injunction 185 Court Reporter: N/A. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006) 06/15/2006 192 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF APPEAL AND REPRESENTATION STATEMENT to 9th CCA filed by defendant Google Inc. Appeal of Order 170 Filed On: 6/08/06; Entered On: 06/08/06; Filing fee $455; Paid; receipt number 86116. cc: Andrew P. Bridges; Russell J. Frackman, Jeffrey N. Mausner, Daniel J. Cooper (lr, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) Civil Appeals Docketing Statement received from defendant Google Inc forwarded to 9th CCA. RE: Appeal to Circuit Court, 192 (lr, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) 199 GOGGLE INC'S REPLY In Support of Its EX PARTE APPLICATION For Stay of the 5/9/06 Preliminary Injunction 193 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/22/2006) ORDER from 9th CCA filed as to Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, Appeal to Circuit Court, 183 filed by Google Inc, Appeal to Circuit Court, 192 filed by Google Inc, Appeal to Circuit Court 168 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 06-55405, 06-55406, 06-55425, 06-55759. Order received in this district on 06/19/06. Numbers 06-55405 and 0655406 are consolidted preliminary injunction appeals. Numbers 06-55425 and 06-55759 and preliminary injuction cross-appeals relating to number 06-55406. Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 applies to these appeals. (cbr, ) (Entered: 06/23/2006) PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED re [Proposed] Order Granting Google Inc's Ex Parte Application for Stay of the May 9, 2006 Prelminary Injunction submitted by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 06/26/2006) Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: Appeal to Circuit Court, mail by Fedex; 183 Filed on: 6/07/06; Entered on: 6/19/06. (lr, ) (Entered: 06/19/2006) Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals; re: Appeal to Circuit Court, 192 (lr, ) (Entered: 06/21/2006) 201 OPPOSITION to Google's MOTION to Stay Discovery 180 filed by Plaintiff (Redacted Version) Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006) NOTICE of Filing the Following Documents Under Seal: 1) Perfect 10's Opposition to Google's Motion to Stay Discovery; 2) Declaration of Jeffrey Mausner in Opposition to Google's Motion to Stay Discovery; 3) Declaration of Norman Zada In Opposition to Google's Motion to Stay Discovery re MOTION to Stay pending Discovery 180 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (dw, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006) SEALED DOCUMENT DECLARATION of Jeffrey Mausner in Opposition to Google's Motion to Stay Discovery(dw, ) (Entered:

06/15/2006

06/15/2006

06/15/2006

200

06/15/2006

06/19/2006

06/21/2006

06/29/2006

06/29/2006

202

06/29/2006

203

06/29/2006

204

07/10/2006) 06/29/2006 205 SEALED DOCUMENT DECLARATION of Norman Zada in Opposition to Google's Motion to Stay Discovery (dw, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006) NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number: 0655877, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 192 filed by Google Inc. (lr, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006) NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number: 0655854, 9th CCA regarding Appeal to Circuit Court, 183 filed by Google Inc,. (lr, ) (Entered: 07/13/2006) REPLY in Support of Motion to Stay Discovery re: Ex Parte Application 193 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 07/25/2006) DECLARATION of Jennifer A Golinveaux in Support of Google's Reply Re Motion to Stay Discovery re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay pending of the 5/9/06 Preliminary Injunction 193 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 07/25/2006) STATEMENT of Non-Opposition to Defendant Google Inc' Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Appeal re MOTION to Stay pending Discovery 180 filed by Defendants Amazon.Com Inc's and A9.Com Inc. (dw, ) (Entered: 07/28/2006) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz : Court questions counsel, issues tentative ruling denying the above motion, and hears oral argument. For reasons and findings stated on the record, the Court DENIES the MOTION to Stay pending Discovery 180 . Court instructs counsel to file a proposed briefing schedule for upcoming discovery motions to be noticed before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. Court Reporter: Leslie A, King. (smo, ) (Entered: 07/24/2006) RECEIPT OF REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date: 7/24/2006 Court Reporter: Leslie A King. (kks ) (Entered: 08/17/2006) TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 7/24/2006. Court Reporter: Leslie A King. (kks ) (Entered: 08/17/2006) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman :, Set Hearings: Telephonic Status Conference set for 8/29/2006 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman.Court Reporter: none present. (sbu, ) (Entered: 08/24/2006) RECEIPT OF REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following dates: 8/29/06; Court Reporter: D Babykin (lr, ) (Entered: 09/27/2006) TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 8/29/06. Telephonic Hearing; Court Reporter: D. Babykin. (lr, ) (Entered: 09/27/2006) RECEIPT OF REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following dates: 10/12/06 Court Reporter: D. Babykin (et) (Entered:

07/10/2006

206

07/13/2006

207

07/17/2006

209

07/17/2006

210

07/19/2006

211

07/24/2006

208

08/15/2006

212

08/15/2006

213

08/16/2006

214

09/20/2006

215

09/20/2006

216

10/23/2006

219

11/03/2006) 10/23/2006 220 TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 10/12/06. Court Reporter: Dorothy Babykin. (et) (Entered: 11/03/2006) RECORD ON APPEAL sent to Circuit Court re: Appeal number, 0655406 Record consists of 11 volumes; 10 bulky documents (see document for details); 4 transcripts re Appeal to Circuit Court, 123 (dmap, ) (Entered: 11/02/2006) APPEAL RECORD sealed documents sent to Circuit Court re: Appeal number, 06-55406. 19 (see document for details) documents were sent with this transmittal. (dmap, ) (Entered: 11/02/2006) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Fourth Cause of Action (Circumevention of Copyright Protection Systems); Memorandum of points and authorities in support thereof; filed by Defendant Google Inc.Motion set for hearing on 7/23/2007 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (mg) (Entered: 07/12/2007) RESPONSE to Google's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Fourth Cause of Action (Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems) 221 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (mg) (Entered: 07/12/2007) NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Defendant Amazon.com's Notice of Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Fourth received on the Fourth Claim, received on 7/11/07, is to be filed and processed. The filing date is Ordered to be the date the document was stamped received but not filed with the Clerk. (mg) (Entered: 07/13/2007) REPLY in support of MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings 221 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (mg) (Entered: 07/31/2007) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information: changing address to 21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 910, Woodland Hills, CA 91367; telephone 818-9927500 and 310-617-8100; fax number 818-716-2773; for attorney Jeffrey N Mausner. Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (mg) (Entered: 07/24/2007) FAX number for Attorney Jeffrey N Mausner is 818-716-2773. (mg) (Entered: 07/24/2007) 226 MINUTES of Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Proceedings: 1) Defendants Google Inc's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings 221 ; 2) Amazon.com Inc's and A9.com Inc's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Court issues tentative order without oral argument. For reasons and findings stated on the record, the Court GRANTS the above motions with prejudice. Order to issue. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg.(mg) (Entered: 07/31/2007) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS ORDER) held before Judge A. Howard Matz: As in both IMS and Egilman, neither of the pleadings at issue here contains any allegation that the defendants accessed or provided access to Perfect 10's website by avoiding or bypassing technological measures designed to protect copyrighted work. As stated in IMS, "a cause of action

11/02/2006

217

11/02/2006

218

06/29/2007

221

07/06/2007

222

07/11/2007

223

07/16/2007

228

07/23/2007

224

07/23/2007

07/23/2007

07/23/2007

227

under the DMCA does not accrue upon unauthorized and injurious access alone; rather, the DMCA `targets the circumvention of digital walls guarding copyrighted material.'"" IMS, 307 F.Supp.2d at 532 (emphasis in original). Thus, the conduct alleged in both pleadings fails to state a claim constituting "circumvention" under the DMCA. As a result, the Court GRANTS both Google's 221 and Amazon's motion. Instead of entering judgment on the pleadings, which invites procedural confusion, the Court dismisses the fourth causes of action with prejudice. (mg) (Entered: 07/31/2007) 07/30/2007 225 TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 07/23/07. Court Reporter: Cindy L. Nirenberg. (bem, ) (Entered: 07/31/2007) APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE DECLARATION OF RADHIKA MALPANI SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S OPPOSITION TO PERFECT 10'S MOTION TO COMPEL, PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED DEC. 27, 2005 re MOTION to Compel 229 filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged under seal and Order. (vh) (Entered: 10/10/2007) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Defendant Google to Produce documents filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.Motion set for hearing on 11/19/2007 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (sbu) (Entered: 10/10/2007) JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel 229 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (sbu) (Entered: 10/10/2007) DECLARATION of Jennifer Golinveaux in opposition MOTION to Compel 229 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (sbu) (Entered: 10/10/2007) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in support MOTION to Compel 229 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (sbu) (Entered: 10/10/2007) ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, GRANTING APPLICATION to file under seal the declaration of Radhika Malpani submitted in support of Google's opposition to perfect 10's motion to compel pursuant to protective order entered Dec. 27, 2005 229 , 233 . (ca) (Entered: 10/17/2007) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Produce Documents PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.Motion set for hearing on 11/19/2007 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Earlier Order re Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents and to Answer Interrogatories)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/05/2007) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Produce Documents DECLARATION OF DR. NORM ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.Motion set for hearing on 11/19/2007 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman.

10/05/2007

233

10/09/2007

229

10/09/2007

230

10/09/2007

231

10/09/2007

232

10/17/2007

234

11/05/2007

235

11/05/2007

236

(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 10 - Google Trends Graph# 2 Exhibit Exhibit 11 - Overture search results# 3 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - page 1 Google Analytics# 4 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - page 2 - Google Analytics# 5 Exhibit Exhibit 12 - page 3 - Google Analytics Terms# 6 Exhibit Exhibit 13 - FOOBR - Google Analytics# 7 Exhibit Exhibit 14 - E-mails# 8 Exhibit Exhibit 15 - page 1 - Ads by Google - Angelina Jolie# 9 Exhibit Exhibit 15 - page 2 - Ads by Google - Jennifer Lopez# 10 Exhibit Exhibit 16 - Excerpt from Defendant Google, Inc.'s Response to Plaintiff's Third Set of Requests for Admissions# 11 Exhibit Exhibit 17 - Letter to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals# 12 Exhibit Exhibit 17-1 - News Article attachment to letter to Ninth Circuit# 13 Exhibit Exhibit 17-2 Declaration of Offir Gutelzon in Support of Perfect 10's Reply Brief Re Form of Preliminary Injunction - attachment to letter to Ninth Circuit# 14 Exhibit Exhibit 17-3 - Printout of portion of website picscout.com re image recognition - attachment to letter to Ninth Circuit)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/05/2007) 11/05/2007 237 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel 229 supplementing Defendant and Counter-Claimant Google Inc.'s Opposition to the Motion to Compel filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux)(Scherb, Matthew) (Entered: 11/05/2007) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following deficiency was found incorrect document type selected: RE MOTION to Produce Documents - PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - 235 . (ca) (Entered: 11/06/2007) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following deficiency was found incorrect document type selected: RE MOTION to Produce Documents - DECLARATION OF DR. NORM ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS - 236 . (ca) (Entered: 11/06/2007) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : re: MOTION to Compel 229 . Motion continued to 11/27/2007 at 9:30a.m. (sbu) (Entered: 11/21/2007) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Stephen J. Hillman : re: MOTION to Produce Documents 236 , MOTION to Produce Documents 235 . (sbu) (Entered: 02/05/2008) TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 11/27/07 Court Reporter: Huntington Court Reporters. (bem, ) (Entered: 12/14/2007) NOTICE of Association of Counsel Filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 12/21/2007) MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 123 , Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 168 , Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 131 , Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 192 ,

11/06/2007

238

11/06/2007

239

11/16/2007

240

11/27/2007

245

12/10/2007

241

12/21/2007

242

12/26/2007

243

CCA # 06-55405, 06-55406, 06-55425, 06-55759, 06-55854 and 0655877. The Judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded. Mandate received in this district on 12/28/2007. (dmap) (Entered: 01/10/2008) 01/10/2008 244 NOTICE Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel for Plaintiff filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Frackman, Russell) (Entered: 01/10/2008) APPEAL RECORD RETURNED from 9th CCA Received: Volume(s): 1 through 11; Sealed Documents(s): 19; Transcripts(s): 4; RE: Appeal Record Sent to USCA (A-26) 217 (car) (Entered: 02/12/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Decl of Rachel M. Herrick re (Proposed) Order; Stipulation to File Under Seal; (Proposed) Order to File Under Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 02/14/2008) DECLARATION of Rachel M. Herrick re (Proposed) Order re Perfect 10's Motion to Compel filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-I to Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 02/14/2008) APPLICATION of Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb of Winston & Strawn LLP to Withdraw as Attorney for Google Inc. filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Scherb, Matthew) (Entered: 02/19/2008) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following deficiency was found: Proposed Order not submitted as separate attachment as to APPLICATION of Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb of Winston & Strawn LLP to Withdraw as Attorney for Google Inc. 249 (se) (Entered: 02/20/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: re APPLICATION of Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb of Winston & Strawn LLP to Withdraw as Attorney for Google Inc. 249 , Attorney Jennifer A Golinveaux; Matthew Alex Scherb; Andrew P Bridges and Michael S Brophy terminated. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Winston & Strawn LLP and its attorneys Andrew P. Bridges, Michael S. Brophy, Jennifer A. Golinveaux, and Matthew A. Scherb are authorized to withdraw as counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. in this action and shall hereby be considered withdrawn. (smo) (Entered: 02/20/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER RE ELECTRONIC FILING held before Judge A. Howard Matz (se) (Entered: 02/21/2008) NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Rachel M Herrick on behalf of Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 02/21/2008) ORDER by Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION to Compel 229 (sbu) (Entered: 02/22/2008)

02/11/2008

246

02/14/2008

247

02/14/2008

248

02/19/2008

249

02/20/2008

250

02/20/2008

251

02/21/2008

252

02/21/2008

253

02/22/2008

254

03/05/2008

255

STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Review of Nondispositive Ruling of Magistrate Judge Hillman filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 03/05/2008) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REVIEW OF NONDISPOSITIVE RULING OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN by Judge A. Howard Matz, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File 255 : COURT HEREBY ORDERS that, to the extent each party files a motion for review of Magistrate Judge Hillman's ruling: Each party's Motion for Review shall be due on March 14, 2008. Each party's Opposition will be due on March 26, 2008. Each party's Reply will be due on April 4, 2008. The parties' Motions will be heard on April 14, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. (smo) (Entered: 03/07/2008) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof re Order 254 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.Motion set for hearing on 4/14/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Proposed Order)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/14/2008) NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION for Review of Order re: Perfect 10's Motion To Compel Defendant Google Inc. To Produce Documents Pursuant to Perfect 10's Requests for Production Nos. 128131, 174, and 194-196 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc.Motion set for hearing on 4/14/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick Regarding Google Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008# 2 Exhibit Exhibit A to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick# 3 Exhibit Exhibit B to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick# 4 Exhibit Exhibit C to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick# 5 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order Sustaining Google Inc.'s Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 03/14/2008) Amendment to MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/14/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Application to File Under Seal the Following Documents Which Contain Information Designated by Google as Confidential or Highly Confidential: Perfect 10's Memorandum in Opposition to Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's Order Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel; Zada Declaration in Support Thereof. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of [Proposed] Order that the Following Documents Which Contain Information Designated by Google as Confidential/Highly Confidential be Filed

03/07/2008

256

03/14/2008

257

03/14/2008

258

03/14/2008

259

03/26/2008

260

03/26/2008

261

Under Seal: Perfect 10's Memorandum in Opposition to Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's Order re Perfect 10's Motion to Compel; Zada Declaration in Support Thereof. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2008) 03/26/2008 262 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's February 22, 2008 Order Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel, which contains information designated Confidential or Highly Confidential by Google.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Google's Objections to Judge Hillman's February 22, 2008 Order Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel, which contains information designated Confidential or Highly Confidential by Google. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2008) MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick Regarding Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008, and Exhibits A-H Thereto# 2 Proposed Order Denying Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 03/26/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WHICH CONTAIN INFORMATION WHICH GOOGLE HAS DESIGNATED AS CONFIDENTAL OR HIGHLY CONFIDENTAL 1) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.,'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PERFECT 10'S MOTION TO COMPEL 20 DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT THEREOF 254 filed by PLAINTIFF Perfect 10 Inc.Application set for hearing on 4/14/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (lra) (Entered: 03/28/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WHICH CONTAIN INFORMATION WHICH GOOGLE HAS DESIGNATED AS CONFIDENTAL OR HIGHLY CONFIDENTAL 1) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.,'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PERFECT 10'S MOTION TO COMPEL 20 DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA

03/26/2008

263

03/26/2008

264

03/28/2008

265

03/28/2008

266

IN SUPPORT THEREOF 254 re APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 265 (lra) (Entered: 03/28/2008) 03/28/2008 267 SEALED DOCUMENT MEMORANDUM in Opposition to DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTION TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 , APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 APPLICATION to Seal Order 254 265 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (lra) (Entered: 03/28/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' PERFECT 10 INC'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S OBJECTION TO JUDGE HILLMAN'S FEBRUARY 22, 2008 ORDER GRANTING IN PART PERFECT 10'S MOTION TO COMPEL 267 , Order 254 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (lra) (Entered: 03/28/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008; Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick In Support Thereof; Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada and Exhibits Thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 04/04/2008) REPLY In Support Of MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/04/2008) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of Reply for MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit 10# 4 Exhibit 11# 5 Exhibit C# 6 Exhibit D)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/04/2008) DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Support Of Reply for MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities i 257 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/04/2008) REPLY Reply In Support of Motion First MOTION for Review of Order re: Perfect 10's Motion To Compel Defendant Google Inc. To Produce Documents Pursuant to Perfect 10's Requests for Production Nos. 128131, 174, and 194-196 258 Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1

03/28/2008

268

04/04/2008

269

04/04/2008

270

04/04/2008

271

04/04/2008

272

04/04/2008

273

Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick In Support of Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 04/04/2008) 04/04/2008 278 APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portion of Google Inc's Reply in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008; Exhibits A, E, F, and H to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support thereof; and Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada and Exhibits thereto filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 04/08/2008) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Reply in support of its Objections; Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick; Google Inc's Evidentiary Objections; APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Reply 278 ; Proposed Order served on 4/4/2008. (jp) (Entered: 04/08/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Corrected Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 (portions thereof filed under seal); Google Inc.'s Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 04/07/2008) NOTICE OF ERRATA Regarding Google Inc.'s Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Google Inc.'s Corrected Reply In Support of Its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 04/07/2008) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google Inc's Corrected Reply in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in part Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 04/08/2008) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Notice of Errata 275 , APPLICATION to File Under Seal Corrected Reply 276 ; Proposed Order; Corrected Reply, served on 4/7/2008. (jp) (Entered: 04/08/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portion of Google Inc's Reply in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008; Exhibits A, E, F, and H to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support thereof; and Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada and Exhibits thereto 278 . (jp) (Entered: 04/08/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - REPLY in support of its Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in part and Denying in Part plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp) (Entered: 04/11/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of RACHEL M. HERRICK in support of Google Inc's Reply in support of its Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in part and Denying in Part

04/04/2008

279

04/07/2008

274

04/07/2008

275

04/07/2008

276

04/07/2008

277

04/07/2008

280

04/07/2008

283

04/07/2008

284

plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp) (Entered: 04/11/2008) 04/07/2008 285 SEALED DOCUMENT - GOOGLE INC'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in support of Pertect 10, Inc's Opposition to Google Inc's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's February 22, 2008 Order Granting in part and Denying in part Pertect 10, Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp) (Entered: 04/11/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - GOOGLE INC'S CORRECTED REPLY in support of its Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in part and Denying in part Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc's Motion to Compel. (jp) (Entered: 04/14/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Perfect 10's Response to Google's Evidentiary Objections; Application to File Under Seal; [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2008) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Following Document which may contain information which Google has designated as confidential or highly confidential; Perfect 10's Response to Google's Evidentiary Objections filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 04/10/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING APPLICATION 282 . It is hereby Ordered that the following document be Filed Under Seal: Perfect 10's Response to Google's Evidentiary Objections. (jp) (Entered: 04/15/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS. (jp) (Entered: 04/17/2008) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court hears oral argument and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART MOTION for Review of Portions of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel Defendant Google, Inc. to Produce Documents, and Objections Thereto; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof re Order 254 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. 257 AND(2) First MOTION for Review of Order re: Perfect 10's Motion To Compel Defendant Google Inc. To Produce Documents Pursuant to Perfect 10's Requests for Production Nos. 128-131, 174, and 194-196 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. 258 . Defense counsel shall submit a proposed order.Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (se) (Entered: 04/15/2008) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey D Goldman counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc. Filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey D. Goldman (Goldman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/15/2008) STIPULATION for Disbursement of Funds to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order For Return of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Cash Bond# 2 Exhibit A - Receipt for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Cash Bond)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/06/2008)

04/08/2008

286

04/09/2008

281

04/09/2008

282

04/09/2008

287

04/09/2008

290

04/14/2008

289

04/15/2008

288

05/06/2008

291

05/07/2008

292

NOTICE OF LODGING filed regarding (Proposed) Order on Google Inc.'s Objections to, and Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, Portions of the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order on Google Inc.'s Objections to, and Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, Portions of the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Perfect 10's Motion to Compel)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 05/07/2008) ORDER FOR RETURN OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.SCASH BOND by Judge A. Howard Matz: The parties having Stipulated 291 , that the principal amount of the Cash Bond in the amount of $100,000 currently on deposit with the United States District Court for the Central District of California in connection with the above-entitled case be returned to Perfect 10 forthwith, together with all accrued interest thereon to date. (jp) (Entered: 05/08/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Mat on Google Inc Objections To, and Perfect 10, Inc's MOTION for Review of, the Magistrate Judge's Order of February 22, 2008, Granting in Part and Denying In Part Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion to Compel, came on for hearing on April 14, 2008, the Honorable A. Howard Matz presiding. Jeffrey N. Mausner appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ("Perfect 10"). Michael T. Zeller and Rachel M. Herrick appeared on behalf of Defendant and Counterclaimant 257 . Upon consideration of all papers and records on file and the parties' oral argument, the Court orders as follows: Perfect 10's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order regarding Request Nos. 135, 136, and 137 are overruled, and the Magistrate Judge's Order regarding those Requests is AFFIRMED (see document for further details). GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS REGARDING REQUEST NO. 174. Google's objections are sustained in part and overruled in part. GOOGLE'S OBJECTIONS REGARDING REQUEST NO. 196 Google's objections are overruled. (jp) (Entered: 05/13/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING MOTION for Leave to File The Amended Complaint. After consideration of the parties submissions and the arguments raised by the parties and defendants nonopposition to the Motion, the Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc is deemed filed and served on 5/27/2008, upon the Defendants who have previously appeared in this action. (jp) (Entered: 05/28/2008) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey N Mausner counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Changing firm name to Law Offices of Jeffrey N. Mausner. Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 7/7/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Support Of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, #

05/08/2008

293

05/13/2008

294

05/27/2008

295

06/12/2008

296

06/12/2008

297

06/12/2008

298

5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) 06/12/2008 299 EXHIBIT 5, Pages 1-28 to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 5, Part 1, Pages 1-28 to Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support Of Motion filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) EXHIBIT 5, Pages 29-50 to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 5, Part 2, Pages 29-50 to Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support Of Motion filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10, # 2 Exhibit 11, # 3 Exhibit 12, # 4 Exhibit 13, # 5 Exhibit 14, # 6 Exhibit 15, # 7 Exhibit 16, # 8 Exhibit 17, # 9 Exhibit 18, # 10 Exhibit 19, # 11 Exhibit 20, # 12 Exhibit 21, # 13 Exhibit 22, # 14 Exhibit 23)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Motion to File Second Amended Complaint (a CD-ROM). (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) NOTICE OF LODGING filed of [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, re MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 1 to Second Amended Complaint, # 3 Exhibit 2 to Second Amended Complaint, # 4 Exhibit 3 to Second Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit 4 to Second Amended Complaint, # 6 Exhibit 5 to Second Amended Complaint, # 7 Exhibit 6 to Second Amended Complaint, # 8 Exhibit 7 to Second Amended Complaint, # 9 Exhibit 8)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) EXHIBIT 4, Part I to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 4, Part I to [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) EXHIBIT 4, Part II to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Exhibit 4, Part II to [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/12/2008) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: account information was not updated in ECF system RE: Notice of Change of Attorney Information (G-06) 296 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (vh) (Entered: 06/13/2008) EXHIBIT 9 to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in support of to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by

06/12/2008

300

06/12/2008

301

06/12/2008

302

06/12/2008

303

06/12/2008

304

06/12/2008

305

06/12/2008

306

06/13/2008

307

Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp) (Entered: 06/17/2008) 06/18/2008 308 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from July 7, 2008 to August 11, 2008 Re: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.; Ex Parte Application filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Ex Parte Application, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Google Inc.'s Ex Parte Application)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 06/18/2008) PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DECLARATIONS OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER AND DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT THEREOF re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from July 7, 2008 to August 11, 2008 Re: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.; Ex Parte Application EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from July 7, 2008 to August 11, 2008 Re: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.; Ex Parte Application 308 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/19/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES Defendant Google Inc.s ex parte application for a continuance of the July 7, 2008 hearing on Plaintiffs motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Defendant has not established good cause for the five week continuance it requests. In light of Plaintiffs acquiescence to a one week continuance, the Court hereby continues the hearing date to July 14, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge A. Howard Matz. Defendants opposition is due June 30, 2008 and Plaintiffs reply is due July 7, 2008. (smo) (Entered: 06/20/2008) MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion for Leave, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits A-G to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 3 Exhibit Exhibits H-Q to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit R (Part I) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit R (Part II) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick, # 6 Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada, # 7 Proposed Order regarding Perfect 10's Motion for Leave)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 06/30/2008) REPLY in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/07/2008) DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 24, # 2 Exhibit 25, # 3 Exhibit 26, # 4 Exhibit 27, # 5 Exhibit 28, # 6 Exhibit 29)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/07/2008)

06/19/2008

309

06/19/2008

310

06/30/2008

311

07/07/2008

312

07/07/2008

313

07/07/2008

314

DECLARATION of Irina Voronina submitted in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/07/2008) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in support of MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 30, # 2 Exhibit 31)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/07/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman:, ( Status Conference set for 7/14/2008 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman.) (sbu) (Entered: 07/16/2008) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz: MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 . Cause called; appearances made. Court circulates tentative order and questionnaire and hears oral argument. For reasons stated on the record, the Court takes plaintiffs motion UNDER SUBMISSION. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp) (Entered: 07/14/2008) REPLY MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 Perfect 10's Reply to Additional Document Submitted by Google's Counsel at the Hearing on Perfect 10's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/14/2008) MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court grants extension regarding outside attorney eyes only to August 1, 2008.Joint Stipulation shall be submitted to court on August 4, 2008. Court Smart: 7/14/2008. (sbu) (Entered: 07/16/2008) ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge A. Howard Matz that this matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on 8/18/2008 at 01:30 PM. The conference will be held pursuant to FRCP 16(b). The parties reminded of their obligations under FRCP 26(a)(1) to disclose information (without awaiting a discovery request) and under Rule 26(f) to confer on a discovery plan not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the scheduling conference and to file a report with the Court entitled "Joint Rule 26(f) Report" not later than fourteen (14) days after they confer. Failure to comply with the following requirements or to cooperate in the preparation of the Joint Rule 26(f) Report may lead to the imposition of sanctions. (jp) (Entered: 07/15/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's FRCP 15(a) MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 297 , which would add certain new claims and new factual allegations. Defendant Google, Inc. ("Google") opposes this motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion (see document for further details). (jp) (Entered: 07/17/2008) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 7-14-08 1:27p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin CourtHouse Services, phone number 626-963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court

07/07/2008

315

07/11/2008

319

07/14/2008

316

07/14/2008

317

07/14/2008

320

07/15/2008

318

07/16/2008

321

07/22/2008

322

Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 8/12/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/22/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/20/2008. (bem, ) (Entered: 07/22/2008) 07/22/2008 323 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 7-14-08 1:27p.m. (bem, ) (Entered: 07/22/2008) ANSWER to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit s A-E to Google's Answer to Perfect 10's Second Amended Complaint)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 07/31/2008) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only - PUBLIC REDACTED filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick, # 2 Exhibit s A through F to the Herrick Declaration, # 3 Declaration of Chuck Rosenberg, # 4 Proposed Order Granting Google's Motion for Reconsideration of Protective Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/04/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/04/2008) DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Opposition To MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside 325 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/04/2008) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Opposition To MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside 325 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/04/2008) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel Eyes Only filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Order. (jp) (Entered: 08/05/2008) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portion of Joint Stipulation 329 , Joint Stipulation, and Proposed Order served on 8/4/2008. (jp) (Entered: 08/05/2008)

07/31/2008

324

08/04/2008

325

08/04/2008

326

08/04/2008

327

08/04/2008

328

08/04/2008

329

08/04/2008

330

08/04/2008

333

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, granting APPLICATION to Seal 329 (lra) (Entered: 08/11/2008) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for International Judicial Assistance ; Letter of Request for International Judicial Assistance to Obtain Documents and Testimony from FoneStarz Media Limited filed by Defendant and Counterclaimaint Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/25/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support of Google's Motion for Issuance of a Letter of Request, and Exhibits A-D Thereto, # 2 (Proposed) Letter of Request for International Judicial Assistance regarding FoneStarz Media Limited, # 3 Exhibit 1 to the (Proposed) Letter of Request for International Judicial Assistance regarding FoneStarz Media Limited)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/05/2008) Amendment to MOTION for Protective Order for Designation of One Category of Documents as Outside Counsel's Eyes Only : Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside 325 ; Amended (Proposed) Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/05/2008) JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan - Joint Rule 16(b) Report ; estimated length of trial Perfect 10 - 12 days, Google - 20 days, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/11/2008) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Joint Stipulation re Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel,, 337 ; Declaration of Rachel M. herrick; application to file Under Seal; Proposed Order granting application to file under seal served on 8/15/2008 by personal service. (ca) (Entered: 09/04/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation re. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Google's Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11; Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support thereof, and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/15/2008) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/8/2008 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/15/2008) JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 - Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1

08/05/2008

331

08/05/2008

332

08/11/2008

334

08/12/2008

352

08/15/2008

335

08/15/2008

336

08/15/2008

337

Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel, # 2 Exhibit A to the Herrick Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B to the Herrick Declaration - Public Redacted, # 4 Exhibit C to the Herrick Declaration, # 5 Exhibit D to the Herrick Declaration, # 6 Exhibit E to the Herrick Declaration, # 7 Exhibit F to the Herrick Declaration, # 8 Exhibit G to the Herrick Declaration)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/15/2008) 08/18/2008 338 DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Opposition To MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/18/2008) DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Opposition To MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/18/2008) MINUTES OF Further Scheduling Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Chief Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman is present. Court questions counsel about outstanding discovery issues. Court informs counsel that it is inclined to appoint a special discovery master and that each side would be expected to propose an appropriate candidate. Case scheduling order to issue. The stipulation and order regarding the copyright cut-off date is due one week after the Court issues its scheduling order.Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (se) (Entered: 08/25/2008) AMENDED ANSWER - ANSWER OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. (NOT AMENDED ANSWER) filed by Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/19/2008) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman,granting Google Inc's Application to File Under seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation re: Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Google's Interrogatory Nos 3 and 11 and Portions of Exhibit B to the Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in support Thereof (lra) (Entered: 08/21/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed(lra) (Entered: 08/22/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of RACHEL M. HERRICK IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed (lra) (Entered: 08/22/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: On Monday, the Court held a scheduling conference in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc. and Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. The Court elicited information on the status of Plaintiffs case against Microsoft Corporation, whose counsel was not present, and issued tentative rulings affecting that case, in an effort to coordinate discovery in all three related cases. The Court directed the parties to obtain a transcript and make it

08/18/2008

339

08/18/2008

346

08/19/2008

340

08/19/2008

343

08/19/2008

344

08/19/2008

345

08/20/2008

341

available to Microsofts counsel as soon as possible. See document. (se) (Entered: 08/20/2008) 08/21/2008 342 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey N Mausner counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Changing e-mail to jeff@mausnerlaw.com. Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/21/2008) MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Google's Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11, # 2 Exhibit A to the Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 08/25/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court GRANTS Microsofts Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to Comply With August 20, 2008 Order and For Telephonic Status Conference. Counsel shall have until September 4, 2008 to submit their joint recommendations concerning a Discovery Master. The Court will hold a telephonic status conference on Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 4:00 p.m. to allow Microsoft to convey its position as to the matters discussed at the August 18, 2008 hearing. (kbr). (Entered: 08/26/2008) NOTICE of Association of Counsel Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/26/2008) MINUTES OF Telephonic Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Cause called; appearances made. Also present is the Honorable Stephen J. Hillman, Magistrate Judge. Court questions Microsofts counsel regarding the current status of the case and the feasability of coordinating the discovery between all three related actions. The Court is provided with Microsoft's position on the matters discussed at the last hearing between plaintiff Perfect 10 and defendants Google and Amazon.com. Court authorizes Magistrate Judge Hillman to take off calendar all pending motions currently scheduled for hearing on 9/8/2008. Court and counsel discuss whether or not to separate the three issues contemplated in A9's forthcoming summary judgment motion into separate motions. The Court agrees that the Safe Harbor issue can be distilled in another motion whereas the direct and vicarious infringement issues should remain in a single motion. Court orders the parties to order a transcript of this hearing. The cost is to be split four ways. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp) (Entered: 09/10/2008) STATUS REPORT of Perfect 10's Court Ordered List Re (1) Pending Discovery Motions, (2) Discovery Motions That Are Currently Contemplated and (3) Discovery Disputes That Are Reasonably Likely to Arise Within The Next Nine Months filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/29/2008) STATEMENT Regarding Google Inc.'s List of Pending and

08/25/2008

347

08/26/2008

348

08/26/2008

349

08/27/2008

355

08/29/2008

350

08/29/2008

351

Contemplated Discovery Motions (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 08/29/2008) 09/04/2008 353 JOINT REPORT of Proposal Regarding Discovery Master filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/04/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Motion to Compel Answer to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc Google Inc Motion to Compel further Responses to Interrogatories Nos. 3 and 11 set for hearing on September 8, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. is hereby taken off calendar, re: MOTION 336 . (ca) (Entered: 09/05/2008) NOTICE Notice of Withdrawal As Counsel For Plaintiff filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 (Proposed) Order re Notice of Withdrawal)(Frackman, Russell) (Entered: 09/16/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Withdrawal 356 of Rusell J. Frackman as counsel for plaintiff; plaintiff is represented by Jeffrey N. Mauser, counsel of record. (se) (Entered: 09/23/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/18/2008) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg in support of Google's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only, filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 09/23/2008) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal 359 , Proposed Order, Further Declaration of Charles Rosenberg served on 9/18/2008. (jp) (Entered: 09/23/2008) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, GRANTING GOOGLE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE FURTHER DECLARATION OF CHARLES ROSENBERG IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION. Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 357 (sbu) (Entered: 09/23/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - FURTHER DECLARATION of CHARLES ROSENBERG IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsel's Eyes Only (lra) (Entered: 09/26/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court does not intend to appoint either a technical advisor or adiscovery master at this time (see document for further details). Accordingly, the Court has determined that a further conference with counsel in all three cases is necessary. Court ORDERS the parties in all these cases to appear for a Status Conference set for 10/6/2008 at 1:30 PM. (jp) (Entered: 09/29/2008)

09/05/2008

354

09/16/2008

356

09/17/2008

361

09/18/2008

357

09/18/2008

359

09/18/2008

360

09/22/2008

358

09/22/2008

362

09/25/2008

363

10/05/2008

364

STATEMENT of Perfect 10 for October 6, 2008 Case Management Conference Before Judge Matz filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set Hearings, 363 . (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/05/2008) MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz:Court and counsel confer regarding the status of all three cases. Court orders Messrs. Zeller and Mausner to meet and confer regarding URLs v. DMCs. Parties are to file a status report which should include a proposal for a future telephonic status conference. Parties are instructed to obtain a transcript of this hearing and to split the cost four ways.Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (se) (Entered: 10/27/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Having considered the parties arguments in the Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.s Motion for Partial Reconsideration of Protective Order to Designate One Category of Documents Outside Counsels Eyes Only (the Motion), and the Supplemental Declaration of Charles Rosenberg, and good cause having been shown, the Motion is hereby partially granted, 325 . Documents with Bates Range GGL 0334466 - GGL 033486 may be viewed by Dr. Zada in Mr. Mausners office only, and under his direct supervision. These documents relate to a 2004 Power Point Presentation. The remaining documents cited by Mr. Rosenberg relate only to 2006 - 2008 Power Point Presentations. The Motion is granted as to those documents. As the litigation progresses, this ruling might be subject to modification for good cause shown, namely a particularized need of Dr. Zada to review those documents. (ca) (Entered: 10/08/2008) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Disclosure of Confidential Information has been taken under submission, and is DENIED. No good cause has been shown to prohibit Mr. Chumura from access to confidential and highly confidential material. (pcl) (Entered: 10/21/2008) NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel, Sean E. Macias, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/22/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Motion for partial summary judgment set for hearing on 12/8/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (se) (Entered: 10/23/2008) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Pursuant to the Notice of Withdrawal As Counsel for Plaintiff, and with the consent of Plaintiff 367 , that Macias Counsel, Inc. and Sean E. Macias, Esq., are removed as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned action. Plaintiff is currently represented by the Law Offices of Jeffrey N. Mausner, attorneys of record for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. (jp) (Entered: 10/27/2008) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 11/17/2008 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen

10/06/2008

370

10/08/2008

365

10/20/2008

366

10/22/2008

367

10/23/2008

368

10/24/2008

369

10/27/2008

371

J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10's Responses to Google's Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/27/2008) 10/27/2008 372 JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/27/2008) DECLARATION of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C (Part 1), # 4 Exhibit C (Part 2), # 5 Exhibit D (Part 1), # 6 Exhibit D (Part 2), # 7 Exhibit D (Part 3), # 8 Exhibit D (Part 4), # 9 Exhibit D (Part 5), # 10 Exhibit D (Part 6), # 11 Exhibit E, # 12 Exhibit F, # 13 Exhibit G, # 14 Exhibit H)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/27/2008) DECLARATION of Valerie Kincaid In Support of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Portions of the Joint Stipulation - MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/28/2008) STATEMENT Regarding the Court's Minute Order Regarding the Status Conference of October 6, 2008 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc ; Statement by Google Inc. re: Status Conference, 370 . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 10/31/2008) MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Google's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10's Responses to Google's Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support of Google's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10's Resposes to Google's Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2, # 2 Exhibit 1 to the Supplemental Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/03/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: re: MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 . Hearing set for 11/17/2008 is vacated. If a hearing is necessary, the court will set a new date. (sbu) (Entered: 11/04/2008)

10/27/2008

373

10/28/2008

374

10/31/2008

375

11/03/2008

376

11/04/2008

377

11/14/2008

380

JOINT LETTER from Jeffrey N. Mausner, attorneys for Perfect 10, and Michael T. Zeller, attorneys for Google. (pcl) (Entered: 11/18/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS AMENDED ORDER RE ELECTRONIC FILING before Judge A. Howard Matz: Effective January 1, 2008, electronic filing has been mandatory for most new and pending civil cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Self-represented litigants and attorneys who take appropriate steps to opt out of the system need not comply with the following requirements. All documents which are required to be filed in an electronic format pursuant to General Order No. 08-03 must be filed electronically no later than midnight on the date due, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Documents filed late may be stricken by the Court. The Court will not accept documents which were filed electronically, but which otherwise fail to comply with filing requirements. (See document for further details). (jp) (Entered: 11/17/2008) DECLARATION of Michael T. Zeller in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Improper Request for Stay, and Request for Sanctions filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to the Declaration of Michael T. Zeller)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 11/17/2008) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The hearing date of December 1, 2008, before Magistrate Judge Hillman is vacated. No other dates are set at this juncture. (pcl) (Entered: 11/24/2008) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 7/14/08 11 am. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 11/25/2008) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 8/18/08 2:28 PM. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg, cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 11/25/2008) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 8/27/08 4:06 PM. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg, cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 11/25/2008)

11/15/2008

378

11/17/2008

379

11/24/2008

381

11/25/2008

382

11/25/2008

383

11/25/2008

384

11/25/2008

385

TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 10/6/08 1:43 PM. Court Reporter Nirenberg, cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 11/25/2008) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 10/27/08 11:13 AM. Court Reporter Cindy Nirenberg cindycsr@gmail.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/16/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/23/2009. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 11/25/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE RE. CASE MANAGEMENT. The Court orders the parties in all three of the Perfect 10 cases to appear for a Status Conference on 12/18/2008 at 3:00 PM. The Court intends to issue an "Order Re Management of Perfect 10 v. Microsoft and Staying Related Actions." (See Tentative Order below.) The parties may respond in writing to the Courts tentative order by not later than 12/12/2008. No replies to response may be filed. (See document for further details). (jp) (Entered: 12/03/2008) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 7/14/08 11 am (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 12/03/2008) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 8/18/08 2:28 pm (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 12/03/2008) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 8/27/08 4:06 pm (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 12/03/2008) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 10/6/08 1:43 pm (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 12/03/2008) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google Inc.'s Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008 and Opposition to Contemplated Stay; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 12/12/2008) RESPONSE filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Incto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set Hearings,, 387 Google Inc.'s Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008 and Opposition to Contemplated Stay (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel M. Herrick in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-M Thereto)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 12/12/2008) Perfect 10's Response to Judge Matz's December 2, 2008 Order filed by

11/25/2008

386

12/02/2008

387

12/03/2008

388

12/03/2008

389

12/03/2008

390

12/03/2008

391

12/12/2008

392

12/12/2008

393

12/12/2008

394

Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set Hearings,, 387 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 14)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/12/2008) 12/12/2008 395 ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Honorable A. Howard Matz, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in this action (Docket No. 94 ), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google Inc.'s Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008 and Opposition to Contemplated Stay, and Exhibits thereto (the "Roberts Declaration"), is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Roberts Declaration is hereby ordered filed under seal. (jp) (Entered: 12/15/2008) GOOGLE INC.'S APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in support of Google Inc's Response to the Court's Tentative Order Dated December 2, 2008, and Opposition to Contemplated Stay filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 12/16/2008) DECLARATION of Thomas D. Nolan filed by Defendant Google Inc. re technical failures in the ECF system resulting in Google Inc.'s inability to electronically file the Notice of Manual Filing of Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts, Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal, and Proof of Service. (se) (Entered: 12/16/2008) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Declaration, Application, Proposed Order 397 served on 12/12/08. (se) (Entered: 12/16/2008) SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of ANDREA PALLIOS ROBERTS IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S TENTATIVE ORDER DATED DECEMBER 2, 2008 AND OPPOSITION TO CONTEMPLATED STAY (lra) (Entered: 12/16/2008) MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court orders Mr. Mausner to provide the exact number of "combinations" to the Court by not later than December 19, 2008. Order to issue. Court orders that parties to agree on a sequence of pending motions but intends to start with A9's motion. The Court will not accept any further papers on plaintiff's fully briefed motions for summary judgment. Court Reporter: Leandra Amber. (jp) (Entered: 12/24/2008) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court ORDERS that Perfect 10 shall select the factual and legal combinations that it will pursue using the list in Exhibit C to the attached Joint Status Report. This must be done by not later than 1/5/2009 (see document for further details). Perfect 10 shall provide this information in a spreadsheet format, preferably using the same spreadsheet referred to above, and shall provide the information to Microsoft by not later than 1/20/2009. The Court sets 8/11/2009 at the trial date. The scheduling order dated 2/11/2008 is vacated. (jp) (Entered: 12/23/2008) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 12-18-08, 3:08 P.M. Court Reporter: Leandra Amber, phone number (213) 613-0179,

12/12/2008

396

12/12/2008

397

12/12/2008

398

12/15/2008

399

12/18/2008

401

12/22/2008

400

02/11/2009

402

www.leandraamber.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/4/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/14/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/12/2009. (Amber, Leandra) (Entered: 02/11/2009) 02/11/2009 403 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 12-18-08, 3:08 p.m. (Amber, Leandra) (Entered: 02/11/2009) MINUTES IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: The MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for International Judicial Assistance 331 is VACATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Google may renew this motion before Judge Hillman after the stay is lifted. (jp) (Entered: 02/12/2009) REQUEST for Hearing as to Pending Discovery Motions re MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 , MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Setting Hearing on Google Inc.'s Pending Discovery Motions)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 05/01/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation re. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Production of Documents, Compliance with Protective Order, and Bates-Stamping; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support thereof, and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 05/07/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 6/1/2009 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 05/07/2009) JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 (Part 1 of 2) (Public Redacted) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions (Part 2 of 2), # 2 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel (Public Redacted), # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit J, # 13

02/12/2009

404

05/01/2009

405

05/07/2009

406

05/07/2009

407

05/07/2009

408

Exhibit K, # 14 Exhibit L, # 15 Exhibit M, # 16 Exhibit N, # 17 Exhibit O, # 18 Exhibit P, # 19 Exhibit Q, # 20 Exhibit R, # 21 Exhibit S, # 22 Exhibit T, # 23 Exhibit U, # 24 Exhibit V, # 25 Exhibit W, # 26 Exhibit X, # 27 Exhibit Y, # 28 Exhibit Z, # 29 Exhibit AA, # 30 Exhibit BB, # 31 Exhibit CC, # 32 Exhibit DD, # 33 Exhibit EE, # 34 Exhibit FF, # 35 Exhibit GG, # 36 Exhibit HH, # 37 Exhibit II, # 38 Exhibit JJ, # 39 Exhibit KK, # 40 Exhibit LL (Part 1 of 2), # 41 Exhibit LL (Part 2 of 2), # 42 Exhibit MM, # 43 Exhibit NN, # 44 Exhibit OO, # 45 Exhibit PP, # 46 Exhibit QQ, # 47 Exhibit RR, # 48 Exhibit SS, # 49 Exhibit TT)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 05/07/2009) 05/07/2009 409 DECLARATION OF VALERIE KINCAID IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S PORTIONS OF THE JOINT STIPULATION RE GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO (1) PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, (2) TO COMPLY WITH PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND (3) TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc re: MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Joint Stipulation re Discovery Motion,,,,,, 408 (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/07/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation re, Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 (1) to Produce Documents, (2) to Comply With Protective Order, and (3) to Affix Document Control Numbers to Its Document Production and Portions of the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support thereof Order filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 05/11/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Schedule for the Filing of Dispositive Motions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 6/15/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for Order Setting a Schedule for the Filing of Dispositive Motions)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 05/08/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 6/1/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 05/08/2009) ORDER GRANTING Google Inc.'s Application to File Under Seal Portions of the Joint Stipulation Re Motion to Compel Perfect 10 (1) to Produce Documents, (2) to Comply with Protective Order, and (3) to Affix Document Control Numbers to Its Document Production and Portions of the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Accordingly, the Confidential Materials are hereby ordered filed under seal. (See document for further details.) (pcl) (Entered: 05/12/2009)

05/07/2009

412

05/08/2009

410

05/08/2009

411

05/12/2009

413

05/14/2009

414

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Google Inc's Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Perfect 10 ( 1) to produce documents (2) to Comply with protective order, and (3) to affix document control number to its document production 407 filed on May 7, 2009 and set for hearing on June 1, 2009 is hereby taken off calendar. (pcl) (Entered: 05/14/2009) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Defendant Google Inc's Request for Oral Argument on Pending Discovery Motions 405 is hereby DENIED. (pcl) (Entered: 05/14/2009) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The action entitled Perfect 10, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, CV 07-5156 AHM (SHx) has been dismissed and is no longer subject to the order dated December 22, 2008, including Section A (Consolidation). (kbr) (Entered: 05/15/2009) PERFECT 10'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER WHICH WOULD DELAY PERFECT 10 FROM FILING ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT in Opposition to re: Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/17/2009) DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER WHICH WOULD DELAY PERFECT 10 FROM FILING ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, in Opposition to Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/17/2009) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER WHICH WOULD DELAY PERFECT 10 FROM FILING ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, in Opposition to Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/17/2009) MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 (1) to Produce Documents, (2) to Comply with the Protective Order, and (3) to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel, and Exhibits Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 05/18/2009)

05/14/2009

415

05/14/2009

416

05/17/2009

417

05/17/2009

418

05/17/2009

419

05/18/2009

420

05/22/2009

421

REPLY in support of Amended MOTION for Order for Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions Amended Notice of Motion and Amended Motion for Order Setting Schedule for Filing Dispositive Motions 411 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Reply Regarding Google Inc.'s Motion for an Order Setting a Schedule for the Filing of Dispositive Motions, and Exhibits A-C Thereto)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 05/22/2009) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: On the Courts own motion, the Court hereby takes OFFCALENDAR andUNDER SUBMISSION Defendants Motion for Order for Schedule for the Filing ofDispositive Motions [410, 411]. The parties will be notified if a hearing is necessary. (smo) (Entered: 05/29/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), & (d); Separate Statements in Support Thereof; Declarations of Shantal Rands Poovala, Paul Haahr, Bill Brougher, and Rachel Herrick Kassabian, and Exhibits Thereto; Application and [Proposed] Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Notice of Lodging of NonDocumentary Exhibits to the Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), and (d); portions of Exhibits N1-N11 and N14-N15 Thereto. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Notice of Lodging of NonDocumentary Exhibit II to the Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b), (c), and (d); Exhibit II Thereto (DVD filed under seal pursuant to Protective Order). (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009)

05/29/2009

422

07/02/2009

423

07/02/2009

424

07/02/2009

425

07/02/2009

426

07/02/2009

427

07/02/2009

428

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) DECLARATION of Sibrina Khan in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) DECLARATION of Bill Brougher in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) DECLARATION of Paul Haahr in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its

07/02/2009

429

07/02/2009

430

07/02/2009

431

Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) 07/02/2009 432 DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L1, # 13 Exhibit L2, # 14 Exhibit L3, # 15 Exhibit L4, # 16 Exhibit L5, # 17 Exhibit L6, # 18 Exhibit L7, # 19 Exhibit L8, # 20 Exhibit L9, # 21 Exhibit L10, # 22 Exhibit L11, # 23 Exhibit L12, # 24 Exhibit L13, # 25 Exhibit L14, # 26 Exhibit L15, # 27 Exhibit L16, # 28 Exhibit L17)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 VOLUME 1 (INCLUDING EXHIBITS A - L39) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L1, # 13 Exhibit L2, # 14 Exhibit L3, # 15 Exhibit

07/02/2009

433

L4, # 16 Exhibit L5, # 17 Exhibit L6, # 18 Exhibit L7, # 19 Exhibit L8, # 20 Exhibit L9, # 21 Exhibit L10, # 22 Exhibit L11, # 23 Exhibit L12, # 24 Exhibit L13, # 25 Exhibit L14, # 26 Exhibit L15, # 27 Exhibit L16, # 28 Exhibit L17, # 29 Exhibit L18, # 30 Exhibit L19, # 31 Exhibit L20, # 32 Exhibit L21, # 33 Exhibit L22, # 34 Exhibit L23, # 35 Exhibit L24, # 36 Exhibit L25, # 37 Exhibit L26, # 38 Exhibit L27, # 39 Exhibit L28, # 40 Exhibit L29, # 41 Exhibit L30, # 42 Exhibit L31, # 43 Exhibit L32, # 44 Exhibit L33, # 45 Exhibit L34, # 46 Exhibit L35, # 47 Exhibit L36, # 48 Exhibit L37, # 49 Exhibit L38, # 50 Exhibit L39)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) 07/02/2009 434 DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 VOLUME 2 (INCLUDING EXHIBITS L40 - N17) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit L40, # 2 Exhibit L41, # 3 Exhibit L42, # 4 Exhibit L43, # 5 Exhibit L44, # 6 Exhibit L45, # 7 Exhibit L46, # 8 Exhibit L47, # 9 Exhibit L48, # 10 Exhibit M, # 11 Exhibit N1, # 12 Exhibit N2, # 13 Exhibit N3, # 14 Exhibit N4, # 15 Exhibit N5, # 16 Exhibit N6, # 17 Exhibit N7, # 18 Exhibit N8, # 19 Exhibit N9, # 20 Exhibit N10, # 21 Exhibit N11, # 22 Exhibit N12, # 23 Exhibit N13 Part 1, # 24 Exhibit N13 Part 2, # 25 Exhibit N13 Part 3, # 26 Exhibit N14, # 27 Exhibit N15, # 28 Exhibit N16 Part 1, # 29 Exhibit N16 Part 2, # 30 Exhibit N16 Part 3(a), # 31 Exhibit N16 Part 3(b), # 32 Exhibit N16 Part 4, # 33 Exhibit N16 Part 5, # 34 Exhibit N16 Part 6, # 35 Exhibit N16 Part 7, # 36 Exhibit N16 Part 8, # 37 Exhibit N16 Part 9, # 38 Exhibit N16 Part 10, # 39 Exhibit N16 Part 11, # 40 Exhibit N16 Part 12, # 41 Exhibit N16 Part 13, # 42 Exhibit N16 Part 14, # 43 Exhibit N16 Part 15, # 44 Exhibit N16 Part 16, # 45 Exhibit N16 Part 17, # 46 Exhibit N16 Part 18, # 47 Exhibit N16 Part 19, # 48 Exhibit N16 Part 20, # 49 Exhibit N16 Part 21, # 50 Exhibit N16 Part 22, # 51 Exhibit N17)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant

07/02/2009

435

Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 VOLUME 3 (INCLUDING EXHIBITS N18 - PP) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit N18 Part 1, # 2 Exhibit N18 Part 2, # 3 Exhibit N18 Part 3, # 4 Exhibit N18 Part 4, # 5 Exhibit N18 Part 5, # 6 Exhibit N18 Part 6, # 7 Exhibit N18 Part 7, # 8 Exhibit N18 Part 8, # 9 Exhibit N18 Part 9, # 10 Exhibit N18 Part 10, # 11 Exhibit O, # 12 Exhibit P, # 13 Exhibit Q, # 14 Exhibit R Part 1, # 15 Exhibit R Part 2, # 16 Exhibit R Part 3, # 17 Exhibit S, # 18 Exhibit T, # 19 Exhibit U, # 20 Exhibit V, # 21 Exhibit W, # 22 Exhibit X, # 23 Exhibit Y, # 24 Exhibit Z, # 25 Exhibit AA, # 26 Exhibit BB, # 27 Exhibit CC, # 28 Exhibit DD, # 29 Exhibit EE, # 30 Exhibit FF, # 31 Exhibit GG, # 32 Exhibit HH, # 33 Exhibit II, # 34 Exhibit JJ, # 35 Exhibit KK, # 36 Exhibit LL, # 37 Exhibit MM, # 38 Exhibit NN, # 39 Exhibit OO, # 40 Exhibit PP)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/02/2009) 07/02/2009 450 GOOGLE INC APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 USC section 512, and Supporting Documents filed by defendant Google Inc. (jp) (Entered: 07/07/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 USC section 512, and Supporting Documents 450 , Proposed Order, Notice of Motiona nd Motion for Summary Judgment, Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC section 512(b) for its Caching Feature, Declarations of Paul Haahr, Rachel Herrick Kassabian, Shantal Rands Poovala, Bill Brougher, Notice of Loding of Non-Documentary Exhibits to the Declarations of Shantal Rands Poovala, Statements of Uncontrverted Facts and Conclusions of Law served on 7/2/2009. (jp) (Entered: 07/07/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order GRANTING PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/05/2009) STATEMENT of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, for Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication Against Google, Inc. MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/05/2009) DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1-7, # 2 Exhibit 8-13, # 3

07/02/2009

451

07/05/2009

436

07/05/2009

437

07/05/2009

438

Exhibit 14-18, # 4 Exhibit 19-23, # 5 Exhibit 24-27, # 6 Exhibit 28-39, # 7 Exhibit 40-47, # 8 Exhibit 48-53)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) 07/06/2009 439 DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) DECLARATION of Sheena Chou In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) DECLARATION of Melanie Poblete In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) DECLARATION of Sean Chumura In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) DECLARATION of David O'Connor In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) DECLARATION of Dean Hoffman In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) DECLARATION of C.J. Newton In Support Of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Copyright Infringement 436 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; AND 2) NOTICE OF LODGING OF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of DISK CONTAINING EXHIBIT 9 TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE [DISK ATTACHED]; AND EXHIBIT G TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/06/2009) APPLICATION to FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 07/06/2009)

07/06/2009

440

07/06/2009

441

07/06/2009

442

07/06/2009

443

07/06/2009

444

07/06/2009

445

07/06/2009

446

07/06/2009

447

07/06/2009

448

07/06/2009

449

NOTICE OF LODGING OF DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AGAINST GOOGLE. Plaintiff hereby lodges the following documents: Disk containing Exhibit 9 to the Declararion of Norman Zada; Exhibit G to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner. (kbr) (Entered: 07/06/2009) EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Schedule for Dispositive Motions Defendant Google Inc.'s Ex Parte Application re: Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication re: Copyright Infringement Against Defendant Google Inc. filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, # 2 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/07/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING of Non-Documentary Exhibit II to the Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala filed by defendant Google Inc. (jp) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google's NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512(d) for Web and Image Search. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google's NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512(c) for its Blogger Service. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google's NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512(b) for its Caching Feature. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Bill Brougher in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitilement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Paul Haahr in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibit G to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication against Google. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Disk Containing Exhibit 9 to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Summary Adudication against Google [Disk Attached]. (mat) (Entered: 07/09/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 USC section 512, and supporting

07/07/2009

452

07/07/2009

455

07/07/2009

456

07/07/2009

457

07/07/2009

458

07/07/2009

459

07/07/2009

460

07/07/2009

461

07/07/2009

462

07/07/2009

463

Documents 450 . (jp) (Entered: 07/09/2009) 07/07/2009 464 ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Documents in support of Perfect 10's Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication against Google 448 . (jp) (Entered: 07/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5)(mat) (Entered: 07/10/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512. Vol 1-3 (mat) (Entered: 07/13/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512. Vol 2-3 (mat) (Entered: 07/13/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512. Vol 3 of 3 (mat) (Entered: 07/13/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS, nunc pro tunc, Googles Motion for Order for Schedule forFiling Dispositive Motions for the reasons stated in Googles briefs.1 In addition, theCourt STAYS further briefing on Perfect 10's just-filed motion for summary judgment(Docket No. 436) until further order of the Court. The August 17, 2009 hearing forPerfect 10's motion is vacated.The Court is aware that Google decided to file its three DMCA motions, noticedfor August 17, 2009, without awaiting the Courts order on its motion. AlthoughGoogles filing of the DMCA motions before the Courts order exhibited gamesmanship -- i.e., it gives the appearance of Google racing to the courthouse at the same time it waspurporting to seek the Courts guidance on an orderly sequence of the filing of motions --Google did not violate any Court order.The Court also notes that the parties have not proposed deadlines for oppositionand reply briefs. The Court requires the oppositions to Googles DMCA motions to befiled by July 27, 2009 and the replies to be filed by August 3, 2009. (smo) (Entered: 07/08/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz DENIED Ex Parte Application Re Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc Motion for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication Re Copyright Infringement against Defendant Google Inc 452 . (jp) (Entered: 07/08/2009) STIPULATION for Order BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. 512(B), (C) & (D) filed by Defendant Google Inc.(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 07/09/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: Pursuant to Stipulation 465 , it is

07/07/2009

466

07/07/2009

467

07/07/2009

468

07/07/2009

469

07/08/2009

453

07/08/2009

454

07/09/2009

465

07/10/2009

470

ordered as follows: (1) Perfect 10 Opposition to Google Motions for Summary Judgment re Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC section 512(b), (c) and (d) shall be due on 8/10/2009; Google Reply papers in support of DMCA Motions shall bedue on 9/8/2009; The Hearing on Google DMCA MOTIONS 426 , 427 , 428 , 456 , 457 , and 458 shall be set for on 10/5/2009, or such other hearing date as is convenient for the Court. (jp) (Entered: 07/13/2009) 07/27/2009 471 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, and Exhibits A-E Thereto, # 2 Proposed Order)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 07/27/2009) MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 471 PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/03/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of (1) Application to File Under Seal Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); (2) [Proposed] Order Granting Perfect 10's Application to File Under Seal Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); (3) Notice of Lodging of Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); and Proof of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of (1) Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. §512(c) For Its Blogger Service; (2) Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Motion For Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. §512(d) For Web And Image Search; (3) Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Motion For Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. §512(b) For Its Caching Feature; (4) Perfect 10's Statement of Genuine Issues In Opposition to Google's Motion For Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service; (5) Perfect 10's Statement of Genuine Issues In Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search; (6) Perfect 10's Statement of Genuine Issues In Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature; (7) Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web And Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, And 426) (Including Exhs 1-26 And 27-53); (8) Exhibit 9, A Disk, to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its

08/03/2009

472

08/09/2009

473

08/09/2009

474

Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426); and (9) Exhibits G, H, K, N, and P to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426). (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) 08/09/2009 475 DECLARATION of Margaret Jane Eden in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) DECLARATION of Dean Hoffman in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) DECLARATION of CJ Newton in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under

08/09/2009

476

08/09/2009

477

17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) 08/09/2009 478 DECLARATION of Les Schwartz in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) DECLARATION of Sean Chumura in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) DECLARATION of David O'Connor in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial

08/09/2009

479

08/09/2009

480

Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) 08/09/2009 481 DECLARATION of Bennett McPhatter in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered:

08/09/2009

482

08/09/2009) 08/09/2009 483 DECLARATION of Sheena Chou in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) DECLARATION of Melanie Poblete in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/09/2009) REPLY in support of MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 471 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 08/10/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING of Documents submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Habor for Its Web and Image Serach, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426) filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp) (Entered: 08/11/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Documents Submtited in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re DMCA Safe Habor for Its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature

08/09/2009

484

08/10/2009

485

08/10/2009

486

08/10/2009

487

(Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426) filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 08/11/2009) 08/11/2009 488 SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibits 1-26 of the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Searhc, Blooger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426). Vol. 1 of 2 (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6)(mat) (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibits 27-57 of the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment Re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Searhc, Blooger Service, and Caching Feature (Docket Nos. 428, 427, and 426). Vol. 2 of 2 (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8)(mat) (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - DISK CONTAINED EXHIBIT 9 to Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment 457 , 458 , 456 filed (lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada Submitted In Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment filed (lra) Modified on 8/12/2009 (lra). (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - EXHIBIT G,H,K,N, AND P to The Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment[ filed (lra) Modified on 8/12/2009 (lra). (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - Perfect 10's Statement of Genuine Issues in Opposition to Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. section 512(d) for Web and Image Search. filed (Attachments: # 1 PART 2)(lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - Perfect 10's STATEMENT of Genuine Issues in Opposition to Google Inc's MOTION for Summary Judgmentre: Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. section 512(c) for its Blogger Service, filed(lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - pLAINTIFF pERFECT 10'S OppositionTo Google's MOTION for Summary Judgmentre: Safe Harbor under 17 U.S.C section 512(c) for Its Blogger Service filed (lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - Perfect 10's STATEMENT of genuine issues in Opposition to Google's MOTION for Summary Judgment RE: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. section 512(b) For Its Caching Feature filed (lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgmentre: Safe Harbor under 17 U.S.C. section 512(b) for Its Caching Feature filed (lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009)

08/11/2009

489

08/11/2009

490

08/11/2009

491

08/11/2009

492

08/11/2009

493

08/11/2009

494

08/11/2009

495

08/11/2009

496

08/11/2009

497

08/11/2009

498

SEALED DOCUMENT - Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Opposition to Google's MOTION for Summary Judgment RE: Safe Harbor under 17 U.S.C. section512(d) for Web and Image Search filed (lra) (Entered: 08/12/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 487 Application to Seal Documents Submitted in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment. (kbr) (Entered: 08/12/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby takes OFF-CALENDAR and UNDER SUBMISSION (1) Defendant's Google's Motion for Summary Judgment 456 ; and (2) Defendant Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Blogger Service 457 ; (3) Defendant Googles Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Entitlement to Safe Harbor 458 ; and and Defendant Google's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 471 . The parties will be notified if a hearing is necessary. (jp) (Entered: 08/13/2009) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Defendant Google's (1) Motion to Compel Answer to Interrogatories, filed August 15, 2008 (docket number #336); (2) Motion Request for Admission, filed October 27, 2008 (docket number # 371); and (3) Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to produce documents to comply with Protective Order and to affix documents control numbers, filed on May 7, 2009 (docket number #409) are all rescheduled to be heard on September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Hillman. (es) (Entered: 08/26/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court sets a Telephonic Conference for September 4, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. (pcl) (Entered: 09/11/2009) MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Case called. Counsel enter there appearances. Court and Counsel confer. Court sets a further Telephonic Conference for September 14, 2009 at 3:00 p.m. Court Recorder: CS 9/8/09. (pcl) (Entered: 09/11/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Defendant Google Inc.'s Replies in Support of its Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 U.S.C. § 512; Consolidated Separate Statements in Support Thereof; Rebuttal Declarations of Shantal Rands Poovala and Bill Brougher in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) REPLY in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009)

08/11/2009

499

08/13/2009

500

08/26/2009

501

09/03/2009

527

09/04/2009

528

09/08/2009

502

09/08/2009

503

09/08/2009

504

REPLY in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) REPLY in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Public Redacted filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Rebuttal Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary

09/08/2009

505

09/08/2009

506

09/08/2009

507

Objections to the Declaration of Sheena Chou in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) 09/08/2009 508 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Sean Chumura in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Margaret Jane Eden in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For

09/08/2009

509

09/08/2009

510

Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dean Hoffman in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) 09/08/2009 511 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Jeffrey Mausner in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And

09/08/2009

512

Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Bennett McPhatter in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) 09/08/2009 513 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of C.J. Newton in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of David O'Connor in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant

09/08/2009

514

09/08/2009

515

Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Les Schwartz in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) 09/08/2009 516 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Melanie Poblete in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/08/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Replies in Support of Its Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Google Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 09/10/2009) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc. Documents related to Motion for Summary Judgment served on 9/8/09. (kbr) (Entered: 09/11/2009) DECLARATION of Bill Brougher in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe

09/08/2009

524

09/08/2009

526

09/09/2009

517

Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Rebuttal Declaration of Bill Brougher in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/09/2009) 09/09/2009 518 DECLARATION of Shantal Rands Poovala in support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Rebuttal Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/09/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Opposition to

09/09/2009

519

Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re: DMCA Safe Harbor for its Web and Image Search, Blogger Service, and Caching Feature [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/09/2009) 09/09/2009 520 STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 Google's Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) for its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/09/2009) STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google's Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) for Web and Image Search (PART 1) [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Google's Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) for Web and Image Search (PART 2) [Public Redacted])(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/09/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 524 Application to Seal Portions of Google's Replies in Support of its Motions for Summary Judgment. (kbr) (Entered: 09/10/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S REPLY In Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. section 512(d) for Web and Image Search. (lra) (Entered: 09/14/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S REPLY In Support Of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.c.Section 512 for it Blogger Service. (lra) (Entered: 09/14/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S REPLY In Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment RE: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. section 512(d) for its Caching Feature.(lra) (Entered: 09/14/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - Google Inc's Evidentiary Objections to the Declarations of Dr. Norman Zada in Opposition to Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment re DMCA Safe Harbor for Its eb and Image Search Blogger Service and Caching Feature.(lra) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/14/2009: # 1 part 2) (lra). (Entered: 09/14/2009)

09/09/2009

521

09/09/2009

525

09/09/2009

529

09/09/2009

530

09/09/2009

531

09/09/2009

532

09/09/2009

533

SEALED DOCUMENT - REBUTTAL DECLARATION of BILL BROUGHER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(lra) (Entered: 09/14/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - REBUTTAL DECLARATION of SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 (lra) (Entered: 09/14/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) for its Blogger Service; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/10/2009) STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 Google's Corrected Consolidated Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment re: Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) for its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/10/2009) GOOGLE INC.'S APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512(c) for its Blogger Service filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 09/15/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Portions of Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law 535 , Proposed Order, Corrected Consolidated Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts, served on 9/10/2009. (jp) (Entered: 09/15/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Portions of Google's Corrected Consolidated Statement of Uncontroverted Facts in support of Google's Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512(c) for its Blogger Service 535 . (jp) (Entered: 09/15/2009) MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court and Counsel confer. Discovery hearing set for September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. will be Telephonic. Tape #: 09/14/09. (pcl) (Entered: 09/18/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Telephonic Hearing is hereby cancelled. Parties shall appear in Courtroom 550 on the 5th floor on September 22, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. for the Discovery Hearing. (pcl) (Entered: 09/18/2009)

09/09/2009

534

09/10/2009

522

09/10/2009

523

09/10/2009

535

09/10/2009

536

09/11/2009

537

09/14/2009

538

09/18/2009

539

09/21/2009

540

DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of MOTION for Admissions of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. ; Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets 1 and 2 371 , MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of (1) Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Documents, to Comply with the Protective Order and to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production, and (2) Google's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google's Requests for Admission filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/21/2009) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman:Case called. Counsel enter there appearances. Court and Counsel confer. Parties shall submitproposed order as to the ruling stated in open court.Court Reporter: CS9/22/09. (sbu) (Entered: 09/25/2009) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting in part and denying in part 371 Motion for Admissions. Perfect 10 is ordered to respond as specified above by December 31, 2009. (sbu) (Entered: 09/25/2009) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/29/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Exhibit 1 to the Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production; Notice of Lodging of Non-documentary Exhibit 1 to the Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/29/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. of [Proposed] Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other Damages-Related Documents, and Amazon.com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Motion Hearing, 541 (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other Damages-Related Documents, and

09/22/2009

541

09/25/2009

542

09/29/2009

543

09/29/2009

544

09/30/2009

545

Amazon.com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 09/30/2009) 09/30/2009 551 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Exhibit 1 to the Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel herrick Kassabia, Notice of Lodging, served on 9/30/2009. (jp) (Entered: 10/01/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. of [Proposed] Order Granting In Part Google Inc.s Motion To Compel Perfect 10 To Produce Complete And Unredacted Financial Documents And Other Damages-Related Documents, And Amazon.Com and Alexa Internets Joinder Therein re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Motion Hearing, 541 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting In Part Google Inc.'s Motion To Compel Perfect 10 To Produce Complete And Unredacted Financial Documents And Other Damages-Related Documents, And Amazon.Com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/01/2009) PERFECT 10'S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE: SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION ("SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL KASSABIAN DECL.") (DOCKET NO. 543-2) re: MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543-2 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/01/2009) REPLY TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10, INC. TO AFFIX CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/01/2009) DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN REPLY TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10, INC. TO AFFIX CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION; re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/01/2009) DECLARATION of MELANIE POBLETE IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION (DOCKET NO. 543); re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document

10/01/2009

546

10/01/2009

547

10/01/2009

548

10/01/2009

549

10/01/2009

550

Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/01/2009) 10/01/2009 552 DECLARATION of MELANIE POBLETE (SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION) IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO AFFIX DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBERS TO ITS DOCUMENT PRODUCTION (DOCKET NO. 543); re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 This document is to be linked to Docket Number 543; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/01/2009) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Objections to Evidence re: Second Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/05/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. of [Proposed] Order Granting In Part Google Inc.'s Motion To Compel Perfect 10, Inc. To Comply With The Protective Order re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 , Motion Hearing, 541 (Attachments: # 1 [Proposed] Order Granting In Part Google Inc.'s Motion To Compel Perfect 10, Inc. To Comply With The Protective Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/05/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 of [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION RE CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS AND BATE STAMPING DOCUMENTS, re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION RE CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS AND BATE STAMPING DOCUMENTS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/05/2009) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 9/04/09 3:15pm. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin Courthouse Services, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 10/27/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/6/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/4/2010. (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 10/06/2009) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 9/22/09 10:02am, 11:21am, 1:35pm, and 2:52pm. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin

10/05/2009

553

10/05/2009

554

10/05/2009

555

10/06/2009

556

10/06/2009

557

Courthouse Services, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 10/27/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/6/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/4/2010. (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 10/06/2009) 10/06/2009 558 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 9/04/09 3:15pm and 9/22/09 10:02am,11:21am,1:35pm,2:52pm (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 10/06/2009) ORDER GRANTING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE COMPLETE AND UNREDACTED FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHER DAMAGES-RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND AMAZON.COM AND ALEXA INTERNET'S JOINDER THEREIN by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The Court HEREBY ORDERS that Google's Motion and the Amazon Defendants' joinder therein is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: (See document for further details.) (pcl) (Entered: 10/07/2009) ORDER GRANTING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL PERFECT 10, INC. TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The Court HEREBY ORDERS that Google's Motion and Amazon.com and Alexa.com's Joinder Application is GRANTED IN PART, as follows: (See document for further details.) (pcl) (Entered: 10/07/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Notice of Lodging of Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits from the September 22, 2009 Hearing on Google's Pending Discovery Motions; Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits from the September 22, 2009 Hearing on Google's Pending Discovery Motions; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/07/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. of NonConfidential Demonstrative Exhibits from the September 22, 2009 Hearing on Google's Pending Discovery Motions re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 64 to the deposition of Google Inc. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6), dated November 19, 2008, # 2 Exhibit 66 to the deposition of Google Inc. pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 30(b)(6), dated November 19, 2008)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/07/2009) APPLICATION To File Under Seal Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order and 2 Under Seal Documents. (pcl) (Entered: 10/14/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING Of Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits From

10/06/2009

560

10/06/2009

561

10/07/2009

559

10/07/2009

562

10/07/2009

575

10/07/2009

576

The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions filed by defendant Google Inc. (pcl) (Entered: 10/14/2009) 10/07/2009 577 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions 575 , Notice of Lodging of Confidential Demonstrative Exhibits 576 , [Proposed] Order Granting Application to File Under Seal Confidential Exhibits (see document for further details), served on October 7, 2009. (pcl) (Entered: 10/14/2009) ORDER GRANTING Google Inc.'s Application To File Under Seal Confidential Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing On Google's Pending Discovery Motions by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: That application 575 is hereby GRANTED. The Confidential Exhibits include materials that Perfect 10 has designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that the Confidential Exhibits be filed under seal. (pcl) (Entered: 10/14/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court set a Telephonic Conference for October 9, 2009 at 2: 30 p.m. (pcl) (Entered: 10/09/2009) MINUTES OF Telephone Conference regarding Bate Stamp Issue held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Case called. Counsel enter their apearances. Due to technical difficulties the hearing was not recorded. (pcl) (Entered: 11/17/2009) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in Opposition to re: MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO: DECLARATION AND REBUTTAL DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF SEAN CHUMURA, BENNETT MCPHATTER AND DAVID OCONNOR RE: GOOGLES MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF MARGARET JANE EDEN, DEAN HOFFMAN, C.J. NEWTON, AND LES SCHWARTZ RE: GOOGLES MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for

10/07/2009

578

10/08/2009

563

10/09/2009

610

10/12/2009

564

10/12/2009

565

10/12/2009

566

10/12/2009

567

Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF SHEENA CHOU RE GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) 10/12/2009 568 OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY MAUSNER RE GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF MELANIE POBLETE RE GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 PERFECT 10'S REDACTED REPLY TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA RE: GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 457 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 458 , MOTION for Summary Judgment 456 DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO: DECLARATION AND REBUTTAL DECLARATION OF BILL BROUGHER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512; 2) PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO: DECLARATION AND REBUTTAL DECLARATION OF SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR, DOCKET NOS. 467-469, 534 (UNDER SEAL); 3) PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS: DECLARATION OF PAUL HAAHR IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: GOOGLE'S ENTITLEMENT TO SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512; 4) PERFECT 10'S REPLY TO GOOGLE, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA. 5) EXHIBITS AA & BB TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY

10/12/2009

569

10/12/2009

570

10/12/2009

571

10/12/2009

572

OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; 6) DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS; 7) NOTICE OF LODGING OF PLEADINGS RE PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and 8) PROOF OF SERVICE.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) 10/12/2009 573 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC'S EXHIBITS FROM THE SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 HEARING REGARDING DISCOVERY ISSUES BEFORE JUDGE HILLMAN as to Miscellaneous Document,, 409 , Joint Stipulation re Discovery Motion,,,,,, 408 . (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/12/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Application To File Under Seal Pleadings Re Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections And Responses To Google's Evidentiary Objections Re Google's Three Motions For Summary Judgment; and [Proposed] Order Thereon. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/13/2009) APPLICATION to File Udner Seal Pleadings re Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections and Responses to google's Evidentiary Objections re Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 10/14/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING of Pleadings re Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections and Responses to Google's Evidentiary Objections re Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgment filed by plaintiff. (jp) (Entered: 10/14/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Evidentiary Objections to Declaration and Rebuttal Declaration of Bill Brougher, Evidentiary Objections to Declaration and Rebuttal Declaration fo Shantal Rands Poovala, Evidentiary Objection Declaration of Paul Haahr, Reply to Evidentiary Objections, Exhibits AA & BB tot he Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner, Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada, Notice of Lodging, Application to File Under Seal Pleadings, Proposed order, served on 10/13/2009. (jp) (Entered: 10/14/2009) ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL PLEADINGS RE EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS RE GOOGLE'S THREE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, granting 579 Application to Seal Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 572 . (se) (Entered: 10/16/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- PERFECT 10'S Evidentiary Objections: Declaration of Paul Haahr in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512. (mat) (Entered: 10/19/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections and Response to Google's Evidentiary

10/13/2009

574

10/13/2009

579

10/13/2009

580

10/13/2009

581

10/13/2009

582

10/13/2009

583

10/13/2009

584

Objections. (mat) (Entered: 10/19/2009) 10/13/2009 585 SEALED DOCUMENT- PERFECT 10's Reply to Google, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Delcaration of Dr. Norman Zada. (mat) (Entered: 10/19/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- PERFECT 10'S Evidentiary Objections to: Declaration of and Rebuttal Declaration of Bill Brougher in Support of Defendant Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 USC 512.(mat) (Entered: 10/19/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- PERFECT 10's Evidentiary Objections to: Declaration and Rebuttal Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala in Support of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbor, Docket Nos. 467-469, 534 (Under Seal). (mat) (Entered: 10/19/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibits AA and BB to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of PERFECT 10'S Evidentiary Objections and Response to Google's Evidentiary Objections Re: Google's Three Motions for Summary Judgement. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3)(mat) (Entered: 10/19/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC'S UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS FROM THE SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 HEARING REGARDING DISCOVERY ISSUES BEFORE JUDGE HILLMAN; Application & Proposed Order to file the same; NOTICE OF LODGING. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/21/2009) REQUEST to Clarify re: the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other Damages-Related Documents, and Amazon.com and Alexa Internet's Joinder Therein filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibit A Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 10/21/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc., Under Seal Exhibits From the September 22, 2009 Hearing Regarding Discovery Issues Before Judge Hillman filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (es) (Entered: 10/27/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc's Under Seal Exhibits From The September 22, 2009 Hearing Regarding Discovery Issues Before Judge Hillman; and Proposed Order to File Under Seal filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc 594 , 593 (es) (Entered: 10/27/2009) REPLY REQUEST to Clarify re: the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Granting in Part Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10 to Produce Complete and Unredacted Financial Documents and Other DamagesRelated Documents, and Amazon.com and Alexa Internet 590 , PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE INC.'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION RE: THE ORDER COMPELLING PERFECT 10 TO

10/13/2009

586

10/13/2009

587

10/13/2009

588

10/21/2009

589

10/21/2009

590

10/22/2009

594

10/22/2009

595

10/23/2009

591

PRODUCE COMPLETE AND UNREDACTED FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHER DAMAGES-RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND AMAZON.COM AND ALEXA INTERNETS JOINDER THEREIN, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUNSER IN RESPONSE TO GOOGLE INC.'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION RE: THE ORDER COMPELLING PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE COMPLETE AND UNREDACTED FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS AND OTHER DAMAGES-RELATED DOCUMENTS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/23/2009) 10/23/2009 592 SEALED DOCUMENT- Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc's Under Seal Exhibits from the September 22, 2009 Hearing Regarding Discovery Issues before Judge Hillman. (mat) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2009: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3, # 3 Part 4) (mat). (Entered: 10/26/2009) ORDER to File Under Seal Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc's Under Seal Exhibits From the September 22, 2099 Hearing Regarding Discovery Issues Before Judge Hillman by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (es) (Entered: 10/26/2009) EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Production and to Reimburse Defendants for Costs and Request for a Telephonic Conference, and Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition Thereto filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/02/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Google's Request for Clarification Re October 6, 2009 Order 590 : At the present time, the court will confirm the language and intent of the Order quoted above. Actual settlement agreements between Perfect 10 and third parties need not be produced. (See document for further details.) (pcl) (Entered: 11/02/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court set a Telephonic Conference for November 3, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. (pcl) (Entered: 11/17/2009) PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S IMPROPER EX PARTE APPLICATION in Opposition to re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/03/2009) MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Case called. Counsel enter their appearances. Telephonic Conference held. Tape #: CS 11/3/2009. (pcl) (Entered: 11/17/2009)

10/23/2009

593

11/02/2009

596

11/02/2009

597

11/02/2009

609

11/03/2009

598

11/03/2009

608

11/06/2009

599

NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Google Inc. of (Proposed) Order Granting in Part Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Production and to Reimburse Defendants for Costs and Request for a Telephonic Conference, and Google Inc.'s Joinder Therein re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/06/2009) SUPPLEMENT to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of its Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application and Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition Thereto filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/06/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING filed - PERFECT 10'S NOTICE OF LODGING OF ITS PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENT re Notice of Lodging,, 599 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PERFECT 10'S PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/09/2009) REPLY Opposition EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 PERFECT 10'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND REPLY TO GOOGLE INC.'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS JOINDER IN AMAZON AND ALEXA'S EX PARTE APPLICATION filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/09/2009) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10's Memorandum in Support of its Proposed Order Regarding the Identification of Certain Documents and Reply to Google's Supplemental Memorandum in Support of its Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/09/2009) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Google Inc.'s Second Supplemental Memorandum In Support Of Its Motion To Compel Perfect

11/06/2009

600

11/09/2009

601

11/09/2009

602

11/09/2009

603

11/11/2009

604

10, Inc. To Affix Control Numbers To Its Document Productions filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/11/2009) 11/12/2009 605 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Order re: Perfect 10's Production of Documents Ordered Produced on October 6, 2009 560 : No later than November 30, 2009, Perfect 10 shall identify the location of documents in its October 22, 2009 production that are "responsive" to each of the 27 Compelled Requests. (See document for further details.) (pcl) (Entered: 11/13/2009) OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE REGARDING DIANE PRICE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER FOR PERFECT 10S RESPONSE REGARDING DIANE PRICE)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/16/2009) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Compel re: Perfect 10, Inc.: Defendant Google Inc.'s Joinder in Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Alexa Internet's Ex Parte Application for an Order Compelling Perfect 10, Inc. to Affix Production Numbers to its Product 596 , MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 Google Inc.'s Reply to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Response Regarding Diane Price filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/17/2009) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration and Rebuttal Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/23/2009) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public

11/16/2009

606

11/17/2009

607

11/23/2009

611

11/23/2009

612

Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Reply to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google's Evidentiary Objections in Support of its Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 U.S.C. § 512 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/23/2009) 11/23/2009 613 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in support re: re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) For Its Blogger Service [Public Redacted] 427 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner Filed in Further Opposition to Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Google's Entitlement to DMCA Safe Harbor filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/23/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Responses to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declarations and/or Rebuttal Declarations of Shantal Rands Poovala, Bill Brougher, and Paul Haahr in Support of Google's Motions for Summary Judgment re: Google's Entitlement to Safe Harbors Under 17 U.S.C. § 512; Google's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Norman Zada; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 11/23/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google's Response and Objections to Perfect 10, Inc's Response and Objections to Google's Evidence in suppor tof its Motions for Summary Judgment re: Safe harbors Under 17 USC section 512 filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 11/25/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to file Under Seal 615 , Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr.

11/23/2009

614

11/24/2009

615

11/24/2009

616

Norman Zada, Resonse to Evidentiary Objections, Response to Evidentiary Objections to the declaration and Rebuttal Declaration of Bill Brougher, Resonse to Evidentiary Objectiosn to the Declaration of Paul Haahr, Proposed Order served on 11/24/2009. (jp) (Entered: 11/25/2009) 11/25/2009 622 SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada Filed in Further Opposition to Google's Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding Entitlement to DMCA Safe Harbor. (mat) (Entered: 11/30/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Rebuttal Declaration of Bill Brougher. (mat) (Entered: 11/30/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Paul Haahr. (mat) (Entered: 11/30/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration and Rebuttal Declaration of Shantal Rands Poovala. (mat) (Entered: 11/30/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Google's Response and Objections to Perfect 10, Inc's Response and Objections to Google's Evidence in suppor tof its Motions for Summary Judgment re: Safe harbors Under 17 USC section 512 615 . (jp) (Entered: 11/30/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 12/21/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/29/2009) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/29/2009) DECLARATION of SHEENA CHOU IN SUPPORT OF MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/29/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF

11/25/2009

623

11/25/2009

624

11/25/2009

625

11/25/2009

629

11/29/2009

617

11/29/2009

618

11/29/2009

619

11/29/2009

620

MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 2) DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST GOOGLE, AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 3) EXHIBIT 9 (A DISK) TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST GOOGLE, AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER [DISK ATTACHED], FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 4) NOTICE OF LODGING OF DOCUMENTS FOR FILING UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER; 5) APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER; and 6) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/29/2009) 11/29/2009 621 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Proof of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/29/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING of Documents for Filing Under Seal, in support of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion for Evidentiary and Other sanctions against Defendant Google Inc., and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp) (Entered: 11/30/2009) APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal in support of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Defendant Google Inc., and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Propsoed Order. (jp) (Entered: 11/30/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re APPLICATION to File Document Under Seal 627 , Notice of Lodging 626 , (see attached document for further information), served on 11/30/2009. (jp) (Entered: 11/30/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Documents Under Seal in support of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Defendant Google Inc., and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master 627 . (jp) (Entered: 12/01/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. for Evidentiary and Other

11/30/2009

626

11/30/2009

627

11/30/2009

628

12/01/2009

630

12/01/2009

633

Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master. (mat) (Entered: 12/02/2009) 12/01/2009 634 SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibit 9 (A Disk) to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google, and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master [Disk Attached]. (mat) (Entered: 12/02/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google, and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7)(mat) (Entered: 12/03/2009) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 9/14/09 3:00pm. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin Courthouse Services, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/23/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/2/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/2/2010. (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 12/02/2009) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 9/14/09 3:00pm (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 12/02/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/07/2009) DECLARATION of Jonathan Land in opposition to MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Declaration of Jonathan Land in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/07/2009) MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court has reviewed the parties' filings re Perfect 10's settlement agreement with Microsoft and the extent (if any) to which it has a bearing on these cases. The Court need not express a view at this time. (See attached Minute Order for further information). The Court will continue to do its best to provide appropriate attention to the pending motions and other developments in these cases, but the only answer to counsel's question as to "when" is "As soon as I can." (jp) (Entered: 12/07/2009) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 11/3/09 10:04a.m.. Court

12/01/2009

635

12/02/2009

631

12/02/2009

632

12/07/2009

636

12/07/2009

637

12/07/2009

638

12/07/2009

639

Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin CourtHouse Services, phone number 626-963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/28/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/7/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/7/2010. (bem) (Entered: 12/07/2009) 12/07/2009 640 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 11/3/09 10:04a.m. (bem) (Entered: 12/07/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google's Opposition to Perfect 10 Inc's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master, and Supporting Documents filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 12/08/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to file Under Seal Opposition to Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master 641 ; Proposed Order, Declaration of Rachel Herrick, Opposition to Plaintiff Motion for Evidentiary and Other sanctions against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master, served on 12/7/2009. (jp) (Entered: 12/08/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 641 Application to Seal re Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 636 . See document for description of documents to be filed under seal. (se) (Entered: 12/09/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC'S Opposition To Plaintiff Perfect 10. Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for The Appointment of a Special Master.(lra) (Entered: 12/10/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of RACHEL HERRICJ KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF MOTION Goggle Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10 inc.'s Motion FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER (Attachments: # 1 PART 2, # 2 PART 3, # 3 PART 4, # 4 PART 5)(lra) (Entered: 12/10/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Defendant Google Inc.'s Corrected Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/09/2009) DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in opposition to MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL

12/07/2009

641

12/07/2009

642

12/08/2009

644

12/08/2009

650

12/08/2009

651

12/09/2009

643

12/09/2009

645

MASTER 617 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master, and Exhibits Thereto [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/09/2009) 12/09/2009 646 NOTICE OF ERRATA Regarding Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/09/2009) MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Defendant Google Inc.'s Corrected Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/09/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Corrected Opposition to Plaintiff Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master; APPLICATION to File Under Seal 648 , Proposed Order, served on 12/9/2009. (jp) (Entered: 12/10/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google's Corrected Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google filed by Defendant Google Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 12/10/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Google's Corrected Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master 648 . (jp) (Entered: 12/11/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google Inc.'s Corrected Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for the Appointment of A Special Master. (mat) (Entered: 12/11/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 1/11/2010 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/11/2009) DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian Regarding Perfect 10, Inc.'s Non-Cooperation Concerning

12/09/2009

647

12/09/2009

649

12/10/2009

648

12/10/2009

652

12/10/2009

653

12/11/2009

654

12/11/2009

655

Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. (Submitted Pursuant to Local Rule 37-2.4) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/11/2009) 12/11/2009 656 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc.; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/11/2009) JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/11/2009) DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-K to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian [PUBLIC REDACTED], # 2 Exhibits L-T to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian [PUBLIC REDACTED])(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/11/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 2) REPLY DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 3) EXHIBIT 35 (A DISK) TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER [DISK ATTACHED], FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 4) DECLARATION OF MARK MCDEVITT; 5) NOTICE OF LODGING OF REPLY DOCUMENTS FOR FILING UNDER SEAL, IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER; 6) APPLICATION TO FILE REPLY DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT

12/11/2009

657

12/11/2009

658

12/13/2009

659

GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER; 7) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE REPLY DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER; AND 8) PROOF OF SERVICE. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/13/2009) 12/13/2009 660 DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 REPLY DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/13/2009) DECLARATION of WENDY AUGUSTINE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 DECLARATION OF WENDY AUGUSTINE IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10, INC.'S PORTIONS OF THE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER, AND IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/13/2009) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S PORTION OF THE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER, AND IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/13/2009) DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S PORTIONS OF THE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER, AND IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/13/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion For A Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc., and Supporting Documents filed by defendant Google Inc.(es) (Entered: 12/15/2009)

12/13/2009

661

12/13/2009

662

12/13/2009

663

12/14/2009

664

12/14/2009

665

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Joint Stipulation re Discovery Motion, 657 , Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related) 658 , APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion For A Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc., and Supporting Documents 664 (es) (Entered: 12/15/2009) APPLICATION to File Reply Documents Under Seal in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google, Inc. and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged proposed order. (mg) (Entered: 12/15/2009) NOTICE OF LODGING of Reply Documents for Filing Under Seal, in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google, Inc. and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master; filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (mg) (Entered: 12/15/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc; Reply Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10; Reply Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10; Exhibit 35 (a disk); Declaration of Mark McDevitt; (see document for further details); served on 12/14/09. (mg) (Entered: 12/15/2009) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER REGARDING GOOGLE, INC.'S NONCOOPERATION CONCERNING GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER, AND PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/15/2009) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Discovery regarding A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE filed by PLAINTIFF Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 1/11/2010 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order re Preservation)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/15/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) JOINT STIPULATION ON GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10, INC., AND PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR A MUTUAL DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE; 2) EXHIBITS A, B & D TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10S PORTION OF THE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING GOOGLES MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER, AND IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER; 3) APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10S PORTION OF THE JOINT

12/14/2009

666

12/14/2009

667

12/14/2009

668

12/15/2009

669

12/15/2009

670

12/15/2009

671

STIPULATION REGARDING GOOGLES MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER, AND IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER; 4) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10S PORTION OF THE JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING GOOGLES MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER, AND IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER; and 5) PROOF OF SERVICE. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/15/2009) 12/15/2009 672 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Granting 664 GOOGLE INC.'s APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE JOINT STIPULATION ON GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10, INC., AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (es) (Entered: 12/15/2009) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Documents In Support of Perfect 10's Portion of the Joint Stipulation Regarding Google's Motion For A Document Preservation Order, and In Support of Perfect 10's Motion For a Document Preservation Order filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (es) (Entered: 12/15/2009) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re APPLICATION for Order for to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Perfect 10's Portion of the Joint Stipulation Regarding Google's Motion For A Document Preservation Order, and in Support of Perfect 10's Motion For a Document Preservation 673 served on Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence By Perfect 10, Inc, and Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion For A Mutual Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google; Exhbits A, B & D to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner; Application to File Under Seal Documents; Proposed Order to File Under Seal Documents. (es) (Entered: 12/15/2009) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court ORDERS the parties to file by December 16, 2009 at 4:00 p.m. separatestatements not to exceed three pages each describing what effect, if any, Perfect 10sMotion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google, Inc. and/or forthe Appointment of a Special Master1 could have on any other pending motions beforethis Court (smo) (Entered: 12/16/2009) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 666 Application to File Under Seal Reply Documents in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. and/or For Appointment of a Special Master. (se) (Entered: 12/16/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibit 35 (A Disk) to the Reply Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master. (mat) (Entered: 12/17/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Reply Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in

12/15/2009

673

12/15/2009

674

12/15/2009

675

12/15/2009

676

12/15/2009

680

12/15/2009

681

Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. for Evidentiary and other Sanctions agains defendant Google Inc. and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master. (mat) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2009: Part 2, Part 3) (mat). Modified on 12/17/2009 (mat). (Entered: 12/17/2009) 12/15/2009 682 SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Mark McDevitt. (mat) (Entered: 12/17/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. for Evidentiary and other Sanctions against defendant Google Inc. and/or for the Appoiintment of a Special Master. (mat) (Entered: 12/17/2009) SEALD DOCUMENT- Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. (mat) (Entered: 12/17/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5)(mat) (Entered: 12/17/2009) STATEMENT of PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S DECEMBER 15, 2009 MINUTE ORDER REGARDING THE EFFECT THAT PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST GOOGLE INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER COULD HAVE ON OTHER PENDING MOTIONS - MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/16/2009) STATEMENT of Defendant Google Inc. Regarding MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Defendant Google Inc.'s Statement in Response to the Court's December 15, 2009 Order Regarding Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/16/2009) NOTICE filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Google Inc.'s Notice re: Perfect 10, Inc.'s Improperly Filed Joint Stipulation (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof)(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/16/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: denying 617 Motion for Sanctions and/or for Appointment of a Special Master. The Court removes the motion hearing from the December 21, 2009 calendar. The Court transfers the motion to Judge Hillman for his

12/15/2009

683

12/15/2009

685

12/15/2009

686

12/16/2009

677

12/16/2009

678

12/16/2009

679

12/16/2009

684

determination, report and recommendation or both (as the case may be). Judge Hillman may schedule the handling of the motion as he sees fit, consistent with his own busy calendar. (se) (Entered: 12/17/2009) 12/18/2009 687 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Protective Order 94 the following documents, which have been lodged with this Court, shall be filed under seal: (1) JOINT STIPULATION on Google Inc's Motion for a Document Preservation Order to prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc., and Perfect 10, Inc's Motion for a Mutual Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google; and (2) EXHIBITS A, B & D to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Portion of the Joint Stipulation Regarding Google's Motion for a Document Preservation Order, and in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for a Document Preservation Order. (pcl) (Entered: 12/21/2009) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Court has set a Telephonic Conference for 12/21/2009 at 1:00 PM. (pcl) (Entered: 12/21/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - JOINT STIPULATION On Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10 Inc and Perfect 10's Motion for a Mutual Document Preservation Order to prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google. (lra) (Entered: 12/23/2009) SEALED DOCUMENT - EXHIBIT A,B and D to To the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of The JOINT STIPULATION On Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10 Inc and Perfect 10's Motion for a Mutual Document Preservation Order to prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google (Attachments: # 1 Part 2)(lra) (Entered: 12/23/2009) MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The hearing on Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence 654 670 is hereby CONTINUED from January 11, 2010, at 2:00 p.m., to January 15, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Stephen Hillman, in Courtroom 550 of the Roybal Courthouse. Opposition due no later than December 31, 2009. Reply due no later than January 6, 2010. The hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google, Inc., 617 is set for January 15, 2010, at 10:00 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Stephen Hillman, in Courtroom 550 of the Roybal Courthouse. The Court ORDERS Defendant Google, Inc., to file a Sur-Reply to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Reply and serve the parties by e-mail no later than January 8, 2010, by 4:00 p.m. (See document for further details.) Court Smart #: CS 12/21/09. (pcl) (Entered: 12/21/2009) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for a Mutual Document Preservation Order; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Declaration of Kris Brewer in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/31/2009)

12/18/2009

688

12/18/2009

690

12/18/2009

691

12/21/2009

689

12/31/2009

692

12/31/2009

693

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Discovery regarding A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE 670 Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for a Mutual Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-E Thereto [PUBLIC REDACTED], # 2 Declaration of Kris Brewer in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-B Thereto [PUBLIC REDACTED])(Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 12/31/2009) Google's APPLICATION to File Under Seal Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion for a Document Preservation Order and Supporting Documents filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged proposed order. (se) (Entered: 01/06/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, served on 12/31/09. (se) (Entered: 01/06/2010) NOTICE of Change of Address by Rachel M Herrick attorney for Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc, changing address to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, CA 94065. Filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Herrick, Rachel) (Entered: 01/04/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1. REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR THE IMPOSITION OF A PRESERVATION ORDER AGAINST GOOGLE TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE, 2. PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF KRIS BREWER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OPPOSITION TO PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE, 3. EXHIBIT 8 TO REPLY DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR THE IMPOSITION OF A PRESERVATION ORDER AGAINST GOOGLE TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE, 4. APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL, 5. [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL, and 6. PROOF OF SERVICE. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/05/2010) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION for Discovery regarding A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE 670 - REPLY DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR THE IMPOSITION OF A PRESERVATION ORDER AGAINST GOOGLE TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE - filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/05/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Reply in Support of its Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc.; Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in

12/31/2009

697

12/31/2009

698

01/04/2010

694

01/05/2010

695

01/05/2010

696

01/06/2010

699

Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Google's Application to Seal; (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/06/2010) 01/06/2010 700 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel, Daniel J. Cooper, for Perfect 10, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/06/2010) REPLY in support of MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-H Thereto [PUBLIC REDACTED])(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/06/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged proposed order. (pcl) (Entered: 01/07/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. re APPLICATION for Order for to File Under Seal 702 ; Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of a Preservation Order Against Google to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google; Evidentiary Objections to declaration of Kris Brewer in support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google (see document for further details,) served on 1/6/2010. (pcl) (Entered: 01/07/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Its Reply in Support of Its Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc., and Supporting Documents filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (pcl) (Entered: 01/07/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc., re APPLICATION to file Under Seal Its Reply in Support of Its Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc., and Supporting Documents 704 ; Reply in Support of Its Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc.; Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Motion; (see document for further details) served on 1/6/2010. (pcl) (Entered: 01/07/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Google Inc.s application 704 to file under seal the following documents is hereby GRANTED: GOOGLE INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10, INC.; REPLY DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10, INC. (pcl) (Entered: 01/08/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Google Inc.'s Reply in Support of its Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. (mat) (Entered: 01/11/2010)

01/06/2010

701

01/06/2010

702

01/06/2010

703

01/06/2010

704

01/06/2010

705

01/07/2010

707

01/07/2010

711

01/07/2010

712

SEALED DOCUMENT- Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of a Preservation Order Against Google to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google. (mat) (Entered: 01/11/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibit 8 to Reply Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of a Preservation Order against Google to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google. (mat) (Entered: 01/11/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. (mat) (Entered: 01/11/2010) ORDER TO FILE UNDER SEAL 702 by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Protective Order in this matter 94 , the following documents, which have been lodged with this Court, shall be filed under seal: 1. REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of a Spoliation of Evidence by Google; 2. Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Kris Brewer in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google; 3. EXHIBIT 8 to Reply Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of a Preservation Order Against Google to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google. granting 702 Application for Order (pcl) (Entered: 01/11/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to Declaration of Kris Brewer in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10's Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google. (mat) (Entered: 01/15/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Surreply Regarding Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions; Surreply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Google's Application to Seal; (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/08/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Its Surreply Regarding Perfect 10 Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Google and/or for the appointment of a Special Master, and Suppporting Documents, filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 01/11/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re Surreply regarding Plaintiff Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Goodle and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master; Surreply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, APPLICATION to File Under Seal 715 , Proposed Order served on 1/8/2010. (jp) (Entered: 01/11/2010)

01/07/2010

713

01/07/2010

714

01/07/2010

718

01/07/2010

734

01/08/2010

706

01/08/2010

715

01/08/2010

716

01/08/2010

717

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Google Inc.'s application to file under seal 715 the following documents is hereby GRANTED: DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S SURREPLY REGARDING PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST GOOGLE AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER; and SURREPLY DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC.'S SURREPLY REGARDING PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER. (pcl) (Entered: 01/11/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) DISK CONTAINING EXHIBIT 2 TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10 [DISK ATTACHED]; 2) EXHIBIT 3 TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10; 3) APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; 4) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; and 5) PROOF OF SERVICE.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/11/2010) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10, INC. re: MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/11/2010) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/11/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian In Support of Google Inc.'s Surreply Regarding Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions and/or for The Appointment of a Special Master.(lra) (Entered: 01/12/2010) APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged proposed order. (pcl) (Entered: 01/13/2010)

01/11/2010

708

01/11/2010

709

01/11/2010

710

01/11/2010

719

01/11/2010

721

01/11/2010

722

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal 721 , [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal, Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections to the Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10 (see document for further details, served on January 11, 2010. (pcl) (Entered: 01/13/2010) DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S SURREPLY re MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Defendant Google Inc.'s Surreply Regarding Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google and/or for the Appointment of a Special Master [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Surreply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-F Thereto [PUBLIC REDACTED])(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/12/2010) ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Perfect 10, Inc.'s application to file under seal 721 the following documents is hereby GRANTED: (1) DISK Containing Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections to the Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10 [Disk Attached] (2) EXHIBIT 3 to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections to the Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10. (pcl) (Entered: 01/13/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Jefferey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Evidentiary Objections to the Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6)(mat) (Entered: 01/15/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt; Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Kris Brewer; Google Inc.'s Application to Seal; (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/13/2010) DECLARATION of Kris Brewer in opposition to MOTION for Discovery regarding A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY GOOGLE 670 Supplemental Declaration of Kris Brewer in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Spoliation of Evidence by Google, and Exhibit A Thereto filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc.

01/12/2010

720

01/12/2010

725

01/12/2010

733

01/13/2010

723

01/13/2010

724

(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/13/2010) 01/13/2010 726 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt Submitted in Support of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/13/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the following documents: Google Inc's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt submitted in support of Perfect 10 Inc's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions; and Google Inc's Response to Perfect 10 Inc's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Kris Brewer filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) Modified on 1/20/2010 (jp). (Entered: 01/15/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal 731 , Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt, Response to Perfect 10 Inc's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Kris Brewer, served on 1/13/2010. (jp) (Entered: 01/15/2010) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Rachel Kassabian counsel for Defendant Google Inc. Changing address to 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, CA 94065. Changing email to rachelkassabian@quinnemanuel.com. Filed by Defendant Google (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/14/2010) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Order for Document Preservation to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. 654 Defendant Google Inc.'s Response to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Reply Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for a Document Preservation Order to Prevent Further Spoliation of Evidence by Perfect 10, Inc. filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-J Thereto)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/14/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING Application to File Under Seal 731 the following documents: Google Inc's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt submitted in support of Perfect 10 Inc's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions; and Google Inc's Response to Perfect 10 Inc's Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Kris Brewer. (jp) (Entered: 01/20/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt Submitted in Support of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions.(mat) (Entered: 01/21/2010)

01/13/2010

731

01/13/2010

732

01/14/2010

727

01/14/2010

728

01/14/2010

739

01/14/2010

742

01/14/2010

743

SEALED DOCUMENT- GOOGLE INC.'S RESPONSE to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Kris Brewer. (mat) (Entered: 01/21/2010) OBJECTION in opposition re: MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Sheena Chou in Support of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/15/2010) OBJECTION in opposition re: MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declarations of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/15/2010) ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE BY PERFECT 10, INC. by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Having considered the parties' briefing and argument, and good cause having been shown, Google's Motion 654 is hereby GRANTED. (See document for further details.) (pcl) (Entered: 01/15/2010) MINUTES OF PERFECT 10's MOTION FOR THE IMPOSITION OF A DOCUMENT PRESERVATION ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Perfect 10's Motion for the Imposition of A Document Preservation Order against Google is Denied, following oral argument on January 15, 2010. See attached order for further details.Court Recorder: 1/15/10. (es) (Entered: 01/19/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S EXHIBITS FOR THE JANUARY 15, 2010 HEARING REGARDING PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND PERFECT 10'S AND GOOGLE'S MOTIONS FOR PRESERVATION ORDER; APPLICATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON; AND PROOF OF SERVICE. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/18/2010) NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. of (Proposed) Order re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 (Attachments: # 1 (Proposed) Order Granting in Part Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. (1) to Produce Documents, (2) to Comply with the Protective Order, and (3) to Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Production)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/19/2010)

01/15/2010

729

01/15/2010

730

01/15/2010

735

01/15/2010

737

01/18/2010

736

01/19/2010

738

01/19/2010

740

APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged proposed order. (pcl) (Entered: 01/20/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Exhibits for the January 15, 2010, Hearing Regarding Perfect 10's Motion for Sanctions and Perfect10's and Google's Motion s for Preservation Order, APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal 740 , Proposed Order to File Under Seal; and Proof of Service, served on 1/19/2010. (pcl) (Entered: 01/20/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION to Compel Perfect 10, Inc. to Produce Documents, Comply with the Protective Order, and Affix Document Control Numbers to its Document Productions 407 .Having reviewed the partiessubmissions and considered the parties arguments thereon, and finding good cause therefor, Section IX of Googles Motion is hereby GRANTED IN PART as follows: Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. is ordered to sufficiently identify the file path and production date for any Perfect 10 non-Bates-numbereddocuments that Perfect 10 offers as evidence or as an exhibit in anycourt proceedingincluding motions, depositions, and pretrialhearingsat the time such documents are first introduced or filed. (sbu) (Entered: 01/22/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN RESPONSE TO PRESERVATION ORDER. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/25/2010) APPLICATION to File Document Under Seal: Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Response to Preservation Order filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 01/25/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in response to preservation order, served on 1/25/2010. (jp) (Entered: 01/25/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of AMENDED DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN RESPONSE TO PRESERVATION ORDER; APPLICATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE THEREON.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/25/2010) ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL 746 by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: (es) (Entered: 01/26/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada in Response to Preservation Order.(mat) (Entered: 01/26/2010) REQUEST for Hearing - REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/26/2010) REQUEST for Hearing - DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN, re REQUEST for Hearing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 , filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/26/2010)

01/19/2010

741

01/20/2010

744

01/25/2010

745

01/25/2010

746

01/25/2010

747

01/25/2010

748

01/25/2010

751

01/25/2010

754

01/26/2010

749

01/26/2010

750

01/26/2010

752

APPLICATION to File Under Seal: Amended Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Response to Preservation Order, filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) Modified on 1/26/2010 (jp). (Entered: 01/26/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Amended Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Resonse to Preservation Order; APPLICATION to File Document Under Seal 752 ; Proposed Order, served on 1/26/2010. (jp) (Entered: 01/26/2010) OPPOSITION re: REQUEST for Hearing - REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Request For a Telephonic Conference with Magistrate Judge Hillman filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/26/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Perfect 10, Inc.'s Application to file under seal 752 the following document is hereby GRANTED: AMENDED DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN RESPONSE TO PRESERVATION ORDER. (pcl) (Entered: 01/27/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- AMENDED Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Response to Preservation Order. (mat) (Entered: 01/28/2010) REQUEST for Hearing - PERFECT 10'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN, re REQUEST for Hearing - REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 , filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/27/2010) REQUEST for Order for Service of the Under Seal Version of the Amazon Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of the Microsoft Settlement Agreement (and All Supporting Under Seal Documents) filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibit A Thereto, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/27/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: A telephonic conference at this juncture would be useless. Counsel shall meet and confer regarding Perfect 10's Sanctions Motion as soon as practicable for all counsel, and then each side shall file a two page statement setting forth the status of the matter. See attached order for further details. (es) (Entered: 01/27/2010) Notice of Withdrawal of Request for Order re Discovery Matter, 758 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/28/2010) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error was found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used RE: Reply in Support of Request for Telephonic Conference with Judge Hillman 756 is "Reply (Motion related)" found under the category of Responses/Replies/Other Motion Related

01/26/2010

753

01/26/2010

755

01/26/2010

757

01/26/2010

760

01/27/2010

756

01/27/2010

758

01/27/2010

759

01/28/2010

761

02/04/2010

762

Documents. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (pcl) (Entered: 02/04/2010) 02/04/2010 763 NOTICE OF JOINDER filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Google Inc.'s Notice of Joinder in the Amazon Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of the Microsoft Settlement Agreement (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Thomas Nolan in Support Thereof, and Exhibits A-C Thereto)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/04/2010) STATEMENT of STATUS - STATUS REPORT REGARDING COURT-ORDERED MEET AND CONFER REGARDING DOCUMENTS NOT PRODUCED BY GOOGLE - re REQUEST for Hearing - REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER FOR STATUS REPORT REGARDING COURT-ORDERED MEET AND CONFER REGARDING DOCUMENTS NOT PRODUCED BY GOOGLE)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/08/2010) RESPONSE TO STATUS REPORT re REQUEST for Hearing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 Google Inc.'s Response To Perfect 10, Inc.'s Status Report Regarding Court-Ordered Meet And Confer Regarding Documents Not Produced By Google filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/09/2010) PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S JOINDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF MICROSOFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT re: REQUEST for Order for Service of the Under Seal Version of the Amazon Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of the Microsoft Settlement Agreement (and All Supporting Under Seal Documents) REQUEST for Order for Service of the Under Seal Version of the Amazon Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of the Microsoft Settlement Agreement (and All Supporting Under Seal Documents) 758 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S JOINDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF MICROSOFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/16/2010) REQUEST for Leave to File a Reply to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google Inc.'s Joinder in the Amazon Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of the Microsoft Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Google Inc.'s Reply to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Joinder in the Amazon Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of the Microsoft Settlement Agreement, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/17/2010) ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC'S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO PERFECT 10, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S JOINDER IN THE AMAZON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF THE MICROSOFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Reply shall be

02/08/2010

764

02/09/2010

765

02/16/2010

766

02/17/2010

767

02/18/2010

768

filed no later than February 24, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. (pcl) (Entered: 02/18/2010) 02/22/2010 769 REPLY of Google Inc. to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Opposition to Google's Joinder in the Amazon Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of the Microsoft Settlement Agreement (Docket No. 763) filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/22/2010) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 1/15/10 10:08 a.m. & 1:08p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin CourtHouse Services, phone number 626- 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/16/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/26/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/24/2010. (bem) (Entered: 02/23/2010) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 1/15/10 10:08 a.m. & 1:08 p.m. (bem) (Entered: 02/23/2010) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 4/5/2010 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-C, # 2 Exhibit D-J, # 3 Exhibit K-P)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of Sheena Chou SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of Melanie Poblete SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of Dean Hoffman SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of CJ Newton SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF

02/23/2010

770

02/23/2010

771

03/03/2010

772

03/03/2010

773

03/03/2010

774

03/03/2010

775

03/03/2010

776

03/03/2010

777

PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) 03/03/2010 778 DECLARATION of Margaret Jane Eden SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of Les Schwartz SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of Sean Chumura SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of David O'Connor SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) DECLARATION of Bennett McPhatter SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC., FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 2) DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 3) VOLUME 1 [EXHIBITS 1-35] TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 4) VOLUME 2 [EXHIBITS 36-73] TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 5) EXHIBIT 9 (A DISK) TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO

03/03/2010

779

03/03/2010

780

03/03/2010

781

03/03/2010

782

03/03/2010

783

PROTECTIVE ORDER [DISK ATTACHED]; 6) EXHIBITS G, H, J AND L TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 7) APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.; 8) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.; and 9) PROOF OF SERVICE.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/03/2010) 03/04/2010 784 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. (PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION) filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/04/2010) APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Google re: Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), 783 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged proposed order. (se) (Entered: 03/05/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, served on 3/4/10. (se) (Entered: 03/05/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 785 Application to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. (se) (Entered: 03/08/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibit 9(A Disk) to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Google. (mat) (Entered: 03/09/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, Inc.'s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Google Inc.(mat) (Entered: 03/09/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibits G, H, J and L to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner Submitted in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Google. (Attachments: Part 2 of Exhibits)(mat) (Entered: 03/09/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Volume 1 of Exhibits to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motions for Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Google, Inc. [Exhibits 1-35] (Attachments: Part 2 of Vol 1, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11)(mat) (Entered: 03/09/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Volume II of Exhibits to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motions for Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Google, Inc. [Exhibits 36-73]. (Attachments: Part 2 of Vol II, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8,

03/04/2010

785

03/04/2010

786

03/05/2010

788

03/05/2010

790

03/05/2010

791

03/05/2010

794

03/05/2010

795

03/05/2010

796

Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12, Part 13)(mat) (Entered: 03/09/2010) 03/05/2010 797 SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google, Inc. (Attachments:Part 2 of Declaration)(mat) (Entered: 03/09/2010) STATEMENT of CLARIFICATION OF PERFECT 10'S POSITION REGARDING APPLICABILITY OF RULE 56(f) TO PENDING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS re: MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/07/2010) EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Striking of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and for Sanctions filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, and Exhibits A-N Thereto (Part 1), # 2 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, and Exhibits A-N Thereto (Part 2), # 3 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/08/2010) OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10. INC. TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Striking of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and for Sanctions 789 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/09/2010) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Striking of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and for Sanctions 789 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/09/2010) DENIED BY ORDER OF Judge A. Howard Matz re Ex Parte Application to Strike Perfect 10 Inc's Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and for Sanctions 789 . (jp) (Entered: 03/10/2010) NOTICE of Change of Counsel's Firm Name filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 03/11/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support Thereof, and Exhibits Thereto; Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Norman Zada; Google's Application to Seal; (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010)

03/07/2010

787

03/08/2010

789

03/09/2010

792

03/09/2010

793

03/10/2010

798

03/11/2010

799

03/15/2010

800

03/15/2010

801

NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Notice of Lodging of Exhibit A (a Disk) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction; Exhibit A (a Disk) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) NOTICE OF LODGING filed by Defendant Google Inc. Of Google's Previously Filed Motions For Summary Judgment Re: Google's Entitlement To Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512, And Supporting Documents re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and Exhibits A-U Thereto [PUBLIC REDACTED], # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Margaret Jane Eden in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dean Hoffman in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Jeffrey Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of C.J. Newton in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Melanie Poblete in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by

03/15/2010

802

03/15/2010

803

03/15/2010

804

03/15/2010

805

03/15/2010

806

03/15/2010

807

03/15/2010

808

Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) 03/15/2010 809 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Les Schwartz in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/15/2010) NOTICE OF LODGING of Exhibit A (A Disk) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of Google's Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 772 filed by defendant Google Inc. (jp) (Entered: 03/17/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google's Opposition to Perfect 10 inc.'s MSecond Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Documents(Motion related) 815 filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged proposed order. (se) (Entered: 03/23/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANT Google Inc, served on 3/15/10 on documents listed in POS document. (se) (Entered: 03/23/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Sheena Chou in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/16/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Sean Chumura in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/16/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Bennett McPhatter in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/16/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of David O'Connor in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/16/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10,Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6)(mat) (Entered: 03/17/2010)

03/15/2010

818

03/15/2010

830

03/15/2010

831

03/16/2010

810

03/16/2010

811

03/16/2010

812

03/16/2010

813

03/16/2010

814

03/16/2010

815

SEALED DOCUMENT- Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.(mat) (Entered: 03/17/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada In Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Google, Inc. (Attachments: Part 2)(mat) (Entered: 03/17/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibit A (A Disk) to the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google's Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. (mat) (Entered: 03/17/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Google's Opposition to Perfect 10 Inc.'s Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Supporting Documents 830 . (jp) (Entered: 03/24/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC., FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 2) REPLY DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 3) EXHIBIT 86 (A HARD DRIVE) TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 4) EXHIBIT R (A DISK) TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER [DISK ATTACHED]; 5) EXHIBITS S & T TO THE REPLY DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER; 6) DECLARATION OF MARK MCDEVITT; 7) NOTICE OF LODGING OF EXTERNAL HARD DRIVE AND DISK IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.; 8) APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.; 9) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.; and 10) PROOF OF SERVICE. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/21/2010) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER - REPLY DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE Re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against

03/16/2010

816

03/16/2010

817

03/16/2010

833

03/21/2010

819

03/22/2010

820

Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/22/2010) 03/22/2010 821 APPLICATION to File Reply documents Under Seal in support of Plaintiff Perfect 10 inc's Motion for Preliminary Injunction against defendant Google Inc filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 03/22/2010) NOTICE OF LODGING of External Hard Drive and disk in support of Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction against Defendant Google, Inc filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp) (Entered: 03/22/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Reply Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada, Exhibit 86, Exhibit R, Exhibits S & T to the Reply Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner, Declaration of Mark McDevitt, Notice of Lodging 822 , and APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal 821 served on 3/22/2010. (jp) (Entered: 03/22/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING Application to File Reply documents Under Seal in support of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc's Motion for Preliminary Injunction against defendant Google Inc 821 . (jp) (Entered: 03/23/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S REPLY MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. (mat) (Entered: 03/23/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- REPLY DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc.(mat) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/23/2010: Part 2, Part 3) (mat). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/23/2010: Part 4) (mat). (Entered: 03/23/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- EXHIBIT R (A Disk) to the Reply Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc.(mat) (Entered: 03/23/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- EXHIBITS S & T to the Reply Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. (mat) (Entered: 03/23/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Mark McDevitt. (mat) (Entered: 03/23/2010) REPLY - PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. (PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION) re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/23/2010) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 - RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF

03/22/2010

822

03/22/2010

823

03/22/2010

824

03/22/2010

825

03/22/2010

826

03/22/2010

827

03/22/2010

828

03/22/2010

829

03/23/2010

832

03/25/2010

834

PERFECT 10, INC. TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF MARGARET JANE EDEN, DEAN HOFFMAN, C.J. NEWTON, AND LES SCHWARTZ RE: PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/25/2010) 03/25/2010 835 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 - RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATIONS OF SEAN CHUMURA, BENNETT MCPHATTER AND DAVID O'CONNOR RE: PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/25/2010) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS REGARDING EDEN, HOFFMAN, NEWTON, SCHWARTZ CHUMURA, MCPHATTER, AND O'CONNOR, RE PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, for MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/25/2010) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 - RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF SHEENA CHOU IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/28/2010) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 - RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER RE: PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/28/2010) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 - RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF MELANIE POBLETE RE: PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/28/2010) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 - RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST GOOGLE, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/28/2010)

03/25/2010

836

03/28/2010

837

03/28/2010

838

03/28/2010

839

03/28/2010

840

03/31/2010

841

NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Reply Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada; Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt; Supplemental Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts, and Exhibit A Thereto; Google's Application to Seal; [Proposed] Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/31/2010) EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS in opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. 772 Google Inc.'s Evidentiary Objections to the Reply Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google Inc. filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/31/2010) Google Inc.'s APPLICATION to File Under Seal Supplemental Documents re Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged proposed order. (se) (Entered: 04/02/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, served on 3/31/10. See Proof of Service for documents served. (se) (Entered: 04/02/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 843 Application to File Under Seal Supplemental Documents re Perfect 10's Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction(G-92) 841 . (se) (Entered: 04/02/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT-GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS to the Reply Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Perfect 10's Second Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google, Inc. 772 (mg) (Entered: 04/05/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT-GOOGLE INC.'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS to the Declaration of Mark McDevitt Submitted in Support of Perfect 10's Second MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Against Defendant Google, Inc. 772 (mg) (Entered: 04/05/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT-SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ANDREA PALLIOS ROBERTS in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second MOTION for A Preliminary Injunction 772 (mg) (Entered: 04/05/2010) STATEMENT of Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Statement of Clarification re: MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Statement of Clarification of Perfect 10's Position Regarding Applicability Of Rule 56(f) to Pending Motions for Summary Judgment and Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/02/2010) MINUTES OF Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 772 (non-

03/31/2010

842

03/31/2010

843

03/31/2010

845

04/01/2010

844

04/01/2010

847

04/01/2010

848

04/01/2010

849

04/02/2010

846

04/05/2010

850

evidentiary) before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court circulates its Memorandum to Parties containing questions to counsel, a copy of which is attached hereto. Court hears oral argument. For reasons stated on the record, the Court takes plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction under submission. The parties are to order a transcript of this hearing and to split the costs incurred. (See attached Minute Order for further information). Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp) (Entered: 04/06/2010) 04/07/2010 851 STATEMENT of STATUS - SECOND STATUS REPORT REGARDING COURT-ORDERED MEET AND CONFER; REQUEST FOR FURTHER HEARING REGARDING DOCUMENTS THAT GOOGLE HAS NOT PRODUCED, re: REQUEST for Hearing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER FOR SECOND STATUS REPORT REGARDING COURT-ORDERED MEET AND CONFER AND REQUEST FOR FURTHER HEARING REGARDING DOCUMENTS THAT GOOGLE HAS NOT PRODUCED, # 2 Exhibit 1 TO DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER, # 3 Exhibit 2 TO DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER, # 4 Exhibit 3 TO DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/07/2010) STATEMENT of RESPONSE re: Perfect 10's REQUEST for Hearing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Status Report Regarding Court-Ordered Meet and Confer filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Second Status Report Regarding CourtOrdered Meet and Confer and Exhibit A Thereto)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/08/2010) REPLY - PERFECT 10'S REPLY RE SECOND STATUS REPORT REGARDING COURT-ORDERED MEET AND CONFER; REQUEST FOR FURTHER HEARING REGARDING DOCUMENTS THAT GOOGLE HAS NOT PRODUCED re: REQUEST for Hearing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2010) STATEMENT of STATUS - PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S STATEMENT REGARDING THE STATUS OF ITS MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS, SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN'S JANUARY 27, 2010 ORDER, re: REQUEST for Hearing - REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/21/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Response To Perfect 10, Inc.'s Statement Regarding the Status of its Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions; Google's Application to Seal; (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 04/23/2010)

04/08/2010

852

04/09/2010

853

04/21/2010

854

04/23/2010

855

04/23/2010

856

STATEMENT of RESPONSE re: Perfect 10's REQUEST for Hearing REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Statement Regarding the Status of its Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions [PUBLIC REDACTED] filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Statement Regarding the Status of its Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions and Exhibits A and B Thereto)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/23/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google's Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Statement Regarding the status of its Motion for Evidentiary and other Sanctions filed by Defendant and Counter-Claimant Google Inc. re: Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 856 (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(lmh) (Entered: 04/26/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Hon. Stephen J. Hillman at Paragraph 17, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in this action (Docket No. 94), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the following (the "Confidential Materials" is hereby GRANTED: Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Statement Regarding the Status of its Motion for Evidentiary and other Sanctions. The Confidential Materials include materials that Google, Inc. has designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court orders that the Confidential Materials be filed under seal. SO ORDERED. 857 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 04/27/2010) REPLY to Defendant Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10's Statement Regarding the Status of its Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions; Request to Strike Response, re: REQUEST for Hearing - REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE WITH JUDGE HILLMAN 749 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Reply to Defendant Google Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10's Statement Regarding the Status of its Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/27/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Exhibit C To The Declaration Of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Reply To Defendant Google Inc.'s Response To Perfect 10's Statement Regarding The Status Of Its Motion For Evidentiary And Other Sanctions And Request To Strike Response. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/27/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Perfect 10's Exhibit C to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Reply to Defendant Google, Inc.'s Response to Perfect 10's Statement regarding the status of its Motion for Evidentiary and other Sanctions and Request to Strike Response filed by Plaintiff and Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(lmh) (Entered: 04/28/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, IT IS HEREBY

04/23/2010

857

04/26/2010

858

04/27/2010

859

04/27/2010

860

04/27/2010

861

04/28/2010

862

ORDERED that pursuant to the Protective Order in this matter, Docket No. 94, the following document, which has been lodged with this Court, shall be filed under seal: EXHIBIT C TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.S REPLY TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.S RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10S STATEMENT REGARDING THE STATUS OF ITS MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AND REQUEST TO STRIKE RESPONSE. The above document includes materials that Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc., Defendant Google Inc., and/or third parties designate as Confidential or Highly Confidential pursuant to the Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 861 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 04/28/2010) 04/30/2010 863 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 4/5/10 10:15 am. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg, www.cindynirenberg.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter or the Court Reporter or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 5/21/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/1/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/29/2010. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 04/30/2010) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 4/5/10 10:15 am (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 04/30/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt; Decl. of B. Love in Support of Google's Motion and Exhibits thereto; Decl. Of K. Brewer in Support of Google's Motion; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 05/04/2010) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Protective Order for relief from P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 6/28/2010 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 05/04/2010) DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt [Exhibits L, M and N Filed Separately Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order]; re MOTION for Protective Order for relief from P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt 866 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-D, # 2 Exhibit E-H, # 3 Exhibit I, # 4 Exhibit J, # 5 Exhibit KR)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/04/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt and Google's supporting documents filed by Defendant and Counter-Claimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(lmh) (Entered: 05/05/2010)

04/30/2010

864

05/04/2010

865

05/04/2010

866

05/04/2010

867

05/04/2010

868

05/05/2010

869

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Honorable Stephen J. Hillman at paragraph 17, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in this acting (Docket No. 94), Google In's application to file under seal the following documents (the "Confidential Materials") is hereby GRANTED: Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt, Declaration of Bradley R. Love in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt and Exhibits thereto, Declaration of Kris Brewer in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. The Confidential Materials include materials that Google Inc. and/or Perfect 10, Inc. has designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court orders that the Confidential Materials be filed under seal. SO ORDERED. 868 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 05/06/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. (mat) (Entered: 05/07/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Kris Brewer in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt.(mat) (Entered: 05/07/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Bradley R. Love in Support of Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3)(mat) (Entered: 05/07/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court sets a hearing date of Monday, May 10, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. for Google's motions for partial summary judgment 456 , 457 , and 458 . (kbr) (Entered: 05/06/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of EXHIBITS L, M AND N TO THE DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING PERFECT 10'S DEPOSITION NOTICE DIRECTED TO DR. ERIC SCHMIDT, FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/09/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING PERFECT 10'S DEPOSITION NOTICE DIRECTED TO ERIC SCHMIDT; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/09/2010) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz re: Google's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment 456 , 457 and 458 . Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (kbr) (Entered: 05/10/2010)

05/05/2010

871

05/05/2010

872

05/05/2010

873

05/06/2010

870

05/09/2010

874

05/09/2010

875

05/10/2010

876

05/10/2010

877

APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 05/12/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re APPLICATION to File documents Under Seal in support of Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc's Motion for Protective Order Regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice directed to Eric Schmidt 877 , Exhibits L, M and N to Declaration Jeffrey N. Mausner, Proposed Order, served on 5/10/2010. (jp) (Entered: 05/13/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Protective Order in this matter, Docket No. 94, the following document, which has been lodged with this Court, shall be filed under seal: Exhibits L, M, and N to the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt, filed Under Seal pursuant to Protective Order. The document includes materials that Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc., Defendant Google Inc., and/or third parties designate as Confidential pursuant to the Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 877 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 05/13/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Exhibits L, M and N to Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding Perfect 10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. (mat) (Entered: 05/14/2010) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 10:00 am. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg, www.cindynirenberg.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the court reporter or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 6/4/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/14/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/12/2010. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 05/14/2010) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 5/10/10 10:00 am (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 05/14/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER filed by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Court sets a Telephonic Conference for May 27, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. (lmh) (Entered: 05/26/2010) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey N Mausner counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Adding David N. Schultz as attorney as counsel of record for Perfect 10, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 05/26/2010) MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Case called. Counsel enter there appearances. Also present is Dr. Norman Zada, President ofPlaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. Court

05/10/2010

878

05/11/2010

879

05/11/2010

880

05/14/2010

881

05/14/2010

882

05/17/2010

883

05/26/2010

884

05/27/2010

888

and Counsel confer.Tape #: CS05/27/2010. (sbu) (Entered: 06/07/2010) 06/01/2010 885 STATEMENT of Status of DMCA-Related Discovery Issues in P10's MOTION for Sanctions Against DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC. AND/OR FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER 617 Google Inc.'s Statement Regarding the Status of DMCA-Related Discovery Issues in P10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions in Response to the Court's Request at the May 27, 2010 Hearing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Bradley R. Love in Support of Google Inc.'s Statement Regarding the Status of DMCA-Related Discovery Issues in P10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 06/01/2010) REQUEST to Strike AND BRIEF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S STATEMENT REGARDING THE STATUS OF DMCA-RELATED DISCOVERY ISSUES IN PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS; Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 885 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/02/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: This court is in receipt of plaintiffs Perfect 10 Incs Request to Strike and Brief Response to Defendant Google Incs Statement Regarding the Status of DMCA related Discovery, filed on June 2, 2010. The Request to Strike is DENIED. Plaintiff may file a Response no later than June 8, 2010. (sbu) (Entered: 06/03/2010) RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Incto Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 885 - PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S STATEMENT REGARDING THE STATUS OF DMCA-RELATED DISCOVERY ISSUES IN PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF DAVID N. SCHULTZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S STATEMENT REGARDING THE STATUS OF DMCA-RELATED DISCOVERY ISSUES IN PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/08/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Supplemental Declaration Of Dr. Norman Zada In Support Of Perfect 10's Response To Google Inc.'s Statement Regarding The Status Of DMCARelated Discovery Issues In Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary & Other Sanctions; Application & [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; Proof of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/08/2010) APPLICATION to Seal the Supplemental Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Response to Defendant Google, Inc.'s Statement Regarding the Status of DMCA-Related Discovery Issues in Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and other

06/02/2010

886

06/02/2010

887

06/08/2010

889

06/08/2010

890

06/08/2010

891

Sanctions filed by Plaintiff and Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(lmh) (Entered: 06/09/2010) 06/09/2010 892 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER filed by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Telephonic Hearing set for June 28, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. on the Defendant Motion for Protective Order for relief from P10's Deposition Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. The call-in information for the telephonic conference is listed below: Call-In Number : 213-894-0800 User access: 7002# User password: 1224#. (lmh) (Entered: 06/09/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum on its Motion for a Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt; Supplemental Decl. of B. Love in Support of Google's Motion and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and (Proposed) Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 06/14/2010) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Protective Order for relief from P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt 866 - Supplemental Memorandum of Law of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Re the Deposition of Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/14/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Google Inc.'s Application to File Under Seal the Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt, and Google's Supporting Documents.(mat) (Entered: 06/18/2010) ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC'S APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL THE SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INC'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDINGS P10'S DEPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re Supplement(Motion related), Supplement(Motion related) 894 , Notice of Manual Filing (G-92), Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) 893 (dam) (Entered: 06/16/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Supplemental Declaration of Bradley R. Love in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for a Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. (Attachments: Part #2)(mat) (Entered: 06/18/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum on its Motion for a Protective Order Regarding P10's Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. (mat) (Entered: 06/18/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- PROOF OF SERVICE (mat) (Entered: 06/18/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER filed by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, After extensive oral argument on January 15, 2010, and supplemental briefing thereafter, Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions Against Google and/or for a Special Master is DENIED.

06/14/2010

893

06/14/2010

894

06/14/2010

897

06/15/2010

895

06/15/2010

898

06/15/2010

899

06/15/2010

900

06/16/2010

896

Alternative relief is partially granted, as set forth herein. All attempts to negotiate a resolution of this Motion have failed, and the parties have requested a ruling on the Motion. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh) (Entered: 06/17/2010) 06/22/2010 901 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 5/27/10 3:07pm. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin Courthouse Services, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 7/13/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/20/2010. (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 06/22/2010) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 5/27/10 3:07pm (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 06/22/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Protective Order in this matter, Docket No. 94, the following document, which has been lodged with this Court, shall be filed under seal: 1) SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.S STATEMENT REGARDING THE STATUS OF DMCA-RELATED DISCOVERY ISSUES IN PERFECT 10S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY AND OTHER SANCTIONS. The above document includes materials that Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc., Defendant Google Inc., and/or third parties designate as Confidential pursuant to the Protective Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 891 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 06/22/2010) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Quash Subpoena served by Perfect 10, Inc. on Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order filed by Defendant and Counter-Claimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/16/2010 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 06/23/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order; Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts In Support thereof and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and [Proposed] Order to Seal; Proof of Service. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 06/23/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion to Quash The Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order, and Google's Supporting Documents filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(lmh) (Entered: 06/24/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE re Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order, Declaration of Andre Pallios Roberts in Support of Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order, APPLICATION to Seal and

06/22/2010

902

06/22/2010

903

06/23/2010

904

06/23/2010

905

06/23/2010

907

06/23/2010

1001

Proposed Order 907 served on June 23, 2010 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (lmh) (Entered: 08/08/2011) 06/24/2010 906 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Declaration Of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Opposition To Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion To Quash Subpoenas Directed To Shantal Rands Poovala And For A Protective Order; Application To File Under Seal; [Proposed] Order To File Under Seal; and Proof of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 06/24/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Declaration of Jeffery N. Mausner in Oppoosition to Defendant Google, Inc.s Motion to Quash Subpoenas directed to Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order filed by Plaintiff and Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(lmh) (Entered: 06/25/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Hon. Stephen J. Hillman at paragraph 17, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in this action (Docket No. 94), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the following documents (the "Confidential Materials") is hereby GRANTED: Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order, Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order. The Confidential Materials include materials that Google Inc. and/or Perfect 10, Inc. has designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court orders that the Confidential Materials be filed under seal. SO ORDERED. 907 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 06/25/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Hon. Stephen J. Hillman at paragraph 17, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in this action (Docket No. 94), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the following documents (the "Confidential Materials") is hereby GRANTED: Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas Directed to Shatal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order. The Confidential Materials include materials that Google Inc. and/or Perfect 10, Inc. has designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court orders that the Confidential Materials be filed under seal. SO ORDERED. 908 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 06/25/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order. (mat) (Entered: 06/28/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5)(mat) (Entered: 06/28/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas Direct to Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order. (Attachments: Part 2, Part

06/24/2010

908

06/24/2010

909

06/24/2010

910

06/24/2010

912

06/24/2010

913

06/24/2010

914

3)(mat) (Entered: 06/28/2010) 06/24/2010 1002 PROOF OF SERVICE re Declaration of Jefferey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc's Motion to Quash Subpoenas Direceted to Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order and APPLICATION to Seal 908 served on June 24, 2010 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (lmh) (Entered: 08/08/2011) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER filed by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Google Incs Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order set for hearing on Monday, August 16, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. shall be reset for hearing on Monday, August 9, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. re: MOTION to Quash Subpoena served by Perfect 10, Inc. on Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order 904 (lmh) (Entered: 06/25/2010) STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Objections to and Motion for Review of Nondispositive Ruling of Magistrate Judge Hillman filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 06/28/2010) MINUTES OF Discovery Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman:Telephonic Conference on Defendant Motion for Protective Order for relieffrom P10's Deposition Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt. Case called. Counsel enter there appearances. Court and Counsel confer.Tape #: 6/28./2010. (sbu) (Entered: 07/02/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' Stipulation 915 AS FOLLOWS: (1) Perfect 10's objections to and motion for review of Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order shall be filed and served on or before 7/12/2010; (2) Google's opposition shall be filed and served on or before 7/26/201; (3) Perfect 10's reply shall be filed and served on or before 8/2/2010; (4) The hearing on Perfect 10's objections and motion for review ofMagistrate Judge Hillman's Order shall be set for 8/16/2010 at 10:00 AM. (jp) (Entered: 06/29/2010) EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for (1 ) Relief from the Ten-Day Requirement of Local Rule 7-3; And (2) a Stay of the Court's June 16, 2010 Order filed by Defendant and Counter-Claimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google's Ex Parte Application, # 2 Proposed Order Granting Google's Ex Parte Application)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 06/30/2010) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STAY THIS COURT'S JUNE 16, 2010 ORDER re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for (1 ) Relief from the Ten-Day Requirement of Local Rule 7-3; And (2) a Stay of the Court's June 16, 2010 Order EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for (1 ) Relief from the Ten-Day Requirement of Local Rule 7-3; And (2) a Stay of the Court's June 16, 2010 Order 917 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Opposition To Defendant Google Inc.'s Ex Parte Application To Stay This Court's June 16, 2010 Order)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/01/2010)

06/25/2010

911

06/28/2010

915

06/28/2010

920

06/29/2010

916

06/30/2010

917

07/01/2010

918

07/01/2010

919

NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. correcting EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for (1 ) Relief from the Ten-Day Requirement of Local Rule 7-3; And (2) a Stay of the Court's June 16, 2010 Order EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for (1 ) Relief from the Ten-Day Requirement of Local Rule 7-3; And (2) a Stay of the Court's June 16, 2010 Order 917 Defendant Google Inc.'s Notice Of Errata Regarding The Declaration Of Andrea Pallios Roberts In Support Of Google's Ex Parte Application (Attachments: # 1 Corrected Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google's Ex Parte Application)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 07/01/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Googles Ex Parte Application for a Stay of the June 16, 2010 Order is Denied. However, the court recognizes that complete production cannot be accomplished for some time. Google shall continue to diligently collect and prepare the documents for production. For documents which do not need to await a format decision, they should be produced as soon as practicable, in a rolling fashion, as they become identified and available for production.Google shall file a detailed status report on July 31, 2010 as to its production of all documents ordered produced in the June 16th Order. The court agrees with Perfect 10 that there is no valid reason for Perfect 10 to be required to wait interminably for documents ordered produced, since they will not be the subject of a Rule 72 Motion for Review.: (sbu) (Entered: 07/02/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Google; Application to File Under Seal; [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; and Proof of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/12/2010) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Review of and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order On Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary And Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 896 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/16/2010 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. For Review of, and Objections To, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order On Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc.)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/12/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. (mat) (Entered: 07/13/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc., filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 07/14/2010)

07/02/2010

921

07/12/2010

922

07/12/2010

923

07/12/2010

925

07/12/2010

926

07/12/2010

927

ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 926 Application to Seal Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Perfect 10's Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc., filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 07/14/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, served on 7/12/10: 1) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.'s Motion for Review of and Objections to JJ Hillman's 6/16/10 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions Against Defendent Google, 2)Application to File Under Seal, 3) Proposed Order to File Under Seal, and 4) Proof of Service. (se) (Entered: 07/13/2010) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 6/28/10. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin Courthouse Services, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 8/5/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/15/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/13/2010. (Lopez, Margarita) . (Entered: 07/15/2010) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 6/28/10 (Lopez, Margarita) (Entered: 07/15/2010) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Defendants Motion for Protective Order Regarding Deposition Notice Directed to Dr. Eric Schmidt (the Motion) is GRANTED. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) 866 Motion for Protective Order (lmh) (Entered: 07/20/2010) MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court ORDERS the parties by noon tomorrow, 7/22/2010, to identify where in the existing briefs on Google's motion for safe harbor under 17 USC 512(b) (458) there is any reference in any of the "Group B spreadsheet" notices sent between May 31, 2004 and April 24, 2007 (Poovala Decl. Paragraph 41, Exhibits. L1-L48) identifying any specific material on Google's cache as infringing. (jp) (Entered: 07/21/2010) RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Incto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 931 - PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S RESPONSE TO MINUTE ORDER DATED JULY 21, 2010 REGARDING GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/22/2010) RESPONSE filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Incto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 931 Google Inc.'s Statement re Whether Perfect 10, Inc.'s Group B Notices Identified Alleged Infringing Material in Google's Cache in Response to the Court's July 21, 2010 Order (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 07/22/2010) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Margret M Caruso counsel for Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc.

07/13/2010

924

07/15/2010

928

07/15/2010

929

07/20/2010

930

07/21/2010

931

07/22/2010

932

07/22/2010

933

07/22/2010

934

Adding Margret M. Caruso as attorney as counsel of record for Google Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 07/22/2010) 07/26/2010 935 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order Denying Perfect 10, Inc.'s; Decl. of B. Love in Support of Google's Opposition and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and [Proposed] Order to Seal; Proof of Service.. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 07/26/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum on its Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order; Supp. Decl. of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google's Motion and Exhibits thereto; Google's Application and [Proposed] Order to Seal; Proof of Service.. (Zeller, Michael) (Entered: 07/26/2010) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Google's motion for partial summary judgment of entitlement to safe harbor for its Web and Image Search 456 . The Court GRANTS Google's motion for partial summary judgment for its caching feature 458 . The Court GRANTS Google's motion for partial summary judgment of entitlement to safe harbor for its Blogger feature 459 . (kbr) (Entered: 07/26/2010) SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS DIRECTED TO SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER re: MOTION to Quash Subpoena served by Perfect 10, Inc. on Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order 904 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David N. Schultz in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas Directed to Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/26/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google Inc's Opposition to Perfect 10 inc.'s Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order Denying Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions and supporting Documents, filed by Defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 07/27/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google Inc's Opposition to Perfect 10 inc.'s Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order Denying Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions and supporting Documents 939 (see attached document for further information), served on 7/26/2010. (jp) (Entered: 07/27/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google Inc's Supplemental Memorandum on its Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order, and Google's Supporting Documents filed by Defendant and Counter Claimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proof Of

07/26/2010

936

07/26/2010

937

07/26/2010

938

07/26/2010

939

07/26/2010

940

07/26/2010

941

Service)(lmh) (Entered: 07/27/2010) 07/26/2010 942 SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Bradley R. Love in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc's Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order Denying Perfect 10 Inc.'s Motionf or Evidentiary Sanctions. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8)(mat) (Entered: 07/27/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 939 Application to Seal Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order Denying Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions and Supporting documents. (kbr) (Entered: 07/27/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Google Inc.'s Opposition to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order On Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary Sanctions. (mat) (Entered: 07/27/2010) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Honorable Stephen J. Hillman at paragraph 17, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in this action (Docket No. 94), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the following documents (the "Confidential Materials") is hereby GRANTED: Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum on its Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order; Supplemental Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas. The Confidential Materials include materials that Google Inc. and/or Perfect 10, Inc. has designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential' pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court orders that the Confidential Materials be filed under seal. SO ORDERED. 941 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 07/28/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Supplemental Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas. (mat) (Entered: 07/30/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Google Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum on its Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order.(mat) (Entered: 07/30/2010) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: denying 471 Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions. (kbr) (Entered: 07/28/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz re: MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 471 , the Court DENIES without prejudice Googles Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions. (se) (Entered: 07/28/2010) MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: NOTICE OF ERRATA REGARDING ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendant Google Inc's Motions for Partial Summary Judgment as to Safe Harbor under 17 USC section 512 (document 937 ). The Court issues this order to correct the paragraph that begins at the bottom of page 27 of

07/26/2010

943

07/26/2010

944

07/26/2010

945

07/26/2010

950

07/26/2010

951

07/28/2010

946

07/28/2010

947

07/28/2010

948

the Order with "As discussed above in the section of this Order...." The reference in that paragraph to Exh. 45 was incorrect. (See attached Minute Order for further details). (jp) (Entered: 07/28/2010) 07/28/2010 949 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Review of and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order On Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary And Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 923 [PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION] filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/28/2010) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT RE: SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512(d) FOR WEB AND IMAGE SEARCH PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION Opposition to re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(d) For Web And Image Search [Public Redacted] 428 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/30/2010) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: denying 772 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See order for further details. (kbr) (Entered: 07/30/2010) STATUS REPORT Re Google's Supplemental Production in Response to the Court's June 16, 2010 Order filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 07/31/2010) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: SAFE HARBOR UNDER 17 U.S.C. §512(b) FOR ITS CACHING FEATURE - PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION Opposition to re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Google Inc.'s Entitlement to Safe Harbor Under 17 U.S.C. § 512(b) For Its Caching Feature [Public Redacted] 426 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 07/31/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of (1) Reply Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion For Review Of, And Objections To, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order On Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary And Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google, Inc.; (2) Declaration Of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support Of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion For Review Of, And Objections To, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order On Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary And Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc.; (3) Application To File Under Seal; (4) [Proposed] Order To File Under Seal; And (5) Proof Of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/02/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Review; and the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner

07/30/2010

952

07/30/2010

953

07/31/2010

954

07/31/2010

955

08/02/2010

956

08/02/2010

957

in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Review, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 08/03/2010) 08/02/2010 958 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, served on 8/2/10. (se) (Entered: 08/03/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 957 Application to Seal the Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Review; and the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Review, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 08/04/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities, in Support of Plaintiff perfect 10, Inc's Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other and Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. (mat) (Entered: 08/04/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Support of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and Other Sanctions against Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3)(mat) (Entered: 08/04/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Telephonic Hearing set for August 9, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. on the Defendants Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order. The call-in information for the telephone conference is listed below: Call-In Number: (213) 894-0800 User Access: 7002# User Password: 6051# re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Terminate Hearings, Set Deadlines/Hearings 911 (lmh) (Entered: 08/05/2010) STATEMENT of Impact of Judge Matz's July 26 and 30, 2010 Orders on MOTION to Quash Subpoena served by Perfect 10, Inc. on Ms. Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order 904 Google Inc.'s Supplemental Statement Regarding the Impact of Judge Matz's July 26 and 30, 2010 Orders on Google's Motion to Quash the Poovala Subpoenas and for a Protective Order filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Bradley R. Love in Support of Google Inc.'s Supplemental Statement and Exhibits thereto)(Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 08/05/2010) MINUTES OF Telephone Conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, For the reasons set forth in this order, defendants Motion to Quash the Subpoenas Directed to Shantal Rands Poovala and for a Protective Order (the Motion) is DENIED. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) 904 Motion to Quash Subpoena; Court Recorder: CS 8-9-10. (lmh) (Entered: 08/10/2010) MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz. On the Court's own motion, the Court hereby takes OFFCALENDAR and UNDER SUBMISSION Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Magistrate Judge Hillman's 6/16/10 Order 923 . The parties will be notified if a hearing is necessary. (kbr) (Entered: 08/13/2010)

08/02/2010

959

08/02/2010

960

08/02/2010

961

08/05/2010

962

08/05/2010

963

08/10/2010

964

08/13/2010

965

08/18/2010

966

STATEMENT of NOTICE SUBMITTING TO THE COURT GOOGLE'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PERFECT 10'S FOURTEENTH SET OF REQUESTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SUBMITTED IN CONNECTION WITH PERFECT 10'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF, AND OBJECTIONS TO, MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN'S JUNE 16, 2010 ORDER re: MOTION for Review of and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillman's June 16, 2010 Order On Perfect 10's Motion For Evidentiary And Other Sanctions Against Defendant Google Inc. re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 923 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner In Support of Notice Submitting to the Court Google's Responses and Objections to Perfect 10's Fourteenth Set of Requests for the Production of Documents)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/18/2010) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 8-9-10 3:08 p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin Courthouse Services, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 9/10/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/20/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/18/2010. (ha) (Entered: 08/20/2010) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 8-9-10 3:08 p.m. (ha) (Entered: 08/20/2010) EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objections to P10's Fourteenth Set of Requests for the Production of Documents, Submitted in Connection with P10's Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hillmans June 16, 2010 Order filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc.(Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 08/23/2010) STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Ruling by Court of Appeals filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 08/23/2010) NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Appeal of Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction 953 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 948 , Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,,,,, 937 (Appeal fee of $455 receipt number 09737419440 paid.) (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/24/2010) NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 1056316, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 as to Plantiff Perfect 10 Inc. (lr) (Entered: 08/24/2010) Google's [Proposed] Order Granting re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 966 Submitting Google's Responses and

08/20/2010

967

08/20/2010

968

08/23/2010

969

08/23/2010

970

08/24/2010

971

08/24/2010

972

08/24/2010

973

Objectio EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio 969 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 08/24/2010) 08/24/2010 974 MINUTES ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: Before the Court is Perfect 10, Inc's Motion for Review of, and Objections to, Magistrate Judge Hilman's June 16, 2010 Order on Perfect 10's Motion for Evidentiary and other Sanctions against defendant Google Inc. Perfect 10 contends that portions of the Order are clearly erroneous and contrary to law. Perfect 10's Memorandum of Points and Authorities p. 1:6. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Perfect 10's Motion 923 . (See attached Minute Order for further information). (jp) (Entered: 08/24/2010) PERFECT 10, INC.'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE PERFECT 10'S NOTICE SUBMITTING GOOGLE'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PERFECT 10'S FOURTEENTH SET OF REQUESTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Opposition to re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s purported Notice re Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related), Statement (Motion related) 966 Submitting Google's Responses and Objectio 969 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/24/2010) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Review of Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 On Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, 964 filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 10/4/2010 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala [Public Redacted], # 2 Declaration of Margret Caruso in Support of Google's Motion, # 3 Proposed Order)(Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 08/24/2010) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc of Google Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala; Google's Application and [Proposed] Order to Seal; Proof

08/24/2010

975

08/24/2010

976

08/24/2010

977

of Service. (Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 08/25/2010) 08/25/2010 978 ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES Stipulation 970 , IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: (1) Discovery and all other proceedings in the District Court in the abovecaptioned action between Perfect 10 and Google, except for those matters directly related to the appeal, are stayed until the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issues a decision on Perfect 10's appeal of the Court's 7/30/2010 Order, which incorporates by reference the Court's 7/26/2010 Order, and (2) The deadline for Google to file objections to and a motion for review of Magistrate Judge Hillmans 8/10/2010 Order is extended until fourteen (14) days after the lifting of that stay following the conclusion of Perfect 10's appeal. (jp) (Entered: 08/25/2010) SEALED DOCUMENT- Google Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of its Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10,2010 on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala. (mat) (Entered: 08/26/2010) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Google Inc.'s Memorandum in support of Its Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to shantal Rands Poovala filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 08/27/2010) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal 980 , Memorandum in suport of its Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order, Proposed Order, served on 8/25/2010. (jp) (Entered: 08/27/2010) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal Google Inc.'s Memorandum in support of Its Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 on Google Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to shantal Rands Poovala 980 . (jp) (Entered: 08/27/2010) STIPULATION to Reschedule the October 4, 2010 hearing on Google's Objections, by removing the hearing from the calendar and allowing Google to re-file the Objections after the current stay is lifted, consistent with the Court's August 25, 2010 Order (Dkt. No. 978); filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 08/30/2010) TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT PERFECT 10, INC.'S NOTICE THAT ALL TRANSCRIPTS OF DISTRICT COURT PROCEEDINGS REQUIRED FOR APPEAL HAVE ALREADY BEEN PREPARED; Court of Appeals Case Number: 10-56316; Re: 971 (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/30/2010) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The appeal filed on August 24, 2010 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. Pursuant to the notice received from appellant on August 31, 2010, it appears that the parties have made the

08/25/2010

979

08/25/2010

980

08/25/2010

981

08/25/2010

982

08/30/2010

983

08/30/2010

984

09/01/2010

985

required arrangement to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than September 21, 2010; the answering brief is due October 19, 2010 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier, and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 33(b). If appellant fails to file timely the opening brief, this appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Order received in this district on 9/01/2010. (lr) (Entered: 09/02/2010) 09/02/2010 986 ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz. ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' Stipulation 983 as follows: (1) The 10/4/2010 hearing on Google's Objections 976 is taken off the Court's calendar (vacated), and (2) Google is granted leave to re-file a motion for review of Magistrate Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order fourteen (14) days after the lifting of the current stay following the conclusion of Perfect 10's appeal, consistent with this Court's August 25, 2010 Order. (jp) (Entered: 09/02/2010) DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT AS MOOT by Judge A. Howard Matz re Ex Parte Application to Strike Perfect 10 Inc's Notice Submitting Google's Responses and Objections to Perfect 10's Fourteenth Set of Requests for the Production of Documents 969 . (jp) (Entered: 09/03/2010) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. A settlement conference will be held by telephone on November 11, 2010, at 3:30 p.m. The Circuit Mediation will initiate the call. The conference shall be attended by the lead attorney on each side and one or more client representatives for each side. Each client representative shall have full authority to negotiate and settle the case or shall have additional authority to negotiate and settle the case or shall have additional authority available by phone. Participants should be prepared to spend up to two hours in meaningful discussions about the dispute, including their interests and goals, the obstacles to settlement, the potential adverse consequences of the case not settling, and possible potential solutions to the dispute that might be acceptable to both side. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The answering brief submitted on December 14, 2010 is filed. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. This case is released from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011)

09/03/2010

987

11/05/2010

990

12/15/2010

991

12/20/2010

992

12/23/2010

993

ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The amicus brief submitted by Chilling Effects Clearinghouse Leaders on December 21, 2010 is filed. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The reply brief submitted on January 19, 2011 is filed. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. This is a preliminary injunction appeal. Appellee's motion to strike portions of appellant's excerpts of record is referred to the panel that will hear the merits of this appeal for whatever consideration the panel deems appropriate. Briefing is completed. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The previous panel has retained jurisdiction of this appeal. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) RECORD ON APPEAL sent to Circuit Court re: Appeal number, 1056316 Record consists of 12 volumes, 10 Bulky Docs: B0028, B0029, B0030, B0042, B0058, B0091, B0101, B0111, B0181. 6 transcripts. One Special Handling: SH307. re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 (lr) (Entered: 02/11/2011) APPEAL RECORD sealed documents sent to Circuit Court re: Appeal number, 10-56316. 36 documents were sent with this transmittal. Document numbers S0116, S0117, S0118, S0130, S0134, S0135, S0136, S0144, S0144, S0171, S0172, S0193, S0194, S0195, S0196, S0197, S0198, S0203, S0204, S0205, S0265, S0266, S0267, S0268, S0290, S0344, S0345, S0462, S0467, S0468, S0469, S0490, S0680, S0723, S0790, S0817, S0827. Re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 , Appeal Record Sent to USCA (A-26), Appeal Record Sent to USCA (A-26) 988 (lr) (Entered: 02/11/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The Court will hear oral argument on Monday, April 11, 2011, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2 of the Richard H. Chambers U.S. of Appeals Building in Pasadena, Ca. Each side will be allotted twenty(20) minutes to present its arguments. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. Due to the death of Judge Hall, Chief Judge Kozinski has been drawn to replace her on the panel. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of

01/21/2011

994

02/03/2011

995

02/08/2011

996

02/11/2011

988

02/11/2011

989

02/17/2011

997

03/09/2011

998

03/10/2011

999

Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The Court withdraws its order on February 17, 2011, which set oral argument in this matter for Monday, April 11, 2011, is Pasadena, California. The Court will hear oral argument on Monday, April 11, 2011, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom One of the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse in San Francisco, California. Each side will be allotted twenty (20) minutes to present its arguments. Order received in this district on 8/03/2011. (lr) (Entered: 08/04/2011) 08/03/2011 1000 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc CCA # 10-56316. Googles motion to strike portions of Perfect 10s excerpts of record, and its motion to strike Perfect 10s Further Excerpts of Record, are denied as moot. DENIED. Order received in this district on 8/3/2011. (dmap) (Entered: 08/04/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. The Petition for Rehearing and the Petition for Rehearing En Banc are Denied. Order received in this district on 9/9/11. (car) (Entered: 09/13/2011) NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Peter R. DionKindem on behalf of Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc, Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Filed by Counter Defendant Perfect 10 Inc, Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (Dion-Kindem, Peter) (Entered: 09/10/2011) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey D Goldman counsel for Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Jeffrey D. Goldman will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice.Jeffrey D. Goldman is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Goldman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/20/2011) MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 971 CCA # 10-56316. The decision of the district court is affirmed. Mandate received in this district on 09/21/2011. (dmap) (Entered: 09/26/2011) ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 971 filed by Perfect 10 Inc, CCA # 10-56316. Appellee Google, Inc.'s bill of costs is granted in part. Cost shall be taxed against appellant Perfect 10 in the amount of $1,517.60. Appellee Google, Inc.'s request for additional costs for the DVD and hard drive duplication is denied. Appellee Google, Inc. is reminded that Ninth Circuit Rule 30-1.4(x) applies to written exhibits and not electronic exhibits. A copy of this order shall serve to amend the court's prior mandate. Order received in this district on 9/27/11. (car) (Entered: 09/28/2011) APPEAL RECORD RETURNED from 9th CCA Received: Volume(s): 1 through 12; Transcripts(s): 6; Bulky Docs 28-30, 42, 58, 91, 101, 110, 111. Sealed Documents [See Document for Item numbers] RE: Appeal Record Sent to USCA (A-26), Appeal Record Sent to USCA (A-26) 988 (car) Modified on 10/3/2011 (car). (Entered: 10/03/2011) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Review of and Objections to

09/09/2011

1004

09/10/2011

1003

09/20/2011

1005

09/21/2011

1006

09/27/2011

1007

10/03/2011

1008

10/05/2011

1009

Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re 964 Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 11/7/2011 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Google's Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order, # 2 Declaration of Bradley R. Love in Support of Google's Motion, # 3 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 10/05/2011) 10/07/2011 1010 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Due to a calendar conflict on 11/7/2011, the Court hereby continues defendant Google, Inc., Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 on Google, Inc.'s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala 1009 from 11/7/2011 to 11/14/2011 at 10:00 AM. In addition, the Court sets a Status Conference to be held on 11/14/2011 10:00 AM. A joint status report must be filed by not later than 10/31/2011. (jp) (Entered: 10/07/2011) NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Margret M Caruso counsel for Defendant Google Inc. Margret M. Caruso will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice.Margret M. Caruso is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Caruso, Margret) (Entered: 10/20/2011) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Google Inc of Notice of Manual Filing. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2011) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc., MOTION to Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 11/14/2011 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion to Overrule Perfect 10, Inc.'s Objections and Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Exs. 1-5 [Public Redacted], # 3 Exhibit Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Exs. 6-8 [Public Redacted], # 4 Exhibit Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Exs. 9-12 [Public Redacted], # 5 Exhibit Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Exs. 13-15 [Public Redacted], # 6 Exhibit Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Ex. 16, Part 1[Public Redacted], # 7 Exhibit Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Ex. 16, Part 2 [Public Redacted], # 8 Exhibit Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Exs.17-18 [Public Redacted], # 9 Exhibit Declaration of Andrea Roberts' In Support of Google's Motion to Compel and Exs. 19-23 [Public Redacted], # 10 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion to Overrule and Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents)(Kassabian, Rachel) Modified on 10/25/2011 (se). (Entered: 10/24/2011)

10/20/2011

1011

10/24/2011

1012

10/24/2011

1013

10/24/2011

1014

DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO OVERRULE PERFECT 10, INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S FOURTH AND FIFTH SETS OF INTERROGATORIES AND TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. MOTION to Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents 1013 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-7, # 2 Exhibit Exhibits 810)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/24/2011) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF AND OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN'S AUGUST 10, 2010 ORDER DENYING GOOGLE'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS DIRECTED TO SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA In Opposition re: MOTION for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re 964 Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, MOTION for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re 964 Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, MOTION for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re 964 Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, 1009 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF AND OBJECTIONS TO JUDGE HILLMANS AUGUST 20, 2010 ORDER ON GOOGLES MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS TO POOVALA, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2-9, # 4 Exhibit 10-14)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 10/24/2011) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Google Incs Notice fo Motion to Overrule Perfect 10, Incs Objection & Compel Further Responses set for hearing on November 14, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. is hereby continued to November 21, 2011 at 2:00p.m. before Magistrate Judge Hillman. (lmh) (Entered: 10/26/2011) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Overrule Perfect 10, Inc's Objections and Compel Further Responses to Google's Fourth and Fifth Sets of Interrogatories and to Compel Production of Documents in Response to Requests for Production filed by Defendant Google, Inc. Google Inc. (lmh) (Entered: 10/26/2011) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to File Under Seal 1017 , Proposed Order Granting Application, Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts served on October 24, 2011. (lmh) (Entered: 10/26/2011) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedurese and Schedules of the Honorable Stephen J. Hillman at paragraph 17, and the Protective Order entered by the Court in

10/24/2011

1015

10/24/2011

1016

10/24/2011

1017

10/24/2011

1018

10/25/2011

1019

this action (Docket No. 94), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the following documents (the "Confidential Materials") is hereby GRANTED: Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Overrule Perfect 10, Inc's Objections and Compel Further Responses to Google's Fourth and Fifth Sets of Interrogatories and to Compel Production of Documents in Response to Requests for Production. The Confidential Materials include materials that Perfect 10, Inc. or third parties have designated "Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court orders that the Confidential Materials be filed under seal. 1017 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 10/26/2011) 10/25/2011 1020 SEALED DOCUMENT- Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Support of Google In.c's Motion to Overrule Perfect 10, Inc.'s Objections and Compel Further Responses to Google's Fourth and Fifth Sets of Interrogatories and to Comple Production of Documents in Response to Requests for Production. (Attachments: Part 2, # Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7)(mat) (Entered: 10/31/2011) REPLY Memorandum in Support of MOTION for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re 964 Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, MOTION for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re 964 Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, MOTION for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala re 964 Order on Motion to Quash Subpoena, Telephone Conference,, 1009 filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 10/31/2011) STATUS REPORT of Perfect 10, Inc. and Google Inc. in Response to the Court's October 7, 2011 Order Setting a Scheduling Conference for November 14, 2011 [Dkt. No. 1010] filed by Defendant Google Inc, Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 10/31/2011) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Procedures and Schedules of the Honorable Stephen J. Hillman at Paragraph 17, and the Protective Order dated December 27, 2005 (Docket No. 94) entered by the Court, Perfect 10, Inc.'s application to file under seal the following document (the "Confidential Materials") is hereby GRANTED: 1. Plaintiff's Perfect 10, Inc.'s exhibits for the January 15, 2010 hearing regarding Perfect 10's Motion for Sanctions and Perfect 10's and Google's Motion for Preservation Order. The Confidential Materials include materials that Perfect 10, Inc., Google Inc., and/or third parties have designated "Confidential" and/or "Highly Confidential" pursuant to the Protective Order. Accordingly, the Court orders that the Confidential Materials be filed under seal. 740 Application for Leave (NUNC PRO TUNC 1-19-10) (lmh) (Entered: 11/04/2011) SEALED DOCUMENT- Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s EXHIBITS for the January 15, 2010 Hearing Regarding Perfect 10's Motion for Sanctions and Perfect 10's and Google's Motions for Preservation Order.

10/31/2011

1021

10/31/2011

1022

11/02/2011

1023

11/02/2011

1026

(Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4)(mat) (Entered: 11/15/2011) 11/07/2011 1024 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. MOTION to Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents 1013 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Jeffrey Atteberry)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 11/07/2011) MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge A. Howard Matz: For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant Google's Motion for Review of and Objections to Magistrate Judge Hillman's 10/10/2010 Order on Google's Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala 1009 is DENIED. The Court orders the parties to meet and confer and propose a joint schedule for future deadlines. They shall file the proposed joint schedule by not later than 11/28/2011. Each party must file with the Court the name of a proposed special master for discovery disputes no later than 11/25/2011. The parties must also select a private mediator and notify the Court of whom they selected by 12/12/2011. Perfect 10 must file a list of all of the copyrights and notices of infringement they intend to assert in this action by 12/31/2011. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp) (Entered: 11/15/2011) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 11/14/11 11:00 am. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg, www.cindynirenberg.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the COURT REPORTER or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/9/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/19/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/16/2012. (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 11/18/2011) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 11/14/11 11:00 am (Nirenberg, Cindy) (Entered: 11/18/2011) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Case called. Counsel enter their appearances and Dr. Norman Zada. Court and Counsel confer. Court grants the Motion to Compel and overrule objections except as to privilege. Counsel shall submit a proposed order as to the courts ruling. Court Recorder: CS 11-21-11. (lmh) (Entered: 11/22/2011) COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 11/21/2011 to 11/21/2011 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Order for:. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Discovery Motion hearing. FEE PAID. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/22/2011) TRANSCRIPT ORDER for date of proceedings 11/21/2011 to 11/21/2011 as to Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc Court Reporter Margaret Babykin. Order for: Jeffrey Mausner. Transcript portion requested: PreTrial Proceeding: Discovery Motion hearing. Category: Ordinary. Ordinary Transcript Order due by 12/22/2011. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/22/2011) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed

11/14/2011

1025

11/18/2011

1027

11/18/2011

1028

11/21/2011

1030

11/22/2011

1029

11/22/2011

1031

11/22/2011

Documents RE: Transcript Order Form (AO-435) 1031 . The following error(s) was found: Other Form AO435 Transcript Order Form must be amended to address the Incorrect Court Reporter/ Recorder selected. Please choose the Courtsmart option for digitally recorded proceedings. Transcript deadline terminated. You must electronically refile the above referenced Request for Transcript in this case to correct this deficiency. (mw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/22/2011) 11/22/2011 1032 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for date of proceedings 11/21/2011 to 11/21/2011 as to defendant Google Inc Court Smart (CS). Order for: Google Inc.. Transcript portion requested: Pre-Trial Proceeding: Discovery Motion Hearing. Category: Expedited. 7 Day Expedited Transcript Order due by 11/29/2011. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 11/22/2011) Joint Proposal Regarding Discovery Master filed by Defendant Google Inc (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 11/23/2011) NOTICE OF LODGING filed Notice of Lodging of (Proposed) Order re Motion Hearing, 1030 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 11/25/2011) NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. NOTICE OF LODGING OF PROPOSED ORDER (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING IN PART GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO OVERRULE PERFECT 10, INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S FOURTH AND FIFTH SETS OF INTERROGATORIES AND TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/28/2011) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 12/19/2011 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google's Requests for Admission, Third Set)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 11/28/2011) JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set 1036 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 11/28/2011) DECLARATION of Andrea Pallios Roberts In Support of MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set 1036 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B (Part 1), # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B (Part 2), # 4 Exhibit Exhibits C-K)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 11/28/2011) DECLARATION of David N. Schultz IN OPPOSITION TO

11/23/2011

1033

11/25/2011

1034

11/28/2011

1035

11/28/2011

1036

11/28/2011

1037

11/28/2011

1038

11/28/2011

1039

DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC.'S MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S RESPONSES TO GOOGLE'S THIRD SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set 1036 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/28/2011) 11/28/2011 1040 PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL SCHEDULE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc re: Order on Motion for Review of Discovery Matter, Status Conference,,,,,, 1025 (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/28/2011) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Granting in part 1013 Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories; Granting in part 1013 Motion to Compel (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh) (Entered: 11/30/2011) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 11-21-11 2:42 p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Babykin Courthouse Services, phone number (626) 963-0566. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 12/22/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/1/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/29/2012. (ha) (Entered: 12/01/2011) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 11-21-11 2:42 p.m. (ha) (Entered: 12/01/2011) RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set 1036 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 12/05/2011) DECLARATION of Andrea Pallios Roberts in support of MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set 1036 Supplemental Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 12/05/2011) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Joint Pretrial Schedule 1040 : Non-expert Discovery cut-off 5/1/2012; Motions to be filed by 7/19/2012; Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/21/2012; Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/14/2013 at 11:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz; Jury Trial set for 1/28/13 at 9:00 am.(se) (Entered: 12/09/2011) NOTICE Joint Proposal Regarding Mediator filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 12/12/2011) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Google Incs Motion to determine the sufficiency of Perfect 10,

11/29/2011

1041

12/01/2011

1042

12/01/2011

1043

12/05/2011

1044

12/05/2011

1045

12/09/2011

1046

12/12/2011

1047

12/13/2011

1048

Incs and Request for admission third, set for hearing on December 19, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. is hereby taken under submission. re: MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set 1036 . (lmh) (Entered: 12/13/2011) 12/20/2011 1049 Joint STIPULATION for Order re Dismissal of Certain Claims filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(DionKindem, Peter) (Entered: 12/20/2011) ORDER ON STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS 1049 by Judge A. Howard Matz the following claims with prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorney's fees and costs as to such dismissed claims (and only as to such dismissed claims) see attached Order for further details. (jp) (Entered: 12/27/2011) LIST OF NOTICES OF INFRINGEMENT THAT PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. INTENDS TO ASSERT IN THIS ACTION filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 14, 2011 re: Order on Motion for Review of Discovery Matter, Status Conference,,,,,, 1025 (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/30/2011) LIST OF COPYRIGHTS THAT PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. INTENDS TO ASSERT IN THIS ACTION filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 14, 2011 re: Order on Motion for Review of Discovery Matter, Status Conference,,,,,, 1025 (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/30/2011) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Exhibit 2 To The List Of Notices of Infringement That Plaintiff Perfect 10 Intends To Assert In This Action; Hard Drive Accompanying The List Of Notices Of Infringement And List Of Copyrights That Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. Intends To Assert In This Action; Application & [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; Proof of Service; and Notice of Lodging. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/30/2011) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Admissions of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiencey of Perfect 10, Inc.'s Responses to Google Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Third Set 1036 Supplemental Statement Regarding Google's Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10's Responses to Google's Requests for Admission, Third Set filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Amended Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 12/30/2011) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, This matter is before the Court on Defendant Google Inc.s (Google) Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Perfect 10, Incs (Perfect 10) Responses to Googles Requests for Admission, Third Set. Having reviewed the parties submissions, having considered the parties arguments thereon, and finding good cause therefor, Googles motion is hereby GRANTED. 1036 Motion for Admissions (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lmh) (Entered: 01/03/2012) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, The court declines plaintiffs request for a discovery dispute

12/22/2011

1050

12/30/2011

1051

12/30/2011

1052

12/30/2011

1053

12/30/2011

1054

01/03/2012

1055

01/03/2012

1056

conference, primarily because the parties have not jointly requested one. The court is willing to have one or more jointly requested telephonic discovery hearings, without briefing, if issues become fully ripe and fully comprehensible to the court without the necessity of briefing. Otherwise, the usual meet and confer/joint stipulation procedures shall control. Until such time as Judge Matz may decide to appoint a discovery master, the magistrate judge remains available to resolve all discovery disputes. (lmh) (Entered: 01/03/2012) 01/03/2012 1057 APPLICATION to File Documents Under Seal the following (1) Exhibit 2 to the List of Notices of Infringement. (2) Hard Drive Accompanying the List of Notices of Infringement and List of Copyrights filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp) (Entered: 01/05/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re APPLICATION to File Document Under Seal 1057 served on 12/30/2011. (jp) (Entered: 01/05/2012) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz granting Application to File Under Seal the following documents: (1) Exhibit 2 to the List of Notices of Infringement. (2) Hard Drive Accompanying the List of Notices of Infringement and List of Copyrights 1057 . (jp) (Entered: 01/05/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- EXHIBIT 2 to the List of Notices of Infringement that Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. Intends to Assert in this Action. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4)(mat) (Entered: 01/06/2012) REQUEST FOR RULING re MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/05/2012) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Enforce Court Orders filed by defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 2/13/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Bradley R. Love In Support of Google's Motion to Enforce and For Sanctions, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/12/2012) EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to 1/23/2012 for Docket No. 1062, Google's Motion to Enforce and for Sanctions filed by defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Bradley R. Love, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/13/2012) OPPOSITION to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE'S REQUEST FOR A RULING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3 AND 11 - RESPONSE TO DOCKET NO. 1060 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/13/2012) DECLARATION of Dr. Norman Zada in opposition to MOTION to

01/03/2012

1058

01/03/2012

1059

01/03/2012

1061

01/05/2012

1060

01/12/2012

1062

01/13/2012

1063

01/13/2012

1064

01/13/2012

1065

Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE'S REQUEST FOR A RULING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3 AND 11 - RESPONSE TO DOCKET NO. 1060 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/13/2012) 01/13/2012 1066 DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in opposition to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE'S REQUEST FOR A RULING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3 AND 11 - RESPONSE TO DOCKET NO. 1060 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/13/2012) DECLARATION of Melanie Poblete in opposition to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. Google Inc.'s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 336 DECLARATION OF MELANIE POBLETE IN SUPPORT OF PERFECT 10'S RESPONSE TO GOOGLE'S REQUEST FOR A RULING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3 AND 11 - RESPONSE TO DOCKET NO. 1060 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/13/2012) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10 INC.'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN THE TIME FOR HEARING GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS in opposition to re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to 1/23/2012 for Docket No. 1062, Google's Motion to Enforce and for Sanctions 1063 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/15/2012) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to 1/23/2012 for Docket No. 1062, Google's Motion to Enforce and for Sanctions 1063 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/15/2012) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz DENIED Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for Hearing 1063 . If necessary date scheduled for 30(b)(6) defendant can be adjusted. Regular briefing schedule necessary. (jp) (Entered: 01/18/2012) REPLY In Support Of Google's Request for a Ruling on its Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3 and 11 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/18/2012) MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION to Enforce Court Orders 1062 PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE

01/13/2012

1067

01/15/2012

1068

01/15/2012

1069

01/17/2012

1070

01/18/2012

1071

01/23/2012

1072

INC.'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS, REDACTED filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/23/2012) 01/23/2012 1073 DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS re MOTION to Enforce Court Orders 1062 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 2-9, # 2 Exhibit 10-15, # 3 Exhibit 16-20)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/23/2012) DECLARATION of MELANIE POBLETE IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS re MOTION to Enforce Court Orders 1062 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/23/2012) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS, REDACTED re MOTION to Enforce Court Orders 1062 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/23/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS, UNREDACTED; DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS, UNREDACTED; EXHIBIT 1 (A DISK) TO THE DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS; APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; NOTICE OF LODGING; and PROOF OF SERVICE.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/23/2012) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Perfect 10's Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce; Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce; and Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (kbr) (Entered: 01/24/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING of Perfect 10's Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce; Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce; Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce; and Proposed Order, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 01/24/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Notice of Lodging, 1079 , APPLICATION to Seal 1078 served on 1/23/12. (kbr) (Entered: 01/24/2012) ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL by Judge A. Howard

01/23/2012

1074

01/23/2012

1075

01/23/2012

1076

01/23/2012

1078

01/23/2012

1079

01/23/2012

1080

01/23/2012

1081

Matz: granting 1078 Application to Seal. (kbr) (Entered: 01/24/2012) 01/23/2012 1082 SEALED DOCUMENT- PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorites in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR Alleged VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS. (mat) (Entered: 01/26/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Google's MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S VIOLATIONOF THE COURT'S ORDERS, UNREDACTED. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6)(mat) (Entered: 01/26/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- EXHIBIT 1 (A DISK) to the Declaration of Dr. Norman Zada in Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce and for Sanctions for Alleged Violations of the Court's Orders. (mat) (Entered: 01/26/2012) MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Judge Matz and Magistrate Judge Hillman have determined that Judge Matz will rule on Googles Motion to Enforce and for Sanctions, prior to Magistrate Judge Hillman ruling on Googles Request for Ruling on Interrogatires 3 and 11. (sbu) (Entered: 01/24/2012) REPLY in support of MOTION to Enforce Court Orders 1062 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 01/30/2012) NOTICE OF FILING OF FURTHER UNREDACTED VERSIONS OF OPPOSITION DOCUMENTS in opposition to re: MOTION to Enforce Court Orders 1062 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS -FURTHER UN-REDACTED VERSION FOLLOWING GOOGLE'S PARTIAL DECLASSIFICATION OF DEPOSITION OF SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA, # 2 Declaration DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE COURT'S ORDERS -- FURTHER UN-REDACTED VERSION FOLLOWING GOOGLE'S PARTIAL DECLASSIFICATION OF DEPOSITION OF SHANTAL RANDS POOVALA)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 01/31/2012) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The MOTION to Enforce Court Orders 1062 previously scheduled for 02/13/12 at 10:00 AM has been continued to 2/13/2012 at 03:00 PM before Judge A. Howard Matz. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(smo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 02/10/2012) 1087 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Bradley R. Love on behalf of Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc. Filed by Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc (Love, Bradley)

01/23/2012

1083

01/23/2012

1084

01/24/2012

1077

01/30/2012

1085

01/31/2012

1086

02/10/2012

02/10/2012

(Entered: 02/10/2012) 02/10/2012 1088 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bradley Robert Love on behalf of Counter Claimant Google Inc, Defendant Google Inc (Love, Bradley) (Entered: 02/10/2012) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 3/5/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AD FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/12/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of JOINT STIPULATION ON MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, Application & [Proposed] Order to File Under Seal; Notice of Lodging; and Proof of Service. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/12/2012) DECLARATION of DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION to Compel PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS 1089 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/12/2012) DECLARATION of DAVID N. SCHULTZ In Support Of MOTION to Compel PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS 1089 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/12/2012) EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for To Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order and for an Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Issue filed by defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Jeffrey Atteberry, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/12/2012) OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for To Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order and for an Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Issue 1093 PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10 INC.'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO ENFORCE THE COURT'S OCTOBER 6, 2009 ORDER AND OSC RE SANCTIONS; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

02/12/2012

1089

02/12/2012

1090

02/12/2012

1091

02/12/2012

1092

02/12/2012

1093

02/13/2012

1094

AGAINST GOOGLE INC. AND QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/13/2012) 02/13/2012 1095 Amendment to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for To Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order and for an Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Issue 1093 Google Inc.'s Amended Ex Parte Application for Order to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order and for an Order to Show Cause Why Sanctions Should Not Issue filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Jeffrey Atteberry, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/13/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: denied on the basis that Perfect 10, without qualification, asserts it has completely complied with the [subject] Order, and has repeatedly advised Google that it has and will comply with the Order. 1093 Ex Parte Application for Order. Moreover, the Court is in no position to meaningfully test P10's assertion on a sameday emergency basis, nor to determine exactly what Mr. Hersh [and P10's counsel]reasonably expect to refer to in order to prepare for his deposition. Sanctions are denied. (sbu) (Entered: 02/13/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Google Inc of Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Opposition to Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.'s Motion to Overrule Google Inc.'s Objections and Compel Production of Documents; Google Inc.'s Application to File Roberts Declaration Under Seal; [Proposed] Order Granting Google's Application to File the Roberts Declaration Under Seal; Proof of Service. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/13/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING JOINT STIPULATION ON MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE OBJECTIONS filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (sbu) (Entered: 02/14/2012) APPLICATION to Seal Joint Stipulation on Motion of plaintiff to overrule defendant Google Objections filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged LODGED PROPOSED ORDER. (sbu) (Entered: 02/14/2012) APPLICATION to Seal Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in opposition to Motion of Plaintiff to overrule defendant Google objections filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged LODGED PROPOSED ORDER. (sbu) (Entered: 02/14/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to Seal 1100 served on 2/13/2012. (sbu) (Entered: 02/14/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re APPLICATION to Seal 1099 , Notice of Lodging 1098 served on 2/10/2012. (sbu) (Entered: 02/14/2012) MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge A. Howard Matz, denying Motion to Enforce 1062 . Court grants the parties' oral request to extend the deadline for Dr. Zada's deposition together with the deadline to file a motion to compel flowing from his deposition. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (kbr) (Entered: 02/14/2012)

02/13/2012

1096

02/13/2012

1097

02/13/2012

1098

02/13/2012

1099

02/13/2012

1100

02/13/2012

1101

02/13/2012

1102

02/13/2012

1103

02/13/2012

1105

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting 1099 Application to Seal Joint Stipulation on Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10 to overrule defendant Google Inc Objections and compel productions of documents (sbu) (Entered: 02/15/2012) JOINT STIPULATION on MOTION of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. to OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS and Compel PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. (Attachments: Part 2)(mat) (Entered: 02/16/2012) MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES Google's Motion to Enforce and for Sanctions. (See attached Minutes Order for further details). Accordingly, Perfect 10 must comply with this Court's instructions in Section III.B by no later than 3/26/2012. The Court therefore orders Google to refrain from unwarranted or disruptive motion practice until 3/26/2012. The Court also notes that this Order may moot the determination of Google's motion to compel currently pending before Judge Hillman. Google is ordered towithdraw that motion, but it will be permitted to file a different motion if necessary and if not inconsistent with this Order. (jp) (Entered: 02/15/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting 1100 Application to Seal the Declaration of Andrea Pallios Roberts in opposition to Motion of Plaintiff to overrule defendant objections and compel productions of documents in response to Perfect 10's tenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth request for productions of documents. (sbu) (Entered: 02/16/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Andrea Pallios Roberts in Opposition to Motion OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. to OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. (mat) (Entered: 02/21/2012) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS 1089 Supplemental Memorandum in Opposition to Motion of Perfect 10 to Overrule Google's Objections and Compel the Production of Documents in Response to Perfect 10's Tenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Requests for Production of Documents filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/20/2012) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS 1089 Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. to Overrule Defendant Google Inc.'s Objections and Compel Production of Documents in Response to Perfect

02/13/2012

1107

02/14/2012

1104

02/15/2012

1106

02/15/2012

1110

02/20/2012

1108

02/20/2012

1109

10's Tenth, Fourteenth, And Fifteenth Requests For Production Of Documents filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/20/2012) 02/22/2012 1111 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS):Joint Stipulation on Motion of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc., to Overrule Defendant Google Incs Objections and Compel Production ofDocuments in Response to Perfect 10's Tenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Request for Production of Documents by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: The above Motion has been taken under submission without oral argument. Thecourt now rules as follows: Requests 342-351 and 354-356: Partially granted and partially denied 1089 The motion is granted limited to those allegedly infringing URLs which survived summary judgment and/or have not been subject to a motion for summary judgment. Requests 416-420: Denied. Judge Matz has already ruled that Google has a reasonably implemented repeat infringer policy.Requests 434-443: Denied for the same reasons as Requests 416-420. Requests 454-470: Denied as overly broad and irrelevant to the remaining claimsin this case. Requests 471,473, 475,477 and 479: Partially granted and partially denied as irrelevant. The motion is granted to the extent that Google has already agreed to produce documents (see Joint Stipulation at p. 63, line 25 through p.64, line 2). Requests 481-483: Denied as irrelevant to the remaining claims in this case, as well as being overly broad. (sbu) (Entered: 02/22/2012) TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2012 3:30 p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: CINDY L. NIRENBERG, www.cindynirenberg.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/14/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/24/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/22/2012. (dc) (Entered: 02/22/2012) NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings MONDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 2012 3:30 p.m (dc) (Entered: 02/22/2012) EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 1104 EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; REQUEST THAT THIS COURT RECUSE ITSELF FROM THIS CASE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER, # 2 Proposed Order GRANTING REQUEST OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. THAT THIS COURT

02/22/2012

1112

02/22/2012

1113

02/23/2012

1114

RECUSE ITSELF FROM THIS CASE, # 3 Declaration OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; REQUEST THAT THIS COURT RECUSE ITSELF FROM THIS CASE, # 4 Declaration OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; REQUEST THAT THIS COURT RECUSE ITSELF FROM THIS CASE)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/23/2012) 02/24/2012 1115 JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS 1089 JOINT STIPULATION ON MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO OVERRULE DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PERFECT 10'S TENTH, FOURTEENTH, AND FIFTEENTH REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, REDACTED Publicly Filed Version filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/24/2012) MEMORANDUM in Opposition to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 1104 EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 1104 EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 1104 EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 1104 EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 1104 EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MODIFICATION OF THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; 1114 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Roberts Declaration In Support of Google's Opposition to Perfect 10's Ex Parte Application for Reconsideration and Recusal)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 02/24/2012) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz. The Court DENIES Perfect 10's "Ex Parte Application... for Reconsideration and Modification of this Courts February 14, 2012 Order" and DENIES Perfect 10's "Request That This Court Recuse Itself from This Case." 1114 . Neither the Application nor the Request has any merit. (kbr)

02/24/2012

1116

02/28/2012

1117

(Entered: 02/28/2012) 03/13/2012 1118 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions [Public Redacted] filed by defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 4/16/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration [Public Redacted] Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/13/2012) EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to March 26, 2012 for Google's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions filed by defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/13/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Google Inc of Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositons; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/14/2012) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10 INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS IN OPPOSITION TO re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to March 26, 2012 for Google's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 1119 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS, # 2 Declaration OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/14/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- GOOGLE INC'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Leave to take Additional Depositions; Memorandum of Points and Authorities. (mat) Modified on 3/19/2012 (mat). (Entered: 03/19/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s MOTION for Leave to take Additional Depositions. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3)(mat) (Entered: 03/19/2012) APPLICATION to Seal Google Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions and the Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (kbr) (Entered: 03/20/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to Seal Documents 1125 ; Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions; Declaration fo Rachel Herrick Kassabian; and Proposed Order served on March 13, 2012. (kbr) (Entered: 03/20/2012)

03/13/2012

1119

03/14/2012

1120

03/14/2012

1121

03/14/2012

1123

03/14/2012

1124

03/14/2012

1125

03/14/2012

1126

03/14/2012

1127

ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting Application to Seal 1125 . (kbr) (Entered: 03/20/2012) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: denying 1119 Defendant Google Inc.'s Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for Hearing its Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions. (kbr) (Entered: 03/16/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of External Drive Containing Perfect 10's DMCA Notice Binder And Perfect 10's Chart, As Ordered On February 14, 2012, Regarding DMCA Notice Number, Copyrighted Image, Model Database Location, And Alleged Infringement, As Well As Additional Information And Materials Requested By Google; Proof of Service; Application to File Documents Under Seal; [Proposed] Order to File Documents Under Seal; Notice of Lodging. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2012) PERFECT 10'S EXPLANATION OF THE SPREADSHEETS AND THE HARD DRIVE IT IS FILING ON MARCH 26, 2012 IN RESPONSE TO THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, 1104 (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2012) Notice of Withdrawal of Joint Stipulation re Discovery Motion,, 337 , Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories, 336 , Motion Related Document, 1060 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/26/2012) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10 INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS IN OPPOSITION TO re: MOTION for Leave 1123 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration OF DR. NORMAN ZADA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS, # 2 Declaration OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE ADDITIONAL DEPOSITIONS)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2012) NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. correcting Miscellaneous Document, 1129 ERRATA TO PERFECT 10'S EXPLANATION OF THE SPREADSHEETS AND THE HARD DRIVE IT IS FILING ON MARCH 26, 2012 IN RESPONSE TO THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2012) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. filed by Defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 4/16/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Joint Stipulation, # 2 Declaration of Rachel Kassabian Part One, # 3 Declaration of Rachel Kassabian Part Two, # 4 Declaration of Rachel Kassabian Part Three, # 5 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/26/2012) DECLARATION of JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. 1133 DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO

03/16/2012

1122

03/26/2012

1128

03/26/2012

1129

03/26/2012

1130

03/26/2012

1131

03/26/2012

1132

03/26/2012

1133

03/26/2012

1134

DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3, 4, 11, 13 AND 14 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/26/2012) 03/26/2012 1135 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to April 2, 2012 on Google's Motion to Compel filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jeffrey A. Atteberry, # 2 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/26/2012) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the External Drive, filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (kbr) (Entered: 03/29/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re APPLICATION to Seal 1140 served on 3/25/12. (kbr) (Entered: 03/29/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING External Drive and Proposed Order to File Documents Under Seal filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (kbr) (Entered: 03/29/2012) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3, 4, 11, 13 AND 14 In Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to April 2, 2012 on Google's Motion to Compel 1135 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for Hearing on Motion to Overrule Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Objections and Compel Further Responses to Interrogatory Nos. 3, 4, 11, 13 and 14)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/27/2012) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: denying 1135 Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for Hearing on Discovery Motions (sbu) (Entered: 03/28/2012) REPLY in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing to April 2, 2012 on Google's Motion to Compel 1135 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Kassabian)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/28/2012) REQUEST to Substitute attorney Natalie H. Locke (who will become counsel of record effective immediately) in place of attorney Jeffrey N. Mausner (whose withdrawal from the case will be effective May 2, 2012) filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Request set for hearing on 4/16/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge A. Howard Matz. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/28/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- EXTERNAL DRIVE Containing Perfect 10's DMCA Notice Binder and Perfect 10's Chart, as Ordered on February 14, 2012, Regarding DMCA Notice Number, Copyrighted Image, Model

03/26/2012

1140

03/26/2012

1141

03/26/2012

1142

03/27/2012

1136

03/28/2012

1137

03/28/2012

1138

03/28/2012

1139

03/28/2012

1143

Database Location, and Alleged Infringement, as Well as Additional Information and Materials Requested by Google. (mat) (Entered: 03/29/2012) 03/28/2012 1151 ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING Application to File Document Under Seal 1140 . (jp) (Entered: 04/03/2012) ORDER by Judge A. Howard Matz: granting 1139 Request to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Natalie H Locke for Perfect 10 Inc. in place and stead of Jeffrey N. Mausner (Jeffrey N. Mausner remains attorney of record until May 2, 2012). (kbr) (Entered: 03/29/2012) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Admissions of DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S RESPONSES TO PERFECT 10, INC.'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SETS: CORRECTED FIRST, SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Motion set for hearing on 4/23/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Declaration OF DAVID N. SCHULTZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S RESPONSES TO PERFECT 10, INC.'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SETS: CORRECTED FIRST, SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH, # 3 Exhibit 1-5 TO THE SCHULTZ DECLARATION, # 4 Exhibit 6-7 TO THE SCHULTZ DECLARATION, # 5 Exhibit 8A TO THE SCHULTZ DECLARATION, # 6 Exhibit 8B TO THE SCHULTZ DECLARATION, # 7 Exhibit 9-14 TO THE SCHULTZ DECLARATION)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/30/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Joint Stipulation re Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Google Inc.'s Responses to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets: Corrected First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth, Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order; Proof of Service; Application to File Documents Under Seal; [Proposed] Order to File Documents Under Seal; and Notice of Lodging. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 03/30/2012) DECLARATION of Bradley Love in support of Google Inc's portion of Joint Stipulation regarding MOTION for Admissions of DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S RESPONSES TO PERFECT 10, INC.'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SETS: CORRECTED FIRS 1145 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 03/30/2012) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. 1133 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/02/2012) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. 1133 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF

03/29/2012

1144

03/30/2012

1145

03/30/2012

1146

03/30/2012

1147

04/02/2012

1148

04/02/2012

1149

PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3, 4, 11, 13 AND 14 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF JEFFREY N. MAUSNER IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORY NOS. 3, 4, 11, 13 AND 14)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/02/2012) 04/02/2012 1150 REPLY in support MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions [Public Redacted] MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions [Public Redacted] 1118 , MOTION for Leave 1123 to Take Additional Depositions filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/03/2012) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Joint Stipulation re Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Google Inc.'s Responses to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets: Corrected First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth, Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Lodged Proposed Order) (lmh) (Entered: 04/03/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Protective Order in this matter, Docket No. 94, the following document, which has been lodged with this Court, shall be filed under seal: Joint Stipulation re Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Google Inc.'s Responses to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets: Corrected First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth, Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order. 1152 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 04/03/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING of Joint Stipulation re Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Google Inc.'s Responses to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets: Corrected First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth, Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (lmh) (Entered: 04/03/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Notice of Lodging, 1154 , APPLICATION to Seal 1152 , Proposed Order and Joint Stipulation re Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Google Inc.'s Responses to Perfect 10, Inc.'s Requests for Admission, Sets: Corrected First, Second, Third, Fourth and Fifth, Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order served on March 30, 2012. (lmh) (Entered: 04/03/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- JOINT STIPULATION Re: PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF GOOGLE INC.S RESPONSES TO PERFECT 10, INC.S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SETS: CORRECTED FIRST, SECOND, THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7)(mat) (Entered: 04/10/2012)

04/02/2012

1152

04/02/2012

1153

04/02/2012

1154

04/02/2012

1155

04/02/2012

1167

04/04/2012

1156

***THIS DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO RESPONSE BY THE COURT, DOCUMENT NUMBER 1158 *** AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Amendment to Notice of Lodging,, 303 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order Re Second Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit Stipulation Re Dismissal of Certain Claims, # 3 Exhibit Order Re Dismissal of Certain Claims)(Mausner, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/5/2012 (jp). (Entered: 04/04/2012) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions [Public Redacted] and MOTION for Leave to Take Additional Depositions [sealed][1118 and 1123] previously scheduled for 4/16/12 at 10:00 am have been rescheduled. The Motions are now set for hearing on 4/16/2012 at 2:00 PM before Judge A. Howard Matz. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(smo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/04/2012)

04/04/2012

04/04/2012

1157

NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Document [SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT] 1156 . The following error(s) was found: All initialing documents (such as SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT) must be filed at Civil Intake Window, Pursuant to General Order 10-07, page 19 section C; After 24 hours, you must submit conformed copy of "Second Amended Complaint" is made by email to the Civil Intake mailbox. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (jp) (Entered: 04/04/2012) RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk of Court to Judge A. Howard Martz: In accordance with the Notice to Filer Of Deficiencies In Electronically Filed Documents REGARDING: Amended Document 1156 . The document is STRICKEN and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document at your earliest convenience. All initialing documents (such as SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT) must be filed at Civil Intake Window, Pursuant to General Order 10-07, page 19 section C. Please note the amended document appears to be a copy of the Second Amended Complaint lodged on June 12, 2008. (jp) (Entered: 04/05/2012) REQUEST to Vacate Request to Lift the Court's February 11, 2010 Order filed by defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Kassabian Declaration)(Hauler, Bridget) (Entered: 04/06/2012) OPPOSITION to REQUEST to Vacate Request to Lift the Court's February 11, 2010 Order 1159 PERFECT 10'S OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE'S REQUEST TO LIFT THE COURT'S FEBRUARY 11, 2010 STAY OF ITS ORDER REQUIRING PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE THE CONFIDENTIAL MICROSOFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO GOOGLE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2012) TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman re:

04/05/2012

1158

04/06/2012

1159

04/09/2012

1160

04/09/2012

MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. 1133 previously scheduled for April 16, 2012 2:00 p.m. has been rescheduled. Motion set for hearing on 4/16/2012 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lmh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/09/2012) 04/09/2012 1161 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Documents, and Motion to Compel Production of Documents Re Previously-Deferred Requests, Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order; Proof of Service; Application to File Documents Under Seal; Notice of Lodging; [Proposed] Order. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2012) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Production of Documents Previously Ordered and Responsive to Previously-Deferred Requests filed by defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/09/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Google Inc of Joint Stipulation on Google's Motion to Enfoce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Documents and Motion to Compel Production of Documents Regarding PreviouslyDeferred Requests; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/09/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION to Compel Production of Documents Previously Ordered and Responsive to Previously-Deferred Requests 1162 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/09/2012) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Production of Documents Previously Ordered and Responsive to Previously-Deferred Requests [Public Redacted] filed by defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian [Public Redacted])(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/09/2012) SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Admissions of DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC. TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S RESPONSES TO PERFECT 10, INC.'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SETS: CORRECTED FIRS 1145 Supplemental Memorandum in Support Of Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.'s Motion To Determine The Sufficiency Of Defendant Google Inc.'s Responses To Perfect 10, Inc.'s Requests For Admission, Sets: Corrected First, Second, Third, Fourth And Fifth filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF DAVID N. SCHULTZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S MOTION TO DETERMINE THE SUFFICIENCY OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.'S RESPONSES TO PERFECT 10, INC.'S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SETS: CORRECTED FIRST, SECOND,

04/09/2012

1162

04/09/2012

1163

04/09/2012

1164

04/09/2012

1165

04/09/2012

1166

THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH)(Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/09/2012) 04/09/2012 1168 APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Documents, and Motion to Compel Production of Documents regarding previously-deferred Requests, filed under seal pursuant to Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (lmh) (Entered: 04/10/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Documents, and Motion to Compel Production of Documents regarding previouslydeferred Requests, filed under seal pursuant to Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc (lmh) (Entered: 04/10/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re Notice of Lodging, 1169 , APPLICATION to Seal 1168 , Declaration of Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Documents, and Motion to Compel Production of Documents regarding previously-deferred Requests, filed under seal pursuant to Protective Order and Proposed Order served on April 9, 2012. (lmh) (Entered: 04/10/2012) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2099 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Document and Motion to Compel Production of Documents regarding previously-deferred Requests; Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian filed by Defendant Google Inc. (lmh) (Entered: 04/10/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to Seal 1171 , Joint Stipulation on Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2099 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Document and Motion to Compel Production of Documents regarding previously-deferred Requests, Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian is Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2099 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Document and Motion to Compel Production of Documents regarding previously-deferred Requests and Proposed Order served on April 9, 2012. (lmh) (Entered: 04/10/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting 1168 Application to Seal Declaration of Jeffrey Mausner in opposition to Google's Motion to Enforce, (sbu) (Entered: 04/12/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting 1171 Application to Seal (1) Joint Stipulation on Google Motion to Enforce the court's October 6, 2009 order (2) Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in support of Google's Motion to Enforce (sbu) (Entered: 04/12/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Jeffrey N. Mausner in

04/09/2012

1169

04/09/2012

1170

04/09/2012

1171

04/09/2012

1172

04/10/2012

1177

04/10/2012

1178

04/10/2012

1191

Opposition to Defendant Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Documents, and Motion to Compel Production of Documents Regarding Previously-Deferred Requests. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7)(mat) (Entered: 04/18/2012) 04/10/2012 1195 SEALED DOCUMENT- JOINT STIPULATION on Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order Compelling the Production of Documents Perfect 10's Financial Documents, and Motion to Compel Production of Documents Regarding Previously-Deferred Requests. (mat) (Entered: 04/19/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Motion to Enforce the Court's Compelling the Production of Perfect 10's Financial Documents, and MOTION to Compel Production of Documents Regarding Previously-Deferred Requests. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3)(mat) (Entered: 04/19/2012) NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Marguerite F Ethier on behalf of Defendant Google Inc (Ethier, Marguerite) (Entered: 04/11/2012) NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Google Inc. correcting Notice of Appearance 1173 to Notice of Association (Ethier, Marguerite) (Entered: 04/11/2012) NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Marguerite Ethier on behalf of Defendant Google Inc. Filed by Defendant Google Inc (Ethier, Marguerite) (Entered: 04/11/2012) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions 1123 . Defendant may take not more than 10 depositions in addition to the 10 permitted by FRCP 30(a). No extensions to the discovery cutoff date will be granted. (jp) (Entered: 04/11/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc of 1) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S ERRATA TO THE DMCA NOTICE BINDER FILED ON MARCH 26, 2012 IN RESPONSE TO THIS COURT'S FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; 2) PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'S EXPLANATION OF THE ERRATA TO SPREADSHEET 1 FILED ON MARCH 26, 2012 IN RESPONSE TO THIS COURTS FEBRUARY 14, 2012 ORDER; 3) APPLICATION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; 4) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL; 5) NOTICE OF LODGING; and 6) PROOF OF SERVICE.. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/12/2012) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the following documents (1) Plaintiff Errata to the DMCA Notice Binder filed on 3/26/12 in response to this Court's 2/14/2012 Order. (2) Plaintiff Explanation of the Errata to Spreadsheet 1 filed on 3/26/2012 in response to this Court's 2/14/2012 Order, filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 04/16/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING for the following documents (1) Plaintiff Errata to the DMCA Notice Binder filed on 3/26/12 in response to this Court's

04/10/2012

1196

04/11/2012

1173

04/11/2012

1174

04/11/2012

1175

04/11/2012

1176

04/12/2012

1179

04/12/2012

1182

04/12/2012

1183

2/14/2012 Order. (2) Plaintiff Explanation of the Errata to Spreadsheet 1 filed on 3/26/2012 in response to this Court's 2/14/2012 Order. (3) Proposed Order to file documents under seal, filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp) (Entered: 04/16/2012) 04/12/2012 1184 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc, re (1) Plaintiff's Errata to the DMCA Notice Binder filed on 3/26/12 in response to this Court's 2/14/2012 Order. (2) Plaintiff Explanation of the Errata to Spreadsheet 1 filed on 3/26/2012 in response to this Court's 2/14/2012 Order. (3) Application 1182 . (4) [Proposed] Order to file documents under seal. (5) Notice of Lodging 1183 , served on 4/12/2012. (jp) (Entered: 04/16/2012) REQUEST for Ruling Google Inc.'s Request For A Ruling On Oustanding Document Requests Previously Deferred By The Court's May 19, 2006 Order filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian, # 2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Google Inc.'s Motion To Compel Perfect 10 To Product Documents Re Requests Previously Deferred By the Court's May 19, 2006 Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/13/2012) ORDER TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1182 by Judge A. Howard Matz that pursuant to the Protective Order in this matter, Docket No. 94, the following documents, which have been lodged with this Court, shall be filed under seal: (1) Plaintiff Errata to the DMCA Notice Binder filed on 3/26/12 in response to this Court's 2/14/2012 Order. (2) Plaintiff Explanation of the Errata to Spreadsheet 1 filed on 3/26/2012 in response to this Court's 2/14/2012 Order. (jp) (Entered: 04/17/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC's ERRATA to the DMCA Notice Binder filed on March 26, 2012 in Response to this Court's February 14, 2012 Order. (mat) (Entered: 04/19/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- PLAINTIFF PERFECT 10, INC.'s Explanation of the Errata to Spreadsheet 1 filed on March 26, 2012 in Response to this Court's February 14, 2012 Order: Errata to Spreadsheet 1 filed on March 26, 2012 in Response to this Court's February 14, 2012 Order. (mat) (Entered: 04/19/2012) PERFECT 10'S OBJECTION TO AND REQUEST TO STRIKE GOOGLE INC.'S REQUEST FOR A RULING ON OUTSTANDING DOCUMENT REQUESTS PREVIOUSLY DEFERRED BY THE COURT'S MAY 19, 2006 ORDER; REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS in opposition to re: REQUEST for Ruling Google Inc.'s Request For A Ruling On Oustanding Document Requests Previously Deferred By The Court's May 19, 2006 Order 1180 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/16/2012) COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 04/16/2012 to 04/16/2012 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. Court will contact Jeffrey N. Mausner at jeff@mausnerlaw.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Other: Complete Hearing. FEE NOT PAID. (Mausner, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/16/2012) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Supplement Google's Motion

04/13/2012

1180

04/13/2012

1187

04/13/2012

1197

04/13/2012

1198

04/16/2012

1181

04/16/2012

1185

04/16/2012

1186

to Enforce the Court's October 6, 2009 Order re MOTION to Compel Production of Documents Previously Ordered and Responsive to Previously-Deferred Requests 1162 Supplemental Memorandum In Support Of Google's Motion to Enforce Court's October 6, 2009 Order filed by defendant Google Inc. Motion set for hearing on 4/30/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. (Hauler, Bridget) (Entered: 04/17/2012) 04/16/2012 1192 MINUTES OF granting in part and denying in part 1133 Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories; Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: Case called. Counsel present and Dr. Norman Zada. Court and counsel confer. Court orders that the Motion to Compel is granted and denied in part. Counsel shall submit a proposed order to the court no later that April 18, 2012 by noon.Court Recorder: cs4/16/2012. (sbu) (Entered: 04/18/2012) NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION to Compel Production of Documents Previously Ordered and Responsive to Previously-Deferred Requests 1162 (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012) NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Google Inc of Transcript of Deposition of Bruce Hersh; Application to File Under Seal; [Proposed] Order. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012) OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, documents for Lodging Transcript of Deposition of Bruce Hersh Under Seal served on April 18, 2012. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/18/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, re MOTION to Compel Answers to Interrogatories of Perfect 10, Inc. 1133 . The Motion is granted in part and denied in part. (sbu) (Entered: 04/18/2012) APPLICATION to File Under Seal Transcript of the Deposition of Bruce Hersh, Dated February 21, 2012 filed by defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp) (Entered: 04/19/2012) COMPACT DISC Order for date of proceedings 4/18/2012 to 4/18/2012 filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. Perfect 10 Inc. Court will contact Melanie Poblete at melanie@perfect10.com with any questions regarding this order. Transcript portion requested: Other: Telephone Conference 4/18/2012. FEE PAID. (Locke, Natalie) (Entered: 04/19/2012) NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: CD Order Form (AO-436), 1199 . The following error(s) was found: Telephonic Hearing (Deposition) was not recorded by Court's electronic recording system. (Entered: 04/24/2012) 1200 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Google Inc of Reply and Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian i/s/o Request to Lift Stay re Order re Production of Microsoft Settlement Agreement. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/20/2012) NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Google Inc. correcting REQUEST to Vacate Request to Lift the Court's February 11, 2010 Order 1159 (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/20/2012)

04/18/2012

1188

04/18/2012

1189

04/18/2012

1190

04/18/2012

1193

04/18/2012

1194

04/19/2012

1199

04/19/2012

04/20/2012

04/20/2012

1201

04/20/2012

1202

REPLY in support of REQUEST for Ruling Google Inc.'s Request For A Ruling On Oustanding Document Requests Previously Deferred By The Court's May 19, 2006 Order 1180 filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/20/2012) REPLY IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST to Vacate Request to Lift the Court's February 11, 2010 Order 1159 REDACTED VERSION filed by Defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Kassabian Declaration i/s/o Reply)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/20/2012) APPLICATION to File Under Seal the Reply I/S/O Request to Lift the Court's February 11, 2010 Stay of its Order Requiring Perfect 10 to Produce the Microsoft Settlement Agreement; and Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Same, filed by Defendant Google Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (kbr) (Entered: 04/24/2012) PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Google Inc, re APPLICATION to Seal 1206 , served on 4/20/12. (kbr) (Entered: 04/24/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting 1194 Application to Seal Transcript of the Deposition of Bruce Hersh dated 2/21/2012. (sbu) (Entered: 04/23/2012) MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting in part and denying in part 1145 Motion for Admissions (see minute order for further details) (sbu) (Entered: 04/23/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, the Order of the Hon. A. Howard Matz regarding Protective Orders and Treatment of Confidential Information at Section I.D., and the Protective order entered by the Court in this action (Docket No. 94), Google Inc.'s application to file under seal the following document (the "Confidential Materials") is hereby GRANTED: Google Inc.'s Reply I/S/O Request to Lift the Court's February 11, 2010 Stay of its Order Requiring Perfect 10 to Produce the Microsoft Settlement Agreement and Declaration of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Google Inc.'s Reply I/S/O Request to Lift the Court's February 11, 2010 Stay of its Order Requiring Perfect 10 to Produce the Microsoft Settlement Agreement. 1206 Application to Seal (lmh) (Entered: 04/24/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Rachel Herrick Kassabian in Support of Reply in Support of GOOGLE INC'S REQUEST TO LIFT THE COURT'S FEBRUARY 11, 2010 STAY OF ITS ORDER REQUIRING PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE THE MICROSOFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. (mat) (Entered: 04/27/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- GOOGLE INC'S Reply in Support of REQUEST TOLIFT THE COURT'S FEBRUARY 11, 2010 STAY OF ITS ORDER REQUIRING PERFECT 10 TO PRODUCE THE MICROSOFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. (mat) (Entered: 04/27/2012) SEALED DOCUMENT- CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF BRUCE HERSH Google Inc on Tuesday, February 21, 2012, Volume: I. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part

04/20/2012

1203

04/20/2012

1206

04/20/2012

1207

04/23/2012

1204

04/23/2012

1205

04/23/2012

1208

04/23/2012

1213

04/23/2012

1214

04/23/2012

1215

7)(mat) (Entered: 04/27/2012) 04/24/2012 1209 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: granting 1180 Request for Ruling. Request No. 2: Denied, however all copyright registration certificates regarding the remaining copyrighted works being asserted in this action shall be produced if they have not already been produced. Request No. 4: Denied, however Perfect 10 shall produce copies of allComplaints it has filed with respect to the remaining copyrighted works being asserted in this action, as well as any related deposition transcripts of Dr. Zada related to the remaining copyrighted works being asserted in this action.Request No. 8: Denied. Request No. 58: Denied, however Perfect 10 shall continue to supplement its prior response to Request 58 as necessary, limited to that which the court previously ordered. Request No. 59: Denied. Request No. 60: Denied, however Perfect 10 shall continue to supplement itsprior response to Request 60, limited to that which the court previously ordered. Request No. 61: Denied, however Perfect 10 shall continue to supplement its prior response to Request 61, limited to that which the courtpreviously ordered. Request No. 62: Denied. Request No. 65: Granted to the extent that Perfect 10 shall identify any lawsuits filed within the last eight years in which it was named as defendant, and in which it was claimed that Perfect 10 falsely or wrongly claimed copyright rights. Request No. 67: Denied.Request No. 68: Denied. (sbu) (Entered: 04/25/2012) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: PARTIALLYgranting in part Google's Motion to enforce the court's October 6, 2009 order compelling the productions 1162 1165 1186 The Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. Within five (5) calendar days of issuance of this Order, Perfect 10, Inc. shall produce the following materials: a. Complete and unredacted financial statements; b. All financial source documents used to prepare those statements, from the locations identified by Mr. Hersh during his deposition, as well as from any other locations within Perfect 10s possession, custody or control; c. All email communications between Mr. Hersh and Perfect 10regarding this case. 2. Within five calendar days of issuance of this Order, Perfect 10, Inc. shall produce documents responsive to Googles previously deferred Document Request Nos. 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, and 154. Such production is limited to nonprivileged documents which Perfect 10 is able to locate upon a reasonable search. 3. The deposition of Mr. Hersh shall continue for up to an additional 8 hours regarding the above-referenced documents following their production. The balance of the Motion is DENIED. (sbu) (Entered: 04/25/2012) STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by defendant Google Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kassabian, Rachel) (Entered: 04/25/2012) ORDER for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice by Judge A. Howard Matz. Pursuant to the Stipulation 1211 of the parties, the Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice. No appeal may be taken, and no motion to alter, amend or be relieved from the judgment in this action may be filed, by either party. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) (Entered: 04/26/2012)

04/24/2012

1210

04/25/2012

1211

04/26/2012

1212

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful