Soil Investigation Report

AGL Upstream Investments Pty Ltd Sugarloaf 03 Well Site Menangle NSW
24 JUNE 2011

Prepared for

AGL Upstream Investments Pty Ltd
Lot 35 Medhurst Road Menangle NSW 2568 PO BOX 67 Menangle NSW 2568

43177447

Sugarloaf Well Site - Soil Investigation

Project Manager: …………………………… Adam Sullivan Senior Associate Environmental Scientist Author: …………………………… Andrew Pettingell-Ward Environmental Scientist Reviewer: Date: Reference: Status: …………………………… Gavan Butterfield Principal Scientist © Document copyright of URS Australia Pty Limited. This report is submitted on the basis that it remains commercial-in-confidence. The contents of this report are and remain the intellectual property of URS and are not to be provided or disclosed to third parties without the prior written consent of URS. No use of the contents, concepts, designs, drawings, specifications, plans etc. included in this report is permitted unless and until they are the subject of a written contract between URS Australia and the addressee of this report. URS Australia accepts no liability of any kind for any unauthorised use of the contents of this report and URS reserves the right to seek compensation for any such unauthorised use. Document delivery URS Australia provides this document in either printed format, electronic format or both. URS considers the printed version to be binding. The electronic format is provided for the client’s convenience and URS requests that the client ensures the integrity of this electronic information is maintained. Storage of this electronic information should at a minimum comply with the requirements of the Commonwealth Electronic Transactions Act (ETA) 2000. Where an electronic only version is provided to the client, a signed hard copy of this document is held on file by URS and a copy will be provided if requested. 24 June 2011 43177447/Rpt/01 Final URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 4, 407 Pacific Highway Artarmon NSW 2064 Australia T: 61 2 8925 5500 F: 61 2 8925 5555

j:\jobs\43177447\mttaurus_soilassess\gilead\final\agl sugarloaf03_soil invest_rpt_final.doc

Sugarloaf Well Site - Soil Investigation

Table of Contents
Executive Summary ..................................................................................................v 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................1
1.1 1.2 1.3 Background ........................................................................................................ 1 Objectives........................................................................................................... 1 Site Description.................................................................................................. 1

2

Methodology......................................................................................................3
2.1 2.2 2.3 Scope of Work.................................................................................................... 3 Sample Identification......................................................................................... 4 URS Field Quality Management........................................................................ 4

3 4

Assessment Criteria .........................................................................................5 Results ...............................................................................................................7
4.1
4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3

Analytical Data Validation ................................................................................. 7
Field QA/QC Results........................................................................................................7 Laboratory QA/QC Results .............................................................................................7 Overall Data Validity ........................................................................................................7

4.2
4.2.1 4.2.2

Analytical Results and Discussion .................................................................. 7
COPCs...............................................................................................................................7 Soil Quality .....................................................................................................................11

5

Conclusions.....................................................................................................13
5.1 Limitations........................................................................................................ 13

6

References.......................................................................................................15

Tables
Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Soil Analytical Results (TPH, BTEX and Metals) Soil Analytical Results (PAHs) Soil Analytical Results (OP & OC Pesticides, Major Ions, General) Soil Analytical Results (VOCs) Soil Analytical Results (QA/QC Results)

43177447/Rpt/01

i

............................Sugarloaf Well Site .............................................................................Soil Investigation Tables (in text) Table 4-1 Table 4-2 Summary of Soil Analytical Results for COPC at the Superfoam Spill Area and Background ...... 9 Summary of Soil Quality Results at the Superfoam Spill and Down gradient Area and Background ........................................................Soil Sampling Locations Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Site Photography Laboratory Certificates Data Validation 43177447/Rpt/01 ............ 11 Figures Figure 1 SL03 foam release area ............................................................

Soil Investigation Abbreviations Abbreviation μS/cm BTEX CoC COPC DECCW DPI EC EIL EPA HIL IL JSA LOR mg/kg NATA NEPM OH&S PAH RPD SB TOC TPH Description microSiemens per centimetre Benzene. Ethyl-benzene. Toluene.Sugarloaf Well Site . Xylenes Chain of Custody Constituents of Potential Concern Department of Environment Climate Change and Water Department of Primary Industries Electrical Conductivity Ecological Investigation Level Environmental Protection Authority Health-based Investigation Level Investigation Level Job Safety Analysis Limit of Reporting milligrams per kilogram National Association of Testing Laboratories National Environment Protection Measure Occupational Health and Safety Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Relative Percentage Difference Soil Bore Total Organic Carbon Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 43177447/Rpt/01 iii .

The foam release was reported by AGL to have extended across an area approximately 40 m north of the well site. URS make this conclusion based on there being no detection of COPC (above the LOR) in the release area. and • assess whether the release of the foam has caused an adverse impact on the immediate area. The Site is located on an open rural grazing area. A coal seam gas well (SL03) and associated pipe work is in operation at the Site. located down slope of the release area. URS make the following conclusion: • The analytical results indicate there is no evidence that the release of foam at the Sugarloaf 03 well has caused adverse environmental impacts on the immediate vicinity of the identified spill site. The conclusions made and all information in this Report is provided strictly in accordance with and subject to the limitations in Section 5. • assess quality of the surface soils within the area of the foam release .Soil Investigation Executive Summary URS Australia Pty Ltd (URS) was engaged by AGL Upstream Investments Pty Ltd (AGL) to undertake an investigation of shallow soil quality at the AGL Sugarloaf 03 (SL03) well site located in Menangle. NSW (the Site).1. The purpose of the work was to assess the soils in the immediate vicinity of the well site subsequent to a release of a foam compound (containing AMC Superfoam) during site work over operations on 17 May 2011. A water storage dam and canal operated by Sydney Catchment Authority (SCA) is located approximately 200 m down slope (north) of the well site. Based on the findings of this investigation. The objectives of the investigation were to: • assess background quality of surface soils of the area.Sugarloaf Well Site . 43177447/Rpt/01 v . URS also consider it is unlikely that the release of foam would have carried to SCA’s water storage dam.

1. 3 and 5). NSW (the Site).Soil Investigation 1 Introduction Background 1 1.Sugarloaf Well Site . and • assess whether the release of the foam has caused an adverse impact on the immediate area. There is a shale access road leading to the well site which is situated on a shale covered work pad (Photos 1. The purpose of the work was to assess the soils in the immediate vicinity of the well site subsequent to a release of a foam compound (containing AMC Superfoam) during site workover operations on 17 May 2011.3 Site Description The Site is located on an open rural grazing area (Photos 1 and 5). • assess quality of the surface soils within the area of the foam release . The foam release was reported by AGL to have extended across an area approximately 40 m north of the well site (refer to Figure 1) (Photo 4).2 Objectives The objectives of the investigation were to: • assess background quality of surface soils of the area. The location of the Site is shown on Figure 1. A water storage dam and canal operated by Sydney Catchment Authority (SCA) is located approximately 200 m down slope (north) of the well site (Photo 2). 43177447/Rpt/01 1 . A coal seam gas well (SL03) and associated pipe work is in operation at the Site (Photo 3). 1.1 URS Australia Pty Ltd (URS) was engaged by AGL Upstream Investments Pty Ltd (AGL) to undertake an investigation of shallow soil quality at the AGL Sugarloaf 03 (SL03) well site located in Menangle.

copper. • Sampling of surface soils was also carried out at two locations to the south and east of the well site. • A URS field scientist was inducted onto the Site by AGL’s site representative. fatigue management. Anionic surfactants (as MBAS) were analysed as instructed by AGL on the basis that the foam contains the specific chemical. to assess background soil quality conditions. • The sampling area was inspected and surface soil sample locations were established. • Surface soils were collected from a maximum depth of 0. chromium. • Soil samples were dispatched to ALS (the NATA accredited subcontracted environmental laboratory) for analysis for the following contaminants of potential concern (COPC) and soil quality indicators: o COPCs: — Hydrocarbons (analysed as total petroleum hydrocarbons/total recoverable hydrocarbons (TPH/TRH)). emergency response protocol. ethylbenzene and xylene compounds (BTEX) — Volatile organic compounds (VOCs). nickel. hazards and controls. communication plan. • Sampling of surface soils was undertaken on 26 May 2011 between 1450 and 1555. Two locations were considered appropriate for the collection of representative background samples. AGL also collected three surface samples in the immediate area of the foam release on 20 May 2011 at 4. 11 locations were sampled using a hand trowel to provide coverage of the footprint of the release area and the immediate down gradient area. Other COPCs were selected based on a suite of common contaminants relative to assessing land contamination and recommended in NSW EPA and National 43177447/Rpt/01 3 . Sampling locations are shown on Figure 1.Sugarloaf Well Site .30pm. chemicals of potential concern (COPC) and job-specific.Soil Investigation 2 Methodology Scope of Work 2 2. lead. Individual samples were collected from the four approximate corners and centre of the identified footprint of the foam release area as well as down gradient of this area. — benzene. toluene. personal protective equipment (PPE). and mercury) — organochlorine (OC) and organophosphorus (OP) pesticides — polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) — anionic surfactants (as (Methylene Blue Active Substances . The locations of these samples are shown on Figure 1.1 URS were instructed by AGL to complete the following scope of work: • An Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) plan was prepared for field works that comprised task specific job safety analyses (JSAs).1 m below ground level (mbgl). cadmium. • In addition to the samples URS collected. zinc.MBAS) o Soil quality indicators: — — — — — — — pH electrical conductivity (EC) organic matter total nitrogen total phosphorus Total soluble salts major cations. — heavy metals (arsenic.

au/agriculture/resources/soils).002. SB3.3 URS Field Quality Management URS samples were collected using a stainless steel hand trowel at each location.gov. URS collected soil samples were transported to ALS (the NATA accredited contracted environmental laboratory). URS field scientists used disposable nitrile gloves to handle and transfer sampling equipment and soil samples. SB8. For a detailed overview of soil sampling locations see Figure 1. Soil quality parameters were selected based on key quality indicators provided on the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) web page for assessing soil health and fertility (www. which was decontaminated between each sampling location. Analyses were subsequently conducted on discrete (un-composited) samples for the analytical parameters listed in Section 2. acid-washed and solventrinsed.Sugarloaf Well Site . SB9 and SB10.e. Each jar was filled. URS samples were transferred directly into laboratory-prepared. are presented in Appendix B. NEPM) guideline documents (refer to section 3). Completed Chain-of-Custody documentation and a Sample Receipt Advice form. using strict Chain-of-Custody procedures.Soil Investigation Methodology (i. which included collection of one field duplicate sample. 250g glass jars.003. — AGL sample SL03. 2. SB2. — AGL sample SL03. certifying the condition of the samples upon arrival at the laboratory.dpi.2. 4 43177447/Rpt/01 . • Down gradient of spill area: — URS samples SB7. Analytical results for the field QC sample are discussed in Section 4.nsw. capped with a Teflon-lined lid and stored immediately in an insulated chest containing ice.001 • Background: — URS samples SB5 and SB6 — AGL sample SL03.1. URS fieldwork Quality Control (QC) was maintained in the field during soil sampling. SB4 and SB11. These COPC have published Health-based and Ecological Investigation Levels (HILs) that can be used to assess potential impacts.2 Sample Identification Sampling locations were identified as follows: • Identified foam release area: — URS samples SB1. 2.

Threshold Concentrations for Sensitive Land Use – Soils. for contaminant parameters not addressed in the NEPC Assessing Service Station Sites. and BTEX. which incorporated: • NEPM 1999. National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999.au). National Environmental Protection Council. For the purposes of this assessment. the adopted guideline thresholds will henceforth be referred to as the Soil Investigation Levels (SILs). in Guidelines for Assessing Service Station Sites (1994). Results for soil quality indicators were interpreted against guidance provided by NSW Department of Primary Industry (DPI) for assessing soil health and fertility (www.dpi. for which EILs were not available. The NEPM 1999 EILs were applied for inorganic analytes. the NSW EPA 1994 sensitive land use thresholds were used for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). Schedule B(1) Guideline on the Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater.Soil Investigation 3 Assessment Criteria 3 Analytical results were assessed against environmental guidelines published or approved by the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage (as NSW EPA).nsw.gov. and • NSW EPA 1994. NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA).Sugarloaf Well Site . however. 43177447/Rpt/01 5 .

An assessment of laboratory QA/QC results indicated that all relevant data quality objectives.1 The analytical data produced by this investigation was validated in accordance with URS protocols. 4.2 Laboratory QA/QC Results ALS carried out internal QA/QC testing on a number of sample types. Copies of the respective Laboratory Certificates and Data Validation summaries are provided in Appendices B and C.1.2 Analytical Results and Discussion Full results are presented in the Tables Appendix as Tables 1. 4. 4. which provided an indication of the accuracy and precision of the analytical data.Soil Investigation 4 4 Results Analytical Data Validation 4. as well as a number of method blanks. 4. which included the laboratory duplicates on URS and anonymous samples.3 Overall Data Validity On the basis of the analytical data validation procedure employed.1. Comparison of the data reported by the laboratory for the primary and secondary samples (Ref. 2. Appendix B) showed that the data quality objectives were met. with the exception of anionic surfactants (as MBAS). URS assume that similar practices were followed during collection and transport of samples by AGL. lower and mean concentrations for the tested analytes for both the foam release area and background soils are summarised in Table 4-1 below. This process involved an evaluation of the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures and results. sample representativeness and data precision.1. 3.1 Field QA/QC Results URS quality control in the field was assessed by collection of one field duplicate sample (QC100). were also adequately maintained. 4 and 5 at the end of this report.1 COPCs The upper. respectively. the overall quality of the soil analytical data produced is considered to be of an acceptable standard valid for the purposes of the assessment. data comparability.2. 4. in terms of document completeness.1. 43177447/Rpt/01 7 . URS note that ALS is accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) for analytical testing methods for the selected analytes in Section 2. matrix spikes and other laboratory control samples.Sugarloaf Well Site .

2 <0.2 <0.1 17 79 <100 7. unless otherwise indicated.5 20.1 16 49 <100 8 <1 16 30 22 <0.2 <0.2 <1 15.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0. NA = Not Analysed.2 <0.1 16 55 <100 7.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0.75 69. LOR = Limit of Reporting.5 <0. 43177447/Rpt/01 9 .5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0.1 13. which are the NEPM 1999 Health or Ecological Investigation Levels. SIL = Soil Investigation Levels.8 49.2 <0.1 15 94 <100 6.5 <1 15.1 14.000* * 1* 20 NEPM NIL NIL <10 <50 <0.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR 20 3 400 100 600 1 60 200 NIL 6 <1 15 23 19 <0.5 27.5 29 20.25 26 33 <0.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0.2 <0. (*) NSW EPA 1994 Threshold Concentrations for Sensitive Land Use – Soils.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0.2 <0.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0.Soil Investigation 4 Results Table 4-1 Parameter (mg/kg) Organics: TPH (C6-C9) TPH (C10-C36) BTEX Benzo(a)pyrene Total PAHs OCPs OPPs VOCs Heavy Metals: Arsenic Cadmium Summary of Soil Analytical Results for COPC at the Foam Release Area and Background SIL (mg/kg) Foam release area Minimum Maximum Mean Down gradient area Minimum Maximum Mean Background Minimum Maximum Mean 65* 1.25 <100 7 <1 15 25 19 <0.75 <1 14.1 13 45 <100 8 <1 16 35 22 <0.2 <0.5 <LOR <LOR <LOR <LOR <10 <50 <0.1 16.2 <100 6 <1 13 25 20 <0.Sugarloaf Well Site .4 <0.1 12 48 <100 8 <1 15 27 44 <0.5 64 <100 Chromium (total) Copper Lead Mercury (inorganic) Nickel Zinc Anionic Surfactants Notes: NIL = no investigation level is currently published for the indicated analytical parameter.2 <0.

Sugarloaf Well Site .002 and SL03. AGL samples taken from the gas well infrastructure (SL03.001. This was considered to indicate that the foam release area had not adversely affected soil quality in the spill area or in the down gradient area. 43177447/Rpt/01 11 .240 7. lower and mean concentrations of soil quality data for both the foam release area.6 320 Mean 92 6.Soil Investigation Results Heavy Metals Mean metals concentrations in surface soils at the foam release area and down gradient areas were comparable with background soil concentrations and all metal concentrations were within the same order of magnitude.0 930 Mean 88 7. All maximum soil concentrations were below the SILs. The minimum and maximum values for soil quality parameters were comparable to those reported for background conditions and indicated a low risk of adverse impacts to site surface soils resulting from the foam release.2 Soil Quality The upper.6 190 Maximum 117 8.420 214 198 1. magnesium. 4. down gradient area and background soils are summarised in Table 4-2.580 960 2.26 328. Anionic Surfactants No detectable concentrations of anionic surfactants were present in the soil samples analysed from specific locations. Table 4-2 Summary of Soil Quality Results at the Foam release area and Down gradient area and Background Foam release area and Down gradient area Parameter EC (uS/cm) pH Total nitrogen Total phosphorus (mg/kg) Total soluble salts (mg/kg) Organic Carbon (%) Total Cations1 (mg/kg) Minimum 59 6. indicating no adverse impacts from site activities in relation to heavy metals.1 4.9 3.7 1.310 226 358 2.991 446 637 4.1 6.0 1. Organics No detectable concentrations of the organic compound groups were identified in the tested soil samples collected by URS.003) were not analysed for heavy metals.920 532 452 9.2. SL03.183 411 405 6 255 Background Notes: (1) refers to the sum of concentrations for major cations including calcium.2 2.4 190 Maximum 92 7. sodium and potassium. This was considered to indicate that the foam release area was not subject to adverse impacts from site activities in relation to the tested organic compounds.9 Minimum 92 6.

8 – 6. 12 43177447/Rpt/01 . indicating soil cation exchange capacities (CEC) consistent with natural conditions. These pH levels indicated neutral pH conditions. The mean concentration of organic carbon in surface soils at the foam release area and down gradient area (4. which may be naturally occurring in the vicinity of the Site.26%) was comparable with the mean background concentration (6%) and consistent with the DPI-preferred concentration of >2 %. The mean concentration of total phosphorus in surface soils at the foam release area and down gradient area (449 mg/kg) was comparable with the mean background concentration (379 mg/kg) and consistent with the DPI-preferred concentration of >50 mg/kg.Soil Investigation Results The mean electrical conductivity (EC) value in the foam release and down gradient areas (88 µS/cm) was comparable with the mean background EC (92 µS/cm) and consistent with the DPI-preferred EC of < 150 µS/cm.018 mg/kg) was comparable to the mean background concentration (3. The mean pH value in surface soils at the foam release area and down gradient area (pH 7. The mean concentration of total nitrogen in surface soils at the foam release area and down gradient area (3. The mean concentration of total soluble salts in the surface soils at the foam release area and down gradient area (637 mg/kg) is comparable to the background concentration (405 mg/kg).Sugarloaf Well Site .2) was comparable with the mean background value (pH 6.3. although both areas were elevated above the DPI-preferred pH range of 5.105 mg/kg) and consistent with the DPI-preferred concentration of >20 mg/kg.9). The mean cation concentrations in surface soils at the foam release area and down gradient area were comparable with mean background concentrations.

URS make this conclusion based on there being no detection of COPC (above the LOR) in the release area. such as the location of buildings. URS has tested only for those chemicals specifically referred to in this Report. 5.Soil Investigation 5 Conclusions 5 Based on the findings of this investigation. guidelines and assessment criteria in existence at the date of this Report. As a result. 43177447/Rpt/01 13 .Sugarloaf Well Site . or if any buildings constructed prior to 1970 have been demolished on the site or materials from such buildings disposed of on the site. Without limiting the generality of sub-clauses (h) and (m). located down slope of the release area. from 26 May 2011 to 23 June 2011. Except as otherwise specifically stated in this Report.1 Limitations The conclusions made and all information in this Report is provided strictly in accordance with and subject to the following limitations: a) This Report should be read in full and no excerpts are to be taken as representative of the findings. the site may contain asbestos or ACM. URS makes no statement or representation as to the existence (or otherwise) of any other chemicals. URS also consider it is unlikely that the release of foam would have carried to SCA’s water storage dam.1 ("Scope of Works") of this Report. URS make the following conclusion: • The analytical results indicate there is no evidence that the release of foam at the Sugarloaf 03 well has caused adverse environmental impacts on the immediate vicinity of the identified spill site. b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) No responsibility is accepted by URS for use of any part of this Report in any other context. This conclusion is based solely on the scope of work agreed between URS and AGL and described in section 2. URS makes no warranty or representation as to the presence or otherwise of asbestos and/or asbestos containing materials (“ACM”) on the site. in accordance with normal prudent practice and by reference to applicable environmental regulatory authority and industry standards. URS has made no independent verification of this information except as expressly stated in the Report. even if asbestos was tested for and those test results did not reveal the presence of asbestos at specific points of sampling. URS accepts no responsibility for any events arising from any changes in site conditions or in the information reviewed that have occurred after the completion of the site investigations. or whether any adjoining sites may have been impacted by contamination or other conditions originating from this site. and information reviewed. and the Report has been prepared. asbestos may still be present at the site if fill has been imported at any time. or if any buildings constructed prior to 1970 have been demolished on the site or materials from such buildings disposed of on the site. not all relevant site features and contamination may have been identified in this Report. Where this Report indicates that information has been provided to URS by third parties. This Report is dated 23 June 2011 and is based on the conditions encountered during the site investigations conducted. This Report has been prepared for the sole benefit of AGL and neither the whole nor any part of this Report may be used or relied upon by any party other than AGL. Investigations undertaken in respect of this Report are constrained by the particular site conditions. This conclusion is based solely on the information and findings contained in this Report. The investigations carried out for the purposes of the Report have been undertaken. If fill has been imported on to the site at any time. No investigations have been undertaken into any off-site conditions. services and vegetation.

The ongoing use of the site and/or the use of the site for any different purpose may require the owner/user to manage and/or remediate site conditions. development or re-development of the site. A site which appears to be unaffected by contamination at the time the Report was prepared may later. URS makes no determination or recommendation regarding a decision to provide or not to provide financing with respect to the site. in some cases. 14 43177447/Rpt/01 .Sugarloaf Well Site . environmental regulatory authority and accredited site auditor approvals. which may include the requirement for additional environmental works. such as contamination and other conditions. or the conditions and obligations which such approvals may impose. development or re-development of the site for any purpose may require planning and other approvals and. statement or representation of any kind concerning the suitability of the site for any purpose or the permissibility of any use. Use. due to natural phenomena or human intervention.Soil Investigation 5 Conclusions l) m) n) o) p) q) Subsurface conditions can vary across a particular site and cannot be exhaustively defined by the investigations described in this Report. become contaminated. URS makes no warranty. the likelihood of obtaining any approvals for development or redevelopment of the site. URS offers no opinion as to whether the current use has any or all approvals required. It is unlikely therefore that the results and estimations expressed in this Report will represent conditions at any location removed from the specific points of sampling. is operating in accordance with any approvals. Except as specifically stated above. including but not limited to conditions referred to in this Report.

New South Wales South Wales Environment Protection Authority (1994).gov. New South Wales Department of Environment and Conservation (2006) Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (2nd Edition).dpi.Sugarloaf Well Site . (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure.Soil Investigation 6 References National Environment Protection 6 Contaminated Sites: National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) (1999). New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (www.au/agriculture/resources/soils) 43177447/Rpt/01 15 . New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (1995) Sampling Design Guidelines.nsw. Guidelines for Assessing Service Station Sites.

Soil Investigation Tables 43177447/Rpt/01 16 .Sugarloaf Well Site .

1 16.5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB3 SB3_0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB4 SB4_0.2 < 0.1 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB8 SB8_0.C40 Fraction (sum) BTEX Compounds Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene ortho-Xylene Total Xylenes Metals (Total) Chromium Arsenic Cadmium Lead Nickel Zinc Copper Mercury Mercury Moisture Content Moisture Content (dried @ 40°C) Legend: PS = Primary Sample FD = Field Duplicate FT = Field Triplicate .5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB11 SB11_0.0-0.2 < 0.5 < 0.003 19/05/2011 PS Analyte Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6-C9 fraction C10-C14 fraction C15-C28 fraction C29-C36 fraction C10 .2 < 0.C10 Fraction >C10 .001 19/05/2011 PS Foam release area SL03.1 1.0-0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB7 SB7_0.0 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.7 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0. 43177447 Location Sample ID Date Sampled Sample Type Adopted ILs SB1 SB1_0.5 < 0.1 14.1 26/05/2011 PS SB10 SB10_0.5 < 0.5 15 7 <1 19 15 55 35 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB9 SB9_0.5 < 0.5 16 8 <1 22 15 49 26 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.2 < 0.5 2 5 1 5 2 5 5 0.3 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.0-0.5 < 0.5 15 6 <1 20 13 47 23 < 0.= Not Analysed ND = Not Detected Exceeds the Adopted Soil Investigation Levels (ILs) J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Final\Appendices\Gilead tables .5 < 0.0-0.7 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.0 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 < 0.1 15.5 15 8 <1 19 16 45 27 < 0.5 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 16 7 <1 22 15 50 25 < 0.5 15 7 <1 20 15 48 27 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.C16 Fraction >C16 .5 < 0.5 < 0.3 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 < 0.3 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.xls 1 of 5 URS Australia Pty Ltd Prepared By: AP Checked By: AS .5 - TRH .2 < 0.2 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB6 SB6_0.5 < 0.C36 Fraction LOR 10 50 100 100 50 10 50 100 100 50 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.5 < 0.0 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % 25 400 20 3 600 60 200 100 1 1 130 50 1000 65 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.2 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 15 8 <1 44 14 74 25 < 0.C34 Fraction >C34 .5 < 0.5 15 8 <1 22 17 79 25 < 0.5 < 0.1 14.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 14 6 <1 43 14 94 27 < 0.2 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0. BTEX and Metals Sugarloaf 03 Well Site Menangle May 2011 URS Job No.5 < 0.Table 1: Soil Analytical Results .0-0.1 8.5 < 0.0-0.1 8.1 26/05/2011 PS SB5 SB5_0.2 < 0.1 18.5 < 0.5 < 0.1 18.5 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS Downgradient area SL03.5 16 7 <1 19 16 49 30 < 0.NEPM 2010 DRAFT C6 .002 19/05/2011 PS Background SL03.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 13 6 <1 25 12 61 25 < 0.2 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.2 0.C40 Fraction >C10 .9 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 10 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 50 < 0.Final.2 < 0.0-0.0-0.5 0.2 < 0.TPH.1 14.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB2 SB2_0.1 18.5 < 0.1 14.5 0.0-0.0-0.

5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB9 SB9_0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.cd)pyrene Dibenz(a.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Final\Appendices\Gilead tables .5 < 0.Final.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB2 SB2_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.h.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.Table 2: Soil Analytical Results .5 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB5 SB5_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS Analyte LOR Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benz(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB8 SB8_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB3 SB3_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.h)anthracene Benzo(g.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.2.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.xls 2 of 5 URS Australia Pty Ltd Prepared By: AP Checked By: AS .5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB11 SB11_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.= Not Analysed ND = Not Detected Exceeds the Adopted Soil Investigation Levels (ILs) 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.i)perylene Naphthalene sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Legend: PS = Primary Sample FD = Field Duplicate FT = Field Triplicate .5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 20 1 < 0.PAHs Sugarloaf 03 Well Site Menangle May 2011 URS Job No.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB7 SB7_0.5 < 0.5 < 0. 43177447 Location Sample ID Date Sampled Sample Type Adopted ILs SB1 SB1_0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB4 SB4_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0-0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.0-0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB6 SB6_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 < 0.3.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.0-0.5 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB10 SB10_0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.

05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 2120 325 484 <1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB6 SB6_0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 2.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.8 6.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 4.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.1 1420 214 497 <1 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.1 6040 960 266 <1 < 0.5 8.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.1 2450 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0-0.4-DDE Dieldrin Endrin beta-Endosulfan 4.05 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 2360 362 198 <1 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.1 20 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 5.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.2 < 0.05 0.3 7.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.7 4900 16.2 < 0.05 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 2450 390 650 <1 < 0.05 < 0.4 7.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS Downgradient area SL03.05 < 0.05 < 0.0 6410 171 6580 678 2240 <1 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0-0.Table 3: Soil Analytical Results .6 7.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 2000 333 520 <1 2120 2230 3320 OPPs Dichlorvos Demeton-S-methyl Monocrotophos Dimethoate Diazinon Chlorpyrifos-methyl Parathion-methyl Malathion Fenthion Chlorpyrifos Parathion Pirimphos-ethyl Chlorfenvinphos Bromophos-ethyl Fenamiphos Prothiofos Ethion Carbophenothion Azinphos Methyl Organic Matter Organic Matter pH pH Value Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N Nitrite + Nitrate as N Nitrite + Nitrate as N Total Nitrogen as N Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P Total Phosphorus as P 454 390 476 Total Soluble Salts Total Soluble Salts <1 <1 <1 Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Legend: PS = Primary Sample FD = Field Duplicate FT = Field Triplicate .05 < 0.3 3890 < 0.9 6.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.0-0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 1310 < 0.05 < 0. Major Ions.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.Final.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.003 19/05/2011 PS Analyte OCPs cis-Chlordane Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone Methoxychlor trans-Chlordane alpha-BHC beta-BHC gamma-BHC delta-BHC Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide alpha-Endosulfan 4.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.xls 3 of 5 .05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0. Anionic Surfactants.05 < 0.1 3890 533 221 <1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 0.4-DDT Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) LOR 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 20 2 5 1 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % pH units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 400 400 400 20 20 20 100 100 < 0.05 < 0.002 19/05/2011 PS Background SL03.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0-0.OCP.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0 1680 7.001 19/05/2011 PS Foam release area SL03.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.5 0.0-0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 4920 532 358 < 0.05 3.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB9 SB9_0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB11 SB11_0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 7.05 < 0.0-0.= Not Analysed ND = Not Detected Exceeds the Adopted Soil Investigation Levels (ILs) URS Australia Pty Ltd Prepared By: AP Checked By: AS J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Final\Appendices\Gilead tables .2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB8 SB8_0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.4 2120 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0-0. 43177447 Location Sample ID Date Sampled Sample Type Adopted ILs SB1 SB1_0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0-0.05 < 0.8 1420 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0-0.0 7.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 0.0 6.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0-0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.0 1690 274 663 <1 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.6 2360 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0-0.4 6040 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.6 6.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 2.2 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB7 SB7_0.4-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4.05 < 0.2 < 0.6 6.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.9 2000 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 1.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0. General Sugarloaf 03 Well Site Menangle May 2011 URS Job No.1 26/05/2011 PS SB2 SB2_0.05 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB10 SB10_0.05 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB5 SB5_0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 5.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB3 SB3_0.05 < 0.05 0.1 26/05/2011 PS SB4 SB4_0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.1 1310 226 452 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 3.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0. OPP.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 9.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.6 8.05 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.

5 <0.2-trichloroethane 1.5 <0.4 2120 454 <100 <0.5 0.5 5 5 5 5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 117 19.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.2.1.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.1.5 <0.2-dichlorobenzene 1.4-trichlorobenzene 1.5 <0.3-dichloropropane tetrachloroethene 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.2.5 <0. 43177447 Location Sample ID Date Sampled Sample Type Adopted ILs Downgradient area SL03.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.2-dichloropropane 1.2.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2-tetrachloroethene trans-1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1-trichloroethane 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.VOCs Sugarloaf 03 Well Site Menangle May 2011 URS Job No.5 <0.2-tetrachloroethane 1.5 <0.5 <0.5-trimethylbenzene sec-butylbenzene 1.5 2230 390 <100 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.3-dichloropropylene trans-1.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.2-dichloroethane trichloroethene dibromomethane 1.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.1.5 <0.3-dichlorobenzene 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.3 3320 476 <100 Oxygenated Compounds Vinyl acetate 2-butanone (MEK) 4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2-hexanone (MBK) Sulfonated Compounds Carbon disulfide Fumigants 2.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.3-dichloropropylene 1.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.2-dibromoethane (EDB) Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds dichlorodifluoromethane chloromethane vinyl chlorides bromomethane chloroethane trichlorofluoromethane 1.5 <0.5 <0.3-trichlorobenzene Trihalomethanes chloroform bromodichloromethane dibromochloromethane bromoform Electrical Conductivity Moisture Content Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P Anionic Surfactants as MBAS J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Final\Appendices\Gilead tables .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.3.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.1-dichloroethene iodomethane trans-1.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.3-trichloropropane pentachloroethane 1.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.xls 4 of 5 URS Australia Pty Ltd Prepared By: AP Checked By: AS .5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.Final.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1-dichloroethene cis-1.002 19/05/2011 PS Background SL03.5 <0.5 <0.2-dichloroethene 1.4-dichloro-2-butene cis-1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2.5 <0.5 0.003 19/05/2011 PS Analyte Monocyclic Aromatic Compounds Styrene Isopropylbenzene n-propylbenzene 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.4-trimethylbenzene tert-butylbenzene p-isopropylbenzene n-butylbenzene LOR 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.2.5 0.5 <0.5 0.001 19/05/2011 PS Foam release area SL03.5 59 10.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1.5 <0.5 1 1 20 2 1 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg µS/cm % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.5 0.4-dichlorobenzene 1.5 0.5 <0.2-dichloroethene 1.5 0.1.5 0.1-dichloropropylene carbon tetrachloride 1.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.4-dichloro-2-butene 1.2-dibromo-3-chloropropane hexachlorobutadiene Halogenated Aromatic Compounds chlorobenzene bromobenzene 2-chlorotoluene 4-chlorotoluene 1.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 92 6.Table 4: Soil Analytical Results .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.2-dichloropropane cis-1.

05 0.5 < 0.1 20.2 0.5 < 0.5 0.3.2 0.5 0.5 < 0.C36 Fraction LOR 10 50 100 100 50 0.05 0.5 2 5 1 5 2 5 5 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.2 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.h.05 < 0.05 < 0.5 < 0.2.5 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.QAQC Sugarloaf 03 Well Site Menangle May 2011 URS Job No.05 < 0.5 0.5 0.xls 5 of 5 URS Australia Pty Ltd Prepared By: AP Checked By: AS .05 < 0.2 < 0. 43177447 Sample ID Date Sampled Sample Type QC100 26/05/2011 FD QC100 26/05/2011 FD QC100 26/05/2011 FD Adopted ILs Adopted ILs Adopted ILs Analyte Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6-C9 fraction C10-C14 fraction C15-C28 fraction C29-C36 fraction C10 .5 < 0.05 < 0.5 < 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.2 < 0.1 20 2 5 1 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % pH units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg < 0.Table 5: Soil Analytical Results .05 Analyte OPPs Dichlorvos Demeton-S-methyl Monocrotophos Dimethoate Diazinon Chlorpyrifos-methyl Parathion-methyl Malathion Fenthion Chlorpyrifos Parathion Pirimphos-ethyl Chlorfenvinphos Bromophos-ethyl Fenamiphos Prothiofos Ethion Carbophenothion Azinphos Methyl LOR 0.2 < 0.5 0.05 0.05 0.05 < 0.1 1.0 Analyte Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benz(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1.5 0.05 0.5 < 0.h)anthracene Benzo(g.05 < 0.5 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.5 < 0.05 0.5 15 7 <1 20 16 60 27 <0.05 0.5 < 0.2 8.05 0.5 0.05 0.05 < 0.5 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.4-DDT Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) Mercury Mercury Organic Matter Organic Matter Moisture Content Moisture Content (dried @ 40°C) pH pH Value Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N Nitrite + Nitrate as N Nitrite + Nitrate as N Total Nitrogen as N Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P Total Phosphorus as P Total Soluble Salts Total Soluble Salts Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Anionic Surfactants as MBAS J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Final\Appendices\Gilead tables .5 0.05 0.05 0.5 < 0.5 0.2 < 0.05 0.5 0.2 < 0.5 0.4-DDD Endosulfan sulfate 4.05 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % <10 < 50 < 100 < 100 <50 < 0.05 0.5 < 0.2 0.0 2080 < 0.05 < 0.05 3.05 < 0.5 0.1 20 0.2 0.5 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.5 0.05 0.2 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.4-DDE Dieldrin Endrin beta-Endosulfan 4.05 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg < 0.05 0.5 0.05 0.5 0.5 < 0.05 0.2 0.cd)pyrene Dibenz(a.i)perylene Naphthalene sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons LOR 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.05 < 0.5 0.05 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.Final.5 < 0.5 0.1 2080 448 494 <1 BTEX Compounds Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene ortho-Xylene Total Xylenes Metals (Total) Chromium Arsenic Cadmium Lead Nickel Zinc Copper OCPs cis-Chlordane Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone Methoxychlor trans-Chlordane alpha-BHC beta-BHC gamma-BHC delta-BHC Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide alpha-Endosulfan 4.05 0.

Soil Investigation Figures 43177447/Rpt/01 17 .Sugarloaf Well Site .

D D D D D D SB9 SB9 SB9 SB9 D D D D D D SB10 SB10 SB10 SB10 SB10 SB10 D D D D D D SB2 SB2 SB2 SB2 D D D D D D SB1 SB1 SB1 SB1 SB1 SB1 D D D D D D SB7 SB7 SB7 SB7 SB7 SB7 SB8 SB8 SB8 D SB8 D SB8 D SB8 D D D D SB4 D SB4 D SB4 D SB4 D SB4 D SB4 D D D D D D D D D D D D SB3 SB3 SB3 SB3 SB3 SB3 SB11 SB11 SB11 SB11 SB11 SB11 D D D D D D SB5 SB5 SB5 SB5 SB5 SB5 D D D D D D SB6 SB6 SB6 SB6 SB6 SB6 This drawing is subject to COPYRIGHT. Legend:  D D & Existing Wells (AGL) Soil Sample Locations (URS 2011) Soil Sample Locations (AGL) Release Area AGL AGL MENANGLE Draft Site Locality Map Figure: 001 A3 File No: 43177747.  Source: Aerial Photography from AGL AGL Drawing AGL Soil Sample Locations Whilst every care is taken by URS to ensure the accuracy of the digital data. reliability. Electronic files are provided for information only.wor Drawn: AY/SB Approved: AS Date: 24-06-2011 Rev. A . The data in these files is not controlled or subject to automatic updates for users outside of URS. suitability for any particular purpose and disclaims all responsibility and liability (including without limitation.004. damages (including indirect or consequential damage) and costs which may be incurred as a result of data being inaccurate in any way for any reason. URS makes no representation or warranties about its accuracy. losses. liability in negligence) for any expenses. completeness.

Sugarloaf Well Site . foam release area past left of frame Site Photo 2: Sydney Catchment Authority dam to the north 43177447/Rpt/01 .Soil Investigation Appendix A Site Photography A Site photo 1: Gas well site looking east.

Sugarloaf Well Site . grass stained orange 43177447/Rpt/01 .Soil Investigation Appendix A Site photo 3: Gas well looking south east Site photo 4: foam release area.

Sugarloaf Well Site .Soil Investigation Site photo 5: Gas well looking south 43177447/Rpt/01 .

Sugarloaf Well Site .Soil Investigation Appendix B Laboratory Certificates B 43177447/Rpt/01 .

of samples received MENANGLE NSW 2568 tlawler@agl. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference.alsglobal. Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information: l General Comments l Analytical Results l Surrogate Control Limits NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 This document is issued in accordance with NATA accreditation requirements. +61-2-8784 8500 www.com . Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.au 4633 5200 ---SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST 4510002862 ---TOM LAWLER ---- : SY/456/10 No. Signatories Position Accreditation Category Ankit Joshi Evie.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement : 23-MAY-2011 : 27-MAY-2011 :3 :3 Client : AGL ENERGY : TOM LAWLER : P. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. +61-2-8784 8555 Fax. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.com.Sidarta Pabi Subba Sarah Millington Stephen Hislop Inorganic Chemist Inorganic Chemist Senior Organic Chemist Senior Inorganic Chemist Senior Inorganic Chemist Sydney Inorganics Sydney Inorganics Sydney Organics Sydney Inorganics Brisbane Inorganics Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel.O BOX 67 MENANGLE : : : : : : : : Contact Address E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Order number C-O-C number Sampler Site Quote number Contact Address E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level Date Samples Received Issue Date No.ES1110639 False CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Work Order : ES1110639 Page Laboratory : 1 of 6 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal.

002 and SL09. the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.001.003 were diluted due to matrix interference. LOR adjusted accordingly. In these instances. this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis. Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. . this may be due to high moisture content.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA. AS and NEPM. SL09. When sampling time information is not provided by the client. sampling dates are shown without a time component. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR. results are reported on a dry weight basis. insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR. Where moisture determination has been performed. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. APHA. LOR = Limit of reporting ^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting l EP050 (anionic surfactants as MBAS): Samples SL09.

001 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-001 SL09.5 0.5 <0.5 0.3 3320 476 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EA055: Moisture Content ^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) EK062: Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) ^ Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Anionic Surfactants as MBAS <100 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <100 <0.5 2230 390 92 6.3-Dichloropropylene 1.5 5 5 5 5 Unit µS/cm % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EA010: Conductivity Electrical Conductivity @ 25°C 59 10.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 3 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SL09.3.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.2-Dichloropropane 1.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.0 20 2 1 0.5 <0.5 0.2-Dichloropropane cis-1.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Styrene Isopropylbenzene n-Propylbenzene 1.5 <0.5 0.2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EP074E: Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl chloride Bromomethane .5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <100 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 0.4 2120 454 117 19.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2.5 0.3-Dichloropropylene trans-1.5 <0.5 0.002 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-002 SL09.5 0.4-Trimethylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene n-Butylbenzene EP074B: Oxygenated Compounds Vinyl Acetate 2-Butanone (MEK) 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 2-Hexanone (MBK) EP074C: Sulfonated Compounds Carbon disulfide EP074D: Fumigants 2.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 5 5 5 5 0.5 <0.5 <0.003 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-003 ---------- ---------- Compound CAS Number ---------------100-42-5 98-82-8 103-65-1 108-67-8 135-98-8 95-63-6 98-06-6 99-87-6 104-51-8 108-05-4 78-93-3 108-10-1 591-78-6 75-15-0 594-20-7 78-87-5 10061-01-5 10061-02-6 106-93-4 75-71-8 74-87-3 75-01-4 74-83-9 LOR 1 1.5 <0.5 0.

5 <0.003 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-003 ---------- ---------- Compound Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2-Dichlorobenzene 1.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.2-Tetrachloroethane 1.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2-Dichloroethene 1.5 <0.2.5 <0.2.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.4-Dichlorobenzene 1.5 <0.5 <0.3-Dichloropropane Tetrachloroethene 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EP074E: Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds .1.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.1-Dichloroethane cis-1.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2-Dichloroethene 1.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.Continued <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2.5 0.001 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-001 SL09.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.002 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-002 SL09.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2.5 <0.1-Dichloropropylene Carbon Tetrachloride 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.1.5 <0.5 <0.2-Tetrachloroethane trans-1.3-Trichloropropane Pentachloroethane 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2-Trichloroethane 1.5 0.5 0.5 <0.3-Dichlorobenzene 1.5 0.5 <0.1.5 <0.1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1-Trichloroethane 1.5 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 4 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SL09.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <0.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EP074F: Halogenated Aromatic Compounds Chlorobenzene Bromobenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene 1.5 0.4-Dichloro-2-butene cis-1.1.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.4-Trichlorobenzene 1.5 <0.5 <0.3-Trichlorobenzene EP074G: Trihalomethanes Chloroform Bromodichloromethane Dibromochloromethane .5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.4-Dichloro-2-butene 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2-Dichloroethane Trichloroethene Dibromomethane 1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane Hexachlorobutadiene CAS Number 75-00-3 75-69-4 75-35-4 74-88-4 156-60-5 75-34-3 156-59-2 71-55-6 563-58-6 56-23-5 107-06-2 79-01-6 74-95-3 79-00-5 142-28-9 127-18-4 630-20-6 110-57-6 1476-11-5 79-34-5 96-18-4 76-01-7 96-12-8 87-68-3 108-90-7 108-86-1 95-49-8 106-43-4 541-73-1 106-46-7 95-50-1 120-82-1 87-61-6 67-66-3 75-27-4 124-48-1 LOR 5 5 0.1-Dichloroethene Iodomethane trans-1.5 <0.

5 86.1 0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.1 0.5 <0.8 <0.C16 Fraction >C16 .2 <0.C40 Fraction (sum) EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates 1.5 0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 5 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SL09.5 <0.7 119 104 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6 .2 <0.5 1 0.C34 Fraction >C34 .6 85.2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene .5 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.2 <0.5 0.9 85.1 0.0 112 93.5 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.2 0.Continued Bromoform <0.C9 Fraction C10 .& para-Xylene ortho-Xylene EP080: BTEXN ^ Sum of BTEX ^ Total Xylenes Naphthalene EP074S: VOC Surrogates 1.C10 Fraction ^ C6 .5 <0.6 93.003 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-003 ---------- ---------- Compound CAS Number 75-25-2 ---------------------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 ---1330-20-7 91-20-3 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 LOR 0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.1 0.C10 Fraction minus BTEX (F1) >C10 .5 <1 92.5 <0.5 <0.C14 Fraction C15 .4 <0.8 108 97.C36 Fraction (sum) C6 .C40 Fraction ^ >C10 .5 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <1 122 119 102 93.2 <0.2 0.C36 Fraction ^ C10 .5 <0.5 <1 112 108 92.5 <0.002 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-002 SL09.1 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % EP074G: Trihalomethanes .1 0.5 10 50 100 100 50 10 10 50 100 100 50 0.5 0.2 <0.NEPM 2010 Draft EP080: BTEX Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene meta.001 20-MAY-2011 04:30 ES1110639-001 SL09.C28 Fraction C29 .5 <0.

6 130.0 EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates 1.8 73.3 133.1 130.2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene 70.2 132.1 66.2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene .3 72.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 6 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Surrogate Control Limits Sub-Matrix: SOIL Recovery Limits (%) Compound CAS Number 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 Low High EP074S: VOC Surrogates 1.9 71.7 136.9 137.3 60.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. of samples analysed :3 :3 Date Samples Received Issue Date : 23-MAY-2011 : 27-MAY-2011 E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level : sydney@alsglobal. Recovery and Acceptance Limits l Matrix Spike (MS) Report . This Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report .O BOX 67 MENANGLE Contact Address Contact Address MENANGLE NSW 2568 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Site C-O-C number Sampler Order number Quote number : tlawler@agl. Signatories Position Accreditation Category Ankit Joshi Evie. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report .False QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : ES1110639 Page Laboratory : 1 of 9 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Client : AGL ENERGY : TOM LAWLER : P. of samples received : SY/456/10 No.au : 4633 5200 : ---: SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST : ---: ---: TOM LAWLER : 4510002862 No. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below.Sidarta Pabi Subba Sarah Millington Stephen Hislop Inorganic Chemist Inorganic Chemist Senior Organic Chemist Senior Inorganic Chemist Senior Inorganic Chemist Sydney Inorganics Sydney Inorganics Sydney Organics Sydney Inorganics Brisbane Inorganics . Recovery and Acceptance Limits NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 This document is issued in accordance with NATA accreditation requirements.com.

results are reported on a dry weight basis. Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR. this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis. this may be due to high moisture content. insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. APHA. AS and NEPM. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 9 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA. Where moisture determination has been performed. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference # = Indicates failed QC .

Page Work Order Client Project

: : : :

3 of 9
ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:- 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR:- 0% - 20%. Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%)

EA010: Conductivity (QC Lot: 1801156)
ES1110629-001 ES1110632-010 ES1110341-001 ES1110423-022 ES1110639-002 ES1110775-008 ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous SL09.002 Anonymous SL09.001 SL09.001 SL09.001 EA010: Electrical Conductivity @ 25°C EA010: Electrical Conductivity @ 25°C EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS EP074: Styrene EP074: Isopropylbenzene EP074: n-Propylbenzene EP074: 1.3.5-Trimethylbenzene EP074: sec-Butylbenzene EP074: 1.2.4-Trimethylbenzene EP074: tert-Butylbenzene EP074: p-Isopropyltoluene EP074: n-Butylbenzene 100-42-5 98-82-8 103-65-1 108-67-8 135-98-8 95-63-6 98-06-6 99-87-6 104-51-8 108-05-4 78-93-3 108-10-1 591-78-6 75-15-0 594-20-7 78-87-5 10061-01-5 10061-02-6 ---------------------1 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5 5 5 5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 µS/cm µS/cm % % % % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 38 50 5.2 38.5 19.5 8.6 454 <100 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 34 51 5.9 40.7 17.9 9.8 463 <100 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 10.6 2.9 13.6 5.6 8.6 13.4 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% - 20% 0% - 20% No Limit 0% - 20% 0% - 50% No Limit 0% - 20% No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1802515)

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1802517)

EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 1800909) EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS (QC Lot: 1801157) EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1800963)

EP074B: Oxygenated Compounds (QC Lot: 1800963)
ES1110639-001 SL09.001 EP074: Vinyl Acetate EP074: 2-Butanone (MEK) EP074: 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) EP074: 2-Hexanone (MBK)

EP074C: Sulfonated Compounds (QC Lot: 1800963)
ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 SL09.001 SL09.001 EP074: Carbon disulfide EP074: 2.2-Dichloropropane EP074: 1.2-Dichloropropane EP074: cis-1.3-Dichloropropylene EP074: trans-1.3-Dichloropropylene

EP074D: Fumigants (QC Lot: 1800963)

Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Laboratory sample ID

: : : :

4 of 9
ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Client sample ID

Method: Compound

CAS Number

LOR

Unit

Original Result

Duplicate Result

RPD (%)

Recovery Limits (%)

EP074D: Fumigants (QC Lot: 1800963) - continued
ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 SL09.001 SL09.001 EP074: 1.2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EP074: 1.1-Dichloroethene EP074: Iodomethane EP074: trans-1.2-Dichloroethene EP074: 1.1-Dichloroethane EP074: cis-1.2-Dichloroethene EP074: 1.1.1-Trichloroethane EP074: 1.1-Dichloropropylene EP074: Carbon Tetrachloride EP074: 1.2-Dichloroethane EP074: Trichloroethene EP074: Dibromomethane EP074: 1.1.2-Trichloroethane EP074: 1.3-Dichloropropane EP074: Tetrachloroethene EP074: 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane EP074: trans-1.4-Dichloro-2-butene EP074: cis-1.4-Dichloro-2-butene EP074: 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane EP074: 1.2.3-Trichloropropane EP074: Pentachloroethane EP074: 1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane EP074: Hexachlorobutadiene EP074: Dichlorodifluoromethane EP074: Chloromethane EP074: Vinyl chloride EP074: Bromomethane EP074: Chloroethane EP074: Trichlorofluoromethane 106-93-4 75-35-4 74-88-4 156-60-5 75-34-3 156-59-2 71-55-6 563-58-6 56-23-5 107-06-2 79-01-6 74-95-3 79-00-5 142-28-9 127-18-4 630-20-6 110-57-6 1476-11-5 79-34-5 96-18-4 76-01-7 96-12-8 87-68-3 75-71-8 74-87-3 75-01-4 74-83-9 75-00-3 75-69-4 108-90-7 108-86-1 95-49-8 106-43-4 541-73-1 106-46-7 95-50-1 120-82-1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit

EP074E: Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds (QC Lot: 1800963)

EP074F: Halogenated Aromatic Compounds (QC Lot: 1800963)
ES1110639-001 SL09.001 EP074: Chlorobenzene EP074: Bromobenzene EP074: 2-Chlorotoluene EP074: 4-Chlorotoluene EP074: 1.3-Dichlorobenzene EP074: 1.4-Dichlorobenzene EP074: 1.2-Dichlorobenzene EP074: 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene

Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Laboratory sample ID

: : : :

5 of 9
ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Client sample ID

Method: Compound

CAS Number

LOR

Unit

Original Result

Duplicate Result

RPD (%)

Recovery Limits (%)

EP074F: Halogenated Aromatic Compounds (QC Lot: 1800963) - continued
ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 SL09.001 SL09.001 EP074: 1.2.3-Trichlorobenzene EP074: Chloroform EP074: Bromodichloromethane EP074: Dibromochloromethane EP074: Bromoform 87-61-6 67-66-3 75-27-4 124-48-1 75-25-2 ------------------------------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 91-20-3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 100 100 50 100 100 50 10 100 100 50 100 100 50 10 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit

EP074G: Trihalomethanes (QC Lot: 1800963)

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1800477)
ES1110202-139 Anonymous EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ES1110549-004 Anonymous EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1800962)
ES1110639-001 ES1110202-139 SL09.001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction ES1110549-004 Anonymous EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction

EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2010 Draft (QC Lot: 1800477)

EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2010 Draft (QC Lot: 1800962)
ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 SL09.001 SL09.001 EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction EP080: Benzene EP080: Toluene EP080: Ethylbenzene EP080: meta- & para-Xylene EP080: ortho-Xylene EP080: Naphthalene

EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 1800962)

The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material.5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 0.5 82.5 0.5 0.2 80.1 ---104 92.2.3-Dichloropropylene EP074: trans-1.5 0.0 ---97.5 ---<5 ---<5 ---<5 ---<5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2-Dichloropropane EP074: cis-1.4-Trimethylbenzene EP074: tert-Butylbenzene EP074: p-Isopropyltoluene EP074: n-Butylbenzene EP074B: Oxygenated Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) EP074: Vinyl Acetate EP074: 2-Butanone (MEK) EP074: 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) EP074: 2-Hexanone (MBK) EP074C: Sulfonated Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) EP074: Carbon disulfide 75-15-0 594-20-7 78-87-5 10061-01-5 10061-02-6 106-93-4 EP074D: Fumigants (QCLot: 1800963) EP074: 2.8 79.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.9 ---59.6 70 70 ---67 64 59 63 61 62 62 60 57 11 ---37 ---56 ---59 ---53 57 68 59 53 69 130 130 ---121 124 129 125 127 126 126 126 129 155 ---169 ---136 ---133 ---135 129 122 127 129 121 EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1800909) EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS (QCLot: 1801157) EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1800963) EP074: Styrene EP074: Isopropylbenzene EP074: n-Propylbenzene EP074: 1.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.8 111 102 103 106 103 108 105 101 70.5 <0.5 0.5 ---81.2 98. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.5 <0.5 1412 µS/cm 442 mg/kg ---1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 97.4 87.3-Dichloropropylene EP074: 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ---91.2-Dichloropropane EP074: 1.5 <0. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix.5 0. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Method Blank (MB) Report Result Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Concentration Spike Recovery (%) LCS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EA010: Conductivity (QCLot: 1801156) EA010: Electrical Conductivity @ 25°C EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P ------1 2 1 100-42-5 98-82-8 103-65-1 108-67-8 135-98-8 95-63-6 98-06-6 99-87-6 104-51-8 108-05-4 78-93-3 108-10-1 591-78-6 0.3. or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes.5 <0.5 0.5-Trimethylbenzene EP074: sec-Butylbenzene EP074: 1.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 6 of 9 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation.5 0.5 µS/cm mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <1 <2 <1 <0.2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EP074E: Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) .5 0.5 0.

5 <0.2.3-Trichloropropane EP074: Pentachloroethane EP074: 1.3 87.2-Dichloroethane EP074: Trichloroethene EP074: Dibromomethane EP074: 1.4 95.5 10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---10 mg/kg ---1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 127 ---126 ---115 ---112 ---120 ---114 ---106 93.5 0.4 51 48 67 68 63 64 146 ---140 ---146 ---152 ---149 ---139 ---133 134 128 126 124 125 128 128 124 129 123 122 121 139 125 137 128 127 126 144 133 136 125 122 127 126 EP074F: Halogenated Aromatic Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) EP074: Chlorobenzene EP074: Bromobenzene EP074: 2-Chlorotoluene EP074: 4-Chlorotoluene .1.2-Trichloroethane EP074: 1.5 0.3 85.5 0.5 <0.2 96.3-Dichloropropane EP074: Tetrachloroethene EP074: 1.5 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg ---<5 ---<5 ---<5 ---<5 ---<5 ---<5 <0.5 <0.7 91.5 <0.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane EP074: Hexachlorobutadiene 75-71-8 74-87-3 75-01-4 74-83-9 75-00-3 75-69-4 75-35-4 74-88-4 156-60-5 75-34-3 156-59-2 71-55-6 563-58-6 56-23-5 107-06-2 79-01-6 74-95-3 79-00-5 142-28-9 127-18-4 630-20-6 110-57-6 1476-11-5 79-34-5 96-18-4 76-01-7 96-12-8 87-68-3 108-90-7 108-86-1 95-49-8 106-43-4 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 0.5 0.5 0.continued EP074: Dichlorodifluoromethane EP074: Chloromethane EP074: Vinyl chloride EP074: Bromomethane EP074: Chloroethane EP074: Trichlorofluoromethane EP074: 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.1-Trichloroethane EP074: 1.8 84.5 <0.1 101 28.5 <0.1.5 0.1 87.Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method: Compound : : : : 7 of 9 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Method Blank (MB) Report CAS Number LOR Unit Result Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Concentration Spike Recovery (%) LCS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EP074E: Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) .5 0.2-Tetrachloroethane EP074: 1.5 0.2.5 0.2-Dichloroethene EP074: 1.1 107 104 102 98.1.5 0.2-Tetrachloroethane EP074: trans-1.5 95.4-Dichloro-2-butene EP074: cis-1.1-Dichloroethene EP074: Iodomethane EP074: trans-1.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.1.2 92.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.9 ---43 ---40 ---44 ---49 ---53 ---57 48 62 64 66 61 62 56 70 65 67 70 71 61 57 45 56 57 62 26.5 0.2 97.8 99.5 <0.5 <0.4 74.5 0.5 <0.3 85.1.4 91.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.2-Dichloroethene EP074: 1.6 91.5 0.1-Dichloroethane EP074: cis-1.1-Dichloropropylene EP074: Carbon Tetrachloride EP074: 1.5 0.4-Dichloro-2-butene EP074: 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2 94.5 <0.5 <0.6 121 99.5 <0.4 91.5 <0.

C40 Fraction EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .9 99.5 0.4 77.3-Trichlorobenzene 541-73-1 106-46-7 95-50-1 120-82-1 87-61-6 67-66-3 75-27-4 124-48-1 75-25-2 ---------------------0.5 0.5 0.C28 Fraction EP071: C29 .NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1800477) EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .3 66 64 67 54 58 67 60 58 57 59 74 63 68.C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 .5 <0.4 63 69 61 62 63 63 124 126 121 134 132 123 126 124 121 131 138 131 128 131 138 ---131 128 121 122 117 118 117 131 EP074G: Trihalomethanes (QCLot: 1800963) EP074: Chloroform EP074: Bromodichloromethane EP074: Dibromochloromethane EP074: Bromoform EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1800477) EP071: C10 .5 <1 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 200 mg/kg 300 mg/kg 200 mg/kg 26 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 350 mg/kg ---150 mg/kg 31 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 2 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 104 99.5 <50 <100 <100 <10 <50 <100 <100 ---<10 <0.5 <0.5 <0.4-Trichlorobenzene EP074: 1.5 <0.2-Dichlorobenzene EP074: 1.2 79.5 1 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.3 98.5 0.continued EP074: 1.5 <0.2 0.8 106 100 77.5 <0.C9 Fraction EP071: >C10 .NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1800962) EP080: C6 .4 91.5 50 100 100 10 50 100 100 50 10 0.5 <0.C36 Fraction EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1800962) EP080: C6 .0 83.4 59 74 ---63 68.C16 Fraction EP071: >C16 .2.2 <0.0 80.2.9 81.Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method: Compound : : : : 8 of 9 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Method Blank (MB) Report CAS Number LOR Unit Result Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Concentration Spike Recovery (%) LCS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EP074F: Halogenated Aromatic Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) .5 0.5 0.8 103 134 112 102 113 133 ---72.3 84.4-Dichlorobenzene EP074: 1.5 0.5 0.5 <0.2 86.5 0.5 <0.C10 Fraction ---71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 91-20-3 EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 1800962) EP080: Benzene EP080: Toluene EP080: Ethylbenzene EP080: meta.& para-Xylene EP080: ortho-Xylene EP080: Naphthalene .1 85.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.3-Dichlorobenzene EP074: 1.C14 Fraction EP071: C15 .5 0.

9 73.NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1800962) ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 SL09.C10 Fraction EP080: Benzene EP080: Toluene EP080: Ethylbenzene EP080: meta.5 mg/kg 2. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries.6 74.9 82.4 77.1 96.8 99.4 74.5 72.5 mg/kg 640 mg/kg 3140 mg/kg 2860 mg/kg 32.& para-Xylene EP080: ortho-Xylene EP080: Naphthalene EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 1800962) .1-Dichloroethene EP074: Trichloroethene ---75-35-4 79-01-6 108-90-7 ------------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 91-20-3 100 mg/kg 2.NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1800477) EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .C9 Fraction EP071: >C10 . Sub-Matrix: SOIL Spike Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration Matrix Spike (MS) Report Spike Recovery (%) MS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1800909) ES1110639-001 ES1110639-001 SL09.5 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg 2. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs).001 Anonymous EP074: Chlorobenzene EP071: C10 .Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 9 of 9 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Matrix Spike (MS) Report The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes.5 mg/kg 2.001 SL09.5 mg/kg 88.2 95.6 73.1 83.3 78.5 mg/kg 2.001 EP080: C6 .0 79.5 mg/kg 2.C16 Fraction EP071: >C16 .3 109 76.001 Anonymous EP080: C6 . Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.5 mg/kg 2.001 EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P EP074: 1.C40 Fraction EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .001 SL09.C36 Fraction EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1800477) EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1800962) ES1110639-001 ES1110202-139 SL09.7 75.C28 Fraction EP071: C29 .5 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg 850 mg/kg 4800 mg/kg 2400 mg/kg 37.C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 .5 99.C14 Fraction EP071: C15 .4 70 70 70 70 73 53 52 70 73 53 52 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 130 130 130 130 137 131 132 130 137 131 132 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 EP074E: Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) EP074F: Halogenated Aromatic Compounds (QCLot: 1800963) ES1110639-001 ES1110202-139 SL09.

+61-2-8784 8555 Fax.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement : 23-MAY-2011 : 27-MAY-2011 :3 :3 Client Contact Address : AGL ENERGY : TOM LAWLER : P.alsglobal.O BOX 67 MENANGLE Contact Address MENANGLE NSW 2568 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Site C-O-C number Sampler Order number Quote number : tlawler@agl.com. This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Analysis Holding Time Compliance l Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance l Brief Method Summaries l Summary of Outliers Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel. +61-2-8784 8500 www.com . Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted.au : 4633 5200 : ---: SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST : ---: ---: TOM LAWLER : 4510002862 : SY/456/10 E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level Date Samples Received Issue Date No.True INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : ES1110639 Page Laboratory : 1 of 6 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. of samples received No.

SL09.001. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and precludes subsequent dilutions and reruns.002.Unpreserved SL09. ü = Within holding time. APHA. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü . 20-MAY-2011 ---- ---- ---- 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09. Mercury (28 days) & other metals (180 days).003 EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Soil Glass Jar . For composite samples.002.001.001.002.003 EP074B: Oxygenated Compounds Soil Glass Jar .Unpreserved SL09. Sample date for laboratory produced leachates is assumed as the completion date of the leaching process. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09. Information is also provided re the sample container (preservative) from which the analysis aliquot was taken.003 EP074D: Fumigants Soil Glass Jar .002. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 16-NOV-2011 ü 25-MAY-2011 26-MAY-2011 ü SL09.Unpreserved SL09.003 SL09.Unpreserved SL09. Matrix: SOIL Method Container / Client Sample ID(s) Sample Date Evaluation: û = Holding time breach . AS and NEPM (1999).Unpreserved SL09.002. For non -volatile analytes.002. sampling date is assumed to be that of the oldest sample contributing to the composite. A recorded breach therefore does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters. SL09.Unpreserved SL09.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Analysis Holding Time Compliance The following report summarises extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares with recommended holding times. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 16-NOV-2011 ü 24-MAY-2011 16-NOV-2011 ü SL09. SL09.001.003 EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Soil Glass Jar . 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09. SL09.Unpreserved SL09.Unpreserved SL09. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09. Extraction / Preparation Date extracted Analysis Evaluation Date analysed Due for extraction Due for analysis Evaluation EA010: Conductivity Soil Glass Jar . SL09.003 EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser Soil Glass Jar .001.001. Outliers for holding time are based on USEPA SW 846. These soil holding times are: Organics (14 days). Holding times for leachate methods (excluding elutriates) vary according to the analytes being determined on the resulting solution. SL09.001. Elapsed period to analysis represents number of days from sampling where no extraction / digestion is involved or period from extraction / digestion where this is present. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 ü 24-MAY-2011 21-JUN-2011 ü SL09. SL09.002.001. the holding time compliance assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method.002.003 EA055: Moisture Content Soil Glass Jar . SL09.003 EP074C: Sulfonated Compounds Soil Glass Jar .

001. SL09.Page Work Order Client Project Matrix: SOIL Method : : : : 3 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Evaluation: û = Holding time breach .Unpreserved SL09.003 EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Soil Glass Jar .Unpreserved SL09.001.Unpreserved SL09.003 EP074G: Trihalomethanes Soil Glass Jar . SL09. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09.Unpreserved SL09.Unpreserved SL09.002. SL09.Unpreserved SL09.003 Soil Glass Jar . SL09. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .001.001.003 Soil Glass Jar .Unpreserved SL09. SL09. ü = Within holding time.003 EP080: BTEX Soil Glass Jar .001.002.003 Soil Glass Jar . 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü .002. SL09. Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Date extracted Analysis Evaluation Date analysed Container / Client Sample ID(s) Due for extraction Due for analysis Evaluation EP074E: Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds Soil Glass Jar .001.003 EP074F: Halogenated Aromatic Compounds Soil Glass Jar . SL09.001.002.Unpreserved SL09.002.Unpreserved SL09. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 SL09.003 EP080: BTEXN Soil Glass Jar . 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09. SL09. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09.002.002. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü SL09.002. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü ü 24-MAY-2011 03-JUL-2011 ü ü SL09. 20-MAY-2011 24-MAY-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü ü 24-MAY-2011 03-JUL-2011 ü ü SL09.002.NEPM 2010 Draft SL09. SL09.001.003 SL09.001.

A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.0 5.0 5.0 Quality Control Specification Evaluation ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement .0 5.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 4 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed.Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX Volatile Organic Compounds Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH .0 33.0 5.0 10.0 5.3 5.0 25.0 5.0 Rate (%) Expected 10.0 25.0 25.0 10.Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX Volatile Organic Compounds QC 1 2 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Regular 3 20 26 3 18 10 4 20 3 18 10 4 3 20 3 18 10 4 3 18 10 4 Actual 33.0 10.3 5.Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX Volatile Organic Compounds Matrix Spikes (MS) Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH .6 10.0 5.3 11.0 33. Matrix: SOIL Quality Control Sample Type Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification .Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX Volatile Organic Compounds Method Blanks (MB) Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH .6 10.0 33.3 10. ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.6 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 33.4 33.0 5.3 5.0 25.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 5. Count Method EP050 EA010 EA055-103 EK067G EP071 EP080 EP074 EA010 EK067G EP071 EP080 EP074 EP050 EA010 EK067G EP071 EP080 EP074 EK067G EP071 EP080 EP074 Analytical Methods Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Moisture Content Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH . Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate.3 5.0 5.0 5.1 10.

8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 . Quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. APHA 21st ed. 2510) Conductivity is determined on soil samples using a 1:5 soil/water leach. ALS is not NATA accredited for this analysis. APHA 21st ed.Soluble by Discrete Analyser TKN as N By Discrete Analyser Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) By Discrete Analyser Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser Anionic Surfactants as MBAS SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL TPH . (USEPA SW 846 .. Samples are settled and the water filtered off for analysis.1) (USEPA SW 846 . Combined oxidised Nitrogen (NO2+NO3) in a water extract is determined by Cadmium Reduction.Semivolatile Fraction Volatile Organic Compounds EP071 EP074 SOIL SOIL TPH Volatiles/BTEX EP080 SOIL (APHA 21st ed.8260B) Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap.. Analytical Methods Method EA010 EA055-103 EK059G EK061G EK062G EK067G EP050 Matrix Method Descriptions Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Moisture Content Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx). This method comprises three successive extractions from acid aqueous medium containing excess methylene blue..1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time). and direct colourimetry by Discrete Analyser. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis.8260B) Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap. each determined seperately as N.. In-house. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 104) A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C. Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 20mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. followed by an aqueous backwash and measurement of the colour by spectrophotometry at 625nm.H.D. This method is compliant with NEPM (2010 Draft) Schedule B(3) Section 7.GC/MS. 4500 P-B&F This procedure involves sulfuric acid digestion and quantification using Discrete Analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 506. (USEPA SW 846 . APHA 21st ed. Capillary GC/MS. . 10 g of soil is mixed with 50 mL of distilled water and tumbled end over end for 1 hour. Capillary GC/MS. MBAS results determined following 1:5 solid / water leach. 4500 P . 5540 B & C. APHA 21st ed. 4500 Norg.. into chloroform.Total Nitrogen is determined as the sum of TKN and Oxidised Nitrrogen. Water soluble salts are leached from the soil by the continuous suspension.... 4500 NO3. Quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. APHA. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 501) Method Descriptions Preparation Methods Method EK061/EK067 EN34 Matrix TKN/TP Digestion 1:5 solid / water leach for soluble analytes Methanolic Extraction of Soils for Purge and Trap Tumbler Extraction of Solids (Option B Non-concentrating) SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL * ORG16 ORG17B APHA 21st ed.C36. AS and NEPM. Macro Kjeldahl digestion. 4500 Norg/NO3. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The solvent is transferred directly to a GC vial for analysis. APHA 21st ed. 4500-Norg-D Soil samples are digested using Kjeldahl digestion followed by determination by Discrete Analyser.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 5 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA. 10g of sample. APHA 21st ed. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 501) (USEPA SW 846 .F.5030A) 5g of solid is shaken with surrogate and 10mL methanol prior to analysis by Purge and Trap . Mechanical agitation (tumbler).

Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW 846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples The following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples. This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only. l No Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist. no surrogate recovery outliers occur. . Regular Sample Surrogates l For all regular sample matrices. no Method Blank value outliers occur. l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed. Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes l l l l For all matrices. For all matrices. no Laboratory Control outliers occur. Duplicates. Method Blanks. For all matrices. For all matrices.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 6 of 6 ES1110639 AGL ENERGY SUGARLOAF 09 SOIL TEST Summary of Outliers Outliers : Quality Control Samples The following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. no Duplicate outliers occur. no Matrix Spike outliers occur. Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance This report displays Holding Time breaches only.

.

com . Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. AUSTRALIA 2060 adam_sullivan@urscorp. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference.alsglobal.com +61 2 8925 5500 +61 2 8925 5555 43177447 ------AM ---- : EN/038/10 No. This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information: l General Comments l Analytical Results l Surrogate Control Limits NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 This document is issued in accordance with NATA accreditation requirements. 116 MILLER STREET : : : : : : : : Contact Address E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Order number C-O-C number Sampler Site Quote number Contact Address E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level Date Samples Received Issue Date No. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. of samples received NORTH SYDNEY NSW. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.ES1111046 False CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Work Order : ES1111046 Page Laboratory : 1 of 15 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal.Marassa Inorganic Chemist Inorganic Chemist Senior Organic Chemist Senior Inorganic Chemist Metals Coordinator Sydney Inorganics Sydney Inorganics Sydney Organics Sydney Inorganics Sydney Inorganics Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel. +61-2-8784 8555 Fax. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted.Sidarta Pabi Subba Sarah Millington Wisam. Signatories Position Accreditation Category Ankit Joshi Evie. Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. +61-2-8784 8500 www.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement : 26-MAY-2011 : 31-MAY-2011 : 12 : 12 Client : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR. this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. AS and NEPM. In these instances. APHA.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA. When sampling time information is not provided by the client. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR. LOR = Limit of reporting ^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting . the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. this may be due to high moisture content. Where moisture determination has been performed. sampling dates are shown without a time component. results are reported on a dry weight basis. Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services.

3 30 30 410 180 8 <1 16 26 22 15 49 7.05 <0.8 497 14.0 2450 2450 390 3.0 2120 2120 325 4.05 <0.4 484 14.05 <0.0-0.5 0.1 0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:05 ES1111046-004 SB5_0.05 <0.1 <5.05 <0.6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.0-0.1 7.05 <0.05 0.0 663 18.0 1420 1420 214 1.0 10 10 10 10 5 1 2 5 5 2 5 0.2 4900 4920 532 9.05 Unit pH Unit mg/kg % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EA002 : pH (Soils) pH Value 8.0-0.0 10 10 230 60 6 <1 15 23 20 13 47 8.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.3 <0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:50 ES1111046-001 SB2_0.1 <5.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 3 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB1_0.0-0.1 40 20 20 110 8 <1 15 25 22 17 79 EA014 Total Soluble Salts ^ Total Soluble Salts EA055: Moisture Content ^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ED093S: Soluble Major Cations Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Zinc EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS Mercury Nitrite + Nitrate as N (Sol.9 10 10 90 40 8 <1 15 27 19 16 45 6.) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N <0.0-0.1 20 20 2 0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:20 ES1111046-005 Compound CAS Number ---------7440-70-2 7439-95-4 7440-23-5 7440-09-7 7440-38-2 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7440-02-0 7440-66-6 7439-97-6 ---------------319-84-6 118-74-1 319-85-7 58-89-9 319-86-8 LOR 0.1 16.05 0.05 .05 <0.05 <0.1 <5.05 <0.05 <0.1 5 1.1 26-MAY-2011 14:55 ES1111046-002 SB3_0.05 <0.5 <0.7 358 15.05 <0.6 EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser EK062: Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) ^ Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser EP004: Organic Matter Organic Matter EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) alpha-BHC Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) beta-BHC gamma-BHC delta-BHC <0.7 10 10 130 80 7 <1 16 25 22 15 50 7.1 650 18.6 <0.0 1680 1690 274 4.1 26-MAY-2011 15:10 ES1111046-003 SB4_0.

05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 4 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB1_0.05 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:50 ES1111046-001 SB2_0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:05 ES1111046-004 SB5_0.05 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.2 0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:20 ES1111046-005 Compound Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide trans-Chlordane alpha-Endosulfan cis-Chlordane Dieldrin 4.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.4`-DDE Endrin beta-Endosulfan 4.2 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.5 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) .05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.05 0.2 <0.2 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:10 ES1111046-003 SB4_0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:55 ES1111046-002 SB3_0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.4`-DDT Endrin ketone Methoxychlor CAS Number 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 5103-74-2 959-98-8 5103-71-9 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 7421-93-4 1031-07-8 50-29-3 53494-70-5 72-43-5 62-73-7 919-86-8 6923-22-4 60-51-5 333-41-5 5598-13-0 298-00-0 121-75-5 55-38-9 2921-88-2 56-38-2 23505-41-1 470-90-6 4824-78-6 22224-92-6 34643-46-4 563-12-2 786-19-6 86-50-0 91-20-3 LOR 0.05 0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.5 EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) Dichlorvos Demeton-S-methyl Monocrotophos Dimethoate Diazinon Chlorpyrifos-methyl Parathion-methyl Malathion Fenthion Chlorpyrifos Parathion Pirimphos-ethyl Chlorfenvinphos Bromophos-ethyl Fenamiphos Prothiofos Ethion Carbophenothion Azinphos Methyl Naphthalene EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons .05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.Continued <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.4`-DDD Endrin aldehyde Endosulfan sulfate 4.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.2 0.05 <0.05 0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.

0-0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.0-0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:55 ES1111046-002 SB3_0.5 <0.2.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:05 ES1111046-004 SB5_0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C16 Fraction >C16 .5 <0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C36 Fraction ^ C10 .5 <0.5 <0.5 0.C9 Fraction C10 .5 0.C34 Fraction >C34 .5 0.5 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons .1 26-MAY-2011 15:20 ES1111046-005 Compound Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benz(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1.5 <0.5 <0.C40 Fraction ^ >C10 .5 0.5 <0.0-0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.NEPM 2010 Draft EP080: BTEX Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene meta.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C28 Fraction C29 .5 <0.h.5 <0.2 EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.0-0.5 <0.5 <0.C40 Fraction (sum) ---------------------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 ---- 10 50 100 100 50 10 10 50 100 100 50 0.cd)pyrene Dibenz(a.5 <0.0-0.C10 Fraction ^ C6 .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 0.5 <0.5 <0.Continued <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C10 Fraction minus BTEX (F1) >C10 .5 <0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C36 Fraction (sum) C6 .C14 Fraction C15 .5 <0.5 0.& para-Xylene ortho-Xylene EP080: BTEXN ^ Sum of BTEX .5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2 <0.3.5 EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6 .h)anthracene Benzo(g.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.i)perylene ^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons CAS Number 208-96-8 83-32-9 86-73-7 85-01-8 120-12-7 206-44-0 129-00-0 56-55-3 218-01-9 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 ---- LOR 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 5 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB1_0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:10 ES1111046-003 SB4_0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:50 ES1111046-001 SB2_0.5 <0.

1 0.2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene .1 0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:50 ES1111046-001 SB2_0.3 82.1 0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 6 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB1_0.0-0.1 Unit mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % % % % % % EP080: BTEXN .1 26-MAY-2011 15:10 ES1111046-003 SB4_0.5 <1 100 102 112 104 106 113 110 117 82.6 91.5 <1 95.5 <1 102 106 107 106 111 114 109 117 86.Continued ^ Total Xylenes Naphthalene <0.5 <0.1 87.1 26-MAY-2011 15:20 ES1111046-005 Compound CAS Number 1330-20-7 91-20-3 21655-73-2 78-48-8 13127-88-3 93951-73-6 118-79-6 321-60-8 1719-06-8 1718-51-0 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 LOR 0.1 0.8 <0.1 76.1 0.5 1 0.6-Tribromophenol EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates 2-Fluorobiphenyl Anthracene-d10 4-Terphenyl-d14 EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates 1.0-0.1 93.1 26-MAY-2011 15:05 ES1111046-004 SB5_0.0-0.2 97.5 <1 99.4 EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate Dibromo-DDE DEF EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates Phenol-d6 2-Chlorophenol-D4 2.2 113 108 106 110 106 106 115 88.4.1 0.0 79.1 0.0 104 110 104 98.9 <0.0-0.4 73.1 0.1 0.6 81.4 <0.6 113 108 116 90.4 86.5 <1 102 107 107 106 111 106 107 118 88.0-0.1 0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:55 ES1111046-002 SB3_0.

3 221 16.0 2240 14.2 20 20 20 130 6 <1 13 25 25 12 61 6.0 2360 2360 362 2.05 <0.6 198 8.05 <0.0-0.0 1310 1310 226 2.0 6040 6040 960 5.05 <0.2 10 20 130 60 7 <1 16 30 19 16 49 6.05 <0.1 452 8.05 0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:25 ES1111046-006 SB7_0.0-0.7 140 70 30 690 8 <1 15 25 44 14 74 6.1 26-MAY-2011 15:40 ES1111046-009 SB10_0.05 <0.0-0.05 <0.1 5 1.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 7 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB6_0.4 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 <0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:30 ES1111046-007 SB8_0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.1 0.3 20 20 20 120 6 <1 14 27 43 14 94 EA014 Total Soluble Salts ^ Total Soluble Salts EA055: Moisture Content ^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ED093S: Soluble Major Cations Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Zinc EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS Mercury Nitrite + Nitrate as N (Sol.05 <0.8 <0.9 <0.1 20 20 2 0.05 <0.5 0.0 3890 3890 533 5.6 EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser EK062: Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) ^ Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser EP004: Organic Matter Organic Matter EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) alpha-BHC Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) beta-BHC gamma-BHC delta-BHC <0.05 <0.4 266 14.05 <0.1 171 6410 6580 678 7.05 <0.05 0.0 10 10 10 10 5 1 2 5 5 2 5 0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:45 ES1111046-010 Compound CAS Number ---------7440-70-2 7439-95-4 7440-23-5 7440-09-7 7440-38-2 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7440-02-0 7440-66-6 7439-97-6 ---------------319-84-6 118-74-1 319-85-7 58-89-9 319-86-8 LOR 0.05 <0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:35 ES1111046-008 SB9_0.0 <0.1 <2.05 .05 Unit pH Unit mg/kg % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EA002 : pH (Soils) pH Value 7.05 <0.0-0.1 <2.05 <0.1 <2.1 <5.05 <0.3 20 20 30 60 7 <1 15 27 20 15 48 6.

05 <0.05 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 8 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB6_0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.0-0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 0.5 <0.05 0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.0-0.05 <0.05 0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:35 ES1111046-008 SB9_0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:30 ES1111046-007 SB8_0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.0-0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.4`-DDD Endrin aldehyde Endosulfan sulfate 4.05 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:25 ES1111046-006 SB7_0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.Continued <0.05 0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.4`-DDT Endrin ketone Methoxychlor CAS Number 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 5103-74-2 959-98-8 5103-71-9 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 7421-93-4 1031-07-8 50-29-3 53494-70-5 72-43-5 62-73-7 919-86-8 6923-22-4 60-51-5 333-41-5 5598-13-0 298-00-0 121-75-5 55-38-9 2921-88-2 56-38-2 23505-41-1 470-90-6 4824-78-6 22224-92-6 34643-46-4 563-12-2 786-19-6 86-50-0 91-20-3 LOR 0.05 <0.2 0.05 0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.2 <0.5 EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) Dichlorvos Demeton-S-methyl Monocrotophos Dimethoate Diazinon Chlorpyrifos-methyl Parathion-methyl Malathion Fenthion Chlorpyrifos Parathion Pirimphos-ethyl Chlorfenvinphos Bromophos-ethyl Fenamiphos Prothiofos Ethion Carbophenothion Azinphos Methyl Naphthalene EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons .05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.0-0.4`-DDE Endrin beta-Endosulfan 4.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 <0.2 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:45 ES1111046-010 Compound Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide trans-Chlordane alpha-Endosulfan cis-Chlordane Dieldrin 4.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 <0.5 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) .05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:40 ES1111046-009 SB10_0.2 0.05 0.2 0.2 <0.

5 0.0-0.2 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.0-0.C14 Fraction C15 .5 <0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:40 ES1111046-009 SB10_0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C36 Fraction (sum) C6 .h.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C9 Fraction C10 .2.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.Continued <0.3.C10 Fraction minus BTEX (F1) >C10 .5 <0.C28 Fraction C29 .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6 .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2 <0.5 0.C16 Fraction >C16 .5 <0.C40 Fraction ^ >C10 .2 EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .5 <0.i)perylene ^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons CAS Number 208-96-8 83-32-9 86-73-7 85-01-8 120-12-7 206-44-0 129-00-0 56-55-3 218-01-9 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 ---- LOR 0.C10 Fraction ^ C6 .5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:45 ES1111046-010 Compound Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benz(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.0-0.2 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.& para-Xylene ortho-Xylene EP080: BTEXN ^ Sum of BTEX .5 <0.2 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.0-0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:30 ES1111046-007 SB8_0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C40 Fraction (sum) ---------------------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 ---- 10 50 100 100 50 10 10 50 100 100 50 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:35 ES1111046-008 SB9_0.0-0.5 <0.cd)pyrene Dibenz(a.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.5 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons .5 <0.5 <0.h)anthracene Benzo(g.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:25 ES1111046-006 SB7_0.NEPM 2010 Draft EP080: BTEX Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene meta.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 9 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB6_0.5 <0.5 <0.C36 Fraction ^ C10 .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.C34 Fraction >C34 .5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.

0-0.7 90.6 89.4 <0.5 <1 88.9 92.4.7 83.1 108 103 112 90.7 94.1 0.1 0.Continued ^ Total Xylenes Naphthalene <0.2 103 97.6 80.5 <1 116 111 103 97.5 <1 89.6 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:25 ES1111046-006 SB7_0.6-Tribromophenol EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates 2-Fluorobiphenyl Anthracene-d10 4-Terphenyl-d14 EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates 1.4 <0.6 <0.1 0.1 0.8 113 109 106 114 112 121 91.2 EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate Dibromo-DDE DEF EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates Phenol-d6 2-Chlorophenol-D4 2.1 0.7 99.1 0.1 0.1 Unit mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % % % % % % EP080: BTEXN .5 <1 102 120 113 107 105 115 111 118 88.0-0.0 80.4 89.5 1 0.0-0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:45 ES1111046-010 Compound CAS Number 1330-20-7 91-20-3 21655-73-2 78-48-8 13127-88-3 93951-73-6 118-79-6 321-60-8 1719-06-8 1718-51-0 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 LOR 0.0-0.1 102 104 103 104 110 105 115 89.9 81.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 10 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB6_0.1 0.1 89.1 0.2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene .6 80.1 26-MAY-2011 15:30 ES1111046-007 SB8_0.7 107 105 113 89.0-0.4 81.1 26-MAY-2011 15:35 ES1111046-008 SB9_0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:40 ES1111046-009 SB10_0.1 0.2 91.5 <1 85.

1 26-MAY-2011 15:55 ES1111046-011 QC100 [26-MAY-2011] ES1111046-012 ---------- ---------- ---------- Compound CAS Number ---------7440-70-2 7439-95-4 7440-23-5 7440-09-7 7440-38-2 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7440-02-0 7440-66-6 7439-97-6 ---------------319-84-6 118-74-1 319-85-7 58-89-9 319-86-8 LOR 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser EK062: Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) ^ Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser EP004: Organic Matter Organic Matter EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) alpha-BHC Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) beta-BHC gamma-BHC delta-BHC <0.05 0.0 494 20.05 <0.0 2000 2000 333 3.05 <0.05 0.0 <0.9 520 18.0 10 10 10 10 5 1 2 5 5 2 5 0.05 <0.0-0.05 0.05 <0.05 Unit pH Unit mg/kg % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EA002 : pH (Soils) pH Value 7.1 20 20 2 0.1 5 1.) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 11 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB11_0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.0 8.05 .05 <0.1 <5.1 <5.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- EA014 Total Soluble Salts ^ Total Soluble Salts EA055: Moisture Content ^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ED093S: Soluble Major Cations Calcium Magnesium Sodium Potassium <10 10 120 60 7 <1 15 35 19 15 55 <10 10 140 60 7 <1 15 27 20 16 60 EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Zinc EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS Mercury Nitrite + Nitrate as N (Sol.1 0.5 0.0 2080 2080 448 3.

05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 12 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB11_0.2 0.2 0.05 <0.0-0.05 0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.2 <0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.4`-DDE Endrin beta-Endosulfan 4.2 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.5 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) .05 0.05 <0.05 0.5 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.2 <0.05 0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:55 ES1111046-011 QC100 [26-MAY-2011] ES1111046-012 ---------- ---------- ---------- Compound Heptachlor Aldrin Heptachlor epoxide trans-Chlordane alpha-Endosulfan cis-Chlordane Dieldrin 4.05 <0.05 <0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.4`-DDD Endrin aldehyde Endosulfan sulfate 4.05 <0.05 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.4`-DDT Endrin ketone Methoxychlor CAS Number 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 5103-74-2 959-98-8 5103-71-9 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 7421-93-4 1031-07-8 50-29-3 53494-70-5 72-43-5 62-73-7 919-86-8 6923-22-4 60-51-5 333-41-5 5598-13-0 298-00-0 121-75-5 55-38-9 2921-88-2 56-38-2 23505-41-1 470-90-6 4824-78-6 22224-92-6 34643-46-4 563-12-2 786-19-6 86-50-0 91-20-3 LOR 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) Dichlorvos Demeton-S-methyl Monocrotophos Dimethoate Diazinon Chlorpyrifos-methyl Parathion-methyl Malathion Fenthion Chlorpyrifos Parathion Pirimphos-ethyl Chlorfenvinphos Bromophos-ethyl Fenamiphos Prothiofos Ethion Carbophenothion Azinphos Methyl Naphthalene EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons .05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.Continued <0.05 <0.2 <0.05 0.

C40 Fraction (sum) ---------------------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 ---- 10 50 100 100 50 10 10 50 100 100 50 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.C40 Fraction ^ >C10 .5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.cd)pyrene Dibenz(a.5 <0.C14 Fraction C15 .NEPM 2010 Draft EP080: BTEX Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene meta.5 <0.h)anthracene Benzo(g.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.2 0.5 0.0-0.5 0.2 ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 13 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB11_0.C10 Fraction minus BTEX (F1) >C10 .5 <0.5 Unit mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons .5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.C34 Fraction >C34 .5 <0.5 <0.Continued <0.5 <0.2 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.2 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 <0.h.5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons C6 .5 <0.5 0.C9 Fraction C10 .5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.C16 Fraction >C16 .5 <0.5 <0.C10 Fraction ^ C6 .5 <0.3.C36 Fraction (sum) C6 .5 <0.2.5 0.5 <0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:55 ES1111046-011 QC100 [26-MAY-2011] ES1111046-012 ---------- ---------- ---------- Compound Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benz(a)anthracene Chrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1.& para-Xylene ortho-Xylene EP080: BTEXN ^ Sum of BTEX .C36 Fraction ^ C10 .2 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.i)perylene ^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons CAS Number 208-96-8 83-32-9 86-73-7 85-01-8 120-12-7 206-44-0 129-00-0 56-55-3 218-01-9 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 ---- LOR 0.C28 Fraction C29 .5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.

Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 14 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB11_0.2 85.5 <1 70.2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene .1 0.1 0.4 79.0-0.4.1 0.Continued ^ Total Xylenes Naphthalene <0.1 0.9 88.0 <0.5 <1 120 115 107 104 107 109 106 115 99.1 Unit mg/kg mg/kg % % % % % % % % % % % EP080: BTEXN .8 95.1 26-MAY-2011 15:55 ES1111046-011 QC100 [26-MAY-2011] ES1111046-012 ---------- ---------- ---------- Compound CAS Number 1330-20-7 91-20-3 21655-73-2 78-48-8 13127-88-3 93951-73-6 118-79-6 321-60-8 1719-06-8 1718-51-0 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 LOR 0.1 0.3 97.4 ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate Dibromo-DDE DEF EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates Phenol-d6 2-Chlorophenol-D4 2.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6-Tribromophenol EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates 2-Fluorobiphenyl Anthracene-d10 4-Terphenyl-d14 EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates 1.5 1 0.3 108 103 107 110 105 113 86.1 0.

2 132.9 132.0 EP068T: Organophosphorus Pesticide Surrogate DEF EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates Phenol-d6 2-Chlorophenol-D4 2.6 147.3 53.5 22.0 54.6 167.8 134.8 23.6-Tribromophenol EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates 2-Fluorobiphenyl Anthracene-d10 4-Terphenyl-d14 EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates 1.4.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 15 of 15 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Surrogate Control Limits Sub-Matrix: SOIL Recovery Limits (%) Compound CAS Number 21655-73-2 78-48-8 13127-88-3 93951-73-6 118-79-6 321-60-8 1719-06-8 1718-51-0 17060-07-0 2037-26-5 460-00-4 Low High EP068S: Organochlorine Pesticide Surrogate Dibromo-DDE 19.7 56.1 58.2-Dichloroethane-D4 Toluene-D8 4-Bromofluorobenzene .0 72.3 133.1 130.0 163.8 133.9 71.8 73.5 133.7 137.9 55.

com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. AUSTRALIA 2060 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Site C-O-C number Sampler Order number Quote number : adam_sullivan@urscorp.Marassa Inorganic Chemist Inorganic Chemist Senior Organic Chemist Senior Inorganic Chemist Metals Coordinator Sydney Inorganics Sydney Inorganics Sydney Organics Sydney Inorganics Sydney Inorganics . Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted.com : +61 2 8925 5500 : +61 2 8925 5555 : 43177447 : ---: ---: AM : ---No. This Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report . Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11. Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report . All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.Sidarta Pabi Subba Sarah Millington Wisam. 116 MILLER STREET Contact Address Contact Address NORTH SYDNEY NSW. of samples received : EN/038/10 No. Recovery and Acceptance Limits l Matrix Spike (MS) Report . of samples analysed : 12 : 12 Date Samples Received Issue Date : 26-MAY-2011 : 31-MAY-2011 E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level : sydney@alsglobal. Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. Recovery and Acceptance Limits NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 This document is issued in accordance with NATA accreditation requirements. Signatories Position Accreditation Category Ankit Joshi Evie.False QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : ES1111046 Page Laboratory : 1 of 13 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Client : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below.

insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR. this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis. this may be due to high moisture content. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR. Where moisture determination has been performed. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference # = Indicates failed QC . APHA. AS and NEPM. results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity.0 0.0 7.0-0.0 12.0 0.1 0. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%) EA002 : pH (Soils) (QC Lot: 1807255) ES1110904-001 ES1111046-010 ES1110915-020 ES1111046-008 ES1111046-001 Anonymous SB10_0.) EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 1807257) .7 4.0% .7 10 10 260 70 20 10 20 110 <1 55 52 <5 28 18 77 <1 15 15 7 28 20 50 <0.1 EG035T: Mercury EG035T: Mercury EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N (Sol.20% 0% .1 SB10_0.1 <0.1 <0.0 0.3 5.0 18.0 0.0 0.1 SB1_0.5 0.1 ED093S: Calcium ED093S: Magnesium ED093S: Sodium ED093S: Potassium ------------7440-70-2 7439-95-4 7440-23-5 7440-09-7 7440-70-2 7439-95-4 7440-23-5 7440-09-7 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-02-0 7440-38-2 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7440-66-6 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-02-0 7440-38-2 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7440-66-6 7439-97-6 7439-97-6 ------0.1 <5.4 17.20% 0% .1 1.0 <5.1 EG005T: Cadmium EG005T: Chromium EG005T: Nickel EG005T: Arsenic EG005T: Copper EG005T: Lead EG005T: Zinc EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 1806657) ES1110955-005 ES1111046-003 ES1111046-001 ES1111046-010 Anonymous SB3_0.0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 2 2 5 5 5 5 1 2 2 5 5 5 5 0.1 0.0-0.20% No Limit No Limit No Limit 0% .7 8.1 0.0-0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.20% No Limit 0% .1 EA002: pH Value EA002: pH Value EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ED093S: Calcium ED093S: Magnesium ED093S: Sodium ED093S: Potassium ES1111046-010 SB10_0.2 10 10 230 60 20 20 20 120 <1 55 52 6 28 22 74 <1 16 15 7 25 22 50 <0.0-0.) EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N (Sol.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.20%.0-0.0 <5.50%.0 1.7 0.0 0.50% No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1806472) ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QC Lot: 1807256) EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 1806656) ES1110955-005 Anonymous EG005T: Cadmium EG005T: Chromium EG005T: Nickel EG005T: Arsenic EG005T: Copper EG005T: Lead EG005T: Zinc ES1111046-003 SB3_0.1 0.50% No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit 0% .8 16.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 3 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:No Limit.1 Anonymous SB8_0.20% No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit 0% . Result > 20 times LOR:.0 0.0 8.4 4.0 0.1 pH Unit pH Unit % % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 7.0 0.0 0% .1 SB1_0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0-0.0-0.0-0. Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:.0 6.0% .50% No Limit No Limit 0% .50% No Limit 0% .1 6.1 <5.

Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Laboratory sample ID

: : : :

4 of 13
ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Client sample ID

Method: Compound

CAS Number

LOR

Unit

Original Result

Duplicate Result

RPD (%)

Recovery Limits (%)

EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 1807646)
ES1110992-021 ES1111046-008 ES1110956-001 ES1111046-008 ES1111040-002 ES1111046-010 ES1111046-002 Anonymous SB8_0.0-0.1 Anonymous SB8_0.0-0.1 Anonymous SB10_0.0-0.1 SB2_0.0-0.1 EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P EP004: Organic Matter EP004: Organic Matter EP068: alpha-BHC EP068: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) EP068: beta-BHC EP068: gamma-BHC EP068: delta-BHC EP068: Heptachlor EP068: Aldrin EP068: Heptachlor epoxide EP068: trans-Chlordane EP068: alpha-Endosulfan EP068: cis-Chlordane EP068: Dieldrin EP068: 4.4`-DDE EP068: Endrin EP068: beta-Endosulfan EP068: 4.4`-DDD EP068: Endrin aldehyde EP068: Endosulfan sulfate EP068: Endrin ketone EP068: 4.4`-DDT EP068: Methoxychlor ES1111046-012 QC100 EP068: alpha-BHC EP068: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) EP068: beta-BHC EP068: gamma-BHC EP068: delta-BHC EP068: Heptachlor EP068: Aldrin EP068: Heptachlor epoxide EP068: trans-Chlordane ------------------319-84-6 118-74-1 319-85-7 58-89-9 319-86-8 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 5103-74-2 959-98-8 5103-71-9 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 7421-93-4 1031-07-8 53494-70-5 50-29-3 72-43-5 319-84-6 118-74-1 319-85-7 58-89-9 319-86-8 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 5103-74-2 20 20 2 2 0.5 0.5 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 2220 3890 Not Authorised 533 1.2 5.6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 2020 4100 # Not Authorised 540 1.2 5.6 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 9.7 5.4 # 3.9 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0% - 20% 0% - 20% 0% - 20% 0% - 20% No Limit 0% - 50% No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit

EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 1807645)

EP004: Organic Matter (QC Lot: 1807990)

EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QC Lot: 1807982)

Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Laboratory sample ID

: : : :

5 of 13
ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Client sample ID

Method: Compound

CAS Number

LOR

Unit

Original Result

Duplicate Result

RPD (%)

Recovery Limits (%)

EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QC Lot: 1807982) - continued
ES1111046-012 QC100 EP068: alpha-Endosulfan EP068: cis-Chlordane EP068: Dieldrin EP068: 4.4`-DDE EP068: Endrin EP068: beta-Endosulfan EP068: 4.4`-DDD EP068: Endrin aldehyde EP068: Endosulfan sulfate EP068: Endrin ketone EP068: 4.4`-DDT EP068: Methoxychlor 959-98-8 5103-71-9 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 7421-93-4 1031-07-8 53494-70-5 50-29-3 72-43-5 62-73-7 919-86-8 60-51-5 333-41-5 5598-13-0 121-75-5 55-38-9 2921-88-2 23505-41-1 470-90-6 4824-78-6 22224-92-6 34643-46-4 563-12-2 786-19-6 86-50-0 6923-22-4 298-00-0 56-38-2 62-73-7 919-86-8 60-51-5 333-41-5 5598-13-0 121-75-5 55-38-9 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit

EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QC Lot: 1807982)
ES1111046-002 SB2_0.0-0.1 EP068: Dichlorvos EP068: Demeton-S-methyl EP068: Dimethoate EP068: Diazinon EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl EP068: Malathion EP068: Fenthion EP068: Chlorpyrifos EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl EP068: Chlorfenvinphos EP068: Bromophos-ethyl EP068: Fenamiphos EP068: Prothiofos EP068: Ethion EP068: Carbophenothion EP068: Azinphos Methyl EP068: Monocrotophos EP068: Parathion-methyl EP068: Parathion ES1111046-012 QC100 EP068: Dichlorvos EP068: Demeton-S-methyl EP068: Dimethoate EP068: Diazinon EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl EP068: Malathion EP068: Fenthion

Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL
Laboratory sample ID

: : : :

6 of 13
ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447
Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Client sample ID

Method: Compound

CAS Number

LOR

Unit

Original Result

Duplicate Result

RPD (%)

Recovery Limits (%)

EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QC Lot: 1807982) - continued
ES1111046-012 QC100 EP068: Chlorpyrifos EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl EP068: Chlorfenvinphos EP068: Bromophos-ethyl EP068: Fenamiphos EP068: Prothiofos EP068: Ethion EP068: Carbophenothion EP068: Azinphos Methyl EP068: Monocrotophos EP068: Parathion-methyl EP068: Parathion 2921-88-2 23505-41-1 470-90-6 4824-78-6 22224-92-6 34643-46-4 563-12-2 786-19-6 86-50-0 6923-22-4 298-00-0 56-38-2 91-20-3 208-96-8 83-32-9 86-73-7 85-01-8 120-12-7 206-44-0 129-00-0 56-55-3 218-01-9 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 91-20-3 208-96-8 83-32-9 86-73-7 85-01-8 120-12-7 206-44-0 129-00-0 56-55-3 218-01-9 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1807978)
ES1111046-002 SB2_0.0-0.1 EP075(SIM): Naphthalene EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene EP075(SIM): Fluorene EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene EP075(SIM): Anthracene EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Pyrene EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene EP075(SIM): Chrysene EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene ES1111046-012 QC100 EP075(SIM): Naphthalene EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene EP075(SIM): Fluorene EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene EP075(SIM): Anthracene EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Pyrene EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene EP075(SIM): Chrysene

2.5 <0.C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 .0-0.5 <0.& para-Xylene .& para-Xylene EP080: ortho-Xylene EP080: Naphthalene ES1111046-005 SB5_0.Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory sample ID : : : : 7 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%) EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1807978) .0 0.0 0.0 0.3.2 <0.C36 Fraction EP071: C10 .5 <0.0 0.1 SB2_0.C28 Fraction EP071: C29 .2 0.C16 Fraction EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .0 0.5 <0.5 <1 <0.0 0.5 <10 <10 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.C40 Fraction EP071: >C10 .C40 Fraction EP071: >C10 .5 0.5 0.C10 Fraction EP071: >C16 .5 10 10 100 100 50 100 100 50 10 10 100 100 50 100 100 50 0.5 <0.5 0.0 0.h)anthracene EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.1 EP080: C6 .C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 .5 <0.5 <10 <10 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <10 <10 <100 <100 <50 <100 <100 <50 <0.5 0.0-0.0 0.0 0.5 <0.0-0.5 <0.5 <0.0 0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.2 <0.5 0.NEPM 2010 Draft (QC Lot: 1806443) ES1110777-001 ES1111046-005 ES1111046-002 Anonymous SB5_0.5 0.0 0.continued ES1111046-012 QC100 EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.5 0.5 0.C9 Fraction EP080: C6 .5 0.0-0.cd)pyrene EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 <0.5 <0.1 EP080: Benzene EP080: Toluene EP080: Ethylbenzene EP080: meta.5 1 0.C14 Fraction ES1111046-012 QC100 EP071: C15 .5 <0.0 0.1 SB2_0.0 0.0 0.0 0.NEPM 2010 Draft (QC Lot: 1807977) EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 1806443) ES1110777-001 Anonymous EP080: Benzene EP080: Toluene EP080: Ethylbenzene EP080: meta.2 <0.0 0.C14 Fraction EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1807977) EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .C36 Fraction EP071: C10 .0 0.0 0.C10 Fraction EP080: C6 .C28 Fraction EP071: C29 .5 <0.0 0.5 <1 <0.5 <0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.i)perylene 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 ------------------------------------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 91-20-3 71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 0.5 <0.C16 Fraction ES1111046-012 QC100 EP071: >C16 .0 0.0 0.C9 Fraction EP071: C15 .1 EP080: C6 .0-0.h.5 <0.0 0.0 No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit No Limit EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1806443) ES1110777-001 ES1111046-005 ES1111046-002 Anonymous SB5_0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 <0.0 0.

0 0.1 EP080: ortho-Xylene EP080: Naphthalene 95-47-6 91-20-3 0.0 No Limit No Limit .5 <1 0.5 1 mg/kg mg/kg <0.0-0.continued ES1111046-005 SB5_0.Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory sample ID : : : : 8 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%) EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 1806443) .5 <1 <0.

Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 9 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation.05 0.5 0.9 83.2 93.2 78.5 mg/kg 0.05 250 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 13.05 <0.05 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <10 <10 <10 <10 <5 <1 <2 <5 <5 <2 <5 <0.1 88.1 85.0 101 99.76 mg/kg 55.1 20 2 0.9 76.5 93.1 97.6 67 65.23 mg/kg 103.2 100 91.6 60.8 101 88.5 mg/kg 96.8 mg/kg 1000 mg/kg 442 mg/kg 4.7 65.8 59.5 84.58 % 0.93 mg/kg 54.1 <0.0 95.11 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.8 86. or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes.68 mg/kg 54.05 <0.05 0.76 mg/kg 60.5 <0.5 mg/kg 0.4 95.05 <0.05 0.2 89.3 89.9 67 70 70 70 86 60.05 0.05 0.9 99.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg 0.1 0.5 mg/kg 0.4 79.6 98.8 59.7 70 83.5 mg/kg 0.2 88.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 0.05 0.1 <20 <2 <0. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.) EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1806657) EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1807257) EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1807646) EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1807645) EP004: Organic Matter (QCLot: 1807990) EP004: Organic Matter EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QCLot: 1807982) EP068: alpha-BHC EP068: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) EP068: beta-BHC EP068: gamma-BHC EP068: delta-BHC EP068: Heptachlor EP068: Aldrin EP068: Heptachlor epoxide EP068: trans-Chlordane EP068: alpha-Endosulfan .7 90.9 111 90.05 0.8 65.5 mg/kg 0.8 97.2 90. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix.88 mg/kg 1.05 0.8 65.4 mg/kg 4.05 <0.2 85. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination.8 88.1 85.4 59.8 108 109 110 111 130 111 117 114 111 116 112 118 130 130 130 111 116 115 117 118 114 115 113 113 113 116 EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1806656) EG005T: Arsenic EG005T: Cadmium EG005T: Chromium EG005T: Copper EG005T: Lead EG005T: Nickel EG005T: Zinc EG035T: Mercury EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N (Sol.05 <0.4 96.3 88. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Method Blank (MB) Report Result Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Concentration Spike Recovery (%) LCS Recovery Limits (%) Low High ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QCLot: 1807256) ED093S: Calcium ED093S: Magnesium ED093S: Sodium ED093S: Potassium 7440-70-2 7439-95-4 7440-23-5 7440-09-7 7440-38-2 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7440-02-0 7440-66-6 7439-97-6 ------------319-84-6 118-74-1 319-85-7 58-89-9 319-86-8 76-44-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 5103-74-2 959-98-8 10 10 10 10 5 1 2 5 5 2 5 0.05 <0.

4 63.1 78.5 0.5 92.5 <0.2 <0.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg 0.2 0.05 <0.2 88.5 mg/kg 0.continued EP068: cis-Chlordane EP068: Dieldrin EP068: 4.1 2.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.5 0.5 mg/kg 0.0 90.5 <0.9 111 71.05 0.5 mg/kg 0.1 65.05 0.9 65.05 0.4`-DDE EP068: Endrin EP068: beta-Endosulfan EP068: 4.88 48.5 mg/kg 0.05 0.9 98.05 <0.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.05 0.5 0.5 mg/kg 0.05 0.9 79.4 81.5 0.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.5 0.2 <0.0 82.4 25.5 mg/kg 0.05 0.5 mg/kg 0.05 0.5 29.05 <0.8 88.05 0.05 0.3 45.05 0.5 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 85.4 64.1 92.2 <0.7 111 89.8 102 109 91.2 <0.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.5 63 66.05 <0.1 61.2 0.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 0.8 89.2 82.05 0.05 <0.7 91.2 0.05 0.05 0.5 <0.4`-DDD EP068: Endrin aldehyde EP068: Endosulfan sulfate EP068: 4.2 <0.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.5 10.05 <0.5 79.5 mg/kg 0.7 110 108 109 110 108 108 106 57.6 50.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.2 60 64.05 0.05 0.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.05 <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 mg/kg 0.5 0.6 81.05 0.05 0.9 79.05 <0.3 67.8 81.05 0.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.1 81.05 0.5 0.2 100 110 110 101 103 83.05 0.3 57.6 58.9 77.4 60.05 <0.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.4 62 59.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg 0.5 <0.4 84.8 61.5 mg/kg 0.4 64.05 <0.5 mg/kg 0.2 0.6 64.7 64.5 92.05 0.5 65.5 mg/kg 0.5 <0.05 <0.5 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.4`-DDT EP068: Endrin ketone EP068: Methoxychlor 5103-71-9 60-57-1 72-55-9 72-20-8 33213-65-9 72-54-8 7421-93-4 1031-07-8 50-29-3 53494-70-5 72-43-5 62-73-7 919-86-8 6923-22-4 60-51-5 333-41-5 5598-13-0 298-00-0 121-75-5 55-38-9 2921-88-2 56-38-2 23505-41-1 470-90-6 4824-78-6 22224-92-6 34643-46-4 563-12-2 786-19-6 86-50-0 91-20-3 208-96-8 83-32-9 86-73-7 85-01-8 120-12-7 206-44-0 0.2 0.3 63.4 97.4 67.Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method: Compound : : : : 10 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Method Blank (MB) Report CAS Number LOR Unit Result Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Concentration Spike Recovery (%) LCS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QCLot: 1807982) .05 0.8 120 116 114 121 117 116 115 119 127 117 132 124 159 149 126 111 111 113 127 110 111 116 111 123 114 128 111 116 119 137 113 113 112 112 114 112 113 EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QCLot: 1807982) EP068: Dichlorvos EP068: Demeton-S-methyl EP068: Monocrotophos EP068: Dimethoate EP068: Diazinon EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl EP068: Parathion-methyl EP068: Malathion EP068: Fenthion EP068: Chlorpyrifos EP068: Parathion EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl EP068: Chlorfenvinphos EP068: Bromophos-ethyl EP068: Fenamiphos EP068: Prothiofos EP068: Ethion EP068: Carbophenothion EP068: Azinphos Methyl EP075(SIM): Naphthalene EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene EP075(SIM): Fluorene EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene EP075(SIM): Anthracene EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1807978) .9 94.5 mg/kg 0.

C9 Fraction EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1807977) EP071: C10 .7 72.4 68.9 113 106 ---92.5 0.C36 Fraction EP080: C6 .5 10 50 100 100 10 50 100 100 50 0.NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1807977) EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 1806443) EP080: Benzene EP080: Toluene EP080: Ethylbenzene EP080: meta.5 0.0 96.4 59 74 63 68.7 98.9 77.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.h)anthracene EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.2 <0.5 <0.Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method: Compound : : : : 11 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Method Blank (MB) Report CAS Number LOR Unit Result Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Concentration Spike Recovery (%) LCS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1807978) .5 <0.5 <0.2 0.C40 Fraction EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .5 0.C10 Fraction EP071: >C10 .5 0.8 74.7 99.5 0.8 89.2 76.5 <1 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 4 mg/kg 26 mg/kg 200 mg/kg 300 mg/kg 200 mg/kg 31 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 350 mg/kg ---150 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 2 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 104 109 109 101 102 106 96.C16 Fraction EP071: >C16 .5 0.h.C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 .3 112 114 110 92.0 78.3 88.4 71 71.continued EP075(SIM): Pyrene EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene EP075(SIM): Chrysene EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.3.5 <0.5 0.2 94.5 <0.5 0.C14 Fraction EP071: C15 .5 <0.8 71.5 0.NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1806443) EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .5 <0.2 79.5 <0.cd)pyrene EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.4 59 74 ---63 63 69 61 62 63 63 113 112 114 118 117 113 113 113 114 128 131 138 131 128 131 138 ---131 121 122 117 118 117 131 EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1806443) EP080: C6 .2.i)perylene 129-00-0 56-55-3 218-01-9 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 ------------------------0.4 90.5 0.4 100 87.5 1 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg <0.& para-Xylene EP080: ortho-Xylene EP080: Naphthalene 71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 91-20-3 .5 <10 <50 <100 <100 <10 <50 <100 <100 ---<0.5 0.C28 Fraction EP071: C29 .

5 mg/kg 87.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg 0.8 90.8 94.8 104 106 95. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries.3 101 90. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs).5 mg/kg 2 mg/kg 2 mg/kg 0.0-0.1 90.0-0.3 86.0 89.1 Anonymous Anonymous SB2_0.6 85.5 91.5 mg/kg 0.1 80.1 EG035T: Mercury EK059G: Nitrite + Nitrate as N (Sol.5 mg/kg 0.C9 Fraction .0-0.8 82.1 EP068: Diazinon EP068: Chlorpyrifos-methyl EP068: Pirimphos-ethyl EP068: Bromophos-ethyl EP068: Prothiofos EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1807978) ES1111046-002 SB2_0.8 88.0-0.5 mg/kg 0.9 99.) EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P EP068: gamma-BHC EP068: Heptachlor EP068: Aldrin EP068: Dieldrin EP068: Endrin EP068: 4. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Spike Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration Matrix Spike (MS) Report Spike Recovery (%) MS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1806656) ES1110955-005 Anonymous EG005T: Arsenic EG005T: Cadmium EG005T: Chromium EG005T: Copper EG005T: Lead EG005T: Nickel EG005T: Zinc 7440-38-2 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7440-50-8 7439-92-1 7440-02-0 7440-66-6 7439-97-6 ---------58-89-9 76-44-8 309-00-2 60-57-1 72-20-8 50-29-3 333-41-5 5598-13-0 23505-41-1 4824-78-6 34643-46-4 83-32-9 129-00-0 ---50 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 50 mg/kg 250 mg/kg 5 mg/kg 30 mg/kg 500 mg/kg 100 mg/kg 0.0-0.1 EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene EP075(SIM): Pyrene EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1806443) ES1111046-005 SB5_0.8 92.5 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg 0.3 86.6 80.5 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 32.2 84.4 82.2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1806657) ES1110955-005 ES1111046-001 ES1110992-021 ES1110956-001 ES1111046-002 Anonymous SB1_0.4`-DDT EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1807257) EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1807646) EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1807645) EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) (QCLot: 1807982) EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) (QCLot: 1807982) ES1111046-002 SB2_0.4 107 98.1 EP080: C6 .Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 12 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Matrix Spike (MS) Report The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes.2 90. Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.

1 SB2_0.5 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg 2.0 77.& para-Xylene EP080: ortho-Xylene EP080: Naphthalene .C14 Fraction EP071: C15 .C10 Fraction EP071: >C10 .0-0.2 93.NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1806443) ES1111046-005 ES1111046-002 SB5_0.1 EP080: C6 .1 92.C40 Fraction EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .0 73 53 52 70 73 53 52 70 70 70 70 70 70 137 131 132 130 137 131 132 130 130 130 130 130 130 EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons .Page Work Order Client Project Sub-Matrix: SOIL : : : : 13 of 13 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Matrix Spike (MS) Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) MS Recovery Limits (%) Low High Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1807977) ES1111046-002 SB2_0.5 mg/kg 2.4 83.C34 Fraction EP071: >C34 .5 mg/kg 2.2 78.1 EP080: Benzene EP080: Toluene EP080: Ethylbenzene EP080: meta.8 85.8 87.C16 Fraction EP071: >C16 .0-0.1 EP071: C10 .5 mg/kg 2.5 mg/kg 850 mg/kg 4800 mg/kg 2400 mg/kg 2.0-0.C28 Fraction EP071: C29 .6 86.NEPM 2010 Draft (QCLot: 1807977) EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 1806443) ES1111046-005 SB5_0.5 85.C36 Fraction ---------------------71-43-2 108-88-3 100-41-4 108-38-3 106-42-3 95-47-6 91-20-3 640 mg/kg 3140 mg/kg 2860 mg/kg 37.0-0.2 88.5 mg/kg 93.7 104 90.

of samples received No.alsglobal. This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Analysis Holding Time Compliance l Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance l Brief Method Summaries l Summary of Outliers Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel.com . Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. 116 MILLER STREET Contact Address NORTH SYDNEY NSW.com : +61 2 8925 5500 : +61 2 8925 5555 : 43177447 : ---: ---: AM : ---: EN/038/10 E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level Date Samples Received Issue Date No. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement : 26-MAY-2011 : 31-MAY-2011 : 12 : 12 Client Contact Address : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. +61-2-8784 8500 www.True INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : ES1111046 Page Laboratory : 1 of 10 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal. AUSTRALIA 2060 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Site C-O-C number Sampler Order number Quote number : adam_sullivan@urscorp. +61-2-8784 8555 Fax.

SB4_0.1.1.0-0. For composite samples.1. SB9_0.1.0-0.1.1.0-0. SB10_0.1.0-0.0-0.1. SB9_0. AS and NEPM (1999).1.1.1.0-0.1. Outliers for holding time are based on USEPA SW 846.1. SB4_0.1.1.0-0. SB5_0. SB2_0. SB11_0. These soil holding times are: Organics (14 days).0-0.0-0. Extraction / Preparation Date extracted Analysis Evaluation Date analysed Due for extraction Due for analysis Evaluation EA002 : pH (Soils) Soil Glass Jar .1.1.0-0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 ---- ---- ---- 26-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü SB2_0.0-0. Information is also provided re the sample container (preservative) from which the analysis aliquot was taken. SB3_0. SB5_0. SB8_0. For non -volatile analytes. SB3_0.Unpreserved SB1_0.0-0. SB11_0. SB6_0.0-0. Sample date for laboratory produced leachates is assumed as the completion date of the leaching process. SB6_0.1. SB7_0.0-0.0-0.1.1. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.Unpreserved SB1_0.0-0.1. A recorded breach therefore does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.1. APHA.0-0. SB4_0. SB8_0.1. ü = Within holding time.0-0.Unpreserved SB1_0.1.1.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü 30-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü SB2_0.Unpreserved SB1_0.0-0.0-0.0-0. sampling date is assumed to be that of the oldest sample contributing to the composite. Holding times for leachate methods (excluding elutriates) vary according to the analytes being determined on the resulting solution.1.0-0.1.1. SB9_0.0-0. SB8_0.1.1. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and precludes subsequent dilutions and reruns.0-0. SB8_0. Matrix: SOIL Method Container / Client Sample ID(s) Sample Date Evaluation: û = Holding time breach .1.0-0. Elapsed period to analysis represents number of days from sampling where no extraction / digestion is involved or period from extraction / digestion where this is present.0-0. SB7_0. SB5_0.0-0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analysis Holding Time Compliance The following report summarises extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares with recommended holding times.0-0. SB10_0.0-0. SB4_0.1.1.0-0.1. EA055: Moisture Content Soil Glass Jar . SB10_0. SB10_0.1.1.1.0-0.0-0.1. SB3_0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 02-JUN-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 ü SB2_0.1. ED093S: Soluble Major Cations Soil Glass Jar .1. SB5_0.0-0.1. SB7_0.0-0. SB9_0. SB6_0.0-0.0-0.1.0-0. SB6_0.0-0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü . SB7_0. the holding time compliance assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method.1. SB3_0.1. SB11_0.0-0. SB11_0.0-0. EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES Soil Glass Jar . Mercury (28 days) & other metals (180 days).

1.0-0. SB3_0.0-0. SB4_0.0-0.1.0-0.1.0-0.0-0. SB9_0.1.1.0-0.1.0-0. Soil Glass Jar .0-0. SB4_0.1.Unpreserved SB1_0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 02-JUN-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 02-JUN-2011 ü . SB5_0.1.1.0-0.0-0.1.0-0. Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Date extracted Analysis Evaluation Date analysed Container / Client Sample ID(s) Due for extraction Due for analysis Evaluation EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS Soil Glass Jar .0-0.1. QC100 26-MAY-2011 30-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü 30-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü SB2_0.0-0.1.0-0. SB6_0.1. SB4_0. SB4_0.1. SB8_0.1. SB6_0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü SB2_0.1.1.0-0.0-0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 30-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü 30-MAY-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü SB2_0. SB8_0.0-0.Unpreserved SB1_0.1. SB7_0. SB5_0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.1.1. SB2_0. SB9_0. SB8_0. SB3_0. SB10_0. SB6_0.0-0.0-0. SB9_0.0-0.1. SB5_0.1.1. SB9_0.Unpreserved SB1_0. SB8_0.1.1.1.1. SB3_0.1.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.1. SB11_0.0-0.1.1.Unpreserved SB1_0.0-0. SB5_0.1. SB11_0.1.1.1.0-0. SB7_0. SB10_0.1.1.0-0. SB11_0.0-0.0-0.1.0-0.1.1. SB5_0.1. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 23-JUN-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 23-JUN-2011 ü EK059G: Nitrite plus Nitrate as N (NOx) by Discrete Analyser SB2_0.0-0.0-0. ü = Within holding time.1.0-0.1. SB7_0. SB3_0.1.0-0. SB10_0.0-0.1.1.0-0. SB7_0. EP004: Organic Matter Soil Glass Jar . SB7_0.Page Work Order Client Project Matrix: SOIL Method : : : : 3 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Evaluation: û = Holding time breach .1.0-0. SB6_0.1. SB8_0.1.1.0-0.0-0.0-0.Unpreserved SB1_0. SB10_0.1. SB4_0.1. SB10_0. EK061G: Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen By Discrete Analyser Soil Glass Jar .0-0. SB9_0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0. SB6_0.1.0-0. EK067G: Total Phosphorus as P by Discrete Analyser Soil Glass Jar . SB11_0.0-0.1.0-0.1. SB11_0. SB3_0.0-0.

QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 30-MAY-2011 06-JUL-2011 ü SB2_0.0-0.0-0. SB10_0. SB4_0.1. SB8_0. SB10_0.0-0. SB9_0.1. SB3_0. SB11_0.0-0.0-0. EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Soil Glass Jar .0-0.0-0.1. SB3_0.0-0.1.1. SB11_0. SB9_0.1.0-0.0-0.0-0.1.0-0.1. SB5_0.1.1. SB11_0.0-0. SB2_0.1. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 06-JUL-2011 ü SB2_0.0-0.0-0.0-0. SB4_0.1.0-0.0-0.1.1.0-0.1.1.0-0.0-0. SB7_0. SB10_0. SB5_0.0-0.0-0. Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Date extracted Analysis Evaluation Date analysed Container / Client Sample ID(s) Due for extraction Due for analysis Evaluation EP068A: Organochlorine Pesticides (OC) Soil Glass Jar .0-0.1. SB4_0.Unpreserved SB1_0.1.1.0-0.0-0.1.0-0.0-0.0-0. EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Soil Glass Jar .0-0.1.0-0.0-0.Unpreserved SB1_0. SB3_0.1.1. SB6_0.1. SB6_0. SB5_0.0-0. SB7_0.0-0.0-0. QC100 SB2_0. EP068B: Organophosphorus Pesticides (OP) Soil Glass Jar .0-0. SB7_0. SB6_0.0-0.1.0-0.1.1. SB7_0.1.0-0.0-0.1.1.1.1.0-0.Unpreserved SB1_0.1. ü = Within holding time.1.Page Work Order Client Project Matrix: SOIL Method : : : : 4 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Evaluation: û = Holding time breach .0-0. SB6_0.1.1.1. SB3_0.1. SB6_0.1.0-0. SB8_0.1.1. SB5_0.1. SB11_0. SB9_0.0-0.1.1.1.Unpreserved SB1_0.1.0-0.1. SB11_0.1.0-0. Soil Glass Jar . SB4_0.0-0.0-0.0-0.1. SB8_0.1. SB4_0.0-0. SB10_0. SB8_0. SB7_0.0-0. SB9_0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 30-MAY-2011 06-JUL-2011 ü SB2_0.1.1.1. SB10_0.1. SB8_0.0-0. SB3_0.0-0.1. SB5_0.0-0.Unpreserved SB1_0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 26-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 29-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 06-JUL-2011 ü .0-0. SB9_0.

0-0.0-0.0-0.1. SB11_0. SB10_0.1.1.0-0.1.0-0. SB6_0. QC100 SB2_0. SB8_0.0-0.1.0-0.1. Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Date extracted Analysis Evaluation Date analysed Container / Client Sample ID(s) Due for extraction Due for analysis Evaluation EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons . SB4_0. SB2_0.1.1. Soil Glass Jar .0-0. SB7_0. SB11_0.1. ü = Within holding time. QC100 26-MAY-2011 26-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 29-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü . SB5_0.1.0-0.1.Unpreserved SB1_0.Unpreserved SB1_0.1. SB10_0.1.0-0.0-0.0-0. SB10_0. SB9_0.Unpreserved SB1_0.1.0-0.0-0.Unpreserved SB1_0.1.1. SB3_0.0-0.1. SB7_0. SB3_0.1. SB5_0.1.0-0.0-0. SB3_0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 26-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 29-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü SB2_0.1. SB4_0.1. SB8_0. SB11_0.0-0. SB8_0.1.0-0.1.0-0. SB3_0.1.0-0.1. SB9_0.0-0.0-0.1. SB6_0. SB5_0.0-0.1.0-0.0-0.0-0.1. SB11_0.1.1.0-0.1. SB10_0. SB7_0.1.0-0.1. SB7_0.0-0.0-0.1.NEPM 2010 Draft Soil Glass Jar .0-0.0-0. EP080: BTEX Soil Glass Jar .0-0.1. SB6_0.0-0.0-0.0-0.1.0-0.0-0.Page Work Order Client Project Matrix: SOIL Method : : : : 5 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Evaluation: û = Holding time breach .0-0.1. EP080: BTEXN Soil Glass Jar .0-0. SB4_0. SB4_0. SB5_0.0-0. SB9_0.1.0-0.1.1.1.1.0-0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 26-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 29-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 26-MAY-2011 27-MAY-2011 09-JUN-2011 ü 27-MAY-2011 06-JUL-2011 ü SB2_0. SB6_0.1.1. SB8_0. SB9_0.

1 7.soluble by ICP-AES Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx).Soluble by Discrete Analyser Organic Matter PAH/Phenols (SIM) Pesticides by GCMS pH (1:5) TKN as N By Discrete Analyser Total Mercury by FIMS Total Metals by ICP-AES Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH .0 5.0 5.8 5.0 5. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate.0 5.0 10.1 8.0 5.7 11. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.0 10. ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.5 10.7 15.soluble by ICP-AES Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Moisture Content Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx).0 5.0 15.0 5.4 10.3 7.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 10.7 16.0 4.0 10.7 16.0 5.7 8.3 8.0 5.4 16.Soluble by Discrete Analyser Organic Matter PAH/Phenols (SIM) Pesticides by GCMS TKN as N By Discrete Analyser Total Mercury by FIMS Total Metals by ICP-AES Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH .3 7.8 5.3 9.soluble by ICP-AES Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx).0 10.1 7.4 16.0 5.0 Quality Control Specification Evaluation ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement .0 10.2 16.0 5.7 5. Count Method ED093S EA010 EA055-103 EK059G EP004 EP075(SIM) EP068 EA002 EK061G EG035T EG005T EK067G EP071 EP080 ED093S EA010 EK059G EP004 EP075(SIM) EP068 EK061G EG035T EG005T EK067G EP071 EP080 ED093S EA010 EK059G EP004 EP075(SIM) EP068 EK061G EG035T Analytical Methods Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) Cations .7 15. Matrix: SOIL Quality Control Sample Type Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification .Soluble by Discrete Analyser Organic Matter PAH/Phenols (SIM) Pesticides by GCMS TKN as N By Discrete Analyser Total Mercury by FIMS QC 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Regular 12 11 12 12 13 12 12 13 14 13 20 13 12 18 12 11 12 13 12 12 14 13 20 13 12 18 12 11 12 13 12 12 14 13 Actual 16.0 7.0 5.0 5.7 18.0 10.4 14.1 8.3 7.6 8.Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Cations .3 7.0 10.0 10.1 8.0 5.Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX Method Blanks (MB) Cations .3 8.7 8.3 15.0 10.0 9.7 Rate (%) Expected 10.3 9.3 5.0 10.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 6 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed.7 8.

3 5.0 5.0 5.Page Work Order Client Project Matrix: SOIL Quality Control Sample Type : : : : 7 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification .0 Quality Control Specification Evaluation ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement ALS QCS3 requirement .0 7.7 5.3 5. ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.0 4.1 7.3 8.7 8.Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX Matrix Spikes (MS) Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx).0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 7.Soluble by Discrete Analyser PAH/Phenols (SIM) Pesticides by GCMS TKN as N By Discrete Analyser Total Mercury by FIMS Total Metals by ICP-AES Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH .8 5.0 5.6 8.Semivolatile Fraction TPH Volatiles/BTEX QC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Regular 20 13 12 18 12 12 12 14 13 20 13 12 18 Actual 5.3 7.0 5.0 5. Count Method EG005T EK067G EP071 EP080 EK059G EP075(SIM) EP068 EK061G EG035T EG005T EK067G EP071 EP080 Analytical Methods Method Blanks (MB) .0 5.6 Rate (%) Expected 5.Continued Total Metals by ICP-AES Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser TPH .3 8.7 8.

Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards.C36. 3112 Hg . each determined seperately as N.6010 (ICPAES) Water extracts of the soil are analyzed for major cations by ICPAES. 4500 Norg/NO3. USEPA SW 846 .. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 506. APHA 21st ed.. 3120. APHA 21st ed..Soluble by Discrete Analyser TKN as N By Discrete Analyser Total Nitrogen as N (TKN + NOx) By Discrete Analyser Total Phosporus By Discrete Analyser Organic Matter Pesticides by GCMS EK059G EK061G EK062G EK067G EP004 EP068 SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL TPH .Semivolatile Fraction PAH/Phenols (SIM) EP071 EP075(SIM) SOIL SOIL (APHA 21st ed. 4500 NO3.Total Nitrogen is determined as the sum of TKN and Oxidised Nitrrogen. This method is compliant with NEPM (2010 Draft) Schedule B(3) Section 7. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. This technique is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 504. APHA 21st ed. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards. APHA 21st ed. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 104) A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C.8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve.. Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) APHA 21st ed.B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique... The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma. emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present.8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in Selective Ion Mode (SIM) and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. Combined oxidised Nitrogen (NO2+NO3) in a water extract is determined by Cadmium Reduction. 4500-Norg-D Soil samples are digested using Kjeldahl digestion followed by determination by Discrete Analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 103) (APHA 21st ed. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. Analytical Methods Method EA002 EA010 EA014 EA055-103 ED093S Matrix Method Descriptions pH (1:5) Electrical Conductivity (1:5) Total Soluble Salts Moisture Content Cations . This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (APHA 21st ed. 4500 P-B&F This procedure involves sulfuric acid digestion and quantification using Discrete Analyser. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma.8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 . 2510) Conductivity is determined on soil samples using a 1:5 soil/water leach. 3120. 4500H+) pH is determined on soil samples after a 1:5 soil/water leach. USEPA SW 846 .1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time).1.1997.6010) (ICPAES) Metals are determined following an appropriate acid digestion of the soil. APHA 21st ed. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) AS 3550.F.505) (USEPA SW 846 .. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.soluble by ICP-AES SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL SOIL Total Metals by ICP-AES EG005T SOIL Total Mercury by FIMS EG035T SOIL Nitrite and Nitrate as N (NOx).1) (USEPA SW 846 .Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 8 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 105) (USEPA SW 846 . emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present. Mercury in solids are determined following an appropriate acid digestion. AS1289.1 . This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 104) In-house.. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 502 and 507) . Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. APHA. The concentration of TSS in a soil is calculated from the Electrical conductivity of a water extract.. AS and NEPM..4. and direct colourimetry by Discrete Analyser.

4500 Norg. Quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. then cooled. In-house. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered and bulked to volume for analysis. Water soluble salts are leached from the soil by the continuous suspension.1. 10g of sample. In-house.1997.2 Mod. The solvent is transferred directly to a GC vial for analysis.4.D. . Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 20mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. 4500 P ... This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 501) Method Descriptions Preparation Methods Method EK061/EK067 EN34 EN69 Matrix TKN/TP Digestion 1:5 solid / water leach for soluble analytes Hot Block Digest for metals in soils sediments and sludges SOIL SOIL SOIL Organic Matter Methanolic Extraction of Soils for Purge and Trap Tumbler Extraction of Solids (Option A Concentrating) Tumbler Extraction of Solids (Option B Non-concentrating) EP004-PR SOIL SOIL SOIL * ORG16 ORG17A ORG17B SOIL APHA 21st ed. Mechanical agitation (tumbler).8260B) Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap. 20g of sample. APHA 21st ed. dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the desired volume for analysis. Macro Kjeldahl digestion. 10 g of soil is mixed with 50 mL of distilled water and tumbled end over end for 1 hour. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 105) (USEPA SW 846 . and soils. Samples are settled and the water filtered off for analysis.GC/MS.H. sediments.5030A) 5g of solid is shaken with surrogate and 10mL methanol prior to analysis by Purge and Trap . Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 150mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and Hydrochloric acids. Mechanical agitation (tumbler).1 . USEPA 200.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 9 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Methods Method EP080 Matrix Method Descriptions TPH Volatiles/BTEX SOIL (USEPA SW 846 . Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge. The solvent is decanted. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 202) AS1289.. Capillary GC/MS.

l No Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist. Regular Sample Surrogates l For all regular sample matrices. For all matrices. This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 10 of 10 ES1111046 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Summary of Outliers Outliers : Quality Control Samples The following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples The following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples. For all matrices. Method Blanks. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW 846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). no Method Blank value outliers occur. Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance This report displays Holding Time breaches only. no Laboratory Control outliers occur. Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes l l l l For all matrices. no Matrix Spike outliers occur. Duplicates. l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist. no surrogate recovery outliers occur. no Duplicate outliers occur. For all matrices. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed. .

l Sample(s) requiring volatile organic compound analysis received in airtight containers (ZHE). +61-2-8784 8500 www. Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel.0. Sample Disposal .00 SAMPLE RECEIPT NOTIFICATION (SRN) Comprehensive Report Work Order : ES1111046 Laboratory : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield Client : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3. of samples received No. of samples analysed : 2. AUSTRALIA 2060 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Order number C-O-C number Site Sampler : adam_sullivan@urscorp. +61-2-8784 8555 Fax.com : +61 2 8925 5500 : +61 2 8925 5555 : 43177447 : ---: ---: ---: AM QC Level Quote number E-mail Telephone Facsimile Page NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal.1'C . 116 MILLER STREET Contact Address Contact Address NORTH SYDNEY NSW. Temperature No.com . Solid (90 days) from date of completion of work order.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : 1 of 2 : ES2011URSMAW0004 (EN/038/10) : NEPM 1999 Schedule QCS3 requirement B(3) and ALS Dates Date Samples Received Client Requested Due Date : 26-MAY-2011 : 31-MAY-2011 Issue Date Scheduled Reporting Date : 26-MAY-2011 23:52 : 31-MAY-2011 Delivery Details Mode of Delivery No. of coolers/boxes Security Seal : Carrier : 1 HARD : Not intact. Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Sydney.alsglobal.Aqueous (14 days). Sample(s) have been received within recommended holding times. l MBAS analysis split into ES1111055 l l l Please direct any queries you have regarding this work order to the above ALS laboratory contact.Ice present : 12 : 12 General Comments l This report contains the following information: Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis Requested Deliverables l l Samples received in appropriately pretreated and preserved containers.

A4 . APHA.) Laboratory sample ID ES1111046-001 ES1111046-002 ES1111046-003 ES1111046-004 ES1111046-005 ES1111046-006 ES1111046-007 ES1111046-008 ES1111046-009 ES1111046-010 ES1111046-011 ES1111046-012 Client sampling date / time 26-MAY-2011 14:50 26-MAY-2011 14:55 26-MAY-2011 15:10 26-MAY-2011 15:05 26-MAY-2011 15:20 26-MAY-2011 15:25 26-MAY-2011 15:30 26-MAY-2011 15:35 26-MAY-2011 15:40 26-MAY-2011 15:45 26-MAY-2011 15:55 [ 26-MAY-2011 ] Client sample ID SB1_0. Na.0-0.Environmental ( SRN ) .0-0.0-0.EP004 (Carbon) Total Organic Carbon (Calc.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.1 SB3_0. Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis Some items described below may be part of a laboratory process neccessary for the execution of client requested tasks.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.com adam_sullivan@urscorp. that are included in the package.EA014 Total Soluble Salts SOIL . Matrix: SOIL SOIL . Mg.1 QC100 ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü Requested Deliverables ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ALL INVOICES .com adam_sullivan@urscorp.1 SB5_0.EDI Format .A4 . the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.0-0.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.ENMRG ( ENMRG ) .1 SB10_0.AU Tax Invoice ( INV ) EQUIS URS_EDMS . K) SOIL .*AU Interpretive QC Report .0-0.*AU QC Report .0-0.EQUIS V5 URS ( EQUV5_URS ) .DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) ( QCI ) .AU Tax Invoice ( INV ) . When sampling time information is not provided by the client.NT-11S Total N + Total P ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü .com adam_sullivan@urscorp.EDI Format .1 SB7_0.Chain of Custody (CoC) ( COC ) . USEPA standards.com adam_sullivan@urscorp. such as the determination of moisture content and preparation tasks.NATA ( QC ) .Chromatogram ( CHROM ) .1 SB2_0.1 SB9_0.NATA ( COA ) .1 SB6_0.0-0.1 SB4_0.*AU Certificate of Analysis .NT-1S Major Cations (Ca.EA002 pH (1:5) SOIL .1 SB11_0.EQUIS V5 URS ( EQUV5_URS ) MR ADAM SULLIVAN . Packages may contain additional analyses. In these instances.A4 .EDI Format .0-0.AU Sample Receipt Notification .S-26 8 metals/TPH/BTEX/PAH SOIL .0-0.0-0.Issue Date Page Work Order Client : : : : 26-MAY-2011 23:52 ES1111046 2 of 2 URS AUSTRALIA Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS. l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exist. sampling dates are shown without a time component.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) .MRED ( MRED ) Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email sydney_accounts@urscorp.S-12 OC/OP Pesticides SOIL .com urs_edms@urscorp.EDI Format .0-0.com SOIL .com adam_sullivan@urscorp.1 SB8_0.

.

Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.ES1111055 False CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS Work Order : ES1111055 Page Laboratory : 1 of 4 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal.com . +61-2-8784 8555 Fax. Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. 116 MILLER STREET : : : : : : : : Contact Address E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Order number C-O-C number Sampler Site Quote number Contact Address E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level Date Samples Received Issue Date No. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.alsglobal. Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. of samples received NORTH SYDNEY NSW. Signatories Position Accreditation Category Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel. This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information: l General Comments l Analytical Results NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 This document is issued in accordance with NATA accreditation requirements.com +61 2 8925 5500 +61 2 8925 5555 43177447 ------AM ---- : EN/038/10 No. +61-2-8784 8500 www. AUSTRALIA 2060 adam_sullivan@urscorp.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement : 26-MAY-2011 : 03-JUN-2011 : 10 : 10 Client : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3.

In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis. Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services.0-0. .1.1. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR. LOR adjusted accordingly. SB10_0.0-0.0-0. Where moisture determination has been performed. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR.1. this may be due to high moisture content. SB8_0. LOR = Limit of reporting ^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting l EP050 (anionic surfactants as MBAS): Samples SB1_0. In these instances. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. SB9_0.0-0. insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.1.1.1. SB11_0.1.0-0. SB4_0. SB7_0.0-0. SB3_0.0-0.1. APHA. AS and NEPM. the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.1. QC100 were diluted due to matrix interference.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 4 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA. SB2_0.0-0. sampling dates are shown without a time component.0-0. results are reported on a dry weight basis. When sampling time information is not provided by the client.

0-0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:05 ES1111055-004 SB7_0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:55 ES1111055-002 SB3_0.0-0.1 26-MAY-2011 14:50 ES1111055-001 SB2_0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:30 ES1111055-005 Compound CAS Number ---- LOR 1 Unit mg/kg EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Anionic Surfactants as MBAS <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 .0-0.0-0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:10 ES1111055-003 SB4_0.0-0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 3 of 4 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB1_0.

Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 4 of 4 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analytical Results Sub-Matrix: SOIL Client sample ID Client sampling date / time SB8_0.0-0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:40 ES1111055-007 SB10_0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:55 ES1111055-009 QC100 26-MAY-2011 15:00 ES1111055-010 Compound CAS Number ---- LOR 1 Unit mg/kg EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Anionic Surfactants as MBAS <100 <100 <100 <50 <50 .0-0.0-0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:45 ES1111055-008 SB11_0.1 26-MAY-2011 15:35 ES1111055-006 SB9_0.0-0.

+61-2-8784 8555 Fax. Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel. This Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report . Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025. 116 MILLER STREET Contact Address Contact Address NORTH SYDNEY NSW.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. of samples analysed : 10 : 10 Date Samples Received Issue Date : 26-MAY-2011 : 03-JUN-2011 E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level : sydney@alsglobal. Recovery and Acceptance Limits l Matrix Spike (MS) Report . +61-2-8784 8500 www. Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.alsglobal. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release. Signatories Position Accreditation Category Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics . Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. of samples received : EN/038/10 No. Recovery and Acceptance Limits NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 This document is issued in accordance with NATA accreditation requirements.com : +61 2 8925 5500 : +61 2 8925 5555 : 43177447 : ---: ---: AM : ---No. Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report . AUSTRALIA 2060 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Site C-O-C number Sampler Order number Quote number : adam_sullivan@urscorp.False QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : ES1111055 Page Laboratory : 1 of 5 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Client : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3.com Signatories This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below.

The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis. AS and NEPM. Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference # = Indicates failed QC .Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 General Comments The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference. results are reported on a dry weight basis. APHA. this may be due to high moisture content. Where moisture determination has been performed. Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR. Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services.

The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:No Limit.20%.1 QC100 EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS 1 1 mg/kg mg/kg <100 <50 <100 <50 0. Result > 20 times LOR:. Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%) EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS (QC Lot: 1812969) ES1111055-004 ES1111055-010 SB4_0.0% .0 0.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 3 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity.50%.0% .0 No Limit No Limit .0-0.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Method Blank (MB) Report Result Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report Spike Concentration Spike Recovery (%) LCS Recovery Limits (%) Low High EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS (QCLot: 1812969) EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS 1 mg/kg <1 ------------- . The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS. or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 4 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation.

Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 5 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Matrix Spike (MS) Report The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. l No Matrix Spike (MS) Results are required to be reported. . Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries.

of samples received No. +61-2-8784 8500 www.com : +61 2 8925 5500 : +61 2 8925 5555 : 43177447 : ---: ---: AM : ---: EN/038/10 E-mail Telephone Facsimile QC Level Date Samples Received Issue Date No. 116 MILLER STREET Contact Address NORTH SYDNEY NSW.True INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Work Order : ES1111055 Page Laboratory : 1 of 5 : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal. AUSTRALIA 2060 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Site C-O-C number Sampler Order number Quote number : adam_sullivan@urscorp. This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information: l Analysis Holding Time Compliance l Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance l Brief Method Summaries l Summary of Outliers Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel.alsglobal. of samples analysed This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. +61-2-8784 8555 Fax.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement : 26-MAY-2011 : 03-JUN-2011 : 10 : 10 Client Contact Address : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3.com . All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

Holding times for leachate methods (excluding elutriates) vary according to the analytes being determined on the resulting solution. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers. Extraction / Preparation Date extracted Analysis Evaluation Date analysed Due for extraction Due for analysis Evaluation EP050: Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Soil Glass Jar .0-0.1.Unpreserved SB1_0.0-0. SB10_0. AS and NEPM (1999).1. ü = Within holding time.0-0.0-0. For non -volatile analytes. SB11_0. These soil holding times are: Organics (14 days). Outliers for holding time are based on USEPA SW 846. SB8_0. For composite samples. Sample date for laboratory produced leachates is assumed as the completion date of the leaching process. Matrix: SOIL Method Container / Client Sample ID(s) Sample Date Evaluation: û = Holding time breach . Information is also provided re the sample container (preservative) from which the analysis aliquot was taken. Mercury (28 days) & other metals (180 days). A recorded breach therefore does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters. the holding time compliance assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method.0-0.0-0.0-0. SB2_0. SB4_0. sampling date is assumed to be that of the oldest sample contributing to the composite.1. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and precludes subsequent dilutions and reruns.0-0.1. Elapsed period to analysis represents number of days from sampling where no extraction / digestion is involved or period from extraction / digestion where this is present.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 2 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Analysis Holding Time Compliance The following report summarises extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares with recommended holding times.0-0.1. SB7_0. QC100 26-MAY-2011 01-JUN-2011 22-NOV-2011 ü 03-JUN-2011 03-JUN-2011 ü . APHA.1.1.1. SB9_0.1. SB3_0.

0 5.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 3 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Matrix: SOIL Quality Control Sample Type Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification .0 10.0 Quality Control Specification Evaluation ü ü NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement .0 Rate (%) Expected 10. Count Method EP050 EP050 Analytical Methods Laboratory Duplicates (DUP) Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Method Blanks (MB) Anionic Surfactants as MBAS QC 2 1 Regular 10 10 Actual 20. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate.

Method Descriptions Preparation Methods Method EN34 Matrix 1:5 solid / water leach for soluble analytes SOIL 10 g of soil is mixed with 50 mL of distilled water and tumbled end over end for 1 hour. Samples are settled and the water filtered off for analysis. . followed by an aqueous backwash and measurement of the colour by spectrophotometry at 625nm. This method comprises three successive extractions from acid aqueous medium containing excess methylene blue.. Water soluble salts are leached from the soil by the continuous suspension. APHA. into chloroform. AS and NEPM. MBAS results determined following 1:5 solid / water leach. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. ALS is not NATA accredited for this analysis. 5540 B & C.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 4 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Brief Method Summaries The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions. Analytical Methods Method EP050 Matrix Method Descriptions Anionic Surfactants as MBAS SOIL APHA 21st ed.

Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed. Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes l l l l For all matrices. Regular Sample Surrogates l For all regular sample matrices. no Laboratory Control outliers occur. l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.Page Work Order Client Project : : : : 5 of 5 ES1111055 URS AUSTRALIA 43177447 Summary of Outliers Outliers : Quality Control Samples The following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. no Duplicate outliers occur. l No Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist. Method Blanks. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW 846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples The following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples. For all matrices. This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only. no Matrix Spike outliers occur. Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance This report displays Holding Time breaches only. no surrogate recovery outliers occur. For all matrices. . For all matrices. Duplicates. no Method Blank value outliers occur.

alsglobal.00 SAMPLE RECEIPT NOTIFICATION (SRN) Comprehensive Report Work Order : ES1111055 Laboratory : Environmental Division Sydney : Client Services : 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield Client : URS AUSTRALIA : MR ADAM SULLIVAN : LEVEL 3. of samples analysed : 2.com : +61 2 8925 5500 : +61 2 8925 5555 : 43177447 : ---: ---: ---: AM QC Level Quote number E-mail Telephone Facsimile Page NSW Australia 2164 : sydney@alsglobal.1'C .com .Ice present : 10 : 10 General Comments l This report contains the following information: Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis Requested Deliverables l l Samples received in appropriately pretreated and preserved containers.Aqueous (14 days).0. Solid (90 days) from date of completion of work order. +61-2-8784 8500 www.com : +61-2-8784 8555 : +61-2-8784 8500 : 1 of 2 : ES2011URSMAW0004 (EN/038/10) : NEPM 1999 Schedule QCS3 requirement B(3) and ALS Dates Date Samples Received Client Requested Due Date : 26-MAY-2011 : 02-JUN-2011 Issue Date Scheduled Reporting Date : 31-MAY-2011 22:04 : 02-JUN-2011 Delivery Details Mode of Delivery No. Sample(s) have been received within recommended holding times. AUSTRALIA 2060 E-mail Telephone Facsimile Project Order number C-O-C number Site Sampler : adam_sullivan@urscorp. 116 MILLER STREET Contact Address Contact Address NORTH SYDNEY NSW. +61-2-8784 8555 Fax. of coolers/boxes Security Seal : Carrier : 1 HARD : Not intact. l MBAS analysis split from ES1111046 l l l Please direct any queries you have regarding this work order to the above ALS laboratory contact. Sample Disposal . Analytical work for this work order will be conducted at ALS Sydney. Environmental Division Sydney 277-289 Woodpark Road Smithfield NSW Australia 2164 Tel. of samples received No. Temperature No.

*AU Interpretive QC Report . l No sample container / preservation non-compliance exist.1 SB8_0.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.A4 .0-0.EP050 Anionic Surfactants as MBAS ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü ü Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email Email sydney_accounts@urscorp.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.AU Sample Receipt Notification . Packages may contain additional analyses.1 SB11_0.1 SB3_0.*AU Certificate of Analysis .0-0.EQUIS V5 URS ( EQUV5_URS ) .Chain of Custody (CoC) ( COC ) .AU Tax Invoice ( INV ) EQUIS URS_EDMS .MRED ( MRED ) SOIL .com adam_sullivan@urscorp.com urs_edms@urscorp.com adam_sullivan@urscorp. In these instances.EDI Format . USEPA standards.NATA ( COA ) . such as the determination of moisture content and preparation tasks.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.0-0.ENMRG ( ENMRG ) .EDI Format . sampling dates are shown without a time component.*AU QC Report .DEFAULT (Anon QC Rep) .com adam_sullivan@urscorp. Matrix: SOIL Laboratory sample ID ES1111055-001 ES1111055-002 ES1111055-003 ES1111055-004 ES1111055-005 ES1111055-006 ES1111055-007 ES1111055-008 ES1111055-009 ES1111055-010 Client sampling date / time 26-MAY-2011 14:50 26-MAY-2011 14:55 26-MAY-2011 15:10 26-MAY-2011 15:05 26-MAY-2011 15:30 26-MAY-2011 15:35 26-MAY-2011 15:40 26-MAY-2011 15:45 26-MAY-2011 15:55 26-MAY-2011 15:00 Client sample ID SB1_0.EDI Format .1 SB4_0.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.A4 . that are included in the package.Environmental ( SRN ) .NATA ( QC ) .EDI Format .0-0.EQUIS V5 URS ( EQUV5_URS ) MR ADAM SULLIVAN . Summary of Sample(s) and Requested Analysis Some items described below may be part of a laboratory process neccessary for the execution of client requested tasks.1 SB10_0.0-0.1 SB7_0. When sampling time information is not provided by the client. the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.A4 .0-0. APHA.Issue Date Page Work Order Client : : : : 31-MAY-2011 22:04 ES1111055 2 of 2 URS AUSTRALIA Sample Container(s)/Preservation Non-Compliances All comparisons are made against pretreatment/preservation AS.DEFAULT (Anon QCI Rep) ( QCI ) .0-0.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.1 SB2_0.AU Tax Invoice ( INV ) .1 QC100 Requested Deliverables ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ALL INVOICES .0-0.com adam_sullivan@urscorp.1 SB9_0.0-0.com .

.

Soil Investigation Appendix C Data Validation C 43177447/Rpt/01 .Sugarloaf Well Site .

Rinsate Blank (RB). Receipt and Holding Times COC completed adequately All requested analysis conducted Samples received intact and chilled Samples analysed within appropriate holding times per analytical methods.001for Total Phosphorous. 43177447 Project/Task Number: Batch/Ref. All results were within acceptable control limits.xls . Samples volumes sufficient for QC analysis? Are there any non-NATA accredited methods used? Have chromatograms for positive TPH been supplied? Laboratory reports signed by an authorised person No SRN provided with lab certificates # of Primary Samples # of QAQC # of FD # of FT 3 0 0 0 Samples taken in the field were sent to ALS by AGL staff. URS is not aware of or evaluating QAQC procedures undertaken in the field.Project Name: Primary Laboratory: Secondary Laboratory: Date Sampled: AGL Soil Assessment ALS None 23/05/2011 DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form. Method Blank (MB). ES1110639 Water Comments Sample Handling. TPH C10-C36 was reported on an anonymous sample. HACs. % Recovery Comments URS Australia Pty Ltd J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\AGL soil results\Data Validation AGL analytical results ES1110639_SH. Field Blank (FB) Type Comments All MB were less than LOR. Number(s): Sample Type: Yes/No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Method EP050 Anionic Surfactants as MBAS. Trip Blank (TB). TPH C6-C9 and BTEX. No other analytes were reported. MB Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Analyte Comments All LCS recoveries were within acceptable control limits Water Matrix Spike (MS) Analyte Comments Water Trip Spike /Control Trip Spike Analyte NA MS were reported on sample SL09.

Performed By: Date: Andrew Pettingell-Ward 17-Jun-11 Checked By: Date: S. SL09. LOR adjusted accordingly.xls .003 were diluted due to matrix interference. no RPDs are calculated. All LD's were within acceptable laboratory RPD control limits Comments Intra-Laboratory Duplicates Analyte N/A Inter-Laboratory Duplicates Analyte N/A Surrogate Monitoring Compound Analyses Analyte Water Comments Comments All surrogate recoveries were within acceptable control limits Overall Comments *As stated by ALS: EP050 (anionic surfactants as MBAS): Samples SL09. This should be noted for reporting purposes to ensure LOR is not above adopted guideline concentrations.Higgs 17-Jun-11 URS Australia Pty Ltd J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\AGL soil results\Data Validation AGL analytical results ES1110639_SH. 43177447 Project/Task Number: Batch/Ref. Number(s): Sample Type: ES1110639 Water Comments LD's were reported on anonymous samples for all specified methods with the exception TPHC10-C36.Project Name: Primary Laboratory: Secondary Laboratory: Date Sampled: Duplicates Laboratory Duplicates Analyte Water AGL Soil Assessment ALS None 23/05/2011 DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form.002 and SL09. This batch is considered to be acceptable for environmental interpretative use.001. Note: When concentrations are less than LOR for both the primary and secondary results.

AGL Soil Assessment Project/Task Number: 43177447 ALS None 26/05/2011 Batch/Ref. Nitrogen as N.Project Name: Primary Laboratory: Secondary Laboratory: Date Sampled: DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form. Receipt and Holding Times COC completed adequately All requested analysis conducted Samples received intact and chilled Samples analysed within appropriate holding times per analytical methods. Total Phosphorous as P. all were within acceptable control limits. Number(s): Sample Type: Yes/No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes # of FT ES1111046 split with batch ES1111055 Soil Comments Sample Handling. Rinsate Blank (RB). % Recovery Comments URS Australia Pty Ltd J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\soil URS\Data Validation URS analytical results general ES1111046_SH. ice present. security seal not intact # of Primary Samples # of QAQC # of FD 11 0 1 Method Blank (MB). Samples volumes sufficient for QC analysis? Are there any non-NATA accredited methods used? Have chromatograms for positive TPH been supplied? Laboratory reports signed by an authorised person Samples received at 2.xls . Trip Blank (TB). Field Blank (FB) Comments Type MB Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Analyte Soil Matrix Spike (MS) Analyte Soil Trip Spike /Control Trip Spike Analyte NA All MB were less than LOR. Comments All LCS recoveries were within acceptable control limits Comments MS were reported on URS and anonymous samples for all methods with the exception of Total Metals and Mercury.1°C.

2%) Inter-Laboratory Duplicates Analyte NA Surrogate Monitoring Compound Analyses Analyte Soil Comments Comments All surrogate recovereis were within acceptable control limits. All LD's returned results within acceptable control limits. This batch is considered to be acceptable for environmental interpretative use. Soil Intra-Laboratory Duplicates Analyte SB2_0. no RPDs are calculated. Note: When concentrations are less than LOR for both the primary and secondary results.0-0.xls . sodium (98%). however total phosporus as P original and duplicate results were reported as "not authorised" and an RPD of 3.1/QC100 Comments RPD for all analytes are within acceptable limits with the following exceptions: Total Nitrogen as N (197. This should be noted when interpreting the data. sodium (98%). potassium (100%). Number(s): Sample Type: ES1111046 split with batch ES1111055 Soil Comments LD's were reported on URS and anonymous samples for all specified methods.2%) have most likely occurred as a result of sample/matrix heterogeneity.6%).Project Name: Primary Laboratory: Secondary Laboratory: Date Sampled: Duplicates Laboratory Duplicates Analyte DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form. AGL Soil Assessment Project/Task Number: 43177447 ALS None 26/05/2011 Batch/Ref. potassium (100%). total phosphorus as P (48.6%). Overall Comments RPD results for total nitrogen as N (197. Performed By: Date: Andrew Pettingell-Ward 17-Jun-11 Checked By Date: Shannon Higgs 17-Jun-11 URS Australia Pty Ltd J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\soil URS\Data Validation URS analytical results general ES1111046_SH. total phosphorus as P (48.9% for an anonymous sample.

3 < 0.00% 0.1 SB2_0.00% 0.05 60 140 2080 2080 448 494 < 0.03 30 < 0.5 0.03 < 0.00% 0.00% 0.05 0.00% 0.03 < 0.00% 0.16% 100.5 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.05 0.3 < 0.21% 0.2 10 0.3 < 0.00% 142.05 0.5 50 0.3 < 0.03 < 0.C40 Fraction (sum) Anthracene Chlorpyrifos-methyl Heptachlor Aldrin Fluoranthene Parathion-methyl Heptachlor epoxide Malathion Pyrene alpha-Endosulfan Benz(a)anthracene Fenthion 4.00% 0.Matrix: SO Location: Sample ID: Date Sampled: Sample Type: LOR2 1 10 0.3.1 <5 < 0.5 0.05 0.3 < 0.05 0.03 < 0.05 0.5 0.05 0.00% 0.5 0.03 < 0.3 < 0.05 0.00% 0.3 < 20 < 0.00% 0.3 < 0.00% 0.5 0.05 0.3 < 0.1 < 0.1 7.00% 0.05 0.3 < 0.05 100 0.05 0.2 0.5 0.0-0.3 < 0.00% 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.5 0.03 < 0.3 < 0.03 < 0.5 0.00% 0.03 < 0.05 0.00% 0.1 < 50 < 0.5 0.00% 0.00% 0.0-0.05 0.05 0.03 < 0.05 0.3 < 0.05 10 0.00% 0.05 0.00% 0.5 0.3 < 0.05 0.3 < 0.03 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.00% 0.03 < 0.1 26/05/2011 Primary < 0.00% 0.05 0.03 < 0.05 0.00% 0.05 0.3 < 0.1 10 10 20 20 2 5 0.2 100 0.03 < 0.28% 20.5 0.00% 0.18% 21.03 < 50 < 0.00% 0.00% 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.2 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg SB2_0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.00% 0.03 < 0.05 0.5 0.00% Category1 Pass Pass-1 Pass Pass Pass Pass-1 Pass Fail Fail Fail Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Analyte Anionic Surfactants as MBAS Calcium cis-Chlordane Endrin aldehyde Endrin ketone Magnesium Methoxychlor Nitrite + Nitrate as N Potassium Sodium Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N Total Nitrogen as N Total Phosphorus as P Total Soluble Salts trans-Chlordane Benzene C6 .cd)pyrene Dibenz(a.03 < 0.1 <5 < 0.03 < 0.00% 0.1 QC100 26/05/2011 Secondary < 0.05 0.00% 0.03 < 0.05 0.1 SB2_0.2 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.3 < 0.05 0.5 0.03 < 0.4-DDT LOR1 1 10 0.C40 Fraction delta-BHC Diazinon Phenanthrene >C10 .00% 100.00% 0.5 0.05 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.05 0.5 0.00% 0.00% 197.00% 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.2 10 0.05 0.5 0.03 10 < 0.3 < 20 < 0.05 0.05 10 0.5 30 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.00% 0.5 0.5 0.3 < 0.05 100 0.05 0.00% 0.05 0.00% 0.1 Primary vs.2 100 0.1 10 10 20 20 2 5 0.00% 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.00% 0.03 < 0.05 0.00% 0.05 0.00% 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.0 180 410 1680 1690 274 663 < 0.00% 0.03 < 0.00% 0.3 < 20 < 0.05 0.00% 0.00% 0.03 < 0.05 0.00% 0.3 < 20 < 0.03 < 0.05 0.00% 0.2 0.05 0.2. Duplicate 0.03 < 0.00% 0.3 < 0.00% 98.3 < 0.03 < 0.3 < 0.5 0.00% 0.05 0.03 < 0.3 < 0.2 0.00% 0.3 < 0.00% 0.05 0.5 0.5 <5 < 0.03 < 0.5 0.0-0.00% 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.00% 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.xls Prepared By:AP URS Australia Pty Ltd 3 of 4 Checked By:SH .05 0.5 0.03 < 0.05 0.5 50 0.03 < 0.2 0.1 < 50 < 0.03 < 0.h)anthracene Endosulfan sulfate Fenamiphos 4.05 0.03 < 50 < 0.05 0.00% 0.3 < 0.20% 29.03 < 0.00% 0.69% 48.00% 0.3 < 0.5 0.2 J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\soil URS\Data Validation URS analytical results general ES1111046_SH.5 50 0.03 < 0.1 < 0.03 < 0.C16 Fraction Acenaphthene beta-BHC Ethylbenzene Monocrotophos >C16 .05 0.03 < 0.5 0.05 0.05 0.4-DDD Bromophos-ethyl Indeno(1.00% 0.5 0.3 < 0.03 < 0.00% 0.5 0.1 < 0.05 0.05 0.1 < 0.00% 0.03 < 0.2 0.1 < 0.4-DDE Chlorpyrifos Chrysene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Dieldrin ortho-Xylene Parathion Benzo(k)fluoranthene Endrin Pirimphos-ethyl Benzo(a)pyrene beta-Endosulfan Chlorfenvinphos Total Xylenes 4.03 < 0.5 0.03 < 0.3 < 0.05 0.86% 0.C10 Fraction Dichlorvos Acenaphthylene alpha-BHC Demeton-S-methyl Toluene >C10 .5 0.5 50 0.05 0.03 < 0.00% 0.03 < 0.5 0.C34 Fraction Dimethoate Fluorene gamma-BHC >C34 .3 < 0.

T Zinc.3 Primary vs.5 RPD Control Limits Pass . T Nickel.3 < 0.Matrix: SO Location: Sample ID: Date Sampled: Sample Type: LOR2 0.45% 20.05 2 0.1 26/05/2011 Primary < 0.RPD <= 30% Pass-1 .RPD > 30% and RPD <= 50%.xls Prepared By:AP URS Australia Pty Ltd 4 of 4 Checked By:SH .03 7 < 0. Duplicate 0.03 8 < 0.05 0. Analysis result > 10 times Detection Limit and < 20 times Detection Limit Exceeds RPD Control Limits J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\soil URS\Data Validation URS analytical results general ES1111046_SH.77% 9.5 0.05 0.05 2 0.03 < 0.5 26 22 15 49 < 0.03 16 < 0.00% 0.5 27 20 16 60 < 0.h.05 0.5 0.05 1 5 5 2 5 0.0-0.1 QC100 26/05/2011 Secondary < 0. Analysis results < 10 times Detection Limit Pass-2 .0-0.00% 0.RPD > 30%.33% 0.05 1 5 5 2 5 0.03 < 0. T Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) Naphthalene LOR1 0.5 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg SB2_0.00% 6. T Lead .00% Category1 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Analyte Benzo(g.45% 0.0-0.03 < 0.1 SB2_0.03 15 < 0.00% 3.05 5 0.00% 13. T Copper.3 SB2_0.00% 0.00% 0.i)perylene Prothiofos Chromium.3 < 0. T Carbophenothion Azinphos Methyl Cadmium.18% 0.03 < 0.52% 6. T Ethion Arsenic.03 < 0.03 < 0.05 5 0.05 0.

xls . Trip Blank (TB). Number(s): Sample Type: Yes/No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes # of FD 1 ES1111055 split batch with ES1111046 Soil Comments Sample Handling.1°C. Samples volumes sufficient for QC analysis? Are there any non-NATA accredited methods used? Have chromatograms for positive TPH been supplied? Laboratory reports signed by an authorised person # of Primary Samples 9 # of QAQC 0 Samples received at 2. Matrix Spike (MS) Analyte Trip Spike /Control Trip Spike Analyte NA Comments No matrix spike results are required to be reported % Recovery Comments J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\soil anionic surfactants URS\Data Validation URS analytical results anionic surfactants URS Australia Pty Ltd ES1111055_SH. Receipt and Holding Times COC completed adequately All requested analysis conducted Samples received intact and chilled Samples analysed within appropriate holding times per analytical methods. Rinsate Blank (RB). security seal not intact EP050 Anionic Surfactants as MBAS. Field Blank (FB) Comments Type All MB were less than LOR. AGL Soil Assessment Project/Task Number: 43177447 ALS None 26/05/2011 Batch/Ref. MB Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) Analyte Comments No LCS were analysed.Project Name: Primary Laboratory: Secondary Laboratory: Date Sampled: DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form. # of FT 0 Method Blank (MB). ice present.

1.0-0. SB2_0.0-0.0-0.1. SB3_0. LOR adjusted accordingly. Comments Surrogate Monitoring Compound Analyses Analyte Comments No surrogates were analysed. Number(s): Sample Type: ES1111055 split batch with ES1111046 Soil Comments LDs were within acceptable control limits.0-0. SB4_0. AGL Soil Assessment Project/Task Number: 43177447 ALS None 26/05/2011 Batch/Ref. Comments All results were less than LOR.1.0-0. SB10_0.1. no RPDs are calculated.-0.0-0.Project Name: Primary Laboratory: Secondary Laboratory: Date Sampled: Duplicates Laboratory Duplicates Analyte Anionic Surfactants Intra-Laboratory Duplicates Analyte SB2_0. SB8_0.1. Performed By: Date: Andrew Pettingell-Ward 16-Jun-11 Checked By: Date: S.1. QC100 were diluted due to matrix interference.1. no RPDs were calculated. SB9_0.00.0-0.xls .1/QC100 Inter-Laboratory Duplicates Analyte NA DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY Note: Data validation assesses each analyte in terms of all the data validation variables and only the exceedances and outliers are reported in this form.1.Higgs 17-Jun-11 J:\JOBS\43177447\MtTaurus_SoilAssess\Gilead\Lab Data\soil anionic surfactants URS\Data Validation URS analytical results anionic surfactants URS Australia Pty Ltd ES1111055_SH. Note: When concentrations are less than LOR for both the primary and secondary results. Overall Comments *As stated by ALS: EP050 (anionic surfactants as MBAS): Samples SB1_0. SB7_0.1. This batch is considered to be acceptable for environmental interpretative use.0-0. SB11_0.

urscorp.URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 4.ap.com . 407 Pacific Highway Artarmon NSW 2064 Australia T: 61 2 8925 5500 F: 61 2 8925 5555 www.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master your semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.