Appellees were supposed to furnish an answer to the Motion for Summary Judgment on 03.29.2012. Appellees never filed an answer. The answer is nearly a month overdue. Appellant respectfully requests the clerk of the court to issue a default.
Original Description:
Original Title
Taitz v Astrue (APPEAL) - 2012-04-27 - (DC Cir) - Taitz Motion for Default
Appellees were supposed to furnish an answer to the Motion for Summary Judgment on 03.29.2012. Appellees never filed an answer. The answer is nearly a month overdue. Appellant respectfully requests the clerk of the court to issue a default.
Appellees were supposed to furnish an answer to the Motion for Summary Judgment on 03.29.2012. Appellees never filed an answer. The answer is nearly a month overdue. Appellant respectfully requests the clerk of the court to issue a default.
04.24.2012 Attn Mark J. Langer UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOli DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT FILED 272012 ]
======:=:j Clerk US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Re Taitz v Astrue 11-05304 Dear Mr. Langer, In above mentioned case Appellees were supposed to furnish an answer to the Motion for Summary Judgment on 03.29.2012. Appellees never filed an answer. The answer is nearly a month overdue. (see docket attached) Appellant respectfully requests the clerk of the court to issue a default. Respectfu Ily, - ...
<---- .l /s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ Appellant I, Lila Dubert, attest that I am over 18 years old, not a party to this case and I served Appellee with a copy of the above Request for Default on 04.23.2012 by fist class mail, ,postage p epaid. Lila Dubert USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1371429 Filed: 04/27/2012 Page 1 of 3 , 11-5304 Sun1mary ---TtTTTi"\Ti)--'--- '-'j
\, i l If you view the i Full ::c:::harged for 2 Pages $0.20
United States Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit 1J 't d 0 1 i.\pp_eclls, J #: 11-5304 : 2'S 5 reedom of Information Act of 1974 Orly Taitz v. Michael Astrue Appeal From: United States District Court for the District of Columbia Fee Status: Fee Paid Case Type Information: 1) Civil US 2) United States 3) Originating Court Information: District: 0090-1 : 1: 11-cv-00402-RCL Trial Judge: Royce C. Lamberth, U.S. District Judge Date Filed: 02/16/2011 Date Order/Judgment: Date NOA Filed: 08/30/2011 10/25/2011 Page 1 ot 1. Docketed: 10/31/2011 -- -- Lead: 1: '11-cv-00402-RCL htlns:llecf.cadc.uscOUliS.gov/cmecf/servlet/TranspoliRoon1?servlet=CaseSummary .jsp?cas... 4/24/2012 USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1371429 Filed: 04/27/2012 Page 2 of 3 11-5304 Summary Page 2 of2 12/27/2011 tJ 01/04/2012 GJ 01/04/2012 D 01/04/2012 [J 01/19/2012 D 02/13/2012 D 02/13/2012 D 03101/2012 D 03/16/2012 03/16/2012 D STATEMENT OF ISSUES FILED [1350337] by Orly Taitz [Service Date: 12/22/2011] [11 -5304] ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed [1351030] by Helen L. Gilbert and co-counsel Mark B. Stern on behalf of Appellee Michael James Astrue. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen) CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES FILED [1351031] by Michael James Astrue [Service Date: 01/04/2012] [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [1351032] to notice 1351030-2 , certificate [135103-1-2] filed by Michael James Astrue. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen) MOTION filed [1353593] by Michael James Astrue for summary affirmance. (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/03/2012) [Service Date: 01/19/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] (Gilbert, Helen) MOTION filed [1358927] by Orly Taitz to permit pro se electronic filing (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [1 1-5304] MOTION filed [1358929] by Orly Taitz to extend time to file response to motion for summary affirmance (Response to Motion served by mail due on 02/24/2012) [Service Date: 02/11/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] CLERK'S ORDER filed [1361423] denying without prejudice motion to permit pro se electronic filing 1358927-2 ; granting motion to extend time [1358929-2]; response to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2] now due on 03/16/2012 [11-5304] INCORRECT DOCKET ENTRY-DISREGARD--RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364401] by Orly Taitz to motion for summary affirmance 1353593-2] [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304]--[Edited 03/20/2012 by KRM] RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FILED [1364625] to motion for summary affirmance [1353593-2](Reply to Response by Mail and Response to Cross Motion due on 03/29/2012) combined with a MOTION FILED [STYLED AS "MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE APPELLANT"] by Orly Taitz for summary reversal [Service Date: 03/15/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 1-10. [11-5304] - - I PACER Service Center _.J I Transaction Receipt
I DC Circuit - 04/24/201 2 17:07:21 Ii I IPACER Login: lIot0363 IIClient Code: I IDescription: J ICase Sumf!1ary IISearch Criteria: 11 11 -5304J IBillable lIeost: 10 1 httns://ecfcadc.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp?cas... 4/24/2012 USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1371429 Filed: 04/27/2012 Page 3 of 3