## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

This is to certify that Mr. PRADIP BHANDARI has been employed with our company from 17th October 2007 up to 15th August 2010 in the capacity of Assistant Store Keeper.

We wish him all the best in his future endeavors.

UNITED PRECAST CONCRETE CO. W.L.L. – QATAR

Peter Guldmann Nielsen General Manager

Scribd Upload a Document Search Documents Explore Raj Khadka

inShare

Embed Doc Copy Link Readcast Collections 2 Comments Download

Analytical Dynamics: Lagrange’s Equation and itsApplication – A Brief Introduction D. S. Stutts, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Mechanical EngineeringMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRolla, MO 65409-0050January 24, 2011 ∗ ∗ Corrected typo in Equation (6) – thanks, Shantanu! 1

© Dr. Daniel S. Stutts, 1995 – 2011All Rights Res. 1 THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS 1 The Calculus of Variations The calculus of variations is an extensive subject, and there are many ﬁne references which present adetailed development of the subject – see Bibliography . The purpose of this addendum is do provide abrief background in the theory behind Lagrange’s Equations. Fortunately, complete understanding of thistheory is not absolutely necessary to use Lagrange’s equations, but a basic understanding of variationalprinciples can greatly increase your mechanical modeling skills. 1.1 Extremum of an Integral – The Euler-Lagrange Equation Given the Integral of a functional (a function of functions) of the form I (

)=

t 2 t 1 F

( U, ˙ U,t ) dt, (1)where t 1 , and t 2 are arbitrary,

is a small positive, real constant, and U and˙ U are given by U ( t )= u ( t )+

(

(2)The functions U .t ) . t 1 . and u may be thought of as describing the possible positions of a dynamical systembetween the two instants in time. and˙ U ( t )=˙ u ( t )+ ˙ η ( t ) .

and t 2 .e. and U ( t ) is u ( t ) plus a variation ( t ). where it is an extremum. where u ( t ) represents the position when the integral de-scribed by Equation (1) is stationary. i.The function U ( t ) does not by deﬁnition render (1) stationary because we shall assume η ..

( t ) is indepen-dent of u ( t ). We willnow specify that the functions u ( . The important point so far is that have not made any restrictivestatements about I ( ) other than it is an integral of a functional of the functions U ( t ) and˙ U ( t ). and we will assume that a unique function renders (1) an extremum. The reasons for theseassumptions will become clear below.

they possess continuous secondderivatives with respect to t .t ). and t = t 2 . Inother words. u . That is. let us stipulate that η ( t ) must vanish at t = t 1 . Further. and η ( t ) are of class C 2 .

by deﬁnition. that the function u ( . We have. lets see what rules the functional F ( U.( t ) and U ( t ) coincide at the end points of the interval [ t 1 .t 2 ].Now that we have the stage more or less set up.t ) mustobey to render (1) extreme. and t 2 are arbitrary . where t 1 . ˙ U.

this situation is depicted in Figure1. assuming that t 1 . and t 2 . Relationship between extremizing function u ( t ). or = 0.Thus.t ) renders I stationary. and variation ( t ). hence.Figure 1.we know this occurs when U ( t )= u ( t ).

we set the ﬁrst derivative of I ( ) equal to zero. dI ( ) =0 = t 2 t 1 ( U. ˙ .are not functions of .

(3)2 © Dr.t )= + ∂F ∂ ˙ U∂ ˙ . ( U. 1995 – 2011All Rights Res. Daniel S. 1 THE CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS However. Stutts.t ) dt =0 . ˙ U.U.

(4)so substituting Equation (4) into Equation (3). we have dI ( ) =0 = t 2 t 1 ∂F ∂uη + ∂F ∂ ˙ u ˙ η . and setting = 0.

(5)Integration of Equation (5) by parts yields: dI ( ) =0 = t 2 t 1 η ( t ) ∂F ∂u .dt =0 .

− ddt∂F ∂ ˙ u dt + ∂F ∂ ˙ uη ( t ) t 2 t 1 =0 . (6)The last term in Equation (6) vanishes because of the stipulation η ( t 1 .

)= η ( t 2 ) = 0. which leaves dI ( ) =0 = t 2 t 1 η ( t ) .

since η ( t ) is arbitrary except at the endpoints t 1 . (7)By the fundamental theorem of the calculus of variations [1]. in general dI ( ) . and t 2 . we must have.∂F ∂u − ddt∂F ∂ ˙ u dt =0 .

or (3) an inﬂection point – i.=0 = ∂F ∂u − ddt∂F ∂ ˙ u =0 . there is noguarantee of the existence of a global extremum.e. In fact. It speciﬁes the conditions on the functional F toextremize the integral I ( ) given by Equation (1). By extremize. the integral may be only locally extreme for small valuesof . we mean that I ( ) may be (1) maxi-mum. neither maximum. nor minimum. (8)Equation (8) is known as the Euler-Lagrange equation. (2) minimum.

Let it suﬃce to say that for every case considered in this class.Equation (5) is often written δI = dI ( ) =0 . I ( ) will be globally minimum when = 0.. The determination of the nature of the stationary condition of I ( ) for the general case is beyondthe scope of this document.

= t 2 t 1 ∂F ∂uη + ∂F ∂ ˙ u ˙ η dt = t 2 t 1 ∂F ∂uδu .

ddtδu = ddt ( )= . and [2]. (9)where δu = η is the variation of u .+ ∂F ∂ ˙ uδ ˙ u dt =0 .

(10)Using Equation (10). . we obtain δI = t 2 t 1 ∂F ∂u − ddt∂F ∂ ˙ u δudt. and integrating Equation (9) by parts.˙ η = δdudt = δ ˙ u.

1995 – 2011All Rights Res. Stutts. that δu ( t 1 )= δu ( t 2 ) = 0. Hence. perhaps. u . the most important result in the calculus of variations. We derivedthe Euler-Lagrange equation for a single variable. as before.3 © Dr. 2 HAMILTON’S PRINCIPLE 2 Hamilton’s Principle Hamilton’s principal is. we may obtain .(11)with the stipulation. but we will now shift our attention to a system N particles of mass m i each. Daniel S.

(12)where the bold font indicates a vector quantity. and F i denotes the total force on the i th particle.D’Alembert’s principle may be stated by rewriting Equation (12) as m i ¨r .N equations of the form m i ¨r i = F i .

i − F i = 0 (13)Taking the dot product of each of the Equations (13) with the variation in position δ r . yields N i =1 ( m i ¨r i − F i ) . and summing theresult over all N particles.

· δ r =0 . (15)Next. (14)We note that the sum of the virtual work done by the applied forces over the virtual displacements isgiven by δW = N i =1 F i · δ r . we note that N i =1 .

m i ¨ r i · δ r i = N i =1 m i ddt (˙ r i · δ r i .

) − δ 12˙ r i · ˙ r i = N i =1 m i ddt (˙ r i · δ .

Equation (16) may be written. (16)where δT is the variation of the kinetic energy.r i ) − δT. δT + δW = N i =1 m i ddt (˙ r i · δ r . Hence.

Possible dynamical paths for a particle between two arbitrary instants in time.i ) . Stutts.4 © Dr. (17)In a manner similar to that shown in Figure1. 2 HAMILTON’S PRINCIPLE Since we again have that δ r ( t 1 )= δ r ( .where the varied dynamical path may bethought to occur atemporally . rrrr Figure 2. 1995 – 2011All Rights Res. Daniel S. and in view of Equation (10) the possible dynamicalpaths of each particle may be represented as shown in Figure2.

t 2 ) = 0. and t 2 to obtain t 2 t 1 ( δT + δW ) dt = N i =1 . we may multiply Equation (17) by dt . and and integratebetween the two arbitrary times t 1 .

(18)If δW can be expressed as the variation of the potential energy.m i (˙ r i · δ r i ) t 2 t 1 =0 . Equation (18) may be written . − δV 1 .

t 2 t 1 ( δT − δV ) dt =0 . Equation (19) becomes δ t 2 t 1 . (19)Introducing the Lagrange function. L = T − V .

and t 2 provided that the path variations vanish at t 1 . and t 2 [2]. Hamilton’s principal may be deﬁnedin words as follows.Ldt =0 . Deﬁnition 1 The actual path a body takes in conﬁguration space renders the value of the deﬁnite integral I = t 2 t 1 Ldt stationary with respect to all arbitrary variations of the path between two instants t 1 . . (20)Equation (20) is the mathematical statement of Hamilton’s principal .

2.1 Generalized Coordinates Implicit in the deﬁnition of Hamilton’s principle is that the system will move along a dynamical pathconsistent with the system constraints – i. the stationary value of I will be a minimum.and (in general) time. Generalized coordinates render thedynamical path explicitly permissible by describing it using the minimum number of independent coor-dinates.In all physical systems. along a permissible path. t. the i th system position may be described as a function of the N generalized coordinates.e. as follows: r i = r i ( q 1 .q 2 . Thus.

the variation of the i th position.. ··· .q 3 . may be expressed as δ r i = N j =1 ∂ r i ∂q j .t ) . which occurs atemporally. (21)Hence.q n .

δq j . Example 1 Given the system shown in Figure3 . and j are the unit vectors in the x and y directions. where i . over a virtual displacement δ r consistent with the constraints: x = r cos . determine the virtual work δW done by the force F =4 i +3 j . (22)Consider the following example.

1 The negative sign on δV is chosen to reﬂect that conservative forces may always be written as the negative gradient of the potential energy: F ci = . and q 2 = θ . q 1 = r . and y = r sin θ .θ . Use the generalized coordinates.

. for example. Where. uploaded a new revision for this document (#1) . in Cartesian coordinates: = ∂∂x i + ∂∂y j + ∂∂z k .− V .. 5 of 00 Leave a Comment Submit Characters: .

(More) Download or Print 3. Analytical Dynamics: Lagrange’s Equation and its Application – A B. 14 p. The Euler-Lagrange equation and the extended Lagran. LagrangeEqn10 14 p. Lagrange Equation From James Miao 14 p..555 Reads Info and Rating Uploaded by danstutts Search More from This User Related Documents 14 p... This document is a brief introduction to the calculus of variations and its a.12 / 06 / 2009 uploaded a new revision for this document (#1) 12 / 06 / 2009 Analytical Dynamics: Lagrange’s Equation and its Application – A Brief Introduction This document is a brief introduction to the calculus of variations and its application in the field of analytical dynamics. lagrangeeqn05 ....

Clasical Mechanics Lagrange From Ricardo Castañeda 39 p.3 Abnormal Problems From fukunaga_smc 306 p. The+Calculus+of+Variations From fukunaga_smc 121 p. Calculus of Variations .3.Methods for Physicists ( C16-17) Only 4 Physicist From jfventes 16 p.1. LagrangeEqn05 From 'Nabeela Mahmood 30 p. Arfken . 4.From Wenny Are Yoweri 14 p. 4.3 Several Dependent Variables From fukunaga_smc 306 p. mekanikkompendium From teomondo 306 p.

From AntiZionist88 .. Math_Dynamic System From Kiti OldFisherMan 237 p.Jaclyn . Ode&Dynamicalsystems From api_user_11797_vishnuvyas 74 p. ODE Teschl From Dima Ina 237 p.. Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems .com 16 p. From Claudia Bau 253 p.G.. Teschl From geo 227 p.. Dynamics a Set of Notes on Theoretical Physical Chemistry .From bhaskerchatterjee@gmail. Teschl (. Calculus of Variations From JIMI H 235 p. Ordinary DiffEqns From api_11797_asif 237 p.G. Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems .

37 p.Language: .com/scribd AboutPressBlogPartnersScribd 101Web StuffSupportFAQDevelopers / APIJobsTermsCopyrightPrivacy Copyright © 2012 Scribd Inc. Mechanics From isatis55 Upload a Document Search Documents Follow Us!scribd.com/scribdfacebook.com/scribdtwitter.

Skip carousel

- Motion Mountain - vol. 5 - Pleasure, Technology and Stars - The Adventure of Physics
- Math books - AoPSWiki.pdf
- 6PH07 June 2011
- 101 Champ Plan of Reso Students
- 4. Numeri Ordinali
- Physics Jan 2010 Mark Scheme Unit 3
- IIT Madras Placement Brochure
- Kalman Dan Simon
- 1449-Skema Matematik Trial Spm 2015
- M_G_University CBCSS B_Sc_ Physics Syllabus 2010 Admission
- Sample Placement Paper Question TCS
- BAYES theorem
- Cxc Maths 2012 Multiple-choice-One
- Solutions to Engineering Mechanics "RESULTANT OF ANY FORCE SYSTEM" 3rd Edition by Ferdinand Singer
- kertas 1 tahun 5 matematik
- Mighty Math 2 - Working With Numbers
- Progress_in_Mathematics_Grade_3.pdf
- Additional Mathematics Project Work 2013 WPKL
- NCERT Book Physics XI Part-I
- Investigation- Dominance Matrices
- IGCSE Mathematics Formula Booklet
- Cooling Coil Selection
- Use of Mathematics in Architecture
- GATE 2013 ME - Analysis & Key
- Keelys Laws of Being
- Schaum s Books
- Solutions to Problem Set 1
- Some Tips for the Revised CSIR UGC NET for Physical Sciences
- STEM_Research or Capstone Project CG_1
- Question Maths for class 8

Skip carousel

- tmp103F.tmp
- The Information
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys2125.103.08f taught by Beatrice Rasmussen (bearas)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for sci5333.06m.07u taught by Mary Lena Kelly (mlk023000)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys2125.602.10s taught by Beatrice Rasmussen (bearas)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys2303.001.10f taught by John Hoffman (jhoffman)
- tmpC906
- As 2900.8-2002 Quantities and Units Physical Chemistry and Molecular Physics
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys5333.501.11f taught by Mary Lena Kelly (mlk023000)
- tmp2561.tmp
- The Experiment Spring 2016 Catalog
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys4352.501.10f taught by Ervin Fenyves (ezbd, cunning, glosser)
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys4352.501.09f taught by Ervin Fenyves (ezbd, chaneyr)
- Petition to President
- UT Dallas Syllabus for phys2125.102.08f taught by Beatrice Rasmussen (bearas)
- tmp3A48
- tmp909F.tmp
- tmp317F.tmp
- tmp8A3D
- tmpA22D
- tmp546E.tmp
- UT Dallas Syllabus for sci5333.501 06s taught by Mary Lena Kelly (mlk023000)
- tmp5D0D
- Effect of Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Buildings
- tmp73BB
- tmp4D6E.tmp
- SENATE HEARING, 108TH CONGRESS - A NEW KIND OF SCIENCE
- tmpB096
- tmpEED6.tmp
- tmp34DA

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading