The Consumer and the Web: a critical review of the contributions made by marketing and the consumer behaviour

discipline to Web Science
Inma Rodríguez-Arduraa, Francisco J. Martínez-Lópezb, Paula Lunac
a

Internet Interdisciplinary Institute, Open University of Catalonia (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, UOC), Spain University of Granada and Open University of Catalonia (UOC), Spain c University of Sevilla, Spain
b

1 Introduction: interconnecting Web science with marketing and the consumer behaviour discipline Web science, the new area of knowledge proposed by Sir Tim Berners-Lee and fellow collaborators (2006), aims to explain the Web as a complex phenomenon with its own ecology (Hendler et al., 2008; Riera, 2008). Given that the growth and development of the Web is largely explained by this technological innovation being put to commercial use, it is vital that Web science incorporates contributions made by marketing and, in particular, by the consumer behaviour discipline. For their part, distinguished authors in marketing (Deighton, 1997; Hoffman, 2000; Mahajan and Venkatesh, 2000; Sharma and Sheth, 2004; etc.) declare that the Web poses a real revolution for the discipline. That the Web provokes and will continue to provoke large and radical changes in the virtual markets is a consideration, however, that must be taken into account not only in the marketing arena. Marketing modelling for the Web can also enrich the Web science field in terms of new theories, data and methods. 2 Main research lines in the Web/consumer behaviour interface The contributions made by marketing and, in particular, by the discipline of consumer behaviour to the study of the Web are evident in the development of studies that aid the understanding of people’s activities in their experiences as consumers on the Web. Early research into the Web/consumer behaviour interface concentrated on the obtaining of user profiles and on the segmentation of consumers who used the Web. However, as use of the Web as a marketing channel increased, resulting in its wider use as a purchasing medium, subsequent research became centred on questions directly related to consumer behaviour. In accordance with the structure proposed by Kımıloğlu (2004), it is possible to group this later research into four different lots: study of the variables in purchase intentions, analysis of the purchasing process on the Web, consumer satisfaction and loyalty on the Web, and adoption of models and theories to the electronic markets. In addition to the four lines of investigation indicated above, there is a fifth line, which analyzes the extent to which the Web empowers consumers. This line has commanded more attention in the last few years, especially after the emergence of the so-called Web 2.0 and the applications of the social web, which allow consumers to benefit from a collective intelligence and to acquire greater control over information. Determinants in making purchases on the Web The identification and analysis of the factors involved in explaining the consumer’s predisposition/intention to buy on the Web – as well as explaining the actual purchase - figure prominently in much of the latest research. Apart from the models used to this end, in which the variable of intention to buy is usually integrated as a terminal element, several different variables have been deployed in an effort to understand what it is that influences purchases on the Web: perceived safety in the transaction (Attaran and Vanlaar, 1999; Iyengar, 2004; Miyazaki and Fernandez, 2001; Phillips, 2002; Udo, 2001), quality of service on the Web (Liu and Arnett, 2000; Long and McMellon, 2004; Surjadjaja et al., 2003; Trocchia and Janda; 2003; Yang and Jun, 2002; Yang et al., 2003; Zeithaml et al., 2002), questions related to product price or service acquired (Garbarino and Lee, 2003; Grewal et al., 2003; Jiang, 2002; Miyazaki, 2003), invasion of privacy risks (Aljifri et al., 2003; Ashrafi and Kuilboer, 2005; Attaran and Vanlaar, 1999; Gritzalis, 2004; Hoffman et al., 1999a; Kruck et al., 2002; Larson et al., 2003; Martínez-López et al., 2005; Miyazaki and Fernandez, 2001; Nakra, 2001; Phillips, 2002; Udo, 2001; Wang et al., 1998), beliefs and attitude towards Web (Alreck and Settle, 2002; Bhatnagar et al., 2000; George, 2002; Goldsmith and Bridges, 2000; Helander and Khalid, 2000; Kim et al., 2003; Sorce et al., 2005; Shim et al., 2001; Vellido et al., 2000; Yoh et al., 2003), purchasing confidence in the Web as a purchasing channel (Aljifri et al., 2003; Jarvenpaa and Todd, 1997; Grabner-Kraeuter, 2002; Hoffman et al., 1996; Hoffman et al., 1999b; Lee and Turban, 2001; Limayem et al., 2000; Lynch et al., 2001; Martínez-López et al., 2005; McKnight and Chervany, 2001; McKnight et al., 2002; Shankar et al., 2002; Urban et al., 2000; Vijayasarathy and Jones, 2000), confidence in the vendor on the Web (Castelfranchi and Tan, 2002; Chen and Dhillon, 2003; Ha, 2004; Jarvenpaa et al., 1999 & 2000; Koehn, 2003; Lee and Turban, 2001; Tan and Thoen, 2000; Wakefield and Whitten, 2006), the consumer’s experience in the use of the Web to obtain information and to make purchases

1

2000). McKnight et al. 2002. 2002. i. 2001). due to the special characteristics of Web transactions. privacy and usability/site design. factors that influence consumer perceptions during and after the purchase. such as the presentation of the selection of products (merchandising). finally. and factors associated with the quality of the product and service being offered. 2000. In addition. Urban et al. etc. 2003. So. 2002). 2001. 1997. 1969. it his or her preference and positive attitude towards that site over all others. Pavlou. 2001. Hoffman et al. as well as users’ loyalty and fidelity to virtual establishments with regards to the purchase (what is typically referred to as e-loyalty) has aroused researchers’ interest in recent times. 1998. Shih and Fang.). and in accordance with the conceptual model proposed by Schaupp and Bélanger (2005). Jacoby and Chestnut. rather. the identification of the reasons the shopping cart is abandoned after an item is selected (Donthu.. Satisfaction and loyalty on the Web The study of a consumer’s satisfaction with a Web purchase.. 2002). 2003. Wolfinbarger and Gilly. 2001. the hedonistic value associated with Web purchases (Childers et al. in line with the postulates of similar studies focused on brand loyalty in the physical markets (for example: Day. and. 1999b. Reynolds. 2006. 1978)..(Balabanis and Vassileiou. Van Iwaarden et al. 2002).. 2004. 2001. Jacoby. Mathwick et al. 1999b).: (1) confidence in the Web as medium of purchase.. Martínez-López et al. Specifically.. (2000) define confidence in the Web as a channel for purchases. the observed behaviour would be consistent with the preferences and attitudes on the part of the consumer towards the website. since this behaviour could be the consequence of other spurious factors... the delivery of the purchased items. but.. confidence in the virtual establishment and. is the analysis of the purchasing process on the Web. The relationship between these concepts has materialized in many studies that have taken consumer behaviour in physical establishments as their framework. 2004. it is to be expected that consumers will not carry out a Web transaction unless the perceived level of confidence exceeds a minimum level of acceptability to the consumer (Castelfranchi and Tan. and why a consumer who visits a particular commercial website finally decides to go ahead with an electronic transaction (Swaminathan. Hoffman et al... 2000) have highlighted that.. in general. In this way. 2001& 2002. in terms of consumers’ opinions regarding safety. Analysis of the purchasing process on the Web Another important line of investigation. 1996. product value and the adaptation of the same to the concrete needs of the individual. the degree of facility perceived regarding the process of electronic exchanges with businesses on the Web (Hoffman and Novak. 1996.. 1999. Goldsmith and Goldsmith. Consumer confidence in purchasing on the Web Another important line of research is that of aspects related to confidence in purchasing on the Web. 1996.e. Furthermore. though one followed less intensely. 2001). Thus. Plant et al. evident transparency in the transaction entered into with companies on the Web. and situational factors that can moderate the relationship among variables considered previously and purchasing on the Web (Avery.g. 2003. Montoya-Weiss et al. although in studies of consumer behaviour on the Web it is necessary to consider other factors which moderate this relationship (Bigné et al. Johnson et al. it is not the mere repetition of purchases that defines a consumer’s loyalty to a web space. is understood as something more than just the consumer’s repeated tendency to buy in a specific web establishment. for example: Srinivassan et al.: Butler and Peppard. Helander and Khalid. (2002) begin with a holistic philosophy to give shape to what 2 . 2000. Liao and Cheung.. One of the principal conclusions which can be drawn from studies centred on consumer e-satisfaction is that the adequate identification and understanding of the principal satisfaction determinants is crucial to the success of every business on the Web (Mckinney et al. 1971.. and the companies’ commitment to respect what has been transacted with the consumer. 2005). Tan and Thoen.. and (2) confidence in the companies that operate on the Web. O´Cass and Fenech. such as convenience. 2003. Wolfinbarger and Gilly. On the other hand. The fact that businesses on the Web count on a tranche of loyal customers has led academics to take an interest in discovering the factors that determine loyalty (see. 2003. 1999. Shim et al. 2000). George. Lee and Turban (2001) indicate that confidence in purchases made on the Web is a two-dimensional concept articulated by confidence in the support/infrastructure of the market and in the companies that operate within this support. Novak et al. 2004. Various studies (e. the consumer’s perceived control over the process of navigating the Web and over electronic transactions. Among the questions examined are: the identification of the reasons that discourage and inhibit purchasing on the Web (Betts. such as security. Likewise. 2001). 2004.. Rowley. Scullin et al. Maignan and Lukas. Mayer. Perea y Monsuwé et al. Lepkowska-White and Rao. companies with a Web presence feel the need to generate confidence and brand image in such a way that consumers show a greater predisposition towards carrying out purchasing processes on their sites. 2003). a lack of consumer confidence in this medium is one of the main factors that inhibit electronic transactions (Hoffman et al. The concept of e-loyalty. it is important to emphasize the following factors as principle antecedents of e-satisfaction: technological factors that ensure website functionality.

they are ready to defend against intrusive or discriminatory marketing initiatives (Acquisti and Varian. However. 2006). Pitt et al. such as marketing. the agenda of Web science demands it embrace the phenomenon of electronic commerce from a range of integrally applied multidisciplinary capacities. confidence in the Web as a medium for purchase and. for example: Chen and Tan (2004). we seek to convey three points. resort to this system of electronic commercialization. there are others who use the Web to enhance their empowerment. While a relevant segment of online consumers shows themselves to be little inclined to increase their levels of empowerment. See. . Drawing on an illustrative pool of studies done on the Web/consumer behaviour interface. Firstly. 3 Discussion and conclusions In accordance with the principles of Web science. (1997). 2002). a model which contemplates various facets: consumer predisposition towards confidence in the generic sense. 2006). such as the online consumers’ increased capacity to intervene directly in the shaping of a value proposition adapted to their individual needs (Pires et al. as well as their greater capacity to “sanction” firms (Rezabakhsh et al. for example: Herrero and Rodríguez del Bosque (2008). These enable the understanding of internal (personal and psychological) and external (relative to the marketing strategy of companies in the market. This second group of consumers are better informed and more active: they use advanced tools to make the most efficient and effective searches for products (Deck and Wilson. Bakos (1997) and Brynjolfsson and Smith.... Harrison et al. Coherently. 2008). the agenda of this new area of knowledge requires contributions from multiple disciplines. whose conceptual model subsequently was validated empirically in Novak et al. 2002. . (2000). Nonetheless. Frequently. .Application of the decomposed theory of planned behaviour (Taylor and Todd.Adaptation of the adoption-diffusion of innovations model (Gatignon and Robertson.. thanks to greater informative transparency regarding electronic exchanges. Pires et al. 2005): . 2006.Application of the flow state concept (Csikszentmihalyi.they term the “model of confidence in the Web”. 2006). and to social groups that reference the individual) factors that influence purchase and consumption experiences and the processes by which they are carried out. 2006. 2005) and to propagate their opinions and recommendations among many other consumers (Carl. 2007). 2001) who. but they can be generally classified in the following manner (Kımıloğlu. 1975) to explain the adoption and use of commercial electronic systems. . Rodríguez del Bosque and Herrero. See. Rezabakhsh et al. this class of studies tends to derive from a notable current of opinion which has taken shape following the pioneering work of Alba et al. 1995). 2006). and which has laid the foundations for greater power on the part of online consumers. Typically this question is tackled by considering and analyzing the different sources of empowerment on the Web (Rezabakhsh et al. . Rodríguez-Ardura and Martínez-López. Ajzen and Fishbein. particularly. for example: Sánchez-Franco and Roldán. (2000). confidence in the website of a specific company. 2004. 1985). the evidence obtained reveals different behaviour patterns as far as empowerment is concerned. Consumer empowerment on the Web Finally... To be precise. Sen et al. the consumer behaviour discipline takes additional sources of empowerment into consideration. 3 . in the search to satisfy needs. 2006.Integration of the TAM model with the flow condition to explain Web surfing and the use of the Web and of individual sites.Adaptation of the theory of reasoned action (Fishbein and Ajzen. and they are more likely to participate in the design of a value proposition that satisfies their preferences (Kamali and Loker..g. the emergence of the Web in the commerce arena is opening up new challenges and opportunities for greater communication and interdisciplinary interaction between researchers and specialists in computer science – the reference discipline – and those whose work is carried out in the economic and social realms. 1980) and planned behaviour (Schifter and Ajzen. we wish to note a line of investigation which is beginning to gain importance and which considers the Web to be an instrument to empower consumers (e. for example: George (2004).. 2008). Adoption of classic theories and models to explain consumer behaviour on the Web Another noteworthy line of investigation refers to the adaptation of classical theories and models relating to consumer behaviour – specifically attitude models – to explain the adoption of the Web and electronic commerce.Adaptation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) proposed by Davis (1989). The contributions to this area of study are many and varied. 2006. See. we propose that Web users in the electronic commerce context are not seen as users of information systems but as consumers (Kauffman and Walden. Rodríguez-Ardura and Martínez-López. See. See. 2006. 2005. those contributions arising initially from a marketing perspective should be incorporated. which must be adequately integrated in order to articulate a doctrinal body (Schneiderman.. Moreover. We highlight the seminal work of Hoffman and Novak (1996). 1975. for example: Shih and Fang (2004). 1985).

“Does your website measure up?”. W. Fishbein. and Gutiérrez. “Influence on the intent to make Internet purchase”. M. 4. 12. (1975). Berners-Lee. Madrid: Pirámide. pp. (2002). “The role of trust and deception in virtual societies”. 10. C. A.. S. No. No. Prentice Hall. (2001). “A two-dimensional concept of brand loyalty”. and Internet shopping behaviour”. (2006). International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 42. L. pp. No. 319-340. W. Donthu. pp. 511-535. T. “Interpreting dimensions of consumer trust in e-commerce”. pp. D. MIT Sloan Management Review. No.F. Rao. Collins. (1996). Vol. “Satisfacción y lealtad del consumidor online”. (1999). 769-771. 2. E.). (Eds. 5.J. 2. CA: Jossey-Bass. J.. G.. special emphasis should be placed on the importance of thinking in terms of the insights that marketing and consumer behaviour discipline can offer. With the adoption of this perspective based on the knowledge of the consumer. 8-9. 3. Bhatnagar. Weitz. J. Vol. No. No. Andreu. Attaran. Journal of Advertising Research. Weitzner. 3. Smith. Avery. pp. As we can see. Peck. A... (1999). 29-36. H. 11. pp. in Sánchez. Belief. No. Gatignon.. S. 12. I. Journal of Consumer Research. 43. Communications of the ACM. Shadbolt.J. European Management Journal. 241-246.. 19. No. pp. pp.D.. Day. Science. 6. pp. M. 11. L. pp. “Turning browsers into buyers”. Donthu. T. Journal of Advertising Research. Vol. Castelfranchi. Estrategia y empresa. pp. Vol. “Creating a science of the Web”. 46. pp. San Francisco. and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research... Vol. A. Vol. E. J. No. C. (2006). 24. Tan. M. I. Vol. “The hurried consumer: time-saving perceptions of Internet and catalogue shopping”. 9. 4. pp. 15.. 3. Kuilboer. 25-35. Marketing Management. R. MA: Addison-Wesley. attitude.J. Vol. the integrated base required by the theoretical and methodological developments and that will come from the understanding of the phenomenon of consumption on the Web can be created.. “Some attitudinal predictors of home-shopping through the Internet”. 74-86. 4.S. No. 5788. 1. Chen. (2005). C... 165-180. No. we propose that in the development of Web science. “Tracking customer search to price discriminate”. Sawyer. (2000). pp. the Web has become a new path for examining many of the traditional concepts. the future of Web science and marketing sciences are interconnected. B. “Online privacy policies: an empirical perspective on self-regulatory practices”. 13. “Technology adaptation in e-commerce: key determinants of virtual stores acceptance”. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. pp. J. Psychology & Marketing. 44.. 280-295. Vol. No. H. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations. 4 . Management Communication Quarterly. pp. RJ. and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces”. 2. Vol. Vol. Settle. Vol. No. No. 5. Marketing en Internet. 61-74. No. “Commentary on ‘Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing’”. A. (2006). Vanlaar. S.P. Vol. 303-318. Ruiz. “Dynamic pricing in Internet retail: effects on consumer trust”. R. “On risk. Childers. Management Science. Alreck. (2001). 2..D. “Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior”. Marketing Science. 1676-1692. 367381. (2004). 7. “Conditioning prices on purchase history”. 563-585. Journal of Marketing. Bakos. (2002). as is evident from the review undertaken. No.347-351. F. 495-513.. 5. Ashrafi. Deighton. Vol.. G. J. 130-138.L. A. Vol. 3.S. 77. No. pp.. S. 3. N. 2/3. Garcia. (1975). (1997). No.. “Determinants of search for non-durable goods: an empirical assessment of the economics of information theory”.. C. Csikszentmihalyi. Ajzen. A. E. “Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces”. 11. 1. 10. 43.. (1997). B. C. 361-385. “Privacy and security on the Internet: how to secure your personal information and company data”. pp. Beyond boredom and anxiety. No. 201-235. No. (1997). N.. pp. (2003). (2005). T. P. Bigné. 30. O. “Interactive home shopping: consumer. (2003). 849-867. 4.A. Chen. Robertson. pp. Journal of Marketing Management. Alba.-D. Vol. 4. “Consumer purchasing on the Internet: processes and prospects”. (1998). References Acquisti. Lutz. Vol. retailer. (1989). 29-32. (2005). Wood. Carl. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. (2001).F. 98-105. Vol. Vol. Dhillon. Information Management & Computer Security. MIS Quarterly. Journal of Retailing. 390-406. 4. 2/3. Y. Lee. Betts. Hendler. Vol. Janiszewski. 61. intention. Ajzen. P. Wilson. pp. No. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. Vol. I. M. Carr. N. 6. J. 313. Vol. 600-610. 3. 3. J. Varian. Vol. No.Secondly. S. Garbarino. perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology”. convenience. J. 4. H. “Global e-commerce: a framework for understanding and overcoming the trust barrier”. No. (1985). No. Vol. pp. (2002). J. Vol. theories and models of marketing and of the consumer behaviour discipline. G. (1980). Brynjolfsson. No. and Tan. pp. 4. The Journal of Consumer Affairs. (1969). M. No. 16. “Perceived usefulness. 55-70. No. J.. (2003). 25. “A propositional inventory for new diffusion research”. and Vassileiou.Y. pp. Reading. No. Thirdly.. Aljifri. Vol. Davis. pp. (1999). Management Science... pp.R. pp. pp. Vol. Journal of Database Marketing. Information Management & Computer Security..L. “What’s all the buzz about?”. European Management Journal. Misra. Information Technology and Management. Pons. “The Internet shopper”.. pp. Hall. M. George. Vol. Balabanis.A. Lynch.601-634.. and Carson. (2000) “Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers”. Deck. Butler. 38-53. 52-58. H. M.R. 20.. Economic Inquiry. 39. N. D. Fishbein. 22. Peppard.

S. Hall. 4. Man.L. Arnett. 181190. Psychology & Marketing. “The nature of and conditions for online trust”. Academy of Marketing Science Review. 2. pp. J. C. pp. 6. 421-432. 6. Marketing Science. Journal of Advertising Research.html. R. “Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations”. pp. 477-493. pp.. pp. No. Waite. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication.. pp. M. L. No.ascusc. Jacoby. Broom. European Journal of Marketing. 19. Munger. Gottovi. “A model of price search behaviour in electronic marketplace”. pp. (1978). No.. G. 4. No. (2000). (2001). 1-3. Koehn. T. Jarvenpaa. Vol. pp. Is there a future for retailing on the Internet?”. 10. No. R.. Tractinsky. pp.E. S. M. “Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: an empirical study”. “E-tailing vs. A.E.F. 329-342. 12. J. Goldsmith. 15. “Protecting personal privacy on the Internet”. Strategic Finance. 77-84. 75-91. “Consumer trust in an Internet store”. (2001).pdf. Khalifa. retailing: using attitude to predict online buying behaviour”. Information Management & Computer Security.W. Kim. N. Journal of Business Ethics. Vol. CA: Sage. Vol. No. 23-34. pp.L.B.. (2000). Todd. (2000).. (2004). (1996).amsreview.J.J. 5-16. “Information privacy in the marketspace: implications for the commercial uses of anonymity on the Web”. E. Ha. 2/3.htm. 38. Grewal. Kruck.. information and empowerment”. Y. D. Moghadami.. 80-85. J. Available at http://jcmc. K.P. H. Communications of the ACM. “The theory of planned behaviour and Internet purchasing”. Liao.P. (1997). Applied Ergonomics. J. (2003). Goldsmith.Y. 3. King. “Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online”. Jarvenpaa. S.. 9/10. Saarinen. Vol. 1/2. “Mass customization: on-line consumer involvement in product design”. (2003). “Affective dimensions of Internet culture”. Jarvenpaa.. 6 Available at http://www. N. pp. Hoffman.A. 3. No. (2000). Available at http://www. Vol. pp. Brand loyalty: measurement and management. No. pp. 21. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 2. 11. R.K. L. Rodríguez del Bosque. No. 7. H. E. Information & Management. 42. (2008). Lakner.H. 50-68. 6. No. No. Turban. Vol. E. Social Science Computer Review. Loker. and home furnishing products by small community consumers”. Shadbolt. Novak.A. Vol. Hoffman. No. T. 31. “Modelling the customer in electronic commerce”. M. Vol. Kumar. Vol. 1. K. No. (1999). and Khalid. C. S. 5.. (2002). 38.S. No. G. 245-253. Kauffman. No. (2002).edu/vol7/issue4/loker. No.. 4953. D. 12. Hoffman. Berners-Lee. “The influence of Internet-retailing factors on price expectations”. M. Vol. Larson. and Hunter. pp. M. (2004). 2. 139-156. pp. Management Decision. Vol. 25-31. F. 944-956. S. H. Communications of the ACM. “The role of consumers’ trust in online-shopping”.. Iyengar. “A discussion of current and potential issues relating information security for Internet communications”. 11. (2003). pp. 39. (2002). The Information Society. pp. “A trust model for consumer Internet shopping”. pp. Forcht. pp. Journal of Product & Brand Management.. “Buying apparel over the Internet”. Competitiveness Review. No. M. pp. 1.. Harrison. D.B. A. “Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the Web”. Vol. 60. T. Bridges. “What makes consumers buy from Internet? A longitudinal study of online shopping”. 7. (2003). 1.. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 60-69. “Consumer trust in an Internet store: a cross-cultural validation”. T. Thousand Oaks.. D. (1999b). Tractinsky. 3-19. D. Harris. “Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce”. Vol. Journal of Business Ethics. 4. and Cybernetics. R. pp. pp. pp. Interacting with Computers. No. 5 . Hendler. Journal of Marketing. pp. 5. Iyer. 14. “Enhancing Web privacy and anonymity in the digital era”. Goldsmith.. pp. G. Vol. Novak. (2004). 9. Frini.L. Vol. 198212. Vol. M.” Communications of the ACM. Weitzner.A.S. “The revolution will not be televised: introduction to the special issue on marketing science and the Internet”. T. pp. 2. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce.V. M.. 185-96. Cheung. pp. R. No. Chestnut. (2008). 4. Vol. No. No. Novak. 20. 2/3. E. in Peterson. 3.org/articles/kimiloglu06-2004. Lennon. S. L.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/jarvenpaa. Vol. Vol. 414-430. 129-139. 1.A. Vol. No. Larson.. 12. pp. Vol. “Building consumer trust in online environments: the case for information privacy”. “Explaining B2C e-commerce acceptance: an integrative model based on the framework by Gatignon and Robertson”. (2000). No.. Cohen.. P. Vol.. (2000). 5. Z. 43. (Ed. Jacoby. No. 1. 4. (2004). A.. 212-224. 89-102.). R. E. M... J. 255-288. Damhorst. Vol. Vol. L. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. Vol. No.. 14. Liu. M. Vol. 2. Helander. (2002). W. 41.. S. 4. IEE Transaction on Systems.. Kalsbeek. No. Jasper.. No. Electronic Marketing and the Consumer. D. Hoffman. D. Hoffman. 609-619. H. 299-306. R. Vol. 43-50. 3.. Internet Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications.E.George. “The ‘e-literature’: a framework for understanding the accumulated knowledge about Internet marketing”. 90-95. Limayem. 5.. (2003). pp. 40. Vol. No. S. 45-71. 1/2. Vol. D. W. Information and Management. P. K. No. (2001)... Kamali. Vol. and Vitale. Vol. No. Johnson. No.R. N. (2003). T. Peralta. “Privacy protection on the Internet”. Vol. Information Technology and Management. Greenlee.972-993. Herrero. 36-46. “The Internet. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. I. 13. Vol. No. L... No. “Internet and Web use in the U. Peralta. Journal of Product and Brand Management. Gritzalis.... N.. food. Vol. Kim. No. Walden. 32-40. 4. 84. J. Lee. T. 1/2.L. “Testing the behavioral intentions model of online shopping for clothing”. 51. D. 19. (2006). Vitale. K. Novak. (2004). Levy. Jiang. Vol. (2002). 1/2. (2001). 12. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Saarinen. (1996). J (1971).. 30.. “An application of Rogers’s innovation model: use of the Internet to purchase apparel.. 21. 1. S. “Economics and electronic commerce: survey and directions for research”. Kımıloğlu. Internet Research.indiana.K. Grabner-Kraeuter. (1999a). 20. Information Management & Computer Security. pp. “Marketing in the Internet age: what can we learn from the past?”. No... pp.. pp. 39.B. pp. “A model of multi-brand loyalty”.

“Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology”. Rezabakhsh. 1. pp. “The global Internet shopper: evidence from shopping tasks in twelve countries”. 15. “Consumer privacy rights: CPR and the age of the Internet”. pp. 2. M. O’Cass. pp. “Determinants of online channel use and overall satisfaction with a relational.. pp.. (2000). No.. Romano. 203-214. (1997). 265-281. Vol. Srinivasan. R. A. “Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model”. R. 1. B. Estrategia y empresa. in Sánchez. Psychology & Marketing. F. B.. F. 51-60. “Guest editorial: the psychology of pricing on the Internet”. McKinney. 49. 45. Management Decision. D. Sharma. Vol. 115-126. Miyazaki. Rodríguez del Bosque. 1. Vol.T. The Journal of Consumer Affairs. A. N. pp. “Motivations for consumption behaviours on the Web: a conceptual model based on a holistic approach”. Vol.. No. Bornemann. Information Systems Research.. (2000). (2001).. 40. Fenech. pp. 312-334. F. pp. 35. No. I. A. G. pp. pp. I. 1. Vol. Urban. Business Horizons. (2002). 78. No. (2004). L.D. J. (2006). F. T. pp. 46-50. King.K. F.J. B. el Web i la ciència del Web”. Dellaert. P. 1. Vol. (2000). (2008).D. R. J. Vol. Voss. No. Journal of Consumer Policy. Schrader. Information Systems and E-business Management. No.). J. (2002).L. International Journal of Business Environment. 15. Mathwick. Vol.J.. Rodríguez-Ardura. Vol. 3. (2006) “Consumer power: a comparison of the old economy and the Internet economy”. No. Pitt. 215-225. 3.N.pdf. Kacmar. (2003). 2. pp. and future directions”. Ajzen. Internet Research. 325-344.. “La aceptación de Internet y el comercio electrónico basado en las actitudes”. 7. Madrid: Pirámide. 81-94. “Online trust: a stakeholder perspective. (2006). McMellon. Vol. “The Internet and the birth of real consumer power”.. No. 23. C. V.. 1. 3. 101-134. 2. and Gutiérrez. Novak. “Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modelling approach”. N.R. J. 211-238. 4. “Shopping from a list: international studies of consumer online experiences”. pp. Vol. 19. pp. Internet Research... multichannel service provider”. “Product searching with shopping bots”. International Journal of Research in Marketing. Malhotra. No. 9/10. Martínez-López. pp. 3. pp. Sultan. 334-359. “The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach”. D. No. (2000). International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing. Riera. No. Hoffman. pp. 1. (2001). No. A. “Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping”. Vol. Vol. Vol. Vol. K. S. (1985). No. No. No. No. J. D.edu/uocpapers/7/dt/cat/riera. Zahedi. Sen. Plant. Journal of Consumer Affairs. Martínez-López. 1. consumer empowerment and marketing strategies”. “Web acceptance and usage model: a comparison between goal-directed and experiential Web users”. Rigdon. the standard learning hierarchy.. 36. “Privacy vs. 95-111. S. Journal of Business Research. H. Montoya-Weis. 6. “The Internet. “What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology”. “Intention... No.uoc.S. pp. P. 2.. M. 102-121. V. (2001).J. U. Herrero. 371-412. (2004). Fjermestad. 7. Vol. Stanton. Marketing en Internet. D. concepts. N. C. Miyazaki.. J. G. Nakra. 11. (2003).. 31. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. “Playing cat and mouse: consumer empowerment and marketing interaction on the net”. A. 2/3. McKnight. Berthon. 10. Zinkhan. “What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review”. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.C.. 20.Long. “Buyers’ choice of online search strategy and its managerial implications”.. pp. No. 18. pp. No. No. (2005).. 29. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. Vol. Vol. and weight loss: an application of the Theory of Planned Behavior”. pp. P. “Measuring e-business performance: towards a revised balanced scorecard approach”.. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. Journal of Advertising Research. Roldán. 1.. Phillips. Choudhury. D. Vol. K. Information Systems Research. (2002). 3.. 22-42. 39. No. 417-444. 3. Vol. Lynch. pp. pp. No. “E-relationship marketing: changes in traditional marketing as an outcome of electronic customer relationship management”. M. I. 346-371. C. Luna. European Journal of Marketing. The Journal of Services Marketing.D. Y. De Ruyter. Vol. (2008). (2001). pp. Sánchez-Franco.D. (2006). “La ciència. (2002). 41.J.. T. M. 1. Martínez. 201-214. Yung. D. No. Vol. 13. Martínez-López. pp.J. Vol. Scullin. Vol. Journal of Management Information Systems. V. 15-23. T. 296-315. 448-458. Schifter. Available at http://www. (2002). No. (2005).. Fernandez. No. G. (2002). Martínez. L. Vol. perceived control. (2005). Vol. 1. 936-949.J.. 7-14.B. R. pp... No.. “The nature and social uses of the Internet: a qualitative investigation”. U. T. Vol. F. Rowley. No. Schaupp. pp. R. 471-476. Hansen. R.. Kent.. Lukas.. Maignan. 2. 21-48. pp. I. pp. Rita.J. No. 842-851. 6. Perea y Monsuwé. (Eds.C.R. 10. 3. implications. Willcocks. 17. 272-278. Venkatesh. “Exploring the determinants of retail service quality on the Internet”. (2003). Vol. pp. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management. “Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of interest users Web retailing behaviour”. Marketing Science. Shaw. Journal of Consumer Affairs.F.. 696-702. 7 No. 4. “Web-based marketing: the coming revolution in marketing thought and strategy”. Grewall. P. No. P. pp. pp. (2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 410415.. pp.. International Journal of Electronic Commerce.J. Bélanger.. J. (2003). L. 10. “Online shopping.. (2002). Yoon. 4. 36.. Chervany. 34. Pavlou. A.. 3. Luna. A. 78-90. 57. 31. Vol. and consumers’ Internet expertise: an American-Spanish comparison”. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. P. (2003). Reynolds. F. 3-20. “The effect of dynamic retail experiences on experiential perceptions of value: an Internet and catalog comparison”.C. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 6. No. 6. No. 1.. Vol. Shankar. E. International Journal of Service Industry Management. Watson. pp. UOC papers. “A conjoint analysis of online consumer satisfaction”. Mayer. No. Pires.. “Marketing modeling for e-business”. “Ecommerce: a critical review”. Vol. McKnight. Vol. Sheth. M. cybersecurity”. Information Management Journal. 13. (2004). 6 . pp. Mahajan. No.. Vol. F. (2004).A. 27-44. Vol. G. 2. Olson. P. pp. 2. 3-36. Vol.N. 17. 28. Journal of Retailing. 35-59.. N. V. 15.

No. S. “Determinants and assessing the determinants of e-service operations”. C.. (2007). B. pp. Vol. International Journal of Electronic Commerce”. P. No. L. No. S. Fang. The Journal of Consumer Marketing. K. (2001). “Print and Internet catalog shopping: assessing attitudes and intentions”. 2. 63-70. Vol. (2001). 77. S. Yang. Widrick. 30. E. Damhorst. Wolfinbarger. pp. “Examining user perceptions of third-party organization credibility and trust in an eretailer”. P. (2003). 4. Cai. “Browsers or buyers in cyberspace? An investigation of factors influencing electronic exchange”.. “Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequents”.. Gilly. 6/7. “A phenomenological investigation of Internet usage among older individuals”. 4. M. M. 33. “How do consumers evaluate Internet retail service quality?”. “Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce”. F. (2000).L.J. M. Warrington.. Jones. pp. Anthony.. 17. (2000).. P. (2003). No. Todd. Meehan. Van Iwaarden.. Vol. Millen. 19-41. Vijayasarathy. 165-174. No. Information Management & Computer Security. 20.. California Management Review. 42. Wang.. “Quantitative characterization and prediction of online purchasing behaviour: a latent variable approach”. (2001).. International Journal of Electronic Commerce.. Lisboa.. “Applying SERVQUAL to Web sites: an exploratory study”. (2005). “Privacy and security concerns as major barriers for e-commerce: a survey study”. Van Der Wiele. 2/3. Whitten. Sloan Management Review. Y. J.M. M. 4. 8/9. M. 13. (2004). Trocchia. 41-50.. 1. Yoh. Trocchia.. 83-104. Vol. Vol. S. Vol. 6. Urban.A. Communications of the ACM. No. (2006). The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 1095-1118. (2000). R. pp. 41.. 18. pp. Thoen. Sultan. Srinivassan. Vellido. control. “Consumer adoption of the Internet: the case of apparel shopping”. 50.. G... 4.edu/vol5/issue2/swaminathan. Lepkowska-White. 2. pp. Vol. 1-19. Y. (2003). No. Managing Service Quality. K. V. 1. (2002). Malhotra. Vol. Vol. pp.. (2002). Rao. Vol. No.L. pp.. P. A. (1999). 919-935. S. E. H. Peterson. (1995). Vol. 213-223. 605-616. Internet Research. 2. 14. 17. Journal of Computer Mediated Communications.L. Vol. 3. S. Journal of Retailing. “Shopping online for freedom. 7. S. and fun”.. 61-74.. Laczniak. No. (1998). D. M. 19. 397-416.A. No. (2003). “Consumer perception on e-service quality: from Internet purchases and non-purchases perspectives”. A. The Journal of Services Marketing. Vol.A. No.J. 39-53. B.O. pp. Shim. 39-48. Journal of Business Strategies. Yang. pp. pp. 243-253.. Shih.. No. Information Systems Research. “Service quality dimensions of Internet retailing: an exploratory analysis”. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. 122-132. The Journal of Service Marketing. No. Gosh. Z.htm. Lee. 33. R. R. “Placing trust at the center of your Internet Strategy”. L. Surjadjaja. S. Udo.Schneiderman..J. “Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models”. 20. 1. pp. J. No.T. Vol.indiana. 2. Psychology & Marketing. K. Perotti. W. Parasuraman. 43.. Zeithaml. (2000). Sorce. Jun. Vol. Vol.. Lotz. T. Janda. 5. Vol. 25-27. pp. Internet Research. pp. “Web science: a provocative invitation to computer science”. Taylor. Vol. A. Anderson. (2003). P. No. F. W. “Service quality delivery through Web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge”. Ball. pp. Available at http://jcmc. H. R. 2. 2/3. Janda. R.. Tan. No. 35-55. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 9. No. “An online prepurchase intentions model: the role of intention to search”. Z. 12.K. pp. pp. Journal of Retailing. (2002). No. S.. No. No. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 362-375. 10. “Attitude and age differences in online buying”. 191-202. 17. Estlick.. Communications of the ACM. Sapp. 78. 5. P. pp. 3.. 685-698. Vol. Wang. Swaminathan. Vol. 7 . 144-176. V. pp.. pp. Ponnavolu. 3..R.. pp. Wakefield. Vol. “The use of a decomposed theory of planned behaviour to study Internet banking in Taiwan”.. (2000). “Consumer privacy concerns about Internet marketing”.V. No. pp. 1. No. Vol. G. S.. No. Qualls. Vol. 6.