CODY ROBERT JUDY 3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2 Ogden UT.

84401 801-497-6655 -------SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Office of the Clerk Mr. William K. Suter Washington, DC 20543-0001 RE: Cody Robert Judy v. Barack Obama --------Dear Mr. Suter- Clerk of the Court: The first class mail return of my document, Petition for Writ of Certiorari on May 12th, 2012, was returned with a letter dated from the Clerk Gail Johnson April 26th,2012 stating: Dear Mr. Judy- The above entitled petition for a writ of certiorari was originally postmarked April 4th,2012 and received again on April 24th,2012. The papers are returned for the following reason(s): For the reasons stated in prior correspondence from this office. It does not appear that you have case pending before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in order to file a Rule 11 petition. Sincerely William K. Suter, Clerk By: Gail Johnson (202) 479-3038 While I appreciate the pressure that may accompany the work of the clerks in their duties of their employ, I would like you to register/note a grievance Mr. Suter on my behalf against Gail Johnson. 1)I have a signed mailing receipt that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari Judy v. Obama that was signed for at the U.S. Supreme Court 05/07/2012 at 07:36 AM in WASHINGTON, DC 20543 May 13,2012

to J KOUROS. 2)The postage mark on my return package from you bears the postage mark of May 10th,2012. 3) The return reference and response letter bears the date of April 26th,2012 on a package that was delivered to you May 7th,2012. 4) The petition itself was dated May 3rd, also with a notarized May 3rd Mailing Certificate to defendants. 5) There is no reference found of Rule 11, even mentioned, in the Jurisdiction Statement, nor anywhere in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari available on line here:
http://www.scribd.com/Freedom%26Liberty

The following facts lead everyone following this to ascertain more than a mistake, but a gross incompetence, perhaps a bias or prejudice of the Clerk Gail Johnson towards me and my Petition

for a Writ that can be seen as a collusion with the Defendant Barack Obama, and really a dereliction of duty to file the action with the Justices representing an obstruction of Justice. How could the Clerk even closely relate the reasons for the return on April 26th of a Petition for Writ of Certiorari not even received by the Court until May 3rd,2012? How is it possible that the Defendants Counsel would testify they in fact received the action, as it was also mailed and emailed to the U.S. Supreme Court, at the same time May 3rd,2012 without any mention of Rule 11 in their copies? The following leads all of the American Citizens to understand completely the total breakdown of law and competence in your office in the assumptions of the duty of the Clerk of the Court. Your Clerk Gail Johnson has no idea what date it is and is clearly living in the past by about 11 or 12 days, which is a delusion. Clerk Gail Johnson is imagining things in a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, like Rule 11, that is clearly not there, which is a delusion. The incompetence of these delusions must be remedied immediately in order to stand upon the facts of reality Sir in very simple things that are normal, and are generally accepted as common for the general population such as, What Date it is, What time it is, The reality of words on a page that are typed in black and white verses words that dont exist or do in someones imagination but dont really exist on the paper. My degree is in psychology, and Im sure you would agree that without these necessities employed in your distinguished office that a total disability exists, perhaps of mental health, of which a kind solution exists for the mental dis-orders that can be diagnosed by a professional. I appreciate your immediate attention Mr. Suter, and acknowledge to you my sincere cooperation to submit to you a satisfactory Petition for Writ of Certiorari, and ask you to beg pardon from the Justices of any time constraints affected by the negligence perpetrated upon my petition by these unfortunate circumstances of which Im not to blame. Thank you for your attention and I sincerely express my concern for any such incidental or accidental trauma Gail Johnson may have experienced leading to these derelictions of duty and obstruction of Justice and sincerely hope immediate remedy may be found. You are no doubt more highly trained and skilled at law then I, and that is precisely why when I recognize a legal problem, there is even a greater concern, than when you do Sir. Sincerely Cody Robert Judy cc: WND, The P&E, Washington Post, New York Times, and many other news agencies around the United States. Available for the public to view here on Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Freedom%26Liberty