This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Known as the Bengal Famine, an estimated four million people died of hunger that year alone in eastern India (that included today's Bangladesh). The initial theory put forward to 'explain' that catastrophe was that there as an acute shortfall in food production in the area. However, Indian economist Amartya Sen (recipient of the Nobel Prize for Economics, 1998) has established that while food shortage was a contributor to the problem, a more potent factor was the result of hysteria related to World War II which made food supply a low priority for the British rulers. The hysteria was further exploited by Indian traders who hoarded food in order to sell at higher prices. Nevertheless, when the British left India four years later in 1947, India continued to be haunted by memories of the Bengal Famine. It was therefore natural that food security was a paramount item on free India's agenda. This awareness led, on one hand, to the Green Revolution in India and, on the other, legislative measures to ensure that businessmen would never again be able to hoard food for reasons of profit.
However, the term "Green Revolution" is applied to the period from 1967 to 1978. Between 1947 and 1967, efforts at achieving food self-sufficiency were not entirely successful. Efforts until 1967 largely concentrated on expanding the farming areas. But starvation deaths were still being reported in the newspapers. In a perfect case of Malthusian economics, population was growing at a much faster rate than food production. This called for drastic action to increase yield. The action came in the form of the Green Revolution.
The term "Green Revolution" is a general one that is applied to successful agricultural experiments in many Third World countries. It is NOT specific to India. But it was most successful in India. What was the Green Revolution in India? There were three basic elements in the method of the Green Revolution: (1) Continued expansion of farming areas; (2) Double-cropping existing farmland; (3) Using seeds with improved genetics. Continued expansion of farming areas As mentioned above, the area of land under cultivation was being increased right from 1947. But this was not enough in meeting with rising demand. Other methods were required. Yet, the expansion of cultivable land also had to continue. So, the Green Revolution continued with this quantitative expansion of farmlands. However, this is NOT the most striking feature of the Revolution.
The credit for developing this strain goes to Dr. India also became an exporter of food grains around that time. more pesticides. Statistical Results of the Green Revolution (1) The Green Revolution resulted in a record grain output of 131 million tons in 1978-79. The most noteworthy HYV seed was the K68 variety for wheat. One would be the natural monsoon and the other an artificial 'monsoon. (2) The increase in irrigation created need for new dams to harness monsoon water. more fertilizer. Simple irrigation techniques were also adopted. This spurred the growth of the local manufacturing sector. This in turn boosted industrial growth. 35 per cent of the rice crop area and 20 per cent of the millet and corn crop area. It developed new strains of high yield value (HYV) seeds. Such industrial growth created new jobs and contributed to the country's GDP.' The artificial monsoon came in the form of huge irrigation facilities. (3) India paid back all loans it had taken from the World Bank and its affiliates . used the HYV seeds. More than 70 per cent of the wheat crop area. The Indian Council for Agricultural Research (which was established by the British in 1929 but was not known to have done any significant research) was re-organized in 1965 and then again in 1973. (2) Yield per unit of farmland improved by more than 30 per cent between 1947 (when India gained political independence) and 1979 when the Green Revolution was considered to have delivered its goods. Singh who is also regarded as the hero of India's Green revolution. there had to be two "monsoons" per year. M. Dams were built to arrest large volumes of natural monsoon water which were earlier being wasted.P. created jobs and improved the quality of life of the people in villages. Economic results of the Green Revolution (1) Crop areas under high-yield varieties needed more water.Double-cropping existing farmland Double-cropping was a primary feature of the Green Revolution. (3) The crop area under HYV varieties grew from seven per cent to 22 per cent of the total cultivated area during the 10 years of the Green Revolution. This was correct. fungicides and certain other chemicals. the decision was made to have two crop seasons per year. mainly wheat and rice but also millet and corn. No other country in the world which attempted the Green Revolution recorded such level of success. So. The one-season-per-year practice was based on the fact that there is only natural monsoon per year. The water stored was used to create hydro-electric power. Instead of one crop season per year. Using seeds with superior genetics This was the scientific aspect of the Green Revolution. This established India as one of the world's biggest agricultural producers.
Limitations of the Green Revolution (1) Even today. The Green Revolution. India faced severe drought conditions due to poor monsoon. These people remitted part of their incomes to their relatives in India. Indira Gandhi (1917-84) and her party. improved India's (4) Some developed countries. howsoever impressive. in today's globalised economic scenario. In 1998. especially in the Third World. In terms of crops. In regional terms. a very powerful political force in India (it would however be wrong to say that it was the only reason). which were facing a shortage in agricultural labour. only Punjab and Haryana states showed the best results of the Green Revolution. it remain largely confined to foodgrains only. . especially Canada. the Indian National Congress. India's agricultural output sometimes falls short of demand.for the purpose of the Green Revolution. has thus NOT succeeded in making India totally and permanently self-sufficient in food. (2) The Green Revolution was one factor that made Mrs. However. Last year. were so impressed by the results of India's Green Revolution that they asked the Indian government to supply them with farmers experienced in the methods of the Green Revolution. India had to import onions. this raised questions about the whether the Green Revolution was really a long-term achievement. Sociological results of the Green Revolution The Green Revolution created plenty of jobs not only for agricultural workers but also industrial workers by the creation of lateral facilities such as factories and hydro-electric power stations as explained above. 100 per cent selfsufficiency is not considered as vital a target as it was when the world political climate was more dangerous due to the Cold War. This not only helped the relatives but also added. (2) India has failed to extend the concept of high-yield value seeds to all crops or all regions. to India's foreign exchange earnings. not to all kinds of agricultural produce. This earned admiration for India in the comity of nations. Political results of the Green Revolution (1) India transformed itself from a starving nation to an exporter of food. Many farmers from Punjab and Haryana states in northern India were thus sent to Canada where they settled (That's why Canada today has many Punjabi-speaking citizens of Indian origin). This creditworthiness in the eyes of the lending agencies. But results were less impressive in other parts of India. albeit modestly. The eastern plains of the River Ganges in West Bengal state also showed reasonably good results. In 1979 and 1987. India imported sugar.
(4) The Green Revolution cannot therefore be considered to be a 100 percent success. . Of course. there are places like Kalahandi (in India's eastern state of Orissa) where famine-like conditions have been existing for many years and where some starvation deaths have also been reported.(3) Nothing like the Bengal Famine can happen in India again. but the very fact that some people are still starving in India (whatever the reason may be). brings into question whether the Green Revolution has failed in its overall social objectives though it has been a resounding success in terms of agricultural production. this is due to reasons other than availability of food in India. But it is disturbing to note that even today.