Process, Power and Marine Division


Getting More Mileage out of your Smart Plant Solution


April 14, 2010

Intergraph Corporation.Agenda ge da Objective The Topics A Question to you Conclusions Questions & Answers Q ti A © 2010. 2 . All Rights Reserved.

3 . Host Sure Ltd. Intergraph Corporation. © 2010.Objectives How a h ti environment can h l your b i H hosting i t help business The Pro’s and con’s of a hosting environment How to set up a hosting environment and who can help The Presenters Robbie O'Brien. All Rights Reserved.

Intergraph Corporation. All Rights Reserved.Opportunities Better tili the B tt utilize th products capabilities d t biliti Increase the productivity Learn about the better and easier ways (tips and tricks) Learn about optimizing the workflows Ask the experts at the Intergraph and Partner team p g p And more…………. 4 . © 2010.

All Rights Reserved. Intergraph Corporation. 5 .The Topics Why and what is hosting The benefits What about support System availability How to get there The things to watch out for © 2010.

SmartPlant Enterprise Configuration SmartPlant P&ID SmartPlant P&ID SmartPlant P&ID SmartPlant Electrical SmartPlant Electrical SmartPlant Electrical Site A P & ID Citrix Server Site B Site C Site A Site B Site C Host Project Site Electrical Citrix Server Instrumentation Citrix Server Project Central Database SmartPlant Foundation SmartPlant 3D Work Share Site A SmartPlant Instrumentation SmartPlant Instrumentation Site B SmartPlant Instrumentation Site C Satellite A Satellite B Satellite C .

7 . Intergraph Corporation.4/20/2010© 2008. All Rights Reserved.

All Rights Reserved.Poll Question © 2010. 8 . Intergraph Corporation.

9 . All Rights Reserved.Hosting in Production at CoP © 2010. Intergraph Corporation.

The Pearl project – Qatar Petroleum and Shell launched new Gas to Liquid (GTL) Pearl Project in Qatar July 2006 – Build offshore upstream gas production facility and onshore GTL plant – Major goal – deliver instrumentation data to commissioning personnel earlier to de-risk the de risk project • Chose MW Kellogg as PMC • Chose SPI as the design tool • 25 Engineering companies chosen for the Design effort – Challenge • Manage the multi-contractor design effort • Mitigate the risk of having to merge 25 versions of the design data around the globe .

Location of the EPCs .

999% – Significantly reduced support calls – Data amalgamation eliminated – Much lower I. skill set in EPCs – Timescales . built. Costs and I. tested and commissioned within 3 months – Fi t Engineering company November 2006 – N users and EPCs put live within First E i i N b New d EPC t li ithi hours – 250 users – excellent feedback from end users and EPCs – Less than 30 minutes of down time since Go-Live – up time of 99.much Improved progress monitoring . Costs and Risk significantly reduced .T.T.The Result – Infrastructure designed.

000 Employees .Alcoa – a global organisation Alcoa – a global organisation 44 Countries 123.

Global EDM ‘Network’ Host Facility in Nashville .

All Rights Reserved.Conclusion Single Design bases for the Project (best practice) Lower the IT cost Easier to make scope splits Project reviews from one single source Central source for management of change Lower cost and risk of data hand-over to operations hand over Need good infra structure Support around the clock pp © 2010. Intergraph Corporation. 15 .

Q&A © 2010. Intergraph Corporation. 16 . All Rights Reserved.

com/ppm/webinars.intergraph. 17 .Additional Information & Recording g The recording of the webinar and additional information can be found at: http://www. All Rights Reserved.aspx p g p pp p © 2010. Intergraph Corporation.

Power and Marine Division .Process. The Future of Engineering – Today .

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful