This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
He said the Ansar Al-Sharia have revolted against Ali Abdullah Saleh is a legitimate one because he committed the clear Kufr, and he attacked the Persian period, and described Saudi Arabia as the hollow state and that its project, and accused the Houthis of handing over Al-Qaeda elements to the Political Security, and he excepted a world war in the Arabian Peninsula and the Levant, and he talked about the Sunnah of Iran, Hezbollah, the Nusayris of Syria, Salafis of Saudi Arabia, Ismailis of Najran, Makarma of Yemen and the Salafis of Dammaj. Al-Yaqeen: What brings you together with the Houthis is more than what divides you, you rebel against the ruler and they see rebelling against him. You shout death to America and they also do. You see jihad and they also do. You boycotted the presidential elections and they also boycotted. Then why is the conflict? Abu Abdurrahman Al-Awlaki: What is more accurate is what divides us is more than brings us together. What you mentioned in the question that we see rebelling against the ruler and they see that also, the difference is too large, they see the rebellion against the Fasiq (immoral) ruler, while we see rebellion against the apostate ruler who changes the Sharia of Allah, and they see rebelling against all the rulers of the Sunni Islamic countries that rule with the Sharia throughout the Islamic history, while we don’t see rebelling against them. They see rebelling against any Muslim pious righteousness ruler who rules with the Sharia of Allah if his lineage wasn’t from (Hassan and Hussein - sons of Ali -), while we rebel against the apostate ruler who changes the Sharia even if he was a Hashmi Qureshi and we listen and obey to who rules with the Sharia of Rahman even if he was an
Abyssinian slave. So the two rebellions are different. So the rebellion of the Houthis against Ali Abdullah Saleh is a despicable racial caste rebellion, but the rebellion of Ansar Al-Sharia against him is a correct legitimate rebellion because he committed the clear Kufr of allying with the Kuffar and governing with the manmade laws and other Kufriyat which we have proof from Allah. What you mentioned in your question of death to America, the difference between us and the Houthis is the difference between claims and actions. They say what they don’t do while Al-Qaeda Organization does what it says, and says what it does, that is why it gained high credibility with the friend and foe. But the Houthis in this issue apply to them the saying of the Almighty: (It is most hateful to Allah that you should say that which you do not do) 3 Surah As-Saff. The reality on the ground proves with conclusive evidence that the stance of the Houthis from the Americans is only a vocal phenomenon. As for the situation of Al-Qaeda with America is very different and war between them is rivalry they kill from us and we kill from them, we inflict harm against them and they inflict harm against us, and the blessed end is for the pious. The American presence is very strong and intensive since the end of WWII and the defeat of Hitler to this day, Yahiya Al-Houthi has taken Germany as his home, and he practices from it his political work and empty statements. So why doesn’t the American forces that are present in Germany arrest him and bring him to America and put him on trial under the accusation of inciting against America and calling for death to Israel? We won’t forget his statement that the motto is merely words and that America and Israel are still ok. The more important question is that: Will America, Germany and all the countries of the world allow the presence of one commander in Al-Qaeda Organization to practice his work in Germany or other countries? The answer will certainly be no it’s impossible. Do you know why? Because the Americans, the Europeans and the whole world knows for sure that Al-Qaeda Organization is very sincere with its self and the world around it and its sayings lines with its actions, but there is no problem in accepting the presence of the Houthis because they say what they don’t do. The Americans know for sure that the Houthis motto “Death to America and Israel” is only a motto for political bidding and trading with the crucial causes of the Ummah in order to tickle the emotions of the helpless Muslim peoples and gain their loyalty, and they have succeeded in that to some extent. But the rope of lying is short and the succession of events is capable of detecting the hidden and clarifying the reality to the people. Regarding the boycotting of the presidential elections the difference between us and them is that their boycotting of the elections is a political boycott based on the principle of the interests that can change political stances in return for getting more political interests and
gains in the coming state. So the stance of the Houthis from the presidential elections is tactical not in principal necessitated by the current political situation. They Houthis have principles they are opportunists. The boycott of the Ansra Al-Sharia of the presidential elections is based on solid basics of the Sharia and an ideological stance that doesn’t change and it is not subjected to the cheap and vulgar political bargaining and swaps. What brings the Houthis together with the Americans is more than what brings them together with us. They share with the Americans the philosophy of pragmatism in the political work and other. All of them the “Houthis and the Americans” are pragmatists and opportunistic moved by the interests not principles. We should remind here that the Americans hadn’t included Al-Houthi to the list of terrorist organizations and groups because they didn’t target the Americans and the Jews, since all the operation against the Houthis is directed in the first degree the Sunnah Muslim and against the Yemeni army and not even one American was killed by the Houthis neither yesterday or today and they don’t plan to do that tomorrow. So why then there is a conflict between us and the Houthis? Our struggle with them is because: 1- They are an aggressive enemy on our religion, honor and money/ 2- They insult Ummahat Al-Momineen and curse the Sahabah may Allah be pleased with them all. 3- They a people of innovation, quackery and superstition and practice witchcraft and sorcery, 4- They work on facilitating the spread of the Twelver religion in the land Iman and wisdom. 5- They agreed with the Americans and Ali Saleh in the Doha talks to fight us and they have handed over our elements imprisoned by them to the Political Security. And our fighting and struggle with them will continue on all levels until we purify the land from their filth. As for our jihad and their jihad there isn’t known any jihad by them according to the meanings of the Sharia through 128 years, meaning from 1839 when the British colonialism entered until it left in 1967 the armies of the Zaydi Imams, which ruled the North and some of the South, didn’t advance to Aden, despite their rule reached the
province of Lahej in the South, and no Fatwa was issued for defensive jihad to drive out the British colonizer from Aden, despite the historical chance was very ripe. And as the grandparents of the Houthis from the Zaydi Imams didn’t fight the British in Aden, their sons won’t fight the Americans anywhere, even if they entered regions in Yemen. Also history says that Zaidism never fought throughout its rule of Yemen a Seeking jihad, we mean by it invading the Kuffar in their land and raising the banner of La Ilaha Illallah fluttering on the lands of the polytheists. For example, Abyssinia which is the stronghold of Christianity in the African continent, and almost 300 kilometers from Al-Hudaydah, but through more than 1000 years from the Zaydi rule to Yemen didn’t prepare a naval fleet to do the mission of seeking jihad and invade the Abyssinian Christians in their home land, as the Sunni Ottoman Turks did in Europe, that’s why the United States of America is never worried from the presence of the Al-Huothi groups, because the Westerners read the Islamic history well and know for sure who is their friend and who is their foe, and the Houthis today in releasing their slogans are like their grandfathers… (The Americans know their enemies well, and also their friends). The Zaydi fighting throughout the history of their presence in Yemen was only in four types: - an internal fighting amongst the Hashemite families over the thrown. - fighting with the Ismailis (the Bohra and Makarma) - fighting with the Turks - fighting with the Shafi'ites Regarding fighting with the Jews and Christians in a defensive jihad or seeking jihad, it was never known of them to do so, neither in their old or modern history, in contrast look to the history of Ahl us-Sunnah wa al-Jamaah in this subject. Y: The Houthis are Zaydis, and the Zaydis the closest Shia sect to Ahli Sunnah, and you are Sunnah so why is the conflict dyed in a sectarian dye? A.A.A: The Houthis aren’t Zaydis in the strict sense of the term Zaydi. They belong to Zaidism, that is true, but their reality today is a blend of imported Shi'ism from Iran and the Zaydi Jaroudi Shi'ism. Houthis are a blend of Shi'ism and superstition and they
practice political and military action within the Safavid Iranian project which is spiteful on the glorious history of the Muslim Ummah and its best men throughout history. As for that the Zaydis are the closest Shia sect to Ahli Sunnah that closeness is a relative closeness and not a complete closeness, they are closer to us from the Ismailis and Twelvers. Zaidism is a Shia sect that is very far from the Sunnah in the utter concept, but is close to the Sunnah in the relative concept. Although the Zaydis as individuals we deal with them in a good way and we consider them Muslims whom their blood is immune like the individuals of Ahli Sunnah, and if there is an evidence against one of them that he committed a violation to the Sharia which deserves punishment he is treated similar to the Sunni who committed the same crime. Y: Can’t you coexist with them as your grandfathers the Shaafa'is and Zaydis coexisted together? A.A.A: The coexistence between the Zaydis and Shaafa'is through history isn’t true, wars and religious Fatwas were the masters of the historical situation. The Shaafi Mazhab ruled Yemen during the Ayyubid state the first enemy of Shi'ism in Yemen, Egypt and the Levant, and the stance of the Zaydis from the Shaafa'is that they are Kuffar of Ta’awil (interpretation) under the pretext that they are Mushabiha and Jabriya and who say that Allah created the actions of the people and see that the only legitimate Caliph for the Muslims is the Sunni Caliph in Damascus, Baghdad and Istanbul. The stance of the Zaydis from the Shaafa'is in Yemen is that their lands are Kharajiya (a tax on agricultural land) and not Ushriysa (tithe). The Zaydi Imam has the right to take from it what he wishes and he permits his soldiers to take from it as they wish with religious Fatwas and from here the Al-Fid culture (illegitimate war spoils) was created. The Al-Fid culture is purely exclusive Zaydi culture. Ibb, Taaz, Yafee and Al-Bayda’a were expropriated illegitimate Fatwas, and who wants to know more may refer to Fatwas of the Qasimid state during the time of Al-Mutawakkil Ismail regarding the Kuffar of Ta’awil which the Ala’ma Sayyid Al-Hassan bin Ahmed responded to it in a thesis called “Bara’at Al-Zima fi Nusuh Al-A’imah”. And by the way, I sincerely call the researchers in the field of the history of Islamic thought to conduct expanded objective studies in the history of the Zaydi Mazhab and its relation with the other Islamic Mazhabs. Y: Are there parties benefiting from this conflict that work on stirring it from inside and abroad, and who are they if they were present?
A.A.A: The first who benefits from our struggle with the Houthis are the Muslims, and to clarify that: Allah have created the heavens and the earth and made them move on universal laws that don’t change and aren’t altered, and from these laws is the struggle between truth and falsehood, if it was not for this struggle the heavens and earth would have been corrupted, if it was not for this struggle the people of falsehood would have overcome the earth and spoiled the crops and cattle, and Allah doesn’t like corruption. The Houthis are people of corruption on earth. They violated the religion, honors and property of the Muwahid Moslems so the first who benefits from fighting them and repelling their aggression are the people of Tawhid. As for who is stirring this conflict, they are the ones who want to spread the Fitnah of the Twelver Rafidi Shi'ism in the land of Iman and wisdom, and the Fitnah is sleeping may Allah curse who wakes it up. Regarding who works for stirring this conflict it is the Safavid Persian Iran to old settling scores and grudges with the Arabs who undermined the Magian Persian state during the time of the righteous Caliph Omar ibn al-Khattab may Allah be pleased with him. Y: Why doesn’t Saudi Arabia support you as Iran is supporting the Houthi group? A.A.A: Saudi Arabia is an empty meaningless state which its only goal is to keep the AlSaud ruler on the largest part of the Arabian Peninsula, and they are going on in the orbit of the American policy. Al-Qaeda is the first enemy of America, and therefore is the first enemy of Saudi Arabia, so is reasonable for Saudi Arabia to support it first enemy? As for the support of Iran to the Al-Houthi group it is because the Safavid Persian Iran has an old expansionist project and ambitions in the region and historical grudges and every has its tools and its biggest tool in Yemen are the Houthis. Y: But it supports the Salafis? A.A.A: Saudi Arabia doesn’t support all the Salafis. Saudi Arabia supports the Murjiits who belong to falsely to Salafism, and the methodology of the Murjiits in Aqeeda is the most loved Mazhab to the hearts of the kings and rulers in the past and present, since it justifies to them All their injustices and absolutely prohibits rebelling against them righteously or falsely, and the Mazhab of the Murjiits gives the rulers an immunity and an impregnable fence from calling the judgment Kufr on them even if they committed the clear which we have proof from Allah. As for the Jihadi Salafism Saudi Arabia is fighting it with all its power it even didn’t leave the Minbar of the noble Haramain it used them in the war against the Jihadi Salafism, and America and the whole world praised the efforts of Saudi Arabia in combatting terror.
Y: You always accuse the Houthi group that it is a hand of the Persian project in Yemen. What is your evidence on that? A.A.A: Our evidence on that are from several matters that are clear to the viewer and don’t need a big mental effort: First: The notebooks of Hussein Al-Houthi praise Al-Khomeini and his Rafidi Shia revolution and sees that all the calamities of the Ummah are because of the taking of Omar bin Al-Khattab may Allah be pleased with him the caliphate because he paved the way for Mu'awiya may Allah be pleased with him to take the reins of power and the beginning of the inheritance rule and the exclusion of Ahlu Al-Bait may Allah be pleased with them all from the leadership of the Islamic Ummah. The Al-Khomeini project is based on Wilayat Al-Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist) and exporting the Rafidi Shia revolution to the Islamic World. “Partisanship begins with influence and ends with absolute treachery”, this is what happened to Hussein Al-Houthi, admiration of Al-Khomeini and his revolution then his travel to Iran and his return from there and beginning of establishing an organized military action in Yemen that nearly overthrow the ruling regime in Sana’a. Is it rational that the financial funding of the Houthis is from the resources of the province of Sada’a which is poor economically? How could Al-Houthi bring military experts and the intellectuals who organize the kinetic action without the Iranian support which is a great power in the region that take care of the Shia minorities, export its miserable revolution to the Gulf, Yemen, and the Levant which is affected by their rule. Second: The Persian project found its goal in the Arab Shia with all their tendencies, Hezbollah in Lebanon are Twelvers, Al-Assad family in Syria are Nusayri Shia, and in Najran the Ismaili Makarma, and in Yemen there aren’t any Twelvers but they found their goal in the Houthis as an entrance to turn the Zaydis to the Twelver religion. Third: Following the Shia satellite channels and especially the Iranian Al-Alam, AlManar Channel and Tehran International Radio keeps you from telling the evidence of the subordination and treachery of the Houthis to Iran. These channels aren’t tired from mentioning the Houthi and his group and call them mujahidin and remind of their oppression, according to them, and praise them and polish their image before the Islamic and international public, and it is known that the directed media of the governments and parties follow the policy of who finance them. Fourth: The motto of death to America and Israel is originally an Iranian and its echo is heard in the Shiite southern Lebanon and Houthi northern Yemen and the united action of
the arms and legs of t6he body clearly indicates to the central source. The most important question: If the hands of the Persian project in Lebanon is the Shiite Hezbollah: are the legs of this project in Yemen the Houthi and his group? Yes, most certainly. Y: And you are the hands of which project? A.A.A: We are a hand to the project of governance of the Sharia of Allah Lord of the worlds (Judgment is only Allah's; He has commanded that you shall not serve aught but Him) 40 Surah Yusuf. We are a hand to the project of establishing the religion of Allah on earth (And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah) 39 Surah Al-Anfal. We are a hand for the project of making the word of Allah the highest and the word of those who disbelievers the lowermost. We are a hand for the project of fighting People of the Book until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection. We are a hand for the project of serve Allah and shun false gods. We are a hand for the project of those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allâh, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Tâghût. Yes, our project is fulfilling the servitude towards Allah Lord of the worlds and renouncing all the Tawagit in all their images and forms and destroying all the stone, human and institutional idols especially the biggest Tagut of this era America, the council of global Kufr and the organization of atheist nations (UN) and everyone who goes in their orbit and recognized them. Our project is the implementation of the Sharia of Allah on earth. Our project was expressed by Rabi bin A’amir may Allah be pleased with him to Rostam leader of the Persians: “Allah has sent us to take (his) slaves from the servitude of (other) slaves to the servitude of the Lord of slaves, and from the narrowness of this world to the vastness of the hereafter, and from the tyranny of religions to the justice of Islam”. Also the whole world will be hostile towards us as Waraqa bin Nawfal to the prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his family: “Anyone (man) who came with something similar to what you have brought was treated with hostility”, and that is what really happened, everyone was hostile towards us even the people of our religion, country, tribes and families, (Those to whom the people said: Surely men have gathered against you, therefore fear them, but this increased their faith, and they said: Allah is sufficient for us and most excellent is the Protector) 173 Surah Aal-e-Imran. Y: So there is an Iranian project, but is there a Saudi project in Yemen? A.A.A: Originally the Saudi project in Yemen is a subversive project that is based on the idea of 'divide and conquer'. Saudi Arabia very much fears the stability and development
of Yemen as it fears and is disturbed that chaos prevails in Yemen and Yemen becomes a platform for Al-Qaeda, the Houthis and smuggling gangs. Saudi Arabia is very turbulent regarding the Yemeni issue which makes it confused, puzzled and hesitant unlike Iran that knows well what it wants in Yemen. Y: Why did the conflicting – America, Iran and Saudi Arabia – agree on fighting you in Yemen and they turned a blind eye on the Houthi group? A.A.A: The conflicting can agree and keep their disagreements aside when there is a common enemy for them all which are the group of the people of truth. This is how people of falsehood deal with people of truth. History says so and the contemporary reality is a witness to that. The confederates gathered to fight the prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his family and his honorable Sahabah and they besieged them in Medina. Ghatafan, Quraysh and the Jews kept their disagreements aside and all of them gathered in one row to eradicate the young state of Islam, and today Saudi Arabia, Iran and America are divided by the worldly interests and united by their hostility to the people of Tawhid and jihad. Who will confront the spiteful crusade attack on Islam except Al-Qaeda Organization? Who will confront the Persian Safavid Rafidi Shiite attack and its ambitions in the Arabian Peninsula and the Levant except Al-Qaeda Organization? Who will confront the tyranny and oppression of Al-Saud except Al-Qaeda Organization? That is why all the conflicting misguided have united and they will be defeated Insha’Allah as the confederates were defeated before. And Allah is the master of His affair, but most people do not know. Y: Away from the ideological differences is there any possibility for convergence with the Hourthi group since that your enemy is common (America), as you have converged with the Salafis of Dammaj against the Houthis despite that there is a fundamental difference between you and the Salafis? A.A.A: There is no place for convergence between us and the Houthis since the difference is fundamental and deep, as for the Salafis in Dammaj despite of the disagreement between us but the general concept of Ahlu-s-Sunnati wa-l-Jamāah includes everyone. There is no room for comparison between the Salafis of Dammaj and the Houthis. Y: If you were called to dialogue with the Houthi group will you agree? And do you expect for Al-Houthi group to agree?
A.A.A: If the dialogue was on the basis of people of truth in their Dawah to the people of falsehood to leave their evident deviation and subjugate to the Book of their Lord and the Sunnah of their prophet peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his family then there is no objection of dialogue if it was like that but if the basis of the dialogue was that both sides cede something to the other there will be no dialogue. The wish of people of falsehood that the people of truth cede even a little from what have of evident truth (They wish that you should be pliant so they too would be pliant) 9 Surah Al-Qalam, as for truce in its considerable legitimate conditions there is nothing wrong in that on the basis of interests and harms. Regarding if the Houthi group and other stray groups are ready for dialogue, the Taqiyya (religious dissimulation) is their religion, and quirks and tricks is their method, and they consider dialogue a method to achieve what they can from gains even if it appeared ostensibly that they cede something unlike the people of truth who consider that dialogue in its final purpose is to manifest the truth and annihilate the falsehood and not just a tactical approach to get worldly fortunes. Y: Why do you respond the caller of war more than the caller of dialogue? A.A.A: We are not callers of war without the presence of reasons of war, but if the reasons were not there then we are callers of peace from the first degree. This matter is pawned by the stance of the Houthis from the Fitnah, as long as they are callers of Fitnah the war will remain and as long as they are assaulting the religion, honors and property of the Muslims the war will continue until their Fitnah is eradicated, and repelling their aggression on the Muslims. Our stance is an implementation of the saying of the Almighty (And fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah) 193 Surah Al-Baqara even in the noble verse states that the order of fighting will remain until they return to the Book of Allah and Sunnah of His messenger peace and blessings of Allah be upon him and his family, so if they do that the reasons of war between us and them will end, and we will have the same rights and obligations. Y: Is every Houthi a target for the operations of the organization? A.A.A: That matter is according to the scientific (Sharia) detail of the issue. We differentiate between the general judgment on the groups and the special judgment on the individual in particular. We differentiate between the judgment of the kind and the judgment of the individual. The general judgment of the Houthis is that they are people of war whose blood and property are squandered, as for their individuals it is different according to their situation. We look into the situation of very one of them, and the one
who is proved of being in war against Allah, His messenger and the believers then in this situation he becomes a target to the operations of the organization, and there is no respect for him, and who nothing is proven against him and he wasn’t detected in war against Allah, His messenger and the believers, we consider him as being peaceful. And Allah knows better. Y: Why does the Houthi group insist on accusing America and Israel of being behind the operations that you adopt? A.A.A: The Houthis insist that who stands behind every operation conducted by AlQaeda Organization and Israel, that's typically known, Allah confound them! How they are perverted! And in this they imitate Iran, since the Rafida in Iran accuse America and Israel of being behind operation that they know for sure that who conducts it is the Baloch Jundullah organization who belong to the Sunni Baloch ethnicity which lives in eastern Iran on border with Pakistan. The Rafida in Iran and their minions the Houthis in Yemen resort to this cheap method to discredit the Sunni Islamist organizations and link them to being agents of Israel and America to win the sentiments of the Sunni Muslim street because they know the intensity of the enmity of the Sunni Muslims towards the Jews and Christians, and show that the Shia have no hostility and hatred towards Ahli Sunnah. This matter is an extension for the old Shiite complex from Ahli Sunnah. This complex is summarized in that only the Sunnis had the honor of the Islamic conquests in the east and west of the earth, from the borders of China in the east, to Spain in the west, and the Shia didn’t participate with them in that, even in the lowest proportion. The Shiite credit on the field of Islamic conquests equals zero. From here began an unpleasant Shiite jealousy from Ahli Sunnah so they began to claim imaginary heroic stances which have no credit in history and reality (Death to America… Death to Israel) which they compensate the inferiority complex which they suffer from very much. And they reached to the point that they are trying to drop that inferiority which they are suffering from on Ahli Sunnah by claiming the treachery of the Sunni organization to America and Israel, in a blatant impudence by imputing the accusation of the treachery of Al-Qaeda Organization to America and a shameless denial to the reality that is a witness that the ongoing war on the ground is between America and Al-Qaeda, and not between the America and the Houthis. Let every man ask himself and his mind and conscience the following questions: Why are the unmanned drones are present over the regions of Al-Qaeda Organization while there isn’t any in the skies of Sada’a where the Houthis are present? Why is America targeting and killing Al-Qaeda leaders and personnel while it hasn’t killed one Houthi? Why is
America pursuing and detaining Al-Qaeda leaders and personnel while it isn’t pursuing and detaining the leaders and personnel of Al-Houthi? Why did America include AlQaeda Organization in the list of terrorist organizations and didn’t include the Houthi group organization? The answer very clearly to who has reason is that the Houthis didn’t fight the Americans, and haven’t killed one American, and didn’t liberate one inch of the land of Muslims. And by a quick view to the history of Islam it becomes obviously clear the Sunni and Shiite stance from liberating the Islamic lands which fell under the crusader occupation and conquer of the non-Muslim countries and subjugating it under the banner of Tawhid, you don’t find any share for them in both matters, liberation and conquer. As for liberation the first enemy of Shiism in Egypt and the Levant is commander Salahuddin Al-Ayyubi who liberated the Al-Aqsa Mosque from the filth of crusade occupation, but in a strange paradox we find the Shia harbor severe enmity and malice towards Salahuddin Al-Ayyubi throughout history and it is still increasing to this day, whereas supposedly they should love Salahuddin if they were sincere in their enmity towards the crusaders, because the enemy of my enemy is my friend. A quick paradox between Salahuddin Al-Ayyubi and Hassan Nasrallah clearly demonstrates the size of the land which was liberated by Salahuddin Al-Ayyubi in comparison to Hassan Nasrallah and his party which didn’t liberate one inch of the originally Lebanese Shaba Farms, so what do you think about the rest of the land of the Muslims. Will Hassan Nasrallah liberate it when he has accepted the Security Council resolution which stated that his forces retreat 30 kilometers from the borders of Israel and that the international forces separate between them, and after his shameful acceptance the war was stopped. And Kofi Annan came to southern Lebanon to inspect and the international forces came to southern Lebanon, so what kind of victor accepts this huge number of crusaders on his land, and below them on the border are the Jews “the state of Israel”, except if it was the victory of the people of Shiite claims. Can we compare between the farce of Hassan Nasrallah and the battle of Hittin in which Allah destroyed the crusaders on the hands of the forces of Salahuddin Al-Ayyubi and the Al-Aqsa Mosque was liberated! It is an explicit injustice to compare between the liberation of Ahli Sunnah and the claims of the Shia of liberation which is denied by reality. Far from comparison with Salahuddin, let us compare between Hassan Nasrallah and the Israeli American agent Anwar Sadat. We find both of them began their wars against Israel to retrieve occupied national lands, Sinai on the eastern gates of Egypt and the Shaba Farms in southern Lebanon. While Sadat crossed the Bar Lev Line and controlled the “A” zone in Sinai and restored it to the Egyptian sovereignty, which its area equals the whole of Lebanon, we find Hassan Nasrallah didn’t retrieve one inch of the Shaba
Farms. As for the political negotiations Hassan Nasrallah accepted to retreat 30 kilometers from the Israeli border, and accepted the international forces presence in southern Lebanon as a separation wall between him and Israel, while Sadat managed through negotiations after the war to make the “B” and “C” zones in Sinai a demilitarized zone and it was restored to the Egyptian sovereignty in the beginning of the reign of his successor Hosni Mubarak. Also the Egyptian army in the time of Sadat managed to shot down tens of Israeli planes in the October war and killed Israelis many times more than those were killed by Hezbollah. As for the conquest compare between the conquests of Muawiya bin Abi Sufyan may Allah be pleased with him and the conquests of the Shia. You will find all the Shiite states throughout the earth and history didn’t conquer one country from the land of the Kuffar. This matter includes all the Shiite sects with their major three divisions, the AlJa'afaryiah, Ismailis and Zaydis. All the states that they established were in war only against Ahli Sunnah, and were peaceful to the Kuffar, and even they cooperated with the invaders against the Muslims. In contrast you will find that the Umayyad state conquered the east and west of the earth. The first who prepared a naval fleet and conquered the island of Cyprus was the first Umayyad caliph Muawiya bin Abi Sufyan may Allah be pleased with him. The first army which crossed the Anatolian Plateau and invaded Constantinople the capital of Byzantium on the Bosporus in Eastern Europe was also in the time of Muawiya may Allah be pleased with him. And so on if you browse the pages of history you will find that the bright pages of heroism were written by the Sunni leaderships. Who repelled the Tartar attacks from the Muslim countries and saved the whole world from falling in the clutches of backwardness except the Mameluke leaders from Ahli Sunnah, Qutuz and Baybars. And this bright history of Ahli Sunnah in fighting the Kuffar against the shameful history of the Shia in that matter explains the Shiite stance from Ahli Sunnah and accusing them of treachery. “You're living in a glass house and throwing stones”. Y: But does that mean that there isn’t any real conflict between America and Iran? A.A.A: My previous words don’t mean that there isn’t a real conflict between Iran and America, but we believe that there is a conflict on influence and interests between the two sides. When the enemy is Taliban and Al-Qaeda the two sides agree, and when the conflict is on the land and petroleum in the Arab region in particular, this warns of a great calamity that the Arabs will be its fuel, including the Arab Shia “So who will awaken the Arab Shia from their hibernation and warn them of the bad outcome”. The American Iranian conflict today, especially in Syria and Iraq and soon in Saudi Arabia and the
countries of the Arabian Gulf, is an extension of the ancient conflict between Persia and the Romans, which is a conflict of empires which has nothing to do with Islam from near or far. And it is not unlikely that this matter will develop to the conflict of international blocs, Iran, China, Russia, North Korea and Venezuela from one side, and America, Europe and Turkey on the other side, and the conflict zone is the Arabian Peninsula and the Levant “Woe to the Arabs because of evil that has come near” . I expect that this war will totally eradicate Iran and Saudi Arabia and all the countries of the region and they will never stand once again but after a long world war that will destroy everything in its path, and the conflict will be limited after that between rising power of the people of Tawhid and jihad on one side, and the crusaders and Jews on the other side. And Allah is the master of His affair. Y: What is your reading to the future of the conflict between you and the Houthi group? A.A.A: The future of the conflict between Ansar Al-Sharia and the Houthis is the same future of the conflict between truth and falsehood (Nay! We cast the truth against the falsehood, so that it breaks its head, and lo! It vanishes) 18 Surah Al-Anbiya even if the battle prolonged the outcome is settled in advance for the interest of Ahli Sunnah and especially in the Arabian Peninsula the fortified fort of Islam and in particular in the Yemen of Iman and wisdom, the land of assistance and the breath of Al-Rahman which is promised of an army that will come out from Aden Abyan that will support Allah and His messenger. Interviewed by: Abdulrazaq Al-Jammal Source: Al-Yaqeen Newspaper
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.