You are on page 1of 3

William David Duff

108 NW 101 PL
Kansas City, Mo 64155

September 10, 2007

Clay County Circuit Court


Clay County Circuit Clerk
11 S Water St
Liberty, Mo 64068

Re: Duff v Frazier, et al


Case#07CY-CV06125

Dear Clerk,

Please find enclosed an original of "TENDER OF ISSUES" and one copy to be filed in above
referenced case (on demand if necessary)

Please return a file stamped copy to my office in the enclosed self-addressed, stamped envelope.
Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,

Plaintiff

Cc; Emily Dodge

2 5 Wfl

CounW Circuit Court


Clay
1 IN THE 7™ JUDICIAL CHtCUIT COURT OF MISSOURI
2 COUNTY OF CLAY - DIVISION 2
3
4 William Duff, ) CASE NO. 07CY-CV06125
5 Plaintiff,
6 ) ACTION
7 v. ) FOR TRESPASS, AND
8 ) TRESPASS ON THE CASE
9 OFFICER WILLIAM FRAZIER, (SERIAL 3092)
10 AND
11 OFFICER ALAN ROTH (SERIAL # 4090) )VERD7IED
12 Defendants.
13
14
15 TENDER OF ISSUE
16
17 COMES HERE NOW, Plaintiff, William Duff, to show cause why this court should proceed with
18 executing the orders, judgments and decrees issued in this case, to wit;
19
20 Defendants, through their attorney; Assistant Attorney General: Emily A Dodge, have failed in a
21 reasonable time to support their Statutory claims and decisional law of jurisdiction and of plaintiff s
22 lack of standing respecting plaintiffs property taken by defendants, with a body of evidence that fully
23 comprehends plaintiffs proven exclusions filed in this case, in that;
24
25
26
27 Whereas, defendants have failed to answer within a timely manner, and
28 Whereas, If defendants, out of time, motions to dismiss, (claiming muni jurisdiction and claiming
29 replevin not available), were to be construed as answer to this action, both were supported by statutes
30 and case law not applicable to the instant subject matter in that both, the statutes and case law, were
31 supported by claims of authority and/or elements of contractual relationships and are based upon an
32 unseen body of evidence that is not present upon the record of this case and should be ignored as being
33 non responsive, and;
34 Whereas, all parties, were given additional time to show cause why the orders, judgments and decrees
35 of this court should not take effect or should be modified, and;

SEP 2 5 2007
william duff Page 1 BMEa 9/24/2007
Coynfe? Circuit Court
)
36 Whereas, all parties have failed to show cause for withdrawal or modification of the orders,
37 judgments and decrees of this court, and;
38 Whereas, plaintiff claims rights to constitutionally protected rights of action in the face of defendants
39 trespass thereon, and;
40 Whereas, all governmental immunity is generally not available to officers thereof who contravene
41 Constitutionally protected Rights of action of plaintiff;
42
43 Now therefore, plaintiff prays this court make final all of the orders, notices and decrees, and
44 judgments currently issued by this court, in pursuance of the protection of plaintiff s rights of action,
45 and to issue preceape on all to the clerk of this court that same shall issue writs of execution thereon,
46 and for further relief this court can and should provide.
47
48
49
50
51

william duff Page 2 9/24/2007