ABSTRAK

Eka Melati. 2011. Pengaruh Metode Jigsaw II terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Membaca Pemahaman (Penelitian Dilakukan pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa Inggris Tingkat Dua di STKIP Dharma Bakti Lubuk Alung). Tesis: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Padang Motivasi belajar dan kemampuan membaca pemahaman sangat diperlukan dalam pengajaran Reading di perguruan tinggi. Kenyataannya, pengajaran Reading di kalangan mahasiswa masih menemui kendala, diantaranya nilai yang diperoleh dalam tes membaca pemahaman rendah, rendahnya motivasi belajar, rendahnya penguasaan kosakata serta kurangya variasi metode yang digunakan dosen dalam mengajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah metode Jigsaw II memiliki pengaruh terhadap motivasi belajar dan kemampuan membaca pemahaman. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen. Populasi penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa STKIP Dharma Bakti Lubuk Alung jurusan Bahasa Inggris tingkat dua tahun pelajaran 2010/2011 yang berjumlah 133 orang. Sampel diambil dengan menggunakan teknik klaster acak. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah angket untuk mengukur motivasi belajar dan tes untuk mengukur kemampuan membaca pemahaman. Data dalam penelitian ini dianalisis secara manual dengan rumus uji t. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa motivasi belajar mahasiswa yang diajar menggunakan Jigsaw II lebih baik daripada motivasi belajar mahasiswa yang diajar menggunakan metode diskusi kelompok kecil dan membaca pemahaman mahasiswa yang diajar menggunakan Jigsaw II lebih baik daripada membaca pemahaman mahasiswa yang diajar menggunakan metode diskusi kelompok kecil. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa metode Jigsaw II dapat memberikan efek yang lebih baik terhadap motivasi belajar dan membaca pemahaman. Penelitian ini mengimplikasikan bahwa Jigsaw II dapat digunakan sebagai salah satu metode dalam pengajaran Reading di STKIP Dharma Bakti Lubuk Alung.

1

The purpose of this research was to find out the effect of Jigsaw II on learning motivation and reading comprehension. Thesis: Graduate Program of State University of Padang). 2011. after students learn Reading skills. It was implied that Jigsaw II could be used as method of teaching Reading at STKIP Dharma Bakti Lubuk Alung. The result of this study were learning motivation of students who were taught by Jigsaw II was better than those who were taught by small group discussion and reading comprehension of students who were taught by Jigsaw II was better than those who were taught by small group discussion. In teaching Reading. This study was an experimental research. The instruments were questionnaire of learning motivation and test to of reading comprehension. The sample was selected by cluster random technique. It concluded that Jigsaw II produced better result on learning motivation and reading comprehension. . their reading comprehension is still low. they are lack of vocabulary mastery. The data were analyzed manually by t-test formula. and the lecturer always uses small group discussion method without any variation. Population of this research was the second grade students of English Department of STKIP Dharma Bakti Lubuk Alung academic year 2010/2011 who was totally 133 students. both of their learning motivation and reading comprehension are better than before. the students still face some problems in comprehending the text. learning motivation and reading comprehension are essential. The problems are: they get low score of reading comprehension. In fact. Ideally. they are lack of motivation. The Effect of Jigsaw II on Learning Motivation and Reading Comprehension (A Study at Second Grade Students of STKIP Dharma Bakti Lubuk Alung).ABSTRACT Eka Melati.

3 .

.

serta sanksi lainnya sesuai dengan norma dan ketentuan yang berlaku. 4. kecuali dikutip secara tertulis dengan jelas dan dicantumkan sebagai acuan di dalam naskah saya dengan menyebutkan nama pengarangnya dan mencantumkannya pada daftar rujukan. tanpa bantuan tidak sah dari pihak lain. 2. Dalam karya tulis ini tidak terdapat hasil karya atau pendapat yang telah ditulis atau dipublikasikan orang lain. Pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sesungguhnya. kecuali arahan dari Tim Pembimbing. 3. Karya tulis ini murni gagasan.SURAT PERNYATAAN Dengan ini saya menyatakan bahwa: 1. dan apabila di kemudian hari terdapat penyimpangan dan ketidakbenaran pernyataan ini. tesis dengan judul The Effect of Jigsaw II on Learning Motivation and Reading Comprehension (A Study at 2nd Grade Students of STKIP Dharma bakti Lubuk Alung) adalah asli dan belum pernah diajukan untuk mendapat gelar akademik baik di Universitas Negeri Padang maupun di perguruan tinggi lainnya. maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi akademik berupa pencabutan gelar yang telah saya peroleh karena karya tulis ini. Karya tulis saya. penilaian dan rumusan saya sendiri. September 2011 Saya yang menyatakan Eka Melati NIM 51463 5 . Padang.

Hj. Padang. I would like to thank to people who helped and supported her in completing this thesis. M. Dr. excellent professionalism and remarkable advices from the beginning until the end.Pd.Pd for their guidance. H.Ed. and Prof. Then. the Almighty.S. H. praise to Allah SWT. the Chairman of English Education Department of STKIP Dharma Bakti Lubuk Alung who permitted and facilitated me in conducting the research. Neviyarni.Pd and Dr. S. Riska Ahmad. Dr. First of all. July 2011 The Researcher. M. Jufri. the Uswatun Hasanah for all Moslems. Dr. Above all. Hermawati Syarif. I thank the Head. Hamzah. Desmawati Radjab. and Dra. Jalius Jama. my special gratitude is expressed to my beloved parents: Heriyono and Legi Wati. the Staffs.D who gave valuable contributions and suggestions. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my advisors Prof.M. Mukhaiyar. Dr. TABLE OF CONTENTS . M. Furthermore. my beloved brothers and sister and all of her siblings who have always given their meaningful supports and prayer in finishing this research. Finally I also thank to all colleagues of English Education Section 2009 who support and encourage me in completing this thesis. M. Prof.Hum. I would like to express my special gratitude to examiners: Prof. The special thank is also addressed to my validators: Drs. who had given me the knowledge and strength with blessing and mercy. M. M.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Alhamdulillahirabbil’alamin. shalawat and blessing are sent upon the Prophet Muhammad SAW. M. Next. Dr.Pd.A. M. M. Ph. support.

.. Background of the Problem ………………………………………… 1 6 6 7 B.... Significance of the Research ………………………………………… G. Identification of the Problem ………………………………………… C.. Purpose of the Research 7 F.. Formulation of the Problems ………………………………………… E...... ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………... LIST OF APPENDICES CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION A. Limitation of the Problem ………………………………………… D. Definition of the Key Terms ………………………………………… CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 7 ………………………………………………… 7 8 ..ABSTRAK ………………………………………………………………… i ii iii iv v vi vii x xi xii ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………… PERSETUJUAN AKHIR ………………………………………………… ………………………………… PERSETUJUAN KOMISI PEMBIMBING SURAT PERNYATAAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………… ………………………………………………… …………………………………….......

A. Conceptual Framework 28 D. Questionnaire of Learning Motivation …………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… . Theoretical Framework 9 1. Small Group Discussion ………………………………………… 3. Population and Sample 32 C. Review of the Related Findings 26 C. Learning Motivation ………………………………………… 4. Reading Comprehension ………………………………………… B. Hypotheses ………………………………………………………… 30 ………………………………………………… 22 17 16 9 ………………………………………… CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY A. Instrumentation 34 a. Jigsaw II ………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… 2. Research Design 31 B.

Limitation of the Research 9 .35 b.. Techniques of Data Gathering ………………………………………… E. Data Description 52 1. Reading Comprehension ………………………………………… 52 55 58 58 62 64 67 ………………………………………………………… B. CHAPTER IV: RESEARCH FINDING A.…………………….. Test of Reading Comprehension 37 D. Learning Motivation ………………………………………………… 2. Techniques of Data Analysis ………………………………………… F. Research Procedures ………………………………………………… 42 43 47 …………. Prerequisite Analysis ………………………………………………… 2. Discussion ………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………… D. Hypothesis Testing C.. Data Analysis ………………………………………………………… 1.

Conclusions B. ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… 68 68 68 REFERENCES APPENDICES ………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… 70 74 . SUGGESTIONS A. Suggestions ………………………………………………………….CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS. IMPLICATION. Implication C.

...... Team Accomplishment …… 3 13 13 …………………………… …………………………………………… Table 4. Summary of T-Test Result of Reading comprehension …………… …………… 11 .. The Number of Second Grade English Department …………… 33 Table 6........... Frequency Distribution of Reading Comprehension of Control Class …………………………………………………… …………………………………… 57 58 61 62 63 56 Table 15. The Schedule of the Research …………………………………… 34 …………… 35 37 48 53 54 55 Table 7.. List of Learning Motivation Questionnaire Indicators Table 8...... Summary of Students’ Learning Motivation Table 11...LIST OF THE TABLES Table 1. List of Reading Comprehension Test Indicators Table 9. Summary of Homogeneity testing …………………………………… Table 17........ Summary of T-Test Result of Learning Motivation Table 18... Summary of Normality Testing Table 16. Percentage of Students’ Grade for Mid Term Test of Reading II Table 2......... Summary of Reading comprehension …………………… …………………… …………………… …………………… …………………………… Table 13............... The Disadvantages of Jigsaw II …………………………………… 15 Table 5.... Table 14... Improvement Point Criteria of Jigsaw II Table 3.... Teaching Procedures of Experimental Class and Table 10.. Percentage of Students’ Learning Motivation Table 12... Frequency Distribution of Reading Comprehension of Experimental Class.

Conceptual Framework ………………………………… 12 29 59 59 60 61 ………………………………………… Figure 3. Normal Curve of Reading Comprehension of Students Teaching by Small Group Discussion …………………………. Normal Curve of Learning Motivation of Students Teaching by Jigsaw II ………………………………………… Figure 4. Figure 6. Normal Curve of Reading Comprehension of Students Teaching by Jigsaw II …………………………………………. Normal Curve of Learning Motivation of Students Teaching by Small Group Discussion ………………………… Figure 5.LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Illustration of Jigsaw Activities Figure 2. .

. 74 76 83 ……………………………...LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1. Appendix 2. Post-Test Sheet of Questionnaire (Experimental Class) ……. Lesson Plan of Experimental Class …………………………… 127 …………………………… 128 13 . 99 Appendix 8. Post-Test Sheet of Questionnaire (Control Class) Appendix 7. Homogeneity and Normality Testing of Population Appendix 3. Validation Sheet of Lesson Plan Appendix 13. ……………………. 117 Appendix 11. Post-Test Sheet of Reading Comprehension Test Appendix 10.... ……………. 122 Appendix 12.. Appendix 6..... Try Out Sheet of Reading Comprehension Test …………… 101 Appendix 9.. Try Out Result of Test …………………………………………. Try Out Result of Questionnaire …………… 110 …………………………. 87 91 95 Appendix 5... Validation Sheet of Reading Comprehension Test ……………. Jigsaw II Sheets …………………………………………………….. Validation Sheet of Questionnaire Appendix 4. Try Out Sheet of Questionnaire ……………..

Summary Quiz Score Sheet …………………………… 226 …………………………… 227 …………………………………… 228 …………………… 230 …………… 234 Appendix 20.Appendix 14. Score of Experimental Class Questionnaire …………………… 224 Appendix 16. Score of Experimental Class Test Appendix 18. Students’ Sheets …………………………………………… . Score of Control Class Test Appendix 19. Letter of Research Permit Appendix 25. Normality Testing of Learning Motivation Appendix 21. Homogeneity Testing …………………………………………… 237 Appendix 23. Normality Testing of Reading Comprehension Appendix 22. Hypothesis Testing …………………………………………… …………………………………… 239 243 245 Appendix 24. Score of Control Class Questionnaire …………………………… 225 Appendix 17. Lesson Plan of Control Class …………………………………… 207 Appendix 15.

15 .