This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
1
A New Conformal Theory of
SemiClassical Quantum General Relativity
Indranu Suhendro
Karlstad, Sweden
2005
We consider a new fourdimensional formulation of semiclassical quantum general
relativity in which the classical spacetime manifold, whose intrinsic geometric
properties give rise to the effects of gravitation, is allowed to evolve microscopically by
means of a conformal function which is assumed to depend on some quantum mechanical
wave function. As a result, the theory presented here produces a unified field theory of
gravitation and (microscopic) electromagnetism in a somewhat simple, effective manner.
In the process, it is seen that electromagnetism is actually an emergent quantum field
originating in some kind of stochastic smooth extension (evolution) of the gravitational
field in the general theory of relativity.
1. Introduction
We shall show that the introduction of an external parameter, the Planck displacement
vector field, that deforms ("maps") the standard general relativistic spacetime
1
S into an
evolved spacetime
2
S yields a theory of general relativity whose spacetime structure
obeys the semiclassical quantum mechanical law of evolution. In addition, an "already
quantized" electromagnetic field arises from our schematic evolution process and
automatically appears as an intrinsic geometric object in the spacetime
2
S . In the
process of evolution, it is seen that from the point of view of the classical spacetime
1
S
alone, an external deformation takes place, since, by definition, the Planck constant does
not belong to its structure. In other words, relative to
1
S , the Planck constant is an
external parameter. However from the global point of view of the universal (enveloping)
evolution space
4
M , the Planck constant is intrinsic to itself and therefore defines the
dynamical evolution of
1
S into
2
S . In this sense, a point in
4
M is not strictly single
valued. Rather, a point in
4
M has a "dimension" depending on the Planck length.
Therefore, it belongs to both the spacetime
1
S and the spacetime
2
S .
2. Construction of a FourDimensional MetricCompatible Evolution Manifold
4
M
We first consider the notion of a fourdimensional, universal enveloping manifold
4
M
with coordinates
µ
x endowed with a microscopic deformation structure represented by
2
an exterior vector field ( )
µ
φ x which maps the enveloped spacetime manifold
4 1
M S ∈ at
a certain initial point
0
P onto a new enveloped spacetime manifold
4 2
M S ∈ at a certain
point
1
P through the diffeomorphism
( ) ( )
µ µ µ
ξ l P x P x + =
0 1
where cm
c
G
l
33
3
10
−
≈ =
h
is the Planck length expressed in terms of the Newtonian
gravitational constant G, the DiracPlanck constant h , and the speed of light in vacuum
c , in such a way that
0 lim
0
=
=
→
µ
µ µ
φ
ξ φ
h
l
From its diffeomorphic structure, we therefore see that
4
M is a kind of strain space. In
general, the spacetime
2
S evolves from the spacetime
1
S through the nonlinear
mapping
( )
2 1
: S S P → φ
Note that the exterior vector field φ can be expressed as
µ
µ
µ
µ
φ φ φ g h = = (the
Einstein’s summation convention employed throughout this work) where
µ
h and
µ
g are
the sets of basis vectors of the spacetimes
1
S and
2
S , respectively. (Likewise for ξ .)
We remark that
1
S and
2
S are both endowed with metricity through their immersion in
4
M , which we shall now call the evolution manifold. Then, the two sets of basis vectors
are related by
( )
ν
ν
µ
ν
µ µ
ξ δ h l g ∇ + =
or, alternatively, by
( )
ν
ν
µ µ µ
ξ g l h g ∇ + =
where
ν
µ
δ are the components of the Kronecker delta.
At this point, we have defined the two covariant derivatives with respect to the
connections ω of
1
S and Γ of
2
S as follows:
... ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
− − − + + + ∂ = ∇
αβ
µσ
σ
νλ
αβ
σν
σ
µλ
ασ
µν
β
σλ
σβ
µν
α
σλ
αβ
µν λ
αβ
µν λ
ω ω ω ω A A A A A A
3
and
... ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
− Γ − Γ − + Γ + Γ + ∂ = ∇
αβ
µσ
σ
νλ
αβ
σν
σ
µλ
ασ
µν
β
σλ
σβ
µν
α
σλ
αβ
µν λ
αβ
µν λ
B B B B B B
for arbitrary tensor fields A and B , respectively. Here
µ
µ
x ∂ ∂ = ∂ , as usual. The two
covariant derivatives above are equal only in the limit 0 → h .
Furthermore, we assume that the connections ω and Γ are generally asymmetric, and
can be decomposed into their symmetric and antisymmetric parts, respectively, as
( )
( )  
λ
µν
λ
µν µ
λ λ
µν
ω ω ω + = ∂ = h h
v
,
and
( )
( )  
λ
µν
λ
µν µ
λ λ
µν
Γ + Γ = ∂ = Γ g g
v
,
Here, by ( ) b a, we shall mean the inner product between the arbitrary vector fields a and
b .
Furthermore, by direct calculation we obtain the relation
( ) ( ) ( )
λ
λ
µ ν
λ
σν
σ
µ
λ
µν µ ν
ξ ω ξ ω h l l g ∇ ∂ + ∇ + = ∂
Hence, setting
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
λ
σµ
σ
ν
λ
σµ ν
σ λ
µ ν
λ
σν
σ
µ
λ
µν
λ
µ ν
λ
σν
σ
µ
λ
µν
λ
µν
ω ξ ω ξ ξ ω ξ ω
ξ ω ξ ω
∂ + ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∇ + =
∇ ∂ + ∇ + =
l
l F
we may simply write
λ
λ
µν µ ν
h F g = ∂
Meanwhile, we also have the following inverse relation:
( )
ν
ν
µ
ν
µ µ
ξ δ g l h ∇ − =
Hence we obtain
4
( ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) )
λ
λ
σ
σ
ρµ
ρ
ν
λ
σ
σ
ρµ ν
ρ
λ
σ
σ
µ
λ
σ
σ
ρν
ρ
µ
λ
σ
σ
µν
λ
σµ
σ
ν
λ
σµ ν
σ λ
µ ν
λ
σν
σ
µ
λ
µν µ ν
ξ ω ξ ξ ω ξ
ξ ξ ξ ω ξ ξ ω
ω ξ ω ξ ξ ω ξ ω
g l l
l l l
l l l l g
v
∇ ∂ − ∇ ∂ −
∇ ∂ ∂ − ∇ ∇ − ∇ −
∂ + ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∇ + = ∂
Using the relation
λ
λ
µν µ ν
g g Γ = ∂ (similarly,
λ
λ
µν µ ν
ω h h = ∂ ), we obtain the relation
between the two connections Γ and ω as follows:
( ) ( ) (
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) )
λ
σ
σ
ρµ
ρ
ν
λ
σ
σ
ρµ ν
ρ λ
σ
σ
µ ν
λ
σ
σ
ρν
ρ
µ
λ
σ
σ
µν
λ
σµ
σ
ν
λ
σµ ν
σ λ
µ ν
λ
σν
σ
µ
λ
µν
λ
µν
ξ ω ξ
ξ ω ξ ξ ξ ξ ω ξ
ξ ω ω ξ ω ξ ξ ω ξ ω
∇ ∂ −
∇ ∂ − ∇ ∂ ∂ − ∇ ∇ −
∇ − ∂ + ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∇ + = Γ l
which is a general nonlinear relation in the components of the exterior displacement
field ξ . We may now write
λ
µν
λ
µν
λ
µν
G F + = Γ
where, recalling the previous definition of
λ
µν
F , it can be rewritten as
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
λ
σµ
σ
ν
λ
σν
σ
µ
λ
µ ν
σ λ
ρν
ρ
µσ
λ
σµ ν
λ
µν
λ
µν
ω ξ ω ξ ξ ξ ω ω ω ω ∂ + ∂ + ∂ ∂ + + ∂ + = l F
and where
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
λ
σ
σ
ρµ
ρ
ν
σ
ρµ ν
ρ σ
µ ν
σ
ρν
ρ
µ
σ
µν
λ
µν
ξ ω ξ ω ξ ξ ω ξ ω ∇ ∂ + ∂ + ∂ ∂ + ∇ + − = l l G
At this point, the intrinsic curvature tensors of the spacetimes
1
S and
2
S are respectively
given by
( )
σ
λν
λ
ρµ
σ
λµ
λ
ρν
σ
ρµ ν
σ
ρν µ ρ ν µ
σ σ
ρµν
ω ω ω ω ω ω − + ∂ − ∂ = ∂ ∂ = h h K
] [
, 2
and
( )
σ
λν
λ
ρµ
σ
λµ
λ
ρν
σ
ρµ ν
σ
ρν µ ρ ν µ
σ σ
ρµν
Γ Γ − Γ Γ + Γ ∂ − Γ ∂ = ∂ ∂ = g g R
] [
, 2
We may also define the following quantities built from the connections
λ
µν
ω and
λ
µν
Γ :
σ
λν
λ
ρµ
σ
λµ
λ
ρν
σ
ρµ ν
σ
ρν µ
σ
ρµν
ω ω ω ω ω ω + + ∂ + ∂ = D
and
5
σ
λν
λ
ρµ
σ
λµ
λ
ρν
σ
ρµ ν
σ
ρν µ
σ
ρµν
Γ Γ + Γ Γ + Γ ∂ + Γ ∂ = E
from which we may define two additional “curvatures” X and P by
( ) ( )
σ
λµ
λ
ρν
σ
ρν µ
σ
ρµν
σ
ρµν ρ ν µ
σ σ
ρµν
ω ω ω + ∂ = + = ∂ ∂ = D K h h X
2
1
,
and
( ) ( )
σ
λµ
λ
ρν
σ
ρν µ
σ
ρµν
σ
ρµν ρ ν µ
σ σ
ρµν
Γ Γ + Γ ∂ = + = ∂ ∂ = E R g g P
2
1
,
such that
 
σ
µν ρ
σ
ρµν
X K 2 = and
 
σ
µν ρ
σ
ρµν
P R 2 = .
Now, we see that
( ) ( )
( ) ( )

¹

\

∂ + ∂ + ∂ ∂ + + =
λ
σµ
σ
ν
λ
σν
σ
µ
λ
µ ν
σ λ
σµν
λ
µν
λ
µν
ω ξ ω ξ ξ ξ ω D l F
2
1
and
   
σ λ
σµν
λ
µν
λ
µν
ξ ω K l F
2
1
+ =
In addition, we also have
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
λ
σ
σ
ρµ
ρ
ν
σ
ρν
ρ
µ
σ
µ ν
ρ σ
ρµν
σ
µν
λ
µν
ξ ω ξ ω ξ ξ ξ ω ∇


¹

\


¹

\

∂ + ∂ + ∂ ∂ + + = D l l G
2
1
and
   
λ
σ
ρ σ
ρµν
σ
µν
λ
µν
ξ ξ ω ∇

¹

\

− = K l l G
2
1
Now, the metric tensor g of the spacetime
1
S and the metric tensor h of the spacetime
2
S are respectively given by
( )
ν µ µν
h h h , =
and
( )
ν µ µν
g g g , =
6
where the following relations hold:
ν
µ
νσ
µσ
ν
µ
νσ
µσ
δ
δ
=
=
g g
h h
In general, the two conditions
ν
µ
νσ
µσ
δ ≠ g h and
ν
µ
νσ
µσ
δ ≠ h g must be fulfilled unless
0 = l (in the limit 0 → h ). Furthermore, we have the metricity conditions
0 = ∇
µν λ
h
and
0 = ∇
µν λ
g
However, note that in general, 0 ≠ ∇
µν λ
h and 0 ≠ ∇
µν λ
g .
Hence, it is straightforward to see that in general, the metric tensor g is related to the
metric tensor h by
λ ν
λ
µ ν µ µν µν
ξ ξ ξ ∇ ∇ + ∇ + =
2
) (
2 l l h g
which in the linear approximation reads
) (
2
ν µ µν µν
ξ ∇ + = l h g
The formal structure of our underlying geometric framework clearly implies that the
same structure holds in n dimensions as well.
3. The Conformal Theory
We are now in the position to extract a physical theory of quantum gravity from the
geometric framework in the preceding section by considering the following linear
conformal mapping:
µ
ϕ
µ
h e g =
where the continuously differentiable scalar function ( )
µ
ϕ x is the generator of the
quantum displacement field in the evolution space
4
M and therefore connects the two
spacetimes
1
S and
2
S .
7
Now, for reasons that will be apparent soon, we shall define the generator ϕ in terms of
the canonical quantum mechanical wave function ( )
µ
ψ x as
( )2
1
1 ln ψ ϕ M + =
where
2
0
2
1

¹

\

± =
h
c m
i l M
Here
0
m is the rest mass of the electron. Note that the sign ± signifies the signature of
the spacetime used.
Now, we also have the following relations:
( ) ( )
( )
( )
ν
µ
ϕ ν
µ
ν
µ
ϕ ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
µ
ν
µ
µ ϕ µ
µ
ϕ
µ
µ ϕ µ
δ
δ
δ
2
2
,
,
, ,
−
−
−
=
=
= =
=
=
=
e g h
e h g
h h g g
g e h
g e h
h e g
as well as the conformal transformation
µν
ϕ
µν
h e g
2
=
Hence
µν ϕ µν
h e g
2 −
=
We immediately see that
ν
µ
ϕ νσ
µσ
ν
µ
ϕ νσ
µσ
δ
δ
2
2
−
=
=
e g h
e h g
At this point, we see that the worldline of the spacetime
2
S ,
∫
=
ν µ
µν
dx dx g s , is
connected to that of the spacetime
1
S ,
∫
=
ν µ
µν
σ dx dx h , through
8
σ
ϕ
d e ds
2
=
Furthermore, from the relation
( )
µ
ϕ
ν
ν
µ
ν
µ µ
ξ δ h e h l g = ∇ + =
we obtain the important relation
( )
µν
ϕ
µ ν
ξ h e l 1 − = ∇
which means that
νµ µ ν µν
ξ Φ = ∇ = Φ l
i.e., the quantum displacement gradient tensor field Φ is symmetric. Hence we may
simply call Φ the quantum strain tensor field. We also see that the components of the
quantum displacement field,
µ µ
ξ φ l = , can now be described by the wave function ψ
as
ψ φ
µ µ
∂ = l
i.e.,
∫
+ =
µ
µ
φ ψ ψ dx
l
1
0
for an arbitrary initial value
0
ψ (which, most conveniently, can be chosen to be 0 ).
Furthermore, we note that the integrability condition
νµ µν
Φ = Φ means that the space
time
1
S must now possess a symmetric, linear connection, i.e.,
( )
νσ µ µν σ σµ ν
σλ λ
νµ
λ
µν
ω ω h h h h ∂ + ∂ − ∂ = =
2
1
which are just the Christoffel symbols
)
`
¹
¹
´
¦
µν
λ
in the spacetime
1
S . Hence ω is now none
other than the symmetric LeviCivita (Riemannian) connection. Using the metricity
condition
νµλ µνλ µν λ
Γ + Γ = ∂ g , i.e.,
( ) ( )
νµλ µνλ λ µν µν λ
ω ω ψ ψ + + + ∂ = ∂ M h M g 1
9
we obtain the mixed form
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ψ ψ ψ ψ
ψ ω
ν λµ µ νλ λ µν
λµ ν νλ µ µν λ λµν
∂ + ∂ − ∂ + −
∂ + ∂ − ∂ + =
−
−
h h h M M
g g g M
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
i.e.,
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ψ ψ δ ψ δ ψ
ψ ω
ρ
λρ
µν µ
λ
ν ν
λ
µ
ρµ ν νρ µ µν ρ
λρ λ
µν
∂ − ∂ + ∂ + −
∂ + ∂ − ∂ + =
−
−
h h M M
g g g h M
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
It may be noted that we have used the customary convention in which
ρ
µν λρ λµν
Γ = Γ g
and
ρ
µν λρ λµν
ω ω h = .
Now we shall see why we have made the particular choice ( )2
1
1 ln ψ ϕ M + = . In order to
explicitly show that it now possess a stochastic part, let us rewrite the components of the
metric tensor of the spacetime
2
S as
( )
µν µν
ψ h M g + = 1
Combining this relation with the linearized relation
) (
2
ν µ µν µν
ξ ∇ + = l h g and
contracting the resulting relation, we obtain
( ) ψ ψ
ϕ
M e D l 2 1 2
2 2
= − =
where we have defined the differential operator
ν µ
µν
∇ ∇ = h D
2
such that
( ) ψ ω ψ ψ
ρ
ρ
µν ν µ
µν
∂ − ∂ ∂ = h D
2
Expressing M explicitly, we obtain ψ ψ
2
0 2

¹

\

=
h
m
c m
D , i.e.,
0
2
0 2
=


¹

\


¹

\

± ψ
h
c m
D
which is precisely the KleinGordon equation in the presence of gravitation.
10
We may note that, had we combined the relation ( )
µν µν
ψ h M g + = 1 with the fully non
linear relation
λ ν
λ
µ ν µ µν µν
ξ ξ ξ ∇ ∇ + ∇ + =
2
) (
2 l l h g , we would have obtained the
following nonlinear KleinGordon equation:
( ) ( ) ψ ψ ψ
ν σ µ ρ
µν ρσ
∇ ∇ ∇ ∇ =


¹

\


¹

\

± h h l
c m
D
2
2
0 2
h
Now, from the general relation between the connections Γ and ω given in Section 2, we
obtain the following important relation:
 
( )
ρ σ
ρµν
λ
σ
λ
σ
λ
µν
ξ ξ δ K l l ∇ − − = Γ
2
1
which not only connects the torsion of the spacetime
2
S with the curvature of the space
time
1
S , but also describes the torsion as an intrinsic (geometric) quantum phenomenon.
Note that
)
`
¹
¹
´
¦
)
`
¹
¹
´
¦
−
)
`
¹
¹
´
¦
)
`
¹
¹
´
¦
+
)
`
¹
¹
´
¦
∂ −
)
`
¹
¹
´
¦
∂ =
λν
σ
ρµ
λ
λµ
σ
ρν
λ
ρµ
σ
ρν
σ
ν µ
σ
ρµν
K
are now the components of the RiemannChristoffel curvature tensor describing the
curvature of spacetime in the standard general relativity theory.
Furthermore, using the relation between the two sets of basis vectors
µ
g and
µ
h , it is
easy to see that the connection Γ is semisymmetric as
ϕ δ ω
ν
λ
µ
λ
µν
λ
µν
∂ + = Γ
or, written somewhat more explicitly,
( ) ( ) ( ) ψ δ
ν
λ
µ νσ µ µν σ σµ ν
σλ λ
µν
M h h h h + ∂ + ∂ + ∂ − ∂ = Γ 1 ln
2
1
2
1
We immediately obtain
( )
( ) ϕ δ ϕ δ ω
µ
λ
ν ν
λ
µ
λ
µν
λ
µν
∂ + ∂ + = Γ
2
1
and
11
 
( ) ϕ δ ϕ δ
µ
λ
ν ν
λ
µ
λ
µν
∂ − ∂ = Γ
2
1
Additionally, using the relation
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ϕ ω ω
µ µ
ϕ
µ µ
ν
µν
ν
νµ
∂ − ∂ = ∂ = ∂ = =
−
g g e h det ln det ln det ln
we may now define two semivectors by the following contractions:
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ϕ
ϕ
µ µ
ν
µν µ
µ µ
ν
νµ µ
∂ + ∂ = Γ = ∆
∂ + ∂ = Γ = Γ
h
h
det ln
4 det ln
or, written somewhat more explicitly,
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ψ
ψ
µ µ
µ µ
M h
M h
+ + ∂ = ∆
+ + ∂ = Γ
1 ln det ln
1 ln det ln
2
We now define the torsion vector by
 
ϕ τ
µ
ν
νµ µ
∂ = Γ =
2
3
In other words,
( )
ψ
ψ
τ
µ µ
∂
+
=
M
M
1 4
3
Furthermore, it is easy to show that the curvature tensors of our two spacetimes
1
S and
2
S are now identical:
σ
ρµν
σ
ρµν
K R =
which is another way of saying that the conformal transformation
µ
ϕ
µ
h e g = leaves the
curvature tensor of the spacetime
1
S invariant. As an immediate consequence, we obtain
the ordinary expression
( ) ( )
β
σν
α
ρµ
β
σµ
α
ρν αβ σν ρ µ ρµ σ ν σµ ρ ν ρν σ µ ρσµν
ω ω ω ω − + ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ = h h h h h R
2
1
Hence the following cyclic symmetry in Riemannian geometry:
12
0 = + +
ρνσµ ρµνσ ρσµν
R R R
is preserved in the presence of torsion. In addition, besides the obvious symmetry
ρσνµ ρσµν
R R − = , we also have the symmetry
σρµν ρσµν
R R − =
which is due to the metricity condition of the spacetimes
1
S and
2
S . This implies the
vanishing of the socalled Homothetic curvature as
0 = =
σ
σµν µν
R H
The Weyl tensor is given in the usual manner by
( ) ( ) R h h h h R h R h R h R h R C
σν ρµ σµ ρν ρν σµ σµ ρν ρµ σν σν ρµ ρσµν ρσµν
− − − − + − =
6
1
2
1
where
σ
µσν µν
R R = are the components of the symmetric Ricci tensor and
µ
µ
R R = is the
Ricci scalar.
Now, by means of the conformal relation
µν
ϕ
µν
h e g
2
= we obtain the expression
( ( )
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( ) ( ))
α
ρ µ
β
σν ν
β
σµ
β
σ µ
α
ρν ν
α
ρµ αβ
ν σ ρµ µ ρ σν σ µ ρν ν ρ σµ
ρ ν µσ σ µ ρν σ ν ρµ ρ µ σν
ν σµ ρ ρµ σ µ ρν σ σν ρ
σ ρν µ ρµ ν ρ σµ ν σν µ
β
σν
α
ρµ
β
σµ
α
ρν αβ σν ρ µ ρµ σ ν σµ ρ ν ρν σ µ
ϕ
ρσµν
δ ϕ ϕ δ ϕ ϕ
ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ
ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ
ϕ ϕ
ϕ ϕ
∂ Γ − ∂ Γ − ∂ Γ − ∂ Γ +
∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ +
∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ +
∂ ∂ − ∂ + ∂ ∂ − ∂ +
∂ ∂ − ∂ + ∂ ∂ − ∂ +
Γ Γ − Γ Γ + ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ − ∂ ∂ + ∂ ∂ =
−
g
g g g g
g g g g
g g g g
g g g g
g g g g g e R
2
2
Note that despite the fact that the curvature tensor of the spacetime
2
S is identical to that
of the spacetime
1
S and that both curvature tensors share common algebraic symmetries,
the Bianchi identity in
2
S is not the same as the ordinary Bianchi identity in the torsion
free spacetime
1
S . Instead, we have the following generalized Bianchi identity:
     
( )
ρσην
η
λµ ρσηµ
η
νλ ρσηλ
η
µν ρσλµ ν ρσνλ µ ρσµν λ
R R R R R R Γ + Γ + Γ = ∇ + ∇ + ∇ 2
Contracting the above relation, we obtain
13
   
ρσν
λ
λ
ρσ
λ
σ
σ
λρ
ρν µν µν
µ
R R g R g R Γ + Γ =

¹

\

− ∇ 2
2
1
Combining the two generalized Bianchi identities above with the relation
 
( ) ϕ δ ϕ δ
µ
λ
ν ν
λ
µ
λ
µν
∂ − ∂ = Γ
2
1
, as well as recalling the definition of the torsion vector,
and taking into account the symmetry of the Ricci tensor, we obtain
( ) ϕ ϕ ϕ
ν ρσλµ µ ρσνλ λ ρσµν ρσλµ ν ρσνλ µ ρσµν λ
∂ + ∂ + ∂ = ∇ + ∇ + ∇ R R R R R R 2
and
ϕ
ν
µν µν µν µν
ν
∂

¹

\

− − =

¹

\

− ∇ R g R R g R
2
1
2
2
1
which, upon recalling the definition of the torsion vector, may be expressed as
ν
µν µν µν µν
ν
τ

¹

\

− − =

¹

\

− ∇ R g R R g R
2
1
3
4
2
1
Apart from the above generalized identities, we may also give the ordinary Bianchi
identities as
0 = ∇ + ∇ + ∇
ρσλµ ν ρσνλ µ ρσµν λ
R R R
and
0
2
1
=

¹

\

− ∇ R h R
µν µν
ν
4. The Electromagnetic Sector of the Conformal Theory. The Fundamental
Equations of Motion
Based on the results obtained in the preceding section, let us now take the generator ϕ as
describing the (quantum) electromagnetic field. Then, consequently, the spacetime
1
S is
understood as being devoid of electromagnetic interaction. As we will see, in our present
theory, it is the quantum evolution of the gravitational field that gives rise to
electromagnetism. In this sense, the electromagnetic field is but an emergent quantum
phenomenon in the evolution space
4
M .
Whereas the spacetime
1
S is purely gravitational, the evolved spacetime
2
S does
contain an electromagnetic field. In our present theory, for reasons that will be clear soon,
14
we shall define the electromagnetic field
4 2
M S F ∈ ∈ in terms of the torsion of the space
time
2
S by
  λ
λ
µν µν
u
e
c m
F Γ =
2
0
2
where e is the (elementary) charge of the electron and
ds
dx
h e
ds
dx
g u
ν
µν
ϕ
ν
µν µ
2
= =
are the covariant components of the tangent velocity vector field satisfying 1 =
µ
µ
u u .
We have seen that the spacetime
2
S possesses a manifest quantum structure through its
evolution from the purely gravitational spacetime
1
S . This means that e may be defined
in terms of the fundamental Planck charge eˆ as follows:
c N e N e h
0
4 ˆ ε π = =
where N is a positive constant and
0
ε is the permittivity of free space. Further
investigation shows that α = N where 137
1
≈
−
α is the conventional fine structure
constant.
Let us now proceed to show that the geodesic equation of motion in the spacetime
2
S
gives the (generalized) Lorentz equation of motion for the electron. The result of parallel
transferring the velocity vector field u along the worldline (in the direction of motion of
the electron) yields
( ) 0 = ∇ =
ν µ
ν
µ
u u
ds
u D
i.e.,
0 = Γ +
σ ρ µ
ρσ
µ
u u
ds
du
where, in general,
( )
     
( )
σ
ρµ νσ
σ
ρν µσ
λρ λ
µν νσ µ µν σ σµ ν
σλ λ
µν
Γ + Γ − Γ + ∂ + ∂ − ∂ = Γ g g g g g g g
2
1
15
Recalling our expression for the components of the torsion tensor in the preceding
section, we obtain
( ) ϕ δ ϕ
µ
λ
ν σ
λσ
µν νσ µ µν σ σµ ν
σλ λ
µν
∂ − ∂ + ∂ + ∂ − ∂ = Γ g g g g g g
2
1
which is completely equivalent to the previously obtained relation ϕ δ ω
ν
λ
µ
λ
µν
λ
µν
∂ + = Γ .
Note that
( )
νσ µ µν σ σµ ν
σλ λ
µν
g g g g ∂ + ∂ − ∂ = ∆
2
1
are the Christoffel symbols in the spacetime
2
S . These are not to be confused with the
Christoffel symbols in the spacetime
1
S given by
λ
µν
ω .
Furthermore, we have
 
σ
λ
λ
ρσ
µρ σ ρ µ
ρσ
µ
u u g u u
ds
du
Γ = ∆ + 2
Now, since we have set
  λ
λ
µν µν
u
e
c m
F Γ =
2
0
2 , we obtain the equation of motion
ν µ
ν
σ ρ µ
ρσ
µ
u F e u u
ds
du
c m =


¹

\

∆ +
2
0
which is none other than the Lorentz equation of motion for the electron in the presence
of gravitation. Hence, it turns out that the electromagnetic field, which is nonexistent in
the spacetime
1
S , is an intrinsic geometric object in the spacetime
2
S . In other words,
the spacetime structure of
2
S inherently contains both gravitation and electromagnetism.
Now, we see that
( ) ϕ ϕ
µ ν ν µ µν
∂ − ∂ = u u
e
c m
F
2
0
In other words,

¹

\

∂ − = ϕ
ϕ
ν
µν µ ν µ
ν
g
ds
d
u c m u F e
2
0
Consequently, we can rewrite the electron’s equation of motion as
16
ϕ
ϕ
ν
µν µ σ ρ µ
ρσ
µ
∂ − = ∆ + g
ds
d
u u u
ds
du
We may therefore define an asymmetric fundamental tensor of the gravoelectromagnetic
manifold
2
S by
µν µν µν
ϕ
F
c m
e
ds
d
g g
2
0
~
− =
satisfying
ϕ
µ
ν
µν
∂ = u g
~
It follows immediately that
ϕ
ϕ
δ
ν
µν ν µ
ν
µ
ν
∂ =


¹

\

− g u F
c m
e
ds
d
2
0
which, when expressed in terms of the wave function ψ , gives the Schrödingerlike
equation
ψ ϕ
ψ
ν
µν µ µ


¹

\

+ ∂ = u F
c m
e
M ds
d
u
2
0
1
We may now proceed to show that the electromagnetic current density given by the
covariant expression
µν
ν
µ
π
F
c
j ∇ − =
4
is conserved in the present theory.
Let us first call the following expression for the covariant components of the
electromagnetic field tensor in terms of the covariant components of the canonical
electromagnetic fourpotential A:
ν µ µ ν µν
A A F ∇ − ∇ =
such that ϕ
ν µ µ ν
∂ = ∇ u c m A e
2
0
, i.e.,
17
ν µ
ν
µ
ϕ A u e c m ∇ = ∂
2
0
which directly gives the equation of motion
ν µ
ν µ
ϕ
A u u e
ds
d
c m ∇ =
2
0
Hence, we obtain the following equation of state:
( )
ν µ
ν µ
ψ ψ
A u u
M
M
e
ds
d
c m ∇
+
=
1
2
2
0
Another alternative expression for the electromagnetic field tensor is given by
 
ϕ ϕ
ν µ µ ν ν µ µ ν
λ
λ
µν ν µ µ ν µν
∂ − ∂ + ∂ − ∂ =
Γ − ∂ − ∂ =
A A A A
A A A F 2
In the particular case in which the fieldlines of the electromagnetic fourpotential
propagate in the direction of the electron’s motion, we have
( )
ν µ µ ν µν
β
u u
c
e
F ∂ − ∂


¹

\

−
Λ =
2
2
1
where Λ is a proportionality constant and
o
m
e
Λ
± = β . Then, we may define a
vortical velocity field, i.e., a spin field, through the vorticity tensor which is given by
( )
ν µ µ ν µν
ω u u ∂ − ∂ =
2
1
and hence
µν µν
ω
β


¹

\

−
Λ =
2
2
1
2
c
e
F
which describes an electrically charged spinning region in the spacetime continuum
2
S .
Furthermore, we have the following generalized identity for the electromagnetic field
tensor:
18
     
( )
σν
σ
λµ σµ
σ
νλ σλ
σ
µν λµ ν νλ µ µν λ
F F F F F F Γ + Γ + Γ = ∇ + ∇ + ∇ 2
which, in the present theory, takes the particular form
( ) ϕ ϕ ϕ
ν λµ µ νλ λ µν λµ ν νλ µ µν λ
∂ + ∂ + ∂ = ∇ + ∇ + ∇ F F F F F F 2
Contracting, we have
 
( )
ρσ µ
ρσ µ
µ
µ
π
F
c
j Γ ∇ − = ∇
4
We therefore expect that the expression in the brackets indeed vanishes. For this purpose,
we may set
 
ρσ µ
ρσ
µ
π
F
c
j Γ − =
4
and hence, again, using the relation
 
( ) ϕ δ ϕ δ
µ
λ
ν ν
λ
µ
λ
µν
∂ − ∂ = Γ
2
1
, we immediately see
that
 
( ) ( )
 
ϕ
π
ϕ
ϕ ϕ ϕ
π
λ
µν λ
µν µ
µ
λ
λ
µν µ ν
µν µν
µ ν
µ
µ
∂ Γ − ∂ − =
∂ Γ − ∂ ∂ + ∇ ∂ − = ∇
F
c
j
F F
c
j
4
4
i.e.,
0 = ∇
µ
µ
j
At this point, we may note the following: the fact that our theory employs torsion, from
which the electromagnetic field is extracted, and at the same time guarantees
electromagnetic charge conservation (in the form of the above continuity equation) in a
natural manner is a remarkable property.
Now, let us call the relation
 
( )
ρ σ
ρµν
λ
σ
λ
σ
λ
µν
ξ ξ δ R l l ∇ − − = Γ
2
1
obtained in Section 3 of this work (in which
σ
ρµν
σ
ρµν
K R = ). This can simply be written
as
19
 
ρ λ
ρµν
ϕ λ
µν
ξ R e l
−
− = Γ
2
1
i.e.,
 
ψ
σ
ρσ λ
ρµν
ϕ λ
µν
∂ − = Γ
−
g R e l
2
1
Hence, we obtain the elegant result
ψ
σ
ρσ
λ
λ
ρµν
ϕ
µν
∂ − =
−
g u R e
e
c m
l F
2
0
i.e.,
ψ
ψ
σ
ρσ
λ
λ
ρµν µν
∂
+
− = g u R
M
c m
e
l
F
1
2
0
or, in terms of the components of the (dimensionless) microscopic displacement field ξ ,
σ
ρσ
λ
λ
ρµν
ϕ
µν
ξ g u R e
e
c m
l F
−
− =
2
0
which further reveals how the electromagnetic field originates in the gravitational field in
the spacetime
2
S as a quantum field. Hence, at last, we see a complete picture of the
electromagnetic field as an emergent phenomenon. This completes the longcherished
hypothesis that the electromagnetic field itself is caused by a massive charged particle,
i.e., when 0
0
= m neither gravity nor electromagnetism can exist. Finally, with this result
at hand, we obtain the following equation of motion for the electron in the gravitational
field:
ν
σ ρ
ρσµ
ν
ϕ σ ρ µ
ρσ
µ
ξ u u R e l u u
ds
du
−
− = ∆ +
i.e.,
ψ
ψ
σ
ν
ρ
ρσµ
ν
σ ρ µ
ρσ
µ
∂
+
− = ∆ + u u R
M
l
u u
ds
du
1
In addition, we note that the torsion tensor is now seen to be given by
20
ν
µν
ϕ
µ
ξ τ R e l
−
− =
2
1
or, alternatively,
ψ τ
λ
νλ
µν
ϕ
µ
∂ − =
−
g R e l
2
1
In other words,
ψ
ψ
τ
λ
νλ
µν µ
∂
+
− = g R
M
l
1
2
1
Hence, the second generalized Bianchi identity finally takes the somewhat more
transparent form
ψ
σ
ρσ µ
ρ νρ
µν ϕ µν µν
ν
∂

¹

\

− − =

¹

\

− ∇
−
g R R R R e l R g R
2
1
3
2
2
1
i.e.,
ψ
ψ
σ
ρσ µ
ρ νρ
µν µν µν
ν
∂

¹

\

−
+
− =

¹

\

− ∇ g R R R R
M
l
R g R
2
1
1
3
2
2
1
5. Final Remarks
The present theory, in its present form, is still in an elementary state of development.
However, as we have seen, the emergence of the electromagnetic field from the quantum
evolution of the gravitational field is a remarkable achievement which deserves special
attention. On another occasion, we shall expect to expound the structure of the
generalized Einstein's equation in the present theory with a generally nonconservative
energymomentum tensor given by

¹

\

− ± = R g R
G
c
T
µν µν µν
π 2
1
8
4
which, like in the case of selfcreation cosmology, seems to allow us to attribute the
creation and annihilation of matter directly to the scalar generator of the quantum
evolution process, and hence the wave function alone, as
0
1
3
2
≠ ∂
+
− = ∇ ψ
ψ
σ
ρσ
νρ
µν µν
ν
g R T
M
l
T
21
Some Related Readings
Thiemann, T. Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity. arXiv: gr
qc/0110034.
Barber, G. A. The Principles of SelfCreation Cosmology and its Comparison with
General Relativity. arXiv: grqc/0212111.
Brans, C. H. Consistency of Field Equations in “SelfCreation” Cosmologies. Gen. Rel.
Grav., 1987, v. 19, 949952.