Induced nuclear transmutations

While the suspense in on regarding the choice of the country that will win the ITER project despite the Cocoricos of the government and his communication net, we are tempted to ask us if that project could not be a very big financial extortion of the international nuclear lobby that wants taxpayers to pay more for the good living of an army of nuclear scientists whose unique preoccupation is to keep for life their job and not to improve the scientific knowledge of our world. As a matter of fact, Ancients have made a lot of observations, and probably they inherited some knowledge. Numerous are the old books that talk about unusual process supposed to produce gold or silver. With the benefit of time, we all would have understood the curiosity of the scientific community in the checking of the saying of Ancients with the best equipments available in the scientific market in order to know for sure if behind weird processes is not hidden a discrete nuclear property of matter. Unfortunately those who had these costly scientific tools, for years, were the nuclear specialists who, we should not to be surprised of that, have never be in excess of creativity and true scientific spirit, may be because business or military program is the priority. From the point of view of theory, I say that to understand the possibility of induced nuclear transmutations, it is required to consider the involved energy, it means that all nuclear reaction may occur if a minimum energy is available. Nuclear reactivity is not so different that the chemical reactivity; for example a volume of chlorine and a volume of hydrogen placed in a flask, no react in obscurity. Just put the flask to the light and reaction will start; light has brought that minimum activation energy that initiated the chemical bounding of chlorine and hydrogen (put again in darkness the flask if you want).

Equation of synergy of nuclear reactions

Considering the possibility of induced nuclear transmutations, we have to ask ourselves about the energy source and the physics of these transmutations that produce a very high number of nuclei, 1018/s. Any natural system is never isolated: it may received two sorts of interactions, electromagnetic and cosmic. Only the cosmic interaction may provide the sufficient energy to start nuclear reactions, soft cosmic rays and for a lesser extend hard cosmic rays. To explain the very high number of transmuted elements we have to admit that it necessarily exists a synergy of nuclear reactions similar to that which is involved in the creation of the super heavy element (Z = 126) of the philosophers stone of alchemists, I have named Trinitium (Tn), from uranium. In the case of the synthesis of Trinitium, energy is released by uranium fission, it exists a probability that a fission fragment initiates the formation of a Trinitium nucleus via a set of exoenergetic and endoenergetic nuclear reactions (pi), and that the excited Trinitium nucleus newly created initiates an other set of nuclear reactions conducing to other Trinitium nucleus, with the probability (pj). So the equation of production of Trinitium stabilized by fluorine is :

In the case of the natural transmutation induced by cosmic rays the path of thinking is similar. A cosmic ray initiates the set of nuclear reactions to produce an excited nucleus that eventually starts other set of nuclear reactions, until required energy conditions are no more fulfilled. The equation of production is now :

In both cases equations describe the formation of a macroscopic amount of nuclei synthesized or transmuted via a synergy of nuclear reactions, they constitute, with the synergy concept, some of the most interesting advances of my work about the rationalization of alchemy and reactions of spagyry.

The use of these equations

Both equations are an exact description of the transmutation phenomenon, they do not state anything about the nature of atom. The strong advantage in describing the creation of elements in terms of probabilities is that for each system we only have to precise the effective parameters that participate to the reaction of transmutation. Therefore we note two key parameters, not including the source of external or internal activation energy, which are the liquid state and the time; density or composition of the medium has its importance, it strongly affects probabilities pi and pj. They are the same parameters described by the French chemist Tiffereau hundred years ago.

Transmutation to silver from uraniferous mixt (2004)

During the processing of an old residue containing uranium, a stopped alchemy experiment, I observed the creation of silver. I had melted the residue with sodium carbonate and potassium nitrate; the fusion was around 1000C and lasted 45 minutes. The grinding of the product showed the presence of a metallic piece weighting 10.9 g, which appeared to be silver after analysis. The gamma spectrum of the metal has been made with a CdTe detector: it presents two peaks, that of Ag-109m and that of Pb-210 (starting from the left). The last peak is the sum of remaining peaks of higher energy.

The presence of lead is not very surprising because lead and silver give an alloy; it is radiogenetical lead . The creation of silver may be explained by one of the equations, but the energy source, because of the yield, is not the cosmic rays. It is germs of super heavy nuclei created in-situ during the alchemy experiment. That fact has to be related with the genesis of native silver in nature: the metal is often associated with pitchblende.

Transmutation silver to or via thermal change (from 1745)

The recipe has been tested in 1998, I have enough talked about it, so I give you the recipe as I found it in an old book: Take hot lime directly from the furnace (it is required to prepare lime from hard rock) put water on it to get the strongest water you can; melt pure silver, & which is free of gold: & when it will be melted, drop it in this lime water; having repeated the operation three to four times, treat silver with nitric acid, you will find that a certain amount of gold has been produced. Those who want to dispute the maturation of metals have to repeat the experiment, they have to tell us where gold now joined with silver is coming from, I say that this fact convinces me more than all their arguments. May be they will say that that gold is the result of melting silver several times, but that cannot be proved nor by reason neither by experience; because I may affirm you that as often you melt silver no change happens despite the contrary has been claimed by Homberg, Kenkel, & and other Authors; but I suggest to who believe them to do the experiment, that should quickly convince them that we may not get gold from pure silver, from any number of melting. So I may assure that the experiment of silver with lime, is not only curious, but very profitable; moreover it of course demonstrates the true in question.

On March 8, 2002 a physicist from CEA Cadarache, despite to have received the recipe wanted me to do the experiment. He asked Biberian, university searcher and CEA interface for all matter related with cold fusion, to be present. I was in charge to bring silver, oven, to satisfy the curiosity of both state scientists. The CEA kept the samples of silver, it was told me that may be they could contain less than 1% gold, so to analyze it they had to wait for the state funds (sic) Biberian organizes the ICCF11 that will be held in Marseille (France) for one week starting on

October 31, 2004. But I observed that Cold Fusion is now Condensate Matter , that proves how you may completely neutralize area of research changing names ; does exist a connection with the ITER project of nuclear fusion ?

Transmutation of mercury to gold in acetic acid medium (ICCF9 Roberto Mont)

An US chemist sent me the paper of Monti that was presented at ICCF9 in China. It is an interesting paper that just presents the fact . According the chemist the yield may be improved, but the mercury becomes quickly very thick. The most important part of the paper in indicated below : Consequently we divided in two parts our supply of "treated Mercury". We washed half of it (500g) with white wine vinegar and the other 500g with a mixture (50%) of white wine vinegar and Acetic Acid, for 2 months. After 2 months we took 100g from the first 500g, and 100g from the second 500g. When dissolved in Nitric 1 to 5 the first 100g gave 13mg, the second 100g gave 55mg of Gold. After two more months another 100g of Mercury treated with the mixture of vinegar and Acetic Acid, gave 88mg of Gold. We have made Gold many times, in different ways, but the Gold obtained directly from Mercury in this way is the most beautiful we have ever seen.

Just put in a jar at least 1 Kg of mercury, not ultra pure, and cover it with acetic acid. Let time do the work and analyze mercury. The yield is around 1% , but the US chemist told me he got more. Transmutation of mercury may be explained by the action of cosmic rays. Mercury is a good screen for soft cosmic rays, that means they lost their energy in the mercury, then the labile hydrogen atom of acetic acid may get fusion with excited mercury ( the barrier of potential is around 12.5 MeV) Let suppose we may collide mercury with heat particle without loss (thermal isolation), after a while all mercury will get the temperature of the beam of heat particle. Cosmic rays have an energy around 2000 MeV, so the hypothetical scheme makes ourselves understand that mercury will be enough excited after a while to produce transmutation via proton

absorption. Taking into account the frequency of cosmic rays, it is obvious that a synergy mechanism is involved. However we have to consider what Monti tells us : We have observed that the "purified" Mercury gives very poor results because in the process of "purification" some properties are lost (the Mercury goes in the wrong isomeric configuration). He also says that it is better to get mercury from roasted cinnabar (HgS). Taking into account that gold may not be obtained from purified mercury, we may think that impurities have a higher reaction crosssection for soft cosmic rays than mercury. Therefore, in order to justify the creation of mercury, excited impurities necessarily transfer their energy to mercury. We now may have a little thought for scientific method. Scientists seem to be in schizophrenic state : for them transmutation of atoms is a reality only if a given atom, in that case mercury, is able with a given reactive to produce other atom, in that case gold. The fact that pure mercury does not react to produce gold means for them that the transmutation of mercury may not be possible. Our world is not as pure as mercury used to claim no transmutation occurred, it means that all elements need each other to product new thing. If we may see flowers on earth it is because they need bees or similar to be reproduced otherwise they will not exist on Earth. A better spirit of synthesis should prevail among scientists to avoid to escape the reality of our world, so the unique correct attitude is to be skeptical and wise enough to study natural facts in a state as close as they used to be. In other words, increase the size of the system under study. To-day cold fusion research We observe that most of the research works are about electrolysis that appears to be not so Sulphurous than transmutation tied with old alchemy. Moreover, the work is minimum, cleaner than old way chemistry; lasers, microwaves, all the man made devices to disturb matter may be used, and so high tech measurement devices that make good science ! To know more about: I suggest you read the list of papers presented at ICCF10 in 2003 : http://world.std.com/~mica/cftrefs.html

Albert CAU laboratory

http://albert.cau.free.fr/English/index.html