Explore Ebooks
Categories
Explore Audiobooks
Categories
Explore Magazines
Categories
Explore Documents
Categories
13 July 2006
Following a recent site visit to European Nickel's Caldag ponds collect the run off from the pads and hold the
deposit, work appears to be progressing well in the liquour at various stages of concentration and either re-
development of a 20,400tpa nickel plant. The company circulates it over a pad or enters the nickel removal
has developed a heap leach process, similar to that used process.
for copper heap leaching. It is extracting nickel from
Once at a sufficient nickel concentration, the liquour is
nickel laterite deposits at significantly lower capital cost
treated to remove the nickel. The first stage of separation
than other technologies being developed and used on
precipitates out iron by adding limestone, the second
these types of deposit e.g. high pressure acid leaching.
stage has soda ash added to produce a first nickel
Nickel laterites are the most common form of deposit and product and a third stage precipitates out a second stage
could dominate new scheduled nickel supply. However, nickel product. The remaining liquid is re-circulated back
the low grades, high costs and frequent technical to the ponds and where sulphuric acid will be added to re-
problems have inhibited their development in the past. acidify and continue the leaching.
The Caldag deposit contains proved and probable The two nickel separation stages produce two different
reserves of 33.5mt of ore at 1.14% Nickel and is expected products, which have been proved to be treatable at
to produce 258kt of nickel over a 15 year mine life. Mining smelters: The first product is 36% nickel, 1-1.4% cobalt
at Caldag will be achieved via three open pits: and less than 2% manganese. The second product is 22%
nickel, 0.6-1% cobalt and less than 10% manganese. Both
! Doktor Pit = 4.5mt @ 1.22% and strip ratio of 2.8 products are a green cake that then gets bagged for
! Pig Valley Pit = 19.0mt @ 1.21% and strip ratio of 4.5 shipment in containers. The pilot plant’s product has high
moisture content of around 65%, although more effective
! South Pit = 9.8mt @ 0.94% and strip ratio of 6.6 drying/pressing equipment will be installed to reduce this
Operations will start at Doktor Pit due to its higher nickel significantly on the final plant. Methods to do this are
content and lower strip ratio. Whilst in production, mining being investigated.
at Pig Valley will commence. Lastly mining will take place
There is the possibility of altering the output of the ratio by
at South Pit in years 10-15, which are likely to be the least
30-70% between the two products. The advantage of this
profitable pit due to the higher strip ratio and that this part
is that the two products can be blended and that there is a
of the deposit contains more calcium carbonate, which
degree of control to produce a final single product that is
raises the acid demand for ore treatment. Acid production
optimised for the relevant smelter/refiner that will take the
will be raised to treat this ore, but ore treatment is due to
material.
drop from 2.5mtpa to 2.0mtpa of ore.
The technology to develop the heap leach treatment and any shortfall to come from nearby boreholes. Water
process has been developed with BHP Billiton, which has will be lost from the process through evaporation, hence
opted to take 100% of the nickel output of the project. the net demand for water despite zero discharge. The
European Nickel views this as positive news and the company will be taking precautions to ensure the land is
conditions of the agreement are under discussion. It could regenerated when mining is completed.
be advantageous to European Nickel, for BHP to take
The pilot scale plant has shown the process to be robust,
ownership of the product at port and ship it to the desired
comparatively simple versus what is taking place for other
smelting destination. Once possible reason is that BHP
nickel laterite deposits, e.g. Inco’s Goro project using high
can no doubt get cheaper shipping terms than European
pressure acid leach due to cost US$2.2bln for 60,000tpa,
Nickel due to its size and the volumes it already ships.
versus European Nickel’s process which is expected to
Mining is scheduled to start late this year and the first heap cost $310m (including financing costs, US$254m
stacked by April 2007. First nickel production is due in excluding financing costs).
October 2007 in conjunction with the plant start up, with full
The company expects that payback will take 5 years, but
production reached by early 2009. US$4.2m worth of
this is based on a long-term nickel price of US$4.25/lb and
orders have been placed for long lead items and a further
cobalt price of $10/lb, both of which may be conservative.
US$11.5m approved for further orders.
Current nickel prices are well over US$10/lb and cobalt is
A key step in development will be the acid plant due to around $14/lb. Using cobalt and power as credits, the
start up in June 2008 which will also generate 30MW of company expects operating costs of $1.18/lb of Nickel.
power, of which 15MW will be consumed on site and the The project is highly cost competitive and even in a poor
remainder sold to the national grid. Prior to the startup, pricing environment then the project would add value.
sulphuric acid will need to be imported for the leaching
The company currently has 371m shares in issue and at 30
process by road. A road is being constructed to the site
June had US$156m in cash following an £85m raised
due to be complete in February next year in time for acid
through a placing in May. Further funding requirements
deliveries. The acid purchases will be short of full
should be raised through debt.
production requirements hence the importance of the acid
plant. The acid plant will allow full production and improve
the project economics significantly. Doubtless the
company will try to bring the start up date forward if
possible.
This document has been approved under section 21(1) of FSMA 2000 by Numis Securities Limited (“Numis”) for communication only to market
counterparties and intermediate customers as those terms are defined by the rules of the Financial Services Authority. Its contents are not
directed at, may not be suitable for and should not be relied on by private customers. Numis does not provide investment advisory services to
private customers.
Numis regards this document as objective research material. It does not constitute a personal recommendation and does not constitute an
offer or a solicitation to buy or sell any security. Neither Numis nor any of its directors, officers, employees or agents shall have any liability,
howsoever arising, for any error or incompleteness of fact or opinion in it or lack of care in its preparation or publication; provided that this shall
not exclude liability to the extent that this is impermissible under the law relating to financial services. All statements and opinions are made as
of the date on the face of this document and are not held out as applicable thereafter.
This document has been prepared for persons in the United Kingdom and is not intended for distribution or use outside the United Kingdom
and in particular is not for distribution in and is not directed at persons in the United States or Canada.
See (www.numiscorp.com/x/regulatory.html) for important legal information and for a list of significant items which could create a conflict of
interest and other material interests in relation to research material. See also (www.numiscorp.com/x/regulatory.html) for the full text of Numis’
disclaimer.
In longer pieces of research material the basis of forecasts and target prices will be set out; in shorter pieces there is a cross-reference to the
archive of research material on the Numis website where, under the appropriate company name, details of the basis can be viewed. Longer
pieces of research material will identify material sources; shorter pieces are normally based on company announcements made through the
Regulatory Information Service. In those cases (but not otherwise) where the subject company has seen the draft research material and has
suggested factual amendments which are incorporated by the analyst, this will be noted on the research material. This applies normally only to
longer pieces. For research material on the Numis website (available to all customers who normally receive Numis research material) – see
www.numiscorp.com/x/Mainresearch.html
In longer pieces of research material the risk warnings (if any) attaching to a particular company will be set out; in shorter pieces there is a
cross-reference to the archive of research material on the Numis website where, under the appropriate company name, details of such matters
can be viewed. For research material on the Numis website (available to all customers who normally receive Numis research material) - see
www.numiscorp.com/x/Mainresearch.html
Research material will carry the date of publication or, on a research circular printed overnight, the date on which it was sent to the printers.
Where a price is quoted in research material it will generally, in the absence of contrary words, be the latest practicable price prior to
distribution or, in the case of a research circular printed overnight, the closing price at the close of business.
The tariff for recommendations is set out in the Numis website, together with the relevant time horizon. A chart showing the recommendation
history for each company covered for the past twelve months is set out under the appropriate company name in the archive of research
material contained in this website and is available to all customers who normally receive Numis research material. There is also available on
this website an analysis of the split of recommendations over the past quarter for all subject companies and for corporate clients. For this
information - see www.numiscorp.com/x/regulatory.html
© Numis Securities Limited.