Issues On Title Suits

ISSUES ON TITLE SUITS
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction as prayed for?

2. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for declaration of right in the suit
schedule property as prayed for?
3. Whether the decree and judgment in O.S.No.______________on the
File of______________court are binding upon the defendant?
4. Whether the pliant plan is correct?
5. Whether the ABGHF is a public site and part and parcel of rastha?
6. Whether the ADF marked site is a sandu left for discharging rain water
from spouts S1 to S5?
7. Whether the defendants 1 and 2 are the owners of ADEF site?
8. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the declaration as prayed for?
9. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction and mandatory
injunction as prayed for?
10. Whether there is cause of action for the suit?
11. Whether the plaintiffs are in possession and enjoyment of the plaint
schedule property?
12. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to permanent and mandatory
injunctions as prayed for?
13. Whether the boundaries and measurements of plaint schedule property
are correct?
14. Whether the plaint plan is correct?
15. Whether the suit for bar injunction is maintainable without asking for
declaration of title?
16. Whether the plaint schedule site is Gramanatham site and the
defendants are in possession and enjoyment of the same as pleaded by
them in their written statement?
17.Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for mandatory injunction for removal
of walls?
18. Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for declaration of title to the plaint
schedule property?
19. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for declaration of easementary right by
prescription for discharging rain water through S1 to S4 spouts from the
roof of his house into the public rasta and for getting light and heat
through W1 and W2 marked windows from EFG open site?
20.Whether S1 to S4 spouts and W1 and W2 marked windows are in
existence from time in memorial?
21.Whether the plaintiff is entitled for mandatory injunction for removal of
the wall constructed in the public site shown in EFG from point E to F
and from point F to G as shown in the plaint plan?
22. Whether the defendant is entitled for permanent injunction as prayed
for?
23. Whether the defendant is entitled for mandatory injunction as prayed
for?
24. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction as prayed for?
25. Whether the defendant duly executed the mortgage deed dt.________?
26. Whether the defendant received the consideration under the mortgage
deed?
ISSUES ON MONEY SUITS
1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the suit claim as prayed for?
2. Whether the suit pronote is true, valid and binding upon the defendant?
3. Whether the suit pronote is fabricated by the plaintiff as pleaded by the
defendant?
4. To what relief?
5. Whether the suit pronote is valid and binding on the defendant?
6. To what relief?
7. whether the first defendant executed the debt acknowledgement on
12/2/1993 as alleged by the plaintiff?
8. Whether the suit is barred by limitation?
9. Whether there is cause of action for the suit?
10. Whether the defendant is entitled to the benefits of agricultural rural
debt relief scheme 1990?
11.Whether the settlement deed dt.8/5/1967 is true, valid and binding upon
the plaintiff?
12.Whether the item NO.3 and 4 shown in the schedule were acquired by
the government for the purpose of construction of Parmanchala tank
and claim to division of said properties is maintainable?
13.Whether Item No.1 and 6 of the schedule property is purchased with
the funds of first defendant and the plaintiff is not entitled for any relief
in the property of item No.6?
14.Whether the plaintiff has local standi to file this suit during the lifetime
of first defendant?
15.Whether there is cause of action for the suit?
16.Whether the suit is barred by limitation?
17.Whether the plaintiff is entitled mense property as prayed for?
18.Whether the plaintiff is entitled for partition and separate possession of
his share in the plaint schedule properties?
19.Whether the suit pronote is not supported by the cash consideration?
20.Whether the suit pronote was not executed in the jurisdiction of this
court and it is executed at Krishnaraopet as pleaded by the defendant?
21. Whether this court has jurisdiction to try this suit?
22. Whether the suit pronote is a renewal of the earlier pronote dt.2/1/1988
for Rs.3900-00?
23.Whether the suit pronote is materially altered as pleaded by the
defendant?
24. Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is usurious and is liable to
be scaled down?
25. Whether the defendant is entitled for the benefits under agricultural
debt relief act?
26.Whether the discharge pleaded by the defendant is true, valid and
binding upon the plaintiff?
27.Whether the defendant is entitled for the benefit of Act IV of 1938 and
defendant is entitled to ask for scale down of interest?
28.Whether the suit pronote is devoid of consideration as pleaded by the
defendant?
29.Whether the suit pronote dt.7/1/1993 is a renewal of earlier pronote
dt.20/2/1984?
30.Whether the interest claimed by the plaintiff is usurious and is liable to
be scaled down?
31.Whether the suit pronote is true, valid and binding upon the defendant?
32.Whether the plaintiff has capacity to provide the suit debt to the
defendant?

Issues On Title Suits

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Issues On Title Suits

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ISSUES ON TITLE SUITS

1. Whether the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction as prayed for?

You might also like