Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I {
(6
C-
0.05
0.04
0
Q
-0 0.03
E
0.02
0.01
I I
O L
0.001 0.01 0.1 I
evaporation rate (A/s)
Fig. 1 Variation of the field-effect mobility! as a function of growth
rate.
1410
At higher gate voltages, we note a revers al of the trend: [2] S.F. Nelson. Y.'. Liin D.J. Gundlach and T.N. Jackson. "Tempera-
that is. mobility now decreases. This can t ture-independent transport in high-mobility pentacene
Phvs. Lett.. 72. 1998. 1854-1856. transistors.-
A4ppl.
H. Klauk. M. Halik U. Zschieschlang. G.
[3] Schmid, W. Radlik and W.
0.5 Weber, "High-mobility polvmer gat.e dielectric pentacene thin film
transistors." J. Appl. Phys.. 92, 2002. 5259-5263.
[4] D. Knipp, R.A. Street. A. V6lkel and J. Ho. "Pentacene thin film
0.4 transistors on inorganic dielectrics: Morphology, structural proper-
En ties, and electronic transport ."J. Appl. Phys.. 93. 2003. 347-355.
[5] T.W. Kelley. L.D. Boardman, T.D. Dunbar. D.V. Muyres. M.J.
c 0.3 Pellerite and T.P. Sniith. "High-performance OTFTs using surface-
modified alumina dielectrics," J. Phvs. Cheim. B. 107. 2003, 5877-
E.
._ 0.2 5881.
0 [6] G. Horowitz and M.E. Hajlaoui, "Grain size dependent mobilitv in
polycrystalline organic field-effect transistors," Synth. Metal.. 122.
0.1 2001, 185-189.
[7] A. Dodabalapur. L. Torsi and H.E. Katz, "Organic transistors: Two-
dimensional transport and improved electrical characteristics." Sci-
0
0 5 10 15 20Dence. 268. 1995. 270-271.
[8] H. Klauk. G. Schmidt XX. Radlik. W. Weber, L. Zhou. C.D. Sheraw.
gate voltage (V) J.A. Nichols and T.N. Jackson. "Contact resistance in organic thin
film transistors" Solid-State Electron.. 47. 2003. 297-301.
Fig. 3 Gate voltage dependent mobilitv of devices vvith and without [9] G. Horowitz. "Organiic thiln film transistors: From theory to applica-
SAM treatmenet. In both cases, the pentacene film is 30 nm thick. tions, 'J. Mater. Res.. in press.
the accumulation of the charge close to the insulator-
semiconductor interface where trap centers are likely to be
more abundant. Note that this effect is more pronounced in
the SAM modified device. This can be related to the struc-
ture of the film in that region. On bare alumina, two-
dimensional growth leads to the formation of a continuous
film with a minimum amount of defects. By contrast. the
three-dimensional growth of the film on SAM modified
alunina induces the formation of holes between the grains.
The filling of these holes occurs during the subsequent
stage of the deposition. However, it is likelv that the filling
does not go down to the aluminia surface. so that charge
transport in this region remains largelyIhindered bv the
holes. We finally note that furtlher evidence for the above
statement is brouglht by that transistors made with very thin
films of pentacene (3 nm) do not show any current on
SAM modified samples. while a small current is detected
on devices with bare alumina.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The growth mechanism of pentacene on bare and SAM
modified alumina shows significant differences. On bare
alumina, the deposition is first two-dimensional and turns
to three-dimensional after the completion of the first layer.
On the modified substrate, film growth remains three-
dimensional all along the deposition process. The present
study brings evidence for the inference of these features on
the behavior of field-effect transistors made on these sub-
strates. A depth dependent analysis of the mobility slhows
that more efficient charge transport is found in the bulk of
the fllm for the SAM modified device, wlhile a reverse trend
is observed for charge transport at the insulator-
semiconductor interface.
V. REFERENCES
[1] C.D. Dimitrakopoulos and P.R.L. Malenfant, "Organic thin film
transistors for large area electronics."' Ad". Mater., 14. 2002, 99-
117.
1411