ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.............................iiiSTATEMENTS OF INTEREST OF
AMICI CURIAE
.......................................................1SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT...........................2ARGUMENT.......................................................3I.
COMPARATIVE ANDINTERNATIONAL LAW ARERELEVANT TO THE ISSUESBEFORE THE COURT...........................3II.
HIGH COURTS OF OTHER NATIONS HAVE UPHELDAFFIRMATIVE ACTIONMEASURES UNDER COMPARABLECIRCUMSTANCES..............................10III.
UNITED STATES TREATYLAW PERMITS AFFIRMATIVEACTION AND, UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES,IMPOSES AFFIRMATIVE DUTIESTO ASSURE EQUALITY.....................14A.
The ICCPR SupportsAffirmative ActionPrograms Such As TheAdmissions Policies AtIssue Here..........................15
iiiB.
CERD Endorses AffirmativeAction Programs................17C.
Self-Execution Is Not An Issue Where,As Here, The TreatyProvisions Are CitedAs Aids To Interpretation..19CONCLUSION..................................................20