2013-1397
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT _______________________________________________________________
GEMALTO S.A.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
, v. HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., EXEDEA, INC., GOOGLE, INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC (also known as Motorola Mobility, Inc.), SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA , LLC,
Defendants-Appellees
,
_______________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Case No. 10-CV-0561, Chief Judge Leonard Davis.
_______________________________________________________________ NON-CONFIDENTIAL BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT GEMALTO S.A. _______________________________________________________________
Robert A. Cote MCKOOL SMITH P.C. One Bryant Park, 47th Floor New York, New York 10036 (212) 402-9400 Dirk D. Thomas MCKOOL SMITH P.C. 1999 K Street, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 370-8302 Joel L. Thollander MCKOOL SMITH P.C. 300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700 Austin, TX 78701 (512) 692-8735
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant Gemalto S.A.
July 9, 2013
NON-CONFIDENTIAL
Case: 13-1397 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 07/09/2013
i
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST
Counsel for Gemalto S.A. certifies the following: 1. The full name of every party represented by me is: Gemalto S.A. 2. The name of the real party in interest represented by me is: Gemalto S.A. 3. All parent corporations and any publicly held companies that own 10 percent or more of the stock of the party represented by me is: Gemalto N.A. 4. The names of all law firms and the partners or associates that appeared for the party represented by me in the trial court or are expected to appear in this Court are: McKool Smith P.C.: Robert Auchter, Samuel F. Baxter, Todd Bellaire, Robert A. Cote, Holly E. Engelmann, Laurie L. Fitzgerald, Shahar Harel, Pierre J. Hubert, Radu A. Lelutiu, Christopher J. Mierzejewski Kevin Schubert, Geoffrey L. Smith, Joel L. Thollander, Dirk D. Thomas.
Case: 13-1397 Document: 34 Page: 2 Filed: 07/09/2013
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST................................................................................i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................................................................v STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES.................................................................viii I.
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION...............................................................1
II.
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES....................................................................1
III.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE.......................................................................2
IV.
STATEMENT OF FACTS..............................................................................7
A.
The Parties.............................................................................................7
B.
The Patents-in-Suit................................................................................8
C.
The Prosecution History........................................................................9
D.
The Patents Do Not Require that “All” Memory For Storing Converted Applications Be On-Chip and Claim Embodiments that Store Converted Applications in a Mix of On-Chip and Off-Chip Memory...............................................................................................11
E.
The Patents Do Not Require that the Memory Used by the Processor to Execute Converted Applications Include the Non-Volatile (Permanent) Memory Located Off-Chip..................................................................14
F.
The Patents Disclose and Claim Embedded Systems for Non-Smartcard Embodiments.........................................16
G.
The Processors Powering Devices that Embody the Claimed Inventions Need Not Be Microcontrollers...........................18
H.
Gemalto’s Inventions Have Had a Dramatic Impact on the World of Mobile Computing........................................18
Case: 13-1397 Document: 34 Page: 3 Filed: 07/09/2013