12345678910111213141516171819202122232425
UNITED
STATES COURT REPORTERS 3
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIAJANUARY 23, 2014 P R O C E E D I N G S(COURT CONVENED AT 2:28 P.M.) THE CLERK: CALLING CASE NUMBER C-12-00630 LHK, APPLE, INCORPORATED VERSUS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LIMITED, ET AL. COUNSEL, IF YOU COULD STATE YOUR APPEARANCES, PLEASE. MR. MCELHINNY: GOOD AFTERNOON, YOUR HONOR. HAROLD MCELHINNY AND RACHEL KREVANS OF MORRISON & FOERSTER FOR PLAINTIFF APPLE. MR. QUINN: GOOD AFTERNOON, YOUR HONOR. JOHN QUINN, VICKY MAROULIS, KEVIN JOHNSON, SCOTT WATSON, AND SEAN PAK FOR QUINN, EMANUEL FOR SAMSUNG. MR. LYON: ALSO MARK LYON FROMGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER ON BEHALF OF APPLE. MR. SELWYN: AND ALSO MARK SELWYN FROMWILMER, HALE ON BEHALF OF APPLE. THE COURT: OKAY. GOOD AFTERNOON. LET'S DO SOME SCHEDULING FIRST. I'D LIKE TO ADVANCE THE DATES FOR YOUR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FILINGS RATHER THAN GOING BY THE 14 AND 10 DAYS THAT ARE IN MY STANDING ORDER JUST BECAUSE I THINK THAT WOULD, I AND MY STAFF, WE WOULD BENEFIT FROMSOME ADDITIONAL TIME. OKAY? SO LET ME FIRST ASK, WHAT RULINGS WOULD MOST HELP WITH YOUR ADR PROCESS SO WE CAN PRIORITIZE ISSUING THOSE ORDERS