SEMINAR
656 – April 2014
62
which they had strongly backed, and profited from, until then – of ‘policy paralysis’, ‘drift’ and ‘indecisiveness’.
S
ince his name had figured in theRadia tapes, it was only natural thatRatan Tata should lead the charge.Warning that India was in danger of becoming a ‘banana republic’, the head of one of the country’s largest con-glomerates hit out at the governmentfor failing to maintain a conducive cli-mate for industry.
7
He was soon joined by Deepak Parekh, the influential head of HDFC Bank, who raised the spec-tre of capital flight since land acquisi-tion and mining leases were becomingmore difficult.
8
‘Talk to businessmanafter businessman’,
Times of India
reported, ‘and one of the first thingshe’ll tell you, off the record, is, “Thegovernment’s come to a halt. Bureau-crats, bankers, everybody’s scared totake decisions.” The next thing he’lltell you: “We are now looking at invest-ing abroad rather than in India”.’
9
Sharad Pawar, the business-friendlyUnion Agriculture Minister, also lenthis voice to this chorus of protest.
10
It is a fact that outward invest-ment from India has been growingsteadily, except for a fall in the slumpyear of 2009-10. Companies investabroad for a wide variety of reasons.Some look for resources like coal or oil to feed their industries at home,others for technology or a means of more easily accessing protected mar-kets. Domestic constraints on profit-ability can also be a factor. As HarunR. Khan, Deputy Governor of theReserve Bank of India has noted,‘There exists a school of thoughtwhich apprehends that overseas in-vestment by Indian corporates is atthe cost of on-shore investment. Oneof the discernible reasons acting as anobstacle for companies to undertakeon-shore investment could be the policy and procedural constraints.’
11
But domestic investment is also con-strained by supply bottlenecks, espe-cially in infrastructure, and domesticdemand, which, in turn, are functionsof public investment and expenditure,investor confidence, and the poor dis- persion of income, which affects thespending power of the population.
A
s long as the Indian economy wasmaintaining a high rate of growth dur-ing the first term of the ManmohanSingh government, the biggest Indiancompanies were able to enjoy both‘normal’ profitability and a ‘crony pre-mium’. But the joint effect of the 2008global slowdown of 2008 on inflation,and interest rates, and the blow thatRadiagate, the CAG, public opinion,and a more vigilant judiciary havedelivered from 2009 onwards hasfatally compromised this cosy revenuemodel. The arraignment of the Saharagroup by the Securities and ExchangeBoard of India and the jailing of its boss,Subrata Roy, by the Supreme Court oncontempt charges is perhaps the mostdramatic example of how the terrainfor big business is changing.To be sure, Manmohan Singhand Finance Minister P. Chidambaramwere aware of the brewing disquiet inthe corporate sector and tried to tacklethe problem at the easier end by cre-ating the Cabinet Committee onInvestment and making rent-friendlychanges in key ministries like Petro-leum and Natural Gas and Environ-ment and Forests.
12
But this has not been enough to restore the confidenceof India Inc in the Congress party’sability to restore the status quo ante.It is hardly surprising that this isthe time the name of Narendra Modias a potential prime minister of Indiaenters public discourse in a deter-mined fashion. Egged on by corporatesponsors as well as by the personal preferences of their proprietors, bigmedia swung into action to take the process of ‘normalizing’ Modi to itslogical conclusion.
B
arely nine years earlier, the Gujaratchief minister and the massacres hefailed to prevent, were universallyacknowledged by the media as having played a key role in the defeat of the National Democratic Alliance govern-ment at the Centre in 2004. The prob-lem was how to convince the sameurban middle class India, which isrepelled by the spectre of communalviolence, that the solution to India’s problems lies in Modi’s leadership.This is how the myth of the ‘Gujaratmodel of development’ came in handy.‘Today people are talking about theChina model of development in Guja-rat,’ Anand Mahindra of Mahindra and Mahindra told the 2013 Vibrant Gujaratsummit. ‘But the day is not far when people will talk about Gujarat model of growth in China.’
13
Enough has been said and writ-ten about the statistical legerdemainthat underlies Modi’s fanciful claims as
7. ‘Act or We Could Become Banana Repub-lic: Tata Strikes Back’,
Indian Express
,27 November 2010.8. ‘The Government Must Reconnect WithCorporate India. There is DisillusionmentAmong the Old Corporate Houses’,
Indian Express
, 10 December 2010.9. ‘Government Paralysis Forcing Indians toInvest Abroad, says Deepak Parekh’,
TheTimes of India
, 7 July 2011.10. ‘The Corporate Sector is Nervous…ButI’m Confident the PM Will Intervene’,
Indian Express
, 21 December 2010. 11. Outward Indian FDI – Recent Trends and Emerging Issues. Address delivered by HarunR Khan, Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India at the Bombay Chamber of Commerce& Industry, Mumbai, 2 March 2012.12. Nitin Sethi, ‘PMO Pulled out all Stops toWeaken Eco, Forest Norms’,
The Hindu
,27 February 2014.13 ‘India Inc Hails Narendra Modi “Vision”,’
Business Today
, 11 January 2013. http:// businesstoday.intoday.in/story/india-inc-hails-narendra-modi-vision/1/191452.html