x
r
.
i k
.
y '
C L l V E N D B U N D Y ' ' '' î '3315 Gnld Butte Road -' ''
.
'
'
Bunkervllle, Nv 98:97 ,à
. .I - bl 7.) 3: 1 'H (702) 246
.
5564 kfji'l -:-,1
.
. .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT 0 F NEVADA . '
UN ITED STATES 0 F A M ERICA, Case N0. CV 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF
P Iai ntlf ,
v. ANSWER T0 C0 MPLAINT
C L I V E N B U N D Y
Defendant.
This Answer is timely filed:Come: N 0 W. Ctiven D. Bundy, Pro ,$T, and resmnds to the allegations sd forth in the
matter nnmed herein aime as follows:
1. Whh reswct to -1 in the Complsint I can cither nmrm nor deny at this time the
assertions tIX't'eiIL
2. With resmct to -2 in the Complnint l do ndnu't tbere wu such a e-qqe witll the allegM
legal caption United &a/8# K Cliven #&pJp, No. CV-S-98-531-JBR (RJ.II (Btmdv h in or aImIZt
the year alleged. However, I do hereby deny any arvl all allegations of violating any such Order
comlng out of that proceeding or Ying in Trespass anmhere by the illegal nmm'ng of cattle for
tlle following reasons; The then entke auterhy clm'med by PlnlntiF at tbat time was pmslmnt to
tlle Endangered S#:;/:,ç Att t# 1973 (ESA 16 U.S.C. j 1531 et se,q.l establishing tlx so called
Oesert Tortoise'' of Seuthem Newdn %itllreatened nnd endangered'' pursunnt to said Act.
1
Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 9 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 9
 
However, the particular Yesert Tortoise'' they used was never proven to meet the criteria of the
Act wherein the critter lhad to lx engaged in Gforelg n commerce'' purmlnnt to the ork inatmg
Treaties, see th- xdions of the Act which state in part &s fonows:
(a) F/?)#/J?::
The tltwgr8r Iltlds and Jpc/ar:, that-
(1) p'r/pt?.ç 'pecies p///#, wlldllle, andplants /?l the t//#/:# Staten have 'Op rendered
px//'/x/ as a ô't)/?>4&,JY, ot Ot/ptlm/c groyh and #,-//##?:?# untempnred :# adeqllate
ctwc4'rp and :qz?>r# l/t)p,'
(2) other .çJ):tnp: ot //:/?, wlldllln, andplants 'ap' been so *:/:*# lt1 J?p/l?::?z that they
az' in #:4::/. ol t)r threatened w#/? êxtlàctlYn;
(3) //?:J: species p/ fish, F//J/#:, and #/ap/: are ol :J/?2/2, ecologicaé :#&ô'al/5pJ4
hintcrinal, rncreêtional, and ,:/:/7/#/: value to the Sal/bp and /1.: qeople;
(4) ?/?: United Slale has J#,J#L.# lb8Ilas a sovereign state in the mternational
ô't=/p&/lJ?
y' lJ connerve to //* extent practicable //?: varliw.ç @:c/p4 otllbh /?' wildllYe and:/4p2 faclhg extinction, ply,papl to-
(A) migratory :/J# treaties #//? canala and #:,wï't),.) th
e #/#J'al/(# and Endangered #/ê# Treaty v#/? Japalb'
(C) t?e &pp'p//tw tm #:1&/': Protedion apJ F//#///: Preservation in //;p Western
dJ??/<p??:r8,'
(D) //?: Intnrnational Dpp:p//k)p tor //?: North-st Atlantic F/.ç/?:r',J,'
(E) //?: International 6'twpp/ll//?l tor the //,4/? Seas >)à/?:r/,.ç ol //?, Worth 'aôb#/: ocean;F) th
e convention (?n Internatitmal Trade m J'pla/lgv:# Species ot Wild Fauna andFIo r , ' and
(9 other international agz'::mep/Jz' and
/W Purposes
7-/): purposes (# this ô'/;ZAJ#:J' are to Jl/'tv/#: a means e:re
.
g thn d<'#4/:/?> uFn e2/?
endangered JJMJ/,J and /??z':al:/;Y specins *JMr?# may be Op,erp' to prdpld a
Jexa?p tor the ct)/).çz'&4//p?? 0t Jt/O 'ndangêred species a/?# threatened species, and totake ,çt/tW nteps a, may & appropriate to achieve the purposes t# the /J':a/24 and
conventions >/ torth /'/? subsedion (a) 5/ this >:l/tw.
Md then a finnl defmûion of what the crhter needs to lx engage 111;
(9) T/le term 'foreign commerce '' includes, twlop; other l/#pJ#, any lrap.ça:l///?..-
(A) ::/e:?? persons F///N?? one /4e/:/7 tolmtry;(B) ::le,z? pnrsons in /* or m/J' toreign Olz/?lr/,.ç;
(c) ::/l-:J) a lô.J:tw withlh the United S/al:.ç and a #p?'mT? in a foreign c/f/p/zy;' or
(D) â,/e,p persons within 1//, United States, epr: the #:/? and F##///: lh 4pp4//4p are
moving in any ô'twp/z
.
y or ctwnli/:, outelte 1/1: United &al:4.
2
k
Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 9 Filed 06/04/12 Page 2 of 9
 
Morover, I %ve operatpd under the authority in NRS 321.596-599 et seq (efective July
1, 1979) wherein the Sovereign State of Nevndn by and throleh its Legislature laid claim to the
lnndq in question in the Bundv lmatter and the IMILS nsmed in tbis mnding matter. 'fhe State of
Nevada laid claim to all Iands within its Mrders retroactively to hs coming into the Union. Thissovereign act of the People of the State of Nevada through its legislative and NBCZ mwers ims
never Ixen proNrly adjudicated in a Court of proper jurilidiolzs meaning that a matter of such
magnitude dealing with two Sovereignl tlx Unhed States and tbe State ofNevada would 1lave to
lx lleard as a matter tmder the Original Jurisdiction Doctline Nfore the United States Supreme
Court The only attempts of trying to lodge a holding on the ownership of the public domain bas
%en by wrongful stipulation of the Nevada Attorney General lxfore this very court in UnlledSla/g, M Wve f/&/llz This very Court wisely recogmzed in the dicta of its Order tbat tlu, ad
prevented tlx merits of that case proceeding on for promr adjudicatioa
The Nevndn Law, NRS 32l .596-599 et ,:4, is still adive 1aw within tite State of Nevndn
and has never Yn repealed by the State of Nevada. nerefores I have omrated over the years
umn the reliance of this Newda Law and the doctrine of necessity to proted my comnmn lawrights of my livelihood. It 1x111g well settled tbat there is no general fedeml commnn law, Just
lx'cnn- a State Attorney General eleds not to enfome a law of tut state does not force me to notomrate to protect my promrty under that state authority and rely umn that ume law in goodfahh until my state r it.In addhiow if the critter, the Tortoise, did not meet the criteriet set forth in the ESA then
the entire proceedings to take my property or deny me access to my ednhlished water ngbts and
vocation was done without any jmisdiction from the lxginning and everything and acts of
3
Case 2:12-cv-00804-LDG-GWF Document 9 Filed 06/04/12 Page 3 of 9
View on Scribd