Claims and Counter-Claims
–
A statement by the curator of the exhibition “Material Evidence: Syria and Ukrain”.
Currently we face
–
since we are presenting the exhibition in NY (opened on the 21
st
of September) - unprecedented attacks on the exhibition from various sides. Interestingly they only focus on the Ukraine part and the Syrian part is fully ignored. As the curator and myself, a freelance conflict reporter who has covered the Syrian War on the opposition side in 2012 and 2013, as well as the Crimean crisis for Corbis Agency and newspapers like the taz.die tageszeitung and weekendavisen (Denmark), and who was threatened by Pro-Russian Separatists in Sevastopol/Crimea I would never have expected something like this to happen. Thus here several clarifying statements: 1.
The claim by a Ukraine newspaper, re-blogged by Euromaidanpress, that the advertisement may have cost millions of dollars and that the homepage is owned by a famous Russian ballerina (who has close ties to Putin) is a lie. A): The costs on advertisements in NY can be checked here: http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/columns/intelligencer/15156/ [access date?] - we published only a small targeted advertisement, running for four weeks, in downtown and other parts of Manhattan on exactly 30 busses (outdoor stickers on the sides of the busses) and roughly 250 posters in subway stations (thus less than 200 subway stations in
total). As you can calculate yourself the costs are nowhere near the claimed “millions of dollars” though the real price is a lot of money for
this project anyway. B): The claim about the ballerina owning the project and/or the homepage is incorrect. If you check the screenshot accompanying this article you clearly see that it refers to the admin
’
s name (!). Additionally we have no clue why the freelance IT/web designer whom we asked to set up the homepage used this name in the first place (so thanks in that regard for pointing this out to us)
–
and/or if he used this name for other customers as well. We have made an inquiry in this regard and will also hold open the option of taking legal action against the web designer. 2.
Regarding the exhibition itself: We have an 18+ section that shows the killed and wounded Maidan protesters. In that room there is a video running on loop that clearly shows the killing of Maidan protesters. The video is from a Pro Maidan You Tube channel. Additionally, we have another video in the Ukraine section commemorating the killed protesters. It is also from a Pro-Maidan channel. This is totally neglected by all the so-called critics. That we focus more on the slow rise of right winged groups and the consequences of the war in the east is a legitimate journalistic expression and these topics got also covered by many western newspapers (like the Guardian etc.). Especially the role of Oleh Ljaschko, who has scored 8.3 percentage with is right-winged populist party in the last presidential elections and whom current polls suggest to get the second place in the upcoming parliament elections, is a serious threat to any peace and reconciliation effort (as well as the extremist pro-Russian separatists in the east). He claimed that the ceasefire would be an act of
“
national betrayal
”
and of
“
national shame
”
. There are also investigations by western Human Rights Groups in his involvement in alleged acts of war crimes (as they are committed on both sides of the conflict line in large numbers). He is also a founding member of the extreme right winged Azow Battalion as well as the Battalion Schachtar. 3.
We had a lot of visitors from (West-) Ukraine that supported the exhibition and expressed themselves in this regard in our guestbook. One Pro-Maidan Activist will also contribute additional photos and videos from his experiences on the Maidan protests for the next show. 4.
All these lies and rants against the exhibition have led to serious problems
–
including a physical attack on myself by a Ukraine (?) nationalist with pepper spray on Friday, 3
rd
of
October. Two additional “thugs”
distributed ultra nationalist flyers, and tried to deface several images in the exhibition itself. That shows how heated this exhibition got and that it now brings serious danger to all the people who help us in this regard. We had to up the security
but probably can’t keep up with the costs and thus the whole exhibition project is thr
eatened. This is another reason why we currently do not disclose the names of the photographers
–
as they are still working (as freelancers) in Ukraine and Syria and any spotlight on them would risk exposing them to serious harm. That is the reason why so many Western colleagues nowadays write their articles with a pseudonym and/or publish their photos via agencies without any name
–
as journalists are seen nowadays in all conflict zones as legitimate targets by either side.
And we want to point out again: Wars are not “good vs. evil” –
wars are grey! But it must be legitimate to show the situation on other conflict sides or other aspects of a
conflict zone, even if they “break” with the “nice simple” image many people have on these
conflicts.