1
 
Official - Subject to Final Review
 
1
 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
 
2
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
3
 
JAMES OBERGEFELL, ET AL., :
 
4
 Petitioners : No. 14-556
 
5
 v. :
 
6
 
RICHARD HODGES, DIRECTOR, :
 
7
 
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, :
 
8
 
ET AL. :
 
9
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
10
 
and
 
11
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
12
 
VALERIA TANCO, ET AL., :
 
13
 Petitioner : No. 14-562
 
14
 v. :
 
15
 
BILL HASLAM, GOVERNOR OF :
 
16
 
TENNESSEE, ET AL. :
 
17
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
18
 
and
 
19
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
20
 
APRIL DEBOER, ET AL., :
 
21
 Petitioner : No. 14-571
 
22
 v. :
 
23
 
RICK SNYDER, GOVERNOR OF :
 
24
 
MICHIGAN, ET AL. :
 
25
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
 
2
 
Official - Subject to Final Review
 
1
 
and
 
2
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
3
 
GREGORY BOURKE, ET AL., :
 
4
 Petitioner : No. 14-574
 
5
 v. :
 
6
 
STEVE BESHEAR, GOVERNOR :
 
7
 
OF KENTUCKY, ET AL. :
 
8
 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
9
 Washington, D.C.
 
10
 Tuesday, April 28, 2015
 
11
 
12
 The above-entitled matter came on for oral
 
13
 
argument before the Supreme Court of the United States
 
14
 
at 10:02 a.m.
 
15
 
APPEARANCES:
 
16
 
MARY L. BONAUTO, ESQ., Boston, Mass.; on behalf of
 
17
 Petitioners on Question 1.
 
18
 
GEN. DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., ESQ., Solicitor General,
 
19
 Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; for United
 
20
 States, as amicus curiae, supporting Petitioners on
 
21
 Question 1.
 
22
 
JOHN J. BURSCH, ESQ., Special Assistant Attorney
 
23
 General, Lansing, Mich.; on behalf of Respondents on
 
24
 Question 1.
 
25
 
Alderson Reporting Company
 
 
 
3
 
Official - Subject to Final Review
 
1
 C O N T E N T S
 
2
 
ORAL ARGUMENT OF PAGE
 
3
 
MARY L. BONAUTO, ESQ.
 
4
4
 
On behalf of the Petitioners on Question 1
5
 
ORAL ARGUMENT OF
 
6
 
GEN. DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., ESQ.
 
7
 For the United States, as amicus curiae,
 
8
 supporting Petitioners on Question 1 28
 
9
 
ORAL ARGUMENT OF
 
10
 
JOHN J. BURSCH, ESQ.
 
11
 On behalf of the Respondents on Question 1 41
 
12
 
REBUTTAL ARGUMENT OF
 
13
 
MARY L. BONAUTO, ESQ.
 
14
 On behalf of the Petitioners on Question 1 85
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
Alderson Reporting Company
 
View on Scribd