Nos. 15-1080 through -1090, and 15-1092 through -1101I 
United States Court of Appealsfor the Federal Circuit
MRO, I., DBA P B,
Plainti-Appellant 
,v.B N G A I.,
 et al.
,
Defendants-Appellees 
.
(Full caption on inside cover) 
A   U S D C   C D C, U S D J G H. W
BRIEF OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE ELECTRONIC FRONTIERFOUNDATION AS
 AMICI CURIAE 
 IN SUPPORT OFDEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
V RE F F815 Eddy StreetSan Francisco, CA 94109(415) 436-9333vera@e.orgC D
Counsel of Record 
P K1818 N Street NW, Suite 410Washington, DC 20036(202) 861-0020cduan@publicknowledge.org
Counsel for amici curiae 
Rev. 9dc54122
 
MRO, I., DBA P B,
Plainti-Appellant 
,v.B N G A I., N D, I.,K D E, I., S  A,I., E A I., O E,I., D I S, I., S E, I.,N E, I., T C,C USA, I., S C E ALLC, A U.S.A., I., S P P, LLC,I W, I., L,  D  LE E C L. LLC, WB. I E,  D  W B.H E I., A P, I., BE, I., V C, C USAG, I., C S I., C,I.,   C S C L,
Defendants-Appellees 
.
 
CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST
Pursuant to Rules 29(a) and 47.4 of the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice, coun-sel of record certies as follows:(1) e full name of every party or amicus represented by counsel to this brief is
 Public Knowledge and the Electronic Frontier Foundation
.(2) e above-identied parties are the real parties in interest.(3) e corporate disclosure statement of Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure is as follows: ere is no parent corporation to or any cor-poration that owns 10% or more of stock in Public Knowledge or the ElectronicFrontier Foundation.(4) e names of all law rms and the partners and associates that have ap-peared for the party in the lower tribunal or are expected to appear for the partyin this court are:
 Charles Duan, Public Knowledge, Washington, DC andVera Ranieri, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, CA
.Dated: June 19, 2015
 /s/ Charles Duan
Charles Duan
Counsel for amici curiae 
(
)
View on Scribd