UNITEDSTATESDISTRICT
COURTEASTERN
DISTRICTOFVIRGINIA
NEWPORT
NEWSDIVISION
G.G.,byhisnextfriendandmother.
DEIRDREGRIMM.
Plaintiff.
,FILED
JUN
29
2015
CLLhK,
US
DiS
i
 r7~7~c7: Jm
 ——_Ji_
.VA
 
GLOU ST R
 OUNTY
S HOOL
BO RD
Defendant
Civil
No.
4:15cv54
JudgeRobert
G.
Doumar
MagistrateJudgeTommyE.Miller
STATEMENTOFINTERESTOF
THE
UNITED
STATES
Case 4:15-cv-00054-RGD-TEM Document 28 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 25 PageID# 283
 
T LE
OF
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
1
INTERESTOFTHEUNITED
STATES
2
I.
BACKGROUND
3
II.
ARGUMENT
4
A.PreliminaryInjunctionStandard4
B.G.G.
HasEstablished
a
Likelihood
of
Success
on
theMeritsBecause
Title
IX
Prohibits
DiscriminationBasedonSex,IncludingGenderIdentity,TransgenderStatus,and
NonconformitytoSexStereotypes4
1.DiscriminationBasedonGenderIdentity,IncludingTransgenderStatus,is
Discrimination
Based
on
Sex
5
2.DiscriminationBasedonaTransgenderIndividual'sNonconformitytoSex
StereotypesisDiscriminationBasedonSex10
C.GrantingaPreliminaryInjunctionisinthePublicInterest13
CONCLUSION
17
Case 4:15-cv-00054-RGD-TEM Document 28 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 25 PageID# 284
 
TABLE
OF
AUTHORITIES
Cases
Auerv.Robbins,
519U.S.452(1997)9
Barnes
v.
City
of
Cincinnati,
401F.3d729(6thCir.2005)11
Biediger
v.
QuinnipiacUniv.,
691F.3d85(2dCir.2012)9
Brown
v.
Bd.
ofEduc
347U.S.483(1954)13,14
Cleburne
v.
CleburneLiving
Ctr.,
473U.S.
432
(1985)16
Cohenv.BrownUniv.,
991F.2d888(1stCir.1993)13
Crosby
v.
Reynolds,
763F.Supp.666(D.Me.1991)16
Cruzan
v.
SpecialSch.Dist.No.1,
294F.3d981(8thCir.2002)16
D.L.exrel
K.L.
v.
Bait.
Bd.
of
Sch.Comm rs,
706F.3d256(4thCir.2013)8
Davis
v.
Monroe
Cnty.
Bd.
ofEduc
526U.S.629(1999)8
Doe
v.
BrimfieldGradeSch.,
552F.Supp.2d816
(CD.
111.
2008)11
Doev.Reg ISch.Unit26,
86A.3d600(Me.2014)10
Doe
v.
Wood
Cnty.
Bd.
ofEduc
888F.Supp.2d771(S.D.W.Va.2012)4
EEOCv.
Boh
Bros.Const.
Co.
731F.3d444(5thCir.2013)11
Elrod
v.Burns,
427U.S.
347(1976)
3
n
Case 4:15-cv-00054-RGD-TEM Document 28 Filed 06/29/15 Page 3 of 25 PageID# 285
View on Scribd